RESOURCE BASE LIMITED. — Regulatory Filings 2021

Dec 1, 2021

ASX Announcement

2 December 2021

==> picture [103 x 104] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [120 x 44] intentionally omitted <==

Alteration & Sulphides in Black Range Air Core Drilling

Highlights

• Air-core drilling being undertaken to test geological and geochemical signatures of geophysical targets across the Eclipse Basin, which is known to host VHMS mineralisation with potential for porphyry mineralisation

• A broad zone of strong hydrothermal alteration has been intersected on the Nebula Prospect, a chargeability anomaly of moderate strength tested by drill traverses, T11, T12, and T6 (Figure 1)

• Sulphide minerals have been visually observed in air-core drill chips

• The geological features observed in drilling are correlating very well to the IP/Resistivity geophysics, giving the Company confidence in its drill targeting moving forward

• Drilling is expected to continue for approximately 1 more week, with first geochemical results expected to be available early in CY2022

Resource Base Limited ( ASX:RBX ) ( Resource Base or the Company ) is pleased to provide an update on progress of its initial air-core drilling program at its Black Range Project located in the well-known and highly prospective Stavely Volcanic corridor in North-West Victoria, which is prospective for copper, gold and zinc.

Resource Base Executive Chairman and CEO, Shannon Green commented:

“It is very exciting to see such positive geological indicators at such shallow depths and so early in the program. The correlation to the geophysics is also very exciting enabling us to target our drilling with confidence.”

Air-Core Drilling Program

An approximately 4,000m air-core drilling program is underway to test a series of geophysical targets generated by recent IP/Resistivity and Gravity geophysical surveys. This is a cost-effective reconnaissance drilling program, designed to narrow the focus prior to commencement of diamond drilling.

Click on the following link see a short video introducing our Exploration Manager, Ian Cameron and the Air- Core Drilling Program in progress. https://resourcebase.com.au/investor centre/videos/

To date 1,265m have been drilled and the Company is pleased to report the following geological observations:

• Broad zone of strong hydrothermal alteration has been intersected on the Nebula Prospect drill traverses, T11, T12, and T6 (Figure 1) which has not been drilled previously and is defined by a moderate chargeability anomaly

• Sulphide minerals have been visually observed in drilling on Nebula Prospect. (The Company notes this is based solely on visual inspection and core is yet to be assayed or analysed)

• The geological features observed in drilling are correlating very well to the IP/Resistivity geophysics, giving the Company confidence in its drill targeting moving forward

Resource Base Limited Registered Office Company Directors Contact ACN: 113 385 425 Suite 5, 62 Ord Street Shannon Green Executive Chairman & CEO Mark Flynn Investor Relations West Perth WA 6156 John Lewis Non - Executive Director +61 (0)416 068 733 ASX: RBX +61 (0)8 9322 1587 Jamie Myers Non-Executive Director info@resourcebase.com.au admin@resourcebase.com.au Paul Hissey Non-Executive Director resourcebase.com.au Shannon Coates Company Secretary

The air-core drilling program is aimed at confirming bedrock geology hidden below shallow transported cover and Grampians Sandstone units. It will also test for the presence of slight geochemical anomalies over geophysical targets. Indications of geochemical signatures interpreted to be associated with VHMS or Porphyry mineralisation will increase ranking of the geophysical target for deep bedrock diamond drilling early next year, see Figure 1 below.

==> picture [442 x 560] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 - Planned drilling traverse lines across various IP, Resistivity and Gravity features (see ASX announcement 18 November 2021). Only IP and Resistivity are shown in the image. Planned air-core holes shown as white dots, chargeability data as coloured shells and 120Ohm.m resistivity isosurface as blue mesh surface. Grid coordinate system is GDA94 MGA54.

2

Exploration Program

As part of its aggressive exploration program, the Company is aiming to commence diamond drilling of deep bedrock targets in Q1 2022. Final geophysical data modelling and geochemical analyses from the current round of shallow air-core drilling are required to prioritise targets for the deeper diamond drilling.

Air-core driling is planned to then continue to further target areas across the broader tenement following further geophysical programs.

