11th May 2016

Board of Directors

TerryGrammer Chairman

Trevor Dixon Managing Director

Fritz Fitton Technical Director

Joe Graziano

Non-Executive Director and Company Secretary

Contact Details

Post

PO Box 565 Mount Hawthorn Western Australia 6915

Office

342 Scarborough Beach Road Osborne Park Western Australia 6017

Phone (08) 9242 2227

Email

[email protected]

Website

www.kinmining.com.au

Shares on Issue: 77,512,890

Options on Issue: 14,925,000

ADDENDUM TO SCOPING STUDY ANNOUNCEMENT OF 9 MAY 2016

Kin Mining NL herewith provides to the market further clarification in relation to its announcement of 9 May 2016 titled "Positive Scoping Study Outcome for the Leonora Gold Project".

Auralia Mining Consulting Pty Ltd ("Auralia"), were engaged by Kin Mining NL to carry out a Scoping Study on its Leonora Gold Project ("Project"), producing a high level mining and processing schedule utilising Whittle shells, inclusive of a high level financial analysis. All mineralised material types (Indicated, Inferred and unclassified) were included for consideration in the study. Given the level of study, and that Inferred and unclassified material was used as an economic driver, no JORC Compliant Ore Reserve table can result from this study.The table below has been amended to include a percentage breakdown of the resource areas classification used in the production target that the Scoping Study was based upon.

Mining Area	Indicated	Inferred	DiscountedCashflowAUD M	TonnesInput toProcessing	GradeInput toProcessing	WasteTonnesMined	Cut-offGradeg/t Au	RecoveredGoldOunces
Mertondale3/4	63%	37%	$23.5M	870,000	1.9	8,430,000	0.6	50,200
Mertondale 5	96%	4%	$12.6M	210,000	3.0	1,740,000	0.7	19,000
Merton'sReward	93%	7%	$21.4M	680,000	2.2	7,770,000	0.6	45,000
Quicksilver	99%	1%	$1.3M	110,000	1.6	800,000	0.6	5,100
Tonto	100%	0%	$7.6M	330,000	1.8	3,500,000	0.7	17,700
Eclipse	96%	4%	$2.8M	270,000	1.5	3,200,000	0.7	12,200
ForgottenFour	37%	63%	$3.3M	80,000	2.4	530,000	0.8	5,500
Krang	100%	0%	$0.8M	50,000	2.5	1,030,000	0.8	4,200
Michelangelo	100%	0%	$10.5M	370,000	2.4	6,170,000	0.8	26,000
Bruno-Lewis	53%	46%	$27.9M	1,740,000	1.4	6,020,000	0.7	72,300
Lewis South	0%	100%	$2.7M	220,000	1.0	400,000	0.7	6,800
Kyte	0%	100%	$11.4	470,000	1.3	1,010,000	0.7	18,700
HelensRangoon	73%	25%	$15.5	890,000	1.4	2,820,000	0.7	36,300
								319,000
		69%	30%*Note ounces are rounded to nearest 100 ounces	$141.3M	6,290,000	1.7	43,420,000

The unclassified material included in the Bruno-Lewis and Helens Rangoon optimisations accounted for less than 1% and 2% of the processed material respectively. On the Project scale, unclassified material was less than 1% of all processed material and is therefore considered to have no impact on the optimisation results. A total of 69% of the total production target is classed in the higher category of Indicated, Inferred 30% and unclassified less than 1%.

Modifying Factors in relation to the Mineral Resources used in the Scoping Study are from the resources that Kin Mining announced on 11th of May 2015 (see ASX Leonora Resource Update). It is believed that no material change has occurred in relation to these factors see Appendix A-C for further details.

Appendix A Mertondale SECTION 1 – Sample Techniques and Data

Criteria	Commentary
Samplingtechniques	The various mineralised lodes at Mertondale have been sampled in a variety of ways dependenton the drill technique. The majority of diamond core (NQ or HQ) was longitudinally cut half coreand occasionally quarter core for larger (HQ) diameter holes. Sample intervals (diamond) variedfrom 0.1-1.3m but were predominantly 1m intervals. The vast majority of RC samples werecollected via a cyclone or riffle splitter (typically a 3kg sample) and collected/bagged at 1mintervals. Composite scoop samples were often collected at 3m or 4m intervals with follow upcollection of the original riffle split 1m samples over anomalous intervals. On occasion wetsamples were encountered and in the case of Navigator spear sampled, data relating to historicalearlier wet samples is unavailable however the number of wet samples involved is considered tobe very low. The procedure for Aircore sampling is similar to RC except the reject, following rifflesplitting, is placed on the ground and not stored in bags.
Drillingtechniques	Numerous phases of drilling have been conducted by various companies including diamond, RCAircore and RAB drilling, the data base consists of 6,801 drill holes. The percentages of diamonddrilling the Mertondale deposits is very small apart from Mertondale 3-4 and Mertondale 5however the database fails to distinguish between RC pre-collars and core intervals. Reportsindicate the core was dominantly HQ or NQ size but database details are incomplete. Corerecoveries are reportedly good, particularly the Navigator drilling; however no confirmation isentered into the database.
	Reverse circulation (RC) drilling is the dominate drill type at all sites except Eclipse where Aircoreholes dominate the resource estimate. Pre-Navigator RC drilling information is limited howeversuitable large rigs fitted with auxiliary and booster compressors were probably used. Recent RCdrilling conducted by Navigator was conducted with suitable rigs equipped with auxiliary andbooster compressors and face sampling hammers, bit diameters were typically 5.25 inches.
	The vast majority of Aircore drilling was conducted by Navigator utilising suitable rigs (eg 250psi,600cfm). Aircore holes were drilled mostly into the weathered zone using blade bits. Hammerbits were used only when necessary on harder rock types. Holes were typically 50-60m deep.When drilling under dry conditions Aircore samples should be of a comparable quality to RCdrilling and sampling techniques.
	Rotary Air Blast (RAB) drilling is used as a first pass shallow exploration drilling tool. RAB drillingis prone to sample biases and downhole contamination. The RAB holes were used as a guide tosupport the geological interpretation but were all omitted from the final resource calculation.
Drill samplerecovery	Core recovery data is not presented in the database although Navigator core recovery wasreported to be good. Regarding Aircore and RC drilling, due to the lack of information in thedatabase, no quantitative or semi-quantitative impression of sample recovery or sample qualityis available, it's assumed to be satisfactory. No indication of sample bias is evident nor has it beenestablished.
	Historical reports indicate diamond core was cut longitudinally, mostly half core with quarter corefrom larger HQ diameter core, samples are overwhelmingly 1m. RC and Aircore sampling werecollected at 1m intervals via a cyclone or riffle split to approximately 3kg. Some earlier holes, preNavigator, were samples at 1.5m intervals and a substantial portion of the historical MPI holes

Criteria	Commentary
	were samples over 2-4m intervals.
	During Navigators drill programs some samples were spear sampled when returned wet, this isregarded as poor sampling procedure and these samples are regarded as unreliable however thetotal number of wet samples is considered to be very low. It's unknown how pre-Navigator wetsamples were handled.
	No relationship was observed between sample recovery and grade.
Logging	The logging data coded in the database uses at least four different lithological code systems, alegacy of numerous past operators; this obscures the significance of much of the coded data. Nodetails of pre-Navigator drill hole logging procedures were located however loggingmethodologies appear consistent with normal industry practices of the time.
	Navigator RC and Aircore logging was entered on a metre by metre basis recording lithology,alteration, texture, mineralisation, weathering and other features. The information was entereddirectly into hand held digital data loggers and transferred directly to the database. Logging ofchips is qualitative on visual recordings of lithology, oxidation, colour, texture and grain size,logging of mineralogy, mineralisation and veining is quantitative.
	Navigator's procedure for diamond core was initially orientation and marking of the bottom ofthe core. Core recovery, fractures per metre and RQD was recorded. The core was geologicallylogged recording lithologies and marked for sampling. Several geotechnical holes were logged forstructural data by Geotechnical Consultants. All the diamond core has been photographed.
	All drill holes are logged in full to the end of hole.
Subsampling	The history of sample preparation and assaying procedures is incomplete and complex.Numerous assay laboratories and numerous assay techniques have been used over the life of theproject.
techniquesand samplepreparation	Historical core, in storage, where sampled is generally half core, it's assumed and confirmed fromsurviving reports that half core was routinely sampled. Sample intervals were based onlithological contacts and sample intervals varied from 0.1-1.3m but were predominantly over onemetre intervals.
	Prior to 1996 limited information indicates most RC sampling was conducted over 1m intervalsvia riffle splitting. RC sampling procedures are believed to be consistent with the normal industrypractices of the day. Navigator collected a 3kg riffle splits over the drilled metre at the rig butinitially submitted a scooped 4m composite for analysis, anomalous intervals were collected (atthe original 1m intervals) pulverised (85% passing 75µ) and assayed. The vast majority of sampleswere dry but when wet a spear sample technique was used. Sons of Gwalia (SGW) followed asimilar procedure but used 3m composites. Aircore sampling also followed a similar procedure.This type of sampling procedure is widely used in the gold mining industry and the sample size isconsidered appropriate for this style of mineralisation.
	Available reports covering the pre-Navigator drilling make no mention of systematic sampling andassaying quality control protocols; only limited information is available regarding check assays.Navigator often submitted standards or blanks every 20 samples. Standards were inserted morefrequently than blanks.
	A variety of laboratories were used for analysis, Navigator did not routinely collect and submitduplicate samples from RC and Aircore drilling to the same laboratory consequently overallsampling and assay precision levels can't be determined.
	While QC protocols were not comprehensive the results indicate that assay results fromNavigators exploration programs were reliable. Results from previous owners are regarded as

Criteria	Commentary
	consistent with normal industry practices of the time

Quality ofassaydata andlaboratorytests	The project has a complex and incomplete history of sample preparation and assay procedures.Numerous laboratories and several analytical techniques have been used over the years. Prior to1996 the incomplete nature of the historic data results could not be accurately quantified in termsof the data derived from the combinations of various laboratories and analytical methodologies.Navigator utilised six different laboratories during their drilling programs although KalgoorlieAssay Laboratories conducted the majority of assaying on diamond, RC and Aircore samples.
	Since 1996 most of the samples were field split and prepared for assay via crushing to a nominal85-90% passing 75µm. Fire Assay techniques were conducted on diamond, RC and Aircorehowever an AAS determination following Aqua Regia digest was generally a first pass RC detectionmethod. Mineralised intervals were subsequently Fire Assayed (usually a 40 gram charge) AASfinish. Aqua Regia digest with an AAS finish was also a first pass detection method for Aircoreholes with subsequent 1m fire assays however 15-20% of the Aircore holes may have been subjectto Aqua Regia digest methods only.
	Tabulations of old significant Hunter RC oxide zone intercepts from Merton's Reward andMertondale 3/4 recorded average grades for both Aqua Regia (AR) and Fire Assay (FA), confirmingthat there was no significant bias between AR/AAS and FA techniques. Length weighted gradeswere almost identical for 800m of aggregate intercepts suggesting very low risk of bias associatedwith the portion of utilised Aqua Regia results. Some low grade (<1g/t Au) assays from Hunterholes are probably Aqua Regia results as opposed to Fire Assay however the proportion cannotbe quantified.
	Navigator regularly submitted standards and blanks to the analytical laboratories, standards orblanks were submitted on average every 20 samples.
	Fire Assay is considered to be a total analytical technique, Aqua Regia acid digest is considered tobe a partial analytical technique.
	No geophysical tools were used to determine any element concentrations used in the resourceestimate.
Verificationof samplingandassaying	The returned significant intersections have been verified by company geologists and McDonaldSpeijers (January 2009) however pre Navigator information has limitations due to the legacy ofdifferent companies and different procedures. The results from all phases of diamond, RC andAircore drilling have been accepted on face value. Core recovery information is not presented inthe database. There is always a risk that sampling or assaying biases may exist between resultsfrom different drilling programs this may be due to differing sampling protocols, differentlaboratories and different analytical techniques.
	It is assumed that diamond, RC and Aircore samples were equally representative. Severaldiamond holes, twining RC holes in the resource model, were drilled for metallurgical test work.
	The use of twinned holes is limited, however where used grade correlation exists.
	Generally by the mid 1980's face sample hammers were in use however earlier RC drilling mayhave used crossover sub-assemblies which are more prone to down-hole contamination. Thereis no concrete information regarding the frequency of wet sample however the use of boostercompressors would allow the majority of holes to be dry.
	The history of sample preparation and assaying procedures is complex and incomplete.Numerous laboratories and analytical methods have been used over the years. It's assumed that

Criteria	Commentary
	sampling and assay procedures were followed to the standards of the day, grades for mostdiamond and RC drill holes in mineralised zones have been obtained by fire assay.
	92% of the assay records in 50 randomly selected check holes were validated with <0.2%discrepancies, the very small proportion of discrepancies indicated that the assay database wasprobably reliable.
	No adjustments or calibrations are made to any of the assay data recorded in the database.
Location ofdata points	A local grid was originally established prior to 1985 however a small angular error in the base lineresulted in substantial errors in the northern portion of the project; the points were transformedfirstly to AMG and subsequently to MGA (GDA94 zone51). This resulted in differenttransformations to be applied in the northern and southern parts of the area. Navigatorrecognised errors in the collar co-ordinates resulting from the transformation, a significantnumber of holes were resurveyed and a new MGA transformation generated, this exerciseappeared to eliminate the offset.
	Old collars have been validated against the original local grid co-ordinates and independentlytransformed to MGA co-ordinates and checked against the database. Navigator's MGA coordinates were checked against the surveyor's reports. Where variations in the MGA co-ordinatesystem were detected geologists deemed the errors were not large enough to have a materialimpact on the resource models.
	Considering the history of grid transformations and various problems recorded in the survivingdocumentation there must be some residual risk of error in the MGA co-ordinates for old drillholes, particularly in the northern area. All recent work conducted by Navigator was conductedin MGA using differential GPS equipment and a network of survey controls. General surveycontrol appears to have been satisfactory.
	Navigator supplied a digital terrain model of the topography, constructed from drill holes, Kin'sgeologists believe the model is sufficiently accurate for resource estimation purposes.
	Almost all the diamond and a small portion of the RC holes were downhole surveyed, preNavigator single shot survey cameras were used with typical survey intervals of about 30-40m,there were some correction between magnetic and grid azimuths (2°-0.9°) however Kin'sgeologists deemed the corrections small enough to be acceptable. Aircore holes and most of theRC holes were not down hole surveyed, as was the general practice of the day.
	All diamond drilling conducted by Navigator were surveyed down hole using a single shot or multishot survey camera, at least 80% of the RC holes drilled by Navigator were also surveyed usingsimilar instruments.
Dataspacinganddistribution	The drill hole spacing is project specific and the current drilling patterns vary considerablythroughout the project area however in the modelled mineralised areas they typically involvedholes spaced at about 15-25m along east-west lines 20-30m apart. The majority of the holes weredrilled grid west at a dip of about -60°. The Quicksilver and Eclipse areas had the least regular drillpatterns. Line spacing's in the Eclipse area were commonly 50m and as much as 100m apart.
	Drill spacing is sufficient to establish mineral resources and classifications applied.
	Sample composting occurs in a portion of the resources however the vast majority of assayintervals are 1m split samples (Aircore and RC). Diamond core was predominantly sampled at 1mintervals

Criteria	Commentary
Orientationofdata inrelationtogeologicalstructure	Most of the known gold mineralisation is hosted in sheared mafics, with local porphyry bodiesand sedimentary units. Mineralisation is hosted by the Mertondale Shear Zone (MSZ) in twodistinct mineralised trends. The western edge of the Mertondale Shear hosts Quicksilver – Tonto- Eclipse - Mertondale 5 while the MSZ (main structure) hosts Merton's Reward - Mertondale 2 -Mertondale 3/4. Mineralisation is associated with varying intensities of carbonate, potassic andsilica alteration (Quartz-sericite-carbonate + sulphides within a broader envelope of carbonatealteration). Felsic intrusive porphyry's have a close association with the mineralisation.
	Detailed subsurface interpretation of the geology of the individual deposits is hampered byinconsistencies in the geological logging code system due to the various companies involved andthe different phases of drilling. Structurally the deposits are deformed, sheared and described ascomplex.
	The rocks are generally foliated with the foliation apparently parallel to sub-parallel to thelithological layering. The rocks within the shear zone are highly foliated and deformed. The MSZis not a simple single structure; it consists of two main branches along the eastern and westernmargins of a broad north-south trending diffuse structural shear feature up to 500m wide.
	At Mertondale 3/4 mineralisation is associated with the intrusive porphyry contact; the contactcan be used as a mineralisation guide. At other sites, due to the lack of geological framework inthe database, no interpretation of host stratigraphy or local structures has been developed apartfrom the observation that the further north and in the western shear steep, shear relatedmineralisation is dominant.
	The geological confidence levels relating to the lack of geological interpretation with respect tomineralisation are reduced north of Mertondale 3/4. There were often glaring inconsistenciesbetween lithological codes in adjacent holes due to the compound history of lease ownership.
	No orientation sampling bias has been identified in the data thus far.
	Holes are drilled orthogonal to the interpreted strike of the target horizon. Holes arepredominantly -60° and on occasion vertical when targeting the MSZ
Samplesecurity	No sample security details are available for pre-Navigator samples. Numbered and compiledNavigator drill samples were collected from the field on a daily basis and transported to a secureyard in Leonora. They were then processes and packaged into 'bulkabag sacks' for transport tothe assay laboratory. No particular security measures were imposed apart from sealing the sacksand storage in a secure yard.
Audits orreviews	A review of sampling and drilling techniques by Kin Mining and others indicates that they wereconducted to the best practice industry standards of the day although historic drilling andsampling methods and QA/QC are regarded as weaker than today's current standards. Coresamples based on geological boundaries or 1m intervals were mostly half core however some wasquarter core. RC samples were usually riffle split at the rig at metre intervals, a 3m (SGW) or 4m(Navigator) composite was collected from the reject and assayed, any anomalous interval(typically >0.1g/t Au) was retrieved at split 1m intervals and assayed. Some (MPI) RC samples(<0.5% of all RC drilling) were collected over 1.5m, 2m or 4m intervals. Aircore sampling followeda similar procedure to RC except the rejects from the riffle split were stored on the ground andnot bagged. The number of wet samples is believed to be very low however the intervals andquantity involved can't be quantified.The data has been validated in Datashed and in Surpac prior to resource estimation. Theseprocesses checked for holes that are missing data, missing intervals, overlapping intervals, databeyond end-of-hole, holes missing collar co-ordinates, and holes with duplicate collar coordinates.

