Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

RAND MINING LIMITED Interim / Quarterly Report 2026

Oct 28, 2025

65721_rns_2025-10-28_a11a33cd-f217-476c-8fa4-12fdc675b9a0.pdf

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

29 October 2025

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

==> picture [108 x 83] intentionally omitted <==

A.B.N. 41 004 669 658

ASX: RND

Quarterly Report for September 2025

Highlights

Board of Directors

Mr Otakar Demis Non-executive Chairman & Joint Company Secretary

Mr Anton Billis Managing Director and CEO

Mr Gordon Sklenka Non-Executive Director

Ms Lyndall Vaughan Alternate Director for Mr Otakar Demis

  • During the quarter Rand and Tribune processed 78,296 tonnes of ore at 2.89 g/t from the EKJV operations at the joint venture partner Evolution Mining Limited Mungari processing plant, with Rand’s share equating to 19,574 tonnes.

  • 6,818 ounces of gold were produced by Rand and Tribune during the quarter.

  • Rand’s 25% share of the gold produced was 1,705 oz

==> picture [301 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

Mr Roland Berzins & Mr Sheran De Silva Joint Company Secretaries

==> picture [301 x 144] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [455 x 55] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 1 of 17

Ore Stockpiles

At the end of the quarter, Rand is entitled to a share of the following stockpiles:

EKJV Stockpiles EKJV Stockpiles EKJV Stockpiles EKJV Stockpiles EKJV Stockpiles EKJV Stockpiles
ROM Pad Ore Source Ore
Tonnes
Grade
**g/t **
Ounces
Au
Rand
Entitlement
Rubicon ROM EKJV RHP MG 9,859 3.31 1,051 12.25%
Rubicon ROM EKJV RHP LG 133,515 1.02 4,367 12.25%
Mungari ROM EKJV RHP MG 414 4.52 60 12.25%
Mungari Crushed Stocks EKJV RHP MG 1,516 3.86 188 12.25%
Hornet ROM EKJV HOP MG 22,115 1.74 1,235 12.25%
Hornet ROM EKJV HOP LG 38,698 0.76 945 12.25%
Mungari ROM EKJV Raleigh LG 1,155 1.71 64 12.50%
Raleigh ROM EKJV Raleigh MG 193 2.50 16 12.50%
Raleigh ROM EKJV Raleigh LG 23,745 1.11 844 12.50%
Raleigh T ROM EKJV Raleigh LG 6,055 0.61 119 12.25%
Rand Share of EKJV Stockpiles 29,128 1.17 1,091 100%

Geology and Mining

East Kundana Joint Venture

Raleigh Underground Mine Development

Development performance for the quarter is summarised in the following table.

ORE BODY Raleigh Raleigh Raleigh Raleigh Raleigh
Month Capital Operating Lateral
development
Decline/Incline Other Ore Waste Paste
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
July 66.7 17.8 46.4 - -
August 103.9 33.5 - - -
September 85.8 61.3 - - 5.0
September 2025 Q 256.4 112.6 46.4 0.0 5.0

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 2 of 17

==> picture [455 x 40] intentionally omitted <==

Rubicon-Hornet-Pegasus Underground Mine Development

Development performance for the quarter is summarised in the following table.

ORE BODY Rubicon, Hornet & Pegasus Rubicon, Hornet & Pegasus Rubicon, Hornet & Pegasus Rubicon, Hornet & Pegasus Rubicon, Hornet & Pegasus
Month Capital Operating Lateral development
Decline Other Ore Waste Paste
(m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
July 19.4 76.9 95.2 59.2 20.0
August 31.2 96.5 85.5 60.1 23.5
September 62.2 99.7 90.2 - 40.0
September 2025 Q 112.8 273.1 270.9 119.3 83.5

Hornet Open Pit Mine Production

Mine production commenced in Hornet open pit during the quarter.