-ENDS-

This announcement has been authorised by the Board of Resource Base Limited.

For further information, contact:

Shannon Green Mark Flynn Shannon Coates Executive Chairman & CEO Investor Relations and Media Company Secretary +61 8 9322 1587 +61 416 068 733 +61 8 9322 1587 admin@resourcebase.com.au info@resourcebase.com.au shannon@evolutioncorp.com.au

3

About Resource Base Ltd

Resource Base Ltd (ASX:RBX) is an Australian based mineral exploration company focused on the development of highly prospective exploration projects with demonstrated potential for scalable discoveries.

Black Range Project

The Black Range Project (124km[2] ) in Victoria’s premier porphyry and VHMS target district, the Mount Stavely Volcanic Complex (MSVC) in Western Victoria, captures three fault-bound segments of the MSVC volcanics with a combined strike length of approximately 55 kilometres. The Project includes the advanced Eclipse prospect which is prospective for copper, gold and zinc.

The Mount Stavely Volcanic Complex is considered an analogue of the Mt Read Volcanics in Tasmania, which is host to a number of world-class VHMS deposits (Rosebery, Hellyer, Que River), the giant Mt Lyell Cu-Au deposit, and the Henty Au deposit.

Numerous other targets, including Anomaly F, Honeysuckle, Anomaly K and Mt Bepcha are associated with MSVC rocks across the tenement but have seen little work to date.

Petrological studies indicate that important VHMS style hydrothermal alteration and is well developed on the Eclipse prospect. Resource Base will utilise systematic geophysics, drilling and geochemical analyses combined with petrological and hyperspectral SWIR alteration mapping to vector towards zones with high mineralisation potential as identified from comparison with known VHMS deposits in the Mt Read Volcanics and around the world.

Mitre Hill Project

On 27 September 2021, the Company announced it had entered a binding term sheet for the acquisition of the Mitre Hill Project (1380km[2] ), which contains five strategic tenement applications over ground located within the Murray Basin across Victoria and South Australia, prospective for ionic clay hosted Rare Earth Element (REE) deposits.

The Applications are located in the Murray Basin on the South Australian and Victorian state Border near the towns of Naracoorte, Penola and Edenhope. The largest and most prospective Application, ELA 2021/00059, runs approximately in a line, covering over 40km of strike length, from the towns of Naracoorte and Penola in South Australia. The main economic target is ionic clay hosted Rare Earth deposits, with possible economic concentrations of Heavy Rare Earths considered strategically important given global supply modelling.

The Applications are located over the transition from the concluding phases of the Loxton - Parilla strandlines to the more broadly spaced Bridgewater formation in South Australia and Victoria. A significant archive of historical exploration data has been acquired by the Company, including drilling results, numerous government studies and minor private exploration.

==> picture [308 x 307] intentionally omitted <==

4

Forward Looking Statements

Information included in this release constitutes forward-looking statements. Often, but not always, forward looking statements can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “continue”, and “guidance”, or other similar words and may include, without limitation, statements regarding plans, strategies and objectives of management, anticipated production or construction commencement dates and expected costs or production outputs.

Forward looking statements inherently involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance, and achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance, or achievements. Relevant factors may include, but are not limited to, changes in commodity prices, foreign exchange fluctuations and general economic conditions, increased costs and demand for production inputs, the speculative nature of exploration and project development, including the risks of obtaining necessary licenses and permits and diminishing quantities or grades of reserves, political and social risks, changes to the regulatory framework within which the company operates or may in the future operate, environmental conditions including extreme weather conditions, recruitment and retention of personnel, industrial relations issues and litigation.

Forward looking statements are based on the Company and its management’s good faith assumptions relating to the financial, market, regulatory and other relevant environments that will exist and affect the Company’s business and operations in the future. The Company does not give any assurance that the assumptions on which forward looking statements are based will prove to be correct, or that the Company’s business or operations will not be affected in any material manner by these or other factors not foreseen or foreseeable by the Company or management or beyond the Company’s control.

