AI assistant
PRESCIENT THERAPEUTICS LIMITED — AGM Information 2021
Nov 11, 2021
65622_rns_2021-11-11_ca27823e-47dd-493d-b883-ba058f2cd65c.pdf
AGM Information
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer

Gaining momentum.
Annual General Meeting November 2021
DISCLAIMER AND SAFE HARBOR

Certain statements made in this document are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on the current expectations of Prescient Therapeutics Limited ("Prescient" or the "Company"), their estimates, assumptions, and projections about the industry in which Prescient operates. Material referred to in this document that use the words 'estimate', 'project', 'intend', 'expect', 'plan', 'believe', 'guidance', and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and should be considered an at-risk statement. These forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond the control of Prescient or which are difficult to predict, which could cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of Prescient to be materially different from those which may be expressed or implied by these statements. These statements are based on our management's current expectations and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could change the results described in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, general industry conditions and competition, general economic factors, the impact of pharmaceutical industry development and health care legislation in the United States and internationally, and challenges inherent in new product development. Investors should be aware that there are no assurances that results will not differ from those projected and Prescient cautions shareholders and prospective shareholders not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect the view of Prescient only as of the date of this presentation. Prescient is not under a duty to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law or by any appropriate regulatory authority.
Certain statements contained in this document, including, without limitation, statements containing the words "believes," "plans," "expects," "anticipates," and words of similar import, constitute "forward-looking statements." Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Prescient to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: the risk that our clinical trials will be delayed and not completed on a timely basis; the risk that the results from the clinical trials are not as favorable as we anticipate; the risk that our clinical trials will be more costly than anticipated; and the risk that applicable regulatory authorities may ask for additional data, information or studies to be completed or provided prior to their approval of our products. Given these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments except as required by law.
This document may not contain all the details and information necessary for you to make a decision or evaluation. Neither this document nor any of its contents may be used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of the Company.
The contents of this document are confidential information of Prescient. These contents are made available on a 'for your eyes only' basis to the person to whom it was sent by Prescient. The purpose of the disclosure is to facilitate commercial and confidential discussions between the disclosee and Prescient. It should not be forwarded without without the prior written consent of the Company.
At the 2020 AGM we said:

Innovative Pipeline in Personalised Medicine



Key achievements during another productive year

Cell Therapies
- Strategic review of OmniCAR to identify three highly differentiated internal programs
- AML
- Her2+ solid tumours
- GBM
- Initiation and progress of these OmniCAR programs
- Manufacturing and testing of key OmniCAR components
- Successful demonstration of unique OmniCAR features
- CAR-T agreement with Peter Mac
- Transitioned Cell Therapy Enhancement program to Peter Mac

Targeted Therapies
- Progression of PTX-200 in AML
- Completion of PTX-100 Phase 1b basket trial
- Excellent safety profile
- Encouraging data in area of unmet need
- Manufacturing PTX-100
- Investigating IST opportunities
Operations
- Building world class capabilities
- Bolstering PTX team in areas including:
- cell therapy
- immunology
- biologic engineering
- clinical operations
- PTX & Peter Mac: a very productive and cohesive relationship
- Full time post docs at Peter Mac together with Professor Phil Darcy
- Significant business development interest



Assembling a world class Scientific Advisory Board


Professor Phil Darcy
Eminent CAR-T expert

Professor H. Miles Prince, AM
Internationally renowned haematologist

Professor Don O'Rourke, MD
Neurosurgeon & brain cancer key opinion leader
Achievements becoming reflected in company valuation
- PTX one the best performing biotech stocks on ASX this year
- Significantly improved liquidity


Share price 28c
Overcoming challenges

COVID-19

- No specific and material disruptions, but impossible to escape its impact
- US disruptions in 2021
- AML recruitment
- Manufacturing and logistics bottlenecks
- Assay development
- Things back on track
- Pre-clinical work forged ahead despite Australian lockdowns
Science and technical

- New modality required bolstering inhouse expertise in new areas
- Matched by world-class SAB and Peter Mac collaboration
- Would novel experiments work in our hands? Even then, how long would it take?
- Outcomes: successful and rapid progress across programs
Building OmniCAR awareness

- cell therapy limitations and
- The more parties understand cell therapy, the more they appreciate the value of the platform!
- Playing the long game, and it is

PTX-100
FIRST IN CLASS RAS PATHWAY INHIBITOR
PTX-100 PHASE 1B BASKET STUDY COMPLETED

-
Phase 1b PK/PD safety study
-
Focus on cancers prone to Ras and Rho mutations
-
Basket trial of:
- Gastric cancer
- Pancreatic cancer
- Colorectal cancer
-
Myeloma
-
T-cell lymphomas

