RESOLUTION MINERALS LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2020

Sep 9, 2020

10 September 2020

==> picture [107 x 79] intentionally omitted <==

ASSAYS AND OPERATIONS UPDATE 64NORTH PROJECT, ALASKA

Summary

• Drilling has reached 422m on hole ID: 20AU07 at the 2km x 5km Aurora Prospect , the hole is designed to test a high priority target with a planned depth of 600m.

• Assays from Aurora drill holes 20AU03 and 20AU04 have indicated minor gold mineralisation is present in the system as detailed in figure 3 and 4. The results will assist in vectoring in on additional targets.

• Geophysics results and initial ground follow up at the Boundary Prospect to be released next week.

• Fully funded exploration on multiple drilling targets with news flow for the remainder of 2020 after the recent $5.1m placement and SPP.

==> picture [508 x 343] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Completed 19 Aug
Completed
Pogo Gold Mine
1 Sept 10M oz Au
New assays
reported
Drilling now
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 1 Aurora, Echo & Reflection Prospects - West Pogo Block, 64North Project Alaska, current drilling focus

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Ordinary Shares Issued 279 M

Options and rights Listed options 6.1 M @ 10c Unlisted options 12.3 M @ 25c Unlisted options 13.4 M @ 6c Unlisted rights 7.5 M

Performance Shares Class A 9.6 M Class B 3.6 M

Last Capital Raise August 2020 - Placement & SPP $5.1M @ 7c

==> picture [52 x 23] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

BOARD
----- End of picture text -----

Len Dean - Chair Duncan Chessell - MD Andrew Shearer - NED Craig Farrow - NED Jarek Kopias - Co Sec

Level 4, 29-31 King William Street, Adelaide SA 5000

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Resolution Minerals Ltd ( RML, Resolution or Company ) is pleased to update investors with assay results from phase two of drilling on the Aurora Prospect and that the third phase of drilling for 2020 is well underway on the West Pogo Block adjacent to Northern Star’s (ASX:NST) Pogo Gold Mine, Alaska.

Status of Phase Three of Drilling West Pogo Block – Aurora, Echo and Reflection Prospects

Prospect	Hole ID	Depth	Completion date	Logging and Assay status
Echo	20EC005	321m	19 August	Logged, samples sent to lab
Reflection	20RE006	553m	1 September	Detailed loggingunderway
Aurora	20AU007	*422m(est 600m)	drillingnow

Drilling production rates have improved throughout the year and high-quality structural data has been collected from orientated HQ core. The structural information learnt from the drilling is crucial in unlocking the structural controls on mineralisation and will be combined with assay data when it becomes available to enhance drill targeting. A surge in gold exploration in North America has resulted in longer time frames on return of assays from laboratories, the Company has taken steps to minimise time frames and will look to fast track the core from the Reflection Prospect.

Hole ID: 20AU07 – Aurora Prospect – currently drilling

A track mounted diamond core drilling rig has commenced the third diamond core hole at the Aurora Prospect for this phase of drilling (hole ID:20AU07). The hole is currently at 422m depth and is designed to a depth of ~600m and will test a NE trending structural zone. The hole is located on the central-northern edge of the Aurora prospect, proximal to an outcropping diorite intrusive and coincident with conductive rocks identified by the ZTEM geophysics survey. The Aurora Prospect is road accessible, which allows for year-round drilling.

Assay Results Hole ID’s 20AU03 and 20AU04

Assays from Aurora drill holes #3 and hole #4 indicate minor gold mineralisation as detailed below. The alteration observed in the drill core matched the CSAMT and ZTEM geophysics anomalies. The Company is encouraged by the strong alteration, presence of minor gold mineralisation, para-gneiss host rocks and presence of sulphides indicating the strong fertility of the system. We interpret that correct structural “dilation” event, or opening of “space”, to allow thick high-grade gold mineralisation did not occur at these locations. We conclude these holes intersected thick zones that were clearly the fluid pathways for a large mineralising system and further drilling will target potential high-grade zones of gold mineralisation.

Intervals Hole 20AU003

• 0.86m @ 0.35 g/t Au from 19m depth

• 0.86m @ 0.44 g/t Au from 423m depth

Intervals Hole 20AU004

==> picture [144 x 191] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 Quartz and sulphide veins at 1,060m Hole ID 20AU04 - typical of this hole.