Although the Company attempts and has attempted to identify factors that would cause actual actions, events, or results to differ materially from those disclosed in forward looking statements, there may be other factors that could cause actual results, performance, achievements, or events not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, and many events are beyond the reasonable control of the Company. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements. Forward looking statements in these materials speak only at the date of issue. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable law or any relevant stock exchange listing rules, in providing this information the company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any of the forward-looking statements or to advise of any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

Competent Person Statement

The information in this report which relates to Exploration Results is based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ian Cameron. Mr Cameron is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and an employee of the Company. Mr Cameron has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (the JORC Code). The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information in the relevant market announcement. Mr Cameron consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

5

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,	•	Air-core drilling
techniques	random chips, or specific specialised industry	•	Each 1m sampled from rig
	standard measurement tools appropriate to the	•	Small grab sample taken for washing and
	minerals under investigation, such as down hole		visual geological classification
	gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments,	•	No geochemical analyses undertaken
	etc). These examples should not be taken as	•	No samples have yet been dispatched for
	limiting the broad meaning of sampling.		geochemical analysis
	• Include reference to measures taken to ensure
	sample representivity and the appropriate
	calibration of any measurement tools or systems
	used.
	• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
	that are Material to the Public Report.
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has
	been done this would be relatively simple (eg
	‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1
	m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
	produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
	cases more explanation may be required, such as
	where there is coarse gold that has inherent
	sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
	mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules)
	may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole	• Air-core drilling – NQ size
techniques	hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic,
	etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or
	standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
	sampling bit or other type, whether core is
	_oriented and if so, by what method, etc). _
Drill sample	• Method of recording and assessing core and chip	• Visual geological classification only
recovery	sample recoveries and results assessed.
	• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery
	and ensure representative nature of the
	samples.
	• Whether a relationship exists between sample
	recovery and grade and whether sample bias
	may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain
	of fine/coarse material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been	• Not	applicable – preliminary visual
	geologically and geotechnically logged to a level	geological classification only
	of detail to support appropriate Mineral
	Resource estimation, mining studies and
	metallurgical studies.
	• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
	nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
	photography.
	• The total length and percentage of the relevant
	intersections logged.
Sub-sampling	• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether	• Not	applicable – preliminary visual
techniques and	quarter, half or all core taken.	geological classification only
	• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary

6

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
sample	split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
preparation	• For all sample types, the nature, quality and
	appropriateness of the sample preparation
	technique.
	• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
	sampling stages to maximise representivity of
	samples.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
	representative of the in situ material collected,
	including for instance results for field
	duplicate/second-half sampling.
	• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
	grain size of the material being sampled.
Quality of	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the	•	Not applicable – preliminary visual
assay data and	assaying and laboratory procedures used and		geological classification only
laboratory	whether the technique is considered partial or
tests	total.
	• For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld
	XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in
	determining the analysis including instrument
	make and model, reading times, calibrations
	factors applied and their derivation, etc.
	• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg
	standards, blanks, duplicates, external
	laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
	levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision
	have been established.
Verification of	• The verification of significant intersections by	•	Not applicable – preliminary visual
sampling and	either independent or alternative company		geological classification only
assaying	personnel.
	• The use of twinned holes.
	• Documentation of primary data, data entry
	procedures, data verification, data storage
	(physical and electronic) protocols.
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Location of	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate	•	Location Method: Garmin handheld 12 channel
data points	drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys),		GPS
	trenches, mine workings and other locations	•	Location Accuracy Horizontal: ±3m
	used in Mineral Resource estimation.	•	Location Accuracy Vertical: ±6m
	• Specification of the grid system used.	•	Grid System: GDA94 UTM Zone 54
	• Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	•	Topographic control is adequate at this stage
Data spacing	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration	•	50m holes along selected traverses located to
and	Results.		test geophysical anomalies from previous
distribution	• Whether the data spacing and distribution is		IP/Resistivity and Gravity surveys
	sufficient to establish the degree of geological
	and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
	Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
	procedure(s) and classifications applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Orientation of	• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves	•	Vertical drill holes
data in relation	unbiased sampling of possible structures and the	•	Not appropriate drilling technique for
to geological	extent to which this is known, considering the		identification of geological structures
structure	deposit type.
	• If the relationship between the drilling
	orientation and the orientation of key
	mineralised structures is considered to have

