AI assistant
PEEL MINING LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2021
May 4, 2021
65545_rns_2021-05-04_e8858ba1-660b-409d-88f4-706fe11357a7.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 5
th MAY 2021
HIGH-GRADE COPPER AT WIRLONG CONTINUES; MALLEE BULL COPPER RESOURCE UPGRADE DRILLING UNDERWAY;
KEY POINTS
WIRLONG
- Latest assays confirm a further high-grade copper intercept at Wirlong in hole WLDD009:
- o 17m @ 4.00% Cu, 12g/t Ag from 269m including:
- 11m @ 5.88% Cu, 17g/t Ag from 271m
- o 17m @ 4.00% Cu, 12g/t Ag from 269m including:
- Further significant zones of copper mineralisation in recent drilling; processing and sampling is continuing with assays pending for four holes (WLDD010 – WWLD013) with visible sulphide mineralisation
- Maiden resource drilling ongoing with two diamond rigs
- High-grade copper mineralisation at Wirlong Central has been defined from near surface to more than 600m below surface and remains open in all directions
MALLEE BULL
- Mallee Bull copper resource upgrade drilling now underway with one diamond rig; second diamond rig to follow
- ~20,000m diamond drilling program is primarily designed to convert Inferred classified resources to Indicated classification
- Mallee Bull represents one of Australia's highest-grade undeveloped copper deposits and resource upgrade drilling is designed to enable detailed development studies
Peel Mining Limited (ASX:PEX) (Peel or the Company) is pleased to report that ongoing drilling at its 100%-owned Wirlong copper deposit has returned a further very high-grade copper-mineralised intercept whilst resource upgrade drilling at the Company's 100%-owned Mallee Bull copper deposit has now commenced. Wirlong and Mallee Bull are part of Peel's South Cobar Project, centred around 100km south of Cobar in Western NSW.
Drilling at Wirlong and Mallee Bull is part of the Company's "Hub & Spoke" strategy to advance each of the Company's deposits to mineable resources, to achieve critical mass in support of a new substantial centrally located processing plant. These deposits also form the basis of the Company's focus on advancing its copper resources.
PEEL MINING MANAGING DIRECTOR ROB TYSON COMMENTED:
"Wirlong has returned yet another excellent copper intersection continuing to highlight the strong tenor of mineralisation present within this developing copper system. Drilling at Wirlong is continuing, with results returned to date advancing our understanding and highlighting the open nature of the deposit.
The commencement of resource upgrade drilling at Mallee Bull marks the next stage of Peel's focus on advancing our South Cobar Project. Mallee Bull's current resource is predominantly inferred reflecting the limited drilling completed at depth due to its Cobar-style pipe-like shape. The primary aim of the resource drilling is to convert inferred resources to indicated classification, to enable detailed mine concept and feasibility studies. Mallee Bull has historically returned some world-class copper-rich intercepts and we look forward to the upcoming drill results and the advancement of this high-grade copper system."

WIRLONG
As previously reported, WLDD009 was recognised as hosting significant copper mineralisation. WLDD009 deviated from its original design, and as a result transected WLRC083 intercepting high grade mineralisation ~10m updip from a similar width and grade of intercept reported in WLRC083 – 9m @ 4.10% Cu, 15g/t Ag from 270m. Whilst not designed as a "twin" drillhole WLDD009 indicates that Wirlong mineralisation has continuity and repeatability.
Recently returned assays from WLDD009 confirmed multiple mineralised zones including the aforementioned high-grade intersection; better assays include:
WLDD009
- o 27m @ 0.68% Cu, 5g/t Ag from 57m including:
- 8m @ 1.24% Cu, 9g/t Ag from 66m
- o 13m @ 0.74% Cu, 3g/t Ag from 96m including:
- 3m @ 1.23% Cu, 5g/t Ag from 98m
- o 39m @ 0.42% Cu, 2g/t Ag from 131m
- o 17m @ 4.00% Cu, 12 g/t Ag from 269m including: 11m @ 5.88% Cu, 17g/t Ag from 271
- o 29m @ 0.78% Cu, 6g/t Ag from 301m including:
- 10m @ 1.25% Cu, 9g/t Ag from 307m
Since last report, further drillholes have intersected significant zones of chalcopyrite-dominant mineralisation as determined by visual inspection and portable XRF analyses. Table 7 shows visual estimates of mineralisation for drillholes with assays pending.
The current result is in addition to previously reported drillholes which intersected substantial chalcopyrite-dominant sulphide mineralisation over significant downhole widths. Better resource drilling results reported to date include:
WLDD006
- o 3.61m @ 3.12% Cu, 25g/t Ag from 165m; and
- o 5m @ 2.84% Cu, 10g/t Ag from 291m
- WLDD007
o 4m @ 1.70% Cu, 6g/t Ag from 255m
WLDD008
- o 10m @ 2.09% Cu, 8g/t Ag from 193m
- WLRC068
- o 51m @ 1.35% Cu, 6g/t Ag, 0.11g/t Au from 177m including:
- 9m @ 4.33% Cu, 14g/t Ag, 0.34g/t Au from 181m
WLRC069
- o 15m @ 3.80% Cu, 17g/t Ag, 0.04g/t Au from 255m including**:**
- 6m @ 8.64% Cu, 37g/t Ag, 0.11g/t Au from 255m
WLRC071
- o 28m @ 1.83% Cu, 8g/t Ag from 263m including:
- 10m @ 4.02% Cu, 16g/t Ag from 275m
WLRC073
- o 163m @ 1.08% Cu, 4g/t Ag from 233m to end of hole including:
- 21m @ 2.00% Cu, 9g/t Ag from 283m; and
- 11m @ 1.73% Cu, 5g/t Ag from 337m; and
- 19m @ 1.58% Cu, 5g/t Ag from 359m
WLRC075
o 9m @ 1.78% Cu, 5g/t Ag from 294m

