Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

PREDICTIVE DISCOVERY LIMITED Interim / Quarterly Report 2015

Apr 29, 2015

65537_rns_2015-04-29_8117989c-d6bb-45d9-9d95-4461388b62d2.pdf

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

30[th] April 2015

==> picture [596 x 107] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [10 x 665] intentionally omitted <==

Quarterly Report for the Period Ending 31[st] March 2015

ASX

Announcement

EXPLORATION

Bonsiega Project, Burkina Faso

Predictive Discovery Limited is a gold exploration company with strong technical capabilities focused on its advanced gold exploration projects in West Africa.

  • Power auger drilling yielded significant results, including:

  • Target 92:

    • Over 3km long gold anomaly . Includes several separate parallel zones, the largest being 2km long and up to 200m wide .

    • Peak values of 4.1g/t Au and 3.2g/t Au.

  • Prospect 71:

ASX: PDI

  • Two excellent drill targets with potential for Bongou-like gold mineralisation and peak values of 4.7g/t Au and 1.8g/t Au .

Issued Capital: 651M shares Share Price: 0.6 cents Market Capitalisation: $3.9M

  • One target includes a historic RC drill intercept of 24m at 2.1g/t Au from 26m[1] with Bongou-like alteration

  • Ongoing, active exploration program on 7 targets near Bongou - power auger drilling, ground magnetic surveys and XRF scans of auger samples.

Côte d’Ivoire - Toro Gold Joint Venture

  • Field program commenced – geological mapping and soil sampling.

Directors

Cape Clear, Victoria - Cape Clear Minerals Joint Venture

Phillip Jackson Non-Exec Chairman

  • Gravity survey and geological mapping completed.

Planned June Quarter Exploration Program

Paul Roberts Managing Director

Burkina Faso

Phil Henty Non-Executive Director

  • Completion of power auger, ground magnetics.

  • 4,000m RC and air core drill program on at least 5 targets near Bongou.

Tim Markwell Non-Executive Director

Côte d’Ivoire and Cape Clear Joint Ventures

  • Ongoing geological mapping and soil geochemistry in Cote D’Ivoire.

c

  • Subject to Government and landholder permissions, drilling in Victoria.

CORPORATE

  • $1.0M cash at 31[st] March 2015 and no debt.

1 This drill result was first reported to the ASX on 23rd April 2012 and was prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004. It has not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012 on the basis that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported.

==> picture [596 x 70] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

INTRODUCTION

PDI’s major country focus is Burkina Faso, West Africa where it has established an effective Burkina-based team and a large regional tenement package mainly in the north-east of the country covering 1,605km[2] (Figure 1). The Company also holds four granted exploration permits in Cote D’Ivoire totalling 1,533km[2] (Figure 7) and an Exploration Licence in Victoria (Figure 8). PDI is now focused on exploration near the Bongou deposit in Burkina Faso to expand the resource inventory there. All other tenements have either been farmed out or are on offer to potential joint venture partners.

The Company’s tenement holding covers approximately 100km of strike length in the Samira Hill greenstone belt in eastern Burkina Faso (the Bonsiega permit group, Figure 1). This belt hosts the 2.5 million ounce Samira Hill gold deposit across the border in Niger and contains numerous active artisanal gold mine sites along its length. PDI now owns 100%, or has the rights to earn 95% to 100% of all its permits in Burkina Faso. PDI has discovered gold mineralisation on multiple prospects in Eastern Burkina Faso area during the past three years (Figure 1).

==> picture [373 x 238] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Locality map of PDI permits in eastern Burkina Faso, showing locations of significant prospects including Bongou, Target 92 and Prospect 71 (yellow dots).

PROJECTS

Burkina Faso

Bonsiega Project

PDI’s focus in Burkina Faso is on the high-grade Bongou gold discovery (100% PDI, Figure 1) and the surrounding area. In September 2014, a formal Mineral Resource Estimate on Bongou

2

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

resulted in 184,000oz of gold in the Inferred and Indicated Mineral Resource categories with an average grade of 2.6g/t Au, including 136,000oz at 3.8g/t Au (ASX release dated 4 September, 2014).

Bongou-Focused Exploration

PDI reviewed its exploration strategy in Burkina Faso in the second half of calendar 2014 and decided to focus all its efforts on finding sufficient high grade gold resources near Bongou to support a profitable gold mine development.