Criteria	Commentary
Mineraltenement andland tenurestatus	The deposits are located on granted Mining Leases within the Mertondale project area. Alltenements are in the name of and 100% owned by Navigator Mining Pty Ltd, Kin Mining NL hasentered into a Share Sale Agreement with Navigator and has acquired all the issued capital andassets of Navigator Mining. The agreement includes the Mertondale tenement package. Thefollowing deposits are located on the following tenements: Quicksilver (North) M37/231,Quicksilver (South) M37/232 and M37/82, Tonto M37/233, Eclipse M37/233, Mertondale 5M37/233, Merton's Reward M37/81, Mertondale 2 M37/81 and M37/1284 and Mertondale3/4 M37/81 and M37/82.
	The leases are located in the Mt Margaret Mineral Field, Navigator Mining Pty Ltd is a whollyowned subsidiary of Kin Mining NL. Waterton Global LP holds a debt security over the assetsof Navigator Mining Pty Ltd. Third parties hold production royalties of up to $2 per dry tonnemined and milledonvarious tenements within the Mertondale group. An annualcompensation payment ($10,000) is payable to the Mertondale Pastoral Lease holder uponcommencement of mining related activities.
	The tenements are in good standing with no known impediments.
Explorationdone byother parties	Gold was initially discovered in the area at Merton's Reward in 1899, underground miningbegan almost immediately. Modern exploration (1981-84) was conducted on a limited scale,around Merton's Reward by Telluride Mining NL, Nickelore NL, International Nickel (Aust) Ltdand Petroleum Securities Mining Pty Ltd. Hunter Resources Ltd commenced major explorationdrill programmes in 1984 discovering Mertondale 2 and Mertondale 3/4.
	Open pit mining commenced in 1986 at Mertondale 4, in 1987 Hunter was taken over byTechnomin Australia NL, mining ceased in late 1988. Hunter's interest in the project was soldto Harbour Lights Mining Ltd (HML) who delineated the Mertondale 5 deposit and resumedmining in 1990. In 1990 Ashton Gold WA Ltd gained control of HML and continued mining until1993. In 1993 Ashton's interest was transferred to Aurora Gold Ltd and a Joint Venture (JV)established between Mining Project Investors Pty Ltd (MPI) and Ashton, minor drillingprogrammes were conducted.
	In 1996 Sons of Gwalia (SGW) entered into a JV with Aurora eventually acquiring (1997) theentire project, only modest drill programmes were conducted (1996-99). In 2004 NavigatorResources Ltd purchased the Mertondale project area conducting numerous substantial drillprogrammes (2004-2009) delineating and defining the six resources. The JORC (2004) ResourceEstimate for the six deposits released in 2009 comprised an Indicated and Inferred Resource of5.6Mt @ 2.20g/t Au (395,000ozs).
	Reported total historic production (1899-1991) from the Mertondale area amounts to274,000oz of gold. Production was sourced from three main areas Mertondale 3/4 pit - 1.3Mt@ 4.3g/t Au, Mertondale 5 Pit - 385,000t @ 2.56g/t Au and Merton's Reward undergroundmine - 90,000t @ 21g/t Au. Kin Mining NL purchased the Leonora Gold project from theNavigator administrator in late 2014.

Criteria	Commentary
Geology	The Mertondale Project is located 20-40km NE of Leonora in the central part of the NorsemanWiluna Greenstone Belt. In broad terms the stratigraphy consists of a central felsic volcanicsequence bound by tholeiitic basalt, dolerite, and carbonaceous shale ± felsic porphyrysequences. The Mertondale Shear consists of two distinct branches which are generally locatednear the contacts between the felsic sequences and the adjoining mafic sequences.
	The six recognised deposits and all the known mineralisation is within the Mertondale ShearZone. The majority of the gold mineralisation is hosted by sheared mafic rocks with localporphyry intrusives and sedimentary units. Two distinct parallel structures are recognised overa strike length of approximately 12km. The Western Shear trend, in the north, runs throughthe Quicksilver, Tonto, Eclipse and Mertondale 5 deposits. The Mertondale Shear, in the south,trends northwest from Merton's Reward and Mertondale 2 through to Mertondale 3/4.
Drill holeInformation	In all 6,801 drill holes have been sourced and included in the Mineral Resource estimation. Itis impractical to list a table of drill hole details in this report format.
	Exploration results are not material to this report; the Mineral Resource Estimate is based onall available historic and modern Diamond, RC, Aircore and RAB drilling data.
DataAggregationmethods	Individual grades are reported as down hole length weighted averages, sample lengths in themineralised zones in all deposits were overwhelmingly 1m. Less than 5% of the total metreswere quotes as composite intervals and less than 2% were intervals shorter than 1m.Composite lengths of 1m or integer multiples of a metre are deemed to be satisfactory andcompatible with the sample lengths.
	Top cut thresholds for Au were selected following analysis of the assay populations on a zoneby zone basis including: examination of cumulative log-probability plots for inflections nearhigh grade extremities, Iterative tests to determine top cuts required to bring arithmetic meansinto line with lognormal mean estimations, inspection of log histograms (to assess high values)and Inspection of cross sections to determine if extreme high values are scattered or formcoherent high grade ore shoots.
	No metal equivalent values are reported. All values are Au (ppm). Top cuts selected rangedfrom 1.5-80g/t Au, some low grade zones didn't require top cutting. These were typically in theorder of 5-15g/t Au for the weaker, lower grade zones and 20-40g/t Au for the major morestrongly developed zones.
RelationshipBetweenMineralisationwidths andinterceptlengths	Varying lode geometry is present in the Mertondale Shear but the effective strike of thedeposits is NS, at Merton's Reward: ore zones display steep shear zones, flatter NE dippingzones and E-NE intershear zones with a northerly plunge. At Mertondale 3/4 the ore zonedisplays a shallow east dipping body that becomes more vertical with depth. At Quicksilvermineralised zones dip steeply (80°E-85°W) and strike 010°. At Tonto mineralised zones typicallydip 85°E and strike 0-005°. At Eclipse mineralisation trends 355° with a steep dip and atMertondale 5 the mineralisation strikes 355° degrees and dips 85°W-85°E.
	The vast majority of holes are generally orientated west at -60° however some holes are drilledvertical, grid drill spacing is varied depending on the deposit and drill holes traces are usuallyat an optimum angle or close to practicable true width to the mineralisation.
Diagrams	Relevant "type example" plans and diagrams are included in ASX announcement dated11/05/2015
BalancedReporting	The available database includes a large inherited data set compiled by previous owners datingback to 1982. There are limitations in the amount of information provided in the data set. Ithas not been possible to fully verify the reliability and accuracy of a substantial proportion ofthe data however it appears that no serious problems have occurred and validation check

Criteria	Commentary
	results were within acceptable limits. In general recent data is more reliable. The Quicksilver,Tonto and Eclipse models are supported predominantly by Navigator drilling. More than 50%of the drilling data for the Merton's Reward model is sourced from Navigator with a substantialportion from Hunter. The Mertondale 3/4 model is based on a combination of old Hunter andrecent Navigator drilling while the Mertondale 5 model is largely based on old drilling byHarbour Lights.
	Considering the complex history of grid transformations there must be some residual risk inconverting old grids to GDA 94 although generally the survey control appears to be satisfactory.
	Navigator also supplied data pertaining to the underground workings, old open cuts andmullock dumps although independently verified they have been accepted on face value. In thecase of Merton's Reward underground mine expansion adjustments were made to reflect thehistoric mined tonnage, the adjustment is considered to be conservative.
	There is always an area of technical risk associated with resource tonnage and gradeestimations.
OtherSubstantiveexplorationdata	Exploration results are not being reported.
Further work	Follow-up resource definition drilling is very likely to occur; the mineralisation along theMertondale Shear Zone remains open in various directions, particularly at depth. Anyadditional exploration drilling is expected to test not only depth extensions but also extensionsalong strike.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Criteria	Commentary
DatabaseIntegrity	The Mertondale data sets date back to 1982. Collected and compiled by numerous previousowners including Nickelore - Carr Boyd 1982, 1986-87, Hunter 1984-88, Harbour Lights 1988-91, Mining Project Investors 1994-95, Sons of Gwalia 1996-99 and Navigator 2004-08 amongothers. Pre-Navigator data is limited due to the time lag (up to 33 years); the database couldnot be fully verified regarding the reliability and accuracy of a substantial portion of thehistorical data.
	Database checks conducted by Kin and others are within acceptable limits, there is missingdata however it is regarded as minimal. It is not possible to identify errors that might haveoccurred prior or during digital tabulation. Geological control in the database is generallyweak, some of the digital lithological data was never captured and no validation wasconductedonthegeologicaldata.Inaddition,duetodifferentloggingtechniques/companies/codes there were many lithological inconsistencies betweenadjoining holes.
	The data has been validated in Datashed and in Surpac prior to resource estimation. Theseprocesses checked for holes that are missing data, missing intervals, overlapping intervals,data beyond end-of-hole, holes missing collar co-ordinates, and holes with duplicate collarco-ordinates. Navigator uploaded the original assay files received from the labs via adatabase administrator using Datashed to minimise loading errors. An export of the data wasthen used to create an access database for use in Surpac.Kin geologists have verified historic drilling/assays/geological logs/survey against thedatabase including viewing old reports and visual checks in Surpac.

Criteria	Commentary
Site Visit	Kin's exploration team have conducted multiple site visits including management of drillprograms within the resource areas when a Kin staff member was previously employed byNavigator.
GeologicalInterpretation	At Mertondale 3/4 gold mineralisation is associated with the intrusive porphyry contact; thecontact can be used as a mineralisation guide or marker horizon. The geological confidencelevels relating to the lack of geological interpretation with respect to mineralisation arereduced north of Mertondale 3/4. There were often inconsistencies between lithologicalcodes in adjacent holes however confidence in the geological interpretation remains highand no alternative interpretation is envisaged.
	Geological interpretation of Merton's Reward is largely based on the historic workings andthus has a sufficient level of confidence in the interpretation.
	The western branch of the fault zone typically contains black mafic mylonite, a black shale,shale, quartz-dolerite, basalt, basaltic andesite and to the east, a felsic volcanic derived froma rhyolite. Felsic porphyritic intrusives occur irregularly along the fault zone. Generally, theblack sulphide-graphite-rich mafic mylonite has reasonably high background goldanomalism, in the order of 0.1 to 0.5 g/t Au.
	Geological data used includes lithology, mineral percentages (such as quartz veining andsulphides) to identify lode positions, weathering codes, rock colour, texture and foliation.Geological codes are assumed to have been logged consistently by various geologist, thoughit is likely that some variations between drillholes are due to different logging styles orinterpretations.
	The 3D wire frame interpretations of the mineralisation trends were supplied by Navigator.Slight modifications to the interpretation by previous independent consultants were madebefore regenerating the wireframes. The base of complete oxidation and the base of partialoxidation wire frames were also supplied by Navigator, they were accepted withoutmodification.
	Alternative interpretations on the mineral Resource would have an effect on the estimationhowever the current estimation is controlled by all available data in an attempt to quantifythe mineralisation with the highest level of confidence.
	Geology is used as a guide at Tonto, Mertondale 5, Mertondale 3/4, Quicksilver and Eclipsewith Merton's Reward lodes are structurally controlled within the sheared basalt.
	All deposits are held within the Mertondale shear zone which has an effect on both gradeand geology.
Dimensions	The Merton's Reward resource drill area covers approximately 1,400m of strike the ore zonecan be divided into 3 broad zones, the drill hole search area (1,550m x 500m) included 708holes of which 147 holes were mineralised intersections amounting to 4,821.9m, and theresource includes/covers the existing Merton's Reward underground workings where99,000t has been omitted from the estimate due to voids/stopes/underground mining etc.
	Mertondale 3/4 resource drill area covers 1,620m of strike, the drill hole search area (1,850mx 600m) included 1,006 holes of which 332 holes were mineralised intersections amountingto 11,572.9m and the resource includes/covers the existing open pit mined by Hunter (1986-1988).
	Quicksilver resource drill area includes 4 independent zones covering 200-500m of strikeseparated by 400-900m of strike, the drill hole search area (4,500m x 625m) included 461holes of which 69 holes were mineralised intersections amounting to 1,660.1m.
	Tonto resource drill area covers approximately 600m of continuous strike, the drill holesearch area (1,000m x 450m) included 274 holes of which 168 holes were mineralised

Criteria	Commentary
	intersections amounting to 7,650.8m.
	At Eclipse, the drill hole search area (2,000m x 450m) included 545 holes of which 275 holeswere mineralised intersections amounting to 9,205m.
	Mertondale 5 covers approximately 800m of continuous strike, the drill hole search area(1,500m x 400m) included 393 holes of which 148 holes were mineralised intersectionsamounting to 4,443.8m and the resource includes/covers the existing open pit mined(1990-1993) by HLM.
Estimations andModellingTechniques	Tonnage and grade estimates were achieved by Recovered Fraction (RF) block modelling.This technique is a probabilistic one that estimates the volumetric proportion of each blocklikely to be above a particular cuttoff grade and what the average grade of that proportion islikely to be.
	Conventional block models were also generated (anisotropic, inverse distance cubed) as acheck parameter.Search radii parameters (dip, strike, cross-dip) was assigned for the following depositsMerton's Reward (30x30x4m), Mertondale 3/4 (60x60x4m), Quicksilver (30x30x5m), Tonto(30x30x4m), Eclipse (30x30x5m), Mertondale 5 (70x35x4m).
	Parent block sizes were 4m X, 10m Y and 4m Z for all resources at Mertondale, minimum subcells were 2m X, 5m Y, 1m Z in all resource block models except for Merton's Reward were1m X, 2.5m Y, 1m Z was implemented. Block sizes are relative to drill density.
	Block models were generated filling the 3D wireframes of the mineralised zones with cells,SG was assigned using oxidation codes as per the data base, assay top cuts were applied,assays composited over 2m intervals, block models were estimated using a range of cut offsand anisotropic inverse distance cubed interpolation, under zonal control.
	Top cuts selected ranged from 1.5-80g/t Au, some low grade zones didn't require top cutting.These were typically in the order of 5-15g/t Au for the weaker, lower grade zones and 20-40g/t Au for the major more strongly developed zones.
	Reported total historic production (1899-1991) from the Mertondale area amounts to274,000oz of gold. Production was sourced from three main areas Mertondale 3/4 pit - 1.3Mt@ 4.3g/t Au, Mertondale 5 Pit - 385,000t @ 2.56g/t Au and Merton's Reward undergroundmine - 90,000t @ 21g/t Au. Previous estimates of the resources by Navigator were deemedappropriate and have been then audited and reviewed by Kin Mining.
	No by-products are to be recovered.
	Previous mining is mostly in the oxide/transition zone. In fresh rock apart from disseminatedsulphides the ore zones can be associated with graphitic material (black shale), however thishas not been considered in the current resource estimate.
	A parent cell size of 4m (east), 10m (north) and 4m (vertical) was used on all deposits,deemed appropriate relative to drill data.
	Multiple compositing and interpolation passes were done, using a range of cutoff grades anddifferent ore loss and dilution parameters. One set of passes were made with no ore loss ordilution to generate hypothetical in situ estimates for comparison with previous Navigatorestimates. A second set used in current resource estimation were made using a down-holedilution skin set at 0.5m for oxide material and 0.8m for transitional and primary material.Downhole ore loss was set at 0.2m in the oxide and 0.3m in the transitional and primaryzones.

