AI assistant
PETROFAC LD — Interim / Quarterly Report 2011
Jun 30, 2011
5194_rns_2011-06-30_4c2048f9-ffc2-4432-844f-72c1300a73d7.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Interim report 2011
...but the journey is just beginning
Contents
-
2 Group financial highlights
-
4 Business review
-
15 Interim condensed consolidated income statement
-
16 Interim condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income
-
17 Interim condensed consolidated 22 Notes to the interim condensed statement of financial position consolidated financial statements
-
31 Statement of directors’
-
18 Interim condensed consolidated cash flow statement
-
responsibilities
-
20 Interim condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity
-
32 Independent review report to Petrofac Limited
-
33 Shareholder information
In 2011, Petrofac turned 30. In three decades we have grown from a Texas-based producer of modular plant to a leading FTSE 100 company, with more than 14,500 people in 27 countries, providing integrated facilities solutions across the life cycle of oil & gas assets.
We are planning to make the coming decades even better. By continuing to learn, evolve and innovate and by staying focused on execution and delivery, we will go on developing our capabilities and service offering – for the benefit of all our stakeholders.
2 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Group financial highlights
For the six months ended 30 June 2011
Revenue
US$2,711m 30 June 2010 restated[1] : US$2,166m
+25.2%
Net profit[2, 3] US$246.3m 30 June 2010 restated[1] : US$231.0m
+6.6%
Backlog[4]
US$11,368m 31 December 2010: US$11,699m
-2.8%
1 See note 2 to the financial statements for details of the restatement 2 Net profit for the period attributable to Petrofac Limited shareholders.
- 3 Excluding the gain on the EnQuest demerger in April 2010.
EBITDA[3]
US$332.0m 30 June 2010 restated[1] : US$349.7m
-5.1%
Earnings per share (diluted)[3]
71.84 cents per share 30 June 2010 restated[1] : 67.31[3] cents per share +6.7%
Interim dividend[5]
17.40 cents
30 June 2010: 13.80 cents
+26.1%
- 4 Backlog consists of the estimated revenue attributable to the uncompleted portion of lump-sum engineering, procurement and construction contracts and variation orders plus, with regard to engineering services and facilities management contracts, the estimated revenue attributable to the lesser of the remaining term of the contract and, in the case of life-of-field facilities management contracts, five years. The group uses this key performance indicator as a measure of the visibility of future earnings. Backlog is not an audited measure.
3 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Group financial highlights
Revenue
==> picture [38 x 15] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
2,711
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
US$ millions
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [118 x 80] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
4,354
3,330 [3,655]
2,711
2,440
2,166
07 08 09 10 1H10 1H11
----- End of picture text -----
Net profit[2, 3]
246
==> picture [53 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
US$ millions
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [117 x 66] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
433
353
265 231 246
189
07 08 09 10 1H10 1H11
----- End of picture text -----
Backlog[4]
11,368
==> picture [108 x 92] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
US$ millions
11,699 11,368
8,071
4,441
3,997
07 08 09 10 1H11
----- End of picture text -----
EBITDA[3]
332
==> picture [55 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
US$ millions
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [117 x 69] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
634
550
419
301 350 332
07 08 09 10 1H10 1H11
----- End of picture text -----
Earnings per share (diluted)[3]
71.84
==> picture [70 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Cents per share
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [119 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
126.09
103.19
77.11 67.31 [71.84]
54.61
07 08 09 10 1H10 1H11
----- End of picture text -----
Interim dividend[5]
17.40
==> picture [70 x 9] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
Cents per share
----- End of picture text -----
==> picture [98 x 75] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
17.40
13.80
10.70
7.50
4.90
1H07 1H08 1H09 1H10 1H11
----- End of picture text -----
- 5 The group reports its financial results in US dollars and, accordingly, will declare any dividends in US dollars together with a Sterling equivalent. Unless shareholders have made valid elections to the contrary, they will receive any dividends payable in Sterling. Conversion of the 2011 interim dividend from US dollars into Sterling is based upon an exchange rate of US$1.6510:£1, being the Bank of England Sterling spot rate as at midday on 19 August 2011.
4 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review
Results
We are pleased to report that the group has had a successful first half of 2011, with an order intake of US$2.2 billion, including new awards in Algeria, Malaysia and Iraq. We continue to deliver good operational performance across our portfolio of projects and we expect to deliver like-for-like[1] net profit growth in 2011 of at least 15% and in line with current market expectations[2] .
In the six months ended 30 June 2011, revenue increased by 25.2% to US$2,711.1 million (2010 restated[3] : US$2,165.8 million) due to high activity levels following recent awards, particularly in the Engineering & Construction and Offshore Engineering & Operations reporting segments.
Net profit attributable to Petrofac Limited shareholders, excluding the gain on the EnQuest demerger in the corresponding period in 2010, increased 6.6% to US$246.3 million (2010 restated[3] : US$231.0 million). The increase in net profit was lower than the increase in revenue predominantly as a result of the timing of profit recognition. We have recognised revenue on a number of early stage projects, particularly in Engineering & Construction, where we have not yet reached the progress threshold for recognising profit. In addition, the net margin in the first half of 2010 benefited from the first-time recognition of profit on a number of Engineering & Construction contracts awarded in 2009.
EBITDA, excluding the gain on the EnQuest demerger, was lower at US$332.0 million (2010 restated: US$349.7 million) following the demerger of the high EBITDA margin Don assets in April 2010.
The group’s net cash increased to US$1,768.0 million over the six months to 30 June 2011 (31 December 2010: US$975.3 million) as the net result of:
-
operating profits before working capital and other non-current changes of US$361 million
-
net working capital inflows of US$906 million, including an increase in advances received from customers of US$976 million (including receipt of an advance payment in January 2011 in relation to the South Yoloten project in Turkmenistan) and a reduction in work in progress of US$247 million
-
investing activities of US$218 million, including investment of a further US$50 million (of an agreed US$75 million) in Seven Energy (see note 11 for details), US$99 million for the purchase and upgrade of three floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels (see note 9 for details: note 9 includes an accrual for US$37 million in addition to the cash outflow) and US$16 million for deferred consideration in relation to an acquisition
-
financing activities, in particular, payment of the 2010 final dividend of US$101 million and financing the purchase of treasury shares for US$47 million for the purpose of making awards under the group’s share schemes
-
taxes paid of US$98 million
| Net cash(US$ million) | 30 June 2011 |
31 December 2010 |
30 June 2010 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term | ||||
| deposits | 1,848.2 | 1,063.0 | 1,074.8 | |
| Interest-bearing loans and borrowings Net cash |
(80.2) 1,768.0 |
(87.7) 975.3 |
(114.2) 960.6 |
Net finance income for the period was US$1.8 million (2010: US$0.5 million) due to higher average net cash balances being held over the first half of the year.
The tax charge for the six months ended 30 June 2011 of US$53.1 million (2010 restated: US$61.2 million) represents an effective tax rate, excluding the gain from the EnQuest demerger, of 17.7% (six months ended 30 June 2010 restated: 21.0%; year ended 31 December 2010: 20.3%). The reduction in the group’s effective tax rate is largely as a result of differences in the timing of profit recognition on Engineering & Construction contracts between the first and second half of 2011. The effective tax rate for the group for the year to 31 December 2011 is expected to be 21.7%.
-
1 Like-for-like net profit growth excludes the gain of US$124.9 million on the EnQuest demerger and the trading net profit from Energy Developments’ demerged assets of US$2.1 million for the year ended 31 December 2010.
-
2 The current market expectations for Petrofac’s net profit for the year ending 31 December 2011 are based on forecasts provided to Petrofac by 21 equity analysts since publication of the group’s 2010 Final Results in March 2011. The average of those forecasts is US$514 million.
-
3 See note 2 to the financial statements for details of the restatement. Prior to restatement, revenue and net profit for the six months ended 30 June 2010 (on the same basis as above) were US$2,130.6 million and US$206.3 million, respectively.
5 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review
Diluted earnings per share, excluding the gain on the EnQuest demerger, for the six months ended 30 June 2011 increased by 6.7% to 71.84 cents per share (2010 restated: 67.31 cents per share) in line with the growth in net profit.
The group’s combined backlog was US$11.4 billion at 30 June 2011 (31 December 2010: US$11.7 billion), maintaining our outstanding revenue visibility for the remainder of 2011 and beyond.
At 30 June 2011, the group had more than 14,500 employees (including long-term contractors), compared to around 13,900 at 31 December 2010. An increase in headcount in Engineering & Construction and Engineering Services to support high levels of activity more than offset a net
reduction in Offshore Engineering & Operations following completion of a long-term maintenance services contract.
Dividend
The Board has declared an interim dividend of 17.40 cents per share (2010: 13.80 cents), an increase of 26.1%, which will be paid on 21 October 2011 to eligible shareholders on the register at 23 September 2011. Shareholders who have not elected to receive dividends in US dollars will receive a Sterling equivalent of 10.54 pence per share. The Board will set the total dividends payable for the year to 31 December 2011 according to the group’s earnings and expects to distribute approximately 35% of full year post tax profits by way of dividend, in accordance with the group’s dividend policy.
Segmental review
The group reports the financial results of its seven business units under four reporting segments:
| Business unit | Reporting segment |
|---|---|
| Engineering & Construction | • Engineering & Construction |
| Engineering & Construction Ventures | |
| Offshore Engineering & Operations | • Offshore Engineering & Operations |
| Engineering Services | • Engineering, Training Services and |
| Training Services | Production Solutions |
| Production Solutions | |
| Energy Developments | • Energy Developments |
We present below an update on each of the group’s reporting segments:
| US$ millions For the six months ended 30 June |
Revenue 2011 20104 |
Operating proft1,3 2011 20104 |
Netproft2,3 2011 20104 |
EBITDA3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 20104 |
||||
| Engineering& Construction | 1,903.7 1,622.7 |
235.8 242.7 |
205.9 206.5 |
248.5 259.8 |
| Offshore Engineering& Operations | 581.0 327.2 |
39.2 5.8 |
31.8 4.0 |
41.3 7.0 |
| Engineering, Training Services and Production Solutions |
193.5 161.5 |
14.2 13.6 |
13.1 13.0 |
18.1 21.5 |
| EnergyDevelopments | 159.7 106.3 |
23.2 37.1 |
7.7 17.5 |
38.2 69.8 |
| Corporate,consolidation and elimination | (126.8) (51.9) |
(13.9) (8.3) |
(12.2) (10.0) |
(14.1) (8.4) |
| Group | 2,711.1 2,165.8 |
298.5 290.9 |
246.3 231.0 |
332.0 349.7 |
| Growth/margin analysis % For the six months ended 30 June |
Revenuegrowth 2011 20104 |
Operatingmargin 2011 20104 |
Net margin 2011 20104 |
EBITDA margin |
| 2011 20104 |
||||
| Engineering& Construction | 17.3 53.0 |
12.4 15.0 |
10.8 12.7 |
13.1 16.0 |
| Offshore Engineering& Operations | 77.6 10.9 |
6.8 1.8 |
5.5 1.2 |
7.1 2.1 |
| Engineering, Training Services and Production Solutions |
19.8 (12.2) |
7.4 8.4 |
6.8 8.1 |
9.4 13.3 |
| EnergyDevelopments | 50.3 29.3 |
14.5 34.9 |
4.8 16.5 |
23.9 65.7 |
| Group | 25.2 36.5 |
11.0 13.4 |
9.1 10.7 |
12.2 16.1 |
- 1 Profit from operations before tax and finance costs.
