Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

REGIS RESOURCES LIMITED Annual Report 2015

Sep 15, 2015

65733_rns_2015-09-15_da66e83c-2295-44f3-8f24-a73d11c35758.pdf

Annual Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [128 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

ABN 28 009 174 761

16 September 2015

Manager Announcements Company Announcements Office Australian Securities Exchange Limited Level 4, 20 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000

www.regisresources.com

Level 1 1 Alvan Street Subiaco WA 6008 Australia

PO Box 862 Subiaco WA 6904 Australia P 08 9442 2200 F 08 9442 2290

2015 FINANCIAL YEAR RESULTS

Regis Resources Limited reports its results for the financial year ended 30 June 2015.

Summary of financial results:

2015
($’000)
2014
($’000)
Change
($’000)
Change
%
Gold sales
464,854
371,232
+93,622
+25%
Profit before tax & impairment
125,071
79,488
+45,583
+57%
Profit after tax & before
impairment
86,953
54,870
+32,083
+58%
Impairment expense (net tax)
(33)
(202,700)
Profit/(loss) after tax and
impairment
86,920
(147,830)
+234,750
Basic earnings/(loss) per share
(cents)
17.39
(29.68)
+47.07
Gold production (ounces)
310,204
270,759
Gold sales (ounces)
308,898
263,913
Sale price ($/oz)
1,488
1,461
Dividend declared
(cents pershare)
6
Nil
  • The profit before tax and impairment of $125.1 million was up $45.6 million (57%) on 2014 as a result of:

  • Increase in gold sales of $93.6m (+25%) which was partly due to higher production (+14%) due to a full year of production from Rosemont in 2015 and the effect of flood impact of production in 2014 and partly due to the 2% better realized gold price.

  • Gross operating costs increased by $45.3m (16%) which was in line with the increase in gold production.


  • The profit after tax (before impairment) at $87.0 million was up $32.1m on the 2014 result and the increase of 58% was consistent with the increase in pretax profit.

  • The board of directors have declared a dividend of 6 cents per share, fully franked. The record date for the dividend is 30 September 2015 and the dividend will be paid on 28 October 2015.

Operations

Op erating results for the Duketon project for2015 were as follows: erating results for the Duketon project for2015 were as follows: erating results for the Duketon project for2015 were as follows:
2015 2014
Oremined (Mbcm) 4.65 4.13
Wastemined (Mbcm) 23.70 25.28
Strippingratio (w:o) 5.10 6.10
Ore mined (Mtonnes) 11.07 9.50
Ore milled (Mtonnes) 9.84 8.59
Head grade (g/t) 1.11 1.10
Recovery (%) 88 89
Gold production(koz) 310 271
Cashcost (A$/oz) 826 815
Cashcostincroyalty (A$/oz) 891 878
All inSustaining Cost (A$/oz)1 994 N/A

1 AISC calculated on a per ounce of production basis

  • Improvements in throughput as a result of optimisations of the processing plants at Garden Well and Rosemont continued during the year and along with a full year of operations at Rosemont, saw throughput increase to 9.84 million tonnes.

  • Whilst there were operational challenges at Garden Well in terms of mining reconciliation during the year it was pleasing that overall Duketon grade and recovery were held at levels consistent with the prior period.

  • Production increased by 14% to 310koz and cash costs were steady at $891 per ounce (2014: $878/oz). The Company quoted AISC for the first time for 2015 and this was an industry competitive $994/oz for the year.

  • The Company released updated Group Ore Reserves for the Duketon project in July 2015 which reflects the operating history at all projects and provides a strong base for the company in FY 2016.

Cashflow

  • Cash and gold bullion holdings of $64.5* million as at 30 June 2015 (30 June 2014: $14.2 million).

  • Cash flow from operating activities for the year was $142.0 million, up 14% from $124.2 million in the previous period.

  • Regis repaid $20m of bank debt during the year and reduced the bank debt to $20m at the end of the financial year. The Company’s liquid working capital position (cash and gold bullion, trade & other payables and bank debt) improved by $94.2m during the course of the year.


  • does not include the value of gold bullion on site at year-end of $8.6m

Regis Managing Director, Mr Mark Clark commented “the pre-tax profit of $125m and operating cashflow of $142m for the year reflects the very robust operations we have at the Duketon Gold Project. The recommencement of dividends with a 6 cents per share final dividend for 2015 is also a reflection of our strong cashflows and profitability. With gold production guidance for FY 2016 of 275,000–305,000 ounces at an all in sustaining cost of A$970-A$1,070 per ounce, I think we have a really strong base to grow the business in the coming years”.

Yours sincerely Regis Resources Limited

==> picture [90 x 54] intentionally omitted <==

Mark Clark Managing Director

==> picture [434 x 114] intentionally omitted <==

ABN 28 009 174 761

and its Controlled Entities

Financial Report for the Year Ended

30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

CONTENTS
Corporate Information 2
Directors’ Report 3
Remuneration Report (audited) 14
Auditor’s Independence Declaration 20
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 21
Consolidated Balance Sheet 22
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 23
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 24
Notes to the Financial Statements 25
Directors’ Declaration 57
Independent Auditor’s Report 58

1

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

CORPORATE INFORMATION

ABN

28 009 174 761

Directors

Nick Giorgetta (Independent Non-Executive Chairman) Mark Clark (Managing Director) Glyn Evans (Independent Non-Executive Director) Frank Fergusson (Independent Non-Executive Director) Ross Kestel (Independent Non-Executive Director) Mark Okeby (Independent Non-Executive Director)

Company Secretary

Kim Massey

Registered Office & Principal Place of Business Level 1 1 Alvan Street SUBIACO WA 6008

Share Register

Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited GPO Box D182 PERTH WA 6840

Regis Resources Limited shares are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). Code: RRL.

Bankers

Macquarie Bank Limited Level 4, Bishops See 235 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000

Auditors

KPMG 235 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000

2

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

DIRECTORS’ REPORT

Your directors submit their report for the year ended 30 June 2015.

Directors

The directors of the Company in office since 1 July 2014 and up to the date of this report are:

Mr Nick Giorgetta

(Independent Non-Executive Chairman)

Mr Giorgetta joined the board of Regis Resources Limited in May 2009 as Non-Executive Chairman. Prior to this Mr Giorgetta was a founding director of Equigold NL. He is a metallurgist with over 40 years of experience in the mining industry. He began his professional career in various technical roles for a major mining company in Kalgoorlie. He later established his own metallurgical consultancy which designed and commissioned a number of gold treatment plants. From 1988 to 1994 he was Managing Director of Samantha Gold NL.

He retired as Managing Director of Equigold in November 2005 and assumed the role of Chairman. He held this position until Equigold’s merger with Lihir Gold Limited in June 2008.

During the past three years, Mr Giorgetta has not served as a director of any other ASX listed companies.

Mr Giorgetta is a fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

Mr Mark Clark, B.Bus CA

(Managing Director)

Mr Clark has over 25 years of experience in corporate advisory and public company management. Prior to joining Regis Resources Limited, Mr Clark was the Managing Director of Equigold NL.

He joined Equigold in 1995 and originally held the roles of Chief Financial Officer and was responsible for the financial, administration and legal functions of the company. He was closely involved in the development and operation of Equigold’s projects in both Australia and Ivory Coast. He was a director of Equigold from April 2003 and was Managing Director from December 2005 until Equigold’s merger with Lihir Gold Limited in June 2008. Prior to working at Equigold Mr Clark held a senior position at an international advisory firm, providing financial and corporate advice to clients in the mining industry.

During the past three years, Mr Clark has not served as a director of any other ASX listed companies.

Mr Clark is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.

Mr Glyn Evans, BAppSc, FAusIMM

(Independent Non-Executive Director)

Mr Evans is a geologist with over 30 years’ experience in base metal and gold mining operations.

He was an executive director with ASX listed gold mining companies between 1991 and 2007. Mr Evans has a strong mine geology background, having held senior mine management positions early in his career and then ultimately managed the gold resources and reserves of both Samantha Gold NL (1987-1994) and Equigold NL (1995-2007). He also led extensive exploration programmes over his long career which culminated in significant gold discoveries including the well-known Higginsville and Chalice Mines in Western Australia and the Bonikro mine in the Ivory Coast.

During the past three years, Mr Evans has not served as a director of any other ASX listed companies.

Mr Evans is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

3

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Mr Frank Fergusson

(Independent Non-Executive Director)

Mr Fergusson is an experienced gold mining industry director and has a long track record of successful operational management.

His career in the gold mining industry spans over 30 years, starting at Great Victoria Gold Mine in 1983 where he was later the project’s General Manager. He was Operations Manager at Samantha Gold NL from 1988 to 1994 and was an Executive Director from 1992 to 1994.

Mr Fergusson was a founding shareholder and executive director of Equigold NL from 1994 until his retirement from the role in 2006. In this executive role, Mr Fergusson was Group Operations Manager overseeing Equigold’s three gold mining operations in Western Australia and Queensland.

After his retirement from Equigold in 2006, Mr Fergusson took a short term executive role at OM Holdings Limited where he undertook an independent technical review of the Company’s manganese mining operations and implemented operational changes that significantly improved operational productivity and led to improved production and operating costs.

During the past three years, Mr Fergusson has not served as a director of any other ASX listed companies.

Mr Ross Kestel, B.Bus, CA, AICD

(Independent Non-Executive Director)

Mr Kestel is a Chartered Accountant and was a director of a mid-tier accounting practice for over 26 years and has a strong corporate and finance background.

He has acted as a director and company secretary of a number of public companies involved in mineral exploration, mining, mine services, property development, manufacturing and technology industries.

Mr Kestel is currently a non-executive director of Beadell Resources Limited.

During the past three years he has also served as a non-executive director of the following ASX listed companies:

  • Xstate Resources Limited (September 2006 to September 2013);

  • Resource Star Limited (August 2006 to November 2012);

  • Equator Resources Limited (June 2011 to December 2012);

Mr Kestel is a member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.

Mr Mark Okeby, LLM

(Independent Non-Executive Director)

Mr Okeby has considerable experience in the resources industry as a solicitor and as a director of listed companies.

He has been an executive and non-executive director of a number of gold producers and other resource companies and has been involved in the development of a number of resource projects and with mergers and acquisitions in the resource sector.

Mr Okeby is currently a non-executive director of Red Hill Iron Limited and, during the past three years, has not served as a director of any other ASX listed companies.

Company Secretary

Mr Kim Massey, B.Com, CA

Mr Massey is a Chartered Accountant with significant experience in financial management and corporate advisory services, particularly in the resources sector, as a corporate advisor and company secretary for a number of ASX and AIM listed companies.

4

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Dividends

After the balance sheet date the following dividends were proposed by the directors:

Cents Total
per share amount
Final dividends recommended:
Ordinary shares
6.00 $’000
29,987

The financial effect of these dividends has not been brought to account in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2015 and will be recognised in subsequent financial reports.

Nature of Operations and Principal Activities

The principal activities of Regis Resources Limited (“Regis” or the “Company”) and its controlled entities (collectively, the “Group”) during the year were:

  • production of gold from the Moolart Well, Garden Well and Rosemont gold mines;

  • exploration, evaluation and development of gold projects in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia; and

  • exploration and evaluation of the McPhillamys Gold Project in New South Wales.

Apart from the above, or as noted elsewhere in this report, no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company occurred during the financial year.

Objectives

The Group’s objectives are to:

  • Achieve operational predictability by optimising mining and processing facilities across the Duketon Gold Project whilst maintaining a high standard of safety;

  • Maximise cash flow by driving the cost base lower from steady state operations and pushing for last capacity opportunities;

  • Organically increase the Reserve base of the Group by bringing satellite resource positions in to the mine plan and infill drill the significant oxide resources at Moolart Well.

  • Focus on regional exploration to add incremental ounces to the three operating mills in the district;

  • Reduce debt in a sensible timeframe;

  • Reactivate the Company’s dividend policy when appropriate; and

  • Actively pursue growth opportunities.

Operating and Financial Review

Overview of the Group

Regis is a leading Australian gold producer, with its head office in Perth, Western Australia. The Company operates three wholly-owned mines at the Duketon Gold Project in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia. The Moolart Well Gold Mine commenced operations in July 2010, the Garden Well Gold Mine commenced in August 2012 and the Rosemont Gold Mine commenced operations in October 2013.

The Group also owns the McPhillamys Gold Project, an advanced exploration project in New South Wales, 250 kilometres west of Sydney near the town of Bathurst.

5

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Financial Summary
2015 2014 Change Change
Keyfinancial data $’000 $’000 $’000 %
Financial results
Sales revenue
Cost of sales (excluding D&A)(i)
Other income
Corporate, admin and other costs
EBITDA(i)and impairment
Depreciation and amortisation (D&A)
Profit before tax and impairment(i)
Asset impairment
Reported profit/(loss) after tax
Other financial information
Cash flow from operating activities
Net cash/(debt)
Net assets
Basic earnings/(loss) per share (cents per share)
464,854
(276,223)
2,452
(9,725)
181,358
(53,388)
125,071
(47)
86,920
141,955
29,574
409,973
17.39
371,232
(224,958)
3,514
(8,947)
141,542
(59,358)
79,488
(289,572)
(147,830)
124,163
(33,385)
321,060
(29.68)
93,622
(51,265)
(1,062)
(778)
39,816
5,970
45,583
289,525
234,750
17,792
62,959
88,913
47.07
25.2%
22.8%
(30.2%)
8.7%
28.1%
(10.1%)
57.3%
(100.0%)
158.8%
14.3%
188.6%
27.7%
158.6%

(i) EBITDA is an adjusted measure of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation. Cost of sales (excluding D&A), EBITDA and Profit before tax and impairment are non-IFRS financial information and are not subject to audit. These measures are included to assist investors to better understand the performance of the business

Performance relative to the previous financial year

Regis made an after tax profit of $86.9 million for the full year to 30 June 2015 compared to an after tax loss of $147.8 million for the previous corresponding year. The result for the previous year reflected an impairment of $289.6 million pre-tax against the non-current assets of the Company. The impairment predominately related to the write-down of the carrying value of the Garden Well and Rosemont gold mines in Western Australia and the McPhillamys Gold Project in New South Wales.

Sales

Sales revenue for the year ended 30 June 2015 increased by $93.6 million (25%) compared to the previous corresponding period. The increase in gold revenue reflects a higher gold price achieved and record gold production from the Company’s Duketon operations. Total gold production for the year was higher than the prior period at 310,204 ounces (2014: 270,759 ounces) due to the first full year of operations at the Rosemont Gold Mine. The prior year was also affected by the flooding event in February 2014 at the Garden Well and Rosemont open pits. The average price of gold sold was $1,488 per ounce, up slightly on the previous year’s average sale price of $1,460 per ounce.

