PEEL MINING LIMITED - Investor Presentation 2013

==> picture [363 x 476] intentionally omitted <==

Peel Mining Limited (ASX:PEX) Investor Presentation – July 2013

==> picture [286 x 125] intentionally omitted <==

Discovering Copper in the Cobar Superbasin

Rob Tyson, Managing Director Investor Presentation

(Image: Sunrise at Mallee Bull)

www.peelmining.com.au

Disclaimer & Competent Persons Statement

• Disclaimer

The views expressed here other than historical fact constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon estimates and assumptions considered reasonable by the Company, albeit subject to uncertainties and contingencies of unknown factors that may cause variation in such forward-looking statements beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Nothing in this release should be construed as either an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell shares in any jurisdiction.

• Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Robert Tyson, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Tyson is Managing Director of Peel Mining Ltd. Mr Tyson has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.’ Mr Tyson consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears .
The information in this report that relates to mineral resource estimation for Apollo Hill is based on work completed by Mr Jonathon Abbott who is a full time employee of Hellman and Schofield Pty Ltd and a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Hellman & Schofield was not required to review the quality or validity of the sampling data, as Peel Mining are accepting responsibility for these aspects of the estimates. Mr Abbott has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Abbott consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this report relating to the Attunga resources is based on information compiled by Mr Murray Hutton, who is a Member of the Australian Instituteof Geoscientists and is employed by Geos Mining. He has sufficient relevant experience to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.’ Mr Hutton consents to the inclusion in this report of this information in the form and context in which it appears.

Capital and Corporate

• Capital structure

Fully paid shares: 130 million Cash: ~$7 million (+ $3.3m via farm-in) Options: 3 million Top 20 investors: ~58% Market cap (@ 34 cps): $44 million Directors’ holding: ~21%

• Business model

– Identify and acquire undervalued/prospective mineral assets

– Add value through systematic exploration

– Monetise (through JV/sale/IPO) or take to production

==> picture [570 x 204] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

3 Year Chart
----- End of picture text -----

Board and Technical Team

Small leadership team with blend of technical and commercial backgrounds; focus on maximising returns

• Board/Management

Maximising PEX’s discovery potential:
Rob Tyson (Managing Director)
Simon Hadfield (Chairman)
Graham Hardie (Non-exec Director)
Ryan Woodhouse (Co. Secretary)

• Technical team

Michael Oates (Chief Geologist)
Steve Leggett (Operations Manager)
David Vaarwerk (Database Geologist)
Angus Hornabrook (Consulting Geologist)
Low admin/corp costs at ~$200K per quarter
Small, efficient, skilled, technical/operations team
High exploration success rate
Focus on drill testing – only way to prove orebodies
Maximising every dollar – money goes into the ground
Nancy Vickery (Consulting Geologist)
Bob Brown (Consulting Geologist)

Some of the Board and Technical Team

==> picture [633 x 434] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Absent
Graham Hardie
Ryan Woodhouse
Steve Leggett
Dave Vaarwerk
Bob Brown
Nancy Vickery
Jason Bryan
Audrey Lee
Greg Chris
Dean
Simon
Nathan
Angus Mick
Rob
----- End of picture text -----

Project Summary

Growing base-precious metal resources company

• Key assets:

Mallee Bull Copper-Polymetallic Discovery
Cobar Superbasin Project (CSP)
Apollo Hill Gold Project
Rise & Shine Gold Project
Attunga Tungsten Project
Ruby Silver Project

==> picture [395 x 61] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Historic production
400,000 oz Ag
17.2 Mt @ 0.9 g/t
Au for 505,000 oz
CSP
1.29 Mt @ 0.61% WO3
----- End of picture text -----

Historic production 180,000 oz Au

Cobar Superbasin is worldclass mineral province

==> picture [319 x 441] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Tinderra granite
• N
ELURA
CSA
GREAT COBAR
MT BOPPY
NEW OCCIDENTAL
PEAK
McKINNONS
PERSERVERANCE PIPELINE
Windnok NYMAGEE
WONAWINTA
Shelf HERA
SANDY CREEK
MALLEE BULL
Thule granite MAY DAY
Canbelego
WAGGA TANK
- Mineral
Hill Rift
MT HOPE MINE MUNDOE Zone
Erimeran granite
Cobar Basin Architecture
Courtesy Vlad David
Nymagee-Wagga Structure
Buckaroon Fault
Mt Hope TroughWalters Ranges Shelf
lt
Rast Trough
Rookery Fault
Fau
ra
nea
ment
nar
e Li
Gilmor
Coo
----- End of picture text -----

Cobar Superbasin pre-mining metal inventory:

– >2.2 Mt Cu = US$18b

– >7 Moz Au = US$12b

– >4.7 Mt Zn = US$9.5b

– >2.8 Mt Pb = US$5.5b – >145 Moz Ag = US$4.5b – Total = US$50b

– >145 Moz Ag = US$4.5b

==> picture [212 x 205] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Ag
Ag Au
Pb
Au
Zn
Zn
Cu
Cu
----- End of picture text -----

“Cobar–style” Deposits vs Mallee Bull Discovery

==> picture [300 x 445] intentionally omitted <==

Cobar-style attribute	Mallee Bull
Polymetallic (Cu-Ag-Au-Pb-Zn)	
Proximity to major structures (growth/transfer faults)	
Shear-hosted	
Strongly leached near surface	
Chlorite and silica alteration	
Facies and rock competency contrasts	
Moderate to high strain zone	
Short strike length (<200m)	
Narrow widths (5-20m)	
Vertical continuity (>400m)	
Clustered/stacked lenses	

Mallee Bull Project

==> picture [631 x 442] intentionally omitted <==

CBH Resources Farm-in

Attracting CBH is testament to Mallee Bull’s potential

• Key Terms of Farm-in

Agreement covers EL7461 and ML1361 including Mallee Bull
Peel remains operator
Stage 1 saw CBH earn 15% interest by payment of $1m to Peel as contribution to past expenditure (received July 2012) and by contributing $1.5m to exploration (complete)
Stage 2 saw CBH earn 30% interest by contributing a further $2.5m to exploration (complete June 2013)
Stage 3 sees CBH increase to 50% interest by contributing a further $3.33m to exploration within a further 12 month period
CBH may elect to form a joint venture at the end of any stage; parties can then elect to contribute on pro-rata basis or be diluted according to an industry-standard formula.

Peel Mining, CBH and Toho – May 2013

==> picture [638 x 425] intentionally omitted <==

Mallee Bull Discovery

Perseverance and methodical exploration lead to discovery

• Location and tenure

80 km[2] of granted leases (EL and ML)
100 km south of Cobar, NSW
Good infrastructure, 3 km off major road, 15 km from Moomba-Sydney Gas Pipeline

• Geology and Mineralisation

Located in Silurian-Devonian Cobar Superbasin
Cobar-style polymetallic (Cu-Au-Ag-Pb-Zn) mineralisation

• Mallee Bull Cu-Ag-Au-Pb-Zn-Co Discovery

8 km east of May Day Au-Ag-Pb-Zn-Cu deposit; adjacent to historic 4-Mile goldfield
Coincident EM and magnetic geophysical anomalies
Favourable geological position in volcaniclastic turbidite sequence age equivalent of Great Cobar geology
Favourable structural position located on “nose” of anticline; high strain environment
Perseverance required; four rounds of drilling necessary
High-grade massive and stringer sulphides intercepted in July/August 2011

Coincident EM and Magnetic Anomalies – Dec 2010

==> picture [686 x 441] intentionally omitted <==

Mallee Bull Phase 1

Phase 1 drilling confirms Mallee Bull as a Cobar-style discovery

– Phase 1 RC/diamond drill programme testing to 300m below surface from discovery – Feb 2012

Better drill results include:

10m @ 9.01% Pb, 11.00% Zn, 41 g/t Ag, 0.77 g/t Au

9.3m @ 1.20% Cu, 19 g/t Ag, 0.14 g/t Au

5m @ 2.40% Cu, 28 g/t Ag, 0.60 g/t Au

7m @ 1.31% Cu, 19 g/t Ag, 0.56 g/t Au

11m @ 2.71% Cu, 36 g/t Ag, 0.26 g/t Au

5m @ 2.14% Cu, 41 g/t Ag, 1.29 g/t Au

6.65m @ 3.10% Cu, 34 g/t Ag, 0.93 g/t Au

10m @ 1.70% Cu, 46 g/t Ag, 0.27 g/t Au

7m @ 2.32% Cu, 14 g/t Ag, 0.15 g/t Au

6m @ 2.01% Cu, 64 g/t Ag, 0.43 g/t Au

10m @ 2.66% Cu, 41 g/t Ag, 0.51 g/t Au 10m @ 2.22% Cu, 33 g/t Ag, 0.44 g/t Au

Cobar-style discovery confirmed
Mineralisation open in multiple directions, including down-dip

– 12-month option to purchase part of Wirchilleba Station covering Mallee Bull footprint

Mallee Bull Phase 2

Phase 2 drilling confirms Mallee Bull as major copper discovery

Phase 2 diamond drill programme (Stage 1 CBH Farm-in Agreement) testing >400m below surface from Jul 2012 – Nov 2012
Better drill results include:

41m @ 1.71% Cu, 33 g/t Ag, 1.84 g/t Au

10m @ 1.12% Cu, 47 g/t Ag, 0.95 g/t Au

14m @ 1.92% Cu, 56 g/t Ag, 0.30 g/t Au

42m @ 1.01% Cu, 23 g/t Ag, 0.91 g/t Au

31m @ 1.61% Cu, 13 g/t Ag, 0.17 g/t Au

35m @ 0.65% Cu, 54 g/t Ag, 1.16 g/t Au, 3.42% Pb, 1.51% Zn

21m @ 1.48% Cu, 24 g/t Ag, 0.25 g/t Au

31m @ 2.65% Cu, 51 g/t Ag, 0.18 g/t Au 12m @ 1.58% Cu, 39 g/t Ag, 0.14 g/t Au

22m @ 3.62% Cu, 38 g/t Ag, 0.09 g/t Au

7m @ 1.09% Cu, 29 g/t Ag, 1.74 g/t Au 13m @ 1.91% Cu, 31 g/t Ag, 0.12 g/t Au 8m @ 1.23% Cu, 12 g/t Ag, 0.09 g/t Au

69m @ 3.48% Cu, 34 g/t Ag, 0.14 g/t Au

Strike of mineralisation = ~120m
Shallowest intercept = ~40m below surface
Deepest intercept = ~600m below surface
Mineralisation open in multiple directions, including down-dip/plunge

Mallee Bull Phase 3

Phase 3 drilling confirms Mallee Bull as high grade copper discovery

• Mallee Bull Phase 3

Stage 2 of farm-in (Phase 3) saw CBH fund $2.5m on further exploration for further 15% interest commenced early February 2013, completed June 2013
Exploration programme comprises multiple intercept directional diamond drilling returning further high-grade copper results including:
MBDD009W1 – 53m @ 4.08% Cu, 42 g/t Ag, 0.22 g/t Au (4.77% Cu Eq) incl 12m @ 9.13% Cu, 86 g/t Ag, 0.34 g/t Au (10.46% Cu Eq)
MBDD009W2 – 21m @ 2.22% Cu, 40 g/t Ag, 0.11 g/t Au (2.80% Cu Eq)
MBDD009W2W1 – 84m @ 4.42% Cu, 38 g/t Ag, 0.14 g/t Au (5.00% Cu Eq) incl 26m @ 11.39% Cu, 80 g/t Ag, 0.20 g/t Au (12.54% Cu Eq)
MBDD010 – 32m @ 3.62% Cu, 46 g/t Ag, 0.21 g/t Au (4.35 % Cu Eq)
MBDD009W3 returns 10m @ 4.54% Cu, 31 g/t Ag, 0.13 g/t Au (5.02% Cu Eq*) from 502m
Purchase of part of Wirchilleba Station containing Mallee Bull
DHEM as required to guide deep drilling
QEM Scan mineralogical study yields encouraging early warning results, confirming stringer copper dominated by medium-coarse grained chalcopyrite with good liberation characteristics

Mallee Bull Mineralisation (Cpy-Po Stringer Zone)

==> picture [571 x 414] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

12.30% Cu, 161 g/t Ag, 0.21 g/t Au
7.15% Cu, 41 g/t Ag, 0.10 g/t Au
22.40% Cu, 180 g/t Ag, 0.28 g/t Au
20.70% Cu, 175 g/t Ag, 0.11 g/t Au
8.26% Cu, 74 g/t Ag, 0.63 g/t Au
20.60% Cu, 143 g/t Ag, 0.54 g/t Au
12.45% Cu, 231 g/t Ag, 0.36 g/t Au
----- End of picture text -----

Mallee Bull Deeps – high-grade, copper-polymetallic

==> picture [326 x 469] intentionally omitted <==

3D TMI Inversion Modeling with DHEM (looking east)

==> picture [514 x 445] intentionally omitted <==

Cobar Project – June 2011

Cobar Project – June 2013

Cobar Superbasin Project (CSP) – 100% PEX

Large, highly prospective land package underwritten by Mallee Bull Farm-in

• 100%-owned and highly prospective

15 ELs and ELAs covering more than 3,062 km[2]
Largest exploration landholding in the South Cobar Superbasin
Leveraging off Mallee Bull discovery and exploration presence/infrastructure
Multiple walk-up targets including Sandy Creek, Mundoe, Bedooba, Tara, Gilgunnia South prospects
Largely underexplored/underdrilled
Preliminary tenure review completed December 2012
RC drilling at Mundoe completed 2012 – significant drill results returned over 600m strike
Major geochem (portable XRF) programme underway
FLEM/DHEM planned at Sandy Creek prior to drill testing

