PROSPECT RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2016

Dec 12, 2016

PROSPECT RESOURCES - ARCADIA LITHIUM MINE DEVELOPMENT

Prospect Resources is prioritizing exploration and technical work to fast track the development of the Arcadia Mine into production.

Results of Scoping Study*

Mineral Resource within Conceptual Pit stands at:

23.4Mt at 1.42% Li2O and 123ppm Ta2O5

(70% Measured and Indicated, & 30% Inferred) Shallow flat lying, high grade (1% Li2O cut-off)

SUMMARY OF SCOPING STUDY*

• 70% increase in Measured Resources - JORC 2012 classification
• Company priority is focusing on early production (anticipated to commence mid 2017)
• Conceptual pit design indicates potential for a mine life of some 15 - 25years
• Conceptual pit design supports extraction of near surface, high grade lithium Mineral Resource of 23Mt at 1.42% Li2O and 123ppm Ta2O5 with a favourable stripping ratio of 2.98:1
• Off-take discussions continuing
• 9 metallurgical holes drilled for production process analysis in South Africa with two additional holes being sent to Western Australia for validation
• Abundant water on site
• All Mineral Resources covered by Mining Claims
• First Environmental approvals in place
• Surface (farm) rights secured and maize farming has commenced
• Strengthening in-house process and production team via new hires
• Additional Exploration Target** of 80-100Mt @ 1.2%-1.5% Li2O, within flat lying pegmatites.

* The Scoping Study referred to in this report is based on low level technical and economic assessments, and is insufficient to support estimation of Ore Reserves or to provide assurance of an economic development case at this stage, or to provide certainty that the conclusions of the Scoping Study will be realized.

** The potential quantity and grade stated by the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource over the exploration target area and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.

Prospect Resources (ASX: PSC) is pleased to provide a Scoping Study and development update at the Company's Arcadia Lithium Deposit in Zimbabwe.

The Company's priority is early production – mid 2017. The current mining plan envisages a series of open pits with production commencing from the first high grade pit, anticipated to commence mid 2017, with the second larger pit coming into production thereafter.

This update relates to the Mineral Resource expected to be targeted in the first production phase. The infill and metallurgical drilling completed during October and November was successful in increasing the Measured Resource by 70% to 4.1Mt at 1.44 % Li2O (>1% Li2O cut off) as well as defining a high grade zone (>1% Li2O cut off) comprising 16.2Mt grading 1.39% Li2O (Measured and Indicated), all of which are incorporated within the initial pit design of 23Mt at 1.42% Li2O and 123ppm Ta2O5 (Figures 1, 2 and Table 1). All Mineral Resources, to date, are shallow and flat lying.

The delineation of this zone provides Prospect Resources with a well-defined and robust block model in which to support and complement the metallurgical testwork and mine design aspects of the Scoping Study.

Regional field work has identified several follow up targets, with all identified pegmatites being shallow dipping, are open along strike and down dip with at least 3km of strike length being identified to date.

1% Li2O Cut-off
Category	tonnes	Li2O%	Ta2O5ppm	Li2OTonnes	Ta2O5lbs
Measured	4,100,000	1.44%	145	59,600	1,317,400
Indicated	12,100,000	1.37%	118	166,600	3,146,700
Inferred	7,100,000	1.47%	123	104,700	1,927,600
GRANDTOTAL	23,400,000	1.42%	123	331,000	6,391,700

Table 1: Mineral Resource included in Conceptual Pit Design

Figure 1a – Arcadia Li Deposit, Li2O Block Model and Conceptual Pit Design incorporating 23.4Mt at 1.42% Li2O and 123ppm Ta2O5

Figure 1b – Arcadia Li Deposit, showing Conceptual Pit Design and Mineral Resource Classification

Figure 2 – Plan showing location of conceptual open pit and drilling completed to date

Conceptual Mine and Pit Design

Based on the geometries, thicknesses and depths to which the pegmatites have been modelled, plus their estimated grades, open pit mining will be the logical method being assessed during feasibility studies.

A provisional mining plan and design at Arcadia has been formulated by McDhui Mining in Johannesburg, and describes an open pit operation with an estimated life of mine of approximately 12-25 years and contains the following characteristics:

• The shallow dipping nature of the pegmatites has resulted in a stripping ratio of 2.98:1 (waste: ore)
• The lithium bearing pegmatite would be extracted from the top of the hill, downwards and north-eastwards towards the valley below.
• The approximate dimensions of the proposed pit are: 650m (length) x 850m (widest point), with the deepest portion of the pit being 120m below surface, equating to approximately 12, 10m high benches.
• The final pit slope angle is estimated to be approximately 52 degrees, and this has been supported by ongoing geotechnical logging and work

Metallurgical Test Work

To date a total of nine dedicated metallurgical drillholes comprising 1,600kg of pegmatite has been submitted to FT Geolabs in Centurion, South Africa, with the aim of assessing spodumene and petalite upgradeability and recovery.

Additional two samples are also being delivered to a Perth based laboratory in order to carry tandem verification testwork. Figure 6, below, shows location of the metallurgical drill holes.

FT Geolabs undertakes most of the laboratory scale chemical, metallurgical and mineralogical testing for the Bikita Mine, in Zimbabwe, the largest operating hard-rock lithium mine in Southern Africa. The work is on-going, but initial Heavy Liquid Separation (HLS) test work has demonstrated that the lithium specification for both spodumene (>6.5% Li2O) and petalite can be obtained through simple Dense Media Separation (DMS) methods. Testwork on iron concentrations in the spodumene and petalite concentrates were successful in producing concentrates with Fe2O3 levels of 0.17% Fe2O3 (spodumene) and 0.03% Fe2O3 (petalite) respectively.

