Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

PACIFIC RESOURCES LIMITED Annual Report 2004

Sep 19, 2004

65638_rns_2004-09-19_4a7cbc6f-a5a7-4e80-a6c7-818d55274abf.pdf

Annual Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED ABN 20 075 877 075

Exploring the Mount Morgan metals district with advanced technologies

.......................................

CORPORATE DIRECTORY

DIRECTORS John Shaw (Chairman)
Martin Ackland
Greg Baynton
John McCawley (Executive director)
SECRETARY Leni Stanley
PRINCIPAL REGISTERED OFFICE IN AUSTRALIA Level 1, 101 Edward Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
$(07)$ 3229 6606
SHARE REGISTER ASX Perpetual Registrars Limited
Level 22, 300 Queen Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
(07) 3228 4000
Auditor Pitcher Partners
Level 21, 300 Queen Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
(07) 3228 4000
SOLICITORS Corrs Chambers Westgarth
1 Eagle Street
Brisbane QLD 4000
(07) 3228 9424
BANKERS Westpac Banking Corporation
Cnr Queen and Eagle Streets
Brisbane QLD 4000
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING Lodestone Exploration Limited shares are
listed on the Australian Stock Exchange.
WEBSITE ADDRESS www.lodestonex.com

LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED ABN 20 075 877 075

LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED ABN 20 075 877 075

Contents

Corporate Directory
Operational Review 2
Directors' Report to Shareholders 8
Corporate Governance Statement 12
Independent Audit Report to the Members 16
Directors' Declaration 17
Financial Report
Statement of Financial Performance 18
Statement of Financial Position 19
Statement of Cash Flows 20
Notes to the Financial Statements 21
Shareholder Information 31

Operational review

The Chairman's perspective

On behalf of your Board of Directors, I have pleasure in presenting the company's eighth annual report, and its second since listing on the Australian Stock Exchange in March 2003.

Lodestone's main objective, for which it was formed, is to "discover another Mount Morgan".

We are now in our second year of a properly resourced search, and the past year's program has added to our knowledge, helped us narrow our focus, and reinforced our hopes of success.

Mount Morgan South, the Mine Corridor, the Mount Victoria-Mt Battery and the Cracow South project areas are now distinct projects that will be advanced separately under largely independent technical leadership.

Mount Morgan South, Since listing in March 2003 we have drilled 8 geophysical targets south of Mount Morgan, including $\Delta$ in the past financial year, and have $\Delta$ yet to test.

The belt between New Chum Station, 11 km south of Mount Morgan, and Pomegranate Station, 30 km south of Mount Morgan is harder to explore than first envisaged. Cover rocks are thicker and the prospective horizon deeper than anticipated.

Airborne electro-magnetics have not delivered us a prize in that terrain, and the company has now turned to gravity tools in its search for massive sulphides. The company's first gravity target, 1105, is outlined on page 5 of this report.

Mine Corridor. The prospective belt between the Hamilton prospect, 7 kms south of Mount Morgan and the Midas prospect, 3 kms north of Mount Morgan, is less challenging, in terms of cover rocks, than the New Chum -Pomegranate belt.

Tenements acquired since listing allow Lodestone to move its focus northward into the "mine corridor" as distinct from its inferred southern extensions.

This belt will be explored intensively, with two potential drill targets already recognised.

Mount Victoria - Mount Battery. The newly optioned Mount Victoria - Mount Battery project area, just west of Mount Morgan, is prospective for epithermal and breccia-hosted style gold. An outline of the most immediate of several areas of interest is shown on page 6.

Cracow South. Lodestone is also targeting epithermal style gold between 20 kms and 50 kms south of Cracow.

These targets are overlain by Jurassic sandstone cover that makes exploration difficult, but easier than the search south of New Chum Station: under volcanic cover rocks.

Lodestone will continue to assess new opportunities in Central Queensland, to take advantage of its presence in the region.

As for risk and reward, the search for "another Mount Morgan" remains high risk, with the potential for considerable reward. This is especially so, in a climate of historically strong metals prices. The search for epithermal gold, though probably less risky, offers worthwhile rewards as recent successes in Queensland have shown.

May I acknowledge and thank those shareholders who have been with us since the float in March 2003, and welcome those of you who have joined us in the past twelve months.

$47 \leq$ hem)

John Shaw Chairman

Operational Review

Where it all began - Overview

Lodestone Exploration (LOD) is an Australian listed junior explorer, with a tenement area of more than 1700 square kilometers in Central and Northern Oueensland.

The Company was established in 1996 to identify and investigate potential economic blind ore bodies in a prospective gold-copper region south of Mount Morgan in Central Queensland.

The Mount Morgan ore deposit was Australia's premier volcanic-hosted massive sulphide deposit. The former mine vielded 9.4 million ounces of gold and 360,000 tonnes of copper and was described as one of the "largest mountains of gold ever discovered".

In other countries, satellite deposits have been discovered around similar ore bodies. Until recently, the limitations of available technologies meant that the detection of conductors that might include similar satellite deposits under thick cover rocks in the Mount Morgan area was extremely difficult.

Lodestone is applying the advances made in airborne geophysical survey techniques to conduct large-scale exploration of the region. The Company has deployed modern airborne electromagnetic survey equipment, specifically GEOTEM, HOISTEM and TEMPEST systems and in addition has utilized advanced ground gravity tools.

Figure 1. Project Location Map

Operational Review

MOUNT MORGAN PROIECT

Drilling on the Mount Morgan Project (Figure 2) (EPM 11840, 11841, 13794) since July 2003 has tested three electromagnetic and one magnetic target. Seven airborne electromagnetic and one magnetic target have now been drilled in total. Only minor copper and gold anomalism was revealed in two drillholes and four anomalies remain undrilled, subject to confirmation as targets.

Figure 2. Mount Morgan Project

The project has nine granted exploration permits that are the subject of an exploration alliance with BHP Billiton. Lodestone's interest in these granted permits (and in the alliance established between the parties) is initially 100%. BHP Billiton may earn a 70% interest in the granted permits if BHP Billiton incurs exploration expenditure of \$8 million or completes a bankable feasibility study within five years, and defines a mineral resource of not less than \$750 million in-ground value. The rights to smaller deposits would remain with Lodestone.

MOUNT MORGAN PROSPECT - "1105" TARGET

Two ground gravity surveys covered more than 100 sq. kms, delineated 10 anomalies, and generated the "1105" target shown in Figure 3. This target will be drilled as soon as a rig becomes available.

