ASX Announcement 15 November 2021

HIGH-GRADE AIR-CORE RESULTS REVEAL NEW SHALLOW GOLD DISCOVERY AT PEGASUS

800m long zone up to 100m wide outlined with similarities to the 374koz Bruno-Lewis deposit

Highlights

Outstanding 4m composite assay results received from initial air-core (AC) drilling at the Pegasus prospect, located adjacent to the cornerstone 374koz Bruno-Lewis deposit at the Cardinia Gold Project. Results include:
- 4m at 10.1g/t Au from 24m (PG21AC144)
- 8m at 3.08g/t Au from 8m (PG21AC224)
- 4m at 1.61g/t Au from 20m (PG21AC285)
- 4m at 2.25g/t Au from 32m (PG21AC290)
- 12m at 0.70g/t Au from 4m (PG21AC138)
- Additional mineralised intersections in historic adjacent holes:
  - o 10m at 3.10g/t Au from 12m (C0031)
  - o 16m at 1.04g/t Au from 4m (C0030)
  - o 8m at 1.07g/t Au from 32m (BL19RC040)
  - o 9m at 1.15g/t Au from 24m (NCAC1241)
Mineralised zone marked by eastern edge of the Pegasus Gravity low.
Pegasus contains numerous ore grade intersections outlined over an area 800m long and up to 100m wide.
Results coincident with shallow north east-dipping sulphide mineralisation in mafic rocks. Mineralisation appears similar to the nearby Bruno lodes at the Bruno-Lewis deposit.
Results awaited for a further 107 holes over four 200m spaced lines of drilling to test north west extension of the Pegasus target below extensive gold-in-soil anomaly.

Kin Mining Managing Director, Andrew Munckton, said: "While still early days, Pegasus appears to be a parallel structure to the adjacent Bruno-Lewis deposit and has all the hallmarks of a significant new discovery in the Cardinia area. The air-core drilling has so far outlined a substantial mineralised position in the eastern side of the gravity low which heightened our interest when we first reviewed the geophysical data in the September quarter."

"The eastern edge of the Pegasus gravity low contains numerous ore grade hits in shallow drilling within a zone extending over at least 800m in length and up to 100m wide. New intersections such as 4m at 10.1g/t Au and 8m at 3.08g/t Au supported by other previous drilling intersections such as 10m at 3.10g/t and 16m at 1.04g/t nearby at the historical Pride of the North workings indicate to the geological team that Pegasus is a potentially significant mineralised area."

"Given the widespread nature of the ore grade intercepts we have seen in the results returned to date, we will now look forward to the remaining results from the north western extension of the anomaly which are expected to be returned over the next 4 weeks.

Kin Mining NL (ASX: KIN or "the Company") is pleased to advise that it has intersected a significant zone of shallow, high-grade, gold mineralisation in the initial air-core (AC) drilling program at the Pegasus prospect, located adjacent to the 374,000 oz Bruno-Lewis deposit at its 100%-owned 1.275Moz Cardinia Gold Project (CGP) near Leonora in Western Australia.

The latest results include a number of strong intercepts such as 4m at 10.1g/t Au from 24m in PG21AC144 and 8m at 3.08g/t Au from 8m in PG21AC224, together with other significant results located on the eastern edge of the Pegasus Gravity Target.

The results have confirmed the discovery of a significant zone of new mineralisation and reinforced our view that gravity lows highlighted in the recent detailed survey over the greater Cardinia area represent priority exploration targets for new discoveries for the Company's exploration team.

The Pegasus prospect was first identified as a soil geochemical anomaly after regional, wide-spaced auger sampling undertaken in early 2020. The auger program identified a number of gold-in-soil anomalies in the western Corridor including the Eagle-Crow prospect which received recent RC drill testing with strong initial results. The prospectivity of the Pegasus target was enhanced with the completion of the detailed gravity survey in the September quarter which showed the anomalous soil geochemistry was coincident with the edge of a large NW-SE trending gravity low. Gravity lows have shown a strong correlation with gold mineralisation at the adjacent Bruno-Lewis deposit and recent high-grade discoveries at Cardinia Hill and Rangoon in the Eastern Corridor at Cardinia.

Figure 1: Location of the Pegasus AC drilling program over geological map. Interpretation suggests the mineralisation is related to NW-SE trending structures that crosscut and alter the underlying mafic (green) rocks. Pegasus appears parallel to the Bruno lodes further north in the Bruno-Lewis deposit.

Adjacent Historical Drilling Results

Pegasus lies to the northwest of previous drilling associated with testing around the Pride of the North historical workings. This drilling includes both Rotary Air blast (RAB) drilling and RC drilling from the 1990s and early 2000's.

Results from the Pride of the North drilling include:

o 10m at 3.10g/t Au from 12m (C0031)
o 16m at 1.04g/t Au from 4m (C0030)
o 8m at 1.07g/t Au from 32m (BL19RC040)
o 9m at 1.15g/t Au from 24m (NCAC1241)

The position of historical Pride of the North drilling results is interpreted to be part of the larger Pegasus mineralised zone which is controlled by structures associated with the eastern edge of the Pegasus Gravity Target.

2021 Air-core Drilling Program

Aircore drilling completed in September and October 2021 comprised 405 AC holes (10,914m) on 12 lines designed to:

Test at 200m line spacing the anomalous soil geochemistry coincident with the eastern edge of the gravity target;
Test at 200m line spacing the western edge of the gravity target which lies within the Cardinia Creek system where soil geochemistry is not effective and where access is limited;
Confirm the relationship of the historical Pride of the North and Lewis drilling results to the Pegasus Gravity target.

The assay results have been returned for the eastern edge of the gravity target, confirming that a continuous zone of mineralised lodes spanning at least 800m of strike and up to 100m wide is present at this location.

Multi-element assay results for bottom-of-hole samples used to characterise the mineralisation, alteration and rock types have confirmed that the gold mineralisation is associated with anomalous silver, antimony, zinc and tungsten in sulphide-rich vein structures within altered mafic rocks. Significant intercepts for the AC drilling received to date are illustrated in Figure 2, summarised in Table 1 with hole location details provided in Table 2. Additional AC drilling to test the western edge of the gravity target has been completed. The locations of these additional drill lines where assays are awaited are illustrated in Figure 2.

The next phase of work, comprising RC and diamond drilling to confirm mineralisation in fresh rock, is planned to commence as soon as drill rigs become available – by which time the remaining assay results from the western edge of the gravity target AC drilling lines are expected to have been received.

Figure 2: Pegasus Target drilling results over detailed gravity map. New AC results in white labels, historical drilling results in grey labels. Pegasus AC drilling defines a zone containing several mineralised lodes trending NW-SE for over 800m of strike.

HOLE_ID	FROM	TO	Width	AU_PPM	Comment
PG21AC012	24	28	4	1.26
PG21AC021	40	44	4	0.76
PG21AC025	40	44	4	0.64
PG21AC056	28	32	4	0.65
PG21AC122	24	28	4	0.62
PG21AC138	4	16	12	0.70
PG21AC140	24	28	4	0.69
PG21AC142	0	4	4	0.57	Within 28m at 0.33g/t Au from
	20	24	4	1.20	0m
PG21AC144	24	28	4	10.1
PG21AC149	20	24	4	0.54
PG21AC174	4	8	4	0.78
PG21AC177	8	12	4	0.51
PG21AC192	4	8	4	0.59
PG21AC221	12	16	4	1.13
PG21AC222	8	12	4	0.52
PG21AC224	8	16	8	3.08	Within 36m at 0.85g/t Au from
	32	36	4	0.54	0m
PG21AC225	20	24	4	0.72
PG21AC226	28	32	4	1.05
PG21AC231	8	12	4	1.07
PG21AC252	40	41	1	0.95	BoH Sample
PG21AC253	28	32	4	0.69
PG21AC255	8	12	4	0.54
PG21AC257	24	28	4	0.53
PG21AC263	16	20	4	1.10
PG21AC270	0	4	4	0.69
PG21AC272	12	15	3	0.71	BoHSample
PG21AC279	0	4	4	0.67
PG21AC285	20	24	4	1.61
PG21AC290	32	36	4	2.25

Table 1: Significant intercepts for the Pegasus air-core (AC) drilling. Reported results are for generally 4m composite samples above 0.5 g/t Au.

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC001	362,405	6,813,309	414	215	-60	24
PG21AC002	362,396	6,813,303	414	215	-60	21
PG21AC003	362,388	6,813,290	414	215	-60	23
PG21AC004	362,380	6,813,280	414	215	-60	24
PG21AC005	362,372	6,813,270	415	215	-60	24
PG21AC006	362,364	6,813,260	414	215	-60	28
PG21AC007	362,357	6,813,250	414	215	-60	38
PG21AC008	362,350	6,813,240	414	215	-60	40

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC009	362,339	6,813,225	414	215	-60	40
PG21AC010	362,328	6,813,210	414	215	-60	33
PG21AC011	362,319	6,813,199	413	215	-60	50
PG21AC012	362,306	6,813,182	413	215	-60	71
PG21AC013	362,285	6,813,155	413	215	-60	78
PG21AC014	362,264	6,813,129	413	215	-60	48
PG21AC015	362,251	6,813,113	412	215	-60	36
PG21AC016	362,240	6,813,101	411	215	-60	46
PG21AC017	362,228	6,813,085	411	215	-60	61
PG21AC018	362,212	6,813,066	410	215	-60	63
PG21AC019	362,194	6,813,044	409	215	-60	65
PG21AC020	362,178	6,813,020	409	215	-60	54
PG21AC021	362,164	6,813,002	409	215	-60	48
PG21AC022	362,149	6,812,983	409	215	-60	42
PG21AC023	362,134	6,812,972	409	215	-60	50
PG21AC024	362,116	6,812,954	409	215	-60	45
PG21AC025	362,107	6,812,938	409	215	-60	50
PG21AC026	362,100	6,812,907	409	215	-60	44
PG21AC027	362,084	6,812,876	409	215	-60	32
PG21AC028	362,046	6,812,838	409	215	-60	29
PG21AC029	362,540	6,813,169	416	215	-60	3
PG21AC030	362,532	6,813,160	417	215	-60	3
PG21AC031	362,523	6,813,148	417	215	-60	5
PG21AC032	362,514	6,813,137	417	215	-60	3
PG21AC033	362,507	6,813,128	417	215	-60	3
PG21AC034	362,498	6,813,119	417	215	-60	3
PG21AC035	362,490	6,813,107	416	215	-60	3
PG21AC036	362,484	6,813,097	416	215	-60	9
PG21AC037	362,478	6,813,085	415	215	-60	10
PG21AC038	362,466	6,813,069	414	215	-60	5
PG21AC039	362,458	6,813,061	413	215	-60	23
PG21AC040	362,452	6,813,049	413	215	-60	23
PG21AC041	362,441	6,813,041	412	215	-60	25
PG21AC042	362,434	6,813,027	412	215	-60	24
PG21AC043	362,425	6,813,016	411	215	-60	25
PG21AC044	362,417	6,813,006	411	215	-60	36
PG21AC045	362,407	6,812,988	410	215	-60	42
PG21AC046	362,398	6,812,981	410	215	-60	49
PG21AC047	362,388	6,812,966	410	215	-60	50
PG21AC048	362,377	6,812,953	410	215	-60	53
PG21AC049	362,363	6,812,937	410	215	-60	47
PG21AC050	362,348	6,812,919	409	215	-60	48
PG21AC051	362,331	6,812,899	409	215	-60	50

