AI assistant
PACIFIC RESOURCES LIMITED — Annual Report 2003
Sep 11, 2003
65638_rns_2003-09-11_d476525d-458a-4878-b8ec-2c536978e2cc.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer

LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED ABN 20 075 877 075
Exploring the Mount Morgan metals district with advanced technologies

| CORPORATE DIRECTORY | |
|---|---|
| DIREGIORS | John Shaw (Chairman) Martin Ackland Greg Baynton John McCawley |
| SECRETARY | Leni Stanley |
| PRINCIPAL REGISTERED OFFICE INAUSTRALIA |
c/o Stanley Yeates & Associates Level 18, 200 Mary Street Brisbane QLD 4000 $(07)$ 3229 6606 |
| SHARE REGISTER | Douglas Heck & Burrell Registries Level 22, 300 Queen Street Brisbane QID 4000 (07) 3228 4000 |
| AUDITOR | Douglas Heck & Burrell Level 21, 300 Queen Street Brisbane QLD 4000 $(07)$ 3228 4000 |
| Soutchors | Corrs Chambers Westgarth 1 Eagle Street Brisbane QLD zooo $(07)$ 3228 9424 |
| BANKERS | Westpac Banking Corporation Cnr Queen and Eagle Streets Brisbane QLD 4000 |
| STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING | Lodestone Exploration Limited shares are listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. (ASX Code: LOD) |
| WEBSITE ADDRESS | www.lodestonex.com |
| ANNUAL GENERAL MELTING | |
| NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING | The annual general meeting of Loclestone Exploration Limited |
| VIII EEEHED AT | ASX Auditorium |
| Level 6, 126 Eagle Street, Brisbane | |
| TIME | 11210 |
| DATE | Monday 20 October 2003 |
| A formal notice of meeting is enclosed. |

LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED ABN 20 075 877 075
LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED ABN 20 075 877 075
Contents
| Corporate Directory | |
|---|---|
| Operational Review | 2 |
| Directors' Report to Shareholders | 9 |
| Corporate Governance Statement | 13 |
| Independent Audit Report to the Members | 16 |
| Directors' Declaration | 17 |
| Financial Report | |
| Statement of Financial Performance | 18 |
| Statement of Financial Position | 19 |
| Statement of Cash Flows | 20 |
| Notes to the Financial Statements | 21 |
| Shareholder Information | 31 |
The Chairman's perspective
On behalf of your Board of Directors. I have pleasure in presenting the Company's seventh annual report, and its first since listing on the Australian Stock Exchange in March this year.
During the past year your Board has maintained its focus on the Company's exploration strategy within the Mount Morgan area, with our four objectives continuing to be:
- Discovering major gold and/or gold-copper deposits similar to Mount Morgan
- Generating drill targets by using advanced exploration tools and concepts $\bullet$
- Enhancing our strategic tenement holding in the Mount Morgan region
- Maintaining, where possible, a tight capital structure intended to maximise shareholder wealth in the event of exploration success.
In line with these objectives, Lodestone achieved some significant milestones during the year:
- The Company undertook a comprehensive assessment of its tenements in Central Queensland, and completed two TEMPEST airborne geophysical surveys
- Lodestone's capital base was broadened and strengthened by means of a successful \$2.5 million raising that introduced A50 new shareholders to the register
- Phase One of the planned drilling program was completed, in which four readily accessible electromagnetic targets were drilled
- An additional tenement was acquired in Central Queensland that covers some 107 square kilometres, and offers prospective geological targets.
The work program at the Mount Morgan Project has seen the completion of the Phase I drilling program in which a selection of priority electromagnetic targets defined from airborne surveys and ongoing work were drill tested, While no significant mineralisation was encountered in that shallow Phase I drilling program, the results have advanced our understanding of local geology and provided valuable data for development of ongoing programs.
Emphasis at the Mount Morgan Project remains on Electromagnetic (EM) targets covered by younger volcanic rocks. Additional airborne and ground geophysical surveys will be carried out to prioritise existing targets and generate further targets for drill testing.
In June, your Company applied for a new tenement, extending Lodestone's exploration area by 107 square kilometres to the north, west and east of the historic Mount Morgan mine – increasing the total area to just under 700 square kilometers. The new tenement was applied for as a result of the recommendations made by an independent advisor engaged by the Company to investigate new opportunities.
The new area has an excellent structural setting and a number of small historic gold prospects. The new tenement area includes a small gold occurrence that might be significant. By extending this tenement area, Lodestone is increasing the potential for a new economic discovery in the future.
During the second half of the financial year, Mr Pat Sankey resigned from your Board due to personal reasons. Mr Sankey played a valuable role in Lodestone's transition from a private to a listed company and we were grateful for his involvement at such a crucial time.
We will continue to focus on maintaining a tight capital structure through our low cost operating model, by using contractors for core activities wherever possible. With this approach, combined with our carefully focussed exploration strategy, your Board is confident that Lodestone has the capabilities and resources to make a discovery that will deliver long-term value to shareholders.
$15$ Shew
Iohn Shaw Chairman
Lodestone Exploration (LOD) is an Australian listed junior explorer, with a tenement area of more than 700 square kilometres in Central Oueensland.
The Company was established in 1996 to identify and investigate potential economic blind ore bodies in a prospective gold-copper region south of Mount Morgan in Central Queensland.
The Mount Morgan ore deposit was Australia's premier volcanic-hosted massive sulphide deposit. The former mine yielded 9.4 million ounces of gold and 360,000 tonnes of copper and was described as one of the "largest mountains of gold ever discovered".
In other countries, satellite deposits have been discovered around similar ore bodies. Until recently, the limitations of available technologies meant that the detection of conductors that might include similar satellite deposits under thick cover rocks in the Mount Morgan area was extremely difficult.
Lodestone is applying the advances made in airborne electromagnetic survey techniques to conduct the first-ever, large-scale exploration of the region south-east of the original Mount Morgan deposit. The Company has deployed modern airborne electromagnetic survey equipment, specifically GEOTEM, HOISTEM and TEMPEST systems.
Operational Review
Figure 1. Project Location Map

MOUNT MORGAN PROJECT
Exploration target: Gold, Copper $0$ wned: Lodestone 100% Location: 40 kilometres southwest of Rockhampton, Queensland
The Mount Morgan Project is strategically located with the northern-most granted tenement boundary approximately three kilometres south of the original Mount Morgan mine (Figure 2). During its productive years this mine produced some 52 million tonnes of ore from which 9.4 million ounces of gold and 360,000 tonnes of copper were extracted.
Figure 2. Mount Morgan Project

Tenure and Infrastructure
The Project comprises nine contiguous exploration permits for minerals and one exploration permit application covering just under 700 square kilometres. The granted exploration permits are the subject of an exploration alliance with BHP Billiton.