Figure 3. Mount Morgan South Project "1105" Target

Lodestone engaged structural geologist, Dr. Tim Hopwood to review the characteristics of Mount Morgan type mineralisation and generate new target areas. Dr. Hopwood defined six potential targets in a belt that extends from one target area named Midas (akms North of Mount Morgan) to Hamilton Creek (zkms South of Mount Morgan). Magnetic and gravity data will be collected over these targets prior to drilling to further define them.

In summary, work programs comprised follow-up ground electromagnetic surveys (Fugro) at three sites South of Mount Morgan, gravity surveys centred on Fletcher's Hill (Daishsat) and Dr. Hopwood's structural and stratigraphic study of the mine and mine corridor.

MOUNT MORGAN PROSPECT - MOUNT VICTORIA TARGET

A fourth program was initiated and advanced by Dr. Gary Arnold immediately west of the Mount Morgan Mine at the Mt Victoria Prospect (Figure $4$ ). This ongoing program of geological mapping and geochemical sampling has defined two gold mineralised systems that appear to be centred on intrusive rhyolites.

Figure 4. Mount Victoria Prospect

Rhvolite in the larger system is intensely altered, quartz veined and brecciated, and has significant surface gold anomalism up to 0.4 ppm gold. The style of mineralisation is not yet well understood but could be similar to breccia-hosted mineralisation known elsewhere in Queensland.

OTHER CENTRAL QUEENSLAND PROJECTS

Lodestone's field office is in Mount Morgan and the company is taking advantage of this location to extend Lodestone's interests more widely in Central Queensland. Consequently, Lodestone has taken up new ground in the Cracow District 20 kms South of Newcrest's Cracow Mine development comprising approximately 600 sq. kms, with 4 specific areas of interest.

The company has also farmed into ground held by Dominion Mining Limited, 25 kms east of Rockhampton, and is looking at other opportunities within easy reach of Mount Morgan.

FUTURE DIRECTION

Lodestone remains focused on finding 'another Mount Morgan' and will continue its methodical and determined campaign, using airborne magnetics and ground gravity. Focus remains centred on the Mount Morgan mine corridor volcanics and the search will move progressively northwards where the Hoopbound cover rocks are thinner or absent.

This northerly progression follows the grant of ground to Lodestone in its own right, as distinct from the original landholdings which are subject to an alliance with BHP Billiton and host the 1105 gravity anomaly, four untested electromagnetic anomalies and the Pomegranate breccias, all of which will be dealt with by year's end.

Future planned work will comprise a third gravity survey to extend coverage by some 20 sq. kms and collect infill data from emergent areas of interest. A high-resolution aeromagnetic survey is to be flown in the northern areas to help define structure and stratigraphy within the 'mine corridor'. Existing aeromagnetic data is between 10 and 20 years' old and of little value. The aim of the next magnetic and gravity surveys is to trace favourable host volcanic horizons and to locate high density bodies that might be VMS deposits within these horizons.

The Mt Victoria mineralised system will be drill tested in October. One or two deep holes will intersect the system at depth and a third hole will be drilled through sandstone cover rocks in search of buried lateral extensions.

Additional ground will be captured and new joint ventures entered into as priority opportunities arise.

Tenement EPM Number Area
$(sub-blocks)3$
MOUNT MORGAN ALLIANCE TENEMENTS .
Mount Gelobera 11837 18.
Walmul West 11838 21
Hoopbound East 11839 4
Mount Hoopbound 11840 19
Walmul 11841 29
Gelobera West 11842 20
Black Mountain 13637 52
Mount Battery 13794 11
Mount Battery East 13802 3
MOUNT MORGAN TENEMENTS'
Mount Battery North 14078 34
Morganite East** 14696 28
New Chim** 14619 6
BAJOOL TENEMENTS2
Mount Kelly 14221 60
Station** 14435 14
Alphadale 14137 38
Queenslander 13743 5
NORTH QUEENSLAND TENEMENTS2
Limestone Creek** 11980 18
CRACOW SOUTH TENEMENTS'
Dawsonvale** 14495 100
Bungaban** 14636 98

Tenement Schedule

** EPMA = Application for an exploration permit for minerals

Notes:

  • "Alliance Tenements" are included in the BHP Billiton Alliance. $\mathbf{1}$
  • 2 Lodestone Exploration Limited has a 100% interest in these tenements.
  • 3 Each sub-block approximates 3 sq. kms.

DIRECTORS' REPORT

Your directors present their report on the company for the year ended 30 June 2004.

Directors

The following persons were directors of Lodestone Exploration Limited during the whole of the financial year and up to the date of this report:

JT Shaw - Chairman M Ackland G A I Baynton J L McCawley - Executive director

Principal Activities

During the year the principal continuing activity of the company was mineral exploration. No changes are expected in the principal activity of the company in subsequent years.

Lodestone Exploration Limited was admitted to the official list of the Australian Stock Exchange on 12 March 2003 and official quotation of the company's securities commenced on 17 March 2003. The company confirms that it used the cash and assets in a form readily convertible to cash that it had at the time of admission in a way consistent with its business objectives.

Review of Operations

The operating loss after income tax of the company for the year was \$720,295 (2003: loss \$123,043). The loss reflects the nature of the company's principal activity.

Earnings per Share

2004 2003
Cents Cents
Basic earnings per share (2.33) (0.57)
Diluted earnings per share (2.33) (0.57)

Significant Changes in the State of Affairs

There were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the company during the financial year.

Dividend

The directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend. No dividend was paid during the year.

Matters Subsequent to the End of the Financial Year

At the date of this report there are no matters or circumstances which have arisen since 30 June 2004 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect:

  • (a) the company's operations in future financial years, or
  • (b) the results of those operations in future financial years, or
  • (c) the company's state of affairs in future financial vears.

Likely Developments and Expected Results from Operations

There are no likely developments in the operations of the company which are expected to significantly affect the results of the company in subsequent years.

Environmental Regulation

The company is subject to significant environmental and other regulations in respect of its exploration activities in Australia and strives earnestly to undertake its operations in an environmentally responsible manner and to maintain compliance with the relevant regulations. Rehabilitation of individual field projects is completed progressively to ensure necessary environmental restoration is kept to a minimum at any particular time.

The directors are satisfied that no breaches of environmental legislation have occurred. No notices of any breaches have been received from any authority.