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC052	362,318	6,812,883	408	215	-60	50
PG21AC053	362,301	6,812,862	408	215	-60	53
PG21AC054	362,287	6,812,845	408	215	-60	48
PG21AC055	362,272	6,812,827	408	215	-60	51
PG21AC056	362,254	6,812,809	408	215	-60	46
PG21AC057	362,238	6,812,790	408	215	-60	39
PG21AC058	362,228	6,812,776	408	215	-60	28
PG21AC059	362,213	6,812,756	408	215	-60	33
PG21AC060	362,203	6,812,741	408	215	-60	40
PG21AC061	362,190	6,812,722	408	215	-60	44
PG21AC062	362,175	6,812,700	408	215	-60	42
PG21AC063	362,162	6,812,684	408	215	-60	48
PG21AC064	362,150	6,812,668	408	215	-60	39
PG21AC065	362,134	6,812,647	408	215	-60	41
PG21AC066	362,679	6,813,031	412	215	-60	3
PG21AC067	362,669	6,813,020	413	215	-60	3
PG21AC068	362,661	6,813,008	413	215	-60	3
PG21AC069	362,650	6,812,994	413	215	-60	3
PG21AC070	362,640	6,812,982	413	215	-60	3
PG21AC071	362,632	6,812,970	412	215	-60	12
PG21AC072	362,623	6,812,958	412	215	-60	9
PG21AC073	362,615	6,812,945	412	215	-60	19
PG21AC074	362,605	6,812,934	412	215	-60	21
PG21AC075	362,597	6,812,921	412	215	-60	22
PG21AC076	362,585	6,812,904	411	215	-60	24
PG21AC077	362,577	6,812,894	411	215	-60	10
PG21AC078	362,564	6,812,878	411	215	-60	11
PG21AC079	362,555	6,812,865	410	215	-60	15
PG21AC080	362,546	6,812,852	410	215	-60	47
PG21AC081	362,534	6,812,833	410	215	-60	45
PG21AC082	362,520	6,812,817	409	215	-60	42
PG21AC083	362,508	6,812,799	409	215	-60	41
PG21AC084	362,494	6,812,782	409	215	-60	40
PG21AC085	362,483	6,812,766	408	215	-60	36
PG21AC086	362,470	6,812,748	408	215	-60	43
PG21AC087	362,457	6,812,732	408	215	-60	45
PG21AC088	362,446	6,812,716	408	215	-60	49
PG21AC089	362,431	6,812,696	407	215	-60	40
PG21AC090	362,418	6,812,680	407	215	-60	43
PG21AC091	362,408	6,812,666	407	215	-60	34
PG21AC092	362,399	6,812,655	407	215	-60	40
PG21AC093	362,394	6,812,646	407	215	-60	54
PG21AC094	362,382	6,812,629	407	215	-60	29

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC095	362,372	6,812,616	407	215	-60	42
PG21AC096	362,360	6,812,601	407	215	-60	39
PG21AC097	362,349	6,812,585	407	215	-60	47
PG21AC098	362,336	6,812,570	407	215	-60	45
PG21AC099	362,321	6,812,552	407	215	-60	36
PG21AC100	362,311	6,812,535	407	215	-60	35
PG21AC101	362,299	6,812,520	407	215	-60	32
PG21AC102	362,286	6,812,504	407	215	-60	28
PG21AC103	362,276	6,812,491	407	215	-60	25
PG21AC104	362,266	6,812,479	407	215	-60	43
PG21AC105	362,668	6,812,677	407	215	-60	21
PG21AC106	362,657	6,812,664	407	215	-60	21
PG21AC107	362,652	6,812,656	407	215	-60	34
PG21AC108	362,643	6,812,641	407	215	-60	36
PG21AC109	362,632	6,812,628	407	215	-60	18
PG21AC110	362,623	6,812,616	407	215	-60	40
PG21AC111	362,614	6,812,601	407	215	-60	51
PG21AC112	362,600	6,812,584	407	215	-60	44
PG21AC113	362,588	6,812,568	407	215	-60	35
PG21AC114	362,578	6,812,557	406	215	-60	33
PG21AC115	362,568	6,812,547	406	215	-60	35
PG21AC116	362,559	6,812,534	406	215	-60	40
PG21AC117	362,547	6,812,518	406	215	-60	39
PG21AC118	362,535	6,812,504	406	215	-60	40
PG21AC119	362,523	6,812,488	406	215	-60	42
PG21AC120	362,509	6,812,469	406	215	-60	41
PG21AC121	362,498	6,812,454	406	215	-60	46
PG21AC122	362,485	6,812,436	406	215	-60	41
PG21AC123	362,473	6,812,420	406	215	-60	45
PG21AC124	362,461	6,812,404	406	215	-60	49
PG21AC125	362,447	6,812,386	406	215	-60	48
PG21AC126	362,433	6,812,368	406	215	-60	57
PG21AC127	362,418	6,812,347	406	215	-60	48
PG21AC128	362,404	6,812,330	406	215	-60	44
PG21AC129	362,392	6,812,315	406	215	-60	32
PG21AC130	362,384	6,812,302	406	215	-60	26
PG21AC131	362,375	6,812,289	406	215	-60	31
PG21AC132	362,365	6,812,273	406	215	-60	23
PG21AC133	362,355	6,812,264	406	215	-60	21
PG21AC134	362,346	6,812,252	406	215	-60	19
PG21AC135	362,338	6,812,243	406	215	-60	12
PG21AC136	362,330	6,812,231	406	215	-60	14
PG21AC137	362,324	6,812,221	406	215	-60	18

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC138	364,025	6,811,753	410	215	-60	36
PG21AC139	364,016	6,811,738	411	215	-60	36
PG21AC140	364,008	6,811,722	412	215	-60	33
PG21AC141	364,000	6,811,705	413	215	-60	34
PG21AC142	363,989	6,811,693	414	215	-60	31
PG21AC143	363,979	6,811,685	415	215	-60	9
PG21AC144	363,969	6,811,678	416	215	-60	35
PG21AC145	363,958	6,811,665	416	215	-60	3
PG21AC146	363,947	6,811,656	415	215	-60	3
PG21AC147	363,939	6,811,641	414	215	-60	35
PG21AC148	363,934	6,811,630	414	215	-60	20
PG21AC149	363,927	6,811,616	413	215	-60	25
PG21AC150	363,920	6,811,607	413	215	-60	4
PG21AC151	363,919	6,811,606	412	215	-60	29
PG21AC152	363,904	6,811,593	412	215	-60	23
PG21AC153	363,899	6,811,578	411	215	-60	40
PG21AC154	363,815	6,811,457	410	215	-60	39
PG21AC155	363,881	6,811,547	411	215	-60	24
PG21AC156	363,871	6,811,534	410	215	-60	19
PG21AC157	363,862	6,811,523	410	215	-60	13
PG21AC158	363,854	6,811,510	410	215	-60	8
PG21AC159	363,846	6,811,494	410	215	-60	4
PG21AC160	363,834	6,811,481	410	215	-60	3
PG21AC161	363,824	6,811,470	410	215	-60	8
PG21AC162	363,815	6,811,457	410	215	-60	6
PG21AC163	363,806	6,811,443	410	215	-60	10
PG21AC164	363,797	6,811,431	410	215	-60	14
PG21AC165	363,790	6,811,421	411	215	-60	25
PG21AC166	363,779	6,811,407	411	215	-60	8
PG21AC167	363,770	6,811,394	411	215	-60	3
PG21AC168	363,760	6,811,380	412	215	-60	1
PG21AC169	363,873	6,811,900	410	215	-60	6
PG21AC170	363,868	6,811,891	410	215	-60	10
PG21AC171	363,865	6,811,879	409	215	-60	21
PG21AC172	363,860	6,811,869	409	215	-60	24
PG21AC173	363,857	6,811,864	409	215	-60	14
PG21AC174	363,848	6,811,852	409	215	-60	8
PG21AC175	363,836	6,811,832	409	215	-60	29
PG21AC176	363,822	6,811,820	409	215	-60	44
PG21AC177	363,811	6,811,806	409	215	-60	15
PG21AC178	363,802	6,811,793	409	215	-60	34
PG21AC179	363,791	6,811,781	409	215	-60	30
PG21AC180	363,784	6,811,771	409	215	-60	25

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC181	363,775	6,811,758	409	215	-60	20
PG21AC182	363,766	6,811,748	409	215	-60	25
PG21AC183	363,760	6,811,738	409	215	-60	19
PG21AC184	363,751	6,811,726	409	215	-60	18
PG21AC185	363,742	6,811,713	409	215	-60	16
PG21AC186	363,733	6,811,701	409	215	-60	16
PG21AC187	363,721	6,811,687	408	215	-60	19
PG21AC188	363,714	6,811,677	408	215	-60	7
PG21AC189	363,704	6,811,663	408	215	-60	18
PG21AC190	363,695	6,811,652	408	215	-60	18
PG21AC191	363,687	6,811,638	408	215	-60	19
PG21AC192	363,679	6,811,628	409	215	-60	13
PG21AC193	363,671	6,811,615	409	215	-60	11
PG21AC194	363,663	6,811,604	409	215	-60	14
PG21AC195	363,654	6,811,593	409	215	-60	9
PG21AC196	363,648	6,811,585	409	215	-60	9
PG21AC197	363,644	6,811,570	409	215	-60	6
PG21AC198	363,636	6,811,560	409	215	-60	4
PG21AC199	363,626	6,811,552	409	215	-60	16
PG21AC200	363,618	6,811,540	410	215	-60	12
PG21AC201	363,608	6,811,529	410	215	-60	13
PG21AC202	363,604	6,811,519	410	215	-60	10
PG21AC203	363,595	6,811,505	411	215	-60	3
PG21AC204	363,586	6,811,492	412	215	-60	4
PG21AC205	363,577	6,811,477	413	215	-60	5
PG21AC206	363,556	6,811,459	413	215	-60	3
PG21AC207	363,826	6,812,171	411	215	-60	13
PG21AC208	363,817	6,812,161	411	215	-60	5
PG21AC209	363,811	6,812,152	411	215	-60	10
PG21AC210	363,804	6,812,142	411	215	-60	3
PG21AC211	363,798	6,812,133	411	215	-60	3
PG21AC212	363,791	6,812,123	412	215	-60	3
PG21AC213	363,784	6,812,116	412	215	-60	6
PG21AC214	363,778	6,812,104	412	215	-60	3
PG21AC215	363,771	6,812,095	412	215	-60	8
PG21AC216	363,765	6,812,090	412	215	-60	19
PG21AC217	363,758	6,812,079	412	215	-60	22
PG21AC218	363,752	6,812,069	411	215	-60	15
PG21AC219	363,743	6,812,058	411	215	-60	43
PG21AC220	363,733	6,812,043	411	215	-60	36
PG21AC221	363,726	6,812,028	411	215	-60	30
PG21AC222	363,718	6,812,018	410	215	-60	24
PG21AC223	363,714	6,812,004	410	215	-60	19