The next phase of testwork is focusing on additional communition and floatation testwork on representative samples drawn from the metallurgical drilling program. This ongoing testwork is focusing on further optimising spodumene and petalite recoveries, and to provide the basis for the design criteria, process flow and equipment specification for the metallurgical process.

Mineralogical Testwork – Petrography and XRD Studies

Petrography

To date, a total of 43 thin and polished thin sections have been investigated by MSA, University of Witwatersrand, University of Pretoria, CSA Global and Townend & Associates in Perth.

Sixteen of these samples were taken from the Main Pegmatite exposed in the old open cast pit (Figure 5). The balance was drawn from a variety of different pegmatite intersections from eight diamond drill holes. There are no significant observable mineralogical differences between the various pegmatite bands. The dominant lithium minerals in order are spodumene, then petalite followed by smaller quantities of eucryptite, and occasional lepidolite.

Gangue minerals are predominantly microcline, albite, quartz, muscovite with minor amounts of dravite, ferro-holmquistite and garnet. The ferro-holmquistite (an iron lithium amphibole) (and hornblende – an iron amphibole) are localised and are typically found located on the upper and lower pegmatite contacts, and are the results of reaction of the lithium-rich pegmatite melt and the basalt host rocks.

XRD Studies

To date, six batches (comprising 245 samples) have been analysed by XRD at ALS Chemex Laboratories in Johannesburg. Samples were drawn from both the Main Pegmatite as well as the Lower Pegmatite, and from within the conceptual pit design (Figure 6).

XRD analyses to date show that the Lower Pegmatite (primary focus of mining) contains five times more spodumene (15%) than petalite (3%), and has similar gangue mineralogy to the Main Pegmatite. The XRD results completed to date on the Lower Pegmatite show a broad mineralogical zonation through the Lower Pegmatite based on the spodumene - petalite ratio and quartz content. Sampled holes located within the modeled Lower Pegmatite display higher spodumene - petalite ratios along the edges and towards the upper contacts and a higher spodumene - petalite ratio in the central and lower portions of the Lower Pegmatite. The quartz content tends to be higher in the high spodumene zones; this can be ascribed to the re-equilibration post crystallization of the petalite to form spodumene-quartz intergrowths (SQI) in the slower cooling central, and to a lesser extent in the lower portions, of the pegmatite.

Initial results from the Main Pegmatite suggest approximately equal quantities of spodumene and petalite (around 11 – 13%), with 39% quartz, 33% feldspar, and the balance largely muscovite.

Geotechnical Engineering

A detailed slope stability study has been commissioned, based on the existing detailed structural logging and on-going rock strength and plane failure tests. Initial investigations by Practara Ltd, a South African based minerals economics consulting firm, has concluded that there are no fatal flaws or critical risk factors to the pit design.

Any localised geological structures and broken ground can be managed during operations by applying sound rock engineering methods and techniques to monitor and support.

The upper part of the pit will likely require a more conservative slope angle, and a maximum bench height of 5m will be utilised to cater for any eventualities and to ensure design within the required factor of safety. The deeper portions of the pit will likely have significantly steeper sidewalls, with bench heights of 10m due to the more competent lithology observed.

Hydrological Studies

A preliminary in-house hydrological study has confirmed that there is sufficient fault hosted ground water supply for the planned flotation plant. Discussions are underway with several Southern African consultancies for a more detailed investigation in the New Year. This will focus on the effects of the planned operation on the water table, and the water bearing faults on the planned pit.

Environmental Impact Assessment

An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) certificate, approving the company's planned work has been granted by the Environmental Management Agency (EMA). This followed a series of meetings with stakeholders, including local landowners, ZINWA (Zimbabwe National Water Authority) and the Mazowe (water) Catchment Authority, and the compilation of an approved environmental impact mitigation plan.

The EIA certificate covers all of Prospect Resources' drilling, sampling and line clearing activities. An application has been made to modify this to cover the planned plant and office construction activities in the New Year. The certificate will be valid for two years, and is based on an appendix to the existing report.

Exploration Target and Regional Exploration Program

The Company continues to identify and evaluate the Arcadia pegmatite field, with discoveries of Lithium bearing pegmatites located to the north as well as along strike to the east where at least 3km of strike of the Lower Main Pegmatite has been identified. An aggressive field mapping and drilling program is ongoing to delineate as well as validate these resources as the company aims to achieve the stated Exploration Target of 80 – 100Mt grading 1.2 – 1.5% Li2O.

The potential quantity and grade stated by the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource over the exploration target area and that it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource.

Community and Local Farming

The Company has secured the surface rights to most of the arable land covered by its mining claims via a Government approved, standard form farm lease agreement. Maize (sweetcorn crops) is currently being sowed to support the local community through employment and provision of maize as a staple crop

Figure 7 – RC Drilling at Arcadia and Company tractor ploughing

Strengthening In-house Management and Technical Personnel

As the Company moves from the exploration to the production phase, new skills are required. The Company is actively working to secure these key hires to enable a seamless transition from exploration to production over the coming year.

Ongoing Off-take Discussions

Off-take discussions are ongoing. As the first ore delivery date becomes more certain so can off-take discussions be completed. We believe that Arcadia's early production and early delivery of lithium oxide concentrate will command a premium in today's supply constrained environment.