Lodestone's interest in the granted permits (and in the alliance established between the parties) is initially 100%. BHP Billiton may earn a 70% interest in the granted permits if BHP Billiton incurs exploration expenditure of \$8 million or completes a bankable feasibility study within six years, and defines a mineral resource of not less than \$750 million in-ground value.
The Mount Morgan Project is favourably located some $\mu_0$ kilometres south west of Rockhampton. Oueensland $\pm$ close to regional infrastructure and personnel. The major port of Gladstone, Stanwell Power Station, the Bruce Highway and railway links are all located within 100 kilometres of the Project.
Exploration Rationale
The Project's exploration objective on the Mount Morgan Project tenements is to discover large gold-copper deposits that are similar to the former Mount Morgan Mine, the premier volcanic-hosted massive sulphide deposit (VHMS) in Australia.
VHMS deposits usually occur as clusters, rarely as an isolated deposit and accordingly, the Mount Morgan district may include deposits similar to the Mount Morgan Mine.
Lodestone has established that a corridor that is prospective for Mount Morgan-type gold-copper orebodies extends over 25 kilometres from the Mount Morgan Mine into the tenement area. A layer of younger volcanic rock covers this prospective corridor. Historically, limited airborne exploration has been carried out on the tenements by previous explorers and, until recently, this corridor had not been assessed using modern geophysical search techniques.
Lodestone is now using advanced exploration tools and concepts and, in particular, airborne electromagnetic (EM) surveys that have generated numerous drill targets.
The Company's exploration focus during the year was on drill testing a small number of priority targets generated from earlier Lodestone and BHP Billiton airborne EM surveys.
Exploration Completed and Results
In July and August 2002, a TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic survey was flown over the central part of the tenements. In combination with the GEOTEM airborne electromagnetic survey flown in 1998, the two surveys have identified a number of EM anomalies. Massive sulphide deposits, (such as the original Mount Morgan Minel would be expected to provide EM anomalies.
Four EM targets were tested in the Phase I drilling program during the year. Three of these targets were generated from the 1998 Geotem survey, flown by BHP Billiton. The fourth target was generated by Lodestone's Tempest EM survey flown in July and August 2002. Locations of targets and drill holes are shown in Figure 3. Drilling statistics are outlined in Table 1.


Table 1. Mount Morgan Project Drilling Statistics
| Target | Hole(s) | Metres drilled |
|---|---|---|
| G4 | G4RDooi G4RDoo2 |
124 139 |
| G5 | G5Roo1 G5RDoo2 |
81 153 |
| G7 | G7Roo1 | 96 |
| MMSoo1 | M1RDoo1 M1Doo2 |
185 165 |
Two combined reverse circulation/diamond holes were drilled at target G4. This target was a weak GEOTEM conductor located 2 kilometres south of outcropping silicified and pyrite-bearing breccia within the prospective Mine Corridor volcanics.
Both holes encountered an alternating sequence of volcaniclastic lithofacies comprising non-mineralised porphyritic andesite, tuffaceous sandstone, volcaniclastic breccia and minor mudstone. Quartz veining with open space textures and associated clay coatings, typical of epithermal systems, were noted but were not mineralised. There was no obvious evidence for the source of the conductor observed in the drill core or chips.
The weak GEOTEM conductor at Gs was tested by two reverse circulation drill holes, one with a diamond tail. The sequence intersected comprised andesitic volcaniclastic breccia and conglomerate, porphyritic andesite and tuffaceous sandstone. Minor pyrite was noted in several siltstone interbeds. The source of the conductor remains unexplained.
The target at G7 was a medium to strong GEOTEM conductor. A single reverse circulation drill hole tested this target. No anomalous geochemistry was associated with interbedded tuffaceous sandstone and mudstone, which was thought to host the conductor.
Two diamond drill holes tested the medium to strong TEMPEST conductor at target MMS001. Both holes intersected a sequence of dominantly andesitic to basaltic volcanics and lesser tuffaceous sandstone and mudstone. Weak copper geochemistry up to 537ppm over a 4-metre interval was recorded in M1Doo1. Rare copper sulphides include bornite and chalcopyrite associated with specular haematite. The source of the conductor is perhaps partly explained by a conductive sequence intersected in M1Doo1 between 45 and 75 metres. There was no evidence for the source of the conductor in drill hole M1Doo2.
Project Generation
Lodestone applied for a new tenement that extended its exploration area by 107 square kilometres around the north, west and east of the historic Mount Morgan Mine site. This tenement was acquired as a result of the recommendations of an independent regional assessment carried out during the year. This assessment included detailed analysis and interpretation of the Company's geophysical data conducted to extract the maximum from these datasets and continue target generation.
Outlook
Results of the shallow Phase I drilling program have assisted in Lodestone better understanding the local geology and provided valuable data for development of a Phase II drilling program which is planned to commence this September.
A further airborne electromagnetic survey is planned for the northern area. The work program for 2003/2004 will continue to drill test the highest priority targets defined from the airborne surveys and ongoing work.
LIMESTONE CREEK PROJECT
| Exploration target: Gold | |
|---|---|
| Owned: | Lodestone 100% |
| Location: | 200 kilometres northwest of Cairns, Queensland |
Lodestone is currently investigating potential gold opportunities at its wholly owned exploration tenement in the Chillagoe district of North Queensland.
At its Limestone Creek Project, Lodestone believes the area has potential for a Red Dome/Mungana-style coppergold deposit. Carbonate-rich, altered and mineralised interbedded siltstones, shales and jaspers intruded by quartz-feldspar porphyry and mafic intrusives host a gold-mineralised system some 3000 metres in strike length. The mineralised system has an en-echelon width of 500-800 metres and assayed and visible gold occurs extensively.
The EPM covering the area is still under application and no work was carried out during this year.
Upon tenement grant, the work planned for 2003/2004 will be aimed at proving the viability, or otherwise, of the extensively mineralised system.
Tenement Schedule
MOUNT MORGAN PROIECT
| Tenement | EPM Number | Area | Area (sub-blocks) (square km) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Gelobera | 11837 | $18*$ | 57 |
| Walmul West | 11838 | $21^{+}$ | 66 |
| Hoopbound East | 11839 | 9 | 28 |
| Mount Hoopbound | 11840 | 19 | 57 |
| Walmul | 11841 | 29 | 89 |
| Gelobera West | 11842 | $20*$ | 63 |
| Black Mountain | 13637 | 52 | 179 |
| Mount Battery | 13794 | 11 | 35 |
| Mount Battery East | 13802 | 3 | 9 |
| Mount Battery North** | 14078 | 37 | 123 |
*These EPM's had sub-blocks dropped during the year
LIMESTONE CREEK PROJECT
| Tenement | EPM Number | Area (sub-blocks) (square km) |
Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limestone Creek $**$ | 11980. | 18 | 60 |
** EPMA = Application for an exploration permit for minerals
DIRECTORS' REPORT
Your directors present their report on the entity for the year ended 30 June 2003.