WLRC077
- o 91m @ 0.93% Cu, 5g/t Ag from 254m including:
- 11m @ 2.08% Cu, 16g/t Ag from 268m; and
- 6m @ 1.40% Cu, 6g/t Ag from 303m; and
- 7m @ 3.58% Cu, 8g/t Ag from 334m
WLRC079
o 7m @ 5.78% Cu, 19g/t Ag from 249m
WLRC080
- o 72m @ 1.01% Cu, 6g/t Ag from 120m including:
- 12m @ 1.70% Cu, 10g/t Ag from 137m
- 13m @ 1.83% Cu, 10g/t Ag from 172m
WLRC083
- o 42m @ 1.26% Cu, 5g/t Ag from 258m to end of hole including:
- 9m @ 4.10% Cu, 15g/t Ag from 270m
WLRC088
- o 51m @ 0.94% Cu, 3g/t Ag from 208m to end of hole including:
- 4m @ 2.17% Cu, 8g/t Ag from 231m
- 3m @ 4.34% Cu, 13g/t Ag from 255m
Mineralisation returned from the resource definition drilling so far is generally consistent with the position of electromagnetic conductor plates, and Peel's geophysical and geological modelling.
Drilling at Wirlong has been designed to test the upper ~300m of the Wirlong Central Zone where highgrade copper (chalcopyrite) mineralisation is understood to be structurally controlled on a NW-SE orientation. The resource definition drill program originally comprised ~15,000m of drilling. At review of Wirlong results to date is currently underway with a view to modifying the programme to optimise the resource modeling. Drill results to date have highlighted the open nature of this evolving copper mineral system.
The true width of intercepts reported is estimated to be approximately 40-60% of the downhole widths. The geology of the Wirlong deposit comprises intercalated and sheared/deformed felsic volcanics and siltstones/sediments with associated alteration including silica, sericite and dark/black chlorite.
WIRLONG BACKGROUND
Wirlong is located within Peel's 100%-owned EL8307, located ~80km SSE of Cobar or ~35km N of Mallee Bull. It is defined by 2km strike of sheared volcanics and sediments; large multi-element soil geochemical anomalies; and coincident/semi-coincident geophysical anomalies. It has since proven to represent a very large hydrothermal system hosting significant copper mineralisation along more than 2.5km strike length and to depths of up to 950m. To date some of the better copper intercepts returned from the Wirlong prospect include:
- 9m @ 3.29% Cu, 18 g/t Ag from 70m in WLRC035
- 27m @ 5.3% Cu, 23 g/t Ag from 286m in WLRC026
- 31m @ 3.19% Cu, 11 g/t Ag from 299m in WLRC052
- 9m @ 8% Cu, 17g/t Ag, 0.21 g/t Au from 616m in WLDD001
- 17m @ 4.59% Cu, 8 g/t Ag from 738m in WLRCDD043
A program consisting of three diamond drillholes at Wirlong Central was undertaken at the end of 2019/early 2020 to test a new structural model (NW-SE) for the controls on high-grade copper mineralisation (see ASX announcement dated 3rd April 2020 "Wirlong Drill Results and Covid-19 update").
Assay results returned significant intercepts in all three drillholes with results including:

- 4.26m @ 2.22% Cu, 7 g/t Ag from 380m and 0.74m @ 14.3% Cu, 66 g/t Ag from 396.2m in WLDD003
- 1.15m @ 7.71% Cu, 30 g/t Ag from 54.45m and 30m @ 1.64% Cu, 8 g/t Ag from 305m (incl. 14m @ 2.63% Cu, 12 g/t Ag) from 320m in WLDD004
- 5.9m @ 3.19% Cu, 13 g/t Ag from 347.1m in WLDD005
Down-hole EM was completed on drillholes WLDD003 and WLDD004 with modelling defining a late-time conductor, with approximate dimensions of 120m x 150m and its geometry consistent with the new structural model. High-grade copper mineralisation at Wirlong Central has been defined from near surface to more than 600m below surface and remains open in all directions.
MALLEE BULL
As previously flagged, resource upgrade drilling at the Company's 100%-owned Mallee Bull copper deposit has now commenced. Mallee Bull represents one of Australia's highest grade undeveloped copper deposits and resource upgrade drilling is part of the Company's "Hub & Spoke" strategy to advance each of the Company's deposits to mineable resources, to achieve critical mass in support of a new substantial centrally located processing plant.
The resource upgrade drilling program, comprising ~20,000m of diamond drilling, is primarily designed to convert Inferred classified resources to Indicated classification. The current resource breakdown is shown in Table 1.
The bulk of Mallee Bull's contained copper is located at below ~350m below surface where resources are predominantly of an Inferred nature. Drilling has been designed to target this area and will initially commence with a double shifting multipurpose drill rig however this is anticipated to increase to as many three rigs over the coming months.
The 2017 resource estimate for Mallee Bull comprises 6.76 Mt at 1.8% Cu, 31g/t Ag, 0.4g/t Au, 0.6% Pb, 0.6% Zn (2.6% CuEq) containing approximately 119,000t Cu, 6.6 Moz Ag, 83,000 oz Au, 38,000t Pb, 38,000t Zn) (using a 1% CuEq cut-off) – Table 1. Refer to 6th July 2017 announcement "Mallee Bull Resource Grows by 65% to 175,000t CuEq" for further details.
| ResourceClassification | Kt | CuEq % | Cu % | Ag g/t | Au g/t | Pb % | Zn % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicated | 1,340 | 2.15 | 0.91 | 30 | 0.4 | 0.96 | 1.23 |
| Inferred | 5,420 | 2.7 | 2 | 31 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Total Resource | 6,760 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 31 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Table 1: Mallee Bull Mineral Resource estimate based on 1% CuEq cutoff grade. The figures in |
|---|
| this table are rounded to reflect the precision of the estimates and include rounding errors. |
MALLEE BULL BACKGROUND & HISTORY
The Mallee Bull copper deposit is located approximately 100km south of Cobar in western NSW and is situated on a 20,000-acre pastoral lease owned by Peel Mining. Mallee Bull has been a flagship project for Peel since its initial discovery of 2011 and exhibits classic 'Cobar-style' Cu-Ag-Au-Zn-Pb mineralisation analogous to Cobar's world class CSA Mine.
In 2010, Peel was granted exploration lease EL7461 which encompassed the historic Gilgunnia and 4- Mile goldfields. Exploration initially focused on the known polymetallic potential of the May Day deposit located within ML1361 (wholly contained within EL7461) until, in late 2010, an airborne electromagnetic geophysical survey resulted in the recognition of a coincident late time conducting anomaly and magnetic high proximal to the historic 4-Mile goldfields. The anomaly was confirmed by a subsequent

ground-based geophysical survey in early 2011, and follow-up RC and diamond drilling resulted in the discovery of strongly anomalous polymetallic (Cu-Pb-Zn-Ag-Au) mineralisation.
In 2012, CBH Resources entered a farm-in agreement to acquire 50% of the Mallee Bull and May Day projects for $8.3m expenditure. During the JV partnership, seven drill programs were completed at Mallee Bull, providing the basis for the reporting of a maiden mineral resource in 2014 and an updated mineral resource in 2017. In 2020, Peel exercised its pre-emptive right to acquire CBH Resources' 50% share of the Mallee Bull Joint Venture by matching a third party's offer of $17m, regaining 100% control of the Mallee Bull and May Day deposits.
Since discovery in 2011, drilling activities at Mallee Bull and proximal targets have comprised 125 RAB holes, 153 RC holes (including 42 with diamond tails), and 51 diamond holes (including 11 wedge holes) for a total of ~9,500m of RAB drilling, ~28,400m of RC drilling, and ~30,500m of diamond drilling at end 2020.
Mineralisation at Mallee Bull commences at ~60m below surface and has been defined to at least 800m below surface and remains open along strike and at depth.
Mallee Bull has historically returned many significant drill intercepts – see Table 2:
| Mineralisation | Hole ID | Fromm | To m | Widthm | Cu % | Ag g/t | Au g/t | Zn % | Pb % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4MRCDD006 | 267.35 | 274 | 6.65 | 2.94 | 33 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 0.62 | |
| 4MRC016 | 232 | 244 | 12 | 2.49 | 33 | 0.24 | 0.12 | 0.13 | |
| 4MRC024 | 174 | 184 | 10 | 2.22 | 33 | 0.44 | 0.16 | 0.11 | |
| MBDD002 | 361 | 404 | 43 | 1.63 | 29 | 1.76 | 0.07 | 0.15 | |
| and | 415 | 446 | 31 | 2.58 | 47 | 0.18 | 0.53 | 0.74 | |
| MBDD003 | 409 | 433 | 14 | 1.92 | 56 | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.10 | |
| and | 441 | 466 | 25 | 3.24 | 34 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.36 | |
| MBDD006 | 396 | 418 | 22 | 1.48 | 28 | 0.63 | 0.12 | 0.21 | |
| and | 445 | 457 | 12 | 1.26 | 16 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.11 | |
| and | 461 | 475 | 14 | 2.37 | 14 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.08 | |
| Copper | MBDD009 | 538 | 592 | 54 | 4.16 | 40 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.27 |
| and | 596 | 606 | 10 | 1.72 | 16 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.15 | |
| MBDD009W1 | 468 | 523 | 55 | 4.02 | 42 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.30 | |
| MBDD009W2 | 708 | 727 | 19 | 2.41 | 44 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.04 | |
| MBDD009W2W1 | 575 | 659 | 84 | 4.42 | 38 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.10 | |
| MBDD009W3 | 502 | 512 | 10 | 4.53 | 31 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.06 | |
| MBDD010 | 634 | 666 | 32 | 3.62 | 46 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.08 | |
| MBRCDD050 | 465 | 527 | 62 | 3.15 | 42 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.12 | |
| MBRCDD064 | 233 | 242 | 9 | 3.69 | 42 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.61 | |
| MBRCDD110 | 262 | 276.15 | 14.15 | 4.32 | 52 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.11 | |
| MBRCDD115 | 296 | 307 | 11 | 9.92 | 125 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.41 | |
| 4MRCDD006 | 253 | 263 | 10 | 0.14 | 41 | 0.77 | 11.00 | 9.01 | |
| Zinc-Lead-Silver | MBDD028 | 79 | 96 | 17 | 0.28 | 126 | 0.00 | 9.93 | 6.64 |
Table 2: Mallee Bull Selection of Significant Intercepts

