OMNIA METALS GROUP LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2023

Apr 2, 2023

==> picture [191 x 58] intentionally omitted <==

ASX RELEASE

ASX:OM1

3 APRIL 2023

Multiple High-Priority Targets Identified from Due Diligence

Omnia Metals Group Ltd (“Omnia” or the “Company”) is pleased to update the market with r esults of the due diligence that has been completed on the Lac Des Montagnes Project (“Project”) in the James Bay region, Quebec which has confirm ed five (5) large scale outcropping “Spodumene Suite” pegmatites.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Due diligence completed at the Lac Des Montagnes Project, James Bay, Quebec, has confirmed the highly prospective nature of the belt scale opportunity, with multiple outcropping “Spodumene Suite” pegmatites identified.

• An additional, extensively outcropping “Spodumene Suite” pegmatite has been identified, named Senay 15, and is situated on a highly prospective trend which is 2.2km in length and 830m in width (Figure 1).

• Total of 7 (seven) large scale “Spodumene Suite” pegmatites confirmed with newly acquired, high-resolution satellite imagery highlighting significant surface exposures of pegmatite bodies (Figures 1-4):

• Senay 5 - 2.3km in length and 440m in width.

• Senay 15 – 2.2km in length and 830m in width.

• Senay 9 - 1.5km in length and 410m in width.

• Senay 8 – 1km in length and 190m in width.

• Senay 21 – 450m in length and 200m in width.

• A total of 58 (fifty-eight) pegmatite granites have been historically mapped within the Project area, with satellite imagery and data review confirming at least 33 (thirty-three) pegmatites outcrop at surface. Of the 9 (nine) highly prospective “Spodumene Suite” pegmatites mapped by MERN within the Project, 7 (seven) are observed to have extensive surface expression highlighting the world class scale of the opportunity.

• The Company has been working closely with APEX Geoscience and Canadian Mining House in preparation for the summer field season, with key Omnia personnel conducting a site visit in May for the upcoming mapping and sampling programs.

OMNIA METALS GROUP LTD │ ACN: 648 187 651 │ ASX: OMI 22 Townshend Road, SUBIACO, WA, AUSTRALIA, 6008 │ +61 08 9388 0051 info@omniametals.com.au │ www.omniametals.com.au

==> picture [114 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Omnia has completed its due diligence process, which has involved GIS database compilation, acquisition of high-resolution satellite imagery, and interpretation of results by Company and APEX Geoscience geologists. Following the completion of due diligence, multiple high-priority targets have been identified, with newly acquired, high-resolution satellite imagery confirming significant surface exposures of pegmatite bodies.

Many of the high-priority pegmatite granites, termed the “Spodumene Suite”, were originally identified by the Government of Quebec’s, Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et des Forêts (“MERN”) and are highly prospective for lithium, based on striking geological similarities with the world class Wabouchi lithium deposit (36.7Mt @ 1.16% Li¬2O), located 38 km along strike from Omnia’s Lac des Montagnes Project. Following completion of the acquisition, Omnia will turn its focus to planning and executing upcoming mapping and sampling programs.

Omnia Metals’ Executive Director, James Warren, commented:

“Through the data acquisition and interpretation process, we have identified several kilometre-scale pegmatite outcrops that we can’t wait to start mapping and sampling throughout the upcoming field season. We have a series of high-priority targets and between the Vendors, APEX Geoscience and ourselves, we have a great team ready to systematically test as many as possible, as soon as possible.

Although we still have a lot to learn, we have a significantly enhanced understanding of the geology and controls on mineralisation at the Lac des Montagnes Project, so we are all looking forward to taking the project to the next level and completing boots on ground fieldwork. We look forward to keeping the market regularly updated with news of our progress over the coming months.”

UPDATE ON DUE DILIGENCE

Omnia recently engaged APEX Geoscience (refer OM1 ASX release 23 February 2023) to assist in compiling all available geological, geochemical and geophysical data and creating a GIS data room that consists of all publicly available data relevant to the Project. Additionally, the Company has acquired high-quality, 50cm Panchromatic and 2.0m 4-Band Multispectral satellite imagery data over the Project extents which has assisted greatly in identifying outcropping pegmatites for follow up mapping and sampling. The acquired satellite imagery was collected between 2010-2021 with the majority of imagery collected around 2017. Satellite imagery for approximately five percent of the Project area is affected by cloud cover, Omnia will acquire new satellite imagery over these portions of the Project in the summer months once the snow has melted. Of the 58 (fifty-eight) pegmatite granites that have been historically mapped within the Project area, satellite imagery and data review has confirmed at least 33 (thirty-three) pegmatites outcrop at surface. Of the 9 (nine) “highly-prospective” pegmatites mapped by MERN within the Project, 7 (seven) are observed to have extensive surface expression (Table 1).