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC224	363,706	6,811,990	410	215	-60	51
PG21AC225	363,691	6,811,975	410	215	-60	41
PG21AC226	363,682	6,811,958	409	215	-60	43
PG21AC227	363,668	6,811,943	409	215	-60	48
PG21AC228	363,653	6,811,923	409	215	-60	40
PG21AC229	363,642	6,811,908	409	215	-60	37
PG21AC230	363,632	6,811,890	408	215	-60	27
PG21AC231	363,619	6,811,882	408	215	-60	24
PG21AC232	363,614	6,811,870	408	215	-60	18
PG21AC233	363,604	6,811,855	408	215	-60	22
PG21AC234	363,596	6,811,847	408	215	-60	18
PG21AC235	363,584	6,811,834	408	215	-60	17
PG21AC236	363,578	6,811,821	408	215	-60	19
PG21AC237	363,571	6,811,811	408	215	-60	15
PG21AC238	363,562	6,811,798	408	215	-60	12
PG21AC239	363,552	6,811,786	408	215	-60	9
PG21AC240	363,543	6,811,775	408	215	-60	3
PG21AC241	363,534	6,811,763	408	215	-60	5
PG21AC242	363,526	6,811,753	408	215	-60	9
PG21AC243	363,519	6,811,741	408	215	-60	8
PG21AC244	363,507	6,811,720	408	215	-60	11
PG21AC245	363,499	6,811,714	408	215	-60	17
PG21AC246	363,487	6,811,698	408	215	-60	18
PG21AC247	363,607	6,812,218	410	215	-60	21
PG21AC248	363,601	6,812,206	410	215	-60	23
PG21AC249	363,594	6,812,195	409	215	-60	32
PG21AC250	363,587	6,812,185	409	215	-60	28
PG21AC251	363,579	6,812,176	409	215	-60	33
PG21AC252	363,570	6,812,163	409	215	-60	41
PG21AC253	363,562	6,812,146	409	215	-60	39
PG21AC254	363,551	6,812,132	409	215	-60	40
PG21AC255	363,540	6,812,117	408	215	-60	54
PG21AC256	363,528	6,812,097	408	215	-60	47
PG21AC257	363,516	6,812,080	408	215	-60	42
PG21AC258	363,501	6,812,064	408	215	-60	39
PG21AC259	363,490	6,812,047	408	215	-60	37
PG21AC260	363,481	6,812,033	408	215	-60	32
PG21AC261	363,471	6,812,023	408	215	-60	27
PG21AC262	363,465	6,812,012	408	215	-60	24
PG21AC263	363,455	6,812,001	408	215	-60	29
PG21AC264	363,448	6,811,990	407	215	-60	48
PG21AC265	363,439	6,811,979	407	215	-60	39
PG21AC266	363,433	6,811,967	407	215	-60	46

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC267	363,426	6,811,959	407	215	-60	42
PG21AC268	363,419	6,811,946	407	215	-60	40
PG21AC269	363,413	6,811,938	407	215	-60	38
PG21AC270	363,404	6,811,924	407	215	-60	27
PG21AC271	363,392	6,811,910	407	215	-60	19
PG21AC272	363,474	6,812,356	410	215	-60	15
PG21AC273	363,470	6,812,347	410	215	-60	12
PG21AC274	363,462	6,812,336	409	215	-60	8
PG21AC275	363,454	6,812,324	409	215	-60	9
PG21AC276	363,445	6,812,309	409	215	-60	11
PG21AC277	363,439	6,812,303	408	215	-60	21
PG21AC278	363,433	6,812,294	408	215	-60	20
PG21AC279	363,425	6,812,281	408	215	-60	33
PG21AC280	363,417	6,812,269	408	215	-60	29
PG21AC281	363,404	6,812,255	408	215	-60	34
PG21AC282	363,393	6,812,242	408	215	-60	32
PG21AC283	363,385	6,812,229	408	215	-60	33
PG21AC284	363,378	6,812,223	408	215	-60	29
PG21AC285	363,369	6,812,212	408	215	-60	33
PG21AC286	363,360	6,812,198	408	215	-60	39
PG21AC287	363,352	6,812,183	408	215	-60	47
PG21AC288	363,340	6,812,168	408	215	-60	40
PG21AC289	363,328	6,812,154	407	215	-60	41
PG21AC290	363,316	6,812,141	407	215	-60	42
PG21AC291	363,326	6,812,495	409	215	-60	3
PG21AC292	363,317	6,812,481	408	215	-60	19
PG21AC293	363,307	6,812,470	408	215	-60	21
PG21AC294	363,300	6,812,460	408	215	-60	19
PG21AC295	363,293	6,812,450	408	215	-60	21
PG21AC296	363,286	6,812,440	408	215	-60	24
PG21AC297	363,279	6,812,429	407	215	-60	26
PG21AC298	363,272	6,812,419	407	215	-60	32
PG21AC299	363,265	6,812,408	407	215	-60	32
PG21AC300	363,257	6,812,396	407	215	-60	30
PG21AC301	363,247	6,812,384	407	215	-60	28
PG21AC302	363,240	6,812,372	407	215	-60	23
PG21AC303	363,232	6,812,360	407	215	-60	21
PG21AC304	363,224	6,812,350	407	215	-60	19
PG21AC305	363,216	6,812,338	407	215	-60	18
PG21AC306	363,207	6,812,328	407	215	-60	42
PG21AC307	363,196	6,812,309	407	215	-60	45
PG21AC308	363,185	6,812,295	407	215	-60	47
PG21AC309	363,173	6,812,276	407	215	-60	52

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC310	363,162	6,812,260	407	215	-60	45
PG21AC311	363,067	6,812,479	408	215	-60	4
PG21AC312	363,058	6,812,467	408	215	-60	9
PG21AC313	363,053	6,812,450	408	215	-60	9
PG21AC314	363,041	6,812,435	407	215	-60	3
PG21AC315	363,032	6,812,432	407	215	-60	4
PG21AC316	363,025	6,812,419	406	215	-60	8
PG21AC317	363,016	6,812,406	406	215	-60	15
PG21AC318	363,005	6,812,386	406	215	-60	24
PG21AC319	362,991	6,812,373	406	215	-60	41
PG21AC320	362,983	6,812,357	406	215	-60	44
PG21AC321	362,966	6,812,337	406	215	-60	44
PG21AC322	362,955	6,812,318	406	215	-60	39
PG21AC323	362,945	6,812,301	406	215	-60	39
PG21AC324	362,935	6,812,283	406	215	-60	43
PG21AC325	362,924	6,812,260	406	215	-60	44
PG21AC326	362,910	6,812,243	406	215	-60	41
PG21AC327	362,896	6,812,223	406	215	-60	48
PG21AC328	362,883	6,812,206	406	215	-60	39
PG21AC329	362,870	6,812,189	406	215	-60	38
PG21AC330	362,853	6,812,165	406	215	-60	41
PG21AC331	362,845	6,812,151	406	215	-60	33
PG21AC332	362,837	6,812,142	406	215	-60	39
PG21AC333	362,821	6,812,119	405	215	-60	29
PG21AC334	362,792	6,812,078	405	215	-60	30
PG21AC335	362,801	6,812,089	405	215	-60	12
PG21AC336	362,811	6,812,105	405	215	-60	9
PG21AC337	362,782	6,812,064	405	215	-60	16
PG21AC338	362,770	6,812,046	405	215	-60	4
PG21AC339	362,952	6,812,536	407	215	-60	5
PG21AC340	362,934	6,812,528	407	215	-60	8
PG21AC341	362,926	6,812,525	406	215	-60	17
PG21AC342	362,919	6,812,522	406	215	-60	20
PG21AC343	362,897	6,812,512	406	215	-60	30
PG21AC344	362,883	6,812,504	406	215	-60	31
PG21AC345	362,864	6,812,488	406	215	-60	41
PG21AC346	362,854	6,812,470	406	215	-60	47
PG21AC347	362,838	6,812,452	406	215	-60	44
PG21AC348	362,821	6,812,436	406	215	-60	48
PG21AC349	362,810	6,812,411	406	215	-60	30
PG21AC350	362,793	6,812,396	406	215	-60	42
PG21AC351	362,778	6,812,378	406	215	-60	47
PG21AC352	362,760	6,812,362	406	215	-60	43

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC353	362,741	6,812,338	406	215	-60	24
PG21AC354	362,730	6,812,327	406	215	-60	22
PG21AC355	362,720	6,812,314	406	215	-60	16
PG21AC356	362,708	6,812,300	406	215	-60	7
PG21AC357	362,697	6,812,286	406	215	-60	15
PG21AC358	362,643	6,812,289	406	215	-60	5
PG21AC359	362,635	6,812,272	406	215	-60	1
PG21AC360	362,623	6,812,258	406	215	-60	3
PG21AC361	362,624	6,812,238	406	215	-60	1
PG21AC362	362,623	6,812,217	406	215	-60	3
PG21AC363	362,618	6,812,199	406	215	-60	2
PG21AC364	362,612	6,812,183	405	215	-60	3
PG21AC365	362,604	6,812,169	405	215	-60	9
PG21AC366	362,597	6,812,158	405	215	-60	40
PG21AC367	362,593	6,812,143	405	215	-60	43
PG21AC368	362,586	6,812,112	405	215	-60	35
PG21AC369	362,586	6,812,084	405	215	-60	27
PG21AC370	362,590	6,812,066	405	215	-60	13
PG21AC371	362,592	6,812,047	405	215	-60	14
PG21AC372	362,587	6,812,033	405	215	-60	11
PG21AC373	362,585	6,812,015	405	215	-60	2
PG21AC374	362,586	6,812,000	405	215	-60	4
PG21AC375	362,580	6,811,983	405	215	-60	2
PG21AC376	362,575	6,811,968	405	215	-60	10
PG21AC377	362,573	6,811,950	405	215	-60	12
PG21AC378	362,575	6,811,931	405	215	-60	11
PG21AC379	362,573	6,811,912	405	215	-60	2
PG21AC380	362,558	6,811,904	405	215	-60	2
PG21AC381	362,542	6,811,892	405	215	-60	3
PG21AC382	362,534	6,811,872	404	215	-60	23
PG21AC383	363,152	6,812,242	407	215	-60	48
PG21AC384	363,137	6,812,223	407	215	-60	38
PG21AC385	363,123	6,812,211	406	215	-60	33
PG21AC386	363,114	6,812,194	406	215	-60	34
PG21AC387	363,103	6,812,179	406	215	-60	31
PG21AC388	363,084	6,812,162	406	215	-60	38
PG21AC389	363,075	6,812,143	406	215	-60	39
PG21AC390	363,068	6,812,131	406	215	-60	53
PG21AC391	363,052	6,812,105	406	215	-60	46
PG21AC392	363,037	6,812,079	406	215	-60	31
PG21AC393	363,026	6,812,065	406	215	-60	25
PG21AC394	363,016	6,812,051	406	215	-60	24
PG21AC395	363,001	6,812,034	406	215	-60	15

Hole Id	East	North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Depth
PG21AC396	362,992	6,812,021	406	215	-60	18
PG21AC397	362,984	6,812,011	406	215	-60	21
PG21AC398	362,972	6,811,996	406	215	-60	17
PG21AC399	362,962	6,811,981	406	215	-60	13
PG21AC400	363,304	6,812,122	407	215	-60	45
PG21AC401	363,282	6,812,095	407	215	-60	44
PG21AC402	363,259	6,812,055	407	215	-60	42
PG21AC403	363,271	6,812,073	407	215	-60	45
PG21AC404	363,246	6,812,031	407	215	-60	44
PG21AC405	363,231	6,812,009	407	215	-60	26

Table 2: Drillhole details for the AC drilling conducted at the Pegasus prospect.