| MBRC018 | 104 | 119 | 15 | 0.11 | 223 | 0.88 | 10.79 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBRC024 | 81 | 95 | 14 | 0.47 | 266 | 1.37 | 17.53 | |
| MBRC028 | 71 | 82 | 11 | 0.01 | 130 | 0.00 | 13.80 | |
| MBRC085 | 87 | 103 | 16 | 0.17 | 195 | 1.11 | 11.97 | |
| MBRCDD065 | 73 | 91 | 18 | 0.11 | 146 | 1.01 | 10.36 |
Other exploration activities completed at Mallee Bull and surrounds include extensive surface geochemical sampling, geological mapping, and numerous airborne, surface and downhole geophysical surveys.
Mallee Bull is interpreted to be in a favourable geological and structural position; it is situated in an interpreted high-stress environment of the "nose" of an anticline and occurs in a geological sequence of turbidite and volcaniclastic sediments which are thought to be age equivalent to the Chesney and Great Cobar Slate Formations found in the immediate Cobar region. Mineralisation occurs either as massive sulphide or hydrothermal breccia styles within a package of brecciated volcaniclastic and turbidite sediments comprising siltstones and mudstones and is interpreted to occur as a shoot/lens-like structure dipping moderately to the west. The deposit is currently subdivided into three lenses: Silver Ray, Union, and Mallee Bull.
This announcement has been approved for release by the Board of Directors.
For further information, please contact: Rob Tyson – Peel Mining, Managing Director +61 (0)420 234 020
PREVIOUS RESULTS
Previous results referred to herein have been extracted from previously released ASX announcements. Previous announcements and reports are available to view on www.peelmining.com.au and www.asx.com.au. Additional information regarding Mallee Bull and Wirlong is available in the Company's quarterly reports from December 2010 through to March 2021 and in progress reports as reported to the ASX. The company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcements. The company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENTS
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Rob Tyson who is a fulltime employee of the company. Mr Tyson is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Tyson has sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposits under consideration, and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Tyson consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears. Exploration results are based on standard industry practices, including sampling, assay methods, and appropriate quality assurance quality control (QAQC) measures.


Figure 1 – Wirlong Drill Plan on Magnetics


Figure 2 – Wirlong Section 1





Figure 4 – Peel Mining Cobar Tenure

Table 3: Wirlong RC Drillhole Collars
| Hole ID | Easting | Northing | Azi (grid) | Dip | Final Depth (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLRC067 | 418338.93 | 6447000.80 | 210.00 | -54.00 | 144 |
| WLRC068 | 418341.91 | 6447000.52 | 199.23 | -59.82 | 268 |
| WLRC069 | 418344.37 | 6447007.80 | 188.00 | -70.64 | 310 |
| WLRC070 | 418364.72 | 6446959.16 | 185.00 | -60.00 | 173 |
| WLRC071 | 418357.19 | 6447027.13 | 210.00 | -60.00 | 352 |
| WLRC072 | 418360.60 | 6446959.50 | 200.90 | -51.00 | 252 |
| WLRC073 | 418369.26 | 6447055.99 | 184.59 | -69.57 | 396 |
| WLRC074 | 418378.52 | 6446987.56 | 199.61 | -59.69 | 263 |
| WLRC075 | 418365.89 | 6447052.82 | 201.68 | -72.29 | 438 |
| WLRC076 | 418309.37 | 6447029.00 | 202.82 | -47.89 | 213 |
| WLRC077 | 418361.61 | 6447040.12 | 198.41 | -68.00 | 380 |
| WLRC078 | 418389.17 | 6446930.74 | 202.42 | -51.68 | 179 |
| WLRC079 | 418310.34 | 6447033.06 | 200.36 | -60.44 | 299 |
| WLRC080 | 418393.97 | 6446942.44 | 192.88 | -60.88 | 243 |
| WLRC081 | 418325.32 | 6447057.86 | 199.95 | -60.47 | 204 |
| WLRC082 | 418239.97 | 6447012.65 | 200.20 | -50.85 | 198 |
| WLRC083 | 418391.83 | 6447013.49 | 200.28 | -60.11 | 300 |
| WLRC084 | 418241.58 | 6447015.88 | 189.66 | -60.26 | 221.5 |
| WLRC085 | 418243.99 | 6447079.50 | 195.78 | -56.62 | 290 |
| WLRC086 | 418240.37 | 6447067.17 | 187.00 | -51.30 | 201 |
| WLRC087 | 418286.80 | 6447074.97 | 193.02 | -61.69 | 296 |
| WLRC088 | 418414.37 | 6446966.75 | 195.38 | -60.91 | 259 |
Table 4: Wirlong DDH Drillhole Collars
| Hole ID | Easting | Northing | Azi(grid) | Dip | Final Depth(m) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDD006 | 418326.99 | 6447057.91 | 199.77 | -61.15 | 372.80 | Completed |
| WLDD007 | 418284.89 | 6447075.52 | 206.60 | -53.00 | 300.40 | Completed |
| WLDD008 | 418312.00 | 6447033.00 | 205.64 | -55.91 | 280.10 | Completed |
| WLDD009 | 418402.19 | 6447031.06 | 201.70 | -59.98 | 426.70 | Completed |
| WLDD010 | 418281.45 | 6447077.88 | 202.90 | -58.90 | 339.50 | Assays pending |
| WLDD011 | 418404.00 | 6447035.08 | 203.20 | -65.77 | 388.70 | Assays pending |
| WLDD012 | 418292.45 | 6447081.11 | 204.10 | -62.00 | 405.60 | Assays pending |
| WLDD013 | 418419.08 | 6447059.82 | 203.35 | -63.86 | 549.80 | Assays pending |
| WLDD014 | 418298.02 | 6447092.43 | 207.50 | -60.00 | 144.40 | Assays pending |
| WLDD015 | 418367.00 | 6447049.70 | 203.30 | -65.07 | 411.70 | Assays pending |
| WLDD016 | 418299.34 | 6447094.26 | 202.60 | -64.00 | 400.00 | Processing underway |
| WLDD017 | 418377.35 | 6447069.94 | 199.04 | -63.99 | 468.80 | Processing underway |
| WLDD018 | 418311.16 | 6447026.70 | 204.80 | -44.80 | 240.00 | Processing underway |
| WLDD019 | 418417.00 | 6447138.00 | 203.10 | -63.85 | 605.60 | Processing underway |
| WLDD020 | 418336.00 | 6446997.00 | 205.00 | -45.00 | 211.90 | Processing underway |
| WLDD021 | 418342.00 | 6447004.00 | 205.00 | -57.00 | 270.80 | Processing underway |
| WLDD022 | 418415.00 | 6446970.00 | 205.82 | -63.04 | Current | Continuing |
| WLDD023 | 418345.00 | 6447011.00 | 205.00 | -63.00 | Current | Continuing |