The satellite imagery has also refined the dimensions of the pegmatite bodies and highlighted the fact that multiple, kilometre-scale, highly prospective pegmatites have had very little work completed upon them historically. As previously reported (refer OM1 ASX release 15 February 2023), the Senay 5 target represents one such target where limited historical mapping has identified a kilometre-scale, highly prospective pegmatite target that satellite imagery shows to have a surface expression of 2.3km x 400m. Further due diligence and data review has highlighted additional, analogous, high-priority targets which include, but are not limited to;

• Senay 15 – 2.2km x 830m highly prospective zone (as defined by MERN) which is interpreted to outcrop over 1.9km x 640m (Figure 1).

• Senay 9 - 1.5km x 410m highly prospective zone (as defined by MERN) which is interpreted to outcrop over 1.2km x 320m (Figure 2).

2

==> picture [114 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

• Senay 8 – 1km x 190m highly prospective zone (as defined by MERN) which is interpreted to outcrop over 800m x 140m with prominent, mapped, pegmatite ridges extending up to 200m observed in satellite imagery (Figure 3).

• Senay 21 – 450m x 200m highly prospective zone (as defined by MERN) which, following geological review, is now interpreted to visibly outcrop over 900m x 210m and is part of a 3.2km prospective pegmatite trend (Figure 4).

These targets represent excellent early-stage opportunities for mapping and sampling to identify potential mineralised zones within the broader pegmatite bodies. Omnia’s focus for the upcoming rock chip and mapping programs, in order of priority, will be:

1. Detailed mapping and sampling of outcropping, highly prospective, ‘Priority 1’ pegmatites targets to identify potential zones of mineralisation within the pegmatite bodies;

2. Additional, regional mapping and sampling of ‘Priority 2’ outcropping pegmatites to further quantify the prospectivity of each pegmatite body, and;

3. Ground truthing of ‘Priority 3’ pegmatite targets identified from aerial imagery, geophysics and geological data interpretation.

FUTURE ACTIVITIES

Omnia is currently focussed on finalising the due diligence process, in consultation with the Vendors, in preparation for completion of the acquisition at the upcoming General Meeting, to be held on the 12[th] April 2023 (refer OM1 ASX release 15 March 2023). Following completion of the acquisition, Omnia will finalise its plans and preparations for the upcoming field season. The Company has been working closely with APEX Geoscience and Canadian Mining House in preparation for the summer field season, with key Omnia personnel completing a site visit in May to engage the local Cree Nations people and relevant stakeholders. Omnia looks forward to updating Shareholders on planned activities and exploration timelines in the coming weeks.

3

==> picture [114 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [444 x 314] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Senay 15 Target.

==> picture [439 x 311] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Senay 9 Target.

4

==> picture [114 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [439 x 310] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Senay 8 Target.

==> picture [439 x 311] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4: Senay 21 Target belt.

5

==> picture [114 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1: Pegmatite granite targets over the Lac des Montagnes Project. Note: coordinates represent centroids of mapped and interpreted pegmatite granite units.