Hornet -Open Pit Units Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25
TotalOre t 8,591 10,415 60,082
TotalGrade g/t 0.68 1.26 1.34
TotalGold _oz _ 188 421 2,590
Mined Waste t 1,115,464 725,498 1,040,952

EKJV Mine Production

Contained gold in stopes, development ore and from open pit sources mined during the quarter is tabulated below:

ORE BODY RHP RHP RHP Raleigh Raleigh Raleigh Hornet Open Pit Hornet Open Pit Hornet Open Pit Total EKJV Total EKJV Total EKJV
Month Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces
July 33,626 2.9 3,135 5,969 2.0 386 8,591 0.7 188 48,186 2.4 3,709
August 16,890 3.8 2,061 1,687 3.5 188 10,415 1.3 421 28,992 2.9 2,670
September 32,920 4.2 4,484 737 2.2 52 60,082 1.3 2,590 93,739 2.4 7,126
September
2025 Q
83,436 3.6 9,680 8,393 2.3 626 79,088 1.3 3,199 170,917 2.5 13,505
June 2025
Q
129,882 3.5 14,528 30,746 3.0 2,931 - - - 160,628 3.4 17,459

Rand’s Entitlements to Mined Ore (RHP & Hornet Open Pit 12.25%, Raleigh 12.50%)

EKJV EKJV EKJV
Quarter Tonnes Grade Ounces
(t) (g/t) (troy oz)
September 2025Q 20,958 2.5 1,656
June 2025 Q 19,754 3.4 2,146

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 3 of 17

Toll Processing

During the quarter a total of 78,296 tonnes of Rand and Tribune ore at 2.89 g/t was processed at the Mungari processing plant under the EKJV joint venture agreement with Evolution Mining Limited to recover 6,818 oz of gold at 93.8% recovery.

Rand and Tribune gold production for the September 2025 quarter, along with Rand share is tabulated below.

Rand and Tribune Ore Processed Rand and Tribune Ore Processed Rand and Tribune Ore Processed Rand and Tribune Ore Processed Rand and Tribune Ore Processed
Campaign Location Tonnes
Milled
Head
Grade Au
(g/t)
Recovery (%) Fine Au
Produced
(Oz)
EVN Mungari 78,296 2.89 93.8% 6,818
Rand’s Share of Ore Processed
Campaign Location Tonnes
Milled
Head
Grade Au
(g/t)
Recovery (%) Fine Au
Produced
(Oz)
EVN Mungari 19,574 2.89 93.85% 1,705

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 4 of 17

EKJV Exploration

During the first quarter of FY26, a total of 671 metres of drilling was completed for the East Kundana Joint Venture (EKJV). Work completed included Diamond Drilling (DD) for the Sadler underground and Resource targeting RC and DD at Ambition.

EKJV exploration activity for the September quarter FY26.

Project Prospect Tenement RAB/AC
Metres
RAB/AC
Samples
RC
Metres
RC
Samples
DD
Metres
DD
Samples
ME
Samples
Raleigh Sadler M16/309 - - - - 671 97 -
Ambition Ambition M16/0326 - - - - - 13 -
Total - - - - 671 110 -

Work Completed

Sadler

During the quarter, surface diamond drilling commenced to test potential southerly extensions of the Sadler mineralisation at Raleigh. This program is targeting additional resource growth beyond the current underground mining area.

Drilling was conducted on an 80m x 80m spacing and intersected a brittle-ductile structure ranging from 0.2m to 0.45m wide, consistent with mineralisation currently being mined at Sadler. These results support the geological model and the potential for resource extension.

A further 1,054 metres of diamond drilling is scheduled for completion in Q2 FY26. No assay results were returned during the quarter; results are expected to inform resource modelling in upcoming periods.

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 5 of 17

==> picture [437 x 533] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1 A Plan view of EKJV area showing Upper Sadler Incline surface diamond drilling drilled in the quarter, holes SADRT25001 and SADRT25004.

Ambition

No drilling was undertaken at Ambition during the quarter. However, all assay results from the previous quarter’s drilling were received and reviewed.

Drilling intersected the Strezlecki lode consistently over a 500-metre strike length, with minimal surface expression. Results suggest the presence of a southward-plunging high-grade zone (see Figure 2), which may represent a new target area for future drilling.

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 6 of 17

Of the six holes with assay results returned in Q1 FY26, three reported significant intercepts (>3 g/t*m), including:

  • 0.6m @ 15.09g/t Au from 196.7m (AMRD25003A)

  • 0.68m @ 8.31g/t Au from 242.35m (AMRD25001)

  • 0.4m @ 7.82g/t Au from 406m (AMRD25004)

These results provide early indications of high-grade mineralisation and will inform the next phase of exploration planning at Ambition.

