AI assistant
REGIS RESOURCES LIMITED — Annual Report 2005
Sep 5, 2005
65733_rns_2005-09-05_385bbd81-2911-495c-9513-af0a070fc978.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
REGIS RESOURCES N.L. ABN 28 009 174 761
ANNUAL REPORT 2005
Regis Resources N.L. Chairman's Report
1 September 2005
Dear Shareholder
This is my second report to you as Chairman following the restructure of the Company shortly before last year's Annual General Meeting. Since that time a lot has happened and your Company is now rapidly progressing its highly prospective joint venture tenements in the Duketon region of the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia.
Although it is still early days, I am pleased to report that the Company's exploration activities are beginning to show some of the promise your Directors believe the Company's Duketon joint venture tenements hold. The recently announced revised gold exploration program at Moolart Well is returning high-grade results from shallow depths as several styles of mineralisation are investigated. Following a detailed geological review of all previous exploration activity on Regis' tenements, a nickel exploration programme at Collurabbie has commenced in August 2005 in this exciting area prospective for nickel. I would encourage you to read the Managing Director's report that follows, as this provides a more detailed explanation of our exploration projects and results from the field programmes.
During the past twelve months, the Directors and management have enhanced the Company's strategic position within the industry and this is leading to a further period of growth and transition. Principally due to strategic changes within our joint venture partner Newmont Australia Ltd ("Newmont"), your Company has the opportunity to increase its effective equity in the joint venture with Newmont. On 9 March 2005 your Company announced a Memorandum of Understanding had been reached with Newmont, whereby Regis will acquire shares in the company that holds Newmont's Duketon joint venture interests, hence increasing Regis' direct and indirect equity in the Duketon tenements to 59.2%. The consideration for this acquisition is an issue of approximately 266 million Regis shares to Newmont and the issue of the shares to Newmont is subject to shareholder approval. It is anticipated this meeting will be held in late October or November 2005.
This transaction will provide Regis shareholders with greater leverage to the exploration success from the Duketon joint venture tenements.
Finally, during the year the Company has established corporate offices in Melbourne and an exploration office in West Perth, and has been progressively building a new management team under our Managing Director, Mr David Walker.
I am also pleased to report that the Company's ordinary share price has increased from the restructure price of 5 cents per share on 18 August 2004 to 13 cents per share on 29 August 2005, a strong performance and recognition from the market of the value of the Company's activities. I am hopeful that shareholders will be rewarded with even more share price appreciation as exploration progresses.
Dr GM Folie Chairman
1 September 2005
INTRODUCTION
During the year the Company has maintained its focus on the Duketon Greenstone Belt located approximately 300 kilometres northeast of Kalgoorlie in Western Australia. The Company's main exploration interests are held in two joint ventures with partner Newmont Australia Ltd ("Newmont"), who managed the joint ventures on behalf of the partners up until 26 May 2005. Since that date, Regis has been agent for the manager as part of a restructure of the joint venture interests.
The Company holds a 20% contributing interest in the Duketon Region joint venture with the balance being held by Newmont. Within the Duketon Region joint venture, exploration activities have continued to focus on the Moolart Well gold project and have now extended to the Collurabbie nickel project, while maintaining an ongoing regional exploration programme. The Company also holds a 19.4% interest in the Duketon Rosemont Joint Venture which contains the Rosemont gold deposit, with the balance held by Newmont.
A total of 653 holes for 50,611 metres of drilling was completed during the year on all projects. continuing the joint venture partner's strong commitment to exploration in the Duketon region.
In May 2005 the joint venture partners approved an exploration budget of \$3.3 million for the period to November 2005. This budget was designed to aggressively examine the potential of the extensive gold mineralisation at Moolart Well while maintaining a regional exploration program. Since the year end the budget has been modified to include an intensive nickel exploration program over the region, particularly at Collurabbie.
At Moolart Well, an extensive aircore and RC drilling program was completed during the year to further determine the potential for significant gold oxide and sulphide zones beneath the shallow, laterite gold resource. Since June 2005, exploration activities have been directed towards greater definition of higher-grade zones in the shallow laterite resource and oxide zones beneath.
Recent drilling success from Moolart Well, including substantially higher-grade gold results than previously intersected, has increased the potential for a stand alone mining operation based on this project. If achieved, this development would also be significant for the potential development of other gold resources in the Duketon region, all of which are owned by the joint venture partners. The joint venture partners currently have 1.74 million ounces of gold in resource in eight deposits.
In March 2005 the Company negotiated a restructure of the Duketon Region and Rosemont Duketon joint ventures which, subject to shareholder approval will increase Regis' interests in each joint venture to approximately 59%, make Regis exploration manager, and result in the introduction of Newmont as Regis' major shareholder.
The Company also has an extensive tenement position in the Leonora-Laverton region either wholly owned or in joint venture with other parties. Regis is manager of exploration in all cases, and a number of exploration targets for gold or base metals require further exploration and drill testing.
TENEMENT POSITION
Regis has an interest in 438 granted tenements and tenement applications in the Leonora-Laverton-Duketon region of the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia, covering 3,350 square kilometres of Archaean greenstone terrain. Two-thirds of these tenements are held in two joint ventures with Newmont, and a significant number of these include minority third parties. The tenement position is summarised in Table 1 below.
| Project | Granted | Tenement | Total Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| tenements | applications | sq kms | |
| Duketon | 60 | 166 | 1,690 |
| Collurabbie | 20 | 56 | 909 |
| Copper Well | 48 | 34 | 347 |
| Melita | 52 | 404 | |
| Totals | 130 | 308 | 3,350 |
Table 1: Summary of Tenement Interests
NB: Refers to total tenement areas
NEWMONT JOINT VENTURE RESTRUCTURE
On 9 March 2005 the Company announced that it had entered into a memorandum of understanding ("MOU") with Newmont to increase the Company's interest in the Rosemont Duketon and Duketon Region Joint Ventures (the "Duketon Joint Ventures") to 59% from 20%.
Under the formal agreement contemplated by the MOU, Regis will acquire 49% of the issued shares in Newmont's subsidiary and the Company's joint venture partner, Newmont Duketon Pty Ltd, which will give Regis a further 39.2% indirect interest in the Duketon Joint Ventures. When included with Regis' existing direct 20% interests, this will increase Regis' total interest in the Duketon Joint Ventures to an interest of approximately 59.2%.
Consideration for the transaction will be the issue of approximately 266 million new shares in Regis to Newmont. Newmont would become Regis' major shareholder with approximately 47% of the issued capital of Regis.
REVIEW OF EXPLORATION
Duketon Region Joint Venture (Regis 20% contributing, Newmont 80%)
The Company holds a 20% interest in the Duketon Region Joint Venture which is located approximately 100 kilometres north of Laverton in Western Australia's prospective Duketon Greenstone Belt. The Duketon Greenstone Belt constitutes the northern portion of the Laverton Tectonic Zone, which hosts several major gold operations to the south of Laverton. The joint venture is split into three sub-areas: Duketon, Collurabbie and Burtville.
During the past year the joint venture partners maintained their strong focus on the gold potential of the Duketon joint venture tenements with the majority of the activities conducted at the Moolart Well gold project and at Collurabbie. The exploration and assessment programs were initially managed by Newmont, however since 25 May 2005 the programs have been managed by Regis.
Duketon Area - Moolart Well Project
During the year, 24 RC holes for 5,469m and 88 aircore holes for 6,498m were completed at the Moolart Well prospect. This program follows an extensive history of exploration and assessment undertaken by Newmont since 2002.
The RC drilling program conducted early in the year was designed to test extensions of known mineralisation on selected sections, both laterally and at depth. The majority of the drilling was located within the weathered oxide zone, or in fresh rock below the base of weathering. Best intersections are summarised below.
| Hole No | From | Τo | Int | gold g/t |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWRC203 | 193 | 195 | 2 | 8.14 |
| Incl. | 193 | 194 | 1 | 15.00 |
| MWRC204 | 97 | 98 | 1 | 4.58 |
| MWRC205 | 132 | 133 | 1 | 4.99 |
| MWRC205 | 156 | 158 | 2 | 3.85 |
| MWRC209 | 64 | 72 | 8 | 1.40 |
| MWRC209 | 104 | 105 | 1 | 7.20 |
| MWRC210 | 112 | 113 | 1 | 7.04 |
| MWRC210 | 199 | 202 | 3 | 6.44 |
| Incl. | 200 | 201 | 1 | 13.60 |
| MWRC211 | 58 | 59 | 1 | 7.90 |
| MWRC211 | 67 | 70 | 3 | 17.32 |
| Incl. | 68 | 69 | 1 | 35.60 |
| MWRC214 | 62 | 63 | 1 | 4.66 |
| MWRC214 | 206 | 207 | 1 | 3.22 |
| MWRC222 | 165 | 166 | 1 | 5.44 |
| MWRC223 | 97 | 105 | 8 | 7.58 |
| Incl. | 99 | 101 | 2 | 20.50 |
| MWRC228 | 175 | 176 | 1 | 21.80 |
| MWRC229 | 144 | 145 | 1 | 10.10 |
Further assessment of the resource continued, with all drillhole and geological data imported into Vulcan for 3D analysis. Plans of gold distribution (grade x thickness) related to the "base of oxidation" and "top of saprock" weathering surfaces were generated to assist deep drill targeting.
The magnetic and gravity survey data over Moolart Well was modelled in 3D to assist with the structural interpretation of the prospect. The magnetic modelling indicates that over a 5km E-W transect centred on Moolart Well, the easterly dip of stratigraphy increases from about $30^{\circ}$ in the west to $70^\circ$ in the east. Gravity modelling shows the eastern basalt/dolerite package as considerably thicker and denser than the basalt/diorite/dolerite package which hosts the mineralisation.
Eight shallow aircore holes (12-16m, totalling 102m) were also completed at Moolart Well to provide geochemical and mineralogical information on the laterite mineralisation. The holes were sampled at 25cm intervals and will be analysed for gold plus a multi-element suite and the mineralogy determined with the ASD (Advanced Spectral Device).
Following the change of management to Regis in May 2005, the Moolart Well exploration program was refocussed to examine in detail a number of the higher grade zones indicated from previous exploration, and a scoping study designed to examine the economic potential of the deposit commenced. It was interpreted that a number of these zones were developed at very shallow depths at the base of the laterite resource, in some cases at less than 10m vertical depth.
A program of detailed infill drilling was designed to close line spacing up to 25m in selected areas. Selected results are listed below.
| Hole No | From | Тo | Int | gold g/t |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lancaster Zone | ||||
| MWRC 237 | 67 | 76 | 9 | 20.55 |
| Inci. | 67 | 69 | 76.50 | |
| Inci. | 69 | 73 | 6.18 | |
| MWAC 786 | 19 | 11 | 2.59 | |
| MWAC 787 | 14 | 6 | 5.08 | |
| MWAC 789 | 20 | 32 | 12 | 3.30 |
| MWAC 790 | 24 | 60 | 36 | 2.29 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inci. | 32 | 48 | 16 | 3.66 |
| IMWAC 791 | 32 | 68 EOH | 36 | 3.93 |
| MWAC 792 | 52 | 64 | 12 | 2.66 |
| Inci. | 52 | 56 | 4 | 6.47 |
| MWAC 793 | 60 | 64 | 4 | 3.35 |
| MWAC 800 | 24 | 70 EOH | 46 | 12.04 |
| Inci. | 40 | 44 | 4 | 108.00 |
| Inci. | 64 | 68 | 4 | 16.30 |
| Stirling Zone | ||||
| MWAC 795 | 36 | 48 | 12 | 22.53 |
$EOH = end of hole$
As a consequence of this program, much greater continuity has been established between previously isolated intersections, and a number of distinct areas of mineralisation have been identified and named.
A number of high-grade zones have been identified within Moolart Well.
In the Lancaster zone, high-grade gold mineralisation is present in the laterite and oxide zones over a strike length of at least 600 metres, and possibly as much as 800 metres. In the laterite zone between 4 and 8 metres vertical depth, grades as high as 10 g/t gold have been intersected, significantly higher than the average Moolart Well laterite resource grade of 1.0 g/t gold. These high grade laterite zones are expected to significantly increase the average grade and contained gold of the Moolart Well laterite resource. High grade oxide mineralisation beneath the laterite cap extends from 10-60m below surface, and appears to occur in north-south shoots within the mineralisation envelope. It is not yet clear what relationship the oxide mineralisation has to the primary gold mineralisation detected in fresh rock directly below.
A number of other discrete zones of mineralisation within the Moolart Well project area have also been identified, with the Stirling zone the most advanced. Significant drilling is underway on Stirling and other areas further to the north.
The joint venture partners have commenced a scoping study to examine the likely engineering parameters and potential economic benefits of a mining project based on the Moolart Well and regional mineralisation. A stand alone operation at Moolart Well may also result in some of the smaller gold resources in the region being able to be economically treated. The study will examine mining and processing options for the various ore types present, and look at a range of financial parameters for the development of a remote operation in the Duketon area. The study will incorporate all current drilling underway and is due to report by the end of 2005.
Duketon Area - Duketon Central
A total of 120 aircore holes for 5,743m were completed at the Campervan and Combi prospects during the year. The drilling was targeting NNW trending axial planar shears associated with the major Christmas Well domal structure.
A total of 71 aircore holes for 5,893m were completed at South Moolart to the immediate south of the Moolart Well project area. The drilling was designed to test the extension of the major shear corridor which hosts the mineralisation at Moolart. The drilling intersected the same stratigraphic package as Moolart, with a sequence from west to east of basalt, diorite, dolerite and basalt. Moderate shearing was present in the east: however no significant alteration was noted. Low level gold results (0.1-0.2) ppm) were returned from several holes in the 0-8m interval associated with lateritic pisolite/iron nodule material.
At Great White, 3 km SE of Moolart Well, a total of 24 soil samples and 10 rockchip samples were collected over an isolated magnetic anomaly. The feature is associated with the NW trending fault corridor which passes through Moolart Well and occurs within a package dominated by mafic lithologies with thin chert/sedimentary units.
Collurabbie
The Collurabbie area is located approximately 160 kilometres north of Laverton and is the northern most part of the Company's Duketon joint venture areas. The basement rocks of the Duketon greenstone belt are concealed by a shallowly cover of windblown sand, but contain extensive ultramafic komatiite units which are prospective for gold and nickel mineralisation. Significantly, no systematic exploration for nickel or other base metals has been conducted over the region.
The Collurabbie tenement of Falcon Minerals Ltd and WMC Resources Ltd (now BHP Billiton Ltd) adioin the Company's Collurabbie tenements to the north, and contain the same stratigraphic sequence present in the western portion of the Company's Collurabbie tenements. On the Falcon/BHP tenement, massive and disseminated nickel-copper sulphides with significant levels of Platinum Group Elements (PGEs) have been discovered at least five separate locations in association with ultramafic komatiitic rocks. The most significant of these. Olympia, has returned an intersection of 5.8 metres at 3.00%nickel, 1.96% copper, 5.3 g/t PGM in hole CLD 159 at a vertical depth of approximately 250 metres vertical depth.
In the Company's Collurabbie tenements, a number of historical and recent exploration prospects for gold and nickel have been located. Evaluation of each of these areas is currently underway.
| Hole No | From | Τo | Int | Au g/t |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRAC335 | 52 | 68 | 16 | 0.41 |
| CRAC352 | 72. | 76 | 4 | 0.72 |
| CRAC352 | 116 | 124 | 8 | 0.36 |
| CRAC357 | 68 | 72 | 4 | 0.38 |
| CRAC438 | 56 | 80 | 24 | 0.62 |
| Incl. | 68 | 72 | 4 | 1.35 |
| CRAC484 | 52. | 64 | 12 | 0.39 |
| CRAC491 | 36 | 56 | 20 | 0.22 |
| CRAC587 | 60 | 68 | 8 | 1.59 |
| CRAC636 | 20 | 68 | 48 | 0.36 |
| CRAC637 | 88 | 96 | 8 | 0.44 |
During the year, a total of 263 aircore holes for a total of 21,766m were completed in the Collurabbie region testing gold structural, geochemical and geophysical targets. Best gold results are shown below:
Whilst these gold values are generally low order, they are often related to broad intervals with elevated arsenic and less commonly antimony. These intersections are associated with the contact between an internal granite and sediments and are open to the SW and NE. Nickel and copper assays received from re-assays of the same holes have returned elevated values, particularly over ultramafics and mafic rocks. Best results are:
| Hole No | From | Тο | Int | Ni % | Cu % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRAC344 | 24 | 52 | 28 | 0.22 | 0.01 |
| CRAC345 | 40 | 64 | 24 | 0.49 | 0.01 |
Burtville
The Burtville area is to the south and east of Laverton, and the tenements form part of the Duketon Region Joint Venture. The main tenement areas adjoin the eastern part of the Meredith Well shear zone in the Laverton tectonic zone, and previous exploration had shown low level gold results which required further follow up exploration.
During the year A1 Minerals Ltd have reported the discovery of the Brightstar gold deposit adjacent to and interpreted to partly cross the south western edge of the Company's tenements E38/1105 and E38/1113. In addition, A1 Minerals report the mineralisation dips shallowly to the northeast, into the Company's ground at moderate depths. Further drilling is planned in this immediate area.
A soil sampling program comprising 134 samples has been completed over tenements in the Granny Smith-Keringal area following previously anomalous exploration results. These results were inconclusive, but given the proximity of this tenement to major operating gold mines, further work is warranted.
Regional Properties
The Company has continued an aggressive programme of regional exploration outside of areas of known mineralisation during the year. A total of 89 holes have been drilled for 4,392 metres. It is proposed to continue this programme during the forthcoming year.
Five RC holes totalling 1,224m and 71 aircore holes totalling 3,881m were completed at the King John prospect in the Murphy Hills project area during the quarter. A summary of the best results is provided below:
| Hole No | From | Тο | Int | Au g/t |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KJRC007 | 68 | 100 | 32 | 0.25 |
| KJRC009 | 124 | 136 | 12 | 0.31 |
| KJRC011 | 40 | 44 | 0.79 | |
| KJRC011 | 56 | 140 | 84 | 0.36 |
| Incl. | 64 | 72 | 1.36 |
At the Swansons prospect in the North Laverton area, 13 aircore holes for 511m were drilled to target elevated gold results from soil sampling.
A total of 365 soil/lag samples were collected from regional Collurabbie tenements over covered areas with increased magnetic response.
Rosemont Duketon Joint Venture (Regis 19.4% contributing, Newmont 80.6%)
This joint venture hosts the Rosemont gold deposit, and is located approximately 100 kilometres north of Laverton in Western Australia. The tenement area also contains several historic gold workings including the exhausted Christmas Well open pit and smaller satellite resources.
Extensive resource modelling has been completed on the Rosemont deposit, and a number of mineralisation estimates, including a JORC compliant resource have been produced. For the main Rosemont deposit, a resource of 14.7 million tonnes at 1.72 g/t gold for 815,000 ounces of contained gold (RSG 2003, JORC compliant) calculated at a 0.5 g/t cut-off grade exists. A further 468,000 ounces of gold at an average grade of 3.32 g/t exists in the Rosemont vicinity within six separate deposits.
The Rosemont gold deposit was deemed not to be economically viable as a stand alone operation by consultants RSG Global, given a number of gold price, ore haulage and milling scenarios. The assessment was not significantly improved with the inclusion of the satellite deposits into the mining plan. However, ongoing reassessment work may assist in delineating further resources in the area. If Moolart Well was to proceed to a stand alone operation, then this may have a significant positive impact on the feasibility of the Rosemont gold deposit.
During the year a closure plan for the former Christmas Well mine site and Banyego mill site/tailings dam was developed.
Leonora Projects
The Company also holds two further significant groups of tenements in the Leonora-Laverton region in joint venture with other parties, and in each case Regis is manager. These tenements were accumulated over many years and are highly prospective for gold and nickel mineralisation.