-ENDS-

Authorised for release by the Board of Directors

For further information, please contact:

Investor enquiries Media enquiries

Andrew Munckton Nicholas Read Managing Director, Kin Mining NL Read Corporate +61 8 9242 2227 +61 419 929 046

ABOUT KIN MINING NL

Kin Mining NL (ASX: KIN) is a West Australian based gold development and exploration company. Kin's focus is its 100% owned Cardinia Gold Project (CGP) located in the highly prospective North-Eastern Goldfields region of Western Australia. The CGP has a 1.23Moz gold Mineral Resource (see Table A1) defined in both oxide and deeper primary mineralisation with considerable potential to grow the Mineral Resource with further drilling.

Kin's exploration effort is the systematic program of work across the Cardinia Mining Centre and potential satellite prospects that seeks to advance a number of targets in parallel while developing a pipeline of exploration projects for ongoing Mineral Resource expansion.

Figure A1 – KIN's Project areas close to Leonora, Western Australia.

								Cardinia Gold Project: Mineral Resources: September 2021
					Measured Resources			Indicated Resources			Inferred Resources			Total Resources
Project Area		Resource GoldPrice (AUD)	LowerCut off(g/t Au)	Tonnes(Mt)	Au(g/t Au)	Au(k Oz)	Tonnes(Mt)	Au(g/t Au)	Au(k Oz)	Tonnes(Mt)	Au(g/t Au)	Au(k Oz)	Tonnes(Mt)	Au(g/t Au)	Au(k Oz)	DateAnnounced
Mertondale
Mertons Reward	$	2,600	0.4				0.9	2.17	66	1.9	0.65	41	2.9	1.15	106	26-Nov-20
Mertondale 3-4	$	2,600	0.4				1.4	1.85	81	1.0	0.97	31	2.3	1.48	111	26-Nov-20
Tonto	$	2,600	0.4				1.8	1.14	67	1.1	1.24	43	2.9	1.18	111	26-Nov-20
Mertondale 5	$	2,600	0.4				0.5	1.67	26	0.8	1.24	32	1.3	1.40	59	26-Nov-20
Eclipse	$	2,600	0.4							0.6	1.01	19	0.6	1.01	19	26-Nov-20
Quicksilver	$	2,600	0.4							1.1	1.10	39	1.1	1.10	39	26-Nov-20
Subtotal Mertondale							4.6	1.61	240	6.5	0.98	205	11.1	1.24	445
Cardinia
Bruno*	$	2,600	0.4	0.3	1.26	10	2.8	1.13	102	1.1	1.05	36	4.1	1.12	148	17-May-21
Lewis*	$	2,600	0.4	0.6	1.24	20	4.7	1.00	151	2.1	0.80	55	7.4	0.95	226	17-May-21
Kyte	$	2,600	0.4				0.3	1.53	17	0.1	0.92	3	0.4	1.38	20	26-Nov-20
Helens	$	2,600	0.4				0.7	2.14	50	0.3	1.94	19	1.0	2.08	69	26-Nov-20
Fiona	$	2,600	0.4				0.6	1.35	25	0.2	1.21	8	0.8	1.32	32	26-Nov-20
Rangoon	$	2,600	0.4				0.5	1.24	21	0.3	1.07	12	0.9	1.17	32	26-Nov-20
Hobby *	$	2,600	0.4							0.5	1.31	22	0.5	1.31	22	17-May-21
Cardinia Hill **	$	2,600	0.4				0.5	2.21	38	1.6	1.12	57	2.1	1.39	95	22-Sep-21
Cardinia Hill UG**			2.0							0.1	2.71	11	0.1	2.71	11	22-Sep-21
Subtotal Cardinia				0.8	1.16	30	10.2	1.23	402	6.4	1.08	222	17.4	1.17	655
Raeside
Michaelangelo	$	2,600	0.4				1.1	2.00	73	0.4	2.19	25	1.5	2.04	98	26-Nov-20
Leonardo	$	2,600	0.4				0.4	2.39	30	0.2	2.20	14	0.6	2.32	44	26-Nov-20
Forgotten Four	$	2,600	0.4				0.1	2.09	7	0.1	1.96	6	0.2	2.03	14	26-Nov-20
Krang	$	2,600	0.4				0.3	1.74	17	0.0	2.59	2	0.3	1.80	19	26-Nov-20
Subtotal Raeside							2.0	2.04	128	0.7	2.17	47	2.6	2.07	175
TOTAL				0.8	1.16	30	16.7	1.43	770	13.6	1.09	474	31.1	1.27	1275

Table 1: Mineral Resource Estimate Table September 2021. Mineral Resources estimated by Jamie Logan, and reported in accordance with JORC 2012 using a 0.4g/t Au cut-off within AUD2,600 optimisation shells. Note * Hobby and Bruno-Lewis Mineral Resource Estimates completed by Cube Consulting, and also reported in accordance with JORC 2012 using a 0.4g/t Au cut-off within AUD2,600 optimisation shells. **Cardinia Hill Mineral Resource Estimates completed by Cube Consulting, and also reported in accordance with JORC 2012 using a 0.4g/t Au cut-off within AUD2,600 optimisation shells for open pit resource, and using a 2g/t Au cut-off for material below the optimised open pit for an underground Mineral Resource estimate.

1The company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the ASX Announcement of 23 September 2021 "Cardinia Gold Project Mineral Resource Increases to 1.28Moz", and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in that announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.

COMPETENT PERSON'S STATEMENT

The information contained in this report relating to exploration results relates to information compiled or reviewed by Glenn Grayson. Mr. Grayson is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is a full-time employee of the company. Mr. Grayson has sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposit under consideration, and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the JORC "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves".

Mr. Grayson consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

Appendix A

JORC 2012 TABLE 1 REPORT

Cardinia Gold Project - Section 1 & 2

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	Nature and quality of sampling (egcutchannels, random chips, or specificspecialised industry standard	DiamondHistoric (pre-2014) diamond core (DD) sampling utilised half core or quarter core sample intervals; typically varying from 0.3mto 1.4m in length. 1m sample intervals were favoured and sample boundaries principally coincided with geological contacts.
	measurement tools appropriate to theminerals under investigation, such asdown hole gamma sondes, or handheldXRF instruments, etc). These examples	Recent (2014-2018) diamond core (DD) samples, either HQ3 or NQ2 in size diameter, were either cut in half longitudinally orfurther cut into quarters, using a powered diamond core drop saw centered over a cradle holding core in place. Core sampleintervals varied from 0.2 to 1.25m in length but were predominantly aligned to 1m intervals or with sample boundaries whichrespected geological contacts.
	should not be taken as limiting thebroad meaning of sampling.Include reference to measures taken to	2019 diamond core samples, either HQ3 or NQ2 in size diameter, were either cut in half longitudinally or a third longitudinally,using an automated Corewise core saw Core was placed in boats, holding core in place. Core sample intervals varied from 0.3 to1.3m in length but were predominantly aligned to 1m intervals or with sample boundaries which respected geological contacts.RC
	ensure sample representivity and theappropriate calibration of anymeasurement tools or systems used.Aspects of the determination ofmineralisation that are Material to the	Historic reverse circulation (RC) drill samples were collected over 1m downhole intervals beneath a cyclone and typically rifflesplit to obtain a sub-sample (typically 3-4kg). 1m sub-samples were typically collected in pre-numbered calico bags and 1msample rejects were commonly stored at the drill site. 3m or 4m composited interval samples were often collected by using ascoop (dry samples) or spear (wet samples). If composite samples returned anomalous results once assayed, the single metresub-samples of the anomalous composite intervals were retrieved and submitted for individual gold analysis.
	Public Report.In cases where 'industry standard' workhas been done this would be relativelysimple (eg 'reverse circulation drilling	Recent reverse circulation (RC) drill samples were collected by passing through a cyclone, a sample collection box, and riffle orcone splitter. All RC sub-samples were collectedover one metre downhole intervals and averaged 3-4kg.
		2019 RC drilling samples were collected in 1m downhole intervals by passing through a cyclone, a collection box and thendropping through a cone splitter. All RC sub-samples were collected over one metre downhole intervals and averaged 3-4kg.
	was used to obtain 1 m samples fromwhich 3 kg was pulverised to produce a30g charge for fire assay'). In other	AC/RABHistoric air core (AC) and rotary air blast (RAB) were typically collected at 1 metre intervals and placed on the ground with3-4kgsub-samples collected using a scoop or spear. Three metre or four metre composited interval samples were often collected by