Criteria	Commentary
	No assumptions are made regarding correlation between variables.
	Downhole lithology data was plotted and colour coded in Surpac and sectional interoperationof geological boundaries were generated. Wireframes of lodes were used as hard boundariesto contain the interpolation.
	Varying top cuts were applied following a series of processes including log-probability plots,Iterative tests, log histograms and cross section inspection.
	To check that the interpolation of the block model honoured the drill data, validation wascarried out comparing the interpolated blocks to the sample composite data, the validationplots showed good correlation thus the raw drill data was honoured by the block model.
Moisture	Tonnages and grades were estimated on a dry in situ basis. No moisture values werereviewed.
Cut-offParameters	Operating cost estimated supplied by Navigator indicate a break even mill feed grade fordeposits in the Mertondale area is likely to be in the vicinity of 0.7g/t Au.
MiningFactors orAssumptions	Previous mining is mostly in the oxide/transition zone. In fresh rock apart from disseminatedsulphides the ore zones can be associated with graphitic material (black shale). Themetallurgical performance, which is an unknown factor, may be poorer in fresh rock. Thebreak even mining grade (0.7g/t Au) is an assumption based on Navigators estimate.
	Historical gold production is over 270,000 ounces of gold; Mertondale 3/4 pit - 1.3Mt @4.3g/t Au; Mertondale 5 Pit - 385,000t @ 2.56g/t au; Merton's Reward - 90,000t @ 21g/t Aufrom underground production 1899-1911.
	The current resource estimation were made using a down-hole dilution skin set at 0.5m foroxide material and 0.8m for transitional and primary material. Downhole ore loss was set at0.2m in the oxide and 0.3m in the transitional and primary zones.
MetallurgicalFactors orAssumptions	Mining of Mertondale 5 (1992) indicated that the presence of graphitic material, in thedeeper fresher portions of the open pit, resulted in lower metallurgical recoveries. Graphiticblack shale may introduce pre-robbing from carbon during processing; arsenopyrite may bea metallurgical issue in transition and primary ore zones. Considerable historical miningsuggests that the Mertondale ore (mostly oxide) can be treated without any seriousextraction issues. Metallurgical test work conducted on the oxide ore zones at Mertondaleand the nearby deposits of Cardinia and Raeside indicate high (+95%) recoveries as well as asignificant gravity gold factor (up 30%).
EnvironmentalFactorsor Assumptions	Three old pits and a set of underground workings are within the proposed pit parametersbeing Merton's Reward, Mertondale 3/4 Mertondale 2 and Mertondale 5 along withassociated mullock dumps. Old Battery tailings at Mertondale 2 and some drill sites withinthe pit parameters and surrounds require rehabilitation. The existing open pits have beenextensively mined and mullock dumps containing millions of tonnes have been rehabilitated.

Criteria	Commentary
Bulk Density	Bulk density measurements are only available on 3 of the 6 areas modelled. No associatedmoisture content determinations are available, an arbitrary adjustment was applied basedon assumptions. The density measurements available for Merton's Reward, Mertondale 3/4and Mertondale 5 all appear to be higher than expected; adjustments were made tocompensate for moisture. The following Specific Gravity figures (Oxide, Transition, Fresh)were assigned to the following deposits; Merton's Reward (2, 2.2, 2.8 t/m3), Mertondale 3/4(2, 2.22, 2.51 t/m3), Quicksilver (2, 2.2, 2.5 t/m3), Tonto (2, 2.2, 2.5 t/m3), Eclipse (2, 2.2, 2.5t/m3), Mertondale 5 (2, 2.2, 2.51 t/m3). The values used in the estimates were assumed basedon analogy with Mertondale 5 mining results.
	When compared with the (April 2009) Ammtec test results Tonto ore composites returned(Oxide 2.738 t/m3, Trans. 2.826 and 2.744 t/m3, Fresh 2.728 and 2.868 t/m3). These testresults indicate a conservative Specific Gravity (SG) value is assigned to the current resourcecalculation at Tonto. Test work on Mertondale ore also returned higher SG values than usedin the estimate calculation. Therefore it is assumed that conservative SG values have beenused on some estimations, with the intention to commence more detailed SG work in thefuture.
Classification	There is not enough available quality control data to indicate that that the old drill hole datais reliable or accurate, in addition there is a general lack of accurate SG information. Theresources could only be classified as Indicated (drill spacing typically 20-30m along strike and15-25m across strike) or Inferred (wider drill spacing and a general lack of geologicalconfidence with the interpretation of the mineralised zone).
	At Merton's Reward the Indicated Resource was classified with some reservations, only theadvent of previous mining allowed a border line Indicated classification, even though the drillspacing was up to 50m in the central portion of the deposit.The Mineral Resource estimate appropriately reflects the view of the Competent Person.
Audits andReviews	Internal reviews have been conducted by the Competent Person who is obliged to review thedata geology/assay/survey/wire frames etc. this procedure is conducted as part of thenormal review process. The technical inputs, methodologies, parameters and results of theestimation have been verified by the Competent Person. McDonald Speijers (January 2009)generated an Indicated and Inferred Resource (0.7g/t Au) cut-off grade - within $2,000 goldprice pit shells. Utilising a 3D block model "Recovered Fraction" technique:Merton's Reward1,090,000t @ 2.64g/t Au(93,000ozs)Mertondale 3/41,540,000t @ 2.21g/t Au(110,000ozs)Quicksilver660,000t @ 1.82g/t Au(39,000ozs)
	Tonto970,000t @ 1.91g/t Au(60,000ozs)Eclipse870,000t @ 1.74g/t Au(49,000ozs)Mertondale 5480,000t @ 3.03g/t Au(46,000ozs)TOTAL(Undiluted)5,600,000t @ 2.20g/t Au(395,000ozs)
Discussionof RelativeAccuracy and	There is a lack of SG values for Quicksilver, Tonto and Eclipse however Ammtec (April 2009)results of oxide ore at Tonto indicate a SG of 2.738 t/m3. Previous consultants who originallycalculated the resource assigned 2.0 t/m3 as the SG value.
Confidence	Due to the lack of QA/QC information the quality of pre Navigator drill hole assay is largelyunknown, the limited data that is available indicates no serious problem however thereliability of the historic assay data cannot be adequately demonstrated. The greatest impactis uncertainty on the remaining mineralisation at Merton's Reward, Mertondale 3/4 andMertondale 5, however historic mining demonstrates that mineralisation can beeconomically mined.

Criteria	Commentary
	The applied ore loss and dilution factors may require some adjustment, up or down,depending on the physical properties of the ore.
	There is a veneer of lateritic or hard pan material over most, if not all of the deposits, thisthin surface horizon was assigned the same SG as the oxide layer, it may be higher and maybe physically harder than the "free dig" oxide zone.
	The positions (RL) of the transition zone may require adjustment, the values were obtainedfrom Navigator, and the physical properties of mineralised zones at these interfaces may notbe "free dig" in addition the SG may be different to that used in the estimations.

Appendix B Cardinia (Bruno Lewis Kyte)

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	Commentary
Sampling	Various sampling methods were used during multiple phases of Diamond, RC, Aircore and
techniques	RAB drilling, ranging from 5m composites to 1m split samples. Analysis of the sample lengths
	revealed the most common sample length was 1m (99%). All samples within the resource
	wireframes were composited to 1m with the exception of Kyte. Only RC and Diamond drill
	holes were used to calculate mineral resource in the Bruno and Lewis grade control areas and
	the Bruno-Lewis exploration link area. Over 60% of the drilling in the Bruno-Lewis-Kyte
	Resource (BLK) is Navigator RC grade control drilling.
	Navigator RC samples were collected at 1m intervals on the drilling rig via a riffle splitter
	(nominally 3kg). Holes were sampled as 4m composites (scoop), assays >0.1g/t were collected
	from the original 1m intervals. Grade Control holes were also sampled at 1m intervals.
	Analysis utilised a FAF1 analysis method (Fire Assay) where a sub-sample of 40g is selected.
	Sampling techniques relating to historic Aircore holes is unknown however it is assumed they
	were conducted in line with the standard industry practices of the day. Details of historic
	Diamond drilling sample techniques is unknown however if the same techniques used at
	Cardinia were like those used at Mertondale, half core averaging 1m would have been the
	dominant procedure.
Drilling	The Cardinia project area has been extensively drilled by several companies in past years
techniques	(mainly Mt Edon, Sons of Gwalia (SGW) and Navigator Resources however the vast majority
	of exploration and resource drilling was conducted by Navigator Resources (NAV). Holes range
	from Diamond, RC, Aircore and RAB (Exploration and Grade Control) using local grids and
	more recently MGA94 Zone 51. An Access database containing drill details was created by
	NAV. This database contained records of 9,140 drill holes for 315,000m of that 2,947 holes
	were used in the resource estimate being 349 Aircore, 2 RAB, 380 RC, 151 Grade Control, 10
	Diamond, 2,055 Grade Control RC. The data was interrogated and validated prior to being
	entered into Surpac.
Drill sample	Drill sample recovery details are not mentioned in the resource estimate however recoveries
recovery	from the various types of drill methods are assumed to have been satisfactory.
	To obtain representative samples, grade control RC drilling was implemented over a large
	portion of the resource to ensure good sample recovery.
	Limited data is recorded about sample recovery in the geological logs, therefore difficulty

Criteria	Commentary
	remains to establish any relationship between grade and sample recovery.
Logging	Navigator RC and Aircore logging were entered on a metre by metre basis recording lithology,alteration, mineralisation, weathering, colour, structure and veining. The information wasentered directly into hand held digital data loggers and transferred directly to the database.Holes were logged to a standard considered appropriate for geological and resourcemodelling.Navigator's procedure for diamond core was initially orientation and marking of the bottom
	of the hole. Core recovery, fractures per metre and RQD was also recorded. The core wasgeologically logged in full recording lithologies as in RC drilling, photographed and marked forsampling. Holes were logged to a level considered appropriate for geological and resourcemodelling.
	No details of pre-Navigator drill holes logging procedures were located, however loggingmethodologies appear consistent with normal industry practices of the time and geologicallogs from historic reports correlate with Navigators logging.Logging of geology, alteration, mineralisation, weathering, colour and structure are
	interpretative and qualitative, whereas logging of mineral and veining percentage isquantitative.Core photos have been reviewed.
	All drill holes were logged in full.
Subsamplingtechniquesand sample	Core was routinely analysed for this Mineral Resource estimate, however Diamond drillingresults comprises a very low proportion of the resource quantifications.All RC and Aircore samples were collected at the rig using a riffle splitter. Samples werepredominantly dry.
preparation	Half core, RC and Aircore sampling are considered standard industry practice.The majority of Navigator drill samples were dispatched to Kalgoorlie Assay Labs (KAL)however SGS and Aurum laboratories were also used for sample analysis. KAL utilised theirFAF1 analysis method (Fire Assay) where a sub-sample of 40g is taken. Flux and reducingagents are introduced to the assay sample charge and mixed mechanically prior to analysis.Aqua Regia digest methods utilised Flame AAS analysis to 0.01ppm detection limits. As a checkof pulverisation process Kalassay completed a wet screen sample test every 50th sample.The preparation procedure at Aurum included drying, splitting to 1kg, pulverising (90%passing 75µ) where a nominal 50g sample was subject to Aqua Regia digest (AuAR50).At SGS the analytical process involved drying, crushing and pulverising (90% passing 75µ) andAqua Regia digest (ARE155), Grade Control holes were Fire Assayed (FAA505) using a 50gm
	charge.Analysis of 916 field duplicates indicates a poor relationship between the original and the fieldduplicate, the result is indicative of a high nugget mineralisation style; repeatability is poorhowever no sample bias was noted.Sample sizes are considered appropriate to correctly represent the nuggetty gold
	mineralisation. The sample preparation followed industry's best practice of the day, thesample size is considered to be appropriate to correctly represent the style of mineralisationbeing tested.
Quality of	In general, with the exception of the Bruno Lewis Grade Control holes, assays were conducted
assay dataand	as 4m composite samples, using an Aqua Regia technique, as a first pass with follow up 1msampling completed using Fire Assay. Fire Assay is considered to be a total analytical
laboratory	technique, Aqua Regia is considered to be a partial analytical technique.
tests	The favoured Assay technique at SGS was Aqua Regia digest (ARE155) where a 50 gram chargeis digested in Aqua Regia acid followed by DIBK extraction with an AAS finish. Grade Controlholes and 1m re-splits were analysed via Fire Assay (FAA505), where a 50 gram representative
	sample was fire assayed with AAS finish, detection limit 0.01ppm Au.Aurum Laboratories used a fire assay technique (AuAR50) in which a 50 gram sample isdigested in Aqua Regia acid and the Au extracted with DIBK/Aliquot (detection limit 0.01
	ppm).