Copper Well Joint Venture (Regis 50-100% and Manager)
The Copper Well project comprises the Copper Well and Salt Well joint ventures and other wholly and partly owned tenements located approximately 30 kilometres east of Leonora in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia. The project consists of 48 granted tenements and 34 tenement applications covering a total of 347 square kilometres.
The tenements are prospective for gold mineralisation and are also close to the Murrin Murrin nickel and cobalt deposits and processing facility owned jointly by Minara Resources Ltd and Glencore International. Some gold exploration has been conducted over the area in the past; however this consisted of mainly reconnaissance surface geochemistry with little or no drilling.
The Salt Well (Regis 50%, earning 85%) and Burley Well areas (Regis earning 70%) cover a portion of the Keith-Kilkenny shear zone which in places is covered by as much as 100 metres of channel and lake sediments. Previous drilling by the Company has intersected gold mineralisation including 4 metres at 7.3 g/t gold and 3 metres at 7.6 g/t gold at the base of alluvial channels in the southeast. During the year, 8 holes for 850 metres were drilled to further define the mineralisation trend, with minor results. Further work in this area will be aimed at determining the source of the gold mineralisation.
In the Kowtah area a northeast trending structure separates a predominantly mafic sequence from and ultramafic sequence, and extensions of this structure beyond the Company's tenements contain several gold occurrences including the Abednego West gold deposit.
Melita Joint Venture (Regis earning 70% and Manager)
The Melita Project is located 15 kilometres southeast of Leonora in the eastern goldfields of Western Australia and consists of 2 granted tenements and 52 tenement applications covering a total of 404 square kilometres. The extensive ground position has been built up over a number of years, exploring for shear-zone hosted gold deposits and volcanic-hosted base metal deposits. The project area continues to be reviewed for gold potential considering its proximity to the Leonora mining centre and the increased level of exploration activity by competitors in the region.
The more mafic rock sequences in the northeast of the tenement group area contain more prospective structural elements related to the Keith-Kilkenny fault corridor bordering to the east. Widespread transported cover and lake sediments obscure the basement geology over much of the area. During the year the Company has continued to evaluate the prospectivity of the tenement package and further evaluation is planned for the forthcoming year.
Resource Statement
| type | RRL* | m | cut-off | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| interest | tonnes | grade | koz | g/t | category | source | ||
| Moolart Well | laterite | 59% | 14.1 | 1.00 | 458 | 0.5 | ind+inf | RSG |
| Rosemont | ox+sulph | 59% | 14.7 | 1.72 | 815 | 0.5 | ind+inf | RSG |
| Other | ||||||||
| Dogbolter | $ox + sub$ | 59% | 0.9 | 2.91 | 87 | 1.0 | ind+inf | NEWM |
| King John | ox+sulph | 59% | 0.7 | 3.19 | 72 | 1.0 | ind+inf | NEWM |
| Baneygo | ox+sulph | 59% | 0.8 | 1.67 | 43 | 0.5 | ind+inf | NEWM |
| Erlistoun | ox+sulph | 59% | 1.4 | 4.34 | 193 | 1.0 | ind+inf | NEWM |
| Russells Find | ox+sulph | 59% | 0.5 | 3.86 | 56 | 1.0 | ind+inf | NEWM |
| Reichelts Find | lduz+sa | 59% | 0.1 | 3.69 | 17 | 1.0 | ind+inf | NEWM |
| Sub-Total | 59% | 4.4 | 3.32 | 468 | ||||
| TOTAL RESOURCES | 33.2 | 1.63 | 1,741 | |||||
| RRL equity | 1.028 |
Source: RSG=RSG Global 2003, NEWM= Newmont Australia Ltd * NB: 59% equity subject to completion of the transaction with Newmont Australia Ltd
The technical information in this report has been reviewed and approved by Mr D Walker who is a
Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has more than 20 years experience in the industry.
DA Walker Managing Director
The Directors of Regis Resources N.L. present their report for the year ended 30 June 2005.
$\mathbf{1}$ Directors
The Directors of the Company in office since 1 July 2004 and up to the date of this Report are:
Dr G. Michael Folie (BE (Civil), DIC, MSc (Econ) PhD, FAICD) - Non-Executive Chairman, Chair of Remuneration Committee
Dr Folie has had a distinguished career in the resource sector and is currently Deputy Chairman of InterOil Corporation Limited and a Director of the Institute of Public Affairs. He was previously a senior executive with Shell Australia Limited and its subsidiaries from 1979 where he was involved in all aspects of Shell's Australian businesses, including investments in coal, alumina, gold, LNG, oil refineries and chemical plants. From 1990 to 1994 Dr Folie was a director of Shell Australia, and was the Executive Director responsible for Billiton Australia activities (alumina, gold, base metals and exploration) and Shell Coal - the third largest Australian producer. From 1994, he was the founding Managing Director and CEO of ASX listed gold explorer and producer Acacia Resources Limited, which was capitalised at \$400 million on listing and acquired in 2000 for over \$834 million. Dr Folie was also a director of the Australian Research Council (2001 – 2004) and the Export Finance and Insurance Corporation ("EFIC") (1994 - 1997), an arm of the Australian Federal Government. Dr Folie has degrees from Melbourne University and Imperial College, a PhD in Civil Engineering from Southampton University and an MSc in Economics from the London School of Economics and currently resides in Melbourne, Australia. In the three years prior to the date of this Report, Dr Folie was also a Director of Helix Resources Limited and Concept Gold Limited. Appointed 26 August 2004. Age 65
Mr David Walker (BSc (Hons), MSc, MAuslMM) - Managing Director
Mr Walker is the principal of Dalkeith Corporate, a firm providing specialist corporate advisory, equity market, research and general capital markets advice to clients. Mr Walker, who gained a Master of Science degree from Oxford University, is a qualified Geologist and has worked in the Mining Industry as an Exploration Geologist, Mine Geologist, Mine Scheduling Engineer and Business Development Manager. Mr Walker has over 15 years professional experience in the stockbroking, corporate finance and resource banking areas, with specialist skills in resource technical and securities analysis. Mr Walker has been a rated equity analyst in the gold, diamonds, diversified resources and coal sectors. Prior to his current role, Mr Walker was a founding director of Auzeg Securities Ltd, an independent institutional resources research house. Mr Walker was an Executive Director of ABN AMRO Australia Securities, the Australian arm of the global investment-banking group, where he also held the several senior positions including Head of Mining Research. In these capacities Mr Walker was involved with management of the operating divisions of the bank, including sales and trading, investment banking, proprietary activities, risk management and compliance. Mr Walker is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metailurgy and is a Director of Concept Gold Limited. Appointed 26 August 2004. Age 50
Mr Marcus Rose (MBA, ASIA, AREI, FAICD) - Non-Executive Director, Member of Audit Committee
Mr Rose is an Executive Director and major shareholder in the Concept Group of Companies, a financial services group that provides corporate and investment services. He has specialist skills in technical and security analysis and has over 25 years of professional experience in the equity, capital and property markets. Mr Rose has advised and acted on behalf of a number of major Australian and international companies and has been responsible for a substantial number of mergers, acquisitions and takeovers. The Concept Group has also successfully completed a number of direct investments. Prior to his involvement with the Concept Group, Mr Rose was an Executive Director of Henty Corporation Limited, a public company providing debt and equity funding to small and medium sized companies. Mr Rose is on the board of Australian Energy Limited, Arafura Resources NL, Concept Investment Management Limited, Carlton Football Club Limited and The Carlton Cricket and Football
Social Club Limited. Mr Rose is also a director of a number of private companies. Mr Rose is an Associate of the Securities Institute of Australia, an Associate of the Real Estate Institute of Australia, and a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Company Directors. In the three years prior to the date of this Report, Mr Rose was also a Director of Concept Gold Limited. Appointed 26 August 2004. Age 58
Mr Glenister Lamont (B.Eng (Hons), MBA, ASIA, FAICD, MAusIMM) - Non Executive Director, Chair of Audit Committee, Member of Remuneration Committee
Mr Lamont is principal of Logmaor Services, which focuses on providing strategic advice and investor relations services to a variety of listed and private companies. He has participated at all levels through to board, both as an adviser and as practitioner in the formulation of strategy, identification, structuring and execution of domestic and international corporate developments. He was on the board of ASX listed Bounty Oil & Gas. His consultancy has included investor relations for Woodside, and work in the healthcare sectors. The most recent role was Manager Corporate for the Gribbles Group, where he undertook considerable work with the board on governance, among other issues. Previously he was General Manager Corporate for Ashton Mining Ltd where he led strategic planning and commercial implementation of business development initiatives, managed all aspects of investor relations and public affairs and oversaw IT for the group. Prior to that he was an Executive Director at UBS, where he spent more than a decade conducting financial, technical and strategic evaluation of resource companies and participated in a wide range of corporate transactions. He also has operational management experience in the resource and energy industries both in Australia and overseas. Mr Lamont is an Associate of the Securities Institute of Australia, a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Company Directors, and a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is a Director of Northern Australian Diamonds Ltd. Appointed 26 August 2004. Age 49
Mr. J I Gutnick, Dr D S Tyrwhitt and Mr. M Z Gutnick were in office from 1 July 2004 to 26 August 2004. Information in respect to Mr. Jl Gutnick. Dr DS Tyrwhitt and Mr. MZ Gutnick are as follows:
Mr Joseph Gutnick FAusiMM FAIM MAICD Formerly Chairman and Managing Director
Mr Gutnick was a Director of the Company from 1987 to 2004 and is currently Chairman and Managing Director of Great Gold Mines N.L. (October 1988 to current), Astro Diamond Mines NL (April 1987 to current) and Quantum Resources Limited (July 1987 to current) and President and Chief Executive Officer of Bay Resources Ltd (March 1988 to current) and Legend International Holdings Inc. (December 2004 to current) Delaware Corporations listed on the over the counter market in the USA. In the three years prior to the date of this Report, Mr Gutnick was also a Director of Tahera Corporation (May 2000 to October 2003).
Dr David Tyrwhitt PhD(Geology) BSc(Hons) FSEG(USA) FAusIMM CPGeo Formerly Non-Executive Director
Dr Tyrwhitt was a Director of the Company from 1996 to August 2004. He has more than 40 years experience in the mining industry. He is currently a Director of Great Gold Mines N.L. (November 1996 to current), Astro Diamond Mines N.L. (November 1996 to current), Quantum Resources Limited (November 1996 to current), Bay Resources Ltd (November 1996 to current) and Legend International Holdings Inc. (March 2005 to current). In the three years prior to the date of this report, Dr Tyrwhitt was also a Director of Tahera Corporation (November 2002 to September 2003).
Mr Mordechai Gutnick Formerly Non-Executive Director
Mr Mordechai Gutnick was appointed a Director of the Company in May 2003 to August 2004. He is also a Director of Great Gold Mines N.L. (May 2003 to current), Astro Diamond Mines N.L. (May 2003 to current) and Quantum Resources Limited (May 2003 to current).
$2.$ Principal Activities
The principal activity of the Economic Entity during the financial year was mineral exploration. There has been no significant change in the nature of this activity during the financial year.
Objectives
The Company's objective is to increase shareholder wealth through successful exploration activities whilst providing a safe workplace and ensuring best practice in relation to its environmental obligations.
Three key opportunities have been the focus of the Company during the year, namely:-
- the restructuring of the Company that took place in August 2004 which resulted in the $(i)$ raising of \$3 million in cash, retirement of all debt and the change in the Board of Directors;
- $(ii)$ the continuation of exploration activities in the Duketon Greenstone Belt of Western Australia in joint venture with Newmont Australia Limited ("Newmont"); and
- the negotiation of an agreement whereby the Company takes management control of the $(iii)$ Duketon joint ventures, and acquires a 49% interest in the joint venture manager (Newmont Duketon Pty Ltd) in exchange for an issue of approximately 266 million ordinary shares in Regis. This arrangement is anticipated to settle in October 2005. This will result in the Company having a total direct and indirect interest in the Duketon joint venture tenements of 59.2%.
As an exploration company, Regis does not have an ongoing source of revenue. Its revenue stream is normally from ad-hoc tenement disposals and interest received on cash in bank.
In the current year, revenue has increased from \$5,577 in 2004 to \$79,685 in 2005. In 2005, as a result of the capital raisings in August and December 2004. Regis has had higher levels of cash in the bank which has generated interest income of \$73,940 (2004 \$4,605).
Costs from ordinary activities have decreased from \$3,944,790 in 2004 to \$3,063,729 in 2005. This is a net result of the following:-
- exploration expenditure provided for or written off decreased from \$1,558,975 in 2004 to $(i)$ \$840,250 in 2005. In 2005, the Company, as part of the transaction with Newmont to take management control and acquire a 49% interest in Newmont Duketon Pty Ltd was required to obtain an independent expert's report which included a mineral valuation of the Company's mineral properties. As part of the Company's impairment testing of the mineral properties, it compared the carrying values to the independent valuation and where the carrying value was higher, wrote down the carrying value. In 2004, a similar mineral valuation of the Company's mineral properties was prepared by an external mineral valuer and as part of the Company's impairment testing of the mineral properties, it compared the carrying values to the independent valuation and where the carrying value was higher, wrote down the carrying value. As a result of the larger write down in the carrying value of the tenements in 2004, there was a lower write down required in 2005.
- during the 2005 year, the Company acquired a 1/6th interest in a future royalty stream if $(ii)$ production occurs from the underlying tenements. The writedown of the royalty is on the basis that the underlying tenements are not economic at this time as feasibility studies have not been prepared, there are no mining operations and no basis to calculate an inflow from the rovalty.
- (iii) administration costs increased from \$453,823 in 2004 to \$1,218,649 in 2005. Directors fees paid to the Non-Executive Directors in 2005 were \$95,376 compared to \$125,369 in 2004 (which included the remuneration paid to the Executive Director). Consulting and contracting fees paid in 2005 totaled \$688,218 (2004: \$242,926) and the key component in 2005 were the corporate advisory fee paid to Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd and Concept Equity Pty Ltd of \$256,250 in regard to the restructuring of the Company which was settled in August 2004; \$171,871 paid/accrued to Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd for the services of the Company's Managing Director, Mr. D Walker; \$218,699 (2004: \$222,216) paid to AXIS
Consultants Pty Ltd who provided company secretarial, finance, payroll and tenement services; \$68,723 paid to consulting geologists; and \$70,000 (2004: \$nil) to Fernwaye Pty Ltd (Dr G M Folie) who provided services in regard to the Newmont transaction. Legal fees amounted to \$71,377 in 2005 (2004: \$6,800) in respect to the Newmont transaction and various rovalty, joint venture commercial and corporate matters.
borrowing costs reduced from \$1,931,992 in 2004 to \$320,898 in 2005. In August 2004, as (iv) part of the restructuring that occurred. \$1,000,000 in interest bearing debt was repaid. \$5,509,678 in interest bearing debt was converted into equity and the balance of \$19,340,940 in interest bearing debt was extinguished. As a result, the interest expense for the year has reduced significantly. In 2004, the interest bearing debt of the Company averaged approximately \$26 million and interest was payable on that amount.
As a result, the operating loss from ordinary activities before income tax was \$2,618,385 in 2005 compared to \$3,939,213 in 2004. The Company has made an operating loss in both 2005 and 2004 and therefore there is no income tax attributable to the operating loss.
In 2005, the Company made a profit of \$19,340,940 being an extraordinary gain on the restructuring that occurred in August 2004. The major component of the extraordinary profit was the extinguishment of all debt of the Company after the repayment of \$1,000,000 and the conversion of \$5,509,678 of debt into equity. There was no tax payable on the extraordinary profit as the Company had carry forward tax losses to deduct against this extraordinary profit.
As a result, the Company made a net profit for 2005 of \$16,356,896 compared to a net loss of \$3,939,213 for 2004.
Statement of Financial Position
Following the restructuring in August 2004, the Company's cash position has improved significantly whilst at the same time, all interest bearing debt has been extinguished. At 30 June 2005, the Company had \$2,091,508 in cash. Exploration expenditure carried forward in regard to areas in the exploration phase at cost amounted to \$4.222.149. The Company's policy is to capitalize exploration expenditure as it is incurred. On a semi annual basis, the Company reviews carried forward exploration expenditure to determine whether costs should continue to be carried forward in respect of that area of interest. The Company has a receivable of \$213,890 being an amount lodged with its joint venture partner as security for its share of performance bonds provided to the Department of Industry and Resources WA in respect to the Duketon exploration project.
Creditors and accruals totaled \$440,787 and the Company's share of the rehabilitation obligation at 30 June 2005 amounted to \$612,480.
At 30 June 2005, the Company had a positive working capital position of \$1,686,190 and net assets of \$5,594.942.
Cash Flow
During 2005, the Company has raised a net \$5.487.174 through equity raisings in the financial markets, has paid \$757,343 to its joint venture partner as its share of exploration expenditure on the Duketon joint ventures, paid a further \$366,432 for exploration on its 100% owned tenements, paid \$147,216 as a security deposit in respect of rehabilitation quarantees and repaid \$1,581,463 in interest bearing debt. At 30 June 2005, the Company has \$2,091,508 in cash. The Duketon joint ventures operating committees have approved budgets for exploration for the period June to December 2005 of \$3,300,000 and Regis' share is 20% or \$660,000 at 30 June 2005. Under the arrangements with Newmont referred to earlier in relation to taking management control and acquiring a 49% interest in Newmont Duketon Pty Ltd, Regis is required to reimburse Newmont, at settlement, for Newmont's share of exploration expenditure on the Duketon joint ventures from January 2005 to the date of settlement. At 30 June 2005, this amount was approximately \$650,000. In addition, from settlement of the transaction with Newmont, Regis will have an obligation to spend a total of \$10,000,000 on exploration on the Duketon joint venture tenements by approximately mid 2007, and any amounts expended since January 2005 (including amounts reimbursed to Newmont) are included in the commitment of \$10,000,000.
In order to meet its ongoing exploration commitments, working capital requirements and other obligations, Regis will need to raise further funds through either equity or debt raisings.
On the settlement of the transaction with Newmont, Regis will hold a 49% interest in Newmont-Duketon Pty Ltd and will use the equity accounting method to account for this investment.
AXIS Consultants Pty Ltd managed the Company pursuant to a service agreement dated 25 November 19988 until August 2004 when the change of Directors occurred. Since that time, AXIS has continued to provide some services to the Company, primarily, company secretarial, finance and tenement management and has reported to the managing director in respect to these areas. The Company has recently recruited a General manager Finance and Admin and has commenced the recruitment of further staff in both Victoria and WA to manage its affairs and it is anticipated that AXIS will cease to provide services in the first half of the 2006 financial year.
3. Review and Results of Operations
A review and results of operations is contained in the Principal Activities section of the Directors' Report. The financial result of the operations was a profit of \$16,722,555 after providing for income tax.
$\overline{4}$ . Significant Change in State of Affairs
The Directors are of the opinion that other than that disclosed in the Principal Activities section of the Directors' Report, there has not been any significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company during the year under review.
5. Dividends
The Directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend and no amount has been paid or declared by way of dividend since the end of the previous financial year and up to the date of this Annual Report.
6. Events After The End Of The Financial Year
There has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of this Report any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature which in the opinion of the Directors of the Economic Entity, has significantly affected or may significantly affect
- the operations of the Economic Entity ٠
- the results of those operations, or
- the state of affairs of the Economic Entity ٠
in financial years subsequent to this financial year.
7. Future Developments and Results
There are no likely developments of which the Directors are aware which could be expected to significantly affect the results of the Company's operations in subsequent financial years not otherwise disclosed in the Principal Activities section of the Directors' Report.
8. Options
At the date of this Report, the Company had on issue the following listed and unlisted options over fully paid ordinary shares.
