Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

PHOSCO LTD Annual Report 2013

Sep 23, 2013

65559_rns_2013-09-23_14402257-00c8-4faa-b596-3e78970f7bdf.pdf

Annual Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Celamin Holdings NL ABN 82 139 255 771

Annual Report - 30 June 2013

Celamin Holdings NL Contents 30 June 2013

Contents

Contents
Page
Corporate directory 3
Managing Director's Operational Review 4
Directors' report 14
Auditor's independence declaration 26
Corporate Governance Statement 27
Financial report
Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 34
Statement of financial position 35
Statement of changes in equity 36
Statement of cash flows 37
Notes to the financial statements 38
Directors' declaration 64
Independent auditor's report to the members of Celamin Holdings NL 65
Shareholder information 68
List of Tenements 71

Celamin Holdings NL Corporate directory 30 June 2013

Celamin Holdings NL
30 June 2013
Corporate directory
Directors The Hon. Andrew Thomson
(Non-Executive Chairman)
Mr David Regan
(Managing Director)
Mr Russell Luxford
(Executive Director)
Mr Martin Broome
(Non-Executive Director)
Mr Gary Scanlan
(Non-Executive Director)
Company secretary Ms Melanie Leydin
Registered office Level 4, 100 Albert Road
South Melbourne VIC 3205
Australia
Principal place of business Level 4, 100 Albert Road
South Melbourne VIC 3205
Australia
Share register Advanced Share Registry Ltd
150 Stirling Highway,
Nedlands, WA 6009
Auditor Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd
The Rialto, Level 30, 525 Collins Street
Melbourne, VIC 3000
Stock exchange listing Celamin Holdings NL securities are listed on the Australian Securities
Exchange as follows:
(ASX code: CNL - fully paid ordinary shares)
(ASX code: CNLO - listed options)
(ASX code: CNLCA - partly paid shares)
Website www.celaminnl.com.au

3

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

The year ended 30 June 2013 has seen Celamin Holdings NL (ASX: CNL) make significant progress with the exploration and development of its flagship Chaketma Phosphate Project in Tunisia. Key milestones achieved during the twelve month period include:

  • Scoping Study successfully completed by Direct Mining Services Pty Ltd in August 2012 (“Scoping Study”). Positive results were received for the technical, economic and social/environmental components of the project.

  • Release of Maiden JORC-compliant Inferred Mineral Resource for the Kef El Louz North Prospect: one of six target prospects within the Chaketma project area. Independent consultants, Geos Mining estimated 37 million tonnes (Mt) of rock phosphate at a grade of 21.0% P2O5, at a 10% P2O5 cut-off grade. The Resource Estimate indicates sufficient mineralisation is present for the initial 10 years of the proposed mining plan from one of the six prospects. Geos Mining has indicated that limited additional work would be required to further upgrade resource confidence.

  • On 18 June 2013 Celamin announced a JORC-compliant Inferred Mineral Resource of 93 million tonnes (Mt) @ 20.3% P2O5 (using a cut-off grade of 10% P2O5) at the Gassaa Kebira prospect within the Chaketma Project area in Tunisia. This is the second of six prospects within the Chaketma Phosphate Project. The resource was independently estimated by consultant Geos Mining.

  • Global JORC Compliant Inferred Resource inventory now stands at 130Mt at a grade of 20.5% P2O5

  • Potential confirmed for long life project: 35+ years on just two of six prospects.

  • Metallurgical test work to date produced a concentrate grading 31% P2O5. Metallurgical optimisation test work to date confirms that a marketable concentrate can be produced with very good phosphate recoveries.

  • Successful execution of diamond drilling and trenching campaigns at Chaketma. Subsequent assay results proved encouraging, exceeding both Scoping Study assumptions and internal expectations. Both phosphate grades and average phosphate seam thicknesses were found to be greater than what was outlined in the Scoping Study, and strip ratios were also found to be lower.

  • Exploration Permits were renewed for both the Chaketma and Bir El Afou Phosphate Projects in Tunisia for a further three years ending 10 February 2016.

  • A new and highly experienced French-speaking Project Manager was appointed to the project and is now based in Tunisia.

  • Appointment of Mr Russell Luxford and Mr Gary Scanlan to the Celamin Board as Executive Director and Non-Executive Director respectively. Both are experienced mining industry professionals.

  • Discussions for financing, marketing, and engineering work are progressing. Planning for social, environmental and water studies is advanced. Invitations to bid for the completion of the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) were issued to selected international engineering companies.

  • Withdrawal from Algerian JV project (Oued El Kebir), allowing the Company to focus resources and capital on accelerating progress of the Chaketma project.

Chaketma Phosphate Project

Development Progress

The positive technical and economic results received from the Scoping Study in August 2012 provided Celamin, in 50/50 partnership with TMS, with the confidence to progress the Chaketma Phosphate Project into the Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) stage.

Further drilling and trenching aims to produce sufficient geological data to enable upgrade of the existing Kef El Louz resource to a JORC Measured Mineral Resource by the end of 2013, in accordance with the DFS requirements.

4

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

Metallurgical test work was conducted in the first half of 2013 to increase the understanding of the metallurgical performance of the ore across the extent of the Kef El Louz North resource, and to specifically define processing parameters to obtain maximum recovery and acceptable concentrate quality. To date, this test work has indicated that Zone B (the highest grade and largest of the three ore zones) will produce marketable concentrate using conventional processing, and that further test work is required on Zones A and C in order to confirm how these zones will be incorporated. This test work will continue in second half of 2013 and early results continue to be encouraging.

Invitations to Bid for the completion of the DFS have been issued to international engineering consultants.

Project Overview

The Chaketma exploration licence covers 56km[2] and hosts 6 individual phosphate prospects: Kef El Louz, Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine, Gaasaa Kebira, Gaasaa Ezarbat, Kef El Agueb and Douar Ouled Hamouda (Figure 1).

==> picture [483 x 340] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Chaketma Licensed Area and Prospects

Phosphate Permit Renewals

The Exploration Permits for both the Chaketma and Bir El Afou Phosphate Projects in Tunisia held by Celamin (50%) were successfully renewed for another three year period, ending 10 February 2016.

The Exploration Permit renewals have been published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Tunisia.

The renewed Exploration Permit for the Chaketma Phosphate Project covers the entire 52 sq. kilometre project area, whereas the renewed permit for the Bir El Afou project covers an area 38% smaller than before. The relinquished area of the permit was deemed to be of little economic interest to all parties.

Celamin has strong support from the Tunisian government to continue advancing the Chaketma Project. The project is deemed to be of high importance to both government and the economy.

5

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

Mineral Resource Summary

A summary of the current global phosphate resource inventory at the Chaketma Project is outlined in the table below and shown in Figure 1:

Prospect JORC Resource Classification Mt % P2O5
Gassaa Kebira Inferred 93 20.3
Kef El Louz North Inferred 37 21.0
Total 130Mt 20.5

Kef El Louz, the largest and most extensively explored prospect, occupies approximately 4.2 km[2] . The current resource area occupies a ~1km[2] region in the northern half of the prospect which has been the focus of drilling and channel sampling to date. Initial exploration of the southern region suggests continuity of mineralisation over much of the prospect and that potential exists to expand the existing resource.

==> picture [452 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Current JORC-compliant Mineral Resources over Chaketma project (red fill indicates Mineral Resource-bearing prospect)

Mineralisation thickness averages 14m over the resource area; however pronounced local thickening occurs over western portion of the deposit results in intersections up to 40m thick. The Kef El Louz North resource is typically located at shallow depth, especially in the north-western area where mineralisation outcrops at surface. Depth of cover averages 42m and reaches a maximum of 88m over the resource area, with mineralisation bottoming out at 120m. Strip ratios are favourable, with the majority of the resource area under 10:1 and a significant portion of the thickened western region below 4:1. The average strip ratio for the resource area is 3.95:1 (see Figure 2).

6

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

==> picture [452 x 318] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: KELN strip ratio contours

Gassaa Kebira is the northernmost of the six prospects within Chaketma exploration permit. It has an elongate shape and spans approximately 2.6km north-south and 0.9km east-west, with a surface area of 2.36km[2] . Despite lower exploration density, the available exploration data provided sufficient confidence to classify most of the prospect as an Inferred Mineral Resource. Mineralisation thickness averages 15.7m and is relatively consistent over the resource area. Approximately 90% of the deposit exists under a strip ratio of 10:1 or less.

For a full description of the Kef El Louz North and Gassaa Kebira resource estimations, please refer to the following publically available company releases on the ASX website:

09/11/2012: Maiden JORC Resource - Chaketma Project (Kef El Louz North) http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=01354327

18/06/2013: Initial Gassaa Kebira Resource triples Chaketma Inventory http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130618/pdf/42gjd74ppx65v9.pdf

7

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

Exploration: Kef El Louz

Kef El Louz prospect contains 47 diamond drill holes and 29 trenches. All drilling, trenching, sampling and recording of geological data was conducted by Tunisian Mining Services (TMS).

Drill holes are irregularly distributed over the Kef El Louz prospect, with drill spacing ranging between 100450m and averaging 160m in the Kef El Louz North resource area. Trenching is largely restricted to the north and eastern limits of the deposit, where the phosphate horizon outcrops along drainages and cliffs. Trench spacing is nominally 100m between points, although this is dictated by accessibility and the nature of the site. Figure 4 shows the location of the drill and trench sites within the Kef El Louz prospect.

==> picture [453 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Exploration over Kef El Louz prospect

Drilling at Kef El Louz has yielded a number of excellent geological results including mineralisation intercepts in five separate holes exceeding 20m thickness accompanied by grades averaging over 20% P2O5. These results complement previous exploration results and increase the Company’s confidence in the continuity of mineralisation within the existing resource area. Drilling has also confirmed continuity of mineralisation to the south, indicating potential southerly extension of existing resource area.

A series of induced polarity geophysical surveys were completed in April 2013. Electrical resistivity along 11 profiles, totalling 18km length was measured in an attempt to better define the mineralisation horizon over the deposit. The programme was deemed successful and yielded valuable data which will be incorporated into the geological and resource models for the prospect.

Additional drilling and sampling was conducted on Kef El Louz North to provide material for the comminution test program, as well as for the flotation optimisation and geo-metallurgical variability.

8

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

Exploration: Gassaa Kebira

Gassaa Kebira prospect currently contains 18 points of observation comprising 10 diamond drill holes and 8 trenches. A complete set of assay results is available for all points of observation.

Diamond drilling at Gassaa Kebira occurs at a nominal spacing of 400m, although site access issues result in irregular drill spacing over sections of the deposit (shown in Figure 5). Trenching is largely restricted to the north and eastern limits of the deposit, where the phosphate horizon outcrops at the base of the massive dolomite. Trench spacing is nominally 350m.

==> picture [468 x 330] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Exploration at Gassaa Kebira & Douar Ouled Hamouda prospects.

Assays from the three latest diamond holes at were also encouraging. The most notable intersection was a down-hole thickness of 27.9m at an average grade of 21.05% P2O5 and a waste to ore ratio of 2.7:1.

Exploration: Douar Ouled Hamouda

Exploration at Douar Ouled Hamouda currently consists of 3 trenches excavated early in the project and two recent drill holes (see Figure 5).

Both holes drilled intersected phosphate mineralisation and the most-promising intercept was 13.25m at a grade of 18.85% P2O5 with a waste to ore ratio of 4.45:1.

9

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

Exploration: Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine

Exploration at Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine prospect currently consists of 9 drill holes and 33 trenches, distributed amongst the 7 identified resource blocks. Recent exploration has helped to constrain mineralisation and quantify grade continuity within each block.

==> picture [452 x 319] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: Exploration at Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine prospect

Induced polarity geophysical surveys will increase understanding of local geological structures and their effects on mineralisation and help optimise the location of future exploration sites.

10

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

Recent Exploration Results

Table 1: Diamond drilling intercepts from the Chaketma Permit Area

Recent Exploration Results
Table 1: Diamond drilling intercepts from the Chaketma Permit Area
Recent Exploration Results
Table 1: Diamond drilling intercepts from the Chaketma Permit Area
Recent Exploration Results
Table 1: Diamond drilling intercepts from the Chaketma Permit Area
Recent Exploration Results
Table 1: Diamond drilling intercepts from the Chaketma Permit Area
Recent Exploration Results
Table 1: Diamond drilling intercepts from the Chaketma Permit Area
Recent Exploration Results
Table 1: Diamond drilling intercepts from the Chaketma Permit Area
Recent Exploration Results
Table 1: Diamond drilling intercepts from the Chaketma Permit Area
Recent Drilling Intercepts from Chaketma Permit Area
Drill Hl Frm (m) T (m) Intrt (m) **PO% ** CO% Prt
oe o o ecep **25 ** a ospec
CHDD-2012-049 Faulted Sidi Ali BenOum Ezzine
CHDD-2012-050 62.60 89.00 26.40 21.51 41.32 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-051 Faulted Sidi Ali BenOum Ezzine
CHDD-2012-052 48.70 62.40 13.70 21.71 42.00 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-054 51.00 63.95 12.95 22.95 43.27 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-056 43.70 45.05 1.35 28.45 44.17 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-057 48.25 76.70 28.45 22.01 41.59 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-058 24.80 25.80 1.00 16.48 38.55 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-059 43.10 48.65 5.55 20.95 42.92 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-060 39.10 45.10 6.00 19.82 41.31 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-061 136.30 146.30 10.00 19.77 39.73 GassaaEl Kebira
CHDD-2012-062 52.50 56.00 3.50 16.24 39.93 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-063 70.00 80.30 10.30 20.25 40.41 GassaaEl Kebira
CHDD-2012-064 75.50 103.40 27.90 21.05 40.90 GassaaEl Kebira
CHDD-2012-065 45.10 52.00 6.90 16.65 39.10 OuedHamouda
CHDD-2012-066 59.05 72.30 13.25 18.85 40.57 OuedHamouda
CHDD-2012-067 10.90 30.80 19.90 21.09 41.74 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2012-068 20.45 62.10 41.65 20.84 40.68 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2013-069 No I ntercept (not sampled ) Kef El Louz
CHDD-2013-070 31.50 71.05 39.55 21.35 41.46 Kef El Louz
CHDD-2013-071 28.10 29.10 1.00 10.23 36.65 Kef El Louz

Note: Intercept lengths are measured down-hole.

Table 2: Recent trenching Results from Chaketma Permit Area

Trench Length P2O5% CaO% Prospect
CHT006 28.00 21.98 41.91 Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine
CHT007 10.00 18.91 39.68 Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine
CHT008 8.00 23.29 43.69 Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine
CHT009 23.00 22.08 41.94 Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine
CHT010 6.00 22.64 43.22 Sidi Ali Ben Oum Ezzine
CHT083 14.00 23.56 47.24 Gassa El Kebira
CHT084 23.00 21.75 44.65 Gassa El Kebira
CHT085 12.00 17.58 47.45 Gassa El Kebira

11

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

Metallurgical Results

Metallurgical optimisation test work for the Kef El Louz prospect commenced in the March quarter 2013 and is ongoing. This work forms part of the program to fully define the flotation flow sheet – a critical input to the DFS. The results to date confirm that a marketable concentrate can be produced with very good phosphate recoveries.

Bench scale test work has focused on using an available reagent suite with a number of stages of flotation – in this case, conventional phosphate reverse flotation, open circuit, at elevated temperature, was used however comparable results have also been achieved at ambient temperature.

A composite sample covering the full intersected width of the existing Kef El Louz resource produced:

  • A concentrate grade of 31.0% P2O5

  • P2O5 recovery of 68%

  • MgO less than 1.0%, with other minor elements in acceptable ranges by industry standard

These results were independently confirmed by a major European reagent supplier, conducting product development test work on a full composite sample at ambient temperature. They received comparable results: 30.5% P2O5 concentrate, with 0.7% MgO and 68.6% recovery.