Cost of sales

Cost of sales including royalties and before depreciation and amortisation increased by 23% to $276 million during the year as a result of increased throughput and production associated with the first full year of operations at Rosemont. In addition, prior year costs were affected by remediation work from the flooding event in February 2014 at the Garden Well and Rosemont open pits. On a unit cost basis, total cash costs at Garden Well were $1,132 per ounce up from $1,061 per ounce in the previous year due predominately to lower grade ore being processed in the current year. The head grade of the ore processed up to 30 June 2015 was 0.90g/t compared to 1.04g/t in the previous year. Moolart Well total cash costs were 7% higher than the previous year at $686 per ounce as a result of a lower grade ore processed during the year. The head grade of the ore processed up to 30 June 2015 was 1.14g/t compared to 1.26g/t in 2014. Total cash costs for the first full year of operations at the Rosemont Gold mine were $836 per ounce.

Impairment of assets

Following a review of the carrying value of the non-current assets of the Group, a pre-tax impairment charge of $289.6 million was recognised for the year ended 30 June 2014. The impairment charge related to the Garden Well and Rosemont operations and exploration projects including McPhillamys. It was the result of a combination of factors including the major flooding event at Duketon in February 2014, operating challenges at the two mines and a fall in the gold price. An impairment loss of $47,000 has been recognised in the current financial year in relation to tenements that were surrendered, relinquished or expired during the 12 months to 30 June 2015.

Depreciation and amortisation

Depreciation and amortisation charges decreased by $5.97 million from the previous year due to the impairment of the carrying value of the non-current assets at Garden Well and Rosemont in the 2014 financial year.

6

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Cash flow from operating activities

Cash inflow from operating activities was $142.0 million, up 14% from $124.2 million in the previous year due to higher production and a higher average gold price achieved. In addition $32.0 million of income taxes were paid in the 2014 financial year in relation to the fully franked dividend paid in October 2013. No income tax was paid in the current financial year.

Cash outflows from investing activities were $76.8 million to 30 June 2015 down 48% from the previous year. There were no major construction projects in the current year and accordingly payments for mine properties under construction reduced in 2015 to $1.8 million compared with $78.0 million in the previous year. Payments for mine properties rose $10.4 million in the current year to $43.9 million as pre-strip material and deferred waste continued to be mined at the Rosemont and Garden Well operations. The Company spent $10.3 million during the year on exploration expenditure and a further $19.3 million on property plant and equipment.

Cash outflows from financing activities were $20 million for the year, which represented the partial repayment of the Macquarie Bank financing facility. The outstanding balance is $20 million and is due for repayment in June 2017.

Gold Forward Contracts

At the end of the financial year the Company had a total hedging position of 281,031 ounces, being 145,834 ounces of flat forward contracts with a delivery price of A$1,437 per ounce and 135,197 ounces of spot deferred contracts with a price of A$1,437 per ounce.

Review of operations

A review of each operation is provided below. Where presented, cash cost per ounce is calculated as costs of production relating to gold sales (note 3), excluding gold in circuit inventory movements divided by gold ounces produced. The calculation is presented both including and excluding the cost of royalties (note 3). All in Sustaining Cost (“AISC”) per ounce is an extension of existing cash cost metrics and incorporates costs relating to sustaining production, such as capitalised pre-strip and production stripping expenditure. These measures are included to assist investors to better understand the performance of the business. Cash cost and AISC per ounce are non-IFRS measures, and where included in this report, have not been subject to review by the Group’s external auditors.

Operations – Moolart Well

Operating results for the 12 months to 30 June 2015 were as follows:

30 June 2015 30 June 2014
Ore mined
Ore milled
Head grade
Recovery
Gold production
Cash cost per ounce – pre royalties
Cash cost per ounce – incl. royalties
Tonnes
Tonnes
g/t
%
Ounces
A$/oz
A$/oz
2,910,547
2,912,706
1.14
92
98,742
$622
$686
2,798,713
2,781,872
1.26
93
104,880
$576
$640

Moolart Well achieved production guidance for the year of 98,742 ounces at a pre royalty cash cost of $622 per ounce. Total production at Moolart Well declined by 6% for the 2015 financial year as a result of an overall decline in the processed head grade at the operation. As was expected the average head grade declined by 9% from the previous year as the project trends towards the life of mine reserve grade of 0.92g/t. The lower head grade was partially off-set by a higher throughput rate for the year of 2.9 million tonnes per annum.

Mining commenced in the Lancaster North oxide pit during the year, however the bulk of production for the year came from the Stirling oxide pit and the laterite deposit. At the end of the financial year approximately 1.4 million tonnes of laterite ore had been exposed in the open pits ready for mining. Mining is scheduled to commence in the Wellington oxide pit in 2016 supplementing the production from the Lancaster North, Stirling and Laterites pits.

7

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Operations – Garden Well

Operating results at the Garden Well Gold Mine for the 12 months to June 2015 were as follows:

30 June 2015 30 June 2014
Ore mined
Ore milled
Head grade
Recovery
Gold production
Cash cost per ounce – pre royalties
Cash cost per ounce – incl. royalties
Tonnes
Tonnes
g/t
%
Ounces
A$/oz
A$/oz
5,781,377
4,581,711
0.90
81
107,719
$1,064
$1,132
5,879,412
4,715,183
1.04
87
137,484
$999
$1,061

Operations at Garden Well for the 2015 financial year produced 107,719 ounces of gold at a pre royalty cash cost of $1,064 per ounce. Gold production in 2015 was 22% lower than the previous year as a result of lower head grade and lower milling recoveries. Milled grade was impacted by lower than forecast ore tonnes generated by mining limiting the ability to selectively process higher grade ore mined and consequently stockpile lower grade ore.

Recovery rates were impacted particularly in the first six months of the year with the treatment of a relatively small area of transitional ore containing higher than normal base metals and highly reactive sulphides. Metallurgical testing confirmed that the poorer recovery ore is contained in a discrete area in the southern end of the pit. Since identifying this problematic ore and the effect it has on recovery rates the Company has attempted to isolate the ore from treatment.

Operations – Rosemont

Operating results at the Rosemont Gold Mine for the 12 months to June 2015 were as follows:

30 June 2015 30 June 2014
(9 months)
Ore mined
Ore milled
Head grade
Recovery
Gold production
Cash cost per ounce – pre royalties
Cash cost per ounce – incl. royalties
Tonnes
Tonnes
g/t
%
Ounces
A$/oz
A$/oz
2,379,513
2,348,333
1.49
92
103,743
$772
$836
826,568
1,088,722
0.98
87
29,695
n/a
n/a

Rosemont completed its first full year of operations producing 103,743 ounces of gold at a pre royalty cash cost of $772 per ounce. The strong performance at Rosemont was driven by a 52% increase in the processed head grade compared to the previous year due to a strong performance in the grade of the actual ore mined compared to the reserve grade. Improvements to the milling circuit during the year increased the recovery and throughput rates at the operation.

8

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Production Guidance

Regis expects gold production for the 2016 financial year to be within the range of 275,000 – 305,000 ounces at an AISC (all in sustaining cost) of $970 - $1,070 per ounce. The mid-point of this (+/- 5%) guidance range is summarised as follows:

Moolart Well Rosemont Garden Well Total
Ore mined
Waste mined
Stripping ratio
Ore mined
Ore milled
Head grade
Recovery
Gold production
Cash cost – pre royalties
Cash cost – incl. royalty
All in Sustaining Cost
Million BCM
Million BCM
Waste:Ore
Million Tonnes
Million Tonnes
g/t
%
Ounces (‘000s)
A$/oz
A$/oz
A$/oz
1.5
4.4
3.1
2.8
2.9
0.89
91
75
820
880
950
1.0
9.3
9.7
2.2
2.3
1.23
93
85
840
910
1,070
2.2
5.9
2.5
5.6
5.0
0.91
88
130
900
970
1,040
4.7
19.6
4.2
10.6
10.1
0.98
91
290
860
930
1,020

Note: errors in summation may occur in this table due to rounding

At the mid-point of guidance and the current gold price (≈A$1,500/oz) the Duketon operations are expected to generate an operating cashflow (derived using AISC as operating cost) of around A$140 million in FY2016. Additional expansion capital expenditures are expected to be in the order of A$15-20 million.

Gold Exploration

Duketon Gold Project (WA)

Regis controls a significant tenement package, encompassing 251 granted exploration, prospecting and mining licences covering 1,502 square kilometres and 37 general purpose and miscellaneous licences covering 1,185 square kilometres at the Duketon Gold Project.

Significant exploration activities took place across the following project areas at Duketon during the year:

Baneygo

The Baneygo gold Resource is located 12 kilometres south of the Rosemont gold mine and is hosted in a quartz dolerite unit believed to be the same unit hosting gold at Rosemont. The JORC 2004 gold Resource at Baneygo of 43,000oz occurs in 4 small deposits namely Baneygo (8,000oz), Baneygo Beacon (14,000oz), Baneygo South (15,000oz) and Sydney Mint (6,000oz) over a strike distance of 3km. The entirety of the Baneygo Project is located on a granted Mining Lease.

Historical drilling at Baneygo is generally only to 50 metres and in some places to 100m vertical depth. Very little drilling has been completed between the four small deposits with up to 250m between drill traverses.

An RC drilling programme commenced in the June 2015 quarter to validate historical drilling at the four deposits and to define and expand the historical Resource by drilling to approximately 100m depth and testing for gold mineralisation between the four small deposits. Initial RC drilling focused on testing the quartz dolerite host on 20m spaced holes on 80m spaced east west traverses over a 3km strike distance.

Highly encouraging gold results were received from holes on the initial 80m spaced drilling traverses and follow-up drilling has commenced to reduce the drill spacing to 20m on 40m spaced east west traverses.

Tooheys Well

The Tooheys Well gold prospect is located 2.5km south of the Garden Well gold mine. Gold mineralisation was previously defined in a NorthSouth trending western shear zone hosted in chert and fine grained sediments.

A programme of RC drilling commenced in the June 2015 quarter to follow-up anomalous gold mineralisation in the western shear zone. The recent drilling has defined a parallel eastern shear zone located approximately 100m east which is also hosted in chert and fine grained sediments.

The eastern shear zone appears to have higher grades than the western shear zone and is untested for 750m to the south. Both shear zones dip about 45° to the east and weathering extends to 80 to 100m vertical depth in the eastern shear zone.

9

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Drilling will commence in the September 2015 quarter to determine the continuity of gold mineralisation in the eastern shear zone 750m to the south, initially on 80m spaced East-West sections in the oxide zone and to target gold mineralisation in the fresh rock zone.

Coopers Gold Prospect

The Coopers gold prospect is located 11km south of Moolart Well and 600m north of Dogbolter, and is located on the same shear zone hosting those two deposits. An earlier programme of Aircore drilling by Regis on 40m and 80m spaced E-W traverses defined gold mineralisation in the oxide zone over a strike distance of 400m. The gold mineralised zone is weakly mineralised to the north and still requires further drilling. A small programme of RC drilling was completed to infill two 80m spaced drill traverses to 40m.

These results will provide enough data to complete a preliminary Resource estimation and review of the Coopers Prospect in the September 2015 quarter. Further drilling will be required to define the northern extent of gold mineralisation.

Moolart Well

The Moolart Well deposit has significant Inferred oxide resources north of the Stirling and Lancaster open pits. Drilling at Moolart Well during the period focussed on RC resource infill drilling on the Wellington Oxide Resource to reduce the drill hole spacing from 50 by 50 metre to 25 by 25 metre pattern spacing across the inferred resource. This drilling is part of Regis’ ongoing mining inventory replacement strategy and formed the basis of the Wellington oxide deposit that was added into Moolart Well’s reserve inventory in the July 2015 Reserve update.

Erlistoun

Gold mineralisation at Erlistoun is hosted in narrow quartz veins which dip shallowly to the west at ~40 . Zones of supergene mineralisation occur in discrete pods where the gold mineralisation structure comes into contact with the weathering horizons. RC infill resource drilling commenced during the year to reduce the drill spacing to 40 by 20 metre and 20 by 20 metre and to better define the discrete zones of high grade gold mineralisation.

Results received from this programme of drilling were used to refine mineralised boundaries and define high grade pods between old holes drilled previously on a 40 by 40 metre grid. Based on this drilling the Erlistoun reserve was updated in the July 2015 Reserve Update.

Rosemont

During the year an RC drill programme was completed at Rosemont to test a mineralised western quartz dolerite unit located 30 metres west of the main lode, in and around the southern extremities of the current Rosemont Main open pit design. This additional drilling combined with a re-optimisation and subsequent pit redesign at Rosemont resulted in an increase to the Rosemont reserve in the July 2015 Reserve Update.

Dogbolter

The Dogbolter deposit is located 12 kilometres south of the Moolart Well processing facility and has gold mineralisation dipping shallowly to the east at 30-40[o] and is associated with a diorite intrusion close to an ultramafic contact. Small high grade pods are associated with the intersection of mineralised structures and weathering horizons.

A programme of RC drilling commenced during the year to target the high grade gold mineralisation in the shallow oxide zone. This programme of drilling is part of the Company’s strategy to develop the numerous satellite deposits across the Duketon tenement package to provide incremental feed to the three operating mills in the district. Results received from this programme of drilling formed the basis of a maiden reserve estimation at Dogbolter in the July 2015 Reserve Update.

Gloster Gold Deposit

In June 2015 Regis completed a transaction to acquire six prospecting licences for $1.5 million and a gross royalty of A$10 per ounce to be paid on any gold production from these licences (indexed to the gold price where the gold price exceeds A$1,500 per ounce). The licences are strategically located 26 kilometres from Regis’ Moolart Well processing plant and contain a historic Resource estimate of 8,279,000 tonnes at 1.37g/t for 365,000 ounces.

The Resource estimate was completed in 1997 in compliance with the 1996 JORC Code and Guidelines. The area (historically referred to as the Famous Blue Project) has previously been well drilled by several companies and historic mining took place on these tenements with approximately 6,000 ounces produced from 1902 to 1910.

Regis believes there is very good potential for mining of the Gloster project to profitably extend the operational life at Moolart Well through the trucking of mined ore to that plant for treatment. Regis’ plan in the short term is to complete a drilling campaign to update the historic Resource and then in due course to use this data as the basis of a mining study.

10

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

McPhillamys Gold Project (NSW)

The McPhillamys Gold Project is located approximately 35 kilometres south east of the town of Orange and 30 kilometres west of the town of Bathurst in the Central West region of New South Wales, Australia. The project is approximately 250 kilometres west of Sydney.

The project area consists of four granted exploration permits covering 477 square kilometres in two discrete locations approximately 25 kilometres apart.