Criteria	Commentary
	KAL used a (FAF1) Fire Assay analysis using a 40 gram charge and Aqua Regia digest with flameAAS finish (detection limit 0.01ppm).NAV used standards and blanks that were routinely submitted with the drill samples. Internal
	QC included field duplicates, Grade Control drilling (first pass) included duplicates at the 11-12m interval on every second hole. During the latest phase of Grade control drilling duplicateswere submitted every 31st and 81st sample. Additionally blanks or standards were inserted onthe 20th, 50th and 81st sample numbers equating to a ratio of 1:20 for QC samples.
	A total of 1,079 standard samples representing 15 different standards and blanks wereanalysed during the Cardinia drilling. Standards for Aircore results indicate the reported gradeto be within acceptable limits. Standards submitted with Grade Control drilling also reportedwithin acceptable limits.
	Duplicate repeat pulp analysis from Helens/Rangoon (a deposit close by and drilled aroundthe same time) indicate an excellent relationship between the original and the repeat assayresult, indicating an acceptable measure of sample preparation reliability in the assaylaboratory.
	Drilling techniques at the time (+2004) utilised face sampling hammers (RC drilling). There isno information regarding the frequency of wet samples however the use of booster andauxiliary compressors would allow the majority of holes to be dry, additionally, the resource
	is shallow (20-60m), a depth that would allow for dry samples.
Verificationof samplingandassaying	The significant intersections have been internally verified by several company personnelincluding geologists and have been analysed on screen using 3D software (Surpac) forcorrelation within the supergene gold mineralisation. Historical results have been acceptedat face value. Top cuts were applied to the datasets due to the high coefficient of variationsin the summary statistics. A high grade cut of 15g/t Au was applied to the data sets (inflectionson the log probability plot). A top cut value of 30g/t Au was also applied to both the BrunoGrade Control (BGC) and Lewis Grade Control (LGC) areas.There is no use of twinned holes in the mineral resource, however a very closely spaced drillhole pattern was implemented in the Grade Control areas where an 8x5m grid pattern wasdrilled, with the intention to increase confidence due to the inherent grade variability of theBLK supergene mineralisation. Documentation of primary data was varied, dependent on ageof drilling. Historic data was obtained by NAV from SGW upon acquisition of the project andlimited detail is available on how the data was constructed. During the NAV period (whichconsists of the vast majority of the resource drilling) field data was entered directly into a fieldlogging tablet and then was entered into the main database via a database administratorusing Datashed. Data verification is possible through Datashed during data importation. Datastorage is on Kin premises and a backup is stored in a secure off-site facility. Hardcopies ofhistoric reports are stored on Kin premises.Assay data has not been adjusted except results that were below detection limit given an 'x'in the database or if there was no sample taken, in this event a 'ns' was assigned.
Location ofdata points	The collars of all NAV holes were surveyed after completion using an RTK-DGPS with aaccuracy on a centimetre scale. 80% of the holes were surveyed using Spectrum Surveys withthe remainder conducted by NAV. No information regarding collar survey technique of earlierdrilling is available. Downhole surveys were conducted on 1,284 of the 9,140 holes in thedatabase, at depths ranging from 3m to 180m. Although downhole surveys are somewhatlimited, this is of low concern due to the shallow nature of the supergene resource. RC andGC (Grade Control) drilling was conducted on the MGA94 zone 51 grid. Historic AC and RABwere drilled on several local grids (Azimuth 220°-270°) on the national GDA grid. Bruno &Lewis are regularly drilled at 8m NS x 5m EW. Bruno Lewis link exploration was drilled on 32msections with hole spacing as close as 10m but generally at 20m. Kyte was AC drilled on anoblique grid pattern at 40m x 20m spacing.A topographic DTM was created using the DGPS pickup data of the drillholes.
Data	The drill hole spacing is deposit specific. Drill holes used in the resource estimate included
spacing and	2,353 vertical RC grade control holes on a nominal 8m NS x 5m EW grid. 1,778 vertical surface
distribution	RC holes. 26 surface diamond holes and 1,710 angled Aircore holes for 315,088m of drilling

Criteria	Commentary
	(entire dataset).The majority of other exploration holes were drilled on a 32m to 42m NS line spacing and 10mto 20m EW spacing. Grade Control holes were drilled on 5m x 8m grid, Aircore holes weremostly angled at -60° grid SW or grid west.The mineralised zones have been extensively drilled and have demonstrated sufficientcontinuity to support the definition of "Mineral Resource" as per the classifications appliedunder the 2012 JORC Code.Analysis of the sample lengths revealed the most common sample length within thewireframes are 1m (99%) with Kyte consisting of some historic 2m composites. All sampleswithin the resource wireframes were composited to 1m.
Orientationof data inrelation togeologicalstructure	Mineralisation at BLK comprises flat lying shallow dipping zones of gold mineralisation relatedto supergene Au enrichment. The blanket of supergene mineralisation cuts across allweathered lithologies and has been drill tested by NAV over a strike length of 2.6km. Thedeeply weathered nature of the deposits has resulted in variable zones of depletion rangingfrom 0-20m deep with subsequent supergene enrichment occurring beneath the depletionzones and extending in places up to 60m deep. Surface silicification is apparent in the top 4m.RC holes are vertical and RAB and Aircore holes angled (mostly at -60°). No orientation basedsample bias has been identified in the sample data.
Samplesecurity	No sample security details are available for pre-Navigator samples. It is assumed the samplesecurity methodologies were the same as those adopted at Mertondale, a former Navigatorresource located further north. At Mertondale numbered and compiled Navigator drillsamples were collected from the field on a daily basis and transported to a secure yard inLeonora. They were then processed and packaged into 'bulkabag' sacks for transport to theassay laboratory. No particular security measures were imposed apart from sealing/tying upthe sacks and a secure yard.
Audits orreviews	A review of sampling techniques indicates that they were conducted to the normal industrystandards of the day, core samples based on geological boundaries or 1m intervals weremostly half core however some was quarter core. RC samples were usually riffle split at therig at metre intervals. A 3m (SGW) or 4m (Navigator) composite was collected from the rejectand assayed, any anomalous interval (typically >0.1g/t Au) was retrieved at 1m intervals (fromthe original split when drilled) and Fire Assayed. Aircore sampling followed a similarprocedure to RC except the rejects from the riffle split were stored on the ground and notbagged. The number of wet samples is believed to be very low however the intervals involvedcan't be quantified. The data has been validated in Datashed and in Surpac prior to resourceestimation. These processes checked for holes that are missing data, missing intervals,overlapping intervals, data beyond end-of-hole, holes missing collar co-ordinates, and holeswith duplicate collar co-ordinates.

Criteria	Commentary
Mineral	The deposits are all located on granted Mining Leases within the Cardinia Project area. All
tenement and	except one of the tenements are in the name of (and 100% owned by) Navigator Mining
land tenure	Pty Ltd. The exception is M37/646 (Bruno Lewis Grade Control) which is 80% Navigator and
status	20% Jindalee Resources Ltd and Mr. Vladimir Nikolaenko. Kin Mining NL has entered into a
	Share Sale Agreement with Navigator and has acquired all the issued capital and assets of
	Navigator Mining Pty Ltd.
	The agreement includes the Cardinia tenement package. The following deposits are located
	on the subsequent tenements: Lewis South M37/86, Lewis Grade Control M37/227,
	M37/86 and (small portion of) M37/277, Bruno Grade Control M37/277, Bruno-Lewis
	Exploration M37/86, M37/227, M37/277, M37/300 and M37/646, Kyte M37/277. M37/86
	is subject to a Royalty payment of 1% of the quarterly gross value of gold sales after

Criteria	Commentary
	10,000oz of production
	All tenements are in good standing and no known impediments exist.
Exploration	The deposits have been extensively drilled by a number of companies including Mt Edon,
done by other	SGW and in more recent times Navigator. A review of the collar file reveals the following
parties	companies Navigator, NR (Normandy Resources?), MET (?), SGW (Sons of Gwalia), CIM
	(Centenary International), AZT (Aztec), HLM (Harbour Lights) have all contributed to various
	drill programmes, however the vast majority of exploration was conducted by Navigator. Atest parcel of ore was mined by NAV from Bruno (100,000t) grade and recoveries exceeded
	expectations. Navigator commissioned Runge Limited to complete a Mineral Resource
	estimate for the Cardinia deposit in January 2009.
Geology	The Cardinia Project geology comprises intermediate mafic and felsic volcanic lithologies
	and locally derived epiclastic sediments. The regional lithological strike is 345° and contacts
	dip between 30°-40°W, foliations tends to dip moderately to the east. Felsic porphyries are
	recognised at Bruno/Lewis. At Lewis the intrusives are associated with mafic-felsic contacts
	and the mineralisation is interpreted to dip 40°-70°E with lenses varying in width from 1-
	7m true thickness.
	Gold mineralisation at Cardinia comprises flat lying, shallow dipping zones of supergene
	gold enrichment in weathered regolith. The mineralisation truncates all lithologies without
	any obvious effects. The central area is dominated by strongly weathered NW trending
	basalts with intercalated beds of felsic rocks and minor shales.Gold distribution is highly variable resulting in very closely spaced drilling being required to
	confidently delineate the mineralised zones. Primary gold mineralisation is associated with
	increased shearing associated with lithological contacts between mafic and felsic rocks.
	Disseminated carbonate-sericite-quartz-pyrite alteration zones are adjacent to the gold
	mineralisation.
	At Bruno/Lewis and Kyte virtually all the known gold resources are associated with flat lying,
	shallow dipping zones of supergene Au enrichment interpreted to be related to supergene
	gold enrichment. Interpretation of cross sections reveals a series of mineralised structures
	evident as quartz-ironstone veining and quartz outcrop.
Drill hole	The total drill hole data base, comprises 9,140 drill holes for a total of 315,088m that was
Information	used for the Mineral Resource estimate. Drilling included in the resource estimateamounted to 2,947 drill holes (99,786m) of which 34,593m were intersection metres. Plan
	and typical cross section views have been including in this report.
	Exploration results are not material to this report; the Mineral Resource Estimate is based
	on all available historic and modern Diamond, RC, Aircore and RAB drilling data.

Data	Individual grades are reported as down hole length weighted averages, sample lengths in
aggregation	the mineralised zones in all deposits were overwhelmingly 1m. A review of sample lengths
methods	determined the optimal sample length to be 1m. More than (>99%) of samples within the
	wireframes are 1m samples. Surpac software was used to extract 1m downhole composites.
	Composites were checked for spatial correlation within wireframe objects.
	The high coefficient of variations in the summary statistics (particularly the GC data)indicated the use of top cuts prior to using linear interpolation methods.
	A high grade cut of 15g/t Au was applied to the datasets, determined by inflections on the
	log probability plots. A top cut value of 30g/t Au was also applied to the grade control
	domains.
	The wire frames were created using Surpac, digitising on screen of cross sectional data using
	a 0.1 g/t and 0.2 g/t Au cut off. To maintain coherent resource shapes substantial areas of
	internal waste have been included inside the wireframes (See figure below for a typical
	cross section at BLK). Metal equivalent values are not being reported.
Relationship	The Bruno-Lewis mineralisation has been defined over a strike length of 2.6km (320°-340°).
between	It is noted that adjacent drill holes, even the 5x8m Grade Control (GC) grid pattern exhibit
mineralisation	highly variable grades (down hole) for the vast majority of the drilling (typical of supergene
widths and	mineralisation). To maintain coherent resource shapes substantial areas of internal waste
intercept	have been included inside the wireframes.

Criteria	Commentary
lengths	The majority of holes are drilled vertical, grid drill spacing is varied depending on theresource and drill holes are believed to be true width due to the flat lying nature of the
	supergene mineralisation. Drilling at Kyte may not be at an optimum angle or true width tothe mineralisation as most of the holes in this deposit are inclined (-60°).
Diagrams	Relevant "type example" plans and diagrams can be found on ASX report dated 11/05/2015
BalancedReporting	The available database includes a large inherited data set compiled by previous ownersdating back to 1982. There are limitations in the amount of information provided in thedata set. It has not been possible to fully verify the reliability and accuracy of a substantialproportion of the data however it appears that no serious problems have occurred andvalidation check results were within acceptable limits. In general recent data is morereliable. All NAV collars were surveyed after completion using an RTK GPS instrument.Considering the complex history of grid transformations there must be some residual riskin converting old grids to GDA 94 although generally the survey control appears to besatisfactory. Navigator also supplied data pertaining to the Specific Gravity (SG), pit shellsand drill hole date and although not independently verified they have been accepted onface value.There is always an area of technical risk associated with resource tonnage and gradeestimations.Exploration results are not being reported.
Othersubstantiveexplorationdata	Exploration results are not being reported.
Further work	Follow-up resource definition drilling is very likely to occur; the mineralisation in theCardinia area remains open in various directions, and at depth. There is the possibility ofmining a bulk sample/test pit to determine the relationship/reconciliation of the model tothe mine head grade and tonnage.Further SG work is recommended to increase confidence in SG values used for futureresource estimates.Exploration results are not being reported.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Criteria	Commentary
Database	The data has been validated in Datashed and in Surpac prior to resource estimation.
Integrity	These processes checked for holes that are missing data, missing intervals, overlapping
	intervals, data beyond end-of-hole, holes missing collar co-ordinates, and holes with
	duplicate collar co-ordinates. Navigator uploaded the original assay files received from
	the labs via a database administrator using Datashed to minimise loading errors. An
	export of the data was then used to create an access database for use in Surpac.
	Kin geologists have verified historic drilling/assays/geological logs/survey against the
	database including viewing old reports and visual checks in Surpac.
Site Visit	Mr Simon Buswell-Smith has visited and worked in the Cardinia area for many years (2008-
	2012) with the last site visit being 01/05/2016 and can confirm drilling, site layout, local
	geology, extent of old workings and has signed off as the Competent Person to this report.
Geological	The BLK is a highly variable 2.6km long zone of supergene Au mineralisation. Gold grades
Interpretation	are highly variable (even at 5x8m drill spacing), not only down hole but also between holes.
	The resource has been drilled to maximum depth of 110m and the resource is modelled to
	68m.
	Geology – a supergene enrichment gold deposit within zones of depletion, Mafic/felsic
	clays with intrusive porphyry. Mineralisation associated with zones of shearing and the
	mafic/felsic lithological contact with carbonate-sericite-quartz-pyrite alteration zones
	adjacent to the gold mineralisation. Deeply weathered regolith. Flat lying, shallow dipping

Criteria	Commentary
	(30°-40°) with NNW or NS strike (320°-340° at Bruno/Lewis), Vertical thickness ofmineralisation averages (5-10m) however it can range between (20-60m) often below adepletion zone (0-20m). The grade is highly variable but continuity is regarded as good.Even though the drilling is closely spaced in some zones (BGC and LGC) the resource isclassified as Indicated and Inferred due to the highly varied grade and the lack of bulkdensity test work. The mineralisation is hosted by a highly weathered clay zone which isdifficult to discriminate geologically and the geological interpretation of the weatheredclays are of low order of confidence, however mineralisation is believed to bepredominately unconstrained in relation to lithology at this stage due to the supergene
	nature of the gold resource.The grade and confidence of the geology are highly affected by the location of themineralisation high in the regolith profile. This environment is conducive for remobilisationof grade and strong weathering of hard rock geology to clays.Trial Mining 2010 (NAV) at Bruno and Mert's Reward extracted 114,000t of ore, 74,200t ofthis parcel was treated at St Barbara's (Gwalia plant) and 39,800t at NAV's Bronzewingplant for a recovered 7,223ozs of gold. Bruno ore was free dig, open pit mining ofsupergene mineralisation. Mining costs/BCM were below budget, the head grade of2.33g/t Au was 40% higher than the mine planned grade and recovery was >95%. The
	mining trial was very successful and much better than predicted
Dimensions	The drilled strike length of Bruno/Lewis is 2.6km, drilling extends to depths of 110m. Thereis a deeply weathered, supergene mineralisation zone beneath surface depletion zones (0-20m) which can extend to 60m in places. The EW drilling extent is up to 400m wide, thevertical thickness of the ore zone can vary (by up to 30m) but averages 5-10m in width. Thedepth of mineralisation is up to 90m however the resource is modelled to a maximumdepth of 68m.
	Kyte (K) - 650m of strike
	Lewis South (LS) - 800m of strike
	Lewis Grade Control (LGC)- 255m of strike
	Bruno Grade Control (BGC) - 400m of strikeBruno/Lewis Exploration (BLE) - 1600m of strike

Estimationsand ModellingTechniques	Surpac Software was used with Ordinary Kriging (OK) interpolation constrained bymineralised envelopes using a minimal 0.2g/t Au cut-off. Wireframes constructed in Surpac(0.1g/t Au and 0.2g/t Au cut-off). There is poor continuity between drill holes andnumerous zones of internal dilution are included to maintain the continuity of the resourcewireframes. Individual holes exhibit a high degree of variable grade and downhole variablegrade, substantial areas of internal waste are included in the wireframes. Maximumdistance of extrapolation from data points is deposit dependant in relation to drill spacing.The largest being 20m at Kyte, BLE and LS (16m) and both the LGC and BGC (4m).A high grade cut of 15g/t Au was applied to the datasets, determined by inflections on thelog probability plots. A top cut value of 30g/t Au was also applied to the grade control
	domains.
	Bruno/Lewis Grade Control was wire framed using RC and Diamond drill holes on tight drillspacing. Older Aircore holes were omitted.Bruno/Lewis Exploration is well drilled with a regular drill pattern. Recent RC results were
	preferred and older AC holes were excluded from the wire frame and the resource
	estimate.
	Deeper zone of mineralisation below Lewis GC wireframe have been defined by historic
	RC, AC and GCAC holes – 220 holes (Aircore) were removed from the estimation.
	Estimation techniques and interpretation constructed by Runge in 2009 that were used by
	NAV for the Cardinia resource, are predominately used in the current resource estimation,due to the successful outcome from the trial mining at Bruno.
	To test the sensitivity of the resource to drill spacing sub set test models interpolated the
	block model. Results show a tonnage and grade variation of 15% at LGC and 25% for BGC.
	The difference in the sub set estimates reflects the highly variable grade distribution