Nearly 100 exploration targets near Bongou (Figure 2) were identified through a rigorous ranking process focused on prospects with Bongou-like geological and geophysical characteristics. Of these, 16 have been prioritised for follow-up activities in the current field season (Figure 2). Most of these targets are traversed by strong east-west magnetic linear features, which also characterise both Bongou and known Bongou-style mineralisation within several kilometres of Bongou. Some targets have pre-existing drill intercepts (e.g. Prospect 71) but most are untested by previous drilling of any kind.

==> picture [437 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Target locality map – SW Bonsiega permit group, Eastern Burkina Faso. Apart from Bongou, all the labelled prospects/targets were explored during the March Quarter. The ongoing work program is assessing targets shown as red and magenta dots.

In the March Quarter, the Company completed three ground magnetic surveys and completed power auger and soil geochemical programs on eight targets (Figure 2).

3

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

Power Auger Drill Program

Two power auger drilling programs, totalling 732 holes and 3,317m were completed in the March Quarter. The holes were designed to collect sample at the “interface” between superficial material (e.g. soil or alluvium) and weathered bedrock. The samples were assayed at the SGS laboratory in Ouagadougou.

Encouraging gold values were recorded at four prospects. Peak values of 4.1 g/t Au, 4.7g/t Au, 0.5 g/t Au and 0.2g/t Au were obtained from Target 92, Prospect 71, Target 11 and Target 15 respectively.

Power auger drilling at Targets 16, 58 and 60 resulted in low order values, the highest being 10ppb Au. No further work is planned at these locations.

Target 92

This target overlaps a 3.5 km long area of surficial artisanal gold workings and coincides with a large east-west structure. PDI’s exploration around Bongou in 2014 showed that large east-west structures may control the location of gold mineralisation in this area. In addition, new geological mapping in 2014 identified east-west geological features within the new grid area that were not known previously, further enhancing the target’s prospectivity.

Power auger drilling was carried out on 100m and 200m spaced lines, with holes located 25m apart along each line. This drilling revealed a large gold anomalous area at a 20ppb Au cut-off extending the full 2.8km length of the grid over a width of between 200m and 600m (Figure 3). Within this zone, there are multiple areas with values above 50ppb Au. Of these the largest (Target 92-South, Figure 3) is 2km long and up to 200m wide with peak values of 4070ppb, 796ppb and 529ppb Au . This area alone is large enough to contain a substantial gold deposit in its own right.

Infill power auger drilling has now been completed on high priority areas within the Target 92 grid to identify the highest priority locations for the planned air core/RAB drilling in May 2015. Assays are awaited.

4

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [469 x 236] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Target 92 contoured gold geochemical data plot on satellite imagery background. Contour intervals are 25ppb Au up to a maximum value of 200ppb Au. Individual auger locations are colour coded by grade interval. The black dashed line shapes encompass targets which are currently being followed up with infill auger drilling. The paler grey dashed lines are structures interpreted from a ground magnetic survey of the prospect; a series of ENE oriented structures (possible shear zones) may control the distribution of gold values in the larger anomalies.

Prospect 71

Drilling completed in 2012 intersected 24m at 2.1 g/t Au from 26m[1] in RC drill hole PSORC041, which lies within the weaker, northern gold anomaly in Figure 4. At the time of drilling, the interpreted strike direction of the drill targets was NNE, based on nearby artisanal mine workings. PDI’s new ground magnetic survey has changed this interpretation by indicating the presence of a NW oriented structure through the target and thereby provided guidance for the next phase of drilling.

The southern anomaly (Figure 4) consists of two zones which are inferred to be oriented northwest along two structures identified by an earlier ground magnetic survey. The recent infill auger drill holes further constrained the location of these anomalies and obtained a peak value of 729ppb Au.

These targets are now ready to be tested by the planned air core/RAB drill program in May 2015.

1 This drill result was reported to the ASX in the March 2012 Quarterly Report and was prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004. It has not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012 on the basis that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported

5

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [469 x 361] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Prospect 71 contoured gold geochemical data plot on satellite imagery background. Contour intervals are 25ppb Au up to a maximum value of 400ppb Au. Individual auger locations are colour coded by grade interval. The black dashed line shapes encompass targets which will be tested by air core or RAB drilling.

Target 11

Power auger drilling was carried out on a 100 x 20m pattern over a 400m long area coinciding with an east-west structure interpreted from aeromagnetic data. Anomalous gold values were obtained from this program peaking at 506ppb Au (Figure 5). Results are awaited from infill sampling around the better gold values, which was completed in April 2015.

Targets 15 and 88

Two single line power auger drill tests were carried out in the March Quarter. Gold anomalous values peaking at 180ppb Au and 50ppb Au were obtained on Targets 15 and 88 respectively (Figure 6). No follow-up drilling is planned at this time.