==> picture [451 x 246] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2 - A Long section view of the Ambition mineralisation showing significant intercepts returned from within the quarter.

These intercepts were calculated based on underground parameters. A full list of the drilling intercepts is listed in Table below.

==> picture [451 x 137] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 7 of 17

Full details of the EKJV Exploration Report for the September 2025 quarter will be released to the ASX on 24 October 2025.

Other Exploration

Seven Mile Hill Joint Venture (Rand’s Interest 50%)

No drilling was conducted during the quarter.

Competent Persons Statement

Information in this report relating to exploration results has been compiled by Mr Andrew Hawker in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). Mr Andrew Hawker is a member of AUSIMM and a consultant to Rand Mining Ltd and has sufficient relevant experience in the activities undertaken and styles of mineralisation being reported to qualify as a Competent Person under the JORC Code. Mr Andrew Hawker consents to the inclusion in this report of the information compiled by him in the form and context in which it appears.

CORPORATE

Summary of Cashflows

The attached Appendix 5B has been prepared on a consolidated basis, including the cash inflows and outflows of the Group's subsidiaries. As of 30 September 2025, the Group's cash and cash equivalents increased to $4.53 million, compared to the $3.57 million held as at 30 June 2025.

Receipts from customers increased slightly to $10.64 million compared to the previous quarter which was $10.33m. This was due to increased gold prices.

Operating cash flow decreased from $1.83m last quarter to $1.18m this quarter due to higher development and administration costs.

Investing cashflows decreased from $599k last quarter to $219k this quarter. This was due to a reduction in the purchases of property, plant and equipment.

The overall financial result for the period highlights a net cash outflow from operating activities amounting to $1.18 million for the quarter, a decrease of 654k from the June quarter.

On-Market Share Buy-Back

The Company has a current on market share buy-back which expires on 9 January 2026. No shares were bought back during the quarter.

Payments to Related Parties of the entity and their associates

During the quarter the following payments were made to related parties of the entity and their associates as disclosed in Item 6 of the Appendix 5B;

Details Amount
$000
Directors fees and superannuation payable to Anthony Billis 24
Directors fees payable to Gordon Sklenka 13
RAND MINING LTD.(ASX: RND)
ASX Announcement **Page ** 8of 17
Directors fees and wages payable to Lyndall Vaughan (Alternate Director for
Otakar Demis) 8
Management fee paid to Tribune Resources 93
Loan to Tribune Resources Ltd 500
Repayment by Tribune Resources Ltd (500)
Payment of rent, rates, and levies for office to Melville Parade Pty Ltd* 7
Reimbursement of operating expenses to Iron Resources Liberia Ltd* 80
Royalties paid to Lake Grace Exploration via EKJV* 1

*An entity in which Anthony Billis is a director.

This report and the attached Appendix 5B have been authorised by the Board of Rand Mining Ltd.

For Shareholder Enquiries

Roland Berzins Joint Company Secretary E: [email protected] Ph: + 61 8 9474 2113

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 9 of 17

INTERESTS IN MINING TENEMENTS

Project/Tenements Location Held at end of
quarter
Acquired
during
the
**quarter **
Disposed
during
the
**quarter **
Kundana WA, Australia
01. M15/1413 12.25%
02. M15/993 12.25%
03. M16/181 12.25%
04. M16/182 12.25%
05. M16/308 12.25%
06. M16/309 12.25%
07. M16/325 12.25%
08. M16/326 12.25%
09. M16/421 12.25%
10. M16/428 12.25%
11. M24/924 12.25%
Seven Mile Hill WA, Australia
01. E15/1664 50.00%
02. M15/1233 50.00%
03. M15/1234 50.00%
04. M15/1291 50.00%
05. M15/1388 50.00%
06. M15/1394 50.00%
07. M15/1409 50.00%
08. M15/1743 50.00%
09. M26/563 50.00%
10. P15/6370 50.00%
11. P15/6398 50.00%
12. P15/6399 50.00%
13. P15/6400 50.00%
14. P26/4173 (Application for
conversion to Mining Lease M26/872
was lodged in Dec 2024 - Pending
approval)
50.00%
West Kimberly WA, Australia
01. E04/2548 100%

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 10 of 17

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Mungari – Ambition

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria Explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling
(e.g. cut channels, random chips,
or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools
appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as downhole
gamma sondes, handheld XRF
instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the
broad meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures
taken to ensure sample
representation and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are material to
the Public Report.
In cases where ‘industry
standard’ work has been
completed this would be relatively
simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation
drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was
pulverised to produce a 30 g
charge for fire assay’). In other
cases, more explanation may be
required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent
sampling problems, or unusual
commodities/mineralisation types
(e.g. submarine nodules).

