ASX ANNOUNCEMENT

31 May 2018

SIBERIA DRILLING DEFINES LATERITE EXTENSIONS & VIABLE LOW GRADE STOCKPILE

HIGHLIGHTS

➢ Additional drilling defines extensions for Sand King laterites
➢ Two holes ended in bedrock mineralisation with a maximum grade of 6.61 g/t gold
➢ Follow-up drilling of Sand King laterites now being planned
➢ Drilling of the low-grade dump complete – assays pending
➢ Drilling of historical low-grade stockpile identifies viable mill feed sources
➢ Total Mineral Resource in the Siberia district now totals 5,678,000t @ 3.1g/t Au for 577,000 ounces
➢ Drilling highlights from low grade stockpile and laterites includes:

ISSUED CAPITAL

Shares: 761.7 m Options: 226.7 m Current Share Price: $0.135 Market Capitalisation: $102.8 m Cash as at 31/03/2018: $3.8m*

*Excluding total debt facilities of $35.0m, see ASX announcement 31 Jan 2017. Drawn to date $18.6m.

Low Grade Stockpile Results

Laterite Results

15.0 m @ 1.41 g/t Au
11.0 m @ 1.90 g/t Au
14.0 m @ 1.38 g/t Au
6.0 m @ 2.47 g/t Au
10.0 m @ 1.75 g/t Au
7.0 m @ 1.78 g/t Au
13.0 m @ 1.30 g/t Au
9.0 m @ 1.30 g/t Au
12.0 m @ 1.40 g/t Au
3.0 m @ 3.79 g/t Au
10.0 m @ 1.59 g/t Au
4.0 m @ 2.79 g/t Au
14.0 m @ 1.13 g/t Au
6.0 m @ 1.85 g/t Au
15.0 m @ 1.04 g/t Au
7.0 m @ 1.52 g/t Au
11.0 m @ 1.39 g/t Au
6.0 m @ 1.70 g/t Au
•
14.0 m @ 1.08 g/t Au 4.0 m @ 2.48 g/t Au
• • 12.0 m @ 1.24 g/t Au 5.0 m @ 1.95 g/t Au
• • 13.0 m @ 1.11 g/t Au 7.0 m @ 1.37 g/t Au

Eastern Goldfields Limited (ASX: EGS) ( Eastern Goldfields or the Company ) is pleased to announce drilling results from the Siberia open pit mining project, located approximately 37 km south-east of the Davyhurst Mill and 80 km north-west of Kalgoorlie (refer Figure 1).

Assays results have been returned on the recently completed low grade stockpile and laterite extensional drilling (see Figure 2). On the low grade stockpile, 92 holes for 1,925 metres were drilled to establish a 15 metre by 15 metre drill spacing. The strength of the results returned to date, combined with the 2,000 metres of infill drilling has now closed out the program. These results will be evaluated to establish low grade mining blocks which will be made available for processing from June 2018 (see Figures 3 & 4).

As announced on 29 August 2017, near surface gold mineralisation was defined outside of the existing Ore Reserve, on the eastern side of the Sand King pit. An initial drilling program was completed in the first quarter resulting in a significant tonnage mined out in April 2018. Additional extensional drilling successfully defined extensions to the

known mineralisation. A total of 191 holes were drilled for 2,444 metres. These recent results are currently being evaluated with mining scheduled for June 2018 (see Figures 5 & 6).

Significantly, two holes ended in mineralisation with a maximum grade of 6.61 g/t gold. Further examinations are being undertaken to confirm a potential intersection with the primary mineralisation that underlies the laterite mineralisation (see Figure 6) . Conceptually this may relate to a cross cutting (east-west) structure. Preliminary follow-up drilling is planned.

Executive Chairman, Michael Fotios said: “Defining relatively broad grade zones within the Sand King low grade stockpile and extensions to the laterite mineralisation clearly bolsters the short-term processing opportunities at Davyhurst, while we progress the Siberia bulk waste mining pre-strip. Both areas are associated with low stripping ratios (waste:ore), which will result in low cost gold production. The potential to find a primary mineralisation source underlying the laterite mineralisation will remain our focus in the short-term.”

Open pit mining at Sand King continues to progress well, reaching approximately 10 vertical metres below surface, with the current pit floor reaching the 402.5mRL level. The first significant grade control drilling event commenced from this level, targeting the upper sections of the southern shoot array.

About Siberia

The Siberia complex is located 37km south-east of the Davyhurst processing plant and approximately 80km northwest of Kalgoorlie within the north eastern Goldfields of Western Australia (Figure 1).

Siberia is scheduled to supply the bulk of the open pit milling tonnes to the Davyhurst processing plant in 2018 and 2019. An Ore Reserve update announced on 14 February 2017 established a combined open pit Reserve for the Missouri and Sand King deposits of 2,025,000t @ 2.3g/t Au for 150,000 ounces . This represents a 30% gold ounce conversion to open pit ore from the combined Mineral Resource for these deposits of 4,884,000 @ 3.2g/t Au for 498,000 ounces . The balance of the combined Mineral Resource ounces is located below the current planned open pits at Sand King and Missouri.

Open pit mining has now commenced, initially targeting the southern end of Sand King pit. Evaluation work investigating the underground mining potential of these two deposits is being considered.

The total Mineral Resource in the Siberia district now totals 5,678,000t @ 3.1g/t Au for 577,000 ounces.

==> picture [456 x 661] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Project location plan

==> picture [496 x 640] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Low grade and laterite location plan

==> picture [711 x 456] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Low grade stockpile showing drill hole locations and results. Thickness shading indicates >4m area of interest.

==> picture [711 x 459] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Cross sections of low grade stockpile displaying composite results and highlighting area of interest.

==> picture [496 x 650] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 5: Laterite extensions showing drill hole locations and results.

==> picture [712 x 459] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 6: Cross sections of laterite mineralisation drilling results and highlighting area of interest.

Investor Enquiries

Michael Fotios Executive Chairman T: +61 8 6241 1888 E : [email protected]

Competent Person Statements

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled under the supervision of Mr Andrew Czerw, a permanent employee of Eastern Goldfields Limited, who is Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Czerw has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Czerw consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to the Sand King, Missouri and Low Grade Stockpile Mineral Resources is based on information compiled under the supervision of Mr Michael Thomson, a former employee of Eastern Goldfields Limited, who is Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Thomson has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been modified from the original announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the initial announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.

The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources (with the exception of Sand King, Missouri and Low Grade Stockpile Mineral Resources) is based on information compiled under the supervision of Mr Michael Thomson, a former employee of Eastern Goldfields Limited, who is Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Thomson has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been modified from the original announcement and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the initial announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed. This information was prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004. It has not been updated since to comply with the JORC Code 2012 on the basis that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported.

The information in this report that relates to Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Craig Mann, who is an independent mining engineering consultant and a full-time employee of Entech Pty Ltd and has sufficient relevant experience to advise Eastern Goldfields Limited on matters relating to mine design, mine scheduling, mining methodology and mining costs. Mr Mann is satisfied that the information provided in this statement has been determined to a PFS level of accuracy, based on the data provided by Eastern Goldfields Limited. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been modified from the original announcement and all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the initial announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.

Forward Looking Statements

Eastern Goldfields Limited has prepared this announcement based on information available to it. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information, opinions and conclusions contained in this announcement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of Eastern Goldfields Limited, its directors, employees or agents, advisers, nor any other person accepts any liability, including, without limitation, any liability arising from fault or negligence on the part of any of them or any other person, for any loss arising from the use of this announcement or its contents or otherwise arising in connection with it. This announcement is not an offer, invitation, solicitation or other recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of any security, and neither this announcement nor anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment whatsoever. This announcement may contain forward looking statements that are subject to risk factors associated with gold exploration, mining and production

businesses. It is believed that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable but they may be affected by a variety of variables and changes in underlying assumptions which could cause actual results or trends to differ materially, including but not limited to price fluctuations, actual demand, currency fluctuations, drilling and production results, reserve estimations, loss of market, industry competition, environmental risks, physical risks, legislative, fiscal and regulatory changes, economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions, political risks, project delay or advancement, approvals and cost estimates.

Table 1: EGS Mineral Resource Statement

PROJECT	MEASURED	MEASURED	INDICATED	INDICATED	INFERRED	INFERRED	TOTAL MATERIAL	TOTAL MATERIAL	TOTAL MATERIAL
Prospect	('000t)	(g/t Au)	('000t)	(g/t Au)	('000t)	(g/t Au)	('000t)	(g/t Au)	('000oz.)
CENTRAL DAVYHURST
Golden Eagle	0	0.0	345	2.5	311	2.6	656	2.5	54
Lights Of Israel Underground	0	0.0	74	4.3	180	4.2	254	4.2	35
Makai Shoot	0	0.0	1,985	2.0	153	1.7	2,138	2.0	136
Waihi	0	0.0	805	2.4	109	2.4	914	2.4	71
Subtotal	0	0.0	3,200	2.2	800	2.6	3,962	2.3	296
RiIVERINA/ MULLINE
LadyGladys	0	0.0	1,858	1.9	190	2.4	2,048	1.9	128
Riverina Area	0	0.0	941	2.4	1,644	2.5	2,585	2.5	205
Forehand	0	0.0	386	1.7	436	1.9	822	1.8	48
Silver Tongue	0	0.0	155	2.7	19	1.3	174	2.5	14
Sunraysia	0	0.0	175	2.1	318	2.0	493	2.0	32
Subtotal	0	0.0	3,515	2.1	2,607	2.3	6,122	2.2	427
SIBERIA
Sand King	0	0.0	1,773	3.3	680	3.7	2,453	3.4	272
Missouri	0	0.0	2,022	3.0	409	2.6	2,431	2.9	227
Palmerston/Camperdown	0	0.0	118	2.3	174	2.4	292	2.4	22
Bewick Moreing	0	0.0	0	0.0	50	2.3	50	2.3	4
Black Rabbit	0	0.0	0	0.0	434	3.5	434	3.5	49
Thiel Well	0	0.0	0	0.0	18	6.0	18	6.0	3
Subtotal	0	0.0	3,913	3.1	1,765	3.2	5,678	3.1	577
CALLION
Callion	0	0.0	86	2.8	83	2.3	169	2.6	14
Subtotal	0	0.0	86	2.8	83	2.3	169	2.6	14
WALHALLA
Federal Flag	32	2.0	112	1.8	238	2.5	382	2.3	28
Salmon Gums	0	0.0	199	2.8	108	2.9	307	2.8	28
Walhalla	0	0.0	448	1.8	216	1.4	664	1.7	36
Walhalla North	0	0.0	94	2.4	13	3.0	107	2.5	9
Mount Banjo	0	0.0	109	2.3	126	1.4	235	1.8	14
Macedon	0	0.0	0	0.0	186	1.8	186	1.8	11
Subtotal	32	2.0	962	2.1	887	2.0	1,881	2.1	126
LADY IDA
Iguana	0	0.0	690	2.1	2,032	2.0	2,722	2.0	177
Lizard	106	4.0	75	3.7	13	2.8	194	3.8	24
Subtotal	106	4.0	765	2.3	2,045	2.0	2,916	2.1	201
Low Grade Stockpiles	-	-	-	-	764	1.1	764	1.1	27
DAVYHURST TOTAL	138	3.5	12,441	2.5	8,187	2.4	21,492	2.4	1,668
MOUNT IDA
Baldock	0	0.0	136	18.6	0	0.0	136	18.6	81
Baldock South	0	0.0	0	0.0	0	0.0	0	0.0	0
Meteor	0	0.0	0	0.0	143	9.3	143	9.3	43
Whinnen	0	0.0	0	0.0	39	13.3	39	13.3	17

