Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Opthea Ltd Investor Presentation 2019

Nov 20, 2019

32698_rns_2019-11-20_42b9b21f-393a-4034-acd1-46bed13c176c.pdf

Investor Presentation

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [250 x 54] intentionally omitted <==

2019

Disclaimer

Investment in Opthea Limited (‘Opthea’) is subject to investment risk, including possible loss of income and capital invested. Neither Opthea nor any other member company of the Opthea Group guarantees any particular rate of return or performance, nor do they guarantee the repayment of capital.

This presentation is not an offer or invitation for subscription or purchase of or a recommendation of securities. It does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of the investor. Before making any investment in Opthea, the investor or prospective investor should consider whether such an investment is appropriate to their particular investment needs, objectives and financial circumstances and consult an investment advisor if necessary.

This presentation may contain forward-looking statements regarding the potential of the Company’s projects and interests and the development and therapeutic potential of the company’s research and development. Any statement describing a goal, expectation, intention or belief of the company is a forward-looking statement and should be considered an at-risk statement. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, particularly those inherent in the process of discovering, developing and commercialising drugs that are safe and effective for use as human therapeutics and the financing of such activities. There is no guarantee that the Company’s research and development projects and interests (where applicable) will receive regulatory approvals or prove to be commercially successful in the future. Actual results of further research could differ from those projected or detailed in this presentation. As a result, you are cautioned not to rely on forward-looking statements. Consideration should be given to these and other risks concerning research and development programs referred to in this presentation.

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

2

Business Snapshot

Opthea Limited

  • Public company listed on ASX (ASX:OPT) developing OPT-302 for wet AMD and Diabetic Macular Edema (“DME”)

  • Market cap A$750m at 20 November 2019 and cash on hand of A$30m at 31 October 2019

OPT-302 has a novel mechanism of action

  • OPT-302 (sVEGFR-3) is the first ‘Trap’ inhibitor of VEGF-C and VEGF-D designed specifically for the eye

  • In combination with anti-VEGF-A therapies, shown to completely shut-down VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 activity

  • Targets mechanisms of resistance and sub-optimal clinical response to existing therapies

  • Current and growing market opportunity of US$10B+ worldwide

Strong and growing commercial potential

  • OPT-302 being developed for use in combination with any of the existing anti-VEGF-A agents, biosimilars or novel therapies in development for wet AMD and DME

  • A novel approach seeking to provide additional visual acuity benefit over standard of care

  • Broad development opportunity in wet AMD, DME, Retinal Vein Occlusion (“RVO”) and other retinal pathologies

Primary endpoint met in Phase 2b study of OPT-302 in wet AMD

  • OPT-302 combination therapy demonstrated superiority in visual acuity over ranibizumab (Lucentis®) at 24 weeks in an international, randomised, controlled, double-masked trial of 366 patients

  • Secondary endpoint results also supportive of primary outcome

  • Exploratory & pre-specified sub-group analyses suggest greater activity of OPT-302 in lesion-types considered more difficult to treat with anti-VEGF-A therapy and highest unmet need

  • Completed Phase 1/2a trial in 51 wet AMD patients

Ph 2A trial of OPT-302 Data anticipated in 2Q CY 2020

  • Nearing completion of patient recruitment in Phase 2a trial of OPT-302 in combination with aflibercept (Eylea®) for the treatment of persistent centre-involving DME

  • Completed Phase 1b dose-escalation trial in 9 persistent DME patients

  • Dose-responsive improvements in visual acuity, reductions in retinal fluid and swelling

Well tolerated safety profile of OPT-302

  • Well tolerated safety profile of OPT-302 administered IVT in combination with ranibizumab and aflibercept

  • Extensive global clinical dosing experience with repeated IVT administration in over 400 patients across three international clinical studies in two disease indications

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

3

Corporate & Operational Achievements

Phase 2b wet AMD

  • Reported top-line data from Phase 2b wet AMD trial several months ahead of schedule (Aug 2019)

  • Met primary endpoint in Phase 2b trial:

  • OPT-302 combination therapy demonstrated superiority in visual acuity over Lucentis®

  • Only novel mechanism of action currently in development that has demonstrated statistically significant clinical benefit in addition to standard of care therapy

  • Exploratory & pre-specified sub-group analyses:

  • Suggest greater activity of OPT-302 in lesion-types considered more difficult to treat with anti-VEGF-A therapy and highest unmet need

  • Provide direction for Phase 3 clinical development program

  • Results well-recognized by market and international ophthalmology community

  • Up 408% over past 12 months

==> picture [132 x 47] intentionally omitted <==

4

Corporate & Operational Achievements

Phase 2a DME Trial

  • Nearing completion of patient recruitment in Phase 2a trial of OPT-302 in combination with aflibercept (Eylea®) for the treatment of persistent centre-involving DME

  • Upcoming Phase 2a clinical data anticipated 2Q CY 2020

Safety

  • Continued demonstration of well tolerated safety profile in combination with Lucentis and Eylea following administration in ~400 patients (wet AMD and DME) across three international clinical studies in two disease indications

Patents

  • OPT-302 patent ‘accepted for grant’ or granted in multiple countries incl. EU & Japan

  • • Pending approval in other countries

Publication

  • Phase 1/2a wet AMD trial results with OPT-302 published in peer-reviewed journal*

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

5

* Ophthalmology Retina, Article in Press, 2019

Corporate & Operational Achievements

Corporate

  • Company fully-funded through:

  • Phase 2a DME clinical readout; and

  • Close-out activities for Phase 2b wAMD

  • Planning for Phase 3 program and regulatory engagement

  • Received A$14.6m R&D tax credit (Aust & O/S eligible expenditure)

  • Added to S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Index (Mar 2019)

  • Data presented at international conferences by management, clinical advisory board & investigators

  • OIS@American Academy Ophthalmology Conference (Oct ‘19)

  • EURetina, Retina Society

  • Continued to raise company profile with local and international investors & global pharmaceutical companies

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

6

Financial Position (Unaudited)

Key Financial Details ASX: OPT
Ticker Symbol ASX:OPT
Share Price (Nov 20 2019) ~A$3.00
Total Ordinary Shares on Issue 250,289,839
Market Capitalisation
(Nov 20 2019)
~A750.0m
(~USD510m)
Trading Range (last 12 months) A$0.55 – 4.15
52-week Change 408%
Cash Balance (Oct 31 2019) ~A$30m
Top 20 Shareholders Own 69%
Institutional Holders 84%

==> picture [436 x 255] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Share Price Performance (2017 - 2019)
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Apr Jul Oct Apr Jul Oct Apr Jul Oct
2017 2018 2019
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [454 x 92] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Analyst Coverage (Aust)
Shane Storey Tanushree Jain
Chris Cooper
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

7

Wet AMD and DME are Leading Causes of Vision Loss in the Elderl & Diabetic Po ulations Res ectivel y p p y

==> picture [228 x 144] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [188 x 153] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

VEGF-A
VEGF-C/D
----- End of picture text -----

Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Central-involved Diabetic Macular Edema
Driver: Ageing Sustained hyperglycaemia
Prevalence: • Increasing prevalence due to ageing population
• ~3M people worldwide, including ~1.8M in the US
• Increasing due to diabetes epidemic
• DME with visual impairment affects ~1-3% diabetes patients
• ~1.3M – 2M people worldwide, many undiagnosed
Primary macular site of
pathology:
• Choroid • Intra-retinal layers
Pathogenesis: • Changes in ageing eye
• Upregulation VEGF-A, -C, -D and other cytokines
• Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV)
• Sub-retinal, intra-retinal fluid accumulation
• Sustained hyperglycemia
• Upregulation VEGF-A, -C, -D and inflammatory mediators
• Inflammation
• Hyperpermeability and retinal swelling

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

8

Existing Therapies Primarily Target VEGF-A

OPT-302 inhibits VEGF-C/D

==> picture [537 x 279] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Ranibizumab
(Lucentis [®] )
VEGF-C OPT-302
Bevacizumab [#] VEGF-A VEGF-D
(Avastin [®] )
VEGF-B
Aflibercept
PlGF
(Eylea [®] )
VEGFR-1 VEGFR-2 VEGFR-3
----- End of picture text -----

OPT-302: Rationale

VEGF-C

  • Long-term therapy with selective VEGF-A inhibitors is associated with sub-optimal responses