Two sample types were used to collect material for analysis: surface
diamond drilling (DD) and surface reverse circulation drilling (RC).

RC samples were split using a rig-mounted cone splitter on 1 m
intervals to obtain a sample for assay.

Diamond core was placed in core trays for logging and sampling. Half
core samples were nominated by the geologist from the diamond core
with a minimum sample width of 30 cm.

Sample procedures followed by historic operators are assumed to be
in line with RC sampling was split using a rig mounted cone splitter to
deliver a sample of approximately 3 kg.

Surface diamond drill holes were completed using HQ (63.5 mm) core.
DD drill core was cut in half using an automated core saw, the mass
of material collected will vary on the hole diameter and sampling
interval.

All samples were delivered to a commercial laboratory where they
were assayed via photon analyses. Samples were dried, crushed to 3
mm for photon, at this point, large samples may be split using a rotary
splitter, pulverisation to 90% passing 75 µm for fire assays. ~500g is
selected for photon analyses or a 40g charge was selected for fire
assay. industry standards at the time.
Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g. core, reverse
circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core
diameter, triple or standard tube,
depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether
core is oriented and if so, by what
method, etc.).

RC sampling was completed using a 4.5” to 5.5” diameter face
sampling hammer. Diamond holes from surface were predominantly
HQ (63.5mm) holes.

All diamond core was orientated where possible using the reflex (act
II or ezi-ori) tool.

In many cases, RC pre-collars were drilled, followed by diamond tails.
Pre-collar depth was determined in the drill design phase depending
on the target being drilled and production constraints.

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 11 of 17

Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria Explanation Commentary
Drill sample recovery Method of recording and
assessing core and chip sample
recoveries and results assessed.
Measures taken to maximise
sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the
samples.
Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.

RC drilling sample weights were recorded for selected sample
intervals and monitored for fluctuations against the expected sample
weight. If samples were below the expected weight, feedback was
given promptly to the RC driller to modify drilling practices to achieve
the expected weights.

All diamond core was orientated and measured during processing and
the recovery recorded into the drill-hole database. The core where
possible was reconstructed into continuous runs on a cradle for
orientation marking. Hole depths were checked against the driller’s
core blocks.

Inconsistencies between the logging and the driller’s core depth
measurement blocks are investigated. Core recovery has been
acceptable. Surface drilling recoveries were generally excellent except
oxide zones; however, these rarely fell below 90%.

Measures taken to maximise sample recovery include instructions to
drillers to slow down drilling rates or reduce the coring run length in
less competent ground.

Recovery of RC samples was continuously monitored. Duplicate
sampling (e.g., field splits) was performed for every meter to assess
reproducibility and identify heterogeneity or size-related segregation.

Recovery was excellent for diamond core, and no relationship
between grade and recovery was observed.
Logging Whether core and chip samples
have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of
detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc.)
photography.
The total length and percentage of
the relevant intersections logged.

RC drill chips and diamond core have been geologically logged to the
level of detail required for the Mineral Resource estimation, mining
studies and metallurgical studies.

All logging is both qualitative and quantitative in nature, recording
features such as structural data, RQD, sample recovery, lithology,
mineralogy, alteration, mineralisation types, vein density, oxidation
state, weathering, colour, etc. All holes are photographed wet.

All RC and diamond holes were logged in entirety from collar to end of
hole.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and
whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc and
whether sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature,
quality and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
Quality control procedures
adopted for all sub-sampling
stages to maximise representivity
of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that
the sampling is representative of
the in-situ material collected,
including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half
sampling.

Diamond core was half-core sampled, and the remaining half was
retained in the EVN core farm.

All RC samples were split by a cone or a riffle splitter and collected
into a sequenced calico bag. Any wet samples that could not be
appropriately split were dried, then riffle split.