$(i)$ Listed
| Number | Maturity Date | Issue Price | Exercise Price | Exercise Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.736.079 30 April 2012 | No issue price A\$0.20 | Anytime after 1 January | ||
| 2002. |
Optionholders have no rights to participate in an issue of shares unless they convert their options. During the year and up to the date of this Report, 15,000,000 options have been issued and no options have lapsed. The names of all the persons who currently hold options are entered on a register maintained for the Company, by ASX Perpetual Registrars Limited. In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, this register may be inspected free of charge.
| Number | Maturity Date | Issue Price | Exercise Price | Exercise Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38,970,230 31 October 2012 No issue price A\$0.10 | Anytime after 1 July 2003. |
Optionholders have no rights to participate in an issue of shares unless they convert their options. During the year and up to the date of this Report, 22,500,000 options have been issued and 250 options have lapsed. The names of all the persons who currently hold options are entered on a register maintained for the Company, by ASX Perpetual Registrars Limited. In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, this register may be inspected free of charge.
| Number | Maturity Date | Issue Price | Exercise Price | Exercise Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96,718,936 31 January 2014 | No issue price | A\$0.05 | Immediately |
Optionholders have no rights to participate in an issue of shares unless they convert their options. During the year and up to the date of this Report, 30,000,000 options have been issued and no options have lapsed. The names of all the persons who currently hold options are entered on a register maintained for the Company, by ASX Perpetual Registrars Limited. In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, this register may be inspected free of charge.
$(ii)$ Unlisted
| Number | Maturity Date | Issue Price | Exercise Price | Exercise Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70.000 | 24 March 2010 | A\$0.131 | A\$5.68 | Under terms and conditions of |
| the employee share option plan |
Optionholders have no rights to participate in an issue of shares unless they convert their options. During the year and up to the date of this Report, no options have been issued or exercised and no options have lapsed. The names of all the persons who currently hold options are entered on a register maintained by the Company. In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, this register may be inspected free of charge.
9. Directors' Interests in Shares and Options
The relevant interest of each Director in the number of fully paid ordinary shares and options over fully paid ordinary shares of the Company disclosed by that Director to the Australian Stock Exchange as at the date of this Report is:
| Director | Relevant Interest | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shares | Options | Options | Options | Options | |
| 30/04/2012 | 31/10/2012 | 31/01/2014 | 24/03/2010 | ||
| M. Folie | 3.171.170 | ||||
| D. Walker | 7.615.000 | 7.500.000 | 11.250.000 | 15,000,000 | $\sim$ |
| M. Rose | 7.500.000 | 7.500.000 | 11.250.000 | 15,000,000 | $\sim$ |
| G. Lamont | 700.000 | - |
$10.$ Meetings of Directors
| BOARD | AUDIT COMMITTEE |
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELIGIBLE | ATTENDED | ELIGIBLE | ATTENDED | ELIGIBLE | ATTENDED | |
| TO | TÓ | TÓ | ||||
| ATTEND | ATTEND | ATTEND | ||||
| M. Folie | 17 | 17 | ||||
| D. Walker | 17 | 13 | $\blacksquare$ | |||
| M. Rose | 17 | 17 | 4 | - | ||
| G. Lamont | 17 | 17 | 4 | 4 | ||
| J Gutnick | 2 | |||||
| D S Tyrwhitt | 2 | - | ||||
| M Z Gutnick | ≘ |
The number of meetings of Directors held including meetings of Committees of the Board during the financial vear including their attendance was as follows:
Note: Dr M. Folie and Mr. G Lamont were appointed to the Remuneration Committee and Mr G. Lamont and Mr M. Rose were appointed to the Audit Committee on 26 August 2004. Dr. D.S. Tyrwhitt and Mr M.Z. Gutnick were members of the Audit Committee and Remuneration Committee from 1 July 2004 to 26 August 2004. On that date, Dr D.S. Tyrwhitt and Mr M.Z. Gutnick resigned,
$11.$ Company Secretary
Mr Peter Lee is the Company Secretary of the Company. Mr Lee is a Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia, a Fellow of Chartered Secretaries Australia Ltd., a Member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors and holds a Bachelor of Business (Accounting) from Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. He has over 25 years commercial experience and is currently General Manager Corporate and Company Secretary of several listed public companies in Australia and a Director, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of a US Corporation listed on the over the counter market in the USA and Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of a second US Corporation listed on the over the counter market in the USA.
Mr Richard Wadley was Joint Company Secretary of the Company from 25 October 2004 to 18 March 2005.
$12.$ Directors And Officers' Indemnity
The Company has entered into an Indemnity Deed with each of the Directors which will indemnify them against liability incurred to a third party (not being the Company or any related company) where the liability does not arise out of conduct including a breach of good faith. The Indemnity Deed will continue to apply for a period of 10 years after a Director ceases to hold office, and a Director's Access and Insurance Deed with each of the Directors pursuant to which a Director can request access to copies of documents provided to the Director whilst serving the Company for a period of 10 years after the Director ceases to hold office. There will be certain restrictions on the Directors' entitlement to access under the deed. In addition the Company will be obliged to use reasonable endeavors to obtain and maintain insurance for a former Director similar to that which existed at the time the Director ceased to hold office. During the year, an Indemnity Deed was entered into with Dr Folie and Messrs Walker, Rose and Lamont.
Directors' and Officers' Insurance $13.$
The Company has, during or since the end of the financial year, paid an insurance premium in respect of an insurance policy for the benefit of the Directors, Secretaries, Executive Officers and employees of the Company and any related bodies corporate as defined in the insurance policy. The insurance grants indemnity against liabilities permitted to be indemnified by the Company under Section 199B of the Corporations Act 2001. In accordance with commercial practice, the insurance policy prohibits disclosure of the terms of the policy including the nature of the liability insured against and the amount of the premium.
$14.$ Environment
The exploration activities of the Company are conducted in accordance with and controlled principally by Australian state and territory government legislation. The Company has extensive exploration land holdings in Western Australia. The Company employs a system for reporting environmental incidents, establishing and communicating accountability, and rating environmental performance. During the year data on environmental performance was reported as part of the exploration reporting regime. In addition, as required under state legislation, procedures are in place to ensure that the relevant authorities are notified prior to the commencement of ground disturbing exploration activities.
The Company is committed to minimising the impact of its activities on the surrounding environment at the same time aiming to maximise the social, environmental and economic returns for the local community. To this end the environment is a key consideration in our exploration activities and during the rehabilitation of disturbed areas. Generally rehabilitation occurs immediately following the completion of a particular phase of exploration. In addition the Company continues to develop and maintain mutually beneficial relationships with the local communities affected by its activities.
15. Non-audit services
During the year KPMG, the Company's auditor, has performed certain other services in addition to their statutory duties.
The Board has considered the non-audit services during the year by the auditor and in accordance with written advice provided by resolution of the Audit Committee, is satisfied that the provision of those non-audit services during the year by the auditor is compatible with, and did not compromise, the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for the following reasons:
- z All non-audit services were reviewed by the Audit Committee to ensure they do not impact the integrity and objectivity of the auditor prior to the commencement of the work; and
- The non-audit services provided do not undermine the general principles relating to auditor $\blacksquare$ independence as set out in Professional Statement F1 Professional Independence, as they did not involve reviewing or auditing the auditor's own work, acting in a management or decision making capacity for the Company, acting as an advocate for the Company or jointly sharing risks and rewards.
A copy of the auditors independence declaration as required under Section 307C of the Corporations Act is attached to the Directors' Report.
Details of the amounts paid to the auditor of the Company, KPMG, and its related practices for audit and non-audit services provided during the year are set out below. In addition, amounts paid to other auditors for the statutory audit have been disclosed:
| Consolidated | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2005 \$ |
2004 \$ |
|
| Statutory audit | ||
| Auditors of the Company | ||
| - audit and review of financial reports (KPMG Australia) | 21,000 | $\blacksquare$ |
| - audit and review of financial reports (PKF) | 24,900 | |
| Other services | ||
| Accounting and taxation advice (KPMG Australia) | 5.000 | ۰ |
16. Remuneration Report
$(i)$ Overview of Remuneration Policies
Remuneration levels for Directors, Secretaries, Senior Managers of the Company ("the Directors and Senior Executives") are competitively set to attract and retain appropriately qualified and experienced Directors and Senior Executives. The Remuneration Committee's decisions on the appropriateness of remuneration packages are based on competitive state of the employment market for different specific skill sets, independently sourced market surveys related to the resources sector and the need to incentivise personnel to meet the Company's strategic objectives.
The remuneration structures explained below are designed to attract suitably qualified candidates. reinforce the imperative to meet the strategic objectives, and hence achieve the broader outcome of creation of value for shareholders. The remuneration structures take into account the
- the capability and experience of the Directors and Senior Executives;
- the Directors and Senior Executives ability to influence the Company's performance;
the Company's performance primarily defined as the Company's success in discovering economically exploitable mineralized systems, with earnings not currently a significant driver of performance. The value of this strategy will be reflected in the growth in share price and returns on shareholder wealth
the mix of cash and option incentives within each Directors' and Senior Executives' remuneration package.
Remuneration packages include a mix of cash and longer-term performance based incentives.
$(ii)$ Fixed Remuneration
Fixed remuneration consists of base remuneration (which is calculated on a total cost basis and includes any fringe benefit tax charges related to employee benefits including motor vehicles), as well as emplover contributions to superannuation funds. The Company allows Directors and Senior Executives to salary sacrifice for additional benefits (on a total cost basis).
Remuneration levels are reviewed annually by the Remuneration Committee through a process that considers individual and overall performance of the Company. In addition, external consultants provide analysis and advice to ensure the Directors' and Senior Executives' remuneration is competitive in the market place, as required.
$(iii)$ Performance-Linked Remuneration
Performance is linked remuneration and focuses on long-term incentives and was designed to reward Executive Directors and Senior Executives for meeting or exceeding their objectives. Recently the Company has not paid short-term incentive bonuses.
Long-Term Incentive
1999 Employee Share Option Plan
Options have been issued under the 1999 Employee Share Option Plan (made in accordance with thresholds set in plans approved by shareholders at the 1999 AGM). No further options can be issued under this plan and none have issued in the 2005 financial year. Note 30 to the financial statements details the options outstanding under this plan.
2005 Employee Share Option Plan
The Directors of the Company are preparing a new plan to be titled the "2005 Employee Share" Option Plan" and it is intended to seek approval to the introduction of this Plan at a shareholders meeting to be convened in October 2005.
Following the restructure of the Company that took place in August 2004, and the negotiation of the transaction with Newmont Australia Ltd as detailed in the Directors' Report, the Remuneration Committee believes it is important to introduce a new plan to provide incentives for Directors, Senior Executives and employees.
$(iv)$ Service Agreements
Mr. David Walker, Managing Director has a contract with Regis Resources N.L. with an effective date of 1 July 2005 via Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd. The contract specifies the duties and obligations to be fulfilled by the Managing Director, is for 2 years, has a contract fee of \$263,000 per annum, provides for 9 months notice of termination (other than in the case of negligent conduct) in the case of termination by the Company and 3 months notice of termination in the case of Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd. The Managing Director has no entitlement to a termination payment.
Dr Folie, and Messrs Lamont and Rose do not have a contract for their services as Non-Executive Chairman and Non - Executive Directors respectively.
Mr. Peter Lee, Company Secretary, does not have a contract of employment with the Company. His services are provided to the Company through the service arrangements with AXIS Consultants Pty Ltd. This service contract is for an unlimited term and is capable of termination on two months notice.
The Company has entered into service contracts with each Senior Executive. The service contract outlines the components of remuneration paid to the Senior Executives but does not prescribe how remuneration levels are modified year to year. Remuneration levels are reviewed each year to take into account cost-of-living changes, any change in the scope of the role performed by the Senior Executive and any changes required to meet the principles of the remuneration policy. The Senior Executives are entitled to receive on termination of employment their statutory entitlements of accrued annual and long service leave, together with any superannuation benefits.
$(v)$ Non-Executive Directors
Total remuneration for all Non-Executive Directors, last voted upon by shareholders at the 1999 AGM, is not to exceed \$200,000 per annum. Directors' base fees are presently up to \$109,000 per annum. Non-Executive Directors did not receive performance related remuneration. Directors' fees cover all main board activities and membership of board committee. Non-Executive Directors do not receive any benefits on retirement. From time to time, Non-Executive Directors may provide consulting services to the Company and in these cases, they are paid consulting fees in line with industry rates.
Details of Directors, Specified Executives and Remuneration. The names of the Directors $(vi)$ and Specified Executives in office during the year are as follows:-
Directors $(a)$
G M Folie - Non Executive Chairman (26 August 2004 to June 2005) D A Walker - Managing Director (26 August 2004 to June 2005) G Lamont - Non Executive Director (26 August 2004 to June 2005) M Rose - Non Executive Director (26 August 2004 to June 2005) J | Gutnick - Chairman and Managing Director (Resigned 26 August 2004) D S Tyrwhitt - Non Executive Director (Resigned 26 August 2004) M Z Gutnick - Non Executive Director (Resigned 26 August 2004)
$(b)$ Specified Officers
P J Lee - General Manager Corporate & Company Secretary R Wadley - CFO & Company Secretary (25 October 2004 to 18 March 2005)
Remuneration $(c)$
| 2005 \$ |
2004 S |
|
|---|---|---|
| G M Folie | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary/Directors fees Consulting fees |
42,374 70,000 |
|
| Cash profit sharing and other bonuses | ||
| Non-monetary benefits | ||
| 112,374 | ||
| Post employment benefits | ||
| Superannuation Prescribed benefits |
2,689 | |
| Other post employment benefits | ||
| 2,689 | ||
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 115,063 | |
| D A Walker | ||
| Primary benefits | ||
| Consulting fees Cash profit sharing and other bonuses |
205,562 | |
| Non-monetary benefits | ||
| 205,562 | ||
| Post employment benefits | ||
| Superannuation Prescribed benefits |
||
| Other post employment benefits | ||
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 205,562 | |
| G Lamont | ||
| Primary benefits | ||
| Cash salary/Directors fees | 21,187 | |
| Consulting fee Cash profit sharing and other bonuses |
3,000 | |
| Non-monetary benefits | ||
| 24,187 |
| 2005 \$ |
2004 S |
|
|---|---|---|
| Post employment benefits | ||
| Superannuation Prescribed benefits |
1,907 | |
| Other post employment benefits | ||
| 1,907 | ||
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 26,094 | |
| M Rose | ||
| Primary benefits | ||
| Cash salary/Directors fees | 21,187 | |
| Cash profit sharing and other bonuses Non-monetary benefits |
||
| 21,187 | ||
| Post employment benefits | ||
| Superannuation | 1,907 | |
| Prescribed benefits Other post employment benefits |
||
| 1,907 | ||
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 23,094 | |
| J Gutnick | ||
| Primary benefits | ||
| Cash salary Cash profit sharing and other bonuses |
13,333 | 76,000 |
| Non-monetary benefits | 3,313 | |
| 13,333 | 79,313 | |
| Post employment benefits | ||
| Superannuation | 1,200 | 13,171 |
| Prescribed benefits Other post employment benefits |
||
| 1,200 | 13,171 | |
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 14,533 | 92,484 |
| 2005 \$ |
2004 S |
|
|---|---|---|
| D S Tyrwhitt | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary/Directors fees |
2,500 | 15,000 |
| Cash profit sharing and other bonuses Non-monetary benefits |
||
| 2,500 | 15,000 | |
| Post employment benefits | ||
| Superannuation Prescribed benefits |
225 | 1,402 |
| Other post employment benefits | ||
| 225 | 1,402 | |
| Equity Compensation | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 2,725 | 16,402 |
| M Z Gutnick | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary/Directors fees |
2,500 | 15,000 |
| Cash profit sharing and other bonuses Non-monetary benefits |
||
| 2,500 | 15,000 | |
| Post employment benefits | ||
| Superannuation Prescribed benefits |
225 | 1,483 |
| Other post employment benefits | ||
| 225 | 1,483 | |
| Equity Compensation | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 2,725 | 16,483 |
| Aggregate for Specified Directors | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary/Directors fees Consulting fees |
103,081 278,562 |
106,000 |
| Cash profit sharing and other bonuses Non-monetary benefits |
3,313 | |
| 381,643 | 109,313 |
| 2005 \$ |
2004 S |
|
|---|---|---|
| Post employment benefits Superannuation |
8,153 | 16,056 |
| Prescribed benefits Other post employment benefits |
||
| 8,153 | 16,056 | |
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 389,796 | 125,369 |
| PJLee | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary |
57,428 | 32,371 |
| Cash profit sharing and other bonuses Non-monetary benefits |
||
| 5,467 62,895 |
5,750 38,121 |
|
| Post employment benefits Superannuation |
10,377 | 6,672 |
| Prescribed benefits Other post employment benefits |
||
| 10,377 | 6,672 | |
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 73,272 | 44,793 |
| D Prentice | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary |
24,059 | |
| Cash profit sharing and other bonuses | ||
| Non-monetary benefits | 4,306 28,365 |
|
| Post employment benefits Superannuation |
2,359 | |
| Prescribed benefits Other post employment benefits |
||
| 2,359 | ||
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 30,724 |
| 2005 S |
2004 S |
|
|---|---|---|
| R Wadley | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary/Consulting fees Cash profit sharing and other bonuses Non-monetary benefits |
11,925 | |
| 11,925 | ||
| Post employment benefits Superannuation Prescribed benefits |
||
| Other post employment benefits | ||
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 11,925 | |
| Aggregate for Specified Executives | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary/Consulting fees Cash profit sharing and other bonuses |
69,353 | 56,430 |
| Non-monetary benefits | 5,467 | 10,056 |
| 74,820 | 66,486 | |
| Post employment benefits Superannuation Prescribed benefits |
10,377 | 9,031 |
| Other post employment benefits | 10,377 | 9,031 |
| Equity Compensation - value of options | ||
| Other compensation benefits | ||
| Total | 85,197 | 75,517 |
| Aggregated for Specified Directors and Executives | ||
| Primary benefits Cash salary/Directors fees/ Consulting fees |
172,434 278,562 |
162,430 |
| Cash profit sharing and other bonuses Non-monetary benefits |
5,467 | 13,369 |
| 456,463 | 175,799 | |
| Post employment benefits Superannuation |
18,530 | 25,087 |
| Prescribed benefits Other post employment benefits |
||
| 18,530 | 25,087 |
| 2005 S |
2004 | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity Compensation - value of options | - | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ |
| Other compensation benefits | $\blacksquare$ | |
| Total | 474,993 | 200,886 |
Certain other payments have been made to the Directors which related to activities prior to their appointment as Directors. These payments have been disclosed in the related party note to the financial statements.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors at Melbourne this 5th day of September 2005.
Glerinster Lemmon
G Lamont Director
D A Walker Director

Lead Auditor's Independence Declaration under Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 to the directors of Regis Resources N.L.
I declare to that to the best of my knowledge and belief, in relation to the audit for the financial year ended 30 June 2005 there have been:
- $(i)$ no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements as set out in the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
- $(ii)$ no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
Kitche
Alison Kitchen
Melbourne
26 August 2005
Regis Resources N.L.
