AI assistant
RESOLUTION MINERALS LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2021
Aug 31, 2021
65717_rns_2021-08-31_d4116254-25d3-4c68-9447-3db65f7f6d3f.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
1 September 2021
==> picture [107 x 79] intentionally omitted <==
COPPER DRILL TARGETS IDENTIFIED - BENMARA PROJECT, NT
==> picture [518 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
-
VTEM geophysics survey identifies 4km strike length drill target in favourable sediment hosted copper setting at the Benmara Project, Northern Territory
-
Same geological setting as the Walford Creek Deposit *40.9Mt @ 2.03% CuEq
-
• The Benmara Project complements the nearby Wollogorang Project and is part of Resolution’s strategy to explore for battery metals in Northern Australia
-
Neighbours operating in the region include BHP, Rio Tinto, South32, Newcrest and Teck
-
New copper / battery-metal drill targets are untested by prior drilling
-
Prior exploration focussed on uranium and diamonds and did not assay for base metals
-
2,500m RC drilling to commence in October and will take ~2 weeks to complete
==> picture [518 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
Link to Video Explainer from Managing Director – Duncan Chessell
==> picture [526 x 371] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Benmara Project Wollogorang
Project
OZ Minerals
earning-in
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 1 The Underexplored Benmara Project is located on the boundary of the South Nicholson and McArthur Basins (NT), with ground held by BHP, Rio Tinto, South 32, Newcrest and Teck in the vicinity.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
BOARD
==> picture [60 x 8] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Ordinary Shares
----- End of picture text -----
Issued 448 M
Options and rights Listed options 6 M @ 10c Listed options 74 M @ 12c Unlisted options 6 M @ 25c Unlisted options 13 M @ 8c Unlisted options 59 M @ 4c Unlisted rights 11 M
Performance Shares Craig Farrow - Chair Class A 9.6 M Duncan Chessell - MD Class B 3.6 M Andrew Shearer - NED Jarek Kopias - Co Sec
Last Capital Raise February 2021 - Placement $3.2M @ 2.8c
Level 4, 29-31 King William Street Adelaide SA 5000
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
Resolution Minerals Managing Director Duncan Chessell commented:
The Benmara Project, nearby to our Wollogorang Copper Project, is prospective for sedimentary hosted stratiform copper and other battery metals. The VTEM geophysics survey identified a large-scale conductive zone of 4km in length at shallow depth which is our priority drill target. The drill targets are all positioned on the regional scale Fish River Fault on which the analogous 40.9Mt @ 2.03% CuEq Walford Creek Deposit formed to our east, within host rocks of the same age. Another key consideration is the relative position of the drill targets, perched on the northern margin of the South Nicholson Basin, where the sediments onlap onto the Murphy Inlier. This is an ideal location for fluids to focus and precipitate metals in reductive trap sites. All the ingredients are present for the formation of a sediment hosted battery metal deposit and drill testing is highly warranted.
The renewable energy future of the planet will require a significant increase in battery metal supply. Resolution is well placed with our Northern Territory copper projects to be a part of the emerging battery metal super-cycle and leverage upward trending copper prices. The battery metal prospectivity of this underexplored part of the Northern Territory has only just started to be realised as evidenced by the recent arrival of the majors and mid-tiers. Metals such as copper, cobalt, nickel, lithium, HREE and other base metals are essential for a sustainable future.
The Benmara projects fits with our Company mantra of “hunting for giants - in big country” with gold in Alaska and copper and other battery-metals in the Northern Territory.
Summary
Resolution Minerals Ltd (ASX: RML ) ( Resolution or Company ) is pleased to announce that it has identified compelling drill targets on the Benmara Project in the Northern Territory. Drill targeting has resulted from initial exploration conducted by Resolution at the Benmara project following the recent grant of the tenure. A 2,500m RC drilling program is planned to commence in October and will take two (2) weeks to complete. Assay results will be reported to the market approximately four weeks later.
The targets have been derived from a VTEM Max geophysics survey flown by Resolution earlier this year ( RML ASX Announcement 9/7/2021 ), with final processing of the geophysics completed today alongside historic data review. The conductors identified could indicate the presence of massive sulfides or the presence of rocks that could be excellent trap sites (reductive units) for base metal mineralisation. The interpreted flat lying conductive sedimentary units at 60m to 120m depth lie beneath a blanket of black clay negating the use of surface geochemical techniques, and it’s only through modern geophysics that targets like this are identified. The VTEM survey was flown to test both the margin of the Murphy Inlier with the South Nicolson Basin for sediment hosted base metal mineralisation and areas of the Murphy Inlier for other styles of base metal mineralisation. Further analysis of the age of rock within our project tenements confirm similarities to those present at Walford Creek (ASX: AML) and the Century Mine (ASX: NCZ). No historic drill holes have tested the VTEM derived priority drill targets.
Previous explorers had focussed on shallow uranium and diamond prospectivity with almost no assays testing for base metals or gold. Figure 3 indicates previous drill holes and target of exploration activities by commodity.
2
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [277 x 44] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
Drill Targets: Target 1 = 4km length, Target 2 = 2km length
==> picture [596 x 279] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Drill Targets
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 2 Drill targets and regional setting, with interpreted extension of the Fish River Fault from QLD to the project.
==> picture [596 x 276] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
EL32228
Target 2
Target 1
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 3 The two highest priority drill targets are VTEM conductors, defined as strong features in time-constant (Tau) imagery, coincident with onlapping basin sediments on the margin of South Nicholson Basin. Target 1 is 4km in length, Target 2 is ~2km in length
3
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
Benmara Prospectivity and Exploration Targeting
Resolution has assessed the Benmara Project for sediment hosted stratiform base metal mineralisation, using the Walford Creek Deposit as an analogy. The Company reviewed historic company data, considered new Geoscience Australia interpretation of the geology and the updated SEEBASE™ depthto-basement Model of the surrounding basin architecture.
Recently, the prospectivity was greatly enhanced by work undertaken by the “Exploring for the Future” initiative, which included contributions from Geoscience Australia (GA), University of Adelaide, NTGS and University of Melbourne (Carson, et al., 2020).
Geochronology published by Geoscience Australia in 2020, demonstrates the Benmara Group is older than previously thought. Importantly GA determined that the Benmara Group is Paleoproterozoic instead of Mesoproterozoic, and stratigraphically and temporally equivalent to the prospective Fickling Group (Walford Creek Deposit Cu-Pb-Zn-Ag-Co) and the McNamara Group (Century Mine Pb-Zn-Ag). i.e. the right age and type of rocks are present.