MOUNT IDA TOTAL	0	0.0	136	18.6	182	10.2	318	13.8	141

	MEASURED		INDICATED		INFERRED		TOTAL MATERIAL
	('000t)	(g/t Au)	('000t)	(g/t Au)	('000t)	(g/t Au)	('000t)	(g/t Au)	('000oz.)
COMBINED TOTAL	138	3.5	12,577	2.7	8,369	2.6	21,810	2.6	1,809

All Resources listed above with the exception of the Missouri and Sand King Resources were prepared and first disclosed under the JORC Code 2004 (refer to ASX release “ Swan Gold Prospectus ”, 13 February 2013) . It has not been updated since to comply with JORC Code 2012 on the basis that the information has not materially changed since it was last reported.
The Missouri, Sand King and low grade stockpile Mineral Resources has been updated and complies with all relevant aspects of the JORC code 2012, and initially released to the market on 15 December 2016 (Missouri) 3 January 2017 (Sand King and 14 July 2017).
The above table contains rounding errors.

Appendix 1: EGS Significant Intercepts, Low Grade Stockpile Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.6 g/t Au lower cut

Hole	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)

SKLGRC001 6656180 303531 433 0 -90 27.0	9.0	17.0	8.0	1.09
SKLGRC002 6656211 303532 436 0 -90 27.0	0.0	4.0	4.0	0.60
	10.0	17.0	7.0	1.18
	20.0	21.0	1.0	0.92
SKLGRC003 6656155 303566 434 0 -90 27.0	1.0	3.0	2.0	1.64
	9.0	19.0	10.0	1.75
SKLGRC004 6656172 303559 435 0 -90 27.0	6.0	7.0	1.0	1.01
	10.0	15.0	5.0	0.61
	22.0	23.0	1.0	1.32
SKLGRC005 6656207 303558 436 0 -90 27.0	5.0	7.0	2.0	3.11
	10.0	17.0	7.0	1.43
	23.0	24.0	1.0	1.20
SKLGRC006 6656228 303577 439 0 -90 30.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	0.82
	4.0	7.0	3.0	0.60
	11.0	25.0	14.0	0.96
SKLGRC007 6656130 303594 430 0 -90 24.0	1.0	8.0	7.0	1.30
	12.0	13.0	1.0	0.73
SKLGRC009 6656184 303593 442 0 -90 33.0	2.0	16.0	14.0	1.08
	22.0	24.0	2.0	0.65
	27.0	29.0	2.0	0.68
SKLGRC010 6656211 303593 441 0 -90 30.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	1.92
	6.0	7.0	1.0	1.35
	10.0	22.0	12.0	1.24
	24.0	29.0	5.0	0.90
SKLGRC011 6656107 303624 427 0 -90 24.0	0.0	8.0	8.0	0.76
SKLGRC013 6656187 303618 443 0 -90 33.0	4.0	5.0	1.0	0.86
	16.0	17.0	1.0	0.93
	20.0	24.0	4.0	0.74
SKLGRC014 6656244 303631 442 0 -90 33.0	4.0	9.0	5.0	0.97
	22.0	25.0	3.0	2.01
	28.0	29.0	1.0	1.56
SKLGRC015 6656143 303656 437 0 -90 24.0	7.0	8.0	1.0	0.64
	9.0	10.0	1.0	0.69
	11.0	12.0	1.0	0.90
	15.0	17.0	2.0	2.11
	22.0	23.0	1.0	0.69
SKLGRC016 6656171 303634 442 0 -90 24.0	12.0	22.0	10.0	1.06
SKLGRC017 6656182 303643 444 0 -90 33.0	16.0	17.0	1.0	1.52
	20.0	31.0	11.0	1.00
SKLGRC018 6656203 303646 444 0 -90 36.0	12.0	19.0	7.0	1.51
	24.0	25.0	1.0	0.69
SKLGRC019 6656223 303650 444 0 -90 33.0	12.0	13.0	1.0	1.85
	21.0	22.0	1.0	0.78
SKLGRC020 6656143 303674 436 0 -90 27.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.90
	8.0	19.0	11.0	0.90
SKLGRC021 6656183 303735 426 0 -90 24.0	6.0	7.0	1.0	1.06
SKLGRC024 6656217 303725 428 0 -90 18.0		NSI
SKLGRC025 6656253 303714 427 0 -90 18.0	11.0	12.0	1.0	0.79
SKLGRC026 6656185 303757 426 0 -90 15.0		NSI
SKLGRC027 6656178 303663 429 0 -90 18.0	2.0	14.0	12.0	0.73
SKLGRC028 6656162 303679 429 0 -90 21.0	0.0	3.0	3.0	1.78
	6.0	11.0	5.0	0.93
SKLGRC029 6656160 303660 430 0 -90 18.0	0.0	7.0	7.0	1.15
	10.0	13.0	3.0	0.80
SKLGRC030 6656160 303645 430 0 -90 18.0	2.0	8.0	6.0	1.36
	12.0	13.0	1.0	0.66
SKLGRC031 6656160 303615 430 0 -90 18.0	0.0	15.0	15.0	1.04
SKLGRC032 6656160 303600 430 0 -90 21.0	2.0	3.0	1.0	3.93
	7.0	9.0	2.0	1.03
SKLGRC033 6656160 303586 429 0 -90 21.0	3.0	4.0	1.0	5.00
	7.0	11.0	4.0	1.29
	16.0	17.0	1.0	1.20
SKLGRC034 6656160 303555 429 0 -90 21.0	1.0	15.0	14.0	1.38

Hole	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)

SKLGRC035 6656145 303570 429 0 -90 24.0	2.0	10.0	8.0	0.85
SKLGRC036 6656147 303585 429 0 -90 22.0	3.0	4.0	1.0	0.79
	7.0	14.0	7.0	1.07
SKLGRC037 6656146 303600 429 0 -90 24.0	3.0	16.0	13.0	1.00
SKLGRC038 6656145 303615 430 0 -90 18.0	1.0	4.0	3.0	0.67
	6.0	8.0	2.0	0.74
	13.0	14.0	1.0	0.83
SKLGRC039 6656145 303630 430 0 -90 18.0	2.0	9.0	7.0	0.74
SKLGRC040 6656145 303644 430 0 -90 18.0	2.0	12.0	10.0	1.00
SKLGRC041 6656145 303690 433 0 -90 18.0	5.0	8.0	3.0	1.15
	11.0	12.0	1.0	0.87
SKLGRC042 6656159 303697 429 0 -90 18.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	0.89
	6.0	7.0	1.0	1.67
SKLGRC043 6656130 303630 430 0 -90 18.0	2.0	3.0	1.0	0.91
	7.0	15.0	8.0	0.96
SKLGRC044 6656130 303675 430 0 -90 19.0	5.0	10.0	5.0	1.22
SKLGRC045 6656115 303660 430 0 -90 24.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.90
	9.0	11.0	2.0	0.62
SKLGRC046 6656115 303675 432 0 -90 24.0	3.0	5.0	2.0	3.21
SKLGRC047 6656175 303540 430 0 -90 21.0	1.0	16.0	15.0	1.41
SKLGRC048 6656175 303554 430 0 -90 21.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.21
	4.0	7.0	3.0	1.24
	10.0	16.0	6.0	1.76
SKLGRC049 6656174 303570 430 0 -90 21.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	1.16
	8.0	10.0	2.0	3.32
	13.0	16.0	3.0	1.79
SKLGRC050 6656169 303578 430 0 -90 21.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.64
	5.0	15.0	10.0	1.59
SKLGRC051 6656188 303527 430 0 -90 20.0	1.0	13.0	12.0	1.40
	16.0	17.0	1.0	1.49
SKLGRC052 6656190 303540 430 0 -90 19.0	1.0	9.0	8.0	1.19
	13.0	17.0	4.0	0.77
SKLGRC053 6656190 303554 430 0 -90 18.0	3.0	12.0	9.0	0.69
SKLGRC054 6656190 303569 430 0 -90 19.0	7.0	18.0	11.0	1.39
SKLGRC055 6656190 303599 430 0 -90 18.0	0.0	13.0	13.0	1.11
SKLGRC056 6656190 303630 430 0 -90 18.0	0.0	6.0	6.0	0.81
SKLGRC057 6656190 303644 430 0 -90 18.0	1.0	4.0	3.0	1.09
	9.0	11.0	2.0	1.24
	14.0	15.0	1.0	1.03
SKLGRC058 6656189 303660 429 0 -90 20.0	1.0	8.0	7.0	1.12
	11.0	15.0	4.0	0.92
SKLGRC059 6656205 303540 430 0 -90 21.0	0.0	12.0	12.0	1.04
	15.0	16.0	1.0	0.66
SKLGRC060 6656205 303555 430 0 -90 21.0	2.0	8.0	6.0	1.00
	11.0	17.0	6.0	0.79
SKLGRC061 6656205 303570 429 0 -90 21.0	2.0	16.0	14.0	0.99
SKLGRC062 6656205 303585 429 0 -90 21.0	4.0	5.0	1.0	1.03
	8.0	16.0	8.0	0.65
SKLGRC063 6656205 303600 430 0 -90 20.0	3.0	14.0	11.0	0.84
SKLGRC064 6656205 303615 430 0 -90 20.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	0.74
	4.0	5.0	1.0	0.77
	8.0	10.0	2.0	1.30
	13.0	15.0	2.0	0.78
SKLGRC065 6656205 303660 430 0 -90 19.0	1.0	7.0	6.0	1.44
	12.0	13.0	1.0	0.75
SKLGRC066 6656220 303555 430 0 -90 21.0	0.0	14.0	14.0	0.90
SKLGRC067 6656220 303569 430 0 -90 21.0	4.0	17.0	13.0	1.30
SKLGRC068 6656220 303585 430 0 -90 21.0	0.0	6.0	6.0	1.63
	10.0	11.0	1.0	2.76
	14.0	16.0	2.0	3.96
SKLGRC069 6656220 303600 430 0 -90 21.0	2.0	16.0	14.0	1.13
SKLGRC070 6656220 303630 430 0 -90 20.0	3.0	10.0	7.0	0.98
SKLGRC071 6656221 303645 430 0 -90 20.0	1.0	13.0	12.0	0.99
	17.0	18.0	1.0	0.80
SKLGRC072 6656220 303704 431 0 -90 21.0	5.0	6.0	1.0	0.83
	9.0	10.0	1.0	0.97
	14.0	15.0	1.0	1.82