6

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [402 x 235] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Target 11 gold geochemical data plot Individual auger hole locations are colour coded by

grade interval.

==> picture [299 x 225] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: Targets 15 and 88 - gold geochemical data plot Individual auger hole locations are colour coded by grade interval.

Planned Exploration Activities June 2015 Quarter – Burkina Faso

The planned June Quarter field program is as follows:

  • Ground magnetics surveys on several priority targets (now completed).

  • Infill power auger drilling on Targets 92 and 11 (now completed) and several other priority targets near Bongou (drilling nearing completion).

7

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

  • Completion of a 4,000m combined RC and air core/RAB drill program designed to test:

  • Three previously identified gold mineralised granite targets within 2km of Bongou.

  • o The two Prospect 71 targets.

  • Locations within Target 92 which will be defined once the last infill results are received.

  • Depending on additional geophysical and power auger results on other targets, which are yet to be received, several other priority targets may be drilled in this program.

Côte d’Ivoire

==> picture [389 x 396] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 7: Locality map of PDI’s interests in Cote D’Ivoire.

Cote D’Ivoire Background

PDI holds four highly prospective exploration permits in Cote D’Ivoire: Kokumbo, Ferkessedougou, Boundiali and Kounahiri, covering a total area of 1,533km[2] (Figure 7). These permits were

8

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

selected by a country-wide analysis of geophysical and geological data using the same Predictore® methods which were used to select the Company’s ground in Burkina Faso.

PDI’s exploration to date has included geological mapping, ground magnetics surveying and bulk leach extractable gold (BLEG) stream sediment sampling. High priority exploration targets have been identified on all four exploration permits.

Joint Venture with Toro Gold Limited

PDI announced to the ASX that it had signed a Heads of Agreement (HOA) with Toro Gold Limited (Toro) on the Company’s entire Cote D’Ivoire ground holding on 22[nd] September 2014. Under the terms of this agreement, Toro can earn a 51% interest in Predictive Discovery Cote D’Ivoire SARL (PDCI), which holds the Company’s interest in the four permits, by spending US$1 million.

Toro Gold has commenced work on the Cote D’Ivoire ground during the March Quarter, focusing initially on Kokumbo permit. Work completed so far has consisted of geological mapping, rock chip and soil sampling. This work program will continue on during the June Quarter.

Australia

Cape Clear EL 5434, Victoria

Exploration Licence 5434 is located west of Ballarat in Victoria (Figure 8). It was granted to PDI in August 2013. The area is highly prospective for shallowly concealed Stawell-style gold mineralisation. PDI has previously carried out geological mapping and a gravity survey over part of the EL area.

Execution of a binding joint venture agreement with Cape Clear Minerals Pty Ltd (CCM) on this EL was announced to the ASX on 22[nd] September 2014. CCM can earn 75% equity in the licence by spending $500,000 on exploration, including at least 1,000m of drilling prior to the end of the September Quarter 2015.

CCM carried out the following work during the March Quarter:

  • Completed a detailed gravity survey consisting of 720 survey stations. This resulted in three target areas being identified.

  • Designed a drill and mapping/soil sampling program to test the three targets.

  • Landholder agreements are currently being sought for access to freehold land along with Victorian Government approval for the drilling program.

Drilling is expected to commence once all approvals have been obtained, either in the June or September Quarters of 2015.

9

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [382 x 348] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 8: Cape Clear Exploration Licence Locality Plan

CORPORATE

Cash Position

PDI held $962,000 in cash at the end of the March Quarter with no debt.

Company Secretary

Mr Ian Hobson resigned as Company Secretary of PDI during the March Quarter. Ian had been Company Secretary of the Company since September 2010 and in that role has closely assisted the Board in the administration of the Company’s affairs.

Mr Hobson was replaced by Mr Eric Moore. Mr Moore has held senior managerial positions in a number of resource companies during the past 30 years, and is currently Company Secretary to Aurora Minerals Limited and Peninsula Mines Limited.

Registered Office Address

The registered office of the Company also changed during the March Quarter to Suite 2, Level 2, 20 Kings Park Road, West Perth, WA 6005.

10

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

The Company’s administrative office continues to operate from Level 2, 33 Ord Street, West Perth.

TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS

TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS TABLE 1 – POWER AUGER RESULTS
Power Auger Drillholes – Interface Sample Results
Power auger
hole
Numbers
Northing
(WGS84-
31N)
Easting
(WGS84 –
31N)
RL Hole dips Azimuth Hole Depth From Interval Au (ppb)
SIRAU3752 to
4373
Refer to
Figures 2, 3, 4,
5 and 6 for
map location
of auger collars

Refer to Figures
2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
for map location
of auger collars

See
notes

All holes
were drilled
vertically
All holes
were drilled
vertically
Average hole depth was
4.5m. Minimum hole depth
was 1m, maximum hole
depth was 19m

See
notes
See notes See notes
and Figures
3, 4, 5 and 6
Notes: Power auger drilling is a reconnaissance exploration technique. Typically the last metre of each auger hole represents
in situ material. PDI’s practice is to collect an interface sample over approximately 1m which is therefore generally the second
last metre of each drill hole. Consequently, results are presented in Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6 of this announcement are nearly all
for the second last metre drilled for each auger hole. Individual drill hole intersections are not reported in this announcement.
The average RL over the areas reported here is 277m. The area is mostly a flat plain with very little variation between adjacent
holes; individual RLs are not reported in this announcement because they are not relevant to interpreting geochemical data of
this type.

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

JORC Code Criteria Commentary Explanation Sampling Nature and quality of sampling The sampling described in this report refers to power auger drill samples. Technique (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry In all the power auger drill holes reported here, 1-2kg samples were collected standard measurement tools at the interface between soil and weathered bedrock. Results from holes appropriate to the minerals where the drill hole did not penetrate through to weathered bedrock are not under investigation, such as reported here as they are not considered an effective geochemical test of downhole gamma sondes, or these locations because of the abundance of transported material overlying handheld XRF instruments, the bedrock. The samples were collected for gold assaying at the SGS etc). These examples should laboratory in Ouagadougou using an aqua regia method with a 1ppb not be taken as limiting the detection limit. broad meaning of sampling Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Drilling Drill type (eg core, reverse The power drilling was carried out using a 4WD-mounted power auger rig.

11

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

circulation, open- hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails,
face- sampling bit or other type,
whether core is oriented and if
so, bywhatmethod, etc).
Drill Sample
Recovery
Method of recording and
assessing core and chip
sample recoveries and
results assessed.
Measures taken to maximise
sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the
samples.
Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample
bias may have occurred due
to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Sample recovery is not assessed for power auger drilling as it is a geochemical
method. In general, however, recoveries are good because the hole has to be
cleared by the screw-type rods in order for the drill rods to advance downwards.
Logging Whether core and chip
samples have been
geologically and geotechnical
logged to a level of detail to
support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining
studies and metallurgical
studies.
Whether logging is
qualitative or
quantitative in nature.
Core (or
costean/Trench,
channel, etc)
photography.
The total length and
percentage of the relevant
intersectionslogged.
None of these samples will be used in a Mineral Resource estimation.
Nonetheless, all power auger holes were geologically logged in a qualitative
fashion.
Sub-Sampling
Technique and
Sample
Preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn
and whether quarter, half or all
core taken. If non-core,
whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the
nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
Quality control procedures
adopted for all sub-sampling
stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
Measures taken to ensure that
the sampling is representative of
the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half
sampling. Whether sample sizes
are appropriate to the grain size
of the material beingsampled.
All of the sample is submitted for assay so no sub-sampling is required and
the sample is representative of what is in the hole.

12

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

Quality of Assay
Data and
Laboratory Tests
The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory
procedures used and
whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
For geophysical tools,
spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining
the analysis including
instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control
procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks)
and whether acceptable levels
of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
and precision have been
established.
The analytical method used was an SGS aqua regia method with a low
detection limit (1ppb) which is appropriate for a geochemical drilling program.
A limited number of external standards and blanks were included with the
submitted samples. Based on these results and SGS’s own repeat results,
the analytical results are judged to be suitable for distinguishing gold
anomalous samples from barren samples.
Verification of
Sampling and
Assaying
The verification of significant
intersections by either
independent or alternative
company personnel.
The use of twinned holes The
verification of significant
intersections by either
independent or alternative
company personnel. Discuss
anyadjustment to assaydata
Hole twinning is not normally practised with power auger drilling.
Location of Data
points
Accuracy and quality of
surveysused tolocate drill
holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine
workings and other locations
used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Specification
of
the
grid
system used Quality and
adequacy
of
topographic
control
Collar locations were located using a hand held GPS with a location error of +/-
3m. Collar coordinates referenced in the table are for Universal Transverse
Mercator (UTM), Datum WGS 84, Zone 31 - Northern Hemisphere.
Data Spacing
and Distribution
Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results
Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of
geological and grade
continuity appropriate for the
Mineral Resource and Ore
Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
Whether sample compositing
has beenapplied
Power auger holes were spaced either 10 or 20m apart on all locations
except Target 92 where samples were located 25m apart. Line spacings
varied from 50m (Prospect 71 infill) to 100m on most other prospects and
200m at Target 92.
This type of drilling is not appropriate for the calculation of any Mineral
Resource estimate.
Orientation of
Data in Relation
to Geological
Structure
Whether the orientation of
sampling achieves unbiased
sampling of possible
structures and the extent to
which this is known,
considering the deposit type.
If the relationship between the
drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling
bias, this should be assessed
and reported if material.
North-south line orientations were employed at most locations as the structural
targets being investigated were east-west structural features defined using
aeromagnetic data. Crossed east-west and north-south lines were employed at
Targets 16 and 60 because the orientation of the gold anomaly source was
unknown (single point anomalies in an area without outcrop).
Sample Security The measures taken to ensure
sample security
Reference samples are stored at PDI’s sample store in Ouagadougou,
Burkina Faso.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