The Exploring for the Future initiative has established evidence supporting a regional shallow-marine hydrothermal circulatory system and potential for associated base metal mineral systems coincident with the Benmara Project. The hydrothermal system is similar in age to base metal mineralisation in the well-endowed Mount Isa Province.
During 2021 Resolution completed a VTEM Max™ geophysical survey over the central zone of the tenement, targeting the basin margin where prospective onlapping sediments from the South Nicholson abutted the Murphy Inlier. The proposed model is the Murphy Inlier and acts as a wall directing upwelling fluid flow carrying metalliferous fluids to flow up the Fish River Fault. These fluids then flow up and through the potentially reductive sediments close to surface. The shaley-reductive units can act as traps sites for base metals to precipitate, potentially forming deposits. Due to the often-pyritic nature of these reductive units, they are detectable by VTEM surveys as conductive rocks or massive sulfides. Benmara is prospective for this mineralisation model.
Resolution’s findings are that many of the key ingredients present at the analogous Walford Creek Deposit are present at the Benmara Project:
-
VTEM conductors are positioned on the margin of the South Nicholson Basin where basin sediments onlap the Murphy Inlier coincident with the Fish River Fault
-
Benmara Group sediments including volcanic and reductive units are stratigraphically and temporally equivalent to the highly prospective Fickling and McNamara Groups
-
Historic drillhole DDHCJ59 located between the two drill targets, intersected laminated shales (potential host rock) at a depth of 55m is consistent with the modelled VTEM
SEEBASE ™ is a structurally enhanced depth-to-basement model that defines the 3D geometry of subsurface basin systems.
VTEM Max ™ (Versatile Time-Domain Electromagnetic) induces a “primary” magnetic field into the earth, which produces eddy currents in any conductors this field passes through. These eddy currents produce a time-varying secondary magnetic field that the VTEM Max system can measure. The stronger the conductor, the slower the secondary-field decays, so a “late-time” response is a favourable outcome. VTEM can directly detect massive sulfides and/or identify conductive formations and thus could also detect reductant carbonaceous or pyritic shales in certain conditions, which are an excellent trap site for copper or base metal mineralisation.
4
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
Benmara potentially analogous to the Walford Creek Deposit
The Walford Creek Deposit has the following characteristics (www.aeonmetals.com.au/walford-creek)
-
Sediment hosted stratiform Cu-Co-Ag-Pb-Zn mineralisation style
-
Metalliferous basement fluids travel upwards against the Fish River Fault (extends to Benmara Project) on the boundary of the Mt Les Formation and Peters Creek Volcanics (Equivalent to Crow –
-
Formation and Murphy Inlier Jarrett et al AGES 2020)
-
“ ”
-
• Peters Creek Volcanics wall forcing fluids upwards to contact overlying conductive shale units
-
Deposit of 40.9 Mt @ 2.03% CuEq (including 50,300t of contained cobalt metal)
==> picture [320 x 448] intentionally omitted <==
Base metal mineralisation at Walford Creek is predominantly hosted in pyritic sedimentary units and associated dolomite (Mt Les Siltstone), which abut the steeply dipping Fish River Fault Zone for a strike length of 10km. This same fault system extends west across the NT border onto Resolution Minerals’ Benmara Project ( Figure 3 ).
The Mt Les Siltstone of the Fickling Group is stratigraphically and temporally equivalent to the Riversleigh Siltstone of the McNamara Group (both part of the Lawn Hill Platform), and the Crow Formation of the Benmara Group (South Nicholson Basin), which has been identified on Resolution Minerals’ Benmara Project . All three formations contain reduced, organic rich shales which make excellent depositional sites for base metal mineralisation (i.e. trigger metal precipitation).
Base metal rich fluids flow up along the contact of the Peter Creek Volcanic “wall” (akin to the Murphy Inlier at Benmara) bringing metalliferous fluids in contact with reductive sedimentary units PY1, PY3 of Mt Les Formation in QLD, equivalent to Crow Formation at Benmara
Figure 4 Walford Creek Schematic cross section showing the stylised relationship between the high-grade copper core (red) and the surrounding cobalt mineralisation (blue) from (Aeon Metals Website, August 2019) with annotations from Resolution.
5
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
The Benmara Project , Northern Territory; EL32228 is owned by Strategic Energy Resources Ltd outright. Resolution executed a binding term sheet with Strategic Energy Resources Ltd (ASX: SER) (Vendors) on 15 December 2020 to acquire a 100% interest in the Benmara Project covering 663km[2] along-strike from the Walford Creek Cu-Ag-Pb-Zn-Co and Westmoreland U Deposits on the Fish River Fault in the Northern Territory. RML has an Option to purchase the project outright within 12 months and issued 2.5m shares to SER in December 2020 for the exclusive option. The Outright Purchase cost of $250,000 can be paid in RML shares or cash, at Resolution’s election (shares subject to shareholder approval) or RML can walk away. RML must keep the tenement in good standing and pay tenement rental. RML intends to assess the potential of this project through the upcoming drilling to inform the option exercise decision.
(*Front page. Company website www.aeonmetals.com.au & ASX Announcement 17 December 2019 “Substantial Walford Creek Resource Upgrade”, Aeon Metals Ltd ASX code AML)
==> picture [511 x 295] intentionally omitted <==
For further information please contact Duncan Chessell the authorising officer:
Duncan Chessell Or Julian Harvey Managing Director Investor Communications Resolution Minerals Ltd Resolution Minerals Ltd +61 414 804 055 +61 404 897 584 [email protected] [email protected] www.resolutionminerals.com
6
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Duncan Chessell who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Duncan Chessell holds shares, options and performance rights in and is a full-time employee of the company and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Duncan Chessell consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form in which it is appears and confirms that the data reported as foreign estimates are an accurate representation of the available data and studies of the material mining project. This report includes results that have previously been released under JORC 2012 by the Company as “Benmara Copper Project Acquisition, Northern Territory” on 15 December 2020. The Company is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this announcement.