Criteria	Commentary
	between adjacent drill holes. The grade discrepancy at Bruno was confirmed by the trialmining.No by-products are to be recovered.
	No estimation of deleterious elements was carried out. Only Au was interpolated in theblock model.
	Block models created for the full extent of Bruno/Lewis trend, Separate block models forBGC and LGC which were then imported into the larger block model.Block model size depended on the drill density of the deposit. Bruno Lewis and Lewis South(16m NS x 10m EW x 5m vert) – sub cells 4m x 2.5m x 2.5m. Grade Control blocks (4m NS x2.5m EW x 2.5m vert). Kyte (20m NS x 10m EW x 2.5m vert) – sub cells 10m x 5m x 1.25m.The parent block size was selected on 50% of the average drill hole spacing for eachdomain, "ellipsoid" searches populated the resource blocks.No assumptions are made regarding modelling of selective mining units.No assumptions are made regarding correlation between variables.The supergene mineralisation is in the weathered oxide zone with a weak correlationwithin a north-west striking mafic/felsic contact. This has been incorporated into the majorsearch direction of the block models that relate to this weathered contact.A high grade cut of 15g/t Au was applied to the datasets, determined by inflections on thelog probability plots. A top cut value of 30g/t Au was also applied to the grade controldomains; this was done to assist in reducing the known nugget affect throughout theresource.To check that the interpolation of the block model honoured the drill data, validation wascarried out comparing the interpolated blocks to the sample composite data, the validationplots showed good correlation thus the raw drill data was honoured by the block model.Hardcopy sections of the resource with the block model plotted on section have also beencarried out to maintain that the block model honours original drill data.
Moisture	Grade and tonnages are estimated on a dry in-situ basis, moisture values have not beenconsidered.
Cut-offParameters	A nominal 0.7g/t Au cut-off grade was used in the mineral resource on the basis that thishas an economic validity throughout similar gold deposits in an open pit environment.
Mining Factorsor Assumptions	Historic mining in the area is restricted to small prospector pits and shallow undergroundworkings. NAV undertook the trail mining of Mertondale 2 and Bruno in 2010 (114,000t @2.05g/t Au) a year after the Runge resource estimation was published. Recovery and headgrade were above expectations.Mining at Bruno returned 100,000t @ 2.33g/t Au, The additional 14,000t came fromMertondale 2, Gwalia plant recovery 97.9% (3,990ozs), Bronzewing plant recovery 94.2%(2,773ozs). Free dig at Bruno trial pit, lower than forecast mining costs, clayey weatheredregolith – easy digging, supergene mineralisation, head grade was 40% higher thanexpected (almost 1g/t Au), good gold recovery, mine cut-off grade 0.85g/t Au, Ammtec SGtest work was completed post mining.The successful mining by NAV at Bruno suggests that the mineral resource at BLK has areasonable prospect for eventual economic extraction by medium scale open pit miningmethods, taking into account current mining costs and metal prices and allowing forpotential economic variations.
MetallurgicalFactors orAssumptions	From the NAV trial mining report Mike Kitney (metallurgist) supervised trial mining toensure that set out procedures were followed, his findings indicate cyanide test workrecoveries of Cardinia ore were 97% after 48Hrs with 90% after 24Hrs (-600µ) 4.4 g/t Augrade. The material was soft and clayey with good recovery from the coarse and the finefraction prior to grinding. Copper and organic carbon content in metallurgical testedsamples is low and limited.
Environmental	Mining at Bruno (100,000t) from trial pit, generated a mullock/waste dump next to open

Criteria	Commentary
Factors or	cut to industry standards. It is assumed that practices concerning waste rock and process
Assumptions	residual will meet accepted industry standards

Bulk Density	Majority of the entire Bruno-Lewis-Kyte is within the weathered oxide domain (0.7 g/t Aucut-off).
	Oxide zone3,274,000t @ 1.3 g/t Au
	Transition zone92,000t @ 1.2 g/t Au
	Fresh zone32,000t @ 1.3 g/t Au
	Limited historic bulk density determinations indicate the values used in the resourceestimation may be slightly underestimated. There remains the risk that the resourcetonnage is not well defined due to the assumed bulk density values Specific Gravity (SG).SG figures of 1.8 t/m3 – Oxide, 2.2 t/m3 – Transition, 2.6 t/m3Fresh – values were used inthe resource estimate and are considered to be conservative. The SG used in the estimationis up to 15-20% lower than the test work results (Ammtec & Amdel), however this data ison only limited samples. Further SG work is recommended to increase confidence in SGvalues used for future resource estimates.
Classification	The resource has been classified as Indicated and Inferred. The classification category is
	based on drill density and associated sample support and the highly variable grade
	distribution both down hole and between holes. Lack of QA/QC in early exploration, Aqua
	Regia vs Fire Assay results and composite sampling.
	BGC & LGC – close spaced 5m x 8m drill pattern, grade variability but good continuity, RC& DD only (AC removed) – Indicated.
	BLE – 20m x 32m drill pattern RC holes, good mineralisation continuity – Indicated.
	Remainder of BLE – variable drill hole types (RC & AC), wider drill spacing and highly
	variable grade distribution – Inferred.
	Kyte/Lewis South – regular grid drill spacing, 32m x 10m, AC holes define the deposit, highlyvariable grade continuity – Inferred.
	The relative accuracy of the Mineral Resource is reflected in the reporting of the Mineral
	Resource as per the guidelines of the 2012 JORC Code.
	Historic documents (including Annual Reports) provide detailed information on drilling and
	mining at the various prospects. A large proportion of digital input data has been
	transcribed from historical written logs and validation checks have confirmed the accuracy
	of this transcription. The input data is comprehensive in its coverage of the mineralisation
	and does not favour or misrepresent in-situ mineralisation. The continuity of geology is
	well understood as existing pits and historical mining reports provide substantial
	information on mineralisation controls and lode geometry. The lack of historical QA/QC
	data is offset by the quantity and the continuity of the sample data in the database.
	The Mineral Resource estimate appropriately reflects the view of the Competent Person.
Audits andReviews	Audits and reviews have been completed by Kin Mining NL.
Discussion of	The relative accuracy of the Mineral Resource estimate is reflected in the reporting of the
Relative	Mineral Resource as per the guidelines of the 2012 JORC Code.
Accuracy and	The Mineral Resource statement relates to a global estimate of tonnes and grade.
Confidence	Mining at Bruno returned 100,000t @ 2.33g/t Au, The additional 14,000t came from
	Mertondale 2. Processing at the Gwalia plant saw recovery at 97.9% (3,990ozs),
	Bronzewing recovery 94.2% (2,773ozs). Free dig at Bruno trial pit, lower than forecast
	mining costs, clayey weathered regolith – easy digging, supergene mineralisation, head
	grade 40% higher than expected (almost 1g/t Au), good gold recovery, mine cut-off grade
	0.85g/t Au. Previous production at Bruno saw an increase in grade relative to resource
	model, it is suspected to be due to multiple high grade outlier Au values at Bruno, the uncut
	resource has good reconciliation. Mineralisation throughout the remainder of the current
	resource has minimal high grade outliers and is therefore deemed to have less potentialfor a large uplift in grade that was seen at Bruno. Mining at Bruno increased the level of
	confidence of the Mineral Resource.

1.18	1.14	$-5555.00$	0.04	0.09	$-5555.00$	0.06	1.14	$\overline{\phantom{a}}$ 0.24
1.151.14	1.12	0.070.03	0.011.12	0.02	1.13	0.05	$1.13,$	0.04	$\Box$ 1.121.13	$\Gamma_{0.01}$		1.191.13	1.161.14
1.15	1.12	0.01	-9.01	4.41	1.12	25	1.111.12	0.10			1.11	0.01	1.11
1.891.68	Time1.58	1.2 e1.32	1.121.13	1.34	1.49	1.23			1.111.12	0.021.12	1.18	0.02	1.12
1.71	1.14	0.37		1.881.13	0.091.12	0.091.31	$1.11$	0.04.	1.81	0.02	1.11		1.13
1.131.17	1.511.21	0.04	1.17	1.15	1.15	0.03		Þ0.51		0.01$-11$	1.16	1.180.02
1.41	1.52	0.080.06	1.291.13	1.581.41	1.121.57	1.450.01	1.19	0.05	LIK	$-42$	1.12	-18	$1.12 -$
1.16$1.18,$	1.18	0.03	1.16	1.17	1.13	0.02	4.311.86	0.030.26	1.151.19	8.62	1.141.91	$-1.14$T. 45
1.11	1.19	0.780.15	1.251.11	1.141.16	0.01	1.381.49	1.24	0.03	1.18	3.19	1.13	1.18	$\blacksquare$ 111.19
1.241.18	1.13	0.03	1.22	1.13		1.12	1.111.11	0.161.63	1.121.28	1.351.25	1.1622.50	1.513.31	1.15
$1.16,$	1.12	0.090.01	1.171.15	1.111.23	1.13	1.21	1.21	0.50	0.10	$-1.13$	2.38	2.91	1.140.01
1.111.37	1.13		1.11	0.01		1.51	1.942.3L		1.441.10	1.21-0.96	1.66	1.16	1.92
1.21	1.14	0.01	1.151.18	1.210.06	1.13	0.02		0.01		4.58	2.343.68		1.32831
1.531.18	1.15	0.08	1.15		1.140.01	1.33	1.12		$-1.18$1.14			$\overline{\phantom{1}}$ $\overline{\phantom{1}}$	$-16$
1.82	1.131.19	0.011.35.	1.25$-1.12$	1.21	1.17	$\mathbb I$	$-1.11,$		1.15	0.05	$\sqrt{1.11}$	1.47	1.12$0.01,$
	1.11		The I			1.15		0.010.06	1.13	0.02	1.13	1.25	1.13
1.11		0.010.02	$-1.11$	- 120.01	$\mathbb{I}.\mathbb{I}$ 1	0.01		1.12	1.14		1.121.15	0.020.01	1.11
					1.15		1.12	0.01	0.06	1.13	1.11	$1.13 -$

Figure 1. Typical Cross Section at Bruno-Lewis-Kyte highlighting the mineralized envelope

Figure 2. Plan view of Bruno-Lewis-Kyte Block Model (with the mined Bruno pit) highlighting the reserve categories. Green – Indicated Red - Inferred

Figure 3. Oblique Plan View of the Lewis Grade Control Drilling with Resource Wire Frames

Appendix C Cardinia (Helens and Rangoon)

SECTION 1 –Sample Techniques and Data
-------------------------------------------	--

Criteria	Commentary
Samplingtechniques	The resource drilling included Aircore, RC and diamond drilling (HQ3) for 16,354m of which4,682m were intersection metres. Aircore holes were composite samples at 4m intervals (assayedfor Au via Aqua Regia). Assays intervals >0.1g/t Au were samples as individual metres (then FireAssayed). Diamond holes were samples along lithological intervals however single meter sampleswere the preferred sample interval once inside the geological unit.
	Nothing is stated regarding RC sampling techniques however it's assumed it was a similarmethodology to Aircore (composites then meter intervals - grade dependent). Mt Edon drilledthe majority of RC holes; their usual assay technique was initially 2m composite sampling, AquaRegia digest, followed by fire assaying any anomalous intervals (>0.5g/t Au) as one metreintervals. These samples were originally collected through a cyclone, when drilled, and stored onsite until submitted to Leonora Laverton Assay Laboratories.
Drillingtechniques	The resource drilling included Aircore, RC and diamond drilling (HQ3) for 16,354m of which4,682m were intersection metres within the wire frames (40,164m of drilling are in the database).45 Aircore, 337 RC holes and 11 diamond holes were used in the resource estimate. This drillingis a mixture of historical and recent Navigator Resources Ltd (NAV) holes. Since obtaining theproject Navigator completed 170 Aircore holes and 9 diamond holes for 5,187m.

Criteria	Commentary
Drill sample	Drill sample recovery details are not mentioned in the database, however recoveries from thevarious types of drill methods are assumed to have been satisfactory.
recovery	Aircore holes drilled by NAV were samples as 4m composite (scoop) and submitted for analysisvia Aqua Regia digest, anomalous (>0.1g/t) sample intervals were sampled again as individual 1mintervals, split at the rig at the time of drilling, and resubmitted for analysis via fire assay. Althoughnot mentioned it's assumed that RC samples were dealt with in a similar fashion, as was the caseon other Cardinia deposits that were drilled around the same time.
	Diamond holes were sampled on lithological boundaries, varied sample lengths, but single metrecomposites were the preferred sample length.
	Limited data is recorded about sample recovery in the geological logs, therefore difficulty remainsto establish any relationship between grade and sample recovery.
Logging	Navigator RC and Aircore logging were entered on a metre by metre basis recording lithology,alteration, mineralisation, weathering, colour, structure and veining. The information wasentered directly into hand held digital data loggers and transferred directly to the database. Holeswere logged to a standard considered appropriate for geological and resource modelling.
	Navigator's procedure for diamond core was initially orientation and marking of the bottom ofthe hole. Core recovery and fractures per metre was also recorded. The core was geologicallylogged in full recording lithologies as in RC drilling, photographed and marked for sampling. Holeswere logged to a level considered appropriate for geological and resource modelling.
	Logging of geology, alteration, mineralisation, weathering, colour and structure are interpretativeand qualitative, whereas logging of mineral and veining percentage is quantitative.
	All drill holes were logged in full.
Subsampling	Half diamond core was routinely analysed for this Mineral Resource estimate, however Diamonddrilling results comprises a very low proportion of the resource quantifications (11 diamondholes).
techniquesand samplepreparation	All RC and Aircore samples were collected at the rig using a riffle splitter. Samples werepredominantly dry.
	Half core, RC and Aircore sampling methods are considered standard industry practice.
	The majority of Navigator drill samples were dispatched to Kalgoorlie Assay Labs (KAL) howeverSGS and Aurum laboratories were also used for sample analysis. At KAL samples are initially ovendried (to 110°C) then crushed to 2mm then pulverised (LM5 ringmill) with 90% passing -75µ thenassayed via Aqua Regia or Fire Assay. The preparation procedure at Aurum included drying,splitting to 1kg, pulverising (90% passing -75µ) where a nominal 50g sample was subject to AquaRegia digest (AuAR50). At SGS the analytical process involved drying, crushing and pulverising(90% passing 75µ) and was digested via Aqua Regia (ARE155) or was Fire Assayed (FAA505) usinga 50gm charge.
	The sample preparation followed industry's best practice of the day, the sample size is consideredto be appropriate to correctly represent the style of mineralisation being tested.
Quality ofassaydata andlaboratorytests	In general, assays were initially conducted as 4m composite samples, using an Aqua Regiatechnique, as a first pass, with follow up 1m sampling completed using Fire Assay. Fire Assay isconsidered to be a total analytical technique, Aqua Regia is considered to be a partial analyticaltechnique.

Criteria	Commentary
Verificationof sampling	Duplicate repeat pulp analysis from Helens/Rangoon indicate an excellent relationship betweenthe original and the repeat assay result, indicating an acceptable measure of sample preparationreliability in the assay laboratory.
andassaying	Drilling techniques at the time (+2004) utilised face sampling hammers (RC drilling). There is noinformation regarding the frequency of wet samples however the use of booster and auxiliarycompressors would allow the majority of holes to be dry.
	NAV maintained approximately 1 QC sample per 20 drill samples submitted to the lab. Thesesamples included the submission of standards and blanks. No field duplicates have been taken.
	Previous QAQC analysis by Runge considers the overall QA/QC results for Helens and Rangoonresource are acceptable and confirm the validity of the assay data for use in the resourceestimate.
Location ofdata points	The collars of all NAV drilling were surveyed following completion of the hole using a RTK GPSinstrument (MGA94), no information regarding the collar survey technique of earlier drilling isavailable. All holes in the database contain design dip and azimuth data. Drilling was carried outon a local grid pattern which is oblique (25°) to the national GDA grid. Downhole surveys ondiamond holes (single shot camera) were conducted roughly at the start, middle and end of hole.
	A topographic DTM was created using the DGPS pickup data of the drillholes.
Dataspacinganddistribution	The majority of the resource has been drilled to 10m hole spacing on 25m EW sections, whilesome portions of the resource are tested at 50m spacing. Drill holes are orientated towards bothgrid east and grid west. The main mineralised zones have demonstrated sufficient continuity inboth grade and geological continuity to support the definition of mineral resource and theclassifications applied under the 2012 JORC Code.
	Analysis of the sample lengths revealed the most common sample length within the wireframesare 1m and 2m. All samples within the resource wireframes were composited to 2m.
Orientationofdata inrelationtogeologicalstructure	Primary gold mineralisation at the Helen's Rangoon project areas, located in the northeast of theCardinia area, is sub-vertical in nature and associated with narrow (1-5m) steeply dipping zonesof shearing and quartz development. Mineralisation trends are either north-northwest or northsouth. At the various Helen's deposits the mineralised shear zones are generally in the mafics butclose to a felsic volcanics/sediment contact. At Helens North Lode, excellent visual correlation hasbeen observed in DDH1 (7m @ 6.4g/t Au) between gold grades and bleaching of the oxidisedbasalt host rock. Only minor supergene mineralisation is present.
	Drilling was carried out on a local grid pattern which is oblique (25°) to the national GDA grid. Drillholes are orientated towards both grid east and grid west. Holes are drilled orthogonal to theinterpreted strike of the target horizon (-60°). Lithological layering within the tenements strikeNW to NNW and dips gently to steeply to the SW. No orientation based sample bias has beenidentified in the sample data.
Samplesecurity	No sample security details are available for pre-Navigator samples. It is assumed the samplesecurity methodologies were the same as those adopted at Mertondale, a former Navigatorresource located approximately 10km further north. At Mertondale numbered and compiledNavigator drill samples were collected from the field on a daily basis and transported to a secureyard in Leonora. They were then processed and packaged into 'bulkabag' sacks for transport tothe assay laboratory. No particular security measures were imposed apart from sealing/tying upthe sacks and a secure yard.