Information on Directors

Particulars of Directors' Interests in Shares and Options

Director Experience Special
Responsibilities
Ordinary
shares
Options
Expiry
Date
30/09/07
Expiry
Date
7/12/04
Chairman – Non-executive
IT Shaw
B.Sc (Geological
Engineering)
MCIM, FAusIMM,
FAICD, SME
Independent
Non-executive
Director for
2 years.
Chairman for 2
years. Age 64.
Chairman of Tri Origin
Minerals Limited and
Gallery Gold Limited.
Director of Kingsgate
Consolidated Limited.
He was formerly a
director of a number
of listed gold
companies.
Chairman 100,000 400,000
Executive director
J L McCawley
B.Com (Hons)
Executive Director
since November
2003. A Director
for 8 years. Age 61.
Executive
Director
5,097,147
Non-executive directors
M Ackland
B.App.Sc.,
M.AusIMM,
SME, FAICD
Non-executive
Director for 2
years. Age 58.
Director of Mineral
Deposits Limited
and Sedimentary
Holdings Limited. He
was formerly a director
of several major
operating resource
and engineering
companies.
Chairman of
the audit
committee.
37,500 200,000 18,750
G Baynton
M.Econ St, MBA,
B.Bus
(Accounting),
ASIA, FAICD
Non-executive
Director for
3 years. Age 35.
Director of Tissue
Therapies Limited and
several private
companies.
Member of
the audit
committee.
1,296,000 200,000 100,000

Company Secretary

The company secretary is Ms Leni Stanley CA, B.Com. Ms Stanley was appointed to the position of company secretary in 2002. Before joining Lodestone Exploration Limited she held a similar position with another company. She currently is a partner with a Chartered Accountants firm.

Meetings of Directors

The numbers of meetings of the company's board of directors and of each board committee held during the year ended 30 June 2004, and the numbers of meetings attended by each director were:

Full Meetings
of Directors
Meetings of
Audit Committee
Number of meetings held 10 2
Number of meetings attended by:
J T Shaw 10 N/A
J L McCawley 10 N/A
M Ackland 9 2
G Baynton 9 2

Retirement, Election and Continuation in Office of Directors

Mr J Shaw and Mr M Ackland are the directors retiring by rotation who, being eligible, offers themselves for reelection.

Remuneration Report

Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration

Non-executive directors

Fees and payments to non-executive directors reflect the demands which are made on, and the responsibilities of, the directors. Non-executive directors' fees and payments are reviewed annually by the Board.

Directors' fees

Non-executive directors' fees are determined within an aggregate directors' fee pool limit, which is periodically recommended for approval by shareholders. The maximum currently stands at \$160,000 in aggregate plus statutory superannuation.

Executive pav

The combination of base pay and superannuation make up the executive directors total remuneration. Base pay for the executive director is reviewed annually to ensure the executive's pay is competitive with the market.

Details of remuneration

Details of the nature and amount of each element of the emoluments of each director of Lodestone Exploration Limited for the year ended 30 June 2004 are set out in the following table.

Directors of Lodestone Exploration Limited

Primary Post-employment Equity
Name Directors' fee Superannuation Options Total
J T Shaw, Chairman 40,000 3,600 $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ 43,600
J L McCawley, Executive director 43,333 3,900 $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ 47,233
M Ackland 30,000 2,700 32,700
G Baynton 30,000 2,700 32,700

Share Options granted to Directors

There have been no options over unissued ordinary shares of Lodestone Exploration Limited granted during or since the end of the financial year to any of the directors of the company as part of their remuneration.

Shares under Option

Unissued ordinary shares of Lodestone Exploration Limited under option at the date of this report are as follows:

Date options granted Expiry date Issue price of shares Number under option
1 October 2002 30 September 2005 \$0.30 100,000
1 October 2002 30 September 2007 50.30 800,000
10 March 2003 7 December 2004 \$0.20 6,245,000

No option holder has any right under the options to participate in any other share issue of the company or of any other entity.

Shares Issued on the Exercise of Options

The following ordinary shares of Lodestone Exploration Limited were issued during the year ended 30 June 2004 on the exercise of options granted. No further shares have been issued since that date. No amounts are unpaid on any of the shares.

Date options granted Issue price of shares Number of shares issued
10 March 2003 \$0.20 5.000

Insurance of Officers

The company has not, during or since the financial year, in respect of any person who is or has been an officer or auditor of the company or a related body corporate paid or agreed to pay a premium in respect of a contract insuring against a liability incurred as an officer for the costs or expenses to defend legal proceedings.

Agreement to Indemnify Officers

During the financial year, Lodestone Exploration Limited entered into an agreement to indemnify the directors and the general manager of the company.

The indemnity relates to any liability:

  • (a) incurred in connection with or as a consequence of the directors acting in the capacity including, without limiting the foregoing, representing the company on any body corporate, and
  • (b) for legal costs incurred in defending an action in connection with or as a consequence of the director acting in the capacity.
  • No liability has arisen under these indemnities as at the date of this report.

Proceedings on Behalf of Company

No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of the company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the company is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the company for all or part of those proceedings.

No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on behalf of the company with leave of the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001.

Auditor

Pitcher Partners, Accountants Auditors & Advisors, continues in office in accordance with section 327 of the Corporations Act 2001.

This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.

F Show

I T Shaw Chairman 14 September 2004

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

This document sets out the principles of governance of Lodestone Exploration Limited (Lodestone) and the conduct of the Board. The Company has complied with the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations which are considered appropriate to their circumstances given the size and maturity of the Company.

Lodestone's corporate governance policies are supported by the following specific code, policies and charter that are available on our website at www.lodestonex.com.

Code of Conduct Continuous Disclosure Policy Securities Trading Policy Risk Management Policy Audit Committee Charter

Commitment

The Company and the Board are committed to achieving the highest standards of integrity and governance in all aspects of Lodestone's activities. The principle obligation of Lodestone is to its shareholders through increasing shareholder wealth, and this is sought to be met while commensurately recognising the interests of employees, customers, creditors, the communities in which Lodestone operates, and other stakeholders.

Role of the Board

The key responsibilities of the Board are to:

  • Review, advance and approve Lodestone's:
  • $-$ objectives and strategies,
  • $-$ exploration and development programmes, and
  • $-$ capital management.
  • Monitor Lodestone's business activities, financial performance, and corporate governance.
  • Oversee Lodestone's financial position.
  • Report to shareholders.
  • Ensure effective control systems are in place.
  • Appoint, and appraise, the Executive Director.
  • Oversee the senior management team in terms of:
  • $-$ performance evaluation;
  • $-$ succession planning; and
  • $-$ remuneration.
  • Establish a culture of high ethical, environmental, heath and safety standards.
  • Ensure the Board is effective.