CSP – Mundoe: early exploration success

• Mundoe copper prospect key facts

50 km south of Mallee Bull
Defined by 2km long multi-element geochemical anomaly
Encouraging historic drill results including:
- 3m @ 2.90% Zn, 0.87% Pb, 30 g/t Ag and 0.4 g/t Au from 88m in MUD-1;
- 6m @ 1.66% Cu, 103 g/t Ag from 111m in MURP-2;
- 3m @ 122 /t Ag, 0.3 g/t Au from 42m and 6m @ 0.42% Cu, 14 g/t Ag from 69m in MURP-3;
- 12m @ 1.09% Cu, 60 g/t Ag from 105m in MURP-4.
December 2012 RC drilling programme confirms Mundoe as valid copper target
Best results returned over 600m strike including:
- 5m @ 42 g/t Ag and 0.68% Cu from 140m in MURC002;
- 6m @ 42 g/t Ag and 1.24% Cu from 112m in MURC003;
- 5m @ 0.86 g/t Au from 22m and 3m @ 180 g/t Ag and 2.07% Cu from 129m in MURC005;
- 8m @ 19 g/t Ag and 0.57% Cu from 163m in MURC007.
Follow-up exploration planned for H1 2013

Sandy Creek: the next Mallee Bull?

• Sandy Creek key facts

20 km along strike and north of Mallee Bull
Stratigraphic equivalent to Mallee Bull
Strongly folded (high strain) structural environment
Coincident “bullseye” magnetic and strong electromagnetic anomalies (HeliTEM and DHEM)
Low resistivity, high chargeability IP anomaly
Historic drilling tested edges of DHEM conductor plate model only with SCDD02 (Pasminco) yielding encouraging results
1.4m at 12.7% Zn, 5.7% Pb, 45g/t Ag from 199.7m
3.0m at 2.0% Zn, 1.2% Pb from 426.0m
10.2m at 1.6% Cu, 7.4% Pb, 68g/t Ag from 521.8m (incl. 3.3m at 1.5% Cu, 18.0% Pb, 122g/t Ag from 523.7m) – coincident with conductor plate model
Wirlong and Redshaft copper workings never drilled with oxide copper at surface

Sandy Creek – DHEM Plate centre untested

==> picture [708 x 398] intentionally omitted <==

Investment Highlights

Cobar-style polymetallic discovery at Mallee Bull, NSW Mineralisation open in multiple directions

4 5

==> picture [39 x 39] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

6
----- End of picture text -----

Strong partnership through CBH Resources Farm-in Strategic Cobar district landholding with exciting prospects Small team but high exploration success rate Maximising every dollar – money goes into the ground

Notes

1. Information regarding drilling/assaying data

2. Drilling was completed as HQ or NQ diamond core.

3. Sample recoveries were considered adequate for all samples.

4. Drillcore has been logged in detail based on lithology, mineralisation, and alteration.

5. Samples for analysis were collected by sawing core in half.

6. Samples were submitted as 1m or 4m composite half-core intervals.

7. Samples were analysed at ALS Chemex utilising methods: Au‐AA25 for Au (fire assay); ME‐ICP41, ME-ICP61 or ME MS61 for multi-element including Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn; Ag-OG46 for >100 g/t Ag; Cu-OG46 for >1% Cu; Pb-OG46 for >1% Pb; and Zn-OG46 for >1% Zn.

8. Drillhole collars were surveyed by DGPS (GDA94) and downhole gyroscopic surveys were run continuously.

* Copper Equivalent Calculation Explanation:

The copper equivalent (CuEq) calculation represents the total metal value for each metal, multiplied by the conversion factor, summed and expressed in equivalent copper percentage. These results are exploration results only and no allowance is made for recovery losses that may occur should mining eventually result, nor metallurgical flowsheet considerations. The copper equivalent calculation is intended as an indicative value only. No metallurgical testwork has been completed to date however it is the Company’s opinion that all the elements included in the copper equivalent calculation have a reasonable potential to be recovered.
Copper equivalent conversion factors and long‐term price assumptions used follow: Massive Sulphide Zone Copper Equivalent Formula (CuEq) = (Cu (ppm) x 0.0075 + Ag (ppm) x 0.96 + Au (ppm) x 50.00 + Co (ppm) x 0.025)/0.0075;
Stringer/Breccia Sulphide Zone Copper Equivalent Formula (CuEq) = (Cu (ppm) x 0.0075 + Ag (ppm) x 0.96 + Au (ppm) x 50.00)/0.0075;
Price Assumptions ‐ Cu (US$7,500/t), Ag (US$30/oz), Au (US$1,500/oz), Co (US$25,000/t).
Pb and Zn have not been used in copper equivalent calculation.

==> picture [362 x 476] intentionally omitted <==

Peel Mining Limited (ASX:PEX)