Statement of Financial Performance for the Year Ended 30 June 2005
| Note | 2005 S |
2004 Ŝ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues | |||
| Revenues from ordinary activities | $\overline{2}$ | 79.685 | 5,577 |
| Total revenue | 79,685 | 5,577 | |
| Expenses | |||
| Costs from ordinary activities Exploration expenditure provided for or written off Provision for write down of mining royalty Administration Borrowing costs Depreciation expenses Provision for diminution of investments Carrying value of non-current assets sold |
3 3 3 |
(840, 250) (682, 220) (1, 218, 649) (320, 898) (1, 169) (542) (1) |
(1,558,975) (453, 823) (1,931,992) |
| Total expenses | (3,063,729) | (3,944,790) | |
| Operating loss from ordinary activities before income tax expense |
(2,984,044) | (3,939,213) | |
| Income tax attributable to ordinary activities | 4 | ||
| Operating loss from ordinary activities after income tax expense |
(2,984,044) | (3,939,213) | |
| Profit from extraordinary items after income tax | 5 | 19,340,940 | |
| Net profit/(loss) | 16,356,896 | (3,939,213) | |
| Total changes in equity other than those resulting from transactions with owners as owners |
16,356,896 | (3,939,213) | |
| Cents | Cents | ||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | 6 | 5.71 | (4.15) |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | 6 | 4.89 | (4.15) |
The Statement of Financial Performance is to be read in conjunction with the attached notes to and forming part of the
Financial Statements.
Regis Resources N.L.
Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June 2005
| Note | 2005 \$ |
2004 \$ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| Cash assets Receivables Other financial assets Other |
7 8 9 10 |
2,091,508 23,218 2,612 9,639 |
7,098 14,599 77,126 |
| TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 2,126,977 | 98,823 | |
| NON-CURRENT ASSETS | |||
| Receivables Other financial assets Exploration expenditure Plant and equipment Other Intangible assets |
8 g 11 12 10 13 |
213,890 4,222,149 5,920 79,273 |
68,500 3.155 3,300,526 |
| TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS | 4,521,232 | 3,372,181 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 6,648,209 | 3,471,004 | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||
| Payables | 14 | 440,787 | 283,886 |
| TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 440,787 | 283,886 | |
| NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||
| Provisions Interest bearing liabilities |
15 16 |
612,480 | 25,883,704 |
| TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | 612,480 | 25,883,704 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 1,053,267 | 26,167,590 | |
| NET ASSETS | 5,594,942 | (22,696,586) | |
| EQUITY | |||
| Contributed equity Accumulated losses |
17 18 |
42,562,554 (36,967,612) |
30,627,922 (53,324,508) |
| TOTAL EQUITY | 19 | 5,594,942 | (22,696,586) |
The Statement of Financial Position is to be read in conjunction with the attached notes to and forming part of the Financial
Statements.
Regis Resources N.L.
Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended 30 June 2005
| Note | 2005 | 2004 \$ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||
| Payments in the course of operations Interest received Borrowing costs paid |
(764.983) 71,538 |
(394, 353) 4.508 (2,226) |
|
| NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES | 22 | (693, 445) | (392, 071) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||
| Contributions to joint venture exploration expenditure Payments for exploration expenditure Proceeds from security deposit refunds Payment of security deposit |
(757, 343) (366, 432) (147, 216) |
(1, 108, 415) (170, 686) 149.250 |
|
| Purchase of plant and equipment Payment for other non-current assets |
(7,089) (45, 776) |
||
| NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES | (1,323,856) | (1, 129, 851) | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||
| Proceeds from issue of shares Payment of share issue costs Net proceeds from issue of shares Proceeds from borrowings Repayment of borrowings |
5,817,780 (330, 606) 202,000 (1,587,463) |
5,030,838 972,645 (4,475,182) |
|
| NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | 4,101,711 | 1,528,301 | |
| Net increase in cash held | 2,084,410 | 6,379 | |
| Cash at the beginning of the financial year | 7,098 | 719 | |
| CASH AT THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR | 7 | 2,091,508 | 7,098 |
The Statement of Cash Flows is to be read in conjunction with the attached notes to and forming part of the Financial
Statements.
1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
$(i)$ Basis of Preparation
The financial report is a general purpose financial report and has been prepared in accordance with applicable Accounting Standards, Urgent Issues Group Consensus Views, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board and the Corporations Act 2001. The financial report has been prepared on the historical cost basis and except where stated, does not take into account changing money values or fair valuations of non-current assets. Except where stated, the accounting policies are consistent with those of the previous year.
$(ii)$ The following Accounting Policies have been adopted in preparing and presenting the Financial Report
Principles of Consolidation
The Company has a single Controlled Entity, which has not operated since incorporation. Consolidated accounts therefore, have not been prepared.
Revenue Recognition
Interest Income
Interest income is recognised as it accrues.
Assets Sales
The gross proceeds of asset sales are included as revenue of the Company. The profit or loss on disposal of assets is brought to account at the date an unconditional contract of sale is signed.
The gain or loss on disposal is calculated as the difference between the carrying amount of the asset at the time of disposal and the net proceeds on disposal.
Other Revenue
Revenue recognition policies for investments are described in the relevant Accounting Policy Note.
Borrowing Costs
Borrowing costs include interest and lease finance charges. Borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.
Non-Current Assets
The carrying amounts of non-current assets, other than exploration expenditure carried forward, are reviewed to determine whether they are in excess of their recoverable amounts at balance date. If the carrying amount of a non-current asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is written down to the lower amount. In assessing recoverable amounts of non-current assets, the relevant cash flows have not been discounted to their present value.
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont'd.) $\mathbf{1}$
Classification of Assets and Liabilities
Assets and liabilities are classified as current and non-current. Current assets are cash or other assets that would in the ordinary course of business be consumed or converted into cash within twelve months. Current liabilities are liabilities that would in the ordinary course of business be due and payable within twelve months.
Income Tax
Income tax has been brought to account using the liability method of tax effect accounting whereby income tax expense/benefit for the period is calculated on the accounting result after adjusting for items which, as a result of their treatment under income tax legislation, create permanent differences between that result and the taxable result. The tax effect of timing differences which arise from the recognition in the accounts of items of revenue and expenses in periods different from those in which they are assessable or allowable for income tax purposes are represented as "Future income tax benefits" or "Provisions for deferred income tax" as the case may be at current tax rates.
Future income tax benefits are only carried forward as assets where realisation of the benefits can be regarded as being virtually certain.
The ultimate realisation of the benefits will depend upon:
- the ability of the Company to derive future assessable income and capital profits of $(a)$ the nature and of sufficient amount to enable the benefits to be realised;
- the ability of the Company to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by $(b)$ law; and
- $(c)$ an expectation that legislation will not change in a manner which would adversely affect the ability of the Company concerned to realise the benefits.
Employee Share Option Plan
The Company has granted options to certain employees under an employee share option plan. Further information is set out in Note 30. The receivable and the option reserve have not been recognised as the probability that the economic benefits embodied in the asset will eventuate, cannot be reliably determined due to the terms of the Option Plan. These amounts will be recognised when options are exercised. Other than the costs incurred in administering the scheme which are expensed as incurred, the scheme does not result in any expense to the Company.
Joint Venture Operations
The Company's interests in unincorporated joint ventures are brought to account by including its interest in the following amounts in the appropriate categories in the Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Financial Performance:
- each of the individual assets employed in the joint venture;
- liabilities incurred by the Company in relation to the joint venture and the liabilities for which it is jointly and/or severally liable; and
- expenses incurred in relation to the joint venture.
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont'd.) 1
Investments
Investments have been valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value as determined in respect of each security holding. Dividend revenue is recognised in the Statement of Financial Performance when received.
Plant and Equipment
Owned
Plant and equipment is carried at the lower of cost less accumulated depreciation and recoverable amount. The carrying amounts of plant and equipment valued on the cost basis are reviewed to determine whether they are in excess of their recoverable amounts at balance date. If the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the asset is written down to the lower amount. The write down is recognised as an expense in the net profit or loss in the reporting period in which it occurs.
In assessing recoverable amounts of plant and equipment the relevant cash flows have not been discounted to their present values.
Items of plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives. The depreciation rate used for computer equipment is 33%.
Assets are depreciated/amortised from the date of acquisition.
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
All loans are measured at the principal amount. Interest is recognised as an expense as it accrues.
Exploration
Exploration expenditure is capitalised for each separate area of interest where rights to tenure are current and:
- (a) such costs are expected to be recovered through successful development and exploitation or by sale; or
- (b) where activities in the area of interest have not vet reached a stage which permits reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves and active and significant operations in relation to the area are continuing.
Ultimate recoupment of exploration expenditure carried forward is dependent on successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas.
Each area of interest is reviewed at the end of each accounting period to determine whether costs should continue to be carried forward in respect of that area of interest. Where it is determined that an area of interest has no commercial value and is to be abandoned, the net balance of costs carried forward is written off.
1. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Cont'd.)
Restoration Expenditure
Provision for rehabilitation is recognised in relation to areas where mining activities have previously taken place. The provision includes rehabilitation of former mining waste dump and pit areas and exploration drillholes. These costs have been determined based on current costs, current legal requirements and current technology. Any changes in the estimates are adjusted on a prospective basis. In determining the restoration obligations the entity has assumed no significant changes will occur in the Federal and State legislation in relation to restoration of such areas.
No material future restoration liabilities are anticipated in relation to the Company's normal exploration program.
(iii) Comparative Figures
Where necessary comparative figures have been restated to be consistent with current year presentation.
| Note | 2005 S |
2004 \$ |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2. | REVENUE | |||
| Other revenues: | ||||
| From operating activities | ||||
| Interest | 73,940 | 4.605 | ||
| Proceeds from sale of non-current assets Sundry income |
1 5,744 |
972 | ||
| 79,685 | 5,577 | |||
| 3. | LOSS FROM ORDINARY ACTIVITIES | |||
| The loss from ordinary activities has been determined after charging: |
||||
| Borrowing costs Related Party |
28 | 318,143 | 1,929,679 | |
| Other Entities Other |
28 | 1,380 1,375 |
2,313 | |
| 320,898 | 1,931,992 | |||
| Depreciation of plant and equipment Provision for write down of mining royalty |
1,169 682,220 |
|||
| Auditor's remuneration Audit services Accounting and taxation advice |
21,000 5,000 |
22,900 | ||
| 4. | TAXATION | |||
| Income tax expense (a) |
||||
| Prima facie income tax (expense) benefit calculated at 30% (2004 30%) on the net (profit) loss |
(4,907,069) | 1,181,764 | ||
| (Increase)/decrease in income tax due to: Future income tax benefit (not) recognised Other sundry items |
4,774,286 (132, 783) |
(1, 180, 498) (1,266) |
||
| Income tax applicable | ||||
| Future income tax benefit not recognised (b) |
The future income tax benefit in respect of tax losses of the Company has not been recognised as an asset in the financial statements as the realisation of the benefit is not virtually
Future income tax benefit has been calculated at 30%
certain.
| Note | 2005 | 2004 \$ |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4. | TAXATION (Cont'd) | ||||
| Revenue losses | 6,804,704 | 11,578,990 | |||
| Capital losses | 2,307 | 2.307 | |||
| The potential future income tax benefit will only be obtained if: | |||||
| (i) | the relevant company derives future assessable income of a nature and an amount sufficient to enable the benefit to be realised: |
||||
| (ii) | the relevant company continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by the law; and |
||||
| (iii) | no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the relevant company in realising the benefit. |
||||
| 5. | EXTRAORDINARY ITEM | ||||
| Extinguishment of non current interest bearing liabilities. | 19,340,940 | ||||
| Profit from extraordinary item before income tax | 19,340,940 | ||||
| Prima facie income tax expenses calculated at 30% | 5,802,282 | ||||
| Utilisation of prior year tax losses | (5,802,282) | ||||
| Applicable income tax expense | |||||
| Profit from extraordinary item after income tax | 19,340,940 | ||||
| In late August/early September 2004, a number of transactions as set out in note 16 settled following shareholder approval obtained on 18 August 2004 to a restructuring of the Company. On 1 September 2004, debts owing to companies associated with Mr Gutnick were extinguished following the payment of \$1 million and this gave rise to a profit. |
Number | Number | |||
| 6. | EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE | ||||
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares on issue used in the calculation of basic earnings (loss) per share. |
286,541,848 | 94,911,371 | |||
| Weighted average number of potential ordinary shares used in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. |
334,199,486 | 94,911,371 | |||
| \$ | \$ | ||||
| Net profit (loss) used in calculating earnings (loss) per share | 16,356,896 | (3,939,213) | |||
| The following securities have been classified as potential ordinary shares and included in diluted earnings per share, 96,718,936 options at an exercise price of \$0.05 cents per option and 38,970,480 options at an exercise price of \$0.10 cents per option. |
|||||
| Options that would be included in the calculation of diluted |
earnings per share when applicable are 25,736,079 options at an exercise price of \$0.20 cents per option.
Options that would be included in the determination of diluted
earnings per share when applicable are 70,000 options at an exercise price of \$5.68 per option issued under the employee share option plan.
| Note | 2005 S |
2004 \$ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 7. | CASH ASSETS | ||
| Cash at bank | 2,091,508 | 7,098 | |
| 8. | RECEIVABLES | ||
| CURRENT | |||
| Non-trade receivable | 23,218 | 14,599 | |
| NON-CURRENT | |||
| Deposits in respect of mineral exploration tenement guarantees |
213,890 | 68,500 | |
| 9. | OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS | ||
| CURRENT | |||
| Listed shares at cost Other Entity |
2,612 | ||
| NON-CURRENT | |||
| Listed shares at cost Other Entity |
3,155 | ||
| Investment in Controlled Entity | |||
| The Company has a 100% Controlled Entity, Rosemont Gold Mines Pty. Ltd. This is dormant and has not traded since it was incorporated in February 1998. The Company has \$2 of issued capital and cash at bank. Preparation of consolidated financial statements would not be meaningful. |
|||
| 2005 S |
2004 | ||
| 10. | OTHER ASSETS | \$ | |
| CURRENT | |||
| Prepayments | 9,639 | 77,126 |
NON-CURRENT
Prepayments
EXPLORATION 11.
Areas in the exploration phase At cost 4,222,149 3,300,526
79,273
The ultimate recoupment of exploration costs carried forward is dependent on the successful development and commercial exploitation or the sale of the respective areas.
| Note | 2005 S |
2004 \$ |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12. | PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | |||
| Plant and equipment at cost Less accumulated depreciation |
7.089 (1, 169) |
|||
| 5,920 | ||||
| Reconciliation Plant and equipment Carrying amount at the beginning of the year Additions |
7,089 | |||
| Disposals Depreciation |
(1,169) | |||
| Carrying amount at the end of the year | 5,920 | |||
| 13. | INTANGIBLES | |||
| Mining royalty at cost Less amortisation: fair value/recoverable amount write-down |
682,220 (682, 220) |
|||
During the year, the Company acquired a 1/6th interest in a future royalty stream if production occurs from the underlying tenements. The writedown of the royalty is on the basis that the underlying tenements are not economic at this time as feasibility studies have not been prepared, there are no mining operations and no basis to calculate an inflow from the royalty.
| Note | 2005 \$ |
2004 \$ |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14. | PAYABLES | |||
| CURRENT | ||||
| Trade creditors and accruals | 440,787 | 283,886 |
15. PROVISIONS
NON-CURRENT
| Rehabilitation | 612,480 | - |
|---|---|---|
A provision for rehabilitation is recognised in relation to areas where mining activities have previously taken place. The estimate is based on the Company's share of Department of Industry and Resources Western Australia environmental performance bonds placed on the relevant tenements and an internal assessment on the cost of closure and reclamation of the areas prepared by the joint venture partner.
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES 16.
NON-CURRENT
| Secured borrowing Other Entity Related Party |
28(iv) 28(v) |
- | 2,512,685 2,688,033 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5,200,718 | |||
| Unsecured borrowing Related Party |
28(v) | ۰ | 20.682.986 |
| 25,883,704 |
$16.$ INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES (Cont'd)
In 2004 the secured borrowing Other Entity was secured by a second ranking floating charge over the assets of the Economic Entity and the secured borrowing Related Party was secured by a first ranking floating charge over the assets of the Economic Entity.
In late August/early September 2004, a number of transactions settled, following shareholder approval obtained on 18 August 2004, to a restructuring of the Company. The restructuring resulted in the following:
- $(i)$ a placement of 60,000,000 ordinary shares raising \$3,000,000
- $(ii)$ an issue of 15,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares at an issue price of five (5) cents per share; 30,000,000 options (at no additional consideration), with an exercise price of five (5) cents and a latest exercise date of 31 January 2014; 22,500,000 options (at no additional consideration), with an exercise price of ten (10) cents and a latest exercise date of 31 October 2012; and 15,000,000 options (at no additional consideration), with an exercise price of twenty (20) cents and a latest exercise date of 30 April 2012 to Concept Equity Pty Ltd (or their nominee) and Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd, as a fee for securing the placement of \$3,000,000 and corporate advisory services.
- an issue of 78,709,686 fully paid ordinary shares at an issue price of 7 cents per fully paid ordinary $(iii)$ share to a nominee of Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd as repayment of a debt to Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd of \$5,509,678.02.
- $(iv)$ Debts owing to companies associated with Mr Gutnick were extinguished following the payment of \$1 million. This gave rise to a gain on debt extinguishment of \$19,340,940 (Refer Note 5).
| Note | 2005 S |
2004 \$ |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17. | CONTRIBUTED EQUITY | |||
| Issued and paid up capital 325,761,366 (June 2004: 139,433,499) shares |
42,562,554 | 30,627,922 | ||
| MOVEMENT IN ORDINARY SHARE CAPITAL | ||||
| Balance at the beginning of the financial period | 30.627.922 | 25.612.405 | ||
| 78,709,686 shares issued to settle outstanding liabilities under corporate restructure Less transaction costs (expert's report, legal) 91,818,181 (June 2004: 6,000,000) shares issued pursuant to a placement of ordinary shares Less transaction costs 800,000 shares issued for payment of consulting services Less transaction costs 15,000,000 shares issued for payment of fees for corporate advisory and placement services |
16(ii) | 5,509,678 (109, 958) 6,500,000 (751, 779) 40.000 (1,527) 750,000 |
420,000 (28, 408) |
|
| Less transaction costs June 2004: 250 options converted |
(1,782) | 25 | ||
| June 2004: 66,718,936 shares issued pursuant to a prospectus Less transaction costs |
4.670.326 (46, 426) |
|||
| Balance at the end of the financial year | 42.562.554 | 30.627,922 |
$17.$ CONTRIBUTED EQUITY (Cont'd)
25,736,079 options are on issue at an exercise price of \$0.20 which, if exercised, will entitle the optionholder to one fully paid ordinary share in the Company for each option. The options may be exercised at any time after 1 January 2003. Options not exercised by 30 April 2012 lapse.
38,970,230 are on issue at an exercise price of \$0.10 which, if exercised, will entitle the optionholder to one fully paid share in the Company for each option. The options may be exercised at any time after 1 July 2003. Options not exercised by 30 October 2012 will lapse.
96,718,936 options are on issue at an exercise price of \$0.05 which, if exercised, will entitle the optionholder to one fully paid share in the Company for each option. The options may be exercised at any time. Options not exercised by 31 January 2014 will lapse.