Table of Material Assumptions & Modifying Factors to the Scoping Study

Sensitivity Analysis	Analysis has related to mine production rates, capital required formining rate, process type, process capacity, capital associated withprocess capacity, variations of ore composition from Spodumene toPetalite, environmental impacts, social impacts to community andlocal farming, access to power and water and market demand forproduct*
Tantalum	The Mineral Resource within the conceptual pit includes 23.4Mt at1.42% Li2O and 123ppm Ta2O5. Process flow sheets and plant designhave to date not incorporated the extraction of Ta2O5andaccordingly, it is not considered a determining factor to the project'sviability.
Margin of Error	30-50%
Production target	No production target is provided in this release
Timeframe of	Long lead time capital items to be ordered in January 2017
Development &	Civil construction to commence in February 2017
Production	Pre-stripping to commence in February 2017
	Starter Pit expected to commence in mid2017
Availability of	Project finance to be sourced from existing cash reserves, pre
Project Finance	payments fromoff-take contracts, new issue of equity and/or debt
	finance
Sequencing of	30% of the Mineral Resource is classified as Inferred. Conversion of
Resources &	these resources to Indicated Resources will be carried out through
Reserves	further infill drilling early in 2017. The Inferred Mineral Resource as
	reported in this Scoping Study was not considered as a determining
	factor in the project's viability

* A detailed breakdown of the sensitivity analysis is not provided given the above margin of error factor incorporated within the Scoping Study.

For further information, please contact:

Hugh Warner	Harry Greaves
Prospect Resources	Prospect Resources
Executive Chairman	Executive Director
Ph: +61 413 621 652	Ph: +263 772 144 669

Competent Persons Declaration

The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results and the Exploration Target is based on information compiled by or under the supervision of by Mr Roger Tyler, a Competent Person who is a member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AUSIMM) and The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM). Mr Tyler is the Company's Senior Geologist. Mr Tyler has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results. Mr Tyler consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by or under the supervision of Ms Gayle Hanssen of Digital Mining Services, Harare Zimbabwe. Ms Hanssen is registered as Professional Scientist with the South African Council for Professional Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP) which is a Recognised Professional Organisation (RPO). Ms Hanssen is employed by DMS and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activity which she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources. Ms Hanssen consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on her information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to Mineral Resources and exploration results has been reviewed and audited by Mr Michael Cronwright of The MSA Group, Johannesburg. Mr Cronwright is registered as a Professional Scientist with the South African Council for Professional Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP) which is a Recognised Professional Organisation (RPO). Mr Cronwright is employed by MSA and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Cronwright consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this announcement that relates to pit design is based on information compiled by or under the supervision of Mr John Schoeman of McDhui Mining, Johannesburg, South Africa. Mr Schoeman is registered as a Professional Scientist with the South African Council for Professional Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP) which is a Recognised Professional Organisation (RPO). Mr Schoeman is employed by McDhui Mining and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources. Mr Schoeman consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Samplingtechniques	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, orspecific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriateto the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gammasondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples shouldnot be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivityand the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systemsused.Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to thePublic Report.In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would berelatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g chargefor fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required,such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent samplingproblems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (egsubmarine nodules) may warrantdisclosure of detailed information.	•At the Arcadia Project, the majority ofsamples were percussion chipsgenerated from a Smith Capital or Thor rig, using a double tubereverse circulation (RC) technique.Samples were collected from thecyclone and riffle split on site before bagging.•3x 3kg samples were collected every meterin triplicate, in additionto a smaller sample retained for reference and logging, one of whichwas sentfor pulverizing and assaying.•For the diamond drill samples, core was marked up on site, andhalved with a diamond saw, in a facility close to site. Half of the core(normally left side) was retained for reference purposes.•Certified Reference Materials (produced by AMIS of Johannesburg),blanks and field duplicates were inserted into each sample batch. (5%of totalbeing CRMs, 5% blanks, 5% field duplicates and 5%laboratory duplicates). This was done by Zimlabs who undertook thesample preperation,as well as blank and CRM insertion, underinstruction from Prospect Resources.The AMIS CRMs used were ; AMIS0338; 0.1682% Li, AMIS0339;2.15%LiAMIS0340;1.43%Li,AMIS0341; 0.4733%Li,AMIS0342;0.1612%Li, AMIS0343; 0.7016%Li & AMIS0355;0.7696%LiAll samples were taken in Company transport to Zimlabs laboratory inHarare, where they were pulverized to produce a 30g charge and thendispatched by courier to ALS Johannesburg. All Phase 1 and 2 sampleswere analysedby multi-element ICP (ME-MS61, following four aciddissolution. Overlimits on lithium analysed by LiOG63 method(four aciddigestion with ICP or AAS finish),Due to problems with the ICP circuit in ALS Johannesburg in October &