7

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	introduced a sampling bias, this should be
	assessed and reported if material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure sample security.	• Samples collected during drilling and
security		removed to secure warehouse each day
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling	• Not applicable – preliminary visual
reviews	techniques and data.	geological classification only

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number, location and	• Eclipse Prospect is located within EL4590
tenement and	ownership including agreements or material	which is 100% owned by Resource Base
land tenure	issues with third parties such as joint ventures,	Ltd (ASX:RBX).
status	partnerships, overriding royalties, native title	• EL4590 was purchased from Navarre
	interests, historical sites, wilderness or national	Minerals Ltd on 5thJuly 2021 however
	park and environmental settings.	registration of the transfer of ownership
	• The security of the tenure held at the time of	by ERR is currently pending.
	reporting along with any known impediments to	• EL4590 is currently in good standing and
	obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	valid until 14thFebruary 2022
		• There are no non-government royalties or
		historical sites at Eclipse.
		• The Eclipse Prospect area is situated on a
		mix of private grazing land and State
		Forest (Crown Land) over which
		exploration is permitted subject to
		standard care required to minimize impact
		to any native flora and fauna as per
		standard Victorian regulations.
		• There are native title agreements in place
		with two Native Title claim groups in
		respect of Crown Land within EL4590.
		• There is no known impediments to
		obtaining a license to operate in the area
		and exploration is active and on-going.
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration	• 1969-1971 Western Mining conducted
done by other	by other parties.	stream sediment, soil and mapping
parties		programs over the black range volcanics.
		No sampling of drainages from Eclipse
		Prospect mineralization.
		• 1984 CRA Exploration (CRAE) conducted
		airborne magnetic survey as part of its
		Murray Basin mineral sands exploration
		program.
		• 1988-1997 CRAE undertook numerous
		drill programs including RAB, Air-Core, RC
		and DDH, soil sampling, mapping,
		geophysics including IP/Resistivity, gravity,
		ground magnetics and numerous
		petrological studies.
		Discovered Eclipse Prospect (then called
		McRaes Prospect) VHMS related Au and
		Base Metal mineralisation during1989

8

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		reconnaissance RAB programs targeting
		easily accessible traverses across volcanics
		(magnetic features).
		329 RAB holes were drilled between 1988
		and 1990. Early programs struggled with
		depth penetration, particularly in areas of
		shallow Grampians Sandstone. Also, end
		of hole samples appear to have been
		assayed for gold only with re-assay for
		base metals where gold was considered
		anomalous. The reliability of early
		reconnaissance RAB drilling in the area is
		questionable, particularly in terms of base
		metal exploration.
		287 air-core holes were drilled during
		1995 and 1996 over Eclipse Prospect and
		immediate surrounds on nominal 100m x
		50m grid. Avoided areas where
		Grampians Sandstone cover was known to
		be thicker. Repeated 39 of the earlier RAB
		holes with improved penetration and
		reliability of bedrock geochemistry.
		25 RC and 6 DDH testing continuity of
		mineralisation and various extensions,
		geophysical and geochemical targets over
		the Eclipse Prospect. No resource
		estimate found in reporting.
		In 1997 commissioned an airborne EM
		survey covering approximately 550km2
		with 200m flight line spacing. This survey
		included the Eclipse Prospect. Conductive
		regolith and the Grampians group
		sediments appears to have limited the
		usefulness of the data. CRAE discontinued
		exploration in the region in 1997.
		• EL4590 was granted to Leviathan
		Resources Ltd on the 14thFebruary 2007.
		No exploration works were undertaken
		and the tenement was farmed out to
		Navarre Discovery No 1 Pty Ltd
		(“Navarre”) on the 25thJune 2008.
		• 2008-2021 Navarre continued on from the
		earlier CRAE exploration on the Eclipse
		Prospect with detailed airborne
		magnetics, multiple IP/Resistivity
		programs, soil sampling, AC, RC and DDH
		drilling.
		A detailed airborne magnetic and
		radiometric survey covered 17.5km of the
		Black Range limb of the Stavely Volcanics
		hosting the Eclipse Prospect and adjacent
		Glenisla limb to its East. Several discrete
		intrusive like magnetic features occur in
		the Eclipse prospect area.