2 Profit for the year attributable to Petrofac Limited shareholders.
3 Excludes gain on the EnQuest demerger.
4 As restated. See note 2 to the financial statements for details of the restatements.
6 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review continued
Engineering & Construction
The Engineering & Construction reporting segment includes the group’s Engineering & Construction business unit and Engineering & Construction Ventures, which was established to replicate the success of the Engineering & Construction business in new markets, such as Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia and Turkmenistan. Engineering & Construction undertakes engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) projects predominantly on a lump-sum basis, with a typical duration of two to four years, and is focused on markets in the Middle East and Africa and the Commonwealth of Independent States, particularly the Caspian region.
We have continued our good operational performance across our portfolio of projects over the first half of the year, including the completion of the Jihar gas plant in Syria and the In Salah Gas compression facilities and power generation in Algeria. We have made substantial progress on the Asab field development and the GASCO natural gas liquids train in Abu Dhabi, the El Merk central processing facility in Algeria, the gas sweetening facilities for Qatar Petroleum and the fuel gas and gas oil pipelines project in Kuwait. In Malaysia, we remain on course to deliver first oil around the end of the year on the SEPAT development for PETRONAS. We are making good progress on the South Yoloten development, in Turkmenistan, having substantially completed construction of the temporary facilities and early works and placed the majority of orders for procurement items.
New awards
In Salah Gas southern fields, Algeria
In January 2011, we were awarded a US$1.2 billion lump-sum EPC contract by In Salah Gas, an association between Sonatrach, BP and Statoil, to develop southern fields in the In Salah development. The 50-month project, to be completed in phases, will support the maintenance of plateau gas production rates of 9 billion cubic metres per annum beyond 2013. As noted above, we recently completed the compression facilities and power generation project for the same customer with success, and believe this new award reflects our dedication to this strategically important market
where we maintain excellent relationships with both our customers and local construction partners.
Majnoon early production facility, Iraq
In March 2011, we announced the award of our first contract in Iraq, a US$240 million engineering, procurement and construction management project with Shell. The Majnoon field in southern Iraq is one of Iraq’s largest developments and we are delighted to be working with Shell to assist them with unlocking the field’s potential. We are providing engineering, procurement, fabrication and construction management services for the development of a new early production system comprising two trains each with capacity for 50,000 barrels of oil per day, along with upgrading of existing brownfield facilities. Work on the project began in mid-2010 and is expected to complete during the fourth quarter of 2012.
Results
Revenue for the first half of the year increased by 17.3% to US$1,903.7 million (2010 restated: US$1,622.7 million), reflecting a substantial increase in activity levels, particularly on the Asab field development in Abu Dhabi and the second phase of the South Yoloten project in Turkmenistan.
Net profit was US$205.9 million (2010 restated: US$206.5 million), representing a net margin of 10.8% (2010 restated: 12.7%). The lower net margin reflects the dilutive effects of the recognition of revenue on some early stage contracts, particularly the South Yoloten project, where we have not yet reached the progress threshold for recognising profit. In addition, the net margin in the first half of 2010 benefited from the first-time recognition of profit on a number of contracts awarded in 2009.
During the first half, Engineering & Construction headcount increased from 5,400 to 6,200, reflecting the increase in activity levels. In addition, our engineering offices in Mumbai, Chennai and Delhi are reported within our Engineering, Training Services and Productions Solutions reporting segment, but principally support our Engineering & Construction activities. Including these offices, our Engineering & Construction headcount stood at 7,800 at 30 June 2011 (December 2010: 7,000).
At 30 June 2011, the Engineering & Construction backlog stood at US$8.7 billion (31 December 2010: US$9.0 billion), maintaining our outstanding revenue visibility for the remainder of 2011 and beyond.
7 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review
Offshore Engineering & Operations
Offshore Engineering & Operations provides engineering and construction services at all stages of greenfield and brownfield offshore projects. In addition, through the provision of operations management services, we deliver production and maintenance support and extend field life. Offshore Engineering & Operations’ activities are primarily in the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) and are predominantly provided on a reimbursable basis, but often with incentive income linked to the successful delivery of performance targets. Many of our production and maintenance contracts are long-term (typically three to five years) and in the case of the provision of Duty Holder services[1] are generally open-ended. Increasingly, we are looking to deliver our engineering and construction services on a lump-sum basis, with the Laggan Tormore gas plant on Shetland, which was awarded in October last year, being the first major predominantly lump-sum project undertaken by Offshore Engineering & Operations.
We have secured a number of contract extensions and new awards in recent months, including, more recently, a contract to provide maintenance services on the Rumaila oilfield in Iraq and an operations contract for the FPF3 FPSO (formerly the Jasmine Venture) in Thailand (see Energy Developments section on page 9). We are experiencing high activity levels across the business, including significant activity on the SEPAT development and upgrade and life extension works on the FPSO Berantai (formerly the East Fortune) in Malaysia (both projects are being undertaken jointly with Engineering & Construction). We have made good progress on the awards secured in the second half of 2010, including the Duty Holder contract for the Sajaa gas plant in the UAE and the Laggan Tormore gas plant on Shetland.
Results
Reported revenue for the period increased by 77.6% to US$581.0 million (2010: US$327.2 million) and revenue excluding ‘pass-through’ revenue[2] increased by 98.3% to US$483.4 million (2010: US$243.8 million), reflecting high activity levels across the business, particularly on the SEPAT development and the FPSO Berantai in Malaysia, the Sajaa gas plant Duty Holder contract in Sharjah, the Laggan Tormore gas plant on Shetland and the
1 Contracts where the group takes full responsibility for managing a customer’s asset and is responsible for the safety case of the asset, reporting to the Department of Energy and Climate Change.
Apache engineering and construction contract in the UKCS. Around two-thirds of Offshore
Engineering & Operations’ revenue was generated in the UKCS and those revenues are generally denominated in Sterling. The average US dollar to Sterling exchange rate for the first half of 2011 was around 7% higher than the corresponding period in 2010, which made a marginal contribution to the reported revenue growth.
Financial reporting exchange rates
| Six months | Six months | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US$/Sterling | ended 30 June 2011 |
Year ended 31 December 2010 |
ended 30 June 2010 |
|
| Average rate forperiod | 1.62 |
1.54 | 1.52 | |
| Period-end rate | 1.60 | 1.56 | 1.50 |
Net profit increased by 703.5% to US$31.8 million (2010: US$4.0 million), reflecting the significant increase in activity levels, particularly on the SEPAT development and the FPSO Berantai, and a provision release following completion of a long-term services maintenance contract.
At 30 June 2011, headcount stood at 4,200 (December 2010: 4,400) as the increase in headcount due to new projects was more than offset by the completion of the long-term maintenance services contract.
Offshore Engineering & Operations backlog remained steady over the period at US$2.4 billion (31 December 2010: US$2.4 billion).
Engineering, Training Services and Production Solutions
The Engineering Services, Training Services and Production Solutions business units are reported together within this segment. Engineering Services and Training Services provide services predominantly on a reimbursable basis. Production Solutions offers customers access to a wide range of services to help them improve production, profitability, operational efficiency, asset integrity and the recovery of marginal reserves. In addition to providing these specialist services on a stand-alone basis, we provide integrated solutions for resource holders, such as on the Ticleni Production Enhancement Contract (PEC) for Petrom in Romania.
2 Pass-through revenue refers to the revenue recognised from low or zero margin third-party procurement services provided to customers.
8 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review continued
Engineering Services continues to support front end engineering and design (FEED) work and early engineering on projects across the group, predominantly in Engineering & Construction and Energy Developments. We have recently opened a third Indian office, in Delhi, to help support the growth in activity levels across the group. We expect the Delhi office to grow to around 100 by the end of the year, which would take the total complement of our Indian engineering offices to around 1,800.
In Training Services, year to date delegate numbers have grown strongly compared to the same period in 2010. The first half of the year saw the first graduates from our recently opened training facility at Hassi Messaoud in Algeria. Supporting the development of local workforces remains a core part of our strategy and we are actively considering establishing training centres in other important markets for the group, including Iraq and Turkmenistan, and aim to develop strategic partnerships with resource holders in our key markets. In July, we signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with PETRONAS to collaborate in the area of competency development, capability building and education activities. This will involve a technical training partnership with Institut Teknologi Petroleum PETRONAS (INSTEP) to develop competency-based training for operations and maintenance personnel, as well as lecture and seminar programmes with the Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS.
In Production Solutions, we have made good progress to date on the Ticleni PEC, not only arresting the decline, but improving production through optimising pump settings, working over wells and, more recently, bringing back on-stream the first five of many shut-in wells. We have recently commenced a pilot water flood programme, the results of which are expected around the end of the year. In Nigeria, we continue to assist Seven Energy with development of their oil & gas assets and at 30 June 2011, 70% of our warrants had vested after reaching agreed milestones. We recently agreed to increase our interest in the company up to 24.5%[1] and, consequently, we are now accounting for Seven Energy as an associate (see note 11 to the
financial statements for more detail). In August, we were declared selected bidder for two PECs in Mexico for the Magallanes and Santuario blocks. We expect to sign the contracts, which will run for 25 years, on 18 October 2011 and we will take responsibility for field operations after an initial three-month transition period.
Results
Reported revenue for the period increased 19.8% to US$193.5 million (2010: US$161.5 million) and revenue excluding ‘pass-through’ revenue increased 20.1% to US$179.9 million (2010: US$149.8 million), due to an increase in activity in Engineering Services in support of Engineering & Construction and Energy Developments projects, particularly Berantai in Malaysia, and strong growth in the number of delegates in Training Services.