Directors' Independence

The board has adopted specific principles in relation to directors' independence. These state that to be deemed independent, a Director must be a Non-executive and:

  • not be a substantial shareholder of the company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial shareholder of the company
  • within the last three years, not have been employed in an executive capacity by the company or been a director after ceasing to hold any such employment
  • within the last three years not have been a principal of a material professional advisor or a material consultant to the company, or an employee materially associated with the service provided
  • not be a material supplier or customer of the company, or an officer of or otherwise associated directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer
  • must not have material contractual relationship with the company other than as a Director
  • not have been on the board for a period which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere $\bullet$ with the director's ability to act in the best interests of the company

• be free from any interest and any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the Director's ability to act in the best interests of the company.

Materiality for these purposes is determined on both quantitative and qualitative bases. An amount of over 5% of the individual directors' net worth is considered material for these purposes.

I Shaw. M Ackland and G Baynton hold shares and options in the Company. However, based upon the materiality guidelines noted above these holding are not considered to impact the directors' independence. The independent directors on the board are:

John Shaw - Independent Chairman Martin Ackland - Independent Non-executive Director

Due to his position of Executive Director and his substantial shareholding in the company John McCawley is not considered an independent director.

Greg Baynton is not considered independent as he is a director of Orbit Capital Pty Ltd. Orbit Capital Pty Ltd received management fees for the management of the company's initial public offering during the prior financial vear.

Role of Management

The management of the business of Lodestone is conducted by the Executive Director, as appointed by the Board, and by those other officers and employees to whom the management function is properly designated by the Executive Director

The Board sets authorities for the Executive Director which are reviewed and updated as required.

A position description for the Executive Director, and any other Executive Director, is being developed and will be agreed between the Board and Executive Director, along with periodic statements of the objectives of the Executive Director.

Board Membership

The following principles have been adopted for the membership of the Board:

  • The Board has a majority of Non-executive Directors.
  • The Chairman of Lodestone is a Non-executive Director.
  • If the Chairman is a substantial shareholder of Lodestone, another Non-executive Director, who is not a substantial shareholder, is appointed as Lead Independent Director.
  • The Lead Independent Director takes over Chairmanship of the Board in any matter in which the Chairman may be perceived to have a conflict of interest with shareholders generally, and acts as the primary point of contact for any person who may have a concern in this regard.
  • As required by law, the term of each Director (except the Executive Director) is limited to three years, with onethird of the Board being subject to re-election by shareholders at each Annual General Meeting.

Board Nomination

Nominations for the Board are considered by the Board as a whole. The Board aims to ensure that it always has an appropriate diversity of qualifications, experience and expertise, consistent with the objectives of Lodestone.

  • Suitable candidates for the Board are identified for appointment having regard to the skills desired and skills represented.
  • A formal letter of appointment is issued to all Directors.
  • Annually the Chairman will conduct a performance review of the Board focused on:
  • $-$ the overall effectiveness and competencies of the Board,
  • $-$ the availability and contribution of each individual Director,
  • effectiveness of Directors' training and orientation, and $\sim$
  • $-$ succession planning.

Board Procedures

  • Each Director is expected to declare any actual or potential conflict of interest.
  • Where conflicts may arise, affected Directors absent themselves from Board deliberation and decisions.
  • Non-Executive Directors regularly meet in private.
  • Where reasonably necessary. Directors may obtain independent advice with prior notification to the Chairman. $\bullet$
  • Directors are expected to be familiar with Lodestone's strategy, operations, financing and risks; Lodestone must arrange suitable orientation and training.
  • Directors may access continuing education to ensure their skills and knowledge are up to date.
  • Directors have a right to expect all information relevant to Lodestone's business and performance to be $\bullet$ presented at Board meetings, and can access further information on request.
  • Directors must maintain confidentiality of information learned by virtue of their position as Director.
  • Non-Executive Directors must confirm they are able to devote such time as is necessary to carry out their $\bullet$ duties on the Board.
  • Directors advise the Chairman prior to accepting new appointments.

Company Secretary

In recognition of the key role played by the Company Secretary:

  • The appointment of the Company Secretary must be approved by the Board.
  • All Directors have direct access to the Company Secretary.
  • The Company Secretary is expected to monitor Lodestone's corporate governance procedures, and advise of possible improvements.

Standards and Code of Conduct

The Board's objective is to foster a culture of high ethical and compliance standards. To this end:

  • Directors must act honestly, in good faith, with high standards of care, diligence and enquiry, and in the best interests of Lodestone as a whole.
  • All Directors and employees must abide by Lodestone's Code of Conduct.
  • Directors and senior management must not use their position to improperly trade in Lodestone's securities, $\bullet$ with all transactions being in accordance with Lodestone's Securities Trading Policy.

Financial Standards

Lodestone is committed to high standards of financial integrity and reporting.

  • Financial reports are required to present a true and fair view, in all material respects, of Lodestone's financial condition and operating results.
  • A sound and effective system of risk management and internal control is required, consistent with Lodestone's Risk Management Policy.
  • An Audit Committee has been appointed to assist the Board in its consideration of financial policy and reporting.

Remuneration Standards

Lodestone's overriding remuneration principle is to provide a fair and sufficient incentive to attract, motivate and retain a high quality Board and management team, based upon rewarding performance which enhances shareholder value.

  • The remuneration of the senior management team may include the following components:
  • $-$ fixed salary and benefits.
  • $-$ a short term incentive based on individual performance, and
  • a long term incentive derived from consideration of the performance of both Lodestone and the individual.
  • Since listing in March 2003 the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors consists solely of fixed fees.
  • Recognising the small capital base of Lodestone, and the high risk inherent in exploration and development, consideration may be given from time to time to equity based incentives for Non-Executive Directors, consistent with increasing shareholder wealth.

• Lodestone's Annual Report discloses all components of the remuneration of Directors, including advice of any discretionary incentive payments, and the remuneration of executives in accordance with prevailing applicable rules.

Market Disclosure

In accordance with its obligations under relevant legislation:

  • Lodestone keeps the market fully informed of information which may have a material effect on the price of Lodestone's shares.
  • Disclosures are to be:
  • $-$ timely:
  • $-$ factual;
  • $-$ comprehensive; and
  • $-$ understandable
  • Lodestone's Continuous Disclosure Policy sets the standards and procedures for information disclosure.