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		November, the majority of the Phase 3 samples have so far only beenassayed for Li by AA at Zimlabs.Where assays from both ALSand Zimlabs are available, the correlationfor Li analysis has been shown to be acceptable. Pulps from holeACD019 was assayed by both laboratories and statistically compared. Acorrelation of almost 90% was returned, with the Zimlabs 'underassaying'Pulps from all Phase 3 samples are either now being analysedat, or enroute to ALSVancouver.
Drillingtechniques	Drill type (egcore, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary airblast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, tripleor standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or othertype, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).	Double tube, 5" reverse circulation. Two RC rigs were used. A trailermounted Smith Capital double tube RC rig was used with a 25 bar(Ingersoll Rand) 2013 compressor. In addition, a Thor truck mounted rigwas used, with a 50 bar Atlas Copcocompressor.3m rods were used, and the hole air blasted to allow sample recovery viaa cyclone every 1m. 35 RC holes which were drilled for a total of2278m, wereused in this estimate.For diamond drilling, two Atlas Copco CS 14rigs were used. HQ corewas drilled through thefirst 20 –30m of broken ground. This section wasthen cased and drilling proceeded with NQ sized core. 33 DD holes wereused in theMineral Resource estimate, which were drilled to a total of3463mTendedicated metallurgical holes(HQ) were drilled(ACD017,018,022,031,041,045,046, 047,048 and 051) totaling 985m.An 11th metallurgical hole, ACD055 is nearing completion.
Drill samplerecovery	Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveriesand results assessed.Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensurerepresentative nature of the samples.Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and gradeand whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferentialloss/gain of fine/coarse material.	RC chip samples were bagged directly from the cyclone, and immediatelyweighed; virtually all samples weighed more than30kg, averaging 35kg.The sample was then riffle splitto produce 3 subsamples(a primary, fieldduplicate and reference sample)of approximately 3kg each.Material seems largely homogenous, and no relationship has beendetected between grain size and assayed grade.Results from the 41 labduplicates generated from the milled core,in the Phase 3 samples show acorrelation of over 99%, and a bias of less than 10%.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		The average core loss across the 33DD holes is 4.25%, the vast majorityof this loss occurring in the first 20m of weathered ground.The core lossthrough the pegmatites is less than 2%.The overall average Li grade of the 755 RC chip samples is 0.41% v0.35% for the 984DD samples.As there is only a partialoverlap in theRC and DD drilling 'grids', it is not possible at this stage to make adefinitivestatistical comparison.
Logging	Whether core and chip samples have been geologically andgeotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriateMineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgicalstudies.Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (orcostean, channel, etc) photography.The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.	A sample of the RC chips was washed and retained in a chip tray. Chipsamples have been geologically logged at 1m intervals, with datarecorded in spreadsheet format using standardized codes. Sample weight,moisture content, lithologies, texture, structure, induration, alteration,oxidation and mineralisation were recorded.Specific gravities(SGs)were measured at Zimlabs using the Archimedesmethod and at SGS laboratories in Harare, using a pycnometer,All drill core has been lithologically logged and had first pass batchgeotech logging done(RQD) on site. At a nearby facility, detailedstructural logging and field SG measurements were made, using theArchimedes method. The SG determinations were made on arepresentative material from every meterin each borehole.The work is undertaken according Prospect Resources' standardprocedures and practices, which are in line with international bestpractice, and overseen by the CP. The CP considersthat the level ofdetail and quality of the work is appropriate to support the currentmineral resource estimation.
Sub-samplingtechniquesand samplepreparation	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all coretaken.If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc andwhether sampled wet or dry.For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of thesample preparation technique.Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages tomaximise representivity of samples.	RC samples were bagged straight from the cyclone. An average of 35kgof sample wasproduced per meter.(A calculated recovery of around of85% was achieved)The dry samples were split using a 3-stage riffle splitter, with three, 3kgsamples being collected per 1m interval. Excess material was dumped ina landfill.Core wassplit inhalfwith a diamond saw. Half was sampled for assay,

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the insitu material collected, including for instance results for fieldduplicate/second-half sampling.Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the materialbeing sampled.	respecting lithological boundaries up to a maximum sample length of ameter. The other half of core (normally leftside) was retained forreference purposes.For RC chip samples, field duplicates were produced every 20th sample.The 3kg samples were crushed and milled (90%, pass-75um) at theZimlabs Laboratory. Pulp duplicates, blanks and standard material(produced byAMIS) were inserted in identical packets to the samples,one per 20 normal samplesfor each of the blanks, standards and labduplicates. This was done under the supervision of a qualified geologistor experienced geotechnicianfrom Prospect Resources.
Quality ofassay dataandlaboratorytests	The nature, quality and appropriateness ofthe assaying andlaboratory procedures used and whether the technique is consideredpartial or total.For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc,the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrumentmake and model,reading times, calibrations factors applied and theirderivation, etc.Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levelsof accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.	All samples were analysed by multi-element ICP (ME-MS61). Over limits(>on lithium analysed by LiOG63 method, after four acid dissolution.Allassayswere performed at ALS Vancouver.For QAQC a 5% tolerance on CRM & duplicate resultswas permitted.Of the 41 blank samples inserted, only one was deemed necessary for reassay.Of the 53 CRMs assayed only three fell outside the acceptablerange, and sent for re-assay. Out of 55pulps produced from fieldduplicates, 15 fell outside acceptable limits. An investigation identifiedthat the issue was Zimlabs duplicating the wrong sample. One of theirstaff had become use to duplicating the precedingsample, irrespective ofwhat was requested by Prospect Resources staff.The affected samples were re-assayed and subsequent results reportedwere considered acceptable. Following the discovery of this issuewithZimlabs, a Prospect Resourcestechniciannow follows each batchthrough the lab, and supervises insertion of standards.For the Phase 3 results, which have largely all been assayed at Zimlabs.Of the 44 blanks, 1 failed,but was found tobe the result of a samplenumbering error. Of 41 duplicates none failed, though 7 will bemonitored after re-assayed. Of 34 CRMs1 failed due to a mix up of CRMtype and 3 will be closely monitored during re-assaying. All pulps arebeing re-assayed at ALS Vancouver .The conclusionis that ALS accuracy is considered acceptable and,

