Regulatory Filings • Oct 12, 2022
Preview not available for this file type.
Download Source FileCORRESP 1 filename1.htm
Golenbock Eiseman Assor bell & Peskoe llp
711 third Avenue – 17 th Floor
New York City, New York 10017
Direct Dial No.: (212) 907-7349
Direct Fax No.: (212) 754-0330
Email Address: [email protected]
October 12, 2022
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance – Office of
Life Sciences
Washington, DC 20549
Attention: Christie Wong
Brian Cascio
Tyler Howes
Celeste Murphy
Re: Origin Agritech Limited Amendment No. 3 to Form 20-F for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021 File No. 000-51576
Dear Sirs and Mesdames:
Reference is made to the letter of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), dated September 27, 2022. This letter sets forth below the comments of that letter to Amendment No. 2 to Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021 (“20-F”), of Origin Agritech Limited (the “Company”), filed on September 22, 2022, followed by the responses of the Company. I am responding on behalf of the Company as its counsel.
Amendment No. 2 to Form 20-F for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021
Introduction
Corporate Structure, page 3
Response : The Amended Form 20-F has been edited to remove references to replication of ownership through a VIE arrangement and to remove the use of “our VIE” on the pages noted in the Staff comment above.
Field: Page; Sequence: 1
Field: /Page
Internal Cash Transfers and Dividends, page 7
Response : The Amended Form 20-F has been edited to clarify the discussion of internal cash transfers and dividends and to add a cross reference to the condensed consolidating schedule and the consolidated financial statements.
Selected Condensed Consolidated Financial Information , page 9
Response : The Amended Form 20-F has been edited to correct the dates for the period discussed in the tables under the subheading “Selected Condensed Consolidated Financial Information.”
Field: Page; Sequence: 2
Field: /Page
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Results of Operations - Revenues, page 41
Response :
Due to the nature of our business, the seed sold in one fiscal year was produced in previous years. There have been over supply issues in Chinese seed market in last several years. We have had carry over inventory that cannot meet our quality standards and, thus, were sold as scrap, which significantly decreased its value and our revenues. The following tables show the detailed seed inventory and scrap sale quantity in both FY2020 and FY 2021.
| FY2020 Available Seed For Sale (metric ton) — Year Produced | Total Seed Inventory | Good quality Seed Inventory | Sales | Carry Over | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seed sale quantity | seed sale revenue (RMB '000) | scrap sale quantity | scrap sale revenue (RMB '000) | ||||
| 2016 or before | 1,597 | 274 | 274 | 1,370 | 1,323 | 470 | - |
| 2017 | 563 | 563 | 128 | 789 | - | - | 435 |
| 2018 | 674 | 674 | 389 | 3,357 | - | - | 285 |
| 2019 | 2,557 | 2,557 | 2,331 | 46,527 | - | - | 226 |
| 2020 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| total | 5,391 | 4,068 | 3,122 | 52,043 | 1,323 | 470 | 946 |
| FY2021 Available Seed For Sale (metric ton) — Year Produced | Total Seed Inventory | Good quality Seed Inventory | Sales | Carry Over | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seed sale quantity | seed sale revenue (RMB '000) | scrap sale quantity | scrap sale revenue (RMB '000) | ||||
| 2016 or before | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2017 | 435 | 195 | 195 | 1,625 | 240 | 720 | - |
| 2018 | 285 | 285 | 285 | 1,460 | - | - | - |
| 2019 | 226 | 226 | 226 | 3,430 | - | - | - |
| 2020 | 2,131 | 2,131 | 1,833 | 38,503 | - | - | 298 |
| 2021 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| total | 3,077 | 2,837 | 2,539 | 45,018 | 240 | 720 | 298 |
Field: Page; Sequence: 3
Field: /Page
The decline in revenues for FY 2021 and FY2020 was overall a decline in sales of our crop seed products. We believe the decline was due to a shortage of our inventory supply and, more generally, increasing competition in seed market.
We had a shortage of inventory supply because parts of our older inventory deteriorated to such a degree that it became scrap seed, and our production of new seed product had not increased sufficiently to meet needed capacity. From 2015 to 2017, we have greatly overproduced our inventory. Seeds that weren’t sold subsequent years aged and became old inventory. Because of our larger inventory levels we decided to produce less seed in subsequent years. As time passed, we found the old seed inventory began to fall below our quality standards, one being the germination rate, for example. Additionally, the older corn seed varieties were becoming less popular with growers. In the 2019-2020 season, we scrapped 1,323 metric tons of seed, which meant they were sold as normal feed crop other than seed, at greatly discounted prices, namely ‘scrap sale’. As a result, our supply to distributors for 2020 was decreased, and thus sales also were decreased. Moreover, we scrapped another 240 metric tons of seed in 2020, which likewise influenced our supply for 2021 and led to a decline in sales and revenue.
As a result, we believe we have cleaned up all of our inventory levels and the quality levels during the last two years. We believe that now we currently have a seed inventory available for sale where most seed is newly produced.
General and Administrative , page 42
Response :
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bad-debt Provision | Nil | RMB28.3million | RMB40.5million |
| Shihui | RMB28.3million | ||
| Linze | Nil | RMB40.5million |
Field: Page; Sequence: 4
Field: /Page
The increase of RMB30.8 million in general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2020 compared to 2019 was due to an increase in the bad-debt provision of RMB28.3 million. In 2019, there was no bad-debt provision. The bad debt related to Shihui.
The increase of RMB15.3 million in general and administrative expenses in FY 2021 compared to FY 2020 was due to the increase in the bad-debt provision of RMB12.2 million recorded in FY 2021. The bad debt was related to the obligations of Linze to the Company.
If you have any questions about the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact Andrew D. Hudders of this firm at 212-907-7349 or [email protected].
Very truly yours,
/S/ Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP
Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP
cc: Dr. Gengchen Han
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Field: Page; Sequence: 5; Options: Last
Field: /Page
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.