AI assistant
PEET LIMITED — Annual Report 2003
Aug 1, 2004
65600_rns_2004-08-01_812773cd-4354-4578-acd8-77bfb30a4b61.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Peet & Company Limited and its Controlled Entities
ABN: 56 008 665 834
Financial Report 30 June 2003
FINANCIAL REPORT 30 June 2003
| CONTENTS | Page No |
|---|---|
| Directors' Report | |
| the contract of the state of the contract ofStatements of Financial Performance | |
| Statements of Financial Position | |
| Statements of Cash Flows | |
| Notes to the Financial Statements | |
| Directors' Declaration | |
| Independent Audit Report |
$\sim 10^{-1}$
DIRECTORS' REPORT
Your directors present their report on the consolidated entity consisting of Peet & Company Limited ("the Company") and the entities it controlled at the end of, or during, the financial year ended 30 June 2003.
$\mathbf{1}$ Directors
The following persons were directors of Peet & Company Limited during the whole of the financial year and up until the date of this report:
AW Lennon, AVLE
Mr Lennon is the Executive Chairman of Peet & Company Limited and has been the Chief Executive since 1985. Mr Lennon has 40 years experience in property agency and development. Of particular relevance, he has specialised in development and marketing of land estates.
Interest in shares of the company; 430,455 ordinary shares
WD Hemsley, B.Comm, CPA, Assoc.Dip.Val, FVLE (VAL & ECON.)
Mr Hemsley is the Managing Director of Peet & Company Limited and has been a Director of Peet & Company since 1985. He has a total of 25 years experience in property and agency work.
Interest in shares of the company; 132,229 ordinary shares
IMC Palmer, Dip.Val., AVLE, Dip. REM
Mr Palmer has been a Director of Peet & Company Limited since 1986. He has been a qualified valuer for 29 years with 33 years in real estate including 13 years as principal of Ian Palmer & $\hat{C}$ o.
Interest in shares of the company; 162,193 ordinary shares
AJ Lennon, BA, Grad.Dip.Bus.Admin.
Mr Lennon joined Peet & Company Limited in 1991 and became a director in 1994. Prior to that he worked in England for 3 years.
Interest in shares of the company; nil
A W Lennon, W D Hemsley and A J Lennon are executive directors. Details of interests in securities of the company are as at the date of this report.
$\mathbf{2}$ Principal activities
The principal activities of the consolidated entity during the course of the financial year were project management, land syndication, management of land sales and marketing, corporate management services, underwriting, land development and land and other real estate sales. There was no significant change in the nature of the activities during the year.
DIRECTORS' REPORT
$3.$ Review of operations and consolidated results
During the year the Company continued to gain good results from the management of various residential land developments and continued its land development and syndication activities.
Western Australia
The Western Australian market continued to provide strong sales for the Group, particularly from the Carramar, St Michel, Ocean Lagoon and Atwell Waters Estates. During the year, the Company also finalised a deal with the State Government seeing it take a joint venture interest in the development of a 3,000 lot subdivision in the suburb of Wellard. This was seen as a major milestone for the Company.
Victoria
During the year ended 30 June 2003, the Company further consolidated its position as one of the major players in the land development industry in Victoria. During the year the company acquired broadacres in Victoria which will yield more than 3,000 residential home-sites, plus various commercial and schooling sites. Included in this were some 1,800 lots in Tarneit. A capital raising allotting 14 Million partly paid $1.00 shares by Peet Tarneit Syndicate Limited will be used to finance the acquisition of 1,100 of those $\ln s$
Queensland
The Company arranged the syndication of its first land acquisition in Queensland - Shire of Pine Rivers. The Peet Warner Lakes Syndicate Limited allotted 21.6 Million partly paid $1.00 shares to fund the acquisition of 206 hectares of land only 19 Kilometres from the Brisbane CBD. The Company is continuing to investigate further acquisition opportunities in Queensland and to this end, has appointed an Operations Manager for the State.
Sales & settlements
Completed settlements of sales of land under the management of the Company in Western Australia and Victoria totalled approximately $179,000,000 for the year ended 30 June 2003 (2002: $115,000,000). Actual gross contracts written during the year ended 30 June 2003 for sales of land in projects under management totalled in excess of $247,000,000 (2002: $200,000,000).
The consolidated profit of the consolidated entity for the year ended 30 June 2003 after providing for income tax was $19,327,348 (2002: $8,205,378).
Changes in Accounting Policy
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous year except for the following: As a result of the adoption of Urgent Issues Group Consensus View Abstract 53 'Pre-Completion Contracts for the Sale of Residential Development Properties' sales revenue is now recognised on the signing of an unconditional contract of sale for land held for resale and on the percentage of completion basis for precompletion sales contracts. Previously land sales revenue was recognised on a settlement basis. Current year's pre-tax profit and inventory have increased by $4,456,306 in the consolidated entity due to the change in accounting policy. Application of the new policy has not impacted the parent entity.
Comparative information for the prior reporting period has not been prepared. The requirement to determine revenue and profits for pre-completion sales contracts in accordance with note (e) above is considered onerous, as the data required is not readily available.
DIRECTORS' REPORT
$\overline{4}$ . Significant changes in the state of affairs
In the opinion of the directors there were no significant changes in the state of the consolidated entity that occurred during the financial year under review.
5. Dividends
Dividends paid or declared by the Company during the financial year ended 30 June 2003 (2002: $2,000,000) were as follows:
| On 23 July 2002 the Company paid a fully franked dividend of approx. $2.70 | $ |
|---|---|
| per share, with Class C franking credits. | 2,000,000 |
| On 30 August 2002 the Company paid a fully franked dividend of approx.$2.70 per share, with Class C franking credits. | 2,000,000 |
| On 17 December 2002 the Company paid a fully franked dividend of approx.$4.06 per share, with Class C franking credits. | 3,000,000 |
| On 26 June 2003 the Company declared a fully franked dividend of approx.$2.70 per share, with Class C franking credits. The dividend was paid on 1 | |
| July 2003. | 2,000,000 |
| 9,000,000 |
6. Environmental regulation
The consolidated entity is subject to environmental regulation by way of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (as amended) in respect of its Western Australian land subdivision activities, the Environmental Protection Act 1970 (as amended) in respect of its Victorian subdivision activities and the Environment Protection Act 1994 (including Regulations 1998) and the Integrated Planning Act in respect to its Queensland land subdivision activities.
To the best of the Directors' knowledge all activities have been undertaken in compliance with the requirements of subdivision and/or other approvals granted.
$\overline{7}$ . Directors' meetings
The number of directors' meetings and number of meetings attended by each of the directors of the company during the financial year are detailed below:
| Peet & Company Ltdin its own right | Peet & CompanyLimited as trustee | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Held | Attended | Held | Attended | |
| AW Lennon | 17 | 15 | 8 | |
| WD Hemsley | 17 | 16 | 9 | |
| IM Palmer | 17 | 13 | 7 | |
| AJ Lennon | 17 | 16 | 9 |
DIRECTORS' REPORT
Likely developments and expected results of operations 8.
No information as to the likely developments in the operations of the consolidated entity and the expected results of those operations in subsequent financial years has been included in this report because in the opinion of the directors, it would prejudice the interests of the consolidated entity.
9. Matters subsequent to the end of the financial year
The Directors declared a fully franked dividend of approximately $2.70 per share ($2,000,000) on Thursday, 26 June 2003 and the dividend was paid on Tuesday, 1 July 2003. Additionally, the Directors declared a fully franked dividend of approximately $$5.40$ per share ($4,000,000) on Monday, 1 September 2003 and the dividend was paid on Friday, 19 September 2003.
Since year-end the Company has executed a joint venture agreement with Landstart for the development of a significant parcel of land at Wellard which is to be marketed as The Village at Wellard.
Additionally, the company arranged for the acquisition of land in Caboolture Queensland by Peet Caboolture Syndicate Ltd in which the company holds a 20% interest. The shares in Peet Caboolture Syndicate Ltd were allotted on $28^{th}$ August 2003 and the acquisition of the land settled on $29^{th}$ August 2003.
Except for the issues discussed above, no other matter or circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2003 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect:
- (a) the consolidated entity's operations in future financial years, or
- (b) the results of those operations in future financial years, or
- (c) the consolidated entity's state of affairs in future financial years.
10. Insurance of Officers
During the financial year, Peet & Company Ltd paid a premium in respect of Directors' and Officers' liability that indemnifies officers of the Company. The liabilities insured are costs and expenses that may be incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings that may be brought against the Directors and Officers in their capacity as such. The Directors have not included more specific details of the nature of the liabilities covered or the amount of the premium paid in respect of Directors' and Officers' liability, as such disclosure is prohibited under the terms of the contract.
11. Auditor
PricewaterhouseCoopers continues in office in accordance with section 327 of the Corporations Act 2001.
Signed for and on behalf of the Board in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.