Table 5: Wirlong RC Significant Assays
| Hole ID | From (m) | To (m) | Width (m) | Cu (%) | Ag (g/t) | Au (g/t) | Zn (%) | Pb (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLRC068 | 177.00 | 228.00 | 51.00 | 1.35 | 6 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.05 |
| including | 181.00 | 190.00 | 9.00 | 4.33 | 14 | 0.34 | 0.20 | 0.01 |
| WLRC069 | 255.00 | 270.00 | 15.00 | 3.80 | 17 | 0.04 | 0.42 | 0.17 |
| including | 255.00 | 261.00 | 6.00 | 8.64 | 37 | 0.11 | 0.83 | 0.32 |
| WLRC070 | 141.00 | 148.00 | 7.00 | 0.75 | 5 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| and | 171.00 | 173.00** | 2.00 | 0.95 | 4 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
| WLRC071 | 251.00 | 255.00 | 4.00 | 1.13 | 9 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| and | 263.00 | 291.00 | 28.00 | 1.83 | 8 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.07 |
| including | 275.00 | 285.00 | 10.00 | 4.02 | 16 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.10 |
| WLRC072 | 241.00 | 244.00 | 3.00 | 0.89 | 6 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| WLRC073 | 233.00 | 396.00** | 163.00 | 1.08 | 4 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| including | 283.00 | 304.00 | 21.00 | 2.00 | 9 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.09 |
| and including | 310.00 | 317.00 | 7.00 | 2.09 | 6 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| and including | 337.00 | 348.00 | 11.00 | 1.73 | 5 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| and including | 359.00 | 378.00 | 19.00 | 1.58 | 5 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| WLRC074 | 203.00 | 215.00 | 12.00 | 0.52 | 2 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| and | 226.00 | 234.00 | 8.00 | 0.93 | 4 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| WLRC075 | 272.00 | 304.00 | 32.00 | 0.78 | 2 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| including | 294.00 | 303.00 | 9.00 | 1.78 | 5 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| and | 334.00 | 338.00 | 4.00 | 0.58 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| and | 413.00 | 416.00 | 3.00 | 0.74 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| WLRC076 | 187.00 | 195.00 | 8.00 | 1.17 | 6 | 0.04 | 0.48 | 0.20 |
| and | 210.00 | 213.00 | 3.00 | 0.81 | 2 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| WLRC077 | 254.00 | 345.00 | 91.00 | 0.93 | 5 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| including | 268.00 | 279.00 | 11.00 | 2.08 | 16 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.08 |
| and including | 303.00 | 309.00 | 6.00 | 1.40 | 6 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
| and including | 334.00 | 341.00 | 7.00 | 3.58 | 8 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| WLRC079 | 249.00 | 256.00 | 7.00 | 5.78 | 19 | 0.06 | 0.80 | 0.19 |
| WLRC080 | 120.00 | 192.00 | 72.00 | 1.01 | 6 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 001 |
| including | 137.00 | 149.00 | 12.00 | 1.70 | 10 | 001 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| and including | 172.00 | 185.00 | 13.00 | 1.83 | 10 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.10 |
| WLRC081 | 120.00 | 122.00 | 2.00 | 0.08 | 11 | 0.13 | 1.82 | 0.63 |
| WLRC083 | 122.00 | 148.00 | 26.00 | 0.58 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
| and | 206.00 | 208.00 | 2.00 | 2.17 | 22 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.15 |
| and | 222.00 | 246.00 | 24.00 | 0.54 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| and | 258.00 | 300.00** | 42.00 | 1.26 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| including | 270.00 | 279.00 | 9.00 | 4.10 | 15 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.09 |
| WLRC087 | 262.00 | 264.00 | 2.00 | 1.11 | 13 | 0.06 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
| WLRC088 | 71.00 | 75.00 | 4.00 | 1.21 | 5 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.01 |
| and | 208.00 | 259.00** | 51.00 | 0.94 | 3 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| including | 231.00 | 235.00 | 4.00 | 2.17 | 8 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| and including | 255.00 | 259.00 | 4.00 | 3.35 | 10 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
**denotes end of hole