The test work has highlighted the opportunity to further improve performance and recoveries by selectively treating the higher grade, lower MgO beds where the bulk of P2O5 is located. Moving forward, work is now focussing on the treatment of selected ore zones, studying alternative reagents and how to further optimise the flotation process.

Additional test-work will be undertaken to define engineering design parameters more accurately, as well as provide basis for variability within the Kef El Louz North deposit.

Management Additions

Celamin has commenced the recruitment of key personnel required to execute the DFS for the Chaketma Phosphate project. Mr Luc Coussement has been appointed as the resident Project Director for the Tunisian projects. Mr Coussement is a qualified and experienced Mining /Metallurgy Engineer who graduated from the University of Brussels. He speaks both French and English fluently and has recently worked on a Phosphate project in North Africa with an international engineering company.

Financing and Off-take Discussions

Financing and marketing initiatives are underway to international groups, with interest being shown by off-take customers, financial institutions, and other parties focused on mining and agricultural investments. Interest in the Chaketma Project is being shown by several potential off-take customers.

Other Projects

Bir El Afou Phosphate Project, Tunisia

Celamin has a second Phosphate Permit in Tunisia covering approx. 52 square kilometres of the Bir El Afou Project.

The Bir El Afou Project has a maiden Inferred JORC Resource of 29 Mt at 11.1% P ₂ O ₅ at a 7.5% cut-off grade.

Less than ten per cent of the permit area has been drilled or explored; thus there remains potential to increase grade, tonnage and improve mining factors during future exploration and evaluation.

Celamin decided to prioritise the Chaketma Phosphate Project due to its larger target potential over the Bir El Afou Project.

12

Celamin Holdings NL Managing Director’s Operational Review 30 June 2013

Base Metal and Tailings Project, Northern Tunisia

Three lead/zinc permits in Northern Tunisia (El Haouria, Oued Maden and Sidi Driss) were granted to Celamin and TMS equally in September 2011. Work on the Northern Tunisian Base Metals Project was restricted to reviewing and compiling historical data.

Oued El Kebir Project in Algeria

On 21 January 2013, the Company announced the termination of its farm-in agreement with Joint Venture partner, Faienceries Algeriennes Group (“FA”), over the Oued El Kebir polymetallic Project (“OEK”) in Algeria.

The decision was prompted by uncertainty over the ability to secure administrative and other approvals from the relevant Algerian authorities. Since withdrawing from the JV, Celamin has been able to explicitly focus efforts and resources on advancing the Chaketma Project in Tunisia.

Corporate

Celamin completed a placement of 36,333,334 fully paid ordinary shares at an issue price of $0.15 (15 cents) per share amounting to $5,450,000 before costs. Proceeds of the placement are being used to advance the Chaketma Phosphate Project and for general working capital.

Petra Capital was the Lead Manager in the capital raising which introduced a new substantial shareholder to the register. Shares were issued under the Company’s 15% placement capacity (Listing Rule 7.1) and was an excluded issue under Section 708 of the Corporations Act and the 10% placement capacity under ASX Listing Rule 7.1A, as approved at the 2012 Annual General Meeting.

On 30 July 2012, the company issued 75,984,913 free bonus options with an exercise price of $0.35 cents. These options expired on 28 June 2013.

Two new Directors joined the Board of Celamin during the year. Mr Gary Scanlan joined as Non-Executive Director and Mr Russell Luxford as Executive Director. Ms Melanie Leydin resigned from her position as a Non-Executive Director of the Board but has continued as the Company Secretary.

Gary Scanlan is a Fellow of the AusIMM and a chartered accountant with over 28 years of experience in the mining industry – 18 of which were with Newmont Mining Corporation/Newcrest Mining Limited. He has extensive experience in the management, evaluation, development, financing and administration of mining projects and companies.

Russell Luxford is an engineer, specialising in the development and operation of large-scale minerals projects. He has spent over 20 years with Rio Tinto, Adelaide Chemical Company and Renison Goldfields. Russell has previous experience in phosphate mining, having worked as the Project Director on the US$5 billion Ma'aden Al Jalamid phosphate project in Saudi Arabia. He was also the Engineering Manager and subsequently the Operations Manager for the WMC Phosphate Hill phosphate project in Australia.

Resource estimation and management of the project database were undertaken by Geos Mining’s Senior Geologist: Resources & Data, Oliver Willetts.

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by Oliver Willetts, a Competent Person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (membership No. 312940).

Oliver Willetts has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Willetts consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

13

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report

30 June 2013

The directors present their report, together with the financial statements, on the consolidated entity (referred to hereafter as the 'consolidated entity') consisting of Celamin Holdings NL (referred to hereafter as the 'company' or 'parent entity') and the entities it controlled for the year ended 30 June 2013.

Directors

The following persons were directors of Celamin Holdings NL during the whole of the financial year and up to the date of this report, unless otherwise stated:

The Hon. Andrew Thomson, Non-Executive Chairman (resigned 30 August 2012, reappointed 9 October 2012) Mr David Regan, Managing Director

Mr Russell Luxford, Executive Director (appointed 26 October 2012)

Mr Martin Broome, Non-Executive Director

Mr Gary Scanlan, Non-Executive Director (appointed 18 October 2012)

Ms Melanie Leydin, Non-Executive Director (resigned 18 October 2012)

Mr Timothy Regan, Executive Director (appointed 30 August 2012, resigned 9 October 2012)

Principal activities

During the financial year, the principal continuing activities of the consolidated entity consisted of exploration and evaluation of phosphate projects in Tunisia.

Dividends

There were no dividends paid or declared during the current or previous financial year.

The Company does not have franking credits available for subsequent financial years.

Review of operations

The loss for the consolidated entity after providing for income tax and non-controlling interest amounted to $2,131,976 (30 June 2012: $2,126,614).

The Statement of Profit and Loss and Other Comprehensive Income includes interest income of $0.053m compared to $0.046m in 2012. The impairment of exploration and evaluation expenditure was $0.437m compared to $0.060m in 2012.

The Group commenced the financial year with cash reserves of $4.534m. Cash inflows included net proceeds from the issue of shares amounting to $5.351m (2012: $5.368m). Cash outlays included payments for exploration and evaluation of $5.151m compared to $1.982m in the prior year. Cash reserves at the end of the financial year totalled $2.892m.

The Statement of Financial Position shows net current assets of $2.868m (2012: $3.773) and exploration and evaluation assets of $27.273m (2012: $23.108m).

A detailed overview of operations precedes this report.

Significant changes in the state of affairs

On 18 February 2013, the consolidated entity announced that it had received confirmations for the placement of 36,333,334 fully paid ordinary shares at $0.15 (15 cents) per share, raising $5.45 million before costs to fund exploration and evaluation projects and working capital. This placement was completed in June 2013.

During the year, the consolidated entity issued a further 592,475 ordinary shares, 583,500 of which had previously been partly paid with the remaining $0.10 (10 cents) paid to make the shares fully paid. The remaining 8,975 shares were issued upon conversion of options.

14

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

On 14 June 2013, the consolidated entity issued 4,150,000 unlisted options under the company's employee share option plan. The options have an exercise price of $0.20 (20 cents) and an expiry date of 31 May 2018. The vesting dates are 31 May 2015 for 2,075,000 of the unlisted options and 31 May 2016 for the balance.

Celamin accelerated its commitments of Tunisianisation of the phosphate projects, pursuant to which Celamin will hold a minimum of 50% in the permits and Tunisian interests will hold up to 50%. This change was achieved by assigning 30% interest in both permits to its Tunisian partner TMS and has been gazzetted in the Official Journal of the Tunisian Republic.

There were no other significant changes in the state of affairs of the consolidated entity during the financial year.

Matters subsequent to the end of the financial year

No matter or circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2013 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect the consolidated entity's operations, the results of those operations, or the consolidated entity's state of affairs in future financial years.

Likely developments and expected results of operations

The consolidated entity will continue to pursue its objectives of developing and exploiting the Chaketma area of interest. The resource identified in the area of 130Mt @ 20.5% P2O5 is currently classified as Inferred Resource inventory. This confirms the potential for a long life project of over 35 years. Focus is now on work to progress the Definitive Feasibility Study ("DFS") and selection of the engineering firm to undertake the study. The initial aim of the continued exploration and resource step out drilling work is to enlarge and improve the classification of both prospects in the Chaketma area of interest. It is anticipated that limited additional work is required to improve the resource classification at Kef El Louz North from Inferred Mineral Resource under the JORC 2012 code to Indicated Mineral Resource.

The consolidated entity will need to raise further capital to fund the completion of the DFS, ongoing exploration and general working capital. The ability of the consolidated entity to raise sufficient capital to complete exploration work and successfully exploit the prospects at Chaketma will be impacted by global financial markets and changes in commodity prices. The Directors are aware of the risks arising from raising capital in challenging financial market conditions, and of fluctuating commodity prices.

Environmental regulation

The Company holds participating interests in a number of exploration tenements. The various authorities granting tenements require the tenement holder to comply with the terms of the grant of the tenement given to it under those terms of the tenement. There have been no known breaches of the tenement condition, and no such breaches have been notified by any government agency during the financial year ended 30 June 2013.

Information on directors

Information on directors
Name: The Hon. Andrew Thomson
Title: Non-Executive Chairman (resigned 30 August 2012, reappointed 9 October 2012)
Qualifications: Graduate of the Law Faculty of the University of Melbourne, the International Center
of Keio University in Tokyo, and Georgetown University Law Center. His other
languages are Japanese, Mandarin Chinese and Arabic.
Experience and expertise: Mr Thomson lives in Tokyo and works as a consultant to Minter Ellison Lawyers
working in the Middle East and Asia on investment and government relations
matters. He is also chairman of Gulf & Asian Mining Limited. Until 2005, Mr Thomson
lived in Washington D.C. where he served at the World Bank as an Assistant and
Acting Executive Secretary of the Inspection Panel. Before moving to Washington
D.C. in 2001 Mr Thomson was a Member of Parliament in Australia.
Other current directorships: Gulf & Asian Mining Limited
Former directorships (in the Athena Resources Ltd (resigned 13 June 2012)
last 3 years): Citadel Resource Group Limited (resigned 31 March 2011)
Special responsibilities: Member of Remuneration & Nomination Committee and Audit Committee
Interests in shares: 567,534 fully paid ordinary shares
Interests in options: None

15

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

Name: Mr David Regan Title: Managing Director Qualifications: LLB (University of Sydney) Experience and expertise: Mr. Regan is a lawyer by training and has been working in the resources industry in Papua New Guinea, Australia, North America and the North Africa Middle East region for over thirty years in various senior corporate roles. During this period he worked for Rio Tinto, BHP Billiton, Atlantic Richfield (Anaconda Minerals, Arco Coal and Arco International) in a variety of roles including legal, corporate planning, economic evaluation, marketing, joint venture management and business development. Mr. Regan has worked in the North Africa Middle East region for over ten years where he led teams that put together over $3 billion of resource investments. Mr. Regan was an independent director of ASX listed Citadel Resource Group (CGG) and a founding director of Celamin Limited.

Other current directorships: None Former directorships (in the last 3 years): Citadel Resource Group Limited (resigned 21 December 2010) Special responsibilities: None Interests in shares: 41,550,871 fully paid ordinary shares 2,088,421 partly paid ordinary shares Interests in options: 2,725,613 listed options with an exercise price of $0.20 expiring on 31 March 2014

Name: Mr Russell Luxford Title: Executive Director (appointed 26 October 2012) Qualifications: BE,(Hon.) UNSW Experience and expertise: Mr Luxford is an engineer specialising in the development and operations of largescale minerals projects. He has prior phosphate experience as the Project Director of the US$5 billion Ma'aden Al Jalamid phosphate project in Saudi Arabia and as Engineering Manager and then start-up Operations Manager for the WMC Phosphate Hill phosphate project in Australia. Mr Luxford also has more than 20 years’ experience in gold, copper, silver/lead/zinc, aluminium and nickel operations with Rio Tinto, Adelaide Chemical Company, WMC and Renison Goldfields. None

Other current directorships: None Former directorships (in the last 3 years): None Special responsibilities: None Interests in shares: None Interests in options: None

Name: Mr Martin Broome Title: Non-Executive Director Qualifications: B.Sc(Hons) Geology, M.Sc Engineering Rock Mechanics, Chartered Engineer, FIOM Experience and expertise: Mr. Broome has more than 38 years of experience working in the minerals industry in Africa. Until 2010, Mr. Broome was Managing Director of African Mining Consultants (“AMC”) having founded AMC in 1994. This followed a 20 year career with Zambian Consolidated Copper Mines Ltd ("ZCCM") in the Zambian Copperbelt. Other current directorships: Barclays Bank of Zambia plc

Other current directorships: Barclays Bank of Zambia plc Former directorships (in the last 3 years): None Special responsibilities: Chair of Remuneration & Nomination Committee and member of Audit Committee Interests in shares: None Interests in options: None

16

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

30 June 2013
Celamin Holdings NL
Directors' report
Name: Mr Gary Scanlan
Title: Non-Executive Director (appointed 18 October 2012)
Qualifications: FAusIMM, CA
Experience and expertise: Mr Scanlan has over 29 years' experience in the mining industry preceded by 10
years'
experience
with
PricewaterhouseCoopers.
His previous roles include
Executive General Manager - Finance for Newcrest Mining Ltd and Managing
Director then Chairman of Castlemaine Goldfields Ltd, a company listed on the ASX
until its acquisition by Liongold Corp in September 2012. He was appointed a director
of Liongold Corporation on 1 October 2012.
Other current directorships: None
Former directorships (in the Red 5 Ltd (resigned 31 December 2012)
last 3 years): Castlemaine Goldfields Ltd (removed from ASX official list on 17 September 2012)
Citadel Resource Group Limited (resigned March 2011)
Special responsibilities: Chair of Audit Committee
Interests in shares: 3,300,000 fully paid ordinary shares
Interests in options: None

'Other current directorships' quoted above are current directorships for listed entities only and excludes directorships in all other types of entities, unless otherwise stated.

'Former directorships (in the last 3 years)' quoted above are directorships held in the last 3 years for listed entities only and excludes directorships in all other types of entities, unless otherwise stated.

Company secretary

Ms Leydin is a Chartered Accountant and is a Registered Company Auditor. She graduated from Swinburne University in 1997, became a Chartered Accountant in 1999 and since February 2000 has been the principal of chartered accounting firm, Leydin Freyer. Ms Leydin has over 22 years' experience in the accounting profession and is a director and company secretary for a number of oil and gas, junior mining and exploration entities on the Australian Stock Exchange.

Meetings of directors

The number of meetings of the company's Board of Directors ('the Board') and of each board committee held during the year ended 30 June 2013, and the number of meetings attended by each director were:

Remuneration and Remuneration and
Full Board Nomination Committee Audit Committee
Attended Held Attended Held Attended Held
The Hon. Andrew Thomson 8 8 1 1 1 1
Mr David Regan* 9 9 - - - -
Mr Russell Luxford 5 6 - - - -
Mr Martin Broome 6 9 1 1 2 2
Mr Gary Scanlan 6 6 - - 1 1
Mr Timothy Regan 1 1 - - - -
Ms Melanie Leydin** 2 3 - - 1 1

Held: represents the number of meetings held during the time the director held office or was a member of the relevant committee.

  • Mr D Regan also invited to attend Audit Committee meetings in his capacity as Managing Director.

  • ** Ms M Leydin also attended board and committee meetings in her capacity as Company Secretary.