Director
Perth, Western Australia $2,4$ September 2003
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003S | 2002S | |
| Revenue from ordinary activities | 2 | 48,844,018 | 16,971,159 | 29,832,314 | 16,949,368 |
| Change in inventoriesPurchases & other inventory costsEmployee benefits expenseDepreciation expenseBorrowing costs expenseProject management, selling andother operating costsOffice costsOther expenses from ordinaryactivities | (46,075,285)58,805,6343,254,46252,795788,9293,202,174562,165683,521 | (6,964,234)7,369,7172,851,97587,107(9,690)1,394,475478,012368,668 | (5,349,179)5,349,1793,254,46249,5216,9972,387,217562,165297,561 | 246,092159,3912,851,97586,956(10, 875)1,394,475478,012326,967 | |
| Profit from ordinary activities beforerelated income tax expense | 3 | 27,569,623 | 11,395,129 | 23,274,391 | 11,416,375 |
| Income tax expense | $\overline{4}$ | (8,242,275) | (3,189,751) | (6,936,602) | (3,213,370) |
| Net profit attributable to membersof Peet & Company LimitedTotal changes in equity other than | 19,327,348 | 8,205,378 | 16,337,789 | 8,203,005 | |
| those resulting from transactionswith owners as owner | 22 | 19,327,348 | 8,205,378 | 16,337,789 | 8,203,005 |
$\sim$
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE 2003
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||||
| Cash assets | 9,842,315 | 5,321,212 | 8,076,861 | 5,320,994 | |
| Receivables | 6 | 16,946,739 | 7,144,101 | 18,393,739 | 7,119,978 |
| Other | 7 | 170,650 | 120,018 | 78,130 | 75,951 |
| Inventories | 8 | 14,639,634 | 2,328,364 | ||
| TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 41,599,338 | 14,913,695 | 26,548,730 | 12,516,923 | |
| NON-CURRENT ASSETS | |||||
| Receivables | 9 | 6,919 | |||
| Inventories | 13 | 7,107 | 2,014,337 | 2,783,528 | |
| Investments | 11 | 47,256,110 | 13,492,095 | 5,855,607 | 506,428 |
| Property, plant and equipment | 678,873 | 537,634 | 680,997 | 537,656 | |
| Deferred tax assets | 12 | 414,462 | 215,881 | 363,836 | 210,463 |
| Other | 10 | 211,068 | |||
| 15 | 83 | ||||
| TOTAL NON-CURRENT | |||||
| ASSETS | 48,356,364 | 14,463,868 | 8,914,777 | 4,038,075 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 89,955,702 | 29,377,563 | 35,463,507 | 16,554,998 | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||
| Payables | 15 | 2,063,751 | 497,631 | ||
| Interest bearing liabilities | 16 | 12,332,905 | 39,298 | 907,455 | 426,667 |
| Current tax liabilities | 3,222,860 | 4,800,000 | |||
| Provisions | 17 | 3,022,059 | 1,227,163208,416 | 1,944,9892,242,709 | 1,085,742208,416 |
| TOTAL CURRENT | |||||
| LIABILITIES | 20,641,575 | 1,972,508 | 9,895,153 | 1,720,825 | |
| NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||
| Payables | 18 | 6,877,700 | |||
| Interest bearing liabilities | 16 | 33,865,000 | 12,500,000 | 28,466 | 2,002 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 19 | 5,376,000 | 2,017,709 | ||
| Provisions | 20 | 5,239,238 | 1,850,043 | ||
| 19,267 | 19,267 | ||||
| TOTAL NON-CURRENT | |||||
| LIABILITIES | 46,118,700 | 14,536,976 | 5,267,704 | 1,871,312 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 66,760,275 | 16,509,484 | 15,162,857 | 3,592,137 | |
| NET ASSETS | 23,195,427 | 12,868,079 | 20,300,650 | 12,962,861 | |
| EQUITY | |||||
| Contributed equity | |||||
| Retained profits | 21 | 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 |
| 22 | 21,716,229 | 11,388,881 | 18,821,452 | 11,483,663 | |
| TOTAL EQUITY | 23 | 23, 195, 427 | 12,868,079 | 20,300,650 | 12,962,861 |
The above statements of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes. $(8)$
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 June 2003
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notes | 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003 | 2002 | |
| Cash flows from operating | $ | $ | |||
| activities | |||||
| Receipts from customers and | |||||
| suppliers (inclusive of GST) | 27,203,833 | 12,113,412 | 17,953,022 | 12,061,609 | |
| Payments to suppliers and | |||||
| employees (inclusive of GST) | (45, 235, 296) | (12, 123, 514) | (11,276,524) | (5,338,222) | |
| Dividend receivedInterest received | 36,348 | 37,987 | 36,348 | 37,987 | |
| Trust Distributions Received | 209,998 | 110,827 | 162,374 | 110,824 | |
| Interest and other borrowing costs | 517,748 | 615,565 | 517,748 | 615,565 | |
| paid | |||||
| Income tax paid | (1,830,060)(2,688,158) | (594,061) | (304, 180) | (160) | |
| Net cash (outflow) inflow from | (959,096) | (2,688,158) | (959,096) | ||
| operating activities | 28(c) | (21, 785, 587) | (798, 880) | ||
| 4,400,630 | 6,528,507 | ||||
| Cash Flows from investing | |||||
| activities | |||||
| Proceeds from sale of property, plant | |||||
| and equipment | 1,064 | 1,064 | |||
| Payments for property, plant and | |||||
| equipment | (261, 929) | (125, 587) | (213, 447) | (122,891) | |
| Proceeds from sale of investments | 1,101,788 | 1,101,788 | |||
| Payments for investments | (214, 801) | (222, 920) | (214, 809) | (222, 936) | |
| Proceeds from capital returns | 71,469 | 203,600 | 71,469 | 203,600 | |
| Net cash (outflow) inflow frominvesting activities | |||||
| (404, 197) | 956,881 | (355, 723) | 959,561 | ||
| Cash Flows from financing | |||||
| activities | |||||
| Dividends paid | (7,000,000) | (2,000,000) | (7,000,000) | ||
| Loans to related entities | (2,000,000) | ||||
| Loan repayments from related | 52,280 | 910,960 | (1,012,391) | ||
| entities | |||||
| Transaction costs from capital | |||||
| raisings | (9,156) | ||||
| Repayments of borrowing | (50,000) | (101, 756) | (101, 756) | ||
| Proceeds from borrowing | 33,715,000 | 6,220,000 | 4,800,000 | ||
| Net cash inflow (outflow) fromfinancing activities | |||||
| 26,717,280 | 4,109,088 | (1,289,040) | (3, 114, 147) | ||
| Net increase in cash held | 4,527,496 | ||||
| Cash at beginning of financial year | 5,281,914 | 4,267,0891,014,825 | 2,755,867 | 4,373,921 | |
| Cash at the end of the financial | 5,320,994 | 947,073 | |||
| year | 28(a) | 9,809,410 | 5,281,914 | 8,076,861 | |
| 5,320,994 | |||||
| Financing arrangements | 28(b) |
$\bar{\gamma}$
$(9)$
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Summary of significant accounting policies 1.
The significant policies, which have been adopted in the preparation of this financial report, are:
$(a)$ Basis of preparation
This general-purpose financial report has been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board, Urgent Issues Group Consensus Views and the Corporations Act 2001.
It is prepared in accordance with the historical cost convention, except for certain assets which, as noted, are at valuation. Unless otherwise stated, the accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous year.
Principles of consolidation $(b)$
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all entities controlled by Peet $&$ Company Limited ("The Company") as at 30 June 2003 and the results of all controlled entities for the year then ended. The Company and its controlled entities together are referred to in this financial report as the consolidated entity. The effects of all transactions between entities in the consolidated entity are eliminated in full.
Where control of an entity is obtained during a financial year, its results are included in the consolidated statement of financial performance from the date on which control commences. Where control of an entity ceases during a financial year its results are included for that part of the year during which control existed.
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment $\left( \text{c} \right)$
Depreciation is calculated to write off the net cost of each asset over its expected useful life to the consolidated entity using the straight-line method. Estimates of remaining useful lives are made on a regular basis for all assets
Expected useful life of furniture, plant $&$ equipment is between 1 and 5 years. The expected useful life of works of art is 100 years.
Employee entitlements $(d)$
Wages, salaries and annual leave
The provisions for employee entitlements to wages, salaries and annual leave represent the amounts which the consolidated entity has a present obligation to pay resulting from employees' services provided up to the balance date. The provision is measured as the amount expected to be paid when the liability is settled and includes related on-costs.
Long service leave
The liability for employee entitlements to long service leave represents the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made by the employer resulting from employees' services provided up to the balance date
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued) 1.
$(d)$ Employee entitlements (continued)
Liabilities for employee entitlements which are not expected to be settled within 12 months are discounted using the rates attaching to national government securities at balance date, which most closely match the terms of maturity of the related liabilities.
In determining the liability for employee entitlements, consideration has been given to future increases in wage and salary rates and the consolidated entity's experience with staff departures. Related on-costs have also been included in the liability.
Superannuation fund
The Company contributes to various complying employee superannuation funds. Contributions are charged against income as they are made.
$(e)$ Income tax
The consolidated entity adopts the liability method of tax-effect accounting whereby the income tax expense shown in the statement of financial performance is based on the operating profit before tax, adjusted for any permanent differences.