9

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		A shallow IP/Resistivity survey was
		undertaken over the Eclipse
		mineralisation which defined a possible
		extension to the South. A later survey was
		oriented parallel the general trend of
		geology and designed to look quite deep
		in search of a porphyry target. Some
		targets remain to be tested.
		20 AC holes were drilled, mostly to infill
		data density over the chalcocite blanket
		zone of the Eclipse Prospect.
		22 RC and 8 DDH holes were drilled mostly
		to test primary grades beneath the Eclipse
		oxide mineralisation.
		Navarre divested EL4590 containing the
		Eclipse Prospect in July 2021 as a non-core
		asset.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of	• The project area is considered highly
	mineralisation.	prospective for the discovery of economic
		precious and base metal deposits related
		to volcanic hosted massive sulphide
		(VHMS) and porphyry style systems.
		• Project geology consists of submarine
		volcanic arc related lithologies including
		mafic volcanics, intermediate to felsic
		volcanics, volcanogenic sediments and
		marine sediments.
		• Past workers have noted considerable
		similarities to geology hosting the Que
		River – Hellyer deposits geology in the Mt
		Read Volcanics on the West coast of
		Tasmania.
		• The Mt Stavely Volcanics in Victoria are
		considered to be an extension of the Mt
		Read Volcanics in Tasmania.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material to the	• Refer Annexure A
Information	understanding of the exploration results
	including a tabulation of the following
	information for all Material drill holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
	above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
	collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is justified on
	the basis that the information is not Material
	and this exclusion does not detract from the
	understanding of the report, the Competent
	Person should clearly explain why this is the
	case.

10

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	• Not applicable – preliminary visual
aggregation	averaging techniques, maximum and/or	geological classification only
methods	minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high
	grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material
	and should be stated.
	• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
	lengths of high grade results and longer lengths
	of low grade results, the procedure used for such
	aggregation should be stated and some typical
	examples of such aggregations should be shown
	in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
	equivalent values should be clearly stated.
Relationship	• These relationships are particularly important in	• Not applicable – preliminary visual
between	the reporting of Exploration Results.	geological classification only
mineralisation	• If the geometry of the mineralisation with
widths and	respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
intercept	nature should be reported.
lengths	• If it is not known and only the down hole lengths
	are reported, there should be a clear statement
	to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width
	_not known’). _
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and	• Please see maps and diagrams included in
	tabulations of intercepts should be included for	the announcement text
	any significant discovery being reported These
	should include, but not be limited to a plan view
	of drill hole collar locations and appropriate
	sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of all	• Not applicable – preliminary visual
reporting	Exploration Results is not practicable,	geological classification only
	representative reporting of both low and high
	grades and/or widths should be practiced to
	avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
	Results.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and	• Not applicable – preliminary visual
substantive	material, should be reported including (but not	geological classification only
exploration	limited to): geological observations; geophysical
data	survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
	samples – size and method of treatment;
	metallurgical test results; bulk density,
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock
	characteristics; potential deleterious or
	contaminating substances.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further work (eg	• Geological logging to be completed
	tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions	• Geochemical analyses of 4m composite
	or large-scale step-out drilling).	samples
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of	• Compilation and interpretation of
	possible extensions, including the main	geological and geochemical data when
	geological interpretations and future drilling	received
	areas, provided this information is not
	commercially sensitive.