Net profit was broadly unchanged at US$13.1 million (2010: US$13.0 million), with an increase in net profit in Engineering Services and Training Services due to higher activity levels, largely offset by a reduction in profit in Production Solutions, where profit in relation to the vesting of Seven Energy warrants was more than offset by the change in scope of the Dubai Petroleum contract which took effect in October 2010 and early mobilisation and set-up costs on the Ticleni PEC in Romania.
At 30 June 2011, headcount had increased to 3,600 (31 December 2010: 3,400), predominantly due to growth in our Engineering Services offices in the UK and India.
Backlog for the Engineering, Training Services and Production Solutions reporting segment remained approximately US$0.3 billion at 30 June 2011 (31 December 2010: US$0.3 billion).
Energy Developments
Energy Developments provides a fully integrated service for resource holders under flexible commercial models that are aligned to their requirements. Projects cover upstream developments, both greenfield and brownfield, and related energy infrastructure projects, and can include the provision of capital.
In late January 2011, we secured our first Risk Service Contract (RSC) in Malaysia, for the development of the Berantai field. We have a 50% interest in the RSC, alongside local partners
1 On a fully diluted basis assuming the full conversion of all convertible securities and exercise of all outstanding warrants and options.
9 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review
Kencana and Sapura, each of whom hold a 25% interest (together the ‘Berantai partners’). The Berantai partners will develop the field and will subsequently operate the field for a period of seven years after first gas production. As part of the fast-track development, a wellhead platform will be installed to support the drilling of 18 wells, with a second wellhead platform expected to be installed in a subsequent phase. Both platforms will be connected to the FPSO Berantai, which is being upgraded in Singapore, with support from Engineering & Construction and Offshore Engineering & Operations. Produced gas will be exported by subsea pipeline via the Angsi Field, while oil will be offloaded via shuttle tanker. The FPSO Berantai is expected to mobilise to the field in early 2012, with first gas from the field expected shortly thereafter.
Pre-investing in field infrastructure in readiness for future developments is part of our strategy to deliver fast-track development solutions for resource holders. In June, we acquired a high specification FPSO from Chevron, following its recent release from the Woodside-operated Cossack Wanaea fields in Australia. This unit, renamed the FPF4 (formerly the Cossack Pioneer), has substantial oil & gas processing capability and we are reviewing deployment opportunities with resource holders that require a combination of fast-track field development and floating production capability. Also in June, we acquired the FPF3 (formerly the Jasmine Venture) from field operator Pearl Energy. The FPF3 is currently deployed on the Jasmine field in the Gulf of Thailand, and is leased to Pearl Energy, a subsidiary of Mubadala Energy, for a minimum term of three years, with options to extend for a further three years. The transaction reflects our strong ongoing relationship with Mubadala, our partner in Petrofac Emirates. We are also providing operations and maintenance services for the FPF3 through Offshore Engineering & Operations. As both owner of the FPSO and its service provider, we can support Pearl’s current requirements, while working with them to identify potential areas for further support on this and future projects in the Gulf of Thailand. The combined cost of these two vessels was approximately US$70 million.
As anticipated, oil production from the first phase of Cendor, offshore Peninsular Malaysia, was lower in the first half of the year at 10,300 barrels per day (bpd) (2010: 14,300 bpd) due to natural field decline. We intend to install gas lift facilities during the second half to stabilise production levels. In July, we announced that we had signed an MOU with
PETRONAS to accelerate the development of the West Desaru fault block by introducing an early production system which will involve both utilising current export facilities and also upgrading and deploying a Mobile Offshore Production Unit (MOPU). This approach is expected to bring forward first oil from West Desaru into the fourth quarter of 2012. The second phase development of the Cendor fault block, also in Block PM304, is expected to start up in the second quarter of 2013, bringing the overall production capacity of Block PM304 to around 60,000 bpd.
Normal production from the Chergui gas plant has been strong during the first half, offsetting the impact of several short shut-ins following the political changes in Tunisia earlier in the year. Production averaged 25.8 million standard cubic feet per day (mmscfd) of gas during the period (2010: 27.0 mmscfd).
The Ohanet RSC in Algeria, which is due to finish in October this year, and the 10,000 bpd capacity KPC refinery in Kyrgyzstan continue to perform in line with expectations.
Results
Revenue for the period increased 50.3% to US$159.7 million (2010: US$106.3 million) due to the commencement of the Berantai RSC, partially offset by the demerger of the Don assets in April 2010. Excluding the current period revenue contribution from Berantai and the prior period contribution from the Don assets, revenue was 12.5% lower than in the corresponding period in 2010 due to lower production levels on Cendor, partially offset by higher average oil prices[1] .
No profit was recognised on the Berantai RSC during the first half of the year, as the project is in its early stages. Notwithstanding higher average oil prices, net profit was lower at US$7.7 million (2010: US$17.5 million), due to a lower contribution from Cendor due to lower production and the demerger of the Don assets.
Headcount was broadly flat over the first six months of the year at 600 (31 December 2010: 600).
1 Brent, a benchmark crude, averaged US$111 per barrel for the six months ended 30 June 2011, compared to US$77 per barrel for the corresponding period in 2010. Energy Developments’ policy is to hedge 75% of forecast production on a rolling 12-month basis for those assets that have achieved steady-state production. At 30 June 2011, a series of commodity price collars and swaps were outstanding in relation to the Cendor and Chergui assets.
10 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review continued
Summary of Energy Developments’ current projects
| Project/asset | Country Type of asset Customer |
|---|---|
| Risk Service Contracts / Infrastructure | |
| Berantai RSC | Malaysia Oil & gas feld PETRONAS |
| Supporting infrastructure: | |
| FPSO Berantai (formerly East | |
| Fortune) | |
| Ohanet RSC | Algeria Gas Field Sonatrach |
| FPF1 | Undeployed Floating production facility n/a - undeployed |
| FPF3 | Thailand FPSO Pearl Energy |
| (previously Jasmine Venture) | |
| FPF4 | Undeployed FPSO n/a - undeployed |
| (previously Cossack Pioneer) | |
| KPC refnery | Kyrgyzstan Refnery Kyrgyzneftgaz |
| Goldeneye | United Kingdom CO2 storage facility n/a - development stage |
| Gateway | United Kingdom Gas storage facility n/a - development stage |
| Production Sharing Contracts / Concessions | |
| Block PM304: | Malaysia Oil feld PETRONAS |
| Cendor phase 1&2 | |
| West Desaru | |
| Supporting infrastructure on West | |
| Desaru: | |
| MOPU to be confrmed | |
| Chergui | Tunisia Gas feld ETAP |
11 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review
| Date of frst investment | Partners Interest Licence Operator |
|---|---|
| January 2011 | Petrofac 50% Petrofac |
| March 2011 | Kencana Sapura 25% 25% Kencana Sapura Petrofac Proceeding with participation of partners in proportion to RSC interest 100% n/a |
| July 2000 | BHP Billiton Japan Ohanet Oil & Gas Woodside Energy Petrofac 45% 30% 15% 10% BHP Billiton |
| July 2009 | None 100% n/a |
| June 2011 | None 100% n/a |
| June 2011 | None 100% n/a |
| January 2004 | Petrofac Kyrgyzneftgaz 50% 50% Petrofac |
| October 2010 | Petrofac Shell 50% 50% Shell |
| December 2010 | Petrofac Various 20% 80% Petrofac |
| May 2004 | Petrofac 30% Petrofac |
| Not yet fnalised | PETRONAS KUFPEC PetroVietnam 30% 25% 15% Petrofac 100% (tbc) n/a |
| February 2007 | ETAP Petrofac 55% 45% ETAP |
12 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review continued
Key risks and uncertainties
Those key risks and uncertainties that could lead to a significant loss of reputation or that could prevent us from executing our strategy and creating shareholder value are summarised below. Our approach to managing and mitigating these risks is as described on pages 30 to 35 of the group’s Annual report and accounts 2010, as is an explanation of our risk management systems and procedures:
| Industry risk | Description |
|---|---|
| Level of demand for the group’s services | The demand for our services is linked to the level of |
| capital and operational expenditure by the oil & gas | |
| industry. | |
| Oil & gas commodity prices | Long-term expectations of the price of oil & gas |
| may have an impact on the level of new investment | |
| in the industry and may therefore affect demand | |
| for our services. | |
| The fnancial performance of Energy Developments | |
| is more leveraged to the price of oil & gas through | |
| its co-investment in upstream oil & gas assets, and its fnancial result may be impacted. |
|
| Availability of essential executive or project staff | The availability of skilled personnel remains one of the most signifcant challenges facing the oil & gas |
| industry. |
13 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review
| Country risk | Description |
|---|---|
| Security | We operate in a number of countries where the security risk is signifcant. |
| Business continuity | We are potentially exposed to, inter alia, natural |
| hazards, acts of terrorism, war and civil unrest that | |
| could impact our infrastructure, either through the | |
| unavailability of physical assets or access to | |
| systems and data. | |
| Exchange rates | Signifcant movements in exchange rates could impact our fnancial performance. |
| Sovereign change of law and contract enforcement | We operate in a number of countries where our |
| ability to rely upon our contracts for protection is | |
| potentially reduced by the opaqueness of the legal | |
| system. | |
| Breach of legal or regulatory code | We recognise the potential fnancial and |
| reputational risk that could result from a breach | |
| of local or international laws, particularly in respect | |
| of behaviour relating to bribery and corruption. | |
| Political risk | We are exposed to potential regime change and |
| civil unrest that could affect our operations. | |
| Project risk | Description |
| Contract performance | Our fnancial performance could be materially |
| affected by the performance of a relatively small | |
| number of large contracts, particularly those which | |
| are lump-sum. Furthermore, our operational | |
| performance is important in maintaining our | |
| reputation for successful project delivery. | |
| Counterparty | There is a risk of commercial counterparties defaulting on payment terms or fnancial |
| counterparties defaulting on deposits that we hold | |
| with them. | |
| Cost infation | Unexpected infation in costs could adversely impact the fnancial performance of our contracts. |
| Health, safety and environmental performance | A serious health, safety or environmental incident |
| on any of our projects has the potential to cause signifcant commercial and reputational damage. |
The list above does not purport to be exhaustive. There may be other risks and uncertainties, not presently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, that could affect the performance of the business.
14 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Business review continued
Going concern
The financial position of the Company, its cash flows, liquidity position and borrowing facilities, and its business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position are set out in this Business review and in the group’s Annual report and accounts 2010 on pages 16 to 55. In addition, note 33 to the group’s Annual report and accounts 2010 includes the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital; its financial risk management objectives; details of its financial instruments and hedging activities; and its exposures to credit risk and liquidity risk.
The Company has considerable financial resources together with long-term contracts with a number of customers and suppliers across different geographic areas and industries. As a consequence, the directors believe that the Company is well placed to manage its business risks successfully.
The directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. Thus they continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the annual financial statements.
The second half performance of the Engineering, Training Services and Production Solutions reporting segment is expected to be broadly in line with the first half of the year, albeit with a greater contribution from Production Solutions, as we expect a general improvement in our consultancy and technology businesses and a positive contribution from the Ticleni PEC.
In Energy Developments, our operational assets are expected to continue to perform broadly in line with the first half, with the exception of the Ohanet RSC, which ends, as expected, in October. On the Berantai field development, we expect the FPSO Berantai to mobilise to the field in early 2012, with first gas from the field expected shortly thereafter.
With a strong financial position, a differentiated and competitive offering and a proven track record in project execution, we are confident that we will continue to deliver superior value for our customers and sector-leading returns for our shareholders. We expect to deliver like-for-like[1] net profit growth in 2011 of at least 15% and in line with current market expectations[2] .
Outlook
We are confident that we can continue the good progress that we have achieved in Engineering & Construction in the year to date, and we expect to deliver full year net margins in line with our medium-term guidance at around 11%.
While Offshore Engineering & Operations activity levels and revenues are expected to continue at record levels, net profit is expected to be lower in the second half of the year, as the first half benefited from significant progress on the SEPAT development and a provision release following completion of a long-term maintenance services contract. Net margins for the full year are expected to be substantially higher than in the prior year.
Norman Murray Chairman
==> picture [62 x 27] intentionally omitted <==
Ayman Asfari Group Chief Executive
-
1 Like-for-like net profit growth excludes the gain of US$124.9 million on the EnQuest demerger and the trading net profit from Energy Developments’ demerged assets of US$2.1 million for the year ended 31 December 2010.
-
2 The current market expectations for Petrofac’s net profit for the year ending 31 December 2011 are based on forecasts provided to Petrofac by 21 equity analysts since publication of the group’s 2010 Final Results in March 2011. The average of those forecasts is US$514 million.
Interim condensed consolidated income statement
15 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Interim condensed consolidated income statement
For the six months ended 30 June 2011
| Six months endedSix months ended | Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | |||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | |||
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | |||
| Notes | Restated | ||||
| Revenue | 4 | 2,711,081 | 2,165,828 | 4,354,217 | |
| Cost of sales | 5 | (2,288,831) | (1,762,349) | (3,595,142) | |
| Grossproft | 422,250 | 403,479 | 759,075 | ||
| Selling, general and administration expenses | (118,199) | (115,405) | (221,449) | ||
| Gain on EnQuest demerger | – | 125,569 | 124,864 | ||
| Other income | 3,069 | 7,185 | 5,013 | ||
| Other expenses | (8,660) | (4,319) | (4,053) | ||
| Proft from operations before tax and fnance income/(costs) |
298,460 | 416,509 | 663,450 | ||
| Finance costs | (3,422) | (4,580) | (5,131) | ||
| Finance income | 5,243 | 5,049 | 10,209 | ||
| Share of losses of associates | 11 | (687) | – | (131) | |
| Proft before tax | ~~299,594~~ | 416,978 | 668,397 | ||
| Income tax expense | 6 | (53,140) | (61,245) | (110,545) | |
| Proft for theperiod | 246,454 | 355,733 | 557,852 | ||
| Attributable to: | |||||
| Petrofac Limited shareholders | 246,286 | 356,535 | 557,817 | ||
| Non-controllinginterests | 168 | (802) | 35 | ||
| 246,454 | 355,733 | 557,852 | |||
| Earningsper share(US cents) | 7 | ||||
| – Basic(excluding gain on EnQuest demerger) | 72.71 | 68.17 | 127.76 | ||
| – Diluted(excluding gain on EnQuest demerger) | 71.84 | 67.31 | 126.09 | ||
| – Basic(including gain on EnQuest demerger) | 72.71 | 105.23 | 164.61 | ||
| – Diluted(including gain on EnQuest demerger) | 71.84 | 103.91 | 162.46 |
The attached notes 1 to 17 form part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
16 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Interim condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income For the six months ended 30 June 2011
| Six months endedSix months ended | Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | Year ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | ||||
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | ||||
| Notes | Restated | |||||
| Proft for theperiod | 246,454 | 355,733 | 557,852 | |||
| Foreign currencytranslation | 15 | 9,934 | (10,247) | (908) | ||
| Foreign currency translation recycled to income | ||||||
| statement in theperiod on EnQuest demerger | 15 | – | 45,818 | 45,818 | ||
| Net losses/(gains)on cash fow hedges recycled in theperiod | 15 | 5,980 | (14,409) | (16,612) | ||
| Net changes in fair value of derivatives and fnancial assets designated as cash fow hedges |
15 | 14,055 | (35,470) | (18,958) | ||
| Net changes in the fair value of available-for-sale fnancial assets | 15 | – |
– | 70 | ||
| Disposal of available-for-sale fnancial assets | 15 | (70) | (74) | (74) | ||
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) | 29,899 | (14,382) | 9,336 | |||
| Total comprehensive income for theperiod | 276,353 | 341,351 | 567,188 | |||
| Attributable to: | ||||||
| Petrofac Limited shareholders | 276,185 | 342,153 | 567,153 | |||
| Non-controllinginterests | 168 | (802) | 35 | |||
| 276,353 | 341,351 | 567,188 |
The attached notes 1 to 17 form part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Interim condensed consolidated statement of financial position
17 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Interim condensed consolidated statement of financial position At 30 June 2011
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | |||
| Notes | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | ||
| Assets | |||||
| Non-current assets | |||||
| Property, plant and equipment | 9 | 443,767 | 286,631 | 287,158 | |
| Goodwill | 10 | 109,198 | 105,189 | 105,832 | |
| Intangible assets | 91,452 | 75,793 | 85,837 | ||
| Investment in associates | 11 | 167,272 | 716 | 16,349 | |
| Available-for-sale fnancial assets | 11 | – | – | 101,494 | |
| Longterm trade receivable | 79,745 | – | – | ||
| Other fnancial assets | 260 | 5,101 | 2,223 | ||
| Deferred income tax assets | 29,128 | 28,932 | 26,301 | ||
| 920,822 | 502,362 | 625,194 | |||
| Current assets | |||||
| Inventories | 9,562 | 6,007 | 7,202 | ||
| Work inprogress | 520,344 | 903,494 | 803,986 | ||
| Trade and other receivables | 1,252,445 | 819,559 | 1,056,759 | ||
| Due from relatedparties | 17 | 330 | 292 | 327 | |
| Other fnancial assets | 51,982 | 27,760 | 42,350 | ||
| Income tax receivable | – | – | 2,525 | ||
| Cash and short-term deposits | 13 | 1,848,249 | 1,074,853 | 1,063,005 | |
| 3,682,912 | 2,831,965 | 2,976,154 | |||
| Total assets | 4,603,734 | 3,334,327 | 3,601,348 | ||
| Equity and liabilities | |||||
| Equityattributable to Petrofac Limited shareholders | |||||
| Share capital | 6,915 | 6,912 | 6,914 | ||
| Sharepremium | ~~1,402~~ | – | 992 | ||
| Capital redemption reserve | 10,881 | 10,881 | 10,881 | ||
| Shares to be issued | 994 | 1,988 | 994 | ||
| Treasuryshares | 14 | (81,691) | (67,039) | (65,317) | |
| Other reserves | 15 | 60,533 | 3,327 | 34,728 | |
| Retained earnings | 928,005 | 632,662 | 787,270 | ||
| 927,039 | 588,731 | 776,462 | |||
| Non-controllinginterests | 3,004 | 2,097 | 2,592 | ||
| Total equity | 930,043 | 590,828 | 779,054 | ||
| Non-current liabilities | |||||
| Interest-bearingloans and borrowings | 30,129 | 51,074 | 40,226 | ||
| Provisions | 52,214 | 42,008 | 45,441 | ||
| Other fnancial liabilities | 10,027 | 31,546 | 11,453 | ||
| Deferred income tax liabilities | 50,247 | 53,789 | 48,086 | ||
| 142,617 | 178,417 | 145,206 | |||
| Current liabilities | |||||
| Trade and otherpayables | 1,606,204 | 879,207 | 1,021,436 | ||
| Due to | relatedparties | 17 | 18,205 | 1,077 | 11,710 |
| Interest-bearingloans and borrowings | 50,091 | 63,157 | 47,435 | ||
| Other fnancial liabilities | 21,734 | 47,565 | 37,054 | ||
| Income taxpayable | 62,964 | 105,006 | 105,559 | ||
| Billings in excess of cost and estimated earnings | 387,750 | 424,719 | 178,429 | ||
| Accrued contract expenses | 1,384,126 | 1,044,351 | 1,275,465 | ||
| 3,531,074 | 2,565,082 | 2,677,088 | |||
| Total liabilities | 3,673,691 | 2,743,499 | 2,822,294 | ||
| Total equityand liabilities | 4,603,734 | 3,334,327 | 3,601,348 |
The attached notes 1 to 17 form part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
18 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Interim condensed consolidated cash flow statement
For the six months ended 30 June 2011
| Six months endedSix months ended | Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | |||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | |||
| Notes | US$’000 |
US$’000 | US$’000 | ||
| Operating activities Proft before tax including gain on EnQuest demerger |
299,594 | 416,978 | 668,397 | ||
| Gain on EnQuest demerger | – | (125,569) | (124,864) | ||
| 299,594 | 291,409 | 543,533 | |||
| Adjustments for: | |||||
| Depreciation,amortisation and impairment | 34,194 | 58,731 | 95,903 | ||
| Share-basedpayments | 14 | 9,910 | 6,538 | 14,784 | |
| Difference between other long-term employment benefts | |||||
| paid and amounts recognised in the income statement | 5,987 | 5,282 | 6,074 | ||
| Net fnance income | (1,821) | (469) | (5,078) | ||
| Gain/(loss)on disposal ofproperty, plant and equipment | – | (192) | 315 | ||
| Gain on disposal | of intangible assets | – | – | (2,338) | |
| Other non-cash items,net | 13,543 | 11,586 | 13,319 | ||
| Operating proft before workingcapital changes | 361,407 | 372,885 | 666,512 | ||
| Trade and other receivables | (196,033) | (24,936) | (266,757) | ||
| Work inprogress | 246,810 | (569,796) | (470,288) | ||
| Due from relatedparties | (3) | 17,968 | 17,933 | ||
| Inventories | (2,360) | (1,787) | (2,982) | ||
| Other current fnancial assets | (6,060) | 4,843 | (12,661) | ||
| Trade and otherpayables | 609,598 | 43,035 | 167,707 | ||
| Billings in excess of cost and estimated earnings | ~~209,321~~ | (36,425) | (282,715) | ||
| Accrued contract expenses | 108,661 | 207,695 | 438,809 | ||
| Due to relatedparties | 6,495 | (56,249) | (45,616) | ||
| Other current fnancial liabilities | (368) | 7,089 | 6,045 | ||
| 1,337,468 | (35,678) | 215,987 | |||
| Other non-current items,net | (69,827) | (9,786) | (8,720) | ||
| Cashgenerated from/(used in)operations | 1,267,641 | (45,464) | 207,267 | ||
| Interestpaid | (1,943) | (941) | (1,948) | ||
| Income taxespaid,net | (97,903) | (47,167) | (99,030) | ||