The Company completed the acquisition of the McPhillamys Gold Project from Newmont Exploration Pty Ltd and Alkane Resources Limited in November 2012. Whilst the Company announced in July 2014 that it would not proceed imminently to DFS on the project, early stage feasibility work continued during the year, particularly focussed on the key infrastructure requirements for development of the project. Limited exploration activity was conducted on the project during the year.

Significant Changes in the State of Affairs

There have been no significant changes in the state of affairs other than those listed in the review of operations above.

Significant Events after the Balance Date

Duketon Gold Exploration Joint Venture

On 14 July 2015, the Group announced an agreement to enter into an exploration joint venture with Duketon Mining Limited (“DKM”) on four of DKM’s exploration licences which are contiguous with some of Regis’ Duketon tenure in proximity to the Moolart Well project. The proposed joint venture will require Regis to make an up-front payment to DKM of $100,000 and spend a minimum of $1 million on exploring for gold on the tenure over a two year period to earn a 75% interest in any mining project that is confirmed by a Regis decision to mine. All non-gold mineral rights remain with DKM.

Dividends

On 15 September 2015, the directors proposed a final dividend on ordinary shares in respect of the 2015 financial year. Refer to note 6.

Other than the matter discussed above, there has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of this Report any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature which, in the opinion of the directors of the Group, has significantly affected or is likely to significantly affect:

  • the operations of the Group;

  • the results of those operations; or

  • the state of affairs of the Group

in future financial years.

Likely Developments and Expected Results

There are no likely developments of which the directors are aware which could be expected to significantly affect the results of the Group’s operations in subsequent financial years not otherwise disclosed in the Principal Activities and Operating and Financial Review or the Significant Events after the Balance Date sections of the Directors’ Report.

Environmental Regulation and Performance

The operations of the Group are subject to environmental regulation under the laws of the Commonwealth and the States of Western Australia and New South Wales. The Group holds various environmental licenses issued under these laws, to regulate its mining and exploration activities in Australia. These licenses include conditions and regulations in relation to specifying limits on discharges into the air, surface water and groundwater, rehabilitation of areas disturbed during the course of mining and exploration activities and the storage of hazardous substances.

All environmental performance obligations are monitored by the board of directors and subjected from time to time to Government agency audits and site inspections. There have been no material breaches of the Group’s licenses and all mining and exploration activities have been undertaken in compliance with the relevant environmental regulations.

11

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Share Options

Unissued Shares

At the date of this report, the Company had the following unissued shares under listed and unlisted options.

Number
outstanding
MaturityDate Exercise Price
Unlisted options
8 November 2015
30 June 2016
31 July 2017
12 September 2017
31 March 2018
10 October 2018
11 August 2019
$2.75
$4.00
$3.50
$1.55
$2.40
$1.55
$1.40
575,000
855,000
1,625,000
1,500,000
550,000
50,000
8,500,000
Total 13,655,000

Option holders do not have any right, by virtue of the option, to participate in any share issue of the Company or any related body corporate.

Details of options granted to directors and other key management personnel during the year are set out in the remuneration report.

Shares Issued as a Result of the Exercise of Options

During the financial year, employees exercised unlisted options to acquire 37,500 fully paid ordinary shares in Regis Resources Limited at an exercise price of $1.00 per share.

Indemnification and Insurance of Directors and Officers

The Company has entered into an Indemnity Deed with each of the directors which will indemnify them against liabilities incurred to a third party (not being the Company or any related company) where the liability does not arise out of negligent conduct including a breach of good faith. The Indemnity Deed will continue to apply for a period of 10 years after a director ceases to hold office. The Company has entered into a Director’s Access and Insurance Deed with each of the directors pursuant to which a director can request access to copies of documents provided to the director whilst serving the Company for a period of 10 years after the director ceases to hold office. There are certain restrictions on the directors’ entitlement to access under the deed. In addition the Company will be obliged to use reasonable endeavours to obtain and maintain insurance for a former director similar to that which existed at the time the director ceased to hold office.

The Company has, during or since the end of the financial year, paid an insurance premium in respect of an insurance policy for the benefit of the directors, secretaries, executive officers and employees of the Company and any related bodies corporate as defined in the insurance policy. The insurance grants indemnity against liabilities permitted to be indemnified by the Company under Section 199B of the Corporations Act 2001. In accordance with commercial practice, the insurance policy prohibits disclosure of the terms of the policy including the nature of the liability insured against and the amount of the premium.

Directors’ Meetings

The number of directors’ meetings held (including meetings of Committees of the Board) and number of meetings attended by each of the directors of the Company during the financial year are:

Audit and Risk Management Remuneration and
Nomination Committee
Directors’ Meetings Committee
Number of meetings held:
Number of meetings attended:
N Giorgetta
M Clark
G Evans
F Fergusson
R Kestel
M Okeby
10
10
10
8
9
9
8
3
3
n/a
n/a
n/a
3
2
1
1
n/a
n/a
1
1
1

All directors were eligible to attend all meetings held.

12

Directors’ Report (continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Committee Membership

As at the date of this report, the Company had an Audit and Risk Management Committee and a Remuneration and Nomination Committee of the board of directors.

Members acting on the committees of the board during the year were:

Audit and Risk Management Remuneration and Nomination
Committee Committee
R Kestel (Chairman)
N Giorgetta
M Okeby
R Kestel (Chairman)
N Giorgetta
M Okeby
F Fergusson

Directors’ Interests in the Shares and Options of the Company

As at the date of this report, the interests of the directors in the options of the Company were unchanged from the holdings as at 30 June 2015 as disclosed in the Remuneration Report. The directors’ interests in the shares of the Company at the date of this report are set out in the table below.

Number of ordinary
shares
N Giorgetta
M Clark
G Evans
F Fergusson
R Kestel
M Okeby
19,529,671
9,460,000
4,235,815
5,003,957
75,000
1,200,000

Auditor Independence and Non-Audit Services

During the year KPMG, the Group auditor, did not perform any non-audit services in addition to the audit and review of the financial statements.

A copy of the auditor’s independence declaration as required under Section 307C of the Corporations Act is attached to the Directors’ Report.

Rounding off

The Company is of a kind referred to in ASIC Class Order 98/100 dated 10 July 1998 and in accordance with that Class Order, amounts in the Financial Statements and Directors’ Report have been rounded to the nearest thousand dollars, unless otherwise stated.

13

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED)

This remuneration report for the year ended 30 June 2015 outlines the remuneration arrangements of the Company and the Group in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) and its regulations. This information has been audited as required by section 308(3C) of the Act.

The remuneration report details the remuneration arrangements for key management personnel (KMP) who are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the Company and the Group, directly or indirectly, including any director (whether executive or otherwise) of the parent company.

For the purposes of this report, the term “executive” includes the Managing Director, senior executives and company secretaries of the Parent and the Group.

Key Management Personnel

Details of KMPs of the Company and Group are set out below:

Directors
N Giorgetta Chairman (non-executive)
M Clark Managing Director
G Evans Director (non-executive)
F Fergusson Director (non-executive)
R Kestel Director (non-executive)
M Okeby Director (non-executive)
Other KMP
J Balkau General Manager – Exploration
M Evans Chief Development Officer
K Massey Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary
P Thomas Chief Operating Officer

Principles of Remuneration

The Remuneration and Nomination Committee is charged with setting remuneration for the directors and the Managing Director determines the remuneration for the other KMPs.

Remuneration levels for KMP are competitively set to attract and retain appropriately qualified and experienced directors and executives. Decisions on the appropriateness of remuneration packages are based on the competitive state of the employment market for different specific skill sets, independently sourced market surveys related to the resources sector, trends in comparative companies and the objectives of the Group’s remuneration strategy.

The remuneration structures take into account:

  • the capability and experience of the KMP;

  • the ability of the KMP to influence the Group’s performance; and

  • the Group’s performance regarding operation success as reflected by growth in share price.

Remuneration packages include a mix of cash and longer-term performance based incentives. The Managing Director holds a significant personal shareholding in the Company, which aligns his goals and objectives with those of the Company. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee takes this into account when deciding whether further share-based incentives are to be offered to the Managing Director.

14

Remuneration Report (Audited) (Continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

The Group’s financial performance over the past five years has been as follows:

2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Revenue
Net profit/(loss) after tax
Basic earnings/(loss) per share (cents)
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share (cents)
Net assets
$’000
465,320
86,920
17.39
17.39
409,973
$’000
371,933
(147,830)
(29.68)
(29.68)
321,060
$’000
416,834
146,506
30.65
30.27
538,096
$’000
171,504
68,239
15.51
15.18
235,626
$’000
108,651
36,281
8.54
8.24
140,278

Historical and current earnings are one of a number of criteria used by the Remuneration and Nomination Committee to assess the performance of directors and executives. Other criteria used in this assessment include gold production and operating costs, safety performance, execution of development projects, exploration success, growth of business through acquisitions and effectiveness of communications with regulators, shareholders, investors and other stakeholders.

Fixed Remuneration

Fixed remuneration consists of base remuneration (including any fringe benefit tax charges related to employee benefits), as well as employer contributions to superannuation funds. The Group allows KMP to salary sacrifice superannuation for additional benefits (on a total cost basis).

Remuneration levels are reviewed annually by the Remuneration and Nomination Committee through a process that considers individual and overall performance of the Group. In addition, external consultants may provide analysis and advice to ensure the key management personnel’s remuneration is competitive in the market place, as required. No external consultants were utilised during the current financial year.

Performance-Linked Remuneration

Performance linked remuneration includes both long-term and short term incentives and is designed to reward key management personnel for meeting or exceeding their objectives.

Short-term incentives

Each year the Managing Director reviews the performance of the KMPs and makes recommendations to the Remuneration and Nomination Committee in relation to the awarding of any short-term incentives.

In addition, the Remuneration and Nomination Committee assess the actual performance of the Group, the separate departments and the individuals’ personal performance. A cash bonus may be recommended at the discretion of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee where Group and department objectives have been met or exceeded.

The Remuneration and Nomination Committee recommends the cash incentive to be paid to the Managing Director for approval by the Board. No such bonuses have been recommended this year.

Long-term incentives

Options are issued under the Regis Resources Limited 2008 Share Option Plan (the “Plan”). The objective of the Plan is to link the achievement of the Group’s operational targets with the remuneration received by the key management personnel charged with meeting those targets. The total potential long-term incentive available is set at a level so as to provide sufficient incentive to the KMP to achieve the operational targets such that the cost to the Group is reasonable in the circumstances.

The Plan provides for key management personnel and employees to receive a set amount of options over ordinary shares for no consideration. The ability to exercise the options is conditional upon the employee remaining with the Group throughout the vesting period. There are no other performance criteria that must be met.

15

Remuneration Report (Audited) (Continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Service Contracts

The Group has entered into service contracts with each KMP. The service contract outlines the components of remuneration paid to each key management person but does not prescribe how remuneration levels are modified year to year. Remuneration levels are reviewed each year to take into account cost-of-living changes, any change in the scope of the role performed by the key management person and any changes required to meet the principles of the remuneration policy. No service contract specifies a term of employment or entitlement to performance based incentives, except as detailed below for the Managing Director.

  • Mr Mark Clark, the Company’s Managing Director, is employed under a fixed term contract, with the following significant terms:

  • An initial term of 3 years from 4 May 2009, which has undergone a further three year extension from 4 May 2015;

  • Fixed remuneration of $550,000 per annum (2014: $550,000) subject to annual review; and

  • Opportunity to earn a performance based bonus determined by the Board.

During and since the end of the financial year, the Board completed its annual review of the Managing Director’s remuneration and decided to increase the fixed remuneration component to $650,000 per annum effective from 1 July 2015.

The Managing Director’s termination provisions are as follows:

Entitlement to Options on
Notice Period Payment in Lieu of Notice Termination
Employer initiated termination:
- without reason
- with reason
- serious misconduct
3 months plus 9 months’ salary
Not less than 3 months
0 – 1 month
12 months
Not less than 3 months
0 – 1 month
1 month to exercise, extendable at
Board discretion
Employee initiated termination 3 months Not specified As above
Change of control 1 month plus 12 months’ salary Not specified As above
Mr Paul Thomas,the Company’s Chief OperatingOfficer,is employed under a contract with the following terminationprovisions:
Entitlement to Options on
Notice Period Payment in Lieu of Notice Termination
Employer initiated termination:
- with or without reason
- serious misconduct
3 months
0 – 1 month
Up to 3 months
0 – 1 month
1 month to exercise, extendable at
Board discretion
Employee initiated termination 3 months Not specified As above
Change of control 1 month plus 12 months’ salary Not specified As above

Mr Kim Massey, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary is entitled to 1 months’ notice plus 12 months’ salary in the event of a change of control.

Non-Executive Directors

Total remuneration for all non-executive directors, last voted upon by shareholders at the 2011 AGM, is not to exceed $500,000 per annum. At the date of this report, total non-executive directors’ base fees are $414,000 per annum. Non-executive directors’ fees cover all main board activities and membership of board committees. Non-executive directors do not receive performance-related compensation and are not provided with any retirement benefits, apart from statutory superannuation. From time to time, non-executive directors may provide consulting services to the Company and in these cases they are paid consulting fees in line with industry rates.

Subsequent to the end of the financial year, the Board completed its review of the non-executive directors’ base fees and decided to make no changes.

16

Remuneration Report (Audited) (Continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Key Management Personnel Remuneration

Table 1: Remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2015

Post Share-based
Short Term Employment Payment
Non-Monetary Superannua- Termination Performance
2015 Salary& Fees
Benefits*
tion Options Payments Total Related
Directors
M Clark
G Evans
F Fergusson
N Giorgetta
R Kestel
M Okeby
Other KMP
J Balkau
M Evans
K Massey
P Thomas
$ 550,000
73,000
73,000
110,000
85,000
73,000
295,000
321,667
310,833
400,000
$ 5,112
-
-
-
-
-
5,112
5,112
5,112
5,112
$ 52,250
6,935
6,935
10,450
8,075
6,935
28,025
30,558
29,529
38,000
$ -
-
-
-
-
-
53,326
71,099
71,099
416,078
$ -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 607,362
79,935
79,935
120,450
93,075
79,935
381,463
428,436
416,573
859,190
%
-
-
-
-
-
-
13.98%
16.60%
17.07%
48.43%
Total 2,291,500 25,560 217,692 611,602 - 3,146,354
  • Non-monetary benefits are presented at actual cost plus any fringe benefits tax paid or payable by the Group.