13

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

Mineral
Tenement and
Land Tenure
Status
Type, reference name/number,
location and ownership
including agreements or
material issues with third
partiessuch asjoint ventures,
partnerships, overriding
royalties, native title interests,
historical sites, wilderness or
national park and
environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held
at the time of reporting along
with any known impediments
to obtaining a licence to
operate in the area.
The locations reported here lie within the Sirba Permit (Arrêté
N°2014/14/296/MCE/SG/DGMGC) which covers an area of 137 sq km, the
Tamfoagou permit (Arrete No2013-16/MCE/SG/DGMGC ) which covers an
area of 238 sq km and the Basieri permit (Arrete No. 2013-
16/MCE/SG/DGMGC ) which covers an area of 73.5 sq km. There are no
overriding reserves or national parks over this permit. In a future mining
operation, the Government of Burkina Faso is entitled to a 10% share of any
mine along with a 3-5% ad valorem royalty, the percentage of which is
determined by the gold price prevailing at the time. The company believes
that (a) the permit is securely held as it has complied with all the necessary
government requirements and (b) the permit can be replaced in due course
by a mining licence as long as a feasibility study shows that a future mine
would be viable and that company completes meets the Government’s legal
requirements, which it fully intends to do..
The Sirba permit was initially acquired, along with three other nearby
permits (Madyabari, Fouli and Tantiabongou), by Birrimian Pty Ltd
(Birrimian), which is a British Virgin Islands-registered company now 100%
owned by PDI. The original owners of Birrimian subsequently entered into
an agreement with Eldore Mining Corporation Limited (Eldore) through
which Eldore could acquire the Birrimian permits through a series of
payments and a commitment to issue US$2 million worth of Eldore stock on
completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study on one or more ore deposits
within the Birrimian permits.
PDI initially acquired an interest in Sirba along with the three other Birrimian
permits via a joint venture with Eldore which commenced in January 2010.
In 2012, Eldore changed its name to Stratos Resources Limited (ASX: SAT)
after which PDI bought out SAT’s residual interest (in late 2012). In
acquiring Birrimian, PDI also inherited the one unfulfilled commitment in the
original Eldore agreement with the original Birrimian shareholders. This
commitment has now been agreed to mean that PDI will issue US$2 million
worth of PDI shares after PDI accepts an offer of finance for development of
a mine on the Birrimian permits at its sole discretion) following completion of
a Bankable Feasibility Study.
The Tamfoagou and Basieri permits were applied for and are held 100% by
PDI.
Exploration Done
by Other Parties
Acknowledgment and
appraisal of exploration
byotherparties.
Past exploration over target areas consisted of wide spaced soil sampling and
an aeromagnetic survey.
Geology Deposit type, geological
setting and style of
mineralisation.
Known mineralisation in the target areas consists of shear hosted
mineralisation in a variety of rock types – mafic volcanics,
metasedimentary rocks and mafic/intermediate intrusives. The
mineralisation is interpreted as a variant of the orogenic gold mineralisation
style,which isknownthroughout theBirimian Belt of WestAfrica.
Drill Hole
Information
A summary of all information
material to the understanding of
the exploration results including
a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill
holes:

easting and northing of
the drill hole collar

elevation or RL (Reduced
Level – elevation above
sea level in metres) of the
drill hole collar

dip and azimuth of the hole

down hole length and
interception depth

hole length

If the exclusion of this
information is justified on
the basis that the
information is not Material
and
this exclusion does not
detract from the
understanding of the
report, the Competent
Person should clearly
explain why this is the
case.
See Table 1 and the notes that accompany it. Individual power auger hole
results from the 733 holes described herein are not reported as the Material
information required for understanding and interpreting geochemical results
of this type is contained in a map showing drill hole locations and assay
results in representative value ranges, both of which are provided in Figures
3, 4, 5 and 6.