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	cases more explanation may berequired, such as where there is coarsegold that has inherent samplingproblems. Unusual commodities ormineralisation types (eg submarinenodules) may warrant disclosure ofdetailed information.	using a scoop (dry samples) or spear (wet samples). If composite samples returned anomalous results once assayed, the singlemetre sub-samples of the anomalous composite intervals were retrieved and submitted for individual gold analysis.
		Assay Methodology
		Historic sample analysis typically included a number of commercial laboratories with preparation as per the following method,oven drying (90-110°C), crushing (<-2mm to <-6mm), pulverizing (<-75μm to <-105μm), and riffle split to obtain a 30, 40, or50gram catchweight for gold analysis. Fire Assay fusion, with AAS finish was the common method of analysis however, onoccasion, initial assaying may have been carried out via Aqua Regia digest and AAS/ICP finish. Anomalous samples weresubsequently re-assayed by Fire Assay fusion and AAS/ICP finish.
		Recent sample analysis typically included oven drying (105-110°C), crushing (<-6mm & <-2mm), pulverising (P90% <-75μm) andsample splitting to a representative 50gramcatchweight sample for gold only analysis using Fire Assay fusion with AAS finish.
		Multi element analysis was also conducted on approximately 10% of samples, predominantly through ore zones. This wasconducted via a 4-acid digest with ICP-MS/OES determination for a 48 element suite.
		Rock ChipsAll rock chip samples are taken using a pick. The samples are taken from outcrop where possible. Samples are also taken from insitu float material or waste rock around historic workings, where outcrop is not present. Care is taken to ensure all samples arerepresentative of the medium being sampled. For example, if a 1m sediment unit is being sampled, a channel sample will be
		taken across the entire unit.All recent drilling, sample collection and sample handling procedures were conducted and/or supervised by KIN geologypersonnel to high level industry standards. QA/QC procedures were implemented during each drilling program to industrystandards.
Drilling techniques	Drill type (egcore, reverse circulation,open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,	Drilling carried out since 1986 and up to the most recent drill programs completed by KIN Mining was obtained from a combinationof reverse circulation (RC), diamond core (DD), air core (AC), and rotary air blast (RAB) drilling.
	auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details(eg core diameter, triple or standardtube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether coreis oriented and if so, by what method,etc).	Data prior to 1986 is limited due to lack of exploration.
		Diamond
		Historic DD was carried out using industry standard 'Q' wireline techniques, with the core retrieved from the inner tubes andplaced in core trays. Core sizes include NQ/NQ3 (Ø 45-48mm) and HQ/HQ3 (Ø 61-64mm). At the end of each core run, thedriller placed core blocks in the tray, marked with hole number and depth. Core recovery was usually measured for each corerun and recorded onto the geologist's drill logs.
		2017 –2018 DD was carried out by contractor Orbit Drilling Pty Ltd ("Orbit Drilling") with a Mitsubishi truck-mounted Hydco1200H 8x4 drill rig, using industry standard 'Q' wireline techniques. 2019 DD was carried out y Topdrill Pty Ltd. With a SandvickDE840 mounted on a Mercedes Benz 4144 Actros 8x8 Carrier. The rig is fitted with Sandvik DA555 hands free diamond drillingrod handler and Austex hands free hydraulic breakout.
		Drill core is retrieved from the inner tubes and placed in plastic core trays and each core run depth recorded onto core markerblocks and placed at the end of each run in the tray. Core sizes include NQ2 (Ø 47mm) and HQ3 (Ø 64mm).
		Recent DD core recovery and orientation was obtained for each core run where possible, using electronic core orientation tools

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		(e.g. Reflex EZ-ACT) and the 'bottom of core' marked accordingly.
		2017 -18 drilling was measured at regular downhole intervals, typically at 10-15m from surface and then every 30m to bottomof hole, using electronic multi-shot downhole survey tools (i.e. Reflex EZ-TRAC or Camteq Proshot). Independent programs ofdownhole deviation surveying were also carried out to validate previous surveys. These programs utilised either electroniccontinuous logging survey tool (AusLog A698 deviation tool) or gyroscopic survey equipment.
		2019 DD was surveyed at regular downhole intervals (every 30m with an additional end-of-hole survey) using electronicgyroscopic survey equipment.
		RC
		Historic RC drilling used conventional reverse circulation drilling techniques, utilising a cross-over sub, or face-samplinghammers with bit shrouds. Drill bit sizes typically ranged between 110-140mm.
		2017-18 RC drilling was carried out by Orbit Drilling's truck-mounted Hydco 350RC 8x8 Actross drill rigs with 350psi/1250cfm aircompressor, with auxiliary and booster air compressors (when required). Drilling utilised mostly downhole face-samplinghammer bits (Ø 140mm), with occasional use of blade bits for highly oxidized and soft formations. The majority of drillingretrieved dry samples, with the occasional use of the auxiliary and booster air compressors beneath the water table, tomaintain dry sample return as much as possible. RC drillhole deviations were surveyed downhole, typically carried out insideanon-magnetic stainless steel (s/s) rod located above the hammer, using electronic multi-shot downhole tool (e.g. Reflex EZTRAC). In some instances, drillholes were surveyed later in open hole. Independent programs of downhole deviation surveyingwere also carried out to validate previous surveys. These programs utilised either electronic continuous logging survey tool(AusLog A698 deviation tool) or gyroscopic survey equipment.
		2019 RC drilling was carried out by Swick Mining Services truck-mounted Swick version Schramm 685 RC Drill Rig (Rod Handler& Rotary ConeSplitter) with support air truck and dust suppression equipment. Drilling utilised downhole face-samplinghammer bits (Ø 140mm). The majority of drilling retrieved dry samples, with the occasional use of the auxiliary and booster aircompressors beneath the water table, to maintain dry sample return as much as possible.
		2019 RC was surveyed at regular downhole intervals (every 30m with an additional end-of-hole survey) using electronicgyroscopic survey equipment.
		AC/RAB
		Historic AC drilling was conductedutilising suitable rigs with appropriate compressors (eg 250psi/600cfm). AC holes were drilledusing 'blade' or 'wing' bits, until the bit was unable to penetrate ('blade refusal'), often near the fresh rock interface. Hammerbits were used only when it was deemed necessary to penetrate further into the fresh rock profile or through notable "hardboundaries" in the regolith profile. No downhole surveying is noted to have been undertaken on AC drillholes.
		Historic RAB drilling was carried out using small air compressors (eg 250psi/600cfm) and drill rods fitted with a percussionhammer or blade bit, with the sample return collected at the drillhole collar using a stuffing box and cyclone collectiontechniques. Drillhole sizes generally range between 75-110mm.No downhole surveying is noted to have been undertaken onRAB drillholes.
Drill sample recovery	Method of recording and assessing core	Diamond
	and chip sample recoveries and results	Historic core recovery was recorded in drill logsfor most of the diamond drilling programs since 1985. A review of historical

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	assessed.Measures taken to maximise samplerecovery and ensure representativenature of the samples.Whether a relationship exists betweensample recovery and grade and whether	reports indicates that core recovery was generally good (>80%) with lesser recoveries recorded in zones of broken groundand/or areas of mineralisation. Overall recoveries are considered acceptable for resource estimation.
		Recent core recovery data was recorded for each run by measuring total length of core retrieved against the downhole intervalactually drilled and stored in the database. KIN representatives continuously monitorcore recovery and core presentationquality as drilling is conducted and issues or discrepancies are rectified promptly to maintain industry best standards. Corerecoveries averaged >95%, even when difficult ground conditions were being encountered. When poor ground conditions wereanticipated, a triple tube drilling configuration was utilised to maximize core recovery
	sample bias may have occurred due to	RC/AC/RAB
	preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse	Historic sample recovery information for RC, AC, and RAB drilling is limited.
	material.	Recent RC drilling samples are preserved as best as possible during the drilling process. At the end of each 1 metre downholeinterval, the driller stops advancing, retracts from the bottom of hole, and waits for the sample to clear from the bottom ofthehole through to the sample collector box fitted beneath the cyclone. The sample is then released from the sample collector boxand passed through either a 3-tiered riffle splitter or cone splitter fitted beneath the sample box.
		Drilling prior to 2018 utilised riffle split collection whereas sample collection via a cone splitter was conducted for drillingundertaken since March 2018; cyclone cleaning processes remained the same.
		Sample reject is collected in plastic bags, and a 3-4kg sub-sample is collected in pre-marked calico bags for analysis. Once thesamples have been collected, the cyclone, sample collector box and riffle splitter are flushed with compressed air, and thesplitter cleaned by the off-sider using a compressed air hose at both the end of each 6 metre drill rod and then extensivelycleaned at the completion of each hole. This process is maintained throughout the entire drilling program to maximise drillsample recovery and to maintain a high level of representivity of the material being drilled.
		RC drill sample recoveries are not recorded in the database however a review by Carras Mining Pty Ltd (CM) in 2017, of RC drillsamples stored in the field, and ongoing observations of RC drill rigs in operation by KIN representatives, suggests that RCsample recoveries were mostly consistent and typically very good (>90%).
		Collected samples are deemed reliable and representative of drilled material and no material discrepancy, that would impede amineral resource estimate, exists between collected RC primary and sub-samples.
Logging	Whether core and chip samples havebeen geologically and geotechnicallylogged to a level of detail to supportappropriate Mineral Resourceestimation, mining studies and	Logging data coded in the database, prior to 2014, illustrates at least four different lithological code systems, a legacy of numerouspast operators (Hunter, MPI, Metana, CIM, MEGM, Pacmin, SOG, and Navigator). Correlation between codes is difficult to establishhowever, based on historical reports, drill hole logging procedures appear consistent with normal industry practices of the time.
		KIN has attempted to validate historical logging data and to standardize the logging code system by incorporating the SOG andNavigator logging codes into one.
	metallurgical studies.	DiamondHistorical diamond core loggingwas recorded into drill logs for most of the diamond drilling programs since 1985. A review of
	Whether logging is qualitative orquantitative in nature. Core (or costean,channel, etc) photography.	historical reports indicates that logging noted core recovery, fractures per metre and RQD, lithology, alteration, texture,mineralisation, weathering, and other features. Core was then marked up for cutting and sampling.
		Navigator's procedure for logging of diamond core included firstly marking of the bottom of the core (for successful core

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	The total length and percentage of therelevant intersections logged.	orientations), then recording of core recovery, fractures per metre and RQD, lithology, alteration, texture, mineralisation,weathering, and other features. Core was then marked up for cutting and sampling. Navigator DD logging is predominantly togeological contacts.
		Navigator logging information was entered directly intohand held digital data loggers and transferred directly to the database,after validation, to minimize data entry errors.
		Drill core photographs, for drilling prior to 2014, are available only for diamond drillholes completed by Navigator.
		KIN DD logging is carried out on site once geology personnel retrieve core trays from the drill rig site. Core is collected from therig daily. The entire length of every hole is logged. Recorded data includes lithology, alteration, structure, texture,mineralisation, sulphide content, weathering and other features. Drillhole collar coordinates, azimuth, dip, depth and samplingintervals are also recorded. KIN DD logging is to geological contacts.
		Qualitative logging includes classification and description of lithology, weathering, oxidation, colour, texture and grain size.Quantitative logging includes percentages of identified minerals, veining, and structural measurements (using a kenometertool). In addition, logging of diamond drilling includes geotechnical data, RQD and core recoveries.
		Drill core is photographed at the Cardinia site, prior to any cutting and/or sampling, and then stored in this location.Photographs are available for every diamond drillhole completed by KIN and a selection of various RC chip trays. SG data is alsocollect
		All information collected is entered directly into laptop computers or tablets, validated in the field, and then transferred to thedatabase.
		The level of logging detail is considered appropriate for exploration and to support appropriate mineral resource estimation,mining studies, and metallurgical studies.
		Diamond drillholes completed for geotechnical purposes were independently logged for structural data by geotechnicalconsultants.
		RC/AC/RAB
		Historical RC, AC, and RAB logging (including Navigator) was entered on a metre by metre basis. Logging consisted of lithology,alteration, texture, mineralisation, weathering, and other features
		For the majority of historical drilling (pre-2004) the entire length of each drillhole have been logged from surface to 'end ofhole'.
		KIN RC logging of was carried out in the field and logging has predominantly been undertaken on a metre by metre basis. KINlogging is inclusive of the entire length of each RC drillhole from surface to 'end of hole'.
		Recorded data includes lithology, alteration, structure, texture, mineralisation, sulphide content, weathering and otherfeatures. Drillhole collar coordinates, azimuth, dip, depth and sampling intervals are also recorded.
		Qualitative logging includes classification and description of lithology, weathering, oxidation, colour, texture and grain size.Quantitative logging includes identification and percentages of mineralogy, sulphides, mineralisation, and veining.
		Photographs are available for a selection of recent KIN RC drillholes.