Timing differences which arise due to the different accounting periods in which items of revenue and expense are included in the determination of operating profit and taxable income, are brought to account as either provision for deferred income tax or an asset described as future income tax benefit at the rate of income tax applicable to the period in which the benefit is expected to be received or the liability is expected to become payable.
Future income tax benefits are not brought to account unless realisation of the asset is assured beyond reasonable doubt. Future income tax benefits relating to tax losses are only brought to account when their realisation is virtually certain.
The amount of benefits brought to account or which may be realised in the future is based on the assumption that no adverse change will occur in income taxation legislation, the anticipation that the Company will derive sufficient future assessable income to enable the benefit to be realised and compliance with the conditions of deductibility imposed by the law.
$f$ Investments
Interests in listed and unlisted securities, other than controlled entities and associates in the consolidated financial statements, are brought to account at cost. Dividend income is recognised in the statement of financial performance when received and trust distribution income is recognised in the statement of financial performance when receivable.
Investments in controlled entities are accounted for in the consolidated financial statements as set out in note $1(b)$ .
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued) $\mathbf{1}$
$\left( \mathbf{r} \right)$ Property, plant and equipment
Items of property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated as per Note 1(c). All items of property, plant and equipment are carried at the lower of cost (less accumulated depreciation) and recoverable amount.
$(h)$ Recoverable Amount of Non Current Assets
The recoverable amount of an asset is the net amount expected to be recovered through the net cash inflows arising from its continued use and subsequent disposal.
When the carrying amount of a non-current asset is greater than its recoverable amount, the asset is written down to its recoverable amount. Where net cash inflows are derived from a group of assets working together, recoverable amount is determined on the basis of the relevant group of assets. To the extent that a revaluation decrement reverses a revaluation increment previously credited to, and still included in the balance of, the asset revaluation reserve, the decrement is debited directly to that reserve. Otherwise the decrement is recognised as an expense in the statement of financial performance.
The expected net cash flows included in determining recoverable amounts of non-current assets are not discounted to their present values.
$(i)$ Land held for syndication or development
Land held for syndication or development or deposits on land are carried at the lower of cost and recoverable amount.
$(i)$ Inventories
Land held for development and resale is stated at the lower of cost (and recognised profits) and net realisable value. Cost includes the cost of acquisition, development and borrowing costs during development. When development is completed borrowing costs and other holding charges are expensed as incurred. Profit on pre-completion sales contracts is recognised in accordance with the percentage of completion method.
Borrowing costs included in the cost of land held for resale are those costs that would have been avoided if the expenditure on the acquisition and development of the land had not been made. Borrowing costs incurred while active development is interrupted for extended periods are recognised as expenses.
Trustee recognition of assets and liabilities $(k)$
In addition to its own operations, the company acts as trustee for a number of trusts.
Pursuant to the ASIC Accounting Commentary Update 163, which states that where a trust has sufficient assets to meet all its liabilities then it is unlikely that the trustee will have to meet these liabilities, it is not appropriate that the trustee recognise the liability and corresponding asset. Accordingly, the company has not recognised the trusts' liabilities at balance date.
$\Omega$ Receivables
Receivables are recognised on an accrual basis as the services to which they relate are performed. Collectibility of receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts, which are known to be uncollectible, are written off.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued) 1.
Borrowing Costs $(m)$
Borrowing costs are recognised as expenses in the period in which they are incurred, except where they are included in the costs of qualifying assets.
The actual amount capitalised to the statement of financial position is determined on a pro-rata basis of cash paid. For example cash paid in respect to qualifying assets divided by the total cash outlay for the period is the percentage of borrowing costs allocated to qualifying assets. Such capitalised amounts are then written off to the statement of financial performance on the same basis as inventory.
Borrowing costs include interest on bank overdrafts and commercial bills and amortisation of ancilliary costs incurred in connection with the arrangement of borrowings.
$(n)$ Trade and Other Creditors
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the consolidated entity prior to the end of the financial year which are unpaid. These amounts are unsecured and usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
$\omega$ Cash
For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash includes deposits at call which are readily convertible to cash on hand and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
$(p)$ Interest bearing liabilities
Loans are carried at the principal amounts, which represent the present value of future cash flows associated with servicing the debt. Interest expense incurred in respect of commercial bills is expensed to the statement of financial performance as it is incurred, except where it is included in the costs of qualifying assets. Any interest attributable to the following financial year is treated as a prepayment.
$(a)$ Dividends
Provision is made for the amount of any dividend declared, determined or publicly recommended by the directors on or before the end of the financial year, but not distributed at balance date.
Change in accounting policy for providing for dividends
The above policy was adopted with effect from 1 July 2002 to comply with AASB 1044 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets released in October 2001. In previous years, in addition to providing for the amount of any dividends declared, determined or publicly recommended by the directors on or before the end of the financial year but not distributed at balance date, provision was made for dividends to be paid out of retained profits at the end of the financial year where the dividend was proposed, recommended or declared between the end of the financial year and the completion of the financial report.
This change in accounting policy has had no impact on the financial statements of the company
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued) 1.
$(r)$ Web Site Costs
Costs in relation to web sites controlled by a controlled entity are charged as expenses in the period in which they are incurred, unless they relate to the acquisition of an asset, in which case they are capitalised and amortised over their period of expected benefit.
$(s)$ Revenue
Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the entity and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:
Sale of Land
Revenue and profits from the sale of blocks from completed stages of land subdivision are recognised on the signing of an unconditional contract.
Pre-completion Sales Contracts
Revenue and profits relating to pre-completion sales contracts are recognised on the basis of the percentage of completion when: -
-
an unconditional sales contract exists;
-
the stage outcome can be reliably measured; and
-
the amounts receivable from sales are considered recoverable.
Percentage of completion is measured by reference to the costs incurred for each separate stage of the project as a proportion of the estimated total costs of the project stage. The stage outcome is not considered to be able to be reliably measured until 50% of costs are incurred.
$(t)$ Changes in Accounting Policy
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous year except for the following:
As a result of the adoption of Urgent Issues Group Consensus View Abstract 53 'Pre-Completion Contracts for the Sale of Residential Development Properties' sales revenue is now recognised on the signing of an unconditional contract of sale for land held for resale and on the percentage of completion basis for precompletion sales contracts. Previously land sales revenue was recognised on a settlement basis. Current year's pre-tax profit and inventory have increased by $4,456,306 in the consolidated entity due to the change in accounting policy. Application of the new policy has not impacted the parent entity.
Comparative information for the prior reporting period has not been prepared. The requirement to determine revenue and profits for pre-completion sales contracts in accordance with note (e) above is considered onerous, as the data required is not readily available.
Acquisition of Assets - Deferred Settlement of Cash Consideration $(u)$
When settlement of all or any part of the cash consideration given in the acquisition of an asset is deferred, the fair value of the purchase consideration must be determined by discounting the amounts payable in the future to their present value as at the date of acquisition. The discount rate to be used in discounting the amounts payable in the future to their present value is the rate at which the acquirer could obtain a similar borrowing under comparable terms and conditions.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
$2.$ Revenue
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003$ | 2002$ | ||
| Revenue from Operating Activities | |||||
| Revenue from sale of landRevenue from other trading activities | 23,614,32924,497,64048,111,969 | 16,090,93416,090,934 | 29,148,25929,148,259 | 16,090,93416,090.934 | |
| Revenue from Outside theOperating Activities | |||||
| - Dividends- Trust distributions- Interest- Other | 36,348485,310210,36823732,049 | 37,987707,835110,82723,576880,225 | 36,348485,310162,37423684,055 | 37,987707,835110,8241,788858,434 | |
| Revenue from ordinary activities | 48,844,018 | 16,971,159 | 29,832,314 | 16,949,368 |
$\overline{3}$ . Profit from ordinary activities
Profit from ordinary activities before income tax includes the following specific expenses:
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Expenses | ||||
| Cost of sales | ||||
| - Land and development costs | 12,730,34912,730,349 | |||
| Auditors' remuneration (parent entityauditors) | ||||
| - Auditing services | 40,954 | 22,165 | 26,250 | 12,915 |
| - Other services | 57,369 | 37,800 | 48,024 | 34,870 |
| 98,323 | 59,965 | 74,274 | 47,785 |
The auditors received no other benefits.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
$\overline{3}$ . Profit from ordinary activities (continued)
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||
| $ | $ | $ | S | ||
| Depreciation | 52,795 | 87,107 | |||
| Borrowing costs: | 49,521 | 86,956 | |||
| - Interest & finance charges | 2,594,158 | ||||
| - Amount capitalised | (1,805,229) | 614,150 | 293,923 | (10, 875) | |
| Borrowing costs expense | (623, 840) | (286, 926) | |||
| 788,929 | (9,690) | 6,997 | (10, 875) | ||
| Amounts set aside as provision for | |||||
| employee entitlements | |||||
| Lease rental expense - operating | 23,375 | 7,939 | 23,375 | 7,939 | |
| expense | 173,996 | 178,702 | 173,996 | 178,702 | |
| Write off of development expenditure | 31,805 | 74,296 | 31,805 | 74,296 | |
| Net loss on disposal of non-current | |||||
| assets | 9,490 | 376 | 9,490 | 376 | |
| 4.Income tax | |||||
| Profit from ordinary activities beforeincome tax expense | 27,569,623 | 11,395,129 | |||
| 23,274,391 | 11,416,375 | ||||
| Income tax calculated at 30% | 8,270,887 | 3,418,539 | 6,982,317 | 3,424,913 | |
| Tax effect of permanent differences: | |||||
| - Non deductible entertainment | 9,752 | ||||
| - Sundry items | 21,645 | 14,118 | 8,883 | 14,096 | |
| (50, 444) | 926 | (18, 358) | |||
| Income tax adjusted for permanent | |||||
| differences | |||||
| Transfer of tax losses from controlled | 8,302,284 | 3,382,213 | 6,992,126 | 3,420,651 | |
| entity | |||||
| (182, 302) | (207, 281) | ||||
| Benefit of tax losses of prior years | |||||
| recouped | (186, 787) | (192, 462) | |||
| Input tax rebates | (10,904) | (10, 904) | |||
| Under (Over) provision in previous | |||||
| year | 137,682 | 137,682 | |||
| Income tax expense | 8,242,275 | 3,189,751 | 6,936,602 | 3,213,370 | |
$\mathbb{R}^2$
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
$\boldsymbol{\Lambda}$ . Income tax (continued)
Tax consolidation legislation
Peet & Company Limited and its wholly owned Australian subsidiaries anticipate implementing the tax consolidation legislation as of 1 July 2003. The Australian Taxation Office has not yet been notifies of this. The entities also intend to enter into a tax sharing agreement, but details of this agreement are yet to be finalised.