11

Annexure A Drill hole Information

Hole details

HoleID	Hole Type	Easting	Northing	Elevation	Dip	Azminuth	TDepth
BRAC21001	AC	600337.00	5886883.00	244.00	90.00	0.00	36.00
BRAC21002	AC	600389.00	5886881.00	242.00	90.00	0.00	51.00
BRAC21003	AC	600911.00	5886993.00	220.00	90.00	0.00	24.00
BRAC21004	AC	600859.00	5886991.00	225.00	90.00	0.00	21.00
BRAC21005	AC	600810.00	5886990.00	226.00	90.00	0.00	28.00
BRAC21006	AC	600740.00	5885795.00	223.00	90.00	0.00	18.00
BRAC21007	AC	600795.00	5885779.00	221.00	90.00	0.00	15.00
BRAC21008	AC	600846.00	5885778.00	221.00	90.00	0.00	16.00
BRAC21009	AC	600942.00	5885761.00	216.00	90.00	0.00	18.00
BRAC21010	AC	600994.00	5885761.00	215.00	90.00	0.00	23.00
BRAC21011	AC	600887.00	5885768.00	216.00	90.00	0.00	12.00
BRAC21012	AC	600708.00	5884001.00	216.00	90.00	0.00	48.00
BRAC21013	AC	600748.00	5884017.00	217.00	90.00	0.00	81.00
BRAC21014	AC	600795.00	5884039.00	219.00	90.00	0.00	48.00
BRAC21015	AC	600833.00	5884064.00	216.00	90.00	0.00	51.00
BRAC21016	AC	600875.00	5884106.00	209.00	90.00	0.00	63.00
BRAC21017	AC	600884.00	5884151.00	214.00	90.00	0.00	48.00
BRAC21018	AC	600880.00	5884219.00	211.00	90.00	0.00	45.00
BRAC21019	AC	600820.00	5884252.00	207.00	90.00	0.00	36.00
BRAC21020	AC	600771.00	5884232.00	211.00	90.00	0.00	57.00
BRAC21021	AC	600727.00	5884213.00	212.00	90.00	0.00	60.00
BRAC21022	AC	600681.00	5884187.00	215.00	90.00	0.00	41.00
BRAC21023	AC	600647.00	5884164.00	212.00	90.00	0.00	51.00
BRAC21024	AC	600587.00	5884588.00	199.00	90.00	0.00	51.00
BRAC21025	AC	600640.00	5884586.00	199.00	90.00	0.00	36.00
BRAC21026	AC	600690.00	5884587.00	198.00	90.00	0.00	33.00
BRAC21027	AC	600737.00	5884586.00	197.00	90.00	0.00	24.00
BRAC21028	AC	600783.00	5884584.00	197.00	90.00	0.00	21.00
BRAC21029	AC	599498.00	5887071.00	243.00	90.00	0.00	27.00
BRAC21030	AC	599436.00	5887080.00	239.00	90.00	0.00	80.00
BRAC21031	AC	599300.00	5887116.00	229.00	90.00	0.00	99.00

12

Significant Alteration

HoleID	Easting	Northing	RL(m)	Dip	Azminuth	Tdepth(m)	From(m)	To(m)	Interval(m)	Alteration_Notes	Sample Type
BRAC21013	600748	5884017	217	90	0	81	49	81	32	strongsi-ser-pyalteration, _c._5% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
							50	51	1	strongsi-ser-pyalteration, _c._20% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
							73	75	2	strongsi-ser-pyalteration, _c._20% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21014	600795	5884039	219	90	0	48	41	48	7	strongsi-ser-pyalteration, _c._3% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21015	600833	5884064	216	90	0	51	46	51	5	strongsi-ser-pyalteration, _c._10% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21016	600875	5884106	209	90	0	63	27	38	11	strongsi-ser-pyalteration, _c._5% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
							39	63	24	intense si-ser-pyalteration, _c._10% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21017	600884	5884151	214	90	0	48	27	48	21	intense si-ser-pyalteration, _c._5% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21018	600880	5884219	211	90	0	45	26	45	19	intense si-ser-pyalteration, c.7% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21020	600771	5884232	211	90	0	57	30	57	27	moderate si-cb-chl-pyalteration, _c._3% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21021	600727	5884213	212	90	0	60	34	56	22	strongsi-ser-pyalteration, _c._5% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21025	600640	5884586	199	90	0	36	22	36	14	moderate si-ep-pyalteration, _c._1% sulphide	Air-core drill chips
BRAC21026	600690	5884587	198	90	0	33	18	33	15	moderate si-ep-pyalteration, _c._1% sulphide	Air-core drill chips

13