Shareholder Communications

Lodestone aims to ensure that shareholders are well informed of all major developments affecting Lodestone. This programme includes:

  • · Included in Lodestone's website:
  • $-$ Annual, half yearly and quarterly reports and accounts
  • $-$ Notices of general meetings
  • $-$ All media and stock exchange releases
  • $-$ Key policies
  • $-$ Committee charters
  • $-$ General Lodestone profile
  • Facilitating the full participation by shareholders at Lodestone's Annual General Meeting.
  • Requiring the attendance of Lodestone's external auditor at the Annual General Meeting.

INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF
LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED

Scope

The financial report and directors' responsibility

The financial report comprises the statement of financial performance, statement of financial position, statement of cash flows, accompanying notes to the financial statements, and the Directors' declaration for Lodestone Exploration Limited (the company) for the year ended 30 June 2004.

The Directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and true and fair presentation of the financial report in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001. This includes responsibility for the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls that are designed to prevent and detect fraud and error, and for the accounting policies and accounting estimates inherent in the financial report.

Audit approach

We conducted an independent audit in order to express an opinion to the members of the company. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards in order to provide reasonable assurance as to whether the financial report is free of material misstatement. The nature of an audit is influenced by factors such as the use of professional judgement, selective testing, the inherent limitations of internal control, and the availability of persuasive rather than conclusive evidence. Therefore, an audit cannot guarantee that all material misstatements have been detected.

We performed procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including compliance with Accounting Standards and other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia, a view which is consistent with our understanding of the company's financial position, and of its performance as represented by the results of its operations and cash flows.

We formed our audit opinion on the basis of these procedures, which included:

  • examining, on a test basis, information to provide evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial report, and
  • assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and disclosures used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the Directors.

While we considered the effectiveness of management's internal controls over financial reporting when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our audit was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls.

Independence

In conducting our audit, we followed applicable independence requirements of Australian professional ethical pronouncements and the Corporations Act 2001.

Audit opinion

In our opinion, the financial report of Lodestone Exploration Limited is in accordance with:

  • (a) the Corporations Act 2001, including:
  • (i) giving a true and fair view of the company's financial position as at 30 June 2004 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and

(ii) complying with Accounting Standards in Australia and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

(b) other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia.

d Chu Pu Fren

PITCHER PARTNERS Accountants Auditors & Advisors Brisbane, 14 September 2004

R C Brown Partner

An Independent Queensland Partnership. ABN 32 862 011 478 Formerly Douglas Heck & Burrell

DIRECTORS' DECLARATION

The directors declare that the financial statements and notes set out on pages 18 to 30:

  • (a) comply with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; and
  • (b) give a true and fair view of the company's financial position as at 30 June 2004 and of its performance, as represented by the results of its operations and its cash flows, for the financial year ended on that date.
  • In the directors' opinion:
  • (a) the financial statements and notes are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
  • (b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.

This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.

J Show

JT Shaw Chairman Brisbane, 14 September 2004

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2004

Notes 2004 2003
s
Revenue from ordinary activities 3 61,752 28,173
Exploration expenditure abandoned (477, 987)
Professional services expenses (89,543) (66,091)
Corporate overhead expenses (54, 713) (38, 696)
Depreciation expenses (3,571) (1,448)
Directors remuneration 15 (156, 233) (44,981)
Loss from ordinary activities before income tax 4 (720, 295) (123, 043)
Income tax expense 5
Net loss (720, 295) (123, 043)
Total changes in equity other than those resulting from
transactions with owners as owners 13 (720, 295) (123, 043)
Cents Cents
Basic earnings per share 21 (2.33) (0.57)
Diluted earnings per share 21 (2.33) (0.57)

The above Statement of Financial Performance should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

AS AT 30 JUNE 2004

Notes 2004
S
2003
S
Current assets
Cash 894,166 1,957,043
Receivables 6 27,567 42,269
Other 7 28,260 13,260
Total current assets 949,993 2,012,572
Non-current assets
Plant and equipment 8 32,037 7,133
Exploration expenditure 9 959,898 692,538
Total non-current assets 991,935 699,671
Total assets 1,941,928 2,712,243
Current liabilities
Payables 10 ° 45,036 96,056
Total current liabilities 45,036 96,056
Total liabilities 45,036 96,056
Net assets 1,896,892 2,616,187
Equity
Contributed equity 11 2,826,159 2,825,159
Accumulated losses 12 (929, 267) (208, 972)
Total equity 13 1,896,892 2,616,187

The above Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2004

Notes 2004 2003
s
Cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from customers (inclusive of goods and services tax) 85,948 58,517
Payments to suppliers (inclusive of goods and services tax) (397, 613) (198, 355)
Interest received 65,218 21,309
Net cash outflows from operating activities 19 (246, 447) (118, 529)
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments for exploration (773, 955) (455, 351)
Payments for property, plant and equipment (28, 475) (2,414)
Payment for security deposit (15,000) (10,760)
Net cash outflows from investing activities (817, 430) (468, 525)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from share issue 1,000 2,745,851
Payment of share issue costs (335,758)
Net cash inflows from financing activities 1,000 2,410,093
Net increase/(decrease) in cash held (1,062,877) 1,823,039
Cash at the beginning of the financial year 1,957,043 134,004
Cash at the end of the financial year 894,166 1,957,043

The above Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2004

Note 1. Summary of significant accounting policies

This general purpose financial report has been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board, Urgent Issues Group Consensus Views and the Corporations Act 2001.

It is prepared in accordance with the historical cost convention, except for certain assets which, as noted, are at valuation. Unless otherwise stated, the accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous year,

(a) Income tax

Tax effect accounting procedures are followed whereby the income tax expense in the statement of financial performance is matched with the accounting profit after allowing for permanent differences. The future tax benefit relating to tax losses is not carried forward as an asset unless the benefit is virtually certain of realisation. Income tax on cumulative timing differences is set aside to the deferred income tax or the future income tax benefit accounts at the rates which are expected to apply when those timing differences reverse.

(b) Exploration expenditure

Exploration expenditure incurred by or on behalf of the entity is accumulated separately for each area of interest until such time as the area moves into development phase, or is abandoned or sold. The realisation of the value of expenditure carried forward depends upon any commercial results that may be obtained through successful development and exploitation of the area of interest or alternatively by its sale. If an area of interest is abandoned or is considered to be of no further commercial interest the accumulated exploration costs relating to the area are written off against income in the year of abandonment.

(c) Acquisitions of assets

The purchase method of accounting is used for all acquisitions of assets. Cost is measured as the fair value of the assets given up, shares issued or liabilities undertaken at the date of acquisition plus incidental costs directly attributable to the acquisition.