CriteriaCommentary
A review of sampling and drilling techniques by Kin and others indicates that they were conductedAudits orto the best practice industry standards of the day, historic drilling and sampling methods andreviewsQA/QC are regarded as acceptable. Core samples based on geological boundaries or 1m intervalswere mostly half core. RC samples were usually riffle split at the rig at metre intervals, a 4m(Navigator) composite was collected from the reject and assayed, any anomalous interval(typically >0.1g/t Au) was retrieved at the split 1m intervals and Fire Assayed. Aircore samplingfollowed a similar procedure to RC except the rejects from the riffle split were stored on theground and not bagged. The number of wet samples is believed to be very low however theintervals involved can't be quantified.

CriteriaCommentary

A review of sampling and drilling techniques by Kin and others indicates that they were conductedAudits orto the best practice industry standards of the day, historic drilling and sampling methods andreviewsQA/QC are regarded as acceptable. Core samples based on geological boundaries or 1m intervalswere mostly half core. RC samples were usually riffle split at the rig at metre intervals, a 4m(Navigator) composite was collected from the reject and assayed, any anomalous interval(typically >0.1g/t Au) was retrieved at the split 1m intervals and Fire Assayed. Aircore samplingfollowed a similar procedure to RC except the rejects from the riffle split were stored on theground and not bagged. The number of wet samples is believed to be very low however theintervals involved can't be quantified.

Criteria	Commentary
Mineraltenement andland tenurestatus	The deposits are all located on granted Mining Leases within the Mertondale project area,specifically Cardinia. All tenements are in the name of and 100% owned by Navigator MiningPty Ltd, Kin Mining NL has entered into a Share Sale Agreement with Navigator and hasacquired all the issued capital and assets of Navigator Mining. The agreement includes theentire Mertondale Project tenement package. The following deposits are located on thefollowing tenements: Rangoon is located on M37/316 and Helen's South, Helen's North andHelen's East are all within M37/317.The leases are located in the Mt Margaret Mineral Field, Navigator Mining Pty Ltd is a wholly
	owned subsidiary of Kin Mining NL. Waterton Global LP holds a debt security over the assetsof Navigator Mining Pty Ltd. The tenements are in good standing with no known impediments.
Explorationdone byother parties	Navigator completed the first resource estimation in October 2006 for the Helens andRangoon deposits. The resource was interpolated using inverse distance to the power of 1(ID1) with resource outlines generated using 1.0g/t Au boundary. High grade cuts 15g/tRangoon, 14g/t Helens North and 10g/t Helens South were applied, the resource was reportedabove 0.5g/t Au cut-off. Results were similar to the original Runge estimate Runge MineralEstimate January 2009 (page 5).
	The deposits have been explored and drilled by Mt Edon Gold Mine (CR and CRC series)commencing in 1986 then Sons of Gwalia and finally Navigator (NRAC, NHAC and NCDD series)commencing in 2004. The Mt Edon RAB holes are omitted from the resource estimate.
	A total of 2,676 tonnes of ore was mined from the area known as Rangoon – Zone 1 yielding464oz of gold at 5.4g/t Au. Mining the underground workings took place in 1939-1941 andagain in 1961.
Geology	The Cardinia tenements overlie a sequence of intermediate mafic and felsic volcaniclithologies and locally derived epiclastic sediments. These lithologies are positioned on thewestern limb of the regionally faulted south plunging Benalla Anticline. Lithological layeringwithin the tenements strikes NW to NNW and dips are orientated gently to steeply to the SW.The central portion of the tenements are dominated by a NNW-SSE trending lenticular unit ofbasalt with thin (<50m thick) intercalated beds of felsic volcanogenic sedimentary rocks andshales. The thick units of felsic volcanics comprising lava, fragmental deposits and fine tocoarse grained volcanogenic sedimentary rocks flank the basalt unit
	Mineralisation is sub-vertical in nature associated with narrow (1-5m) steeply dipping zonesof shearing and quartz development that transectlithological layering. Only minorsupergene/laterite mineralisation is present.

Criteria	Commentary
Drill holeInformation	In all 393 drill holes have been sourced and included in the Mineral Resource estimation,comprising 45 Aircore holes, 337 RC holes and 11 diamond holes for an advance of 16,354metres of which 4,682 are intersection metres.
	Exploration results are not material to this report. The Mineral Resource Estimate is based onall available historic and modern Diamond, RC and Aircore drilling data.
DataAggregation	Individual grades are reported as downhole length weighted averages, sample lengths in themineralised zones are 2m.
methods	Resource outlines were generated based on a 0.25g/t Au mineralised envelopes. Someinternal dilution was included to maintain wireframe continuity based on geological contacts.The wire framed objects were validated using Surpac software and set as solids. Metalequivalent values are not being reported.
RelationshipBetweenMineralisationwidths and	Drill holes are orientated grid east or grid west (-60°), grid drill spacing varies, drilling wascarried out on a local grid pattern which is oblique (25°) to the national GDA grid. Holes aredrilled orthogonal to the interpreted strike of the target horizon. Lithological layering withinthe tenements strike NW to NNW and dips gently to steeply to the SW mineralisation is subvertical.
interceptlengths	Mafic and felsic hosted mineralisation extends over 3,000m strike x 115m deep. Goldmineralisation is associated with narrow (1-5m) steeply dipping zones of shearing and quartzdevelopment. The majority of resource is tested at 10m hole spacing on 25m EW sectionsalthough some portions are tested at 50m spacing's.
Diagrams	Relevant "type example" plans and diagrams can be found on ASX report dated 11/05/2015
BalancedReporting	The available database includes a large inherited data set compiled by previous owners datingback to the mid 1980's. There are limitations in the amount of information provided in thedata set. It has not been possible to fully verify the reliability and accuracy of a substantialproportion of the early data however it appears that no serious problems have occurred andvalidation check results were within acceptable limits. In general recent data is more reliable.All NAV collars were surveyed after completion using an RTK GPS instrument.
OtherSubstantiveexplorationdata	Exploration results are not being reported.
Further work	Follow-up resource definition drilling is very likely to occur; the mineralisation in the Cardiniaarea remains open in various directions and drilling conducted by NAV in 2012 has not yetbeen included in the resource estimate. There is the possibility of mining a bulk sample/testpit to determine the relationship/reconciliation of the model to the mine head grade andtonnage.
	Further Specific Gravity (SG) work is recommended to increase confidence in SG values usedfor future resource estimates.
	Exploration results are not being reported.

Criteria	Commentary
Database	The deposits have been historically drilled by several companies, utilising different drillingand assaying techniques. Companies include Mt Edon, Sons of Gwalia and Navigator.
Integrity	The database is inherited from NAV (historic and recent). Historic geological logs have notbeen converted to the NAV system/logging codes however they are acceptable.
	Runge Limited conducted the original Mineral Resource estimate (January 2009) theyreviewed historic assay/geological logs/survey data against the originals and appraised theold annual reports.
	Grid transformation from early drilling is regarded as acceptable, all NAV drill holes aresurveyed and DGPS controlled.
	The data has been validated in Datashed and in Surpac prior to resource estimation. Theseprocesses checked for holes that are missing data, missing intervals, overlapping intervals,data beyond end-of-hole, holes missing collar co-ordinates, and holes with duplicate collarco-ordinates. Navigator uploaded the original assay files received from the labs via adatabase administrator using Datashed to minimise loading errors. An export of the data wasthen used to create an access database for use in Surpac.
	Kin geologists have verified historic drilling/assays/geological logs/survey against thedatabase including viewing old reports.
Site Visit	Paul Payne (Runge - Competent Person) visited the site 5/2/2009 and confirmed drilling, sitelayout, local geology, extent of old workings and signed off on the original resourcecalculation. Simon Buswell-Smith (Competent Person) has also visited the site on manyoccasions and was involved in some of the original NAV drilling/logging etc.
GeologicalInterpretation	The deposits mineralisation style is consisting of quartz veining (1-5m wide) and shear zonesin basaltic host rock. Excellent correlation between grade and bleached basalt is evident inDDH1 - 7m @ 6.4g/t Au. Gold mineralisation is quartz vein hosted and regarded as regular.Mineralisation trends NNW and NS.
	Geological data in logs records quartz veining, sulphide content and gold associated withquartz and sulphides. Weathering codes is varied in logging data because differentcompanies used differing logging styles.
	Drill spacing is regarded as good and company geologists have confidence in the model, NAVand Runge agreed on resource estimates, 1,417 holes were drilled by either Mt Edon andNavigator, these included Aircore, RAB, RC and diamond drilling at 25m or 50m spaced drillsections including several costeans,.
	Helensgeologyincludes–shearedmaficswithquartzveiningclosetofelsicvolcanic/sediment contact. Rangoon geology includes – Sheared felsic volcanic/sedimentshost quartz close to the mafic contact.
	A high degree of confidence is placed on the geological model, any alternative modelinterpretations are unlikely to have a significant impact on the resource classification.
	The use of geology is of high importance in guiding and controlling the resourceinterpretation due to gold associated with qtz veining along lithological contacts.
	Both deposits are related to qtz veining therefore this is a major factor affecting gradecontinuity.

Criteria	Commentary
Dimensions	Helens South, Helens North and Rangoon extend from (local grid) 9,450mN to 12,450mNwith a vertical extent of 115m. Resource estimate is based on data from 393 drill holes(Aircore, RC and Diamond core).
Estimations andModellingTechniques	Runge (2009) estimated the original resource via standard Surpac block modelling usingOrdinary Kriging interpolation constrained by mineralised envelopes utilising a nominal0.25g/t cut off and applied block dimensions 12.5mNS x 5mEW x 5m vert. with sub cells of6.25mx2.5mx1.25m, a high grade cut of 15g/t was applied.
	Bulk density (SG) was estimated based on information from similar projects, values of1.9t/m3, 2.3t/m3 and 2.7t/m3 were assigned to the oxide, transitional and fresh portions ofthe resource, wire frames were constructed using cross section interpretation based onmineralised envelopes (0.25g/t cut off). Samples within the wireframe were composited to2m intervals.
	Ellipsoid orientated search included 3 passes, >90% of model was filled in the initial twopasses.
	Some of the earlier drill holes (of lower sample quality) were omitted from the data baseincluding all 667 RAB holes (10,406m) and 5 early RC holes which conflicted with adjacentdrill holes, costeans (originally dug by Mt Edon) were also omitted.
	The Helens and Rangoon deposits display reasonable geological continuity (geology andmineralisation). The resource is defined within an Inferred Resource classification.
	Numerous resource shapes that were only tested via a single drill hole were omitted fromthe model.
	No by-products are to be recovered.No estimation of deleterious elements and no by-products were included – only Au, therewere no selective mining units applied.
	The parent block size was selected on 50% of the average drill hole spacing for each domain,"ellipsoid" searches populated the resource blocks.No assumptions are made regarding correlation between variables.Wireframes were constructed of the mineralised envelopes utilising a nominal 0.25g/t cutoff.QQ plots indicate no particular bias between resource domains. All composites, a 2mcomposite was selected as appropriate for the deposit, were appended to a single file andassessed for a suitable high grade cut-off of 15g/t was applied affecting only 9 compositesamples.
	To check that the interpolation of the block model honoured the drill data, validation wascarried out comparing the interpolated blocks to the sample composite data, the validationplots showed good correlation thus the raw drill data was honoured by the block model.Hardcopy sections of the resource with the block model plotted on section have also beencarried out to maintain that the block model honours original drill data
Moisture	Grade and tonnages are estimated on a dry insitu basis, moisture values have not beenconsidered.
Cut-offParameters	A nominal 0.7g/t Au cut-off grade was used in the mineral resource on the basis that this hasan economic validity throughout similar gold deposits in an open pit environment.

Criteria	Commentary
MiningFactors or	Historic mining in the area is restricted to small prospector pits and shallow undergroundworkings. The Rangoon area was previously mined underground (1939-41) yielding 464ozfrom 2,676t @ 5.4g/t Au.
Assumptions	Helen's and Rangoon resources comprise well defined zones of Au mineralisation –associated with shearing/quartz veining. The mineralised zones are robust, 3km strikeextension to a vertical depth of 115m.
	A significant portion of the deposit has reasonable prospects for open cut extraction – miningcosts and metal prices require further consideration.
	The resource is undiluted and a dilution factor should be incorporated in any evaluation ofthe deposit.
MetallurgicalFactors orAssumptions	Specific gravity and cyanide leach testing of various ore types is recommended. Goldrecoveries should be determined. Historic metallurgical testwork (1988) on 7 coarselycrushed (-50 to -6mm) RC samples returned recoveries between 8 and 96%, when pulverisedrecoveries increased to >93%. Static leach test work (1992) on two diamond core samplesreturned gold recoveries of 83% and 75%.
EnvironmentalFactorsor Assumptions	No assumptions have been made regarding environmental factors.
Bulk Density	Bulk density values were nominal and relative to nearby deposits (oxide 1.8t/m3, transition2.3t/m3 and fresh 2.7t/m3). Note: the average SG for Basalt is 2.8-3.0t/m3 when fresh. SG testwork conducted by Ammtec (April 2009) was conducted not for Helen's and Rangoon but forthe nearby Bruno and Tonto deposits, oxide/ transition/ fresh SG's averaged 2.8t/m3, thusscope exists to increase the overall tonnage due to the lower estimation of the Bulk Density's– perhaps by as much as 10%. A comprehensive programme of bulk density test work isrecommended. The position (RL) of the oxide transition contact is questionable due tologging inconsistencies, future drill campaigns should attempt to delineate the oxidetransition fresh zones.
Classification	The resource has been classified as Indicated and Inferred. The classification category isbased on drill density and associated sample support.The mineralised zones (indicated and inferred) are described as robust; however goldmineralisation is narrow, well defined and extends over 3km of strike, the mineralisation isnot economically continuous over the entire strike and can be divided into 3 distinct areas;Helens North, Helens South and Rangoon. The majority of the resource has been drilled at10m hole spacing's on 25m E-W sections and some parts of the resource are drilled on 50msections. 393 drill holes (45 Aircore, 337 RC, and 11 Diamond) for an advance of 16,354m ofwhich 4,662m are resource intersection metres.
	Mineralisation shows reasonable continuity within the mineralised domain allowing themajority of drill hole intersections to be modelled into coherent geologically robust wireframes. Classifications are Indicated where hole spacing is 25m x 10m and Inferred wherehole section spacing is >25m
	Historic documents (including Annual Reports, A reports) provide detailed information ondrilling and mining at the various prospects. A large proportion of digital input data has beentranscribed from historical written logs and validation checks have confirmed the accuracyof this transcription. The input data is comprehensive in its coverage of the mineralisationand does not favour or misrepresent in-situ mineralisation. The continuity of geology is wellunderstood as existing pits and historical mining and exploration reports provide substantialinformation on mineralisation controls and lode geometry. The lack of historical QA/QC datais offset by the quantity and the continuity of the sample data in the database.