14

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

Data
Aggregation
Methods
In reporting Exploration
Results, weighting averaging
techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations
(eg cutting of high grades) and
cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of
high grade results and longer
lengths of low grade results, the
procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated
and some typical examples of
such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
The assumptions used for any
reporting of metal equivalent
values should be clearly stated.
No weighted averaging or truncation methods were used for the power auger
results.
Relationship
Between
Mineralisation
Widths and
Intercept Lengths
These relationships are
particularly important in the
reporting of Exploration Results
If the geometry of the
mineralisation with respect to
the drill hole angle is known,
its nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the
down
hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear
statement to this effect (eg
‘down hole length, true width
not known’).
True widths cannot be estimated for the power auger drill results as both
“flat-dipping” soils and steeply dipping underlying weathered bedrock is
sampled.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections
(with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included
for any significant discovery
being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a
plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate
sectional views.
Appropriate maps are provided in Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Balanced Reporting Where comprehensive
reporting of all Exploration
Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of
both low and high grades
and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration
Results.
The ranges of power auger gold assays shown on Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6
meet this requirement.
Other
Substantive
Exploration
Data
Other exploration data, if
meaningful and material,
should be reported including
(but not limited to): geological
observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical
survey results; bulk samples –
size and method of treatment;
metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential
deleterious or contaminating
substances.
Apart from the previous power auger results and structures interpreted from
ground magnetic data and the dolerite orientation shown in Figure 3, there are
no other exploration data which are relevant to the results reported in this
release.
Further Work The nature and scale of
planned further work (eg tests
for lateral extensions or large
scale step out drilling.
Diagrams clearly highlighting the
areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information
is not commerciallysensitive.
RAB or air core drilling is planned to test Prospect 71 and Target 92. It may
also be carried out Target 11depending on the results of infill power auger
drilling at that location.

15

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

Predictive Discovery Limited (PDI) was established in late 2007 and listed on the ASX in December 2010. The Company is focused on exploration for gold in West Africa. The Company’s major focus is in Burkina Faso, West Africa where it has assembled a substantial regional ground position totalling 1,605km[2] and is exploring for large open-pittable gold deposits. Exploration in eastern Burkina Faso has yielded a large portfolio of exciting gold prospects, including the Bongou trend where a series of high-grade gold drill intercepts have been obtained recently. PDI also has interests in a strategic portfolio of tenements in Côte D’Ivoire covering a total area of 1,533 km[2] .

Competent Persons Statement

The exploration results reported herein, insofar as they relate to mineralisation, are based on information compiled by Mr Paul Roberts (Fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists). Mr Roberts is a full time employee of the company and has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits being considered to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Roberts consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

For further details please contact:

Paul Roberts Ric Moore Managing Director Company Secretary Tel: +61 8 9216 1020 Tel: +61 8 6143 1840 Email: Email: [email protected] [email protected]

TENEMENT STATUS – MARCH QUARTER, 2015

Name Number Location Area
(sq.
km)
PDI
equity
Changes in holding
during March Quarter,
2015
Fouli arrêté 2014-294
/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
186.2 100% None
Tantiabongou arrêté 2013-168
/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
93.9 100% None
Sirba arrêté 2014-296
/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
136.9 100% None
Madyabari arrêté 2014-295
/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
171.9 100% None
Tyekanyebi Arrêté 2010- Burkina 242 100% Renewal in progress

16

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

202/MCE/SG/DGMGC Faso
Tamfoagou arrêté 2010-
195/MCE/SG/DGMGC)
Burkina
Faso
238 100% Renewal in progress
Tangagari arrêté 2013-37
/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
127.5 Earning
95%;
current
equity 0%
(until final
cash
payment is
made)
None
Aoura arrêté 2011-405
/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
25 Earning
95%;
current
equity 0%
(until final
cash
payment is
made)
Special renewal in progress
Boussouma Arrete 2011-
059/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
116 Earning
95%;
current
equity 0%
(until final
cash
payment is
made)
Renewal in progress
Bangaba Arrete 2015-109
/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
128 Earning
95%;
current
equity 84%
Renewed during the March
Quarter 2015. Permit owner,
SOMIKA SARL, has agreed to
postpone final option payment
of USD100,000 until February
2016. This is the second
postponement of the final
payment.
Kogodou
South
2011-
299/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
44.6 Earning
100%;
current
equity 0%
(until final
cash
payment is
made)
Renewal in progress
Bira 2013-
33/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
21 100% None
Basieri 2013-
16/MCE/SG/DGMGC
Burkina
Faso
73.5 100% None
Kokumbo Mining exploration permit
No. 307
Cote
D'Ivoire
400 Earning
90%
Agreement signed with Toro
Gold Limited (Toro) of the UK
on 21stOctober 2014 whereby
Toro can earn a 51% interest
in the company which has a
right to earn a 90% interest in
this permit, Predictive
Discovery Cote D’Ivoire SARL,
byspendingUS$1 million