Sample preparation of RC and diamond samples was undertaken by
external laboratories according to the sample preparation and
assaying protocol established to maximise the representation of the
mineralisation. Samples are sorted for processing. The material jaw
crushed to a nominal 3mm particle size, and a 500g subsample was
prepared for analysis. Grind checks are performed at the crushing
stage (3mm) for Photon Assay samples. This 500g subsample was
sealed into a plastic jar, weighed and labelled with a unique identifier
and reference disk. Laboratory's performance was monitored as part
of EVN’s QAQC procedure. Laboratory inspections were undertaken
to monitor the laboratory's compliance with the EVN sampling and
sample preparation protocol.

Quality
control
procedures
adopted
to
maximise
sample
representation for all sub-sampling stages include the collection of
field and laboratory duplicates and the insertion of certified reference
material as assay standards (1 in 20) and the insertion of blank
samples (1 in 20) or at the geologist’s discretion. Coarse blank material
is routinely submitted for assay and is inserted into each mineralised
zone where possible. The quality control performance was monitored
as part of EVN’s QAQC procedure.

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 12 of 17

Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria Explanation Commentary
Whether sample sizes are
appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.

Umpire sampling is performed monthly, where 3% of the samples are
sent to the umpire laboratory for processing.

The sample sizes are considered appropriate for the laboratory test-
work being conducted. In-situ grain sizes of the sampled materials
have not been measured and most likely vary considerably.
Quality of assay data
and laboratory tests
The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the assaying
and laboratory procedures used
and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
For geophysical tools,
spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc., the parameters
used in determining the analysis,
including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibration
factors applied and their derivation,
etc.
Nature of quality control
procedures adopted (eg standards,
blanks, duplicates, external
laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e.
lack of bias) and precision have
been established.

The sampling preparation and assaying protocol used by EVN was
developed to ensure the quality and suitability of the assaying and
laboratory procedures relative to the mineralisation types. Fire assay
and photon assay are tests designed to measure the total gold within
_a sample. Both_methods have been confirmed as suitable technique
for orogenic-type mineralisation. It has been extensively used
throughout the Goldfields region.

No geophysical tools or other remote sensing instruments were
utilised for reporting or interpretation of gold mineralisation, although
aeromagnetic interpretation was used to build the structural model,
which does constrain the mineralised envelope.

Quality control samples were routinely inserted into the sampling
sequence and were also inserted either inside or around the expected
zones of mineralisation. The intent of the procedure for reviewing the
performance of certified standard reference material is to examine for
any erroneous results (a result outside of the expected statistically
derived tolerance limits) and to validate, if required, the acceptable
levels of accuracy and precision for all stages of the sampling and
analytical process. Typically, batches which fail quality control checks
are re-analysed.
Verification of
sampling and assaying
The verification of significant
intersections by either independent
or alternative company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data,
data entry procedures, data
verification and data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay
data
Independent internal or external verification of significant intercepts is not
routinely completed. The quality control/quality assurance (QAQC)
process ensures the intercepts are representative of the orogenic gold
systems. Half core is retained at Mungari if further verification is required,
and field duplicates used for verification of any assay value where
required.
The twinning of holes is not a common practice undertaken. Data which is
inconsistent with the known geology undergoes further verification to
ensure its quality.
All sample and assay information are stored utilising the acQuire database
software system. Data undergoes QAQC validation prior to being
accepted and loaded into the database. Assay results are merged when
received electronically from the laboratory. The geologist reviews the
database, checking for the correct merging of results and that all data has
been received and entered. Any adjustments to this data are recorded
permanently in the database. Historical paper records (where available)
are retained in the exploration and mining offices.
No adjustments or calibrations have been made to the final assay data
reported by the laboratory.
Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys
used to locate drillholes (collar and
downhole surveys), trenches, mine
workings and other locations used
in Mineral Resource estimation.
Specification of the grid system
used.
Quality and adequacy of
topographic control.
All drill holes have been surveyed for easting, northing and reduced level.
Resource drill hole collar positions are surveyed by the site-based survey
department or contract surveyors (utilising a differential GPS or
conventional surveying techniques, with reference to a known base
station) with a precision of less than 0.2m variability. Holes drilled prior to
2019 had downhole gyroscopic surveys completed at distance between
40 and 80 metres downhole, and again at end of hole. Holes drilled post
2019 had downhole gyroscopic surveys completed at an average of 10 m
spacing downhole.