As a consequence, Peet & Company Limited, as the head entity in the tax consolidated group, will recognise current and deferred tax amounts relating to transactions, events and balances of the wholly owned Australian controlled entities in this group in future financial statements as if those transactions, events and balances were its own, in addition to the current and deferred tax balances arising in relation to its own transactions, events and balances. Amounts receivable or payable under the tax sharing agreement will be recognised separately by Peet & Company Limited as tax related amounts receivable or payable. The impact on the income tax expense and results of Peet & Company Limited is unlikely to be material because of the tax sharing agreement. This is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated assets and liabilities and results.
The financial effect of the implementation of the legislation has not been recognised in the financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2003.
5. Dividends
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003S | 2002S | ||
| Ordinary Shares | |||||
| Fully franked dividends paid duringthe yearFully franked dividends provided for | 7,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 7,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |
| but not paid during the year | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | |||
| 9,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 9,000,000 | 2,000,000 | ||
| Franking credits available for thesubsequent financial year | 3,971,353 | 7,311,609 | 2,693,481 | 6,981,627 |
A fully franked dividend of approximately $2.70 per share ($2,000,000) was declared on Thursday, 26 June 2003 and the dividend was paid on Tuesday, 1 July 2003. Additionally, a fully franked dividend of approximately $5.40 per share ($4,000,000) was declared on Monday, 1 September 2003 and the dividend was paid on Friday, 19 September 2003.
The above amounts represent the balances of the franking accounts as at 30 June of the relevant financial year, adjusted for:
franking credits that will arise from the payment of income tax payable as per the accounts for the $(a)$ year ended 30 June 2003.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
$\overline{5}$ . Dividends (continued)
franking debits that will arise from the payment of dividends proposed (if any) as at 30 June. $(b)$
The amounts for the year ended 30 June 2003 are shown in tax dollars as compared to the amounts for the year ended 30 June 2002 which are shown in profits after tax dollars. For comparative purposes, consolidated franking credits available for 2002 would be $3,133,547 had the same policy been adopted as for this year. This change is as a result of a change in the tax laws during the year.
6. Current Assets - Receivables
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003S | 2002$ | 2003$ | 2002S | ||
| Trade debtorsAccrued incomeOwing by controlled entitiesOther debtors | 534,21514,329,5442,082,980 | 174,9096,803,379165,813 | 529,17417,833,14331,422 | 174,9096,803,379115,30726,383 | |
| . | 16,946,739 | 7,144,101 | 18,393,739 | 7,119,978 |
Accrued income
These amounts represent project management fees, marketing & selling fees, bookkeeping fees and trust distributions owing to the company from related entities.
Other debtors
These amounts generally arise from transactions other than fee earning activities of the consolidated entity. Interest may be charged at commercial rates where the terms of repayment exceed six months. Collateral is not normally obtained.
7. Current Assets - Other
| Prepayments | 170,650170,650 | 120,018120,018 | 78,13078,130 | 75,95175,951 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.Current Assets - Inventories | ||||
| Land held for resale:Cost of acquisitionCapitalised development costs and | 837,891 | 596,057 | ||
| recognised profits | 13,801,74314,639,634 | 1,732,3072,328,364 | ||
| 9.Non-Current Assets - Receivables |
| Owing by controlled entities | $\sim$ | ₩ | 2,007,418 | 2,776,421 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owing by other related parties | 6,919 | 7,107. | 6.919 | $\cdot 107$ |
| Further information on the above is set out in Note 26. $R_{\text{other}}$ in | 6.919. | 7.107 | 2,014,337 | 2,783,528 |
ove is set out in Note 26 – Related Parties.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Non-Current Assets - Deferred Tax Assets 10.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002$ | 2003 | 2002 | ||
| Future income tax benefit | $\mathbf{m}\mathrm{t}$$\mathbf{m}\mathrm{t}$ | 211,068211,068______________________________________ | Section | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ |
Non-Current Assets - Investments 11.
| Shares in unrelated companiesUnit trustsControlled entities | 23,150219,750 | 27,000285,750 | 23,150219,750 | 27,000285,750 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syndicates (related companies) | 435,973678,873 | 224,884537,634 | 2,124435,973680,997 | 224,906537,656 |
Investments in controlled entities comprise:
| Place ofIncorporation | Class of Share | Holding | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003$%$ | 2002$\frac{0}{6}$ | |||
| At Directors' valuation - 1996 | ||||
| Peet Prosper Pty Ltd | WA. | Ord $&$ Pref. | 100 | 100 |
| Hawkestone Conveyancing Pty Ltd | WA | Ordinary | 100 | |
| At Cost | 100 | |||
| Hawkstone Unit Trust | N/A | Trust Unit | ||
| Peet Management Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | 100 |
| Peet Innisfail Syndicate Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | 100 |
| Peet & Co Western Estates Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | 100 |
| Peet Point Cook No 2 Syndicate Limited | WA | 100 | 100 | |
| Peet Warner Lakes Syndicate Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | 100 |
| Peet Tarneit West Limited | WA | Ordinary | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 100 |
| Peet Craigieburn Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | 100 |
| Peet Greenvale No 2 Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | 100 |
| Peet Southern JV Limited | Ordinary | 100 | 100 | |
| Peet No 63 Syndicate Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | 100 |
| Peet Sneydes Road Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | 100 |
| Peet Pakenham Syndicate Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | |
| Peet No 67 Syndicate Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | |
| Peet No 68 Syndicate Limited | WA | Ordinary | 100 | |
| Peet No 69 Syndicate Limited | WΑ | Ordinary | 100 | |
| WA | Ordinary | 100 | ||
| Peet No 70 Syndicate Limited | WA. | Ordinary | 100 | |
| Peet No 71 Syndicate Limited | WА | Ordinary | 100 | |
| Peet No 72 Syndicate Limited | WΑ | Ordinary | 100 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Non-Current Assets - Investments (continued) 11.
- The valuations were based on a review of the net asset values of the controlled entities, which $(a)$ resulted in a write down to recoverable amount.
- The net tangible assets of Hawkstone Unit Trust at acquisition date were nil. The trust was acquired $(b)$ on 9 September 1994 for nil consideration.
- In August 2003, additional shares were allotted in Peet No 71 Syndicate Ltd. After the allotment, $(c)$ Peet & Company Ltd's investment was reduced to 20% and accordingly, from this date, Peet No 71 Syndicate Ltd will no longer be part of the consolidated group.
- During December 2002, Peet Warner Lakes Syndicate Ltd issued 21,600,000 shares to the public to $(d)$ fund the acquisition of land in Queeensland. During March 2003, Peet Tarneit Gardens Syndicate Ltd issued $14,000,000$ shares to the public to fund the acquisition of land in Victoria. Peet & Company Limited was allotted 337,000 shares in Peet Warner Lakes and 200,000 shares in Peet Tarneit Gardens. Accordingly, these entities are no longer part of the consolidated group. Peet Tarneit Gardens Syndicate Ltd was established during the year and as such was not part of the wholly own group at the beginning of the year nor at the end.