17

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

Remuneration report (audited)

The remuneration report, which has been audited, outlines the director and executive remuneration arrangements for the consolidated entity and the company, in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 and its Regulations.

The remuneration report is set out under the following main headings:

  • A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration B Details of remuneration C Service agreements D Share-based compensation E Additional information

A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration

The intention of the consolidated entity's and company's executive reward framework is to ensure reward for performance is competitive and appropriate for the results delivered. The planned framework aims to align executive reward with the achievement of strategic objectives and the creation of value for shareholders, and conforms with the market best practice for delivery of reward. The Board of Directors ('the Board') ensures that executive reward satisfies the following key criteria for good reward governance practices:

  • competitiveness and reasonableness

  • acceptability to shareholders

  • ● alignment of executive compensation ● transparency

The Board is responsible for determining and reviewing remuneration arrangements for its directors and executives. The performance of the consolidated entity and company depends on the quality of its directors and executives. The remuneration philosophy is to attract, motivate and retain high performance and high quality personnel.

The Board will implement an executive remuneration framework that is market competitive and complementary to the reward strategy of the consolidated entity and company.

Alignment to shareholders' interests:

  • focuses on sustained growth in shareholder wealth, growth in share price, and delivering constant or increasing return on assets as well as focusing the executive on key non-financial drivers of value

  • ● attracts and retains high calibre executives

Alignment to program participants' interests:

  • rewards capability and experience

  • reflects competitive reward for contribution to growth in shareholder wealth

  • provides a clear structure for earning rewards

In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of non-executive directors and executive remunerations are separate.

Non-executive directors remuneration

Non-Executive Directors’ fees are paid within an aggregate limit which is approved by the shareholders from time to time. The limit of Non-Executive Director fees was increased to a maximum of $350,000 at the company's Annual General Meeting on 20 October 2010. Retirement payments, if any, are agreed to be determined in accordance with the rules set out in the Corporations Act 2001 at the time of the Director’s retirement or termination. Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration may include an incentive portion consisting of bonuses and/or options, as considered appropriate by the Board, which may be subject to shareholder approval in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules.

Currently the Company remunerates Non-Executive Directors at a rate of $60,000 per annum plus superannuation except for the Non-Executive Chairman who receives fees of $120,000 per annum. There were no incentives, bonuses or options paid during the year to Non-Executive Directors.

18

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

Executive remuneration

Despite remuneration for executives currently consisiting of entirely fixed remuneration, the consolidated entity aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration, based on their position and responsibility, which is both fixed and variable. The consolidated entity is currently taking steps to ensure that executives are paid the correct blend of remuneration to align the interests of executives and shareholders.

  • The executive remuneration and reward framework has the following components: ● base pay

  • other remuneration such as superannuation and long service leave

The combination of these comprises the executive's total remuneration.

The long-term incentives ('LTI') include long service leave.

Consolidated entity performance and link to remuneration

Currently the company remunerates Non-Executive Directors at a rate of $60,000 per annum plus superannuation. There were no incentives, bonuses or options paid during the year to Non-Executive Directors.

As stated above, the consolidated entity aims to reward executives with a level and mix of remuneration, based on their position and responsibility, which is both fixed and variable. The consolidated entity is currently taking steps to ensure that executives are paid the correct blend of remuneration to align the interests of executives and shareholders.

Fixed remuneration, consisting of base salary, superannuation and non-monetary benefits, is reviewed annually by the Board, based on individual and business unit performance, the overall performance of the consolidated entity and comparable market remunerations.

Voting and comments made at the company's 20 November 2012 Annual General Meeting ('AGM')

The company received 63.85% of 'for' votes in relation to its remuneration report for the year ended 30 June 2012. Having received 47.85% of 'for' votes at the 2011 AGM in relation to its remuneration report for the year ended 30 June 2011 the company was required to table a "Board Spill Meeting Resolution" under the Corporation Act's Two Strikes rule. The "Board Spill Meeting Resolution" received 32.83% of 'for' votes, and was therefore unsuccessful. It was therefore not necessary for a further meeting to be scheduled within 90 days to consider the position of each director in office.

A Remuneration and Nomination Committee was established during the year in accordance with ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations to ensure there is a fully transparent process when establishing remuneration for key management personnel.

B Details of remuneration

Amounts of remuneration

Details of the remuneration of the directors, other key management personnel (defined as those who have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the consolidated entity) and executives of Celamin Holdings NL are set out in the following tables.

In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of Non-Executive Directors and executive remunerations are separate. This provides a clear structure for earning rewards.

All remuneration paid to Executive and Non-Executive Directors during the 2013 and 2012 financial years was fixed.

19

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

30 June 2013
Ms M Leydin
Name
Mr R Luxford
Non-Executive
Directors:
Mr L
Coussement

Mr G Scanlan
2013
Mr T Regan

Mr N Sekfali

Other Key
Management
Personnel:
Executive
Directors:
Mr D Regan
Mr A Thomson

Mr M Broome
Ms M Leydin* **
Cash salary
Non-
and fees
Bonuses
monetary
$ $ $ 106,451
-
-
66,000
-
-
42,092
-
-
32,645
-
-
165,138
-
-
82,116
-
-
67,355
-
-
157,200
-
-
159,120
-
-
26,200
-
-
904,317
-
-
Short-term benefits
Post-
employment
benefits
Super-
annuation
$ -
-
3,788
-
14,862
-
-
-
-
-
Termination
payments
Termination
payments
$ -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Share-based
payments
Equity-
settled
Total
$ $ -
106,451
-
66,000
-
45,880
-
32,645
-
180,000
-
82,116
-
67,355
1,477
158,677
1,477
160,597
1,477
27,677
4,431
927,398
904,317 - - 18,650 -
  • Refer to appointment and resignation dates on page 14 above.

** includes fees paid to Leydin Freyer Corporate Pty Ltd for company secretarial fees and accounting services provided.

*** Determined to be Key Management Personnel from 1 July 2012.

**** Commenced on 22 April 2013.

20

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

Non-Executive
Directors:
Name
Mr M Broome
Mr M Trifunovic

Executive
Directors:
Mr A Thomson

Ms M Leydin
2012
Mr J
Mouchacca*
Mr P Avery

Mr D Regan
Mr K Nichol**
Cash salary
Non-
and fees
Bonuses
monetary
$ $ $ 60,000
-
22,000
-
-
146,500
-
-
25,000
-
-
35,000
-
-
15,000
-
-
165,138
-
-
75,000
-
-
543,638
-
-
Short-term benefits
Cash salary
Non-
and fees
Bonuses
monetary
$ $ $ 60,000
-
22,000
-
-
146,500
-
-
25,000
-
-
35,000
-
-
15,000
-
-
165,138
-
-
75,000
-
-
543,638
-
-
Short-term benefits
Cash salary
Non-
and fees
Bonuses
monetary
$ $ $ 60,000
-
22,000
-
-
146,500
-
-
25,000
-
-
35,000
-
-
15,000
-
-
165,138
-
-
75,000
-
-
543,638
-
-
Short-term benefits
Post-
employment
benefits
Super-
annuation
$ -
-
-
-
7,650
-
14,862
-
Termination
payments
Termination
payments
$ -
-
-
67,000
60,000
-
-
177,910
Share-based
payments
Equity-
settled
Total
$ $ -
60,000
-
22,000
-
146,500
-
92,000
-
102,650
-
15,000
-
180,000
-
252,910
-
871,060
543,638 - - 22,512 304,910
  • A. Thomson appointed as a director 4 January 2012.

  • M. Broome appointed director on 22 February 2012.

  • M. Leydin appointed director on 18 November 2011.

  • J. Mouchacca appointed director on 18 November 2011, resigned 22 February 2012.

  • ** M. Trifunovic, P. Avery and K. Nichol resigned from the Board on 18 November 2011.

  • *** includes fees paid to Leydin Freyer Corporate Pty Ltd for company secretarial fees and accounting services provided.

C Service agreements

Remuneration and other terms of employment for key management personnel are formalised in service agreements. Details of these agreements are as follows:

Name: Mr David Regan Title: Executive Director Agreement commenced: 25 March 2012 Term of agreement: Initial term of 36 months Details: Mr Regan may resign from his position and thus terminate this contract by giving 1 month’s written notice. After the expiry of the Employment Period (36 months) either party may terminate the Employment by giving the other 1 months notice in writing. During the Employment Period, a fee will be payable by the company upon the company’s termination equal to the fee that would be payable from the termination date to the date that is twelve months from the anniversary of the commencement of the Employment Period. The company may terminate the contract at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred.

21

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

30 June 2013
Celamin Holdings NL
Directors' report
Name: Mr Martin Broome
Title: Non-Executive Director
Agreement commenced: 22 February 2012
Details: Mr Broome may resign from his position and thus terminate this contract by giving
one month’s written notice.
The engagement of the Director may be terminated at any time by three months’
written notice to the Director. The Company may terminate the contract at any time
without notice if serious misconduct has occurred.
Remuneration comprises a base salary of $60,000 for non-executive board duties,
and the Company will make a further superannuation contribution of 10% of
combined base and variable components of salary paid.
Name: The Hon. Andrew Thomson
Title: Non-Executive Chairman
Agreement commenced: 9 October 2012
Details: Mr Thomson may resign from his position and thus terminate this contract by giving
one month's written notice.
The engagement of the Chairman may be terminated at any time by three months’
written notice to the Chairman. The Company may terminate the contract at any time
without notice if serious misconduct has occurred.
Fees are set initially at $120,000 per annum for Non-Executive Chairman duties.
Name: Mr Gary Scanlan
Title: Non-Executive Director
Agreement commenced: 18 October 2012
Details: Mr Scanlan may resign from his position and thus terminate this contract by giving
thirty day's written notice.
The engagement of the Director may be terminated at any time by three months'
written notice to the Director. The Company may terminate the contract at any time
without notice if serious misconduct has occurred.
Salary is set initially at $60,000 per annum for non-executive board duties and the
Company will make a superannuation contribution of 9% of the combined base and
variable components of salary paid.
Name: Mr Russell Luxford
Title: Executive Director
Agreement commenced: 25 October 2012
Details: Mr Luxford may resign from his position and thus terminate this contract by giving
thirty day's written notice.
The engagement of the Director may be terminated at any time by three months'
written notice to the Director. The Company may terminate the contract at any time
without notice if serious misconduct has occurred.
Salary is set initially at $60,000 per annum for board duties plus fees for work
undertaken
on
the
Company's
projects,
and
the
Company will
make
a
superannuation contribution of 9% of the combined base and variable components of
salary paid.

Key management personnel have no entitlement to termination payments in the event of removal for misconduct.

D Share-based compensation

Issue of shares

There were no shares issued to directors and other key management personnel as part of compensation during the year ended 30 June 2013.

22

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

Options

The terms and conditions of each grant of options over ordinary shares affecting remuneration of directors and other key management personnel in this financial year or future reporting years are as follows:

Fair value
Vesting date and per option
Grant date exercisable date Expiry date Exercise price at grant date
23 May 2013 1 June 2015 31 May 2018 $0.20 $0.043
23 May 2013 1 June 2016 31 May 2018 $0.20 $0.043

Options granted carry no dividend or voting rights.

The number of options over ordinary shares granted to and vested by directors and other key management personnel as part of compensation during the year ended 30 June 2013 are set out below:

Number of options granted Number of options granted Number of options vested Number of options vested
during the year during the year
Name 2013 2012 2013 2012
Mr T Regan 1,000,000 - - -
Mr N Sekfali 1,000,000 - - -
Mr L Coussement 1,000,000 - - -

Values of options over ordinary shares granted, exercised and lapsed for directors and other key management personnel as part of compensation during the year ended 30 June 2013 are set out below:

Value of Value of Value of Remuneration
options options options consisting of
granted exercised lapsed options
during the during the during the for the
year year year year
$ $ $ %
Name
Mr T Regan 1,477 - -
1
Mr N Sekfali 1,477 - -
1
Mr L Coussement 1,477 - -
5

23

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

E Additional information

The earnings of the consolidated entity for the four years to 30 June 2013 are summarised below:

2010 2011 2012 2013
$ $ $ $
Revenue 41,011 100,828 45,567 53,388
Loss before income tax (621,375) (1,643,079) (2,130,114) (2,131,976)
Loss after income tax (621,375) (1,643,079) (2,130,114) (2,131,976)

The factors that are considered to affect total shareholders return ('TSR') are summarised below:

2010 2011 2012 2013
Share price at start of year ($) - 0.12 0.46 0.16
Share price at end of year ($) 0.12 0.46 0.16 0.08
Basic earnings per share (cents per share) (3.66) (1.92) (3.82) (1.35)

This concludes the remuneration report, which has been audited.

Shares under option

Unissued ordinary shares of Celamin Holdings NL under option at the date of this report are as follows:

Exercise
price
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
5 February 2010
Expiry date
Grant date
31 March 2014
31 March 2014
31 March 2014
14 June 2013
31 May 2018
29 October 2010
22 February 2010
Number
under option
6,300,000
14,058,026
5,000,000
4,150,000
29,508,026

No person entitled to exercise the options had or has any right by virtue of the option to participate in any share issue of the company or of any other body corporate.

Shares issued on the exercise of options

There were no shares of Celamin Holdings NL issued on the exercise of options during the year ended 30 June 2013 and up to the date of this report.

Indemnity and insurance of officers

The company has indemnified the directors of the company for costs incurred, in their capacity as a director, for which they may be held personally liable, except where there is a lack of good faith.

During the financial year, the company paid a premium in respect of a contract to insure the directors of the company against a liability to the extent permitted by the Corporations Act 2001. The contract of insurance prohibits disclosure of the nature of liability and the amount of the premium.

Indemnity and insurance of auditor

The company has not otherwise, during or since the financial year, indemnified or agreed to indemnify the auditor of the company or any related entity against a liability incurred by the auditor.

During the financial year, the company has not paid a premium in respect of a contract to insure the auditor of the company or any related entity.

24

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' report 30 June 2013

Proceedings on behalf of the company

No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of the company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the company for all or part of those proceedings.

Non-audit services

There were no non-audit services provided during the financial year by the auditor.

Officers of the company who are former audit partners of Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd

There are no officers of the company who are former audit partners of Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd.

Auditor's independence declaration

A copy of the auditor's independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on the following page.

Auditor

Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd was appointed as auditor at the Annual General Meeting on 20 November 2012, and Andrew Frewin Stewart resigned at the same date, in accordance with section 327 of the Corporations Act 2001.

This report is made in accordance with a resolution of directors, pursuant to section 298(2)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001.

On behalf of the directors

==> picture [108 x 48] intentionally omitted <==

________ David Regan Managing Director

23 September 2013 MELBOURNE

25

==> picture [206 x 39] intentionally omitted <==

Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd ACN 130 913 594

The Rialto, Level 30 525 Collins St Melbourne Victoria 3000 GPO Box 4736 Melbourne Victoria 3001

T +61 3 8320 2222 F +61 3 8320 2200 E [email protected] W www.grantthornton.com.au

Auditor’s Independence Declaration To the Directors of Celamin Holdings NL

In accordance with the requirements of section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, as lead auditor for the audit of Celamin Holdings NL for the year ended 30 June 2013, I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been:

  • a no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and

  • b no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.

GRANT THORNTONAUDIT PTY LTD Chartered Accountants

B. A. Mackenzie Partner – Audit & Assurance

Melbourne, 23 September 2013

‘Grant Thornton’ refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton Australia Ltd is a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL). GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions. In the Australian context only, the use of the term ‘Grant Thornton’ may refer to Grant Thornton Australia Limited ABN 41 127 556 389 and its Australian subsidiaries and related entities. GTIL is not an Australian related entity to Grant Thornton Australia Limited.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Liability is limited in those States where a current scheme applies.