Directors
The following persons were directors of Lodestone Exploration Limited during the whole of the financial year and up to the date of this report:
JT Shaw - Chairman G A I Baynton J L McCawley
M C Ackland was appointed on 1 luly 2002 and continues in office at the date of this report.
P W Sankey was a director from the beginning of the financial year until his resignation on 2 May 2003.
Principal Activities
During the year the principal continuing activity of the company was mineral exploration. No changes are expected in the principal activity of the company in subsequent years.
Review of Operations
The operating loss after income tax of the company for the year was \$123,043 (2002; loss \$14,386). The loss reflects the nature of the company's principal activity.
Earnings per Share
| 2003 Cents |
2002 Cents |
|
|---|---|---|
| Basic earnings per share | (0.57) | (0.10) |
| Diluted earnings per share | (0.57) | (0.10) |
Significant Changes in the State of Affairs
Significant changes in the state of affairs of the entity during the financial year were as follows:
- (a) On 18 July 2002 the company converted to a public company,
- (b) Issued a Prospectus offering 12,500,000 shares at 20 cents each to raise \$2,500,000,
- (c) Listed on the Australian Stock Exchange on 17 March 2003.
| 2003 | |
|---|---|
| An increase in contributed equity of $$2,436,665$ (from \$388,494 to \$2,825,159) as a result of: |
|
| Issue of $1,816,154$ fully paid ordinary shares $@$ \$0.15 | 272,423 |
| Issue of 12,500,000 fully paid ordinary shares @ \$0.20 under the Prospectus | 2,500,000 |
| 2,772,423 | |
| Less transaction costs arising on share issues | (335,758) |
| Net increase in contributed equity | 2,436,665 |
There were no other significant changes in the state of affairs of the company during the financial year.
Dividend
The directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend. No dividend was paid during the year.
Matters Subsequent to the End of the Financial Year
At the date of this report there are no matters or circumstances which have arisen since 30 June 2003 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect:
- (a) the entity's operations in future financial years, or
- (b) the results of those operations in future financial years, or
(c) the entity's state of affairs in future financial years.
Likely Developments and Expected Results from Operations
There are no likely developments in the operations of the company which are expected to significantly affect the results of the company in subsequent years.
Environmental Regulation
The company is subject to significant environmental regulation in respect of its exploration activities in Australia and is committed to undertaking all its operations in an environmentally responsible manner.
Information on Directors
| Particulars of Directors' Interests in | Shares and Options | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director | Experience | Special Responsibilities |
Ordinary shares |
Options | ||
| Expiry Date 07/12/04 |
Expiry Date 30/09/05 |
Expiry Date 30/09/07 |
||||
| JT Shaw B.Sc (Geological Engineering) MCIM, FAUSIMM, FAICD, AIME |
Non-Executive Director for 1 year. Chairman for 1 year. Director of Kingsgate Consolidated Limited. Formerly a director of a number of listed gold companies. |
Non-Executive Chairman. |
100,000 | 400,000 | ||
| M C Ackland B.App.Sc., M.AusIMM, AIME |
Non-Executive Director for 1 year. Director of Mineral Deposits Limited, and Sedimentary Holdings Limited. Formerly a director of several major operating resource and engineering companies. |
Chairman of the audit committee. |
37,500 | 18,750 | 200,000 | |
| G A J Baynton M.Econ St, MBA, B.Bus (Accounting), ASIA, FAICD |
Non-Executive Director for 2 years. Director of several private companies. |
1,291,000 | 100,000 | 200,000 | ||
| J L McCawley B.Com (Hons) |
Non-Executive Director for 7 years. |
5,097,147 |
Company Secretary
The company secretary is Ms Leni Stanley CA, B.Comm. Ms Stanley was appointed to the position of company secretary in 2002. She currently is a partner with a Chartered Accounting firm.
Meetings of Directors
The numbers of meetings of the company's board of directors and of each board committee held during the year ended 30 June 2003, and the numbers of meetings attended by each director were:
| Full Meetings of Directors |
Meetings of Audit Committee |
|
|---|---|---|
| Number of meetings held | 8 | |
| Number of meetings attended by: | ||
| JT Shaw | 8 | N/A |
| M C Ackland | ||
| G A J Baynton | 8 | N/A |
| J L McCawley | 8 | N/A |
| P W Sankey | $7^*$ | 1 |
*Seven meetings held whilst a director
Retirement, election and continuation in office of directors
Mr P W Sankey retired as a director on 2 May 2003 and did not offer himself for re-election.
Mr | L McCawley and Mr G A | Baynton are the directors retiring by rotation who, being eligible, offer themselves for re-election.
Directors' and Executives' emoluments
Remuneration for non-executive directors is determined by the board within the maximum amount approved by the shareholders from time to time. The maximum currently stands at \$160,000 plus statutory superannuation.
Details of the nature and amount of each element of the emoluments of each director of Lodestone Exploration Limited are set out in the following table.
Non-Executive Directors of Lodestone Exploration Limited
| Name | Directors' | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| base fee | Superannuation | Options | Total | |
| \$ | ||||
| JT Shaw, Chairman | 11,534 | 1,038 | 23,989 | 36,561 |
| M C Ackland | 8,651 | 779 | 11,994 | 21,424 |
| G A J Baynton | 8,651 | 779 | 11,994 | 21,424 |
| J L McCawley | 8,651 | 779 | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | 9,430 |
| P W Sankey | 3,781 | 340 | 4,121 |
The amounts disclosed above for remuneration relating to options are the assessed fair values of options at the date they were granted to directors during the year ended 30 June 2003. Fair values have been assessed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Factors taken into account by the Black-Scholes option pricing model include the exercise price, the term of the option, the current price and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest date for the term of the option.
Further information on the options, including the number of options granted to directors is set out in the following sections of this report.
Share options granted to directors
Options over unissued ordinary shares of Lodestone Exploration Limited granted during or since the end of the financial year to any of the directors of the entity as part of their remuneration were as follows:
Directors Options granted
| I T Shaw | 400,000 |
|---|---|
| M C Ackland | 200,000 |
| G A J Baynton | 200,000 |
Shares under option
Unissued ordinary shares of Lodestone Exploration Limited under option at the date of this report are as follows:
| Date options granted | Expiry date | Issue price of shares | Number under option |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 October 2002 | 30 September 2005 | \$0.30 | 100,000 |
| 1 October 2002 | 30 September 2007 | \$0.30 | 800.000 |
| 10 March 2003 | 7 December 2004 | \$0.20 | 6,250,000 |
No option holder has any right under the options to participate in any other share issue of the company or of any other entity.