Table 6: Wirlong DDH Significant Assays
| Hole ID | From (m) | To (m) | Width (m) | Cu (%) | Ag (g/t) | Au (g/t) | Zn (%) | Pb (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDD006 | 165.00 | 168.61 | 3.61 | 3.12 | 25 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.03 |
| including | 166.00 | 168.61 | 2.61 | 4.12 | 33 | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.04 |
| and | 213.00 | 216.00 | 3.00 | 0.67 | 10 | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| and | 239.00 | 244.00 | 5.00 | 0.27 | 14 | 0.06 | 1.36 | 0.66 |
| and | 291.00 | 296.00 | 5.00 | 2.84 | 10 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.10 |
| and | 333.00 | 344.00 | 11.00 | 0.88 | 5 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.06 |
| including | 340.00 | 344.00 | 4.00 | 1.67 | 6 | 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.04 |
| WLDD007 | 255.00 | 259.00 | 4.00 | 1.70 | 6 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.06 |
| WLDD008 | 193.00 | 203.00 | 10.00 | 2.09 | 8 | 0.05 | 0.32 | 0.05 |
| WLDD009 | 57.00 | 84.00 | 27.00 | 0.68 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| including | 66.00 | 74.00 | 8.00 | 1.24 | 9 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.01 |
| and | 96.00 | 109.00 | 13.00 | 0.74 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| including | 98.00 | 101.00 | 3.00 | 1.23 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| and | 131.00 | 170.00 | 39.00 | 0.42 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| and | 269.00 | 286.00 | 17.00 | 4.00 | 12 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
| including | 271.00 | 282.00 | 11.00 | 5.88 | 17 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| and | 301.00 | 330.00 | 29.00 | 0.78 | 6 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| including | 307.00 | 317.00 | 10.00 | 1.25 | 9 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
*ORANGE denotes new results.
Table 7: Wirlong mineralised intersection descriptions (Visual Estimate)
| Interval (m) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| From | To | Width | Mineralization Description Sulphide % |
| WLDD010 | |||
| 72 | 76 | 4 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Sph-Gn) 1 – 3% |
| 256 | 257 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 284 | 285 | 1 | Sediment + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 285 | 293 | 8 | Sediment + volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 293 | 309 | 16 | Sediment + volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Sph-Gn) 1 – |
| WLDD011 | 3% | ||
| 59 | 81 | 22 | Sediment + volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 81 | 82 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 82 | 87 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 120 | 123 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 3 – 5% |
| 123 | 126 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 256 | 300 | 44 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 300 | 305 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 305 | 310 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 310 | 312 | 2 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 312 | 317 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 317 | 323 | 6 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 323 | 328 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 328 | 329 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 329 | 334 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 334 | 345 | 11 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 345 | 348 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 348 | 349 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| WLDD012 | |||
| 96 | 97 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Sph-Gn) 2 – 5% |
| 238 | 239 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Sph-Gn) 1 – 3% |
| 310 | 311 | 1 | Sediments + volcanics + Qtz veins + vein/blebby (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 319 | 325 | 6 | Sediments + Qtz veins + vein/blebby (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| WLDD013 | |||
| 217 | 255 | 48 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 255 | 261 | 6 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1-3% |
Peel Mining Limited ACN 119 343 734

| 261 | 286 | 25 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 286 | 301 | 15 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1-3% |
| 301 | 350 | 49 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 350 | 353 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 353 | 367 | 14 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 367 | 375 | 8 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 375 | 386 | 11 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 386 | 388 | 2 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 388 | 393 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| WLDD015 | |||
| 255 | 273 | 18 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 273 | 277 | 4 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 277 | 283 | 6 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 283 | 302 | 19 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 302 | 312 | 10 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 312 | 317 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 317 | 322.85 | 5.85 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 322.85 | 323.4 | 0.55 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 323.4 | 340 | 16.6 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 340 | 342 | 2 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 342 | 345 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| WLDD016 | |||
| 325 | 330 | 5 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 330 | 331 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 331 | 353.25 | 22.25 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 353.25 | 355 | 1.75 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 355 | 359 | 4 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 359 | 365 | 6 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| WLDD017 | |||
| 97 | 90 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 271 | 273 | 2 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 273 | 274 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 274 | 290 | 16 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 290 | 301 | 11 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 301 | 304 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 304 | 310 | 6 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 310 | 326 | 16 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 326 | 339 | 13 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 339 | 342 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 342 | 343 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/semi-massive sulphide (Cpy) 20 – 40% |
| 343 | 362 | 19 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 362 | 365 | 3 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 365 | 375 | 10 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 375 | 387 | 12 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 387 | 395 | 8 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 395 | 396 | 1 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 2 – 5% |
| 396 | 418 | 22 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
| 418 | 440 | 22 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 1 – 3% |
| 440 | 468.8 | 28.8 | Volcanic + Qtz veins + vein/blebby sulphide (Cpy) 0.2 – 1% |
In relation to the disclosure of visual mineralisation, the Company cautions that visual estimates of sulphide and oxide material abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analysis. Laboratory assay results are required to determine the widths and grade of the visible mineralisation reported in preliminary geological logging. The Company will update the market when laboratory analytical results become available.