26

Celamin Holdings NL Corporate Governance Statement 30 June 2013

The Board of Directors (‘the Board’) of Celamin Holdings NL (the ‘Company’) is responsible for the corporate governance of the consolidated entity. The Board guides and monitors the business and affairs of the company on behalf of the shareholders by whom they are elected and to whom they are accountable.

The table below summarises the company's compliance with the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Revised Principles and Recommendations.

Principles and
Recommendations
Principles and
Recommendations
Compliance Comply
Principle 1 – Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
1.1
1.2
1.3
Establish the functions
reserved to the Board and
those delegated to manage
and disclose those
functions.
Disclose the process for
evaluating the performance
of senior executives.
Provide the information
indicated in_Guide to_
reporting on Principle 1.
The Board is responsible for the overall
corporate governance of the company.
The Board has adopted a Corporate
Governance charter that formalises its roles
and responsibilities and defines the matters
that are reserved for the Board and specific
matters that are delegated to management.
The Board has adopted a Delegations of
Authority that sets limits of authority for senior
executives.
On appointment of a director, the company
issues a letter of appointment setting out the
terms and conditions of appointment to the
Board.
The Board meets annually to review the
performance of senior executives. The senior
executives’ performance is assessed against
the performance of the Company as a whole.
A Corporate Governance Charter has been
disclosed on the company’s website and is
summarised in this Corporate Governance
Statement.
A performance evaluation process is included
in the Corporate Governance Charter, which
has been disclosed on the company’s website
and is summarised in this Corporate
Governance Statement.
Complies.
Complies.
Complies.
Complies.

27

Celamin Holdings NL Corporate Governance Statement 30 June 2013


30 June 2013

30 June 2013
Principles and
Recommendations
Compliance Comply
Principle 2 – Structure the Board to add value
2.1 A
majority
of
the
Board
should
be
independent
directors.
Three of the Board’s directors are independent
directors of the company.
The Hon. Andrew Thomson is the Non-Executive
Chairman and is independent.
Mr David Regan is an Executive Director.
Mr Martin Broome is a Non-Executive
Director and is independent.
Mr Gary Scanlan is a Non-Executive
Director and is independent.
Mr Russell Luxford is an Executive Director.
Complies.
2.2 The chair should be an
independent director
The Hon. Andrew Thomson is the Chairman and
is an independent Non-Executive Director.
Complies.
2.3 The roles of chair and
chief executive officer
should not be exercised by
the same individual.
As noted, the Hon. Andrew Thomson is the
Company Chairman. Mr David Regan is Chief
Executive Officer of the Company.
Complies.
2.4 The Board should
establish a nomination
committee.
The company has established a Nomination
and Remuneration Committee. The members
are Mr Martin Broome, The Hon. Andrew
Thomson and Mr Gary Scanlan.
Complies.
2.5 Disclose the process for
evaluating the
performance of the Board,
its committees and
individual directors.
The company is in the process of evaluating the
performance of the Board, its committees and
individual directors as outlined in the Board
Charter which is available on the company’s
website.
The Board’s induction program provides
incoming directors with information that will
enable them to carry out their duties in the best
interests of the company. This includes
supporting ongoing education of directors for the
benefit of the company.
Complies.

28

Celamin Holdings NL Corporate Governance Statement 30 June 2013

Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Principles and
Recommendations
Compliance Comply
Principle 2 – Structure the Board to add value
2.6 Provide the information
indicated in the_Guide to_
reporting on Principle 2.
A director is considered independent when he
substantially satisfies the test for
independence as set out in the ASX Corporate
Governance Recommendations.
Members of the Board are able to take
independent professional advice at the
expense of the company.
The Hon. Andrew Thomson, independent Non-
Executive Chairman, was appointed to the Board
in October 2012.
Mr David Regan, Executive Director, was
appointed to the Board in October 2010.
Mr Martin Broome, independent Non-Executive
Director, was appointed to the Board in February
2012.
Mr Russell Luxford, Executive Director, was
appointed to the Board in October 2012.
Mr Gary Scanlan, independent Non-Executive
Director, was appointed to the Board in October
2012.
The Board has undertaken a review of the mix of
skills and experience on the Board in light of the
company’s principal activities and direction, and
has considered diversity in succession planning.
The Board considers the current mix of skills and
experience of members of the Board and its
senior management issufficient tomeet the
requirements of the company.
In accordance with the information suggested in
Guide to Reporting on Principle 2, the company
has disclosed full details of its directors in the
Annual Report containing this Corporate
Governance Statement. Other disclosure material
on the Structure of the Board has been made
available on the company’s website.

Complies.
Principle 3 – Promote ethical and responsible decision making
3.1 Establish a code of
conduct and disclose the
code or a summary of
the code.
The Board has adopted a code of conduct. The
code establishes a clear set of values that
emphasise a culture encompassing strong
corporate governance, sound business
practices and good ethical conduct.
The code is available on the company’s
website.
Complies.

29

Celamin Holdings NL Corporate Governance Statement 30 June 2013


30 June 2013

30 June 2013
Principles and
Recommendations
Compliance Comply
Principle 3 – Promote ethical and responsible decision making
3.2 Companies should
establish a policy
concerning diversity and
disclose the policy or a
summary of that policy.
The policy should
include
requirements for the Board
to establish measurable
objectives for achieving
gender diversity and for
the Board to assess
annually both the
objectives and progress in
achieving
them.
The Board has undertaken a review of the mix of
skills and experience on the Board in light of the
company’s principal activities and direction.
The Board has prepared a Diversity Policy that
considers the benefits of diversity, ways to
promote a culture of diversity, factors to be taken
into account in the selection process of
candidates for Board and senior management
positions in the company, education programs to
develop skills and experience in preparation for
Board and senior management positions,
processes to include review and appointment
of directors, and identify key measurable
diversity performance objectives for the Board,
CEO and senior management.
Complies.
3.3 Companies should
disclose in each annual
report the measurable
objectives for achieving
gender diversity set by the
board in accordance with
the diversity policy and
progress towards
achieving them.
The Company adopted a Diversity Policy during
the previous financial year and intends to report
in each annual report the measurable objectives
for achieving gender diversity set by the Board.
Does not comply. However
the Company intends to set
measurable objectives at the
appropriate time in the future.
3.4 Companies should
disclose in each annual
report the proportion of
women employees in the
whole organisation,
women in senior executive
positions and women on
the board.
The Board currently comprises of 5 male
Directors whilst the Company Secretary is female.
The proportion of females in the company is
33% being 3 out of a total of 9 employees.
Complies.
3.5 Provide the information
indicated in_Guide to_
reporting on Principle 3.
This information is available on the Company’s
website (www.celaminnl.com.au).
Complies.

30

Celamin Holdings NL Corporate Governance Statement 30 June 2013

Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Principles and
Recommendations
Compliance Comply
Principle 4 – Safeguard integrity in financial reporting
4.1 The Board should establish
an audit committee.
The Board has established an audit committee.
The members are Mr Gary Scanlan, Mr Martin
Broome and The Hon. Andrew Thomson.
Complies
4.2 The auditcommittee
shouldbe structuredso
thatit consists of only non-
executive directors, a
majority of independent
directors, is chaired by an
independent chair who is
not chair of the Board and
have at least 3 members.
The audit committee consists of all non-
executive directors and is chaired by a non-
executive director who is not chair of the
board.
Complies.
4.3 The audit committee
should have a formal
charter.
The audit committee has a formal charter. Complies
4.4 Provide the information
indicated in_Guide to_
reporting on Principle 4.
This is disclosed in the directors’ report in this
annual report for the year ending 30 June
2013.
Complies.
Principle 5 – Make timely and balanced disclosure
5.1
5.2
Establish written policies
designed to ensure
compliance with ASX
Listing Rules disclosure
requirements and to
ensure accountability at a
senior executive level for
that compliance and
disclose those policies or a
summary of those policies.
Provide the information
indicated in the_Guide to_
reporting on Principle 5.
The Board has adopted a Corporate
Governance charter, to ensure that it complies
with the continuous disclosure regime under
the ASX Listing Rules and theCorporations
Act2001.
This charter is available on the company’s
website (www.celaminnl.com.au).
The company’s Corporate Governance Charter
is available on the company’s website
(www.celaminnl.com.au).
Complies.
Complies.

31

Celamin Holdings NL Corporate Governance Statement 30 June 2013

Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Principles and
Recommendations
Compliance Comply
Principle 6 – Respect the rights of shareholders
6.1 Design a communications
policy for promoting
effective communication
with shareholders and
encouraging their
participation at general
meetings and disclose that
policy or a summary of that
policy.
The company has not adopted a shareholder
communications policy. The company uses its
website (www.celaminnl.com.au), annual
report, market announcements, media
disclosures and webcasting to communicate
with its shareholders, as well as encourages
participation at general meetings.
The Board believes that given the size and
nature of the Company’s activities, that the
framework in place for the Company’s
communications with shareholders is entirely
appropriate and effective. The Company
intends to develop the communications
framework into a detailed policy as its operations
continue to grow

Does not comply, however
the Company is committed to
preparing a Communications
Policy as its operations
continue to grow.
6.2 Provide the information
indicated in the_Guide to_
reporting on Principle 6.
The company’s provides relevant shareholder
communication documents on the company’s
website.
Complies.
Principle 7 – Recognise and manage risk
7.1 Establish policies for the
oversight and management
of material business risks
and disclose a summary of
these policies.
The company has adopted a risk management
statement within the audit committee charter.
The audit committee is responsible for
managing risk; however, ultimate responsibility
for risk oversight and risk management rests
with the Board.
The audit charter is available on the company’s
website and is summarised in this Corporate
Governance Statement.
Complies.
7.2 The Board should require
management to design and
implement the risk
management and internal
control system to manage
the company’s material
business risks and report
to it on whether those risks
are being managed
effectively. The Board
should disclose that
management has reported
to it as to the effectiveness
of the company’s
management of its material
business risks.
The Board believes the risk management and
internal control systems designed and
implemented by the Directors and the Financial
Officer are adequate given the size and nature
of the Company’s activities.
Management has not formally
reported to the Board as to
the effectiveness of the
Company’s management of
its material business risks.
Given the nature and size of
the Company and the Board’s
ultimate responsibility to
manage the risks of the
Company this is not
considered critical. The
Company intends to develop
the risk reporting framework
into a detailed policy as its
operations continue to grow.

32

Celamin Holdings NL Corporate Governance Statement 30 June 2013

Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Celamin Holdings NL
Corporate Governance Statement
30 June 2013
Principles and
Recommendations
Compliance Comply
Principle 7 – Recognise and manage risk
7.3 The Board should disclose
whether it has received
assurance from the chief
executive officer and chief
financial officer that the
declaration provided in
accordance with section
295A of the Corporations
Act is founded on a sound
system of risk
management and internal
control and that the system
is operating efficiently and
effectively in all material
respects in relation to the
financial reporting risks.
The Board has previously received a statement
from the previous Chairman Mr Martin Broome
and former director Ms Melanie Leydin that the
declaration provided in accordance with section
295A of the Corporations Act 2001 was founded
on a sound system of risk management and
internal control and that the system was
operating efficiently and effectively in all
material respects in relation to the financial
reporting risks. This statement will be updated
by the current Chairman in due course.
Complies.
7.4 Provide the information
indicated in_Guide to_
reporting on Principle 7.
Refer to the comments above in 7.1, 7.2 and
7.3.
Complies.
Principle 8 – Remunerate fairly and responsibly
8.1 The Board should establish
a remuneration committee.
The Board has established a Nomination and
Remuneration Committee and has adopted a
remuneration charter.
Complies. The remuneration
charter can be accessed at
www.celaminnl.com.au.
8.2 Clearly distinguish the
structure of non-executive
directors’ remuneration
from that of executive
directors and senior
executives.
The company complies with the guidelines for
executive remuneration packages and non-
executive director remuneration.
No senior executive is involved directly in
deciding their own remuneration.
Complies.
8.3 Provide the information
indicated in_the Guide to_
reporting on Principle 8.
This is disclosed in this annual report for the
year ending 30 June 2013.
Complies.

Celamin Holdings NL’s corporate governance practices are in place at the date of this Annual Report.

Various corporate governance practices are discussed within this statement. For further information on corporate governance policies adopted by Celamin Holdings NL, refer to our website: www.celaminnl.com.au

33

Celamin Holdings NL Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income For the year ended 30 June 2013

Note
5
7
29
29
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to the owners of
Celamin Holdings NL
Loss for the year is attributable to:
Non-controlling interest
Owners of Celamin Holdings NL
Loss before income tax expense
Non-controlling interest
Diluted earnings per share
Basic earnings per share
Corporate expenses
Employment expenses
Expenses
Administration expenses
Owners of Celamin Holdings NL
Unrealised foreign exchange gain
Other comprehensive income
Revenue
Depreciation and amortisation
Impairment of exploration and evaluation
Share Based Payments
Loss on sale of property plant and equipment
Exploration expenditure written off
Total comprehensive income for the year is attributable to:
Loss after income tax expense for the year
Income tax expense
Foreign currency translation
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
2013
2012
$
$
53,388
45,567
(790,745)
(807,013)
(391,998)
(377,501)
(522,105)
(772,040)
(30,987)
(41,535)
(52,500)
(115,841)
(757)
(1,751)
(6,130)
-
(436,808)
(60,000)
46,666
-
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
-
-
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
4,117
-
4,117
-
(2,127,859)
(2,130,114)
-
(3,500)
(2,131,976)
(2,126,614)
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
-
(3,500)
(2,127,859)
(2,126,614)
(2,127,859)
(2,130,114)
Cents
Cents
(1.35)
(3.82)
(1.35)
(3.82)
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
53,388
45,567
(790,745)
(807,013)
(391,998)
(377,501)
(522,105)
(772,040)
(30,987)
(41,535)
(52,500)
(115,841)
(757)
(1,751)
(6,130)
-
(436,808)
(60,000)
46,666
-
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
-
-
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
4,117
-
4,117
-
(2,127,859)
(2,130,114)
-
(3,500)
(2,131,976)
(2,126,614)
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
-
(3,500)
(2,127,859)
(2,126,614)
(2,127,859)
(2,130,114)
Cents
Cents
(1.35)
(3.82)
(1.35)
(3.82)
Consolidated
(2,131,976)
-
(2,130,114)
-
(2,131,976)
4,117
(2,130,114)
-
4,117 -
(2,127,859) (2,130,114)
-
(2,131,976)
(3,500)
(2,126,614)
(2,131,976) (2,130,114)
-
(2,127,859)
(3,500)
(2,126,614)
(2,127,859) (2,130,114)
Cents
(1.35)
(1.35)
Cents
(3.82)
(3.82)