(d) Recoverable amount of non-current assets

The recoverable amount of an asset is the net amount expected to be recovered through the cash inflows and outflows arising from its continued use and subsequent disposal.

Where the carrying amount of a non-current asset is greater than its recoverable amount, the asset is written down to its recoverable amount. The decrement in the carrying amount is recognised as an expense in the net profit or loss in the reporting period in which the recoverable amount write-down occurs.

(e) Depreciation of property, plant and equipment

Depreciation is calculated on a straight line basis to write off the net cost or revalued amount of each item of property, plant and equipment over its expected useful life to the entity. Estimates of remaining useful lives are made on a regular basis for all assets, with annual reassessments for major items. The expected useful lives are as follows:

Plant and equipment

$5 - 10$ years

(f) Trade and other creditors

These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the entity prior to the end of the financial year and which are unpaid. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.

(g) Cash

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash includes deposits at call with financial institutions and other highly liquid investments with short periods to maturity which are readily convertible to cash on hand and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.

(h) Earnings per share

(i) Basic earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net profit after income tax attributable to members of the company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the year.

Note 1. Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

(h) Earnings per share (continued)

(ii) Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares.

(i) Web site costs

Costs in relation to web sites are charged as expenses in the period in which they are incurred. Costs in relation to the development of a web site, and ongoing costs of maintenance during the operating phase are considered to be expenses.

(i) International Financial Reporting Standards

The company has commenced investigating the transition from current Australian Standards to Australian equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Management has had initial discussions with its professional advisors to identify key areas that may be impacted. As the company has a 30 June year end, consideration will be given to the preparation of an opening balance sheet in accordance with AASB equivalents to IFRS as at 1 July 2004. This will form the basis of accounting for Australian equivalents of IFRS in the future, and is required when the consolidated entity prepares its first fully IFRS compliant financial report for the year ending 30 June 2006. Set out below are the key areas identified at this time where accounting policies may change and have an impact on the financial report of the company.

Exploration and Evaluation Costs

The current accounting policy for exploration and evaluation costs is set out in note 1(b). Under the IASB's ED 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources it was expected that a more rigorous impairment test would need to be performed in relation to recognised exploration and evaluation assets. However, in its July 2004 Action Alert the AASB advised that the IASB has decided to fully grandfather national GAAP such as Australia's existing area of interest method of accounting for exploration costs until such time as the IASB produces a comprehensive extractive industry IFRS. Accordingly, at this time it is expected that the current policy will continue under the grandfathering in the transition to Australian equivalents of IFRS. The policy will, however, be subject to possible future change under a more comprehensive extractive industry IFRS post 2005.

Equity-based Compensation Benefits

Under the new standard AASB 2 Share-based Payments, equity-based compensation to directors and employees will be recognised as an expense in respect of the services received. This will result in a change to the current accounting policy where no expense is recognised for equity-based compensation.

Income Tax

Under the new standard AASB 112 income Taxes, there is a requirement that the company adopt a balance sheet approach to income tax accounting rather than the current income statement approach. Additionally, the tests for the recognition of deferred tax assets, such as future income tax benefits, will be based on where realisation of the benefit is "probable" rather than where realisation of the benefit can be regarded as being assured beyond any reasonable doubt or virtually certain. The company does not currently recognise deferred tax assets as these are not considered virtually certain. Adoption of the new standard may result in recognition of deferred tax assets earlier than under the current standard.

Note 2 Segment information

The company operates solely within one business segment, being the mineral exploration industry in Australia.

2004
S
2003
S
Note 3
Revenue
Revenue from outside the operating activities
Interest 61,752 28,173
Loss from ordinary activities
Note 4
Loss from ordinary activities before income tax expense
includes the following specific expenses:
Exploration expenditure abandoned
Depreciation
477,987
3,571
1,448
Note 5
Income tax
The income tax benefit for the financial year differs
from the amount calculated on the loss. The differences
are reconciled as follows:
Loss from ordinary activities before income tax expense (720, 295) (123,043)
Income tax calculated at 30% (2003: 30%)
Tax effect of permanent differences:
(216, 089) (36, 913)
Business related capital costs
Other
(21,557) (20, 848)
1,835
Income tax expense / (benefit) adjusted for permanent differences
Future income tax benefits not brought to account
(237, 646)
237,646
(55, 926)
55,926
Income tax expense attributable to the loss

The directors estimate that the potential net future income tax benefit at 30 June 2004 amounts to \$355,810 (2003: \$188,452). The future income tax benefit, which has not been recognised as an asset, will only be obtained if:

  • (i) the company derives future assessable income of a nature and an amount sufficient to enable the benefit to be realised;
  • (ii) the company continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by the law; and

(iii) no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the company in realising the benefit.

No franking credits are available for the subsequent financial year.

Note 6 Current assets - Receivables

Other debtors Interest receivable 3,398
24,169
6,864
35,405
27,567 42,269
Note 7 Current assets - Other
Security deposit 28,260 13.260
2004
\$
2003
-S
Non-current assets - Plant and equipment
Note 8
Motor vehicles $-$ at cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation
49,319
(20, 283)
22,060
(17, 280)
29,036 4,780
Plant and equipment - at cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation
3,630
(629)
2,414
(61)
3,001 2,353
32,037 7,133

Reconciliations of the carrying amounts of each class of plant and equipment at the beginning and end of the current financial year are set out below:

Motor vehicles Plant and equipment Total
s
Carrying amount at 1 July 2003
Additions
Depreciation expense
4,780
27,259
(3,003)
2,353
1,216
(568)
7,133
28,475
(3,571)
Carrying amount at 30 June 2004 29,036 3,001 32,037
2004
s
2003
s
Non-current assets - Exploration expenditure
Note 9
Exploration phase property costs
Geological and exploration database expenditure $-$ at cost 959,898 692,538
The capitalised exploration expenditure carried forward
above has been determined as follows:
Opening balance
Expenditure incurred during the year
Exploration expenditure abandoned
692,538
745,347
(477, 987)
190,625
501,913
Closing balance as shown above 959,898 692,538
Note 10 Current liabilities - Payables
Trade creditors 45,036 96,056

Note 11 Contributed equity

2004
Shares
2004
Shares
2004
Ş
2003
\$
(a) Share capital
Ordinary shares
Fully paid
30,916,154 30,911,154 2,826,159 2,825,159
(b) Movements in ordinary share capital:
Date Details Number of
Shares
Issue
Price
\$
30 June 2002 Opening balance 16,595,000 388,494
23 August 2002 Share issue 500,000 \$0.15 75,000
31 October 2002 Share issue 807,822 \$0.15 121,173
31 December 2002 Share issue 508,332 \$0.15 76,250
10 March 2003 Share issued under Prospectus 12,500,000 \$0.20 2,500,000
Share issue expenses (335,758)
30 June 2003 Balance 30,911,154 2,825,159
25 November 2003 Exercise of options issued
under prospectus
5,000 \$0.20 1,000
30 June 2004 Closing balance 30,916,154 2,826,159

(c) Ordinary shares

Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.