Table 2: Remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2014

Post Share-based
Short Term Employment Payment
Non-Monetary Superannua- Termination Performance
2014 Salary& Fees Benefits* tion Options Payments Total Related
Directors
M Clark
M Hart(i)
G Evans(ii)
F Fergusson(iii)
N Giorgetta
R Kestel
M Okeby
Other KMP
J Balkau
M Evans
T Hinkley(iv)
K Massey
P Thomas(v)
B Wyatt(iv)
$ 550,000
356,667
18,250
51,708
110,000
85,000
73,000
295,000
305,000
225,000
290,000
100,000
225,000
$ 4,853
3,640
-
-
-
-
-
4,853
4,853
-
4,853
1,213
-
$ 50,875
32,992
1,688
4,783
10,175
7,863
6,753
27,288
28,212
20,813
26,825
9,250
20,813
$ -
-
-
-
-
-
-
36,808
49,077
36,808
51,282
-
212,503
$ -
233,910
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 605,728
627,209
19,938
56,491
120,175
92,863
79,753
363,949
387,142
282,621
372,960
110,463
458,316
%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10.11%
12.68%
13.02%
13.75%
-
46.37%
Total 2,684,625 24,265 248,330 386,478 233,910 3,577,608
  • Non-monetary benefits are presented at actual cost plus any fringe benefits tax paid or payable by the Group.

(i) Mr Hart resigned from his position as Operations Director on 25 February 2014.

(ii) Mr G Evans was appointed as Non-Executive Director on 1 April 2014.

(iii) Mr Fergusson was appointed as Non-Executive Director on 14 October 2013.

(iv) Due to a senior management restructure on 1 April 2014, Mr Hinkley and Mr Wyatt ceased to be classified as KMPs.

(v) Mr Thomas commenced with the Company on 1 April 2014 in the role of Chief Operating Officer.

17

Remuneration Report (Audited) (Continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Table 3: Compensation Options - Granted and vested during the year

2015 Granted Granted Terms & Conditions for each Grant Terms & Conditions for each Grant Terms & Conditions for each Grant Vested Vested
Fair value Exercise % Vested
during the
per option at
price per
First exercise
Last exercise
No. Grant Date grant date option Expirydate date date No. year
Other KMP
P Thomas
1,500,000 12 Sep 14 $0.8710 $1.55 12 Sep 17 12 Sep 16 12 Sep 17 - 0%
Total 1,500,000 -

Table 4: Value of options awarded, exercised and lapsed during the year

Value of options
granted during the
year
Value of options
exercised during the
year
Remuneration
consisting of share
options for theyear
Value of options
lapsed duringtheyear
2015
Other KMP
J Balkau
M Evans
K Massey
P Thomas
$ -
-
-
1,306,500
$ -
-
-
-
$ -
-
-
-
%
13.98%
16.60%
17.07%
48.43%
Total 1,306,500 - -

There were no options exercised by KMPs during the year.

No options were forfeited during the current or prior year due to performance criteria not being achieved.

There have been no alterations to the terms and conditions of options awarded as remuneration since their award date.

Table 5: Option holdings of key management personnel

The movement during the reporting period, by number of options over ordinary shares in Regis Resources Limited held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management person, including their related parties, is as follows:

Held at start of Held at end of
period period Vested at 30 June 2015
Granted as Options Net change Not
1 July2014 remuneration exercised other 30 June 2015 Total Exercisable exercisable
Other KMP
J Balkau
M Evans
K Massey
P Thomas
75,000
100,000
100,000
-
-
-
-
1,500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
75,000
100,000
100,000
1,500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total 275,000 1,500,000 - - 1,775,000 - - -

18

Remuneration Report (Audited) (Continued)

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Table 6: Shareholdings of key management personnel

The movement during the reporting period in the number of ordinary shares in Regis Resources Limited held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management person, including their related parties, is as follows:

Held at On exercise of Held at
1 July2014 options Net change other 30 June 2015
Directors
N Giorgetta
M Clark
G Evans
F Fergusson
M Okeby
Other KMP
J Balkau
M Evans
K Massey
P Thomas
21,529,671
9,460,000
3,507,815
5,003,957
1,200,000
1,525,464
863,188
161,049
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(5,000,000)
-
-
-
-
-
(161,481)
-
80,000
16,529,671
9,460,000
3,507,815
5,003,957
1,200,000
1,525,464
701,707
161,049
80,000
Total 43,251,144 - (5,081,481) 38,169,663

“Net change other” relates to on-market purchases and sales of shares.

All equity transactions with KMP other than those arising from the exercise of remuneration options have been entered into under terms and conditions no more favourable than those the Group would have adopted if dealing at arm’s length.

Loans to key management personnel and their related parties

There were no loans made to any director, key management personnel and/or their related parties during the current or prior years.

Other transactions with key management personnel

Other than the ordinary accrual of personnel expenses at balance date, there are no other amounts receivable from and payable to key management personnel and their related parties.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors.

Mr Mark Clark Managing Director

Perth, 15 September 2015

19

==> picture [75 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

Lead Auditor’s Independence Declaration under Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001

To: the directors of Regis Resources Limited

I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, in relation to the audit for the financial year ended 30 June 2015 there have been:

  • (i) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements as set out in the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and

  • (ii) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.

==> picture [68 x 32] intentionally omitted <==

KPMG

==> picture [113 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

R Gambitta Partner

Perth

15 September 2015

KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the year ended 30 June 2015

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
Note $’000 $’000
Revenue
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit
Other income
Investor and corporate costs
Personnel costs
Share-based payment expense
Occupancy costs
Other corporate administrative expenses
Impairment of non-current assets
Other expenses
Finance costs
Profit/(loss) before tax
Income tax (expense)/benefit
Profit/(loss) from continuing operations
Other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax
Total comprehensive income for the period
Profit/(loss) attributable to members of the parent
2
3
2
22
15
3
18
5
465,320
(329,611)
371,933
(284,316)
135,709
2,452
(1,129)
(4,825)
(1,959)
(524)
(550)
(47)
(738)
(3,365)
87,617
3,514
(1,271)
(3,737)
(2,519)
(513)
(733)
(289,572)
(174)
(2,696)
125,024
(38,104)
(210,084)
62,254
86,920
-
(147,830)
-
- -
86,920 (147,830)
Total comprehensive income/(loss)attributable to members of theparent 86,920 (147,830)
Basic earnings/(loss) per share attributable to ordinary equity holders of the
parent (cents per share)
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share attributable to ordinary equity holders of the
parent (cents per share)
4
4
17.39
17.39
(29.68)
(29.68)

The above statement of comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

21

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

As at 30 June 2015

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
Note $’000 $’000
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Gold bullion awaiting settlement
Receivables
Current tax assets
Inventories
Financial assets held-to-maturity
Other current assets
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Inventories
Property, plant and equipment
Exploration and evaluation assets
Mine properties under development
Mine properties
Deferred tax assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Interest-bearing liabilities
Income tax payable
Provisions
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Provisions
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
7
8
9
10
10
11
12
13
14
21
16
18
17
18
21
17
51,781
12,710
4,732
-
30,818
152
939
6,615
7,605
3,863
27,080
43,045
148
1,242
101,132 89,598
21,377
208,959
118,779
68
65,874
-
-
212,020
105,788
14,235
38,668
6,363
415,057 377,074
516,189 466,672
36,104
787
3,522
3,622
59,825
5,714
-
3,288
44,035 68,827
21,420
1,140
39,621
34,286
-
42,499
62,181 76,785
106,216 145,612
Net assets 409,973 321,060
Equity
Issued capital
Share option reserve
Accumulated losses
20 431,338
18,510
(39,875)
431,304
16,551
(126,795)
Total equity 409,973 321,060

The above balance sheet should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

22

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

For the year ended 30 June 2015

Consolidated Consolidated
Retained profits/
Issued capital Share option reserve
(accumulated losses)
Total equity
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
At 1 July 2014
Profit for the period
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income for the year
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners:
Share-based payments expense
Shares issued, net of transaction costs
431,304
-
-
16,551
-
-
(126,795)
86,920
-
321,060
86,920
-
-
-
34
-
1,959
-
86,920
-
-
86,920
1,959
34
At 30 June 2015 431,338 18,510 (39,875) 409,973
At 1 July 2013
Loss for the period
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income for the year
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners:
Share-based payments expense
Dividends paid
Shares issued, net of transaction costs
428,358
-
-
14,032
-
-
95,706
(147,830)
-
538,096
(147,830)
-
-
-
-
2,946
-
2,519
-
-
(147,830)
-
(74,671)
-
(147,830)
2,519
(74,671)
2,946
At 30 June 2014 431,304 16,551 (126,795) 321,060

The above statement of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

23

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the year ended 30 June 2015

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
Note $’000 $’000
Cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from gold sales
Payments to suppliers and employees
Option premium income
Interest received
Interest paid
Proceeds from rental income
Income tax paid
Other income
Net cash from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Payments for exploration and evaluation (net of rent refunds)
Payments for exploration assets (net of cash)
Payments for held-to-maturity investments
Proceeds on disposal of held-to-maturity investments
Payments for mine properties under development
Payments for mine properties
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of shares
Payment of transaction costs
Payment of dividends
Proceeds from borrowings
Repayment of finance lease
Repayment of borrowings
Net cash used in financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 July
7 459,750
(316,314)
75
458
(2,024)
10
-
-
385,542
(232,142)
2,949
862
(1,604)
10
(32,009)
555
141,955 124,163
(19,257)
(10,292)
(1,557)
(4)
-
(1,800)
(43,855)
(21,709)
(13,881)
(50)
(5)
10
(77,992)
(33,407)
(76,765) (147,034)
37
(3)
-
-
(58)
(20,000)
3,020
(73)
(74,671)
39,990
-
-
(20,024) (31,734)
45,166
6,615
(54,605)
61,220
Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June 7 51,781 6,615

The above statement of cash flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

24

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Basis of preparation
26
Performance for the year
28
1. Segment information .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
2. Revenue and Other Income ................................................................................................................................................................................ 29
3. Expenses ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30
4. Earnings per Share ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 32
5. Current Income Tax ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 33
6. Dividends .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33
7. Cash and Cash Equivalents .................................................................................................................................................................................. 34
Operating assets and liabilities
35
8. Gold Bullion Awaiting Settlement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 35
9. Receivables .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35
10. Inventories ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
11. Property, Plant and Equipment .......................................................................................................................................................................... 37
12. Exploration and Evaluation Assets ...................................................................................................................................................................... 38
13. Mine Properties under Development ................................................................................................................................................................. 39
14. Mine Properties ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40
15. Impairment .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
16. Trade and Other Payables ................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
17. Provisions ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42
Capital structure and finance costs
44
18. Net Debt and Finance Costs ................................................................................................................................................................................ 44
19. Financial Risk Management ................................................................................................................................................................................ 45
20. Issued Capital and Reserves ................................................................................................................................................................................ 48
Other disclosures
49
21. Deferred Income Tax ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 49
22. Share-based Payments ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 50
23. Related Parties ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52
24. Parent Entity Information ................................................................................................................................................................................... 53
25. Commitments ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 53
26. Contingencies ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 54
27. Auditor’s Remuneration ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 54
28. Subsequent Events .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 55
29. New Accounting Standards and Interpretations................................................................................................................................................ 55

25

Notes to the Financial Statements: Basis of preparation | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Basis of preparation

Regis Resources Limited (“Regis” or the “Company”) is a for profit company limited by shares, incorporated and domiciled in Australia, whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian Securities Exchange. Its registered office and principal place of business is:

Regis Resources Limited Level 1 1 Alvan Street Subiaco WA 6008

A description of the nature of operations and principal activities of Regis and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Group”) is included in the Directors’ Report, which is not part of these financial statements.

The financial statements were authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the directors on 15 September 2015.

The financial report is a general purpose financial report which:

  • has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 , Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB);

  • has been prepared on a historical cost basis except for assets and liabilities and share-based payments which are required to be measured at fair value. The basis of measurement is discussed further in the individual notes;

  • is presented in Australian dollars with all values rounded to the nearest thousand dollars ($’000) unless otherwise stated, in accordance with ASIC Class Order 98/100;

  • presents reclassified comparative information where required for consistency with the current year’s presentation;

  • adopts all new and amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the AASB that are relevant to the operations of the Group and effective for reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2014. Refer to note 29 for further details;

  • does not early adopt any Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have been issued or amended but are not yet effective. Refer to note 29 for further details.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Group. A list of controlled entities (subsidiaries) at year end is contained in note 23.

The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. Adjustments are made to bring into line any dissimilar accounting policies that may exist.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and profits and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been eliminated. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is obtained to the date on which control is disposed. The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.

Foreign currencies

Both the functional currency of each entity within the Group and the Group’s presentation currency is Australian dollars.

Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in Australian dollars at the exchange rate on that day. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated to Australian dollars at the reporting date exchange rate. Foreign currency gains and losses are generally recognised in profit or loss.

Other accounting policies

Significant and other accounting policies that summarise the measurement basis used and are relevant to an understanding of the financial statements are provided throughout the notes to the financial statements. Where possible, wording has been simplified to provide clearer commentary on the financial report of the Group. Accounting policies determined non-significant are not included in the financial statements. There have been no changes to the Group’s accounting policies that are no longer disclosed in the financial statements.

26

Notes to the Financial Statements: Basis of preparation | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Key estimates and judgements

In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies, management has made a number of judgements and applied estimates of future events. Judgements and estimates which are material to the financial report are found in the following notes.

Note 3 Expenses Page 30
Note 10 Inventories Page 36
Note 12 Exploration and evaluation assets Page 38
Note 14 Mine properties Page 40
Note 15 Impairment Page 41
Note 17 Provisions Page 42
Note 21 Deferred income tax Page 49
Note 22 Share-based payments Page 50

The notes to the financial statements

The notes include information which is required to understand the financial statements and is material and relevant to the operations and the financial position and performance of the Group. Information is considered relevant and material if, for example:

  • the amount is significant due to its size or nature;

  • the amount is important for understanding the results of the Group;

  • it helps to explain the impact of significant changes in the Group’s business; or

  • it relates to an aspect of the Group’s operations that is important to its future performance.

The notes are organised into the following sections:

  • Performance for the year;

  • Operating assets and liabilities;

  • Capital structure and finance costs;

  • Other disclosures.

A brief explanation is included under each section.

27

Notes to the Financial Statements: Performance for the year | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Performance for the year

This section focuses on the results and performance of the Group. This covers both profitability and the resultant return to shareholders via earnings per share combined with cash generation and the return of cash to shareholders via dividends.

1. Segment information

Operating segments are reported in a manner that is consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Managing Director and his executive management team (the chief operating decision makers). The Group has two reportable segments which comprise the Duketon Gold Project; being the Moolart Well Gold Mine and the Garden Well Gold Mine, which incorporates Rosemont. The segments are unchanged from those reported at 30 June 2014.

Unallocated items comprise corporate administrative costs, exploration and evaluation assets relating to areas of interest where an economically recoverable reserve is yet to be delineated, interest revenue, finance costs and income tax assets and liabilities.

Segment capital expenditure is the total cost incurred during the period to acquire property, plant and equipment, conduct exploration and evaluation activities and develop mine properties.

The following table presents financial information for reportable segments for the years ended 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2014:

Moolart Well
Gold Mine
Moolart Well
Gold Mine
Garden Well
Gold Mine
Garden Well
Gold Mine
Unallocated Total
2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
Continuing Operations
Segment revenue
Sales to external customers
Other revenue
Total segment revenue
Total revenue per the
statement of comprehensive
income
Interest expense
Impairment of non-current
assets
Depreciation and amortisation
Depreciation capitalised
Total depreciation and
amortisation recognised in the
statement of comprehensive
income
Segment result
Segment net operating
profit/(loss) before tax
Segment assets
Segment assets at balance date
Capital expenditure for the
year
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
144,400 154,056 320,454 217,176 - - 464,854 371,232
- - - - 466 701 466 701
144,400 154,056 320,454 217,176 466 701 465,320 371,933
465,320 371,933
- - - - 1,677 1,351 1,677 1,351
- - - 205,559 47 84,013 47 289,572
24,612 26,085 28,776 33,284 229 223 53,617 59,592
(87) (111)
53,530 59,481
54,528 63,220 81,564 (182,668) (11,068) (90,636) 125,024 (210,084)
62,849 80,045 261,408 219,552 191,932 167,075 516,189 466,672
6,650 14,025 57,596 122,142 13,059 21,574 77,305 157,741

28

Notes to the Financial Statements: Performance for the year | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

2. Revenue and Other Income

Accounting Policies

Gold sales

Revenue is recognised and measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured and it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group. The specific recognition criteria for the Group’s gold sales is upon dispatch of the gold bullion from the mine site as this is the point at which the significant risks and rewards of ownership and control of the product passes to the customer. Adjustments are made for variations in gold price, assay and weight between the time of dispatch and the time of final settlement.

Interest

Interest income is recognised as it accrues using the effective interest method.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Revenue
Gold sales
Interest
464,854
466
371,232
701
465,320 371,933

Gold forward contracts

As part of the risk management policy of the Group and in compliance with the conditions required by the Group’s financier, the Group enters into gold forward contracts to manage the gold price of a proportion of anticipated gold sales. The counterparty to the gold forward contracts is Macquarie Bank Limited (“MBL”).

It is management’s intention to settle each contract through physical delivery of gold and as such, the gold forward sale contracts disclosed below do not meet the criteria of financial instruments for accounting purposes. This is referred to as the “normal purchase/sale” exemption. Accordingly, the contracts will be accounted for as sale contracts with revenue recognised once the gold has been delivered to MBL or its agent.

Open contracts at balance date are summarised in the table below:

Within one year
- Spot contracts
- Spot deferred contracts(ii)
- Fixed forward contracts
- Fixed forward contracts
Between one and five years
- Fixed forward contracts
- Fixed forward contracts
Gold for physical Gold for physical Contracted gold Contracted gold Value of committed Value of committed
delivery sale price sales Mark-to-market(i)
2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
ounces ounces $/oz $/oz $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
20,000
47,724
1,400.00
1,419.68
1,402.35
1,460.25
1,402.35
1,453.50
28,000
67,753
32,138
35,046
64,275
145,350
(156)
566
(832)
921
(2,839)
(4,279)
- - - -
135,197 1,436.50 194,210 (11,310)
45,834 22,917 1,402.50 64,275 (6,263)
20,000 24,000
45,834
1,453.50 29,070 (1,723)
- - - -
80,000 100,000 1,453.50 116,280 (9,316)
281,031 260,475 403,835 372,562 (28,612) (6,619)
culated with reference to the following spot price at period end $1,520/oz $1,408/oz

Mark-to-market has been calculated with reference to the following spot price at period end $1,520/oz $1,408/oz

  • (i) Mark-to-market represents the value of the open contracts at balance date, calculated with reference to the gold spot price at that date. A negative amount reflects a valuation in the counterparty’s favour.

  • (ii) The contracted gold sale price disclosed for spot deferred contracts reflects a weighted average of a range of contract prices. The range of prices at the end of the year was from $1,402.35/oz to $1,588.48/oz (2014: $1,400.32/oz to $1,460.25/oz).

29

Notes to the Financial Statements: Performance for the year | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Accounting Policies

Derivatives

The Group also uses derivative financial instruments such as gold call options to manage the risk associated with commodity price fluctuations. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date the derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently measured at fair value. The fair value of derivative financial instruments that are traded on an active market is determined using appropriate valuation techniques. Changes in fair value are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income, net of any transaction costs.

During the financial year, the Group sold gold call options for 7,000 ounces with a weighted average exercise price of A$1,409/oz (2014: 65,000 ounces at A$1,419/oz). The options expired unexercised and the below gains reflect the premiums received.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Other income
Realised gain on gold options
Rehabilitation provision adjustment
Legal settlement
Rental income
75
2,949
2,367
-
-
555
10
10
2,452
3,514

3. Expenses

Accounting Policies

Cash costs of production

Cash costs of production include direct costs incurred for mining, milling, laboratory and mine site administration, net of costs capitalised to pre-strip and production stripping assets. This category also includes movements in the cost of inventory and any net realisable value write downs.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Cost of goods sold
Cash costs of production
Royalties
Depreciation of mine plant and equipment
Amortisation of mine properties
256,192
208,471
20,031
16,487
36,710
30,415
16,678
28,943
329,611
284,316

Depreciation

Depreciation of mine specific plant and equipment and buildings and infrastructure is charged to the statement of comprehensive income on a unit-of-production basis over the economically recoverable reserves of the mine concerned, except in the case of assets whose useful life is shorter than the life of the mine, in which case the straight-line method is used. The unit of account is tonnes of ore milled.

Depreciation of non-mine specific plant and equipment is charged to the statement of comprehensive income and exploration and evaluation assets on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of plant and equipment in current and comparative periods as follows:

  • Plant and equipment: 3 - 20 years

  • Fixtures and fittings: 3 - 20 years

  • Leasehold improvements: 10 years

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date.

Amortisation

Mine properties are amortised on a unit-of-production basis over the economically recoverable reserves of the mine concerned. The unit of account is tonnes of ore milled.

30

Notes to the Financial Statements: Performance for the year | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Depreciation and amortisation
Depreciation expense
Amortisation expense
Less: Amounts capitalised
Depreciation and amortisation charged to the statement of comprehensive
income
36,939
30,649
16,678
28,943
(87)
(111)
53,530
59,481
Keyestimates and assumptions
Unit-of-production method of depreciation/amortisation
The Group uses the unit-of-production basis when depreciating/amortising life of mine specific assets which results in a
depreciation/amortisation charge proportionate to the depletion of the anticipated remaining life of mine production. Each item’s economic
life, which is assessed annually, has due regard for both its physical life limitations and to present assessments of economically recoverable
reserves of the minepropertyat which it is located. These calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions.
Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Employee benefits expense
Wages and salaries
Defined contribution superannuation expense
Share-based payments expense
22
Other employee benefits expense
Less: Amounts capitalised
Employee benefits expense recognised in the statement of comprehensive
income
Lease payments and other expenses included in the statement of
comprehensive income
Minimum lease payments – operating lease
Less: Amounts capitalised
Recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
Other expenses
Gold swap fees
Non-capital exploration expenditure
Loss on disposal of assets
Rehabilitation provision adjustment
30,347
30,945
2,759
2,734
1,959
2,519
1,893
1,990
36,958
38,188
(2,627)
(7,861)
34,331
30,327
351
346
(105)
(104)
246
242
151
124
579
10
8
-
-
40
738
174

31

Notes to the Financial Statements: Performance for the year | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

4. Earnings per Share

Accounting Policy

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is the amount of post-tax profit attributable to each share. The Group presents basic and diluted EPS data for ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.

Diluted EPS takes into account the dilutive effect of all potential ordinary shares, being unlisted employee share options on issue. In the prior year, these potential ordinary shares were not considered dilutive as their exercise would reduce the loss per share.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Earnings used in calculating EPS
Net profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent
Weighted average number of shares
Issued ordinary shares at 1 July
Effect of shares issued
Weighted average number of ordinary shares at 30 June
Effect of dilution:
Share options
Weighted average number of ordinary shares adjusted for the effect of
dilution
86,920 (147,830)
No. shares No. shares
(‘000s) (‘000s)
499,744
29
494,085
3,962
499,773
21
498,047
-
499,794 498,047

There have been no transactions involving ordinary shares between the reporting date and the date of completion of these financial statements which would impact on the above EPS calculations.

32

Notes to the Financial Statements: Performance for the year | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

5. Current Income Tax

Accounting Policy

Current tax

Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantially enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

The major components of income tax expense are:
Current income tax
Current income tax expense
Adjustment in respect of income tax of previous years
Deferred income tax
Relating to the origination and reversal of temporary differences
Adjustment in respect of income tax of previous years
Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the statement of comprehensive
income
A reconciliation between tax expense and the product of accounting profit
before tax multiplied by the Group’s applicable income tax rate is as follows:
Accounting profit/(loss) before income tax
At the Group’s statutory income tax rate of 30% (2014: 30%)
Share-based payments
Other non-deductible items
Adjustment in respect of income tax of previous years
Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the statement of comprehensive
income
6.
Dividends
Declared and paid during the year:
Dividends on ordinary shares
Final franked dividend for 2014: nil (2013: 15 cents per share)
Proposed by the directors after balance date but not recognised as a liability at
30 June:
Dividends on ordinary shares
Final dividend for 2015: 6 cents (2014: nil)
Dividend franking account
Amount of franking credits available to shareholders of Regis Resources
Limited for subsequent financial years
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
26,121
5,139
4,480
(209)
11,976
(67,406)
(4,473)
222
38,104
(62,254)
125,024
(210,084)
37,507
(63,025)
588
756
3
3
6
12
38,104
(62,254)
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
-
74,671
29,987
-
-
-

The ability to utilise the franking credits is dependent upon the ability to declare dividends.

33

Notes to the Financial Statements: Performance for the year | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

7. Cash and Cash Equivalents

Accounting Policy

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand. Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates.

At 30 June 2015, the Group had no undrawn, committed borrowing facilities available (2014: $30 million available). Refer to note 18.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet and cash flow statement
Cash at bank and on hand
51,781
6,615

Restrictions on cash

The Group is required to maintain $161,000 on deposit to secure a bank guarantee in relation to the Perth office lease. The amount will be held for the term of the lease. Refer to note 25.

Reconciliation of profit/(loss) after income tax to net cash inflow from operating
activities
Net profit/(loss) for the year
Adjustments for:
Impairment of non-current assets
Unwinding of discount on provisions
Loss on disposal of assets
Share-based payments
Rehabilitation provision adjustment
Depreciation and amortisation
Changes in assets and liabilities
(Increase)/decrease in gold bullion awaiting settlement
(Increase)/decrease in receivables
(Increase)/decrease in inventories
(Increase)/decrease in other current assets
(Increase)/decrease in current tax assets/income tax payable
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
Increase/(decrease) in deferred tax liabilities/assets
Increase/(decrease) in provisions
Net cash from operating activities
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
86,920
(147,830)
47
289,572
1,543
906
8
-
1,959
2,519
(2,367)
-
53,530
59,481
(5,105)
14,310
(1,136)
365
(9,150)
(24,621)
272
186
30,620
(27,080)
(21,750)
23,375
7,503
(67,184)
(939)
164
141,955
124,163

Non-cash financing and investing activities

During the year ended 30 June 2015, the Group entered into a hire purchase arrangement for the acquisition of a Komatsu WA900 loader for the Duketon Gold Project. The amount financed was $2,183,000. Refer to note 18 for further details. This transaction is not reflected in the statement of cash flows. There were no non-cash financing or investing activities in the prior year.

34

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Operating assets and liabilities

This section shows the assets used to generate the Group’s trading performance and the liabilities incurred as a result. Liabilities relating to the Group’s financing activities are addressed in the capital structure and finance costs section on page 44.

8. Gold Bullion Awaiting Settlement

Accounting Policy

Bullion awaiting settlement comprises gold that has been received by the refiner prior to period end but which has not yet been delivered into a sale contract. Bullion awaiting settlement is initially recognised at the expected selling price and adjustments for variations in the gold price are made at the time of final settlement.

Due to the short-term nature of the bullion awaiting settlement, the carrying value is assumed to approximate fair value. The maximum exposure to credit risk is the fair value.

Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Current
Gold bullion awaiting settlement 12,710 7,605

At balance date, gold bullion awaiting settlement comprised 8,158 ounces valued at a weighted average realisable value of $1,558/oz (2014: 5,209 ounces at $1,460/oz).

9. Receivables

Accounting Policy

Receivables are recognised at fair value and subsequently at the amounts considered receivable (amortised cost). Balances within receivables do not contain impaired assets, are not past due and are expected to be received when due.

The Group does not have trade receivables in relation to gold sales. The only material receivables at year end are for GST and fuel tax credits receivable from the Australian Taxation Office and therefore, the Group is not generally exposed to credit risk in relation to its receivables.

Due to the short-term nature of these receivables, their carrying value is assumed to approximate fair value.

Current
GST receivable
Fuel tax credit receivable
Interest receivable
Dividend trust account
Other receivables
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
2,850
2,286
1,364
939
17
10
340
477
161
151
4,732
3,863

35

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

10. Inventories

Accounting Policy

Gold bullion, gold in circuit and ore stockpiles are physically measured or estimated and valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is determined by the weighted average method and comprises direct purchase costs and an appropriate portion of fixed and variable overhead costs, including depreciation and amortisation, incurred in converting ore into gold bullion. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and costs of selling the final product, including royalties.

Consumable stores are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of consumable stores is measured on a first-in first-out basis.

Inventories expected to be sold (or consumed in the case of stores) within 12 months after the balance sheet date are classified as current assets, all other inventories are classified as non-current.

Current
Ore stockpiles
Gold in circuit
Bullion on hand
Consumable stores
Non-current
Ore stockpiles
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
11,780
20,874
10,168
13,721
6,022
5,697
2,848
2,753
30,818
43,045
21,377
-

During the year ended 30 June 2015, a portion of ore stockpiles were reclassified as non-current as a result of the annual update of life of mine plans. This reflects the expected timing for conversion to bullion and subsequent sale.

At 30 June 2015, all inventory is carried at cost, except for the non-current ore stockpile which is held at net realisable value (2014: $11,337,000 of current ore stockpiles and $4,243,000 of gold in circuit were carried at net realisable value). During the year, $1,810,000 (2014: $13,616,000) was recognised as an expense in costs of goods sold for inventories carried at net realisable value.