The above statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes

34

Celamin Holdings NL Statement of financial position As at 30 June 2013

Note
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Trade and other payables
Total assets
Issued capital
Equity
Non-current liabilities
Total non-current liabilities
Net assets
Employee benefits
Total equity
Accumulated losses
Trade and other receivables
Total current liabilities
Current liabilities
Non-current assets
Total current assets
Employee benefits
Current assets
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Other
Non-controlling interest
Equity attributable to the owners of Celamin Holdings NL
Reserves
Property, plant and equipment
Total liabilities
Exploration and evaluation
Liabilities
Total non-current assets
2013
2012
$
$
2,891,723
4,533,946
36,224
100,295
598,217
76,216
3,526,164
4,710,457
80,894
85,442
27,273,473
23,108,079
27,354,367
23,193,521
30,880,531
27,903,978
635,211
937,023
22,977
-
658,188
937,023
8,014
-
8,014
-
666,202
937,023
30,214,329
26,966,955
36,730,626
31,361,523
10,247
-
(6,523,044)
(4,391,068)
30,217,829
26,970,455
(3,500)
(3,500)
30,214,329
26,966,955
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
2,891,723
4,533,946
36,224
100,295
598,217
76,216
3,526,164
4,710,457
80,894
85,442
27,273,473
23,108,079
27,354,367
23,193,521
30,880,531
27,903,978
635,211
937,023
22,977
-
658,188
937,023
8,014
-
8,014
-
666,202
937,023
30,214,329
26,966,955
36,730,626
31,361,523
10,247
-
(6,523,044)
(4,391,068)
30,217,829
26,970,455
(3,500)
(3,500)
30,214,329
26,966,955
Consolidated
3,526,164 4,710,457
80,894
27,273,473
85,442
23,108,079
27,354,367 23,193,521
30,880,531 27,903,978
635,211
22,977
937,023
-
658,188 937,023
8,014 -
8,014 -
666,202 937,023
30,214,329 26,966,955
36,730,626
10,247
(6,523,044)
31,361,523
-
(4,391,068)
30,217,829
(3,500)
26,970,455
(3,500)
30,214,329 26,966,955

The above statement of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes

35

Celamin Holdings NL Statement of changes in equity For the year ended 30 June 2013

Consolidated
Balance at 1 July 2011
Loss after income tax
expense for the year
Cost of capital raising
Total comprehensive income
for the year
Issue of shares
Derecognition of foreign
subsidiary
Balance at 30 June 2012
Consolidated
Transactions with owners in
their capacity as owners:
Other comprehensive income
for the year, net of tax
Other comprehensive income
for the year, net of tax
Loss after income tax
expense for the year
Total comprehensive income
for the year
Balance at 1 July 2012
Issue of shares
Cost of capital raising
Share-based payments
Balance at 30 June 2013
Transactions with owners in
their capacity as owners:
$
-
(3,500)
-
Non-
controlling
Interest
$
11,493,980
-
-
equity
Contributed
$
-
-
-
Option
Reserve
$
1,025
-
-
Foreign
Currency
Reserve
Total
equity
$
$
(2,264,454)
9,230,551
(2,126,614)
(2,130,114)
-
-
(2,126,614)
(2,130,114)
-
20,457,987
-
(590,444)
-
(1,025)
(4,391,068)
26,966,955
Total
equity
$
$
(4,391,068)
26,966,955
(2,131,976)
(2,131,976)
-
4,117
(2,131,976)
(2,127,859)
-
6,130
-
5,510,145
-
(141,042)
(6,523,044)
30,214,329
losses
Accumulated
Accumulated
losses
Total
equity
$
$
(2,264,454)
9,230,551
(2,126,614)
(2,130,114)
-
-
(2,126,614)
(2,130,114)
-
20,457,987
-
(590,444)
-
(1,025)
(4,391,068)
26,966,955
Total
equity
$
$
(4,391,068)
26,966,955
(2,131,976)
(2,131,976)
-
4,117
(2,131,976)
(2,127,859)
-
6,130
-
5,510,145
-
(141,042)
(6,523,044)
30,214,329
losses
Accumulated
Accumulated
losses
(3,500)
-
-
-
-
20,457,987
(590,444)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,025)
(2,126,614)
-
-
-
(2,130,114)
20,457,987
(590,444)
(1,025)
(3,500) 31,361,523 - - (4,391,068) 26,966,955
$
(3,500)
-
-
Non-
controlling
Interest
$
31,361,523
-
-
Contributed
Equity
$
-
-
-
Reserve
Option
$
-
-
4,117
Foreign
Currency
Reserve
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,510,145
(141,042)
-
6,130
-
-
4,117
-
-
-
(2,131,976)
-
-
-
(2,127,859)
6,130
5,510,145
(141,042)
(3,500) 36,730,626 6,130 4,117 (6,523,044) 30,214,329

The above statement of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes

36

Celamin Holdings NL Statement of cash flows For the year ended 30 June 2013

Celamin Holdings NL
For the year ended 30 June 2013
Statement of cash flows
Note
28
8
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash flows from financing activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Share issue transaction costs
Payments for investments
Proceeds from sale of investments
Payments for exploration and evaluation
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year
Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of shares
Cash flows from operating activities
Interest received
Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of GST)
Net cash used in operating activities
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash
Payments for property, plant and equipment
Deposit received for sale of tenement
2013
2012
$
$
(1,843,497)
(1,107,317)
53,485
45,892
(1,790,012)
(1,061,425)
-
(200,000)
-
140,000
10,000
-
(26,439)
(85,185)
(5,151,387)
(1,982,055)
(5,167,826)
(2,127,240)
5,510,145
5,957,988
(159,538)
(590,445)
5,350,607
5,367,543
(1,607,231)
2,178,878
4,533,946
2,355,068
(34,992)
-
2,891,723
4,533,946
Consolidated
(1,790,012) (1,061,425)
-
-
10,000
(26,439)
(5,151,387)
(200,000)
140,000
-
(85,185)
(1,982,055)
(5,167,826) (2,127,240)
5,510,145
(159,538)
5,957,988
(590,445)
5,350,607 5,367,543
(1,607,231)
4,533,946
(34,992)
2,178,878
2,355,068
-
2,891,723 4,533,946

The above statement of cash flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes

37

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 1. General information

The financial report covers Celamin Holdings NL as a consolidated entity consisting of Celamin Holdings NL and the entities it controlled. The financial report is presented in Australian dollars, which is Celamin Holdings NL's functional and presentation currency.

The financial report consists of the financial statements, notes to the financial statements and the directors' declaration.

Celamin Holdings NL is a listed public company, incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Its registered office and principal place of business is:

Level 4, 100 Albert Road South Melbourne VIC 3205 Australia

A description of the nature of the consolidated entity's operations and its principal activities are included in the directors' report, which is not part of the financial report.

The financial report was authorised for issue, in accordance with a resolution of directors, on 19 September 2013. The directors have the power to amend and reissue the financial report.

Note 2. Significant accounting policies

The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

New, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations adopted

The consolidated entity has adopted all of the new, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board ('AASB') that are mandatory for the current reporting period.

Any new, revised or amending Accounting Standards or Interpretations that are not yet mandatory have not been early adopted.

Any significant impact on the accounting policies of the consolidated entity from the adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations are disclosed below. The adoption of these Accounting Standards and Interpretations did not have any significant impact on the financial performance or position of the consolidated entity.

The following Accounting Standards and Interpretations are most relevant to the consolidated entity:

AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements as outlined in AASB 2011-9 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income

The consolidated entity has applied AASB 2011-9 amendments from 1 July 2012. The amendments requires grouping together of items within other comprehensive income on the basis of whether they will eventually be 'recycled' to the profit or loss (reclassification adjustments). The change provides clarity about the nature of items presented as other comprehensive income and the related tax presentation. The amendments also introduced the term 'Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income' clarifying that there are two discrete sections, the profit or loss section (or separate statement of profit or loss) and other comprehensive income section.

Basis of preparation

These general purpose financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board ('AASB') and the Corporations Act 2001, as appropriate for for-profit oriented entities. These financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ('IASB').

38

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 2. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Historical cost convention

The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for, where applicable, the revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets, financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, investment properties, certain classes of property, plant and equipment and derivative financial instruments.

Critical accounting estimates

The preparation of the financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the consolidated entity's accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements, are disclosed in note 3.

Parent entity information

In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, these financial statements present the results of the consolidated entity only. Supplementary information about the parent entity is disclosed in note 24.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of Celamin Holdings NL ('company' or 'parent entity') as at 30 June 2013 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended. Celamin Holdings NL and its subsidiaries together are referred to in these financial statements as the 'consolidated entity'.

Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the consolidated entity has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The effects of potential exercisable voting rights are considered when assessing whether control exists. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the consolidated entity. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases.

Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between entities in the consolidated entity are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the consolidated entity.

The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Refer to the 'business combinations' accounting policy for further details. A change in ownership interest, without the loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction, where the difference between the consideration transferred and the book value of the share of the non-controlling interest acquired is recognised directly in equity attributable to the parent.

Non-controlling interest in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, statement of financial position and statement of changes in equity of the consolidated entity. Losses incurred by the consolidated entity are attributed to the non-controlling interest in full, even if that results in a deficit balance.

Where the consolidated entity loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets including goodwill, liabilities and non-controlling interest in the subsidiary together with any cumulative translation differences recognised in equity. The consolidated entity recognises the fair value of the consideration received and the fair value of any investment retained together with any gain or loss in profit or loss.

Operating segments

Operating segments are presented using the 'management approach', where the information presented is on the same basis as the internal reports provided to the Chief Operating Decision Makers ('CODM'). The CODM is responsible for the allocation of resources to operating segments and assessing their performance.

39

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 2. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Foreign currency translation

The financial report is presented in Australian dollars, which is Celamin Holdings NL's functional and presentation currency.

Foreign currency transactions

Foreign currency transactions are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at financial year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or loss.

Foreign operations

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates at the reporting date. The revenues and expenses of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the average exchange rates, which approximate the rate at the date of the transaction, for the period. All resulting foreign exchange differences are recognised in other comprehensive income through the foreign currency reserve in equity.

The foreign currency reserve is recognised in profit or loss when the foreign operation or net investment is disposed of.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognised when it is probable that the economic benefit will flow to the consolidated entity and the revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.

Interest

Interest revenue is recognised as interest accrues using the effective interest method. This is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset and allocating the interest income over the relevant period using the effective interest rate, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to the net carrying amount of the financial asset.

Other revenue

Other revenue is recognised when it is received or when the right to receive payment is established.

40

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 2. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Income tax

The income tax expense or benefit for the period is the tax payable on that period's taxable income based on the applicable income tax rate for each jurisdiction, adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences, unused tax losses and the adjustment recognised for prior periods, where applicable.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary differences at the tax rates expected to apply when the assets are recovered or liabilities are settled, based on those tax rates that are enacted or substantively enacted, except for:

  • When the deferred income tax asset or liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and that, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting nor taxable profits; or

  • When the taxable temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates or interests in joint ventures, and the timing of the reversal can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses.

The carrying amount of recognised and unrecognised deferred tax assets are reviewed each reporting date. Deferred tax assets recognised are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that future taxable profits will be available for the carrying amount to be recovered. Previously unrecognised deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that there are future taxable profits available to recover the asset.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only where there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities and deferred tax assets against deferred tax liabilities; and they relate to the same taxable authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entity's which intend to settle simultaneously.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.

Trade and other receivables

Other receivables are recognised at amortised cost, less any provision for impairment.

Property, plant and equipment

Plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis to write off the net cost of each item of property, plant and equipment (excluding land) over their expected useful lives as follows:

Plant and equipment 3-8 years

The residual values, useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each reporting date.

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when there is no future economic benefit to the consolidated entity. Gains and losses between the carrying amount and the disposal proceeds are taken to profit or loss. Any revaluation surplus reserve relating to the item disposed of is transferred directly to retained profits.

41

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 2. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Exploration and evaluation assets

Exploration and evaluation expenditure in relation to separate areas of interest for which rights of tenure are current is carried forward as an asset in the statement of financial position where it is expected that the expenditure will be recovered through the successful development and exploitation of an area of interest, or by its sale; or exploration activities are continuing in an area and activities have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable estimate of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves. Where a project or an area of interest has been abandoned, the expenditure incurred thereon is written off in the year in which the decision is made.

Impairment of non-financial assets

Non-financial assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds it recoverable amount.

Receoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and value-in-use. The value-in-use is the present value of the estimated future cash flows relating to the asset using a pre-tax discount rate specific to the asset or cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Assets that do not have independent cash flows are grouped together to form a cash-generating unit.

Trade and other payables

These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the consolidated entity prior to the end of the financial year and which are unpaid. Due to their short-term nature they are measured at amortised cost and are not discounted. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.

Employee benefits

Share-based payments

Equity-settled and cash-settled share-based compensation benefits are provided to employees.

Equity-settled transactions are awards of shares, or options over shares, that are provided to employees in exchange for the rendering of services. Cash-settled transactions are awards of cash for the exchange of services, where the amount of cash is determined by reference to the share price.

The cost of equity-settled transactions are measured at fair value on grant date. Fair value is independently determined using either the Binomial or Black-Scholes option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option, together with non-vesting conditions that do not determine whether the consolidated entity receives the services that entitle the employees to receive payment. No account is taken of any other vesting conditions.

The cost of equity-settled transactions are recognised as an expense with a corresponding increase in equity over the vesting period. The cumulative charge to profit or loss is calculated based on the grant date fair value of the award, the best estimate of the number of awards that are likely to vest and the expired portion of the vesting period. The amount recognised in profit or loss for the period is the cumulative amount calculated at each reporting date less amounts already recognised in previous periods.

42

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 2. Significant accounting policies (continued)

The cost of cash-settled transactions is initially, and at each reporting date until vested, determined by applying either the Binomial or Black-Scholes option pricing model, taking into consideration the terms and conditions on which the award was granted. The cumulative charge to profit or loss until settlement of the liability is calculated as follows:

  • during the vesting period, the liability at each reporting date is the fair value of the award at that date multiplied by the expired portion of the vesting period.

  • from the end of the vesting period until settlement of the award, the liability is the full fair value of the liability at the reporting date.

All changes in the liability are recognised in profit or loss. The ultimate cost of cash-settled transactions is the cash paid to settle the liability.

Market conditions are taken into consideration in determining fair value. Therefore any awards subject to market conditions are considered to vest irrespective of whether or not that market condition has been met, provided all other conditions are satisfied.

If equity-settled awards are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the modification has not been made. An additional expense is recognised, over the remaining vesting period, for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based compensation benefit as at the date of modification.

If the non-vesting condition is within the control of the consolidated entity or employee, the failure to satisfy the condition is treated as a cancellation. If the condition is not within the control of the consolidated entity or employee and is not satisfied during the vesting period, any remaining expense for the award is recognised over the remaining vesting period, unless the award is forfeited.

If equity-settled awards are cancelled, it is treated as if it has vested on the date of cancellation, and any remaining expense is recognised immediately. If a new replacement award is substituted for the cancelled award, the cancelled and new award is treated as if they were a modification.

Issued capital

Ordinary shares are classified as equity.

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

Dividends

Dividends are recognised when declared during the financial year and no longer at the discretion of the company.

43

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 2. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Business combinations

The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for business combinations regardless of whether equity instruments or other assets are acquired.

The consideration transferred is the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets transferred, equity instruments issued or liabilities incurred by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree and the amount of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. For each business combination, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree is measured at either fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. All acquisition costs are expensed as incurred to profit or loss.

On the acquisition of a business, the consolidated entity assesses the financial assets acquired and liabilities assumed for appropriate classification and designation in accordance with the contractual terms, economic conditions, the consolidated entity's operating or accounting policies and other pertinent conditions in existence at the acquisition-date.

Where the business combination is achieved in stages, the consolidated entity remeasures its previously held equity interest in the acquiree at the acquisition-date fair value and the difference between the fair value and the previous carrying amount is recognised in profit or loss.

Contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer is recognised at the acquisition-date fair value. Subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability is recognised in profit or loss. Contingent consideration classified as equity is not remeasured and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity.

The difference between the acquisition-date fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of any pre-existing investment in the acquiree is recognised as goodwill. If the consideration transferred and the pre-existing fair value is less than the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired, being a bargain purchase to the acquirer, the difference is recognised as a gain directly in profit or loss by the acquirer on the acquisition-date, but only after a reassessment of the identification and measurement of the net assets acquired, the non-controlling interest in the acquiree, if any, the consideration transferred and the acquirer's previously held equity interest in the acquirer.