Shares issued on the exercise of options
There were no ordinary shares of Lodestone Exploration Limited issued during the year ended 30 June 2003 on the exercise of options granted. No shares have been issued since that date.
Insurance of officers
The company has not, during or since the financial year, in respect of any person who is or has been an officer or auditor of the company or a related body corporate paid or agreed to pay a premium in respect of a contract insuring against a liability incurred as an officer for the costs or expenses to defend legal proceedings.
Agreement to indemnify officers
During the financial vear, Lodestone Exploration Limited entered into an agreement to indemnify the directors and the general manager of the company.
The indemnity relates to any liability:
- (a) incurred in connection with or as a consequence of the Directors acting in the capacity including, without limiting the foregoing, representing the Company on any body corporate, and
- (b) for legal costs incurred in defending an action in connection with or as a consequence of the Director acting in the capacity.
- No liability has arisen under these indemnities as at the date of this report.
Proceedings on behalf of company
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of the company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the company is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the company for all or part of those proceedings.
No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on behalf of the company with leave of the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001.
Auditor
Douglas Heck & Burrell, Chartered Accountants, continues in office in accordance with section 327 of the Corporations Act 2001.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
'J Shaw
IT Shaw Chairman 5 September 2003
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
The directors are responsible to the shareholders for the performance of the company in both the short and the longer term and seek to balance these sometimes competing objectives in the best interests of the company as a whole. Their focus is to enhance the interests of shareholders and other key stakeholders and to ensure the company is properly managed.
Day to day management of the company's affairs and implementation of corporate strategy and policy initiatives are delegated by the board to the General Manager.
The functions of the board include:
- reviewing and approving corporate strategies, budgets and financial plans
- overseeing and monitoring organisational performance and the achievement of the company's strategic goals and objectives
- monitoring financial performance including approval of the annual and half-year financial reports and liaison with the company's auditors
- appointment of, and assessment of the performance of, the General Manager
- ensuring there are effective management processes in place and approving major corporate initiatives $\bullet$
- enhancing and protecting the reputation of the company
- ensuring the significant risks facing the company have been identified and appropriate and adequate control, monitoring and reporting mechanisms are in place, and
- reporting to shareholders.
A description of the company's main corporate governance practices is set out below. All these practices, unless otherwise stated, were in place for the entire year.
The board of directors
The board operates in accordance with the following broad principles:
the board may be comprised of both executive and non-executive directors with a majority of non-executive directors.
At the date of signing the directors' report the board consisted of four non-executive directors.
Further information about the directors is set out in the directors' report under the heading "information on directors".
- in recognition of the importance of independent views and the board's role in supervising the activities of management the Chairman should be a non-executive director
- the Chairman of the board is elected by the full board and should meet regularly with the General Manager
- there is sufficient benefit to the company in maintaining a mix of directors on the board from different backgrounds with complementary skills and experience
- the board should undertake an annual board performance review and consider the appropriate mix of skills required by the board to maximise its effectiveness and its contribution to the company.
The board has established an audit committee to assist in the execution of its duties and to allow detailed consideration of complex issues.
The audit committee is comprised entirely of non-executive directors. The committee structure and membership is reviewed on an annual basis.
All matters determined by the committee are submitted to the full board as recommendations for board decision.
In addition the board seeks to ensure that the membership at any point in time represents an appropriate balance between directors with experience and knowledge of the company and directors with an external or fresh perspective.
Commitment
The board meets at least 5 times during a year. The number of meetings of the company's board of directors and each board committee held during the year ended 30 lune 2003, and the number of meetings attended by each director is disclosed on page 11.
Conflict of interests
The board has considered the independence of its four directors and would offer the following:
- John Shaw and Martin Ackland are considered to be independent.
- J McCawley, because of his large shareholding, is not considered to be independent.
- G Baynton has in the past provided management services to the company. These are not considered to be material in nature and the board does not believe that this would affect Mr Baynton's independence.
The company defines "independent" as independent of the executive management and of business or other relationships which could otherwise detract from a director's ability to act impartially. A former executive is not considered independent until $\kappa$ vears from the date of retirement.
Independent professional advice
Directors and board committees have the right, in connection with their duties and responsibilities, to seek independent professional advice at the company's expense. Prior written approval of the Chairman is required, but this will not be unreasonably withheld.
Audit committee
The audit committee consists of the following non-executive directors:
- M Ackland (Chairman) (appointed 7 November 2002)
- G Baynton (appointed 14 April 2003)
- P Sankey (appointed 7 November 2002 and resigned 2 May 2003)
The main responsibilities of the audit committee are to:
- review and report to the board on the annual report, the half-year financial report and all other financial information published by the company or released to the market
- assist the board in reviewing the effectiveness of the company's internal control environment covering:
- $-$ effectiveness and efficiency of operations
- reliability of financial reporting
- $-$ compliance with applicable laws and regulations
- oversee the effective operation of the risk management framework
- recommend to the board the appointment, removal and remuneration of the external auditors, and review the terms of their engagement, the scope and quality of the audit and the auditor's independence, and
- review the level of non-audit services provided by the external auditors and ensure it does not adversely impact on auditor independence.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the audit committee receives regular reports from management and the external auditors, It also meets with the external auditors at least twice a year - more frequently if necessary, and reviews any significant disagreements between the auditors and management, irrespective of whether they have been resolved. The external auditors have a clear line of direct communication at any time to either the Chairman of the audit committee or the Chairman of the board. It is the policy of the external auditors to provide an annual declaration of their independence to the audit committee.
The audit committee has authority, within the scope of its responsibilities, to seek any information it requires from any employee or external party.
Ethical standards
The company has developed a Code of Conduct (the Code) which has been adopted by the board at a meeting held on 18 August 2003 and applies to all directors and employees. The Code is regularly reviewed and updated as necessary to ensure it reflects the highest standards of behaviour and professionalism. A copy of the Code is available to interested parties on request.
In summary, the Code requires that company personnel act with the utmost integrity, objectivity and in compliance with the letter and the spirit of both the law and company policies at all times.
Directors and officers of the company are prohibited from short-term trading of the company's securities while in possession of price sensitive information. Subject to the foregoing, directors and officers may buy or sell shares in the company in the four week period following the release of a Quarterly Report, half yearly results and yearly results. Any transactions undertaken must be notified to the Chairman and company secretary within three days of the transaction.