  • Sub-optimal improvements in visual acuity

  • Persistent retinal fluid

  • Resistance to VEGF-A monotherapy may be related to other VEGF family members

  • VEGF-C/D signal for angiogenesis and vascular permeability independently of VEGF-A; and

  • VEGF-C/D are elevated when VEGF-A is inhibited

  • OPT-302 combination therapy achieves a more complete suppression of the VEGF/VEGFR pathway

  • OPT-302 targets incomplete response to VEGF-A inhibition

Used in combination with a VEGF-A inhibitor, completely blocks VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 signalling

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

9

# Bevacizumab is used ‘off-label’ for the treatment of wAMD

A Currently Unmet Medical Need for wet AMD and DME

Despite receiving a VEGF-A inhibitor (ranibizumab, aflibercept or bevacizumab)*:

Large and Growing Market Opportunity

50% Do not achieve significant vision gains wet AMD 2/3 Will continue to have fluid at the back of the eye 25% Will have further vision loss at 12 months 2/3 Do not achieve significant vision gains[#] DME 25% Continue to have macula thickening/swelling[^] Opportunity: New Products that Improve Efficacy and Durability

  • Wet AMD and DME are the leading causes of blindness in the elderly and diabetic populations respectively

  • Prevalence is increasing

  • Market opportunity is growing

  • Approved VEGF-A inhibitors (ranibizumab and aflibercept) generated revenues >US$10b in 2018

  • Approximately 50% of wet AMD and DME patients worldwide receive bevacizumab as an off-label, less-costly treatment option

Opthea’s strategy is to develop OPT-302 as a combination therapy to be administered with any of the approved a-VEGF-A therapies or new VEGF-A inhibitors in development

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

10

* Based on randomised, controlled clinical trial data; # Fail to achieve ≥ 2 lines improvement in BCVA;

^ SD-OCT CST ≥ 300 µM or Time-Domain OCT CST ≥ 250 µM

OPT-302: A ‘trap’ inhibitor of VEGF-C and VEGF-D

VEGF-C

OPT-302: A soluble form of VEGFR-3

Strategy

  • Comprises the extracellular domains 1-3 of VEGFR-3 and the Fc fragment of human IgG1

  • To develop OPT-302 for use in combination with inhibitors of VEGF-A to address the unmet medical need in wet AMD and DME

  • Potent inhibitor of VEGF-C (~5 pM) and VEGF-D (~0.5 nM)

  • To demonstrate superior gains in visual acuity in patients administered OPT-302 in combination with a VEGF-A inhibitor

  • A ‘trap’ that blocks VEGF-C and VEGF-D binding to the receptors VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3

  • Targets a validated pathway involved in wet AMD progression

  • Targets a mechanism of escape from existing therapies that is differentiated to VEGF-A therapies

==> picture [170 x 162] intentionally omitted <==

Extra-Cellular Domains 1-3 hVEGFR-3

==> picture [36 x 10] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

hIgG1 Fc
----- End of picture text -----

  • Currently administered as a sequential intravitreal injection every 4 weeks (q4w), with the potential to also:

  • investigate OPT-302 efficacy and durability in patients receiving less frequent doses (e.g. q8w, q12w), and

  • co-formulate with other agents

  • Wet AMD and DME landscape includes only a limited number of novel combination therapies that may address the sub-optimal clinical responses that many patients experience on anti-VEGF-A therapies

OPT-302 has comparable ocular biodistribution and PK profile to aflibercept, with low systemic exposure

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

11

The Opportunity for OPT-302

==> picture [471 x 263] intentionally omitted <==

  • To increase the number of patients who experience a significant gain in vision

  • To increase the magnitude of the vision gain

  • To prolong response to therapy and prevent visual decline

  • Potential to reduce dosing frequency

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

12

OPT-302 Clinical Program

OPT-302
Target: VEGF-C/D
OPT-302
Target: VEGF-C/D
Ranibizumab
Target: VEGF-A
Aflibercept,
Bevacizumab
Target: VEGF-A
Phase 3
Phase 3b
Phase 3
Complete
Ph 1/2a (n=51)
Positive
Ph 2b (n=366)
Planned
Two concurrent
Ph 3 trials (each 2
arms, n=~330 per arm;
~660 total per trial)
Planned
Ph 3b trial (2 arms,
n=~330 per arm;
~660 total)
April 2017
Primary Endpoint Met
(Safety)
August 2019Primary
Endpoint Met
(Superior Efficacy)
Diabetic Ma cular Edema

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

13

Note: The final design of the phase 3 trials is to be confirmed following receipt of regulatory advice and confirmation of the design of the phase 3 clinical program.