Professor H. Miles Prince, AM Principal Investigator

PTX-100 PHASE 1B SUMMARY

Excellent safety profile
- PTX-100 well tolerated up to and including 2,000 mg/m2
- No SAEs related to PTX-100

SAE: SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT PR: PARTIAL RESPONSE (REDUCTION OF DISEASE) PFS: PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL (TIME UNTIL DISEASE WORSENS) SOC: STANDARD OF CARE
Early clinical activity
- PRs in 2 patients with aggressive refractory TCL
- Expected PFS of <4 months on SoC
- r/r CTCL: 12 months (19 cycles)
- r/r PTCL: 17 months so far (24 cycles, still on therapy)
PROGRESSING TO EXPANSION COHORT
- 8 12 patients with r/r T cell lymphoma (esp PTCL)
- Potential bridge to registration study
- Focussing on sweet spot in an area of considerable unmet need
- Shortest path to market
- Awaiting delivery of drug product to Australia – US-wide manufacturing and logistics bottlenecks!
- Working closely with manufacturer

Case Study
- pralatrexate (Folotyn®)
- Approved for PTCL
- 5,600 cases/year in US
- US$450,540 per patient, per year



PTX-200 NOVEL AKT INHIBITION
PHASE 1B TRIAL UNDERWAY: ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
- Building upon encouraging Phase 1 results with PTX-200 (monotherapy)
- PI Professor Jeff Lancet at Moffitt, with Dr Tara Lin at KUMC
- 18 patients with cytarabine held constant at 200-400 mg/m2 as continuous infusion
- 3 CRs so far
- Both sites were impacted by general COVID-19 disruptions in 2021, which impacted recruitment and correlative analysis
- Currently screening second cohort at 45 mg/m2
- Granted Orphan Drug Designation by US FDA


Jeffrey E Lancet, M.D. Principal Investigator



Universal, Next Generation CAR-T
How does the CAR-T process work?


OmniCAR: flexible, modular CAR platform




Associate Professor Daniel J. Powell, Jr
Professor Andrew Tsourkas


Thorough strategic review yielded 3 internal OmniCAR programs


• Prescient understands the landscape, challenges and opportunities

What is the broader vision for cell therapy?
The future is efficient yet personalized: OmniCAR cells + "plug & play" binder library


Strategically positioned in a rapidly moving landscape for cell therapy

Current In development
With OmniCAR, this is just the start for CAR-T


Companion diagnostics
- Seeking to enhance current generation CAR-Ts….
- …& more significantly, help realise the broader potential of CAR-T, which is much bigger opportunity!
Other hematological malignancies
Solid tumours!!!
- Novel antigens & optimising antigen combinations
- Overcoming trafficking
- Tumor microenvironment
Safer CAR-T = more applications
- Safer and more controllable next-gen therapies will bring CAR-T to many more patients
- Opens opportunities beyond oncology
Business development
- Extremely active business development activities, spearheaded by Dr Dan Shelly (US)
- Different parties have different drivers
- Incumbent cell therapy players: Top priorities are maximizing returns on their existing programs
- Emerging companies: Believe the "second mouse will get the cheese"; looking for technologies to leapfrog competitors
- Companies with binders: e.g. antibody companies. See OmniCAR as a way to add enter the cell Tx field and bolster their pipelines
- OmniCAR can benefit all these groups!
- Prescient is playing the long game for the right parties

Considerations include:

What is the party brining to the table, and how will it help us win?

Balance between doing a deal and not jeopardising the bigger picture

Summary
Key building blocks to PTX Future Value

Targeted therapies • PTX-100 • PTX-200 Cell Therapy Enhancements • Enhancing current generation CAR-T • Also applicable to next gen • Collaboration with Peter Mac • 100% ownership of Intellectual Property OmniCAR • Next generation universal CAR platform • AML • Her2+ solid tumours • GBM • 3rd party opportunities 1 2 3
In the next 12 months we will work towards:


* Estimates only, given inherent uncertainty of biotech development

Thank you!
ASX code: PTX

Appendices
Key Challenges confronting the field of CAR-T


Time and Cost
of delivering treatment

Targets
Finding targets that work; Antigen heterogeneity - esp. in solid tumours

Safety
CAR-T can have serious safety concerns

Exhaustion
Persistent stimulation of CAR-Immune cells leads to exhaustion

No Control
Clinicians have no control of cells post infusion

Escape
Antigen loss leads to relapse
OmniCAR can do what conventional CAR-T cannot

Conventional CAR-T

- Soldier with only one map
- Single weapon
- Only trained to hit one target
- Incapable of redirection
- No communication or control in


CD33 & CLL-1 for AML
Global AML market opportunity


AML Market Growth
- AML market is expected to reach US$5.1B in 2029
- CAGR of 13.6%
- Growth assumptions largely based on new targeted therapies
- Any CAR-T breakthrough in AML would grow this market further
Landscape for CAR-T in blood cancers


