Investor Presentation • Feb 26, 2014
Investor Presentation
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Preliminary year-end results 2013 Investor presentation
26 February 2014
GWP + 16 % CR ~ 90%
30 – 50% of profit after tax Target solvency margin > 250%
Protector share
Data pr. 14.02.2014
Claims ratio 2009 - 2013
¹ Exclusive claims handling expenses, 5.0 percentage points (5.0 percentage points)
² Exclusive claims handling expenses, 6.6 percentage points (6.6 percentage points)
¹ Inclusive claims handling expenses, 5.0 percentage points (5.0 percentage points) ² Inclusive claims handling expenses, 6.6 percentage points (6.6 percentage points)
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRF | 11,2 % | 12,1 % | 11,9 % | 10,0 % | 7,7 % | 8,8 % |
| Top* | 14,7 % | 14,9 % | 15,4 % | 15,7 % | 15,8 % | 16,2 % |
| Gjensidige | 17,0 % | 17,7 % | 16,5 % | 16,4 % | 15,5 % | 15,3 % |
| Tryg | 17,1 % | 17,2 % | 17,0 % | 16,6 % | 16,4 % | 15,6 % |
| If | 17,4 % | 17,6 % | 17,2 % | 17,3 % | 16,9 % | 16,8 % |
| Codan* | 20,2 % | 20,4 % | 19,9 % | 21,5 % | 22,4 % | 20,9 % |
| LF | 21,0 % | 22,0 % |
22,0 % | 21,0 % | 21,0 % | 19,0 % |
| KLP* | 26,7 % | 29,1 % | 30,4 % | 26,5 % | 26,4 % | 25,1 % |
KLP, Top – pr. Q3 2013, Codan – pr. Q2 2013
• Protector's low cost ratio is driven by cost effective operations in all areas (sales, UW, services, IT and admin.)
GWP Q4 2009 – Q4 2013 (NOKm)
8
Protector receives the highest score when brokers are asked to rank insurance companies according to how satisfied they are with their service and offerings
Protector receives the highest score when brokers are asked to rank insurance companies according to how satisfied they are with their service and offerings
First survey, few respondents
High real estate market turnover rate
Good profitability
GWP Q4 2009 – Q4 2013 (NOKm)
What is the value of COI for your client?
What is the value of COI for you as a real estate broker?
When asked for your opinion on Protector, to what extent will you speak of the company in positive terms?
What is the probabilty of you recommending COI from Protector to your next client?
To what extent has Protector met your expectations to the
How satisfied are you with Protector as a supplier of COI?
| NOKm | Q4 2013 | Q4 2012 | FY 2013 | FY 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premiums written gross | 237,7 | 198,2 | 1 860,6 | 1 517,0 |
| Premiums earned gross | 468,4 | 375,6 | 1 814,6 | 1 464,2 |
| Claims incurred gross | (362,4) | (327,1) | (1 450,6) | (1 171,0) |
| Premiums earned for own account | 352,5 | 279,5 | 1 373,6 | 1 107,4 |
| Claims incurred for own account | (291,9) | (259,3) | (1 133,5) | (940,1) |
| Operating costs for own account | (36,0) | (23,8) | (56,9) | (14,2) |
| Other income/costs | (1,8) | (0,7) | (9,5) | (5,0) |
| Net financial income | 83,9 | 61,2 | 256,7 | 245,6 |
| Profit before change in security provision etc. | 106,6 | 56,9 | 430,3 | 393,7 |
| Change in security provision etc. | 19,6 | (96,7) | (54,8) | (146,5) |
| Profit after change in security provision etc. | 126,2 | (39,8) | 375,5 | 247,1 |