70,000 employee share options are on issue at an exercise price of \$5.68 per option - refer Note 30 for details.
| Note | 2005 \$ |
2004 S |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18. | ACCUMULATED LOSSES | |||
| Accumulated losses at the beginning of the year Net profit (loss) for the year |
(53, 324, 508) 16.356.896 |
(49, 385, 295) (3,939,213) |
||
| Accumulated losses at the end of the year | (36,967,612) | (53, 324, 508) | ||
| 19. | TOTAL EQUITY RECONCILIATION | |||
| Total deficiency at the beginning of the year Total changes in equity recognised in Statement of Financial |
(22,696,586) | (23,772,890) | ||
| Performance Transactions with owners as owners |
16,356,896 | (3,939,213) | ||
| Contributions of equity | 11,934,632 | 5,015,517 | ||
| Total equity/(deficiency) at the end of the year | 5,594,942 | (22,696,586) |
20. ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE
(a) Interest rate risk exposures
The Company's exposure to interest rate risk and the effective weighted average interest rate for classes of financial assets and financial liabilities is set out below:
| Fixed interest maturing in: | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Note | Weighted Average interest rate $\%$ |
Floating interest rate Ş |
1 year or less \$ |
Over 1 to 5 years \$ |
More than 5 years \$ |
Non- interest bearing \$ |
Total \$ |
| Financial assets Cash assets Receivables Investments |
7 8 9 |
4.15% 5.29% $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ |
2,091,508 193,890 |
$\overline{a}$ ä, |
43,218 2,612 |
2,091,508 237,108 2,612 |
||
| Total | 2,285,398 | $\overline{a}$ | 45,830 | 2,331,228 | ||||
| Financial liabilities Payables Total |
14 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 440,787 440,787 |
440,787 440,787 |
||||
| 2004 | ||||||||
| Financial assets Cash assets Receivables Investments Total |
7 8 9 |
3.30% 2.95% |
7,098 48,500 55,598 |
34,599 3,155 37,754 |
7,098 83,099 3,155 93,352 |
|||
| Financial liabilities Borrowings (i) Borrowings (iii) Borrowings (ii) Borrowings Payables |
16 16 16 16 14 |
9.10% 7.43% 10.10% 9.10% |
2,688,033 14,863,690 2,512,685 5,819,296 |
$\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | ÷. | 283,886 | 2,688,033 14,863,690 2,512,685 5,819,296 283,886 |
|
| Total | 25,883,704 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 283,886 | 26, 167, 590 |
In late August/early September 2004, a number of transactions settled, following shareholder approval obtained on 18 August 2004, to a restructuring of the Company (See Note 16). The restructuring included the following:
An issue of 78,709,686 fully paid ordinary shares at an issue price of 7 cents per fully paid ordinary share to a nominee of Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd as repayment of a debt to Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd of \$5,509,678.02.
Debts owing to companies associated with Mr Gutnick were extinguished following the payment of \$1 million. This gave rise to a gain on debt extinguishment of \$19,340,940.
- (i) Wilzed Pty Ltd, a Director Related Entity, charged interest at the "Reference Rate" of the ANZ Banking Group Limited. The actual rate for 2004 was 9.10%. In 2004 the loan was secured by a floating charge over the assets on the Economic Entity.
- (ii) AXIS Consultants Pty Ltd, charged interest at the National Australia Bank business base rate plus a margin. The actual rate for 2004 was 10.10%. In 2004 the loan was secured by a second ranking floating charge over the assets of the Company.
$21.$ ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE (Con'td)
- (iii) In prior years, the Company had a loan from Newmont Australia Limited which was secured by a Mining Act mortgage over certain tenements. During the 2002 year, the loan was renegotiated and this included assignment of 50% of the loan to Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd ("Edensor Nominees") a Director Related Entity. The Mining Act mortgage over certain tenements continues to secure the part of the loan assigned to Edensor Nominees. The actual interest rates for 2005 ranged between 7.43% and 7.45% (2004: 6.7067% and 7.51%). A company of which Mr Gutnick is a Director and shareholder has provided security to the Company in case the security provided by the Company to Newmont Australia Limited is called. At 30 June 2005, the value of that security is \$9,398,866.
- $(b)$ Credit risk exposures
Credit risk represents the loss that would be recognised if counterparties failed to perform as contracted. The credit risk on financial assets, excluding investments of the Company, which have been recognised on the Statement of Financial Position, is the carrying amount, net of any provision for doubtful debts.
Net fair values of financial assets and liabilities $(c)$ Valuation approach Net fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined by the Company on the following basis:
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments: The carrying amount approximates fair value because of their short-term to maturity.
Receivables and payables: The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Short term borrowings: The carrying amount approximates fair value because of their short-term to maturity.
Long-term bank guarantee deposits: The fair value of long-term bank guarantee deposits are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on current incremental lending rates for similar types of lending arrangements.
Long-term borrowings: The fair value of long-term borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on the year end interest rates and in accordance with terms and conditions disclosed in Note 21(a).
Non-current investments/securities: For financial instruments traded in organised financial markets, fair value is the current quoted market bid price for an asset or offer price for a liability, adiusted for transaction costs necessary to realise the asset or settle the liability. For investments where there is no quoted market price, a reasonable estimate of the fair value is determined by reference to the current market value of another instrument which is substantially the same or is calculated based on the expected cash flows or the underlying net asset base of the investment/security.
The carrying amounts and net fair values of financial assets and liabilities as at the reporting date are as follows:
| Note | 2005 Carrying amount \$ |
2005 Net fair Value \$ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | |||
| Cash assets | 2,091,508 | 2,091,508 | |
| Receivables | 8 | 237,108 | 237,108 |
| Investments: | 9 | ||
| Shares in other corporations - listed | 2,612 | 2,612 | |
| Financial liabilities | |||
| Payables | 14 | 440,787 | 440.787 |
The carrying amounts and net fair values of financial assets and liabilities as at 30 June 2004 were as follows:
| Recognised financial instruments | Note | 2004 Carrying amount S |
2004 Net fair Value \$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | |||
| Cash assets | 7.098 | 7.098 | |
| Receivables | 8 | 83,099 | 83,099 |
ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE (Cont'd) $21.$
| Note | 2004 Carrying amount S |
2004 Net fair Value \$ |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investments: Shares in other corporations - listed |
9 | 3,155 | 7.192 | |
| Financial liabilities | ||||
| Payables Borrowings |
14 16 |
283,886 25,883,704 |
283,886 25,883,704 |
|
| 2005 S |
2004 | |||
| 22. | STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS | |||
| (a) Reconciliation of operating loss after income tax to net cash used in operating activities |
||||
| Operating profit (loss) after income tax | (2,984,044) | (3,939,213) | ||
| Add (less) non-cash items: Increase in borrowing costs payable Exploration expenditure written off Amortisation of non current assets Share based payments Depreciation of non current assets Diminutation of investments |
320,898 840,250 682,220 250,000 1,169 542 |
1,931,992 1,558,975 |
||
| Net cash used in operating activities before change in assets and liabilities |
(888,965) | (448, 316) | ||
| (Increase) decrease in receivables Increase (decrease) in trade creditors |
(6,219) 201,739 |
100,054 (43, 879) |
||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | (693, 445) | (392, 071) | ||
(b) Non-cash financing and investing activities.
Proceeds from borrowings does not include interest of \$320,898 (2004 \$1,929,678) that was capitalised into borrowings for the year.
During the year 10,800,000 shares were issued for \$540,000 as payment to creditors for share placement and advisory services and 6,202,000 shares were issued for \$682,220 as payment of the mining royalty.
(c) Reconciliation of cash
For the purpose of the Statements of Cash Flows, cash includes cash on hand and in banks.
(d) Investing and Financing activities
Refer Note 16 for details of company restructure.
23. INTEREST IN UNINCORPORATED JOINT VENTURES
Duketon Region Agreements
(i) Duketon-Rosemont Joint Venture
During the 1999 year the Company entered into an agreement with Aurora Gold Pty Ltd ("Aurora") to acquire a 100% interest in Rosemont and certain other tenements, for \$8 million, and a royalty arrangement. Newmont Duketon Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Newmont Australia Limited ("Newmont"), paid the \$8 million to Aurora on behalf of the Company and earned a 30% interest in Rosemont. In addition Newmont could earn a further 20% interest in Rosemont by sole funding \$10 million in exploration and feasibility activities. During the 2002 year Newmont agreed to release and discharge the Company from certain monies outstanding under the Facility Agreement dated 15 December 1998. The consideration for this transaction included Newmont obtaining an immediate 80% interest in Rosemont, management of the Joint Venture and the cessation of its sole contribution obligations.
(ii) Duketon Region Joint Venture
As further consideration of the release and discharge of the obligations arising under the Facility Agreement described in note 23(a)(i), Newmont received 80% of the Company's interest in a number of certain other joint venture tenements. Management of the other joint venture tenements also transferred to Newmont in the 2002 year.
| 2005 | 2004 | |
|---|---|---|
| - 52 | ||
| 24. COMMITMENTS |
(a) Tenement exploration commitments
The Company has to perform minimum work and expend minimum amounts of money on its tenements. The overall expenditure requirement tends to be limited in the normal course of the Company's tenement portfolio management through expenditure reductions or relinquishment of parts or the whole of tenements deemed non prospective. Should the Company wish to preserve interests in its current tenements the amount which may be required to be expended is as follows:
| Not later than one vear Later than one year but not later than five years Later than five vears but not later than twenty one years |
345.720 838.240 $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ |
367.720 294.760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.183.960 | 662.480 |
The terms and conditions under which the Company has litle to its various mining tenements oblige it to meet tenement rentals and minimum levels of exploration expenditure as gazetted by the Department of Industry and Resources Western Australia, as well as Local Government and taxes.
The "Later than five years but not later than twenty-one years" component represents commitments starting from five years hence for the following sixteen years in respect of Mining Licences which are granted for a period of twenty one years, but in common with Prospecting Licences and Exploration Licences may be relinquished or sold by the Company before the expiry of the full term of the Licence.
(b) Farm-in contract commitments
The Company is required to spend certain amounts on exploration expenditure to earn an interest under a Farm-In contract.
At balance date the amount which may be required to be expended in respect of the abovementioned is as follows:
| 2005 S |
2004 \$. |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 24. | COMMITMENTS (Cont'd) | ||
| Not later than one year Later than one year but not later than five years |
623,390 | 813,197 | |
| 623,390 | 813,197 | ||
| The Company can withdraw from this commitment after expending \$200,000 on exploration and maintaining the tenements in good standing until the date of withdrawal. To date \$376,610 has been spent. |
|||
| (c) Joint venture exploration commitments | |||
| The Company is a party to joint ventures with Newmont Duketon Pty Ltd. The joint venture partners have to perform statutory minimum work and expend minimum amounts of money on their tenements. The overall expenditure requirement tends to be limited in the normal course of the joint venture partners tenement portfolio management through expenditure reductions or relinquishment of parts or the whole of tenements deemed non prospective. Should the joint venture partners wish to preserve interests in their current tenements the amount which may be required to be expended is as follows: |
|||
| Not later than one year Later than one year but not later than five years Later than five years but not later than twenty one years |
476,537 1.810.934 1,557,303 |
464,579 1,588,083 1,750,811 |
|
| 3.844.774 | 3.803.473 | ||
The terms and conditions under which the joint venture partners have title to their various mining tenements oblige it to meet tenement rentals and minimum levels of exploration expenditure as gazetted by the Department of Industry and Resources of Western Australia, as well as Local Government and taxes.
The "Later than five years but not later than twenty-one years" component represents commitments starting from five years hence for the following sixteen years in respect of Mining Licences which are granted for a period of twenty one years, but in common with Prospecting Licences and Exploration Licences may be relinquished or sold by the Company before the expiry of the full term of the Licence.
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES 25.
Cash deposits provide various guarantees to the Department of Business, Industry and Resources Development, Northern Territory for the purposes of guaranteeing the Company's performance in accordance with Northern Territory law. The performance relates to the requirement that the Company adheres to the terms and conditions of its mining leases, which inter alia, may require site restoration. However, the Directors do not anticipate that the Department will exercise these guarantees as the Company adheres to all terms and conditions of its leases.
| The following deposits have been provided | 2005 | 2004 S. |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Business, Industry and Resources Development | 20,000 | 20,000 |
| Total deposits | 20,000 | 20,000 |
25. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Cont'd)
The Company is a joint venture partner with Newmont Australia and holds a 19.61% interest in the Rosemont Duketon joint venture and 20% interest in the Duketon Region joint venture. The Company has a contingent liability for a share of the guarantees, in line with its joint venture percentage, for performance requirements of the terms and conditions of mining leases in Western Australia. Newmont Australia has put up 100% security of the quarantee and the Company has lodged a cash deposit with Newmont Australia for its appropriate share. This deposit of \$193,890 (2004: \$45,800) is disclosed in note 8 as part of receivables non-current amount.
In prior years, the Company had a loan from Newmont Mining Finance Pty Ltd which was secured by a Mining Act mortgage over certain tenements. During 2002 the loan was renegotiated whereby management of the Duketon joint ventures was transferred to Newmont Duketon Pty Ltd., Newmont Duketon Pty Ltd gained an immediate 80% of the Company's interest in the joint venture tenements, a first right of refusal over the Duketon tenements and a royalty. In return, Newmont Mining Finance Pty Ltd assigned 50% of the loan (\$12,842,748) to Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd ("Edensor Nominees"), a company of which Mr. Gutnick is a Director and shareholder and released the Company from the balance of the loan. The Mining Act mortgage over certain tenements continues to secure that part of the loan assigned to Edensor Nominees. Refer note 28. A company of which Mr Gutnick is a Director and shareholder has provided security to the Company in case the security provided by the Company to Newmont Australia is called. At 30 June 2005, the value of that security is \$9,398,866.
SEGMENT INFORMATION 26.
The principal activity of the Company is mineral exploration. The Company operates within Australia.
27. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVES DISCLOSURE
The names of the Directors and Specified Executives in office during the year are as follows:-
Directors
G M Folie - Non Executive Chairman (August 2004 to June 2005)
D A Walker - Managing Director (August 2004 to June 2005)
G Lamont - Non Executive Director (August 2004 to June 2005)
M Rose - Non Executive Director (August 2004 to June 2005)
J | Gutnick - Chairman and Managing Director (Resigned 26 August 2004)
D S Tyrwhitt - Non Executive Director (Resigned 26 August 2004)
M Z Gutnick - Non Executive Director (Resigned 26 August 2004)
Specified Officers
P J Lee - General Manager Corporate & Company Secretary
R Wadley - CFO & Company Secretary
Pursuant to the Corporations Act Regulation 2M.6.04, Directors and Executives remuneration is disclosed in the Remuneration Report.
Equity Holdings and Transactions
C. M. Enlin
| ພ ພ ເມ | Ordinary Shares |
Options 31/10/2012 |
Options 30/4/2012 |
Options 31/01/2014 |
Options 24/3/2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At start of reporting period | |||||
| Granted as Remuneration Received on exercise of options or rights |
|||||
| Exercised | |||||
| Resulting from other changes | 3,171,170 | ||||
| At close of reporting period | 3,171,170 | ||||
| Vested at reporting date | |||||
| Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date |
|||||
| Held nominally at reporting date |
27. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURE (Cont'd)
| Ordinary Shares |
Options 31/10/2012 |
Options 30/4/2012 |
Options 31/01/2014 |
Options 24/3/2010 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D A Walker | |||||
| At start of reporting period Granted as Remuneration Received on exercise of options or rights Exercised |
|||||
| Resulting from other changes | 8,132,000 | 11,250,000 | 7,500,000 | 15,000,000 | |
| At close of reporting period | 8,132,000 | 11,250,000 | 7,500,000 | 15,000,000 | |
| Vested at reporting date Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date |
11,250,000 | 7,500,000 | 15,000,000 | ||
| Held nominally at reporting date | |||||
| G Lamont | |||||
| At start of reporting period Granted as Remuneration Received on exercise of options or rights Exercised |
|||||
| Resulting from other changes | 700,000 | ||||
| At close of reporting period | 700,000 | ||||
| Vested at reporting date Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date |
|||||
| Held nominally at reporting date | |||||
| M Rose | |||||
| At start of reporting period Granted as Remuneration Received on exercise of options or rights |
|||||
| Exercised Resulting from other changes |
7,500,000 | 11,250,000 | 7,500,000 | 15,000,000 | |
| At close of reporting period | 7,500,000 | 11,250,000 | 7,500,000 | 15,000,000 | |
| Vested at reporting date Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date |
|||||
| Held nominally at reporting date |
27. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURE (Cont'd)
| Ordinary Shares |
Options 31/10/2012 |
Options 30/4/2012 |
Options 31/01/2014 |
Options 24/3/2010 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J I Gutnick * | |||||
| At start of reporting period Granted as Remuneration |
95,401,434 | 15,753,700 | 7,876,850 | 62,794,800 | 50,000 |
| Received on exercise of options or rights Exercised Resulting from other changes |
|||||
| At close of reporting period | 95,401,434 | 15,753,700 | 7,876,850 | 62,794,800 | 50,000 |
| Vested at reporting date Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date |
15,753,700 | 7,876,850 | 62,794,800 | 50,000 | |
| Held nominally at reporting date | |||||
| * to date of resignation | |||||
| D S Tyrwhitt * | |||||
| At start of reporting period Granted as Remuneration Received on exercise of options or rights Exercised |
|||||
| Resulting from other changes At close of reporting period |
|||||
| Vested at reporting date Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date |
|||||
| Held nominally at reporting date | |||||
| * to date of resignation | |||||
| M Z Gutnick * | |||||
| At start of reporting period Granted as Remuneration Received on exercise of options or rights Exercised Resulting from other changes |
95,386,934 | 15,753,700 | 7,876,850 | 62,784,800 | 50,000 |
| At close of reporting period | 95,386,934 | 15.753.700 | 7,876,850 | 62,784.800 | 50,000 |
27. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE DISCLOSURE (Cont'd)
| Ordinary Shares |
Options 31/10/2012 |
Options 30/4/2012 |
Options 31/01/2014 |
Options 24/3/2010 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date |
15,753,700 | 7,876,850 | 62,784,800 | 50,000 | |
| Held nominally at reporting date | |||||
| * to date of resignation | |||||
| PJLee | |||||
| At start of reporting period Granted as Remuneration Received on exercise of options or rights Exercised Resulting from other changes |
2,000 | 30,000 | 30,500 | 20,000 | 17,500 |
| At close of reporting period | 2,000 | 30,000 | 30,500 | 20,000 | 17,500 |
| Vested at reporting date Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date Held nominally at reporting date |
30,000 | 30,500 | 20,000 | 17,500 | |
| R Wadley | |||||
| At start of reporting period Granted as Remuneration Received on exercise of options or rights Exercised Resulting from other changes |
|||||
| At close of reporting period | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | L. | L. | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | |
| Vested at reporting date Vested and exercisable at reporting date Vested and unexercisable at reporting date Held nominally at reporting date |
|||||
Equity instruments for each disclosing party include equity instruments held by director related parties. Messrs J I Gutnick
and M Z Gutnick are related and accordingly are director related parties of each other. The equit by Messrs J I Gutnick and M Z Gutnick are primarily the same equity instruments.