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 13 of 17

Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Mungari – Ambition Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria Explanation Commentary
Recent data is collected and stored in MGA 20 Zone 51.
Topographic control was generated from aerial surveys and detailed Lidar
surveys to 0.2m accuracy.
Data spacing and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results.
Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to establish
the degree of geological and grade
continuity appropriate for the
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
Whether sample compositing has
been applied.
Resource definition drilling spacing was typically 40m x 40m, to allow for
classification as Indicated Resource for an Underground resource, or 20m
x 20m for an Open Pit resource. Outside of the Indicated Resource, drill
spacing is highly variable with Resource classifications applied
appropriately.
Data spacing and distribution is considered sufficient for establishing
geological continuity and grade variability appropriate for classifying a
Mineral Resource.
Sample data is composited before grade estimation is undertaken.
Orientation of data in
relation to geological
structure
Whether the orientation of
sampling achieves unbiased
sampling of possible structures and
the extent to which this is known,
considering the deposit type.
If the relationship between the
drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
Drilling is planned to intersect the mineralisation in an orientation that
does not introduce sample bias.
The relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures at Ambition is not considered to have introduced a
sampling bias and is not considered to be material.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure
sample security.
Chain of custody protocols to ensure the security of samples are followed.
Prior to submission, samples are retained on site and access to the
samples is restricted. Collected samples are dropped off at the respective
commercial laboratories in Kalgoorlie. The laboratories are contained
within a secured/fenced compound. Access into the laboratory is
restricted and movements of personnel and the samples are tracked
under supervision of the laboratory staff. During some drill campaigns,
some samples are collected directly from site by the commercial
laboratory. While various laboratories have been used, the chain of
custody and sample security protocols have remained similar.
Audits or reviews The results of any audits or
reviews of sampling techniques
and data.
No audits have been undertaken for the drill holes at this stage.

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 14 of 17

Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results
Criteria Explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and
land tenure status
Type, reference name/number,
location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with
third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held at the
time of reporting, along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.

All holes mentioned in this report are located on the M16/326.
Mining lease held by the East Kundana Joint Venture (EKJV).
The EKJV is majority owned and managed by Evolution Mining
Limited (51%). The minority holding in the EKJV is held by
Tribune Resources Ltd (36.75%) and Rand Mining Ltd
(12.25%). There are no private royalty agreements applicable
to M16/326.

No known impediments exist, and the tenements are in good
standing.
Exploration done by
other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.

The Ambition target was originally defined in 2001 from
magnetic ‘anomalies’ as “a continuation of the Arctic Structure
mined in the Arctic Pit to the south”. A small drill program of
four RC holes targeted the mineralised structure at Ambition in
2003. These holes failed to intersect the structure, presumably
due to an offset of the aeromagnetic lineament. Other drilling
in the area has absent or poor-quality geological logging. The
2003 drillholes assisted in successfully intersecting the target
in this drill program, but beyond that, historical drilling provides
little value in appraisal of the structure at Ambition.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and
style of mineralisation.

The Kundana camp is situated within the Norseman-Wiluna
Greenstone Belt, in an area dominated by the Zuleika shear
zone, which separates the Coolgardie Domain from the Ora
Banda Domain. K2-style mineralisation consists of narrow vein
deposits hosted by shear zones located along steeply dipping
overturned hangingwall basalts. The K2 structure defines the
contact between a black shale unit (Centenary shale) and
intermediate volcaniclastics (Sparogville formation). In the
northern part of the Ambition target, the hangingwall basalts
are absent and the structure separates a gabbro and lithic
gritstone from Spargoville Volcaniclastic rocks. Although it is
unclear at this stage, the current interpretation is that the target
structure in the northern part of the Ambition prospect is
actually the confluence of the Strzelecki and K2 structures thus
the basalt sequences are faulted out where the two structures
converge.
Drill Hole Information A summary of all information material
to the understanding of the exploration
results, including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material
drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drillhole
collar
o elevation or RL of the drillhole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o downhole length and interception
depth
o hole length.

See Table 1 for a table of results.