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Zimlabs sample preparation procedures were acceptable.Round Robin checks have beenundertaken at Zimlabs in Harare, (whichhave returned an 85% correlation)Additional check Additional checksamples are also being analysed atGenalysis -Intertekin Perth,Australiafor Round Robin checks.
Verification ofsampling andassaying	The verification of significant intersections by either independent oralternative company personnel.The use of twinned holes.Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, dataverification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	Prospect Resources' Chief geologist was on site during most of thedrilling and sample pre-preparation. The significant intersections werealso shown toZimbabweGeological Survey staffand an MSA GeologistCP).All hard copies of data are retained at the Prospect Resource Explorationoffices, attached to the Farvic Mine. All electronic data resides inExcel™format on the office desktop, with back-ups retained on harddrives in a safe, and in an Access™ databasein a data cloudoffsite.No drillholes from the current campaign have been twinned but 4holesfrom the current campaign were designed to twin historically drilledholes from the 1970's. Although no logging or assays are available fromthis old data.Logging and assay data captured electronically on Excel™spreadsheet,and subsequently Access™ database.All assay results reported as Li ppm and over limits as %, adjusted to thesame units and also expressed as Li2O %. Similarly,Ta assays arereported in ppm, but expressed as Ta2O5.
Location ofdata points	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar anddown-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locationsused in Mineral Resource estimation.Specification of the grid system used.Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	All drill holes were surveyedcompleted with down-hole surveytoolusinganAzimuth Point System (APS) Single Shot survey method down-holeinstrument at a minimum of every 30m and measured relative to magneticNorth. These measurements have been converted from magnetic to UTMZone 36South values. No significant hole deviation is evident in plan orsection.All collar positions have been surveyed using a High Target DGPSsystem, from Fundira Surveys. The topography in the greater project areawas surveyed to 30cm accuracy using a Leica1600 DGPS. Permanentsurvey reference beacons have been erectedon site.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		All surveys were done in the WGS84 datum on grid UTM 36S, andsubsequently converted to ARC1950 datum.
Data spacinganddistribution	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish thedegree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the MineralResource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) andclassifications applied.Whether sample compositinghas been applied.	Phase 1 drill holes were drilled at an average of 50mintervals alongstrikeand down dip of the pegmatites. This wassufficient to establishconfidence in geological and grade continuity,The approximate grid for along strike and down dip drilling wasextended to approaching 100mfor the subsequent drilling phases.
Orientation ofdata inrelation togeologicalstructure	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling ofpossible structures and the extent to which this isknown, consideringthe deposit type.If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientationof key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced asampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.	Mineralisedstructures are shallow dipping (10°northwest)pegmatiteshostedwithin meta-basalts and drilling was planned to intersect thesestructures perpendicularly(drilled at -80 to the southeast)Though the target pegmatites can show considerable mineralogical andto a lesser extent grade variation, the geology is relatively simple.
Samplesecurity	The measures taken to ensure sample security.	RC and core samples were placed in sealed bags to prevent movementand mixing. Minimal preparation was done on site.Samples weretransported in company vehicles accompanied by a senior technician tothe pre-preparation laboratory.
Audits orreviews	The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.	The CP (Mr Michael Cronwright of The MSA Group), is continuallyauditing sampling and logging practices.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineraltenement andland tenurestatus	Type, reference name/number, location and ownership includingagreements or material issues with third parties such as jointventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmentalsettings.The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with anyknown impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	Arcadia V, Arcadia H, Arcadia 2V, Arcadia Trand Arcadia L claims,held by Examixinvestments, JV between Prospect Resources(90%)andlocal partner Paul Chimbodza.No environmental or land title issues or impediments. EIA certificate ofapproval granted by the Environmental Management agency, to cover allof the company's exploration activities.Rural farmland –fallow, effectively defunct commercial farm.
Explorationdone by otherparties	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	Two rounds of historical drilling were done. Three EXT holes weredrilled in 1969 with support from the Geological Surveyof Zimbabwe, atsite of current pit. These logs are available, and the lithologies observedare consistent with that seen by Prospect Resources' drilling.The sites of at least 10 previously drilled NQ sized boreholes have alsobeen identified in the field. The detailed records of this programme havebeen lost. But the work done in the late 1970's by Rand Mines, wasrecorded by the Geological Survey in their 1989 Harare bulletin, wherean estimate of 18Mt is recorded.
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	The deposit comprises a number of pegmatites hosted in meta-basalts ofthe ArcturusFormation within the Harare Greenstone Belt.The pegmatites belong to the Petalitesubclass of the Rare-Elementpegmatite deposit class and belong to the LCT pegmatite family.The pegmatites are poorly to moderately zoned (but not symmetrically orasymmetrically zoned and have no quartz core) The main lithium bearingminerals are dominantly petaliteand spodumene, with sub-ordinateeucryptite, and minor lepidolite. In addition, disseminated tantalite ispresent. Gangue minerals are quartz, alkali feldspars and muscovite.The pegmatites strike 045°and dip at 10°to the northwest.
DrillholeInformation	A summary of all information material to the understanding of theexploration results including a tabulation of the following information	See Appendix I