A dose-ranging study of intravitreal OPT-302 in combination with ranibizumab, compared with ranibizumab alone, in participants with wet AMD

==> picture [132 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

14

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345082

OPT-302 Phase 2b wAMD

Randomised 1:1:1 to treatment arms : intravitreal dosing every 4 weeks (x 6)

==> picture [638 x 255] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

OPT-302 (2.0 mg) + ranibizumab (0.5 mg)
Wet AMD
OPT-302 (0.5 mg) + ranibizumab (0.5 mg)
Naïve Pts
Sham + ranibizumab (0.5 mg)
Primary Outcome:
Week 24 Follow-up
----- End of picture text -----

  • Mean change from Baseline in ETDRS best corrected visual acuity at Week 24

Key Secondary Outcomes at Week 24:

  • Patients gaining ≥15 or more ETDRS letters

  • Patients losing ≥15 or more ETDRS letters

  • Change in central subfield thickness (SD-OCT)

  • Change in subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid (SD-OCT)

  • Key Exploratory Outcomes at Week 24:

  • Change in total lesion area and choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) area (FA)

  • Key Safety Outcome:

  • Safety and tolerability

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

15

ETDRS – Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; SD-OCT – spectral domain optical coherence tomography; FA – fluorescein angiography

Primary Analysis – Mean Change in BCVA Baseline to Week 24 Primary endpoint achieved

OPT-302 (2.0 mg) Combination Therapy Demonstrated Superiority in Visual Acuity over Ranibizumab

==> picture [854 x 364] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

20 Δ = +3.4 (p=0.0107) 20
15 15
14.22
10 10.84 10
9.44
5 5
0 0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Weeks
Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab 0.5 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab
(n=119) (n=122) (n=121)
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----

16

mITT; BCVA – best corrected visual acuity

Left: Difference in Least Square Means, using Model for Repeated Measures (MRM) analysis. Right: Graph represents “as observed” data and SEM

Central Subfield Thickness

Reduction in CST in OPT-302 combination group compared to sham + ranibizumab

Mean Change in CST – Baseline to Week 24

==> picture [235 x 276] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

-100
-120
-133.80
-140
-146.70
-160
m)

(
Mean change in CST (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----

Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n=116) (n=119)

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

17

Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population; as observed; CST – central subfield thickness

Sub-retinal Fluid and Intra-retinal Cysts at Week 24

Fewer participants with retinal fluid present in OPT-302 combination group compared to sham + ranibizumab

==> picture [577 x 407] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

% Participants % Participants with
with SRF present IR Cysts present
30 30
29.3
25 25
21.6
20 20
18.5
16.8
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab
(n=116) (n=119)
% Participants % Participants
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

18

Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population; as observed; SRF – sub-retinal fluid; IR – intra-retinal

Total Lesion Area and CNV Area – Baseline to Week 24

Greater reduction in Total Lesion and CNV Area in OPT-302 combination group compared to sham + ranibizumab

==> picture [593 x 407] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Mean Change in Mean Change in
Total Lesion Area CNV Area
0
0
-2
-2
-3.1
-3.6
-4
-4
-4.3
-5.0
p=0.0137
p=0.0055
-6
-6
Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab
(n=109) (n=112)
)
2
(mm
Mean change in Total Lesion Area (SEM)
)
2
(mm
Mean change in CNV Area (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

19

Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population; as observed; CNV – choroidal neovascularisation; Difference in Least Square Means

A multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham controlled study of intravitreal OPT-302 in combination with ranibizumab, in participants with neovascular (wet) AMD Pre-Specified Subgroup Analyses

OPT-302-1002; NCT ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345082

==> picture [132 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

20

60% of the World’s Population is Asian

==> picture [404 x 426] intentionally omitted <==

Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV)

  • Most common sub-type of neovascular (wet) AMD in Asian populations

  • Estimated to be the most prevalent form of wet AMD world-wide

  • PCV lesions typically less responsive to anti-VEGF-A therapy

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

21

Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Mean chan e in BCVA to Week 24 in artici ants with and without PCV at baseline g p p