| Net cash fows from/(used in)operatingactivities | 1,167,795 | (93,572) | 106,289 | ||
| Investing activities | |||||
| Purchase ofproperty, plant and equipment | 9 | (144,849) | (78,177) | (115,345) | |
| Acquisition of subsidiaries,net of cash acquired | – | (15,290) | (15,110) | ||
| Payment of deferred consideration on acquisition | (15,804) | – | – | ||
| Purchase of other intangible assets | (1,088) | – | (153) | ||
| Purchase of intangible oil &gas assets | (11,492) | (4,778) | (15,644) | ||
| Cash outfow on EnQuest demerger(includingtransaction costs) | – | (17,783) | (17,783) | ||
| Investment in associates | 11 | (50,359) | – | (8,459) | |
| Purchase of available-for-sale fnancial assets | – | – | (101,494) | ||
| Proceeds from disposal ofproperty, plant and equipment | 829 | 987 | 3,219 | ||
| Proceeds from disposal of available-for-sale fnancial assets | 374 | 534 | 539 | ||
| Proceeds from disposal of intangible assets | – | – | 6,018 | ||
| Interest received | 4,484 | 3,914 | 10,257 | ||
| Net cash fows used in investingactivities | (217,905) | (110,593) | (253,955) |
Interim condensed consolidated cash flow statement
19 Petrofac Interim report 2011
| Six months endedSix months ended | Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | ||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | ||
| Notes | US$’000 |
US$’000 | US$’000 | |
| Financing activities | ||||
| Repayment of interest-bearingloans and borrowings | (9,646) | (5,900) | (32,458) | |
| Treasurysharespurchased | 14 | (47,387) | (37,016) | (36,486) |
| Equitydividendspaid | (101,443) | (84,548) | (132,244) | |
| Net cash fows used in fnancingactivities | (158,476) | (127,464) | (201,188) | |
| Net increase/(decrease)in cash and cash equivalents | 791,413 | (331,629) | (348,854) | |
| Net foreign exchange difference on cash and cash equivalents | (6,856) | (13,480) | (7,793) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January | 1,034,097 | 1,390,744 | 1,390,744 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents atperiod end | 13 | 1,818,654 | 1,045,635 | 1,034,097 |
The attached notes 1 to 17 form part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
20 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Interim condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity For the six months ended 30 June 2011
| Attributable to Petrofac Limited shareholders Issued Capital Shares Treasury Other Non- share Share redemption to be shares* reserves Retained controlling Total capital premium reserve issued US$’000 US$’000 earnings Total interests equity US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 (note 14) (note 15) US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 |
|
|---|---|
| For the six months ended 30 June 2011 |
|
| Balance at 1 January201 | 1 6,914 992 10,881 994 (65,317) 34,728 787,270 776,462 2,592 779,054 |
| Proft for theperiod | – – – – – – 246,286 246,286 168 246,454 |
| Other comprehensive income |
– – – – – 29,899 – 29,899 – 29,899 |
| Total comprehensive income |
– – – – – 29,899 246,286 276,185 168 276,353 |
| Share-based payments charge(note 14) |
– – – – – 9,910 – 9,910 – 9,910 |
| Shares vested during theperiod(note 14) |
– – – – 31,013 (27,250) (3,763) – – – |
| Transfer to reserve for share-based payments(note 14) |
– – – – – 16,906 – 16,906 – 16,906 |
| Deferred tax on share- basedpayment reser |
ve – – – – – (3,660) – (3,660) – (3,660) |
| Treasury shares purchased(note 14) |
– – – – (47,387) – – (47,387) – (47,387) |
| Shares issued on acquisition 1 410 – – – – – 411 – 411 |
|
| Dividends(note 8) – – – – – –(101,788) (101,788) –(101,788) |
|
| Movement in non-controllinginterests – – – – – – – – 244 244 |
|
| Balance at 30 June 2011 (unaudited) 6,915 1,402 10,881 994 (81,691) 60,533 928,005 927,039 3,004 930,043 |
- Shares held by Petrofac Employee Benefit Trust.
| Attributable to Petrofac Limited shareholders Issued Capital Shares Treasury Other Non- share Share redemption to be shares* reserves Retained controlling Total capital premium reserve issued US$’000 US$’000 earnings Total interests equity US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 (note 14) (note 15) US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 |
|
|---|---|
| For the six months ended 30 June 2010 (restated) |
|
| Balance at 1 January201 | 0 8,638 69,712 10,881 1,988 (56,285) 25,394 834,382 894,710 2,819 897,529 |
| Proft for the period as reported |
– – – – – – 331,918 331,918 2,860 334,778 |
| Other comprehensive loss as reported |
– – – – – (9,001) – (9,001) (5,381) (14,382) |
| Total comprehensive income as reported |
– – – – – (9,001)331,918 322,917 (2,521)320,396 |
| Restatement | – – – – – (5,381) 24,617 19,236 1,719 20,955 |
| Total comprehensive inc as restated |
ome – – – – – (14,382)356,535 342,153 (802)341,351 |
| Share-based payments charge(note 14) |
– – – – – 6,538 – 6,538 – 6,538 |
| Shares vested during the period |
– – – – 26,262 (24,895) (1,367) – – – |
| Transfer to reserve for share-based payments (note 14) – – – – – 12,750 – 12,750 – 12,750 |
Interim condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity
21 Petrofac Interim report 2011
| Attributable to Petrofac Limited shareholders Issued Capital Shares Treasury Other Non- share Share redemption to be shares* reserves Retained controlling Total capital premium reserve issued US$’000 US$’000 earnings Total interests equity US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 (note 14) (note 15) US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 |
|
|---|---|
| For the six months ended 30 June 2010 (restated) |
|
| Deferred tax on share-ba payment reserve |
sed – – – – – (2,078) – (2,078) – (2,078) |
| Treasury shares purchased (note 14) – – – – (37,016) – – (37,016) – (37,016) |
|
| Shares issued on acquisition 2 1,460 – – – – – 1,462 – 1,462 |
|
| EnQuest demerger share split and redemption (1,728) – – – – – 1,728 – – – |
|
| Distribution on Enquest demerger – (71,172) – – – –(473,325) (544,497) –(544,497) |
|
| Dividends(note 8) – – – – – – (85,291) (85,291) – (85,291) |
|
| Movement in non-controlling interests – – – – – – – – 80 80 |
|
| Balance at 30 June 2010 (unaudited) 6,912 – 10,881 1,988 (67,039) 3,327 632,662 588,731 2,097 590,828 |
- Shares held by Petrofac Employee Benefit Trust.
| Attributable to Petrofac Limited shareholders Issued Capital Shares Treasury Other Non- share Share redemption to be shares* reserves Retained controlling Total capital premium reserve issued US$’000 US$’000 earnings Total interests equity US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 (note 14) (note 15) US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 US$’000 |
|
|---|---|
| For the year ended 31 December 2010 |
|
| Balance at 1 January201 | 0 8,638 69,712 10,881 1,988 (56,285) 25,394 834,382 894,710 2,819 897,529 |
| Proft for theyear | – – – – – – 557,817 557,817 35 557,852 |
| Other comprehensive income |
– – – – – 9,336 – 9,336 – 9,336 |
| Total comprehensive inc | ome – – – – – 9,336 557,817 567,153 35 567,188 |
| Shares issued as payment of deferred consideration on acquisition 4 2,452 – (994) – – – 1,462 – 1,462 |
|
| Share-based payments charge(note 14) – – – – – 14,784 – 14,784 – 14,784 |
|
| Shares vested during the period – – – – 27,454 (26,170) (1,284) – – – |
|
| Transfer to reserve for share-based payments (note 14) – – – – – 12,750 – 12,750 – 12,750 |
|
| Treasury shares purchased (note 14) – – – – (36,486) – – (36,486) – (36,486) |
|
| Deferred tax on share-based payments reserve – – – – – (1,366) – (1,366) – (1,366) |
|
| EnQuest demerger share split and redemption (1,728) – – – – – 1,728 – – – |
|
| Distribution on Enquest demerger – (71,172) – – – –(473,325) (544,497) –(544,497) |
|
| Dividends(note 8) – – – – – –(132,048) (132,048) –(132,048) |
|
| Movement in non-controlling interests – – – – – – – – (262) (262) |
|
| Balance at 31 December 2010(audited) 6,914 992 10,881 994 (65,317) 34,728 787,270 776,462 2,592 779,054 |
- Shares held by Petrofac Employee Benefit Trust.
The attached notes 1 to 17 form part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
22 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements For the six months ended 30 June 2011
~~interests to trade and other payables~~
1 Corporate information
Petrofac Limited is a limited liability company registered in Jersey under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 and is the holding company for the international group of Petrofac subsidiaries (together “the group”). The group’s principal activities are the provision of facilities solutions to the oil & gas production and processing industry and appraisal, development and operation of oil & gas production and refining projects. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the group for the six months ended 30 June 2011 were authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors on 19 August 2011.
2 Basis of preparation and accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for derivative financial instruments and available-for-sale financial assets that have been measured at fair value. The presentation currency of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements is United States dollars (US$) and all values in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements are rounded to the nearest thousand dollars (US$’000) except where otherwise stated.
- A variation order on a contract in the Engineering & Construction reporting segment was agreed in the first half of 2010 but was not reflected in the interim results, leading to an understatement in revenue (US$35,200,000), cost of sales (US$3,170,000) and income tax expense (US$5,977,000). Furthermore, the group’s income tax expense was adjusted by US$1,436,000 to reflect the impact of this adjustment on the interim group tax charge
Accounting policies
The accounting policies and methods of computation adopted in the preparation of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements are consistent with those followed in the preparation of the group’s financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2010, except as noted below.
The group has adopted new and revised Standards and Interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) of the IASB that are relevant to its operations and effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. The principal effects of the adoption of the relevant new and amended standards and interpretations are discussed below:
Statement of compliance
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Petrofac Limited and all its subsidiaries for the six months ended 30 June 2011 have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 ‘Interim Financial Statements’ and applicable requirements of Jersey law. They do not include all of the information and disclosures required in the annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the group as at and for the year ended 31 December 2010. Certain comparative information has been restated in the current period presentation as outlined below.