Business combinations are initially accounted for on a provisional basis. The acquirer retrospectively adjusts the provisional amounts recognised and also recognises additional assets or liabilities during the measurement period, based on new information obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition-date. The measurement period ends on either the earlier of (i) 12 months from the date of the acquisition or (ii) when the acquirer receives all the information possible to determine fair value.

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to the owners of Celamin Holdings NL, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the financial year.

Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares.

44

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 2. Significant accounting policies (continued)

Goods and Services Tax ('GST') and other similar taxes

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred is not recoverable from the tax authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of the acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense.

Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the tax authority is included in other receivables or other payables in the statement of financial position.

Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing activities which are recoverable from, or payable to the tax authority, are presented as operating cash flows.

Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the tax authority.

New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet mandatory or early adopted

Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet mandatory, have not been early adopted by the consolidated entity for the annual reporting period ended 30 June 2013. The consolidated entity's assessment of the impact of these new or amended Accounting Standards and Interpretations, most relevant to the consolidated entity, are set out below.

AASB 9 Financial Instruments, 2009-11 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9, 20107 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9 and 2012-6 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9

This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015 and completes phase I of the IASB's project to replace IAS 39 (being the international equivalent to AASB 139 'Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement'). This standard introduces new classification and measurement models for financial assets, using a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortised cost or fair value. The accounting for financial liabilities continues to be classified and measured in accordance with AASB 139, with one exception, being that the portion of a change of fair value relating to the entity’s own credit risk is to be presented in other comprehensive income unless it would create an accounting mismatch. The consolidated entity will adopt this standard from 1 July 2015 but its adoption is not expected to have a significant impact in reporting the performance or the position of the consolidated entity.

AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements

This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The standard has a new definition of 'control'. Control exists when the reporting entity is exposed, or has the rights, to variable returns (e.g. dividends, remuneration, returns that are not available to other interest holders including losses) from its involvement with another entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its 'power' over that other entity. A reporting entity has power when it has rights (e.g. voting rights, potential voting rights, rights to appoint key management, decision making rights, kick out rights) that give it the current ability to direct the activities that significantly affect the investee’s returns (e.g. operating policies, capital decisions, appointment of key management). The consolidated entity will not only have to consider its holdings and rights but also the holdings and rights of other shareholders in order to determine whether it has the necessary power for consolidation purposes. The adoption of this standard from 1 July 2013 would only have an impact where the consolidated entity has a holding of less than 50% in an entity, has de facto control, and is not currently consolidating that entity. The consolidated entity has no such investments and therefore the adoption of the standard will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.

AASB 11 Joint Arrangements

This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The standard defines which entities qualify as joint ventures and removes the option to account for joint ventures using proportional consolidation. Joint ventures, where the parties to the agreement have the rights to the net assets will use equity accounting. Joint operations, where the parties to the agreements have the rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities will account for the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses separately, according to the relevant standards. The adoption of this standard from 1 July 2013 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.

45

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 2. Significant accounting policies (continued)

AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

This standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. It contains the entire disclosure requirement associated with other entities, being subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures. The disclosure requirements have been significantly enhanced when compared to the disclosures previously located in AASB 127 'Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements', AASB 128 'Investments in Associates', AASB 131 'Interests in Joint Ventures' and Interpretation 112 'Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities'. The adoption of this standard from 1 July 2013 will not have a material impact on the consolidated entity.

AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement and AASB 2011-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 13

This standard and its consequential amendments are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. The standard provides a single robust measurement framework, with clear measurement objectives, for measuring fair value using the 'exit price' and it provides guidance on measuring fair value when a market becomes less active. The 'highest and best use' approach would be used to measure assets whereas liabilities would be based on transfer value. As the standard does not introduce any new requirements for the use of fair value, its impact on adoption by the consolidated entity from 1 July 2013 should be minimal, although there will be increased disclosures where fair value is used.

Note 3. Critical accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions

The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements, estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on other various factors, including expectations of future events, management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The resulting accounting judgements and estimates will seldom equal the related actual results. The judgements, estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities (refer to the respective notes) within the next financial year are discussed below.

Estimation of useful lives of assets

The consolidated entity determines the estimated useful lives and related depreciation and amortisation charges for its property, plant and equipment and finite life intangible assets. The useful lives could change significantly as a result of technical innovations or some other event. The depreciation and amortisation charge will increase where the useful lives are less than previously estimated lives, or technically obsolete or non-strategic assets that have been abandoned or sold will be written off or written down.

Recovery of deferred tax assets

Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences only if the consolidated entity considers it is probable that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses.

Business combinations

As discussed in note 2, business combinations are initially accounted for on a provisional basis. The fair value of assets acquired, liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed are initially estimated by the consolidated entity taking into consideration all available information at the reporting date. Fair value adjustments on the finalisation of the business combination accounting is retrospective, where applicable, to the period the combination occurred and may have an impact on the assets and liabilities, depreciation and amortisation reported.

Exploration and evaluation costs

At each reporting date, the directors review the carrying value of each area of interest, with reference to the indicators of impairment outlined in AASB 6 - Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources. The directors also consider whether the expenditure on each area of interest qualify for treatment under the requirements of AASB 6.

46

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 4. Operating segments

The consolidated entity operated predominantly as an explorer for phosphate and minerals with exploration activities being performed in northern Africa.

AASB 8 requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports about the components of the consolidated entity that are regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Makers in order to allocate resources to the segment and to assess its performance. The Board of Directors reviews the consolidated entity as a whole in the business segment of phosphate and mineral exploration.

Geographical information

Tunisia
Algeria
Australia
2013
2012
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sales to external
customers
2013
2012
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sales to external
customers
2013
2012
$
$
3,066,667
4,795,899
27,813,864
22,757,503
-
350,576
30,880,531
27,903,978
Geographical
non-current assets
2013
2012
$
$
3,066,667
4,795,899
27,813,864
22,757,503
-
350,576
30,880,531
27,903,978
Geographical
non-current assets
- - 30,880,531 27,903,978

The geographical non-current assets above are exclusive of, where applicable, financial instruments, deferred tax assets, post employment benefits assets and rights under insurance contracts.

Note 5. Revenue

Loss before income tax includes the following specific
expenses:
Interest revenue - bank deposits
Employee benefits expense
Note 6. Expenses
Superannuation
2013
2012
$
$
53,388
45,567
2013
2012
$
$
18,651
22,960
Consolidated
Consolidated

47

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 7. Income tax expense

Note 7. Income tax expense
-
-
-
-
Movement in provisions
Accrued expenses
Loss before income tax expense
Share-based payments
Deductible capital raising costs
Unused tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has
been recognised
Tax losses not recognised
Loss on sale of investments
Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense and tax at
the statutory rate
Tax effect amounts which are not deductible/(taxable) in
calculating taxable income:
Prepaid expenses
Other timing differences
Income tax expense
Incorporation fees
Deductible capitalised exploration expenditure
Potential tax benefit @ 30%
Tax losses not recognised
Tax at the statutory tax rate of 30%
2013
2012
$
$
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
(639,593)
(639,034)
1,839
-
-
18,000
3,721
1,075
9,297
-
482
(641)
(624,254)
(620,600)
(1,249,618)
(198,300)
(105,032)
(96,569)
(6,259)
(3,488)
(232)
(232)
1,985,395
919,189
-
-
15,051,630
8,433,648
4,515,489
2,530,094
Consolidated
(639,593)
1,839
-
3,721
9,297
482
(639,034)
-
18,000
1,075
-
(641)
(624,254)
(1,249,618)
(105,032)
(6,259)
(232)
1,985,395
(620,600)
(198,300)
(96,569)
(3,488)
(232)
919,189
- -
15,051,630 8,433,648
4,515,489 2,530,094

The above potential tax benefit for tax losses has not been recognised in the statement of financial position. These tax losses can only be utilised in the future if the continuity of ownership test is passed, or failing that, the same business test is passed.

The taxation benefits of tax losses and temporary differences not brought to account will only be obtained if:

i) the consolidated entity derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefit from the deductions for the losses to be realised;

ii) the consolidated entity continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by law; and

iii) no change in tax legislation adversely affects the consolidated entity in realizing the benefits from deducting the losses.

In respect of the activities in Tunisia, the current Mining Code of the Republic of Tunisia provides the holder of exploration permits with a five year exemption from payment of income tax following the commencement of effective exploitation.

48

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 7. Income tax expense (continued)

Note 7. Income tax expense (continued)
-
-
Deferred tax assets not recognised comprises temporary
differences attributable to:
Deferred tax assets not recognised
Total deferred tax assets not recognised
Tax losses
Other temporary differences
2013
2012
$
$
4,515,489
2,530,094
(2,576,788)
(1,229,148)
1,938,701
1,300,946
Consolidated
1,938,701 1,300,946

The above potential tax benefit, which excludes tax losses, for deductible temporary differences has not been recognised in the statement of financial position as the recovery of this benefit is uncertain.

Note 8. Current assets - cash and cash equivalents

Cash at bank 2013
2012
$
$
2,891,723
4,533,946
Consolidated

Note 9. Current assets - trade and other receivables

-
-
GST receivable
Trade and other receivables
2013
2012
$
$
3,390
52,500
32,834
47,795
36,224
100,295
Consolidated

The average credit period on trade and other receivables is 30 days. Due to the short term nature of the receivables their carrying value is assumed to approximate their fair value. No collateral or security is held. No interest is charged on the receivables.

49

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 10. Current assets - other

-
-
Prepayments
Deposits supporting bank guarantees
Security deposits
2013
2012
$
$
533,629
11,628
21,883
21,883
42,705
42,705
598,217
76,216
Consolidated

Prepayments amounting to $501,137 (2012: $nil) have been included as payments for exploration and evaluation in cash flows from investing activities in the statement of cash flows.

Note 11. Non-current assets - property, plant and equipment

Note 11. Non-current assets - property, plant and equipment
-
-
-
-
-
-
Plant and equipment - at cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation
Motor vehicles - at cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation
2013
2012
$
$
88,164
61,725
(31,569)
(8,682)
56,595
53,043
42,601
42,601
(18,302)
(10,202)
24,299
32,399
80,894
85,442
Consolidated
56,595 53,043
42,601
(18,302)
42,601
(10,202)
24,299 32,399
80,894 85,442

Reconciliations

Reconciliations of the written down values at the beginning and end of the current and previous financial year are set out below:

$ $ $ $ -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Disposals
Balance at 30 June 2013
Balance at 1 July 2011
Additions
Depreciation expense
Consolidated
Balance at 30 June 2012
Additions through business
combinations
Depreciation expense
$ 202,633
88,600
(164,256)
(41,535)
Plant and
Equipment
Total
$ 202,633
88,600
(164,256)
(41,535)
85,442
26,439
(30,987)
85,442
26,439
(30,987)
80,894 80,894

50

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 12. Non-current assets - exploration and evaluation

Exploration and evaluation assets 2013
2012
$
$
27,273,473
23,108,079
Consolidated

Reconciliations

Reconciliations of the written down values at the beginning and end of the current and previous financial year are set out below:

$ $ $ $ -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Balance at 30 June 2013
Additions through business
combinations
Balance at 30 June 2012
Additions
Consolidated
Balance at 1 July 2011
Write off of assets
Additions
Write off of assets
Total
$ $ 3,000,320
3,000,320
662,752
662,752
19,446,758
19,446,758
(1,751)
(1,751)
23,108,079
23,108,079
4,602,959
4,602,959
(437,565)
(437,565)
27,273,473
27,273,473
Exploration &
Evaluation

The recoverability of the carrying amount of exploration and evaluation assets is dependent on the successful exploration and sale of phosphate and base metals across the permits held by the consolidated entity. Capitalised costs amounting to $4,650,250 (2012: $1,982,055) have been included in cash flows from investing activities in the statement of cash flows.

Exploration and evaluation expenditure relating to Algeria was fully impaired during the financial year following the withdrawal from the Algeria JV project.

Note 13. Current liabilities - trade and other payables

Note 13. Current liabilities - trade and other payables
-
-
Other payables
Trade payables
2013
2012
$
$
589,162
896,661
46,049
40,362
635,211
937,023
Consolidated
635,211 937,023

Refer to note 18 for further information on financial instruments.

51

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 14. Equity - issued capital

2013
2012
Securities
Securities
188,671,986
151,746,177
14,887,796
15,471,296
101,342,939
25,367,001
304,902,721
192,584,474
No of shares
47,289,508
4,666,669
2,000,000
72,500,000
25,290,000
151,746,177
583,500
8,975
36,333,334
188,671,986
No of shares
-
5,626,801
4,200,000
7,500,000
800,000
(316,900)
(92,500)
(246,105)
(2,000,000)
15,471,296
(583,500)
14,887,796
Conversion of partly paid shares
Issue of shares to Celamin Ltd vendors
30 November 2010
Conversion to fully paid share capital
10 July 2012 to 16 Oct 2012
2 May 2011
30 June 2013
Issue of Partly paid shares to Celamin Ltd
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Balance
Details
Movements in ordinary share capital
1 July 2011
4 January 2012
Conversion of options
30 June 2012
12 June 2012
20 August 2011
Balance
Less capital raising costs
Ordinary shares - fully paid
Placement
4 January 2012
Details
Conversion of partly paid shares
Balance
30 November 2010
Date
Balance
30 June 2013
Less capital raising costs
Consolidated
10 July 2012 to 16 Oct 2012
Balance
11-16 July 2012
23 May 2011
Issue of shares under Prospectus
12 Feb 2013 to 3 June 2013
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Partly paid shares
Issue of Partly Paid shares
Placement
Balance
16 June 2011
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Issue of Partly paid shares
4 January 2012
1 July 2011
Options over shares
Movements in partly paid shares
30 June 2012
Issue of Partly paid shares
29 July 2011
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Date
12 June 2012
2013
2012
Securities
Securities
188,671,986
151,746,177
14,887,796
15,471,296
101,342,939
25,367,001
304,902,721
192,584,474
No of shares
47,289,508
4,666,669
2,000,000
72,500,000
25,290,000
151,746,177
583,500
8,975
36,333,334
188,671,986
No of shares
-
5,626,801
4,200,000
7,500,000
800,000
(316,900)
(92,500)
(246,105)
(2,000,000)
15,471,296
(583,500)
14,887,796
Conversion of partly paid shares
Issue of shares to Celamin Ltd vendors
30 November 2010
Conversion to fully paid share capital
10 July 2012 to 16 Oct 2012
2 May 2011
30 June 2013
Issue of Partly paid shares to Celamin Ltd
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Balance
Details
Movements in ordinary share capital
1 July 2011
4 January 2012
Conversion of options
30 June 2012
12 June 2012
20 August 2011
Balance
Less capital raising costs
Ordinary shares - fully paid
Placement
4 January 2012
Details
Conversion of partly paid shares
Balance
30 November 2010
Date
Balance
30 June 2013
Less capital raising costs
Consolidated
10 July 2012 to 16 Oct 2012
Balance
11-16 July 2012
23 May 2011
Issue of shares under Prospectus
12 Feb 2013 to 3 June 2013
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Partly paid shares
Issue of Partly Paid shares
Placement
Balance
16 June 2011
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Issue of Partly paid shares
4 January 2012
1 July 2011
Options over shares
Movements in partly paid shares
30 June 2012
Issue of Partly paid shares
29 July 2011
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Date
12 June 2012
2013
2012
Securities
Securities
188,671,986
151,746,177
14,887,796
15,471,296
101,342,939
25,367,001
304,902,721
192,584,474
No of shares
47,289,508
4,666,669
2,000,000
72,500,000
25,290,000
151,746,177
583,500
8,975
36,333,334
188,671,986
No of shares
-
5,626,801
4,200,000
7,500,000
800,000
(316,900)
(92,500)
(246,105)
(2,000,000)
15,471,296
(583,500)
14,887,796
Conversion of partly paid shares
Issue of shares to Celamin Ltd vendors
30 November 2010
Conversion to fully paid share capital
10 July 2012 to 16 Oct 2012
2 May 2011
30 June 2013
Issue of Partly paid shares to Celamin Ltd
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Balance
Details
Movements in ordinary share capital
1 July 2011
4 January 2012
Conversion of options
30 June 2012
12 June 2012
20 August 2011
Balance
Less capital raising costs
Ordinary shares - fully paid
Placement
4 January 2012
Details
Conversion of partly paid shares
Balance
30 November 2010
Date
Balance
30 June 2013
Less capital raising costs
Consolidated
10 July 2012 to 16 Oct 2012
Balance
11-16 July 2012
23 May 2011
Issue of shares under Prospectus
12 Feb 2013 to 3 June 2013
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Partly paid shares
Issue of Partly Paid shares
Placement
Balance
16 June 2011
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Issue of Partly paid shares
4 January 2012
1 July 2011
Options over shares
Movements in partly paid shares
30 June 2012
Issue of Partly paid shares
29 July 2011
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Date
12 June 2012
2013
2012
$
$
34,859,671
29,490,568
17,285
17,285
1,853,670
1,853,670
36,730,626
31,361,523
Issue price
$
9,623,025
$0.15
699,987
$0.10
200,000
$0.20
14,500,000
$0.20
5,058,000
(590,444)
29,490,568
$0.10
58,350
$0.20
1,795
$0.15
5,450,000
(141,042)
34,859,671
Issue price
$
2,100
$0.00
3,485
$0.00
4,200
$0.00
7,500
$0.00
-
$0.10
-
$0.10
-
$0.10
-
$0.10
-
17,285
$0.10
-
17,285
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
34,859,671
29,490,568
17,285
17,285
1,853,670
1,853,670
36,730,626
31,361,523
Issue price
$
9,623,025
$0.15
699,987
$0.10
200,000
$0.20
14,500,000
$0.20
5,058,000
(590,444)
29,490,568
$0.10
58,350
$0.20
1,795
$0.15
5,450,000
(141,042)
34,859,671
Issue price
$
2,100
$0.00
3,485
$0.00
4,200
$0.00
7,500
$0.00
-
$0.10
-
$0.10
-
$0.10
-
$0.10
-
17,285
$0.10
-
17,285
Consolidated
304,902,721 192,584,474 36,730,626 31,361,523
No of shares
47,289,508
4,666,669
2,000,000
72,500,000
25,290,000
Issue price
$0.15
$0.10
$0.20
$0.20
$0.10
$0.20
$0.15
Issue price
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.10
$0.10
$0.10
$0.10
$0.10
$
9,623,025
699,987
200,000
14,500,000
5,058,000
(590,444)
151,746,177
583,500
8,975
36,333,334
29,490,568
58,350
1,795
5,450,000
(141,042)
188,671,986 34,859,671
No of shares
-
5,626,801
4,200,000
7,500,000
800,000
(316,900)
(92,500)
(246,105)
(2,000,000)
$
2,100
3,485
4,200
7,500
-
-
-
-
-
15,471,296
(583,500)
17,285
-
14,887,796 17,285