17

==> picture [596 x 77] intentionally omitted <==

Ferkessedoug
ou
Mining exploration permit
No. 310
Cote
D'Ivoire
387 100% Agreement signed with Toro
Gold Limited (Toro) of the UK
on 21stOctober 2014 whereby
Toro can earn a 51% interest
in the company which owns
this permit, Predictive
Discovery Cote D’Ivoire SARL,
byspendingUS$1 million
Boundiali Mining exploration permit
No. 414
Cote
D'Ivoire
399 100% Agreement signed with Toro
Gold Limited (Toro) of the UK
on 21stOctober 2014 whereby
Toro can earn a 51% interest
in the company which owns
this permit, Predictive
Discovery Cote D’Ivoire SARL,
byspendingUS$1 million
Kounahiri Mining exploration permit
No. 317
Cote
D'Ivoire
347 100% Agreement signed with Toro
Gold Limited (Toro) of the UK
on 21stOctober 2014 whereby
Toro can earn a 51% interest
in the company which owns
this permit, Predictive
Discovery Cote D’Ivoire SARL,
byspendingUS$1 million
Cape Clear EL 5434 Victoria,
Australia
160 100%
(Cape Clear
Minerals
Pty Ltd JV
partner and
earning in
to 51% by
expenditure
of
$250,000)
None

18

Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

Rule 5.5

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/2013

Name of entity

Predictive Discovery Limited

ABN Quarter ended (“current quarter”) 11 127 171 877 31 March 2015

Consolidated statement of cash flows

Cash flows related to operating activities
1.1
Receipts from product sales and related
debtors
1.2
Payments for (a) exploration & evaluation
(b) development
(c) production
(d) administration
1.3
Dividends received
1.4
Interest and other items of a similar nature
received
1.5
Interest and other costs of finance paid
1.6
Income taxes paid
1.7
Other (provide details if material)
Net Operating Cash Flows
Current quarter
$A’000
Year to date
(9 months)
$A’000
(303)
(250)
3
(1,003)
(637)
7
(550) (1,633)
Cash flows related to investing activities
1.8
Payment for purchases of: (a) prospects
(b) equity investments
(c) other fixed assets
1.9
Proceeds from sale of:
(a) prospects
(b) equity investments
(c) other fixed assets
1.10
Loans to other entities
1.11
Loans repaid by other entities
1.12
Other (provide details if material)
Net investing cash flows
1.13
Total operating and investing cash flows
(carried forward)
- -
(550) (1,633)
  • See chapter 19 for defined terms.

01/05/2013 Appendix 5B Page 1

Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

1.13
Total operating and investing cash flows
(brought forward)
(550) (1,083)
Cash flows related to financing activities
1.14
Proceeds from issues of shares, options, etc.
1.15
Proceeds from sale of forfeited shares
1.16
Proceeds from borrowings
1.17
Repayment of borrowings
1.18
Dividends paid
1.19
Other (provide details if material)
Net financing cash flows
-
-
1,858
(176)
- 1,682
Net increase (decrease) in cash held
1.20
Cash at beginning of quarter/year to date
1.21
Exchange rate adjustments to item 1.20
1.22
Cash at end ofquarter
(550)
1,513
-
49
916
(2)
963 963

Payments to directors of the entity, associates of the directors, related entities of the entity and associates of the related entities

1.23
1.24
1.23
1.24
Aggregate amount of payments to the parties included in item 1.2
Aggregate amount of loans to the parties included in item 1.10
Current quarter
$A'000
59
1.25
Explanation necessaryfor an understandingof the transactions
Non-cash financing and investing activities
2.1
Details of financing and investing transactions which have had a material effect on
consolidated assets and liabilities but did not involve cash flows
2.2
Details of outlays made by other entities to establish or increase their share in projects in
which the reportingentityhas an interest
Explanation necessaryfor an understandingof the transactions
Details of outlays made by other entities to establish or increase their share in projects in
which the reportingentityhas an interest
  • See chapter 19 for defined terms.

Appendix 5B Page 2

01/05/2013

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

Financing facilities available

Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the position.