Restatements
The following restatements were made in the 2010 comparatives:
- The directors have re-considered the nature of the contractual commitments to a joint venture on a lump sum construction contract in the Engineering & Construction reporting segment and as a result, US$13,426,000 included in non-controlling interests in the statement of financial position at 1 January 2010 was reclassified to trade and other payables (US$9,226,000) and other reserves (US$4,200,000)
IAS 24 ‘Related Party Transactions (Amendment)’ the
definition of a related party has been clarified and the new definitions emphasise a symmetrical view of related party relationships as well as clarifying in which circumstances persons and key management personnel affect related party relationships of an entity. Further, the amendment exempts the entity from disclosing general related party disclosures for transactions with a government and entities that are controlled, jointly controlled or significantly influenced by the same government as the reporting entity. The adoption of the amendment did not have any impact of the financial position or performance of the group.
IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments (Amendment)’ the
amendment alters the definition of a financial liability in IAS 32 to enable entities to classify rights issues and certain options or warrants as equity instruments. The amendment is applicable if the rights are given pro rata to all existing owners of the same class of an entity’s non derivative equity instruments, to acquire a fixed number of the entity’s own equity instruments for a fixed amount in any currency. The amendment has had no effect on the financial position or performance of the group.
- The amount of US$3,662,000 shown as attributable to non controlling interests in the 2010 income statement has been reclassified to cost of sales. US$5,381,000 shown within other comprehensive income has been shown as attributable to Petrofac. In the statement of financial position, the same amount was reclassified from non controlling interests to trade and other payables
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements
23 Petrofac Interim report 2011
3 Segment information
The following tables represent revenue and profit information relating to the group’s primary business segments for the six months ended 30 June 2011.
Included within the Engineering, Training Services and Production Solutions segment are three diverse businesses none of which have ever met the quantitative thresholds set by IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’ for determining reportable segments.
The consolidation adjustments and corporate columns include certain balances which due to their nature are not allocated to segments.
segments. |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering, | |||||||
| Training | |||||||
| Offshore | Services & | Consolidation | |||||
| Engineering & | Engineering & | Production | Energy | Corporate | adjustments & | ||
| Construction | Operations | Solutions | Developments | & others | eliminations | Total | |
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | |
| Six months ended 30 June 2011 | |||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||
| Revenue | |||||||
| External sales | 1,875,561 | 558,111 | 117,724 | 159,685 | – | – | 2,711,081 |
| Inter-segment sales | 28,167 | 22,931 | 75,812 | – | – | (126,910) | – |
| Total revenue | 1,903,728 | 581,042 | 193,536 | 159,685 | – | (126,910) | 2,711,081 |
| Segment results | 235,810 | 39,234 | 14,247 | 23,158 | (210) | (8,353) | 303,886 |
| Unallocated corporate costs | – | – | – | – | (5,426) | – | (5,426) |
| Proft/(loss) from operations before tax and fnance income/(costs) 235,810 |
39,234 | 14,247 | 23,158 | (5,636) | (8,353) | 298,460 | |
| Share of losses of associates | – | – | – | (687) | – | – | (687) |
| Finance costs | – | (28) | (311) | (1,526) | (1,763) | 206 | (3,422) |
| Finance income | 4,891 | 209 | 199 | 16 | 438 | (510) | 5,243 |
| Proft/(loss) before | |||||||
| income tax | 240,701 | 39,415 | 14,135 | 20,961 | (6,961) | (8,657) | 299,594 |
| Income tax(expense)/beneft | (34,584) | (7,646) | (1,018) | (13,247) | 3,355 | – | (53,140) |
| Non-controllinginterests | (168) | – | – | – | – | – | (168) |
| Proft/(loss) for the period | |||||||
| attributable to Petrofac | |||||||
| Limited shareholders | 205,949 | 31,769 | 13,117 | 7,714 | (3,606) | (8,657) | 246,286 |
| Other segment information | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | 12,642 | 2,027 | 3,899 | 15,711 | 245 | (330) | 34,194 |
| Other long-term employment benefts 7,728 | 169 | 304 | 36 | 50 | – | 8,287 | |
| Share-basedpayments | 5,356 | 1,037 | 765 | 1,086 | 1,666 | – | 9,910 |
24 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements continued
| 3 Segment informationcontinued | 3 Segment informationcontinued | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering, | |||||||
| Training | |||||||
| Offshore | Services & | Consolidation | |||||
| Engineering & | Engineering & | Production | Energy | Corporate | adjustments & | ||
| Construction | Operations | Solutions | Developments | & others | eliminations | Total | |
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | |
| Restated | Restated | ||||||
| Six months ended 30 June 2010 | |||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||
| Revenue | |||||||
| External sales | 1,622,694 | 325,537 | 111,339 | 106,258 | – | – | 2,165,828 |
| Inter-segment sales | – | 1,641 | 50,166 | – | – | (51,807) | – |
| Total revenue | 1,622,694 | 327,178 | 161,505 | 106,258 | – | (51,807) | 2,165,828 |
| Segment results | 242,722 | 5,774 | 13,582 | 37,104 | (734) | 204 | 298,652 |
| Gain on EnQuest demerger | – | – | – | 125,569 | – | – | 125,569 |
| Unallocated corporate costs | – | – | – | – | (7,712) | – | (7,712) |
| Proft/(loss) from operations before tax and fnance income/(costs) 242,722 |
5,774 | 13,582 | 162,673 | (8,446) | 204 | 416,509 | |
| Finance costs | – | (425) | (619) | (2,400) | (3,531) | 2,395 | (4,580) |
| Finance income | 5,001 | 97 | 86 | 112 | 2,148 | (2,395) | 5,049 |
| Proft/(loss)before tax | 247,723 | 5,446 | 13,049 | 160,385 | (9,829) | 204 | 416,978 |
| Income tax(expense)/income | (42,132) | (1,492) | 91 | (17,269) | (443) | – | (61,245) |
| Non-controllinginterests | 901 | – | (99) | – | – | – | 802 |
| Proft/(loss) for the period | |||||||
| attributable to Petrofac Limited | |||||||
| shareholders | 206,492 | 3,954 | 13,041 | 143,116 | (10,272) | 204 | 356,535 |
| Other segment information | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | 17,056 | 1,211 | 7,913 | 32,729 | 151 | (329) | 58,731 |
| Other long-term employment benefts 6,005 | 1,109 | 134 | 30 | 51 | – | 7,329 | |
| Share-basedpayments | 3,292 | 968 | 463 | 561 | 1,254 | – | 6,538 |
| Engineering, | |||||||
| Training | |||||||
| Offshore | Services & | Consolidation | |||||
| Engineering & | Engineering & | Production | Energy | Corporate | adjustments & | ||
| Construction | Operations | Solutions | Developments | & others | eliminations | Total | |
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | |
| Year ended 31 December 2010 | |||||||
| (audited) | |||||||
| Revenue | |||||||
| External sales | 3,232,174 | 710,080 | 223,748 | 188,215 | – | – | 4,354,217 |
| Inter-segment sales | 21,732 | 11,821 | 131,538 | – | – | (165,091) | – |
| Total revenue | 3,253,906 | 721,901 | 355,286 | 188,215 | – | (165,091) | 4,354,217 |
| Segment results | 438,867 | 24,506 | 26,590 | 66,290 | (900) | (3,362) | 551,991 |
| Gain on EnQuest demerger | – | – | – | 124,864 | – | – | 124,864 |
| Unallocated corporate costs | – | – | – | – | (13,405) | – | (13,405) |
| Proft/(loss) from operations before tax and fnance income/(costs) 438,867 |
24,506 | 26,590 | 191,154 | (14,305) | (3,362) | 663,450 | |
| Share of loss of associate | – | – | – | (131) | – | – | (131) |
| Finance costs | – | (968) | (696) | (3,121) | (3,659) | 3,313 | (5,131) |
| Finance income | 9,741 | 209 | 525 | 348 | 2,699 | (3,313) | 10,209 |
| Proft/(loss)before tax | 448,608 | 23,747 | 26,419 | 188,250 | (15,265) | (3,362) | 668,397 |
| Income tax(expense)/beneft | (75,550) | (6,519) | 1,144 | (31,895) | 2,275 | – | (110,545) |
| Non-controllinginterests | (35) | – | – | – | – | – | (35) |
| Proft/(loss) for the year attributable | |||||||
| to Petrofac Limited shareholders | 373,023 |
17,228 | 27,563 | 156,355 | (12,990) | (3,362) | 557,817 |
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements
25 Petrofac Interim report 2011
| Engineering, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training | |||||||
| Offshore | Services & | Consolidation | |||||
| Engineering & | Engineering & | Production | Energy | Corporate | adjustments & | ||
| Construction | Operations | Solutions | Developments | & others | eliminations | Total | |
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | |
| Other segment information | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortisation | 35,384 | 2,835 | 8,076 | 49,816 | 367 | (575) | 95,903 |
| Other long-term employment benefts 10,435 | 613 | 1,581 | 54 | 87 | – | 12,770 | |
| Share-basedpayments | 7,693 | 1,167 | 1,896 | 1,121 | 2,907 | – | 14,784 |
The significant movements in total group assets as at 30 June 2011 compared to total assets as at 31 December 2010 are primarily in the following segments:
| Engineering & | Energy | |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | Developments | |
| US$’000 | US$’000 | |
| Total assets as at 30 June 2011 | 3,780,018 | 563,435 |
| Total assets as at 31 December 2010 | 3,008,719 | 322,437 |
Increase in Engineering & Construction segment assets during the period is primarily due to increase in cash and cash equivalents of US$833,255,000 mainly as a result of advances received on EPC contracts.
Increase in Energy Developments segment assets during the period is primarily due to additions to property, plant and equipment of US$138,961,000 mainly relating to the purchase of Floating Production Storage and Offloading Vessels (FPSOs) (see note 9) and recognition of a receivable on the Berantai RSC contract in Malaysia of US$79,745,000 and a receivable from joint venture partners for the purchase of the FPSO Berantai (formerly the East Fortune) of US$30,103,000.
4 Revenues
| Six months endedSix months ended | Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | |
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | |
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | |
| Restated | |||
| Renderingof services | 2,651,110 | 2,078,445 | 4,202,371 |
| Sale of crude oil &gas | ~~55,827~~ | 85,012 | 146,075 |
| Sale ofprocessed hydrocarbons | 4,144 | 2,371 | 5,771 |
| 2,711,081 | 2,165,828 | 4,354,217 |
Included in revenues from rendering of services are Offshore Engineering & Operations, Engineering Services, Training Services and Production Solutions revenues of a ‘pass-through’ nature with zero or low margins amounting to US$111,274,000 (six months ended 30 June 2010: US$95,011,000; year ended 31 December 2010: US$227,974,000).
