Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2025

Oct 6, 2025

65719_rns_2025-10-06_f69126ab-4a47-4350-bc50-52ca090c8815.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX Announcement 7 October 2025

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

RED MOUNTAIN ACQUIRES ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL ANTIMONY-GOLD MINE IN IDAHO, USA

HIGHLIGHTS

  • RMX has acquired the highly prospective “Silver Dollar Antimony Project” in Idaho, USA, increasing RMX’s footprint in the Idaho area by over 80%

  • The historical Silver Dollar Mine lies within RMX’s claims. Historical production from the 1940s has estimated average ore grades of 17.7% and the USGS mineral database records a grade of 14.6% Sb and 6.3ppm Ag from a stockpile sample from the mine

  • Red Mountain’s Silver Dollar Antimony Project lies southeast of the Company’s Yellow Pine Antimony Project and features multiple antimony and gold mineral occurrences, including a 10m deep shaft sunk into fractured granodiorite in 1944, targeting a massive stibnite vein up to 1m thick

  • The stibnite vein mineralisation is related to an ENE-striking, steeply N-dipping fault and the granodiorite host is part of the Cretaceous Idaho Batholith, which is an analogous geological setting to Perpetua Resources’ (Nasdaq: PPTA) Stibnite Gold-Antimony Project, which has a Proven and Probable mineral reserve of 4.8Moz Au and 148 Mlbs Sb

  • The addition of the Silver Dollar Antimony project provides RMX increased scale in the central Idaho region and its North American Antimony-Gold portfolio

  • RMX’s US based technical team identified and secured the project, further advancing the Company’s strategy of acquiring highly prospective projects utilising internal resources, thereby increasing expertise and knowledge in the US critical metals space with the intention of significantly increasing shareholder value, without the cost of external vendors

  • The Company believes achieving scale will be a significant long-term competitive advantage in the US Critical Metals sector and continues to assess additional high potential opportunities

  • Following its recent capital raising, RMX is well-funded to aggressively execute exploration across its portfolio and assess new venture opportunities

ASX: RMX investorhub.redmountainmining.com.au [email protected] Red Mountain Mining Ltd ACN 119 568 106

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Red Mountain Mining Limited (ASX: RMX), a gold and critical minerals exploration and development company, is pleased to announce that it has acquired a further 24 claims in central Idaho, with demonstrated potential to host economic antimony mineralisation. The Silver Dollar Antimony Project lies approximately 70km southeast of both RMX’s recently acquired Yellow Pine Antimony Project , announced on 25 September 2025[1] , and Perpetua Resources’ ( Nasdaq: PPTA / TSX: PPTA ) Stibnite Gold-Antimony Project, which is the largest known antimony deposit in the USA, with a Proven and Probable Reserve of 104 Mt @ 1.33g/t Au and 0.06% Sb for 4.8Moz Au and 148Mlbs Sb[2] . ASX listed Resolution Minerals’ (ASX: RML) flagship project also lies in the Stibnite District of Idaho .

RMX’s Silver Dollar claims encompass four known alluvial gold and two antimony mineral occurrences, including the Silver Dollar Mine (Figure 1), which features a 10m deep shaft sunk into fractured granodiorite in 1944, targeting a massive stibnite vein up to 1m thick.

==> picture [382 x 347] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: USGS surface geology[3] and mineral occurrences[4] of RMX’s Silver Dollar Antimony Project (yellow outline). The inset shows the relative locations of RMX’s Silver Dollar (SD) and Yellow Pine (YP) projects in Idaho.

1 RMX ASX Announcement, 25/09/2025: https://investorhub.redmountainmining.com.au/announcements/7162731

2 Stibnite Gold Project Feasibility Technical Study, 27/01/2021: https://perpetuaresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2021-01-27-feasibility-study.pdf

3 F.S. Fisher, D.H. McIntyre & K.M. Johnson, 1992, Geologic Map of the Challis 1° x 2° Quadrangle, Idaho. https://doi.org/10.3133/i1819

4 USGS Mineral Resource Data System - Idaho dataset: https://mrdata.usgs.gov/catalog/science.php?thcode=1&term=fUS16

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

2

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Antimony mineralisation at Silver Dollar

The most recent published description of the antimony mineralisation at Silver Dollar is included in Choate (1962)[5] , who notes that the stibnite vein mineralisation at the Silver Dollar Mine, as well as that seen at the second, unnamed antimony mineral occurrence shown on Figure 1, is spatially related and thought to be genetically linked to an ENE-striking, steeply N-dipping fault. The granodiorite host at Silver Dollar is part of the Cretaceous Idaho Batholith, which is the same intrusive suite that hosts Perpetua Resources’ Stibnite Project, where mineralisation is also structurally controlled, along early Tertiary north-south striking regional scale faults and smaller northeast-striking splays.