All holes in this FY program are listed in the table. No drill holes
are excluded from this report or from Table 1.
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade

All reported assay results have been length weighted to
provide an intersection width. Barren material between
mineralised samples has been permitted in the calculation of
these widths where the resultant average composite grade of

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 15 of 17

Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results

Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results
Criteria Explanation Commentary
truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades)
and cut-off grades are usually material
and should be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high-grade
results and longer lengths of low-grade
results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and
some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in
detail.
The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent values
should be clearly stated.
samples beyond (and not including) the core mineralised zone
exceeds the 1 g/t cut-off grade used for intercept calculation.

No assay results have been top cut for the purpose of this
report. A lower cut-off of 1g/t has been used to identify
significant results. Where the target zone does not exceed the
1g/t cut-off, NSI (no significant intercept) has been declared.

No metal equivalent values have been used for the reporting
of these exploration results.
Relationship between
mineralisation widths
and intercept lengths
These relationships are particularly
important in the reporting of
Exploration Results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation
with respect to the drill hole angle is
known, its nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the
downhole lengths are reported, there
should be a clear statement to this
effect (e.g. ‘downhole length, true width
not known’)

The target structure undulates, but its general orientation is
well constrained, allowing reliable calculations of true widths.
True widths have been calculated for all reported intersections.

Both the downhole width and true width have been clearly
specified when used.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant
discovery being reported. These
should include but not be limited to a
plan view of drill hole.

The diagram below shows the location of the Ambition drilling
relative to the geological model and historic Arctic open pit

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 16 of 17

Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results

Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results Mungari – Ambition Section 2 Reporting of Resource Development Results
Criteria Explanation Commentary
Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low
and high grades and/or widths should
be practised to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results.

Both high and low grades have been reported accurately,
clearly identified with the drillhole attributes and ‘From’ and ‘To’
depths. All target zone intercepts for all eighteen holes have
been reported for this drill program, regardless of grade. Drill
holes with outstanding assays have not been included in the
table.
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful
and material, should be reported,
including (but not limited to): geological
observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemical survey results;
bulk samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.

No other material exploration data has been collected for this
drill program.
Further work The nature and scale of planned
further work (e.g. tests for lateral
extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas of possible extensions, including
the main geological interpretations and
future drilling areas, provided this
information is not commercially
sensitive.

Further Reverse Circulation and Diamond drilling is planned to
infill the higher-grade zones of the structure intersected to date
and to better define the exact position and orientation of the
structure, especially in the northern half of the prospective
trend. Diamond drilling is planned to test the south plunging
high-grade zone at depths exceeding 400m from the surface.

Appropriate Diagrams accompany this report.

==> picture [35 x 31] intentionally omitted <==

RAND MINING LTD. (ASX: RND) ASX Announcement

Page 17 of 17

Rule 5.5

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report

Name of entity Rand Mining Ltd ABN Quarter ended (“current quarter”) 41 004 669 658 30 September 2025

Consolidated statement of cash flows Current quarter
$A’000
Year to date (3
months)
$A’000
1.
Cash flows from operating activities
1.1
Receipts from customers
1.2
Payments for
(a) exploration & evaluation
(b) development
(c) production
(d) staff costs
(e) administration and corporate costs
1.3
Dividends received (see note 3)
1.4
Interest received
1.5
Interest and other costs of finance paid
1.6
Income taxes paid
1.7
Government grants and tax incentives
1.8
Other (provide details if material)
1.9
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities
10,647
(261)
(3,317)
(4,159)
(67)
(392)
-
42
-
(1,315)
-
-
10,647
(261)
(3,317)
(4,159)
(67)
(392)
-
42
-
(1,315)
-
-
1,178 1,178
2.
Cash flows from investing activities
2.1
Payments to acquire or for:
(a) entities
(b) tenements
(c) property, plant and equipment
(d) exploration & evaluation
(e) investments
(f)
other non-current assets
-
-
(132)
(97)
-
-
-
-
(132)
(97)
-
-

ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.