5 Cost of sales
Also included in cost of sales are forward points and ineffective portions on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and gains on undesignated derivatives of US$1,150,000 (six months ended 30 June 2010: US$3,175,000 gains; year ended 31 December 2010: US$3,409,000 losses).
26 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements continued
6 Income tax
Income tax expense is recognised based on management’s best estimate of the annual income tax rate applied to the pre tax income of the interim period.
The major components of the income tax expense are as follows:
| The major components of the income tax expense are as follows: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | ||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | ||
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | ||
| Restated | ||||
| Current income tax | ||||
| Current income tax charge | 65,485 | 59,921 | 115,199 | |
| Adjustments in respect of current income tax ofpreviousperiods | (158) | (3,495) | (2,843) | |
| Deferred income tax | ||||
| Relatingto origination and reversal of temporarydifferences | (11,789) | 5,484 | 907 | |
| Adjustments in respect of deferred income tax ofpreviousperiods | (398) | (665) | (2,718) | |
| 53,140 | 61,245 | 110,545 |
The group’s effective tax rate for the six months is 17.7% (excluding the 2010 gain from the demerger; six months ended 30 June 2010: 21.0%; year ended 31 December 2010: 20.3%).
Excluding the gain from the demerger, the effective tax rate has decreased from the comparable 2010 period and the year ended 31 December 2010. The effective tax rate for the group for the year to 31 December 2011 is expected to be 21.7%. However, due to the timing of profit recognition on Engineering & Construction contracts between the first half and second half of the year, a lower tax charge and effective tax rate is acknowledged in the first half of 2011.
If the consequences of the timing issues noted above are accounted for, the effective tax rate for 2011 for the group is expected to be greater than the effective tax rate in the comparable 2010 periods. This is a result of changes in the overall mix of taxable jurisdictions within which Engineering & Construction operate.
In March 2011, the UK Government announced its intention to reduce the UK corporation tax rate from 28% to 26% effective from 1 April 2011 and then to further reduce the UK corporation tax rate to 23% over the course of the next three years. As of 30 June 2011, the initial tax rate change to 26% was substantively enacted and the deferred tax asset and liabilities are disclosed at the new rate. The deferred tax assets and liabilities would have reduced by approximately US$1,142,000 and US$17,000 respectively, had the further changes to the corporation tax rate down to 23% been substantively enacted as of the said date.
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements
27 Petrofac Interim report 2011
7 Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing the net profit for the period attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing the net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders, after adjusting for any dilutive effect, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the effects of ordinary shares granted under the employee share award schemes which are held in trust.
The following reflects the income and share data used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share:
| Six months endedSix months ended | Six months endedSix months ended | Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | |||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | |||
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | |||
| Restated | |||||
| Net proft attributable to ordinary shareholders for basic | |||||
| and diluted earningsper share excluding gain on EnQuest demerger | 246,286 | 230,966 | 432,953 | ||
| Net proft attributable to ordinary shareholders for basic | |||||
| and diluted earningsper share including gain on EnQuest demerger | 246,286 | 356,535 | 557,817 | ||
| Weighted average number of ordinaryshares for basic earningsper share | 338,703 | 338,817 | 338,867 | ||
| Effect of dilutedpotential ordinarysharesgranted under share-basedpayment | schemes | 4,134 |
4,314 | 4,493 | |
| Adjusted weighted average number of ordinaryshares for diluted earningsper share | 342,837 |
343,131 | 343,360 |
8 Dividends paid and proposed
| 8 Dividends paid and proposed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | ||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | ||
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | ||
| Declared and paid during the period | ||||
| Equitydividends on ordinaryshares: | ||||
| Final dividend for 2009: 25.10 centsper share | – | 85,291 | 85,291 | |
| Interim dividend for 2010: 13.80 centsper share | – | – | 46,757 | |
| Final dividend for 2010: 30.00 centsper share | 101,788 | – | – | |
| 101,788 | 85,291 | 132,048 |
The Company proposes an interim dividend of 17.40 cents per share which was approved by the Board on 19 August 2011 for payment on 21 October 2011.
9 Property, plant and equipment
Increase in property, plant and equipment during the period mainly comprises of the purchases and upgrade of the FPSO Berantai, the Jasmine Venture FPSO (renamed FPF3) and the Cossack Pioneer FPSO (renamed FPF4) for a combined cost of US$135,465,000.
28 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements continued
10 Goodwill
The net increase in the goodwill balance in the current period mainly represents unrealised foreign exchange gains on translation of US$2,546,000 with the balance being the payment of additional deferred consideration in respect of the SPD Group Limited and Caltec Limited acquisitions.
11 Investment in associates and available-for-sale financial assets
During the period an additional investment of US$50,000,000 was made in Seven Energy International Limited (Seven Energy) which increased the group’s shareholding in the company from 15% to 20% which has resulted in the group exercising significant influence over the financial and operating policy decisions of Seven Energy. As a result the available-for-sale financial asset with a carrying value of US$101,251,000 at 31 December 2010 has been reclassified as an investment in associate from 10 June 2011. The movement in investment in associates during the period is as follows:
| US$’000 | |
|---|---|
| As at 1 January2011 | 16,349 |
| Transfer from available-for-sale fnancial assets | 101,251 |
| Additional investment in Seven Energy,includingtransaction costs | 50,359 |
| Share of loss in associates | (687) |
| 167,272 |
12 Derivative financial instruments
The movement during the period is due to changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments which the group uses to hedge its risk against foreign currency exposure on sales, purchases and borrowings that are entered into in a currency other than US dollars and exposure to oil price revenue fluctuations.
During the period the group entered into various fuel oil swaps for hedging gas production of 12,700MT with maturities ranging from January 2012 to May 2012. In addition, two crude oil swaps were also entered into for hedging oil production of 16,800 bbl with maturities from January 2012 to February 2012.
During the period the group entered into the following foreign exchange forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges:
| Currencies | Sales Purchases |
|---|---|
| Foreign currency US$ Foreign currency US$ amount equivalent amount equivalent ’000 US$’000 ’000 US$’000 |
|
| Euro | 153,925 218,639 311,400 425,422 |
| Sterling | – – 72,800 118,668 |
| UAE Dirhams | 3,307,095 900,000 1,652,850 450,000 |
13 Cash and cash equivalents
For the purposes of the interim condensed consolidated cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents comprise the following:
| 30 June | 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | ||
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | ||
| Cash at bank and in hand | 359,846 | 215,356 | 244,018 | |
| Short-term deposits | 1,488,403 | 859,497 | 818,987 | |
| Cash and short-term deposits | ~~1,848,249~~ | 1,074,853 | 1,063,005 | |
| Bank overdrafts | (29,595) | (29,218) | (28,908) | |
| 1,818,654 | 1,045,635 | 1,034,097 |
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements
29 Petrofac Interim report 2011
14 Treasury shares and share-based payments
During the period, the Company acquired 1,950,000 (30 June 2010: 2,122,786; 31 December 2010: 2,122,960) of its own shares at a cost of US$47,387,000 (30 June 2010: US$37,016,000; 31 December 2010: US$36,486,000) for the purpose of making awards under the group’s employee share schemes and these shares have been classified in the balance sheet as treasury shares within equity. In addition during the period 2,407,103 shares (including 288,408 accrued dividend shares) with a cost of US$31,013,000 were transferred out of the Employee Benefit Trust on vesting of various employee share scheme awards as shown below.
The following table shows the movements in the number of shares held under the three group employee share schemes excluding the 8% EnQuest demerger uplift adjustment and rolled up dividends:
the 8% EnQuest demerger uplift adjustment and rolled up dividends: |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred Bonus | Performance | Restricted | |
| Share Plan* | Share Plan | Share Plan | |
| Number | Number | Number | |
| Outstandingat 1 January2011 | 4,082,311 | 1,350,189 | 1,003,712 |
| Granted duringtheperiod | 1,491,820 | 482,379 | 134,394 |
| Vested duringtheperiod | (1,648,147) | (419,379) | (21,007) |
| Forfeited duringtheperiod | (72,482) | – | – |
| Outstandingbut not exercisable at 30 June 2011 | 3,853,502 | 1,413,189 | 1,117,099 |
Made up of following awards:
| 2007 | – | – | 105,932 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | – | – | 644,535 |
| 2009 | 1,362,436 | 540,532 | 36,658 |
| 2010 | 1,008,528 | 390,278 | 195,580 |
| 2011 | 1,482,538 | 482,379 | 134,394 |
| 3,853,502 | 1,413,189 | 1,117,099 |
- Includes invested and matching shares.
The fair value of the equity-settled awards granted during the period ended 30 June 2011 in respect of the Deferred Bonus Share Plan were estimated based on the quoted closing market price of 1,426 pence per Company share at the date of grant with an assumed vesting rate of 98.0% per annum over the vesting period of the plan.
The fair value of the non-market based equity-settled awards granted during the period ended 30 June 2011 representing 50% of the total Performance Share Plan award were estimated based on the quoted closing market price of 1,426 pence per Company share at the date of grant with an assumed vesting rate of 95.0% per annum over the three year vesting period of the plan. The remaining 50% of these awards which are market performance based were fair valued by an independent valuer at 788 pence per share using a Monte Carlo simulation model taking into account the terms and conditions of the plan rules and using the following assumptions at the date of grant:
| Expected share price volatility (based on median of comparator group’s three-year volatilities) | 51.0% |
|---|---|
| Share price correlation with comparator group | 43.0% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.7% |
| Expected life of share award | three years |
The fair value of the equity-settled awards granted at various dates during the period ended 30 June 2011 in respect of the Restricted Share Plan were based on an average market price of 1,398 pence with an assumed vesting rate of 95.0% per annum over the vesting period of the plan.
The group has recognised an expense in the income statement for the period to 30 June 2011 relating to employee share-based incentives of US$9,910,000 (six months ended 30 June 2010: US$6,538,000; year ended 31 December 2010: US$14,784,000) which has been transferred to the reserve for share-based payments along with US$16,906,000 of the remaining bonus liability accrued for the year ended 31 December 2010 (30 June 2010: US$12,750,000; 31 December 2010: US$12,750,000) which has been voluntarily elected or mandatorily obliged to be settled in shares granted during the period.