The Walford Creek Resource estimate* has three components, namely a Vardy/Marley Copper Resource, a Vardy/Marley Cobalt Peripheral Resource and the Amy Copper Resource. These combined Resources of 40.9 Mt @ 2.03% CuEq (Copper Equivalent) (including 50,300t of cobalt metal content) shows Walford Creek to be one of the highest grades and largest tonnages copper/cobalt sulfide deposit in Australia. (Reference www.aeonmetals.com.au/walford-creek/ and ASX Announcement 17 December 2019 “ Substantial Walford Creek Resource Upgrade ” , Aeon Metals Ltd ASX code AML ).
Appendix 1. VTEM Geophysics survey and summary of historic drilling at the Benmara Project, Northern Territory, Australia.
Table 1a: Summary of all known assays for base metals of historic drill intervals from the Benmara Project
| Hole ID | From(m) | To(m) | Interval | Cu(ppm) | Pb(ppm) | Zn(ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDH4 | 0 | 12 | 12 | NSI | NSI | NSI |
| BDH4 | 88.7 | 89 | 0.3 | NSI | NSI | NSI |
| BDH5 | 52.4 | 52.7 | 0.3 | NSI | NSI | NSI |
| BDH67 | 55.3 | 55.6 | 0.3 | NSI | NSI | NSI |
All results are covered by the accompanying JORC table.
Table 1b: Historic drill collar location for the Benmara Project, Northern Territory, Australia.
| Hole ID | Drill Method |
Company | Target Commodity |
MGA Z53 East |
MGA Z53 North |
RL (SRTM) |
Dip | Azi | EOH Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BDH1 | Diamond | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715705 | 8032634 | 188 | -60 | 160 | 52.45 |
| BDH2 | Diamond | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715724 | 8032664 | 148 | -60 | 160 | 10 |
| BDH3 | Diamond | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715701 | 8032631 | 188 | -90 | 0 | 89.3 |
| BDH4 | Diamond | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715757 | 8032601 | 193 | -60 | 120 | 89.4 |
| BDH5 | Diamond | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715932 | 8032615 | 212 | -60 | 180 | 56 |
| BDH67 | Diamond | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715828 | 8032617 | 214 | -60 | 180 | 56.5 |
| BEN001 | RC | BHP | Diamonds | 716280 | 8023070 | 111 | -90 | 0 | 57 |
7
| Hole ID | Drill Method |
Company | Target Commodity |
MGA Z53 East |
MGA Z53 North |
RL (SRTM) |
Dip | Azi | EOH Depth |
| BG04 | RotaryMud | IMC Development Corp | Phosphate | 681863 | 8019353 | 166 | -90 | 0 | 42.67 |
| BHP59 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718194 | 8030327 | 103 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BHP60 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718296 | 8030273 | 174 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BHP61 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718292 | 8030245 | 173 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BHP62 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718237 | 8030224 | 82 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BHP63 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718261 | 8030360 | 194 | -60 | 210 | 34 |
| BHP64 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718216 | 8030364 | 203 | -60 | 190 | 34 |
| BHP65 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718207 | 8030538 | 169 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BHP66 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718102 | 8030545 | 95 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH10 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715581 | 8032545 | 93 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| BPH11 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715580 | 8032419 | 207 | -90 | 0 | 40 |
| BPH12 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715579 | 8032396 | 188 | -90 | 0 | 10 |
| BPH13 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715830 | 8032591 | 210 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| BPH14 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715831 | 8032616 | 214 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| BPH15 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715833 | 8032642 | 213 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| BPH16 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715930 | 8032563 | 193 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| BPH17 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715931 | 8032538 | 201 | -90 | 0 | 4 |
| BPH18 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716034 | 8032639 | 216 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH19 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716033 | 8032689 | 213 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH20 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716034 | 8032739 | 182 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH21 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716007 | 8032715 | 189 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH22 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715982 | 8032690 | 184 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH23 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716008 | 8032664 | 215 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH24 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716332 | 8032558 | 133 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH25 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716330 | 8032532 | 184 | -90 | 0 | 4 |
| BPH26 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716332 | 8032833 | 186 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH27 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716332 | 8032933 | 130 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH28 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716332 | 8033033 | 209 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH29 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716332 | 8033133 | 161 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH30 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716435 | 8032983 | 193 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH31 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716435 | 8032883 | 146 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH32 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716435 | 8032783 | 216 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH33 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716031 | 8032563 | 174 | -90 | 0 | 14 |
| BPH34 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716032 | 8032588 | 155 | -90 | 0 | 52 |
| BPH35 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715931 | 8032589 | 219 | -90 | 0 | 55 |
| BPH36 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715882 | 8032590 | 188 | -60 | 180 | 28 |
| BPH37 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715902 | 8032600 | 196 | -90 | 0 | 58 |
| BPH38 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715557 | 8032496 | 99 | -90 | 0 | 58 |
| BPH39 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715606 | 8032495 | 95 | -90 | 0 | 58 |
| BPH40 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715981 | 8032589 | 215 | -90 | 0 | 46 |
8
| Hole ID | Drill Method |
Company | Target Commodity |
MGA Z53 East |
MGA Z53 North |
RL (SRTM) |
Dip | Azi | EOH Depth |
| BPH41 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716460 | 8032527 | 180 | -90 | 0 | 40 |
| BPH42 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716460 | 8032556 | 180 | -90 | 0 | 58 |
| BPH43 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717589 | 8031303 | 184 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| BPH44 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717615 | 8031278 | 209 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH45 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717976 | 8031013 | 96 | -60 | 275 | 28 |
| BPH46 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718004 | 8030985 | 97 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH47 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717951 | 8030881 | 92 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH48 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717924 | 8030881 | 110 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH49 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717898 | 8030881 | 123 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH50 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717872 | 8030881 | 119 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH51 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717794 | 8030881 | 98 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH52 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717795 | 8030934 | 116 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH53 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717768 | 8030881 | 92 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH54 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717820 | 8030881 | 98 | -90 | 0 | 10 |
| BPH55 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717964 | 8030971 | 100 | -90 | 0 | 34 |
| BPH56 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 718002 | 8030827 | 100 | -90 | 0 | 4 |
| BPH57 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717644 | 8030293 | 169 | -60 | 150 | 34 |
| BPH58 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 717747 | 8030249 | 124 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| BPH6 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715580 | 8032444 | 173 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| BPH68 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715956 | 8032565 | 202 | -90 | 0 | 28 |
| BPH69 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715934 | 8032615 | 212 | -60 | 0 | 64 |
| BPH7 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715580 | 8032470 | 99 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| BPH70 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715957 | 8032616 | 212 | -90 | 0 | 64 |
| BPH71 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715907 | 8032616 | 213 | -90 | 0 | 52 |
| BPH72 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716131 | 8032561 | 212 | -90 | 0 | 10 |
| BPH73 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716230 | 8032560 | 212 | -90 | 0 | 64 |
| BPH74 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 716580 | 8032552 | 90 | -90 | 0 | 52 |