52

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 14. Equity - issued capital (continued)

Movements in options issued

1 July 2011
Details
Issue of ESOP options
11-16 July 2012
Balance
30 June 2013
Balance
30 June 2012
Conversion to fully paid share capital
Issue of bonus options
30 July 2012
14 June 2013
Date
Balance
No of options
$
25,367,001
1,853,670
25,367,001
1,853,670
(8,975)
-
75,984,913
-
4,150,000
-
105,492,939
1,853,670

Ordinary shares

Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on the winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held. The fully paid ordinary shares have no par value and the company does not have a limited amount of authorised capital.

On a show of hands every member present at a meeting in person or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll each share shall have one vote.

Partly paid shares

Partly paid shares do not entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on the winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.

Partly paid shares do not have any voting rights.

Options

Options do not entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on the winding up of the company.

Option holders do not have any voting rights.

Share buy-back

There is no current on-market share buy-back.

Capital risk management

The consolidated entity's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, so that it can provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimum capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.

The consolidated entity may issue new shares in order to provide a sufficient level of funding for its phosphate projects whilst maintaining an appropriate capital structure and sound gearing.

The consolidated entity would look to raise capital when an opportunity to invest in a business or company was seen as value adding relative to the current parent entity's share price at the time of the investment. The consolidated entity is not actively pursuing additional investments in the short term as it continues to integrate and grow its existing businesses in order to maximise synergies.

The capital risk management policy remains unchanged from the 30 June 2012 Annual Report.

53

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 15. Equity - reserves

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Derecognition of subsidiary
Foreign currency reserve
Options issued - share-based
Foreign currency translation
Consolidated
Options reserve
Balance at 30 June 2012
Balance at 1 July 2011
Balance at 30 June 2013
-
$ -
-
Option
2013
2012
$
$
4,117
-
6,130
-
10,247
-
Total
$ $ 1,025
1,025
(1,025)
(1,025)
-
-
4,117
4,117
-
6,130
4,117
10,247
Foreign
Currency
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
4,117
-
6,130
-
10,247
-
Total
$ $ 1,025
1,025
(1,025)
(1,025)
-
-
4,117
4,117
-
6,130
4,117
10,247
Foreign
Currency
Consolidated
10,247 -
$ 1,025
(1,025)
Foreign
Currency
Total
$ 1,025
(1,025)
-
-
6,130
-
4,117
-
-
4,117
6,130
6,130 4,117 10,247

Foreign currency reserve

The reserve is used to recognise exchange differences arising from translation of the financial statements of foreign operations to Australian dollars. It is also used to recognise gains and losses on hedges of the net investments in foreign operations.

Share-based payments reserve

The reserve is used to recognise the value of equity benefits provided to employees and directors as part of their remuneration, and other parties as part of their compensation for services.

Note 16. Equity - non-controlling interest

-
-
Note 17. Equity - dividends
Accumulated losses
2013
2012
$
$
(3,500)
(3,500)
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
(3,500)
(3,500)
Consolidated

There were no dividends paid or declared during the current or previous financial year.

The Company does not have franking credits available for subsequent financial years.

54

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 18. Financial instruments

Financial risk management objectives

The consolidated entity's activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including foreign currency risk, price risk and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The consolidated entity's overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the consolidated entity.

Risk management is carried out by the Board of Directors ('the Board'). The methods include identification and analysis of the risk exposure of the consolidated entity and appropriate procedures, controls and risk limits. The Board identifies and evaluates financial risks within the consolidated entity's operating units.

Market risk

Foreign currency risk

The consolidated entity undertakes certain transactions denominated in foreign currency and are exposed to foreign currency risk through foreign exchange rate fluctuations.

Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions and recognised financial assets and financial liabilities denominated in a currency that is not the entity’s functional currency. The risk is measured using sensitivity analysis and cash flow forecasting.

Price risk

The consolidated entity is not exposed to any significant price risk.

Interest rate risk

The consolidated entity's only exposure to interest rate risk is primarily in relation to short-term deposits held which are held with reputable financial institutions.

As at the reporting date, the consolidated entity had the following variable rate cash and deposits:

2013 2012 2012
Weighted Weighted
average average
interest rate Balance interest rate Balance
% $ % $
Consolidated
Cash at bank 2.75 2,891,723 4.36 4,533,946
Net exposure to cash flow interest rate risk 2,891,723 4,533,946
Basis points increase Basis points decrease
Basis Effect on Basis Effect on
points profit Effect on points profit Effect on
Consolidated - 2013 change before tax equity change before tax equity
Cash at bank 55 15,904 15,904 55 (15,904) (15,904)
Basis points increase Basis points decrease
Basis Effect on Basis Effect on
points profit Effect on points profit Effect on
Consolidated - 2012 change before tax equity change before tax equity
Cash at bank 131 59,395 59,395 131 (59,395) (59,395)

55

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 18. Financial instruments (continued)

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk that the other party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge their obligations resulting in financial loss to the consolidated entity. This usually ocurs when debtors or counterparties to contracts fail to settle their obligations owing to the consolidated entity. The consolidated entity's main credit risk is associated with bank default. However the consolidated entity holds most of its cash with solid banking institutions.

Liquidity risk

Vigilant liquidity risk management requires the consolidated entity to maintain sufficient liquid assets (mainly cash and cash equivalents) and available borrowing facilities to be able to pay debts as and when they become due and payable.

The consolidated entity manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate cash reserves and available borrowing facilities by continuously monitoring actual and forecast cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities. At 30 June 2013 the consolidated entity had working capital of $2,867,976 (2012: $3,773,434).

Remaining contractual maturities

The following tables detail the consolidated entity's remaining contractual maturity for its financial instrument liabilities. The tables have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities based on the earliest date on which the financial liabilities are required to be paid. The tables include both interest and principal cash flows disclosed as remaining contractual maturities and therefore these totals may differ from their carrying amount in the statement of financial position.

Weighted
average
interest rate
%
-
-
Weighted
average
interest rate
%
-
-
Non-interest bearing
Total non-derivatives
Non-derivatives
Trade payables
Consolidated - 2012
Other payables
Non-interest bearing
Trade payables
Total non-derivatives
Consolidated - 2013
Other payables
Non-derivatives
1 year or
less
$ 589,162
46,049
Between 1
and 2 years
$ -
-
Between 2
and 5 years
$ -
-
Over 5 years
Remaining
contractual
maturities
$ $ -
589,162
-
46,049
-
635,211
Over 5 years
Remaining
contractual
maturities
$ $ -
896,661
-
40,362
-
937,023
635,211 - -
1 year or
less
$ 896,661
40,362
Between 1
and 2 years
$ -
-
Between 2
and 5 years
$ -
-
937,023 - -

The cash flows in the maturity analysis above are not expected to occur significantly earlier than contractually disclosed above.

Fair value of financial instruments

Unless otherwise stated, the carrying amounts of financial instruments reflect their fair value. The carrying amounts of trade receivables and trade payables are assumed to approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. The fair value of financial liabilities is estimated by discounting the remaining contractual maturities at the current market interest rate that is available for similar financial instruments.

56

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 19. Key management personnel disclosures

Directors

The following persons were directors of Celamin Holdings NL during the financial year:

Key Management Personnel Comment Mr David Regan - Executive Director Ms Melanie Leydin - Non-executive Director Resigned as a director 18 October 2012, Co. Secretary for entire period Mr Martin Broome - Non-executive Director The Hon. Andrew Thomson - Non-executive Chairman Resigned 30 Aug 2012, re-appointed 9 October 2012 Mr Russell Luxford - Executive Director Appointed 26 October 2012 Mr Gary Scanlan - Non-executive Director Appointed 18 October 2012

Other key management personnel

The following persons also had the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the consolidated entity, directly or indirectly, during the financial year:

Mr Timothy Regan Lawyer Mr Nadir Sekfali Project Director Mr Luc Coussement Project Director, appointed 22 April 2013

Compensation

The aggregate compensation made to directors and other members of key management personnel of the consolidated entity is set out below:

-
-
Termination benefits
Share-based payments
Post-employment benefits
Short-term employee benefits
2013
2012
$
$
904,317
543,638
18,650
22,512
-
304,910
4,431
-
927,398
871,060
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
904,317
543,638
18,650
22,512
-
304,910
4,431
-
927,398
871,060
Consolidated
927,398 871,060

Shareholding

The number of shares in the parent entity held during the financial year by each director and other members of key management personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally related parties, is set out below:

Mr D Regan
Mr N Sekfali
Ms M Leydin
Ordinary shares
Mr G Scanlan
Mr A Thomson
*
2013*
Mr D Regan

Mr T Regan ***
Balance at
the start of
the year
41,550,871
333,334
10,000
-
2,088,421
2,010,000
7,394,300
Received
as part of
remuneration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additions
-
234,200
-
3,300,000
-
-
-
Balance at
Disposals/
the end of
other
the year
41,550,871
-
567,534
10,000
-
3,300,000
-
2,088,421
-
2,010,000
-
7,394,300
-
56,921,126
53,386,926 - 3,534,200
  • Partly paid shares

  • ** Resigned on 30 August 2012, reappointed 9 October 2012 *** Determined to be Key Management Personnel from 1 July 2012

57

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 19. Key management personnel disclosures (continued)

Ordinary shares
Mr K Nichol
Mr P Avery

Mr M Trifunovic

Mr D Regan
Mr P Avery *
2012**
Mr D Regan
Ms M Leydin
Mr A Thomson
Mr M Trifunovic **
Balance at
the start of
the year
1,362,806
-
-
2,850,001
30,000
3,010,001
4,088,421
6,000
602,000
Received
as part of
remuneration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additions
40,188,065
333,334
10,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
Balance at
Disposals/
the end of
other
the year
41,550,871
-
333,334
10,000
(2,850,001)
-
(30,000)
-
(3,010,001)
-
(2,000,000)
2,088,421
(6,000)
-
(602,000)
-
(8,498,002)
43,982,626
11,949,229 - 40,531,399
  • Director resigned on 18 November 2011

  • ** Partly paid shares

Option holding

The number of options over ordinary shares in the parent entity held during the financial year by each director and other members of key management personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally related parties, is set out below:

Ms M Leydin
2013
Mr D Regan

Mr T Regan
Options over ordinary shares
Mr A Thomson

Mr L Coussement ***
Mr N Sekfali ***
Balance at
the start of
the year
2,725,613
-
-
-
792,953
-
Granted
20,785,775
166,667
5,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
Exercised
-
-
-
-
-
-
Expired/
Balance at
forfeited/
the end of
other
the year
(20,785,775)
2,725,613
(166,667)
-
(5,000)
-
-
1,000,000
-
1,792,953
-
1,000,000
(20,957,442)
6,518,566
3,518,566 23,957,442 -
  • Resigned on 30 August 2012, reappointed 9 October 2012

  • ** 20,957,442 listed options, issued as part of a pro-rata Loyalty Bonus options issue to existing shareholders in 30 July 2012, expired on 28 June 2013.

  • *** 3,000,000 options with an expiry date of 31 May 2018 and an exercise price of $0.20 were granted to key management personnel on 14 June 2013. 1,500,000 of these options vest on 1 June 2015 and 1,500,000 options vest on 1 June 2016.

Mr K Nichol
Mr P Avery

Mr D Regan
Options over ordinary shares
2012
Mr M Trifunovic *
Balance at
the start of
the year
2,725,613
275,000
245,416
205,000
Granted
-
-
-
-
Exercised
-
-
-
-
Expired/
Balance at
forfeited/
the end of
other
the year
-
2,725,613
(275,000)
-
(245,416)
-
(205,000)
-
(725,416)
2,725,613
3,451,029 - -
  • Resigned on 18 November 2011

58

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 20. Remuneration of auditors

During the financial year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd, the auditor of the company, and its network firms:

Audit or review of the financial statements
Audit services - Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd
Audit or review of the financial statements
Audit services - Andrew Frewin Stewart
2013
2012
$
$
43,000
-
-
19,800
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
43,000
-
-
19,800
Consolidated
- 19,800

At the Annual General Meeting on 20 November 2012 Andrew Frewin Stewart resigned auditor to the consolidated entity, and Grant Thornton was appointed.

Note 21. Contingent liabilities

The consolidated entity did not have contingent liabilities at 30 June 2013 or 30 June 2012.

