AI assistant
RAND MINING LIMITED — Annual Report 2008
Sep 25, 2008
65721_rns_2008-09-25_70319bbe-1cd2-4f65-9b23-f9672f6d9294.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Rand Mining NL ABN 41 004 669 658
Annual Report For The Year Ended 30 June 2008
Rand Mining NL Corporate Directory
Directors
O Demis A Billis G Sklenka
Company Secretary and Chairman O Demis
Registered Office
Suite G1, 49 Melville Parade SOUTH PERTH WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9474 2113 Fax: +61 8 9367 9386
PO Box 307 WEST PERTH WA 6872
Web Site www.randmining.com.au
Share Registry
Advanced Share Registry Services Limited 150 Stirling Hwy Nedlands WA 6009 Telephone: 08 9389 8033 Fax: 08 9389 7871
Bankers
ANZ Bank PERTH WA 6000
Auditors
Grant Thornton (WA) Partnership PO Box 570 PERTH WA 6872
Stock Exchange Listing
The Company's shares are quoted on the Official List of Australian Stock Exchange Limited. The ASX Code is RND.
Rand Mining NL Contents
| Corporate Directory | 1 |
|---|---|
| Review of Operations | 3 |
| Directors' Report | 10 |
| Auditor's Independence Declaration | 19 |
| Corporate Governance Statement | 20 |
| Income Statement | 24 |
| Balance Sheet | 25 |
| Statement of Changes in Equity | 26 |
| Cash Flow Statement | 27 |
| Notes to the Financial Statements | 28 |
| Directors' Declaration | 60 |
| Independent Audit Report | 61 |
| Competent Person's Consent Forms | 64 |
| Shareholder Information | 72 |
East Kundana Joint Venture
The EKJV is located 25km west north west of Kalgoorlie and 47km north east of Coolgardie.
The East Kundana Joint Venture (EKJV) is between Rand Mining NL (12.25%), Tribune Resources NL (36.75%) and Gilt‐Edged Mining NL (51%) a wholly owned subsidiary of Barrick Australia Pacific Limited.


Note: The Joint Venture deposits are located within the blue shaded area. Other deposits indicated on this map do not belong to either Rand Mining NL or the Joint Venture.
Raleigh Underground
Mining
During the year ending 30 June 2008, 234,400 tonnes of ore were extracted from the 6185 to 6034 stopes and development headings spanning 6067 to 5898 levels. The grade dropped to 11.9 g/t, from 16.6 g/t in the previous year, due to most of the development and stoping taking place in the northern portion of mining Block B – a lower grade region of the ore‐body.
Rand's entitlement to the ore extracted was 29,300 tonnes, compared to 30,000 tonnes the previous year.
| Raleigh Production | 2008 | 2007 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mining | Grade | Gold | Mining | Grade | Gold | |
| (t) | (g/t) | (oz) | (t) | (g/t) | (oz) | |
| Development | 122,600 | 12.1 | 47,600 | 129,400 | 13.6 | 56,700 |
| Stoping | 111,800 | 11.8 | 42,300 | 110,300 | 20.0 | 71,000 |
| Total | 234,400 | 11.9 | 89,800 | 239,700 | 16.6 | 127,700 |
| RAND'S ENTITLEMENT | 29,300 | 11.9 | 11,200 | 30,000 | 16.6 | 16,000 |
The scheduled positions of the stoping front and the mine development at the end of December 2008 in the current LOM plan are shown below in blue.

The stoping front is advanced at a diagonal to minimise the impact of the high regional stress field at depth.
The sequence of stoping and mine development until the end of December 2013 in the current LOM plan is shown below, where red represents 2009, brown 2010, green 2011, light blue 2012 and dark blue 2013.

Processing
During the year ending 30 June 2008, 146,531 tonnes of Raleigh ore was processed in four campaigns at the Greenfields Plant located near Coolgardie for the Rand and Tribune Group.
| Rand and Tribune Group Processing | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Campaign | From | To | Processed | Head Grade | Recovery | |||
| (t) | (g/t) | (%) | ||||||
| 5 | 30 Jun 07 | 15 Aug 07 | 44,976 | 15.9 | 95.1 | |||
| 6 | 13 Dec 07 | 20 Jan 08 | 52,611 | 12.4 | 95.2 | |||
| 7 | 13 Mar 08 | 25 Mar 08 | 18,187 | 9.5 | 94.4 | |||
| 8 | 05 Jun 08 | 26 Jun 08 | 30,757 | 10.1 | 93.4 | |||
| 30 Jun 07 | 30 Jun 08 | 146,531 | ||||||
| 01 Jul 06 | 30 Jun 07 | 101,208 | ||||||
| 01 Jul 05 | 30 Jun 06 | 52,400 |
Note: Campaign 5 started on 28 May 2007 ‐ See ASX Release on Campaign 5 dated 31 August 2007
During the year ending 30 June 2008, 59,638 ounces of gold and 8,048 ounces of silver were credited to the Rand and Tribune Group Bullion Account.
Rand's share of the gold bullion was 14,909 ounces compared to 12,333 ounces the previous year.
| Rand and Tribune Group Bullion | Rand's Share | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| To | From | Gold | Silver | Gold | Silver | |
| (oz) | (oz) | (oz) | (oz) | |||
| 01 Jul 07 | 30 Jun 08 | 59,638 | 8,048 | 14,909 | 2,012 | |
| 01 Jul 06 | 30 Jun 07 | 49,335 | 6,640 | 12,333 | 1,660 | |
| 01 Jul 05 | 30 Jun 06 | 25,599 | 3,951 | 6,399 | 987 | |
| 01 Jul 05 | 30 Jun 08 | 134,572 | 18,640 | 33,643 | 4,660 |
Project Development
The cash flows in the feasibility study to develop the Rubicon‐Pegasus‐Hornet mineral resources as an integrated operation with the currently operating Raleigh Underground mine are being updated. The EKJV parties are discussing commercial terms.
Exploration
A three dimensional model of the Kundana region showing all available data has been completed. In excess of thirty potential targets have been identified. The drill holes to explore all targets have been planned. The drilling schedule is being discussed.
Exploration – Other Areas
Seven Mile Hill (50%)
The potential for further exploration targets for drill testing within the Seven Mile Hill tenements are limited and discussions to farm out the tenements are continuing.
Resources andReserves
| EKJV | MINERAL RESOURC | NCLUSIVE O | F ORERES | ERVEINSITU | EMAINING | ATJUNE3020 | (subjecttoro | E IRdinrs)08ung erro | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENTITLEMENT | MEAS | URED | INDICA | TED | INFER | RED | TOTA | L RESOU | RCE | ||||||
| (%) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | Au(g/t) | Au(oz) | ||||||
| Raleih Undndgergrou | |||||||||||||||
| M16/157 | 12.5 | 105981, | 18.8 | 60568, | 10.9 | 41929, | 11.4 | 208,478 | 15.0 | 100,690 | |||||
| 5/9M193 | 12.5 | 378,900 | 25.6 | 827,019 | 18.0 | 87868, | 9.6 | 1,293,787 | 19.7 | 818,307 | |||||
| Subtotal | 12.5 | 484,881 | 24.1 | 887,587 | 17.5 | 129,797 | 10.2 | 1,502,265 | 19.0 | 918,997 | |||||
| Hot On Pitrnepe | 12.25 | 136,000 | 3.3 | 63000, | 3.7 | 130,000 | 2.5 | 329,000 | 3.1 | 32373, | |||||
| Hot Undndrneergrou | 12.25 | - | - | 505,000 | 13.5 | 266,000 | 10.9 | 1,00077 | 12.6 | 312,405 | |||||
| RubicUndndonergrou | 12.25 | - | - | 96000, | 22.5 | 228,000 | 12.4 | 324,000 | 15.4 | 160,342 | |||||
| Pes On Pitgasupe | 12.25 | - | - | - | - | 9,000 | 4.4 | 9,000 | 4.4 | 1,273 | |||||
| Pes Undndgasuergrou | 12.25 | - | - | 263,000 | 9.9 | 200,000 | 7.0 | 463,000 | 8.6 | 128,546 | |||||
| ineTotalMralResource | 620,881 | 19.6 | 1,814,587 | 15.1 | 962,797 | 9.2 | 3,398,265 | 14.2 | 1,553,936 | ||||||
| The Ct Ps' Ctenntsompeersononse | inthe fd ct inhich its 63 t0.texo 7ormanonwappearsonpage |
| MINERAL RESOURCESINCLUSIVEOF OREON STOCKPILE AT 30 JUNE 2008 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENTITLEMENT | MEAS | URED | INDICATED | INFERRED | TOTAL RESOURCE | |||||
| (%) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | Au(g/t) | Au(oz) | |
| Raleigh ROMPad | 12.5 | 8,463 | 11.7 | - | - | - | - | 8,463 | 11.7 | 3,175 |
| GrROnfieldsMPadee | 25.0 | 150 | 10.0 | - | - | - | - | 150 | 10.0 | 48 |
| Total | 8,613 | 11.6 | - | - | - | - | 8,613 | 11.6 | 3,223 | |
| Rand'sEntitltemen | In situ | 77270, | 19.6 | 224,506 | 15.1 | 118267, | 9.2 | 420,043 | 14.3 | 192655, |
| Insitkpile7836619.5224,50615.1118,2679.2421,13914.3193,064stu +oc, | ||||||||||
| The Ct Ps' Cinthe fd ct inhich ittenntstexs 63 to 70.ompeersononseormanonappearsonpagew |
| EKJVORERESERVES IN SITUREMAININGAT30JUNE2008(subjdinrs)ecttoroung erro | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENTITLEMENT | PR | OVED | PROB | ABLE | PROVEDPROBABLE+ | ||||
| (%) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | Au(g/t) | (t) | ||
| Raleih Undndgergrou | |||||||||
| M16/157 | 12.5 | 86298, | 15.4 | 28339, | 12.9 | 114636, | 14.8 | 54551, | |
| M15/993 | 12.5 | 411,334 | 21.1 | 875,836 | 13.3 | 1,287,171 | 15.8 | 654,312 | |
| Subtotal | 12.5 | 497,632 | 20.1 | 904,175 | 13.3 | 1,401,807 | 15.7 | 708,863 | |
| Hot On Pitrnepe | 12.25 | 135,000 | 3.3 | 45000, | 4.0 | 180,000 | 3.5 | 20110, | |
| Hot Undndrneergrou | 12.25 | - | - | 596,000 | 9.6 | 596,000 | 9.6 | 183,954 | |
| RubicUndndonergrou | 12.25 | - | - | 138,000 | 11.3 | 138,000 | 11.3 | 50136, | |
| Pes Undndgasuergrou | 12.25 | - | - | 167,000 | 9.3 | 167,000 | 9.3 | 50044, | |
| insiTotalORetureserve | 632,632 | 16.5 | 1,850,175 | 11.4 | 2,482,807 | 12.7 | 1,013,107 | ||
| The Ct Ps' Ctenntsompeersononse | inthe fd ct intexormanonw | hich itappearsonpa | s 63 to 70.ge |
| ORE RESERVES INCLUSIVE OF OREON STOCKPILE AT 30 JUNE 2008 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENTITLEMENT | PROV | ED | PROBAB | LE | PR | OVEDPROBABLE+ | |||
| (%) | (t) | (g/t)Au | (t) | (g/t)Au | (t) | (g/t)Au | (t) | ||
| Raleigh ROM | 12.5 | 8,463 | 11.7 | - | - | 8,463 | 11.7 | 3,175 | |
| GrROnfieldsMee | 25.0 | 150 | 10.0 | - | - | 150 | 10.0 | 48 | |
| Total | 8,613 | 11.6 | - | - | 8,613 | 11.6 | 3,223 | ||
| Rand'sEntitltemen | In situ | 78742, | 16.6 | 228,907 | 11.4 | 307,648 | 12.7 | 125878, | |
| Insitkpilestu +oc | 79837, | 16.5 | 228,907 | 11.4 | 308,744 | 12.7 | 126,287 | ||
| The Ct Ps' Ctenompeersonon | inthe fd ct inhich its 63 to 70.ntstexseormanonwappearsonpage |
Notes totables:
• Thegold price used for Raleigh Resources was US$750/oz and for Raleigh Reserves was US$900/oz
The Resources andReserves for Hornet, Rubicon and Pegasus are those reported last year. The gold price was US$625/oz.
Under the EKJV legal documentation, Rand is entitled to a benefit for the use of EKJV capital to mine Raleigh ore located on M16/157, forming the extensions of the Raleigh Underground Ore Reserve within Kundana Gold Pty Limitedlease for payment of a Lease Fee.
Raleigh Ore mined from M15/993 & M16/157 is subject to an Ore Division Agreement whereby the Raleigh Ore is divided equally between Gilt Edged Mining NL (Barrick) and the R&T Group.
The directors submit their report on the Company and its controlled entities for the year ended 30 June 2008.
Directors
The names and details of the directors of the Company in office at any time during or since the end of the year are:
| DirectorAppointedAgePositionExperience &ExpertiseOther currentDirectorships oflisted companies | Mr Otakar Demis29 November 198566Executive Chairman & Company SecretaryChairman and Company Secretary appointed in 1985 and is a private investor andbusinessman with several years experience as a Director of the Company and of TribuneResources NL since 1985.Executive Director & Company Secretary of Tribune Resources NL since 1990. |
|---|---|
| DirectorAppointed | Mr Anthony Billis22 January 2003 |
| AgePosition | 64Executive Director |
| Experience &Expertise | Mr Billis has over 25 years experience in gold exploration within the mining industry inWestern Australia. He has been involved in the exploration and development of theKundana project for over 20 years. |
| Other currentdirectorships oflisted companies | Executive Director of Tribune Resources NL since 2003. |
| Director | Mr Gordon Sklenka – BCom |
| Appointed | 16 August 2004 |
| Age | 47 |
| Position | Non‐Executive Director |
| Experience & | Mr Sklenka has worked in Chartered Accounting, Stockbroking and Corporate Advisory in |
| Expertise | both Perth and Sydney and has in excess of 15 years experience in corporate finance inthe resources and technology industries predominantly focusing on capital raisings, IPOs,acquisitions and project finance. |
| Other current | Non‐executive Director of Regal Resources Ltd since 2003, Tribune Resources NL since |
| directorships oflisted companies | 2004, AXG Mining Ltd since 2005, Advance Energy since 2005, Vector Resources Ltd since2007 and Kilgore Oil and Gas Ltd since 2008. |
Principal Activities
The principal activities of the Company during the year were exploration, development and production activities at the Company's East Kundana Joint Venture tenements.