| BPH8 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715580 | 8032495 | 97 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| BPH9 | RC | Mines Administration | Uranium | 715580 | 8032519 | 97 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| C07 | AC | AAR Ltd | Uranium | 683052 | 8018316 | 145 | -90 | 0 | 66.7 |
| C08 | AC | AAR Ltd | Uranium | 677701 | 8015442 | 150 | -90 | 0 | 53.6 |
| C09 | AC | AAR Ltd | Uranium | 678940 | 8011970 | 161 | -90 | 0 | 77.8 |
| C10 | AC | AAR Ltd | Uranium | 678975 | 8009236 | 142 | -90 | 0 | 58.8 |
| C11 | AC | AAR Ltd | Uranium | 691188 | 8016454 | 173 | -90 | 0 | 72 |
| C12 | AC | AAR Ltd | Uranium | 686720 | 8012720 | 159 | -90 | 0 | 71.5 |
| C13 | AC | AAR Ltd | Uranium | 684632 | 8010081 | 140 | -90 | 0 | 42.9 |
| CJ1 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 675364 | 8016625 | 93 | -90 | 0 | 47.6 |
| CJ120 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 679365 | 8017521 | 186 | -90 | 0 | 134.8 |
| CJ2 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 675364 | 8016625 | 93 | -90 | 0 | 50 |
| CJ216 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684842 | 8019991 | 141 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
9
| Hole ID | Drill Method |
Company | Target Commodity |
MGA Z53 East |
MGA Z53 North |
RL (SRTM) |
Dip | Azi | EOH Depth |
| CJ217 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684836 | 8019845 | 104 | -90 | 0 | 33 |
| CJ218 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684834 | 8019702 | 81 | -90 | 0 | 33 |
| CJ219 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684835 | 8019551 | 194 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ220 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684835 | 8019404 | 103 | -90 | 0 | 32 |
| CJ221 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684836 | 8019256 | 174 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ222 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684832 | 8019111 | 111 | -90 | 0 | 42 |
| CJ223 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684833 | 8018964 | 198 | -90 | 0 | 37 |
| CJ224 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684833 | 8018815 | 147 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ225 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684830 | 8018664 | 172 | -90 | 0 | 43 |
| CJ226 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684827 | 8018520 | 132 | -90 | 0 | 42 |
| CJ227 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684826 | 8018371 | 117 | -90 | 0 | 16 |
| CJ228 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684824 | 8018226 | 165 | -90 | 0 | 40 |
| CJ229 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684826 | 8018075 | 115 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ230 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684821 | 8017924 | 147 | -90 | 0 | 35 |
| CJ231 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684820 | 8017781 | 190 | -90 | 0 | 27 |
| CJ232 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684819 | 8017633 | 185 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ233 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684819 | 8017486 | 117 | -90 | 0 | 37 |
| CJ234 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684817 | 8017341 | 116 | -90 | 0 | 38 |
| CJ235 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684815 | 8017186 | 188 | -90 | 0 | 37 |
| CJ236 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684816 | 8017042 | 77 | -90 | 0 | 27 |
| CJ237 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684814 | 8016897 | 174 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ238 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684809 | 8016741 | 154 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ239 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684812 | 8016596 | 80 | -90 | 0 | 34 |
| CJ240 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684809 | 8016450 | 189 | -90 | 0 | 37 |
| CJ241 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684805 | 8016309 | 135 | -90 | 0 | 33 |
| CJ242 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684804 | 8016011 | 145 | -90 | 0 | 35 |
| CJ243 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684801 | 8015861 | 137 | -90 | 0 | 33 |
| CJ244 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684801 | 8015718 | 181 | -90 | 0 | 33 |
| CJ245 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684799 | 8015568 | 174 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ246 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684798 | 8015421 | 183 | -90 | 0 | 27 |
| CJ247 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684796 | 8015269 | 149 | -90 | 0 | 23 |
| CJ248 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684794 | 8015116 | 142 | -90 | 0 | 23 |
| CJ249 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684795 | 8014968 | 182 | -90 | 0 | 26 |
| CJ250 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684795 | 8014968 | 182 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ251 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684794 | 8014671 | 109 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ252 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684791 | 8014520 | 191 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ253 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684789 | 8014376 | 71 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ254 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684793 | 8014226 | 116 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ255 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684787 | 8014082 | 198 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ256 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684786 | 8013933 | 191 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
10
| Hole ID | Drill Method |
Company | Target Commodity |
MGA Z53 East |
MGA Z53 North |
RL (SRTM) |
Dip | Azi | EOH Depth |
| CJ257 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684785 | 8013783 | 118 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ258 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684783 | 8013635 | 78 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ259 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684782 | 8013488 | 143 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ260 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684781 | 8013343 | 197 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ261 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684780 | 8013194 | 113 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ262 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684780 | 8013044 | 154 | -90 | 0 | 21 |
| CJ263 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684777 | 8012898 | 197 | -90 | 0 | 28 |
| CJ264 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684779 | 8012754 | 127 | -90 | 0 | 15 |
| CJ265 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684775 | 8012607 | 129 | -90 | 0 | 10 |
| CJ266 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684776 | 8012462 | 183 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ267 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684775 | 8012309 | 118 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ268 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684773 | 8012165 | 188 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ269 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684771 | 8012020 | 188 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ270 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684769 | 8011875 | 174 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ271 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684770 | 8011723 | 117 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ272 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684769 | 8011576 | 188 | -90 | 0 | 28 |
| CJ273 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684767 | 8011429 | 145 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ274 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684766 | 8011282 | 136 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ275 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684765 | 8011137 | 67 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ276 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684763 | 8010983 | 150 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ277 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684764 | 8010840 | 112 | -90 | 0 | 24 |
| CJ278 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684758 | 8010694 | 190 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ279 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684760 | 8010541 | 191 | -90 | 0 | 21 |
| CJ280 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684758 | 8010396 | 194 | -90 | 0 | 27 |
| CJ281 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684757 | 8010250 | 137 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ282 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684756 | 8010104 | 172 | -90 | 0 | 20 |
| CJ283 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684755 | 8009957 | 153 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ284 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684753 | 8009799 | 120 | -90 | 0 | 27 |
| CJ285 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684752 | 8009657 | 184 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ286 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684749 | 8009510 | 163 | -90 | 0 | 43 |
| CJ29 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683911 | 8018921 | 195 | -90 | 0 | 240.9 |
| CJ32 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 682925 | 8019236 | 211 | -90 | 0 | 46.7 |
| CJ34 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683035 | 8019233 | 114 | -90 | 0 | 45.05 |
| CJ350 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8015715 | 210 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ351 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8015425 | 85 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ352 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680241 | 8015134 | 161 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ353 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8014845 | 209 | -90 | 0 | 23 |