| Tax | (32,4) | 13,5 | (88,5) | (48,4) |
| Profit before comprehensive income | 93,8 | (26,3) | 287,0 | 198,8 |
| Comprehensive income | (1,5) | 8,9 | 5,7 | 8,9 |
| Profit for the period | 92,3 | (17,4) | 292,6 | 207,7 |
| Net claims ratio | 82,8 % | 92,8 % | 82,5 % | 84,9 % |
| Net expense ratio | 10,2 % | 8,5 % | 4,1 % | 1,3 % |
| Net combined ratio | 93,0 % | 101,3 % | 86,7 % | 86,2 % |
| Retention rate | 75,3 % | 74,4 % | 75,7 % | 75,6 % |
Note:
Net claims ratio = claims incurred for own account / NPE
Net expense ratio = (sales costs + admin costs + commission on reinsurance ceded)/NPE
Retention rate = NPE in % of GPE
15 • 23% growth, net combined ratio 86.7%
| NOKm | 31.12.2013 | 31.12.2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | 3 999,8 | 3 192,8 |
| Bank deposits | 153,3 | 141,9 |
| Other assets | 590,9 | 430,9 |
| Total assets | 4 744,1 | 3 765,6 |
| Total equity | 777,2 | 583,7 |
| Subordinated loan capital | 148,1 | 148,1 |
| Total reserves | 3 368,8 | 2 748,0 |
| Other liabilities | 450,0 | 285,8 |
| Total equity and liabilities | 4 744,1 | 3 765,6 |
| Solvency capital | 1 335,3 | 1 087,0 |
| Return on solvency capital, after tax | 28 % | 38 % |
| Solvency capital per share, end of period | 16,2 | 13,2 |
| Solvency ratio | 93 % | 93 % |
| Solvency margin | 315 % | 304 % |
| Capital adequacy ratio (risk weighted) | 20 % | 20 % |
| NAV | 1 179,0 | 946,0 |
| NAV per share, end of period | 14,3 | 11,5 |
Note:
Solvency Capital = shareholder's funds + security provision etc.
Return on solvency capital: Operating profit after tax /average solvency capital
Solvency ratio = solvency capital / NPW
Solvency margin calculated according to regulations from the FSA of Norway.
NAV = total equity pluss 72% of the total security provision etc.
No. of shares = total outstanding shares ex own shares
Total financial assets end year; NOK 3.999m Total financial assets end year; NOK 3.193m
Bond portfolio 31 December 2013
| Split of fixed income portfolio | NOK mill | % |
|---|---|---|
| Bonds Bond funds |
1 104 2 319 |
32 % 67 % |
| Bank deposits | 48 | 1 % |
| Total | 3 471 | 100 % |
| Rating including internal rating by Norwegian financial institutions | ||
| Investmentgrade | 1 919 | 55 % |
| BB | 62 | 2 % |
| B | - | 0 % |
| Non rated (funds) | 1 489 | 43 % |
7% return on the investment portfolio
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protector | -2,1 % | 16,1 % | 9,7 % | -2,3 % | 8,9 % | 7,0 % | 6,2 % |
| KLP Skade* | 0,4 % | 8,3 % | 7,2 % | 4,5 % | 6,5 % | 4,6 % | 5,3 % |
| If | -3,1 % | 12,4 % | 7,4 % | 1,8 % | 6,1 % | 5,0 % | 4,9 % |
| Tryg | 3,5 % | 6,6 % | 4,3 % | 4,8 % | 5,1 % | 2,5 % | 4,5 % |
| Gjensidige | -0,6 % | 5,5 % | 5,2 % | 4,4 % | 5,4 % | 4,3 % | 4,0 % |
| Codan* | 5,6 % | 5,9 % | 3,5 % | 3,0 % | 3,9 % | -0,5 % | 4,0 % |
| Top* | -6,9 % | 7,3 % | 4,8 % | 3,1 % | 6,9 % | 2,8 % | 3,0 % |
| LF | -14,0 % | 10,0 % | 6,0 % | -2,0 % | 5,0 % | N/A | 1,0 % |
| Average ex. PF |
-3,2 % | 7,5 % | 5,1 % | 2,5 % | 5,3 % | 3,2 % | 3,3 % |
*KLP, Top – pr. Q3 2013, Codan – pr. Q2 2013
• Our assessment is that Protector also is doing well when we risk adjust the investment income