Page 1

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report

Consolidated statement of cash flows Current quarter
$A’000
Year to date (3
months)
$A’000
2.2
Proceeds from the disposal of:
(a) entities
(b) tenements
(c) property, plant and equipment
(d) investments
(e) other non-current assets
2.3
Cash flows from loans to other entities
2.4
Dividends received (see note 3)
2.5
Other (Cash Advances between Rand
Mining Ltd and Tribune Resources Ltd))
2.6
Net cash from / (used in) investing
activities
-
-
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
-
-
(219) (219)
3.
Cash flows from financing activities
3.1
Proceeds from issues of equity securities
(excluding convertible debt securities)
3.2
Proceeds from issue of convertible debt
securities
3.3
Proceeds from exercise of options
3.4
Transaction costs related to issues of equity
securities or convertible debt securities
3.5
Proceeds from borrowings
3.6
Repayment of borrowings
3.7
Transaction costs related to loans and
borrowings
3.8
Dividends paid
3.9
Other (provide details if material)
3.10
Net cash from / (used in) financing
activities
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
4.
Net increase / (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents for the period
4.1
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period
4.2
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9 above)
4.3
Net cash from / (used in) investing activities
(item 2.6 above)
4.4
Net cash from / (used in) financing activities
(item 3.10 above)
3,572
1,178
(219)
-
3,572
1,178
(219)
-

ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.

Page 2

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report

Consolidated statement of cash flows Current quarter
$A’000
Year to date (3
months)
$A’000
4.5
Effect of movement in exchange rates on
cash held
4.6
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
- -
4,531 4,531
5.
Reconciliation of cash and cash
equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in the
consolidated statement of cash flows) to the
related items in the accounts
Current quarter
$A’000
Previous quarter
$A’000
5.1
Bank balances
5.2
Call deposits
5.3
Bank overdrafts
5.4
Other (provide details)
5.5
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
quarter (should equal item 4.6 above)
4,531
-
-
-
3,572
-
-
-
4,531 3,572
6.
Payments to related parties of the entity and their
associates
Current quarter
$A'000
6.1
Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their
associates included in item 1
725
6.2
Aggregate amount of payments to related parties and their
associates included in item 2
-
Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an
explanation for, such payments.
725
-

ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.

Page 3

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report

7.
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
Financing facilities
Note: the term “facility’ includes all forms of financing
arrangements available to the entity.
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the
sources of finance available to the entity.
Total facility
amount at quarter
end
$A’000
Amount drawn at
quarter end
$A’000
Loan facilities
-
-
Credit standby arrangements
-
-
Other (EKJV Lease)
-
-
Total financing facilities
-
-
Unused financing facilities available at quarter end
-
Include in the box below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest
rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional financing
facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end,
include a note providing details of those facilities as well.
Total facility
amount at quarter
end
$A’000
Amount drawn at
quarter end
$A’000
- -
- -
- -
- -
N/A
8. Estimated cash available for future operating activities $A’000
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9)
1,178
(Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing
activities) (item 2.1(d))
(97)
Total relevant outgoings (item 8.1 + item 8.2)
1,081
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter end (item 4.6)
4,531
Unused finance facilities available at quarter end (item 7.5)
-
Total available funding (item 8.4 + item 8.5)
4,531
Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided by
item 8.3)
N/A
Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings (ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as “N/A”.
Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding available must be included in item 8.7.
If item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, please provide answers to the following questions:
8.8.1
Does the entity expect that it will continue to have the current level of net operating
cash flows for the time being and, if not, why not?
1,178
(97)
1,081
4,531
-
4,531
Answer: N/A
8.8.2
Has the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to take any steps, to raise further
cash to fund its operations and, if so, what are those steps and how likely does it
believe that they will be successful?
Answer: N/A
8.8.3
Does the entity expect to be able to continue its operations and to meet its business
objectives and, if so, on what basis?
Answer: N/A
Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be answered.

ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.

Page 4

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration entity quarterly cash flow report

Compliance statement

  • 1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.

  • 2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.

29 October 2025

Date: ...................................................................................

Authorised by: by the Board

(Name of body or officer authorising release – see note 4)

Notes

  1. This quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report provide a basis for informing the market about the entity’s activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information over and above the minimum required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.

  2. If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.

  3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.

  4. If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors, you can insert here: “By the board”. If it has been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your board of directors, you can insert here: “By the [ name of board committeeeg Audit and Risk Committee ]”. If it has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure committee, you can insert here: “By the Disclosure Committee”.

  5. If this report has been authorised for release to the market by your board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations , the board should have received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion, the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained, that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively.

ASX Listing Rules Appendix 5B (17/07/20) + See chapter 19 of the ASX Listing Rules for defined terms.

Page 5