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	for all Material drill holes:oeasting and northing of the drill hole collaroelevation or RL (Reduced Level –elevation above sea level inmeters) of the drill hole collarodip and azimuth of the holeodown hole length and interception depthohole length.If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that theinformation is not Material and this exclusion does not detract fromthe understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearlyexplain why this is the case.
Dataaggregationmethods	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of highgrades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high graderesults and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure usedfor such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples ofsuch aggregations should be shown in detail.The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent valuesshould be clearly stated.	Borehole intersections were reported using downhole length weightedaveraging methods. No maximum or minimum grade truncations wereused. The mineralisation is well constrained in pegmatites.
Relationshipbetweenmineralisationwidths andinterceptlengths	These relationships are particularly important in the reporting ofExploration Results.If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill holeangle is known, its nature should be reported.If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, thereshould be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, truewidth not known').	The first drilled to intersect the shallow dipping pegmatite veins at about90°. All drill holes were drilled with an azimuth of 135°. The dip of all theholes is -80°, planned to intersect the pegmatites perpendicularly.Virtually all holes intersected the pegmatites as planned, though thepegmatites do bifurcate and vary in thickness. There are remarkablylittle structural complications in the area. A series of northeast –southwest striking faults cut the ore body, but with little apparentdisplacement.
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations ofintercepts should be included for any significant discovery beingreported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view ofdrill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.	Maps and cross sections are attached in the body of the report
Balanced	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not	The Company states that all results have been reported and comply with

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
reporting	practicable, representative reporting of both low and high gradesand/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting ofExploration Results.	balanced reporting.
Othersubstantiveexplorationdata	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reportedincluding (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysicalsurvey results; geochemicalsurvey results; bulk samples –size andmethod of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potentialdeleterious or contaminating substances.	Channel sampling also carried out at the adjacentdormant pit,previously mined in the 1970s. Continuous 1m sampleswere channelsampled and hand sampledalong cut lines, every 2m on the pit face.Approx 3kg samples were collected, and assayed at ALS after crushingand milling at Zimlabs. Assays were incorporated into the MRE.Geological mapping and grab sampling was undertaken down-dip andalong strike of the piand has been incorporated into the current MRE.Soil sampling orientation lines have produced lithium geochemicalanomalies that coincide with sub-outcropping projections of thepegmatites.
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateralextensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas,provided this information is not commercially sensitive.	The on-going Phase 3 drilling is extendingthe strike extent to thenortheast and southwest is already underway (commenced in 4th October2016), three Atlas Copco CS14 DD and one Smith Capital and one truckmounted Thor RC rig have been deployed.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

(Criteria listed in section 1, and where relevant in section 2, also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Databaseintegrity	Measures taken to ensure that data has not been corrupted by, forexample, transcription or keying errors, between its initial collectionand its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes.Data validation procedures used.	All data is stored in Excel spreadsheets, which are checked by the ProjectGeologist prior to import into an Access Database.Columns in the spreadsheet have been inserted to calculate the samplelengths and compare them to that recorded by the samplers.The spreadsheets are set up to, allow only standardized logging codes.Checks are also done during data capture and prior to import to ensurethere are no interval or sample overlaps, duplication of data or samples.
Site visits	Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person andthe outcome of those visits.If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why this is the case.	The project has regularly been visited by the Company's Chief Geologistand CP. In addition, Mr Michael Cronwright of The MSA Group, a

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		pegmatite specialist has undertaken a number of site visits to advise onpegmatite mineralogy and observe sampling practices.
Geologicalinterpretation	Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of ) the geologicalinterpretation of the mineral deposit.Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made.The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral Resourceestimation.The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resourceestimation.The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology.	The geology of the deposit is relatively simple, a number of shallowdipping (10° to the NW) pegmatites hosted in meta-basalt. The deposit iscross-cut by southwest-northeast and north northwest –south southeasttrending faults. The latter set are thoughtto have controlled initialemplacement of the pegmatites, but there is little discernible displacementalong them.Estimations have been done separately on each of the major threepegmatites bodies; the Main Pegmatite, the Middle Pegmatite and theLower Main PegmatiteLithium is a highly mobile element, and weathering has affected andleached the grade down to 20-30m depth. Separate estimations have beenmade on the weathered and un-weathered zones.
Dimensions	The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed aslength (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth belowsurface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource.	The block model encompasses the 1,600m of known SW-NE strike, by800m down dip, SE-NW drilled. The model is 300m thick, whichrepresents a depth greater than the combined maximum topographicheight, plus maximum depth drilled.
Estimationand modellingtechniques	The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s)applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme gradevalues, domaining, interpolation parameters and maximum distanceof extrapolation from data points. If a computer assisted estimationmethod was chosen include a description of computer software andparameters used.The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mineproduction records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takesappropriate account of such data.The assumptions made regarding recovery of by-products.Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables ofeconomic significance (eg sulphur for acid mine drainagecharacterisation).	The initial geological models were constructed in Leapfrog softwarebased on hand drawn sections compiled by the Project and ChiefGeologists. The Mineral Resource Model was constructed by DigitalMining Services (DMS) in Surpac software. No top cut was applied, asthere were no statistical outliers. Based on frequency distributionanalysis however a bottom cut off, of 0.2% Li2Owas used.In addition ahigher grade resource was defined, using a cut-off of 1% Li2O.OrdinaryKriging(OK) was employed. A spherical model was used, with searchparameters set to follow the SW-NE strike and NW dip of the pegmatites.N/AEstimations were also made on tantalum, the primary by-product andniobium, which is intimately associated with it, andalso rubidium. The
	In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation tothe average sample spacing and the search employed.	latter has a very high background level and is considered to be