Non-Current Assets - Property, plant and equipment 12.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003S | 2002S | 2003S | 2002$ | |
| Fixtures and fittings- at costLess: accumulated depreciation | 964,530(550,068) | 884,436(668, 555) | 910,450(546, 614) | 878,838(668, 375) |
| 414,462 | 215,881 | 363,836 | 210,463 |
Reconciliations
Reconciliations of the carrying amounts of each class of property, plant and equipment at the beginning and end of the current financial year are set out below.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant $&$Equipment | Total | Plant $&$Equipment | Total | |
| S | S. | $ | $ | |
| Carrying amount at 1 July 2002 | 215,881 | 215,881 | 210,463 | 210,463 |
| Additions | 261,929 | 261,929 | 213,447 | 213,447 |
| Disposals | (10, 553) | (10, 553) | (10, 553) | (10, 553) |
| Depreciation | (52, 795) | (52, 795) | (49, 521) | (49, 521) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2003 | 414,462 | 414,462 | 363,836 | 363,836 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
13. Non-Current Assets - Inventories
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003$ | 2002$ | ||
| Land held for resale:Cost of acquisitionCapitalised development costsCapitalised borrowing costs | 41,494,2803,449,8882,311,94247,256,110 | 11,585,966586,1401,319,98913,492,095 | 5,337,335231,346286,9265,855,607 | 506,428506,428 | |
| 14.Non-Current Assets - Other | |||||
| Transaction costs from capital raisings | 8383 | ||||
| 15.Current Liabilities - Payables | |||||
| Trade creditorsOther creditorsAccrualsOuring to estated excel. | 1,087,062667,534259,155 | 328,889168,742 | 222,620442,402241,893 | 266,688159,393 |
540
907,455
586
426,667
Further information on amounts owing to controlled entities is set out in note 26 - Related Parties.
50,000
2,063,751
Liabilities - Interest bearing liabilities 16.
Owing to related entities
| Current - SecuredBank OverdraftBank BillsNon-current - Secured | 32,90512,300,00012,332,905 | 39,29839,298 | 4,800,0004,800,000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank Bills | 33,865,00033,865,000 | 12,500,00012,500,000 |
÷,
497,631
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Current Liabilities - Interest bearing liabilities (continued) 16.
The interest bearing liabilities are secured by a variety of registered mortgage debentures over the consolidated entity's assets and undertakings and first registered mortgages over the land assets of the consolidated entity. The terms of the consolidated entity's borrowing facilities are as follows:
Terms of facilities
| Peet & Company Limited | |
|---|---|
| Facility: | Fixed and/or Floating Accommodation Bills |
| Limit: | $4,800,000 expiry date 31 October 2003. |
| Facility: | Overdraft & Multi-Option Facility |
| Limit: | $500,000 expiry date 31 October 2003. |
| Peet Innisfail Limited | |
| Facility: | Commercial Bills and/or Overdraft |
| Limit: | $16,000,000 until 30 September 2003, then $13,000,000 until 31December 2003, then $8,000,000 until 30 April 2004, then$4,000,000 until 31 May 2006. |
| Facility: | Bank Guarantee |
| Limit: | $5,000,000 in favour of Peet & Company Limited until 30September 2003. |
| Peet Management Limited | |
| Facility: | Overdraft & Multi Option Facility |
| Limit: | $2,458,000 term expiry date 30 September 2003. |
| Peet Point Cook No 2 Syndicate Limited | |
| Facility: | Overdraft & Multi Option Facility |
| Limit: | $2,458,000 term expiry date 30 September 2003. |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Current Liabilities - Interest bearing liabilities (continued) 16.
| Peet Sneydes Road Limited | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility: | Overdraft & Multi Option Facility | ||
| Limit: | $8,500,000 term expiry date 31 October 2003. | ||
| Peet Pakenham Syndicate Limited | |||
| Facility: | Overdraft & Multi Option Facility | ||
| Limit: | $500,000 term expiry date 31 October 2003. Subsequent to yearend this has been increased to $17,500,000. | ||
| Peet Greenvale No 2 Limited | |||
| Facility: | Overdraft & Multi Option Facility | ||
| Limit: | $19,000,000 term expiry date 31 October 2005. | ||
| Peet Southern JV Limited | |||
| Facility: | Overdraft & Multi Option Facility | ||
| Limit: | $1,000,000 term expiry date 31 October 2003. Subsequent toyear end this has increased to $2,000,000. |
The above-mentioned multi option facilities that expire on 30 September 2003 and 31 October 2003 will be rolled forward on a regular basis until the respective entities commence selling land and thus generating profits. Accordingly, these debts have been shown as non current liabilities. The multi option facility for Peet Innisfail Syndicate Ltd has been allocated as per the loan terms that were negotiated with the bank.
The directors do not envisage any difficulties in obtaining extensions to the above facilities.
Current Liabilities - Provisions 17.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003S | 2002$ | 2003S | 2002$ | ||
| DividendsEmployee EntitlementsRebates | 2,000,000214,809807,250 | 172,16636,250 | 2,000,000214,80927,900 | 172,16636,250 | |
| 3,022,059 | 208,416 | 2,242,7092000 Block of Contract Contract on the | 208,416 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Current Liabilities - Provisions (continued) 17.
Reconciliation
Reconciliations of the carrying amounts of each class of provisions at the beginning and end of the current financial year are set out below.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $\mathcal{L}^{(N)}$ | Dividends | Total | Dividends | Total |
| S | $ | 3 | $ | |
| Carrying amount at 1 July 2002 | ||||
| Dividends declared during the year | 9,000,000 | 9,000,000 | 9,000,000 | 9,000,000 |
| Dividends paid during the year | (7,000,000) | (7,000,000) | (7,000,000) | (7,000,000) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2003 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,000,000 |
| $\mathbf{T}^{\mathbf{u}}$ . The compact of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract |
The carrying amount of the provision for dividends at 30 June 2003 was paid to shareholders on 1 July 2003.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebates | Total | Rebates | Total | ||
| $ | $ | $ | S. | ||
| Carrying amount at 1 July 2002 | 36,250 | 36,250 | 36,250 | 36,250 | |
| Increase in provision | 804,068 | 804,068 | 4,455 | 4,455 | |
| Payments to suppliers | (33,068) | (33,068) | (12, 805) | (12, 805) | |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2003 | 807,250 | 807,250 | 27,900 | 27,900 |
Once the consolidated entity sells lots, the purchasers become entitled to a rebate for fencing and landscaping. In general, the company expects that rebates will be claimed within 12 months of the purchased lots settling.
Non-Current Liabilities - Payables 18.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unsecured | 2003S | 2002S | 2003$ | 2002S |
| Balance of development property | ||||
| purchase priceFuture interest component of deferred | 8,868,729 | |||
| payments | (1,991,029) | |||
| Owing to controlled entities | 28,466 | 2,002 | ||
| Fortharm Commodiation | 6,877,700 | 28,466 | 2,002 |
Further information on amounts owing to controlled entities is set out in note $26$ – Related Parties.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Non-Current Liabilities - Deferred Tax Liabilities 19.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003S | 2002$ | ||
| Provision for deferred income tax | 5,376,000 | 2,017,709 | 5,239,238 | 1,850,043 | |
| 5,376,000 | 2,017,709 | 5,239,238 | 1,850,043 | ||
| 20.Non-Current Liabilities - Provisions | |||||
| Employee Entitlements | 19,267 | 19,267 | |||
| 19,267 | 19,267 | ||||
| 21.Contributed Equity - Peet & Company Limited | |||||
| Paid up capital | |||||
| 739,599 Ordinary shares - fully paid | 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 | |
| 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 | 1,479,198 |
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.
On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or in proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share held is entitled to one vote.
$22.$ Retained Profits
$\overline{\phantom{a}}$
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003S | 2002S | 2003$ | 2002$ | |
| Retained profits at the beginning of | ||||
| the financial yearNet profit from ordinary activities | 11,388,881 | 5,183,503 | 11,483,663 | 5,280,658 |
| after related income taxDividends provided for or paidRetained profits at the end of the | 19,327,348(9,000,000) | 8,205,378(2,000,000) | 16,337,789(9,000,000) | 8,203,005(2,000,000) |
| financial year | 21,716,229 | 11,388,881 | 18,821,452 | 11,483,663 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Equity 23.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003S | 2002S | 2003S | 2002S | |
| Total equity at the beginning of the | ||||
| financial yearTotal changes in equity recognised in | 12,868,079 | 6,662,701 | 12,962,861 | 6,759,856 |
| the statement of financial performance- Dividends provided for or paidTotal equity at the end of the financial | 19,327,348(9,000,000) | 8,205,378(2,000,000) | 16,337,789(9,000,000) | 8,203,005(2,000,000) |
| year | 23, 195, 427 | 12,868,079 | 20,300,650 | 12,962,861 |
24. Directors' remuneration
The numbers of parent entity directors whose total income from the parent entity or related parties was within the specified bands are as follows:
| Number | Number | |
|---|---|---|
| $$10,000 - $19,999$ | ||
| $$50,000 - $59,999$ | ||
| $140,000 - $149,999 | ||
| $200,000 - $209,999 | ||
| $240,000 - $249,999 | ||
| $270,000 - $279,999 | ||
| 2003 | 2002 | |
| Income paid or payable, or otherwise made available, to directors byentities in the consolidated entity and related parties in connection with themanagement of affairs of the parent entity or its controlled entities, | S | S |
| inclusive of GST: | 728,488 | 713,941 |
Aggregate number of shares of Peet & Company Limited held directly, indirectly or beneficially by directors or their director-related entities at balance date.
| 2003 | 2002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares | 724,877and the contract with the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the contract of the cont | 724,877_______________________________________ |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
25. Remuneration of Executives
The numbers of Australian based executive officers including directors whose remuneration from entities in the consolidated entity and related parties was within the specified bands are as follows:
| Number | Number | |
|---|---|---|
| $$110,000 - $119,999$$$120,000 - $129,999$$130,000 - $139,999$$140,000 - $149,999$$200,000 - $209,999$240,000 - $249,999 | $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{S}}$ | |
| $$270,000 - $279,999$ | 2003 | 2002 |
| Remuneration received, or due and receivable from entities in theconsolidated entity and related parties by Australian based executiveofficers (including directors) whose remuneration was at least $100,000. | S | S |
| Executive officers of the parent and consolidated entity | 844,528 | 899.027 |
26. Related parties
Directors
The names of persons who were directors of the company at any time during the financial year are as follows: AW Lennon, WD Hemsley, IMC Palmer and AJ Lennon. All of these persons were also directors during the year ended 30 June 2003.