JORC CODE (2012 Edition) – Table 1 Checklist of Assessment and Reporting Criteria Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data for South Cobar Project
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Samplingtechniques | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, orspecific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate tothe minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, orhandheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken aslimiting the broad meaning of sampling.Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity andthe appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to thePublic Report.In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would berelatively simple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 msamples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fireassay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as wherethere is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusualcommodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) maywarrant disclosure of detailed information. | Reverse circulation (RC) drilling were used to obtain samples for geologicallogging and assaying.RC drill holes were sampled at 1m intervals and split using a cone splitterattached to the cyclone to generate a split of 2-4kg to ensure samplerepresentivity.Multi-element readings were taken of the diamond core and RC drill chipsusing an Olympus Delta Innov-X portable XRF machine or an Olympus Vantaportable XRF machine. Portable XRF machines are routinely serviced,calibrated and checked against blanks/standards. |
| Drillingtechniques | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary airblast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple orstandard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type,whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | RC drilling utilised a 5 1/2 inch diameter hammer. |
| Drill samplerecovery | Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries andresults assessed.Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representativenature of the samples.Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade andwhether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain offine/coarse material. | RC samples are not weighed on a regular basis but no significant samplerecovery issues have been encountered in a drilling program to date.When poor sample recovery is encountered during drilling, the geologist anddriller have endeavoured to rectify the problem to ensure maximum samplerecovery. |
| Logging | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically andgeotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate MineralResource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,channel, etc) photography. | All drill chip samples are geologically logged. Drill chip samples are logged at1m intervals from surface to the bottom of each individual hole to a level thatwill support appropriate future Mineral Resource studies.Logging of RC samples records lithology, mineralogy, mineralisation,structure (DDH only), weathering, colour and other features of the samples. |

| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | Chips are photographed as wet samples.All RC drill holes in the current program were geologically logged in full. | |
| Sub-samplingtechniques andsamplepreparation | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whethersampled wet or dry.For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of thesample preparation technique.Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages tomaximise representivity of samples.Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the insitu material collected, including for instance results for fieldduplicate/second-half sampling.Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the materialbeing sampled. | The RC drilling rigs were equipped with an in-built cyclone and splittingsystem, which provided one bulk sample of approximately 20kg and a subsample of 2-4kg per metre drilled.All samples were split using the system described above to maximise andmaintain consistent representivity. The majority of samples were dry.Bulk samples were placed in green plastic bags, with the sub-samplescollected placed in calico sample bags.Field duplicates were collected by re-splitting the bulk samples from largeplastic bags. These duplicates were designed for lab checks.Laboratory duplicate samples are split using method SPL-21d whichproduces a split sample using a riffle splitter. These samples are selected bythe geologist within moderate and high-grade zones.A sample size of 2-4kg was collected and considered appropriate andrepresentative for the grain size and style of mineralisation. |
| Quality of assaydata andlaboratory tests | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratoryprocedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, theparameters used in determining the analysis including instrument makeand model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and theirderivation, etc.Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks,duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels ofaccuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. | ALS Laboratory Services are used for Au and multi-element analysis workcarried on out on 1m split RC samples. The laboratory techniques below arefor all samples submitted to ALS and are considered appropriate for the styleof mineralisation at Wirlong:oPUL-23 (Sample preparation code)oAu-AA25 Ore Grade Au 30g FA AA Finish, Au-AA26 Ore GradeAu 50g FA AA FinishoME-ICP41 35 element aqua regia ICP-AES, with an appropriateOre Grade base metal AA finishoME-ICP61 33 element 4 acid digest ICP-AES, with anappropriate Ore Grade base metal AA finishoME-MS61 48 element 4 acid digest ICP-MS and ICP-AES, with anappropriate Ore Grade base metal AA finishAssaying of samples in the field was by portable XRF instruments: OlympusDelta Innov-X or Olympus Vanta Analysers. Reading time for Innov-X was 20seconds per reading, reading time for Vanta was 10 & 20 seconds perreading.The QA/QC data includes standards, duplicates and laboratory checks. |

| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Duplicates for percussion drilling are collected directly from the drill rig orthe metre sample bag using a half round section of pipe or via samplesplitter. In-house QA/QC tests are conducted by the lab on each batch ofsamples with standards supplied by the same companies that supply ourown. | ||
| Verification ofsampling andassaying | The verification of significant intersections by either independent oralternative company personnel.The use of twinned holes.Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, dataverification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | All geological logging and sampling information is completed via GeobankMobile or in spreadsheets, which are then transferred to a database forvalidation and compilation at the Peel head office. Electronic copies of allinformation are backed up periodically.No adjustments of assay data are considered necessary. |
| Location of datapoints | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar anddown-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used inMineral Resource estimation.Specification of the grid system used.Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | A Garmin hand-held GPS is used to define the location of the drill holes.Standard practice is for the GPS to be left at the site of the collar for a periodof 5 minutes to obtain a steady reading. Collars are routinely picked up afterby DGPS.Down-hole surveys are conducted by the drill contractors using either aReflex gyroscopic tool with readings every 10m after drill hole completion ora Reflex electronic multi-shot camera will be used with readings for dip andmagnetic azimuth taken every 30m down-hole. QA/QC in the field involvescalibration using a test stand. The instrument is positioned with a stainlesssteel drill rod so as not to affect the magnetic azimuth.Grid system used is MGA 94 (Zone 55). All down-hole magnetic surveys wereconverted to MGA94 grid.DGPS pick-up delivers adequate topographic control. |
| Data spacing anddistribution | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish thedegree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the MineralResource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classificationsapplied.Whether sample compositing has been applied. | Data/drill hole spacing is variable and appropriate to the geology andhistorical drilling.3m to 6msample compositing is applied to RC drilling for gold and/or multielement assay where appropriate. |
| Orientation ofdata in relation togeologicalstructure | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling ofpossible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering thedeposit type.If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of | Most drillholes are planned to intersect the interpreted mineralisedstructures/lodes as near to a perpendicular angle as possible (subject toaccess to the preferred collar position).Drillhole deviation may affect the true width of mineralisation andwill be |

| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a samplingbias, this should be assessed and reported if material. | further assessed when resource modelling commences. | |
| Sample security | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | The chain of custody is managed by the project geologist who places calicosample bags in polyweave sacks. Up to 5 calico sample bags are placed ineach sack. Each sack is clearly labelled with:oPeel Mining LtdoAddress of LaboratoryoSample rangeDetailed records are kept of all samples that are dispatched, including detailsof chain of custody. |
| Audits or reviews | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | Data is validated when loading into the database. No formal external audithas been conducted. |
Section 2 - Reporting of Exploration Results for South Cobar Project
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement andland tenure status | Type, reference name/number, location and ownership includingagreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures,partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites,wilderness or national park and environmental settings.The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with anyknown impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | TheWirlong prospect is located within 100%-owned tenements –EL8126and EL8307.The Mallee Bull prospect is located within 1005-owned tenementEL7461.The tenements are in good standing and no known impediments exist. |
| Exploration done byother parties | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | Wirlong is a zone of known mineralisation within a belt of acid volcanicrocks, on which four historic shafts have been sunk.In 1982, CRAE completed reconnaissance exploration including drillingof 1 diamond drillhole and 3 percussion drillholes.Minimal other modern exploration has been completed at Wirlong.Work at Mallee Bull was completed in the area by several formertenement holders including Triako Resources between 2003 and 2009; itincluded diamond drilling, IP surveys, geological mapping andreconnaissance geochemical sampling around the historic Four MileGoldfield area. Prior to Triako Resources, Pasminco Exploration exploredthe Cobar Basin area for a "Cobar-type" or "Elura-type" zinc-lead-silver orcopper-gold-lead-zinc deposit. |
| Geology | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | Wirlong is believed to a VHMS or Cobar-style deposit similar in style to |

| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Peel's Mallee Bull deposit.The Mallee Bull prospect area lies within the Cobar-Mt Hope SiluroDevonian sedimentary and volcanic units. The northern Cobar regionconsists of predominantly sedimentary units with tuffaceous member,whilst the southern Mt Hope region consists of predominantly felsicvolcanic rocks; the Mallee Bull prospect seems to be located in an area ofoverlap between these two regions. Mineralisation at the Mallee Bulldiscovery features the Cobar-style attributes of short strike lengths(<200m), narrow widths (5-20m) and vertical continuity, and occurs as ashoot-like structure dipping moderately to the west. | ||
| Drill hole Information | A summary of all information material to the understanding of theexploration results including a tabulation of the following information forall Material drill holes:oeasting and northing of the drill hole collaroelevation or RL (Reduced Level –elevation above sea level in metres)of the drill hole collarodip and azimuth of the holeodown hole length and interception depthohole length.If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that theinformation is not Material andthis exclusion does not detract from theunderstanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearlyexplain why this is the case. | All relevant information material to the understanding of explorationresults has been included within the body of the announcement or asappendices.No information has been excluded. |
| Dataaggregationmethods | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques,maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades)and cut-off grades are usuallyMaterial and should be stated.Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high graderesults and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used forsuch aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of suchaggregations should be shown in detail.The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent valuesshould be clearly stated. | No length weighting or top-cuts have been applied.No metal equivalent values are used for reporting exploration results. |

| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship betweenmineralisation widthsand intercept lengths | These relationships are particularly important in the reporting ofExploration Results.If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angleis known, its nature should be reported.If itis not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, thereshould be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down hole length, true widthnot known'). | True widths are estimated to be 40-60% of the downhole width unlessotherwise indicated. |
| Diagrams | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of interceptsshould be included for any significant discovery being reported Theseshould include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collarlocations and appropriate sectional views. | Refer to Figures in the body of text. |
| Balanced reporting | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is notpracticable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/orwidths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of ExplorationResults. | In relation to the disclosure of visual mineralisation, the Companycautions that visual estimates of sulphide and oxide material abundanceshould never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analysis.Laboratory assay results are required to determine the widths and gradeof the visible mineralisation reported in preliminary geological logging.The Company will update the market when laboratory analytical resultsbecome available. |
| Othersubstantiveexploration data | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reportedincluding (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical surveyresults; geochemical survey results; bulk samples –size and method oftreatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater,geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious orcontaminating substances. | No other substantive exploration data are available. |
| Further work | The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateralextensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, includingthe main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, providedthis information is not commercially sensitive. | Further drilling (as part of the current resource drilling) and geophysicalsurveys are planned at Wirlong.Further drilling (as part of the current resource drilling) and geophysicalsurveys are planned at Mallee Bull. |