Choate (1962) spoke directly with Arthur McGowan, who sunk the shaft at Silver Dollar in 1944, who advised him that the vein he mined comprised a pure stibnite core with quartz gangue only at the margins. He communicated that the near-vertical, steeply north-dipping vein was “paper-thin” at surface, but at 25 feet (7.5m) depth it had swelled to a width of three feet (~1m) and that pieces of pure stibnite up to 45 pounds (20kg) in weight were removed during mining. Choate (1962) states that McGowan received $US56 per ton of ore shipped, which at a fixed US price of 15.84c per pound in 1944-1945[6] , equates to a grade of 354lbs/ton, or 17.7% Sb . This value is consistent with the value of 14.6% Sb and 0.2oz/ton (6.3ppm) Ag cited by the USGS for a stockpile sample from the Mine[7] .

Choate (1962) concluded that there was significant untested potential remaining for additional antimony, gold, silver, uranium and possibly mercury mineralisation, which is likely to occur as pods or shoots where secondary structures intersect each other and the main NNE-striking fault that cuts RMX’s Silver Dollar claims. There has been extremely limited exploration over the prospect since.

DISCLAIMER: Grades, masses and widths reported herein for the Silver Dollar Mine are historical estimates from primarily academic sources and US Government Data and are not intended to imply the presence of a Mineral Resource as defined under the JORC Code, 2012.

5 R. Choate, 1962, Geology and ore deposits of the Stanley area: https://www.idahogeology.org/pub/Pamphlets/p-126.pdf

6 CIA compilation of data regarding the world antimony situation, 1977: https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117845/documents/HHRG-119-II0620250206-SD008.pdf

7 https://mrdata.usgs.gov/mrds/show-mrds.php?dep_id=10105686

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

3

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Silver Dollar Antimony Project Exploration Program

Red Mountain’s initial exploration program at Silver Dollar will focus on mapping and sampling where appropriate the main ENE-trending fault through the project area, to locate evidence of intersecting secondary structures, hydrothermal fluid flow, brecciation, alteration and antimony mineralisation, which will then be targeted for drill testing, where justified.

==> picture [489 x 290] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: A location image of a small section of RMX’s Silver Dollar Antimony Project, image was taken as the claims were staked in Idaho, USA.

Authorised for and on behalf of the Board,

==> picture [80 x 28] intentionally omitted <==

Mauro Piccini

Company Secretary

About Red Mountain Mining

Red Mountain Mining Limited (ASX: RMX) is a mineral exploration and development company. Red Mountain has a portfolio of US, Canada and Australia projects in Critical Minerals and Gold. Red Mountain is advancing its Armidale Antimony-Gold Project in NSW, Utah Antimony Project in the Antimony Mining District of Utah, the Idaho Antimony Projects, Fry Lake Gold Project and US Lithium projects.

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX

INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

4

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Competent Person Statement

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results and other technical information complies with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). It has been compiled and assessed under the supervision of contract geologist Mark Mitchell. Mr Mitchell is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Geoscientists and has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code. Mr Mitchell consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Disclaimer

In relying on the above mentioned ASX announcement and pursuant to ASX Listing Rule 5.23.2, the Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the above-mentioned announcement.

==> picture [77 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

JOIN THE RED MOUNTAIN MINING INVESTOR HUB

Visit https://investorhub.redmountainmining.com.au for access to the Investor Hub

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX

INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

5

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

DISCLAIMER: Grades, masses and widths reported herein for the Silver Dollar Mine are historical estimates from primarily academic sources and US Government Data and are not intended to imply the presence of a Mineral Resource as defined under the JORC Code, 2012.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as
down hole gamma sondes, or handheld
XRF instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the
broad meaning of sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
• Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work
has been done this would be relatively
simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling
was used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a
30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases more explanation may be required,
such as where there is coarse gold that
has inherent sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.

No sampling details available on the
historical workings

The claims were worked by prospectors
with their ore sales registered with the
US government.
Drilling
techniques
• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details
(e.g. core diameter, triple or standard
• No drilling reported

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

6

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether core
is oriented and if so, by what method,
etc).
Drill
sample
recovery
• Method of recording and assessing core
and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
• No drilling reported.
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
• The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
• No drilling reported.
• No resource estimation given on the
remaining historical workings.
Sub-
sampling
techniques
and
sample
preparation
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality
and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted for
all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, includingfor instance
• Historical workings were dug by pick and
shovel with ore hand sorted where ore
produced was reported to the US
government which provides the detail in
this report.
• All results are non- JORC compliant.