Continuous disclosure
The company secretary has been nominated as the person responsible for communications with the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). This role includes responsibility for ensuring compliance with the continuous disclosure requirements in the ASX listing rules and overseeing and co-ordinating information disclosure to the ASX. analysts, brokers, shareholders, the media and the public.
The company has written policies and procedures on information disclosure that focus on continuous disclosure of any information concerning the company that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the price of the company's securities.
All information disclosed to the ASX is posted on the company's web site as soon as it is disclosed to the ASX. Prior to analysts being briefed on aspects of the company's operations, any new information used in the presentation is released to the ASX and posted on the company's web site. Procedures have also been established for reviewing whether any price sensitive information has been inadvertently disclosed, and if so, this information is also immediately released to the market.
INDEPENDENT AUDIT REPORT TO THE
MEMBERS OF LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED
Scope
The financial report and directors' responsibility
The financial report comprises the statement of financial performance, statement of financial position, statement of cash flows, accompanying notes to the financial statements, and the Directors' declaration for Lodestone Exploration Limited (the company), for the year ended 30 June 2003.
The Directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and true and fair presentation of the financial report in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001. This includes responsibility for the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls that are designed to prevent and detect fraud and error, and for the accounting policies and accounting estimates inherent in the financial report.
Audit approach
We conducted an independent audit in order to express an opinion to the members of the company. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards in order to provide reasonable assurance as to whether the financial report is free of material misstatement. The nature of an audit is influenced by factors such as the use of professional judgement, selective testing, the inherent limitations of internal control, and the availability of persuasive rather than conclusive evidence. Therefore, an audit cannot guarantee that all material misstatements have been detected.
We performed procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including compliance with Accounting Standards and other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia, a view which is consistent with our understanding of the company's financial position, and of its performance as represented by the results of its operations and cash flows.
We formed our audit opinion on the basis of these procedures, which included:
- examining, on a test basis, information to provide evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial report, and
- assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and disclosures used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the Directors.
While we considered the effectiveness of management's internal controls over financial reporting when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our audit was not designed to provide assurance on internal controls.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we followed applicable independence requirements of Australian professional ethical pronouncements and the Corporations Act 2001.
Audit opinion
In our opinion, the financial report of Lodestone Exploration Limited is in accordance with:
(a) the Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the company's financial position as at 30 June 2003 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
(ii) complying with Accounting Standards in Australia and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
(b) other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia.
bylas Heth& Bried
DOUGLAS HECK & BURRELL Chartered Accountants Brisbane, 5 September 2003

DIRECTORS' DECLARATION
The directors declare that the financial statements and notes set out on pages 18 to 30:
- (a) comply with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; and
- (b) give a true and fair view of the company's financial position as at 30 June 2003 and of its performance, as represented by the results of its operations and its cash flows, for the financial year ended on that date.
In the directors' opinion:
- (a) the financial statements and notes are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001; and
- (b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
5 Show
IT Shaw Chairman Brisbane, 5 September 2003
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003
| Notes | 2003 s |
2002 \$ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from ordinary activities | 3 | 28,173 | |
| Professional services expenses Exploration related expenses Corporate overhead expenses Depreciation expenses Directors remuneration |
(66,091) (38,696) (1,448) (44,981) |
(1,050) (6, 168) (5,377) (1,791) |
|
| Profit/(loss) from ordinary activities before income tax Income tax expense |
4 5 |
(123, 043) | (14,386) |
| Net profit/(loss) | (123, 043) | (14, 386) | |
| Total changes in equity other than those resulting from transactions with owners as owners |
14 | (123, 043) | (14, 386) |
| Cents | Cents | ||
| Basic earnings per share Diluted earnings per share |
22 22 |
(0.57) (0.57) |
(0.10) (0.10) |
The above Statement of Financial Performance should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2003
| Notes | 2003 Ś |
2002 \$ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Current assets | |||
| Cash | 1,957,043 | 134,004 | |
| Receivables | 6 | 42,269 | |
| Other | 7 | 13,260 | 2,500 |
| Total current assets | 2,012,572 | 136,504 | |
| Non-current assets | |||
| Plant and equipment | 8 | 7,133 | 6,167 |
| Exploration expenditure | 9 | 692,538 | 190,625 |
| Total non-current assets | 699,671 | 196,792 | |
| Total assets | 2,712,243 | 333,296 | |
| Current liabilities | |||
| Payables | 10 | 96,056 | 19,159 |
| Total current liabilities | 96,056 | 19,159 | |
| Non-current liabilities | |||
| Borrowings | 11 | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | 11,572 |
| Total non-current liabilities | 11,572 | ||
| Total liabilities | 96,056 | 30,731 | |
| Net assets | 2,616,187 | 302,565 | |
| Equity | |||
| Contributed equity | 12 | 2,825,159 | 388,494 |
| Accumulated profits/(losses) | 13 | (208, 972) | (85, 929) |
| Total equity | 14 | 2,616,187 | 302,565 |
The above Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2003
| Notes | 2003 | 2002 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| s Inflows / (Outflows) |
|||
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Receipts from customers (inclusive of goods and services tax) | 58,517 | ||
| Payments to suppliers (inclusive of goods and services tax) | (198, 355) | (13,018) | |
| Interest received | 21,309 | ||
| Net cash outflows from operating activities | 20 | (118, 529) | (13,018) |
| Cash flows from investing activities | |||
| Payments for exploration | (455, 351) | (98, 691) | |
| Payments for property, plant and equipment | (2,414) | ||
| Payment for security deposit | (10,760) | ||
| Net cash outflows from investing activities | (468, 525) | (98, 691) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | |||
| Loan from director | 947 | ||
| Repayments of loan from director | (15,366) | ||
| Proceeds from share issue | 2,745,851 | 219,000 | |
| Proceeds from share applications not yet issued | 15,000 | ||
| Payment of share issue costs | (335,758) | (9,900) | |
| Net cash inflows from financing activities | 2,410,093 | 209,681 | |
| Net increase in cash held | 1,823,039 | 97,972 | |
| Cash at the beginning of the financial year | 134,004 | 36,032 | |
| Cash at the end of the financial year | 1,957,043 | 134,004 | |
The above Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 IUNE 2003
Note 1. Summary of significant accounting policies
This general purpose financial report has been prepared in accordance with Accounting Standards, other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board, Urgent Issues Group Consensus Views and the Corporations Act 2001.
It is prepared in accordance with the historical cost convention, except for certain assets which, as noted, are at valuation. Unless otherwise stated, the accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous year.
(a) Income tax
Tax effect accounting procedures are followed whereby the income tax expense in the statement of financial performance is matched with the accounting profit after allowing for permanent differences. The future tax benefit relating to tax losses is not carried forward as an asset unless the benefit is virtually certain of realisation. Income tax on cumulative timing differences is set aside to the deferred income tax or the future income tax benefit accounts at the rates which are expected to apply when those timing differences reverse.