Criteria	Commentary
	The Mineral Resource estimate appropriately reflects the view of the Competent Person.
Audits andReviews	Internal reviews have been conducted by the Competent Person who is obliged to review thedata geology/assay/survey/wire frames etc. this procedure is conducted as part of thenormal review process. The technical inputs, methodologies, parameters and results of theestimation have been verified by the Runge (2009) and the Competent Person. This type ofaudit is conducted as part of the normal review process.
Discussionof RelativeAccuracy andConfidence	Accuracy of the Mineral Resource is reflected in the reporting of Mineral Resources as perthe guidelines of the 2012 JORC code. Global estimates of tonnage and grade. The deposithas not been mined. Reconciliation of the current mined resource vs. historic production isnot possible.Navigator conducted an in-house resource estimate (2006), the tonnage and grade valuescompare favourably with the Runge (2009) estimation 47,667oz (NAV 0.5g/t cut-off) vs.47,600ozs (Runge 1.0g/t cut-off).

Appendix D Raeside

SECTION 1 – Sample Techniques and Data

Criteria	Commentary
Samplingtechniques	The majority of diamond core was longitudinally cut half core. Sample intervals varied,lithological boundary dependent, but were predominantly 1m intervals. The vast majorityof RC samples, collected by Triton, were collected via a cyclone or riffle split and bagged at1m intervals (typically 2-3kg.) Composite spear samples were often collected at a nominal3m interval with follow up collection of the riffle split 1m samples over anomalous intervals.On occasion wet samples were encountered and in the case of Triton Resources Ltd spearsampled, data relating to earlier wet samples is unavailable however the number of wetsamples involved is believed to be very low. The procedure for Aircore sampling is similar toRC except the reject, following riffle splitting, is placed on the ground and not bagged.
Drillingtechniques	The resource estimate is overwhelmingly based on RC drilling (95%) other drilling techniquesinclude diamond (2%) and Aircore (3%). RC drilling has been used to delineate ore bodies inthis region over the last 25 years and is regarded as a satisfactory technique. Old reportsindicate that most of the samples were kept dry. Face sampling hammers were used for themajority of the RC drilling.
Drill samplerecovery	Diamond drilling (HQ) at Michelangelo, by Sons of Gwalia (SGW), no recovery figures areavailable but a report stated "there was some core loss in mineralised zones" however only53.8m of SGW diamond core is included in the resource calculation. The vast majority of theRC drilling was conducted by Triton using suitable rigs with booster and auxiliarycompressors, as was the practice of the day. Rigs of this caliber provide satisfactory resultsin dry conditions.It appears that the sample quality was satisfactory with the possible exception of any wetsamples. Sample recovery and comments regarding wet samples are not in the database.
	Aircore holes are as reliable as RC when the holes are shallow and under soft dry conditionsas was the case at Raeside.No relationship between sample recovery and grade was observed.

Criteria	Commentary
Logging	There is a good deal of inconstancy in geological codes between different phases of drillingand the geological structure is complex. There is a major lack of supporting geological dataand most of the lithology in old holes was never captured digitally. Less than 50% of theholes were represented in the lithological database.
	The details regarding drill hole logging techniques and procedures are unknown andundocumented. The vast majority of data was originally compiled by Triton and data setshave been passed down as ownership of the project changed.
Sub-samplingtechniquesand samplepreparation	Triton diamond core, from a limited number of holes, 67m of mineralisation, was split tohalf core, typically at one metre intervals and assayed. No information is available regardingSGW diamond core sampling techniques however it's considered to be half core. Limitedinformation regarding Triton's RC sampling procedure indicates a riffle split at the rig, to anappropriate size (2-3kg) was kept and 3m speared composite samples collected and assayedvia Aqua Regia, anomalous intervals would be collected from the original 1m split andsubmitted for Fire Assay. Wet samples were also speared and assayed, which yields a poorquality sample, but the intervals and quantity are unknown. RC samples from SGW were"riffle split off the rig" at 1m intervals and it's assumed that the assay methodology wouldhave been similar to Triton being composites followed by anomalous re-splits. No detailsregarding Aircore sampling procedures could be located.The RC sampling procedures would have been consistent with the standard industrypractices of the day. No systematic quality control checks were conducted on sample
	batches therefore the reliability of the bulk of the assay data can't be demonstrated.QC procedures undertaken by SGW and Navigator Resources Ltd (Nav) have little relevancebecause of the small portion of the overall data they provide for the estimate.
Quality of assay	The reliability of the bulk of the assay data is unknown. Only limited information regardinglaboratories, sample preparation and analytical methodologies is available.
data andlaboratory tests	Prior to 1994 most of the Triton samples were assayed using an Aqua Regia technique(AR/AAS) and some were Fire Assayed (usually if sulphide rich). From 1995 the standardanalytical procedure was initially 3m composite samples digested in Aqua Regia with AASanalysis determination. Anomalous values from selected zones using the original rig rifflesplit sample were subject to a Fire Assay with an AAS finish (when the weight charge wasquoted it was 50 gram). The drill hole data base lists the analytical code as unknown in manyentries.
	There is no mention of checks directly comparing Fire Assay against Aqua Regia. The risk ofanalytical biases affecting some of the assay results can't be ruled out. Aqua Regia isregarded as a partial analytical technique; Fire Assay is regarded as a total analyticaltechnique.
	No geophysical tools were used to determine any element concentrations used in thisresource estimate.
	It's unknown whether QA/QC samples were collected because no results are available in thedatabase and Triton did not impose any systematic quality control checks. Consequentlyanalysis of any historical QA/QC data has not occurred. The reliability of the bulk of the assaydata cannot be demonstrated.
	The Quality Control procedures used by Navigator and SGW have little relevance due to thevery small proportions of data provided by their drilling programmes.

Criteria	Commentary
Verification ofsampling andassaying	The returned significant intersections have been verified by company geologists andMcDonald Speijers, who calculated the original (2009) resource calculation however preNavigator information has limitations due to the legacy of different companies and differentprocedures. The results from all phases of diamond, RC and Aircore drilling have beenaccepted on face value. McDonald Speijers was not able to gain any quantitative or semiquantitative impression of RC or Aircore sample recovery or sample quality. Core recoveryinformation is not presented in the database. There is always a risk that sampling or assayingbiases may exist between results from different drilling programmes this may be due todiffering sampling protocols, different laboratories and different analytical techniques.
	Generally by the mid 1980's face sample hammers were commonly in use. There is noconcrete information regarding the frequency of wet samples however the use of boostercompressors allowed the majority of holes to be dry.
	The history of sample preparation and assaying procedures is complex and incomplete.Numerous laboratories and analytical methods have been used over the years. The historicdata, dating back to 1992, is incomplete and McDonald Speijers was unable to accuratelyquantify the proportions of data derived from the various combinations of laboratories andmethods.
	It's assumed that sampling and assay procedures were followed to the standards of the day;it seems that grades for most diamond and RC drill holes in mineralised zones have beenobtained by fire assay.
	Top cuts selected ranged from 8-16g/t for the more substantial mineralised zones butusually between 4-8g/t for minor peripheral zones. No other alterations were made to thedata apart from top-cutting
	SGW twinned six pairs of holes at Michelangelo. The SGW assays were on average, 10%lower than the earlier Triton holes, however there were 2 unusually high results in a singleintercept, removing these 2 results returned the grade difference to 4% lower. Given thevariable nature of gold mineralisation the comparison is reasonably satisfactory.
Location ofdata points	The co-ordinate data has been transferred from local grid to AGM and then to MGA, whentransferred back to local grid the results were to within a fraction of a metre however forresource estimation purposes the local grid co-ordinates were used.
	It appears that at least 70% of all RC and diamond holes were surveyed and the rest werelocated reasonably accurately. McDonald Speijers felt that there is unlikely any serious riskassociated with the drill hole co-ordinates and they accepted the survey data base ascorrect.
	The majority of drill holes at Raeside are not very deep, only a few are >200m. There is ashortage of down hole survey data but it isn't a serious area of risk and holes that have beensurveyed didn't show substantial deviations.
	A Digital Terrain Model of topography was supplied by Nav based on known collar surveyelevations and assumptions based on survey precision. McDonald Speijers believed the RLdata to be adequate and acceptable.

Criteria	Commentary
Data spacingand distribution	The drill patterns are deposit specific, at Michelangelo line spacing of 12.5m or 25m withholes at 25m intervals with localised closer spacing's to about 10m in some areas, holeswere orientated grid west at -60°. At the southern end of Leonardo the drill pattern isirregular with line spacing's ranging from 10m to 40m (25m average). Moving northward thepattern becomes regular at 20m intervals and 20m spacing but opens up to 40m and even70m towards the down dip limits of the drill pattern. Holes are inclined grid west at -60°.
	At the Forgotten Four the initial drilling was on a different local grid (orientated 19°-20° tothe current grid) these holes were drilled grid west at -60° on 10m spaced lines. Recentdrilling was on 10m spaced lines at 25m intervals moving to 25m x 25m at the outer edgesof the mineralisation. Holes are all inclined grid west at -60°.
	At Krang a 25mx25m drill pattern covers most of the resource area although the patternbecomes incomplete in the western most zones, some areas have been infilled to 12.5mwith hole spacing at 10-20m along lines. Holes are predominantly drilled grid west at -60°.
	The local grid is orientated at 045° west of Magnetic North.
	There is not enough information to regard the assay data as reliable and accurate and so nopart of the resource is regarded as measured. The majority of the estimate is Indicated anda small percentage Inferred. The mineralised domains support sufficient continuityappropriate for JORC 2014 Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimate procedures and theclassifications applied.
	Samples were composited over 1m down hole intervals.
Orientation ofdata in relationto geologicalstructure	The ore zones at all four deposits strike roughly NW. At Michelangelo sub parallelmineralised zones typically dip 25° east, these zones are on or close to the dolerite contact(170° strike) at the contact mineralisation is sub parallel to the contact but as it moves awayfrom the contact (into the dolerite) their orientation becomes more distorted. The H/Wcontact of the host unit is poorly defined in the lithological codes.
	At Leonardo the southern end of single mineralised zone is a similar orientation toMichelangelo however as it moves north it steepens to 35-45° and the strike displays asignificant angular discordance however it strikes basically NW.
	At Forgotten Four the mineralisation strikes basically NW and dips 40-50° east
	At Krang the ore zone strikes basically NNW and dips 50-60° east. Flanking mineralisation isorientated more NS strike and dips 30-50°.
	A pervasive weak foliation is present in the host sequence sub parallel to the apparentstratigraphic layering. Mineralisation is generally related to zones of stronger foliation andweak to moderate shearing with local ductile deformation.
	No orientation based sampling bias has been identified.
Samplesecurity	No details regarding sample security protocols are available for the Triton and SGW drillsamples. Numbered and compiled Navigator drill samples, although minimal, were collectedfrom the field on a daily basis and transported to a secure yard in Leonora as was theirgeneral practice. They were then processes and packaged into sacks 'bulkabags' fortransport to the assay laboratory. No particular security measures were imposed apart fromsealing the sacks and a secure yard.

Criteria	Commentary
Audits orreviews	The data was validated, in all cases the Datamine versions of the data files after transfermatched those in the original Access sourced data tables. Holes were checked forduplication of hole numbers or co-ordinates, Overlaps, reversals or gaps in (to-from)sequences and statistically unusual values. The original JORC 2004 resource calculation wasconducted by McDonalds Speijers (2009) nothing has materially changed since that time. Areview of sampling and drilling techniques by Kin Mining and others indicates that they wereconducted to the best practice industry standards of the day although historic drilling andsampling methods and QA/QC are regarded as weaker than today's current standards

Criteria

Commentary

Audits orreviews

The data was validated, in all cases the Datamine versions of the data files after transfermatched those in the original Access sourced data tables. Holes were checked forduplication of hole numbers or co-ordinates, Overlaps, reversals or gaps in (to-from)sequences and statistically unusual values. The original JORC 2004 resource calculation wasconducted by McDonalds Speijers (2009) nothing has materially changed since that time. Areview of sampling and drilling techniques by Kin Mining and others indicates that they wereconducted to the best practice industry standards of the day although historic drilling andsampling methods and QA/QC are regarded as weaker than today's current standards

Criteria	Commentary
Mineraltenement and	The leases are located approximately 10km southeast of the town of Leonora in the EasternGoldfields region of Western Australia
land tenurestatus	A royalty, to a third party, of $1 per tonne of gold bearing ore mined from below 40m fromthe natural surface of the tenement applies to the Raeside project area.
	The Raeside deposits are contained within a large ML (M37/1290) surrounded by 2 EL's(E37/868 and E37/1103). All the tenements are 100% owned by Navigator Mining Pty Ltd.Kin Mining NL has entered into a Share Sale Agreement with Navigator and has acquired allthe issued capital and assets of Navigator Mining. The agreement includes the Raesidetenement package. Navigator Mining Pty Ltd is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Kin MiningNL. Waterton Global LP holds a debt security over the assets of Navigator Mining Pty Ltd.The tenements are in good standing with no known impediments.
Explorationdone byother parties	Prospectors began to seriously explore the Raeside area during the 1980's. In 1989 TritonResources acquired the Forgotten Four area from local prospectors. In 1982 Triton (70%)formed a JV with Sabre Resources and Copperwell P/L (a subsidiary of Cityview Energy Corp)amalgamating their tenements and applying for additional ground. Prior to 1996 drillexploration consisted of RAB with RC follow up, RAB was later replaced with Aircore drillingdue to clays and water issues.
	Triton mined a trial parcel at Forgotten Four in 1990 (6,280t @ 5.18g/t Au) then extendedthe open pit to 40m in 1992 (43,359t @ 4.15g/t Au and L/G of 6,200t @ 1.0g/t Au) processingthe ore at the Harbour Lights plant. Triton continued exploring (on and off) till 1999 anddecided the project was not an economically viable stand-alone operation. SGW farmed intothe project in 2000, subsequently acquiring full ownership, they conducted limited drillingat Michelangelo. Navigator acquired the Raeside project from SGW (the administrator) in2004 but only conducted limited drilling. Kin have purchased all the assets of Navigator(from the administrator).