On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote.

(d) Options

At balance date 7,145,000 options over ordinary shares of Lodestone Exploration Limited were on issue. 900,000 options were issued on 1 October 2002 with an exercise price of \$0.30. 800,000 of these options expire on 30 September 2007 and the remaining 100,000 expire on 30 September 2005. A further 6,250,000 options were issued under the Prospectus. These options are exercisable at \$0.20 and expire on 7 December 2004. During the financial year 5,000 options that were issued under the Prospectus were exercised.

2004 2003
Note 12 Accumulated losses
Accumulated losses at the beginning of the financial year
Net loss attributable to members of Lodestone Exploration Limited
(208, 972)
(720, 295)
(85, 929)
(123,043)
Accumulated losses at the end of the financial year (929, 267) (208, 972)
Note 13
Equity
Total equity at the beginning of the financial year
Total changes in equity recognised in the statement
2,616,187 302,565
of financial performance
Transactions with owners as owners:
(720, 295) (123,043)
Contributions of equity net of transaction costs 1,000 2,436,665
Total equity at the end of the financial year 1,896,892 2,616,187

Note 14 Financial instruments

(a) Interest rate risk exposure

The company's exposure to interest rate risk and the effective weighted average interest rate for classes of financial assets and financial liabilities are set out below.

Floating
Interest
Non-Interest
Bearing
Total
2004 Rate
Financial assets: \$ \$ \$
Cash
Receivables
885,000 9,166 894,166
Other L. 27,567
28,260
27,567
28,260
885,000 64,993 949,993
Weighted average interest rate 4.50%
Financial liabilities:
Payables 45,036 45,036
45,036 45,036
Weighted average interest rate
Net financial assets/(liabilities) 885,000 19,957 904,957
Floating Non-Interest
Interest Bearing Total
2003 Rate
Financial assets: Ś. \$ Ś
Cash 1,950,000 7,043 1,957,043
Receivables 42,269 42,269
Other 13,260 13,260
1,950,000 62,572 2,012,572
Weighted average interest rate 4.25%
Financial liabilities:
Payables 96,056 96,056
96,056 96,056
Weighted average interest rate

(b) Fair net values

The company's financial assets and liabilities included in current assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position are carried out at amounts approximate net fair value.

(c) Credit risk exposures

The company's maximum exposure to credit risk at balance date in relation to each class of recognised financial asset is the carrying amount of those assets as indicated in the statement of financial position.

Note 15 Director and executive disclosures

Directors

The following persons were directors of Lodestone Exploration Limited during the financial year:

Chairman - Non-executive

IT Shaw

Executive director

J L McCawley

Non-executive directors

M C Ackland G A J Baynton

Remuneration of directors

Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration

Non-executive directors

Fees and payments to non-executive directors reflect the demands which are made on, and the responsibilities of, the directors. Non-executive directors' fees and payments are reviewed annually by the Board.

Non-executive directors' fees are determined within an aggregate directors' fee pool limit, which is periodically recommended for approval by shareholders. The maximum currently stands at \$160,000 in aggregate.

Executive director

The executive directors' pay and reward framework has two components, base pay and superannuation. The combination of these comprises the executives total remuneration. The base pay for the executive director is reviewed annually.

Details of remuneration

Details of the remuneration of each director of Lodestone Exploration Limited are set out in the following table.

2004 Primary Post-employment Equity
Cash salary and fees Superannuation Options Total
JT Shaw 40,000 3,600 43,600
L McCawley 43,333 3,900 ىسە 47,233
M C Ackland 30,000 2,700 32,700
GA J Baynton 30,000 2,700 $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ 32,700
143,333 12,900 156,233

Total remuneration of directors of Lodestone Exploration Limited for the year ended 30 June 2003 is set out below. Information for individual directors is not shown as this is the first financial report prepared since the issue of AASB 1046 Directors and Executives Disclosures by Disclosing Entities.

2003 Primary Post-employment Equity
Cash salary and fees Superannuation Options Total
Total $41,268*$ $3,715*$ 47,977 92,960

*During the 2003 financial year directors were paid remuneration from 17 March 2003.

Equity instrument disclosures relating to directors and executives

Option holdings

The number of options over ordinary shares in the company held during the financial year by each director of Lodestone Exploration Limited is set out below.

Name Balance at
the start of
the year
Granted during
the year as
remuneration
Exercised
during the
vear
Other changes
during the
vear
Balance at
the end of
the year
Vested and
exercisable at
the end of
the year
I T Shaw 405,000 $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ 405,000 405,000
M C Ackland 218,750 $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ 218,750 218,750
G A J Baynton 427,500 $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ 427,500 427,500

No options are vested and unexercisable at the end of the year.

Note 15 Director and executive disclosures (continued)

Shareholdings

The number of ordinary shares in the company held during the financial year by each director of Lodestone Exploration Limited is set out below.

Name Balance at the
start of the year
Received during
the year on the
exercise of options
Other changes
during the year
Balance at the
end of the year
I T Shaw 110,000 110,000
M C Ackland 37,500 37,500
G A J Baynton 1,599,333 5,000 1,604,333
L McCawley 5,097,147 50,000 5, 147, 147

Other Transactions of Directors and Director-Related Entities

G Baynton is a director of Orbit Capital Pty Limited, which received commission in respect of equity raised during the prior financial year, such service being provided in the ordinary course of business to the company.

The wife of a director, Mr G Baynton, is a director of Nous Corporate Pty Ltd and has the capacity to significantly influence decision making of that company. Lodestone Exploration Limited has rented office space from Nous Corporate Pty Ltd during the prior year. Nous Corporate Pty Ltd has also provided professional services to Lodestone Exploration Limited during the financial year.