3.1 Loan facilities
3.2 Credit standby arrangements
Amount available
$A’000
Amount used
$A’000

Estimated cash outflows for next quarter

4.1
Exploration and evaluation
4.2
Development
4.3
Production
4.4
Administration
$A’000
338
168
Total 506

Reconciliation of cash

Reconciliation of cash at the end of the quarter (as
shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows)
to the related items in the accounts is as follows.
Current quarter
$A’000
Previous quarter
$A’000
5.1
Cash on hand and at bank
5.2
Deposits at call
5.3
Bank overdraft
5.4
Other (provide details)
2 105
961 1,408
Total: cash at end of quarter(item 1.22) 963 1,513
  • See chapter 19 for defined terms.

01/05/2013 Appendix 5B Page 3

Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

Changes in interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements

Tenement
reference
and
location
Nature of interest
(note (2))
Interest at
beginning
of quarter
Interest at
end of
quarter
6.1
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
relinquished, reduced
or lapsed
6.2
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
acquired or increased
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
Tenement
reference
and
location
Nature of interest
(note (2))
Interest at
beginning
of quarter
Interest at
end of
quarter
6.1
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
relinquished, reduced
or lapsed
6.2
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
acquired or increased
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
Tenement
reference
and
location
Nature of interest
(note (2))
Interest at
beginning
of quarter
Interest at
end of
quarter
6.1
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
relinquished, reduced
or lapsed
6.2
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
acquired or increased
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
Tenement
reference
and
location
Nature of interest
(note (2))
Interest at
beginning
of quarter
Interest at
end of
quarter
6.1
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
relinquished, reduced
or lapsed
6.2
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
acquired or increased
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
Tenement
reference
and
location
Nature of interest
(note (2))
Interest at
beginning
of quarter
Interest at
end of
quarter
6.1
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
relinquished, reduced
or lapsed
6.2
Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum tenements
acquired or increased
Issued and quoted securities at end of current quarter
Description includes rate of interest and any redemption or conversion rights together with prices and dates.
Total number Number quoted Issue price per
security (see
note3) (cents)
Amount paid up
per security (see
note3) (cents)
7.1
Preference
+securities
(description)
7.2
Changes during
quarter
(a) Increases
through issues
(b) Decreases
through returns
of capital, buy-
backs,
redemptions
7.3
+Ordinary
securities
7.4
Changes during
quarter
(a) Increases
through issues
(b) Decreases
through returns
of capital, buy-
backs
650,584,343 650,584,343 Fully Paid
7.5
+Convertible
debt
securities
(description)
  • See chapter 19 for defined terms.

Appendix 5B Page 4

01/05/2013

Appendix 5B

Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

7.6
Changes during
quarter
(a) Increases
through issues
(b) Decreases
through
securities
matured,
converted
7.7
Options
(description and
conversion
factor)
7.8
Issued during
quarter
7.9
Exercised
during quarter
7.10
Expired during
quarter
6,000,000
500,000
9,131,015
2,000,000
8,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
Exercise price
25 cents
31 cents
Various
15 cents
2.2 cents
Expiry date
20 August 2015
11 July 2015
30 June 2015
30 October 2015
31 March 2017
7.11
Debentures
(totals only)
7.12
Unsecured
notes(totals
only)

Compliance statement

  • 1 This statement has been prepared under accounting policies which comply with accounting standards as defined in the Corporations Act or other standards acceptable to ASX (see note 5).

  • 2 This statement does / ~~does not*~~ (delete one) give a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.

==> picture [101 x 61] intentionally omitted <==

Sign here: ............................................................ Date: 30 April 2015 (Company secretary)

Print name: Eric Moore

Notes

  • 1 The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash
  • See chapter 19 for defined terms.

01/05/2013 Appendix 5B Page 5

Appendix 5B Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report

position. An entity wanting to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes attached to this report.

  • 2 The “Nature of interest” (items 6.1 and 6.2) includes options in respect of interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired, exercised or lapsed during the reporting period. If the entity is involved in a joint venture agreement and there are conditions precedent which will change its percentage interest in a mining tenement or petroleum tenement, it should disclose the change of percentage interest and conditions precedent in the list required for items 6.1 and 6.2.

  • 3 Issued and quoted securities The issue price and amount paid up is not required in items 7.1 and 7.3 for fully paid securities .

  • 4 The definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report.

  • 5 Accounting Standards ASX will accept, for example, the use of International Financial Reporting Standards for foreign entities. If the standards used do not address a topic, the Australian standard on that topic (if any) must be complied with.

== == == == ==

  • See chapter 19 for defined terms.

Appendix 5B Page 6

01/05/2013