==> picture [277 x 346] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

20
Δ = 2.71 Δ = 6.70
(p = 0.0491) (p = 0.0253)
15
14.2
13.5
11.5
10
6.9
5
98 99 20 22
0
Absent Present
PCV Detected at Baseline
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----

Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab

mITT; PCV – polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy;

Least square means determined using Model for Repeated Measures (MRM) analysis (adjusted for baseline vision and lesion type (randomisation) as covariates). PCV determination by SD-OCT, FA and fundus photography

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

22

Neovascular (wet) AMD Lesion Types Differ in vessel location, leakiness and responsiveness to VEGF-A inhibitors

  • Predominantly Classic Minimally Classic Occult

  • • >50% of vessels are above the RPE • <50% of vessels are above the RPE • Vessels 100% beneath RPE • Highly responsive to a-VEGF-A • Occult vessels may be present • Least responsive to a-VEGF-A • Moderately responsive to a-VEGF-A • Lesions shift to occult following a-VEGF-A (largest population)

  • ~12% ~44% ~44%

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

23

Percentages shown are represent the proportion of patients with each lesion type randomised into Opthea’s Phase 2b clinical trial

Mean Change in BCVA Over Time by Lesion Type Small number of predominantly classic patients

==> picture [909 x 337] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Predominantly Classic Minimally Classic Occult
20
20 20
15
15 15
10
10 10
5
5 5
0
0 0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Weeks
Weeks Weeks
Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 15) Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 53) Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 51)
2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 15) 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 53) 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 53)
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
(letters) (letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM) Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

24

mITT; as observed

Mean Change in BCVA at Week 24 by Lesion Type

Greater vision gains at Week 24 in OPT-302 2.0 mg group in minimally classic and occult lesions

==> picture [597 x 406] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Minimally Classic Occult
20 20
Δ = 6.0
(p = 0.0008)
Δ = 2.7
16.2
15 15
13.7
11.1
10 10
10.2
5 5
53 53 51 53
0 0
Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----*

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

25

mITT; Least square means determined using Model for Repeated Measures (MRM) analysis (adjusted for baseline vision and lesion type (randomisation) as covariates).

Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation (RAP) Lesions Have a distinct biology and vessel proliferation occurs within the retina (not the choroid)

==> picture [185 x 194] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [194 x 194] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [185 x 194] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [194 x 240] intentionally omitted <==

  • No consensus of which treatment is optimal for RAP lesions*

  • Favorable short-term results with anti-VEGF-A treatments but long-term results are conflicting

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

  • Tsai AS et al., Surv Ophthalmology, 2017 Jul-Aug; 62(4):462-92. de Jong et al., Ophthalmologica 2019; 241:143-153.

26

Nb. RAP lesions were excluded from: e.g. Phase 3 Ophthotech trials, Abicipar (Allergan) Phase 2 study, early conbercept studies

Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation (RAP) Lesions Mean change in BCVA to Week 24 in participants without RAP at baseline

==> picture [355 x 359] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

20
Δ = 4.4
p = 0.0025
15
15.0
10 10.6
5
102 103
0
Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab 2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----*

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

27

mITT; RAP – retinal angiomatous proliferation;

Least square means (LSM) determined using Model for Repeated Measures (MRM) analysis (adjusted for baseline vision and lesion type as used in the randomisation as covariates).

Mean Change in BCVA Over Time by Lesion Type, RAP Absent

In RAP absent participants, +4.7 letter gain in minimally classic and +6.5 letter gain in occult participants treated with OPT-302 combination therapy compared to sham + ranibizumab

==> picture [421 x 390] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Minimally Classic
20
15 +14.9
Δ = 4.7
p = 0.0415
10 +10.0
5
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Weeks
Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 40)
2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 39)
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----*

==> picture [420 x 389] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Occult
20
+16.8
15
Δ = 6.5
p = 0.0005
+10.2
10
5
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Weeks
Sham + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 47)
2.0 mg OPT-302 + 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 49)
(letters)
Mean change in BCVA (SEM)
----- End of picture text -----*

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

28

mITT, as observed, Δ based on least square means determined using Model for Repeated Measures (MRM) analysis (adjusted for baseline vision and lesion type (randomisation) as covariates).