Aggregate amounts of each of the above types of other transactions with directors and their director-related entities:

2004
s
2003
Commission 25,000
Rent of office space 6,000
Consulting fees 4,074 31,882
Aggregate amounts payable to directors and their
director related entities at balance date:
Current liabilities 2,439
Note 16 Remuneration of auditors
During the year the following services were paid to the auditor,
its related practices and non-related audit firms:
Assurance services
1. Audit services
Fees paid to Pitcher Partners for audit and review of financial
reports and other audit work under the Corporations Act 2001 18,750 10,000
2. Other assurance services
Fees paid to Pitcher Partners for Prospectus Independent Accountant's Report 6,900
Total remuneration for assurance services 18,750 16,900
Taxation services
Fees paid to Pitcher Partners for tax compliance services, including
review of company income tax returns 2,760 1,600
Share registry services
Fees paid to Pitcher Partners for maintaining the company's share register 6,320 3,229

It is the entity's policy to employ Pitcher Partners on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where Pitcher Partners' expertise and experience with the company are important. These assignments are principally tax advice.

Note 17 Related parties

Directors

Disclosures relating to directors are set out in note 15.

Note 18 Events occurring after reporting date

There have been no matters or circumstances, that have arisen since the end of the financial year, that have significantly affected, or may affect, the operations of the company, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the company in future financial years.

Note 19 Reconciliation of loss from ordinary activities after income tax to net cash inflow from operating activities

2004 2003
Loss from ordinary activities after income tax
Exploration abandoned
(720, 295) (123,043)
Depreciation 477,987
Change in operating assets and liabilities: 3,571 1,448
(Increase)/decrease in other debtors 11,236 (30,073)
(Increase)/decrease in interest receivable 3,466 (6, 864)
Increase/(decrease) in trade creditors (22, 412) 40,003
Net cash outflow from operating activities (246, 447) (118, 529)
Note 20 Commitments for expenditure
Operating leases
Commitments for minimum lease payments in relation to
non-cancellable operating leases are payable as follows:
Within one year 2,890 2,890
Exploration commitments
Commitments for payments under exploration permits
for minerals in existence at the reporting date but not
recognised as liabilities payable are as follows:
Within one year 900,790 695,561
Later than one year but not later than 5 years 1,803,000
Later than 5 years
Commitments not recognised in the financial statements 2,703,790 695,561

So as to maintain current rights to tenure of various exploration tenements, the company will be required to outlay amounts in respect of tenement exploration expenditure commitments. These outlays, which arise in relation to granted tenements are noted above. The outlays may be varied from time to time, subject to approval of the relevant government departments, and may be relieved if a tenement is relinquished.

Exploration commitments total \$2,703,790. They extend over 22 exploration tenements and are calculated on the assumption that each of these tenements will be held for its full term. But, in fact, commitments will decrease materially as exploration advances and ground that is shown to be unprospective is progressively surrendered. Expenditure commitments on prospective ground will be met out of existing funds, joint ventures, and new capital raisings.

Note 21 Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share 2004
Cents
(2.33)
2003
Cents
(0.57)
Diluted earnings per share (2.33) (0.57)
Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in
2004
Number
2003
Number
calculating basic earnings per share 30,914,132 21,683,540
Weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential ordinary
shares used as the denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share
30,914,132 21,683,540

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 8 September 2004.

A. Distribution of equity securities

Analysis of numbers of equity security holders by size of holding:

Class of equity security
Ordinary shares
Shares Options
$1 - 1,000$ 2 مسعه
$1,001 - 5,000$ 27 173
$5,001 - 10,000$ 182 68
$10,001 - 100,000$ 256 152
100,001 and over 35 8
502 401

There were 19 holders of less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares and there were no holders of less than a marketable parcel of options.

B. Equity security holders

Twenty largest quoted equity security holders

The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted equity securities are listed below:

Ordinary shares
Name Number
held
Percentage of
issued shares
John Lachlan McCawley 5,097,147 16.48
Maria Julienne Barron 3,000,000 9.70
Foxcorp Holdings Limited 2,000,000 6.46
Allegro Capital Nominees Pty Limited 1,201,000 3.88
Talmetal Pty Limited 1,010,000 3.26
Noel Clarence White 1,000,000 3.23
TBIC Pty Limited 800,000 2.58
Nicola Maree Mullins 500,000 1.61
Lili Haas & Doug Price 500,000 1.61
Raul Used 485,000 1.56
Closemarket Pty Limited 387,500 1.25
Donald Julien Channer 375,000 1.21
William J Daffron 360,000 1.16
Carl Adolph Morawitz & Gail Josephine Morawitz 356,275 1.15
Deslie Dawn Brampton 250,000 0.80
Scott William Power 250,000 0.80
JJNA Pty Limited 222,500 0.71
Foligno Pty Limited 205,000 0.66
Badge Nominees Pty Limited 200,000 0.64
Bedel & Sowa Corp Pty Limited 200,000 0.64
18,399,422 59.39
Options
Name Number
held
Percentage of
issued options
Carnethy Investments Pty Limited 237,500 3.80
Closemarket Pty Limited 193,750 3.10
Donald Julien Channer 187,500 3.00
Benjamin James Cleary 161,250 2.58
Envoy Investments Limited 142,500 2.28
Berne No 132 Nominees Pty Limited 125,000 2.00
Blue Skies Investments Pty Limited 110,000 1.76
Foligno Pty Limited 102,500 1.64
Robert James Dougall 100,000 1.60
Allegro Capital Nominees Pty Limited 100,000 1.60
Hancroft Pty Limited 87,500 1.40
David Frederick Oakley 87,500 1.40
Talmetal Pty Limited 85,000 1.36
Nicola Maree Mullins 82,500 1.32
Capco Trust Jersey Limited 75,000 1.20
ANZ Nominees Limited 62,500 1.00
Lyndal Joy Peterson 57,500 0.92
Matthew Alan Baker 52,500 0.84
Grant Donald Peterson & Christine Myrtle Lane 52,500 0.84
Noel James Blake 50,000 0.80
2,152,500 34.44

C. Substantial holders

Substantial holders in the company are set out below:

Number
held
Percentage
Ordinary shares
John Lachlan McCawley 5,097,147 16.48
Maria Julienne Barron 3,000,000 9.70
Foxcorp Holdings Limited 2,000,000 6.46

D. Voting rights

The voting rights attaching to each class of equity securities are set out below:

(a) Ordinary shares

On a show of hands every member present at a meeting in person or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll each share shall have one vote.

(b) Options

No voting rights.

LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED

GPO Box 762, Brisbane QLD 4001 Telephone: 07 3229 6606 Facsimile: 07 3221 6625 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lodestonex.com