(b) Exploration expenditure
Exploration expenditure incurred by or on behalf of the entity is accumulated separately for each area of interest until such time as the area moves into development phase, or is abandoned or sold. The realisation of the value of expenditure carried forward depends upon any commercial results that may be obtained through successful development and exploitation of the area of interest or alternatively by its sale. If an area of interest is abandoned or is considered to be of no further commercial interest the accumulated exploration costs relating to the area are written off against income in the year of abandonment.
(c) Acquisitions of assets
The purchase method of accounting is used for all acquisitions of assets. Cost is measured as the fair value of the assets given up, shares issued or liabilities undertaken at the date of acquisition plus incidental costs directly attributable to the acquisition.
(d) Recoverable amount of non-current assets
The recoverable amount of an asset is the net amount expected to be recovered through the cash inflows and outflows arising from its continued use and subsequent disposal.
Where the carrying amount of a non-current asset is greater than its recoverable amount, the asset is written down to its recoverable amount. The decrement in the carrying amount is recognised as an expense in the net profit or loss in the reporting period in which the recoverable amount write-down occurs.
Summary of significant accounting policies (continued) Note 1.
(e) Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Depreciation is calculated on a diminishing value basis to write off the net cost or revalued amount of each item of property, plant and equipment over its expected useful life to the entity. Estimates of remaining useful lives are made on a regular basis for all assets, with annual reassessments for major items. The expected useful lives are as follows:
Plant and equipment
$15 - 20$ years
(f) Trade and other creditors
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the entity prior to the end of the financial year and which are unpaid. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
(g) Cash
For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash includes deposits at call with financial institutions and other highly liquid investments with short periods to maturity which are readily convertible to cash on hand and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
(h) Earnings per share
(i) Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net profit after income tax attributable to members of the company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the year.
(ii) Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares.
(i) Web site costs
Costs in relation to web sites are charged as expenses in the period in which they are incurred. Costs in relation to the development of a web site, and ongoing costs of maintenance during the operating phase are considered to be expenses.
Note 2. Segment information
The company operates solely within one business segment, being the mineral exploration industry in Australia.
| 2003 s |
2002 s |
|
|---|---|---|
| Note 3. Revenue |
||
| Revenue from outside the ordinary activities Interest |
28,173 | |
| Note 4. Profit from ordinary activities | ||
| Loss from ordinary activities before income tax expense includes the following specific expenses: |
||
| Depreciation | 1,448 | 1,791 |
| Note 5 . Income tax |
||
| The income tax benefit for the financial year differs from the amount calculated on the loss. The differences are reconciled as follows: |
||
| Loss from ordinary activities before income tax expense | (123, 043) | (14, 386) |
| Income tax calculated at 30% (2002: 30%) Tax effect of permanent differences: |
(36, 913) | (4, 316) |
| Business related capital costs Other |
(20, 848) 1,835 |
|
| Income tax expense / (benefit) adjusted for permanent differences Future income tax benefits not brought to account |
(55, 926) 55,926 |
(4,316) 4,316 |
| Income tax expense attributable to the loss |
The directors estimate that the potential net future income tax benefit at 30 June 2003 amounts to \$188,452 (2002: \$62,553). The future income tax benefit, which has not been recognised as an asset, will only be obtained if.
(i) the company derives future assessable income of a nature and an amount sufficient to enable the benefit to be realised:
(ii) the company continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by the law; and
(iii) no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the company in realising the benefit.
No franking credits are available for the subsequent financial year.
| 2003 \$ |
2002 \$ |
|
|---|---|---|
| Note 6. Current assets - Receivables | ||
| Interest receivable | 6,864 | |
| Other debtors | 35,405 | |
| 42,269 | ||
| Note 7. Current assets - Other | ||
| Security deposit | 13,260 | 2,500 |
| Note 8. Non-current assets - Plant and equipment | ||
| Motor vehicle $-$ at cost | 22,060 | 22,060 |
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | (17,280) | (15, 893) |
| 4,780 | 6,167 | |
| Plant and equipment - at cost | 2,414 | |
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | (61) | |
| 2,353 | ||
| 7,133 | 6,167 |
Reconciliations of the carrying amounts of each class of plant and equipment at the beginning and end of the current financial year are set out below:
| Motor vehicle \$ |
Plant and equipment s |
Total S |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying amount at 1 July 2002 | 6,167 | 6,167 | |
| Additions | 2,414 | 2,414 | |
| Depreciation expense | (1,387) | (61) | (1,448) |
| Carrying amount at 30 June 2003 | 4,780 | 2,353 | 7,133 |
| 2003 S |
2002 \$ |
||
| Non-current assets - Exploration expenditure Note 9. |
|||
| Exploration phase property costs | |||
| Geological and exploration expenditure $-$ at cost | 692,538 | 190,625 | |
| The capitalised exploration expenditure carried forward above has been determined as follows: |
|||
| Opening balance | 190,625 | 89,852 | |
| Expenditure incurred during the year | 501,913 | 100,773 | |
| Closing balance as shown above | 692,538 | 190,625 |
| 2003 | 2002 \$. |
|
|---|---|---|
| Note 10. Current liabilities - Payables | ||
| Trade creditors Share application funds received |
96,056 | 4,159 15,000 |
| 96,056 | 19,159 | |
Note 11. Non-current liabilities - Borrowings
| Loan payable to director - unsecured | 11,572 |
|---|---|
Note 12. Contributed equity
| 2003 Shares |
2002 Shares |
2003 | 2002 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Share capital Ordinary shares |
||||
| Fully paid | 30,911,154 | 16,595,000 | 2,825,159 | 388,494 |
(b) Movements in ordinary share capital:
| Date | Details | Number of Shares |
Issue Price |
\$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 June 2001 | Opening balance | 13,505,000 | 179,394 | |
| 6 November 2001 | Share issue | 500,000 | \$0.04 | 20,000 |
| 29 January 2002 | Share issue | 1,000,000 | \$0.04 | 40,000 |
| 28 May 2002 | Share issue | 1,590,000 | \$0.10 | 159,000 |
| Share issue expenses | (9,900) | |||
| 30 June 2002 | Balance | 16,595,000 | 388,494 | |
| 23 August 2002 | Share issue | 500,000 | \$0.15 | 75,000 |
| 31 October 2002 | Share issue | 807,822 | \$0.15 | 121,173 |
| 31 December 2002 | Share issue | 508,332 | \$0.15 | 76,250 |
| 10 March 2003 | Shares issued under Prospectus | 12,500,000 | \$0.20 | 2,500,000 |
| Share issue expenses | (335,758) | |||
| 30 lune 2003 | Closing balance | 30,911,154 | 2,825,159 |
(c) Ordinary shares
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.