Safety – Adverse Events (AEs)

N Participants (%) Sham +
ranibizumab
N=121
0.5 mg OPT-302 +
ranibizumab
N=120
2.0 mg OPT-302 +
ranibizumab
N=124
Treatment emergent AEs 84 (69.4%) 87 (72.5%) 93 (75.0%)
Ocular AEs - Study Eye – related to study product(s)1 17 (14.0%) 17 (14.2%) 19 (15.3%)
Ocular AEs - Study Eye – Severe2 1 (0.8%) 2 (1.7%) 1 (0.8%)
Serious AEs 10 (8.3%) 16 (13.3%) 7 (5.6%)
Ocular SAEs in Study Eye 0 (0.0%) 23 (1.7%) 0 (0.0%)
Intraocular inflammation4 – Study Eye 0 (0.0%) 23 (1.7%) 15 (0.8%)
Participants with AEs leading to study IP discontinuation only 2 (1.7%) 3 (2.5%) 0 (0.0%)
Participants with AEs leading to study discontinuation 16 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Any APTC event 0 (0.0%) 17 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%)
Deaths 28 (1.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)

Safety population analysed according to medication received

  • 1 Assessed by investigator to be “possibly related”, “probably related” or “definitely related” to administration of study drug(s)

  • 2 Assessed by Investigator to be National Institutes of Health (NIH) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or above, or, if CTCAE grade is unavailable, an AE assessed as “causing an inability to perform normal daily activities”

  • 3 SAE of endophthalmitis, with AEs of hypopyon and anterior chamber cell (n=1), SAE of vitritis (n=1)

  • 4 AEs considered to be indicative of intraocular inflammation, defined prior to database lock as: Endophthalmitis, iritis, vitritis, iridocyclitis, uveitis, hypopyon, viral iritis, or anterior chamber inflammation 5 Anterior chamber cell (trace 1-4 cells)

  • 6 Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung diagnosed shortly after Baseline visit

  • 7 Non-fatal myocardial infarction

  • 8 Pneumonia (n=1), infective endocarditis (n=1)

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

29

Study Outcomes - OPT-302 Phase 2b wet AMD Trial

Phase 2b trial met primary endpoint

  • OPT-302 (2.0mg) combination therapy demonstrated superiority in visual acuity over ranibizumab + sham

  • Vision gain of +3.4 letters

  • Statistically significant (p=0.0107)

  • High ranibizumab control arm

Secondary outcomes were supportive of the primary endpoint

  • Vision

  • More patients gained ≥ 15 letters of vision

  • Fewer patients lost ≥ 15 letters of vision

  • Retinal anatomical improvements

  • Reductions in central subfield thickness (CST), sub-retinal and intra-retinal fluid

  • Greater decreases in total lesion area and choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) Area

Exploratory and pre-specified subgroup analyses

  • Suggest greater activity of OPT-302 in lesion-types considered more difficult to treat with anti-VGEF-A therapy and highest unmet need

  • Promising evidence of activity in polypoidal AMD (PCV) and minimally classic/occult lesions that are less responsive to VEGF-A inhibitors

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

30

Planned: OPT-302 Pivotal Phase 3 Program

==> picture [746 x 256] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Safety Phase
Efficacy Phase
Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) + OPT-302 (2.0 mg) Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) + OPT-302 (2.0 mg)
IVT q4w x 48 weeks IVT q4w or q8w x 48 weeks
Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) + Sham Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) + Sham
IVT q4w x 48 weeks IVT q4w or q8w
x 48 weeks
Week 96
Primary Efficacy Endpoint Week 48 Safety Follow –up
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [146 x 95] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Wet AMD
Naïve Pts
----- End of picture text -----

  • Two studies of similar design: Multi-centre, double-masked, randomised (1:1), sham controlled

  • Regulatory quality: 90% power, 5% type I error rate

  • Sample size: 330 patients per arm, 660 per study (1,320 patients across the two studies)

  • Primary Objective: Mean change from Baseline in BCVA (visual acuity) (ETDRS) at Week 48

  • Trial Initiation: 4Q 2020

  • Top-line Data Readout: 1H 2023

  • Full Data Readout: 1H 2023

* Dosing every 4 or 8 weeks based on clinical signs of disease progression

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

31

Planned: Phase 3b Trial

==> picture [506 x 245] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

SoC Anti-VEGF-A + OPT-302 (2.0 mg)
IVT q4w [1] or q8w [2] x 48 weeks
Wet AMD
Naïve Pts
SoC Anti-VEGF-A + Sham
IVT q4w [1] or q8w [2] x 48 weeks
Primary Efficacy Endpoint Week 48
----- End of picture text -----