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units.Any assumptions about correlation between variables.Description of how the geological interpretation was used to controlthe resource estimates.Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping.The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparisonof model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data ifavailable.	associated with the K-Feldspar, but unlikely to form economicmineralisation.Deleterious elements, such as Cd, Fe and U are at acceptable to lowlevels.Initial block sizewas set at 40m x 40m x 5m (standard ZimbabweanBench height). Sub –blocking done at 10 x 10 x 2.5m.Statistical analysis suggests a strong correlation between Cs & Rb, andTa, Nb and Be, but a weak to negative one of the lithium to almost allother elements.No outlier high values to warrant top cut-off. Statistical analysissuggested a 0.2% Li2Olower cut-off.Sections were sliced through the body at 100m intervals and bore holeintercept grades visually compared against the estimated block grades.
Moisture	Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with naturalmoisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content.	Estimated on a dry basis
Cut-offparameters	The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parametersapplied.	Commodity is an industrial mineral. Key value drivers are Li (or Li2O)grade and mineralogy. Lower cut -off of 0.2% Li2Odeterminedstatistically.Metallurgical and mineralogical test work is being undertaken.
Mining factorsorassumptions	Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimummining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) miningdilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of determiningreasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to considerpotential mining methods, but the assumptions made regardingmining methods and parameters when estimating Mineral Resourcesmay not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should bereported with an explanation of the basis of the miningassumptionsmade.	5m block height size used to confirm with standard Zimbabwean benchheight. Open cast mining is planned in the eastern part of the ore body toexploit both the Lower Main and Main Pegmatites.A stripping ratio of less than 2 : 1 is deemed possible.Although numerous thin pegmatite bands (14 in all) exist; practicalminimum size of 2m is deemed possible to economically mine (equates toaverage bucket width of an excavator). Bands thinner than this willdictate the necessity of establishing low grade stock piles, which may beeconomic to process once mine and floatation plant and gravity circuitrunning successfully. The currentestimate was made on the four thickestbands; the Upper Pegmatite, Main Pegmatite, the Middle Pegmatite andLowerMain Pegmatite.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Metallurgicalfactors orassumptions	The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgicalamenability. It is always necessary as part of the process ofdetermining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction toconsider potential metallurgical methods, but the assumptionsregarding metallurgical treatment processes and parameters madewhen reporting Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous.Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation ofthe basis of the metallurgical assumptions made.	Detailed XRD and petrological thin section investigations have beencarried out. The results indicate the mineralogy of the lithiummineralisation is coarse grained petaliteand fine grained spodumene,both of which are amenable to conventional recovery methods for theproduction of a potentially saleable lithium concentrate. Results to datesuggest that spodumene is the dominant lithium mineral, but that it islargely fine grained and intergrown with quartz. The two can beseparated after fine grinding, by floatation. Petalite is coarse grained andInitialmetallurgical test results have been reported by FT Geolabs andare very favourable. (ACD017, 018 , 022, 033)Heavy liquidseparationresults in petalite reporting largely to the floats and spodumene to thesinks. An average head grade of 2% lithium oxide was produced fromheavy liquid separation tests with a recovery of 20% -30 % spodumene,reporting to the sinks.Work isbeginning on holes ACD031,041, 045, 046048, 049, 051)The good grades and liberation lead to an expectation of obtainingspodumene with grades exceeding the 6.5% Li2O sales specifications.Work is now focusing on optimizing petalite recovery from the floatconcentrates.Additional metallurgical test work is still required in order to establishthe distribution of the spodumene and petalite down dip and along strike.
Environmental factors orassumptions	Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residuedisposal options. It is always necessary as part of the process ofdetermining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction toconsider the potential environmental impacts of the miningandprocessing operation. While at this stage the determination ofpotential environmental impacts, particularly for a greenfields project,may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration ofthese potential environmental impacts should be reported. Wherethese aspects have not been considered this should be reported withan explanation of the environmental assumptions made.	EIA certificate issue for exploration phase, and under application formining stage. Sterilization drilling is underway to determine a plant siteaway from any of the perennial water courses. There are no centres ofdense human habitation.
Bulk density	Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for theassumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the	Specific gravities for all RC and DD core samples have been measured,

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	frequency of the measurements, the nature, size andrepresentativeness of the samples.The bulk density for bulk material musthave been measured bymethods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity,etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zoneswithin the deposit.Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in theevaluation process of the different materials.	in both weathered and un-weathered zones. The pegmatites arecompetent units with no voids, and the specific gravities measured shouldbe a good estimate of future mined bulk densities.In core, an Archimedes technique has been used by the company. For theRC chips, a pycnometer was used by SGS Harare, and the Archimedestechnique by Zimlabs.
Classification	The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into varyingconfidence categories.Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors (ierelative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of inputdata, confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, quality,quantity and distribution of the data).Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person'sview of the deposit.	The deposits show reasonable continuity in geology and grade. The basisof resource classification is therefore largely based in drill hole density.Measured at 50m spacing, indicated up to 100m, inferred > 100m.The company believes that all relevant factors have been taken intoaccount.The CP, Chief Geologist and Project Geologist agree that the MRE is afair and realistic model of the deposit.
Audits orreviews	The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource estimates.	The Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) wasaudited by The MSA Group.
Discussion ofrelativeaccuracy/confidence	Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy andconfidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approachor procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. Forexample, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedurestoquantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidencelimits, or, if such an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitativediscussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy andconfidence of the estimate.The statement should specify whether it relates to global or localestimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should berelevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation shouldinclude assumptions made and the procedures used.These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimateshould be compared with production data, where available.	The individual pegmatite bodies are geologically consistent, and it isdeemed that the estimates are valid for such deposits over significantdistances.N/AThe statement refers to the four main pegmatite bodies; the UpperPegmatite, the Main Pegmatite, the Lower Main Pegmatite and MiddlePegmatite.