For CAR-T to succeed in AML, it must overcome:


Safety
AML patients are especially ill with many unable to tolerate vigorous therapies like CAR-T
Rapidly Mutating Disease
AML can mutate midtherapy, quickly rendering single CAR-Ts infective

Rapid Disease Progression
Even if multiple current generation CAR-T therapies were available, resistant patients are likely to progress before subsequent therapies are manufactured for them
OmniCAR is uniquely placed to address these CAR-T challenges in AML
OmniCAR CD33/CLL-1 for AML

| Targets | OmniCAR features | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| CD33 + CLL-1 | •(and ability to switch off/on) forTitrationimproved safety & tolerability•Co-arming against CD33 & CLL-1•Sequential or simultaneous targeting | •targetsValidated•Expressed on >90% of AML blasts &LSCs |
| •Ability to cease treatment to avoidneutropenia | •Only 1 of 3 programs worldwidetargeting CD33 & CLL1 |
Unique OmniCAR flexibility important in AML


Sequentially Simultaneously

AML peer with CD33/CLL1 CAR-T

| Legend Biotech Corp | Prescient Therapeutics | |
|---|---|---|
| Ticker | NASDAQ: LEGN | ASX: PTX |
| Market Cap | A$8.2B | A$174M |
| AML program | CD33 + CLL1 | OmniCAR CD33 + CLL1 |
| Generation | Current generation, | Next generation, |
| autologous | autologous | |
| Stage of development | Phase 1 | Discovery/Pre-clinical |
| Titratable for safety | | |
| Switch on/off | | |
| Persistent dosing withoutnew cell product | | |
| Able to switch antigentargeting | | |


Her2 for Ovarian, Breast & Gastric cancers
Key challenges for CAR-T in solid tumours





Targets Limited targets that are cancer-specific
Leads to on-target, off-tumour effects
Safety
Ability to titrate doses safely and switch off in the event of adverse events
Trafficking
Inability of T-cells to reach tumour sites and penetrate physical barriers
TME
Overcoming an immunosuppressive Tumour Microenvironment once they get there
OmniCAR's features enable it to address these solid tumour challenges
Huge market opportunities for Her2+ cancers

| New Her2+ cases/year | |
|---|---|
| Ovarian Cancer | 87,000 |
| Breast Cancer | 340,000 |
| Gastric Cancer | 209,440 |
-
Very large patient populations
-
"Basket study" approach
-
Patients failing Herceptin treatment would make excellent candidates
-
- Shang AQ, et al. Relationship between HER2 and JAK/STAT-SOCS3 signaling pathway and clinicopathological features and prognosis of ovarian cancer. Cancer biology & therapy. 2017:1–9
-
- Luo, H et al, The prognostic value of HER2 in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE 13(1) 2018
-
- Bang YJ, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:687-97.
1. World Cancer Research Fund
OmniCAR Her2 for Her2+ solid cancers

| Target | OmniCAR features | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Her2 | •Titrationfor improved safety &tolerability•Persistent binder dosing for improvedefficacy and persistence•TMEand checkpoint enhancements | •Validated targetLarge difference of antigen•expression on tumorvs healthytissue•Most mature next-gen Her2 CAR-Tprogram |
OmniCAR Her2: durable, dose-dependent CAR-T activity


- Ovarian cancer model, using anti-Her2 OmniCAR
- Loading more binder results in proportionate killing of cancer…
- …and proportionate survival
- Lasting effects even when cease dosing of binder

Notable Her2 CAR-T peers

• Prescient the most advanced next-generation CAR-T program in Her2
| Shenzhen GenoImmune MedicalInstitute1 | Tessa Therapeutcs2 | Fate Therapeutics | Novartis3 | Calibr | Xyphos | PrescientTherapeutics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status | Hospital | Private Company | NASDAQ: FATE;Market capA$9.3B | Global pharmacompany | ResearchInstitute | Acquired byAstellas 2019 | ASX: PTXMarket capA$174M |
| Indications | Breast cancer | Multiple cancers | Breast & otherunspecified cancers | Ovarian cancer | Breast cancer | Solid cancers(unspecified) | Ovarian, Breast,Gastric |
| Generation | Currentgeneration,autologous | Current generation+ oncolytic virus | Current generation,autologous | Currentgeneration,autologous | Nextgeneration,autologous | Next generation,autologous | Next generation,autologous |
| Stage ofdevelopment | Phase 2 | Phase 1 | Discovery | Discovery | Discovery | Discovery | Pre-clinical |
Google Finance
Company data; 47 1. Together with The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
- Together with Baylor College of Medicine