Gross premiums written (NOKm)
Gross cost ratio, inclusive claims handling expenses
Operating expenses Claims handling expenses
Combined ratio
RoNAV
Return on investments
Combined ratio
RoNAV
| Shareholder | No. shares | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| ODIN NORDEN | 6 611 211 | 7,67 % |
| STENSHAGEN INVEST AS | 4 489 873 | 5,21 % |
| MSF-MUTUAL FINANC IAL SERVI FD |
4 479 410 | 5,20 % |
| PROTECTOR FORSIKRING ASA | 3 570 661 | 4,14 % |
| OJADA AS | 3 563 116 | 4,14 % |
| HANSARD EUROPE LTD | 3 353 957 | 3,89 % |
| TJONGSFJORD INVEST AS | 2 811 809 | 3,26 % |
| GABLER RÅDGIVNING AS | 2 502 751 | 2,90 % |
| MP PENSJON PK | 2 375 706 | 2,76 % |
| VERDIPAPIRFONDET ALFRED BERG GAMBA | 2 111 193 | 2,45 % |
| ARTEL HOLDING A/S | 1 873 451 | 2,17 % |
| VERDIPAPIRFONDET HANDELSBANKEN | 1 804 734 | 2,09 % |
| AVANZA BANK AB | 1 721 599 | 2,00 % |
| VPF NORDEA NORGE VERDI | 1 671 268 | 1,94 % |
| FROGNES AS | 1 649 916 | 1,92 % |
| VARMA MUTUAL PENSION INSURANCE | 1 642 329 | 1,91 % |
| JOHAN VINJE AS | 1 437 841 | 1,67 % |
| PETROSERVICE AS | 1 343 815 | 1,56 % |
| NORDEA NORDIC SMALL CAP FUND |
1 283 657 | 1,49 % |
| JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA | 1 250 000 | 1,45 % |
| TOTAL 20 LARGEST | 51 548 297 | 59,83 % |
| OTHERS | 34 607 308 | 40,17 % |
| TOTAL SHARES | 86 155 605 | 100,00 % |
| • | Management's direct and indirect shareholding totals 3,1m shares or 3,6% of current outstanding shares |
|---|---|
| • | Board members directly and indirectly own a total of 6,3m shares or 7,3% |
| of current outstanding shares | |
| • | 31 employees own directly a total of 4.8 m shares or 5.5% of current outstanding shares (incl. management) |
| • | Protector own 3.570.661 own shares or 4,14% of current outstanding shares |
No. Shareholders 2.564
¹ CEO Sverre Bjerkeli
² Chairman of the Board, Jostein Sørvoll
Volume up 16 % (23 % in 2013)
Net claims ratio¹ 80% (75.9% in 2013)
Gross cost ratio² <13% (13,8% in 2013)
Net Combined ratio 90% (86.7% in 2013)
| Risk | |
|---|---|
| + Volume up in commercial & public sector Norway | Low |
| + Sweden and Denmark support double digit growth | No |
| + Balance sheet growing leads to increased financial income | No |
| + Cost ratio Gross & Net going down | Low |
| 0 Unchanged volume in Change of Ownership sector | Medium |
| - Price inflation lower than claims inflation in Change of Ownership |
High |
| - Rate pressure driving claims ratio upwards |
Medium |
| - One or two negative surprises will occur |
Medium |
| - Sweden and/or Denmark develops worse than guided |
Low |
| NOKm | Res 2013 |
Outlook 2014 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Premium growth (%) | 23 | 16 | |
| Operating profit | 430 | 330 | |
| Investment Income | 257 | 190 | |
| Gross cost ratio (%) | 13.8 | < 13 | |
| Net combined ratio (%) |
86.7 | 90 | |
| Return on solvency (%) | 28 | 20 |
| Return assumptions 2014: |
|---|
| Equity allocation approx. 10% |
| Return equities: 8% p.a. |
| Return bonds: 4% p.a. |
| Average invested capital: NOK 4.300m |
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.