APPENDIX – SUMMARY OF DRILL HOLES USED IN ESTIMATE

DD Holes

Bhs	EastingsARC	NorthingsARC	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
ACD001	331,375	8,034,080	1410	145	80	67.1
ACD002	331,340	8,034,060	1380	148	79	104.7
ACD003	331,331	8,034,126	1382	144	80	86.7
ACD004	331,375	8,034,160	1402	135	80	80.7
ACD005	331,408	8,034,109	1393	135	80	71.6
ACD006	331,386	8,034,223	1402	135	80	77.7
ACD007	331,290	8,034,030	1400	135	80	74.3
ACD008	331,238	8,034,075	1397	135	79	53.6
ACD009	331,200	8,033,965	1409	142	80	62.7
ACD010	331,109	8,033,900	1402	135	80	67.3
ACD011	331,209	8,033,903	1406	135	80	32.7
ACD012	331,100	8,033,850	1395	135	80	71.5
ACD013	331,072	8,033,937	1384	145	79.2	60.26
ACD014	331,291	8,034,168	1408	150	78	86.7
ACD014(b)	331,287	8,034,176	1404	135	80	29.75
ACD015	331,135	8,033,973	1398	158	79	57.75
ACD016	331,460	8,034,144	1383	132	80	85.4
ACD019	331,830	8,034,407	1316	124	80	77.70
ACD020	331,573	8,034,592	1319	133	79	139.40
ACD021	332,020	8,034,483	1307	130	80	65.60
ACD029	331,460	8,034,510	1333	118.6	79.13	125.70
ACD030	331,635	8,034,651	1318	132.3	79.1	205.25
ACD032	331,520	8,034,675	1322	134.9	79.2	188.60
ACD033	331,363	8,034,566	1332	133.9	79.2	137.60
ACD034	331,961	8,034,719	1308	128.9	80.2	188.70
ACD035	331,289	8,034,511	1338	127.8	79.3	104.60
ACD036	332,041	8,034,811	1307	131.2	81.4	191.60
ACD037	332,114	8,034,871	1304	125.2	78.3	164.60
ACD038	331,206	8,034,443	1348	132.9	78.1	113.60
ACD039(b)	332,001	8,034,932	1309	132.7	78.2	200.60
ACD040	332,099	8,034,730	1300	126.4	80.1	77.80
ACDT001	331,320	8,034,638	1318	154.1	79.9	134.60
ACDT002	331,167	8,034,676	1330	132.1	81.2	176.50
ACDT004	331,598	8,034,727	1317	132.1	79.8	170.6
					Total	3462.91

RC Holes

Bhs	Eastings	Northings	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
ACR001	331,538	8,034,130	1,367	130	-79	51
ACR002	331,505	8,034,181	1,366	151	-81	52
ACR003	331,454	8,034,257	1,375	144	-80	76
ACR004	331,672	8,034,203	1,348	147	-80	37
ACR005	331,587	8,034,234	1,342	144	-80	33
ACR006	331,533	8,034,314	1,344	148	-80	55
ACR007	331,708	8,034,254	1,335	139	-81	43
ACR008	331,670	8,034,293	1,330	148	-80	50
ACR009	331,615	8,034,365	1,328	155	-79	55
ACR010	331,471	8,034,399	1,346	156	-80	70
ACR011	331,684	8,034,450	1,320	156	-80	76
ACR012	331,638	8,034,511	1,318	146	-80	81
ACR013	331,781	8,034,489	1,321	135	-79	81
ACR014	331,780	8,034,308	1,324	150	-78	82
ACR015	331,753	8,034,344	1,327	135	-80	68
ACR016	331,557	8,034,449	1,318	158	-79	76
ACR018	331,417	8,034,476	1,360	135	-80	82
ACR019	331,346	8,034,425	1,342	128	-80	77
ACR020	331,400	8,034,321	1,360	127	-77	69
ACR021	331,314	8,034,287	1,381	132	-80	85
ACR022	331,262	8,034,367	1,363	134	-80	83
ACR023	330,960	8,033,776	1,401	129	-81	89
ACR024	330,878	8,033,719	1,419	150	-77	55
ACR025	330,795	8,033,657	1,426	130	-79	55
ACR026	330,707	8,034,110	1,392	135	-77	60
ACR027	330,653	8,034,195	1,393	144	-75	74
ACR028	330,741	8,034,247	1,395	131	-59	70
ACR029	330,817	8,034,314	1389	130	-79	70
ACR030	330,621	8,034,059	1404	141	-80	53
ACR031	330,827	8,033,796	1421	131	-78	61
ACR032	331,673	8,034,112	1334	135	-79	24
ACR046	331,924	8,034,283	1304	137	-80	83
ACR056	331,950	8,034,425	1313	131	-81	75
ACR058	332,244	8,035,050	1292	149	-69	74
				TOTAL		2278