Remuneration Benefits
Information on remuneration benefits of directors is disclosed in notes 24.
$\bar{z}$
Transactions of Directors and Director-related Entities Concerning Shares
There were no transactions with directors and director-related entities concerning shares during the financial year ended 30 June 2003. The aggregate number of shares held directly, indirectly or beneficially by directors or their director-related entities at balance date is disclosed in note 24, with individual details disclosed in the Directors' Report.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Related parties (continued) 26.
Other Transactions with Directors and Director-related Entities
During the year ended 30 June 2003, the Company derived the following fees from entities over which the directors and their related entities have significant influence:
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002S | 2003 | 2002S | |
| Project management, marketing and selling feesManager's performance feesBrokerage, underwriting & finder's feesBookkeeping and secretarial feesOther consultancy fees | 12,639,094 | 11,121,813 | 15,495,558 | 11,121,813 |
| 8,601,116 | 1,600,613 | 10,371,469 | 1,600,613 | |
| 2,422,970 | 549,000 | 2,422,970 | 549,000 | |
| 410,238 | 395,343 | 468,841 | 395,343 | |
| .91,731 | 74,965 | 105,223 | 74,965 | |
| 24, 165, 149 | 13,741,734 | 28,864,061 | 13,741,734 |
During the year a consultancy fee of $272,250 (2002: $272,250) was paid to Tony Lennon & Associates, a related entity of A W Lennon
As at 30 June 2003 the following amounts were receivable from / (payable) to directors and their director related entities:
| Parent Entity | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2003Ж | 2002 | |
| Aggregate amounts receivable from directors and their director -related entitiesAggregate amounts payable to directors and their director-related | 16,516,016 | 6,878,959 |
| entities | (72,038) | (33,600) |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
26. Related parties (continued)
Other related parties
Aggregate amounts of advances receivable from and payable to controlled entities at balance date are as follows:
| Parent Entity | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | |
| Payable to Controlled Entities | S | S |
| Current: | $\Delta \mathcal{A}$ | |
| Peet No 67 Syndicate Ltd | 90 | |
| Peet No 68 Syndicate Ltd | 90 | |
| Peet No 69 Syndicate Ltd | ||
| Peet No 70 Syndicate Ltd | 90 | |
| Peet No 71 Syndicate Ltd | 90 | |
| Peet No 72 Syndicate Ltd | 90 | |
| Peet Windsor Park Syndicate Limited | 90 | |
| 586 | ||
| Non-current: | 540 | 586 |
| Peet Pakenham Syndicate Ltd | ||
| Peet Innisfail Syndicate Ltd | 662 | |
| Hawkestone Conveyancing Pty Ltd | 25,802 | |
| 2,002 | 2,002 | |
| 28,466 | 2,002 | |
| Total | 29,006 | 2,588 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
26. Related parties (continued)
J.
| 2003 | Consolidated & Parent Entity2002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Receivable from Controlled Entities | $ | $ |
| Current: | ||
| Peet Warner Lakes Syndicate Limited | ||
| 115,307 | ||
| Non-current: | 115,307 | |
| Hawkstone Unit Trust | ||
| Peet Innisfail Syndicate Limited (formerly Dunnings Road Limited) | 243,951 | 241,045 |
| Peet & Co Western Estates Syndicate Limited | 1,942,891 | |
| Peet & Company Limited Management Limited | 10,914 | 13,306 |
| Peet Tarneit West Limited | 445,326 | 278,047 |
| Peet Craigieburn Limited | 10,419 | 1,814 |
| Peet Greenvale No 2 Limited | 341,097 | 1,814 |
| Peet No Southern JV Limited | 247,385 | 1,814 |
| Peet No 63 Syndicate Limited | 1,814 | |
| Peet Sneydes Road Limited | 2,801 | 1,814 |
| Peet No 67 Syndicate Limited | 74,842 | 1,814 |
| Peet No 68 Syndicate Limited | 2,662 | |
| Peet No 69 Syndicate Limited | 13,253 | |
| Peet No 70 Syndicate Limited | 2,867 | |
| Peet No 71 Syndicate Limited | 2,640 | |
| Peet No 72 Syndicate Limited | 18,271 | |
| Peet Point Cook No 2 Syndicate Limited | 2,640 | |
| 588,350 | 292,062 | |
| 2,007,418 | 2,776,421 | |
| 2,007,418 | 2,892,944 | |
| Receivable from other related partiesNon current: | ||
| Thompson's Lake Unit Trust | 6,919 | |
| 6,919 | 7,107 | |
| 7,107 |
The amounts owing are unsecured, interest free and repayable on demand. The purpose of the advances to the various entities is to allow the purchase and potential development of broad acre land and is considered a part of the project management services performed by the Company.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
26. Related parties (continued)
Wholly Owned Group
The wholly owned group as at 30 June 2003 consists of Peet & Company Limited (incorporated in Australia), being the ultimate parent entity, and its wholly owned controlled entities:
-
Peet Prosper Pty Limited: ↘
-
Peet Management Limited $\blacktriangle$
-
$\triangleright$ Hawkestone Conveyancing Pty Ltd
-
$\triangleright$ Hawkstone Unit Trust
-
Peet & Co Western Estates Syndicate Limited
-
Peet Point Cook No 2 Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet Innisfail Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet Tarneit West Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet Craigieburn Limited
-
$\prec$ Peet Greenvale No 2 Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet Southern JV Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet No 63 Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet Sneydes Road Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet Pakenham Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet No. 67 Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet No 68 Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet No 69 Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet No 70 Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet No 71 Syndicate Limited
-
$\triangleright$ Peet No 72 Syndicate Limited
Ownership interest in these controlled entities is set out in note 11.
Transactions between Peet & Company Limited and other entities in the wholly owned group during the years ended 30 June 2003 and 2002 consisted of loans advanced and project management, marketing & selling fees charged by Peet & Company Limited. There are no interest charges or fixed terms for the repayment of loans advanced by Peet & Company Limited.
Peet & Company Limited derived total fees of $4,688,620 from Peet Innisfail Syndicate Limited during the year ended 30 June 2003 (2002; Nil).
27. Trusts
The company is trustee for the following trusts:
| 2003Right of | 2003Total | 2003 | 2002Right of | 2002Total | 2002 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indemnity | LiabilitiesS | DeficiencyS | IndemnityS | LiabilitiesS | Deficiency | ||
| Australind Unit Trust | 13,956 | 13,956 | |||||
| Burns Beach Property Trust | 4,911,238 | 8,018 | 8.018 | ||||
| Eaton Unit Trust | 4,911,238 | 7,761,985 | 7,761.985 | ||||
| Glenfield Oceanside Unit Trust | 326,247 | 326.247 | 556,327 | 556,327 | |||
| 73,823 | 73,823 | ||||||
| Hawkstone Unit Trust | 220,138 | 244,152 | 24,014 | 220,135 | 241,794 | ||
| Jandakot Unit Trust | 704,140 | 704,140 | 146,779 | 21,659 | |||
| Thompson's Lake Unit Trust | 920,198 | 920,198 | 146.779 | ||||
| Warnbro Oceanside Unit Trust | 1,426,578 | 1,426,578 | 333,135 | 333,135 | |||
| Yanchep Ocean Front Unit Trust | 3,352,772 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 2,118,716 | 2,118,716 | |||
| Yatala Unit Trust | 3,352,772 | $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 2,538,722 | 2,538,722 | |||
| 15,905,915 | 15,905,915 | 7,384,505 | 7,384,505 | ||||
| 27,781,182 | 27,805,196 | 24,014 | 21,142,145 | 21,163,804 | 21,659 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Notes to Statements of Cash Flows 28.