| Note | 2005 | 2004 S |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28. | RELATED PARTY AND OTHER INFORMATION | \$ | |||
| Directors Transactions with the Company | |||||
| (i) | Transactions with Dr G M Folie. | ||||
| Dr G M Folie has provided consulting services to the Company. |
|||||
| Transactions during the year Fees for consulting services Issue of 500,000 shares to satisfy liability for consulting fees |
25,000 (25,000) |
||||
| (ii) Transactions with Director Related Entity of Mr D A Walker |
|||||
| Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd ("Dalkeith") Dalkeith is a shareholder in the Company and has provided capital raising and corporate advisory services. |
|||||
| Transactions during the year Capital raising and corporate advisory services Issue of 7,500,000 ordinary shares, 15,000,000 options expiring 31 January 2014, 11,250,000 options expiring 31 October 2012 and 7,500,000 options expiring 30 April 2012 to satisfy liability for capital raising and corporate advisory services plus GST. |
412,500 (412,500) |
||||
| (iii) Transactions with Director Related Entity of Mr M Rose | |||||
| Concept Equity Pty Ltd ("Concept Equity"). Concept Equity is a shareholder in the Company and has provided capital raising and corporate advisory services. |
|||||
| Transactions during the year Capital raising and corporate advisory services Issue of 7,500,000 ordinary shares, 15,000,000 options expiring 31 January 2014, 11,250,000 options expiring 31 October 2012 and 7,500,000 options expiring 30 April 2012 to satisfy liability for capital raising and corporate advisory services plus GST. |
412,500 (412,500) |
||||
| (iv) Transactions with Director Related Entity of Mr G Lamont |
|||||
| Logmaor Pty Ltd ("Logmaor") is a shareholder in the Company and has provided consulting services to the Company. |
|||||
| Transactions during the year Fees for consulting services Issue of 300,000 shares to satisfy liability for consulting fees. |
15,000 (15,000) |
| Note | 2005 | 2004 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28. | RELATED PARTY AND OTHER INFORMATION (Cont'd) | \$ | \$ | |
| (v) Transactions with Director Related Entities of Mr J I Gutnick Chevas Pty Ltd ("Chevas") Chevas provided loan funds to the Company |
||||
| At year end Borrowings unsecured (non current) |
||||
| Transactions during the year Amounts advanced during the year Amounts repaid during the year Borrowing costs paid or due and payable Amount assigned Wilzed Pty Ltd |
3 | 491,749 (4,411,036) 743,556 (8,058,731) |
||
| The actual interest rate for 2004 was 8.60% to 9.10%. | ||||
| Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (Loan A) ("Edensor"). Edensor took an assignment of a loan (and security) due by the Company. |
||||
| At year end Borrowings - unsecured (non current) |
16 | 14,863,690 | ||
| Transactions during the year Extinguished of amount owed following corporate restructure Borrowing costs incurred |
3 | (15,048,199) 184,509 |
1,000,956 | |
| The actual interest rate charged for 2005 was 7.43% to 7.45% (2004: 6.7067% to 7.51%). In 2004 the amount was secured (Note 16, 20). |
||||
| Edensor (Loan B) Edensor provided loan funds to the Company |
||||
| At year end Borrowings - unsecured (non current) |
16 | 5,550,887 | ||
| Transactions during the year Amounts assigned from Wilzed Pty Ltd Amounts repaid by issue of shares Extinguishment of amount owed following corporate |
(5,509,678) | 5,509,678 | ||
| structure Borrowing costs incurred |
з | (127,012) 85,803 |
41,209 | |
| The actual interest rate charged for 2005 was 9.10% $(2004: 9.10\%).$ |
||||
| Wilzed Pty Ltd ("Wilzed") Wilzed provided loan funds to the Company |
||||
| At year end Borrowings - secured (non current) |
16 | 2,688,032 | ||
| Transactions during the year Amounts assigned from Chevas Pty Ltd Amount assigned to Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (Loan B) |
8,058,731 (5,509,678) |
|||
| Amount repaid | (1,000,000) |
| Note | 2005 \$ |
2004 \$ |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28. | RELATED PARTY AND OTHER INFORMATION (Cont'd) | |||
| Extinguishment of amount owed following corporate restructure Borrowing costs paid or due and payable |
3 | (1,731,028) 42,996 |
138,979 | |
| The actual interest rate charged for 2005 was 9.10% $(2004:9.10\%)$ |
||||
| Edensor Gold Pty Ltd. ("Edensor Gold") - Current account. This Company provided geological consulting services to the Company on normal terms and conditions. |
||||
| Transactions during the year | ||||
| Fees for geological services Amounts paid |
2,431 (2,431) |
|||
| Edensor Gold Edensor Gold provided loan funds to the Company |
||||
| At year end Borrowings - unsecured (non current) |
16 | 268,409 | ||
| Transactions during the year Amounts advanced Amounts repaid |
102,000 (294,000) |
263,431 | ||
| Extinguishment of amount owed following corporate restructure Borrowing costs paid or due and payable |
3 | (81, 244) 4,835 |
4,978 | |
| The actual interest rate charged for 2005 was 9.10% $(2004: 9.10\%).$ |
||||
| Some of the Directors of the Company were also Directors of the following entities ("Other Entities"). |
||||
| (iv) AXIS Consultants Pty Ltd ("AXIS") AXIS provided management and geological services to the Company |
||||
| Transactions during the period Charges by AXIS for Management services |
61,729 | 388,165 | ||
| Geological services | 43,901 | |||
| Borrowing costs Payments to AXIS Interest received |
3 | 1,380 (193, 463) (1,380) |
2,313 (310, 189) (571) |
|
| Payments received from AXIS Extinguishment of amount owed following corporate restructure |
2,353,457 | 29,700 | ||
| Amounts outstanding to (by) AXIS Interest bearing liabilities Terms and conditions |
16 | 2,512,685 | ||
| Charges are calculated on the basis of costs incurred. | ||||
| The actual interest rate charged for 2005 was 10.60% (2004: 10.10% to 10.60%). In 2004 the amount was secured (Note 16, 20). |
| 28. | RELATED PARTY AND OTHER INFORMATION (Cont'd) | Note | 2005 S |
2004 \$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Gold Mines N.L. ("GNL") (ii) GNL managed the Rand joint venture on behalf of the joint ventured partners, incurred all costs and billed the Company for its share. |
||||
| Transactions during the period Geological expenditure Amount repaid |
59,888 (59, 888) |
|||
| At year end - accounts payable | ||||
| The Company has the following ownership interests and is one of a number of public companies that hold shares in AXIS. |
||||
| % | ℅ | |||
| AXIS - ordinary GNL - ordinary |
0.01 | 9.07 0.02 |
The principal activity of GNL is mineral exploration.
29. ULTIMATE PARENT ENTITY
After consideration of AASB 1024 and the Corporations Act 2001, the Directors do not believe there is a Parent Entity.
$30.$ EMPLOYEE SHARE OPTION PLAN
On 24 March 2000 the Company granted unlisted options over 5,500,000 unissued ordinary shares at an issue price of 13.0 cents under the employee share option plan to employees and certain consultants.
- The options are exercisable from 25 March 2003 until the earlier of their expiry date on 24 March 2010 or the $(i)$ termination of employment.
- The options may only be exercised if the price on the ASX of the ordinary shares in the Company has $(ii)$ increased by a factor of 20%, after adjustments for rights issues, bonus issues and dividends, from the date that the options were acquired.
- The exercise price for the options will be equal to the weighted average market price of the ordinary shares $(iii)$ on the five business days prior to and including the date of acquisition, less the issue price.
Off Balance Sheet Items
| 2005 Number |
2004 Number |
|
|---|---|---|
| Number of unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option |
70.000 | 70,000 |
| The market value of the shares under these options at 30 June was Exercise price |
\$0.10 \$5.68 |
\$0.07 \$5.68 |
Interest free loans were made available to participants who subscribed for options. The option loans are repayable if the participant disposes of any ordinary shares acquired as a result of the exercise of the options or on the termination of employment, however in these circumstances the Company will buy back the options and use the proceeds to repay the loan.
$30.$ EMPLOYEE SHARE OPTION PLAN (Cont'd)
| _________ | 2005 Number |
2004 Number |
|---|---|---|
| Number of options repurchased by the Company | 12,500 | |
| Value of options repurchased by the Company | \$32,750 | |
| Interest free option loans provided | \$183.400 | \$183,400 |
The Company may at the discretion of the Board, make loans to participants to fund the exercise price of the options. These loans are likely to be interest free and repayable with "after tax" dividends or on the earlier of the disposal of the ordinary shares or the termination of the executive's employment.
On 9 April 2002, shareholders approved a consolidation of the ordinary shares of the Company on the basis that every 20 ordinary shares on issue became 1 ordinary share. In accordance with ASX listing rules and the terms and conditions of the issue of the options, the options were consolidated on the same basis as the ordinary shares and the exercise price was reconstructed in inverse proportion.
$31.$ NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
At 30 June 2005, the Company had 3 employees being the Non-Executive Directors.
$32.$ IMPACT OF ADOPTING AASB EQUIVALENTS TO IASB STANDARDS
The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) has adopted International Financial Standards Reporting ("IFRS") for application to reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. The AASB has issued Australian equivalents to IFRS ("AIFRS"), and the Urgent Issues Group has issued abstracts corresponding to IASB interpretations originated by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee or the former Standing Interpretations Committee. The adoption of AIFRS will be first reflected in the financial statements for the half-year ending 31 December 2005 and the year ending 30 June 2006.
Entities complying with AIFRS for the first time will be required to restate their comparative financial statements to amounts reflecting the application of IFRS to that comparative period. Most adjustments required on transition to IFRS will be made, retrospectively, against opening retained earnings as at 1 July 2004.
This financial report has been prepared in accordance with Australian accounting standards and other financial reporting requirements ("Australian GAAP") applicable for reporting periods ended 30 June 2005.
The Company has reviewed the transition to AIFRS. The project is being run by the Company Secretary who reports to the Managing Director and the Board of Directors.
Assessment and planning phase
The assessment and planning phase was a high level overview of the impacts of conversion to AIFRS on existing accounting and reporting policies and procedures, systems and processes, business structure and staff. This phase included:
- high level identification of the key differences in accounting policies and disclosures that are expected to arise from adopting AIFRS
- assessment of new information requirements
- evaluation of the implications for staff; and
- preparation of a conversion plan for expected changes to accounting policies, reporting structures, systems, accounting and business processes and staff training.
$32.$ IMPACT OF ADOPTING AASB EQUIVALENTS TO IASB STANDARDS (Cont'd)
The assessment phase is completed as at 30 June 2005 and the planning phase is expected to be completed shortly.
Design phase
The design phase formulated the changes required to existing accounting policies and procedures and systems and processes in order to transition to AIFRS. The design phase included staff working on areas such as application of impairment requirements and transitional elections.
The design phase incorporated:
- formulation of revised accounting policies and procedures for compliance with AIFRS requirements
- identification of potential financial impacts as at the transition date and for subsequent reporting periods prior to adoption of AIFRS
- development of revised AIFRS disclosures
- formulation of accounting processes to support AIFRS reporting obligations
- identification of required changes to financial reporting and systems, and
- development of training programs for staff.
The design phase is substantially completed as at 30 June 2005.
Implementation phase
The implementation phase includes implementation of identified changes to accounting and business procedures, processes and systems and operational training for staff and enables the Company to generate the required reconciliations and disclosures of AASB 1 First Time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards.
This phase is substantially complete as at 30 June 2005.
Impact of transition to AIFRS
The impact of transition to AIFRS, including the transitional adjustments disclosed in the reconciliations from current Australian GAAP to AIFRS, and the selection and application of AIFRS accounting policies, are based on AIFRS standards that management expect to be in place, or where applicable, early adopted, when preparing the first complete AIFRS financial report (being the half-year ending 31 December 2005). Only a complete set of financial statements and notes together with comparative balances can provide a true and fair presentation of the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with AIFRS. This note provides only a summary, therefore, further disclosure and explanations will be required in the first complete AIFRS financial report for a true and fair view to be presented under AIFRS.
There is a significant amount of judgement involved in the preparation of the reconciliations from current Australian GAAP to AIFRS, consequently the final reconciliations presented in the first financial report prepared in accordance with AIFRS may vary materially from the reconciliations provided in this Note.
Revisions to the selection and application of the AIFRS accounting policies may be required as a result of:
- changes in financial reporting requirements that are relevant to the Company's first complete AIFRS financial report arising from new or revised accounting standards or interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board subsequent to the preparation of the 30 June 2005 financial report.
- additional guidance on the application of AIFRS in a particular industry or to a particular transaction
- changes to the Company's operations.
$32.$ IMPACT OF ADOPTING AASB EQUIVALENTS TO IASB STANDARDS (Cont'd)
Where the application or interpretation of an accounting standard is currently being debated, the accounting policy adopted reflects management's current assessment of the likely outcome of those deliberations. The uncertainty relating to the accounting guidance is disclosed in the relevant accounting policy note and where practicable, the expected impact of the alternative interruption is also disclosed.
The rules for first time adoption of AIFRS are set out in AASB 1 First Time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards. In general, AIFRS accounting policies must be applied retrospectively to determine the opening AIFRS balance sheet as at transition date, being 1 July 2004. The Standard allows a number of exemptions to this general principle to assist in the transition to reporting under AIFRS. The accounting policies note includes details of the AASB 1 elections adopted.
The significant changes in accounting policies expected to be adopted in preparing the AIFRS reconciliations and the elections expected to be made under AASB 1 are set out below.
(a) Reclassifications
AASB 101 prohibits the presentation of items of income or expense as extraordinary, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes. The nature and amount of material items will be disclosed separately in the notes to the financial statements.
For the year ended 30 June 2005, the Company recorded a profit from extraordinary items after tax of \$19,340,940. Under AIFRS, this items will be treated as a credit in costs and expenses however it has no effect on net profit/(loss).
Non-current assets classified as held for sale and the assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale will be presented separately from other assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. A non-current asset (or disposal group) is classified as held for sale if its carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use, the asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its current condition, and its sale is highly probable. For the Company there are no non current assets to be reclassified.
The changes identified to date that will be required to the Company's existing accounting policies include the following:
- Exploration and Evaluation - The Australian equivalent of the IFRS standard AASB 6 - Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources was issued in December 2004. This standard is specific to exploration and evaluation assets and mandates the "area of interest" concept. It also requires companies that recognize exploration and evaluation assets to perform impairment tests on those assets when facts and circumstances suggest the carrying amount of the asset may be impaired. The impairment test is assessed at a cash generating unit or group of cash generating units level provided this is no larger than an area of interest.
As at 30 June 2004, the carrying value was based on an independent specialist report prepared in April/May 2004; and at 30 June 2005 the carrying value was based on an independent specialist report prepared in June 2005. The carrying value has been further adjusted to take into account expenditure on ungranted tenements except refundable rents where there are no underlying related granted tenements. The adjustment to the carrying value of the asset at 30 June 2004 is a decrease of \$154,654 and at 30 June 2005, a decrease of \$168,156 (cumulative). Exploration expenditure written off as at 30 June 2004 will increase by \$154,654 and at 30 June 2005 by \$13,502.
$32.$ IMPACT OF ADOPTING AASB EQUIVALENTS TO IASB STANDARDS (Cont'd)
- Impairment of Assets - The recoverable amount of non-current assets will be assessed as the higher of net selling price and value in use, on a discounted basis.
The Company currently assesses recoverable amounts of non-current assets based on undiscounted future net cash flows. The Company's non-current assets (other than exploration and evaluation and receivable assets) are not material and therefore, the Company does not believe the impairment of assets test will have a material effect on the Company's financial position.
- Other non current assets - Receivables
The Company has lodged a cash deposit with its managing joint venture partner, for its share of guarantees in line with its joint venture participating interest, for performance obligations under the terms and conditions of mining leases and exploration licences in Western Australia
The impact of the change in the basis of impairment testing, based on the current interest rate and the assumption that the deposit will not be called for the next two years, is, at 30 June 2005, a decrease in the receivable to \$174,760. The adjustment to the profit for the year is a decrease of \$19,130. Receivables at 30 June 2004 were not material.
4. Property Plant and Equipment
The equipment purchased during the year has been revaluated as at 30 June 2005. The fair values have been determined directly by reference to observable prices in an active market. The fair value of property, plant and equipment at 30 June 2005 is not material. There were no property, plant and equipment at 30 June 2004.
Restoration, rehabilitation and environmental expenditure - Environmental obligations associated with the 5. retirement or disposal of long lived assets will be recognized when the disturbance occurs and is based on the extent of damage incurred. The provision is measured as the present value of the future expenditure and a corresponding rehabilitation asset is also recognized. On an ongoing basis, the rehabilitation liability will be remeasured in line with the changes in the time value of money (recognized as an expense in the statement of financial performance and an increase in the provision), and additional disturbances will be recognized as additions to a corresponding asset and rehabilitation liability.
The Company will be required to remeasure the existing environmental rehabilitation provision to the present value of the future expenditure and recognise a related rehabilitation asset. Retained earnings will be impacted to the extent that this net position differs from the existing rehabilitation provision.
Under AIFRS a provision has been created as at 30 June 2004 of \$45,800. At 30 June 2005, the Company had booked a provision under AGAAP which was calculated at the present value of the future expenditure.
Income Tax - Under the Australian equivalent to IAS 12 Income Taxes, deferred tax balances are determined using the balance sheet method which calculates temporary differences based on the carrying amounts of an entity's assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position and their associated tax bases. In addition, current and deferred taxes attributable to amounts recognized directly in equity are also recognized directly in equity.
This will result in a change to the current accounting policy, under which deferred tax balances are determined using the income statement method, items are only tax-effected if they are included in the determination of pretax accounting profit or loss and/or taxable income or loss and current and deferred taxes cannot be recognized directly in equity. Under IFRS deferred tax assets will be recognized for the carry forward of unused tax losses to the extent that future taxable profit is probable rather than virtually certain.
There is no impact for the Company as at 30 June 2005 and 2004.
$32.$ IMPACT OF ADOPTING AASB EQUIVALENT TO IASB STANDARDS (Cont'd)
Share Based Payments - Under AASB 2 Share Based Payments, the Company will be required to determine $7.$ the fair value of options issued to employees as remuneration and recognise an expense in the Statement of Financial Performance. This standard is not limited to options and also extends to other forms of equity based remuneration. It applies to all share-based payments issued after 7 November 2002 which have not vested as at 1 January 2005. No adjustment will be made for share based payments made prior to 1 January 2005 as the Company has elected not to re-calculate comparatives and it had not disclosed the fair value of those equity instruments, determined at measurement date, at the time.
8. Non current Liabilities
Restatement of debt at fair value rather than cost and the recognition of the movement through profit and loss of 30 June 2005 balances has been considered but as the debt was settled in August 2004, it is considered no adjustment is necessary.
Earnings per share 9.
Under AIFRS, basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated using the profit or loss from continuing operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the parent entity. The basic and diluted earnings per share for the discontinued operations is calculated and disclosed separately.
| Basic EPS from continuing operations per share | \$5.64 |
|---|---|
| Diluted EPS from continuing operations per share | \$4.84 |
- Restated AIFRS Statement of Cash Flows for the year end 30 June 2005 No material impacts are expected to the cash flows re-stated under AGAAP on adoption of AIFRS.
Summary of transitional adjustments
The following table sets out the expected adjustments to the Statements of Financial Position of the Company at transition to AIFRS as at 1 July
2004 and for the AIFRS comparative period Balance Sheet as at 30 June 2005.