  • Similar design to Phase 3: Multi-centre, double-masked, randomised (1:1), sham controlled

  • Standard of Care (SoC) Anti-VEGF-A: Standard of Care anti-VEGF-A therapy: 0.5 mg ranibizumab[1] , 2.0 mg aflibercept[2] , or 1.25 mg bevacizumab[1]

  • Regulatory quality: 90% power, 5% type I error rate

  • Sample size: 330 patients per arm, 660 per study, stratified for anti-VEGF-A therapy

  • Primary Objective: Mean change from Baseline in BCVA (visual acuity) (ETDRS) at Week 48

1 Dosing schedule: IVT every 4 weeks for 48 weeks

2 Dosing schedule: IVT every 4 weeks for 12 weeks, then IVT every 8 weeks for 36 weeks

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

32

Note: The final design of the phase 3 trials is to be confirmed following receipt of regulatory advice and confirmation of the design of the phase 3 clinical program.

Topline data expected 2Q CY 2019

==> picture [132 x 33] intentionally omitted <==

33

Phase 1b Dose Escalation study of OPT-302 + Aflibercept in DME

==> picture [778 x 270] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Phase 1b Dose-Escalation Phase 2a Dose-Expansion
(Randomised 2:1 ratio)
(Complete- data reported)
OPT-302 (2.0 mg) OPT-302 (2.0 mg)
+ Aflibercept (2.0 mg) + Aflibercept (2.0 mg)
IVT Q4W x 3, n=3 IVT Q4W x 3, n=~72 pts
Cohort 3
OPT-302 (1.0 mg) N=
Aflibercept (2.0 mg)
+ Aflibercept (2.0 mg)
IVT Q4W x 3, n=~36 pts
IVT Q4W x 3, n=3
Cohort 2
OPT-302 (0.3 mg)
+ Aflibercept (2.0 mg)
IVT Q4W x 3, n=3
ClinTrials Identifier
Cohort 1 NCT 03397264
14 Day DLT window Week 12 to 24
PRN anti-VEGF-A Primary Analysis after all
Follow-up to week 12 subjects complete 12 weeks
----- End of picture text -----

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years; centre-involving DME

  • CST ≥ 335 µm*

  • BCVA 73 – 24 ETDRS letters (20/40 – 20/320 Snellen)

  • Prior exposure to anti-VEGF-A therapy with sub-optimal therapeutic response

  • ≥ 3 intravitreal injections

  • Last injection ≤ 6 wks prior to study day 1

  • Prior bevacizumab only allowed if switched to IVT aflibercept or ranibizumab prior to study

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • HbA1c ≥ 12%

  • Uncontrolled hypertension ≥ 180 mmHg systolic or ≥ 110 mmHg diastolic

  • Eyes needing PRP within 3 months of screening

  • Concurrent / prior use of intravitreal injections of steroids within 4 months of study start

  • Concurrent / prior use of dexamethasone or fluocinolone implant in study eye

==> picture [114 x 27] intentionally omitted <==

  • *CST as measured by Spectralis (Heidelberg) at screening, ≥ 320 µm for Cirrus.

34

OPT-302:

An asset with strategic flexibility looking to enter the retinal disease market

==> picture [802 x 416] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Majority of wet AMD & DME patients treated with standard of care anti-VEGF-A treatments
Large
Unmet respond sub-optimally
Need
>USD
Lucentis and Eylea generated >$10bn revenue in 2018
10bn
OPT-302 is seeking to ‘add-on’, not ‘replace’, existing treatments
Market
Opp.
OPT-302:
Superior OPT-302 combination therapy demonstrated superior gains in visual acuity in a 366 pt Ph2b trial
Vision
Gains
Upcoming
milestone:
Phase 2a trial results with OPT-302 + Eylea in 2Q CY 2020
DME Additional clinical development opportunities
Phase 2a
----- End of picture text -----

35

==> picture [194 x 41] intentionally omitted <==

Authorised by Megan Baldwin, PhD CEO and Managing Director