$(a)$ Reconciliation of cash
Cash as at the end of the financial year as shown in the Statement of Cash Flows is reconciled to the related items in the statement of financial position as follows:
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003$ | 2002 | 2003S | 2002 | |
| Cash at bank and on handInterest bearing overdraft | 9,842,315(32,905) | 5,321,212(39, 298) | 8,076,861$\overline{\phantom{a}}$ | 5,320,994 |
| 9,809,410 | 5,281,914 | 8,076,861 | 5.320.994 |
$(b)$ Financing arrangements
Unrestricted access was available at balance date to the following lines of credit:
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003$ | 2002S | 2003 | 2002 | |
| Total facilities | S | S | ||
| Bank overdraftsBank loan facilitiesCredit cardsBank Guarantees/ Letters of Credit | $\Omega$54,827,49875,0005,388,502 | $\left( i\right)$17,925,26824,0005,090,732 | $\left( i\right)$5,209,26875,00090,732 | $\left( 1\right)$259,26824,00090,732 |
| Used at balance dateBank overdraftBank loan facilities | 32,905 | 39,298 | ||
| Credit cards | 46,165,000 | 12,500,000 | 4,800,000 | |
| Bank Guarantees/ Letters of Credit | 5,321,762 | 5,023,992 | 23,992 | 23,992 |
| Unused at balance date | ||||
| Bank overdraftBank loan facilitiesCredit cardsBank Guarantees/ Letters of Credit | $\rm\scriptstyle{(i)}$8,629,59375,00066,740 | $\rm _{(i)}$5,385,97024,00066,740 | $\mathfrak{u}$409,26875,00066,740 | $\rm _{(1)}$259,26824,00066.740 |
(i) the bank loan facilities, the bank overdraft and the Bank Guarantees of the parent entity cannot together exceed $5,300,000 (2002: $350,000) at any one time. The bank loan facilities, the bank overdrafts and the Bank Guarantees of the consolidated entity as at 30 June 2003 could not together exceed $60,216,000 (2002: $23,016,000) at any one time. These are multi option facilities. Refer to note 16 Liabilities – Interest bearing liabilities for details about terms and securities on the above facilities.
$\mathcal{A}$
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Notes to Statements of Cash Flows (continued) 28.
Reconciliation of operating profit after income tax to net cash provided by operating activities. $\left( \mathrm{e}\right)$
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20032002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | ||
| Operating profit after income tax | 19,327,348 | 8,205,378 | 16,337,789 | ||
| Profit on sale of investments | (892, 634) | 8,203,005 | |||
| Subvention charge | 141,421 | (892, 634) | |||
| Consolidation adjustments to | |||||
| Statement of financial performance | 31,603 | ||||
| Add/(deduct) non cash items: | |||||
| Depreciation | 52,795 | 87,107 | |||
| Bad debts | 1,156 | 49,521 | 86,956 | ||
| Loss on sale of non-current | 9,490 | 376 | 1,156 | ||
| assets | 9,490 | 376 | |||
| Amortisation of interest | 4,335 | ||||
| Other non-cash | 2,042 | 4,335 | |||
| Net eash provided by operating | |||||
| activities before changes in assets | |||||
| and liabilities | 19,389,633 | 7,580,784 | 16,396,800 | ||
| Change in operating assets and | 7,403,194 | ||||
| liabilities during the financial year: | |||||
| Decrease/(increase) in trade | |||||
| debtors | (359,306) | (3,953,257) | (11, 384, 029) | ||
| Decrease/(increase) in | (3,953,257) | ||||
| prepayments & other debtors | (9, 493, 964) | (263,702) | |||
| (Increase)/decrease in inventory | (46,075,285) | 7,027,800 | (7,218)(5,349,179) | 353,985 | |
| Decrease/(increase) in future | 246,092 | ||||
| income tax benefit | 211,068 | (186,069) | |||
| (Decrease)/increase in income | |||||
| taxes payable | 1,995,697 | 944,176 | |||
| Increase/(decrease) in trade | 859,247 | 1,035,841 | |||
| creditors | 758,173 | 185,852 | |||
| Increase/(decrease) in other | (44, 114) | 198,656 | |||
| creditors | 7,635,647 | (13,512,038) | |||
| (Decrease)/increase in provisions | 794,376 | (3,311) | 524,902 | 28,874 | |
| Increase/(decrease) in deferred | 15,026 | (3,311) | |||
| taxes payable | 3,358,291 | ||||
| Decrease/(increase) in other | 1,380,885 | 3,389,195 | 1,218,433 | ||
| assets | 83 | ||||
| Net cash provided by operating | |||||
| activities | (21, 785, 587) | ||||
| (798, 880) | 4,400,630 | 6,528,507 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
29. Financial instruments
Credit risk exposures $(a)$
The credit risk on financial assets of the consolidated entity which have been recognised on the statement of financial position, other than investments in shares, is generally the carrying amount, net of any provisions for doubtful debts.
The cash component of financial assets is considered to have low credit risk as it is maintained within accounts operated by a reputable financial institution subject to Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority supervision.
$(b)$ Interest rate risk exposures
The consolidated entity's exposure to interest rate risk and the interest rate for each class of financial asset and liability is set out below.
Exposures to this type of risk arise predominantly from assets and liabilities bearing variable interest rates as any fixed rate assets or liabilities that the consolidated entity may hold is likely to be held to maturity.
| 2003Financial assets | Notes | FloatinginterestrateS | Fixed interestmaturing inless than 1year | Fixed interestmaturing in1-5 yearsS | Non-interestbearings | Total$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash assets | 28(a) | 9,842,315 | ||||
| ReceivablesInvestments | 6,910 | 16,953,658678,873 | 9,842,31516,953,658678,873 | |||
| 9,842,315 | 17,632,531 | 27,474,846 | ||||
| Weighted average interest rate | 3.60% | NA | ||||
| Financial liabilitiesPayablesInterest bearing habilities | 1415 | 32,905 | 12,300,000 | 33,865,000 | 8,941,451 | 8,941,45146,197,905 |
| 32,905 | 12,300,000 | 33,865,000 | 8,941,451 | 55,139,356 | ||
| Weighted average interest rate | 9.60% | 6.10% | 6.10% | N/A | ||
| Net financial assets/(liabilities) | 9,809,410 | (12,300,000) | (33,865,000) | 8,691,080 | (27,664,510) |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Financial instruments (continued) 29.
| 2002 | Notes | Floatinginterestrate$ | Fixedinterestmaturing inI year or lessS | Non-interestbearing | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets | $ | $ | |||
| Cash assets | 28(a) | 5,321,098 | 114 | 5,321,212 | |
| Receivables | 6 | 7,271,226 | 7,271,226 | ||
| Investments | 10 | 537,634 | 537,634 | ||
| 5,321,098 | 7,808,974 | 13,130,072 | |||
| Weighted average interest rate | 3.70 % | N/A | |||
| Financial liabilitiesPayables | 15 | ||||
| Interest bearing liabilities | 16 | 497,631 | 497,631 | ||
| 39,298 | 12,500,000 | 12,539,298 | |||
| 39,298 | 12,500,000 | 497,631 | 13,036,929 | ||
| Weighted average interest rate | 9.60% | 5.80% | N/A | ||
| Net financialassets/(liabilities) | 5,281,800 | (12,500,000) | 7,311,343 | 93,143 |
Net fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities $(c)$
The net fair value of the consolidated entity's financial assets and financial liabilities approximates their carrying value.
30. Commitments
The Company commitments relate to the lease of its premises at Level 7, 200 St George's Terrace, Perth and Level 2, 470 St Kilda Road, Melbourne.
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future operating lease rentals notprovided for in the financialstatements and payable: | 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003S | 2002$ |
| Not later than one yearLater than one year but not later | 185,091 | 163,978 | 185,091 | 163,978 |
| than five yearsLater than five years | 290,318 | 69,422 | 290,318 | 69,422 |
| 475,409 | 233,400 | 475,409 | 233,400 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
30. Commitments (continued)
The consolidated entity's purchase commitments relate to land development project contracts. $C = 1.31324$
| сонзоналыса | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |
| Future capital expenditure notprovided for in the financialstatements and payable: | S | $ | S | $ |
| Not later than one yearLater than one year but not later | 2,918,953 | $\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$1,690,191 | ||
| than five years | 1,343,878 | 1,485,200 | ||
| Later than five years | 2,332,000 | 2,332,000 | ||
| 6,594,831 | 5,507,391 |
31. Contingent liabilities
The details and estimated amount of contingent liabilities are set out below. The directors are not aware of any circumstances or information, which would lead them to believe that these liabilities will crystallise and consequently no provisions are included in the accounts in respect of these matters.
In September 2000, the company arranged a bank guarantee of $13,992 in favour of 470 St Kilda Road Pty Ltd (A.C.N. 006 075 381) for the sub lease of premises at Level 2, 470 St Kilda Road Melbourne, Victoria. The lease term commenced 8 August 2000 and ends 8 September 2003. The lease agreement also contains two, 2-year options to extend the term at the discretion of the Company. The first 2-year option was exercised in September 2003.
As from 1 July 2000, the Company is subject to the Managed Investments Provisions of the Corporations Act 2001, in respect to several associated entities for which it acts as the Responsible Entity ("RE") and Custodian. The entities are:
- (a) Burns Beach Property Trust
- (b) Yatala Unit Trust
- (c) Jandakot Unit Trust
- (d) Thompson's Lake Unit Trust
- (e) Australind Unit Trust
To assist the Company in meeting the requirements to act as an RE and Custodian, it had one of its wholly owned subsidiaries arrange a Bank Guarantee of $2,400,000 in favour of the Company. In June 2002 this Bank Guarantee was increased to $5,000,000.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
31. Contingent liabilities (continued)
As trustee of the Hawkstone Unit Trust an agreement was entered into during the 1998 financial year with Peet Adios Syndicate Limited, Peet Forrestdale Syndicate Limited and Peet Oakford Land Syndicate Limited relating to a cost sharing arrangement for joint use of a water pipeline. The total costs relating to the pipeline agreement amount to $329,750. The trust's share is calculated at 2% of the total cost, being $6,595. The company as trustee for the Hawkstone Unit Trust has a bank guarantee of $10,000 in favour of the City of Armadale, in respect to this issue.