| CJ354 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680245 | 8014702 | 189 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ355 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8014554 | 173 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ356 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8014412 | 186 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
11
| Hole ID | Drill Method |
Company | Target Commodity |
MGA Z53 East |
MGA Z53 North |
RL (SRTM) |
Dip | Azi | EOH Depth |
| CJ357 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8014269 | 117 | -90 | 0 | 28 |
| CJ358 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680245 | 8014122 | 207 | -90 | 0 | 45 |
| CJ359 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8013979 | 78 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ36 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683912 | 8018537 | 181 | -90 | 0 | 40.6 |
| CJ360 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8013833 | 161 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ361 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8013688 | 196 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ362 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680245 | 8013544 | 147 | -90 | 0 | 45 |
| CJ363 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8013399 | 117 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ364 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8013109 | 192 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ365 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8012816 | 82 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ366 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8012526 | 79 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ367 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8012240 | 100 | -90 | 0 | 35 |
| CJ368 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8012094 | 145 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ369 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8011950 | 204 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ370 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8011805 | 79 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ371 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8011662 | 201 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ372 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680247 | 8011517 | 80 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ373 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8011369 | 76 | -90 | 0 | 37 |
| CJ374 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680245 | 8011226 | 185 | -90 | 0 | 32 |
| CJ375 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8011080 | 156 | -90 | 0 | 32 |
| CJ376 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8010937 | 169 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ377 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8010788 | 107 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ378 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8010651 | 167 | -90 | 0 | 28 |
| CJ379 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680242 | 8010501 | 119 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ38 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683880 | 8018664 | 182 | -90 | 0 | 252 |
| CJ380 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8010359 | 135 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ381 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680242 | 8010213 | 115 | -90 | 0 | 37 |
| CJ382 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8009921 | 198 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ383 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680240 | 8009778 | 184 | -90 | 0 | 28 |
| CJ384 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8009633 | 200 | -90 | 0 | 22 |
| CJ385 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680240 | 8009487 | 160 | -90 | 0 | 31 |
| CJ386 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680245 | 8014992 | 104 | -90 | 0 | 37 |
| CJ41 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 679566 | 8015016 | 154 | -90 | 0 | 85 |
| CJ418 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680246 | 8013252 | 120 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ419 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680245 | 8012963 | 102 | -90 | 0 | 25 |
| CJ420 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680243 | 8012674 | 155 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ421 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680244 | 8012385 | 124 | -90 | 0 | 28 |
| CJ422 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 680242 | 8010069 | 136 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ423 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684760 | 8010590 | 193 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ424 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684762 | 8010641 | 142 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
12
| Hole ID | Drill Method |
Company | Target Commodity |
MGA Z53 East |
MGA Z53 North |
RL (SRTM) |
Dip | Azi | EOH Depth |
| CJ425 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684760 | 8010685 | 190 | -90 | 0 | 28 |
| CJ426 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684763 | 8010738 | 131 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ427 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684762 | 8010789 | 93 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ428 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684768 | 8011474 | 183 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ429 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684767 | 8011522 | 190 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ430 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684770 | 8011561 | 188 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ431 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684767 | 8011628 | 115 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ432 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684768 | 8011673 | 71 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ433 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684796 | 8014872 | 71 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ434 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684795 | 8014916 | 171 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ435 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684797 | 8014957 | 182 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ436 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684797 | 8015014 | 153 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ437 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684798 | 8015063 | 100 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ45 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 675489 | 8016865 | 162 | -90 | 0 | 59.4 |
| CJ48 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 676423 | 8016830 | 183 | -90 | 0 | 63.6 |
| CJ535 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683731 | 8019052 | 158 | -90 | 0 | 145.5 |
| CJ536 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683543 | 8019132 | 112 | -90 | 0 | 113.5 |
| CJ56 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 687117 | 8019229 | 77 | -90 | 0 | 68.4 |
| CJ575 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683388 | 8019202 | 89 | -90 | 0 | 137 |
| CJ576 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683633 | 8019399 | 118 | -90 | 0 | 30 |
| CJ577 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683633 | 8019497 | 115 | -90 | 0 | 33 |
| CJ578 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683634 | 8019178 | 201 | -90 | 0 | 27 |
| DDH CJ10 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684650 | 8014377 | 182 | -90 | 0 | 132 |
| DDH CJ19 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 682873 | 8014643 | 183 | -90 | 0 | 368.6 |
| DDH CJ20 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 685045 | 8016816 | 136 | -90 | 0 | 99.7 |
| DDH CJ24 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 705569 | 8010475 | 181 | -90 | 0 | 183.1 |
| DDH CJ26 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 703343 | 8017105 | 112 | -90 | 0 | 133 |
| DDH CJ3 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683995 | 8017758 | 136 | -90 | 0 | 50 |
| DDH CJ6 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 677696 | 8017354 | 187 | -90 | 0 | 44.5 |
| DDH CJ7 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683507 | 8015597 | 116 | -90 | 0 | 96.6 |
| DDH CJ8 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683860 | 8018798 | 135 | -90 | 0 | 346 |
| DDH CJ9 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683642 | 8019348 | 140 | -90 | 0 | 200 |
| DDHCJ106 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 678075 | 8014817 | 172 | -90 | 0 | 90 |
| DDHCJ107 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 684346 | 8018617 | 78 | -90 | 0 | 168.4 |
| DDHCJ118 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 677958 | 8016593 | 90 | -90 | 0 | 89.9 |
| DDHCJ123 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 683770 | 8012591 | 87 | -90 | 0 | 185.15 |
| DDHCJ135 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 678964 | 8015028 | 175 | -90 | 0 | NR |
| DDHCJ137 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 678373 | 8015073 | 86 | -90 | 0 | NR |
| DDHCJ59 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 690298 | 8013257 | 69 | -90 | 0 | 66.7 |
| MD10 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 682132 | 8008653 | 140 | -90 | 0 | 103.7 |
13
| Hole ID | Drill Method |
Company | Target Commodity |
MGA Z53 East |
MGA Z53 North |
RL (SRTM) |
Dip | Azi | EOH Depth |
| MD7 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 706298 | 8002995 | 128 | -90 | 0 | 55.4 |
| MD8 | RAB | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 682132 | 8008653 | 140 | -90 | 0 | 46.8 |
| RABCJ165 | Diamond | Ashton MiningLtd | Diamonds | 687231 | 8016332 | 196 | -90 | 0 | 42 |
| RN026815 | NR | NTGS | NR | 701606 | 8013269 | 129 | NR | NR | NR |
| W5_H1 | RC | Stockdale Prospecting Ltd |
Diamonds | 716687 | 8030990 | 187 | -90 | 0 | 26 |
| W5_H2 | RC | Stockdale Prospecting Ltd |
Diamonds | 716687 | 8030990 | 187 | -90 | 0 | 42.9 |
| W6_H1 | RC | Stockdale Prospecting Ltd |
Diamonds | 720227 | 8031810 | 150 | -90 | 0 | 47.9 |
Notes for Tables 1a and 1b
-
An accurate dip and strike and the controls on mineralisation are yet to be determined and the true width of the intercepts is not yet known.