Review of Operations
The activities of the Company were focused on the East Kundana Joint Venture Project. During the year processing of ore from the Raleigh Underground Mine continued at Higginsville Mining Pty Ltd's Greenfields plant on a toll treatment basis. A more detailed review of operations is contained in Review of Operations of this Annual Report.
Operating Results
The profit/(loss) of the consolidated entity after income tax was $2,154,654 [2007:$ 1,993,364]. The profit/(loss) of the parent entity after income tax was ($1,667,446) [2007: ($461,958)].
Changes in State of Affairs
Other than noted below during the course of the financial year ended 30 June 2008, there were no significant changes to the state of affairs of the Company.
Subsequent Events
Other than those listed below there have been no subsequent events since balance date which would have had a significant effect of the Company's financial position.
On 14 August 2008, Barrick (Kalgoorlie Limited), Rand Mining NL and Tribune Resources NL signed an Indicative Term Sheet for the development of the Rubicon Project which includes Rubicon, Hornet and Pegasus deposits. The development of Rubicon will add a second underground mine to the East Kundana Joint Venture and complement current gold production from the Raleigh Project.
The development is subject to revised cash flow projects and entry into formal agreements as approved by the Board of each of the participants.
Likely Developments
The Company intends to continue its exploration, development and production activities on its existing tenements and to acquire further suitable tenements for exploration as opportunities arise.
The Rubicon, Pegasus and Hornet Project is likely to start in the coming year.
Environmental Regulations
The Company is subject to and compliant with all aspects of environmental regulation of its exploration and mining activities. The directors are not aware of any environmental law that is not being complied with.
Dividends
No dividends have been paid by the Company during the year ended 30 June 2008 [2007: $Nil] nor have the directors recommended that any dividend be paid.
Directors' Meetings
The following table sets out the number of directors' meetings held during the financial year and the number of meetings attended by each director.
| Director | Directors' meetings heldwhile a director | Number of directors'meetings attended |
|---|---|---|
| O Demis | 10 | 10 |
| A Billis | 10 | 10 |
| G Sklenka | 10 | 10 |
Director's Shareholdings
As at the date of this report, the following represents shares and options held by directors in the Company.
| Ordinary Shares | Options over Ordinary Shares | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Indirect | Direct | Indirect | |
| O Demis | 3,200 | 8,349,389 | ‐ | 1,000,000 |
| A Billis | 14,000 | 15,109,864 | ‐ | 2,000,000 |
| G Sklenka | ‐ | 8,317,364 | 1,000,000 | ‐ |
The indirect interest in the Company's shares includes, where applicable, the shareholding of the following companies by virtue of the relevant director being a director of:
Tribune Resources NL (holds 8,317,364 shares)
- O Demis
- A Billis
- G Sklenka
Lake Grace Exploration Pty Ltd (holds 2,917,000 shares)
• A Billis
Sierra Gold Pty Ltd (holds 2,100,000 shares)
• A Billis
Resource Capital Ltd (holds 1,604,500 shares)
• A Billis
O Demis Super Fund (holds 32,025 shares)
• O Demis
Nimby (WA) Pty Ltd (holds 171,000 shares)
• A Billis
Remuneration Report (audited)
The Remuneration report is set out below.
The information provided in the Remuneration report has been audited as required by section 308(3C) of the Corporations Act 2001.
A. Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration
Remuneration levels for directors, officers and senior managers of the consolidated entity are competitively set to attract and retain appropriately directors and senior executives.
The full Board determines remuneration packages provided for directors, officers and senior managers.
The Board, where appropriate, seeks independent advice on remuneration policies and practices, involving the remuneration packages and terms of employment.
The remuneration structures explained below are designed to attract suitably qualified candidates, reward the achievement of strategic objectives, and achieve the broader outcome of creation of value for shareholders.
Fixed remuneration
Fixed remuneration consists of base remuneration (which is calculated on a total cost basis and includes any FBT charges related to employee benefits including motor vehicles), as well as employer contributions to superannuation funds.
Remuneration levels are reviewed annually by the Board where applicable.
Performance‐linked remuneration
Performance‐linked remuneration is designed for rewarding executive directors, officers and senior management for their role in achieving corporate objectives and is directly linked to the creation of shareholder value.
This incentive is provided under terms and conditions determined at the time of issue by the Board.
Directors' fees
The Company pays directors' fees to both executive and non‐executive directors.
The current base remuneration was last reviewed with effect from 1 September 2006.
Non‐executive directors' fees are determined within an aggregate directors' fee pool limit, which is periodically recommended for approval by shareholders. The maximum currently stands at $160,000 per annum and was approved by shareholders at the Company's 2005 Annual General Meeting.
The following fees have applied:
| Base fees | From 1 | Prior to 1 |
|---|---|---|
| January | January | |
| 2007 | 2007 | |
| Chairman | $20,000 | $20,000 |
| Executive directors | $50,000 | $36,000 |
| Non‐executive directors | $20,000 | $20,000 |
There are no termination or retirement benefits for non‐executive directors other than statutory superannuation.
Informal performance evaluations for senior executives took place during the reporting period in accordance with disclosed processes.
B. Details of remuneration (audited)
Details of remuneration of directors and key management personnel (as defined in AASB124: Related Party Disclosures) of the consolidated entity are set out in the following table.
The key management personnel of the Company and the consolidated entity includes the directors Anthony Billis, Otakar Demis and Gordon Sklenka and the following executive officers, who are also among the 5 highest paid executives of the consolidated entity.
| Dr Ian Robertson General Manager (until 5 October 2008) |
|---|
| John Andrews Manager of Kalgoorlie Operations (from 25 January 2007) |
| 2008 | Short‐term benefits | Postemployment | Share basedpayment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cashsalaryand fees | Bonus | Non‐monetarybenefits | Super‐annuation | Options/shares | Total | Equitytotal % | |
| (A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | (F) | ||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Non‐Executive | |||||||
| Directors | |||||||
| G Sklenka | 20,000 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 354,350 | 374,350 | 94.66 |
| Sub‐total | 20,000 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 354,350 | 374,350 | 94.66 |
| Executive | |||||||
| Directors | |||||||
| A Billis | 57,705 | ‐ | 51,505 | 45,194 | 708,700 | 863,104 | 82.11 |
| O Demis | 20,000 | ‐ | ‐ | 1,800 | 354,350 | 376,150 | 94.20 |
| Sub‐total | 77,705 | ‐ | 51,505 | 46,994 | 1,063,050 | 1,239,254 | 85.78 |
| Other Key | |||||||
| Management | |||||||
| Personnel | |||||||
| I Robertson* | 22,092 | ‐ | ‐ | 26,068 | ‐ | 48,160 | ‐ |
| J Andrews | 40,179 | ‐ | ‐ | 47,411 | ‐ | 87,590 | ‐ |
| Sub‐total | 62,271 | ‐ | ‐ | 73,479 | ‐ | 135,750 | ‐ |
| Total | 159,976 | ‐ | 51,505 | 120,473 | 1,417,400 | 1,749,354 | 81.02 |
Details of remuneration for the Company and the consolidated entity:
* From 1 July 2007 – 5 October 2007.
Details of remuneration for the Company and the consolidated entity:
| 2007 | Short‐term benefits | Postemployment | Share basedpayment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cashsalaryand fees | Bonus | Non‐monetarybenefits | Super‐annuation | Options/shares | Total | Equitytotal % | |
| (A) | (B) | (C) | (D) | (E) | (F) | ||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Non‐Executive | |||||||
| Directors | |||||||
| W Jay | 17,917 | ‐ | ‐ | 112 | ‐ | 18,029 | ‐ |
| G Sklenka | 20,000 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 20,000 | ‐ |
| Sub‐total | 37,917 | ‐ | ‐ | 112 | ‐ | 38,029 | ‐ |
| Executive | |||||||
| Directors | |||||||
| A Billis | 36,513 | ‐ | 47,586 | 42,102 | ‐ | 126,201 | ‐ |
| O Demis | 20,000 | ‐ | ‐ | 1,800 | ‐ | 21,800 | ‐ |
| J Andrews | 20,000 | ‐ | ‐ | 22,936 | ‐ | 42,936 | ‐ |
| Sub‐total | 76,513 | ‐ | 47,586 | 66,838 | ‐ | 190,937 | ‐ |
| Other Key | |||||||
| Management | |||||||
| Personnel | |||||||
| I Robertson | 47,276 | ‐ | 28,028 | 46,562 | ‐ | 121,866 | ‐ |
| Sub‐total | 47,276 | ‐ | 28,028 | 46,562 | ‐ | 121,866 | ‐ |
| Total | 161,706 | ‐ | 75,614 | 113,512 | ‐ | 350,832 | ‐ |
Note: The above table includes payments made to J Andrews whilst employed as a Director only.
Notes to the tables:
- (A) Includes cash salary, director's fees and annual leave payouts;
- (B) Cash bonuses paid during the year;
- (C) Includes car and housing plus applicable fringe benefits payable on benefits;
- (D) Superannuation payable in accordance with applicable legislation;
- (E) The assessed fair value of the options at grant date is determined using a binomial lattice model that takes into account the exercise price, term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk‐free interest rate for the term of the option; and
- (F) Represents the value of options included in remuneration as a percentage of total remuneration.
C. Service contracts
The consolidated entity has not entered into service agreements with any executive director.
Employment of executives is subject to 4 weeks' notice and are not subject to any termination payments other than those required by law.
Major provisions relating to remuneration are set out below:
A Billis, Managing Director
- Term on‐going subject to re‐election at Annual General Meetings every 2 years.
- Base salary, inclusive of superannuation, for the year ended 30 June 2008 of $102,898 to be reviewed annually by the board of directors. The Company also provides housing and motor vehicle benefits to Mr Billis.
O Demis, Company Secretary
- Term on‐going subject to re‐election at Annual General Meetings every 2 years
- Base salary, inclusive of superannuation, for the year ending 30 June 2008 of 21,800.
I Robertson, General Manager (until 5 October 2007)
- Position made redundant effective 5 October 2007
- Base salary, inclusive of superannuation, for the 3 months ended 5 October 2007 of $48,160. The Company also provided Mr Robertson with a company motor vehicle and some expense benefits.
J Andrews, Manager of Kalgoorlie Operations
- Term on‐going commencing 25 January 2007.
- Base salary, inclusive of superannuation for the year ended 30 June 2008 of $87,590.
D. Share based compensation
Options
The following options were issued to directors during the financial year:
| Name | Numberof optionsvested | Number ofoptionsgranted | Value ofoptions atgrant date$ | Remunerationconsisting ofoptions% | ExercisePrice pershare$ | Expiry Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | ||||||
| A Billis | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 708,700 | 82.11 | $0.60 | 29 August 2012 |
| O Demis | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 354,350 | 94.20 | $0.60 | 29 August 2012 |
| Non‐executive | ||||||
| G Sklenka | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 354,350 | 94.66 | $0.60 | 29 August 2012 |
In a general meeting held on 29 August 2007, shareholders approved the grant of 4,000,000 options to directors. The options are exercisable at a price of 60 cents on or before 29 August 2012. The actual options were issued 26 October 2007; however in accordance with AASB 2 Share Based Payments, the independent valuations using the binomial lattice model, have been determined using a grant date of 29 August 2007, which is the date when shareholder approval was obtained.
The following terms and conditions of the grants made during the financial year are as follows:
| Grant date | Number ofinstruments | Vesting conditions | Contractual life of options |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 August 2007 | 4,000,000 | Options are exercisable at $0.60 and expireon 29 August 2012. | 5 years |
Fair value of share options and assumptions for the financial year:
| Options granted 29August 2007 | |
|---|---|
| Fair value at grant date | $1,417,400 |
| Share price | $0.56 |
| Exercise price | $0.60 |
| Expected volatility (expressed as weighted average volatility used in the modellingunder binomial lattice model) | 90% |
| Option life (expressed as weighted average volatility used in the modelling underbinomial lattice model) | 3.75 years |
| Expected dividends | Nil |
| Risk‐free interest rate (based on government bonds) | 6.15% |
The options above were not exercised during the year.
E. Additional Information
Principles Used to Determine the Nature and Amount of Remuneration: Relationship between Remuneration and Company Performances
Due to the nature and size of the Company the level of remuneration is aligned with market conditions of persons holding similar positions in similar mining and exploration companies. The level of remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board and the process consists of a review of Company and individual performance, and relevant comparative remuneration in the market.
Proceedings on behalf of the Company
The Company was not a party of any proceedings during the year.
Share Options
Unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option at the date of this report are as follows:
| Number | Exercise Price | Expiry Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlisted Options | 500,000 | $1.00 | 1 October 2010 |
| Unlisted Options | 4,000,000 | $0.60 | 29 August 2012 |
During the year no options expired, 4,000,000 options were issued [2007: nil] and no options were exercised.
Insurance and Indemnity of Officers
During the year the Company paid an insurance premium in respect of a Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance Contract. The insurance premium relates to liabilities that may arise from an officers' position with the exception of insolvency, conduct involving a wilful breach in relation to the Company ; or a contravention of section 182 or 183 of the Corporations Act 2001, an entity that is involved in any joint venture or, partnership or enterprise carried on in common with the Company, Outside Directorships, any Outside Entity or Non Profit Outside Entity or any vehicle or entity established to conduct such joint venture partnership or enterprise. The officers covered by the contract of insurance are the directors and officers of the Company.
The contract of insurance prohibits the disclosure of the nature of the liabilities and the amount of premium.
Non‐Audit Services
During the year the entities related to the Company's auditor, Grant Thornton (WA) Partnership, have performed certain other services in addition to their statutory duties.
The Board has considered the non‐audit services provided during the year and is satisfied that the provision of those non‐audit services is compatible with, and did not compromise, the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 for the following reasons:
- All non‐audit services were subject to corporate governance procedures adopted by the Company and have been reviewed by the Board to ensure they do not impact with the integrity and objectivity of the auditor; and
- The non‐audit services provided to no underestimate the general principles relating to auditor independence as set out in the Professional Statement FI, as they did not involve reviewing or auditing the auditors' own work, acting in a management or decision making capacity for the Company, acting as an advocate for the Company or jointly sharing risks and rewards.
Details of the amounts paid to the auditor of the Company, Grant Thornton (WA) Partnership during the year are set out below.
| Consolidated | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | ||
| Statutory audit | |||
| ‐ audit and review of financial reports | 40,000 | 36,000 | |
| Services other than statutory audit | |||
| ‐ taxation services | 20,457 | 1,310 | |
Auditor's independence declaration
A copy of the auditor's independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on page 19.
Auditor
Grant Thornton (WA) Partnership continues in office in accordance with section 327 of the Corporations Act 2001.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of directors.
_____________________________
A Billis Director
Perth, Western Australia 25 September 2008

Grant Thomton (WA) Parh€Bhip ABN: 17 735 3,14 518 Level 1 10 Kings Park Road West Perth WA 6005 PO BOX 570 West Perth WA 6872 T +61 894802000
F +61 8 9922 7787 E [email protected] W www.grantthonton.com.au
DECLARATIO}I TO THE DIRECTORS OF RAND MINING NL
In accordance with the requirements of section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, as lead auditor for the audit of Rand Mining NL for the year ended 30June 2008, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:
- a No contraventions of the auditor independence requfuements of the Corporations Act20O1 in relation to the auditl and
- b No contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
Gtrr-,s t!^,r*Jr-^ CrntX> e*"<-"[,*lC
GRANT THORNTON (WA) PARTNERSHIP Chartered Accountents
t lll t/| tJ'urt .
P WWARR Parhet
Perth, 25 September 2008
Lidility limited by a scheme approvd undet Prcfessional Standards Legislation.
Gmt lhof,lon is atadsnarkmed bJ G6d lholoo humiioEl dtd t$d lndsr I@ by indepsdsl fm ed e$lisltwghortte Kld
Corporate Governance
The Board of Directors of Rand Mining NL is responsible for the corporate governance of the consolidated entity. The Board guides and monitors the business and affairs of Rand Mining NL on behalf of the shareholders by whom they are elected and to whom they are accountable.
Rand Mining NL's Corporate Governance Statement is structured with reference to the Corporate Governance Council's principles and recommendations (2nd edition), which are as follows:
| Principle 1 | Lay solid foundations for management and oversight |
|---|---|
| Principle 2 | Structure the board to add value |
| Principle 3 | Promote ethical and responsible decision‐making |
| Principle 4 | Safeguard integrity in financial reporting |
| Principle 5 | Make timely and balanced disclosure |
| Principle 6 | Respect the rights of shareholders |
| Principle 7 | Recognise and manage risk |
| Principle 8 | Remunerate fairly and responsibly |
Rand Mining NL's corporate governance practices were in place throughout the year ended 30 June 2008 and were fully compliant with the Council's best practice recommendations, unless otherwise stated.
The Board considers that the Company is not currently of a size, nor are its affairs of such complexity to justify the formation of separate or special committees at this time.
During the financial year the Company has complied with each of the 8 Essential Corporate Governance Principles and the corresponding Best Practice Recommendations, other than in relation to the matters specified below:
| Recommendation | Rand's current practice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Formalise and disclose functions reserved to the boardand those delegated to management. | Satisfied. Board charter available at:www.randmining.com.au. | ||
| 2.1 | A majority of the board should be independentdirectors. | Not satisfied. The Board has considered this andbelieves that the structure is effective for the currentrange of duties of the Board to be properlydischarged. | ||
| 2.2 | The chairperson should be an independent director. | Not satisfied. The Board believes that the Chairman,Mr Otakar Demis, brings quality and independentjudgement to all relevant issues falling within thescope of the role of Chairman. | ||
| 2.3 | Roles of chairperson and CEO should not be exercisedby same person. | Satisfied. | ||
| 2.4 | The board should establish a nomination committee. | Not Satisfied. The Board considers that the Companyis not currently of a size to justify the formation of anomination committee. The Board as a wholeundertakes the process of reviewing the skill base andexperience of existing Directors to enableidentification or attributes required in new Directors. | ||
| 2.5 | Report in Annual Report on: | |||
| skills, experience and expertise relevant to the positionof director held by each director. | Satisfied. Included in Directors' Report. | |||
| names of the independent directors and materialitythresholds. | Satisfied. Included in Directors Report. |
| whether there is a procedure agreed by the board fordirectors to take independent advice at the expense ofthe company. | Each director has a right to seek independentprofessional advice at the Company's expense.However, prior approval of the Chairman is required,which is not unreasonably withheld. | |
|---|---|---|
| term of office held by each existing director. | Satisfied. Included in Directors' Report. | |
| names of members of nomination committee andattendance | No nomination committee has been established –refer 2.4 above. | |
| 3.1 | Establish a code of conduct | Satisfied. Code of conduct available atwww.randmining.com.au. |
| 3.2 | Disclose policy concerning trading in company'ssecurities by directors, officers and employees involvedin material transactions or privy to material information. | Satisfied. Trading in securities policy available atwww.randmining.com.au . |
| 4.1 | The board should establish an audit committee. | Not Satisfied. The Board believes that the Company isnot of a size, nor is its financial affairs of suchcomplexity to justify the formation of an auditcommittee. The Board as a whole undertakes thefunctions normally associated with an auditcommittee. |
| 4.2 | Structure the audit committee so that it consists of onlynon‐executive directors, a majority of independentdirectors and the chairperson is independent and notthe chair of the board and it has at least three members. | Not Satisfied. Refer 4.1. |
| 4.3 | The audit committee should have a formal charter. | Not Satisfied. Refer 4.1. |
| 5.1 | Establish and disclose written policies and proceduresdesigned to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Ruledisclosure requirements and to ensure accountability atsenior management level for that compliance. | Satisfied. Continuous disclosure policy available atwww.randmining.com.au. |
| 6.1 | Design and disclose a communications policy topromote effective communication with shareholdersand encourage effective participation at generalmeetings. | Satisfied. Communications with shareholders policyavailable at: www.randmining.com.au. |
| 7.1 | The board or appropriate board committee shouldestablish and disclose policies for the oversight andmanagement of material business risks. | Satisfied. Risk Management Policy available at:www.randmining.com.au. |
| 7.2 | The board should require management to design andimplement the risk management and internal controlsystem to manage the company's material business risksand report to it on whether those are beingmanagement effectively. The board should disclose thatmanagement has reported to it as to the effectivenessof the company's management of its material businessrisks. | Satisfied. |
| 7.3 | The board should disclose whether it has receivedassurance from the chief executive officer (orequivalent) and the chief financial officer (or equivalent)that the declaration provided in accordance with 295Aof the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system ofrisk management and internal control and that thesystem is operating effectively in all respects in relationto financial reporting risks. | Satisfied. Included in Directors Report. |
|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | The board should establish a remuneration committee. | Not satisfied. The Board considers that at theCompany's stage of development no benefits orefficiencies are to be gained by delegating thisfunction to a separate committee.The Board reviews the remuneration packages andpolicies applicable to the managing director, seniorexecutives and non‐executive directors on an annualbasis. Remuneration levels are competitively set toattract the most qualified and experienced directorsand senior executives. Where necessary the boardobtains independent advice on the appropriatenessof remuneration packages. |
| 8.2 | Companies should clearly distinguish the structure of | Satisfied. Included in Directors' Report. |
non‐executive directors' remuneration from that of executive directors and senior executives.
Structure of the Board
The skills, experience and expertise relevant to the position of director held by each director in office at the date of the annual report is included in the Directors' Report.
Ethical Standards
All Directors and employees are expected to act with the utmost of integrity and objectivity, striving at all times to enhance the reputation and performance of the Company.
Conflict of Interest
In accordance with the Corporation Act 2001, Directors must keep the Board advised, on an ongoing basis, of any interest that could potentially conflict with those of the Company. Where the Board believes that a significant conflict exists the Director concerned is unable to vote at the meeting.
Directors Dealings in Company Securities
The Constitution permits Directors to acquire securities in the Company. In accordance with the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 and the Listing Rules of the Australian Stock Exchange, the Company on behalf of the Directors must advise the Australian Stock Exchange of any transactions conducted by them in shares and/or options in the Company.
Nomination Committee
The role of the Nomination Committee has been assumed by the full Board. The size and scope of the Company's activities does not justify the establishment of such a Committee. The Board has taken a view that the full Board will hold special meetings or sessions as required. The Board are confident that this process for selection and review is stringent and full details of all Directors are provided to shareholders in the annual report and on the web.
Audit Committee
The Company does not have an Audit Committee. The role of the Audit Committee has been assumed by the full Board. The role of the Audit Committee has been assumed by the full Board.
Performance Evaluation
During the financial year an evaluation of the Board and its members was not formally carried out. To date, there has been no formal process in place for performance evaluation.
Company's Remuneration Policies
The board policy is to remunerate directors at market rates for time, commitment and responsibilities. The board determines payments to the directors and reviews remuneration annually, based on market practice, duties and accountability. Independent external advice is sought when required. The maximum aggregate amount of directors' fees that can be paid is subject to approval by shareholders in general meeting, from time to time.
Full details of the objective and structure of directors remuneration is provided in the Remuneration Report in the Directors' Report.
Rand Mining NL Income Statements for the year ended 30 June 2008
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Revenues from operations | 5 | 13,512,316 | 11,137,384 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Other Income/(expenses) | 6 | (1,112) | 20,940 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Share of net profits of equity accounted | |||||
| investment | 1,034,299 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Changes in inventories of finished | |||||
| goods and work in progress | (846,739) | (500,623) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Employee benefits expense | (1,818,718) | (497,491) | (1,803,714) | (461,248) | |
| Depreciation and amortisation expense | 7 | (319,169) | (1,452,394) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Impairment exploration expenditure | (67,502) | (136,877) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Finance cost expenses | 7 | (1,253,451) | (297,824) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Doubtful debts | 7 | ‐ | (10,438) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Administrative expenses | (289,911) | (447,970) | (443) | (710) | |
| Management fees | (206,614) | (109,716) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Mining expenses | (4,033,150) | (3,471,827) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Processing expenses | (1,065,612) | (872,077) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Royalty expenses | (606,672) | (507,006) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Profit/(Loss) from operations before | |||||
| income tax expense | 4,037,965 | 2,854,081 | (1,804,157) | (461,958) | |
| Income tax (expense)/benefit | 8 | (1,883,311) | (860,717) | 136,711 | ‐ |
| (461,958) | |||||
| Net Profit/(Loss) after income tax | 9 | 2,154,654 | 1,993,364 | (1,667,446) | |
| Earnings per share | |||||
| Basic (cents per share) | 30 | 5.31 | 4.91 |
Rand Mining NL Balance Sheet as at 30 June 2008
| Note | Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||
| Current Assets | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 10 | 2,711,945 | 1,433,884 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Trade and other receivables | 11 | 94,225 | 100,320 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Receivable from controlled entity | ‐ | ‐ | 400,000 | ‐ | ||
| Inventories | 12 | 1,429,500 | 2,276,239 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Total Current Assets | 4,235,670 | 3,810,443 | 400,000 | ‐ | ||
| Non Current Assets | ||||||
| Available for sale financial assets | 13 | 895,949 | 10,712,176 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Other financial assets | 14 | ‐ | ‐ | 8,528,718 | 8,214,293 | |
| Investments accounted for using the | ||||||
| equity method | 15 | 8,214,382 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Deferred tax asset | 19 | 652,314 | 564,703 | 11,923 | ‐ | |
| Exploration and Evaluation | 16 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Mine Development | 17 | 4,326,450 | 2,900,865 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | 18 | 2,750,279 | 2,500,758 | 460,000 | 460,000 | |
| Total Non Current Assets | 16,839,374 | 16,678,502 | 9,000,641 | 8,674,293 | ||
| Total Assets | 21,075,044 | 20,488,945 | 9,400,641 | 8,674,293 | ||
| Current Liabilities | ||||||
| Trade and other payables | 20 | 1,006,615 | 1,947,902 | 1,005,596 | ‐ | |
| Borrowings | 21 | 4,673,423 | 3,618,478 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Provisions | 22 | 39,746 | 68,948 | 39,746 | 68,948 | |
| Total Current Liabilities | 5,719,784 | 5,635,328 | 1,045,342 | 68,948 | ||
| Non‐Current Liabilities | ||||||
| Provisions | 22 | 341,325 | 338,755 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Deferred tax liability | 23 | 959,061 | 1,220,572 | 51,680 | 70,696 | |
| Total Non‐Current Liabilities | 1,300,386 | 1,559,327 | 51,680 | 70,696 | ||
| Total Liabilities | 7,020,170 | 7,194,655 | 1,097,022 | 139,644 | ||
| Net Assets | 14,054,874 | 13,294,290 | 8,303,619 | 8,534,649 | ||
| Equity | ||||||
| Contributed equity | 25 | 11,453,559 | 11,453,559 | 11,453,559 | 11,453,559 | |
| Reserves | 9 | 1,780,679 | 3,174,749 | 1,610,081 | 173,666 | |
| Accumulated profits/(losses) | 9 | 820,636 | (1,334,018) | (4,760,021) | (3,092,576) | |
| Total Equity | 14,054,874 | 13,294,290 | 8,303,619 | 8,534,649 | ||
Rand Mining NL Statements of Changes in Equity as at 30 June 2008
| Consolidated | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share CapitalOrdinary$ | AccumProfits/(Losses)$ | Reserves$ | Total$ | |||
| Balance at 1 July 2006 | 11,453,559 | (4,654,538) | 2,466,125 | 9,265,146 | ||
| Employee share options issued | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ||
| Available for sale financial assetsrevaluation increment | ‐ | ‐ | 2,035,598 | 2,035,598 | ||
| Reserves no longer required | ‐ | 1,326,974 | (1,326,974) | ‐ | ||
| Sundry amount written off | ‐ | 182 | ‐ | 182 | ||
| Asset revaluation | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ||
| Profit for year | ‐ | 1,993,364 | ‐ | 1,993,364 | ||
| Balance at 30 June 2007 | 11,453,559 | (1,334,018) | 3,174,749 | 13,294,290 | ||
| Balance at 1 July 2007 | 11,453,559 | (1,334,018) | 3,174,749 | 13,294,290 | ||
| Employee share options issued | ‐ | ‐ | 1,417,400 | 1,417,400 | ||
| Available for sale financial assetsrevaluation increment | ‐ | ‐ | (2,678,619) | (2,678,619) | ||
| Share in revaluation decrement of equityaccounted investment | ‐ | ‐ | (151,868) | (151,868) | ||
| Asset revaluation reserve | 19,017 | 19,017 | ||||
| Profit for year | ‐ | 2,154,654 | ‐ | 2,154,654 | ||
| Balance at 30 June 2008 | 11,453,559 | 820,636 | 1,780,679 | 14,054,874 |
Rand Mining NL
| Share CapitalOrdinary$ | AccumProfits/(Losses)$ | Reserves$ | Total$ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 July 2006 | 11,453,559 | (3,744,559) | 1,287,425 | 8,996,425 |
| Reserves no longer required | ‐ | 1,113,759 | (1,113,759) | ‐ |
| Sundry amount written off | ‐ | 182 | ‐ | 182 |
| Asset revaluation | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Profit/(loss) for year | ‐ | (461,958) | ‐ | (461,958) |
| Balance at 30 June 2007 | 11,453,559 | (3,092,576) | 173,666 | 8,534,649 |
| Balance at 1 July 2007 | 11,453,559 | (3,092,576) | 173,666 | 8,534,649 |
| Employee share options issued | ‐ | ‐ | 1,417,400 | 1,417,400 |
| Sundry amount written off | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Asset revaluation | ‐ | ‐ | 19,015 | 19,016 |
| Profit/(loss) for year | ‐ | (1,667,445) | ‐ | (1,667,446) |
| Balance at 30 June 2008 | 11,453,559 | (4,760,021) | 1,610,081 | 8,303,619 |
Rand Mining NL Cashflow Statements as at 30 June 2008
| Note | Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | ||
| Cash Flows from Operating | |||||
| Activities | |||||
| Receipts from customers | 13,347,864 | 11,004,410 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Finance costs | (4,486) | (260,228) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Payments to suppliers and | |||||
| employees | (6,512,069) | (5,478,263) | (404,286) | (420,400) | |
| Tax payments | (2,050,353) | 56,893 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Interest received | 164,451 | 132,974 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Net Cash provided by (used in) | |||||
| Operating Activities | 31 | 4,945,407 | 5,455,786 | (404,286) | (420,400) |
| Cash Flows from Investing ActivitiesProceeds from sale of available for | |||||
| sale financial assetsPayment for available for sale | ‐ | 22,192 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| financial assetsPayment for exploration and | (1,414,949) | (363,204) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| development | (1,806,510) | (1,350,941) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Payment for plant and equipment | (252,694) | (223,385) | |||
| Net Cash provided by (used in) | |||||
| Investing Activities | (3,474,153) | (1,915,338) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Cash Flows from Financing | |||||
| Activities | |||||
| Loans by related entities | ‐ | ‐ | 404,286 | 420,400 | |
| Loans repaid by related parties | ‐ | 22,243 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Loans to related parties | (10,000) | (21,460) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Loans repaid by other parties | 10,000 | 268,933 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Repayment of bank borrowings | (193,193) | (4,525,657) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Net Cash provided by (used in) | |||||
| Financing Activities | (193,193) | (4,255,941) | 404,286 | 420,400 | |
| Net Increase/ (Decrease) in Cash | |||||
| and Cash Equivalents | 1,278,061 | (715,493) | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the | |||||
| beginning of the financial year | 1,433,884 | 2,149,377 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents at the | |||||
| End of the Financial Year | 10 | 2,711,945 | 1,433,884 | ‐ | ‐ |
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
a) Basis of preparation
Rand Mining NL (the 'Company') is a company domiciled in Australia. The consolidated financial report of the Company for the financial year ended 30 June 2008 comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the 'consolidated entity') and the consolidated entity's interest in joint venture operations.
This general purpose financial report for reporting period ended 30 June 2008 has been prepared in accordance with Corporations Act 2001, Australian Accounting Standards, other pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board and the Australian Accounting Interpretations.
The functional currency of the consolidated entity is Australian dollars.
Compliance with IFRS
Australian Accounting Standards set out accounting policies that the AASB has concluded would result in a financial report containing relevant and reliable information about transactions, events and conditions to which they apply.
Historical cost convention
These financial statements have been prepared under the prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of available‐for sale financial assets and financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss.
b) Principles of consolidation
i. Subsidiaries
A controlled entity is any entity controlled by Rand Mining NL whereby Rand Mining NL has the power to control the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
All inter‐company balances and transactions between entities in the economic entity, including any unrealised profits or losses, have been eliminated on consolidation. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistencies with those policies applied by the parent entity.
Where controlled entities have entered or left the economic entity during the year, their operating results have been included/excluded from the date control was obtained or until the date control ceased.
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the consolidated entity. They are de‐consolidated from the date that control ceases.
Minority equity interests in the equity and results of the entities that are controlled are shown as a separate item in the consolidated financial report.
ii. Associates
Associates are all entities over which the consolidated entity has significant influence but not control, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of voting rights. Investments in associates are accounted for in the parent entity financial statements using the cost method and in the consolidated financial using the equity method of accounting, after initially being recognised at costs. (refer to note 15 and note 35).
The consolidated entity's share of its associates' post‐acquisition profit or losses is recognised in the income statement, and its share of post‐acquisition movement in reserves is recognised in reserves. The cumulative post‐ acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment.
When the consolidated entity's share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other unsecured long‐term receivables, the consolidated entity does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred obligations or made payments on behalf of its associates.
Unrealised gains on transactions between the consolidated entity and its associates are eliminated to the extent of the consolidated entity's interest in the associates. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the consolidated entity.
iii. Joint ventures
The proportionate interest in the assets, liabilities and expenses of a joint venture activity have been incorporated in the financial statements under the appropriate headings. Details of the joint venture are set out in note 26.
c) Segment Reporting
A segment is a distinguishable component of the consolidated entity that is engaged either in providing products or services (business segment), or in providing products or services within a particular economic environment (geographical segment), which is subject to risks and rewards that are different from those of other segments.
d) Foreign Currency Transactions and Balances
Functional and presentation currency
The functional currency of each of the entities within the consolidated entity is measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which that entity operates ('the functional currency'). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars which is the parent entity's functional and presentation currency.
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the year‐end exchange rate. Non‐ monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non‐monetary items measured at fair value are reported at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were determined.
Exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items are recognised in the income statement, except where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge.
Exchange differences arising on the translations of non‐monetary items are recognised directly in equity to the extent that the gain or loss is directly recognised in equity, otherwise the exchange difference is recognised in the income statement.
Group companies
The financial results and position of foreign operations whose functional currency is different from the consolidated entity's presentation currency are translated as follows:
- (i) Assets and liabilities are translated at year‐end exchange rates prevailing at that reporting date.
- (ii) Income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period.
- (iii) Retained profits are translated at the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction.
- (iv) Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign operations are transferred directly to the consolidated entity's foreign currency translation reserve in the balance sheet. These differences are recognised in the income statement in the period in which the operation is disposed.
e) Revenue recognition
Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised in the Income Statement when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer.
Interest revenue is recognised on a proportional basis taking into account the interest rates applicable to the financial assets.
Dividend revenue is recognised when the right to receive a dividend has been established. Dividends received from associates and joint venture entities are accounted for in accordance with the equity method of accounting. Revenue from the rendering of a service is recognised upon the delivery of the service to the customers.
Royalty revenue is recognised on an accrual basis in accordance with the substance of the relevant agreement. All revenue is stated net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST).
f) Income Tax
The consolidated entity adopts the liability method of tax‐effect accounting whereby the income tax expense is based on the profit from ordinary activities adjusted for any non‐assessable or disallowed items.
Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements. No deferred income tax will be recognised from the initial recognition of an asset or liability, excluding a business combination, where there is no effect on accounting or taxable profit or loss.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realised or liability is settled. Deferred tax is credited in the income statement except where it relates to items that may be credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is adjusted directly against equity. Deferred income tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future tax profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised.
The amount of benefits brought to account or which may be realised in the future is based on the assumption that no adverse change will occur in income taxation legislation and the anticipation that the economic entity will derive sufficient future assessable income to enable the benefit to be realised and comply with the conditions of deductibility imposed by the law.
g) Leases
Leases of fixed assets where substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to the ownership of the asset, but not the legal ownership that are transferred to entities in the consolidated entity are classified as finance leases.
Finance leases are capitalised by recording an asset and a liability at the lower of the amounts equal to the fair value of the leased property or the present value of the minimum lease payments, including any guaranteed residual values. Lease payments are allocated between the reduction of the lease liability and the lease interest expense for the period.
Leased assets are depreciated on a straight‐line basis over their estimated useful lives where it is likely that the economic entity will obtain ownership of the asset or over the term of the lease.
Lease payments for operating leases, where substantially all the risks and benefits remain with the lessor, are charged as expenses in the periods in which they are incurred.
Lease incentives under operating leases are recognised as a liability and amortised on a straight‐line basis over the life of the lease term.
h) Impairment of Assets
Intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changed in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash generating units).
Impairment calculations assumptions include life of mine plans based on prospective reserves and resources, management's estimate of the future gold price, based on current market price trends, and a pre‐tax discount rate adjusted for project risk. It is therefore reasonably possible for changes to occur which may affect the recoverability of mining assets.
i) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short‐term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within short‐borrowings in current liabilities on the balance sheet.
j) Inventories
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value after appropriate allowances for redundant and slow moving stocks. Net realisable value tests are performed at least annually and represent the estimated future sales price of the product based on prevailing gold prices, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale.
Cost is determined on the following basis:
- Gold on hand is valued on an average total production cost method.
- Ore stockpiles are valued at the average cost of mining and stockpiling the ore, including haulage.
- A portion of related depreciation and amortisation charge is included in the cost of inventory.
k) Investments and other financial assets
Classification
The Company classifies its investments in the following categories; loans and receivables, available‐for‐sale financial assets and other financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments were acquired.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non‐derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for those with maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date which are classified as non‐current assets. Loans and receivables are included in trade and other receivables in the balance sheet (notes 11).
Available‐for‐sale financial assets
Available‐for‐sale financial assets, comprise principally of marketable equity securities, are non‐derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non‐
current assets unless management intends to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the balance sheet date. Refer to note 13.
Other financial assets
Other financial assets comprises of investments in controlled entities. As there is no repayment plan this loan is considered an investment in the subsidiary of the Company. Refer to note 14.
Recognition and de‐recognition
When securities classified as available‐for‐sale are sold, the accumulated fair value adjustments recognised in equity are included in the income statement as gains and losses from investment securities.
Subsequent measurement
Loan and receivables are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Available‐for‐sale financial assets are carried at fair value. Changes in the value of securities classified as available‐ for‐sale are recognised in equity.
l) Exploration and Evaluation Costs
Exploration expenditure which is regarded as not being able to produce recoverable resources will be written off in the period in which it is incurred.
m) Mine Development Costs
Capitalised mine development costs include expenditures incurred to develop new ore bodies to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, to expand the capacity of a mine and to maintain production. Mine development also includes costs transferred from exploration and evaluation phase once production commences in the area of interest.
Amortisation of mine development is computed by the units of production basis over the estimated proved and probable reserves. Proved and probable mineral reserves reflect estimated quantities of economically recoverable reserves which can be recovered in the future from known mineral deposits. These reserves are amortised from the date on which production commences. The amortisation is calculated from recoverable proven and probable reserves and a predetermined percentage of the recoverable measured, indicated and inferred resource. This percentage is reviewed annually.
Restoration costs expected to be incurred are provided for as part of development phase that give rise to the need for restoration.
n) Property, Plant and Equipment
Each class of property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less, where applicable, any accumulated depreciation or amortisation and impairment losses.
Property
Freehold land and buildings are held at fair value, less accumulated depreciation for buildings.
Plant and equipment
Plant and equipment are measured on the cost basis less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.
The carrying amount of plant and equipment is reviewed annually by directors to ensure it is not in excess of the recoverable amount from these assets. The recoverable amount is assessed on the basis of the expected net cash flows that will be received from the assets employment and subsequent disposal. The expected net cash flows have been discounted to their present values in determining recoverable amounts.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the consolidated entity and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Depreciation
The depreciable amount of all non‐mining related fixed assets including building and capitalised lease assets, but excluding freehold land, is depreciated on a straight line basis over their useful lives to the consolidated entity commencing from the time the asset is held ready for use. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of either the unexpired period of the lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
The depreciation rates used for each class of depreciable assets are:
| Class of Fixed Asset Depreciation Rate | |
|---|---|
| Buildings 2.5% | |
| Plant and equipment 15 – 37.5% |
The assets' residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date. An asset's carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset's carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with the carrying amount. These gains and losses are included in the income statement.
o) Mining Plant and Equipment and Capital Work in Progress
Mining plant and equipment and capital work in progress is carried at cost which includes acquisition, transportation, installation, and commissioning costs. Costs also include present value of decommissioning costs and finance charges capitalized during the construction period where such expenditure is financed by borrowings. Costs are not depreciated until such time as the asset has been completed ready for use.
If there is indication that the recoverable amount is less than its carrying value, the recoverable amount is estimated and an allowance is made for the impairment in value.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the consolidated entity, and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
Depreciation of assets is calculated to allocate the cost of each asset to its residual value over its estimated useful life for those assets not amortised on the units of production basis.
The assets residual value and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These are included in the income statement.
p) Borrowings
Borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption amount is recognised in the income statement over the period of the borrowing using the effective interest method.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the consolidated entity has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.
q) Borrowing Costs
Borrowing costs incurred for the construction of any qualifying asset are capitalized during the period of time that is required to complete and prepare the asset for its intended use or sale. Other borrowing costs are expensed.
r) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the consolidated entity has a legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events, for which it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will result and that outflow can be reliably measured.
s) Employee Benefits
Provision is made for the Company's liability for employee benefits arising from services rendered by employees to balance date. Employee benefits that are expected to be settled within one year have been measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liability is settled, plus related on‐costs. Employee benefits payable later than one year have been measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made for those benefits.
t) Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing the profit from ordinary activities after income tax by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year.
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share by taking the amounts unpaid on ordinary shares and any reduction in earnings per share that will probably arise from the exercise of options outstanding during the financial year.
u) Site Rehabilitation
In accordance with the consolidated entity's environmental policy and applicable legal requirements, a provision for site restoration in respect of contaminated land, is recognised when the land is contaminated.
The provision is the best estimate of the present value of the expenditure required to settle the restoration obligation at the reporting date, based on current legal requirements and technology. Future restoration costs are reviewed annually and any changes are reflected in the present value of the restoration provision at the end of the reporting period
The amount of the provision for future restoration costs is capitalised and is depreciated in accordance with the policy set out under note 3(b). The unwinding of the effect of discounting on the provision is recognised as a finance cost.
v) Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST, except where the amount of GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Tax Office. In these circumstances the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of an item of the expense. Receivables and payables in the balance
sheet are shown inclusive of GST.
Cash flows are presented in the cash flow statement on a gross basis, except for the GST component of investing and financing activities, which are disclosed as operating cash flows.
w) Comparative Figures
When required by Accounting Standards, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in presentation for the current financial year.
x) Share Based Payment
The consolidated entity may provide benefits to employees (including directors) of the consolidated entity in the form of share‐based payment transactions, whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares ('equity‐settled transactions').
No expense is recognised in respect of options granted before 7 November 2002 and/or vested before 1 January 2005. The shares are recognized when the options are exercised and the proceeds received allocated to share capital.
The fair value of options granted after 7 November 2002 and vested after 1 January 2005 is recognised as an employee benefit expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which the employee become unconditionally entitled to the options.
The cost of these equity‐settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined using a binomial lattice model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option.
The fair value of the options granted is adjusted to reflect market conditions, but excludes the impact of any non‐ market vesting conditions. Non‐market vesting conditions, if any, are included in assumptions about the number of options likely to be exercisable.
Upon exercise of the options, the balance of the share‐based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred to share capital and the proceeds received, net of any transaction costs, are credited to issued capital.
y) New standards and interpretations not yet adopted.
The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations have been identified as those which may impact the Company in the period of initial application. They are available for early adoption at 30 June 2008, but have not been applied in preparing this financial report: There is no material impact in relation to adopting these standards.
(i) AASB 123 (revised Jun 2007) ‐ Borrowing Costs
Applicable for periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. The transitional provisions of this standard only require capitalisation of borrowing costs on qualifying assets where commencement date for capitalisation is on or after 1 January 2009. As such, there will be no impact on prior financial statements when this standard is adopted.
(ii) AASB 3 (reissued March 2008) ‐ Business Combinations
Applicable to business combinations where the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first reporting period that commences 1 July 2009 or later. As there is no requirement to retrospectively restate comparative amounts for business combinations undertaken before this date, there is unlikely to be any impact on the financial statements when this revised standard is first adopted.
However, due to the nature of some of the changes in the revised standard, business combinations that the entity undertakes after this date may in future impact negatively on the results of the entity. For example, acquisition costs will have to be expensed instead of being recognised as part of goodwill.
Specific changes in respect of step acquisitions and sell downs may introduce situations whereby adopting the revised standard may improve profitability.
Also, deferred tax assets that do not satisfy recognition criteria when a business combination is initially accounted for, but do subsequently qualify for recognition post acquisition date, will be recognised as a credit to the income statement and there will be no consequential write‐down of goodwill for a similar amount, provided that the deferred tax assets are recognised outside the initial measurement period of 12 months from acquisition date.
(iii) AASB 127 (reissued March 2008) ‐ Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements
Applicable to periods commencing on or after 1 July 2009. As there is no requirement to retrospectively restate the effect of these revisions, there is unlikely to be any impact on the financial statements when this revised standard is first adopted.
(iv) AASB 2008‐3 (issued March 2008) Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 3 and AASB 127 [AASB 1, AASB 2, AASB 4, AASB 5, AASB 7, AASB 101, AASB 107, AASB 112, AASB 114, AASB 116, AASB 121, AASB 128, AASB 131, AASB 132, AASB 133, AASB 134, AASB 136, AASB 137, AASB 138, AASB 139, Interpretation 9 and Interpretation 107]
Applicable to periods commencing on or after 1 July 2009. As there is no requirement to retrospectively restate the effect of these revisions, there is unlikely to be any impact on the financial statements when this revised standard is first adopted.
(v) AASB 2008‐1 (issued February 2008) – Amendments to AASB 2 – Share‐based Payments – Vesting Conditions and Cancellations.
Applicable to periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. To date the entity has not issued any options to employees that include non‐vesting conditions and as such there will be no impact on the financial statements when this revised standard is adopted for the first time.
(vi) AASB Interpretation 11 (issued Feb 2007) – AASB 2 – Group and Treasury Share Transactions
Applicable to periods commencing on or after 1 March 2007. There will be no impact because at the reporting date the entity has not issued any equity instruments to employees of subsidiaries.
(vii)1AS27, IAS 18 and IAS 36 (issued May 2008) – Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, Revenue and Impairment of Assets.
Applicable to periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. There will be no impact as these requirements are only required to be applied prospectively for periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. However, any pre‐ acquisition dividends received after this date may result in additional impairment charges on investments in subsidiaries, associates and jointly controlled entities. This is because such amounts would previously have been written off directly against the cost of the investment, whereas in future they will be recognised as revenue which may result in the investment being stated at an amount exceeding recoverable amount.
(viii)IAS 27 (issued May 2008) – paragraphs 38B and 38C
Applicable to periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. There will be no impact as these requirements are only required to be applied prospectively to reorganisations occurring in annual periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009.
(ix) Improvements to IFRS (issued May 2008) – Improvements to IFRSs
- i. IAS 27 ‐ Consolidated and separate Financial Statements. Applicable to periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. This amendment will have no impact when this amendment is first adopted because the entity used the cost method under IAS 27 to account for its investment in subsidiaries, associates and jointed controlled entities which will continue to be measure under IFRS 5.
- ii. IAS 23 Borrowing costs
Applicable for periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. There will be no impact as these amendments merely clarify existing practice.
- iii. IAS 36 Impairment of Assets Applicable for periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. There will be no financial impact when these amendments are first adopted because these amendments relate to additional disclosure requirements only.
- (x) AASB 8 (issued Feb 2007) Operating Segments
Applicable to periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. As this is a disclosure standard only, there will be no impact on amounts recognised in the financial statements. However, disclosures required for the operating segments will be significantly different to what is currently reported (business and geographical segment).
(i) AASB 101 –(revised Sep 2007) – Presentation of Financial Statements
Applicable to annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2009. As this is a disclosure standard only. As this is a disclosure standard only, there will be no impact on amounts recognised in the financial statements. However, there will be various changes to the way financial statements are presented and various changes to names of individual financial statements.
2. Financial Risk Management
The consolidated entity's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including, interest risk and price risk) and liquidity risk. The consolidated entity's overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the consolidated entity.
Risk management is carried out by the Board under policies approved by the Board of Directors. The Board provides written principles for overall risk management, as well as policies regarding specific areas, such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and non‐derivative financial instruments and investment of excess liquidity.
a) Market risk
i. Foreign exchange risk
The consolidated entity does not operate internationally and is therefore not exposed to foreign exchange risk.
Foreign exchange risk arises from future transactions and recognised assets and liabilities denominated in a currency that is not the entity's function currency and net investments in foreign operations. The risk is measured using sensitivity analysis and cash flow forecasting.
Group sensitivity
The consolidated entity does not have a risk management policy in relation to this exposure.
ii. Price risk
The parent entity is exposed to equity securities price risks and bullion price risk. This arises from investments held by the consolidated entity and classified on the balance sheet as available‐for‐sale financial assets and bullion held as inventory.
If there was a 10% increase or decrease in market price of gold, the net realisable value of bullion on hand as reported in note 12 would increase/(decrease) by $182,081 [2007: $152,919] and the bullion in transit would increase/(decrease) by $55,128 [2007: nil].As gold on hand is held at cost there would be no impact on the profit/loss.
An increase or decrease in the market price of gold would also impact the Bullion loan from Tribune Resources NL. A 10% increase or decrease in the price of bullion would mean a $467,342 [2007: $342,528] increase/(decrease) in the carrying value of the loan. The profit/(loss) would be affected as below:
The impact of a 10% increase or decrease on capitalised interest and the movement on the bullion loan is summarised as follows:
| Impact on capitalisedinterest | Impact on movement inbullion loan | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Bullion loan from Tribune Resources NL | 34,580 | 27,749 | 90,233 | 23,989 |
The majority of the consolidated entity's investments are publicly traded and are listed on the ASX.
The table below summaries the impact of increases/decreases on equity for the consolidated entity for the year. The analysis is based on the assumption that the equity indexes increase/decreased by 10% [2007: 10%] with all other variables held constant and all the consolidated equity instruments moved according to the historical correlation with the index.
| Index | Impact on Equity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | ||||
| $ | $ | ||||
| ASX | 89,595 | 1,071,217 |
The consolidated entity considers the impact on post‐tax profit to be immaterial.
The price risk for the unlisted securities is immaterial in terms of the possible impact on profit or loss or total equity. It has therefore not been included in the sensitivity analysis.
iii. Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk
The consolidated entity's main interest rate risk arises from cash equivalents and loans and other receivables with variable interest rates.
b) Credit risk
Credit risk is managed on a consolidated entity basis. Credit risk arises from cash equivalents and loans, derivatives financial instruments and deposits with banks and financial institutions.
The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying amount of the receivables as summarised in note 11. For some receivables the consolidated entity obtains agreements which can be called upon if the counterparty is in default under the terms of the agreement.
c) Liquidity risk
The consolidated entity manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities. Surplus funds are generally only invested in instruments that are tradeable in highly liquid markets.
Financing arrangements
The consolidated entity had access to approximately 150 ounces of bullion in undrawn borrowing facilities at the reporting date.
Maturities of financial liabilities
The table below analyses the entity's financial liabilities. The amounts disclosed are based on estimated bullion production and estimated gold prices.
| Group – at 30 June 2008 | Less than6 months$ | 6 – 12months$ | Between 1and 2 years$ | Over 5years$ | Totalcontractualcash flows | Carrying Amount(assets)/liabilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest bearing | ||||||
| borrowings | ‐ | 50,000 | 4,350,000 | 1,450,000 | 5,850,000 | 4,673,423 |
d) Fair value estimation
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement for disclosure purposes.
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as available‐for‐sale securities) is based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the consolidated entity is the closing bid price.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market (for example, investments in unlisted companies or subsidiaries) is based on the carrying value less any impairment considered appropriate by the Board of Directors.
The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values due to their short‐term nature.
3. Critical accounting estimates and judgements.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors,
including expectation of future events that may have a financial impact on the entity and that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
a) Critical accounting estimates and assumptions
The consolidated entity makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year will be discussed below.
b) Critical judgements in applying the entity's accounting policies
The preparation of a financial report in conformity with AIFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below:
Carrying value of Mining Plant & Equipment, Mining Infrastructure and Mine Development All mining assets (excluding mobile mining plant and equipment) are amortised using the unit of production (UOP) method where the mine operating plan calls for production from well defined Mineral Reserves.
The calculation of UOP rate of amortisation could be impacted to the extent that actual production in the future is different from the current forecast production based on proved and probable mineral reserves. This would generally result to the extent that there are significant changes in any of the factors or assumptions used in estimating mineral reserves. These factors could include:
Changes in proved and probable reserves;
The grade of mineral reserves may vary significantly from time to time;
Differences between actual commodity prices and commodity prices assumption;
Unforeseen operational issues at mine site;
Changes in capital, operating, mining, processing and reclamation costs, discount rates; and
Changes in mineral reserves could similarly impact the useful lives of the assets depreciated on a straight line basis, where those lives are limited to the life of the mine.
The recoverable amounts of cash generating units and individual assets have been determined based on the higher of value‐in‐use calculations and fair values. The calculations require the use of estimates and assumptions. It is reasonably possible that the gold price assumption may change which may then impact our estimated life of mine determination and may then require a material adjustment to the carrying value of tangible assets.
The consolidated entity reviews and tests the carrying value of assets when events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of cash flows of other assets and liabilities. If there are indications that impairment may have occurred, estimates are prepared for future cash flows for each class of asset. Expected future cash flows used to determine the value in use of tangible assets are inherently uncertain and could materially change over time. They are significantly affected by a number of factors including reserves and production estimates, together with economic factors such as spot gold prices, discount rates, estimates of costs to produce reserves and future capital expenditure.
During the year ended 30 June 2008, there was an increase in the proven and probable reserves for the Raleigh Underground project, based on a review by Barrick.
The carrying amount of tangible assets at 30 June 2008 was $2,750,279 [2007:$2,500,758].
Provision for site rehabilitation
The consolidated entity's mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. The consolidated entity recognises management's best estimate for assets retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred. Actual costs incurred in the future periods could differ materially from the estimates. Additionally, future changes to environmental laws and regulations, life of mine estimates and discount rates could affect the carrying amount of this provision. Such changes in Mineral Reserves could similarly impact useful lives of assets depreciated on a straight line basis, where those lives are limited to the life of mine.
The carrying amount of the rehabilitation obligation at 30 June 2008 was $341,325 [2007: $338,755].
Stockpiles, gold in process and gold bullion
Costs incurred in or benefits of the productive process are accumulated as stockpiles, gold in process, ore on leach pads and product inventory. Net realisable value tests are performed at least annually and represent the estimated future sales price of the product based on prevailing gold prices, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale.
Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of tonnes added and removed from the stockpile, the number of contained gold ounces based on assay data, and the estimated recovery percentage based on the expected processing method.
The metallurgical balancing process is constantly monitored and the recovery estimates are refined based on reconciliations with actual results over time.
Gold in process is calculated in accordance with our Toll Processing Agreements which incorporate the standard metallurgical practices.
The carrying amount of inventories at 30 June 2008 was 1,429,500 [2007: $2,276,239].
Share‐based payment transactions
The consolidated entity measures the cost of equity settled share based payments at fair value at the grant date using the binomial lattice model taking into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date, the expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option.
The total expenses in share based transactions for the year ended 30 June 2008 was 1,417,400 [2007: nil].
Increase in Reserves and Resources
The proved and probable Reserves and Resources were increased during the year, based on a review performed by the Joint Venture Managers Barrick Gold.
4. Segment information
During the year ended 30 June 2008, the consolidated entity operated within the mineral exploration industry in Australia and Angola. Due to the immaterial nature of its segment results and assets (less than 10% of total segment), the geographical segment is not considered as a reportable segment.
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| 5. Revenue from operations | ||||
| Sales revenue | ||||
| ‐ Sale of gold & silver | 13,340,716 | 11,004,362 | ‐ | ‐ |
| ‐ Sundry | ‐ | 48 | ‐ | ‐ |
| 13,340,716 | 11,004,410 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Other revenue | ||||
| ‐ Interest received | 171,600 | 132,974 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total Operating Revenue | 13,512,316 | 11,137,384 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Consolidated2008 | 2007 | Rand Mining NL2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| 6. Other Income | ||||
| Net gain/(loss) on sale of available for salefinancial assets | (1,112) | 20,940 | ‐ | ‐ |
| 7. Expenses | ||||
| The profit/(loss) before income tax includes the | ||||
| following specific expenses: | ||||
| Depreciation and amortisationAmortisation ‐ mine development costs | 315,996 | 803,343 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Amortisation – borrowing set up costs | ‐ | 98,461 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Depreciation ‐ mining plant & equipment | (7,212) | 537,735 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Depreciation ‐ other plant and equipment | 10,385 | 12,855 | ‐ | ‐ |
| 319,169 | 1,452,394 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Finance costs | ||||
| Interest and finance charges paid or payable | 351,120 | 537,718 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Unrealised loss ‐ change in value of gold loan | 902,331 | (239,894) | ‐ | ‐ |
| 1,253,451 | 297,824 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Doubtful debts | ||||
| Bad debt | ‐ | 21,459 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Loans to related parties – reversal | ‐ | (11,021) | ‐ | ‐ |
| ‐ | 10,438 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| 8. Income Tax Expense | ||||
| A. Income tax expense/(benefit) | ||||
| Current taxDeferred tax relating to origination and reversal | 907,101 | 1,287,383 | (124,788) | ‐ |
| of temporary differences | 976,210 | (426,666) | (11,923) | ‐ |
| 1,883,311 | 860,717 | (136,711) | ‐ |
B. Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense to prima facie tax payable
Profit from continuing operations before income
| tax | 4,037,965 | 2,854,081 | (1,804,157) | ‐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tax at Australian tax rate of 30% (2007 – 30%) | 1,211,389 | 856,224 | (541,247) | ‐ |
| Non allowable items | 671,922 | 4,493 | 404,536 | ‐ |
| 1,883,311 | 860,717 | (136,711) | ‐ | |
| Tax assets not brought to account | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Income tax expense/ (benefit) attributable to | ||||
| entity | 1,883,311 | 860,717 | (136,711) | ‐ |
The franking account balance at year end was $nil [2007: nil]
| 9. Reserves and Retained Profits | Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retained profits/(losses) | 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Accumulated losses at the beginning of the | |||||
| financial year | (1,334,018) | (4,654,538) | (3,092,576) | (3,744,559) | |
| Reserve no longer required | ‐ | 1,326,974 | ‐ | 1,113,759 | |
| Sundry amount written off | ‐ | 182 | ‐ | 182 | |
| Net profit/(loss) for the year | 2,154,654 | 1,993,364 | (1,667,446) | (461,958) | |
| Accumulated losses at the end of the financial | |||||
| year | 820,636 | (1,334,018) | (4,760,021) | (3,092,576) | |
| Reserves | |||||
| Available for sale financial assets reserve | 170,597 | 3,001,083 | 191,281 | ‐ | |
| Asset revaluation reserve | 191,282 | 172,266 | ‐ | 172,266 | |
| Capital reserve | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Share based payments reserve | 1,418,800 | 1,400 | 1,418,800 | 1,400 | |
| 1,780,679 | 3,174,749 | 1,610,081 | 173,666 | ||
| Movements: | |||||
| Available for Sale Financial Assets | |||||
| Balance 1 July | 3,001,083 | 965,485 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Revaluation (net of tax) | 368,861 | 2,035,598 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Reversal of revaluations relating to investment in | |||||
| associate – Tribune Resources NL | (3,047,480) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Share of revaluation movement for investment | |||||
| in associate | (151,867) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Balance 30 June | 170,597 | 3,001,083 | ‐ | ‐ |
Share Based Payments Reserve
| Balance 1 JulyFair value of options issuedBalance 30 June | 1,4001,417,4001,418,800 | 1,400‐1,400 | 1,4001,417,4001,418,800 | 1,400‐1,400 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Reserve | ||||
| Balance 1 July | ‐ | 1,326,974 | ‐ | 1,113,759 |
| Transferred to Retained profits/(losses) | ‐ | (1,326,974) | ‐ | (1,113,959) |
| Balance 30 June | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Asset Revaluation Reserve | ||||
| Balance 1 July | ‐ | ‐ | 172,266 | 172,266 |
| Adjustment to Deferred tax liability | ‐ | ‐ | 19,015 | ‐ |
| Balance 30 June | ‐ | ‐ | 191,281 | 172,266 |
Nature and Purpose of Reserves
Available for sale financial assets reserve
Changes in the fair value and exchange differences arising on the translation of investments, such as equities, classified as available‐for‐sale financial assets, are taken to the available‐for‐sale investments revaluation reserve. Amounts are recognised in profit and loss when the associated assets are sold and impaired.
Asset revaluation reserve
The asset revaluation reserve is used to record increments/decrements on the revaluation of property, plant and equipment to fair value.
Capital reserve
The capital reserve is used to record increments/decrements in capital expenditure. The Directors of the Company concluded that the Capital Reserve is no longer required.
Share based payments reserve
The share based payments reserve is used to recognise the fair value of options issued.
10. Cash and Cash Equivalents
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Current cash at bank | 2,588,220 | 1,336,619 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Deposits at call | 123,725 | 97,265 | ‐ | |
| 2,711,945 | 1,433,884 | ‐ | ‐ |
Reconciliation to cash at the end of the year
The above figures were reconciled to cash at the end of the financial year as shown in the Cash Flow Statement as follows:
| Balances per statement of Cash Flows | 2,711,945 | 1,433,884 | ‐ | ‐ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -------------------------------------- | ----------- | ----------- | --- | --- |
Cash at bank
Interest rate risk exposure
The consolidated entity's exposure to interest rate risk is discussed in note 2.
Cash at bank bears fixed interest of 7.00% [2007: 4.50%]
11. Trade and Other Receivables
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2006$ | |
| Current | ||||
| Trade and other receivables | 124,225 | 130,320 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Provision for impairment of receivables | (30,000) | (30,000) | ‐ | ‐ |
| 94,225 | 100,320 | ‐ | ‐ |
a) Impaired trade receivables
As at 30 June 2008 current trade receivables of the consolidated entity with a nominal value of $30,000 [2007: $30,000] were impaired. The amount of the provision was $30,000 [2007: $30,000]. The impairment relates to a loan made which is unlikely to be repaid.
The aging of these receivables are as follows:
| Consolidated | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | ||
| $ | $ | ||
| 1 to 3 months | 64,225 | ‐ | |
| 3 to 6 months | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Over 6 months | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Movements in the provision for impairment of receivables are as follows:
| Consolidated | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | |
| At 1 July | 30,000 | 30,000 |
| Provision for impairment recognised during the year | ‐ | ‐ |
| 30,000 | 30,000 |
12. Inventories
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | ||
| Current Assets | $ | |||
| Ore stockpiles – at cost | 219,779 | 1,416,401 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Gold on hand‐at cost | 932,941 | 859,838 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Gold in transit | 276,780 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 1,429,500 | 2,276,239 | ‐ | ‐ |
Gold on hand at 30 June 2008 has a net realisable value of $1,820,810 [2007: $1,113,211] measured at spot rate of $964.34 [2007:$765.62].
Gold in transit had a net realisable value of $551,283 [2007: nil] measure at spot rate of $964.34.
13. Available for Sale of Financial Assets
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Non‐Current | ||||
| At beginning of the year | 10,712,176 | 8,322,022 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Additions | 1,414,950 | 361,103 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Disposals | (1,100) | (6,037) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Transfer to investment accounted for using equity | (10,379,444 | |||
| method (note 15) | ) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Revaluation increment/(decrement) | (850,633) | 2,035,088 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Balance as at 30 June | 895,949 | 10,712,176 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Listed Securities | ||||
| Equity Securities | 895,949 | 10,712,164 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Unlisted Securities | ||||
| Equity Securities | ‐ | 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| 895,949 | 10,712,176 | ‐ | ‐ |
Unlisted Securities
Unlisted securities are traded in inactive markets. They are carried at cost at initial recognition. An impairment loss amounting to $nil [2007: $ nil] in respect of an unlisted security was recognised during the year.
Impairment and risk exposure
All available‐for‐sale financial assets are denominated in Australian currency. For an analysis of the sensitivity of available‐for‐sale financial assets to price and interest risk rate refer to note 2.
14. Other Financial Assets
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | ||
| Non‐Current | |||||
| Investment in controlled entities | ‐ | ‐ | 538,161 | 538,161 | |
| Loan to controlled entities | ‐ | ‐ | 8,390,557 | 7,676,132 | |
| Receivable from controlled entity | ‐ | ‐ | (400,000) | ‐ | |
| ‐ | ‐ | 8,528,718 | 8,214,293 |
These financial assets are carried at cost. As there is no current repayment plans this loan is considered to be an investment in the subsidiary of the Company.
Investments in controlled entities
| CountryOfName | Incorporation | %Ordinary SharesCarrying ValueOwnedOf Investment | Contribution ToConsolidated OperatingProfit/(Loss) AfterIncome Tax | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | ||||
| Rand ExplorationN.L. | Australia | 100 | 100 | 538,161 | 538,161 | (1,667,446) | (461,958) | ||
| Pan AfricanMining Ltd | Angola | 100 | 100 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
15. Investments accounted for using the equity method
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Shares in associate – Rand Mining NL (note 35) | 8,214,382 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 8,214,382 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
Shares in associates (note 13)
Investments in associates are accounted for in the consolidated financial statements using the equity method of accounting and carried at cost by the parent entity [refer to note 35].
16. Exploration and Evaluation Costs
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Balance at 1 July | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Costs incurred during the year | 67,502 | 136,877 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Costs written off | (67,502) | (136,877) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Balance at 30 June | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
The recoverability of the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation assets is dependent upon the successful development and commercial exploitation, or alternatively, sale of the respective areas of interest.
17. Mine Development Costs
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Balance at 1 July | 7,444,336 | 6,164,612 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Costs incurred during the year | 1,741,581 | 1,279,724 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Balance as 30 June | 9,185,917 | 7,444,336 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Accumulated depreciation | ||||
| Balance as 1 July | (4,543,471) | (3,740,128) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Charge for the year | (315,996) | (803,343) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Balance at 30 June | (4,859,467) | (4,543,471) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Net Book Value | 4,326,450 | 2,900,865 | ‐ | ‐ |
18. Property, Plant and Equipment
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Non Current | ||||
| Freehold land and buildings | ||||
| At valuation | 460,000 | 460,000 | 460,000 | 460,000 |
| Plant and equipment | ||||
| At cost | 3,607,255 | 3,352,581 | 59,249 | 59,249 |
| Accumulated amortisation/depreciation | (1,349,349) | (1,346,174) | (59,249) | (59,249) |
| 2,257,906 | 2,006,407 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Construction work in progress – at cost | 32,373 | 34,351 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total net book amount | 2,750,279 | 2,500,758 | 460,000 | 460,000 |
| Total Cost | 4,099,628 | 3,846,932 | 519,249 | 519,249 |
| Total Accumulated Depreciation | (1,349,349) | (1,346,174) | (59,249) | (59,249) |
| Net book amount | 2,750,279 | 2,500,758 | 460,000 | 460,000 |
A. Movement in Property, Plant & Equipment:
| Consolidated | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended 30 June 2008 | |||||||
| Land andOther Plant andMining Plant andConstruction | |||||||
| Buildings | Equipment | Equipment | Work in | ||||
| Progress | |||||||
| Opening net book amount | 460,000 | 48,076 | 1,958,331 | 34,351 | 2,500,758 | ||
| Additions | ‐ | 1,422 | 164,195 | 101,502 | 267,119 | ||
| Revaluation | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ||
| Transfers | ‐ | ‐ | 103,480 | (103,480) | ‐ | ||
| Depreciation and | |||||||
| amortisation expense | ‐ | (10,386) | (7,212) | ‐ | (17,598) | ||
| Closing net book amount | 460,000 | 39,112 | 2,218,794 | 32,373 | 2,750,279 |
| Rand Mining NLYear Ended 30 June 2008 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land andBuildings | Other Plant andEquipment | Mining Plant andEquipment | Construct‐ionWork inProgress | Total | |
| Opening net book amount | 460,000 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 460,000 |
| Additions | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Revaluation | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Depreciation andamortisation expense | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Closing net book amount | 460,000 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 460,000 |
| Consolidated | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land and | Other Plant andEquipment | Year Ended 30 June 2007Mining Plant andEquipment | ConstructionWork in | Total | ||
| Buildings | Progress | |||||
| Opening net book amount | 460,000 | 59,831 | 2,235,021 | 73,109 | 2,827,961 | |
| Additions | ‐ | 1,100 | 222,286 | ‐ | 223,386 | |
| Revaluation | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Transfers | ‐ | 38,759 | (38,759) | ‐ | ||
| Depreciation and | ||||||
| amortisation expense | ‐ | (12,855) | (537,735) | ‐ | (550,590) | |
| Closing net book amount | 460,000 | 48,076 | 1,958,331 | 34,351 | 2,500,758 |
| Rand Mining NLYear Ended 30 June 2007 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land andBuildings | Other Plant andEquipment | Mining Plant andEquipment | ConstructionWork inProgress | Total | |
| Opening net book amount | 460,000 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 460,000 |
| Additions | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Revaluation | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Depreciation andamortisation expense | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Closing net book amount | 460,000 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 460,000 |
Non‐current assets pledged as security
There are no non‐current assets pledged as security by the parent entity and its controlled entities.
| 19. Deferred Tax Assets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Non‐Current | ||||
| The balance comprises temporary differencesattributable to: | ||||
| Amounts recognised in profit or loss | ||||
| Provisions | 135,006 | 122,311 | ‐ | 20,684 |
| Other | 44,961 | 442,392 | ‐ | (20,684) |
| Tax losses | 276,252 | ‐ | 11,923 | ‐ |
| 456,219 | 564,703 | 11,923 | ‐ | |
| Amounts recognised directly in equity | ||||
| Revaluation reserve | 196,095 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ||
| Balance of deferred tax asset transferred to | ||||
| deferred tax liability (note 19) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 652,314 | 564,703 | 11,923 | ‐ |
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Opening balance at 1 July | 564,703 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Adjustments to opening balance | 27,384 | 90,136 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Credited/(charged) to the income statement | (144,810) | 474,567 | 11,923 | ‐ |
| Credited/(charged) to equity | 196,095 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Unders and overs adjustment | 8,942 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Closing balance at 30 June | 652,314 | 564,703 | 11,923 | ‐ |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities shall be set off if, and only if: (a) there is a legally recognised right to set off current tax assets and liabilities, and (b) the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority.
20. Trade and Other Payables
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Current | ||||
| Trade Payables | 993,618 | 878,032 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Current income tax payable | 12,997 | 1,069,870 | 1,005,596 | ‐ |
| 1,006,615 | 1,947,902 | 1,005,596 | ‐ |
Risk exposure
Information about the consolidated entity's exposure to foreign exchange risk is provided in note 2.
| 21. Borrowings | Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Current | ||||
| Bank loan | ‐ | 193,194 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Gold loan from Tribune Resources NL | 4,673,423 | 3,425,284 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total Current Borrowings | 4,673,423 | 3,618,478 | ‐ | ‐ |
Further information relating to loans from related parties is set out in note 28.
Total secured liabilities
Total secured liabilities (current and non‐current) are as follows:
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| Bank loan | $‐ | $193,194 | $‐ | $‐ |
| A. Bank loan |
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank Loan‐principle | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Balance the beginning of the year | 193,194 | 4,718,850 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Principle repayments | (193,194) | (4,525,656) | ‐ | |
| Balance at the end of the year | ‐ | 193,194 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Capitalised Initial Transaction costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjustment on initial adoption of AASB132 and | ||||
| AASB139 | ‐ | 98,461 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Amortisation during the year | ‐ | (98,461) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Balance at the end of the year | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| ‐ | 193,194 | ‐ | ‐ |
B. Total unsecured liabilities
Total unsecured liabilities (current) are as follows:
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2007 | 2006 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Gold loan from Tribune Resources NL | 4,673,423 | 3,425,284 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
| Gold loan‐principle | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Gold loan from Tribune Resources NL | 2,834,600 | 2,834,600 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Value of imbedded derivative recognised in | ||||
| profit and loss | 1,838,823 | 590,684 | ||
| Balance at the end of the year | 4,673,423 | 3,425,284 | ‐ | ‐ |
Tribune Resources NL loaned the consolidated entity 4,000 ounces of gold bullion during the year. Interest is payable in gold bullion and is calculated on the principle at the interest rate of 8% per annum. The interest is calculated on the daily balance of the principle sum on the basis of a 365 day year and compounding on the last day of each month.
C. Financial arrangements
The consolidated entity had 150 ounces available to draw down from the gold loan from Tribune Resources NL at 30 June 2008.
D.Interest rate risk exposures
Information about the consolidated entity's exposure to interest rate and foreign currency changes is provided in note 2.
E. Fair value
The carrying amounts and fair values of borrowings at balance date are:
| 2008 | 2007 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying Amount$'000 | Fair value$'000 | Carrying Amount$'000 | Fair Value$'000 | |
| On Balance Sheet | ||||
| Bank loan | ‐ | ‐ | 193,194 | 193,194 |
| Bullion loan | 4,673,423 | 4,673,423 | 3,425,284 | 3,425,284 |
Fair value is inclusive of costs which would be incurred on settlement of a liability. The fair value of borrowing is based upon market price where a market exists or by discounting the expected future cash flows by the current
interest rates for liabilities with similar risk profiles.
| 22. Provisions | Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | ||
| Current | |||||
| Employee entitlements | 39,746 | 68,948 | 39,746 | 68,948 | |
| Non‐Current | |||||
| Rehabilitation | 341,325 | 338,755 | ‐ | ‐ |
A. Movements in Provisions
Movements in each class of provision during the financial year, other than employee benefits, are set out below:
| Rehabilitation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | ||
| Consolidated | $ | $ | |
| Carrying amount at start of year | 338,755 | 273,094 | |
| Additional provisions recognised | 2,570 | 65,661 | |
| Carrying amount at the end of the year | 341,325 | 338,755 |
Details regarding restoration of operating location are contained in the significant accounting policies note 1.2 (h)
A provision of $341,325 exists at 30 June 2008 in respect of consolidated entity's obligation to rehabilitate the Raleigh Underground mine site upon cessation of production in accordance with the state environmental regulatory requirements. The consolidated entity has been assured that the site would be restored using technology and materials that are available currently. The provision for site restoration has been calculated using a discount rate of 0% as adjustments to present value are not material.
23. Deferred tax liability
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Non‐Current | ||||
| The balance comprised temporary | ||||
| differences attributable to: | ||||
| Amounts recognised in profit or loss | ||||
| Development | 303,520 | 33,202 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Other | 558,302 | 209,531 | 51,680 | ‐ |
| 861,822 | 242,733 | 51,680 | ||
| Amounts recognised directly in equity | ||||
| Available for sale financial assets | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Asset revaluation reserve | 97,239 | 977,839 | ‐ | ‐ |
| 97,239 | 977,839 | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Balance of deferred tax asset transferred | ||||
| (note 15) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Net deferred tax liabilities | 959,061 | 1,220,572 | 51,680 | ‐ |
Movements:
| Opening balance at 1 July | 1,220,572 | 907,057 | 70,696 | 70,696 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjustments to opening balance | (137,563) | (567,367) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Reversal of 2007 revaluation | (985,616) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Credited/(charged) to the income | ||||
| statement | 816,108 | 47,901 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Credited/(charged) to equity | ‐ | 832,981 | (19,016) | ‐ |
| Revaluation adjustment | 45,560 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Closing balance at 30 June | 959,061 | 1,220,572 | 51,680 | 70,696 |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities shall be set off if, and only if: (a) there is a legally recognised right to set off current tax assets and liabilities, and (b) the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority.
24. Deferred tax equity
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| The balance comprised temporary | ||||
| differences attributable to: | ||||
| Amounts recognised directly in equity | ||||
| Available for sale financial assets | 196,095 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Asset revaluation reserve | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 196,095 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Movements: | ||||
| Opening balance at 1 July | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Investments transferred to equity | 196,095 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Closing balance at 30 June | 196,095 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| 25. Contributed Equity | ||||
| Rand Mining NL | Rand Mining NL |
| 2008Shares | 2007Shares | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a) Share Capital | ||||
| Ordinary shares | 40,650,813 | 40,560,813 | 11,453,559 | 11,453,559 |
Movements in ordinary share capital of the company are as follows:
| Date | Details | No. ofShares | Issue Price | $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 July 2007 | Balance | 40,560,813 | ‐ | 11,453,559 |
| 30 June 2008 | Balance | 40,560,813 | ‐ | 11,453,559 |
b)Ordinary shares
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the Company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.
c) Options
Information relating to options including options issued, exercised and lapsed during the financial year and options outstanding at the end of the financial year, is set out in the Directors' Report.
d) Capital risk management
The consolidated entity and the parent entity's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard their ability to continue as a going concern, so that they can provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
26. Interest in Joint Ventures
Jointly Controlled Assets
The controlled entity, Rand Exploration NL has 12.25% interest in the East Kundana Joint Venture, whose principle activity is exploration and mining of gold.
The consolidated entity share of assets employed in the joint venture are included in the consolidated balance sheet, in accordance with the accounting policy described in note 1, under the following classification:
| Consolidated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||
| $ | $ | |||
| Current Assets | ||||
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | 2,152,096 | 1,033,269 | ||
| Trade and Other Receivables | 64,555 | 57,225 | ||
| Inventories | 202,705 | 305,617 | ||
| Total Current Assets | 2,419,356 | 1,396,111 | ||
| Non‐Current Assets | ||||
| Mine Development | 6,093,591 | 4,213,256 | ||
| Construction Work in Progress | 32,373 | 34,351 | ||
| Plant and Equipment – at cost | 3,125,058 | 3,010,582 | ||
| Total Non‐Current assets | 9,251,022 | 7,258,189 | ||
| Share of Assets employed in Joint Venture | 11,670,378 | 8,654,300 | ||
| Net Interest in Joint Venture | 10,623,852 | 7,963,871 | ||
| 27. Auditor's Remuneration | ||||
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Amounts paid or payable to the auditors for: | ||||
| Audit and review of the financial statements | 40,000 | 36,000 | ‐ |
28. Key Management Personnel Disclosures
A. Directors
Directors of Rand Mining NL during the financial year were:
(i) Executive Directors A Billis
O Demis
(ii)Non‐ Executive Directors G Sklenka
B. Other Key Management Personnel
The following persons also had authority and responsibilities for planning and directing and controlling the activities of the consolidated entity, directly or indirectly, during the financial year:
| Name | Position | Employer |
|---|---|---|
| J Andrews | General Manager ‐ Kalgoorlie Operations | Rand Mining NL |
In accordance with AASB 124 remuneration disclosures related to Key Management Personnel are included in the Remuneration Report in the Directors' Report.
C. Equity instruments disclosures relating to Key Management Personnel
(i) Options provided as remuneration and shares issued on exercise of such options
Details of option provided as remuneration and shares issued on the exercise of such options, together with terms and conditions of the options, can be found in the remuneration report on page 16.
(ii) Option holdings
The number of options over ordinary shares in the company held during the financial year by each director of Rand Mining NL and other key management personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally related parties, are set out below:
| 2008 | Balance atthe start ofthe year | Grantedduring theyear | Exercisedduring theyear | Otherchangesduring theyear | Balance atthe end ofyear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directors | |||||
| O Demis | ‐ | 1,000,000 | ‐ | ‐ | 1,000,000 |
| A Billis | ‐ | 2,000,000 | ‐ | ‐ | 2,000,000 |
| G Sklenka | ‐ | 1,000,000 | ‐ | ‐ | 1,000,000 |
| Other Key Management | |||||
| Personnel | |||||
| I Robertson | 500,000 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 500,000 |
| 2007 | Balance at the | Granted | Exercised | Other | Balance at |
| start of theyear | during theyear | during theyear | changesduring the | the end ofyear | |
| year | |||||
| Directors | |||||
| O Demis | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| A Billis | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| G SklenkaOther Key ManagementPersonnel | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
(iii) Share holdings
The number of shares in the Company held during the financial year by each director of Rand Mining NL and other key management personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally related parties, are set out below:
| 2008 | Balance at thestart of the year | Purchasedduring theyear | Sold duringthe year | Other changesduring the year | Balance at theend of year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directors | |||||
| O Demis | 8,774,118 | 305,571 | ‐ | (727,100) | 8,352,589 |
| A Billis | 14,091,193 | 305,571 | ‐ | 727,100 | 15,123,864 |
| G Sklenka | 8,011,793 | 305,571 | ‐ | ‐ | 8,317,364 |
| 2007 | Balance atthe start ofthe year | Purchasedduring theyear | Sold duringthe year | Other changesduring the year | Balance at theend of year |
| Directors | |||||
| O Demis | 8,079,347 | 694,771 | ‐ | ‐ | 8,774,118 |
| A Billis | 13,323,422 | 917,771 | (150,000) | ‐ | 14,091,193 |
| G Sklenka | 7,317,022 | 694,771 | ‐ | ‐ | 8,011,793 |
G. Other Transactions with Key Management Personnel
At 30 June 2008, the consolidated entity held 11,923,904 [2007: 11,040,404] ordinary shares in Tribune Resources NL. Messrs Demis, Billis and Sklenka were directors of Tribune Resources during the year.
At 30 June 2008, the consolidated entity held 2,819,998 [2007: 950,000] ordinary shares in Regal Resources Ltd and 649,998 [2007: 184,999] Regal Resources Ltd options. Messrs Sklenka was a director of Regal Resources Ltd during the year.
At 30 June 2008, the consolidated entity held 3,3,360,857 [2007: 3,595,857] ordinary shares and 3,212,428 [2007: 3,212,428] options in AXG Mining Ltd. Mr Sklenka was a director of AXG Mining Ltd during the year.
As at 30 June 2008 the consolidated entity held 1,000,000 shares in Palace Resources Ltd, a company previously related to Messrs Sklenka, which were acquired in the year ended 30 June 2004 for $100,000.
As at 30 June 2008 the consolidated entity held 10,000 [2007: nil] shares in Vector Resources Limited, a company related to Messrs Sklenka.
During the year ended 30 June 2008, the joint venture paid $127,605 [2007: $129,524] in royalties to Lake Grace Exploration NL, of which $15,631 [2007: $15,866] related to Rand Mining NL. Lake Grace Exploration NL is a company related to Messrs Billis.
During the 2006 year the consolidated entity received a 4000 oz bullion loan from Tribune Resources NL, a Company related to Messers Billis, Demis and Sklenka. The loan has an interest rate of 8% and has no fixed payment date.
During the year the consolidated entity purchased 880,000 shares in Tribune Resources NL from Mr Otto Demis, the father of Director Otakar Demis, for $1,320,000. This was approved by the shareholders in a meeting on 27 June 2008.
29. Related Party Transactions
Subsidiaries
Investments in subsidiaries are set out in note 14.
Key management Personnel
Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in note 28.
| 30. Earnings Per Share | Consolidated | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | ||
| $ | $ | ||
| Basic earnings per share | 5.31 cents | 4.91 cents | |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year | 40,560,813 | 40,560,813 | |
| used in the calculation of basic earnings per share | |||
| Earnings/(loss) used in calculating basic earnings/(loss) per share | 2,154,654 | 1,993,364 |
The Company has 4,500,000 [2007: 500,000] options on issue which are not considered dilutive.
31. Reconciliation of Profit/(Loss) after Income Tax to Net Cash Inflow from Operating Activities
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Profit (Loss) for the year after tax | 3,185,040 | 1,993,364 | (1,688,130) | (461,958) |
| Unrealised Loss – Tribune Resources NL gold loan* | 902,331 | (239,895) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Interest – Tribune Resources NL gold loan* | 345,808 | 277,490 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Depreciation and Amortisation | 319,169 | 1,452,394 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Income from equity accounted investment | (1,034,299) | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Exploration cost write off | 67,502 | 136,877 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Doubtful debts | ‐ | 10,438 | ‐ | ‐ |
| (Profit) /Loss on sale of available for sale financial | ||||
| assets | 1,112 | (18,815) | ‐ | ‐ |
| Write‐off of cost of other financial assets | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Write‐off development costs | ‐ | 2,611 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Tax payments | (2,050,796) | 56,893 | (116,027) | ‐ |
| Equity reserve | 1,417,400 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Movement in tax balances | 852,925 | 860,717 | ‐ | |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||
| Receivables | 6,095 | 36,846 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Trade creditors and accruals | 115,583 | 344,685 | 11,673 | ‐ |
| Inventories | 846,739 | 500,623 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Provisions | (29,202) | 41,558 | 1,388,198 | 41,558 |
| Net Cash inflows/(outflows) from activities | 4,945,407 | 5,455,786 | (404,286) | (420,400) |
A term deposit of $123,725 [2007: $97,511] is included in cash at bank.
*Non Cash Investing and Finance Activities
• Tribune Resources NL loaned the consolidated entity 4,000 ounces of bullion.
32. Commitments
Mineral Tenement Leases
In order to maintain current rights of tenure to mining tenements, the consolidated entity will be required to outlay the following funds in respect of tenement lease rentals and to meet minimum expenditure requirements of the Western Australian Mines Department. These obligations are expected to be fulfilled in the normal course of operations.
| Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Lease expenditure commitments: | ||||
| ‐ not later than one year‐ later than one year and not later than two | 124,168 | 105,548 | 124,168 | 105,548 |
| years | 124,168 | 105,548 | 124,168 | 105,548 |
| ‐ later than two years and not later than fiveyears | 372,503 | 633,287 | 372,503 | 633,287 |
| ‐ later than five years | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
| Capital Commitments ‐ EKJV | Consolidated | Rand Mining NL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| Mining Property, Plant and Equipmentpayable; | ||||
| ‐ Within one year | 167,825 | 1,034,000 | 167,825 | 1,034,000 |
| ‐ Later than one year but no later than 5 years‐ Later than 5 years | 15,925‐ | 152,250‐ | 15,925‐ | 152,250‐ |
| 183,750 | 1,186,250 | 183,750 | 1,186,250 |
The above commitments relate to capital expenditure commitments relating to the East Kundana joint venture Raleigh underground mine. They do not include the Hornet, Rubicon and Pegasus project amounts which has an estimated start date of January 2009.
33. Contingent Liabilities
Native title claims have been made with respect to areas which include tenements in which the consolidated entity has interests. The consolidated entity is unable to determine the prospects for success or otherwise of the claims and, in any event, whether or not and to what extent the claims may significantly affect the consolidated entity or its projects.
The consolidated entity has the following performance guarantees with the Minister for State Development:
| ML15/993 | $49,122.50 |
|---|---|
| ML16/309 | $26,460.00 |
| ML16/309 | $48,142.50 |
The total limit of the performance guarantee is $124,000 of which $ 275 is unused.
34. Subsequent Events
Other than those listed below there have been no subsequent events since balance date which would have had a significant effect of the Company's financial position.
On 14 August 2008, Barrick (Kalgoorlie Limited), Rand Mining NL and Tribune Resources NL signed an Indicative Term Sheet for the development of the Rubicon Project which includes Rubicon, Hornet and Pegasus deposits. The development of Rubicon will add a second underground mine to the East Kundana Joint Venture and complement current gold production from the Raleigh Project.
The development is subject to revised cash flow projects and entry into formal agreements as approved by the
Board of each of the participants.
35. Investment in Associate
| Consolidated | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | ||
| $ | $ | ||
| a) Movements in carrying amounts | |||
| Carrying amount at the beginning of the year | ‐ | ‐ | |
| Investment at cost | 7,331,951 | ‐ | |
| Share of profits after income tax | 1,034,299 | ‐ | |
| Share of increment on revaluation of investments | (151,868) | ‐ | |
| Carrying amount at the end of the financial year | 8,214,382 | ‐ | |
b) Summarised financial information of associates
The consolidated entity's share of the results of its principle associated and its aggregated assets and liabilities are as follows:
| Group's share of: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OwnershipInterest% | Assets | Liabilities | Revenues | Profit | |
| 2008 | |||||
| Tribune Resources NL* | 23.69 | 11,050,814 | 1,446,123 | 4,327,879 | 1,034,299 |
Tribune Resources NL is a listed entity and is incorporated in Australia
| Consolidated | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2008$ | 2007$ | |
| c) Fair value of listed investment in associate | ||
| Rand Mining NL | 24,444,003 | 9,053,131 |
| d) Contingent liabilities of associate | ||
| Share of contingent liabilities incurred jointly with other investors | ||
| ‐ | ‐ |
Rand Mining NL Directors Declaration
Rand Mining NL and its controlled entities ABN 41 004 669 658
Declaration by Directors
The directors of the Company declare that:
-
- The financial statements, comprising the income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement, statement of changes in equity and accompanying notes, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and;
- a) comply with Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
- b) give a true and fair view of the financial position as at 30 June 2008 and of the performance for the year ended on that date of the Company and the consolidated entity.
-
- In the directors' opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
-
- The remuneration disclosures included on pages 12 to 17of the directors' report (as part of the audited Remuneration Report); for the year ended 30 June 2008, comply with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.
-
- The directors have been given the declarations of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer required by section 295A.
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors and is signed for and on behalf of the directors by:
A Billis Director
DATED this 25 day of September 2008
______________________________________

Grant lhomton (wA) Paftiershlp ABN: 177353,14518 Level 1 10 Kings Park Road West Penh WA 6005 PO BOX 570 West Pedh WA 6872 T +61 894802000 F +6'| 8 9322 287 E admin€gtwa.mm.au
W wvw.grantlhornton,com.au
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the members of Rand Mlning NL
Report on the Financial Report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Rand Mining NL (the company) which comprises the balance sheet as at 3OJune 2008, and the income statemerit, statement of changes in equity and cash flow statement for the year ended on that date, a surnmary of significant accountingpolicies, other erplanatory notes and the dfuectots'declaration ofthe consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year's end ot from time to time during the financial year.
Dlrectors' Responslbility for the Financial Repott
The directors of the company ate responsible for the preparation and fak presentation of the finaflcial report in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Act 2001 . This tesponsibiJity includes establishing and maintaining internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report that is free.from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or ertot; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are teasonable in the circurnstances. In Note1, the dfuectors also state, in accordance vrith Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation oJFinancial Stalenents, that compliance with the Austalian equivalents to Intemational Financial Reporting Standards ensures that the f,nancial report, compdsing the ftnancial statements and notes, complies with Intetnational Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. !7e conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards tequLe that we ccimply with relwant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perfom the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the fnancialteport is fiee from matedal misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and discloswes in the financial teport. The procedures selected depend on the auditols
Liability limited by a scheme sppDved under Prolessional Standalds Legislation.
Gflfi Tlbffi Cr''rA) Pamld|b ls 4 in@ndsn bud@qililsdb bade unde.trp idsEiiqsl mm GEitThomton. Gfat Thrnon is a traddiaft md by G@l thomtor lngdidrd dd lsed utder t@ by ird€poded frc edqxilios trcuSlFd the wld

judgement, induding the assessment of the dsks of material misstatement of the financial tepot, whether due to ftaud or ertor. In making those risk assessrnents, the auditor considets internal control relevant to the entity's pteparation and fair presentation of the financial report in otder to design audit ptocedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's intemal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the dfuectors, as well as evaluating the ovetall presentation of the financial repon.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and apptopriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Electronic Presentation of Audited Financial Report
This auditor's report relates to the financial report of Rand Mining NL for the year ended 30 June 2008 included on the company's web site. The company's directors ate responsible for the integrity of its web site. 'We have not been engaged to report on the integrity of Rand Mining NL's web site. The auditor's report refers only to the statements named above. It does not provide an opinion on any other information which may have been hypedinked tof fuom these statements. If users of this teport ate concemed with the inherent risks arising from electronic data communications they ate advised to refer to the hard copy of the audited frnancial report to confirm the information induded in the audited ftnancial report presented on this web site
Independence
In conducting our audit, we complied with applicable independence requirements of the Corporatiou Act 2001 .
Audltoy's Opinion
In ott opinion;
- (a) the financial repot of Rand Mining NL is in accotdance with rhe Corporations Act 200l ,inctuding:
- i. gving a true and fair view of the company's and consolidated entity's frnancial position as at 3OJune 2008 and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and
- n. cornplying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Austraiian Acconnting Intelpretations) and the Corporations Reguktions 2001; and,
(b) th. frnancial report also complies with Intemational Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1.
Report on the Remuneration Report
'!7e have audited the Remuneration Report included in pagesl2 to 16 of the directors' repoft for the year ended 30 June 2008. The directors of the company are tesponsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporation: Act 2001 . Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on out audit conducted in accotdance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Liability limited by a sdleme approved under Prof$sional stil&rds Legislation.
GM Thmbn (WA) PatrE6lip is o ir@er$qt bugre$ edided b tade utds ttF intsfiBliod lw GEdlhdrto.

Audltoy's Opinion
In ow opinion the Remunetation Report of Rand Mining NL for the year ended 3OJune 2008, complies with section 300A of the Cotporatioxs Act 2001 .
Gr-s f},*r^^*.^ L^t) a*"m"*;p
GRANT THORNTON (WA) PARTNERSHIP Chartered Accountants
il, il,,,u,
P WWARR Partnet
Perth, 25 Septernber 2008
LiSilily limibd by a sdrems apgoved urder Pmfessional Slandads Legblation.








Rand Mining NL Shareholder Information
Distribution of ordinary shareholders at 10 September 2008:
| Total holders | |
|---|---|
| 1 – 1,000 | 248 |
| 1,001 – 5,000 | 179 |
| 5,001 – 10,000 | 59 |
| 10,001 – 100,000 | 72 |
| 100,001 and over | 28 |
| TOTAL | 586 |
Distribution of ordinary option holders at 10 September 2008:
| Total holders | |
|---|---|
| 1 – 1,000 | ‐ |
| 1,001 – 5,000 | ‐ |
| 5,001 – 10,000 | ‐ |
| 10,001 – 100,000 | ‐ |
| 100,001 and over | 4 |
| TOTAL | 4 |
Unmarketable Parcels at 10 September 2008:
| Minimum parcel size | Holders | Units | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum $ 500.00 parcel at $0.40 per unit | 1,250 | 257 | 111,099 |
Voting Rights
On a show of hands every member present or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll share shall have one vote.
Substantial Shareholders
The name of the substantial shareholders listed in the holding company's register as at 10 September 2008 are:
| Shareholder | Fully Paid | % Held | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary Shares | |||
| 1. | Tribune Resources NL | 8,317,364 | 20.51 |
| 2. | Trans Global Trust D O O | 7,899,584 | 19.47 |
| 3. | Lake Grace Exploration Pty Ltd | 2,917,000 | 7.19 |
| 4. | McNeil Nominees Pty Ltd | 2,335,615 | 5.76 |
| 5. | Sierra Gold Pty Ltd | 2,098,000 | 5.17 |
Stock Exchange Listing
Quotation has been granted for all the ordinary shares of the company on all Member Exchanges of the Australian Stock Exchange Limited
Twenty Largest Shareholders
The names of the twenty largest shareholders of ordinary fully paid shares in the capital of the company are listed below as at 10 September 2008.
Rand Mining NL Shareholder Information
| Name | Fully Paid Ordinary | % Held of Fully Paid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shares | Ordinary Shares | ||
| Tribune Resources NL | 8,317,364 | 20.51 | 1 |
| Trans Global Trust D O O | 7,899,584 | 19.47 | 2 |
| Lake Grace Exploration Pty Ltd | 2,917,000 | 7.19 | 3 |
| McNeil Nominees Pty Limited | 2,335,615 | 5.76 | 4 |
| Sierra Gold Pty Limited | 2,098,000 | 5.17 | 5 |
| Auriongold Limited | 1,950,240 | 4.81 | 6 |
| HKT Au Pty Ltd | 1,914,100 | 4.72 | 7 |
| Resource Capital Limited | 1,604,500 | 3.96 | 8 |
| Mr S Ilkiw | 1,020,000 | 2.51 | 9 |
| Dom Fund PIF | 1,000,000 | 2.47 | 10 |
| ANZ Nominees Limited | 855,933 | 2.11 | 11 |
| Southam Investments 2003 Pty Ltd | 780,000 | 1.92 | 12 |
| Dom Fond PIF DD | 673,250 | 1.66 | 13 |
| RBC Dexia Investor Services Australia | 600,000 | 1.48 | 14 |
| Nominees Pty Ltd | |||
| Raypoint Pty Ltd | 530,000 | 1.30 | 15 |
| Mr A Sage | 478,660 | 1.18 | 16 |
| Donlea Nominees Pty Ltd | 372,500 | 0.92 | 17 |
| Mr F Bozic | 250,000 | 0.62 | 18 |
| Mr W Feldhus | 245,750 | 0.61 | 19 |
| Mrs PYS Ay | 230,000 | 0.57 | 20 |
| Top 20 Shareholders | 36,072,496 | 88.93 | |
| Total Shares on Issue | 40,560,813 | 100.00 |
Rand Mining NL Shareholder Information
| Tenement Schedule | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project/Location | Tenement Number | Rand Interest | |||
| Kundana | |||||
| Kundana | M15/1413 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M15/993 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/181 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/182 | 12.25% | |||
| West Kundana | M16/213 | 12.25% | |||
| West Kundana | M16/214 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/218 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/308 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/309 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/310 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/325 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/326 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/421 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/424 | 12.25% | |||
| Kundana | M16/428 | 12.25% | |||
| Seven Mile Hill | |||||
| Kurrawang | M15/850 | 50.00% | |||
| Kurrawang | M26/563 | 50.00% | |||
| Binduli | M15/1233 | 50.00% | |||
| Seven Mile Hill | M15/1291 | 50.00% | |||
| Seven Mile Hill | M15/1234 | 50.00% | |||
| Binduli | M15/1388 | 50.00% | |||
| Seven Mile Hill | M15/1394 | 50.00% | |||
| Seven Mile Hill | M15/1409 | 50.00% | |||
| Kurrawang | P15/4495 | 50.00% | |||
| Kurrawang | PL15/5178 | 50.00% | |||
| Kurrawang | PL15/5179 | ||||
| Kurrawang | PL15/5180 | 50.00% | |||
| Kurrawang | M26/3616 | 50.00% | |||
| Kurrawang | E15/669 | 50.00% | |||
| Kalgoorlie | |||||
| Kalgoorlie | PL26/3047 | 80.00% | |||
| Kalgoorlie | PL26/3075 | 80.00% | |||
| Ashburton | |||||
| Ashburton | EL08/1616 | 100.00% | |||
| Ashburton | EL08/1617 | 100.00% | |||
| Ashburton | PL08/507 | 100.00% | |||