Note 22. Commitments

Committed at the reporting date but not recognised as
liabilities, payable:
Committed at the reporting date but not recognised as
liabilities, payable:
Exploration Tenements
Within one year
One to five years
Lease commitments - operating
2013
2012
$
$
76,551
-
1,112,920
190,003
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
76,551
-
1,112,920
190,003
Consolidated
1,112,920 190,003

In order to maintain current rights of tenure to the permits held by Celamin Limited, the consolidated entity is required to outlay rentals and to meet the minimum expenditure requirements as required by the local jurisdictions. Minimum expenditure commitments may be subject to renegotiation and with approval may otherwise be avoided by sale, farm out or relinquishment. These obligations are not provided in the accounts and were not payable during the reporting period.

Minimum expenditure, as required by the terms of the permits, has been reached on both Bir El Afou and Chaketma. There are commitments in respect of these permits of $270,213 (2012: $nil) and $638,906 (2012: $nil) respectively. Commitments of $203,801 (2012: $190,003) relates the consolidated entity's 50% share of the outstanding expenditure on the three Base Metals permits (Sidi Driss, Oued El Maden and El Haouaria).

59

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 23. Related party transactions

Parent entity

Celamin Holdings NL is the parent entity.

Subsidiaries

Interests in subsidiaries are set out in note 25.

Key management personnel

Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in note 19 and the remuneration report in the directors' report.

Transactions with related parties

There were no transactions with related parties during the current and previous financial year.

Receivable from and payable to related parties

There were no trade receivables from or trade payables to related parties at the current and previous reporting date.

Loans to/from related parties

There were no loans to or from related parties at the current and previous reporting date.

Note 24. Parent entity information

Set out below is the supplementary information about the parent entity.

Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income

Accumulated losses
Total current liabilities
Total assets
Total equity
Statement of financial position
Total comprehensive income
Issued capital
Total liabilities
Equity
Total current assets
Loss after income tax
2013
2012
$
$
(2,206,926)
(2,005,635)
(2,206,926)
(2,005,635)
2013
2012
$
$
2,148,296
3,136,223
30,362,823
27,363,678
140,480
268,377
148,494
268,377
36,730,626
31,361,523
(6,516,297)
(4,266,222)
30,214,329
27,095,301
Parent
Parent
2013
2012
$
$
(2,206,926)
(2,005,635)
(2,206,926)
(2,005,635)
2013
2012
$
$
2,148,296
3,136,223
30,362,823
27,363,678
140,480
268,377
148,494
268,377
36,730,626
31,361,523
(6,516,297)
(4,266,222)
30,214,329
27,095,301
Parent
Parent
30,362,823 27,363,678
140,480 268,377
148,494 268,377
36,730,626
(6,516,297)
31,361,523
(4,266,222)
30,214,329 27,095,301

Guarantees entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries The parent entity had no guarantees in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries as at 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2012.

60

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 24. Parent entity information (continued)

Contingent liabilities

The parent entity had no contingent liabilities at 30 June 2013 and 30 June 2012.

Capital commitments - Property, plant and equipment

Refer to Note 22 for details of commitments. All commitments in that note relate to the parent entity.

Included in assets for the parent entity are investments in subsidiaries, carried at $17,877,454 and a loan receivable from its subsidiary of $8,348,475. The loan is not interest bearing and no repayment terms have been fixed.

Significant accounting policies

The accounting policies of the parent entity are consistent with those of the consolidated entity, as disclosed in note 2, except for the following:

  • Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost, less any impairment.

  • Investments in associates are accounted for at cost, less any impairment.

Note 25. Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following subsidiaries in accordance with the accounting policy described in note 2:

Equity holding
Country of 2013 2012
Name of entity incorporation % %
Celamin Limited Australia 100.00 100.00
Vic Gold Mines Pty Ltd* Australia 100.00 100.00
Celamin Tunisia Ltd** Malta 100.00 100.00
Numidia Phosphate SA** Tunisia 80.00 80.00
Celamin Algeria WWL** Bahrain 100.00 100.00
  • Incorporated on 16 November 2010. The company was deregistered by ASIC on 31 July 2013.

  • ** Acquired as part of the acquisition of Celamin Limited on 12 June 2012.

61

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 26. Deed of cross guarantee

The following entities are party to a deed of cross guarantee under which each company guarantees the debts of the others:

Celamin Holdings NL Celamin Limited

By entering into the deed, the wholly-owned entities have been relieved from the requirement to prepare a financial report and directors' report under Class Order 98/1418 (as amended) issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ('ASIC'). It is a condition of the Class Order that the Company and each of its subsidiaries enter into a Deed of Cross Guarantee. The effect of the Deed is that the Company guarantees to each creditor payment in full of any debt in the event of winding up of any of the subsidiaries under certain provisions of the Corporations Act 2001. If a winding up occurs under the provisions of the Act, the Company will only be liable in the event that after six months any creditor has not been paid in full. The subsidiaries have also given similar guarantees in the event that the Company is wound up.

The above companies represent a 'Closed Group' for the purposes of the Class Order, and as there are no other parties to the Deed of Cross Guarantee that are controlled by Celamin Holdings NL, they also represent the 'Extended Closed Group'.

The statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and statement of financial position are substantially the same as the consolidated entity and therefore have not been separately disclosed.

Note 27. Events after the reporting period

No matter or circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2013 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect the consolidated entity's operations, the results of those operations, or the consolidated entity's state of affairs in future financial years.

Note 28. Reconciliation of loss after income tax to net cash used in operating activities

-
-
-
-
Loss after income tax expense for the year
Impairment of exploration and evaluation
Increase in other provisions
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Net loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Exploration costs written off
Share-based payments
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
Net loss on disposal of investments
Derecognition of foreign subsidiary
Foreign exchange differences
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortisation
Net cash used in operating activities
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables
Decrease/(increase) in prepayments
2013
2012
$
$
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
30,987
41,535
52,500
115,841
6,130
-
757
1,751
436,808
-
46,666
-
-
(1,025)
-
60,000
23,057
(62,853)
(20,864)
12,566
(265,068)
889,386
30,991
11,488
(1,790,012)
(1,061,425)
Consolidated
2013
2012
$
$
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
30,987
41,535
52,500
115,841
6,130
-
757
1,751
436,808
-
46,666
-
-
(1,025)
-
60,000
23,057
(62,853)
(20,864)
12,566
(265,068)
889,386
30,991
11,488
(1,790,012)
(1,061,425)
Consolidated
(1,790,012) (1,061,425)

62

Celamin Holdings NL Notes to the financial statements 30 June 2013

Note 29. Earnings per share

Note 29. Earnings per share
Loss after income tax attributable to the owners of Celamin Holdings NL used in
calculating diluted earnings per share
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating diluted earnings per
share
Non-controlling interest
Loss after income tax attributable to the owners of Celamin Holdings NL
Loss after income tax
Basic earnings per share
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating basic earnings per
share
Diluted earnings per share
2013
2012
$
$
(2,131,976)
(2,130,114)
-
3,500
(2,131,976)
(2,126,614)
(2,131,976)
(2,126,614)
Number
Number
157,999,502
55,688,039
157,999,502
55,688,039
Cents
Cents
(1.35)
(3.82)
(1.35)
(3.82)
Consolidated
(2,131,976) (2,126,614)
(2,131,976) (2,126,614)
Number
157,999,502
Number
55,688,039
157,999,502 55,688,039
Cents
(1.35)
(1.35)
Cents
(3.82)
(3.82)

Diluted earning per share

The rights to options held by option holders have not been included in the weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes of calculating diluted EPS as they do not meet the requirements for inclusion in AASB 133 “Earnings per Share”. The rights to options are non-dilutive as the consolidated entity generated a loss during the financial year.

63

Celamin Holdings NL Directors' declaration

In the directors' opinion:

  • the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with the Corporations Act 2001, the Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements;

  • the attached financial statements and notes thereto comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board as described in note 2 to the financial statements;

  • the attached financial statements and notes thereto give a true and fair view of the consolidated entity's financial position as at 30 June 2013 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date;

  • there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable; and

  • at the date of this declaration, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the members of the Extended Closed Group will be able to meet any obligations or liabilities to which they are, or may become, subject by virtue of the deed of cross guarantee described in note 26 to the financial statements.

The directors have been given the declarations required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.

Signed in accordance with a resolution of directors made pursuant to section 295(5)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001.

On behalf of the directors

==> picture [110 x 49] intentionally omitted <==

________ David Regan Managing Director

23 September 2013 MELBOURNE

64

==> picture [206 x 39] intentionally omitted <==

Grant Thornton Audit Pty Ltd ACN 130 913 594

The Rialto, Level 30 525 Collins St Melbourne Victoria 3000 GPO Box 4736 Melbourne Victoria 3001

T +61 3 8320 2222 F +61 3 8320 2200 E [email protected] W www.grantthornton.com.au

Independent Auditor’s Report To the Members of Celamin Holdings NL

Report on the financial report

We have audited the accompanying financial report of Celamin Holdings NL (the “Company”), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2013, the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information and the directors’ declaration of the consolidated entity comprising the Company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.

Directors’ responsibility for the financial report

The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001. The Directors’ responsibility also includes such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. The Directors also state, in the notes to the financial report, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.

Auditor’s responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require us to comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.

‘Grant Thornton’ refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton Australia Ltd is a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL). GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions. In the Australian context only, the use of the term ‘Grant Thornton’ may refer to Grant Thornton Australia Limited ABN 41 127 556 389 and its Australian subsidiaries and related entities. GTIL is not an Australian related entity to Grant Thornton Australia Limited.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Liability is limited in those States where a current scheme applies.

65

==> picture [139 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error.

In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company’s preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Independence

In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.

Auditor’s opinion

In our opinion:

  • a the financial report of Celamin Holdings NL is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:

  • i giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2013 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and

  • ii complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.

  • b the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.

Report on the remuneration report

We have audited the remuneration report included in pages 18 to 24 of the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2013. The Directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the remuneration report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the remuneration report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.

66

==> picture [139 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

Auditor’s opinion on the remuneration report

In our opinion, the remuneration report of Celamin Holdings NL for the year ended 30 June 2013, complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.

GRANT THORNTON AUDIT PTY LTD Chartered Accountants

B. A. Mackenzie Partner - Audit & Assurance

Melbourne, 23 September 2013

67

Celamin Holdings NL Shareholder information 30 June 2013

The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 10 September 2013.

Distribution of Equitable Securities

Analysis of number of equitable security holders by size of holding:

1 to 1,000
1,001 to 5,000
5,001 to 10,000
10,001 to 100,000
100,001 and over
Holding less than a marketable parcel
Number of holders of
ordinary shares
(CNL)
8
44
170
181
74
Number of holders of
options over ordinary
shares (CNLO)
-
28
17
98
32
Number of holders
of partly paid shares
(CNLCA)
2
32
27
28
16
477 175 105
71 37 39

Equity Security Holders

Twenty largest quoted equity security holders

The names of the twenty largest security holders of quoted equity securities are listed below:

Ordinary Shares
Holders
David GM Regan & Marie M Regan
Avery International Limited
RNAJ Pty Ltd
African Lion 3 Limited
IBDC Sarl
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
CTBFAM Pty Ltd
Gwynvill Trading Pty Ltd
Edwin Sugiarto
Gary FP Scanlan & J Scanlan
Dawesville Nominees Pty Ltd
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited
J & TW Dekker Pty Ltd < J & TW Dekker Family A/C>
Bizzell Capital Partners Pty Ltd
Douglass W Cahill
ABN Amro Clearing Sydney Nominees Pty Ltd
Timothy Regan
Kevin Nichol
Baru Resources Limited
Sharon R Sievert
Beny Manuru
% of total
shares
Number held
issued
41,550,871
22.02
33,300,000
17.65
21,266,785
11.27
18,552,589
9.83
7,394,300
3.92
5,655,237
3.00
4,955,000
2.63
4,534,834
2.40
4,185,255
2.22
3,300,000
1.75
3,000,001
1.59
2,400,887
1.27
2,372,013
1.26
2,356,814
1.25
2,219,221
1.18
2,193,398
1.16
2,000,000
1.06
1,800,001
0.95
1,760,000
0.93
1,455,107
0.77
1,450,000
0.77
167,702,313
88.88

68

Celamin Holdings NL Shareholder information 30 June 2013

Options over ordinary shares (CNLO)

Options over ordinary shares (CNLO)
Holders
Hawera Pty Ltd
Beny Manuru
David GM Regan & Marie M Regan
RNAJ Pty Ltd
Treluc Investments Pty Ltd
Frengky Manuru
Direct Mining Services Pty Ltd
Brett G Walker
Jacobs Corporation Pty Ltd
IBDC Sarl
Statton Nominees Pty Ltd
HK Securities Pty Ltd
Charles W Thomas
Jeremy Tobias
Motte & Bailey Pty Ltd
Amarilo Investments Pty Ltd
JCV Nominees Pty Ltd
Peter Malkin & Christopher M Malkin


Mila M Trifunovic
Dr Hans-Ulrich Muller

% of total
options
Number held
issued
5,274,205
20.80
3,565,205
14.06
2,725,613
10.75
1,462,732
5.77
725,000
2.86
640,975
2.53
550,000
2.17
549,589
2.17
500,000
1.97
492,953
1.94
383,400
1.51
341,778
1.35
300,000
1.18
286,500
1.13
260,000
1.03
250,000
0.99
250,000
0.99
250,000
0.99
245,416
0.97
220,000
0.87
19,273,366
76.03

Partly Paid Shares (CNLCA)

Partly Paid Shares (CNLCA)
Holders
Hawera Pty Ltd
RNAJ Pty Ltd
Beny Manuru
David GM Regan & Marie M Regan
Frengky Manuru
IBDC Sarl
Dawesville Nominees Pty Ltd
Douglass W Cahill
Strefrewen Pty Ltd
Treluc Investments Pty Ltd
J & TW Dekker Pty Ltd < J & TW Dekker Family A/C>
Ian Lovett
African Lion 3 Limited
Charles W Thomas
Sharon R Sievert
Mineconnect Pty Ltd
Brian P Byass
White Knight Technology Pty Ltd
Gaje Pty Ltd
Compagnie Bancaire Helvetica
% of total
Partly Paid
shares
Number held
issued
2,842,718
19.10
2,194,097
14.74
2,100,000
14.11
2,088,421
14.03
1,527,754
10.26
739,430
4.97
600,000
4.03
330,000
2.22
290,000
1.95
252,500
1.70
200,000
1.34
200,000
1.34
200,000
1.34
150,000
1.01
145,511
0.98
86,605
0.58
45,000
0.30
41,640
0.28
40,000
0.27
35,629
0.24
14,109,305
94.79

69

Celamin Holdings NL Shareholder information 30 June 2013

Unquoted equity securities

Unquoted equity securities
Number on Number of
issue holders
Unlisted options, exercise price $0.20, expiry date 31 May 2018 4,150,000 5

Substantial Holders

Substantial Holders
Substantial holders in the Company are set out below: % of total
shares
Number held issued
David GM Regan & Marie M Regan 41,550,871 22.02
Avery International Limited 33,300,000 17.65
RNAJ Pty Ltd 21,266,785 11.27
African Lion 3 Limited 18,552,589 9.83

Voting Rights

The voting rights attached to ordinary shares are set out below:

Ordinary shares

On a show of hands every member present at a meeting in person or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll each share shall have one vote.

There are no other classes of equity securities.

70

Celamin Holdings NL List of Tenements

Tenement Location Ownership Interest
Bir El Afou Tunisia 50%
Chaketma Tunisia 50%
Sidi Driss Tunisia 50%
Oued El Maden Tunisia 50%
El Haouaria Tunisia 50%

71