Her2 & EGFRviii for GBM
CAR-T challenges in GBM: single antigen targeting

• Limited effectiveness of CAR-Ts only targeting a single antigen in GBM
"A major limitation of a single-antigen targeting in GBM is the inherent heterogeneity and plasticity of the tumor cells, allowing some cells to escape CAR-T cell killing due to the loss of the targeted antigen…"
- "…single antigen-targeting CAR-T cells fail to completely eradicate brain tumors resulting in antigen negative relapses"
- By contrast, CAR-Ts targeting multiple antigens have demonstrated anti tumor responses and more importantly prevented antigen escape in vivo
| REVIEW | Open Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy | ||
| in glioblastoma: charging the T cells to fight | ||
| Craig A. Land 1 , Phillip R. Musich 1 , Dalia Haydar 3 , Gedre Krenciute 2 and Qian Xie 1, 16 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Globlastoma multiforme IGBM is the most common malignant brain cancer that invades normal brain tissue andimpedes surgical eradication, resulting in early local recurrence and high mortality. In addition, most therapeutic | ||
| agents lack permeability across the blood brain banker (888), further reducing the efficacy of chemotherapy. Thus, | ||
| effective treatment against GBM requires tumor specific targets and efficient intracranial drug delivery. With the mostrecent advances in immunotherapy, genetically engineered T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) are becom- | ||
| ing a promising approach for treating cancer. By transducing T lymphocytes with CAR constructs containing a turnor-associated antigen (TAA) recognition domain linked to the constant regions of a signaling T cell receptor, CART cells | ||
| may recognize a predefined TAA with high specificity in a non-MHC restricted manner, and is independent of antigen | ||
| processing. Active T cells can travel across the BBB, providing additional advantage for drug delivery and tumpr target-ing. Here we review the CAR design and technical innovations, the major targets that are in pre-clinical and clinical | ||
| development with a focus on GBM, and multiple strategies developed to improve CART cell efficacy.Keywords: Chimeric antigen receptors, CAR, T-cell therapy, Globlastoma, Cellular immunotherapy | ||
| Background | rates to about 50% of patients [4, 5]. During the same | |
| Glichlastoma (GBM), WHO erade IV elioma, is the mostdevastating brain tumor in adults [1]. The intrinsic capa- | period, genetically engineered T cell receptors (TCR)were explored to achieve robust T cell responses which | |
| bility of single tumor cells to invade normal brain tis- | ultimately led to the emergence of chimeric antigen | |
| use impedes surgical eradication, predictably resultingin early local recurrence and death. Current treatment | receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy [6, 7]. In 2017, CD19-CAR(tissgenlecksocel) became the first IDA-sporesed CAR-T | |
| options for GBM include maximal surgical removal,radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, the overall | cell therapy for treating patients with relapsed or refrac-tory B cell acute hymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [8]. | |
| survival rate has not changed significantly over the past | The first ACT-based attempts for GBM therapy started | |
| decade. | Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) using autologous lym- | about 40 years ago when several case reports showed thatautologous leukocyte infusion into the resection cavity at |
| phocytes for treating cancer started in 1988 with meta- | the time of tumor resection may improve patient's sur-vival without texicity [9-11]. However, these approaches | |
| static melanoma patients [2]. While early trials reportedan overall response in approximately 34% of patients [3]. | lacked specificity. To overcome this, practic engineered | |
| subsequent studies demonstrated that hyrphodepletionprior to ACT may significantly improve the response | T cells have been generated to specifically target brainturner associated antigens (TAA) and have shown | |
| promising pre-clinical results. For GBM, interleakin-13 | ||
| Companience and MetuschOrpannent of Borredical Sciences, Quiller College of Medicine, East | receptor alpha 2 (IL13Ra2) became the first CAR T-celltarget tested in the clinic for its specific overespon- | |
| Tennessee Spee University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USAfull for of author information is available at the end of the article | sion in tumors but not in normal tissues [12]. Epidermalgrowth factor receptor variant III (EGFRxIII) [13], human | |
| $\blacksquare$ BMC | 4 The Authority 305 This article is licensed under p/besties Commons Athliculate Administrational License, which cremits use, sharing,administrativista and researched to any medium in formal administrativista any respective medical control authority andthe journal provides the low the County Commons from an order of changes were made. The images or other this pay material | |
| in this analysis are industried and analysis company for the company of the company of a credit line to the material if material | ||
| is not included in the aristin Casable Commons formal and your interview out permitted by passage regulation or exceeds the |
Competitive landscape in CAR-T GBM


OmniCAR 1 of only 3 targeting multiple antigens
- OmniCAR the only next gen CAR-T
- (The 2 other programs are at a not-for profit)

| Targets | OmniCAR features | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Her2 + EGFRviii | •Multivalent antigen targeting•Persistent binder dosingfor improved& persistenceefficacy•Titrationfor improved safety | •1 of 3 multiple antigen programs inthe world•Single antigen targeting isinadequate in GBM |