Criteria	Commentary
Geology	Mineralisation within the Raeside prospect is hosted by a mixed package of fine grainedsediments and a quartz dolerite unit. The dolerite is sill like in nature and roughly confirmsto the observed bedding trends. The dolerite is fine to medium grained with extensivechlorite alteration. Discontinuities and breaks in diamond core are mostly orientated alongthe foliation planes and slickensides are prominent throughout. Gold mineralisation ishosted by a series of stacked, irregular, sub-parallel structures which dip at a shallow angleto the east. Higher gold grades are generally associated with increased quartz/carbonateveining and varying degrees of iron alteration. Veins are predominantly stockwork in natureand widths of massive veining are generally <1m.
	Gold mineralisation at Raeside occurs close to or within a large NW trending body of doleritein a sequence of mafic volcanics (basalts and dolerites) and sediments (dominantly shales,some are graphitic) and/or intrusives near the southern margins of a porphyry intrusion.
	Gold mineralisation at Michelangelo is hosted by a uniform metamorphosed mediumgrained dolerite. The position of the F/W has been roughly delineated however no otherconvincing geological boundaries are defined. Gold mineralisation at Leonardo occursmainly in a partly graphitic shale (coded as generic metasediment) close or adjacent to amafic contact. Gold mineralisation at Forgotten Four and Krang is hosted mainly in maficrocks with some association with contact zones between mafic and metasediment units, thesediments are also mineralised. At the Forgotten Four the strongest zone of mineralisationis just below the lower contact of the overlying sediments. Some mineralisation at Krangappears to be broadly related to the metasediments however no other convincing geologicalboundaries have been defined.
	Most of the mineralised zones contain weak stockworks or sheeted veins usually a fewcentimetresthickandrarely>1-2m,predominantlyquartzorquartz-carbonateaccompanied (below the base of oxidation) by disseminated to stringer sulphides (mostlypyrite and minor arsenopyrite).
	Geological structure is obscured by the lack of outcrop but the variation of themineralisation suggests a considerable level of structural complexity.
Drill holeInformation	In all 2,430 drill holes for an advance of 153,100.4m are included in the drillhole summaryand used in the resource estimate, of which 10,139m are mineralised meters. It isimpractical to list a table of drill hole details in this report format. Exploration results are notmaterial to this report. The Mineral resource Estimate is based on all historic and modernDiamond, RC Aircore and RAB drilling data.
DataAggregationmethods	Sample lengths in mineralised zones were predominantly 1m with a small proportion of 2mand some 3m intervals. Some shorter intervals 0.3m to 0.95m occurred infrequently.McDonald Speijers concluded that composite lengths of 1m or integer multiples of a metrewere adequate for modelling purposes.
	Metal equivalent values are not used in the estimate. Exploration results are not beingreported. Individual grades are reported as down hole length weighted averages
RelationshipBetweenMineralisationwidths andintercept lengths	Drill holes were designed to achieve the optimum intersection of the mineralisation or closeto practicable true width to the mineralisation. The deposits are generally orientated NW,drill holes were mostly drilled grid west (or SW) at -60°.
Diagrams	Relevant "type example" plans and diagrams can be found on ASX report dated 11/05/2015

Criteria	Commentary
BalancedReporting	Ore loss and dilution factors assumed for the Recovered Fraction models may requireadjustment up or down, subject to additional information regarding the physicalcharacteristics of the ore boundaries and the proposed mining procedure. Indications froma reconciliation exercise on a Mertondale model indicated that the dilution factor used atRaeside may be optimisticThe continuity of thin mineralised zones at Michelangelo, particularly below the base ofstrong weathering, might not be as good as implied by the current interpretation.The level of accuracy for locating the drill holes cannot be confirmed however it appearsthat most RC and diamond holes are located with reasonably accurately and McDonald
	Speijers believed it was unlikely that there was a serious risk associated with drill hole collarco-ordinates.
OtherSubstantiveexploration data	No interpretations of host stratigraphy or local structures have been developed.
Further work	Specific Gravity (SG) definition is questionable due to the lack of data further drilling may berequired for metallurgical, geotechnical and QAQC purposes.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Criteria	Commentary
DatabaseIntegrity	The database consists of an assemblage of data originally compiled by Triton (1989-98),Sons of Gwalia (2000-01) and Navigator (2004-08). The pre Navigator data cannot be fullyverified regarding reliability and accuracy.
	The database was provided by Navigator, multiple programmes were conducted by Triton(vast majority of data), Navigator sourced some data from old annuals and DMP reportshowever they contain limited information regarding collection procedures and virtually noQA/QC information. SGW data is generally reliable and the Navigator data is good althoughNavigator and SGW data represents a negligible percentage of the overall data package(approx. 2.5%).
	The bulk of the data has not been fully verified regarding quality, accuracy and reliability.Historical drill hole data was obtained by Navigator (Nav) from SGW (2004) and transferredinto the Nav database. McDonald Speijers validated 25 randomly selected representativeholes (there are 2,430 holes in the database representing 153,100.4 drilled metres); originallogs were cited for 21 of the 25 and printed records of co-ordinates/sample numbers/assayreports found for the majority of the remainder. Original assay reports for 20 holes werecited and the others had assay results annotated to the paper geological logs. Geologicaldata for <50% of the holes had been entered; it seems that much of the original geologicaldata was never formatted and entered digitally. Validations were conducted on 93% of theassay records in the selected 25 representative holes.
	The data base displays some discrepancy (which is expected considering the age of theinformation), particularly geological logs but there is a low rate of error in the sample andassay date base. Even though incomplete the database has been accepted as reliable andonly minor discrepancies were noted. However there is not enough information in the olddrillhole assay files to determine that the data is completely accurate and reliable thus theclassification of the resource is mostly Indicated (94.8%) with a small Inferred component(5.2%) even though in some places the drill spacing is relatively close.
	No quality control assay checks were conducted by Triton. The reliability of the bulk of theassay data used in the resource estimation, originally sourced from Triton (97.5%), can't be

Criteria	Commentary
	confirmed. QA/QC procedures were regularly conducted by Navigator and SGW howeverthis data comprises a very small portion of the resource estimation.
Site Visit	The Competent Person can confirm site conditions at Raeside. Kin's exploration team haveconducted multiple site visits within the resource areas including time when a Kin staffmember was previously employed by Navigator.
GeologicalInterpretation	Interpretation of the subsurface geology is difficult due to inconsistencies in the loggingcodes. There is a lack of outcrop in the area; a veneer (2-10m thick) of recent transportedmaterial covers the ore bodies. The weathering profile is deep (25-75m), the structureobscure, the apparent orientation of the mineralisation varies suggesting a considerablelevel of structural complexity.
	Most of the mineralisation, in the oxide zone, consists of quartz/quartz carbonate veiningin the form of weak stockworks or sheeted veins, in fresh rock disseminated to stringersulphides (pyrite and minor arsenopyrite) are associated with the "veining or weakstockwork". Individual veins are commonly centimetres thick and rarely exceed 1-2m.
	Total oxidation extends to a depth of 20-50m containing saprolitic clays. The transitionzone, containing partly oxidised sulphides, extends downward for another 5-20m. Thebase of oxidation may not represent the base of "free dig material". Weathering profileswere supplied by Navigator and are regarded as correct on face value.
	Mineralised lodes have a consistent geometry and any alternative interoperation isbelieved to have little impact on the resource estimate.
	The recorded geology, a portion of which is unavailable, seems to be contradictory throughdrillholes in relation to lithology, however mineralisation is associated with logged quartzveining.
Dimensions	Michelangelo-Leonardo –holes included in the estimate -486 holes intersectedmineralisation amounting to 5,529m of intersected mineralisation over a tested areacovering 960m of strike and 800m width.
	Forgotten Four - holes included in the estimate - 112 holes intersected mineralisationamounting to 1,981m of intersected mineralisation over a tested area covering 520m ofstrike and 350m width.
	Krang - holes included in the estimate - 201 holes intersected mineralisation amounting to2,629m of intersected mineralisation over a tested area covering 650m of strike and 500mwidth.
	The ore zones are obviously much narrower but no specific numbers are quoted.
Estimations andModellingTechniques	The resource estimate was obtained using a 3D block model "Recovered Fraction" (RF)technique, block models were generated filling the 3D wireframes of the mineralised zoneswith cells, SG was assigned using oxidation codes as per the data base, assay top cuts wereapplied, assays composited over 2m intervals, block models were estimated using a rangeof cut offs and anisotropic inverse distance cubed interpolation, under zonal control.
	A search radii of 20m, 20m and 3m was used for dip, strike and cross-dip for Michelangelo,30m, 30m and 3m for Leonardo, 50m, 40m and 2m for Forgotten Four and 20m, 30m and3m for Krang. Search radii was determine relative to drill density.
	Parent block sizes were 4m X, 12.5 Y and 4 Z for Michelangelo, Leonardo and Krang. Parentblock sizes were 4m X, 10 Y and 4 Z for Forgotten Four, sub cells were half parent cells in all

Criteria	Commentary
	resource block models. Blocks are deemed appropriate relate to drill data.
	Estimates were initially made with no loss or dilution (hypothetical in situ estimate) andcompared to the original Nav estimate. A second set of estimates incorporating ore lossand dilatational skin thickness was also obtained. Following reconciliation from mining atMertondale 5 it was noted that somewhat larger dilution factors may be required tocorrelate with the reported grade/tonnage. The dilution factor applied to the Raesideresource may be somewhat optimistic. However Mert 5 (mafics/porphyry) is a completelydifferent style of mineralisation to Raeside (mafics/sediments).Furthermore manyresources have no dilution added at the resource stage.
	Diamond (1,906m), RC (102,264.2m) and Aircore (30,100.2m) have been utilised for theresource estimate. RAB drilling (18,822m) when mineralised is used as a guide to supportthe interpretation however RAB holes were rejected for the resource estimate purposes.
	Top cuts selected ranged from 4-16g/t Au a pod by pod basis with the use of cumulativelog-probability plots, histograms and Iterative tests.Triton mined a trial parcel at Forgotten Four in 1990 (6,280t @ 5.18g/t Au) then extendedthe open pit to 40m in 1992 (43,359t @ 4.15g/t Au and L/G of 6,200t @ 1.0g/t Au)processing the ore at the Harbour Lights plant.
	Previous resource calculations completed by Navigator compare well with the undiluted RFmodel as there is no significant change in total contained ounces and a 5% variance ingrade. Applying dilution skins and containing the resource within a $2000 pit shell increasesthe level of confidence in the current resource.No by-products are to be recovered.
	Testwork on samples from Michelangelo and Krang (oxide and transition) did not revealany metallurgical issues however there may be an issue with (potential) refractory oreparticularly at Leonardo where the ore is associated with graphitic shales, this has not beentaken into account with the current resource.
	No assumptions are made regarding selective mining units.
	No assumptions are made regarding correlation between variables.Downhole lithology data was plotted and colour coded in Surpac and sectionalinteroperation of geological boundaries were generated. Wireframes of lodes were usedas hard boundaries to contain the interpolation. Lithology was limited and contradictoryand lodes were constrained by grade and quartz content.
	Varying top cuts were applied following a series of processes including log-probability plots,Iterative tests, log histograms and cross section inspection.To check that the interpolation of the block model honoured the drill data, validation wascarried out comparing the interpolated blocks to the sample composite data, the validation
Moisture	plots showed good correlation thus the raw drill data was honoured by the block model.Tonnages and grades were estimated on a dry in situ basis. No moisture values werereviewed.
Cut-offParameters	Preliminary operating cost estimates established by Navigator indicate that the break evenmill feed grade cut-off for the Raeside deposits are in the vicinity of 0.7g/t Au.
MiningFactors orAssumptions	The current resource estimation were made using a down-hole dilution skin set at 0.4m foroxide material and 0.7m for transitional and primary material. Downhole ore loss was setat 0.2m in the oxide and 0.3m in the transitional and primary zones.
MetallurgicalFactors orAssumptions	Testwork on samples from Michelangelo and Krang (oxide and transition) did not revealany metallurgical issues however there may be an issue with (potential) refractory oreparticularly at Leonardo where the ore is associated with graphitic shales.

Criteria	Commentary
EnvironmentalFactorsor Assumptions	An old mined open pit exists at the Forgotten Four (no final survey is available). It'sunknown if the pit has been back filled because of current water levels. Environmentalfactors are unknown. No environmental assumptions have been made.
Bulk Density	Several density tests have been conducted by various companies utilising differenttechniques over the projects period (gamma-gamma density probing and generalisedassumptions). Techniques are poorly documented and information relating to how the SG'swere measured is limited, none of the previous bulk density testwork was accepted.
	SGW conducted gamma-gamma surveys and density measurements from core atMichelangelo. McDonald Speijers accepted the SGW figures of 2.0t/m3 oxide, 2.4 t/m3transition and 2.7 t/m3for oxide. The values appear reasonable for Michelangelo. Theremaining three deposits, that tend to be more like the Forgotten Four than Michelangeloused the mining based values from the mining of the Forgotten Four open pit being 1.9t/m3oxide, 2.35 t/m3transition and 2.65 t/m3for oxide.
	There remains a general shortage of verifiable dry bulk density measurements and there isa lack of any bulk density measurements in the Leonardo deposit.
	Values for bulk density test work conducted to date either don't agree very well and can'tbe accepted or an arbitrary assumed factor was included in the calculation or there arecrucial explanations of methodologies that are missing. The SG values used in theestimation are considered to be reasonable however they are still a "best guess" based onnearby mines and recommendations by Nav. Physical measurements on samples arerequired to finalise the SG however most of the samples have been lost, destroyed orrehabilitated over the last 25 years. The density factors originally adopted by SGW forMichelangelo (2.0 t/m3 oxide, 2.40 t/m3transition, 2.70 t/m3fresh) appear reasonable andwere adopted. A slightly lower SG factor was applied to the remaining deposits becausehost lithologies are similar to Forgotten Four (1.90 t/m3 oxide, 2.35 t/m3transition, and2.65 t/m3fresh).
Classification	The resource estimate was obtained using a 3D block model "Recovered Fraction" (RF)technique, when applied without ore loss or dilution parameters it results in a hypotheticalinsitu tonnage and grade, if appropriate ore loss or dilution parameters are applied thenthe result is a recoverable resource estimate.
	Due to the lack of reliability and not being able to verify the quality of the bulk of the olddrill hole assays the mineralisation could not be classified as Measured despite therelatively close spaced drilling in places. The majority of the resource is Indicated (94.8%)and where drill spacing is wider and the interpretation of the mineralisation is notconvincing an Inferred classification (5.2%) is applied however much of this percentage fallsoutside the limits of material that meet the resource classification criteria. At Leonardo theapplied bulk density values limits the classification to Indicated.
	An Inferred classification was applied to any mineralised zone where the drill sectionsexceeded 40m i.e. down dip extensions of Leonardo and some peripheral zones in the otherdeposits.
Audits andReviews	Internal audits were compiled by McDonald Speijers and Kin geologists where possible anddata was checked and validated however in some instances assumptions were made basedon information supplied by Nav (SG and weathering depths). Some data (geological logs)are scant; the assay data is historical and could not be independently verified. The definitivenumbers are considered by the Competent Person as reasonable. The drillhole databasewas generated by transferring and collated databases generated by previous owners. 25holes (mineralised intersections containing 1,141 sample records) were selected at randomand checked against originals the data correlation was not perfect but acceptable (quite

Criteria	Commentary
	good 93%) considering the age of the data and the passing through different companyhistory.
Discussionof RelativeAccuracy andConfidence	The drill hole assay data is old (mostly originating from Triton) and second if not third hand,accuracy and reliability of the samples are unknown and have not been verified, itsassumed to be correct however no QA/QC control or check measures have been noted orapplied. Numerous entries are missing from the geological logging data and there is a gooddeal of inconsistency in the geological codes thus geological control is limited. The SG valuehas been assigned based on local knowledge (determined by Nav) however the bulk densityvalues have not been verified particularly at Leonardo.
	At Michelangelo some of the thin mineralised zones may not be as good as theinterpretation suggests particularly below the base of strong weathering.
	Ore loss and dilution factors applied to the model may require adjustment up or downsubject to the physical characteristics of the ore boundaries and proposed miningprocedures. Indications from reconciliation of mining at Mertondale suggest that thedilution factor at Raeside might be optimistic which possibly may result in a tonnagereduction. The dilution skins uses in the RF modelling at Mertondale were 0.5m (oxide) and0.8m (transition and fresh), 0.1m greater in each case than those used in the Raesidemodels, ore loss skins were the same. However many resources do not apply dilution atthis stage and therefore the resources at Raeside can be considered robust.

Competent Persons Statement

The information contained in this report relates to information compiled or reviewed by Mr. Paul Maher who is a member of the (AusIMM) and Mr. Simon Buswell-Smith who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (MAIG), both are employees of the company and fairly represents this information. Mr. Maher and Mr. Buswell-Smith have sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposit under consideration, and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the "JORC Australian code for reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves". Both consent to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

Certain information in this document refers to the intentions of Kin Mining NL, but these are not intended to be forecasts, forward looking statements or statements about future matters for the purposes of the Corporations Act or any other applicable law. The occurrence of events in the future are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Kin Mining NL's actual results, performance or achievements to differ from those referred to in this announcement. Accordingly, Kin Mining NL, its directors, officers, employees and agents do not give any assurance or guarantee that the occurrence of the events referred to in this announcement will actually occur as contemplated.

AI assistant

PATRONUS RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2016

65620_rns_2016-05-10_ce032a6c-320d-4232-8487-57cf59355c65.pdf

Board of Directors

Contact Details

Post

Office

ADDENDUM TO SCOPING STUDY ANNOUNCEMENT OF 9 MAY 2016

Appendix A Mertondale SECTION 1 – Sample Techniques and Data

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Appendix B Cardinia (Bruno Lewis Kyte)

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Appendix C Cardinia (Helens and Rangoon)

Appendix D Raeside

SECTION 1 – Sample Techniques and Data

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Competent Persons Statement

Forward Looking Statements

AI assistant

PATRONUS RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2016

65620_rns_2016-05-10_ce032a6c-320d-4232-8487-57cf59355c65.pdf

Board of Directors

Contact Details

Post

Office

ADDENDUM TO SCOPING STUDY ANNOUNCEMENT OF 9 MAY 2016

Appendix A Mertondale SECTION 1 – Sample Techniques and Data

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Appendix B Cardinia (Bruno Lewis Kyte)

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Appendix C Cardinia (Helens and Rangoon)

Appendix D Raeside

SECTION 1 – Sample Techniques and Data

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Competent Persons Statement

Forward Looking Statements

More from PATRONUS RESOURCES LIMITED

PATRONUS RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2016