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

7

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
the grain size of the material being
sampled.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
• The nature, quality and appropriateness
of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the
technique is considered partial or total.
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks)
and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision
have been established.

The historical assay methods are not
documented.
Verification
of
sampling
and
assaying
• The verification of significant
intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
• The use of twinned holes.
• Documentation of primary data, data
entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
• Discuss anyadjustment to assaydata.
• No drill holes reported.
Location of
data points
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
• Specification of the grid system used.
• Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
• The Old workings were verified by IGS
geologists with sites reported in their
database as well as the USGS database. Ref
Database of the Mines and Prospects of
Idaho: Tate & Eldredge 2023
www.idahogeology/pub/Digital_Databases
• No mineral resource estimation is presented
in this release.

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX

INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

8

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Data
spacing
and
distribution
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
• Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree of geological and grade
continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and classifications applied.
• Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
• Historical mining techniques follow the
visible mineralisation and are therefore
biased toward the ore as are the results
reported.
• No resource is presented in this release.
• No analytical compositing has been
reported.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
• Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
• If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
• Ore samples biased to known exploited
mineralisation areas and not oriented other
than following the mineralisation trends
seen in the pit/shaft exposures.
• No drilling conducted or reported.
Sample
security
• The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
• It is not reported what sample security was
observed.
Audits or
reviews
• The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
• No audit or reviews of sampling techniques
and data was reported.

1.2 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement
and land
tenure status
• Type, reference name/number,
location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with
third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
• The security of the tenure held at
the time of reportingalongwith
• The 24 Red Mountain mining claims, which
cost approximately $50k to stake with the BLM,
cover a rectangular block of 200.67 Hectares in
area approximately 70km southeast of the
Yellow Pine Antimony Field.
• The Silver Dollar Antimony Project claim
numbers are SD 3-7, SD 11-15, expiring on
1/9/2026.

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX

INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

9

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in
the area.
Exploration
done by
other parties
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
• Seven individual mineral deposits are known
within the RMX claims and reported by the
Idaho Geological Survey.
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting
and style of mineralisation.
• The Silver Dollar claims lie in the mining district
of Stanley with a cluster of reported mineral
occurrences in the Idaho Batholith, a
Cretaceous sodic quartz monazite to calcic
granodiorite. Mineralisation occurs in oxidized
and hydrothermal veins within a shear zone
striking N65oE and dipping north.
• The Silver Dollar Mine resides in the center of
the low flat saddle between Kelley Creek and
Doran Gulch. The historical 1944-45 workings
consist of a 10.6m shaft and a shallow single
blade bulldozer trench. Dump workings reveal
stibnite and quartz altered to whitish boxworks
texture with massive yellowish crusts of
secondary alteration minerals including
senarmontite, cervantite and stibiconite
.
Drill hole
Information
• A summary of all information
material to the understanding of
the exploration results including a
tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill
holes:
o easting and northing of the drill
hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in
metres) of the drill hole collar
o dipand azimuth of the hole
• No drilling conducted

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

10

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
o down hole length and
interception depth
o hole length.
• If the exclusion of this information
is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from
the understanding of the report,
the Competent Person should
clearlyexplain whythis is the case.
Data
aggregation
methods
• In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (e.g. cutting of high
grades) and cut-off grades are
usually Material and should be
stated.
• Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high
grade results and longer lengths of
low grade results, the procedure
used for such aggregation should
be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
• The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent
values should be clearlystated.
• No aggregated methods are reported
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
• These relationships are particularly
important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
• If the geometry of the
mineralisation with respect to the
drill hole angle is known, its nature
should be reported.
• If it is not known and only the
down hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear statement
to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole
• No relationship is made between mineralisation
width and intercept lengths

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

11

==> picture [140 x 38] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
length, true width not known’).
Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections
(with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being
reported These should include, but
not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
• Appropriate location diagram is presented in
the text. The diagram is indicative only as no
assumptions of grade, extent or depth are
made.
Balanced
reporting
• Where comprehensive reporting of
all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative
reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading
reportingof Exploration Results.
• Only pertinent results are given as due to the
relevance of the announcement.
Other
substantive
exploration
data
• Other exploration data, if
meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited
to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results;
geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious
or contaminatingsubstances.
• There is no other substantive exploration data
provided or withheld as this announcement
deals with this early phase exploration target.
Further work • The nature and scale of planned
further work (e.g. tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is
not commerciallysensitive.
• The forward work programme includes due
diligence sampling over the known
mineralisation as reported by the Idaho
Geological Survey with emphasis on the
Stibnite reports.
• Diagrams of the sampling positions have been
provided in the text.

RED MOUNTAIN MINING LTD ASX: RMX

INVESTORHUB.REDMOUNTAINMINING.COM.AU

12