-
Coordinates are in GDA94, Zone 53.
-
Elevation and Hole Depth are in metres.
-
Azimuth is in Degrees Grid North.
-
Dip is in degrees.
-
g/t (grams per tonne), ppm (parts per million), ppb (parts per billion), NSI (no significant intercept).
-
Historic drilling is a mixture of AC, RAB, RC, Diamond and Rotary Mud of variable hole diameter.
-
There are no significant results for base metals
-
NR = not recorded.
14
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
Table 1c
The following Figures 5, 6 and 7 are Resistivity Depth Images (RDI) section views. These RDI sections are shown in the video released with the announcement. The location of the north-south flights lines can be correlated to Figure 3, above.
==> picture [344 x 131] intentionally omitted <==
Location Map Line 3110
==> picture [49 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Flight Line
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 5 RDI Line 3110
==> picture [345 x 130] intentionally omitted <==
Location Map Line 3110
==> picture [157 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6 RDI Line 3100
==> picture [345 x 131] intentionally omitted <==
Location Map Line 3090
==> picture [155 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7 RDI Line 3090
15
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
Appendix 2. The following tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012) requirements for the reporting of the exploration results for the Benmara Project, Northern Territory, Australia.
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut | • | This release relates to results from |
| techniques | channels, random chips, or specific | a geophysical survey; | |
| specialised industry standard measurement | • | Resolution has not undertaken any | |
| tools appropriate to the minerals under | drilling on EL32228. | ||
| investigation, such as down hole gamma | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| These examples should not be taken as | exploration using analysis | ||
| limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | methods which do not apply to | ||
| • Include reference to measures taken to | base metal exploration. | ||
| ensure sample representivity and the | • | Additional details from historic | |
| appropriate calibration of any measurement | drilling are unknown. | ||
| tools or systems used. | |||
| • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation | |||
| that are Material to the Public Report. | |||
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has | |||
| been done this would be relatively simple | |||
| (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to | |||
| obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was | |||
| pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire | |||
| assay’). In other cases, more explanation may | |||
| be required, such as where there is coarse Au | |||
| that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual | |||
| commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. | |||
| submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure | |||
| of detailed information. | |||
| Drilling | • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- | • | This release relates to results from |
| techniques | hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, | a geophysical survey; | |
| sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, | • | Resolution has not undertaken any | |
| triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, | drilling on EL32228. | ||
| face-sampling bit or other type, whether core | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| exploration using analysis | |||
| methods which do not apply to | |||
| base metal exploration. | |||
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drillingare unknown. |
16
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing core and | • | This release relates to results from |
| recovery | chip sample recoveries and results assessed. | a geophysical survey; | |
| • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery | • |
Resolution has not undertaken any | |
| and ensure representative nature of the | drilling on EL32228. | ||
| samples. | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| • Whether a relationship exists between sample | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| recovery and grade and whether sample bias | exploration using analysis | ||
| may have occurred due to preferential | methods which do not apply to | ||
| loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | base metal exploration. | ||
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drillingare unknown. | |||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been | • | This release relates to results from |
| geologically and geotechnically logged to a | a geophysical survey; | ||
| level of detail to support appropriate Mineral | • | Resolution has not undertaken any | |
| Resource estimation, mining studies and | drilling on EL32228. | ||
| metallurgical studies. | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) | exploration using analysis | ||
| photography. | methods which do not apply to | ||
| • The total length and percentage of the | base metal exploration. | ||
| relevant intersections logged. | • | Additional details from historic | |
| drillingare unknown. | |||
| Sub- | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether | • | This release relates to results from |
| sampling | quarter, half or all core taken. | a geophysical survey; | |
| techniques | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, | • | Resolution has not undertaken any |
| and sample | rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or | drilling on EL32228. | |
| preparation | dry. | • | The focus of historical drilling was |
| • For all sample types, the nature, quality and | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| appropriateness of the sample preparation | exploration using analysis | ||
| technique. | methods which do not apply to | ||
| • Quality control procedures adopted for all | base metal exploration. | ||
| sub-sampling stages to maximise | • | Additional details from historic | |
| representivity of samples. | drilling are unknown. | ||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling | |||
| is representative of the in situ material | |||
| collected, including for instance results for | |||
| field duplicate/second-half sampling. | |||
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the | |||
| grain size of the material being sampled. |
17
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of | • | This release relates to results from |
| assay data | the assaying and laboratory procedures used | a geophysical survey; | |
| and | and whether the technique is considered | • | Resolution has not undertaken any |
| laboratory | partial or total. | drilling on EL32228. | |
| tests | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, | • | The focus of historical drilling was |
| handheld XRF instruments, etc., the | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| parameters used in determining the analysis | exploration using analysis | ||
| including instrument make and model, | methods which do not apply to | ||
| reading times, calibrations factors applied and | base metal exploration. | ||
| their derivation, etc. | • | Additional details from historic | |
| • Nature of quality control procedures adopted | drilling are unknown. | ||
| (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external | |||
| laboratory checks) and whether acceptable | |||
| levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and | |||
| precision have been established. | |||