• 0.78m @ 0.41 g/t Au from 522m depth

• 1.19m @ 0.76 g/t Au from 762m depth

2

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

==> picture [470 x 295] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3 Cross section with assay results from 20AU001 and 20AU004 - Aurora Prospect, West Pogo Block

==> picture [470 x 314] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4 Cross section of new assay results for Hole ID 20AU004 and historic results MR-12-02 and MR-12-01

3

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

==> picture [511 x 363] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5 Deposit sizes stated as Endowment (Resources & Reserves + Historic Production) *sourced from Company websites

For further information please contact the authorising officer:

Duncan Chessell Managing Director Resolution Minerals Ltd +61 8 6118 7110

E: info@resolutionminerals.com

Follow RML on LinkedIn or Twitter or visit our website www.resolutionminerals.com

==> picture [50 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [40 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

*Tintinta Gold Province Endowment Map – source of data: Pebble (Northern Dynasty, www.northerndynastyminerals.com), Pogo (Northern Star Resources, www.nsrltd.com), Fort Knox (Kinross, www.kinross.com), Donlin Creek (NovaGold, www.novagold.com), Livengood (International Tower Hill Mines, www.ithmines.com), Eagle & Dublin Gulch (Victoria Gold Corp, www.vgcx.com), Brewery Creek (Golden Predator, www.goldenpredator.com), White Gold (White Gold Corp, whitegoldcorp.ca), Coffee (Newmont, www.newmont.com), Kensington (Coeur Mining, www.coeur.com).

4

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Targets, Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Duncan Chessell who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Duncan Chessell is a full-time employee of the company and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Duncan Chessell consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form in which it is appears and confirms that the data reported as foreign estimates are an accurate representation of the available data and studies of the material mining project. This report includes results that have previously been released under JORC 2012 by the Company as “Binding agreement earning 80% of Gold Project in Alaska” on 17 October 2019, “Gold Symposium Conference Presentation” on 24 October 2019, “2019 AGM Managing Director’s Presentation” on 26 November 2019, “Operations Update at 64North Project, Alaska” on 31 March 2020, “Exploration Update - 64North Project Alaska” on 14 May 2020, “Drilling Update - 64North Project Alaska” on 24 June 2020, “Investor Presentation - Noosa Mining Virtual Conference” on 13 July 2020 and ‘Drilling Commenced at Reflection Prospect – 64North” on 25 August 2020. The Company is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this announcement.

Appendix 1. Summary table of drill hole details.

Table 1a: Summary of RML drill intervals from May drilling at the 64North Project, Alaska.	Table 1a: Summary of RML drill intervals from May drilling at the 64North Project, Alaska.	Table 1a: Summary of RML drill intervals from May drilling at the 64North Project, Alaska.	Table 1a: Summary of RML drill intervals from May drilling at the 64North Project, Alaska.	Table 1a: Summary of RML drill intervals from May drilling at the 64North Project, Alaska.	Table 1a: Summary of RML drill intervals from May drilling at the 64North Project, Alaska.
Hole ID	Prospect	From	To	Interval	Au(g/t)
20AU003	Aurora	19.01	19.87	0.86	0.35
20AU003	Aurora	423.32	424.18	0.86	0.44
20AU004	Aurora	521.78	522.56	0.78	0.41
20AU004	Aurora	761.58	762.77	1.19	0.76
Including	Aurora	761.58	762.13	0.55	0.96

Table 1b: RML drill collar location for the 64North Project, Alaska.

Hole ID	Easting	Northing	Elevation	Azimuth	Dip	EOH Depth
20AU003	595970	7148300	565m	145	-80	615.09
20AU004	594885	7149325	700m	145	-80	1093.32

Notes for Tables 1a and 1b

1. An accurate dip and strike and the controls on mineralisation are yet to be determined and the true width of the intercepts is not yet known.

2. Coordinates are in NAD83, Zone 6

3. Elevation and Hole Depth are in metres

4. Azimuth is in Degrees Grid North

5. Dip is in degrees

6. g/t (grams per tonne), ppm (parts per million), ppb (parts per billion), NSI (no significant intercept)

7. All drilling is HQ diamond core drilling, all of hole is sampled

8. Significant results are shown for intercepts >0.3g/t Au with no more than 0.4m of internal dilution

5

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Appendix 2. The following tables are provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012) requirements for the reporting of the exploration results for the 64North Project – Alaska.

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut	•	Sampling was undertaken using
techniques	channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement		standard industry practices and a standard operating procedure to
	tools appropriate to the minerals under		ensure continuity of work practices
	investigation, such as down hole gamma		between staff. The sections of the
	sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.).		core that are selected for assaying
	These examples should not be taken as		are marked up and then recorded
	limiting the broad meaning of sampling.		on a sample sheet for cutting and
	• Include reference to measures taken to		sampling at the certified assay
	ensure sample representivity and the		laboratory. Samples of HQ core
	appropriate calibration of any measurement		are cut just to the right of the
	tools or systems used.		orientation line where available
	• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation		using a diamond core saw, with
	that are Material to the Public Report.		half core sampled lengthways for
	• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was		assay. Half core was sampled length wise for assay. QAQC samples (standards, blanks and duplicates) are inserted into the
	pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire		sequences as per industry best
	assay’). In other cases, more explanation may		practice the details of which are
	be required, such as where there is coarse Au		set out below in sub-sampling
	that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual		techniques section.
	commodities or mineralisation types (e.g.	•	The HQ diamond core was
	submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure		sampled as half core at
	of detailed information.		geologically defined or significant
			alteration and mineralisation
			boundaries to ensure adequate
			sample representivity.
		•	Diamond core sample intervals
			were set between 0.1m minimum
			and 1.5m maximum.
		•	Individual samples weigh less than
			3kg to ensure total preparation at
			the laboratory pulverisation stage
			to produce 30gram charge for fire
			assay. The sample size is deemed
			appropriate for the grain size of the
			materialbeing sampled.
Drilling	• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-	•	Oriented HQ diamond core triple
techniques	hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter,		tube, down hole surveys every 100 feet (~30m), using a Reflex ACT-III
	triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails,		tool.
	face-sampling bit or other type, whether core
	_is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.). _

6

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Drill sample	• Method of recording and assessing core and	•Core was processed in the
recovery	chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery	Fairbanks ALS laboratory core processing room for the full
	and ensure representative nature of the	duration of the program.
	samples.	Recoveries were recorded for all
	• Whether a relationship exists between sample	holes, into a logging database to
	recovery and grade and whether sample bias	3cm on a laptop computer by a
	may have occurred due to preferential	qualified geologist using the drillers
	loss/gain of fine/coarse material.	recorded depth against the length
		of core recovered. No significant
		core loss was observed.
		•Triple tube HQ was used to
		maximise core recovery.
		•No relationship between sample
		recovery and gradeisidentified.
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples have been	•Core logging is carried out by
	geologically and geotechnically logged to a	project partner (Millrock Resources)
	level of detail to support appropriate Mineral	qualified geologists using a project
	Resource estimation, mining studies and	specific logging procedure. Data
	metallurgical studies.	recorded includes, but is not limited
	• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative	to, lithology, structure, quality,
	in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.)	recovery, alteration, sulphide
	photography.	mineralogy and presence of visible
	• The total length and percentage of the	gold. This is supervised by senior
	relevant intersections logged.	geologists familiar with the
		mineralisation style and nature.
		Resolution’s Exploration Manager
		and Managing Director monitor drill
		core remotely using photographs
		and logs. Lithology is measured to
		~3cm scale marked from the
		closest core block. Rock codes
		have been set up specifically for the
		project. Logging is to a sufficient
		level of detail to support appropriate
		Mineral Resource estimation and
		mining studies.
		•Drill logging is both qualitative by
		geological features and quantitative
		by geotechnical parameters.
		Photographs are taken of all cores
		trays, (wet) of whole core prior to
		cutting.
		•All drilled intervals are logged and
		recorded as standard operating
		practice.
Sub-	• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether	•Drill core was initially cut and
sampling techniques	quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or	submitted for analysis at the ALS laboratory in Fairbanks. Due to high demand at ALS, RML opted to
and sample preparation	dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation	outsource core cutting to Metallogeny Inc. in Fairbanks and sample analysis to BV laboratory in
	technique.	Fairbanks to improve assayturn

7

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Criteria		JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		• Quality control procedures adopted for all	around time.
		sub-sampling stages to maximise	•Selective sampling techniques were
		representivity of samples.	not used, all core was sampled.
		• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling	•Half HQ core was taken as the
		is representative of the in situ material	sample and is considered
		collected, including for instance results for	representative and appropriate for
		field duplicate/second-half sampling.	exploration stage. Field duplicates
		• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the	of quarter core were submitted on a
		grain size of the material being sampled.	1:50 basis (2%). Appropriate high,
			medium and low gold and base
			metal standards (CRM’s) are used
			on a 1:20 basis (5%). Blanks are
			inserted on a 1:50 basis (2%).
			Laboratories introduce QAQC
			samples and complete duplicate
			check assays on a routine basis.
			•Sample preparation is considered
			appropriate and was undertaken by
			ALS Fairbanks (ALS Code Prep-
			31Y) and BV Fairbanks (PRP70-
			250) both using 70% to <2mm
			Crush and Pulverize 85% to <75
			um. Samples were split and were
			subsequently analysed at ALS
			laboratory in Whitehorse, Canada
			and BV laboratory in Reno,
			Nevada. Gold was analysed by
			Fire Assay (specifically ALS code
			Au-AA25 and BV code FA430/AA).
			Both Au by fire assay and AAS
			finish using a 30gram nominal
			sample weight. No multi-element
			analysis was completed on the
			samples.
			•Quarter core field duplicates were
			sampled to assess Au variability.
			The company considers analysing
			half core to be representative and
			appropriate for the stage of
			exploration, with half core retained
			for audit purposes.
			•Sample size as defined above is
			considered appropriate to the
			materialsampled.
Quality	of	• The nature, quality and appropriateness of	•The sampling digest methods are
assay and	data	the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.	considered appropriate and industry standard. ALS method Au- AA25 and BV method FA430/AA
laboratory tests		• For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis	are fire assay techniques were applied. •No use of portal XRF is reported.
		including instrument make and model,	•QAQC procedures included the
		reading times, calibrations factors applied and	insertion of appropriate high,
		their derivation, etc.	mediumandlowgold and base

8

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Criteria		JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
		• Nature of quality control procedures adopted		metal Certified Reference Materials
		(e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external		(CRM) on a 1:20 basis (5%), Blank
		laboratory checks) and whether acceptable		material on a 1:50 basis (2%) and
		levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and		Field Duplicates on a 1:50 basis
		precision have been established.		(2%) for a total insertion rate of 9%,
				which is appropriate to the
				exploration stage. QC checks are
				conducted after results are received
				utilising Company QC and supplied
				internal laboratory QC information.
				Laboratories introduce QAQC
				samples and complete duplicate
				check assays on a routine basis.
				No abnormalitieswere detected.
Verification		• The verification of significant intersections by	•	At least two geologists have
of sampling and		either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes.		reviewed the physical core in addition to offsite RML and Millrock geologists reviewing the logging
assaying		• Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage	•	and photographs. No twinned holes.
		(physical and electronic) protocols.	•	Drilling information is digitally
		• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.		entered and stored following
				documented core handling
				procedures and backed up
				electronically.
			•	No adjustment has been made to
				theprimaryassaydata.
Location	of	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to	•	All maps and locations are in UTM
data points		locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other		grid (NAD83 Z6N) and have been measured by hand-held GPS with
		locations used in Mineral Resource		a lateral accuracy of ±4 metres
		estimation.		and a vertical accuracy of ±10
		• Specification of the grid system used.		metres.
		• Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Data		• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration	•	Data spacing is insufficient to
spacing and distribution		Results. • Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological		establish the degree of geological and grade continuity required for a Mineral Resource estimation.
		and grade continuity appropriate for the	•	Sample composting has not been
		Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve		applied to these exploration
		estimation procedure(s) and classifications		results.
		applied.
		• Whether sample compositing has been
		applied.
Orientation		• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves	•	The relationship between the
of data relation	in to	unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.		drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures has not been confirmed.
geological structure		• If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have
		introduced a sampling bias, this should be
		assessed and reported if material.

9

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Criteria		JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sample		• The measures taken to ensure sample	•	A secure chain of custody protocol
security		security.		has been established with the site geologist locking samples in
				secure shipping container at site
				until loaded by courier to secure
				restricted access room at
				Fairbanks ALS laboratory for core
				processing by Millrock staff
				geologists.
			•	Cutting and sampling was initially
				undertaken at the ALS site and
				delivered directly to ALS staff. Due
				to high demand at ALS, RML
				opted to submit some samples to
				ALS directly in Fairbanks and
				outsource core cutting to
				Metallogeny Inc. in Fairbanks and
				sample analysis to BV laboratory
				in Fairbanks. Millrock staff
				geologists arranged courier from
				the logging facility at ALS to
				secure rooms at Metallogeny and
				then secure rooms at Fairbanks
				BV laboratory.
Audits	or	• The results of any audits or reviews of	•	No review has been undertaken at
reviews		sampling techniques and data.		this time.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral		• Type, reference name/number, location and	•Resolution Minerals Ltd executed a
tenement and land		ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,	binding agreement with Millrock Resources to acquire, via joint venture earn-in, up to 80% interest
tenure		native title interests, historical sites,	of the 64North Project in Alaska
status		wilderness or national park and environmental settings.	(ASX:RML Announcement 16/12/2019).
		• The security of the tenure held at the time of	•The total tenement area comprising
		reporting along with any known impediments	the 64North Project consists of
		to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	1176 State of Alaska claims
			(66,050 hectares).
			•The 64North Project is located
			approximately 120km east of
			Fairbanks.
			•The tenure is in good standing and
			noknown impediments exist.

10

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Criteria	Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Exploration done by		• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	• •	Previous exploration work includes; Surface Geochemical Sampling:
other	parties			Pan concentrates, fine silts, silts,
				soils & rock chips. Airborne
				Geophysics: EM, LiDAR,
				Radiometric & Magnetics.
				Ground Geophysics: Magnetics,
				Radio-metrics, EM, VLF-EM,
				NSAMT & CSAMT.
				Exploration Drilling: 46 Diamond.
Geology		• Deposit type, geological setting and style of	•	Resolution Minerals Ltd is primarily
		mineralisation.		exploring for Intrusion Related Gold
				mineralisation (e.g. Pogo-style)
				within the Yukon-Tanana Terrane
				of thenorthernCordillera,Alaska.
Drill	hole	• A summary of all information material to the	•	See Appendix 1 summary table of
Information		understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following	•	drill hole results. An accurate dip and strike and the
		information for all Material drill holes:		controls on mineralisation are yet
		o easting and northing of the drill hole collar		to be determined and the true
		o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –		width of the intercepts is not yet
		elevation above sea level in metres) of the		known.
		drill hole collar
		o dip and azimuth of the hole
		o down hole length and interception depth
		o hole length.
		• If the exclusion of this information is justified
		on the basis that the information is not
		Material and this exclusion does not detract
		from the understanding of the report, the
		Competent Person should clearly explain why
		this is the case.
Data		• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	•	Sample length weighted averaging
aggregation methods		averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually		was used to calculate the aggregated intervals of significant mineralisation. A cut off of 0.3 g/t
		Material and should be stated.		Au has been applied for significant
		• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short		intersections. No top cut has been
		lengths of high-grade results and longer		applied. There is no internal
		lengths of low-grade results, the procedure		dilution.
		used for such aggregation should be stated	•	No metal equivalents have been
		and some typical examples of such		used.
		aggregations should be shown in detail.
		• The assumptions used for any reporting of
		metal equivalent values should be clearly
		stated.
Relationship		• These relationships are particularly important	•	Down hole length has been
between mineralisati		in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its		reported, as true width is not known, as insufficient work has been undertaken to understand the
on	widths	nature should be reported.		true width of intervals.
		• If it is not known and only the down hole	•	A structural interpretation is being

11

==> picture [104 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
and	lengths are reported, there should be a clear	undertaken by an external
intercept lengths	statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).	consultant •“Down hole length, true width not known” is stated in the notes to
		Table 1a.
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)	•Plan view of drill collar locations
	and tabulations of intercepts should be	have been included in the body of
	included for any significant discovery being	this report.
	reported These should include, but not be	•Sections for each drill hole has also
	limited to a plan view of drill hole collar	been provided.
	locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of all	•The reporting is considered
reporting	Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high	balanced. •Comprehensive reporting of all
	grades and/or widths should be practiced to	drilling, trench, soil samples has
	avoid misleading reporting of Exploration	occurred in historical reports and
	Results.	reported when appropriate here.
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and	•Resolution Minerals completed a
substantive exploration	material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical	ZTEM survey. See ASX:RML announcement released on the 25/08/2020 for details.
data	survey results; bulk samples – size and	•Millrock Resources completed a
	method of treatment; metallurgical test	CSAMT survey. See TSX.V: MRO
	results; bulk density, groundwater,	announcement, released on the
	geotechnical and rock characteristics;	9/10/2019 for details.
	potential deleterious or contaminating
	substances.
Further	• The nature and scale of planned further work	•Drilling is ongoing at the Aurora
work	(e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).	Prospect and a plan view of drill collar locations has been provided
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of	in the body of this report.
	possible extensions, including the main
	geological interpretations and future drilling
	areas, provided this information is not
	commercially sensitive.

12