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		All information collected is entered directly into laptop computers or tablets, validated in the field, and then transferred to thedatabase.
		The level of logging detail is considered appropriate for exploration and to support appropriate mineral resource estimation,mining studies, and metallurgical studies.
		Rock Chips
		All rock chip samples are inspected by the sampling geologist and logged for lithology, alteration, mineralisation, veining, andstructural fabric. This is a combination of qualitative and quantitative data.
Sub-sampling techniques and	If core, whether cut or sawn and	Diamond
sample preparation	whether quarter, half or all core taken.	Historic diamond drill core (NQ/NQ3 or HQ/HQ3) samples collected for analysis were longitudinally cut in half, and occasionally
	If non-core, whether riffled, tubesampled, rotary split, etc and whethersampled wet or dry.	in quarters for the larger (HQ/HQ3) diameter holes, using a powered diamond core drop saw centered over a cradle holding thecore in place. Half core or quarter core sample intervals typically varied from 0.3m to 1.4m in length. 1m sample intervals werefavoured and are the most common method of sampling, however sample boundaries do principally coincide with geologicalcontacts. The remaining core was retained in core trays.
	For all sample types, the nature, qualityand appropriateness of the samplepreparation technique.Quality control procedures adopted forall sub-sampling stages to maximiserepresentivity of samples.Measures taken to ensure that thesampling is representative of the in situmaterial collected, including for instance	2017-18 diamond drill core samples collected for analysis were longitudinally cut in half, with some samples cut into quarters,using a powered diamond core drop saw blade centered over a cradle holding the core in place. Core sample intervals variedfrom 0.2 to 1.25m in length but were predominantly aligned to 1m intervals or with sample boundaries which respectedgeological contacts. The remaining core was retained in their respective core trays and stored in KIN's yard for future reference.
		All KIN diamond drill core is securely stored at the KIN Leonora Yard.2019 diamond drill core samples collected for analysis were longitudinally cut in half, with some samples cut into thirds, usingan automated Corewise powered diamond core saw with the blade centered over a boat holding the core in place. Core sampleintervals varied from 0.2 to 1.25m in length but were predominantly aligned to 1m intervals or with sample boundaries whichrespected geological contacts. The remaining core was retained in their respective core trays and stored in KIN's yard for future
		reference. All KIN diamond drill core is securely stored at the Cardinia coreyard.
	results for field duplicate/second-halfsampling.	All sub-sampling techniquesand sample preparation procedures conducted and/or supervised by KIN geology personnel are tostandard industry practice. Sub-sampling and sample preparation techniques used are considered to maximise representivity ofdrilled material. QA/QC procedures implemented during each drilling program are to industry standard practice.
	Whether sample sizes are appropriate tothe grain size of the material being	Samples sizes are considered appropriate for this style of gold mineralisation and as an industry accepted method for evaluationof gold deposits in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia.
	sampled.	RC/AC/RAB
		Historic sampling was predominantly conducted by collecting 1m samples from beneath a cyclone and either retaining theseprimary samples or passing through a riffle splitter to obtain a 3-4kg sub-sample for analysis. First pass sampling often involvedcollecting composite samples by using a scoop (dry samples) or spear/tube (wet samples) to obtain 3m or 4m compositedintervals, with the single metre split samples being retained at the drill site as spoil or in sample bags. If composite sampleassays returned anomalous results, the single metre samples for this composite were retrieved and submitted for analysis.RC/AC/RAB sampling procedures are believed to be consistent with the normal industry practices at the time.
		Samples obtained from conventional RC drilling techniques with cross-over subs often suffered from down hole contamination,

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		especially beneath the water table. Samples obtained from RC drilling techniques using the face sampling hammer suffered lessfrom down hole contamination and were more likely to be kept dry beneath the water table, particularly if auxiliary and boosterair compressors were used. These samples are considered to be representative.
		The vast majority of Reverse Circulation (RC) drill samples were collected at 1m downhole intervals from beneath a cyclone andthen riffle split to obtain a sub-sample (typically 3-4kg). After splitting, 1m sub-samples were typically collected in prenumbered calico bags, and the 1m sample rejects were commonly stored atthe drill site in marked plastic bags, for futurereference. First pass sampling often involved collecting composite samples by using a scoop (dry samples) or spear/tube (wetsamples) to obtain 3m or 4m composited intervals, with the single metre split sub-samples being retained at the drill site. If thecomposite sample assays returned anomalous results, single metre sub-samples for the anomalous composite intervals wereretrieved and submitted for analysis.
		Navigator included standards, fields duplicate splits (since 2009), and blanks within each drill sample batch, at a ratio of 1 forevery 20 samples, with the number of standards being inserted at a ratio of 1 for every 50 samples.
		Recent RC sub-samples were collected over 1 metre downhole intervals and retained in pre-marked calico bags, after passingthrough a cyclone and either a riffle splitter, prior to March 2018, or cone splitter, after March 2018. The majority of RC subsamples consistently averaged 3-4kg. Sample reject from the riffle splitter were retained and stored in plastic bags, and locatednear each drillhole site. When drilling beneath the water table, the majority of sample returns were kept dry by the use of theauxiliary and booster air compressors. Very few wet samples were collected through the splitter, and the small number of wetor damp samples is not considered material for resource estimation work.
		KIN RC drill programs utilise field duplicates, at regular intervals at a ratio of 1:25, and assay results indicate that there isreasonable analytical repeatability; considering the presence of nuggety gold.
		All sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation procedures conducted and/or supervised by KIN geology personnel are tostandard industry practice. Sub-sampling and sample preparation techniques used are considered to maximise representivity ofdrilled material. QA/QC procedures implemented during each drilling program are to industry standard practice.
		Samples sizes are considered appropriate for this style of gold mineralisation and as an industry accepted method for evaluationof gold deposits in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia.
		No duplicates are taken for rock chip sampling. Sample sizes are approximately 3kg, this is considered appropriate for thematerial beingsampled.
Quality of assay data andlaboratory tests	The nature, quality and appropriatenessof the assaying and laboratoryprocedures used and whether the	Numerous assay laboratories and various sample preparation and assay techniques have been used since 1981. Historicalreporting and descriptions of laboratory sample preparation, assaying procedures, and quality control protocols for the samplesfrom the various drilling programs are variable in their descriptions and completeness.
	technique is considered partial or total.	Assay data obtained prior to 2001 is incomplete and the nature of results could not be accurately quantified due to thecombinations of various laboratories and analytical methodologies utilised.
	For geophysical tools, spectrometers,handheld XRF instruments, etc, the	Since 1993, the majority of samples submitted to the various laboratories were typically prepared for analysis firstly by ovendrying, crushing and pulverizing to a nominal 85% passing 75µm.
	parameters used in determining theanalysis including instrument make and	In the initial exploration stages, Aqua Regia digest with AAS/ICP finish, was generally used as a first pass detection method, withfollow up analysis by Fire Assay fusion and AAS/ICP finish. This was a common practice at the time. Mineralised intervals were

•Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	model, reading times, calibrations	subsequently Fire Assayed (using 30, 40 or 50 gram catchweights) with AAS/ICP finish.
	factors applied and their derivation, etc.Nature of quality control procedures	Approximately 15-20% of the sampled AC holes may have been subject to Aqua Regia digest methods only, however AC sampleswere predominantly within the oxide profile, where aqua regia results would not be significantly different to results from fire
adopted (eg	standards, blanks,	assay methods.
have been established.	duplicates, external laboratory checks)and whether acceptable levels ofaccuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision	Limited information is available regarding checkassays for drilling programs prior to 2004.During 2004-2014, Navigator utilised six different commercial laboratories during their drilling programs, however KalgoorlieAssay Laboratories conducted the majority of assaying for diamond, RC, and AC samplesusing Fire Assay fusion on 40 gramcatchweights with AAS/ICP finish.
		Since 2009 Navigator regularly included field duplicates and Certified Reference Material (CRM), standards and blanks, with theirsample batch submissions to laboratories at average ratio of 1 in 20 samples. Sample assay repeatability and blank and CRMstandard assay results were typically within acceptable limits.
		KIN sample analysis from 2014 to 2018 was conducted by SGS Australia Pty Ltd's ("SGS") Kalgoorlie and Perth laboratories. Samplepreparation included oven drying (105°C), crushing (<6mm), pulverising (P90% passing 75µm) and riffle split to obtain a 50 gramcatchweight. Analysis for gold only was carried out by Fire Assay fusion technique with AAS finish (SGS Lab Code FAA505).
		•KIN regularly insert blanks and CRM standards in each sample batch at a ratio of 1:50. This allows for at least one blank andone CRM standard to be included in each of the laboratory's fire assay batch of 50 samples. Field duplicates are typicallycollected at a ratio of 1:50 samples and test sample assay repeatability. Blanks and CRM standards assay result performanceis predominantly within acceptable limits for this style of gold mineralisation.
		•KIN requests laboratory pulp grind and crush checks at a ratio of 1:50 or less since May 2018 in order to better qualify samplepreparation and evaluate laboratory performance. Samples have generally illustrated appropriate crush and grind sizepercentages since the addition of this component to the sample analysis procedure.
		•SGS include laboratory blanks and CRM standards as part of their internal QA/QC for sample preparation and analysis, as wellas regular assay repeats. Sample pulp assay repeatability, and internal blank and CRM standards assay results are typicallywithin acceptable limits.
		From late 2018 samples have been analysed by Intertek Genalysis, with sample preparation either at their Kalgoorlie preplaboratory or the Perth Laboratory located in Maddington. Sample preparation included oven drying (105°C), crushing (<6mm),pulverising (P90% passing 75µm) and split to obtain a 50 gram catchweight. Analysis for gold only was carried out by Fire Assayfusion technique with AAS finish.
		•KIN regularly insert blanks and CRM standards in each sample batch at aratio of 1:25. Kin accepts that this ratio of QAQC isindustry standard. Field duplicates are typically collected at a ratio of 1:25 samples and test sample assay repeatability. Blanksand CRM standards assay result performance is predominantly within acceptable limits for this style of gold mineralisation.
		•KIN requests laboratory pulp grind and crush checks at a ratio of 1:50 or less since May 2018 in order to better qualify samplepreparation and evaluate laboratory performance. Samples have generally illustrated appropriate crush and grind sizepercentages since the addition of this component to the sample analysis procedure.
		•Genalysis include laboratory blanks and CRM standards as part of their internal QA/QC for sample preparation and analysis,