| Verification | • The verification of significant intersections by | • | This release relates to results from |
| of sampling | either independent or alternative company | a geophysical survey; | |
| and | personnel. | • | Resolution has not undertaken any |
| assaying | • The use of twinned holes. | drilling on EL32228. | |
| • Documentation of primary data, data entry | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| procedures, data verification, data storage | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| (physical and electronic) protocols. | exploration using analysis | ||
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | methods which do not apply to | ||
| base metal exploration. | |||
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drillingare unknown. | |||
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to | • | This release relates to results from |
| data points | locate drill holes (collar and down-hole | a geophysical survey; | |
| surveys), trenches, mine workings and other | • | Resolution has not undertaken any | |
| locations used in Mineral Resource | drilling on EL32228. | ||
| estimation. | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| • Specification of the grid system used. | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | exploration using analysis | ||
| methods which do not apply to | |||
| base metal exploration. | |||
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drilling are unknown. | |||
| • | The grid system used for the | ||
| geophysical sensing survey was | |||
| UTM grid (MGA94 Zone 53). | |||
| • | Airborne survey lines have been | ||
| measured by a Real time GPS | |||
| Navigation System providing an in- | |||
| flight accuracy up to 1.5 metres. | |||
| • | Topographic control of the | ||
| airborne geophysical survey was | |||
| achieved using a Radar altimeter | |||
| with an accuracy of approximately | |||
| 1 metre. |
18
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration |
• | Airborne geophysical survey data |
| and | Results. | was acquired continuously on 1km | |
| distribution | • Whether the data spacing, and distribution is | line spacing. | |
| sufficient to establish the degree of geological | • |
Resolution has not undertaken any | |
| and grade continuity appropriate for the | drilling on EL32228. | ||
| Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| estimation procedure(s) and classifications | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| applied. | exploration using analysis | ||
| • Whether sample compositing has been | methods which do not apply to | ||
| applied. | base metal exploration. | ||
| • | Data spacing on historical drilling | ||
| is insufficient to establish the | |||
| degree of geological and grade | |||
| continuity required for a Mineral | |||
| Resource estimation. | |||
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drillingare unknown. | |||
| Orientation | • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves | • | Geophysical survey data was |
| of data in | unbiased sampling of possible structures and | acquired in an orientation to avoid | |
| relation to | the extent to which this is known, considering | running parallel to the dominant | |
| geological | the deposit type. | structural trend and therefore | |
| structure | • If the relationship between the drilling | maximise structural definition. | |
| orientation and the orientation of key | • | This release relates to results from | |
| mineralised structures is considered to have | a geophysical survey; therefore | ||
| introduced a sampling bias, this should be | drilling orientation and sampling | ||
| assessed and reported if material. | bias is not relevant to this release. | ||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample | • | This release relates to results from |
| security | security. | a geophysical survey; this section | |
| is not relevant to this release. | |||
| • | No drilling has been undertaken by | ||
| Resolution Minerals on the | |||
| Benmara Project following the | |||
| acquisition of the project | |||
| announced on 15 December 2020. | |||
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drillingare unknown. | |||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of | • | No independent audit was |
| reviews | sampling techniques and data. | undertaken on the geophysical | |
| data. | |||
| • | Internal review of all data was | ||
| undertaken by RML geoscientists | |||
| on contractor provided data and | |||
| analysis. | |||
| • | The internal review determined the | ||
| data and analysis are of good | |||
| quality. No issues were identified. |
19
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location and | • | Resolution Minerals Ltd executed |
| tenement | ownership including agreements or material | a binding term sheet with Strategic | |
| and land tenure |
issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, |
Energy Resources Ltd (Vendors) as an Option to Purchase a 100% interest in the Benmara Project - |
|
| status | wilderness or national park and environmental | EL32228 (ASX:RML | |
| settings. | Announcement 15/12/2020). | ||
| • The security of the tenure held at the time of | • | EL32228 consists of 663km2and | |
| reporting along with any known impediments | falls entirely within Benmara | ||
| to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | Station and Creswell Downs | ||
| Station, Northern Territory. | |||
| • | The Benmara Project is centred | ||
| approximately 340km ENE of | |||
| Tenant Creek. | |||
| • | The tenure is in good standing and | ||
| no known impediments exist. | |||
| Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration | • |
Previous exploration work on the |
| done by other parties |
by other parties. | Benmara Project includes; Surface Geochemical Sampling: stream sediments, BCL, soils & |
|
| rock chips. | |||
| Airborne Geophysics: GeoTEM, | |||
| Radiometric & Magnetics. | |||
| Ground Geophysics:Gravity, | |||
| Seismic (17GA-SN5), Magnetics, | |||
| Alpha meter (Scintillometer). | |||
| Exploration Drilling:254 drill | |||
| holes have been completed within | |||
| EL32228. | |||
| 1 Rotary Muddrill hole BG04 | |||
| (IMC, 1968).7 ACdrill holes C02 | |||
| – 10 (AAR, 1977).133 RAB | |||
| CJ216 – 578, MD8, MD10 (Ashton | |||
| Mining, 1985). | |||
| 72 RCBEN001 (BHP, 1997), | |||
| BPH1 – 74 (Mines Admin, 1979), | |||
| W5_H1, W5_H2, W6_H1 | |||
| (Stockdale Prospecting, 1988) | |||
| 40 Diamonddrill holes including | |||
| BDH1 – 5 and BDH67 (Mines | |||
| Admin, 1978), DDHCJ1 – 140 | |||
| (Ashton Mining, 1985), | |||
| 1 Non – recordedmethod drill | |||
| holes RN026815 (NTGS, | |||
| unknown) |
20
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of | • | Resolution Minerals Ltd is primarily |
| mineralisation. | exploring for sediment-hosted | ||
| stratiform base metal | |||
| mineralisation (e.g. Walford Creek) | |||
| within the Benmara Group, | |||
| Northern Territory. | |||
| • | In 2020 Geoscience Australia | ||
| proposed the Benmara Group get | |||
| re-assigned to a Paleoproterozoic | |||
| age (formerly thought to be | |||
| Mesoproterozoic) after publishing | |||
| new geochronology data on historic | |||
| drill holes. making the Benmara | |||
| Group stratigraphically equivalent | |||
| to the Fickling Group, host to the | |||
| Walford Creek deposit. | |||
| • | The Benmara Group is bound to | ||
| the north by the Fish River Fault, | |||
| which is known to have structurally | |||
| control fluid movement and | |||
| mineralisation at Walford Creek. | |||
| • | Resolution will be targeting | ||
| reduced sedimentary facies of the | |||
| Benmara Group, which includes | |||
| dolostones, sandstones and | |||