Reconciliation of Equity
| THE COMPANY | THE COMPANY | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | AGAAP | 1 JULY 2004 Transition |
AIFRS | AGAAP | 30 JUNE 2005 Transition |
AIFRS | |
| impact | impact | ||||||
| ASSETS | \$'000 | \$'000 | \$'000 | \$'000 | \$'000 | \$'000 | |
| Current assets | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 7.098 | 7,098 | 2,091,508 | 2,091,508 | |||
| Receivables | 14,599 | 14,599 | 23,218 | 23,218 | |||
| Other current assets | 77.126 | 77,126 | 12,251 | 12,251 | |||
| 98,823 | 98,823 | 2,126,977 | 2,126,977 | ||||
| Non-current assets classified as held for sale |
|||||||
| Total current assets | 98,823 | 98,823 | 2,126,977 | ۰ | 2,126,977 | ||
| Non-current assets | |||||||
| Other financial assets | 3,155 | 3,155 | |||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 5,920 | (1, 742) | 4,178 | ||||
| Exploration expenditure | 3,300,526 | (108, 854) | 3,191,672 | 4,222,149 | (168, 527) | 4,053,622 | |
| Other non-current receivable assets |
68,500 | 68,500 | 293,163 | (19, 130) | 274,033 | ||
| Total non-current assets | 3,372,181 | (108, 854) | 3,263,327 | 4,521,232 | (189, 399) | 4,331,833 | |
| Total assets | 3,471.004 | (108, 854) | 3,362,150 | 6,648,209 | (189, 399) | 6,458,810 | |
| LIABILITIES | |||||||
| Current liabilities | |||||||
| Trade and other payables | 283,886 | 283,886 | 440,787 | 440.787 | |||
| Liabilities directly associated with non-current assets classified as held for sale |
|||||||
| Total current liabilities | 283,886 | ۰ | 283,886 | 440,787 | 440.787 | ||
| Non-current liabilities | |||||||
| Long-term borrowings | 25,883,704 | 25,883,704 | |||||
| Long-term provisions | $\ddot{\phantom{0}}$ | 45,800 | 45,800 | 612,480 | $\blacksquare$ | 612,480 | |
| Total non-current liabilities | 25,883,704 | 45,800 | 25,929,504 | 612,480 | ×, | 612,480 | |
| Total liabilities | 26,167,590 | 45,800 | 26,213,390 | 1,053,267 | × | 1,053,267 | |
| Net Assets (Deficiency) | (22,696,586) | (154, 654) | (22, 851, 240) | 5,594,942 | (189, 399) | 5,405,543 | |
| EQUITY | |||||||
| Share capital | 30,627,922 | 30,627,922 | 42,562,554 | 42,562,554 | |||
| Retained losses | (53, 324, 508) | (154, 654) | (53, 479, 162) | (36,967,612) | (189, 399) | (37, 157, 011) | |
| (22,696,586) | (154, 654) | (22, 851, 240) | 5,594,942 | (189, 399) | 5,405.543 | ||
| Amounts recognized directly in equity relating to non-current assets classified as held for sale |
|||||||
| Parent interest | (22,696,586) | (154, 654) | (22, 851, 240) | 5,594,942 | (189, 399) | 5,405,543 | |
| Minority interest | ۰ | ||||||
| Total Equity | (22,696,586) | (154, 654) | (22,851,240) | 5,594,942 | (189, 399) | 5,405,543 |
Reconciliation of Profit for the Financial Year ended 30 June 2005
The following table sets out the expected adjustments to the Statements of Financial Performance of the Company for the year ended 30 June 2005.
| COMPANY For the year ended 30 June 2005 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | AGAAP | Transition Impact |
AIFRS | |
| \$'000 | \$'000 | \$'000 | ||
| Other income | 79,685 | 19,340,940 | 19,420,625 | |
| Exploration expenditure written off | (840, 250) | (59.673) | (899, 923) | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | (1, 169) | (1, 169) | ||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | (1.742) | (1, 742) | ||
| Other expenses | (1.218, 649) | (1.218, 649) | ||
| Impairment of non current assets | (19, 130) | (19, 130) | ||
| Borrowing costs | (320, 898) | (320, 898) | ||
| Mining royalty fully provided | (682, 220) | (682, 220) | ||
| Provision for diminution of investments | (542) | (542) | ||
| Carrying value of non current assets sold | (1) | (1) | ||
| Profit from extraordinary items | 19,340.940 | (19,340.940) | ||
| Profit from continuing operations | 16,356.896 | (80.545) | 16,437,441 | |
| Profit before income tax expense | 16,356,896 | (80.545) | 16.437,441 | |
| Income tax expense | ||||
| Profit for the period | 16,356,896 | (80, 545) | 16.437,441 | |
| Profit attributable to members | 16,356.896 | (80.545) | 16.437,441 |
Summary of Impact of Transition to AIFRS on Retained Earnings
The impact of the transition to AIFRS on Retained Earnings as at 1 July 2004 is summarized below:
| Retained losses as at 1 July 2004 under AGAAP | The Company \$'000 (53.324.508) |
|---|---|
| AIFRS reconciliation: | |
| - exploration expenditure written off | (154.654) |
| Retained losses as at 1 July 2004 under AIFRS | (53.479.162) |
Regis Resources N.L. ABN 28 009 174 761 Directors' Declaration
In the opinion of the Directors of Regis Resources N.L.
- The accompanying financial statements and notes including the remuneration disclosures $(a)$ contained in the remuneration report section of the Director's Report are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, comply with accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company as at 30 June 2005 and of its performance, as represented by the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
- $(b)$ There are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
Signed in accordance with a Resolution of the Board of Directors at Melbourne this 5th day of September 2005.
Gleriote Lemmon
G Lamont Director
D A Walker Director

Independent audit report to members of Regis Resources N.L.
Scope
The financial report and directors' responsibility
The financial report comprises the statement of financial position, statement of financial performance, statement of cash flows, accompanying notes to the financial statements, the disclosures made by the Company in accordance with the Corporations Regulations 2001 as required by AASB 1046 Director and Executive Disclosures by Disclosing Entities in the "Remuneration report" in the Directors' report ("remuneration disclosures") and the directors' declaration for Regis Resources N.L. (the "Company"), for the year ended 30 June 2005.
The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and true and fair presentation of the financial report and the Remuneration report in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001. This includes responsibility for the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls that are designed to prevent and detect fraud and error, and for the accounting policies and accounting estimates inherent in the financial report.
Audit approach
We conducted an independent audit in order to express an opinion to the members of the Company. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards in order to provide reasonable assurance as to whether the financial report is free of material misstatement and the remuneration disclosures comply with Accounting Standard AASB 1046 and the Corporations Regulations 2001. The nature of an audit is influenced by factors such as the use of professional judgement, selective testing, the inherent limitations of internal control, and the availability of persuasive rather than conclusive evidence. Therefore, an audit cannot guarantee that all material misstatements have been detected.
We performed procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia, a view which is consistent with our understanding of the Company's financial position, and of its performance as represented by the results of its operations and cash flows and whether the remuneration disclosures comply with Accounting Standard AASB 1046 and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
We formed our audit opinion on the basis of these procedures, which included:
- examining, on a test basis, information to provide evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial report, and
- assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and disclosures used and the $\blacksquare$ reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors.
While we considered the effectiveness of management's internal controls over financial reporting when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our audit was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls.

Statement of continued independence
The lead auditor's independence declaration provided to the directors of Regis Resources N.L. dated 26 August 2005 would be unchanged if provided to the directors as at the date of this audit report
Audit opinion'
In our opinion, the financial report including the remuneration disclosures that are contained in the Remuneration report in the Directors' report of Regis Resources N.L. are in accordance with:
- a) the Corporations Act 2001, including:
- i. giving a true and fair view of the Company's financial position as at [date] and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; and
- ii. complying with Accounting Standards in Australia, including AASB 1046 Director and Executive Disclosures by Disclosing Entities, and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
- b) other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia.
a
a Kuhe Alison Kitchen
Partner
Melbourne $\leq$ September 2005
Regis Resources N.L. Corporate Governance
The main corporate governance practices that the Board of Regis Resources N.L. had in place during the year were:
$\mathbf{1}$ . Board of Directors
$\mathbf{i}$ . Board Responsibilities
The Board's role is to maximize wealth creation and shareholder value in the Company. It assumes responsibility for overseeing the affairs of the Company by ensuring that they are carried out in a professional and ethical manner and that business risks are effectively managed. The primary responsibilities of the Board include the following:
- To oversee the Company, including its control and accountability systems
- To appoint and remove the Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent)
- To ratifving the appointment and, where appropriate, the removal of the Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) and the Company Secretary
- To have input into and final approval of management's development of corporate strategy and performance objectives
- To review and ratify systems of risk management and internal compliance and control, codes of conduct, legal compliance and any other regulatory compliance
- To monitor senior management's performance and implementation of strategy, and ensure appropriate resources are available
- To approve and monitor the progress of major capital expenditure, capital management, and acquisitions and divestitures
- To approve and monitor financial and other reporting to shareholders and the market
- To monitor the Board composition, Director selection, Board processes and performance and ensure Directors have an understanding of the Company's business
- To monitor and influence the key standards of the Company including ethical standards, reputation and culture
- To review and approve executive remuneration
- To approve annual budgets
ii. Board Composition
The Company's Constitution fixes the maximum number of Directors at twelve.
On 26 August 2004, as a result of the changes to the Board of Directors, the new Board comprised three Non-Executive Directors of which two are independent (including the Chairman of the Board) and one Executive Director. Up to 26 August 2004, the Board comprised one Executive Director and two Non-Executive Directors and did not have a majority of independent Directors. In the period up to 26 August 2004, the Chairman of the Company had an interest in a substantial shareholder of the Company, and was not independent. The Chairman was also the Managing Director. The Board believed the experience in the industry that Mr. JI Gutnick brought to the Company was invaluable and was in the best interests of all shareholders and should not preclude him from holding those offices.
The Board uses the criteria for assessing the independence of Directors as set out in Principle 2 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council "Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations" booklet dated March 2003.
The Board considers Dr Folie and Mr Lamont to be independent however. Mr Rose has provided corporate advisory and placement services in the last three years and therefore is not considered to be independent.
To ensure that it has the right mix of management skills and technical expertise to meet the challenges of its business, the Board regularly reviews its composition. The Board believes that at the current stage of the Company's development, the composition is adequate. However, it continues to assess the need to enhance the membership of the Board and is cognisant of the ASX Corporate Governance Council definitions and recommendations.
iii. Appointment/retirement of Directors
The Company's Constitution requires that all Directors other than the Managing Director submit themselves for re-election every three years with not less than one third of the Board retiring by rotation. Directors appointed during the period since the last Annual General Meeting of the Company must submit themselves for election at the next Annual General Meeting.
Dr Folie and Messrs Lamont and Rose were appointed Directors at the 2004 Annual General Meeting. Dr Folie will retire by rotation at the 2005 Annual General Meeting and will be eligible for re-election. One of Mr Lamont and Mr Rose will retire at the 2006 Annual General Meeting and will be eligible for re-election and the Director who does not retire at the 2006 Annual General Meeting will retire at the 2007 Annual General Meeting and will be eligible for reelection. Generally Directors are appointed for a period of three years.
iv. Board Meetings
The full Board meets formally to conduct appropriate business.
Directors' Remuneration v.
Total remuneration for the Executive Director includes an annual salary and other entitlements. Attendance at and participation in Board and Committee meetings are considered among the duties of the Executive Director. Non-Executive Directors receive fees (on a total cost of employment basis) for attending Board and Committee meetings. There are no retirement benefits for Directors. Pro-rata fees are paid to Non-Executive Directors who serve for less than a full year. None of the Directors or the Company Secretary has letters of appointment. However, the Company is in the process of preparing appropriate letters of appointment.
٧İ External Advice to Directors
The Company recognises that in the exercise of their responsibilities there may be occasions when Directors may wish to seek independent professional advice. With the prior consent of the Chairman, advice can be obtained at the Company's expense and is to be made available to the whole Board.
$\mathbf{2}$ . Board Committees
The Board has Committees to address the areas of remuneration and audit.
i. Remuneration Committee
During the year, the Company had a Remuneration Committee made up of two independent Directors. It did not have at least three members all of whom are independent as the Company only has two independent Directors. Information on the Company's remuneration practices are set out in the Remuneration Report.
ii. Audit Committee
The Audit Committee comprises only non-executive Directors and has an independent Chairperson, who is not Chairperson of the Board. It does not have at least three members all of whom are independent. The Company currently only has two independent Directors, one of whom is Chairman of the Board and he is not a member of the Audit Committee. Both members of the Audit Committee are financially literate, have financial expertise and have an understanding of the industry in which the Company operates.
The Audit Committee has a formal charter. The Audit Committee meets to plan and review annual and half-yearly financial statements and reports prior to their release to the Australian Stock Exchange. The Committee also monitors the performance of the Company's Auditors and for evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls. The external Auditor is invited to attend and speak at these meetings.
Regis Resources N.L. Corporate Governance
iii. Nomination Committee
The Company does not have a Nomination Committee. The Board believes that with only four Directors on the Board, the Board itself is the appropriate forum to deal with this function.
$\overline{3}$ . Role of Management
Day to day management of the Company's activities and the implementation of Board strategy, policy and decisions is delegated to management. This includes the following:
- To develop and recommend internal control and accountability systems for the Company and if approved, ensure compliance with such systems.
- To prepare mission systems, corporate strategy and performance objectives for approval by the Board of Directors.
- To prepare systems of risk management and internal compliance and controls, codes of conduct, legal compliance and any other regulatory compliance and if approved, ensure compliance with such systems.
- To monitor employees' performance, recommend appropriate resources and review and approve remuneration.
- To prepare all required financial reports, tax returns, budgets and any other appropriate $\bullet$ financial reports, meet all statutory deadlines, monitor performance against budgets.
- Prepare recommendations on acquisitions and divestments of assets.
- To implement decisions of the Board of Directors on key standards of the Company covering such areas as ethical standards, reputation and culture of the Company and influence and provide quidance for employees on these areas.
- To protect the assets of the Company. $\bullet$
4. Risk Management
The Company continues to monitor its operations to identify the greatest areas of potential risk to minimise any adverse effects on the Company's strategic, operational and financial activities. The Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer state to the Board in writing that the Company's risk management and internal compliance and control system is operating efficiently and effectively in all material aspects.
i. Environment
Details of the environmental policy and other related matters are provided in the Environment section of the Directors' Report.
ii. Occupational Health and Safety
The Company is committed to providing a safe and healthy working environment for all staff. It considers that safety is a collective responsibility and ensures that regular training in safe working methods is undertaken and encourages participation and involvement in the development of workplace safety programs. Individual employees and employees of contractors are required to practice safe working habits, to take all reasonable care to prevent injury to themselves and their colleagues and to report all hazards and accidents.
New staff and contractors (where appropriate) are required to undergo an induction program to familiarise themselves with policies, procedures and work practices prior to commencing work. All staff are covered against injury under the various Workers' Compensation Acts.
iii. Financial Reporting
It is the Board's policy that the Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer sign off in writing to the Board that the financial statements present a true and fair view, in all material respects, of the Company's financial condition and operational results and are in accordance with relevant accounting standards.
Regis Resources N.L. Corporate Governance
5. Code of Conduct
i. Ethical Standards
The Company operates under a Code of Conduct that sets out the ethical standards under which the Company operates when dealing with internal and external parties. This Code requires parties to act with integrity, fairness and honesty in all dealings and to treat other parties with dignity at all times. They are required to:
- not discriminate against any staff member or potential employee;
- carry out their duties in respect to the law at all times;
- to use the Company's assets responsibly;
- to respect the confidentiality of the Company's business dealings; and
- take responsibility for their own actions and for the consequences surrounding their own $\bullet$ actions.
ii. Share Trading
It is the Company's policy to encourage Directors, employees and related parties to own shares in the Company. The trading in shares policy strongly reinforces the obligations of Directors and employees, under the Corporations Act 2001 and the Australian Stock Exchange Listing Rules in relation to trading in Company shares. The acquisition and sale of Company shares by Directors and employees is restricted to periods of fourteen (14) days immediately following announcements of the Company's quarterly, half yearly and full year reports to the Australian Stock Exchange. Directors, employees and related parties can seek permission from the Chairman to purchase or sell shares outside this 14-day period. Directors and employees are required to report share trading to the Company Secretary.
6. Continuous Disclosure Compliance
The Company's continuous disclosure compliance procedure enables it to meet its obligations and to ensure that all matters, which may require announcement to the Australian Stock Exchange, are brought to the attention of Directors immediately.
$\overline{7}$ . Communicating with Shareholders
The Board ensures that shareholders are kept informed of all major developments that affect their shareholding or the Company's state of affairs through quarterly, half-yearly, annual and ad hoc reports. All shareholders are encouraged to attend the Annual General Meeting to meet the Chairman and Directors and to receive the most updated report on Company activities.
The Company maintains a website at http://www.regisresources.com to provide shareholders with up to date information on the Company's activities. Shareholders may also communicate with the Company through its e-mail address [email protected]
The Company does not web-cast shareholder meetings and does not believe that at this stage the costbenefit of web casting is worthwhile to a Company of its size.
Regis Resources N.L.
Tenement Listing
| TENEMENTS | Tenements | M 38/1091 | E 38/1406 | M 38/898 | P 38/3248 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHOLLY | Subject To | Duketon | E 38/1407 | M 38/943 | P 38/3249 |
| OWNED | Joint | Regional | E 38/1408 | M 38/944 | P 38/3250 |
| WELCOME | Venture | Part A | E 38/1412 | M 38/945 | P 38/3253 |
| WELL | DUKETON | 20% | E 38/1413 | M 38/946 | P 38/3254 |
| M 37/952 | JOINT | E 37/664 | E 38/1436 | M 38/960 | P 38/3255 |
| M 39/694 | VENTURES | E 38/348 | E 38/1595 | M 38/961 | P 38/3275 |
| M 39/695 | E 38/380 | E 38/1596 | M 38/962 | P 38/3276 | |
| Artane Duketon |
E 38/381 | E 38/1597 | M 38/963 | ||
| Salt Well | (see Note) | E 38/387 | E 38/1689 | M 38/964 | Erlistoun |
| M 37/1018 | M 38/579 | E 38/464 | E 38/1735 | M 38/965 | Duketon |
| P 37/5225 | M 38/589 | E 38/465 | E 38/1758 | M 38/990 | (see Note) |
| M 38/590 | E 38/823 | L 38/26 | M 38/1092 | M 38/407 | |
| OTHER | M 38/889 | E 38/961 | L 38/29 | M 38/1093 | M 38/424 |
| Angus | E 38/1001 | L 38/30 | M 38/1094 | German Well | |
| E 38/1566 | AuroralDelta | E 38/1046 | L(GW) 38/73 | M 38/1095 | (see Note) |
| M 38/758 | Duketon | E 38/1070 | L(GW) 38/74 | M 38/1096 | E 38/648 |
| M 38/808 | (see Note) E 38/378 |
E 38/1071 | M 38/354 | M 38/1097 | M 38/939 |
| M 38/991 | M 38/413 | E 38/1072 | M 38/411 | M 38/1098 | M 38/940 |
| M 38/414 | E 38/1073 | M 38/412 | M 38/1105 | M 38/941 | |
| Camel Hump | M 38/415 | E 38/1074 | M 38/469 | M 38/1106 | |
| E 38/965 | M 38/537 | E 38/1075 | M 38/498 | M 38/1107 | Gerry's Well |
| E 38/1098 | M 38/538 | E 38/1076 | M 38/499 | M 38/1108 | (see Note) E 38/1021 |
| E 38/1133 | M 38/674 | E 38/1096 | M 38/500 | M 38/1109 | M 38/903 |
| E 38/1146 | M 38/737 | E 38/1100 | M 38/515 | M 38/1110 | M 38/904 |
| E 38/1260 | M 38/738 | E 38/1101 | M 38/516 | M 38/1111 | M 38/924 |
| M 38/682 | M 38/739 | E 38/1104 | M 38/517 | M 38/1115 | M 38/925 |
| M 38/809 | E 38/1105 | M 38/518 | M 38/1116 | M 38/1112 | |
| M 38/810 | Deleta | E 38/1111 E 38/1112 |
M 38/519 | M 38/1117 | M 38/1113 |
| M 38/835 | (see Note) | E 38/1113 | M 38/520 | M 38/1118 | M 38/1114 |
| M 38/992 | E 38/419 | E 38/1114 | M 38/521 | M 38/1119 | |
| M 38/993 | E 38/423 | E 38/1115 | M 38/522 | M 38/1120 | Hot Holdings |
| M 38/994 | E 38/1307 | E 38/1135 | M 38/745 | P 38/2754 | (see Note) |
| M 38/995 M 38/996 |
E 38/1308 M 38/478 |
E 38/1163 | M 38/757 | P 38/2768 | E 38/565 M 38/708 |
| M 38/479 | E 38/1182 | M 38/759 | P 38/2800 | M 38/709 | |
| Kowtah | M 38/734 | E 38/1184 | M 38/791 | P 38/2801 | M 38/969 |
| M 39/693 | M 38/735 | E 38/1186 | M 38/795 | P 38/2802 | |
| M 39/696 | M 38/752 | E 38/1191 | M 38/811 | P 38/2803 | Mount |
| M 39/697 | M 38/753 | E 38/1192 | M 38/812 | P 38/2804 | Zephyr Farm-out |
| M 39/698 | M 38/754 | E 38/1193 | M 38/813 | P 38/2805 | (see Note) |
| M 39/699 | M 38/1099 | E 38/1199 | M 38/826 | P 38/2806 | E 37/706 |
| M 39/700 | M 38/1100 | E 38/1238 | M 38/827 | P 38/2807 | E 39/898 |
| M 39/895 | M 38/1101 | E 38/1239 | M 38/836 | P 38/2808 | E 39/899 |
| Pinnacle | M 38/1102 | E 38/1282 | M 38/837 M 38/838 |
P 38/2809 P 38/2810 |
E 39/924 |
| M 37/1012 | M 38/1103 | E 38/1314 | M 38/847 | P 38/2811 | |
| M 38/1104 | E 38/1335 | M 38/850 | P 38/2812 | ||
| M 38/1084 | E 38/1345 | M 38/851 | P 38/2918 | ||
| M 38/1085 | E 38/1370 | M 38/852 | P 38/2950 | ||
| M 38/1086 | E 38/1371 | M 38/861 | P 38/2951 | ||
| M 38/1087 | E 38/1372 | M 38/882 | P 38/2993 | ||
| M 38/1088 | E 38/1385 E 38/1398 |
M 38/885 | P 38/2995 | ||
| M 38/1089 | E 38/1399 | M 38/890 | P 38/3016 | ||
| M 38/1090 | M 38/897 | P 38/3017 |
Regis Resources N.L.