Key estimates and assumptions

Inventories

Net realisable value tests are performed at each reporting date and represent the estimated future sales price of the product based on prevailing spot metals process at the reporting date, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale.

Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tonnes added and removed from the stockpile, the number of contained gold ounces based on assay data, and the estimated recovery percentage. Stockpile tonnages are verified by periodic surveys.

36

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

11. Property, Plant and Equipment

Accounting Policy

The value of property, plant and equipment is measured as the cost of the asset, less accumulated depreciation and impairment. The cost of the asset also includes the cost of replacing parts that are eligible for capitalisation, the cost of major inspections and an initial estimate of the cost of dismantling and removing the item from site at the end of its useful life (rehabilitation provisions). Changes in the rehabilitation provisions resulting from changes in the size or timing of the cost or from changes in the discount rate are also recognised as part of the asset cost.

Derecognition

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised when it is sold or otherwise disposed of, or when its use is expected to bring no further economic benefits. Any gain or loss from derecognising the asset (the difference between the proceeds on disposal and the carrying amount of the asset) is included in the income statement in the period the item is derecognised.

Consolidated Consolidated Consolidated Consolidated Consolidated
Freehold Leasehold Plant &
Furniture &
Buildings &
Capital
Land Improvements Equipment
Equipment
Infrastructure
WIP Total
$’000 $’000 $’000
$’000
$’000
$’000 $’000
Net carrying amount at 1 July 2014
Additions
Depreciation expense
Transfers from mine properties
under development
Transfers between classes
Rehabilitation provision adjustments
Disposals
Net carrying amount at 30 June 2015
At 30 June 2015
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net carrying amount
Net carrying amount at 1 July 2013
Additions
Depreciation expense
Transfers from mine properties
under development
Transfers between classes
Rehabilitation provision adjustments
Net carrying amount at 30 June 2014
At 1 July 2013
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net carrying amount
At 30 June 2014
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net carrying amount
16,488
481
-
-
-
(72)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
136,702
726
54,026
8,034
69
3,191
(26,142)
(188)
(10,537)
14,277
-
734
743
6
529
(65)
-
(406)
(8)
-
-
3,597
212,020
8,052
19,346
-
(36,939)
-
15,011
(1,278)
-
-
(471)
-
(8)
16,488
409
133,541
613
47,537
10,371
208,959
16,488
721
-
(312)
213,694
1,432
76,187
(80,153)
(819)
(28,650)
10,371
318,893
-
(109,934)
16,488
409
133,541
613
47,537
10,371
208,959
5,028
518
10,294
4
-
(71)
-
-
1,166
30
-
-
111,197
357
44,389
7,151
246
2,998
(21,366)
(162)
(9,050)
41,924
-
10,832
358
285
2,716
(2,562)
-
2,141
4,697
166,186
3,455
24,148
-
(30,649)
-
52,756
(4,555)
-
-
(421)
16,488
481
136,702
726
54,026
3,597
212,020
5,028
687
-
(169)
146,443
826
59,207
(35,246)
(469)
(14,818)
4,697
216,888
-
(50,702)
5,028
518
111,197
357
44,389
4,697
166,186
16,488
721
-
(240)
191,393
1,357
74,309
(54,691)
(631)
(20,283)
3,597
287,865
-
(75,845)
16,488
481
136,702
726
54,026
3,597
212,020

37

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

12. Exploration and Evaluation Assets

Accounting Policy

Exploration and evaluation expenditure is accumulated on an area of interest basis. Exploration and evaluation assets include the costs of acquiring licences, costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity, and the fair value (at acquisition date) of exploration and evaluation assets acquired in a business combination. Expenditure is carried forward when incurred in areas for which the Group has rights of tenure and where economic mineralisation is indicated, but activities have not yet reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves and active and significant operations in, or in relation to, the area of interest are continuing. Costs incurred before the Group has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.

Once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral resources in an area of interest are demonstrable, exploration and evaluation assets attributable to that area of interest are first tested for impairment and then reclassified to mine properties under development. No amortisation is charged during the exploration and evaluation phase.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Reconciliation of movements during the year
Balance at 1 July
Expenditure for the period
Acquisition of tenements
Impairment
15
Transferred to mine properties
14
Balance at 30 June
105,788
204,644
11,394
11,083
1,644
50
(47)
(84,013)
-
(25,976)
118,779
105,788

Acquisition of tenements

During the year, the Group purchased the Gloster Gold deposit from a private individual for $1.5 million (paid in cash) and a gross royalty of $10 per ounce to be paid on any gold production from these licences (indexed to the gold price where the gold price exceeds $1,500 per ounce).

Impairment

Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment if (i) sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability, and (ii) facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. For the purposes of impairment testing, exploration and evaluation assets are allocated to cash-generating units (“CGUs”) to which the exploration activity relates. The CGU is not larger than the area of interest.

Carrying value by area of interest
Moolart Well CGU
Garden Well CGU
Duketon Gold Project satellite deposits
Regional WA exploration
McPhillamys
9,719
8,062
1,931
49
11,912
6,148
4,367
1,507
90,850
90,022
118,779
105,788

Key estimates and assumptions

Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets

The future recoverability of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is dependent upon a number of factors, including whether the Group decides to exploit the related lease itself or, if not, whether it successfully recovers the related exploration and evaluation asset through sale.

Factors that could impact future recoverability include the level of reserves and resources, future technological changes which could impact the cost of mining, future legal changes (including changes to environmental restoration obligations) and changes to commodity prices.

To the extent that capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is determined not to be recoverable in the future, profits and net assets will be reduced in the period in which the determination is made.

38

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Exploration expenditure commitments

Exploration expenditure commitments represent tenement rentals and expenditure requirements that may be required to be met under the relevant legislation should the Group wish to retain tenure on all current tenements in which the Group has an interest.

The terms and conditions under which the Group retains title to its various mining tenements oblige it to meet tenement rentals and minimum levels of exploration expenditure as gazetted by the Western Australian and New South Wales state governments, as well as local government rates and taxes.

The exploration commitments of the Group not provided for in the consolidated financial statements and payable are as follows:

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Within one year
2,255
2,917

The tenement commitments shown above represent the minimum required to be spent on all granted tenements as at reporting date. Actual expenditure will vary as a result of ongoing management of the tenement portfolio including reductions and relinquishment of tenements not considered prospective, in whole or in part.

Tenement commitments are shown gross of exemptions that are likely to be available in the ordinary course of business as the financial impact of potential exemptions cannot be measured reliably in advance.

13. Mine Properties under Development

Accounting Policy

Mine properties under development represents the costs incurred in preparing mines for production and includes plant and equipment under construction and operating costs incurred before production commences. These costs are capitalised to the extent they are expected to be recouped through the successful exploitation of the related mining leases. Once production commences, these costs are transferred to property, plant and equipment and mine properties, as relevant, and are depreciated and amortised using the units-of-production method based on the estimated economically recoverable reserves to which they relate or are written off if the mine property is abandoned.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Balance at beginning of period
Pre-production expenditure capitalised
Construction expenditure
Transferred to property, plant and equipment
Transferred to mine properties
Balance at end of period
14,235
62,301
68
21,488
776
32,134
(15,011)
(52,756)
-
(48,932)
68
14,235

39

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

14. Mine Properties

Accounting Policies

Other mine properties

Other mine properties represents expenditure in respect of exploration, evaluation, feasibility and pre-production operating costs incurred by the Group previously accumulated and carried forward in mine properties under development in relation to areas of interest in which mining has now commenced. Other mine properties are stated at cost, less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses.

Other mine properties are amortised on a unit-of-production basis over the economically recoverable reserves of the mine concerned. The unit of account is tonnes of ore milled.

Pre-strip costs

In open pit mining operations, it is necessary to remove overburden and waste materials to access the ore. This process is referred to as stripping and the Group capitalises stripping costs incurred during the development of a mine (or pit) as part of the investment in constructing the mine (“pre-strip”). These costs are subsequently amortised over the life of mine on a units of production basis, where the unit of account is tonnes of ore milled.

Production stripping costs

Once access to the ore is attained, all waste that is removed from that point forward is considered production stripping activity. The amount of production stripping costs deferred is based on the extent to which the current period cost per tonne of ore mined exceeds the expected cost per tonne for the life of the identified component. A component is defined as a specific volume of the ore body that is made more accessible by the stripping activity, and is identified based on the mine plan.

The production stripping asset is initially measured at cost, which is the accumulation of costs directly incurred to perform the stripping activity that improves access to the identified component of the ore body. The production stripping asset is then carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and any impairment losses.

The production stripping asset is amortised over the expected useful life of the identified component (determined based on economically recoverable reserves), on a unit of production basis. The unit of account is tonnes of ore mined.

Consolidated Consolidated Consolidated Consolidated
Production Pre-strip Other Mine
StrippingCosts Costs Properties Total
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Net carrying amount at 1 July 2014
Additions
Rehabilitation provision adjustment
Amortisation expense
Net carrying amount at 30 June 2015
At 30 June 2015
Cost
Accumulated amortisation
Net carrying amount
Net carrying amount at 1 July 2013
Additions
Amortisation expense
Transfers from mine properties under development
Transfers from exploration and evaluation expenditure
Impairment expense
Net carrying amount at 30 June 2014
At 30 June 2014
Cost
Accumulated amortisation
Net carrying amount
8,103
11,434
19,131
38,668
16,231
27,317
529
44,077
-
-
(193)
(193)
(3,870)
(7,088)
(5,720)
(16,678)
20,464
31,663
13,747
65,874
31,322
45,541
50,051
126,914
(10,858)
(13,878)
(36,304)
(61,040)
20,464
31,663
13,747
65,874
8,122
54,440
66,861
129,423
12,578
36,152
20,109
68,839
(2,768)
(14,758)
(11,417)
(28,943)
4,221
35,748
8,963
48,932
-
-
25,976
25,976
(14,050)
(100,148)
(91,361)
(205,559)
8,103
11,434
19,131
38,668
15,091
18,224
49,715
83,030
(6,988)
(6,790)
(30,584)
(44,362)
8,103
11,434
19,131
38,668

40

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Consolidated
Production
StrippingCosts
Pre-strip
Costs
Other Mine
Properties
Total
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
12,573
62,870
96,147
171,590
(4,451)
(8,430)
(29,286)
(42,167)
8,122
54,440
66,861
129,423
Consolidated
Production
StrippingCosts
Pre-strip
Costs
Other Mine
Properties
Total
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
12,573
62,870
96,147
171,590
(4,451)
(8,430)
(29,286)
(42,167)
8,122
54,440
66,861
129,423
Consolidated
Production
StrippingCosts
Pre-strip
Costs
Other Mine
Properties
Total
$’000
$’000
$’000
$’000
12,573
62,870
96,147
171,590
(4,451)
(8,430)
(29,286)
(42,167)
8,122
54,440
66,861
129,423
Production Pre-strip Other Mine
StrippingCosts Costs Properties
$’000 $’000 $’000
At 1 July 2013
Cost
Accumulated amortisation
Net carrying amount

Key estimates and assumptions

Production stripping costs

The Group capitalises mining costs incurred during the production stage of its operations in accordance with the accounting policy described above. The identification of specific components will vary between mines as a result of both the geological characteristics and location of the ore body. The financial considerations of the mining operations may also impact the identification and designation of a component.

The expected cost per tonne is a function of an individual mine’s design and therefore changes to that design will generally result in changes to the expected cost. Changes in other technical or economic parameters that impact reserves will also have an impact on the expected costs per tonne for each identified component. Changes in the expected cost per tonne are accounted for prospectively from the date of change.

15. Impairment

Accounting policy

At each reporting date, the Group assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. Where an indicator of impairment exists, the Group makes a formal estimate of recoverable amount. Where the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.

The recoverable amount of other assets is the greater of their fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

Impairment losses are reversed when there is an indication that the impairment loss may no longer exist and there has been a change in the estimate used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.

Total impairment losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income for the year were as follows:

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Exploration and evaluation assets
12
Mine properties
14
47
84,013
-
205,559
47
289,572

Exploration and evaluation assets

An impairment loss of $47,000 (2014: $608,000) has been recognised in relation to tenements that were surrendered, relinquished or expired during the year. There were no other indicators of impairment identified.

41

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Key judgements

Determination of mineral resources and ore reserves

The determination of mineral resources and ore reserves impacts the accounting for asset carrying values. The Group estimates its mineral resources and ore reserves in accordance with the Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves 2012 (the “JORC” Code). The information on mineral resources and ore reserves was prepared by or under the supervision of Competent Persons as defined in the JORC Code. The amounts presented are based on the mineral resources and ore reserves determined under the JORC Code.

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating mineral resources and ore reserves, and assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly when new information becomes available.

Changes in the forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs or recovery rates may change the economic status of reserves and may ultimately result in reserves being restated.

16. Trade and Other Payables

Accounting Policies

Trade payables

Trade and other payables are recognised at the value of the invoice received from a supplier. They represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services. The amounts are unsecured and generally paid within 30 days of recognition.

Employee entitlements

A liability is recognised for the amount expected to be paid to an employee for annual leave they are presently entitled to as a result of past service. The liability includes allowances for on-costs such as superannuation and payroll taxes, as well as any future salary and wage increases that the employee may be reasonably entitled to.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Current
Trade payables
Accrued expenses
Employee entitlements – annual leave payable
Other payables
11,813
31,998
15,710
20,707
2,429
2,282
6,152
4,838
36,104
59,825

17. Provisions

Accounting Policies

Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recognised as a finance cost. Refer to note 18.

Site rehabilitation

In accordance with the Group’s published environmental policy and applicable legal requirements, a provision for site rehabilitation is recognised in respect of the estimated cost of rehabilitation and restoration of the areas disturbed by mining activities up to the reporting date, but not yet rehabilitated.

When the liability is initially recorded, the estimated cost is capitalised by increasing the carrying amount of the related mining assets. At each reporting date the site rehabilitation provision is re-measured to reflect any changes in discount rates and timing or amounts to be incurred. Additional disturbances or changes in rehabilitation costs will be recognised as additions or changes to the corresponding asset and rehabilitation provision, prospectively from the date of change. For closed sites, or where the carrying value of the related asset has been reduced to nil either through depreciation and amortisation or impairment, changes to estimated costs are recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive income.