| carbonaceous shales. | |||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information material to the | • | This release relates to results from |
| Information | understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following |
• | a geophysical survey; Resolution has not undertaken any |
| information for all Material drill holes: | drilling on EL32228. | ||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar |
• | The focus of historical drilling was | |
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – |
for diamonds and uranium | ||
| elevation above sea level in metres) of the | exploration using analysis | ||
| drill hole collar | methods which do not apply to | ||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
base metal exploration. | ||
o down hole length and interception depth |
• | Additional details from historic | |
o hole length. |
drilling are unknown. | ||
| • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not |
• | See Appendix 1 summary table 1a and 1b of historic drill hole results. |
|
| Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why |
• |
An accurate dip and strike and the controls on mineralisation are yet to be determined and the true |
|
| this is the case. | width of the intercepts is not yet | ||
| known. | |||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | • | This release relates to results from |
| aggregation methods |
averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually |
• | a geophysical survey; Resolution has not undertaken any drilling on EL32228. |
| Material and should be stated. | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| lengths of high-grade results and longer | exploration using analysis | ||
| lengths of low-grade results, theprocedure |
21
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| used for such aggregation should be stated | methods which do not apply to | ||
| and some typical examples of such | base metal exploration. | ||
| aggregations should be shown in detail. | • | Additional details from historic | |
| • The assumptions used for any reporting of | drilling are unknown. | ||
| metal equivalent values should be clearly | • | There are no historic drilling | |
| stated. | intervals of significant | ||
| mineralisation. No cut off, top cut | |||
| or maximum interval of internal | |||
| dilution has been applied. | |||
| • | No metal equivalents have been | ||
| used. | |||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly important |
• | This release relates to results from |
| between | in the reporting of Exploration Results. | a geophysical survey; | |
| mineralisati on widths and |
• If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole |
• • |
Resolution has not undertaken any drilling on EL32228. The focus of historical drilling was for diamonds and uranium |
| intercept | lengths are reported, there should be a clear | exploration using analysis | |
| lengths | statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). |
methods which do not apply to base metal exploration. |
|
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drilling are unknown. | |||
| • | Historic down hole length has | ||
| been reported, as true width is not | |||
| known, as insufficient work has | |||
| been undertaken to understand | |||
| the true width of intervals. | |||
| • | “Down hole length, true width not | ||
| known” is stated in the notes to | |||
| Table 1a and 1b. | |||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) | • | This release relates to results from |
| and tabulations of intercepts should be | a geophysical survey; | ||
| included for any significant discovery being | • | Resolution has not undertaken any | |
| reported These should include, but not be | drilling on EL32228. | ||
| limited to a plan view of drill hole collar | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| locations and appropriate sectional views. | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| exploration using analysis | |||
| methods which do not apply to | |||
| base metal exploration. | |||
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drilling are unknown. | |||
| • | A plan view of historical drill collar | ||
| locations has been included in the | |||
| body of this report. | |||
| • | No cross sections of historical | ||
| drilling have been provided given | |||
| holes were targeting diamonds | |||
| and uranium and multi-element | |||
| assay results are extremely | |||
| limited. |
22
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all | • | This release relates to results from |
| reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high |
• | a geophysical survey; Resolution has not undertaken any |
| grades and/or widths should be practiced to | drilling on EL32228. | ||
| avoid misleading reporting of Exploration | • | The focus of historical drilling was | |
| Results. | for diamonds and uranium | ||
| exploration using analysis | |||
| methods which do not apply to | |||
| base metal exploration. | |||
| • | Additional details from historic | ||
| drilling are unknown. | |||
| • | The reporting is considered | ||
| balanced. | |||
| • | The proposed drilling area occurs | ||
| within a region of black soil plains, | |||
| a regolith type known to mask | |||
| basement geochemical response. | |||
| Historical soils are considered a | |||
| null test (ineffective) and for this | |||
| reason have not been included. | |||
| • | Historical drilling results | ||
| predominately include gravity | |||
| separation of cuttings for diamond | |||
| exploration and scintillometer | |||
| readings and U, Th assays for | |||
| uranium exploration and are not | |||
| considered relevant to base metal | |||
| exploration. | |||
| • | Hole locations have been provided | ||
| on aplan mapfor reference. | |||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and | • | Resolution Minerals flew a 351 line |
| substantive | material, should be reported including (but not | km VTEM survey from which the | |
| exploration data |
limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and |
• | drill targets relating to this release were derived. Previous drilling on EL32228 did |
| method of treatment; metallurgical test | not test the VTEM conductors | ||
| results; bulk density, groundwater, | identified in this geophysical | ||
| geotechnical and rock characteristics; | survey. | ||
| potential deleterious or contaminating | • | As this release relates to results | |
| substances. | from a geophysical survey; this | ||
| section is not relevant to this | |||
| release. | |||
| • | VTEM (Versatile Time-Domain | ||
| Electromagnetic) helicopter borne | |||
| system developed by Geotech Ltd | |||
| with a 35 m diameter transmitter | |||
| loop. The VTEM Max can generate | |||
| up to 866,000 NIA peak dipole | |||
| moment (230Amps). The EM | |||
| receiver provides both dB/dt and | |||
| B-field measurements for Z, X and | |||
| optional Y axis. The revised data |
23
==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==
ASX RELEASE
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| acquisition system (full waveform) | ||
| provides a wider range of time | ||
| gate windows (18 microseconds to | ||
| 10milliseconds). | ||
| Further | • The nature and scale of planned further work | •A range of exploration techniques |
| work | (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth | are being considered to progress |
| extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | exploration including drilling. | |
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | •Refer to figures in the body of this | |
| possible extensions, including the main | report. | |
| geological interpretations and future drilling | ||
| areas, provided this information is not | ||
| commercially sensitive. |
24