The Company was the underwriter to a $21,600,000 capital raising by Peet Warner Lakes Syndicate Limited ("Warner Lakes"). As at the date of this report, the Company's potential liability had reduced to $9,324,600.
The Company was the underwriter to a $14,000,000 capital raising by Peet Tarneit Gardens Syndicate Limited ("Tarneit Gardens"). As at the date of this report, the Company's potential liability had reduced to $4,394,000.
Peet & Company Limited has provided a total of $52,216,000 in guarantees and indemnities which are secured by registered mortgage debenture over the whole of its assets and undertakings including uncalled capital, if any, to secure the borrowings to fund the acquisition of the consolidated entity's land assets.
Peet & Company Limited has guaranteed the performance of a purchase contract for Peet Tarneit Gardens Syndicate Limited. The amount of the guarantee is $11,902,324. Peet & Company Limited has also guaranteed the performance of a purchase contract for Peet Tarneit West Limited. The amount of the guarantee is $7,151,029.
32. Employee Entitlements
| Consolidated | Parent Entity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee Entitlement LiabilitiesProvision for employee entitlements | 2003$ | 2002$ | 2003$ | 2002$ |
| Current (note 17)Non – current (note 20) | 214,808 | 172,16619,267 | 214,808 | 172,16619,267 |
| 214,808 | 191,433 | 214,808 | 191,433 | |
| Employee numbersNumber of employees at the end ofthe financial year (not including | Number | Number | ||
| Directors) | 40 | 34 | 39 | 34 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Events subsequent to reporting date 33.
The Directors declared a fully franked dividend of approximately $2.70 per share ($2,000,000) on Thursday, 26 June 2003 and the dividend was paid on Tuesday, 1 July 2003. Additionally, the Directors declared a fully franked dividend of approximately $5.40 per share ($4,000,000) on Monday, 1 September 2003 and the dividend was paid on Friday, 19 September 2003
34. Segment information
Business segments
The consolidated entity is an Australian based company having the following two business segments:
Land Syndication
External equity capital raisings are undertaken to fund the acquisition of land across Australia. The consolidated entity derives fees from underwriting and capital raising coordination services, as well as asset identification fees from this activity. Ongoing project related fees are then derived by the consolidated entity for the duration of a particular project.
Land development and resale
Purchase and development of various parcels of land in Australia, primarily for residential purchases. However, certain land holdings will also produce non-residential blocks of land.
Geographical segments
The consolidated entity operates primarily in one geographical segment being Australia. Accordingly, no further geographical information is provided.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
34. Segment information (continued)
Primary reporting - business segments
| 2003 | LandSyndication$ | Landdevelopment $&$resale$ | Inter-segmenteliminationsS | Consolidated$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales to external customersInter-segment sales | 29,148,259 | 23,706,902 | (4,743,192) | 48,111,969 |
| Total sales revenue | 29,148,259 | 23,706,902 | (4,743,192) | 48,111,969 |
| Other revenue | 23 | 23 | ||
| Total segment revenue | 29,148,282 | 23,706,902 | (4,743,192) | 48,111,992 |
| Segment resultUnallocatedrevenueless | 23,506,603 | 6,252,589 | (834, 185) | 28,925,007 |
| unallocated expenseProfit from ordinaryactivities before income tax | (1,355,384) | |||
| expense | 27,569,623 | |||
| Income tax expense | (8, 242, 275) | |||
| Profit from ordinaryactivities after income tax | ||||
| expense | 19,327,348 | |||
| Segment assets | 29,588,105 | 65,912,200 | (5, 544, 603) | 89,955,702 |
| Unallocated assets | ||||
| Total assets | 89,955,702 | |||
| Segment liabilities | 6,969,888 | 9,701,914 | (4,708,292) | 11,963,510 |
| Unallocated liabilities | 54,796,765 | |||
| Total liabilities | 66,760,275 | |||
| Acquisitions ofproperty,plant & equipment and other | ||||
| non-current segment assets | 428,256 | 48,474 | 476,730 | |
| Depreciation expense | 49,521 | 3,274 | 52,795 | |
| Other non-cash expenses | 9,490 | 9.490 |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 30 June 2003
Segment information (continued) 34.
Primary reporting -- business segments
| 2002 | LandSyndication$ | Landdevelopment &resaleS | Inter-segmenteliminationsS | ConsolidatedS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales to external customersInter-segment sales | 16,090,934 | 16,090,934 | ||
| Total sales revenue | 16,090,934 | 16,090,934 | ||
| Other revenue | 1,788 | 19,686 | 2102 | 23,576 |
| Total segment revenue | 16,092,722 | 19,686 | 2,102 | 16,114,510 |
| Segment resultUnallocatedrevenueless | 11,846,272 | 19,686 | 2,102 | 11,462,577 |
| unallocated expenseProfit from ordinaryactivities before income tax | (67, 448) | |||
| expense | ||||
| Income tax expense | 11,395,129 | |||
| Profit from ordinary | (3,189,751) | |||
| activities after income tax | ||||
| expense | 8,205,378 | |||
| Segment assets | 16,047,922 | 16,012,243 | (2,893,753) | 29,166,412 |
| Unallocated assets | 211,151 | |||
| Total assets | 29,377,563 | |||
| Segment liabilities | 654,350 | 186,272 | (115,308) | |
| Unallocated liabilities | 725,314 | |||
| Total liabilities | 15,784,170 | |||
| 16,509,484 | ||||
| Acquisitionsofproperty,plant & equipment and other | ||||
| non-current segment assets | 345,827 | 2,696 | (16) | 348,507 |
| Depreciation expense | 86,956 | 3,274 | 87,107 | |
| Other non-cash expenses | 5,867 | 2,042 | 7,909 |
DIRECTORS' DECLARATION
The directors declare that the financial statements and notes set out on pages 10 to 40:
- comply with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other $(a)$ mandatory professional reporting requirements; and
- give a true and fair view of the company's and consolidated entity's financial position as at $(b)$ 30 June 2003 and of their performance, as represented by the results of their operations and their cash flows, for the financial year ended on that date.
In the directors' opinion:
- the financial statements and notes are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and $(a)$
- there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as $(b)$ and when they become due and payable.
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
Director
Perth, Western Australia $\mathcal{K}$ . September 2003

Independent audit report to the members of Peet & Company Limited
PricewaterhouseCooners ABN 52 780 433 757
ovi 250 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 GPO Box 11198 PERTH WA 6840 DX 77 Perth Australia www.pwc.com/air Telephone +61 8 9238 3000 Facsimile +61 8 9238 3999
Audit opinion
In our opinion, the financial report of Peet & Company Limited:
- gives a true and fair view, as required by the Corporations Act 2001 in Australia, of the financial position of Peet & Company Limited and the Peet & Company Group (defined below) as at 30 June 2003, and of their performance for the year ended on that date, and
- is presented in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia, and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
This opinion must be read in conjunction with the rest of our audit report.
Scope
The financial report and directors' responsibility
The financial report comprises the statement of financial position, statement of financial performance, statement of cash flows, accompanying notes to the financial statements, and the directors' declaration for both Peet & Company Limited (the company) and the Peet & Company Group (the consolidated entity), for the year ended 30 June 2003. The consolidated entity comprises both the company and the entities it controlled during that year.
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and true and fair presentation of the financial report in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001. This includes responsibility for the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls that are designed to prevent and detect fraud and error, and for the accounting policies and accounting estimates inherent in the financial report.
Audit approach
We conducted an independent audit in order to express an opinion to the members of the company. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards, in order to provide reasonable assurance as to whether the financial report is free of material misstatement. The nature of an audit is influenced by factors such as the use of professional judgement, selective testing, the inherent limitations of internal control, and the availability of persuasive rather than conclusive evidence. Therefore, an audit cannot guarantee that all material misstatements have been detected.
We performed procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia, a view which is consistent with our understanding of the company's and the consolidated entity's financial position, and of their performance as represented by the results of their operations and cash flows.
PRICEWATERHOUSE COPERS @
We formed our audit opinion on the basis of these procedures, which included:
- examining, on a test basis, information to provide evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial report, and
- assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and disclosures used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors.
When this audit report is included in a document containing the director's report, our procedures include reading the director's report to determine whether it contains any material inconsistencies with the financial report.
While we considered the effectiveness of management's internal controls over financial reporting when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our audit was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls.
Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by directors or management.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we followed applicable independence requirements of Australian professional ethical pronouncements and the Corporations Act 2001.
Pruvoteckundopers
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Ò
John O'Connor Partner
Perth September 2003