30 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements continued
| 15 Other reserves | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | unrealised | ||||
| gains/(losses) | |||||
| on available-for- sale fnancial |
Net unrealised (losses)/gains |
Foreign currency |
Reserve for share-based |
||
| assets | on derivatives | translation | payments | Total | |
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | |
| Balance at 1 January2011 | 70 | (2,797) | (19,418) | 56,873 | 34,728 |
| Foreign currencytranslation | – | – | 9,934 | – | 9,934 |
| Disposal of available-for-sale fnancial assets | (70) | – | – | – | (70) |
| Netgains on cash fow hedges recycled in theperiod | – | 5,980 | – | – | 5,980 |
| Net changes in fair value of derivatives and fnancial assets designated as cash fow hedges |
– | 14,055 | – | – | 14,055 |
| Share-basedpayments charge(note 14) | – | – | – | 9,910 | 9,910 |
| Transfer duringtheperiod(note 14) | – | – | – | 16,906 | 16,906 |
| Shares vested duringtheperiod(note 14) | – | – | (27,250) | (27,250) | |
| Deferred tax on share-basedpayments reserve | – | – | – | (3,660) | (3,660) |
| Balance at 30 June 2011(unaudited) | – | 17,238 | (9,484) | 52,779 | 60,533 |
| Balance at 1 January2010 | 74 | 32,773 | (64,328) | 56,875 | 25,394 |
| Foreign currencytranslation | – | – | (10,247) | – | (10,247) |
| Foreign currency translation recycled to income statement | |||||
| in theperiod on EnQuest demerger | – | – | 45,818 | – | 45,818 |
| Disposal of available-for-sale fnancial assets | (74) | – | – | – | (74) |
| Netgains on cash fow hedges recycled in theperiod | – | (14,409) | – | – | (14,409) |
| Net changes in fair value of derivatives and fnancial assets designated as cash fow hedges |
– | (35,470) | – | – | (35,470) |
| Share-basedpayments charge(note 14) | – | – | – | 6,538 | 6,538 |
| Transfer duringtheperiod(note 14) | – | – | – | 12,750 | 12,750 |
| Shares vested duringtheperiod | – | – | – | (24,895) | (24,895) |
| Deferred tax on share basedpayments reserve | – | – | – | (2,078) | (2,078) |
| Balance at 30 June 2010(unaudited) | – | (17,106) | (28,757) | 49,190 | 3,277 |
| Balance at 1 January2010 | 74 | 32,773 | (64,328) | 56,875 | 25,394 |
| Foreign currencytranslation | – | – | (908) | – | (908) |
| Foreign currency translation recycled to income statement | |||||
| in theperiod on EnQuest demerger | – | – | 45,818 | – | 45,818 |
| Net changes in fair value of available-for-sale fnancial assets | 70 | – | – | – | 70 |
| Disposal of available-for-sale fnancial assets | (74) | – | – | – | (74) |
| Netgains on cash fow hedges recycled in theyear | – | (16,612) | – | – | (16,612) |
| Net changes in fair value of derivatives and fnancial assets designated as cash fow hedges |
– | (18,958) | – | – | (18,958) |
| Share-basedpayments charge(note 14) | – | – | – | 14,784 | 14,784 |
| Transfer duringtheyear(note 14) | – | – | – | 12,750 | 12,750 |
| Shares vested duringtheyear | – | – | – | (26,170) | (26,170) |
| Deferred tax on share-basedpayments reserve | – | – | – | (1,366) | (1,366) |
| Balance at 31 December 2010(audited) | 70 | (2,797) | (19,418) | 56,873 | 34,728 |
Notes to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements
31 Petrofac Interim report 2011
16 Capital commitments
At 30 June 2011 the group had capital commitments of US$232,383,000 (31 December 2010: US$90,416,000; 30 June 2010: US$10,744,000).
Included in the above are commitments relating to expenditure on the FPSO Berantai in Malaysia of US$161,972,000 (31 December 2010: US$52,800,000; 30 June 2010: US$nil), expenditure on the Ocean Legend MOPU of US$34,200,000 (31 December 2010: US$nil; 30 June 2010: US$nil), additional appraisal and development well costs on the Cendor project in Malaysia of US$6,844,000 (31 December 2010: US$7,269,000; 30 June 2010: US$nil), additional expenditure on the Chergui gas field of US$4,683,000 (31 December 2010: US$nil; 30 June 2010: US$nil), commitments in respect of the Ticleni Production Enhancement contract in Romania US$16,906,000 (31 December 2010: US$21,046,000; 30 June 2010: US$nil) and commitments in respect of IT projects of US$6,332,000 (31 December 2010: US$9,281,000; 30 June 2010: US$8,400,000).
17 Related party transactions
The following table provides the total amount of transactions which have been entered into with related parties:
| Sales | Purchases | Amounts | Amounts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| to | from | owed | owed | ||
| related | related | by related | to related | ||
| parties | parties | parties | parties | ||
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | ||
| Joint ventures | Six months ended 30 June 2011(unaudited) | 90,661 | 96,232 | 330 | 18,060 |
| Six months ended 30 June 2010(unaudited) | 36,638 | 22,876 | 292 | 712 | |
| Year ended 31 December 2010(audited) | 101,370 | 88,796 | 327 | 11,098 | |
| Keymanagement | Six months ended 30 June 2011(unaudited) | – | 486 | – | 145 |
| personnel | Six months ended 30 June 2010(unaudited) | – | 561 | – | 365 |
| interests | Year ended 31 December 2010(audited) | – | 1,688 | – | 612 |
All sales to and purchases from joint ventures are made at normal market prices and the pricing policies and terms of these transactions are approved by the group’s management.
All related party balances at 30 June 2011 will be settled in cash.
Purchases in respect of key management personnel interests of US$428,000 (six months ended 30 June 2010: US$561,000; year ended 31 December 2010: US$1,601,000) reflect the market rate based costs of chartering the services of an aeroplane used for the transport of senior management and directors of the group on company business, which is owned by an offshore trust of which the Chief Executive of the Company is a beneficiary.
Also included in purchases in respect of key management personnel interests is US$58,000 (six months ended 30 June 2010: US$nil; year ended 31 December 2010: US$87,000) relating to client entertainment provided by a business owned by a member of the group’s key management.
Compensation of key management personnel
| Compensation of key management personnel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six months endedSix months ended | Year ended | |||
| 30 June | 30 June | 31 December | ||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | ||
| Unaudited | Unaudited | Audited | ||
| US$’000 | US$’000 | US$’000 | ||
| Short-term employee benefts | 3,539 | 3,132 | 11,870 | |
| Other long-term employment benefts | 79 | 71 | 142 | |
| Share-basedpayments | ~~2,426~~ | 1,976 | 3,827 | |
| Feespaid to non-executive directors | 394 | 276 | 581 | |
| 6,438 | 5,455 | 16,420 |
Statement of directors’ responsibilities
The directors confirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the condensed set of financial statements on pages 15 to 31 have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34 ‘Interim Financial Reporting’, and that the interim management report on pages 4 to 14 includes a fair review of the information required by DTR 4.2.7 and DTR 4.2.8.
The directors of Petrofac Limited are listed in the Petrofac Annual Report and Accounts 2010.
By order of the Board
==> picture [43 x 19] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [36 x 19] intentionally omitted <==
Ayman Asfari Group Chief Executive 19 August 2011
Keith Roberts Chief Financial Officer 19 August 2011
32 Petrofac Interim report 2011
Independent review report to Petrofac Limited
Introduction
We have been engaged by Petrofac Limited (‘the Company’) to review the interim condensed consolidated financial statements in the Interim report for the six months ended 30 June 2011 which comprises the Interim condensed consolidated income statement, the Interim condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the Interim condensed consolidated statement of financial position, the Interim condensed consolidated cash flow statement, the Interim condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity and the related explanatory notes. We have read the other information contained in the interim report and considered whether it contains any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the information in the condensed set of financial statements.
This report is made solely to the Company in accordance with guidance contained in International Standard on Review Engagements 2410 (UK and Ireland) “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity” issued by the Auditing Practices Board. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company, for our work, for this report, or for the conclusions we have formed.
Directors’ Responsibilities
The interim report is the responsibility of, and has been approved by, the directors. The directors are responsible for preparing the interim report in accordance with the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom’s Financial Services Authority.
Our Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express to the Company a conclusion on the interim condensed consolidated financial statements in the interim report based on our review.
Scope of Review
We conducted our review in accordance with International Standard on Review Engagements (UK and Ireland) 2410, “Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity” issued by the Auditing Practices Board for use in the United Kingdom. A review of interim financial information consists of making enquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion.
Conclusion
Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Interim condensed consolidated financial statements in the interim report for the six months ended 30 June 2011 are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 and the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of the United Kingdom’s Financial Services Authority.
Ernst & Young LLP London 19 August 2011
As disclosed in note 2, the annual consolidated financial statements of Petrofac Limited are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The condensed consolidated financial statements included in this interim report have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, “Interim Financial Reporting”.
Shareholder information At 30 June 2011
Petrofac shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange using code ‘PFC.L’.
Registrar
Capita Registrars (Jersey) Limited 12 Castle Street St Helier Jersey JE2 3RT
Company Secretary and registered office
Ogier Corporate Services (Jersey) Limited Ogier House The Esplanade St Helier Jersey JE4 9WG
UK Transfer Agent
Capita Registrars The Registry 34 Beckenham Road Beckenham Kent BR3 4TU
Legal Advisers to the Company Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP 65 Fleet Street London EC4Y 1HS
Auditors
Joint Brokers
Goldman Sachs Peterborough Court 133 Fleet Street London EC4A 2BB
JP Morgan Cazenove 10 Aldermanbury London EC2V 7RF
Ernst & Young LLP 1 More London Place London SE1 2AF
Corporate and Financial PR
Tulchan Communications Group 85 Fleet Street London EC4Y 1AE
Financial calendar
| Financial calendar | |
|---|---|
| 23 September 2011 | Interim dividend record date |
| 21 October 2011 | Interim dividendpayment |
| 31 December 2011 | 2011 fnancialyear end |
| 5 March 2012 | 2011 fullyear results announcement |
Dates correct at time of print, but subject to change.
The group’s investor relations website can be found through www.petrofac.com
Petrofac Services Limited 117 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 6HH United Kingdom
T +44 20 7811 4900 F +44 20 7811 4901
www.petrofac.com
==> picture [117 x 219] intentionally omitted <==
This Report is printed on Revive 100 Pure White Silk paper and has been independently certified on behalf of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). The inks used are all vegetable oil based.
==> picture [45 x 49] intentionally omitted <==
Printed at St Ives Westerham Press Ltd, ISO14001, FSC certified and CarbonNeutral[®]