Tenement Listing
| Rosemont – | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murphy Hills (see Note) |
Duketon | WELCOME WELL |
P 37/6183 | M 40/312 |
| E 38/559 | 19.63% | P 37/6184 | M 40/313 | |
| M 38/237 | Burley Well | P37/6190 | M 40/314 | |
| M 38/598 | M 38/250 | Earning 70% | P37/6191 | M 40/315 |
| M 38/599 | M 38/319 | M 37/1084 | P 37/6192 | M 40/316 |
| M 38/600 | M 38/343 | M 37/1085 | P 37/6193 | M 40/317 |
| M 38/601 | M 37/841 | P 37/6194 | M 40/318 | |
| M 38/602 | M 38/344 | M 37/842 | P 37/6195 | M 40/319 |
| M 38/619 | Texrise | M 37/843 | P 37/6196 | M 40/320 |
| M 38/620 | Purchase | M 37/844 | P 37/6197 | M 40/321 |
| M 38/621 | and Royalty | M 37/845 | P 39/4070 | M 40/322 |
| M 38/622 | (see Note) | M 37/846 | P 39/4071 | M 40/323 |
| M 38/623 | E 38/649 | M 37/847 | P 39/4072 | M 40/324 |
| M 38/624 | E 38/653 | M 37/848 | P 39/4073 | M 40/325 |
| M 38/1081 | M 38/746 | P 39/4074 | M 40/326 | |
| M 38/1082 | M 38/779 | Copper Well | ||
| M 38/1083 | M 38/780 | Earning 70% | P 39/4075 | M 40/327 |
| M 38/821 | E 39/383 | P 39/4076 | P40/1066 | |
| North | M 38/927 | M 37/837 | P 39/4077 | P 40/1068 |
| Laverton | M 38/942 | M 37/838 | P 39/4078 | P 40/1069 |
| (Duketon) (see Note) |
M 37/1232 | P 39/4079 | P 40/1070 | |
| E 38/379 | Top Well | M 37/1233 | MELITA | P 40/1091 |
| $L$ 38/20 | (see Note) | M 37/1234 | Earning 70% | OTHER |
| L 38/47 | E 38/241 | M 39/580 | E 37/528 | |
| L 38/49 | E 38/510 | M 39/581 | E 37/543 | Christmas |
| E 38/511 | M 39/582 | E 37/574 | Well | |
| M 38/114 | M 38/450 | M 39/815 | E40/112 | 80% |
| M 38/262 | M 38/451 | E 40/113 | M 38/785 | |
| M 38/283 | M 38/724 | M 39/816 | E 40/138 | M 38/786 |
| M 38/292 | M 38/935 | M 39/817 | ||
| M 38/303 | M 38/936 | M 39/959 | E 40/145 | Mt Mabel 51% |
| M 38/316 | M 38/937 | P 37/6158 | E 40/184 | M 38/765 |
| M 38/317 | P37/6159 | E 40/185 | ||
| M 38/938 | ||||
| M 38/341 | P37/6160 | M 37/1147 | M 38/766 | |
| M 38/352 | P37/6161 | M 37/1172 | M 38/888 | |
| M 38/408 | P 37/6162 | M 37/1208 | ||
| M 38/409 | P37/6163 | M 37/1209 | ||
| M 38/487 | P 37/6164 | M 37/1210 | ||
| M 38/488 | P37/6165 | M 37/1211 | ||
| M 38/489 | P 37/6166 | M 37/1212 | ||
| M 38/490 | P 37/6167 | M 37/1213 | ||
| M 38/491 | P 37/6168 | M 39/910 | ||
| M 38/492 | P 37/6169 | M 39/911 | ||
| M 38/493 | P 37/6170 | M 40/178 | ||
| M 38/494 | P 37/6171 | M 40/242 | ||
| P 37/6172 | M 40/243 | |||
| M 38/495 M 38/503 |
P 37/6173 | M40/261 | ||
| P 37/6174 | M 40/297 | |||
| M 38/528 M 38/629 |
P 37/6175 | M40/300 | ||
| M 40/301 | ||||
| M 38/630 | P 37/6176 P 37/6177 |
M 40/306 | ||
| M 38/702 | ||||
| M 38/703 | P 37/6178 | M 40/307 M 40/308 |
||
| P 37/6179 | ||||
| P 37/6180 P 37/6181 |
M 40/309 M40/310 |
Note: The Company
retains 20%
of the interest it
held or was entitled to hold prior to the ure
restructure
of the
Duketon Joint Venture
As at 30 August 2005 the following information applied:
$\mathbf{1}$ . SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS
Substantial shareholders disclosed in substantial shareholder notices to the Company:
| Name | Number of Fully Paid Ordinary Shares held |
|---|---|
| Edensor Nominees Pty Limited | 94,132,795 |
| Chabad House of Caulfield Pty Ltd | 43.620.000 |
| Saturn IV LLC | 29,215,000 |
$2.$ SECURITIES
FULLY PAID ORDINARY SHARES $(a)$
The number of holders of fully paid ordinary shares in the Company is 1,391. On a show of hands every holder of fully paid ordinary shares present or by proxy, shall have one vote. Upon a poll, each share shall have one vote. The distribution of holders of fully paid ordinary shares is as follows:
| Category | Number of | |
|---|---|---|
| shareholders | ||
| Holding between | 1-1,000 Shares | 187 |
| Holding between | 1,001 - 5,000 Shares | 269 |
| Holding between | 5.001 - 10.000 Shares | 117 |
| Holding between | 10,001-100,000 Shares | 602 |
| Holding more than | 100,001 Shares | 216 |
The number of holders with less than a marketable parcel of fully paid ordinary shares is 417. The Company's fully paid ordinary shares are quoted on the Australian Stock Exchange using the code RRL.
The top 20 shareholders are as follows:
| Name | Number of | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Fully Paid | interest | |
| Ordinary | ||
| shares held | ||
| Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd | 50.902.200 | 15.63 |
| Harapid Pty Ltd | 38.709.686 | 11.88 |
| Chabad House of Caulfield Pty Ltd | 34.720.000 | 10.66 |
| Saturn IV LLC | 28,775,000 | 8.83 |
| ANZ Nominees Limited | 12,077,287 | 3.71 |
| Fleet Street LLC | 10.000.000 | 3.07 |
| Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd | 7,615,000 | 2.34 |
| Chance Energy Pty Ltd | 7,500,000 | 2.30 |
| Mr Anderson Gregory Hunter Jr | 6,590,000 | 2.02 |
| Newmont Capital Pty Limited | 6.202.000 | 1.90 |
| Quantum Resources Limited | 4.520.909 | 1.39 |
| Asher Nominees Pty Ltd | 3.363.636 | 1.03 |
| Mr Mark Gareth Creasy | 3,324,000 | 1.02 |
| Total | 231,633,547 | 71.11 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A/C | ||||
| Chastain Corporate Pty Ltd <mandel fund<="" super="" td=""> | 2.000.000 | 0.61 | 2.000.000 | 0.61 |
| Arharidis Brothers Pty Ltd | 2,274,000 | 0.70 | ||
| No. $2$ A/C $>$ | 2,326,250 | 0.71 | ||
| Thorpe Road Nominees Pty Ltd <tregoning family<="" td=""> | ||||
| Merrill Lynch (Australia) Nominees Pty Ltd | 2,633,579 | 0.81 | ||
| Malvern Arch Pty Ltd | 2,800,000 | 0.86 | ||
| Tikvah LLC | 3.000.000 | 0.92 | ||
| Fernwaye Pty Ltd | 3.171.170 | 0.97 |
$(b)$ OPTIONS MATURING 31 JANUARY 2014 OVER FULLY PAID ORDINARY SHARES.
The number of holders of options maturing 31 November 2014 over fully paid ordinary shares issued by the Company is 72. Optionholders may attend and speak at general meetings of the Company. However, they do not have an entitlement to vote upon the business before the meeting either by show of hands or by poll. The distribution of holders of options is as follows:
| Category | Number of | |
|---|---|---|
| shareholders | ||
| Holding between | 1-1,000 Shares | |
| Holding between | 1,001 - 5,000 Shares | |
| Holding between | 5,001 - 10,000 Shares | 31 |
| Holding between | 10,001-100,000 Shares | 23 |
| Holding more than | 100.001 Shares | 13 |
The Company's options maturing on 31 January 2014 over fully paid ordinary shares are quoted on the Australian Stock Exchange using the code RRLO.
The top 20 optionholders are as follows:
| Name | Number of | Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Options held | interest | |||
| Chabad House of Caulfield Pty Ltd | 62,744,800 | 64.87 | ||
| Chance Energy Pty Ltd | 15,000,000 | 15.51 | ||
| Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd | 15,000,000 | 15.51 | ||
| Mr David Likht & Ms Rina Likht | 500,000 | 0.52 | ||
| M & K Korkidas Pty Ltd | 398,521 | 0.41 | ||
| Firemat Pty Ltd | 351,000 | 0.36 | ||
| Mr Christopher Robert Cannon | 225,000 | 0.23 | ||
| Anthony's Foot Clinic Pty Ltd | 200,000 | 0.20 | ||
| Reynolds (Nominees) Pty Limited | 186,358 | 0.19 | ||
| Mr Frank Corbellini & Mrs Maria Anita Corbellini <f &<="" td=""> | 157,592 | 0.16 | 157,592 | 0.16 |
| M Super Fund A/C> | ||||
| Ms Mary Graham Neild | 154,620 | 0.16 | ||
| City Corp Pty Ltd | 153.078 | 0.16 | ||
| Pontil Consolidated Pty Ltd <rodney george="" invest<="" td=""> | 125.230 | 0.13 | 125.230 | 0.13 |
| A/C> | ||||
| Ms Moya Sue Tin | 124,200 | 0.13 | ||
| Kaiser Holdings Pty Ltd | 100,000 | 0.10 | ||
| Mr Brian John Tyson | 100,000 | 0.10 | ||
| Vallelonga International Pty Ltd | 100,000 | 0.10 | ||
| Mr James lan Yuen | 100,000 | 0.10 | ||
| Mr Donald Lawrence Valentino & Mrs Judith Ann | 80.000 | 0.08 | ||
| Valentino | ||||
| Mr lanaki Semerdziev | 67,400 | 0.07 | ||
| Total | 95,867,799 | 99.11 |
$(c)$ OPTIONS MATURING 30 APRIL 2012 OVER FULLY PAID ORDINARY SHARES.
The number of holders of options maturing 30 April 2012 over fully paid ordinary shares issued by the Company is 71. Optionholders may attend and speak at general meetings of the Company. However, they do not have an entitlement to vote upon the business before the meeting either by show of hands or by poll. The distribution of holders of options is as follows:
| Category | Number of | |
|---|---|---|
| shareholders | ||
| Holding between | 1-1,000 Shares | 15 |
| Holding between | 1,001 - 5,000 Shares | 5 |
| Holding between | 5,001 - 10,000 Shares | 34 |
| Holding between | 10,001-100,000 Shares | |
| Holding more than | 100,001 Shares | 6 |
The Company's options maturing on 30 April 2012 over fully paid ordinary shares are quoted on the Australian Stock Exchange using the code RRLOA.
The top 20 optionholders are as follows:
</aqua<>| Name | Number of | Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Options held | interest | |||
| Chabad House of Caulfield Pty Ltd | 7.666.850 | 29.76 | ||
| Chance Energy Pty Ltd | 7,500,000 | 29.11 | ||
| Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd | 7,500,000 | 29.11 | ||
| M & K Korkidas Pty Ltd | 1,454,143 | 5.64 | ||
| Mr Christopher William Mc Kinnon | 600,000 | 2.33 | ||
| Dr Glen Whisson & Mrs Tania Whisson <aqua< td=""> | 300,000 | 1.16 | 300,000 | 1.16 |
| Research & Market A/C> | ||||
| Mr David Vargess | 100,000 | 0.39 | ||
| Scalia Holdings Pty Ltd | 60,000 | 0.23 | ||
| Brentine Nominees Pty Ltd | 50,000 | 0.19 | ||
| Mr Chee Chin | 50,000 | 0.19 | ||
| Equity Trustees Limited | 50,000 | 0.19 | ||
| Fopar Nominees Pty Ltd | 50,000 | 0.19 | ||
| Kirriemuir Investments Pty Ltd | 25,000 | 0.10 | ||
| Morgeo Nominees Pty Limited | 25,000 | 0.10 | ||
| Tin Yie Lam | 20,000 | 0.08 | ||
| Mr Pasquale Albano + Mrs Rosemary Annette Albano | 16,000 | 0.06 | ||
| lan Douglas Batch | 15,000 | 0.06 | ||
| Mrs Catherine Baker & Mr Matthew Baker <felix &<="" td=""> | 10.000 | 0.04 | 10.000 | 0.04 |
| Daisy Baker A/C> | ||||
| Mr Adam Hume Boyd | 10,000 | 0.04 | ||
| Mr Scott Heeley | 10,000 | 0.04 | ||
| Total | 25,511,993 | 99.01 |
OPTIONS MATURING 31 OCTOBER 2012 OVER FULLY PAID ORDINARY SHARES. $(d)$
The number of holders of options maturing 31 October 2012 over fully paid ordinary shares issued by the Company is 56. Optionholders may attend and speak at general meetings of the Company. However, they do not have an entitlement to vote upon the business before the meeting either by show of hands or by poll. The distribution of holders of options is as follows:
| Category | Number of | |
|---|---|---|
| shareholders | ||
| Holding between | 1-1,000 Shares | |
| Holding between | 1,001 - 5,000 Shares | 6 |
| Holding between | 5,001 - 10,000 Shares | 28 |
| Holding between | 10,001-100,000 Shares | 10 |
| Holding more than | 100,001 Shares |
The Company's options maturing on 31 October 2012 over fully paid ordinary shares are quoted on the Australian Stock Exchange using the code RRLOB.
The top 20 optionholders are as follows:
| Name | Number of | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Options held | interest | |
| Chabad House of Caulfield Pty Ltd | 15,543,700 | 39.89 |
| Chance Energy Pty Ltd | 11,250,000 | 28.87 |
| Dalkeith Resources Pty Ltd | 11,250,000 | 28.87 |
| M & K Korkidas Pty Ltd | 281.579 | 0.72 |
| Mr Roland Erhard Rohm | 90,000 | 0.23 |
| Morgeo Nominees Pty Limited | 85,000 | 0.22 |
| Fresh Start Pty Ltd | 57,500 | 0.15 |
| C C D Services Pty Ltd | 50,000 | 0.13 |
| Mr Donald Lawrence Valentino & Mrs Judith Ann | 40.000 | 0.10 |
| Valentino | ||
| Ms Janelle Louise Bartlett | 30,000 | 0.08 |
| Mr lanaki Semerdziev | 16,300 | 0.04 |
| Fairley Morgan Batch | 15,000 | 0.04 |
| Cameron Investments Pty Ltd | 14,958 | 0.04 |
| Bonos Pty Ltd | 13,524 | 0.03 |
| Jandamint Pty Ltd | 10,000 | 0.03 |
| Fresh Start Pty Ltd | 8,985 | 0.02 |
| Mr Peter James Lee | 8,500 | 0.02 |
| Amanda Anagnostopoulos | 7,500 | 0.02 |
| Melissa Joyce Barlow | 7.500 | 0.02 |
| Steven Andrew Barlow | 7,500 | 0.02 |
| Total | 38,787,546 | 99.53 |
(e) UNLISTED OPTIONS MATURING 24 MARCH 2010 OVER FULLY PAID ORDINARY SHARES.
The number of unlisted options maturing 24 March 2010 over fully paid ordinary shares is 70,000 options and the number of holders of options is 3. Mr J I Gutnick holds 50,000 options and Mr P J Lee holds 17,500 options. Optionholders may attend and speak at general meetings of the Company. However, they do not have an entitlement to vote upon the business before the meeting either by show of hands or by poll.
REGIS RESOURCES N.L.
Share Registry On-Line
You can do so much more online
Did you know that you can access - and even update - information about your holdings in Regis Resources via the internet.
Visit ASX Perpetual's website www.asxperpetual.com.au and access a wide variety of holding information, make some changes online or download forms. You can:
- Check your current and previous holding balances $\bullet$
- Choose your preferred annual report delivery option $\bullet$
- Update your address details $\bullet$
- Update your bank details $\bullet$
- Lodge, or confirm lodgement of, your Tax File Number (TFN), Australian Business Number (ABN) or $\bullet$ exemption
- Check transaction and dividend history $\bullet$
- Enter your email address $\bullet$
- Check the share prices and graphs $\bullet$
- Download a variety of instruction forms $\bullet$
- Subscribe to email announcements $\bullet$
You can access this information via a security login using your Securityholder Reference Number (SRN) or Holder Identification Number (HIN) as well as your surname (or company name) and postcode (must be the postcode recorded on your holding record).
Top 5 tips for Regis Resources investors visiting ASX Perpetual's website
-
- Bookmark www.asxperpetual.com.au to bookmark, click on 'Favourites' on the menu bar at the top of your browser then select 'Add to Favourites'
-
- Create a portfolio for your holding or holdings and you don't have to remember your SRN or HIN every time vou visit
-
- Lodge your email via the 'Communications Options' and benefit from the online communications options Regis Resources offers its investors
-
- Check out the 'FAQs' page (accessible via the orange menu bar) for answers to frequently asked questions
-
- Use the 'Client List' page (accessible via the orange menu bar) to link to Regis Resources website and the website of the other ASX Perpetual clients in which you invest.
Contact Information
You can also contact the Regis Resources share registry by calling 1300 554 474.
Regis Resources N.L. Corporate Information
Directors
Michael Folie David Walker Marcus Rose Glenister Lamont
Company Secretary
Peter Lee
Senior Management
Peter Lee, General Manager Corporate & Company Secretary Janet Cohen, General Manager Finance & Administration
Registered Office and Domicile
Level 8 580 St. Kilda Road Melbourne Victoria 3004 Australia +61 3 8532 2830 Telephone: Facsimile: +61 3 8532 2805 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.regisresources.com
Legal Form
A public company A no liability company
Country of Incorporation Australia
Share Registry
ASX Perpetual Registrars Limited Level 4 333 Collins Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia Telephone: 1300 554 474 or +61 3 9615 9999 Facsimile: +61 3 8614 2903
Shareholder Information
Manager Investor Relations Telephone: 0412 285 763 Facsimile: +61 3 8532 2805 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http:/www.regisresources.com
Auditors
KPMG 161 Collins Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia
Australian Stock Exchange Listing Code RRL RRLO RRLOA RRLOB
Bankers Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
388 Collins Street
Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia
Solicitors Blake Dawson Waldron 101 Collins Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia