Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

QMINES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2022

Jul 3, 2022

65647_rns_2022-07-03_ae774322-4d45-4a3d-af4c-064aeab46b90.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Mt Chalmers Exploration Update

Highlights

4 July 2022

74 diamond and RC holes for 10,157m drilled completed since listing;

Wider than expected mineralised intersections reported in several drillholes;

Multiple wide intersections in recently reported drillholes demonstrate potential for significant resource upgrade including¹;

  • 61m @ 3.83 % CuEq (MCDD017)²
  • 67m @ 1.51 % CuEq (MCDD044)³
  • 69m @ 2.03 % CuEq (MCRC012)⁴

RC drilling scheduled to continue with 1,800 - 2,000m expected to be delivered each month;

Ten RC holes submitted for assay with results expected shortly.

³ ASX Announcement – Further Broad High-Grade Copper, Gold and Zinc Intersections at Mt Chalmers, 28 April 2022

¹ Individual grades presented in table 1.

² ASX Announcement – Multiple Wide High-Grade Intersections Outside Known Resource, 6 October 2021

⁴ ASX Announcement – More Outstanding Copper & Gold Results at Mt Chalmers, 16 June 2022

Overview

QMines Limited (ASX:QML) (QMines or Company) is pleased to provide the following update on recent diamond and RC drilling programs at its flagship Mt Chalmers copper and gold Project, located 17km north-east of Rockhampton in Queensland (Figure 1).

Infill and extensional drill holes in and around the Mt Chalmers resource have retuned several impressive mineralised zones since drilling commenced at the Mt Chalmers Project in March 2021. Outstanding results have been retuned in multiple diamond and RC drillholes with peak grades up to 38.8% CuEq in drill hole MCDD017. All CuEq results from QMines drill holes are now summarised in Table 1 with base and precious metal grades also shown.

Figure 1: Mt Chalmers Project, tenure, geology and infrastructure.

Management Comment

QMines Executive Chairman, Andrew Sparke, comments:

"The summary of our results to date clearly shows Mt Chalmers is the high quality copper and gold asset with strong growth potential. With over 10,000m drilled since listing we are now starting to see the upside potential of this asset.

The recent acquisition of the Company's RC drill rig is deliver significantly more metres drilled per month. We expect to deliver an additional 10,000 metres of RC results by November 2022 leading to our third resource upgrade and consistent new flow over this period."

Diamond and RC drilling has been ongoing at Mt Chalmers since drilling operations commenced in March 2021. The Company has completed approximately 5,900 metres of diamond and approximately 4,300 metres of RC drilling to date.

To accelerate RC drilling operations the Company made the decision to acquire an RC drill rig with support vehicles and equipment (Figure 2). Experienced drilling personnel were hired to manage, run and maintain the drilling equipment. QMines has also built a base of operations and workshops on site during January – March 2022 (Figure 3). The new RC rig commence drilling in April 2022 at the Mt Chalmers Project.

The Company is now reaping the benefits of this investment with an accelerated drill program and an increase in samples delivered to the laboratory for analysis. This has allowed the Company to move towards an upgraded resource at Mt Chalmers faster than would have otherwise been possible.

Figure 2: QMines RC drilling rig operating at the Mt Chalmers Project, June 2022.

Figure 3: QMines operating base, biodiesel storage, core yard and workshops constructed between January - March 2022.

Recent analysis has shown that some of the historical drilling was not analysed for precious metals or zinc. All drilling by QMines has been analysed for a broad suite of economic minerals including copper, gold, silver, lead and zinc. The infill drilling will not only improve confidence categories in the planned Mineral Resource Estimate, but also allow for better estimation of gold and silver.

Additional work is being undertaken to better understand the distribution and controls on gold mineralisation within the system as recent drilling has highlighted the potential for a late gold overprint.

Both QMines and historical drillholes can be seen in Figures 4 and 5, with Sections AA' and BB' shown in plan in Figures 7 and 8. Sections AA' and BB' show historical and recent QMines drillhole intersections displayed as copper equivalents.

The Mt Chalmers drilling program will continue with the Company planning to deliver a further 20,000 metres of RC drilling in line with the projects planned 30,000 metres of drilling. Investors can expect consistent news flow with results to be reported to the market on a regular basis.

Copper Equivalent Calculations

All Copper Equivalent (CuEq) figures included in this announcement are calculated based on the following formula:

CuEq (%) = (Cu grade x Cu recovery) + ((Pb grade x Pb recovery x Pb price)/Cu Price) + (Zn grade x Zn price x Zn recovery)/Cu price) + ((Au grade x Au price x Au recovery)/Cu price) + ((Ag grade x Ag price x Ag recovery)/Cu price).

  • All grades are converted to % and prices converted to $/t prior to calculating CuEq.
  • Commodity price used include: Au price of US$1,900/oz, Ag price of US$25/oz, Cu price of US$6,655/t, Pb price of US$2,450/t, and Zn price of US$3,450/t.
  • The following metallurgical recoveries have been applied: 97.0% Cu, 87% Au, 70.5% Ag, 85.0% Pb and 77.0% Zn.

It is the company's opinion that all the elements included in the metal equivalents calculation have a reasonable potential to be recovered and sold. CuEq with all results for base and precious metals that make up the CuEq are also shown. The CuEq formula uses the same metal price assumptions and metallurgical recovery grades used in the Company's recent resource upgrade delivered to the market in December 2021¹.

Figure 4: QMines and historical drillhole locations used in Sections AA' and BB'.

Figure 5: Section AA' mineralised CuEq intersections with revised wireframe and interpreted geology, June 2022.

Figure 6. Section BB' mineralised CuEq intersections with revised wireframe and interpreted geology, June 2022.

Updated Geological & Exploration Model

QMines is working on an improved geological and exploration model which will help guide future drill campaigns and resource estimates. The additional drilling together with the work completed by Dr Brett Davis is providing QMines with a more robust structural and geological model¹.

As previously mentioned, observations on gold distribution within Mt Chalmers are being investigated. Historic drilling which did not include analysis for Au and Ag in all drill holes has in the past hampered any investigations into the controls. The gold prospects on the property are thought to largely lie on a NE-SW to NNE-SSW trend named the Cawarral Gold Trend. It is not yet known if the gold in the Mt Chalmers mineral resource estimate is related solely to the VMS mineralisation, a late overprint, or a combination of both.

The model will continue to be adjusted as more information comes to hand. Of particular interest is how the gold-rich Exploration Targets² at Botos and Woods Shaft relate to Mt Chalmers.

Discussion

Kuroko-style mineralisation usually occurs as clusters of mineralised zones, which appears to be the case for Mt Chalmers, which may be only one of several deposits. In addition, the interpreted structural dislocation for the mine area may have caused the break-up of larger mineral bodies structurally dispersing lenses within the general Mt Chalmers area.

The geometry of the Mt Chalmers ore body indicates a relatively flat lying asymmetrical massive sulphide mound (Figure 7) with both historical and recent drilling results intersecting higher grade Cu-Au massive sulphides proximal to the centre of the deposit and high grade Pb, Zn, Ag in the massive sulphide and exhalate ore body distal from the centre of the orebody. Similar metal zoning has also been observed in the stringer/disseminated zone beneath the Massive Sulphide Ore Body where Cu-Au grades are typically higher in the centre and Pb, Zn, Ag grades typically higher distally and at greater depths.

A structural study of drillcore from holes drilled in early 2022 has found that the sulphide stringer zone (SSZ) is comprised of anastomosing and multidirectional sulphide veins, often present as breccia cement, with no clearly defined structural orientation. This is more typical of boiling zone architecture. Stringer sulphides are more highly concentrated at the top of the SSZ where they directly underlie the massive sulphide horizon. These findings suggest the massive sulphide horizon has at least in part resulted from the combined surface output of this widespread boiling zone and possibly more so than a single feeder pipe.

Historical drilling is largely constrained in and around the existing Mt Chalmers mine. The Company is extending drilling operations outside the existing wireframe with extensional and additional infill drilling. Recent mineralised intersections appear wider than historical intersections with current assay methods used in the ALS laboratory suggesting higher tenor and grade with precious and base metals. QMines geologists are delivering a significantly more robust geological model to be used in the next resource upgrade and will wireframe all base and precious metals prior to delivering our third mineral resource estimate.

¹ ASX Announcement – Further Broad High-Grade Copper, Gold & Zinc Intersections at Mt Chalmers, 23 November 2021.

Figure 7: Geological Long Section 5010E of the Mt Chalmers Main Lode (pre-mining), (Large & Both, 1980).

Geology

The geology of the Mt Chalmers area is relatively well-known with the Mt Chalmers mineralisation being identified as a well-preserved, volcanic-hosted massive sulphide ("VHMS") mineralised system containing copper, gold, zinc, lead and silver. Mineral deposits of this type are deemed syngenetic and formed contemporaneously on, or in close proximity to, the sea floor during the deposition of the host-rock units. The mineralisation is believed to have been deposited from hydrothermal fumaroles, or direct chemical sediments or sub-seafloor massive sulphide replacement zones and layers, together with footwall disseminated and stringer zones within the host volcanic and sedimentary rocks.

The mineralisation system at Mt Chalmers displays some similarities to Australian VHMS deposits of Cambro-Ordovician and Silurian age, however closer comparison can be made with the Kuroko-style of VHMS of Tertiary age in Japan (Taube 1990).

The Mt Chalmers mineralisation is situated in the early Permian Berserker Beds, which occur in the fault-bounded Berserker Graben, a structure 120km long and up to 15km wide. The graben is juxtaposed along its eastern margin with the Tungamull Fault and in the west with the Parkhurst Fault (Figure 1). The Berserker Beds lithologies consist mainly of acid to intermediate volcanics, tuffaceous sandstone and mudstone (Kirkegaard and Murray 1970). The strata are generally flat lying, but locally folded. Most common lithotypes are rhyolitic and andesitic lavas, ignimbrites or ash flow tuffs with numerous breccia zones.

Rocks of the Berserker Beds are weakly metamorphosed and, for the most part, have not been subjected to major tectonic disturbance, except for normal faults and localised high strain zones that are interpreted to have developed during and after basin formation. Recent geological work by the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines places volcanic and sedimentary units of the prospective Chalmers Formation, the host unit to the Mt Chalmers copper-gold mineralisation, at the base of the Berserker Beds.

The Ellrott Rhyolite and the Sleipner Member andesite were emplaced synchronously with the deposition of the Chalmers Formation. Late Permian to early Triassic gabbroic and dioritic intrusions occur parallel to the Parkhurst Fault. Smaller dolerite sills and dykes are common throughout the region and in the Berserker Beds.

Ongoing Exploration Activity

Ongoing drill programs for the planned +30,000m of RC and Diamond drilling;

Drilling to commence at the Woods Shaft prospect, the first of three Exploration Targets (JORC 2012);

Preparations underway to drill Tracker 3, the first of four large copper and zinc soil anomilies;

Planned 1,800-line kilometre Heli-EM survey to identify further drill targets; and

Third resource upgrade planned to be released in CY-2022.

Forward-Looking Statements

This document may include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning QMines Limited planned exploration program and other statements that are not historical facts. When used in this document, the words such as "could," "plan," "expect," "intend," "may", "potential," "should," and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Although QMines believes that its expectations reflected in these forward- looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource or a larger Mineral Resource.

Competent Person Statement

Exploration

The information in this document that relates to mineral exploration and exploration targets is based on work compiled under the supervision of Mr Glenn Whalan, a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Whalan is QMines' principal geologist and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves' (JORC 2012 Mineral Code). Mr Whalan consents to the inclusion in this document of the exploration information in the form and context in which it appears.

Hole ID MGAEast* MGANorth* mRL Dip MGAAzi* MaxDepth Mfrom Mto Int(m) Au(g/t) Ag(g/t) Cu(%) Pb(%) Zn(%) CuEq(%)
MCDD001 259849.4 7421092.2 103.2 -90 360 130 70.5 78 7.5 0.75 22.9 0.24 3.52 7.39 5.08
including 72.5 74.7 2.2 0.85 40.7 0.54 8.26 16.79 10.84
MCDD002 259867.1 7421101.3 102.8 -90 360 98.9 53.6 58 4.4 0.8 6.4 0.01 0.11 0.13 0.79
including 61.8 63.2 1.2 0.84 65 0.26 1.62 2.63 3.03
MCDD003 259810.9 7421102.4 104.7 -61 285 77.1 54.2 65 10.8 2.96 55.3 2.07 1.94 3.82 6.97
MCDD004 260052.2 7421250.3 137.6 -58.5 278 118.4 Hole Abandoned VOID
MCDD005 260045.5 7421220.0 139.4 -58.5 276 160.9 116 116 0.6 3.31 87.3 5.21 0.36 0.99 8.95
and 134 141 7.1 0.59 4 2.81 0.01 0.05 3.25
including 140 140 0.5 1.2 12.3 10.35 0.01 0.04 11.12
and 155 156 1 0.12 5.3 1.22 0.01 0.11 1.37
MCDD006 260052.6 7421304.5 125.3 -90 360 160 102 139 37.3 0.22 1.4 0.83 -0.01 0.02 1.00
including 114 116 2 0.61 8.8 4.96 0.03 0.1 5.42
MCDD007 260055.4 7421375.0 120.6 -55 286 170.7 131 160 28.55 1.43 3.5 1.98 -0.01 0.07 3.12
including 133 133 0.75 6.11 31.1 13.4 0.03 0.02 18.16
and 166 170 3.7 0.07 1.4 0.87 0.01 0.03 0.93
MCDD008 259729.3 7421247.4 92.2 -60 95 96.5 21.2 29.9 8.7 0.73 25.7 0.34 1.67 4.37 3.40
and 50.3 51.3 1 0.4 0.9 1.15 -0.01 0.03 1.45
and 56 65 9 0.32 0.4 0.63 0.02 0.02 0.88
and 71 79.5 8.5 1.13 5.2 2.13 0.03 0.07 3.05
and 87 88.3 1.3 0.56 3.4 1.08 0.04 0.06 1.56
MCDD009 259867.2 7421394.7 120.0 -55 99 147.8 143 144 1.3 2.87 17.4 11.7 0.09 0.11 13.86
MCDD010 260005.1 7421466.9 134.3 -90 360 189.7 139 154 15.2 2.36 1.3 0.67 -0.01 -0.01 2.54
including 152 154 2 9.31 2.4 1.34 -0.01 -0.01 8.75
and 165 166 1 0.81 5.5 2.81 0.03 -0.01 3.42
and 177 182 5 0.37 2.6 1.08 0.1 0.49 1.59
MCDD011 260090.1 7421457.2 124.4 -60 343 237.5 186 200 14.6 0.07 1.3 1.01 -0.01 0.01 1.05
and 205.9 222 16.1 NSR NSR 1.08 NSR NSR 1.05
MCDD012 259723.1 7421170.6 93.6 -90 360 51.3 14.3 40 25.7 0.42 5 0.47 NSR NSR 0.83
Including 14.3 17 2.7 1.13 20 1.92 NSR NSR 2.94
Including 23 24.4 1.4 1.48 23 0.96 NSR NSR 2.31
Including 28.7 30 1.3 0.9 7 1.75 NSR NSR 2.48
MCDD013 259823.5 7421297.4 110.6 -60 121 108.8 69.9 77.2 7.3 0.34 20 0.12 0.55 1.33 1.26
And 80 81 1 0.58 14 0.21 0.11 3.49 2.21
MCDD014 259770.8 7421305.1 104.3 -90 360 126.3 95 118.6 23.6 0.09 2 1.3 NSR NSR 1.35
Including 96.5 101 4.5 0.23 5 3.11 NSR NSR 3.24
Including 114.1 118.6 4.5 0.11 4 3.13 NSR NSR 3.16
MCDD015 259741.3 7421309.6 100.2 -90 360 125.8 104 120 16 0.57 1 2.18 NSR NSR 2.58
Including 111.6 118.2 7.2 1.11 2 4.15 NSR NSR 4.93
Including 114 116 2 2.41 4 10.1 NSR NSR 11.76
MCDD016 259786.6 7421377.6 120.1 -90 360 180.93 Hole Abandoned
MCDD017 259731.2 7421238.6 91.3 -60 96 93.1 6.2 33.8 27.6 0.86 21.4 0.48 1.53 3.93 3.38
Including 21.2 33.8 12.6 12.01 43 0.79 3.25 8.42 15.10
Including 48.4 49.2 0.8 41.51 6 5.85 NSR NSR 38.87
Including 53.5 55.5 2 22.92 4.7 2.65 NSR NSR 20.91
Including 58.67 60 1.33 26.6 7.2 6.1 NSR NSR 27.22
Including 48.4 67 18.6 6.84 2.6 1.69 NSR NSR 7.12
Within 6.2 67 60.8 2.59 11.1 0.74 0.71 1.81 3.83
Hole ID MGAEast* MGANorth* mRL Dip MGAAzi* MaxDepth Mfrom Mto Int(m) Au(g/t) Ag(g/t) Cu(%) Pb(%) Zn(%) CuEq(%)
MCDD018 259795.6 7421202.5 94.8 -55 309 110.3 35 36 1 0.37 2.5 1.85 NSR NSR 2.11
Including 48 49 1 0.38 3.6 1.26 NSR NSR 1.56
Including 63 64 1 7.21 1.8 1.41 NSR NSR 7.14
Including 71 72 2 10.69 1.8 4.67 NSR NSR 13.08
Including 91 101.5 10.5 1.3 5.2 1.93 NSR NSR 2.95
Within 63 101.5 38.5 1.22 2.3 0.76 NSR NSR 1.73
Within 35 101.5 66.5 0.8 2 0.54 NSR NSR 1.18
MCDD019 259673.4 7421136.9 92.9 -60 105 60.1 31 39.2 8.2 0.26 3.8 1 NSR NSR 1.21
MCDD020 259841.2 7421119.7 101.9 -55 295 72 49 57.6 8.6 1.98 36 0.2 1 2 3.19
MCDD021 259817.9 7421097.6 104.6 -55 330 78.7 47.5 63 15.5 0.47 42 0.4 2.3 3.9 3.40
Including 50 55 5 1.14 119 1.1 6.9 11.3 9.66
MCDD022 259839.3 7421064.9 106.9 -90 360 129.4 44 49 5 0.97 39 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.81
and 117 120 3 0.13 10 0.2 0.7 2.2 1.48
MCDD023 259860.8 7421067.6 106.9 -90 360 165.5 123 127 4 0.11 8.7 0.4 0.8 1.7 1.48
MCDD024 259903.5 7421064.2 110.9 -90 360 140.95 103 105 2 0.14 9.4 NSR 0.8 1.6 1.08
and 112 115 3 1.7 7.7 NSR 0.2 1.3 2.00
and 119.7 130 10.3 0.21 8.7 0.1 0.8 1.4 1.15
MCDD025 259947.8 7421054.9 109.6 -90 360 144.4 84 116.9 32.9 0.21 4.9 NSR 0.2 0.4 0.43
MCDD026 259932.1 7421104.4 103.7 -90 360 123.3 32 87.3 55.3 0.1 2 NSR NSR 0.3 0.22
MCDD027 260003.0 7421092.5 113.8 -90 360 132.5 105 114.1 9.1 0.15 3 0.4 NSR NSR 0.53
MCDD028 260013.0 7421040.6 124.6 -90 360 188.8 153.7 185 31.3 0.11 3 NSR NSR NSR 0.11
MCDD029 260048.9 7421284.6 125.6 -90 360 207.75 93.9 122 28.1 0.1 2 0.3 NSR NSR 0.39
MCDD030 260066.8 7421288.4 125.6 -90 360 166.4 96.4 131.7 35.3 2.75 4 1.4 NSR NSR 3.59
including 96.4 101.9 5.5 9.91 13 4 NSR NSR 11.90
MCDD031 260132.6 7421285.1 131.8 -90 360 200.0 166.3 168.4 2.1 NSR NSR 0.17 0.16 0.53 0.42
and 185 186 1 0.17 11 0.42 NSR NSR 0.64
MCDD032 260062.5 7421203.1 139.7 -90 360 154.84 Hole failed to reach target depth
MCDD033 260069.9 7421317.1 125.3 -90 360 157.1 130.8 149 18.2 0.09 2 0.53 NSR NSR 0.60
MCDD034 259962.0 7421162.0 91.7 -80 246 114.6 7.5 63.8 56.3 0.47 8.9 0.35 0.18 0.46 1.03
Including 7.5 9.4 1.9 0.67 26.6 0.81 1.17 2.47 2.90
including 29 32 3 0.72 17 1.03 0.33 NSR 1.82
MCDD035 259696.1 7421324.3 91.6 -90 360 138.3 No Significant Intersections
MCDD036 259692.3 7421313.1 91.6 -90 360 152.9 121.9 123.2 1.25 0.41 6 3.42 NSR NSR 3.70
MCDD037 259683.7 7421301.0 91.3 -90 360 159.1 121 145 24 NSR NSR 0.17 NSR NSR 0.16
including 123 124 1 0.12 2.2 0.9 NSR NSR 0.99
Including 144 145 1 0.1 2.6 0.87 NSR NSR 0.95
MCDD038 259970.0 7421174.0 91.7 -60 340 105.6 14.1 42 27.9 0.64 14.9 1.36 0.14 0.2 2.08
including 14.1 17.7 3.6 1.83 59.7 5.27 0.64 0.54 7.50
Including 28.7 31.7 3 0.69 19.9 2.44 NSR NSR 3.09
and 68.9 101 32.1 0.28 18.8 0.82 NSR 0.67 1.45
including 68.9 72 3.1 0.56 16.2 2.21 0.23 0.62 3.05
within 68.9 88 19.1 0.39 11 1.23 NSR 0.79 1.91
MCDD039 259964.0 7421172.0 91.7 -65 100 119.9 39 47 8 1.04 69.4 NSR 0.73 1.16 2.11
and 97.5 98.5 1 0.66 10.6 1.14 0.53 2.46 2.87
Hole ID MGAEast* MGANorth* mRL Dip MGAAzi* MaxDepth Mfrom Mto Int(m) Au(g/t) Ag(g/t) Cu(%) Pb(%) Zn(%) CuEq(%)
MCDD040 259965.0 7421172.0 91.7 -80 98 108.8 13 30.6 17.6 0.24 9.8 0.93 0.1 0.41 1.37
including 24 25 1 0.17 11.7 1.56 NSR 1.05 2.17
including 27.7 28.6 0.9 0.31 16.2 2.86 NSR NSR 3.16
and 58 100 42 0.1195 2.17 0.152 NSR 0.147 0.32
Including 85 87 2 0.21 5.5 0.72 0.16 0.55 1.18
MCDD041 259975.0 7421180.0 91.7 -60 56 113.2 55.9 58.3 2.4 0.47 26.3 NSR 0.51 1.28 1.27
and 77.1 87 9.9 0.118 NSR 0.461 NSR NSR 0.54
Including 83 85 2 0.21 2.6 1.39 NSR NSR 1.54
MCDD042 259970.0 7421179.0 91.7 -60 11 129.3 52 58 6 2.01 35 1.09 0.48 0.93 3.48
and 68 95 27 0.099 NSR 0.358 NSR NSR 0.43
Including 84.7 87.7 3 0.22 4 2.38 NSR NSR 2.52
MCDD043 259957.0 7421167.0 91.7 -58 191 99.7 10.5 42 31.5 0.4 11.2 0.33 0.31 0.82 1.16
including 10.5 17 6.5 0.37 18.8 0.44 0.65 1.55 1.70
including 34 36 2 1.03 18.5 0.57 0.46 1.37 2.22
MCDD044 259977.0 7421187.0 91.7 -45 328 154.9 39.5 106 66.5 0.51 5.9 0.86 0.11 0.45 1.51
Including 41.3 66 24.7 0.693 8.21 0.239 0.222 0.51 1.13
Including 49.7 51.5 1.8 2.22 25.2 0.67 0.63 1.49 3.43
Including 62 64 2 0.97 14.5 0.63 0.34 1.15 2.07
Including 73 81 8 1.34 6.8 4.08 NSR 0.5 5.29
within 73 94.2 21.2 0.7 5.9 2.14 NSR 0.6 2.92
Pre-Collar 018 259746.6 7421296.6 96.0 -90 360 57 38 48 10 0.45 21.1 0.21 1 3.43 2.42
MCRC001 260069.2 7421244.8 138.0 -60 279 142 107 114 7 2.9 119 0.1 3.3 13.7 9.93
MCRC002 259740.3 7421278.8 99.2 -60 99 131 38 51 13 0.44 14.6 0.31 0.42 1.26 1.41
and 77 80 3 0.18 4.2 1.32 NSR NSR 1.46
and 120 125 5 0.1 2.2 0.69 NSR NSR 0.77
MCRC003 259726.2 7421280.1 98.4 -60 99 131 72 75 3 0.63 5.6 1.97 NSR NSR 2.46
MCRC004 259708.2 7421253.0 96.6 -60 99 101 86 100 14 0.19 1.8 0.9 NSR NSR 1.04
MCRC005 259734.9 7421234.1 90.8 -60 99 15 Hole Abandoned
MCRC006 259904.8 7421115.4 102.5 -60 19 59 16 40 24 1.02 22.9 0.28 0.57 0.36 1.60
MCRC007 259886.4 7421114.7 102.3 -60 19 43 18 31 13 2.28 39.1 0.23 0.92 0.43 2.84
MCRC008 259876.4 7421113.8 102.1 -60 19 40 22 40 18 0.26 4.7 0.19 0.51 0.45 0.77
MCRC009 260060.0 7421439.0 124.0 -90 360 220 161 190 29 0.1 3.6 1.52 NSR NSR 1.58
including 161 163 2 0.28 10.5 3.98 NSR NSR 4.17
including 173 175 2 0.15 8.5 3.88 NSR NSR 3.96
including 179 181 2 0.12 4.7 3.53 NSR NSR 3.56
MCRC010 260007.0 7421423.0 125.0 -90 360 134 113 134 21 0.44 1.9 2.32 NSR NSR 2.62
including 119 127 8 0.78 2.8 4.2 NSR NSR 4.72
MCRC011 259918.0 7421418.0 126.0 -90 360 170 188 212 24 0.07 1.3 1.27 NSR NSR 1.30
and 132 148 16 0.21 7.3 0.09 0.61 1.55 1.13
including 136 138 2 0.52 16.1 0.28 2.25 6.82 4.25
MCRC012 260022.0 7421435.0 124.0 -70 10 215 137 206 69 0.55 2.5 1.62 NSR NSR 2.03
including 137 153 16 0.75 6.2 4.6 NSR NSR 5.11
including 157 159 2 0.9 3.6 4.03 NSR NSR 4.66
including 163 167 4 2.34 3.5 2.09 NSR NSR 3.93
and 172 174 2 3.86 2.4 1.13 NSR NSR 4.20
Hole ID MGAEast* MGANorth* mRL Dip MGAAzi* MaxDepth Mfrom Mto Int(m) Au(g/t) Ag(g/t) Cu(%) Pb(%) Zn(%) CuEq(%)
MCRC013 260098.0 7421457.0 124.0 -90 360 205 150 168 18 0.1 3.3 0.6 NSR NSR 0.69
MCRC014 260128.7 7421415.5 125.6 -80 280 205 165 178 13 0.06 2 1.22 NSR NSR 1.25
MCRC015 260103.0 7421479.0 124.0 -75 280 214 153 163 10 0.43 3 0.98 NSR NSR 1.32
MCRC016 260090.5 7421392.4 125.5 -72 280 178 144 156 12 0.06 1 0.48 NSR NSR 0.52
MCRC017 259742.0 7421294.0 100.0 -90 360 150 25 40 15 0.22 19.5 0.12 0.9 3.36 2.08
and 76 116 40 0.802 NSR 0.568 NSR NSR 1.19
Including 79 83 4 0.05 1.8 1.47 NSR NSR 1.48
Including 107 116 9 3.38 1 1.38 NSR NSR 4.05
MCRC018 259795.0 7421300.5 104.0 -90 360 155 64 92 28 0.1657 8.682 0.442 0.336 0.626 0.99
Including 64 76 12 0.22 15 0.1 0.68 1.23 1.10
Including 84 92 8 0.13 4.8 1.37 NSR NSR 1.47
MCRC019 259806.0 7421310.0 107.5 -60 180 140 64 78 14 1.6 33.3 0.36 1.1 1.82 2.98
MCRC020 259854.0 7421356.0 104.0 -90 360 100 84 95 11 0.24 30.2 0.03 0.16 0.42 0.70
and 145 147 2 0.17 3.1 0.94 NSR NSR 1.07
MCRC021 259821.0 7421316.0 103.0 -65 80 125 Assays Pending
MCRC022 259722.0 7421272.0 98.0 -90 360 125 Assays Pending
MCRC023 259687.0 7421233.0 95.0 -65 90 115 Assays Pending
MCRC024 259673.0 7421235.0 95.0 -70 90 130 Assays Pending
MCRC025 259647.0 7421203.0 93.0 -60 120 100 Assays Pending
MCRC026 259731.0 7421209.0 103.0 -90 360 110 Assays Pending
MCRC027 259710.0 7421189.0 103.0 -90 360 85 Assays Pending
MCRC028 260017.0 7421434.0 124.0 -70 350 220 Assays Pending
MCRC029 260107.0 7421524.0 136.0 75 5 215 Assays Pending
MCRC030 260113.0 7421529.0 136.0 75 340 194 Assays Pending

Table 1: Significant intercepts from QMines drilling at Mt Chalmers to date.*

*Note MGA 94_56

  • In reported exploration results, length weighted averages are used for any non-uniform intersection sample lengths. Length weighted average is (sum product of interval x corresponding interval assay grade), divided by sum of interval lengths and rounded to two decimal points.
  • No top cuts have been considered in reporting of grade results, nor was it deemed necessary for the reporting of significant intersections.
  • NSR = No Significant Result
  • * Downhole intersections contained in this announcement in the vertical drill holes reported, represent true widths of the assayed mineralised intersections contained in Table 1.
  • * Downhole intersections contained in the announcement in drill holes at ~60-degree dip represent approximately 87% true width of the assayed mineralised intersections contained in Table 1.

About QMines

QMines Limited (ASX:QML) is a Queensland based copper and gold exploration and development company. QMines vision is to become Australia's first zero carbon copper and gold developer. The Company owns 100% of four advanced projects covering a total area of 1,096km². The Company's flagship project, Mt Chalmers, is located 17km North East of Rockhampton.

Mt Chalmers is a high-grade historic mine that produced 1.2Mt @ 2.0% Cu, 3.6g/t Au and 19g/t Ag between 1898-1982. Mt Chalmers has a Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resource (JORC 2012) of 5.8Mt @ 1.7% CuEq for 101,000t CuEq¹.

QMines' objective is to grow its Resource base, consolidate assets in the region and assess commercialisation options. The Company has commenced an aggressive exploration program (+30,000m) providing shareholders with significant leverage to a growing Resource and exploration success.

Projects & Ownership

Mt Chalmers (100%) Silverwood (100%) Warroo (100%) Herries Range (100%)

QMines Limited

ACN 643 212 104

Directors & Management

ANDREW SPARKE Executive Chairman

ELISSA HANSEN (Independent) Non-Executive Director & Company Secretary

PETER CARISTO (Independent) Non-Executive Director (Technical)

JAMES ANDERSON General Manager Operations

GLENN WHALAN

Exploration Geologist (Competent Person – Exploration)

Shares on Issue

113,672,748

Unlisted Options

4,200,000 ($0.375 strike, 3 year term)

Compliance Statement

With reference to previously reported Exploration results and mineral resources, the Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. The company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.

This announcement has been approved and authorised by the Board of QMines Limited.

QMines Limited (ASX:QML)

Contact

Registered Address: Suite J, 34 Suakin Drive, Mosman NSW 2088 Postal Address: PO BOX 36, Mosman NSW 2088 Website: www.qmines.com.au

Telephone: +61 (2) 8915 6241 Email: [email protected] Peter Nesveda, Investor Relations Email: [email protected] Andrew Sparke, Executive Chairman Email: [email protected]

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Mt Chalmers Mineral Resources

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Samplingtechniques •Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels,random chips, or specific specialised industrystandard measurement tools appropriate to theminerals under investigation, such as down holegamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).These examples should not be taken aslimiting thebroad meaning of sampling.•Include reference to measures taken to ensuresamplerepresentivityandtheappropriatecalibration of any measurement tools or systemsused.•Aspects of the determination of mineralisation thatare Material to the Public Report.•In cases where 'industry standard' work has beendone this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reversecirculation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samplesfrom which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 gcharge for fire assay'). In other cases,moreexplanation may be required, such as where there iscoarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g.submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure ofdetailed information. •QMINES continued drilling operations at Mt Chalmers,drilling 9 reverse circulation percussion (RC) holes for 1,711metres.•RC samples were collected at 1m intervals from an on-rigcyclone cone splitter with 2-3kg, or approximately 10% ofthe split sample saved in calico bags with the exceptionof duplicate samples with each being 1-2kg, orapproximately 5% of the total sample.•During the course of drilling, to avoid contamination, fourindividual calicos were placed in polyweave bags andsealed for delivery to the assay lab. Samples were sent byroad to ALS Laboratories in Brisbane, crushed, pulverisedand riffle split delivering 200g pulp for base metal andprecious metal assay.
Drillingtechniques •Drill type (e.g.core, reverse circulation, open-holehammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc)and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard •RC drilling was completed by the company's KWLRC350rig with booster and auxiliary compressor and using 5m,102mm diameter RC rods and a 143mm percussion face

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit orother type, whether core is oriented and if so, by whatmethod, etc). sampling hammer.
Drillsamplerecovery •Method of recording and assessing core and chipsample recoveries and results assessed.•Measures taken to maximise sample recovery andensure representative nature of the samples.•Whether a relationship exists between samplerecovery and grade and whether sample bias mayhave occurred due to preferential loss/gain offine/coarse material. •Rock chips from each RC metre were collected in chiptrays and logged.•Over 95% of RC samples were dry with the remainingsamples beingwet samples close to the end of holeMCRC010 below the water table. This hole wasabandoned in mineralisation due to possible loss ofsulfides from saturated samples. Drilling techniques havesince improved to allow for almost entirely dry samples.•Drilling methods were consistent with current industrypractices.
Logging •Whether core and chip samples have beengeologically and geotechnically logged to a level ofdetail to support appropriate Mineral Resourceestimation,miningstudiesandmetallurgicalstudies.•Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative innature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.•The total length and percentage of the relevantintersections logged. •All drilling was competently logged by Companygeologists with all logging data digitised electronicallyinto a Panasonic Toughbook.•Loggingcodeswereestablishedpriortocommencement of drilling operations by H & SConsultants and are a mixture of quantitative andqualitative data.•Geological information consists of lithology descriptions,alteration, mineralisation, veining, weathering etc.•All data is available in a digital format.•All chip trays have been digitally photographed andstored in the Company NAS drive.
Sub-samplingtechniquesandsamplepreparation •If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,half or all core taken.•If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split,etc and whether sampled wet or dry.•For all sample types, the nature, quality andappropriatenessofthesamplepreparationtechnique. •RC samples were collected from a cyclone with a conesplitter delivering 10% representative sampling per linearmetre drilled. Duplicate samples were collected every 25m and 75 m drilled in the drilling sequence with duplicatesamples being a 50-50% split sample from the same conesplitter.•ALS Laboratories dry the samples prior to crushing and

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
•Quality control procedures adopted for all subsampling stages to maximise representivity ofsamples.•Measures taken to ensure that the sampling isrepresentative of the in-situ material collected,includingforinstanceresultsforfieldduplicate/second-half sampling.•Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grainsize of the material being sampled. pulverising. All sample material from each RC samplesubmission is crushed and pulverized to a nominal 90%passing 75 µm giving a 200 g representative sample fromwhich a sub-sample of 30 g is taken for base metalanalysis and a 50 g charge for gold.
Qualityofassaydataandlaboratorytests •The nature, quality and appropriateness of theassaying and laboratory procedures used andwhether the technique is considered partial or total.•For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRFinstruments,etc,theparametersusedindetermining the analysis including instrument makeand model, reading times, calibrations factorsapplied and their derivation, etc.•Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratorychecks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy(i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. •All samples for assay were submitted to ALS Laboratoriesin Brisbane.•Ag, As, Ba, Cu, Pb, S and Zn were determined by ALS (MEICP61) by ICP-AES on a four-acid digest. Au wasdetermined using ALS method AA25 (fire assay with AASon a 30g pulp). Sample preparation and base metalanalysis was undertaken in Brisbane and Fire Assayundertaken by ALS in Townsville.•The Company submits batches to ALS from drillprograms as they come to hand. Reporting on QAQCresults for all drillhole samples submitted betweenFebruary 2021 and November 2021 has been undertakenby Lisa Orr of Orr and Associates, who found that QMines'QAQC is consistent with current industry practice for adrill program.•Duplicate samples of cone splits are inserted at 50mintervalsandareutilisedtomonitorlaboratoryreproducibility. With coefficients of variation under 31%there is no significant bias in assayed results fromduplicates assayed.•Certified Reference Materials (CRM) are supplied byOREAS and GEOSTATS Pty Ltd and are inserted at 20mintervals with suitable CRMs being used to monitorlaboratory accuracy. With252 out of 265 CRMs reporting

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
within 3 standard deviations of certified values a successrate of 95.1% was achieved.•Blank samples of barren gravel are inserted at 33mintervals.•Internal laboratory QAQC reports are delivered by ALSwith certification of assay method used and certifiedassay results. These results are delivered to the principalgeologist, database manager and the Company
Verification ofsampling andassaying •The verification of significant intersections by eitherindependent or alternative company personnel.•The use of twinned holes.•Documentationofprimarydata,dataentryprocedures, data verification, data storage (physicaland electronic) protocols.•Discuss any adjustment to assay data. •Since early 2021, all documentation and digitisation ofdata has been undertaken by the company databasemanager, Lisa Orr of Orr and Associates. The drill holedatabase is stored as an Access database and housedindependently in an external NAS drive and backed upin a cloud storage system.
Locationofdata points •Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mineworkings and other locations used in MineralResource estimation.•Specification of the grid system used.•Quality and adequacy of topographic control. •QMines has implemented a complete conversion by localmine surveyors of all historical drill collar surveys and localgridding utilised by previous explorers. The local work hasbeen validated by MINECOMP Surveying.•Conversion has been from local grids to GDA 94 MGAZone 56.•All drill hole collars listed in this release were picked up byhand held GPS with accuracy of +/-3m and these will belater picked up by and validated by the site surveyors.•The Company has flown a Digital Terrain Model (DTM)using drone survey technology.•The quality and accuracy of the DTM has been validatedand processed independently of the data capture byMINECOP Surveying.
Data spacinganddistribution •Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.•Whether the data spacing and distribution issufficient to establish the degree of geological andgrade continuity appropriate for the Mineral •The drill programs have been designed to validatehistorical drill hole data, expand the resource envelopeand make new discoveries.•Line and drill hole spacing is not applicable

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)and classifications applied.•Whether sample compositing has been applied. •No composite sampling has been applied
Orientation ofdatainrelationtogeologicalstructure •Whether the orientation of sampling achievesunbiased sampling of possible structures and theextent to which this is known, considering the deposittype.•If the relationship between the drilling orientationand the orientation of key mineralised structures isconsidered to have introduced a sampling bias, thisshould be assessed and reported if material. •The deposit is generally flat-lying and most drillholes arevertical to give an optimal intersection angle withmineralisation.•Angled holes from the current program have beenoriented to reach otherwise inaccessible targets.•Downhole intersections contained in this announcementin drill holesat for example ~60-degree dip representapproximately 87% true width of the assayed mineralisedintersections contained in Table 1 of this announcement.•There is no obvious sampling bias with the drillingorientation
Samplesecurity •The measures taken to ensure sample security. •Samples were collected directly from the cone splitterinto individual numbered calico sample bags, then 4calico bags are inserted into polyweave bags, sealed andtied. Polyweave bags were numbered in sequence andplaced in large bulka bags.•The bulka bags were then delivered by Company staff toa commercial freight depot in Rockhampton andshipped directly to the ALS Laboratory in Brisbaneovernight.
Auditsorreviews •The results of any audits or reviews of samplingtechniques and data. •Sampling techniques were established by the Companygeologist. Results were reviewed and validated by theCompany database geology manager.•Exploration results are not audited independently

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineraltenementandlandtenure status •Type,referencename/number,locationandownership including agreements or material issueswiththirdpartiessuchasjointventures,partnerships,overridingroyalties,nativetitleinterests, historical sites, wilderness or national parkand environmental settings.•The security of the tenure held at the time ofreporting along with any known impediments toobtaining a licence to operate in the area. •QMines Pty Ltd has two 100% owned subsidiaries, DynastyGold Pty Ltd and Rocky Copper Pty Ltd, through which theCompany has a 100% beneficial interest in the Mt ChalmersProject. The Mt Chalmers Project is held in EPM 25935 andEPM 27428 located 25 kilometres east of the City ofRockhampton in coastal central Queensland, Australia. Theproject covers an area of historic gold and copper mining,which comprises an area of 198 km2.•The Project is free and unencumbered by either jointventures or any other equity participation of the tenement.•QMines has yet to negotiate any landowner provisions orGovernment royalties or yet to commence environmentalstudies within the project area. Currently the QueenslandDepartment of Natural Resources & Mines is conductingremediation works on minor acid mine waste draining froma mineralised mullock dump.•All the tenements are for "all minerals" excepting coal.•Note that the granted tenements allow QMines to carry outmany of their planned drilling programs under relevantaccess procedures applying to each tenement.•All the EPMs are subject to the Native Title ProtectionConditions with respect to Native Title.•Declared Irrigation Areas, Declared Catchment Areas,Declared Drainage Areas, Fossicking Areas and State Forestare all land classifications that restrict exploration activity.These do not affect QMines' main prospects but may haveimpacts on regional programs in places.•All annual rents and expenditure conditions havebeen paidand QMines has been fully compliant

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Explorationdonebyother parties •Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration byother parties. •INAL, CEC and Geopeko were generally recognized ashighly competent exploration companies that usedappropriate techniques for the time. Written logs andhardcopy sections of their work are considered good.•Federation was a small explorer that was entirely focussedon defining the Mt Chalmers resource. They used a verycompetent geologist, Alex Taube, for the drilling program.Alex Taube is widely respected for his knowledge aboutVHMS deposits in North Queensland
Geology •Deposit type, geological setting and style ofmineralisation. •The Mt Chalmers mineralization is situated in the earlyPermian Berserker Beds, which occur in the fault-boundedBerserker Graben, a structure 120 km long and up to 15 kmwide. The graben is juxtaposed along its eastern marginwith the Tungamull Fault and in the west, with theParkhurst Fault.•The Berserker Beds consist mainly of acid to intermediatevolcanics, tuffaceous sandstone and mudstone (Kirkegaardand Murray 1970). The strata are generally flat lying, butlocally folded. Most common are rhyolitic and andesiticlavas, ignimbrites or ash flow tuffs with numerous brecciazones.RocksoftheBerserkerBedsareweaklymetamorphosed and, for the most part, have not beensubjected to major tectonic disturbance, except for normalfaults that are interpreted to have developed during andafter basin formation.•Late Permian to early Triassic gabbroic and dioriticintrusions occur parallel to the Parkhurst Fault. Smallerdolerite sills and dykes are common throughout the regionand the Berserker Beds.•ResearchershaveshownthattheMtChalmersmineralization is a well-preserved, volcanic-hosted massive-

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
sulphide ("VHMS –Kuroko style") mineralized systemcontaining zinc, copper, lead, gold and silver. Mineraldeposits of this type are syngenetic and formedcontemporaneously on, or in close proximity to, the sea floorduring the deposition of the host-rock units deposited fromhydrothermal fumaroles, direct chemical sediments orreplacements(massivesulphides),togetherwithdisseminated and stringer zones within these host rocks.•The oldest rocks in the area, the 'footwall sequence' ofpyritic tuffs, are seen only in the Mt Chalmers open pit andin drill holes away from the mine. The rock is usually a lightcoloured eutaxitic tuff with coarse fragments, mainly ofchert, porphyritic volcanics and chloritic fiamme (fiammeare aligned, "flame-like" lenses found in welded ignimbriteand other pyroclastic rocks and indicate subaerialdeposition. Eutaxitic texture, the layered or banded texturein this unit, is commonly caused by the compaction andflattening of glass shards and pumice fragments aroundundeformedcrystals).Thealteration(silicification,sericitization and pyritization) of this basal unit becomesmore intense close to mineralization.•The'mineralizedsequence'overlyingthe'footwallsequence' consists mainly of tuffs, siltstones and shales andcontains stratiform massive sulphide mineralization andassociated exhalites: thin barite beds, chert and occasionallyjasper, hematitic shale and thin layers of beddeddisseminated sulphides. Dolomite has been recorded in themineralized sequence close to massive sulphides. Thissequence represents a hiatus in volcanic activity and aperiod of water-lain deposition.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
•The 'hanging wall sequence' is a complex bedded series ofunaltered crystal and lithic rhyolitic tuffs and sedimentswith breccia zones and occasional chert and jasper.•A mainly conformable body of andesite, ranging from 10 mto 250 m thick, intrudes the sequence; it usually occurs justabove the 'mineralized sequence'. A quartz-feldsparporphyry body intrudes the volcanic sequence and in placesintrudes the andesite.•The rocks in the mine area are gently dipping, about 20o tothe north in the Main Lode mine area and similarly dippingsouth at the West Lode: the predominant structure is abroad syncline trending north-north-west. Slaty cleavage isstrongly developed in some of the rocks, notably insediments and along fold axes. Such cleavage is prominentin areas close to the mineralization.•Doming of the rocks close to the mineralization has beeninterpreted by detailed work in the open cut to be largelydue to localized horst block-faulting (Taube 1990), but thedoming might also be a primary feature in part. Steep dipsare localized and usually the result of block faulting. TheMain Lode outcrop and West Lode outcrop are variablysilicified rocks which, by one interpretation, may have beenpushed up through overlying rocks in the manner of a MontPelée spine (Taube 1990), but in any case, form a dome ofrhyolite / high level intrusions of the Ellrott Rhyolite. Thesurrounding mineralized horizon is draped upon the flanksof domal structures.
DrillholeInformation •A summary of all information material to theunderstanding of the exploration results including atabulation of the following information for allMaterial drill holes: •Exploration Results are reported in the body of the relevantannouncements in Table 1

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
easting and northing of the drill hole collaroelevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation aboveosea level in metres) of the drill hole collardip and azimuth of the holeodown hole length and interception depthohole length.o•If the exclusion of this information is justified on thebasis that the information is not Material and thisexclusion does not detract from the understandingof the report, the Competent Person should clearlyexplain why this is the case.
Dataaggregationmethods •InreportingExplorationResults,weightingaveraging techniques, maximum and/or minimumgrade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) andcut-off grades are usually Material and should bestated.•Where aggregate intercepts incorporate shortlengths of high grade results and longer lengths oflow grade results, the procedure used for suchaggregation should be stated and some typicalexamples of such aggregations should be shown indetail.•The assumptions used for any reporting of metalequivalent values should be clearly stated. •In reported exploration results, length weighted averagesare usedfor any non-uniform intersection sample lengths.Length weighted average is (sum product of interval xcorresponding interval assay grade), divided by sum ofinterval lengths and rounded to two decimal points.•No top cuts have been considered in reporting of graderesults, nor was it deemed necessary for the reporting ofsignificant intersections.•No metal equivalent values have been reported.•Mt Chalmers VHMS is a polymetallic base and preciousmetal mineral system, cut off grades used by the Companyincalculating mineralized intersections are 2,500 ppm Cu,0.1 ppm Au and 1 ppm Ag, 0.5% Zn and 0.5% Pb.•Metal Rice Assumptions and Recovery data used incalculating the Copper Equivalent has been reported to themarket in December 2021 and is contained in the MtChalmers Resource Upgrade Report and can be seen on theCompany Websitehttps://wcsecure.weblink.com.au/pdf/QML/02460632.pdf
Relationshipbetween •These relationships are particularly important in the • At Mt Chalmers, the drilling has generally intersected themineralization at high angles.

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
mineralisation widths andinterceptlengths reporting of Exploration Results.•If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect tothe drill hole angle is known, its nature should bereported.•If it is not known and only the down hole lengths arereported, there should be a clear statement to thiseffect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not known'). •The majority of holes drilled at Mt Chalmers Copper Projectare vertical in nature.•Holes drilled on other dips are reported in the SignificantIntercepts table. True widths in e.g. 60-degree dipping holesare not reported. True width at 60 degrees is approximately87% of the down hole intersection.
Diagrams •Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) andtabulations of intercepts shouldbe included for anysignificant discovery being reported These shouldinclude, but not be limited to a plan view of drill holecollar locations and appropriate sectional views. •Maps, sections, mineralized intersections, plans and drillcollar locations are included in the body of the relevantannouncement.
Balancedreporting •Where comprehensive reporting of all ExplorationResults is not practicable, representative reporting ofboth low and high grades and/or widths should bepracticedtoavoidmisleadingreportingofExploration Results. •Table 1in the body of the announcement
Othersubstantiveexplorationdata •Other exploration data, if meaningful and material,should be reported including (but not limited to):geological observations; geophysical survey results;geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size andmethod of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulkdensity,groundwater,geotechnicalandrockcharacteristics;potentialdeleteriousorcontaminating substances. •CEC and Geopeko completed some brownfields explorationto assist with defining the resource including InducedPolarization surveys and Sirotem (electromagnetic method)surveys.•Federationconcentratedondefiningtheresourceestimates.•No other exploration data is considered meaningful at thisstage.•In 2021 QMines digitized the results of soil geochemicalgrids obtained from the Geological Survey of Queenslandconsisting of 19,000 samples collected by various workersfor its use in ongoing target generation.•INAL completed greenfields exploration in the 1960's and

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
1970's. Exploration included geological mapping, soil androck chip sampling, costeaning and rotary percussiondrilling
Further work •The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g.tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions orlarge-scale step-out drilling).•Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possibleextensions,includingthemaingeologicalinterpretations and future drilling areas, providedthis information is not commercially sensitive. •Infill and resource expansion drilling is being undertaken toupgrade and potentially expand the current resourceestimates.