On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote.
(d) Options
At balance date 7,150,000 options over ordinary shares of Lodestone Exploration Limited were on issue. 900,000 options were issued on 30 September 2002 with an exercise price of \$0.30. 800,000 of these options expire on 30 September 2007 and the remaining 100,000 expire on 30 September 2005. A further 6,250,000 options were issued under the Prospectus. These options are exercisable at \$0.20 and expire on 7 December 2004.
| 2003 | 2002 Ś |
|
|---|---|---|
| Note 13. Accumulated losses | ||
| Accumulated losses at the beginning of the financial year Net loss attributable to members of Lodestone Exploration Limited |
(85, 929) (123,043) |
(71,543) (14, 386) |
| Accumulated losses at the end of the financial year | (208, 972) | (85, 929) |
| Note 14. Equity | ||
| Total equity at the beginning of the financial year Total changes in equity recognised in the statement |
302,565 | 107,851 |
| of financial performance Transactions with owners as owners: |
(123, 043) | (14, 386) |
| Contributions of equity net of transaction costs | 2,436,665 | 209,100 |
| Total equity at the end of the financial year | 2,616,187 | 302,565 |
Note 15. Financial instruments
(a) Interest rate risk exposure
The company's exposure to interest rate risk and the effective weighted average interest rate for classes of financial assets and financial liabilities are set out below: $E$ lantin n Non-Intornet
| 2003 | Floating Interest Rate |
Non-Interest Bearing |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets: | \$ | \$ | \$ |
| Cash | 1,950,000 | 7,043 | 1,957,043 |
| Receivables | 42,269 | 42,269 | |
| Other | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | 13,260 | 13,260 |
| 1,950,000 | 62,572 | 2,012,572 | |
| Weighted average interest rate | 4.25% | ||
| Financial liabilities: | |||
| Payables | 96,056 | 96,056 | |
| 96,056 | 96,056 | ||
| Weighted average interest rate | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | ||
| Net financial assets/(liabilities) | 1,950,000 | (33,484) | 1,916,516 |
Note 15. Financial instruments (continued)
| 2002 | Floating Interest Rate |
Non-Interest Bearing |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial assets: | \$ | \$ | \$ |
| Cash | 134,004 | 134,004 | |
| Other | 2,500 | 2,500 | |
| 136,504 | 136,504 | ||
| Weighted average interest rate | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | ||
| Financial liabilities: | |||
| Payables | 4,159 | 4,159 | |
| Borrowings | 11,572 | 11,572 | |
| 15,731 | 15,731 | ||
| Weighted average interest rate | |||
| Net financial assets/(liabilities) | 120,773 | 120,773 |
(b) Fair net values
The company's financial assets and liabilities included in current assets and liabilities in the statement of financial position are carried at amounts approximate their net fair value.
(c) Credit risk exposures
The company's maximum exposure to credit risk at balance date in relation to each class of recognised financial asset is the carrying amount of those assets as indicated in the statement of financial position.
| 2003 | 2002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Note 16. Remuneration of directors and executives | ||
| (a) Directors | ||
| Income paid or payable, or otherwise made | ||
| available, to directors by the entity | ||
| and related parties in connection with the | ||
| management of affairs of the entity | 92,960 |
The amounts disclosed for remuneration of directors include the assessed fair values of options granted to directors during the year ended 30 June 2003 at the date they were granted. Fair values have been determined using an appropriate option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the vesting and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, the non-tradeable nature of the option, the current price and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option.
Note 16. Remuneration of directors and executives (continued)
The numbers of directors whose total income from the entity or related parties was within the specified bands are as follows:
| \$ | Ś | 2003 | 2002 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| o | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | 9,999 | 2 | |
| 20,000 | $\overline{\phantom{0}}$ | 29,999 | 2 | |
| 30,000 | 39,999 | |||
| (b) Executives | ||||
| No executives received remuneration in excess of \$100,000. | ||||
| 2003 | 2002 \$ |
|||
| Note 17. Remuneration of auditors | ||||
| During the year the auditor of the entity earned the following remuneration: |
||||
| Audit of financial report of the entity | 10,000 | 1,050 | ||
| IPO's Independent Accountant's Report | 6,900 | |||
| Taxation compliance and share registry | 4,829 | |||
| Other services | ||||
| Total remuneration | 21,729 | 1,050 |
Note 18. Related parties
Directors
The names of persons who were directors at any time during the financial year are as follows: J L McCawley, G Baynton, J T Shaw, P Sankey and M Ackland. J L McCawley was the only director who also held office during the year ended 30 June 2001. G Baynton was appointed on 5 November 2001. J T Shaw was appointed on 20 May 2002. P Sankey was appointed on 4 June 2002 and resigned on 2 May 2003. M Ackland was appointed on 1 July 2002.
Transactions of Directors and Director Related Entities concerning shares or share options
Aggregate number of shares and share options of Lodestone Exploration Limited acquired or disposed by directors or their director related entities during the period were as follows:
| 2003 Number |
2002 Number |
|
|---|---|---|
| Acquisitions | ||
| Ordinary shares | 415,647 | 1,090,000 |
| Options over ordinary shares | 918,750 |
Aggregate number of shares and share options of Lodestone Exploration Limited held directly, indirectly, or beneficially by directors of the company or their director related entities at balance date:
| 2003 | 2002 | |
|---|---|---|
| Number | Number | |
| Ordinary shares | 6,525,647 | 6,110,000 |
| Options over ordinary shares | 918,750 |
Note 18. Related parties (continued)
Other Transactions of Directors and Director-Related Entities
G Baynton is a director of Orbit Capital Pty Limited, which received commission in respect of equity raised during the financial year, such service being provided in the ordinary course of business to the Company.