42

Notes to the Financial Statements: Operating assets and liabilities | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Long service leave

The Group’s net obligation in respect of long-term employee benefits is the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for their service up to reporting date, plus related on costs. The benefit is discounted to determine its present value and the discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on high-quality corporate bonds that have maturity dates approximating the terms of the Group’s obligations

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Current
Dividends payable
Rehabilitation
Non-current
Long service leave
Rehabilitation
Provision for rehabilitation
Balance at 1 July
Provisions made during the year
Provisions used during the year
Provisions re-measured during the year
Unwinding of discount
Balance at 30 June
340
477
3,282
2,811
3,622
3,288
789
457
38,832
42,042
39,621
42,499
44,853
23,735
-
20,406
(1,250)
(194)
(3,032)
-
1,543
906
42,114
44,853

Nature and purpose of provision for rehabilitation

The nature of rehabilitation activities includes dismantling and removing structures, rehabilitating mines, dismantling operating facilities, closure of plant and waste sites and restoration, reclamation and re-vegetation of affected areas. Typically the obligation arises when the asset is installed at the production location.

Key estimates and assumptions

Rehabilitation obligations

The Group assesses site rehabilitation liabilities annually. The provision recognised is based on an assessment of the estimated cost of closure and reclamation of the areas using internal information concerning environmental issues in the exploration and previously mined areas, together with input from various environmental consultants, discounted to present value. Significant estimation is required in determining the provision for site rehabilitation as there are many factors that may affect the timing and ultimate cost to rehabilitate sites where mining and/or exploration activities have previously taken place. These factors include future development/exploration activity, changes in the cost of goods and services required for restoration activity and changes to the legal and regulatory framework. These factors may result in future actual expenditure differing from the amounts currently provided.

43

Notes to the Financial Statements: Capital structure and finance costs | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Capital structure and finance costs

This section outlines how the Group manages its capital and related financing costs.

The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can continue to provide returns to shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an efficient capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.

The Board’s policy in relation to capital management is to regularly and consistently monitor future cash flows against expected expenditures for a rolling period of up to 12 months in advance. The Board determines the Group’s need for additional funding by way of either share issues or loan funds depending on market conditions at the time. The Board defines working capital in such circumstances as its excess liquid funds over liabilities, and defines capital as being the ordinary share capital of the Company, plus retained earnings, reserves and net debt. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Board may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or reduce debt.

There were no changes in the Group’s approach to capital management during the year.

Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.

18. Net Debt and Finance Costs

Accounting Policies

Loans and borrowings

All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received less directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.

Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting date.

Finance Leases – Group as a lessee

Finance leases, which transfer to the Group substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership for the lease item, are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased asset or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are recognised as an expense in profit or loss.

Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term if there is no reasonable certainty that the Group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term.

The carrying amounts of the Group’s current and non-current borrowings approximate their fair value.

Current interest-bearing liabilities
Secured bank loan
Finance lease liability
Non-current interest-bearing liabilities
Secured bank loan
Finance lease liability
Less: cash and cash equivalents
7
Net (cash)/debt
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
82
5,714
705
-
787
5,714
20,000
34,286
1,420
-
21,420
34,286
(51,781)
(6,615)
(29,574)
33,385

44

Notes to the Financial Statements: Capital structure and finance costs | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Interest-bearing liabilities

Secured bank loan

At balance date, the Group has $20 million (2014: $40 million) outstanding on the secured bank loan provided by Macquarie Bank Limited (“MBL”) which is due for repayment on 30 June 2017.

The loan attracts a variable interest rate which ranged between 4.655% and 5.255% in the current year (2014: 5.120% to 6.781%).

The debt facility also incorporated a performance bond facility whereby MBL provided performance bonds in relation to statutory environmental obligations on certain tenements and guarantees in relation to office lease commitments. The performance bond facility was closed during the year as the Mine Rehabilitation Fund levy scheme introduced by the Department of Mines and Petroleum removed the requirement for companies to hold performance bonds for rehabilitation obligations. At the prior year end, the performance bond facility limit was $30 million and the amount used was $26,886,000.

Finance lease commitments

During the current year, the Group entered into a hire purchase agreement for the acquisition of a Komatsu WA900 loader. The agreement incorporates a fixed interest rate of 3.35%, monthly repayments and an expiry date of 29 May 2018. Ownership of the loader passes to the Group once all contractual payments have been made. Refer to note 25.

Finance costs
Interest expense
Other borrowing costs
Unwinding of discount on provisions
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
1,677
1,351
145
439
1,543
906
3,365
2,696

Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset (i.e. an asset that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale) are capitalised as part of the cost of that asset. All other borrowing costs are expensed as part of finance costs in the period incurred. Borrowing costs consist of interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with the borrowing of funds.

Unwinding of discount on provisions

The unwinding of discount on provisions represents the cost associated with the passage of time. Rehabilitation provisions are recognised at the discounted value of the present obligation to restore, dismantle and rehabilitate each mine site with the increase in the provision due to the passage of time being recognised as a finance cost in accordance with the policy described in note 17.

19. Financial Risk Management

Overview

The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:

  • Credit risk

  • Liquidity risk

  • Market risk

This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks and its objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing risk. Further quantitative disclosures are included throughout this financial report.

The Group’s exposure to movements in the gold price, which it manages through the use of gold forward contracts, is discussed at note 2. The gold forward sale contracts do not meet the criteria of financial instruments for accounting purposes on the basis that they meet the normal purchase/sale exemption because physical gold will be delivered into the contract.

The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework. The Audit and Risk Management Committee is responsible for developing and monitoring risk management policies. The committee reports regularly to the Board of Directors on its activities.

45

Notes to the Financial Statements: Capital structure and finance costs | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group’s activities. The Group, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to develop a disciplined and constructive control environment in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.

The Group’s Audit and Risk Management Committee oversees how management monitors compliance with the Group’s risk management policies and procedures and reviews the adequacy of the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Group.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if the counterparty to a financial asset fails to meet its contractual obligation. The Group has determined that it currently has no significant exposure to credit risk as at reporting date.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risk damage to the Group’s reputation.

The Group uses daily and monthly cash forecasting to monitor cash flow requirements. Typically the Group ensures that it has sufficient cash on demand to meet expected operational expenses, including the servicing of financial obligations; this excludes the potential impact of extreme circumstances that cannot reasonably be predicted, such as natural disasters.

The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments:

30 June 2015 Carrying Contractual More than 5
($’000) amount cash-flows 6 mths or less 6-12 mths 1-2years 2-5years years
Trade and other payables
Secured bank loan
Finance lease
Total
33,675
20,082
2,125
(33,675)
(21,865)
(2,234)
(33,675)
(467)
(383)
-
(467)
(383)
-
(20,931)
(766)
-
-
(702)
-
-
-
55,882 (57,774) (34,525) (850) (21,697) (702) -
30 June 2014 Carrying Contractual More than 5
($’000) amount cash-flows 6 mths or less 6-12 mths 1-2years 2-5years years
Trade and other payables
Secured bank loan
Total
57,543
40,000
(57,543)
(45,558)
(57,543)
(530)
-
(7,286)
-
(13,235)
-
(24,507)
-
-
97,543 (103,101) (58,073) (7,286) (13,235) (24,507) -

Assets pledged as security

The secured bank loan provided by MBL is secured by:

  • a first ranking, registered fixed and floating charge over all of the assets of Regis Resources Limited and its wholly-owned subsidiary Duketon Resources Pty Limited;

  • a first ranking, registered Mining Act (WA) mortgage over the Company’s interest in the Duketon Gold Project tenements;

  • a fixed charge over the Proceeds Account and Gold Account; and

  • satisfactory security over Regis’ rights under key project documents.

The finance lease liability is secured by the related asset. Ownership of the asset remains with Komatsu until all contractual payments have been made.

Financial guarantee liabilities

As at 30 June 2015, the Group did not have any financial guarantee liabilities (2014: Nil).

46

Notes to the Financial Statements: Capital structure and finance costs | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Market risk

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the Group’s income or value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return.

  • Interest rate risk: The Group is exposed to interest rate risk through its secured project loan facility with Macquarie Bank Limited (“MBL”) and cash deposits, which attract variable interest rates. The Group regularly analyses its interest rate exposure and considers the cost of equity financing as an alternative to debt.

  • Foreign currency risk: The Group is occasionally exposed to foreign currency risk when long lead items are purchased in a currency other than Australian dollars. The Group maintains all of its cash in Australian dollars and does not currently hedge these purchases. There is no significant exposure to foreign currency risk at reporting date.

  • Equity price risk: The Group does not have any exposure to movements in equity prices.

Interest rate risk

At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments was:

Fixed rate instruments
Term deposit held to maturity
Finance lease liability
Variable rate instruments
Cash and cash equivalents
Secured bank loan
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
152
-
(2,125)
-
(1,973)
-
51,433
6,757
(20,000)
(40,000)
31,433
(33,243)

Fair value sensitivity analysis for fixed rate instruments

The Group does not account for any fixed rate financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. Therefore a change at reporting date would not affect profit or loss.

Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments

As at 30 June 2015 a sensitivity analysis has not been disclosed in relation to the variable interest rate cash on deposit and secured bank loan as the results have been determined to be immaterial to the statement of comprehensive income. For the year ended 30 June 2014, a decrease of 50 basis points in variable interest rates would have resulted in a decrease in the net loss of $46,000.

47

Notes to the Financial Statements: Capital structure and finance costs | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

20. Issued Capital and Reserves

Accounting Policy

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Transaction costs directly attributable to the issue of shares or options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any related income tax effects.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Ordinary shares – issued and fully paid
431,338
431,304

The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time and, on a poll, are entitled to one vote per share at meetings of the Company. The Company does not have authorised capital or par value in respect of its issued shares.

Movement in ordinary shares on issue
At 1 July 2013
Issued on exercise of options
Transaction costs
At 30 June 2014
Issued on exercise of options
Transaction costs
At 30 June 2015
No. shares
(‘000s) $’000
494,085
5,659
-
428,358
3,019
(73)
499,744 431,304
37
-
37
(3)
499,781 431,338

Nature and purpose of reserves

The share option reserve is used to record the value of share-based payments provided to employees, including KMP, as part of their remuneration, as well as non-employees.

48

Notes to the Financial Statements: Other disclosures | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Other disclosures

This section provides information on items which require disclosure to comply with Australian Accounting Standards and other regulatory pronouncements.

21. Deferred Income Tax

Accounting Policy

Deferred tax balances are determined using the balance sheet method, which provides for temporary differences at the balance sheet date between accounting carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities.

Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences, other than for the exemptions permitted under accounting standards. At 30 June 2015 there are no unrecognised temporary differences associated with the Group’s investment in subsidiaries (2014: $nil).

Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available to utilise these deductible temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are only offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Deferred income tax at 30 June relates to the following:

Deferred tax liabilities
Receivables
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
Mine properties under development
Mine properties
Gross deferred tax liabilities
Set off of deferred tax assets
Net deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax assets
Inventories
Property, plant and equipment
Trade and other payables
Provisions
Expenses deductible over time
Tax losses carried forward
Gross deferred tax assets
Set off of deferred tax assets
Net deferred tax assets
Reconciliation of deferred tax, net:
Opening balance at 1 July – net deferred tax assets/(liabilities)
Income tax (expense)/ benefit recognised in profit or loss
Closing balance at 30 June – net deferred tax (liabilities)/ assets
Consolidated
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
1,362
735
13,353
9,921
20
-
19,603
11,600
34,338
22,256
(33,198)
(22,256)
1,140
-
946
5,008
9,847
9,112
931
894
12,871
13,593
58
12
8,545
-
33,198
28,619
(33,198)
(22,256)
-
6,363
6,363
(60,821)
(7,503)
67,184
(1,140)
6,363

49

Notes to the Financial Statements: Other disclosures | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Key judgements

Recovery of deferred tax assets

Judgement is required in determining whether deferred tax assets are recognised on the balance sheet. Deferred tax assets, including those arising from unutilised tax losses, require management to assess the likelihood that the Group will generate taxable earnings in future periods, in order to utilise recognised deferred tax assets. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecast cash flows from operations and the application of existing tax laws in Australia.

To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, the ability of the Group to realise the net deferred tax assets recorded at the reporting date could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws in Australia could limit the ability of the Group to obtain tax deductions in future periods.

Tax consolidation

The Company and its wholly-owned Australian resident entities became part of a tax-consolidated group on 14 December 2006. As a consequence, all members of the tax-consolidation group are taxed as a single entity from that date. The head entity within the taxconsolidation group is Regis Resources Limited.

The head entity, in conjunction with other members of the tax-consolidated group, have entered into a tax funding arrangement which sets out the funding obligations of members of the tax-consolidated group in respect of tax amounts. Any current tax liabilities (or assets) and deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses of the subsidiaries are assumed by the head entity and are recognised by the Company as intercompany receivables (or payables). Contributions to fund the current tax liabilities are payable as per the tax funding arrangement and reflect the timing of the head entity’s obligation to make payments for tax liabilities to the relevant tax authorities.

The Company recognises deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses of the tax-consolidated group to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits of the tax-consolidated group will be available against which asset can be utilised.

Any subsequent period adjustment to deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses as a result of revised assessments of the probability of recoverability is recognised by the head entity only.

The head entity in conjunction with other members of the tax-consolidated group has also entered into a tax sharing agreement. The tax sharing agreement provides for the determination of the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities should the head entity default on its tax payment obligations. No amounts have been recognised in the financial statements in respect of this agreement as payment of any amounts under the tax sharing agreement is considered remote.

22. Share-based Payments

Accounting Policy

The value of options granted to employees is recognised as an employee expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period that the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options (the vesting period), ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the option (the vesting date).

At each subsequent reporting date until vesting, the cumulative charge to the statement of comprehensive income is the product of:

  • The grant date fair value of the option;

  • The current best estimate of the number of options that will vest, taking into account such factors as the likelihood of employee turnover during the vesting period and the likelihood of non-market performance conditions being met; and

  • The expired portion of the vesting period.

Until an option has vested, any amounts recorded are contingent and will be adjusted if more or fewer awards vest than were originally anticipated to do so.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Recognised share-based payments expense
Employee share options expense
Total expense arising from share-based payment transactions
1,959
2,519
1,959
2,519

50

Notes to the Financial Statements: Other disclosures | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

The share-based payment plans are described below. There have been no cancellations or modifications to any of the plans during the current or prior years.

Employee share option plan (ESOP)

The Company has one ESOP, being the Regis Resources Limited 2008 Share Option Plan (the “Plan”). The objective of the Plan is to assist in the recruitment, reward, retention and motivation of eligible persons of the Group. Under the Plan, the board or Remuneration and Nomination Committee may issue eligible employees with options to acquire shares in the future at an exercise price fixed by the board or Remuneration and Nomination Committee on grant of the options.

The vesting of all options is subject to service conditions being met whereby the recipient must meet the eligible employee criteria as defined in the Plan.