Hole	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)

SKLGRC073 6656220 303689 431 0 -90 21.0	0.0	9.0	9.0	1.31
	15.0	16.0	1.0	0.71
SKLGRC074 6656220 303675 430 0 -90 20.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.14
	7.0	8.0	1.0	0.71
	12.0	15.0	3.0	0.99
SKLGRC075 6656236 303569 430 0 -90 20.0	3.0	4.0	1.0	0.72
	7.0	17.0	10.0	0.87
SKLGRC076 6656235 303584 430 0 -90 20.0	5.0	7.0	2.0	2.48
	14.0	17.0	3.0	0.73
SKLGRC077 6656235 303599 429 0 -90 20.0	2.0	12.0	10.0	1.00
	15.0	16.0	1.0	0.76
SKLGRC078 6656236 303615 429 0 -90 20.0	0.0	3.0	3.0	1.06
	7.0	15.0	8.0	1.22
SKLGRC079 6656235 303630 430 0 -90 20.0	1.0	9.0	8.0	0.94
	12.0	13.0	1.0	0.87
SKLGRC080 6656235 303644 430 0 -90 20.0	2.0	8.0	6.0	1.16
	12.0	14.0	2.0	1.53
SKLGRC081 6656234 303661 430 0 -90 18.0	2.0	14.0	12.0	0.90
SKLGRC082 6656250 303586 430 0 -90 20.0	3.0	4.0	1.0	0.97
	7.0	14.0	7.0	1.14
SKLGRC083 6656250 303600 430 0 -90 20.0	11.0	12.0	1.0	0.61
	14.0	15.0	1.0	0.86
SKLGRC084 6656250 303615 430 0 -90 20.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.67
	6.0	9.0	3.0	1.31
	10.0	11.0	1.0	1.50
	14.0	16.0	2.0	0.71
SKLGRC085 6656250 303630 430 0 -90 20.0	6.0	16.0	10.0	0.80
SKLGRC086 6656135 303431 430 0 -90 21.0	7.0	8.0	1.0	0.89
	12.0	13.0	1.0	0.90
SKLGRC087 6656075 303425 430 0 -90 27.0				NSI
SKLGRC088 6656050 303500 430 0 -90 28.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.10
SKLGRC089 6656125 303475 430 0 -90 24.0	12.0	13.0	1.0	0.71
SKLGRC090 6656100 303501 430 0 -90 24.0		NSI
SKLGRC091 6656050 303450 430 0 -90 24.0		NSI
SKLGRC092 6656092 303559 431 0 -90 24.0		NSI
SKLGRC093 6656120 303515 430 0 -90 22.0		NSI
SKLGRC094 6656130 303511 430 0 -90 21.0		NSI
SKLGRC095 6656145 303525 430 0 -90 20.0	15.0	16.0	1.0	0.82
SKLGRC096 6656145 303510 430 0 -90 21.0		NSI
SKLGRC097 6656145 303495 431 0 -90 24.0		NSI
SKLGRC098 6656145 303480 430 0 -90 24.0	4.0	5.0	1.0	1.48
SKLGRC099 6656101 303450 430 0 -90 28.0		NSI
SKLGRC100 6656160 303465 430 0 -90 22.0		NSI
SKLGRC101 6656160 303480 430 0 -90 21.0		NSI
SKLGRC102 6656160 303495 431 0 -90 20.0		NSI
SKLGRC103 6656160 303510 431 0 -90 21.0	10.0	11.0	1.0	0.62
SKLGRC104 6656160 303524 431 0 -90 24.0	14.0	19.0	5.0	0.75
SKLGRC105 6656175 303465 430 0 -90 22.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.63
SKLGRC106 6656175 303480 431 0 -90 21.0		NSI
SKLGRC107 6656175 303495 431 0 -90 22.0		NSI
SKLGRC108 6656175 303509 431 0 -90 23.0	13.0	14.0	1.0	1.03
SKLGRC109 6656175 303524 431 0 -90 22.0	12.0	15.0	3.0	1.04
SKLGRC110 6656190 303465 431 0 -90 20.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	1.49
	6.0	8.0	2.0	0.80
SKLGRC111 6656190 303480 431 0 -90 21.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	1.26
SKLGRC112 6656190 303495 431 0 -90 22.0	14.0	15.0	1.0	0.69
SKLGRC113 6656190 303510 432 0 -90 22.0		NSI
SKLGRC114 6656205 303495 431 0 -90 23.0	1.0	3.0	2.0	1.61
	14.0	16.0	2.0	0.80
SKLGRC115 6656205 303510 432 0 -90 23.0		NSI
SKLGRC116 6656220 303510 432 0 -90 23.0	4.0	5.0	1.0	0.79
	12.0	16.0	4.0	1.11
SKLGRC117 6656205 303525 433 0 -90 21.0	5.0	13.0	8.0	1.31
SKLGRC118 6656265 303630 433 0 -90 18.0	4.0	5.0	1.0	3.42
	8.0	9.0	1.0	4.00
	12.0	15.0	3.0	1.10

Note: 50g Fire assay with AAS finish, 2m maximum internal waste unless otherwise specified, coordinates in MGA94 zone 51.

Appendix 2: EGS Significant Intercepts, Laterite Drilling Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.7 g/t Au lower cut

Hole	MGA Northing	MGA Easting	MGA RL	MGA Azimuth	Dip	Max Depth	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)

17SKGC023	6655970	304015	421	0	-90	30.0	4.0	8.0	4.0	1.90
17SKGC024	6655980	304016	421	0	-90	30.0	3.0	7.0	4.0	2.40
17SKGC026	6655992	304016	421	0	-90	30.0	3.0	7.0	4.0	1.44
18SKEX002	6656030	304115	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKEX003	6656025	304105	415	0	-90	15.5	12.5	13.5	1.0	0.80
18SKEX006	6656000	304075	415	0	-90	13.6		NSI
18SKEX009	6655985	304065	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKEX011	6655980	304055	415	0	-90	14.5	4.5	6.5	2.0	1.17
18SKEX013	6655970	304045	415	0	-90	15.5	4.5	9.5	5.0	0.80
18SKEX014	6655970	304055	415	0	-90	15.5	4.5	6.5	2.0	0.91
18SKEX018	6655960	304035	415	0	-90	10.5	4.5	7.5	3.0	2.58
18SKEX019	6655960	304045	415	0	-90	15.5	0.5	1.5	1.0	2.20
							5.5	6.5	1.0	1.40
							8.5	9.5	1.0	0.76
							10.5	11.5	1.0	0.94
18SKEX021	6655950	303975	415	0	-90	10.5	3.5	5.5	2.0	1.33
18SKEX022	6655950	303985	415	0	-90	10.5	3.5	7.5	4.0	0.98
18SKEX024	6655950	304025	415	0	-90	11.5	4.5	11.5	7.0	1.37
18SKEX025	6655950	304035	415	0	-90	11.5	6.5	11.5	5.0	0.89
18SKEX026	6655940	303965	415	0	-90	12.5		NSI
18SKEX027	6655940	303975	415	0	-90	12.5		NSI
18SKEX030	6655940	304005	415	0	-90	15.5	3.5	12.5	9.0	1.30
18SKEX031	6655940	304015	415	0	-90	12.5	4.5	8.5	4.0	0.87
18SKEX033	6655930	303955	415	0	-90	12.5		NSI
18SKEX036	6655930	303985	415	0	-90	15.5	5.5	8.5	3.0	1.11
18SKEX037	6655930	303995	415	0	-90	15.5	4.5	11.5	7.0	1.52
18SKEX041	6655910	303945	415	0	-90	12.5	6.5	8.5	2.0	1.26
18SKEX042	6655910	303955	415	0	-90	15.5	4.5	7.5	3.0	1.21
18SKEX043	6655910	303965	415	0	-90	15.5	4.5	7.5	3.0	1.61
18SKEX044	6655910	303975	415	0	-90	15.5	5.5	9.5	4.0	1.30
18SKEX045	6655910	303985	415	0	-90	15.5	6.5	8.5	2.0	2.77
18SKEX046	6655910	303995	415	0	-90	14.5	6.5	10.5	4.0	1.09
18SKEX047	6655910	304005	415	0	-90	13.5		NSI
18SKEX048	6655910	304015	415	0	-90	14.5		NSI
18SKEX051	6655890	303955	415	0	-90	12.5		NSI
18SKEX053	6655890	303975	415	0	-90	14.5		NSI
18SKEX054	6655890	303985	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKEX055	6655890	303995	415	0	-90	14.5	6.5	8.5	2.0	2.98
18SKEX057	6655870	303935	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKEX058	6655870	303945	415	0	-90	15.5	2.5	9.5	7.0	1.78
							13.5	14.5	1.0	5.00
18SKEX059	6655870	303955	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKEX060	6655870	303965	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKEX066	6655850	303945	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKEX068	6655850	303965	415	0	-90	14.5		NSI
18SKEX069	6655850	303975	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKEX070	6655850	303985	415	0	-90	9.5		NSI
18SKEX071	6655850	303995	415	0	-90	14.5		NSI
18SKEX073	6655850	304015	415	0	-90	14.5		NSI
18SKEX074	6655850	304025	415	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKGC001	6655952	303994	416	0	-90	15.5	0.5	5.5	5.0	1.79
18SKGC002	6655961	303995	416	0	-90	15.5		NSI
18SKGC003	6655953	304005	416	0	-90	15.5	0.5	5.5	5.0	1.95
18SKGC004	6655962	304004	416	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	2.48
18SKGC005	6655973	304004	416	0	-90	9.5	1.5	4.5	3.0	1.06
18SKGC006	6655982	304004	416	0	-90	9.5	1.5	7.5	6.0	1.53
18SKGC007	6655993	304004	417	0	-90	9.5	1.5	2.5	1.0	1.54
18SKGC008	6656002	304003	417	0	-90	9.5	2.5	3.5	1.0	1.04
18SKGC009	6656010	304004	417	0	-90	9.5	1.5	2.5	1.0	1.01
18SKGC010	6655992	303985	416	0	-90	9.5		NSI
18SKGC011	6655992	303994	416	0	-90	9.5	1.5	2.5	1.0	1.03
18SKGC012	6656002	303994	417	0	-90	9.5	1.5	3.5	2.0	1.33

Hole	MGA Northing	MGA Easting	MGA RL	MGA Azimuth	Dip	Max Depth	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)

18SKGC013	6656012	304013	417	0	-90	9.5	0.5	2.5	2.0	1.28
18SKGC014	6656010	304015	410	0	-90	9.5	0.0	1.5	1.5	2.29
18SKGC015	6656000	304015	410	0	-90	9.5	0.0	2.5	2.5	1.86
18SKGC016	6655990	304015	410	0	-90	9.5	0.0	4.5	4.5	1.35
18SKGC017	6655980	304015	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	7.5	7.0	1.23
18SKGC018	6655970	304015	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	6.5	6.0	2.47
18SKGC019	6655960	304015	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	6.5	6.0	1.85
18SKGC020	6655970	304025	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	6.5	6.0	1.31
18SKGC021	6655980	304025	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	5.5	5.0	1.64
18SKGC022	6655990	304025	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	3.5	3.0	2.16
18SKGC023	6656000	304025	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	1.66
18SKGC024	6656010	304025	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	2.79
18SKGC025	6656020	304025	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	3.5	3.0	1.52
18SKGC026	6656020	304035	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	3.5	3.0	1.52
18SKGC027	6656010	304035	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	2.29
18SKGC028	6656000	304035	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	3.5	3.0	1.59
18SKGC029	6655990	304035	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	1.10
18SKGC030	6655980	304035	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	1.87
18SKGC031	6655990	304045	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	0.98
18SKGC032	6656000	304045	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	5.5	5.0	1.39
18SKGC033	6656010	304045	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	5.5	5.0	1.46
18SKGC034	6656020	304045	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	8.5	8.0	1.20
18SKGC035	6656026	304045	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	1.45
18SKGC036	6656026	304055	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	6.5	6.0	1.22
18SKGC037	6656020	304055	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	7.5	7.0	1.05
18SKGC038	6656010	304055	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	6.5	6.0	1.53
18SKGC039	6656000	304055	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	2.5	2.0	1.92
							6.5	7.5	1.0	1.49
18SKGC040	6655992	304055	410	0	-90	9.5	1.5	3.5	2.0	1.12
18SKGC041	6656002	304065	410	0	-90	9.5	1.5	2.5	1.0	1.21
							7.5	9.5	2.0	1.00
18SKGC042	6656010	304065	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	1.5	1.0	1.60
18SKGC043	6656020	304065	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	3.5	3.0	1.43
18SKGC044	6656026	304065	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	2.5	2.0	3.89
							5.5	6.5	1.0	0.72
18SKGC045	6656026	304075	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	2.5	2.0	1.34
							6.5	7.5	1.0	0.71
18SKGC046	6656020	304075	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	1.5	1.0	1.12
18SKGC047	6656010	304075	410	0	-90	9.5	2.5	3.5	1.0	0.90
18SKGC048	6656020	304085	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	6.5	6.0	0.99
18SKGC049	6656030	304085	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	2.5	2.0	1.40
18SKGC050	6656028	304095	410	0	-90	9.5	1.5	2.5	1.0	1.45
18SKGC051	6656035	304095	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	4.5	4.0	1.26
18SKGC052	6656039	304105	410	0	-90	9.5	2.5	3.5	1.0	0.85
18SKGC053	6656045	304115	410	0	-90	9.5	2.5	3.5	1.0	0.81
18SKGC054	6656055	304115	410	0	-90	9.5	0.5	1.5	1.0	1.47
18SKGC055	6655921	303937	410	0	-90	10.5	NSI
18SKGC056	6655930	303936	410	0	-90	10.5	NSI
18SKGC057	6655940	303934	410	0	-90	6.5	NSI
18SKGC058	6655951	303935	410	0	-90	6.5	NSI
18SKGC059	6655960	303936	410	0	-90	12.5	NSI
18SKGC060	6655972	303995	416	0	-90	10.5	1.5	3.5	2.0	1.03
18SKGC061	6655980	303993	417	0	-90	10.5	2.5	4.5	2.0	1.27
18SKGC062	6655981	303984	417	0	-90	10.5	2.5	4.5	2.0	1.56
18SKGC063	6655970	303983	416	0	-90	10.5	3.5	4.5	1.0	0.71
18SKGC064	6655961	303985	416	0	-90	9.5	3.5	4.5	1.0	0.87
18SKGC065	6655970	303973	417	0	-90	10.5	4.5	5.5	1.0	1.41
18SKGC066	6655982	303975	417	0	-90	10.5	NSI
18SKGC067	6655988	303977	417	0	-90	10.5	3.5	4.5	1.0	0.72
18SKGC068	6655940	303930	418	0	-90	5.5	NSI
18SKGC069	6655981	303967	417	0	-90	10.5	NSI
18SKGC070	6655975	303964	417	0	-90	10.5	NSI
18SKGC071	6655770	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.40
18SKGC072	6655780	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.03
18SKGC073	6655790	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC074	6655800	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.38
18SKGC075	6655810	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	NSI

Hole	MGA Northing	MGA Easting	MGA RL	MGA Azimuth	Dip	Max Depth	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)

18SKGC076	6655820	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC077	6655830	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC078	6655840	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC079	6655850	303860	417	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC080	6655860	303860	418	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC085	6655860	303925	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC086	6655870	303925	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC087	6655880	303925	419	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC088	6655890	303925	419	0	-90	15.0	5.0	8.0	3.0	1.87
18SKGC089	6655850	303935	418	0	-90	15.0	6.0	7.0	1.0	4.86
18SKGC090	6655860	303935	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC091	6655880	303935	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC092	6655890	303935	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC093	6655900	303935	419	0	-90	15.0	5.0	7.0	2.0	1.32
18SKGC094	6655907	303935	418	0	-60	15.0	7.0	8.0	1.0	1.33
							10.0	11.0	1.0	0.89
18SKGC095	6655860	303945	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC096	6655870	303945	419	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC097	6655880	303945	418	0	-90	18.0	NSI
18SKGC098	6655890	303945	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC099	6655900	303945	419	0	-90	15.0	5.0	7.0	2.0	1.58
18SKGC100	6655850	303955	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC101	6655860	303955	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC102	6655880	303955	418	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC103	6655900	303955	419	0	-90	15.0	4.0	7.0	3.0	1.46
18SKGC104	6655920	303955	419	0	-90	15.0	6.0	7.0	1.0	0.88
18SKGC106	6655890	303965	419	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC107	6655900	303965	419	0	-90	15.0	8.0	9.0	1.0	5.00
18SKGC108	6655918	303965	419	0	-90	15.0	2.0	5.0	3.0	1.23
18SKGC109	6655922	303965	419	0	-60	15.0	NSI
18SKGC111	6655875	303975	419	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC112	6655900	303975	419	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC113	6655920	303975	419	0	-90	15.0	3.0	6.0	3.0	0.96
18SKGC114	6655930	303975	419	0	-60	15.0	7.0	9.0	2.0	0.80
18SKGC115	6655870	303990	419	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC116	6655880	303985	419	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC117	6655900	303985	419	0	-90	15.0	7.0	8.0	1.0	0.78
							9.0	10.0	1.0	0.88
18SKGC118	6655920	303985	419	0	-90	15.0	4.0	7.0	3.0	2.33
18SKGC119	6655934	303985	419	0	-60	19.0	5.0	9.0	4.0	1.17
18SKGC121	6655880	303995	419	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC122	6655900	303995	419	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC123	6655920	303995	419	0	-90	19.0	6.0	7.0	1.0	1.00
18SKGC124	6655937	303995	419	0	-60	18.0	4.0	12.0	8.0	0.85
18SKGC126	6655880	304005	420	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC127	6655890	304005	420	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC128	6655900	304005	419	0	-90	10.0	NSI
18SKGC129	6655920	304005	419	0	-90	15.0	4.0	7.0	3.0	1.37
18SKGC130	6655930	304005	419	0	-90	20.0	3.0	7.0	4.0	1.25
18SKGC131	6655940	304005	419	0	-60	18.0	4.0	10.0	6.0	1.70
18SKGC133	6655880	304015	420	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC135	6655920	304015	420	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC136	6655920	304015	419	0	-90	15.0	NSI
18SKGC137	6655930	304015	419	0	-90	15.0	5.0	6.0	1.0	1.31
18SKGC138	6655944	304015	419	0	-90	15.0	4.0	15.0	11.0	1.90
18SKGC139	6655900	304025	420	0	-90	12.0	NSI
18SKGC140	6655910	304025	419	0	-90	10.0	NSI
18SKGC141	6655920	304025	420	0	-90	10.0	6.0	7.0	1.0	1.05
18SKGC142	6655930	304025	420	0	-90	15.0	4.0	6.0	2.0	1.58
							13.0	14.0	1.0	0.85
18SKGC143	6655940	304025	420	0	-90	15.0	4.0	9.0	5.0	1.00
18SKGC144	6655953	304025	420	0	-60	15.0	NSI
18SKGC145	6655932	304035	420	0	-90	15.0	5.0	6.0	1.0	0.74
18SKGC146	6655934	304035	420	0	-90	15.0	4.0	5.0	1.0	1.37
							9.0	13.0	4.0	1.32
18SKGC147	6655963	304035	420	330	-60	15.0	NSI
18SKGC148	6655940	304045	420	0	-90	15.0	NSI

Hole	MGA Northing	MGA Easting	MGA RL	MGA Azimuth	Dip	Max Depth	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)

18SKGC149	6655950	304045	420	0	-90	15.0	12.0	15.0	3.0	3.79
18SKGC150	6655972	304045	420	0	-60	15.0		NSI
18SKGC151	6655950	304055	421	0	-90	15.0	13.0	15.0	2.0	4.03
18SKGC152	6655960	304055	421	0	-90	15.0		NSI
18SKGC153	6655975	304065	421	0	-90	16.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.81
18SKGC154	6655988	304075	422	0	-90	36.0		NSI
18SKGC155	6655997	304085	422	0	-90	16.0		NSI
18SKGC156	6656003	304085	422	0	-60	15.0		NSI
18SKGC157	6656008	304095	422	0	-90	16.0		NSI
18SKGC158	6656014	304095	422	0	-60	15.0	6.0	7.0	1.0	5.00

Note: 50g Fire assay with AAS finish, 2m maximum internal waste unless otherwise specified, coordinates in MGA94 zone 51.

Appendix 3: Historic Significant Intercepts, Low Grade Stockpile Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.6 g/t Au lower cut

Hole	MGA Northing	MGA Easting	MGA RL	MGA Azimuth	Dip	Max Depth	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)	Company

SC890	6656107	303587	424	0	-90	22.0		NSI			WMC
SC891	6656157	303536	430	0	-90	28.0	2.0	3.0	1.0	0.71	WMC
							6.0	8.0	2.0	0.72
							11.0	13.0	2.0	0.90
SC892	6656007	303538	430	0	-90	20.0		NSI			WMC
SC893	6656057	303486	429	0	-90	20.0		NSI			WMC
SC894	6656107	303437	427	0	-90	20.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	0.97	WMC
SC895	6656207	303537	436	0	-90	26.0	3.0	5.0	2.0	1.18	WMC
							9.0	21.0	12.0	0.73
SC896	6656218	303566	437	0	-90	26.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	1.67	WMC
							6.0	7.0	1.0	1.51
							10.0	11.0	1.0	0.72
							12.0	13.0	1.0	0.64
							15.0	16.0	1.0	0.83
							20.0	25.0	5.0	1.30
SC897	6656243	303587	439	0	-90	28.0	3.0	13.0	10.0	1.54	WMC
							19.0	21.0	2.0	0.79
							24.0	25.0	1.0	0.66
SC898	6656227	303612	441	0	-90	29.0	2.0	6.0	4.0	0.64	WMC
							9.0	10.0	1.0	0.65
							12.0	13.0	1.0	1.18
							23.0	27.0	4.0	0.91
SC899	6656242	303635	443	0	-90	31.0	6.0	10.0	4.0	0.97	WMC
							26.0	27.0	1.0	0.60
SC900	6656227	303656	445	0	-90	33.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	1.09	WMC
							9.0	10.0	1.0	0.87
							23.0	24.0	1.0	0.64
SC901	6656207	303637	444	0	-90	32.0	5.0	7.0	2.0	0.84	WMC
							11.0	12.0	1.0	5.00
							21.0	24.0	3.0	1.26
							30.0	31.0	1.0	1.07
SC902	6656197	303587	442	0	-90	27.0	6.0	8.0	2.0	1.15	WMC
							15.0	16.0	1.0	1.29
SC903	6656174	303611	443	0	-90	26.0	23.0	25.0	2.0	0.73	WMC
SC904	6656157	303636	440	0	-90	25.0	8.0	12.0	4.0	1.52	WMC
							18.0	19.0	1.0	0.93
SC905	6656247	303686	435	0	-90	23.0	19.0	21.0	2.0	0.62	WMC
SC906	6656208	303687	436	0	-90	22.0	0.0	10.0	10.0	1.26	WMC
SC907	6656180	303674	436	0	-90	23.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	1.17	WMC
							5.0	6.0	1.0	0.89
							11.0	16.0	5.0	1.03
SC908	6656157	303686	436	0	-90	22.0	6.0	13.0	7.0	1.25	WMC
							17.0	18.0	1.0	1.09
SC909	6656127	303662	436	0	-90	22.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.96	WMC
							8.0	9.0	1.0	0.78

Hole	MGA Northing	MGA Easting	MGA RL	MGA Azimuth	Dip	Max Depth	From	To	Interval (m)	Grade (g/t)	Company

							17.0	21.0	4.0	1.29
SC910	6656130	303638	436	0	-90	23.0	8.0	10.0	2.0	3.33	WMC
							15.0	19.0	4.0	0.75
SC911	6656171	303592	443	0	-90	30.0	2.0	3.0	1.0	2.93	WMC
							12.0	14.0	2.0	1.24
							24.0	25.0	1.0	0.60
SC912	6656137	303577	432	0	-90	21.0	8.0	15.0	7.0	1.03	WMC
SC913	6656098	303636	425	0	-90	21.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	0.65	WMC
							6.0	8.0	2.0	1.52
SC914	6656247	303736	427	0	-90	12.0	0.0	1.0	1.0	2.10	WMC
SC915	6656229	303718	426	0	-90	12.0	2.0	3.0	1.0	2.70	WMC
SC916	6656227	303752	426	0	-90	12.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	1.73	WMC
SC917	6656207	303737	426	0	-90	12.0	4.0	5.0	1.0	0.79	WMC
SC918	6656182	303762	426	0	-90	11.0	4.0	6.0	2.0	1.34	WMC
SC919	6656183	303721	426	0	-90	12.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	0.79	WMC
SC920	6656158	303737	425	0	-90	11.0	3.0	4.0	1.0	1.41	WMC
							7.0	9.0	2.0	0.81
SC921	6656132	303707	425	0	-90	10.0	5.0	9.0	4.0	0.89	WMC

Note: aqua regia leach, with AAS finish, 2m maximum internal waste unless otherwise specified, coordinates in MGA94 zone 51.

JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION – TABLE 1 EXPLORATION RESULTS

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Information for historical (pre Eastern Goldfields Limited - from 1996 and 2001) drilling and sampling has been extensively viewed and validated where possible. Information pertaining to historical QAQC procedures and data is incomplete but of a sufficient quality and detail to allow drilling and assay data to be used for resource estimations. Further, Eastern Goldfields Limited has undertaken extensive infill and confirmation drilling which confirm historical drill results. Sections 1 and 2 describe the work undertaken by Eastern Goldfields Limited and only refer to historical information where appropriate and/or available.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
*Sampling*	•	Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,	•	Goldfields Group; Auger holes were drilled to a maximum depth of 1.5m. RC samples were routinely collected at 1m intervals. Diamond drill
*techniques*		random chips, or specific specialised industry		core samples were taken at geological boundaries and sawn in half. Samples pulverised at laboratory.
		standard measurement tools appropriate to the	•	Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 2m and 4m composites via a scoop method at 1m intervals. RC samples
		minerals under investigation, such as down hole		were collected at 1m, 2m to 5m intervals. 1m samples were riffle split.
		gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).	•	WMC; in early drilling by WMC, samples were “panned’ for visible gold. Percussion samples were collected at 1m intervals, split in the field.
		These examples should not be taken as limiting the		Diamond core samples were cut in half or quartered.
		broad meaning of sampling.	•	Gilt Edged Mining NL; All RAB and RC holes were collected through a cyclone and sampled at 1m intervals, pipe or spear sampled,
	•	Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample		composited over 5m intervals. The composite samples weighing about 3kg were despatched for analysis. 5m composites with assays greater
		representivity and the appropriate calibration of any		than 0.2 g/t Au were resampled by riffle-splitting the whole of each 1m sample down to about 3kg prior to being despatched for analysis.
		measurement tools or systems used.	•	Siberia Mining Corporation Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 1m intervals from the drill hole collar using a plastic bucket and laid on the
	•	Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that		ground. A scoop sample was taken from each sample to form a 5m composite. RC samples were collected at 1m intervals, and passed
		are Material to the Public Report.		through a cyclone and split using a two tiered, 75:25 riffle splitter. The split sample (approximately 2-3kg) was stored in a drawn calico bag,
	•	In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been		which was then placed next to the split sample reject (approximately 10-15kg), which was contained in UV resistant PVC bags. A
		done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse		representative scoop sample was then taken from each split sample reject bags to form a 4m composite sample. Diamond half core sampled
		circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples		at 1m intervals.
		from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g	•	Maitland Mining NL: RC samples were collected at 2m intervals and split into about 2kgs on-site. Aqua regia assays were completed by
		charge for fire assay’). In other cases more		Comlabs, Kalgoorlie.
		explanation may be required, such as where there is	•	Newcrest Mining Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 4m intervals and RC samples were collected in 2m intervals and speared to produce 6m
		coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.		composites.
		Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg	•	Julia Mines NL; RC samples were collected at 1m intervals in a large plastic bag from a cyclone, split numerous times until a 2kg portion was
		submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of		obtained. Samples were bagged and taken to RDL and later KAL assay in Kalgoorlie for assay. NQ diamond drill core was split at Kalgoorlie.
		detailed information.	•	Placer Dome Asia Pacific Ltd; Auger samples were taken a maximum depth of 1.5m. RAB 4m composite spear samples were collected. RC
				samples were collected at 1m and passed through a riffle splitter. Samples pulverised at laboratory. 50g charge taken for fire assay or aqua
				regia assay.
			•	Goongarrie Gold Pty Ltd; RC samples were collected at 1m intervals, sample and assay method unknown.
			•	Australian Consolidated Equities Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 2m intervals, sample and assay method unknown.
			•	Centaur Mining and Exploration Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 4m intervals, RC sampled at 1m intervals. Samples weighed between 1kg
				and 2kg. Sample oven dried, pulverised, to nominal -75 microns, 400-500g split. 40g charge taken for aqua regia assay, selected repeats by
				fire assay. RC samples were collected from 1m to 2m intervals.
			•	Eastern Goldfields Ltd (EGS); RC samples were routinely collected at 1m intervals and cone split. Half sawn core samples crushed, pulverised
				and 40g or 50g sample taken for fire assay at Analabs, Kalgoorlie. More recently (this announcement) samples were riffle split from the
				cyclone, and submitted to SGS Kalgoorlie for fire assay utilising a 50gm charge.
			•	Britannia Gold NL; Samples from RAB holes which were drilled to blade refusal or base of transported cover whichever was encountered first.
				RC samples from each metre were laid out in piles in rows of ten. Samples were taken to form 2m composites with a PVC sample spike.
				Within the shear zone, 1m samples were taken using a sample splitter.
			•	GlengarryResources NL;Aircore samples were collected at 1m intervals were collected at 1m,2m,3m and 4m intervals.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
			•	Sundowner Minerals NL; Percussion samples were collected over 1m intervals and split down by riffle splitter to approximately 1kg on site.
				They were then composited into 2m intervals.
			•	Gutnick Resources NL; RC samples were collected at 2m intervals.
*Drilling*	•	Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole	•	Goldfields Group; Auger holes were using an auger rig on the back of a Toyota Landcruiser from Snap Drilling. RC holes were drilled by
*techniques*		hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc)		Western Diamond Drillers using a Schramm Rig. Diamond holes were drilled by Mundy Drilling services using a KL1200 rig. Diamond holes
		and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube,		were oriented.
		depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other	•	Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd; RC holes were drilled by Kennedy Drilling using a 4 inch blade.
		type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what	•	WMC; RC percussion holes were drilled using a Schram Rig. RC holes were drilled using blades and hammer. The RC drilling diameter is
		method, etc).		unknown. Diamond drill holes for NQ core were drilled and reduced to BQ core at depth if necessary. Some diamond holes commenced with
				a percussion pre-collar. Diamond core generally not oriented.
			•	Gilt Edged Mining NL; RC holes were drilled by either Sing Drilling or McKay Drilling. Both Kalgoorlie companies used a booster and auxiliary
				compressor. The RC drilling diameter is unknown.
			•	Siberia Mining Corporation Ltd; RAB holes were drilled by ProDrill Pty Ltd of Kalgoorlie using an open hole RAB drill rig. All holes were drilled
				dry. RC holes were drilled by Premium Drilling Pty Ltd of Kalgoorlie using a 350/750 Schram RC drill rig and a 5.25” face sampling hammer. An
				auxiliary booster was used on holes deeper than 75m.
			•	Maitland Mining NL: RC were drilled using Schram T64 Drill rig. Diameter unknown
			•	Newcrest Mining Ltd; RC hole were drilled by Westralian Diamond Drillers of Kalgoorlie using a Schram 450 drill rig. Diameter unknown.
			•	Julia Mines NL; RC holes were drilled by Davies Drilling using a Schramn 64 with percussion hammer and button bits. Diamond holes for NQ
				core (with 47.6mm diameter) were drilled by Glindemann and Kitching. There is no information about core being oriented.
			•	Placer Dome Asia Pacific Ltd; Auger holes were drilled by SNAP Geochemistry. RAB holes were drilled by Challenge Drilling. RC holes were
				drilled by Drill Torque.
			•	Goongarrie Gold Pty Ltd; RC drilling, details unknown
			•	Australian Consolidated Equities Ltd; RAB drilling, details unknown
			•	Centaur Mining and Exploration Ltd; RC and RAB drilling, details unknown
			•	EGS; RC drilling using 5.25 inch and 4.5 inch diameter bits. PQ, HQ and NQ diamond core. PQ/HQ normally drilled from surface until fresh
				rock encountered, then changed to NQ
			•	Britannia Gold NL; RAB holes were drilled using a Toyota-mounted Wallis Mantis 30 Rotary air blast rig. Drilling to blade refusal or base of
				transported cover whichever was encountered first. RC holes were drilled using a Universal Drilling Rig (UDR 650) with an Atlas Copco
				compressor with a capacity of 350psi delivering 950 cfm. Drill diameter unknown
			•	Glengarry Resources NL; Aircore holes were drilled by Westralian Diamond Driller using a Mantic 75 air core rig mounted on a Toyota
				Landcruiser trayback vehicle. Drill diameter unknown
			•	Sundowner Minerals NL; Percussion holes were drilled by Gerick Drilling Kalgoorlie using a Warman Investigator with a 4 1/2 inch percussion
				hammer bit.
			•	Gutnick Resources NL; RC drilling was completed by Anaconda. Drill diameter unknown
*Drill sample*	•	Method of recording and assessing core and chip	•	Quantitative auger, RAB and RC drill recoveries were not recoded by Goldfields Group, Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd, WMC, Gilt Edged
*recovery*		sample recoveries and results assessed.		Mining NL, Siberia Mining Corporation, Maitland Mining NL, Newcrest Mining Ltd, Julia Mines NL, Placer Dome Asia Pacific Ltd, Goongarrie
	•	Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and		Gold Pty Ltd, Australian Consolidated Equities Ltd, Centaur Mining and Exploration Ltd, EGS, Britannia Gold NL, Glengarry Resources NL,
		ensure representative nature of the samples.		Sundowner Minerals NL and Gutnick Resources NL.
	•	Whether a relationship exists between sample	•	EGS - Diamond drill recoveries are recorded as a percentage calculated from measured core against downhole drilled intervals (core blocks).
		recovery and grade and whether sample bias may		RC sample recoveries generally not recorded.
		have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of	•	Diamond Core recoveries are very high due to the competent ground. Any core recovery issues are noted on core blocks and logged.
		fine/coarse material.	•	There is no known relationship between sample recovery and grade.
*Logging*	•	Whether core and chip samples have been	•	Goldfields Group; Qualitative: colour, oxidation, hardness, shearing, texture, grain size, rock, alteration, minerals and Quantitative: alteration
		geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of		intensity, mineralisation intensity, structure intensity, vein percent.
		detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource	•	Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd; Qualitative: colour, oxidation, hardness, shearing, texture, grain size, rock, alteration, minerals.
		estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.		Quantitative: alteration intensity,mineralisation intensity,structure intensity,veinpercent.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
	•	Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in	•	WMC; RC and diamond logging describes the dominant and minor rock types, mineralisation, oxidation, alteration, texture, vein type and
		nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.		basic structure. Quantitative values assigned to amounts of sulphides, alteration and veining.
	•	The total length and percentage of the relevant	•	Gilt Edged Mining NL; Qualitative: rock code, alteration, sulphides, weathering.
		intersections logged.	•	Siberia Mining Corporation Ltd; Qualitative: alteration, colour, lithology, oxidation, mineralogy, vein style, vein assemblage, remarks.
				Quantitative: mineralisation intensity.
			•	Maitland Mining NL: 5 samples were petrographically described by Mintek Services. Qualitative: sample colour, sample description and
				mineralisation. Quantitative; percentage of quartz.
			•	Newcrest Mining Ltd; Qualitative: rock type, colour, texture, typifying minerals and comments. Quantitative; grain size.
			•	Julia Mines NL; Qualitative: rock type and alteration. Quantitative; percentage of pyrite.
			•	Placer Dome Asia Pacific Ltd; Same as Goldfields Group.
			•	Goongarrie Gold Pty Ltd; Qualitative: description.
			•	Australian Consolidated Equities Ltd; Qualitative: rock type and description. Quantitative: sulphides
			•	Centaur Mining and Exploration Ltd; Qualitative: Lithology.
			•	EGS; Qualitative: alteration, colour, grain size, lithology, oxidation, mineralogy, structure, texture, vein style, vein assemblage, remarks.
				Quantitative: mineralisation intensity, vein percent.
			•	Britannia Gold NL; For RC samples: Qualitative: geological description, lithology. Quantitative: percent quartz, percent pyrite, percent
				pyrrhotite, percent veins.
			•	Glengarry Resources NL; Qualitative: description.
			•	Sundowner Minerals NL; Qualitative: description. Logging 1m intervals using Nikon microscope or handlens.
			•	Gutnick Resources NL; Qualitative: colour, comment and descriptions.
			•	For all Company’s, entire holes were geologically logged.
			•	All holes were geologically logged entirely to a level of detail to support mineral resource estimation.
			•	It is unknown whether core was routinely photographed by earlier operators.
*Sub-* *sampling* *techniques* *and sample* *preparation*	• • • • • •	If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	• • • •	Goldfields Group; RC samples were routinely collected at 1m intervals and riffle split. Diamond drill core samples were taken at geological boundaries and sawn in half. RC and diamond samples were dried, crushed, split, pulverised and a 50 gm charge taken. All sampling of resource drilling incorporated a system of standards and blanks to keep strict control on assay reliability. Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 1m intervals and 2m and 4m composites taken via a scoop method. RC samples were collected at 1m, 2m and 5m intervals. 1m samples were riffle split. Samples were prepared with a single stage mix and grind from which an assay charge was taken Composite samples with assays greater than 0.2 g/t Au were split at 1m intervals and re-analysed. Field duplicate samples were taken and analysed every 20 samples. Blanks and standards were routinely submitted with assay batches to evaluate sample preparation and assay accuracy. WMC; In early drilling by WMC, samples were “panned’ for visible gold. Percussion samples were collected at 1m intervals, split in the field. Diamond core samples were cut in half or quartered. Samples were dried in fan forced ovens at 80oC for paper packets and 140oC for samples in calico bags, sieved using a nylon mesh .Oversize samples crushed in Jacques jaw crusher to produce -6mm sample, split employing either a rotary or riffle splitter and pulverised using Tema Swing mills prior to analysis, except for soil and stream sediment samples finer than 80 mesh. A 25grm charge was taken for assaying. Gilt Edged Mining NL; All RAB and RC holes were collected through a cyclone and sampled at 1m intervals, pipe or spear sampled, composited over 5m intervals. The composite samples weighing about 3kg were despatched for analysis. 5m composites with assays greater
				than 0.2 g/t Au were resampled by riffle-splitting the whole of each 1m sample down to about 3kg prior to being despatched for analysis.
				Samples were despatched to MinLab in Kalgoorlie where they were dried, pulverised to a nominal 90% minus 200 mesh (75 microns) and a
				25 gm aliquot taken to be analysed for gold. Comprehensive QA/QC and check sampling reports were produced. Umpire assay checks were
				completed using a second laboratory (genalysis).
			•	Siberia Mining Corporation Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 1m intervals from the drill hole using a plastic bucket and laid on the ground.
				A scoop sample was taken from each sample to form a 5m composite. RC samples were collected at 1m intervals, and passed through a
				cyclone and split using a two teared, 75:25 riffle splitter. The split sample (approximately 2-3kg) was stored in a drawn calico bag, which was
				then placed next to the split sample reject (approximately 10-15kg), which was contained in UV resistant PVC bags. A representative scoop
				sample was then taken from each split sample reject bags to form a 4m composite sample. Diamond half core was sampled at 1m intervals.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
				Samples were dried, crushed, split, pulverised until 80% passed minus 75 microns and a 50 gm charge taken. Field duplicates were
				submitted. Composites with assays greater than 0.2 g/t Au were re-assayed using individual 1m re-split samples.
			•	Maitland Mining NL: RC samples were collected at 2m intervals and split into about 2kgs on-site.
			•	Newcrest Mining Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 4m intervals and RC samples were collected in 2m intervals and speared to produce 6m
				composites. RC samples returning assays greater than 0.2 g/t Au were resampled at 2m intervals and assayed.
			•	Julia Mines NL; RC samples were collected at 1m intervals in a large plastic bag from a cyclone, split numerous times until a 2kg portion was
				obtained. NQ diamond drill core was split at Kalgoorlie. Samples were loaded into a hammer mill, crushed to 1.5mm, passed through a
				rotary splitter to extract 200gms which was pulverised by a ring grinder to 200 mesh. A 50gm charge was extracted for assaying.
			•	Placer Dome Asia Pacific Ltd; Auger samples were taken a maximum depth of 1.5m. RAB 4m composites collected using a spear. RC samples
				were collected at 1m and passed through a riffle splitter. Anomalous RAB composites were resplit into 1m intervals and re-analysed using
				the same assay method.
			•	Goongarrie Gold Pty Ltd; RC samples were collected at 1m intervals, details unknown
			•	Australian Consolidated Equities Ltd; RAB samples method unknown.
			•	Centaur Mining and Exploration Ltd; RAB samples were collected at 4m intervals. RC samples were collected from 1m to 2m intervals.
				Samples weighted between 1kg and 2kg. Samples were oven dried, pulverised to nominal -75 microns and split to 400 to 500 gm and a 40
				gm charge taken for assaying.
			•	EGS; RC samples were routinely collected at 1m intervals from a cone or riffle splitter and submitted for analysis. Drill samples were crushed,
				pulverised and usually a 50gm charge taken for analysis by fire assay. Field duplicates, blanks and standards were submitted for QAQC
				analysis.
			•	Britannia Gold NL; Samples from RAB holes which were drilled to blade refusal or base of transported cover whichever was encountered first.
				RC samples from each metre were laid out in piles in rows of ten. Samples were taken to form 2m composites with a PVC sample spike.
				Within the shear zone, 1m samples were taken using a sample splitter.
			•	Glengarry Resources NL; Aircore samples were collected at 1m intervals and sampled at 1m, 4m composite samples sent for assay. Sample
				methods unknown.
			•	Sundowner Minerals NL; ; Percussion samples were collected over 1m intervals and split down by riffle splitter to approximately 1kg on site.
				They were then composited into 2m intervals, method unknown.
			•	Gutnick Resources NL; RC samples were collected at 2m intervals, method unknown.
			•	Unless specified above, samples were dried, crushed, split, pulverised and a charge taken for assaying.
			•	Repeat assays were undertaken on pulp samples at the discretion of the laboratory.
*Quality of*	•	The nature, quality and appropriateness of the	•	Goldfields Group; Auger samples were set to Analabs (Welshpool) to be assayed for gold to 1ppb by graphite furnace P605 and arsenic to
*assay data*		assaying and laboratory procedures used and		1ppm by aqua regia hydride H605. RC samples were submitted to Australian Laboratory Services (ALS) in Kalgoorlie for gold and arsenic
*and*		whether the technique is considered partial or total.		analysis. Fire assay methods were used for gold analysis with 50gm charge, detection limit of 0.01ppm Au, while Aqua Regia methods, with
*laboratory* *tests*	•	For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining		detection limits of 5ppm As, were used for arsenic analysis. Diamond drill core samples were despatched to Genalysis in Kalgoorlie and analysed for gold using 50gm fire assay to 0.01ppm. A system of standards and blanks were incorporated in all sample despatches to keep a
		the analysis including instrument make and model,		strict control on assay reliability. QA/QC re-assaying of mineralised RC intersections and interpreted structures was undertaken later in the
		reading times, calibrations factors applied and their		reporting period.
		derivation, etc.
	•	Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg	•	Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd; Samples submitted to ALS for 50g Fire Assay with AAS finish. Samples were also analysed at Ultratrace
		standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory		for gold, palladium and platinum.Submitted field duplicates, blanks and standards for QAQC analysis.
		checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie	•	WMC; All samples were sent to WMC Exploration Division Kalgoorlie Laboratory to be analysed for gold using wet method, aqua regia leach,
		lack of bias) and precision have been established.		reading by A.A.S; a 25gm sample was digested with aqua regia, the gold extracted using aliquot DIBK and the solvent backwashed. The gold
				concentration was determined by Atomic Absorption.
			•	Gilt Edged Mining NL; All samples were submitted to Minlab of Kalgoorlie to be assayed for gold; 5m composites were analysed by aqua
				regia/AAS with a detection limit of 0.01ppm and 1m samples assayed by Fire/AAS with a detection limit of 0.01ppm. Certified reference
				material standards was employed. Duplicate samples, analytical standards, and check analyses at a second laboratory were used to monitor
				analytical quality.
			•	Siberia MiningCorporation Ltd;All samples were submitted to SGS Analabs in Kalgoorlie to be assayed forgold using50grm Fire Assaywith

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
				detection limit at 0.01ppm Au and for sulphur. Samples were also analysed at Ultratrace. Standards and repeats (1 in 20) were used during
				the first phase drilling campaign to provide a reference to the internal lab standards. There was a strong correlation between standard
				(client) and laboratory results. Repeats of composite samples showed no problems with technique or dependability with the laboratory.
			•	Maitland Mining NL: Samples were sent to Comlabs in Kalgoorlie to be assayed for analysed for gold, lead, tungsten and silver.
			•	Newcrest Mining Ltd; RAB samples were sent to Australian Laboratory Services Perth and analysed for low level analysis by dissolution in
				aqua regia followed by fire assay. RC samples were despatched to Australian Assay Laboratories in Boulder to be assayed for gold by fire.
			•	Julia Mines NL; Samples were sent to SGS Kalgoorlie Laboratory to be assayed for gold using 50 gm Fire Assay. 95% of all assays results
				greater than 1 g/t Au were check from 1 to 4 times by taking a split from the original sample residue.
			•	Placer Dome Asia Pacific Ltd; Auger samples were submitted to ALS to be assayed for gold and arsenic. Gold assays were performed using
				aqua-regia digest and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy to 0.001ppm. Inductively coupled mass (emission) spectrometry was
				used to analyse for arsenic to 1ppm. RAB samples were submitted to Analab to be analysed for gold assay using aqua-regia digestion and a
				flame atomic absorption spectroscopy finish to a 1 ppb detection limit. RC samples were submitted to Analab to be assayed for gold by fire
				and flame AAS finish to 0.01ppm. Arsenic was also analysed using triple acid digest and flame AAS to a 50ppm detection limit.
			•	Goongarrie Gold Pty Ltd; Samples were assayed for gold, unknown method.
			•	Australian Consolidated Equities Ltd; Samples were analysed for gold using a detection limit of 0.01 g/t Au. The assaying and laboratory
				procedures are unknown. About 1 assay in 20 was repeated.
			•	Centaur Mining and Exploration Ltd; RAB samples were sent to Minlabs to be analysed for gold via aqua regia digest with a detection limit of
				0.01ppm. Samples were also assayed for nickel, cobalt, copper, magnesium and zinc. RC samples were despatched to Analabs in Kalgoorlie
				to be assayed for gold using aqua regia digest with a detection limit of 0.01ppm. Samples were also analysed for aluminium, cobalt, iron,
				magnesium and nickel. Selected repeat assays were by fire assay.
			•	EGS; Samples were sent to Kalgoorlie Assay Laboratories to be analysed for gold by 40gm fire assay, or to Genalysis for fire assay utilising a
				50gm charge. More recently (this announcement) samples were analysed by SGS Kalgoorlie via fire assay utilising a 50gm charge.
			•	Certified reference material standards were employed for a gold range of 0.32 to 48.55ppm. Blanks were also employed. Satisfactory results
				were obtained for both.
			•	Britannia Gold NL; Samples were submitted to Ultratrace in Perth to be analysed for gold sing aqua regia digest and AAS finish to ppb level.
				Samples were also assayed for copper, nickel, cobalt, chromium and manganese. RC samples were sent to Genalysis Laboratories in
				Maddington to be analysed for gold by fire assay followed by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS) with a detection limit of 0.01ppm.
				RC duplicates were taken on average 1 in 15 samples.
			•	Glengarry Resources NL; Samples were sent to Genalysis Laboratory Services to be assayed for gold, ppb detection limit, unknown method.
			•	Sundowner Minerals NL; Samples were submitted to SGD (Aust.) to be analysed for gold using AAS and arsenic using x-ray fluorescence.
				Significant results were confirmed by fire assay. Final samples were prepared after the crusher was cleaned with quartz blanks between
				every sample. Significant results were confirmed by fire assay and resampled over 1m intervals.
			•	Gutnick Resources NL; Samples were sent to Leonora Laverton Assay Lab in Kalgoorlie to be analysed for copper, cobalt, aluminium, arsenic,
				calcium, chromium, iron, magnesium, manganese, nickel and zinc using total acid digest (TAD) or OES (ICP).
			•	Fire Assayis considered a total technique. Aqua regia apartial technique.
*Verification* *of sampling* *and assaying*	• •	The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes.	• •	Selected drill intersections from WMC, Goldfields and Siberia Mining Corporation diamond core have been inspected by EGS geologists Some WMC holes have been re-logged by EGS geologists and mineralisation identified at the reported intervals. Drill intersections from WMC and Goldfields diamond core were inspected by Siberia Mining Corporation geologists in 2005 and
	•	Documentation of primary data, data entry		mineralization was visible in core at the expected intervals. Mineralisation widths and styles are very comparable with NQ2 drilling by SMC in
		procedures, data verification, data storage (physical		2004
		and electronic) protocols.	•	Holes are not deliberately twinned.
	•	Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	•	WMC; Hand written geology logs and assays were digitally captured.
			•	EGS; Data has been verified by reviewing original drill and assay logs. Print outs of computerized sample intervals and assays generated by
				WMC were used to verify the intercepts reported. Geological and sample data logged directly into field computer at the core yard. Data is
				transferred to Perth via email and imported into GBIS SQL database by the database administrator (DBA). Assay files are received in .csv
				format and loaded directly into the database by the DBA. Hardcopy and/or digital copies of data are kept for reference if necessary.
			•	Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd; Geological and sample data was logged digitally and .csv or .xls files imported into Datashed SQL
				database with in-built validation.

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
			•	Data entry, verification and storage protocols for remaining operators is unknown.
			•	No adjustments have been made to assaydata.
*Location of*	•	Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill	•	Goldfields Group; Collar co-ordinates for RC and DD holes, including elevation were surveyed with DGPS. RAB holes were located with GPS.
*data points*		holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine		Downhole surveys were taken every 10m for RC and DD holes, method unknown. RAB holes not downhole surveyed. The gird system used is
		workings and other locations used in Mineral		AGD 1984 AMG Zone 51.
		Resource estimation.	•	Monarch Gold Mining Company Ltd; Drill hole collars were surveyed by Spectrum Surveys of Kalgoorlie using RTK GPS. Downhole surveys
	•	Specification of the grid system used.		were undertaken by electronic multiple shot (ems) or Eastman single shot. The gird system used is GDA1994 MGA Zone 51.
	•	Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	•	WMC; Drill hole collars were surveyed by Electronic Distance Meter (EDM) theodolite by the Kalgoorlie Gold Operations’ mine surveyor.Holes
				also surveyed using theodolite by McGay Surveys as well as by WMC mine surveyors. WMC RC holes were generally not downhole surveyed.
				Diamond holes down hole surveyed by Eastman single shot camera or multishot approximately every 30m. The gird system used is AGD
				1984 AMG Zone 51.
			•	Gilt Edged Mining NL; Contract surveyors were engaged for siting of drill holes prior to drilling, pick-up of accurate drill hole co-ordinates
				after drilling and down-hole plunge and azimuth readings. All holes drilled after 1998 were picked up by Fugro Survey Pty Ltd of Kalgoorlie
				using differential GPS. The gird system used is AGD 1984 AMG Zone 51.
			•	Siberia Mining Corporation Ltd; Collar co-ordinates for northings, eastings and elevation were recorded by Fugro Spatial Solutions Pty Ltd.
				The gird system used is AGD 1984 AMG Zone 51. Diamond holes were down hole surveyed by gyro. RC holes generally not downhole
				surveyed. If surveyed then done by digital electronic multishot (DEMS)
			•	Maitland Mining NL: Collar co-ordinates recorded on local grids and converted to MGA94 zone 51. Survey collection methods are unknown.
				Holes not downhole surveyed.
			•	Newcrest Mining Ltd; Collar co-ordinates recorded on local grids and converted to MGA94 zone 51. Survey collection methods are unknown.
				Holes not downhole surveyed.
			•	Julia Mines NL; RC holes drilled on local grid and surveyed by unknown method. RC holes not downhole surveyed.
			•	Placer Dome Asia Pacific Ltd; Collar co-ordinates for RC and DD holes, including elevation were surveyed with DGPS. RAB holes were located
				with GPS. Downhole surveys were taken every 10m for RC and DD holes, method unknown. RAB holes not downhole surveyed. The gird
				system used is AGD 1984 AMG Zone 51.
			•	Goongarrie Gold Pty Ltd; RC holes drills and surveyed on local grid. No downhole surveys. Survey collection methods are unknown.
			•	Australian Consolidated Equities Ltd; RC holes drills on local grid, unknown whether coordinates were surveyed. No downhole surveys.
			•	Centaur Mining and Exploration Ltd; Collars drilled on AGD 1984 AMG Zone 51 grid. Unclear whether surveyed on not. No downhole surveys.
			•	EGS; Collar locations were surveyed by DGPS and downhole surveys were collected using electronic multishot where appropriate. The gird
				system used is GDA1994 MGA Zone 51.
			•	Britannia Gold NL; RC holes drilled on local grid, unknown whether surveyed. RC holes not downhole surveyed.
			•	Glengarry Resources NL; Holes drilled on AGD 1984 AMG Zone 51 grid. Unknown whether surveyed. No downhole surveys.
			•	Sundowner Minerals NL; Holes drilled on AGD 1984 AMG Zone 51 grid and local grid. Unknown whether surveyed.
			•	Gutnick Resources NL; RC collar co-ordinates surveyed on AMG grid, method unknown. No downhole surveys (Holes vertical).
			•	Topography has been surveyed by recent operators in the vicinity of operating mines. Collar elevations are consistent with surrounding holes
				and the natural surface elevation.
*Data spacing*	•	Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.	•	Data spacing varies from wide spaced regional drilling to close spaced resource drilling depending on the development stage of the deposit
*and*	•	Whether the data spacing and distribution is	•	For deposits with resources and previously mined deposits the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish geological and grade
*distribution*		sufficient to establish the degree of geological and		continuity.
		grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
		Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)
		and classifications applied.
	•	Whether sample compositing has been applied.	•	Samples are not composited for this report. Samples are composited for resource calculations.
*Orientation*	•	Whether the orientation of sampling achieves	•	Missouri; Drilling predominantly to the south, optimal for the east-west striking, north dipping mineralisation.
*of data in*		unbiased sampling of possible structures and the	•	Sandking; Drilling predominantly to the south, targeting EW to WSW striking, steep north dipping mineralisation.
*relation to*		extent to which this is known, considering the deposit	•	Sandking Laterites & Low Grade dump; Drilling predominantly vertical.
		type.	•	Palmerston & Berwick Moering;Drilling predominantlyto the SW targetingmineralisation trending090oat the south-westernportion of the

Criteria	JORC Code explanation Commentary
*geological* *structure*	• If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. deposit and changing strike to approximately 030othrough the central portion before curving to 070oat Berwick Moering. • Theil Well; dominantly inclined drilling to the W targeting E dipping structure. • Regional drilling in all orientations, depending on the geological understanding at the time. • It is not known whether there is anyintroduced sample bias due to drill orientation.
*Sample* *security*	• The measures taken to ensure sample security. • Unknown for earlier operators. • EGS – Samples are bagged, tied and in a secure yard. Once submitted to the laboratories they are stored in cages within a secure fenced compound. Samples are tracked through the laboratoryvia their LIMS.
*Audits or* *reviews*	• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • Digital data from the SQL database has been reviewed by EGS and is consistent with hard copy and digital WAMEX data. • Goldfields Group and WMC; Siberia Mining Corporation conducted a due diligence on the data and core in 2005 and were “comfortable with the quality and integrity of the data”. Digital data has been reviewed and is consistent with hard copy data. • Monarch Gold MiningCompanyLtd;Monthly QAQC reports wereproduced to monitor accuracyandprecision.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation	Commentary
*Mineral* *tenement and* *land tenure* *status* • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.	• Siberia deposit is on Tenement M24/290 and M24/352, held by Siberia Mining Corporation Pty. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Eastern goldfields Limited. The tenement is ingood standing.
	TENEMENT	HOLDER	AGREEMENTS
	M24/0290, M24/0352,	SIBERIA MINING CORPORATION PTY LTD	M24/290 - SIBERIA GRANTED GARDNER THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR NICKEL MINERALS ON M24/290. ROB MITCHELL AND HANK SHRERS (SURFACE ALLUVIAL RIGHTS TO 2M DEPTH)
			M24/0352 - ROB MITCHELL AND HANK SHRERS(SURFACE ALLUVIAL RIGHTS TO 2M DEPTH)
	• There are no • There are no	heritage issues known impediments to operating in the area.
*Exploration* *done by other* *parties* • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.	• Drilling on the tenements was completed by numerous operators, but the majority of work was completed by WMC, Gilt Edged Mining, Siberia Mining Corporation & Monarch Gold. All work by these companies was to industry standards of the time
*Geology* • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	• Wyche & Witt (1994) described the rock units of the Siberia area in the Davyhurst 1:100,000 Sheet, and assigned the mafic rocks of the Siberia area to the Wongi and Missouri Basalt Units of the Pole Group, and the ultramafics to their east, to the Walter Williams Formation. In its most simplistic sense the geology of the mafic rocks is a sequence of high-Mg to tholeiitic basalts and flow dolerites interleaved with medium to coarse grained dolerite and gabbro dykes and sills. Ultramafic rocks outcrop poorly along a NE-SW trending, central spine dominated by in situ lateritic outcrop. The contact between the Missouri Basalt in the west and the ultramafics in the east has been the focus of extensive gold mining activity from the period 1900-1930. • Gold mineralisation at Siberia has two styles: `o` quartz-biotite-feldspar-sulphide shear lodes within the basalt and; `o` quartz-talc-sulphide schist lodes in the ultramafic contact against the ‘top’ of the mafics (i.e. a contact lode). This style of mineralisation has been the focus of extensive gold mining activity from the period 1900-1930.
*Drill hole* *Information* • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: `o` easting and northing of the drill hole collar `o` elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole	• See Significant Intercepts in Appendix 1

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
		collar
		`o` dip and azimuth of the hole
		`o` down hole length and interception depth
		`o` hole length.
	•	If the exclusion of this information is justified
		on the basis that the information is not
		Material and this exclusion does not detract
		from the understanding of the report, the
		Competent Person should clearly explain why
		this is the case.
*Data*	•	In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	•	Original assays are length weighted. Grades in this release are top cut to 5.0g/t. Lower cut off is nominally 0.7g/t. Maximum 2m internal
*aggregation*		averaging techniques, maximum and/or		dilution.
*methods*		minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high	•	No metal equivalents reported.
		grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material
		and should be stated.
	•	Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
		lengths of high grade results and longer lengths
		of low grade results, the procedure used for
		such aggregation should be stated and some
		typical examples of such aggregations should
		be shown in detail.
	•	The assumptions used for any reporting of
		metal equivalent values should be clearly
		stated.
*Relationship*	•	These relationships are particularly important	•	All intercept widths reported are down hole lengths. The geometry of mineralisation is known for major deposits (Sand King & Missouri).
*between*		in the reporting of Exploration Results.		However no attempt has been made here to report true widths.
*mineralisation* *widths and* *intercept* *lengths*	• •	If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole
		lengths are reported, there should be a clear
		statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length,
		_true width not known’). _
*Diagrams*	•	Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)	•	See plans and sections.
		and tabulations of intercepts should be
		included for any significant discovery being
		reported These should include, but not be
		limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
		locations and appropriate sectional views.
*Balanced*	•	Where comprehensive reporting of all	•	Results from historic drilling are shown on the diagrams. All intercepts from recent drilling are reported
*reporting*		Exploration Results is not practicable,
		representative reporting of both low and high
		grades and/or widths should be practiced to
		avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
		Results.
*Other*	•	Other exploration data, if meaningful and	•	Metallurgical and geotechnical work has been completed for Sand King and Missouri deposits.
*substantive*		material, should be reported including (but not	•	Additional metallurgical, geotechnical, environmental and engineering work is currently underway for the Sand King and Missouri deposits
*exploration data*		limited to): geological observations;
		geophysical survey results; geochemical survey

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

		results; bulk samples – size and method of
		treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
		density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
		characteristics; potential deleterious or
		contaminating substances.
*Further work*	•	The nature and scale of planned further work	•	As mining continues at Siberia, drilling will also continue on an episodic basis at Missouri and Sand King to better understand and define
		(eg tests for lateral extensions or depth		current resource potential.
		extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).
	•	Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
		possible extensions, including the main
		geological interpretations and future drilling
		areas, provided this information is not
		commercially sensitive.

AI assistant

ORA BANDA MINING LTD Capital/Financing Update 2018

65475_rns_2018-05-30_f3b2b550-eb47-4fcd-bdaf-74cee76e0559.pdf

SIBERIA DRILLING DEFINES LATERITE EXTENSIONS & VIABLE LOW GRADE STOCKPILE

HIGHLIGHTS

ISSUED CAPITAL

Laterite Results

About Siberia

Figure 6: Cross sections of laterite mineralisation drilling results and highlighting area of interest.

Investor Enquiries

Competent Person Statements

Forward Looking Statements

Appendix 1: EGS Significant Intercepts, Low Grade Stockpile Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.6 g/t Au lower cut

Appendix 2: EGS Significant Intercepts, Laterite Drilling Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.7 g/t Au lower cut

Appendix 3: Historic Significant Intercepts, Low Grade Stockpile Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.6 g/t Au lower cut

JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION – TABLE 1 EXPLORATION RESULTS

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

AI assistant

ORA BANDA MINING LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2018

65475_rns_2018-05-30_f3b2b550-eb47-4fcd-bdaf-74cee76e0559.pdf

SIBERIA DRILLING DEFINES LATERITE EXTENSIONS & VIABLE LOW GRADE STOCKPILE

HIGHLIGHTS

ISSUED CAPITAL

Laterite Results

About Siberia

Figure 6: Cross sections of laterite mineralisation drilling results and highlighting area of interest.

Investor Enquiries

Competent Person Statements

Forward Looking Statements

Appendix 1: EGS Significant Intercepts, Low Grade Stockpile Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.6 g/t Au lower cut

Appendix 2: EGS Significant Intercepts, Laterite Drilling Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.7 g/t Au lower cut

Appendix 3: Historic Significant Intercepts, Low Grade Stockpile Results Table 5.0 g/t top cut and 0.6 g/t Au lower cut

JORC CODE, 2012 EDITION – TABLE 1 EXPLORATION RESULTS

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

More from ORA BANDA MINING LTD

ORA BANDA MINING LTD Capital/Financing Update 2018