The wife of a director, Mr G Baynton, is a director of Nous Corporate Pty Ltd and has the capacity to significantly influence decision making of that company. Lodestone Exploration Limited has rented office space from Nous Corporate Pty Ltd during the year. Nous Corporate Pty Ltd has also provided professional services to Lodestone Exploration Limited during the financial year.
| 2003 | 2002 s |
|
|---|---|---|
| Aggregate amounts of each of the above types of other transactions with directors and their director-related entities: |
||
| Commission | 25,000 | 9.000 |
| Rent of office space | 6.000 | |
| Consulting fees | 31,882 | |
| Aggregate amounts payable to directors and their director-related entities at balance date: |
||
| Current liabilities | 2,439 | 11,572 |
Note 19. Events occurring after reporting date
There have been no matters or circumstances, that have arisen since the end of the financial year, that have significantly affected, or may affect, the operations of the company, the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the company in future financial years.
| 2003 | 2002 S |
|
|---|---|---|
| Note 20. Reconciliation of loss from ordinary activities after income tax to net cash outflow from operating activities |
||
| Loss from ordinary activities after income tax | (123,043) | (14,386) |
| Depreciation | 1,448 | 1,791 |
| Change in operating assets and liabilities: | ||
| (Increase)/decrease in other debtors | (30,073) | (2,000) |
| (Increase)/decrease in interest receivable | (6,864) | |
| Increase/(decrease) in trade creditors | 40,003 | 1,577 |
| Net cash outflow from operating activities | (118, 529) | (13,018) |
| Note 21. Commitments for expenditure | |
|---|---|
| Operating leases |
Commitments for minimum lease payments in relation to non-cancellable operating leases are payable as follows:
| Within one year | 2,890 | |
|---|---|---|
| Exploration commitments Commitments for payments under exploration permits for minerals in existence at the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities payable are as follows: |
||
| Within one year Later than one year but not later than 5 years Later than 5 years |
695,561 | |
| Commitments not recognised in the financial statements | 695.561 |
2002
Ś
2003 Ś
So as to maintain current rights to tenure of various exploration tenements, the entity will be required to outlay amounts in respect of tenement exploration expenditure commitments. These outlays, which arise in relation to granted tenements are noted above. The outlays may be varied from time to time, subject to approval of the relevant government departments, and may be relieved if a tenement is relinquished.
| 2003 S |
2002 s |
|
|---|---|---|
| Consulting commitments Commitments for payments under personal services contracts in existence at the reporting date but not recognised as liabilities payable are as follows: |
||
| Within one year Later than one year but not later than 5 years Later than 5 years |
122,500 | 50,000 |
| Commitments not recognised in the financial statements | 122,500 | 50,000 |
| Note 22. Earnings per share | ||
| 2003 Cents |
2002 Cents |
|
| Basic earnings per share | (0.57) | (0.10) |
| Diluted earnings per share | (0.57) | (0.10) |
| Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator | 2003 Number |
2002 Number |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating basic earnings per share |
21,683,540 | 14,467,932 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share |
21,683,540 | 14,467,932 |
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 26 August 2003.
A. Distribution of equity securities
| ັ Class of equity security |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares | ||||
| Shares | Options | |||
| $1 - 1,000$ | 1 | - | ||
| $1,001 - 5,000$ | 20 | 176 | ||
| $5,001 - 10,000$ | 191 | 72 | ||
| $10,001 - 100,000$ | 265 | 168 | ||
| 100,001 and over | 36 | 7 | ||
| 513 | 423 |
Analysis of numbers of equity security holders by size of holding:
There were 13 holders of less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares and 350 holders of less than a marketable parcel of options.
B. Equity security holders
Twenty largest quoted equity security holders
The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted equity securities are listed below:
| Ordinary shares | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Number held |
Percentage of issued shares |
| John Lachlan McCawley | 5,097,147 | 16.48 |
| Patrick Thomas Charles & Maria Julienne Barron | 3,000,000 | 9.70 |
| Foxcorp Holdings Ltd | 2,000,000 | 6.47 |
| Allegro Capital Nominees Pty Ltd | 1,201,000 | 3.88 |
| Talmetal Pty Ltd | 1,000,000 | 3.23 |
| Noel Clarence White | 1,000,000 | 3.23 |
| TBIC Pty Ltd | 800,000 | 2.58 |
| Lili Haas & Doug Price | 500,000 | 1.61 |
| Nicola Maree Mullins | 416,667 | 1.34 |
| Closemarket Pty Ltd | 387,500 | 1.25 |
| Donald Julian Channer | 375,000 | 1.21 |
| William J Daffron | 360,000 | 1.16 |
| Envoy Investments Limited | 285,000 | 0.92 |
| Hancroft Pty Ltd | 250,000 | 0.80 |
| Deslie Dawn Brampton | 250,000 | 0.80 |
| Scott William Power | 250,000 | 0.80 |
| JJNA Pty Ltd | 222,500 | 0.71 |
| Foligno Pty Ltd | 205,000 | 0.66 |
| Badge Nominees Pty Ltd | 200,000 | 0.64 |
| Berne No 132 Nominees Pty Ltd | 199,999 | 0.64 |
| 17,999,813 | 58.11 |
B. Equity security holders (continued)
Twenty largest quoted option holders
The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted options are listed below:
| Options | ||
|---|---|---|
| Name | Number held |
Percentage of issued options |
| Carnethy Investments Pty Ltd | 237,500 | 3.80 |
| Closemarket Pty Ltd | 193,750 | 3.10 |
| Donald Julien Channer | 187,500 | 3.00 |
| Envoy Investments Limited | 142,500 | 2.28 |
| Berne No 132 Nominees Pty Ltd | 125,000 | 2.00 |
| Benjamin James Cleary | 120,000 | 1.92 |
| Foligno Pty Ltd | 102,500 | 1.64 |
| Allegro Capital Nominees Pty Ltd | 100,000 | 1.60 |
| Robert James Dougall | 90,000 | 1.44 |
| Hancroft Pty Ltd | 87,500 | 1.40 |
| Talmetal Pty Ltd | 85,000 | 1.36 |
| Nicola Maree Mullins | 82,500 | 1.32 |
| Capco Trust Jersey Limited | 75,000 | 1.20 |
| ANZ Nominees Limited | 62,500 | 1.00 |
| Lyndal Joy Peterson | 57,500 | 0.92 |
| Matthew Alan Baker | 52,500 | 0.84 |
| Grant Donald Peterson & Christine Myrtle Lane | 52,500 | 0.84 |
| Noel James Blake | 50,000 | 0.80 |
| Burns Construction Pty Ltd | 50,000 | 0.80 |
| Dundee Investments Pty Ltd | 50,000 | 0.80 |
| 2,003,750 | 32.06 |
C. Substantial holders
Substantial holders in the company are set out below:
| Number held |
Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares | ||
| John Lachlan McCawley | 5,097,147 | 16.48 |
| Patrick Thomas Charles and Maria Julienne Barron | 3,000,000 | 9.70 |
| Foxcorp Holdings Ltd | 2,000,000 | 6.47 |
D. Voting rights
The voting rights attaching to each class of equity securities are set out below:
(a) Ordinary shares
On a show of hands every member present at a meeting in person or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll each share shall have one vote.
(b) Options
No voting rights.



LODESTONE EXPLORATION LIMITED
GPO Box 762, Brisbane QLD 4001 Telephone: 07 3229 6606 Facsimile: 07 3221 6625 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lodestonex.com