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		as well as regular assay repeats. Sample pulp assay repeatability, and internal blank and CRM standards assay results aretypically within acceptable limits.
		The nature and quality of the assaying and laboratory procedures used are considered to be satisfactoryand appropriate for usein mineral resource estimations.
		Fire Assay fusion is considered to be a total extraction technique. The majority of assay data used for the mineral resourceestimations were obtained by the Fire Assay technique with AAS or ICP finish. AAS and ICP methods of detection are bothconsidered to be suitable and appropriate methods of detection for this style of mineralisation
		Aqua Regia is considered a partial extraction technique, where gold encapsulated in refractory sulphides or somesilicate mineralsmay not be fully dissolved, resulting in partial reporting of gold content.
		No other analysis techniques have been used to determine gold assays.
		Ongoing QAQC monitoring program identified one particular CRM returning spurious results. Further analysis demonstrated thatthe standard was compromised and was subsequently removed and destroyed. A replacement CRM of similar grade wassubstituted into the QAQC program.
		KIN continues to both develop and reinforce best practice QAQC methods for all drilling operations and the treatment andanalysis of samples. Regular laboratory site visits and audits have been introduced since April 2018 and will be conducted onaquarterly basis. This measure will ensure that all aspects of KIN QAQC practices are adhered to and align with industry bestpractice.
		All rock chip samples have been submitted to Intertek Genalysis (Perth) for analysis by 50g Fire assay, with multi-element analysisvia a 4-acid digest for a 48-element suite. Sample preparation included oven drying (105°C), crushing (<6mm), pulverising (P90%passing 75µm). Blanks and standards are inserted by the lab at a minimum rate of 1 in 50. Lab repeats are performed for sampleswith particularly high gold values. Due to the nature and intended uses of this data, this QAQC procedure is intentionally lessrigorous than that used for drilling samples.
Verification of sampling andassaying	The verification of significantintersections by either independent or	Verification of sampling, assay techniques, and results prior to 2004 is limited due to the legacy of the involvement of variouscompanies, personnel, drilling equipment, sampling protocols and analytical techniques at different laboratories.
	alternative company personnel.	During 2009, a selection of significant intersections had been verified by Navigator's company geologists and an independent
	The use of twinned holes.	consultant McDonald Speijers ("MS"). MS were able to validate 92% of the assay records in 50 randomly selected check holes, andonly 6 assay discrepancies were detected (< 0.2%), only 2 of those were considered significant. MS concluded that the very small
	Documentation of primary data, data	proportion of discrepancies indicated that the assay database was probably reliable at that time.
	entry procedures, data verification, datastorage (physical and electronic)protocols.	In 2009, Runge Ltd ("Runge") completed a mineral resource estimate report for the Cardinia Project area, including the Helens,Rangoon, Kyte and Bruno_Lewis deposits. Runge's database verification included basic visual validation in Surpac and fieldverification of drillhole positions in February 2009. Runge did not report any significant issues with the database.
	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	Since2014, significant drill intersections have been verified by KIN company geologists during the course of the drilling programs.
		During 2017, Carras Mining Pty Ltd ("CM") carried out an independent data verification. 38,098 assay records for KIN 2014-2017drilling programs were verified by comparing laboratory assay reports against the database. 6 errors were found, which are notconsidered material and which represented only 0.03% of all database records verified for KIN 2014-2017 drilling programs

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		No adjustments, averaging or calibrations are made to any of the assay data recorded in the database. QA/QC protocol isconsidered industry standard with standard reference material submitted on a routine basis.
		Recent (2014-2018) RC and diamond drilling by KIN included twinning of some historical holes within the Helens and Rangoonresource areas. There is no significant material difference between historical drilling information and KIN drilling information.
		Areas without twinned holes illustrate a drill density that is considered sufficient to enable comparison with surrounding historicinformation. No material difference of a negative nature exists between historical drilling information and KIN drillinginformation.
		KIN diamond holes drilled for metallurgical and geotechnical test work illustrate assay results with adequate correlation to bothnearby historical and recent drilling results.
		No adjustment or calibration has been made to assay data.
Location of data points	Accuracy and quality of surveys used tolocate drill holes (collar and down-hole	Several local grids were established and used by previous project owners. During the 1990s, SOG transformed the surface surveydata firstly to AMG and subsequently to MGA (GDA94 zone51).
	surveys), trenches, mine workings andother locations used in Mineral Resourceestimation.Specification of the grid system used.Quality and adequacy of topographiccontrol.	Navigator recognised errors in the collar co-ordinates resulting from transformations and as a result, a significant number of holeswere resurveyed and a new MGA grid transformation generated. Historical collars have been validated against the original localgrid co-ordinates and independently transformed to MGA co-ordinates and checked against the database. Navigator's MGA coordinates were checked against the surveyor's reports.
		Drilling was carried out using these various local grids. Since 2004, All Navigators drill hole collars were surveyed on completion ofdrilling in the Australian MGA94, Zone51 grid using RTK-DGPS equipment by licensed surveyors, with more than 80% of thepickups carried out by independent contractors.
		Almost all the diamond and at least 70% of Navigator RC holes were downhole surveyed. Pre-Navigator, single shot surveycameras were used, with typical survey intervals of 30-40 metres.
		Recent KIN drill hole collars are located and recorded in the field by a contract surveyor using RTK-DGPS (with a horizontal andvertical accuracyof ±50mm). Location data was collected in the GDA94 Zone51 grid coordinate system.
		Downhole surveying was predominantly carried out by the drilling contractor which, prior to late 2018, was Orbit Drilling PtyLtd.This was conducted using a downhole electronic single shot magnetic tool. (Relfex EZ-shot), which is industry standard practice.This is considered sufficiently accurate except where significant magnetic interference is encountered. The magnetic field isrecorded on every survey and flagged when likely to interfere with the reading. These surveys are downgraded in the database. Inaddition, if the downhole survey tool is located within 15 metres of the surface, there is risk of influence from the drill rig affectingthe azimuth readings. This was observed for the survey readings, which include total magnetic intensity (TMI) measurements,where TMI is spurious for readings taken at downhole depths less than 20 metres. These spurious readings are included in thedatabase, but are not used.
		Downhole surveying in 2019 has been conducted by the drilling contractors (Topdrill Pty Ltd and Swick Mining Services Pty Ltd)utilizing downhole electronic gyroscopic survey tools. These are considered very accurate and not susceptible to magneticinterference. Nofurther surveying required to check drill hole deviation.
		A small selection of drillhole collars, which do not have DGPS collar surveys, were picked up with a handheld GPS and individually

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		appraised in regards to their location prior to modelling; the position of these collars is deemed appropriate for the resourceestimation work.
		Considering the history of grid transformations and surviving documentation, there might be some residual risk of error in theMGA co-ordinates for old drillholes, however this is not considered to be material for the resource estimation.
		Azimuth data was historically recorded relative to magnetic north. Much of the historical drilling data was recorded relativetomagnetic north. Variation in magnetic declination for the Cardinia Project area is calculated at +0.823° East (1985) to +1.301° East(2017), with a maximum variation of +1.575° in 2005. The difference between true north and magnetic north, and the annualvariation in magnetic declination since 1985 is not significant, therefore magnetic north measurements have been used, wheretrue north data is unavailable, for all survey data used in resource estimation processes.
		The accuracy of drill hole collars and downhole data are located with sufficient accuracy foruse in resource estimation work.
		For rock chip samples, locations are recorded at the time of sampling using a handheld GPS in the GDA94 Zone51 grid coordinatesystem.
Data spacing and distribution	Data spacing for reporting ofExploration Results.	Drill hole spacing patterns vary considerably throughout the Cardinia Gold Project area and are deposit specific, depending on thenature and style of mineralisation being tested.
	Whether the data spacing anddistribution is sufficient to establish thedegree of geological and gradecontinuity appropriate for the MineralResource and Ore Reserve estimationprocedure(s) and classifications applied.	Drill hole spacing within the resource areas is sufficient to establish an acceptable degree of geological and grade continuity and isappropriate for both the mineral resource estimation and the resource classifications applied.
	Whether sample compositing has beenapplied.
Orientation of data in relation togeological structure	Whether the orientation of samplingachieves unbiased sampling of possible	The Cardinia greenstone sequence displays a NNW to NW trend. Drilling and sampling programs were carried out to obtainunbiased locations of drill sample data, generally orthogonal to the strike of mineralisation.
	structures and the extent to which this isknown, considering the deposit type.	At Helens mineralisation is structurally controlled in sub-vertical shear zones, with supergene components of varying lateralextensiveness present in the oxide profile.
	If the relationship between the drillingorientation and the orientation of keymineralised structures is considered tohave introduced a sampling bias, thisshould be assessed and reported ifmaterial.	The vast majority of historical drilling, pre-Navigator (pre-2004), and KIN drilling is orientated at -60°/245° (WSW) and -60°/065°(ENE).
		At Bruno-Lewis and Kyte, mineralisaton is either stratigraphy parallel (trending NNW, steep to moderately W-dipping) or crosscutting and dipping shallowly to the NE (striking NW). The vast majority of the drilling is therefore predominantly orientated at -60°/225-250° or -60°/090°. Grade Control drillholes were drilled vertically. Since late 2018, Kin's drilling has been largely orientedto 070° to target contact lodes and 225-250° to target the NE-dipping potassic lodes.
		The chance of sample bias introduced by sample orientation is considered minimal. No orientation sampling bias has beenidentified in data thus far.

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sample security	The measures taken to ensure sample	No sample security details are available for pre-Navigator (pre-2004) drill or field samples.
	security.	Navigator drill samples (2004-2014) were collected in pre-numbered calico bags at the drill rig site. Samples were then collectedby company personnel from the field and transported to the secure Navigator yard in Leonora. Samples were then batchprocessed (drillhole and sample numbers logged into the database) and then packed into 'bulkabag sacks'. The bulkabags weretied off and stored securely in the Navigator yard until being transported to the selected laboratory. There was no perceivedopportunity for the samples to be compromised from collection of samples at the drill site to delivery to the laboratory.
		2017 -18 KIN RC drill samples were collected in pre-numbered calico bags at the drill rig site. The samples were then batchprocessed (drillhole and sample numbers encoded onto a hardcopy sample register) in the field, and then transported andstacked into 'bulkabag sacks' at the secure KIN yard location in Leonora. Bulkabags were tied off and stored securely in the yarduntil being transported to the laboratory.
		2019 RC drill samples were collected in pre-numbered calico bags at the drill rig site. The samples were then batch processed(drillhole and sample numbers encoded onto a hardcopy sample register) in the field, and then transported and stacked into'bulkabag sacks' at the Cardinia office.
		2017-18 KIN DD samples were obtained by KIN personnel in pre-numbered calico bags at the KIN yard location in Leonora.Samples were then stacked into 'bulkabag sacks' at the yard location and stored securely until being transported to thelaboratory.
		2019 samples were obtained by KIN personnel in pre-numbered calico bags at the core yard located at theCardinia office.Samples were then stacked into 'bulkabag sacks' at the yard location and stored securely until being transported to thelaboratory.
		Transport contractors are utilised to transport samples to the laboratory. No perceived opportunity for samples to becompromised from collection of samples at the drill site, to delivery to the laboratory, where they were stored in their securecompound, and made ready for processing is deemed likely to have occurred.
		On receipt of the samples, the laboratoryindependently checked the sample submission form to verify samples received andreadied the samples for sample preparation. SGS and Genalysis sample security protocols are of industry standard and deemedacceptable for resource estimation work.
Audits or reviews	The results of any audits or reviews ofsampling techniques and data.	Historic drilling and sampling methods and QA/QC are regarded as not being as thoroughly documented compared to currentstandards. Inhouse reviews of various available historical company reports of drilling and sampling techniques indicates thatthese were most likely conducted to industry best practice and standards of the day.
		Independent geological consultants Runge Ltd completed a review of the Cardinia Project database, drilling and samplingprotocols, and so forth in 2009. The Runge report highlighted issues with bulk density and QA/QC analysis within the supplieddatabase. Identified issues were subsequently addressed by Navigator and KIN.
		Carras Mining Pty Ltd (CM), an independent geological consultant, reviewed and carried out an audit on the field operations anddatabase in 2017. Drilling and sampling methodologies observed during the site visits were to industry standard. No issues wereidentified for the supplied databases which could be considered material to a mineral resource estimation. During the review,Carras Mining logged the oxidation profiles (base of complete oxidation and top of fresh rock) for each of the deposit areas,basedon visual inspection of selected RC drill chips from KIN's recent drilling programs, and a combination of historical and KIN drillholelogging. Final adjustments were made with input from KIN geologists. The oxidation profiles were used to assign bulk densities