Summary of options granted

The following table illustrates the number (No.) and weighted average exercise prices (WAEP) of, and movements in, share options issued during the year:

during the year:
2015
No.
WAEP
Outstanding at the beginning of the year
5,337,500
$3.1666
Granted during the year
1,650,000
$1.5500
Forfeited during the year
(1,495,000)
$2.9040
Exercised during the year
(37,500)
$1.0000
Expired during the year
(300,000)
$2.2300
Outstanding at the end of the year
5,155,000
$2.7956
Exercisable at the end of the year
1,430,000
$3.4974
Weighted average share price at the date of exercise
Weighted average remaining contractual life
Range of exercise prices
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year
2015 2014
No. WAEP No. WAEP
5,337,500
1,650,000
(1,495,000)
(37,500)
(300,000)
$3.1666
$1.5500
$2.9040
$1.0000
$2.2300
5,131,146
2,730,000
(560,000)
(1,963,646)
-
$2.4046
$3.1575
$3.5313
$1.0588
-
5,155,000 $2.7956 5,337,500 $3.1666
$3.4974 1,815,000 $3.0123
2015 2014
$1.65
1.8 years
$1.55 - $4.00
$0.8600
$3.89
2.3 years
$1.00 - $4.00
$1.5081

Option pricing model

The fair value of the equity-settled share options granted under the ESOP is estimated as at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted. The following table lists the inputs to the model used for the years ended 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2014:

model used for the years ended 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2014:
Dividend yield (%)
Expected volatility (%)
Risk free interest rate (%)
Expected life of the option (years)
Option exercise price ($)
Weighted average share price at grant date ($)
2015 ESOP 2014 ESOP
0
76.32 – 88.51
2.54 – 2.72
2 – 3 years
1.55
1.51 – 1.83
0 - 3.72
66.04 – 82.29
2.61 – 3.02
2 – 3 years
2.40 – 3.50
2.28 – 4.03

The expected life of the options is based on historical data and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that historical volatility is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome.

Key estimates and assumptions

Share-based payments

The Group is required to use assumptions in respect of the fair value models used in determining share-based payments to employees in accordance with the requirements of AASB 2 Share–based payment. The accounting estimates and assumptions relating to equity-settled share-based payments would have no impact on the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next annual reporting period but may impact expenses and equity.

51

Notes to the Financial Statements: Other disclosures | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

23. Related Parties

Key management personnel compensation

The key management personnel compensation included in employee benefits expense (note 3) and share-based payments (note 22), is as follows:

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$ $
Short-term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
Termination benefits
Share-based payment
Total compensation
2,317,060
2,708,890
217,692
248,330
-
233,910
611,602
386,478
3,146,354
3,577,608

Individual directors and executives compensation disclosures

Information regarding individual directors’ and executives’ compensation and equity instrument disclosures required by s300A of the Corporations Act and Corporations Regulations 2M.3.03 are provided in the Remuneration Report section of the Directors’ Report.

No director has entered into a material contract with the Group either in the current or prior financial year and there were no material contracts involving directors’ interests existing at year end.

Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Regis Resources Limited and the subsidiaries listed in the following table:

% EquityInterest % EquityInterest Investment$’000 Investment$’000
Country of
Name
Incorporation
2015 2014 2015 2014
Duketon Resources Pty Ltd
Artane Minerals NL
Rosemont Gold Mines Pty Ltd
LFB Resources NL
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
30,575
-
-
44,110
30,575
-
-
44,110
74,685 74,685

Ultimate parent

Regis Resources Limited is the ultimate Australian parent entity and the ultimate parent entity of the Group.

Transactions with related parties

A loan is made by the Company to Duketon Resources and represents the subsidiary’s share of payments for exploration and evaluation expenditure on commercial joint ventures existing between the Company and Duketon Resources. The loan outstanding between the Company and Duketon Resources has no fixed date of repayment and is non-interest-bearing. As at 30 June 2015, the balance of the loan receivable was $14,978,000 (2014: $8,366,000).

A loan is made by the Company to LFB Resources and represents the subsidiary’s share of payments for exploration and evaluation expenditure. The loan outstanding between the Company and LFB Resources has no fixed date of repayment and is non-interest-bearing. As at 30 June 2015, the balance of the loan receivable was $24,728,000 (2014: $23,875,000).

52

Notes to the Financial Statements: Other disclosures | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

24. Parent Entity Information

The following details information related to the parent entity, Regis Resources Limited, at 30 June 2015. The information presented here has been prepared using consistent accounting policies as detailed in the relevant notes of this report.

Current assets
Non-current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Issued capital
Share option reserve
Retained profits/(accumulated losses)
Total equity
Net profit/(loss) for the year
Other comprehensive income for the period
Total comprehensive income for the period
2015
2014
$’000
$’000
100,932
89,399
445,120
406,455
546,052
495,854
43,972
68,764
60,035
74,657
104,007
143,421
431,338
431,304
18,510
16,551
(7,803)
(95,422)
442,045
352,433
87,620
(125,488)
-
-
87,620
(125,488)

The parent entity has not guaranteed any loans of its subsidiaries.

There are no contingent assets or liabilities of the Group or parent entity at 30 June 2015 as disclosed at note 26.

All commitments are commitments incurred by the parent entity, except for $1,570,000 (2014: $1,958,000) of the exploration expenditure commitments disclosed at note 12, and $14,000 (2014: $35,000) of the operating lease commitments disclosed at note 25.

25. Commitments

Operating lease commitments – Group as lessee

The Group leases office premises in Perth, WA and Blayney, NSW under normal commercial lease arrangements. The Perth office lease was entered into for an initial period of 5 years beginning 1 May 2010 and was renewed for a further 5 year period during the current year. The Group is under no legal obligation to renew the lease once the extended lease term has expired. The Blayney lease is for a period of 3 years beginning 22 February 2013 with an option to renew for a further 3 years.

Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases at 30 June are as follows:

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Within one year
Between one and five years
Total minimum lease payments
336
289
1,320
14
1,656
303

53

Notes to the Financial Statements: Other disclosures | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Finance lease commitments - Group as lessee

The Group has entered into a hire purchase contract for the purchase of a Komatsu WA900 loader. The contract expires on 29 May 2018 and ownership of the loader passes to the Group once all contractual payments have been made.

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$’000 $’000
Within one year
Between one and five years
Total minimum lease payments
Less amounts representing finance charges
Present value of minimum lease payments
Included in the financial statements as:
Current interest-bearing liabilities
Non-current interest-bearing liabilities
766
-
1,468
-
2,234
-
(109)
-
2,125
-
705
-
1,420
-
2,125
-

Contractual commitments

On 19 January 2010, the Group entered into an agreement with Pacific Energy (KPS) Pty Ltd (“KPS”) for the supply of electricity to the Moolart Well Gold Mine. The terms of this agreement commit the Group to purchasing a fixed amount of electricity per month for six years from 7 July 2010 (the “Effective Date”) at a price which will be reviewed annually. As at 30 June 2015, at the current contract price, the Group had commitments to purchase electricity for the remaining term of $1,625,000 (30 June 2014: $3,178,000).

On 23 June 2011, the Group entered into an agreement with Pacific Energy (KPS) Pty Ltd (“KPS”) for the supply of electricity to the Garden Well Gold Mine. The terms of this agreement commit the Group to purchasing a fixed amount of electricity per month for 5 years from 1 September 2012 (the “Effective Date”) at a price which will be reviewed annually. The agreement was amended, effective 1 October 2013, to incorporate Rosemont Gold Mine’s power requirements. As at 30 June 2015, at the current contract price, the Group had commitments to purchase electricity for the remaining term of $9,907,000 (30 June 2014: $14,837,000).

26. Contingencies

As at 30 June 2015, the Group did not have any contingent assets or liabilities (30 June 2014: nil).

27. Auditor’s Remuneration

Consolidated Consolidated
2015 2014
$ $
Audit services
KPMG Australia
Audit and review of financial statements
Other services
Other assurance services
Taxation compliance services
Total auditor’s remuneration
195,297
194,988
-
-
-
-
195,297
194,988

54

Notes to the Financial Statements: Other disclosures | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

28. Subsequent Events

Duketon Gold Exploration Joint Venture

On 14 July 2015, the Group announced an agreement to enter into an exploration joint venture with Duketon Mining Limited (“DKM”) on four of DKM’s exploration licences which are contiguous with some of Regis’ Duketon tenure in proximity to the Moolart Well project. The proposed joint venture will require Regis to make an up-front payment to DKM of $100,000 and Regis will spend a minimum of $1 million on exploring for gold on the tenure over a two year period to earn a 75% interest in any mining project that is confirmed by a Regis decision to mine. All non-gold mineral rights remain with DKM.

Option issue

On 11 August 2015, 8,500,000 unlisted employee options were issued under the Regis Resources Employee Share Option Plan. The options are exercisable on or before 11 August 2019 at an exercise price of $1.40.

Dividends

On 15 September 2015, the directors proposed a final dividend on ordinary shares in respect of the 2015 financial year. Refer to note 6.

Other than the matters discussed above, there has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of this Report any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature which, in the opinion of the directors of the Group, has significantly affected or is likely to significantly affect the operations of the Group; the results of those operations; or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years.

29. New Accounting Standards and Interpretations

Changes in accounting policy

The Group has adopted the following new and revised accounting standards, amendments and interpretations as of 1 July 2014:

  • Interpretation 21 Levies

  • AASB 2013-3 Amendments to AASB 136 Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets

  • AASB 1031 Materiality

  • AASB 2013-9 Part B Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Conceptual Framework, Materiality and Financial Instruments

  • AASB 2014-1 Part A Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2010-2012 Cycle and Annual Improvements to IFRSs 2011-2013 Cycle

The adoption of these new and revised standards did not have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements.

New standards and interpretations issued but not yet effective

The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been identified as those which may impact the entity in the period of initial application. They are available for early adoption at 30 June 2015, but have not been applied in preparing this financial report.

AASB 9 Financial Instruments

AASB 9 (December 2014) is a new standard which replaces AASB 139. This new version supersedes AASB 9 issued in December 2009 (as amended) and AASB 9 issued in December 2010 and includes a model for classification and measurement, a single, forward-looking ‘expected loss’ impairment model and a substantially reformed approach to hedge accounting.

AASB 9 will be effective for the Group from 1 July 2018 and is not expected to have a material impact on the classification and measurement of the Group’s financial instruments.

AASB 2014-4 Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortisation (Amendments to AASB 116 and AASB 138) AASB 116 Property, Plant and Equipment and AASB 138 Intangible Assets both establish the principle for the basis of depreciation and amortisation as being the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits of an asset.

The IASB has clarified that the use of revenue-based methods to calculate the depreciation of an asset is not appropriate because revenue generated by an activity that includes the use of an asset generally reflects factors other than the consumption of the economic benefits embodied in the asset.

The amendment also clarified that revenue is generally presumed to be an inappropriate basis for measuring the consumption of the economic benefits embodied in an intangible asset. This presumption, however, can be rebutted in certain limited circumstances.

55

Notes to the Financial Statements: Other disclosures | 30 June 2015

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers which replaces IAS 11 Construction Contracts , IAS 18 Revenue and related Interpretations (IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes , IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate , IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets from Customers and SIC-31 Revenue – Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services ). The AASB issued the Australian equivalent of IFRS 15, being AASB 15, in December 2014. AASB 2014-5 incorporates the consequential amendments to a number of Australian Accounting Standards (including Interpretations) arising from the issuance of AASB 15.

The core principle of IFRS 15 is that an entity recognises revenue to depict the transfer of promised good or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those good or services. An entity recognises revenue in accordance with that core principle by applying the following steps:

Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract

Step 3: Determine the transaction price Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract Step 5: Recognise revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation

Currently, these standards are effective for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2018. Early application is permitted.

The Group has evaluated the impact of the new standard and determined that the changes are not likely to have a material impact on the timing or amount of revenue recognised from gold sales, nor is it expected that significant changes to disclosures will be required.

AASB 2015-1 Annual Improvements to Australian Accounting Standards 2012-2014 Cycle The subjects of the principal amendments to the Standards are set out below:

AASB 119 Employee Benefits

The amendment clarifies that the high quality corporate bonds used to estimate the discount rate for post-employment benefit obligations should be denominated in the same currency as the liability. Further it clarifies that the depth of the market for high quality corporate bonds should be assessed at the currency level.

AASB 134 Interim Financial Reporting

The changes to AASB 134 clarify the meaning of ‘disclosure of information elsewhere in the interim financial report’ and require the inclusion of a cross-reference from the interim financial statements to the location of this information.

AASB 2015-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Disclosure Initiative: Amendments to AASB 101

The Standard makes amendments to AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements arising from the IASB’s Disclosure Initiative project. The amendments are designed to further encourage companies to apply professional judgment in determining what information to disclose in the financial statements. For example, the amendments make clear that materiality applies to the whole of financial statements and that the inclusion of immaterial information can inhibit the usefulness of financial disclosures. The amendments also clarify that companies should use professional judgment in determining where and in what order information is presented in the financial disclosures.

AASB 2015-3 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Withdrawal of AASB 1031 Materiality The Standard completes the AASB’s project to remove Australian guidance on materiality from Australian Accounting Standards.

56

==> picture [133 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION

In accordance with a resolution of the directors of Regis Resources Limited, I state that:

  1. In the opinion of the directors:

  2. (a) The financial statements, notes and additional disclosures included in the directors’ report designated as audited, of the Company and the consolidated entity are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:

    • (i) Giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2015 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; and

    • (ii) Complying with Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001 ; and

  3. (b) There are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.

  4. The Directors have been given the declarations required by Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for the financial year ended 30 June 2015.

  5. The directors draw attention to the notes to the consolidated financial statements, which include a statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

  6. On behalf of the board

==> picture [92 x 54] intentionally omitted <==

Mr Mark Clark Managing Director

Perth, 15 September 2015

57

==> picture [75 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

Independent auditor’s report to the members of Regis Resources Limited

Report on the financial report

We have audited the accompanying financial report of Regis Resources Limited (the company), which comprises the consolidated balance sheet as at 30 June 2015, and consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended on that date, the notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information and the directors’ declaration of the Group comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.

Directors’ responsibility for the financial report

The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error. In the notes, the directors also state, in accordance with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements , that the financial statements of the Group comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.

Auditor’s responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control . An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.

We performed the procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and Australian Accounting Standards, a true and fair view which is consistent with our understanding of the Group’s financial position and of its performance.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

==> picture [41 x 17] intentionally omitted <==

Independence

In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 .

Auditor’s opinion

In our opinion:

(a) the financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:

(i) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2015 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and

(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations

(b) the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in the basis of preparation.

Report on the remuneration report

We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 14 to 19 of the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2015. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the remuneration report in accordance with Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the remuneration report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards.

Auditor’s opinion

In our opinion, the remuneration report of Regis Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2015, complies with Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 .

==> picture [68 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

KPMG

==> picture [113 x 53] intentionally omitted <==

R Gambitta Partner

Perth

15 September 2015