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		and metallurgical recoveries to the 2017 resource models.
		Past bulk density test work has been inconsistent with incorrect methods employed, to derive specific gravity or in-situ bulkdensity, rather than dry bulk density. Navigator (2009) and recent KIN (2017) bulk density test work was carried out using thewater immersion method on oven dried, coated samples to derive dry bulk densities for different rock types and oxidationprofiles. This information has been incorporated into the database for resource estimation work. CM conducted site visits during2017 to the laboratory to validate the methodology.
		Drilling, sampling methodologies, and assay techniques used in these drilling programs are considered to be appropriate and tomineral exploration industry standards of the day.
		Laboratory site visits and audits were introduced in April 2018 and are conducted on a quarterly basis. This measure ensures thatall aspects of KIN QAQC practices are adhered to and align with industry best practice.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral tenement and landtenure status	Type, reference name/number, location and ownershipincluding agreements or material issues with third parties suchas joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native titleinterests, historical sites, wilderness or national park andenvironmental settings.	The Cardinia Project, 35-40km NE of Leonora is managed, explored and maintained by KIN, and constitutea portion of KIN's Leonora Gold Project (LGP), which is located within the Shire of Leonora in the MtMargaret Mineral Field of the North Eastern Goldfields.
		The Helens and Rangoon area includes granted mining tenements M37/316 and M37/317, The tenementsare held in the name of Navigator Mining Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of KIN.
	The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting alongwith any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operatein the area.	The Bruno-Lewis and Kyte areas includes granted mining tenements M37/86, M37/227, M37/277,M37/300, M37/428 and M37/646. The tenements are held in the name of Navigator Mining Pty Ltd, awholly owned subsidiary of KIN. The following royalty payment may be applicable to the areas within theCardinia Project's Bruno and Lewis areas that comprise the deposits being reported on:
		1.Gloucester Coal Ltd (formerly CIM Resources Ltd and Centenary International Mining Ltd) in respectof M37/86 -1% of the quarterly gross value of sales for gold ounces produced, in excess of 10,000ounces.
		There are no known native title interests, historical sites, wilderness areas, national park or environmentalimpediments over the outlined current resource areas, and there are no current impediments to obtaininga licence to operate in the area.
Exploration done by otherparties	Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	At Cardinia, from 1980-1985, Townson Holdings Pty Ltd ("Townson") mined a small open pit over selectedhistorical workings at the Rangoon prospect. Localised instances of drilling relating to this mining event arenot recorded and are considered insubstantial and immaterial for resource modelling. Companies involvedin the collection of the majority of the gold exploration data since 1985 and prior to 2014 include: Thames

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		Mining NL ("Thames") 1985; Mt Eden Gold Mines (Aust) NL (also Tarmoola Aust Pty Ltd "MEGM") 1986-2003; Centenary International Mining Ltd ("CIM") 1986-1988, 1991-1992; Metana Minerals NL ("Metana")1986-1989; Sons of Gwalia Ltd ("SOG") 1989, 1992-2004; Pacmin Mining Corporation ("Pacmin") 1998-2001, and Navigator Resources Ltd ("Navigator") 2004-2014.
		In 2009 Navigator commissioned Runge Limited ("Runge") to complete a Mineral Resource estimate forthe Bruno, Lewis, Kyte, Helens and Rangoon deposits. Runge reported a JORC 2004 compliant MineralResource estimate, at a cut-off grade of 0.7g/t Au, totaling 1.45Mt @ 1.3 g/t au (61,700 oz Au) for Helensand Rangoon, and totaling 4.34Mt @ 1.2 g/t au (169,700 oz Au) for Bruno, Lewis and Kyte.
		A trial pit (Bruno) was mined by Navigator in 2010, and a 'test parcel' of ore was extracted and transportedfirstly to Sons of Gwalia's processing plant in Leonora, and finally to Navigator's processing plant located atBronzewing, where approximately 100,000 tonnes were processed at an average head grade of 2.33 g/t au(7,493 oz Au).
Geology	Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	The Cardinia Project area is located in the central part of the Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, whichextends for some 600km on a NNW trend across the Archean Yilgarn Craton of Western Australia.
		The regional geology comprises a suite of NNE-North trending greenstones positioned within theMertondale Shear Zone (MSZ) a splay limb of the Kilkenny Lineament. The MSZ denotes the contactbetween Archaean felsic volcanoclastics and sediment sequences in the west and Archaean mafic volcanicsin the east. Proterozoic dolerite dykes and Archaean felsic porphyries have intruded the shearedmafic/felsic volcanoclastic/sedimentary sequence.
		Locally within the Cardinia Project area, the stratigraphy consists of intermediate, mafic and felsic volcanicand intrusive lithologies and locally derived epiclastic sediments, which strike NNW, dipping steep-tomoderately to the west. Structural foliation of the areas stratigraphy predominantly dips steeply to theeast but localised inflections are common and structural orientation can vary between moderately (50-75°)easterly to moderately westerly dipping.
		Mineralisation at Helens is controlled by a cross-cutting fault, hosted predominantly in mafic rock units,adjacent to the felsic volcanic/sediment contacts. The ore zones are associated with increased shearing,intense alteration and disseminated sulphides. Minor supergene enrichment occurs locally withinmineralised shears throughout the regolith profile.
		Mineralisation at Bruno-Lewis is largely controlled by the stratigraphic contact between basalt and felsicvolcanics. Gold is associated with significant sulphide mineralisation in the sediments and volcaniclasticsbetween the 2 volcanic units. Gold Is also hosted within shallowly NE-dipping lodes, associated withincreasedpotassic-sericite alteration and quartz stockwork veining. These lodes also host themineralisation at Kyte. Substantial supergene mineralisation sits above both styles of mineralisation.
Drill hole Information	A summary of all information material to the understanding ofthe exploration results including a tabulation of the followinginformation for all Material drill holes:	Material drilling information for exploration results has previously been publicly reported in numerousannouncements to the ASX by Navigator (2004-2014) and KINsince 2014.

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	•easting and northing of the drill hole collar•elevation or RL (Reduced Level –elevation above sea levelin metres) of the drill hole collar•dip and azimuth of the hole•down hole length and interception depth•hole length.If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis thatthe information is not Material and this exclusion does notdetract from the understanding of the report, the CompetentPerson should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data aggregation methods	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averagingtechniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (egcutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Materialand should be stated.	When exploration results have been reported for the resource areas, the intercepts are reported asweighted average grades over intercept lengths defined by geology or lower cut-off grades, without highgrade cuts applied. Where aggregate intercepts incorporated short lengths of high grade results, theseresults were included in the reports.
	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of highgrade results and longer lengths of low grade results, theprocedure used for such aggregation should be stated andsome typical examples of such aggregations should be shownin detail.	Since 2014, KIN have reported RC drilling intersections with low cut off grades of >= 0.5 g/t Au and amaximum of 2m of internal dilution at a grade of <0.5g/t Au.There is no reporting of metal equivalent values.
	The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalentvalues should be clearly stated.
Relationship betweenmineralisation widths and	These relationships are particularly important in the reportingof Exploration Results.	The orientation, true width, and geometry of mineralised zones have been primarily determined byinterpretation of historical drilling and continued investigation and verification of KIN drilling.
intercept lengths	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drillhole angle is known, its nature should be reported.	Drill intercepts are reported as downhole widths not true widths.Accompanying dialogue to reported intersections normally describes the attitude of mineralisation.
	If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg 'down holelength, true width not known').
Diagrams	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations ofintercepts should be included for any significant discoverybeing reported These should include, but not be limited to aplan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional	Appropriate maps and sections are included in the main body of this report.

Criteria	•JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	views.
Balanced reporting	Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is notpracticable, representative reporting of both low and high	Public reporting of exploration results by KIN and past tenement holders and explorers for the resourceareas are considered balanced.
	grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleadingreporting of Exploration Results.	Representative widths typically included a combination of both low and high grade assay results.
		All meaningful and material information relating to this mineral resource estimate is or has been previouslyreported.
Other substantive explorationdata	Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should bereported including (but not limited to): geological observations;geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulksamples –size and method of treatment; metallurgical testresults; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rockcharacteristics; potential deleterious or contaminatingsubstances.	Since 2018, a campaign of determining Bulk Densities has been undertaken. The water displacementmethod is used on drill samples selected by the logging geologist. These measurements are entered intothe logging software interface and loaded to the Datashed database.
Further work	The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests forlateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-outdrilling).	KIN intend to continue exploration and drilling activities at in the described area, with the intention toincrease the project's resources.
	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,including the main geological interpretations and future drillingareas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

AI assistant

PATRONUS RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2021

65620_rns_2021-11-14_2610232a-80eb-4dc8-bd40-9e5d93d19288.pdf

HIGH-GRADE AIR-CORE RESULTS REVEAL NEW SHALLOW GOLD DISCOVERY AT PEGASUS

Highlights

Adjacent Historical Drilling Results

2021 Air-core Drilling Program

-ENDS-

For further information, please contact:

Investor enquiries Media enquiries

ABOUT KIN MINING NL

COMPETENT PERSON'S STATEMENT

Appendix A

JORC 2012 TABLE 1 REPORT

Cardinia Gold Project - Section 1 & 2

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

AI assistant

PATRONUS RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2021

65620_rns_2021-11-14_2610232a-80eb-4dc8-bd40-9e5d93d19288.pdf

HIGH-GRADE AIR-CORE RESULTS REVEAL NEW SHALLOW GOLD DISCOVERY AT PEGASUS

Highlights

Adjacent Historical Drilling Results

2021 Air-core Drilling Program

-ENDS-

For further information, please contact:

Investor enquiries Media enquiries

ABOUT KIN MINING NL

COMPETENT PERSON'S STATEMENT

Appendix A

JORC 2012 TABLE 1 REPORT

Cardinia Gold Project - Section 1 & 2

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

More from PATRONUS RESOURCES LIMITED

PATRONUS RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2021