Easting	Northing	MERN ID	DESC_LITH	Priority	MERN Target Extents	Outcrop Extents from Imagery
482597	5736895	1192884	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.9km x 260m	1.0km x 120m
488839	5740202	1192905	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.5km x 250m	0.4km x 140m
498620	5745599	1192935	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	3.4km x 180m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
525921	5743512	1267669	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	0.4km x 175m	0.3km x 100m
526588	5743297	1267670	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	0.9km x 200m	0.4km x 170m
524043	5748446	1267721	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.9km x 400m	0.9km x 350m
521328	5748544	1267724	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.6km x 270m	0.85km x 250m
509391	5748859	1267725	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2 Senay2	1.0km x 370m	30% within property boundary
500550	5749264	1267732	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	1.2km x 400m	sporadic outcrop along lake edges
501927	5749684	1267733	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	1.3km x 450m	sporadic outcrop along lake edges
513963	5749997	1267734	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.9km x 200m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
509938	5750103	1267735	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	1 Senay 4	1.3km x 420m	0.92km x 450m
519691	5750546	1267736	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.7km x 480m	1.0km x 380m
513266	5750504	1267737	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	1.3km x 450m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
503358	5750749	1267738	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.9km x 240m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
507732	5750786	1267739	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	1 Senay 5	1.8km x 440m	2.3km x 440m
504599	5751652	1267741	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.4km x 200m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
528141	5757172	1267767	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.4km x 260m	1.0km x 250m
527269	5757408	1267770	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.8km x 380m	1.5km x 330m
520099	5757081	1267772	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	2.4km x 380m	1.5km x 190m
517742	5757332	1267773	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	1 Senay 8	1.0km x 190m	0.8km x 140m, multiple pegmatite ridges
521411	5755862	1267774	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	2.9km x 880m	2.0km x 800m
526504	5757944	1267777	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.4km x 150m	0.9km x 130m
515204	5757922	1267778	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	1 Senay 9	1.5km x 410m	1.2km x 420m
523119	5757727	1267779	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	4.3km x 350m	1.0km x 250m
526015	5758372	1267780	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	1.0km x 160m	20% within property boundary
519848	5757888	1267781	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	3.3km x 900m	1.5km x 540m
519605	5758821	1267782	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.2km x 290m	0.62km x 190m
514498	5759235	1267801	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	0.45km x 70m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
509849	5754718	1267809	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.55km x 110m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders

6

==> picture [114 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

509359	5751359	1294776	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	1.1km x 230m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
505214	5753243	1294796	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.3km x 45m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
513036	5755136	1294797	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.45km x 190m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
517549	5758572	1294798	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.82km x 260m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
542564	5744428	1301921	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2 Senay23	0.9km x 200m	30% within property boundary
539630	5746624	1301934	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	1 Senay 16	0.86km x 200m	0.5km x 160m
547508	5747898	1301951	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	1.5km x 260m	outcrop along lake & island edges
549108	5748088	1301952	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.94km x 240m	outcrop along lake edges
550163	5748474	1301960	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	0.88kmx 150m	0.63km x 100m
551299	5749159	1301965	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	1 Senay 21	0.45km x 200m	0.76km x 180m
543325	5754933	1302016	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.7km x 310m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
558446	5755262	1302018	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.9km x 460m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
550398	5755770	1302020	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.95km x 250m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
547252	5755818	1302022	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	0.8km x 220m	0.55km x 200m
554357	5756288	1302023	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.1km x 220m	0.7km x 170m
542005	5756100	1302025	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	1.6km x 310m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
542558	5756444	1302029	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	3.1km x 500m	requires confirmatory mapping/sampling
551238	5757122	1302031	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.0km x 460m	3 pegmatite ridges up to 300m x 100m in dimension
556230	5757191	1302032	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	0.8km x 320m	0.7km x 240m
543804	5757521	1302036	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.6km x 230m	0.14km x 50m
551293	5757853	1302039	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	2.6km x 660m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
551005	5758636	1302040	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	0.6km x 170m	requires confirmatory mapping/sampling
542198	5759059	1302042	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	0.4km x 260m	0.52km x 200m
557414	5759627	1302046	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	0.85km x 200m	sporadic pegmatite outcrop/boulders
554658	5760212	1302054	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.4km x 380m	0.7km x 250m
535627	5760391	1302056	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	2	1.3km x 1.0km	0.7km x 300m
556423	5760954	1302057	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	3	1.2km x 340m	requires confirmatory mapping/sampling
568205	5759912	1303239	Pegmatite granitique blanche à biotite ± grenat ± muscovite ± tourmaline	1 Senay 15	2.8km x 830m	1.9km x 640m

7

- END –

==> picture [114 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

This announcement is approved for release by the Board of Omnia Metals Group

For further information please contact:

James Warren Anna MacKintosh Managing Director Company Secretary james@omniametals.com.au anna@omniametals.com.au

About Omnia

Omnia Metals Group Ltd (ASX:OM1) goal is to become a leader in the exploration, and development, of future facing commodities used in advanced technologies and essential to the global energy transition.

Omnia continues to progress its highly prospective Ord Basin Project through extensive approval process in consultation with the local Native Title groups and relevant stakeholders. The Ord Basin Project consists of 1,305km[2] of tenure situated in an emerging district prospective for Norilsk-style nickel-copper-PGE and stratigraphic copper mineral systems. Due to the impact of the extensive flooding in the Kimberley region (which does not materially impact the Company’s intentions with respect to the Projects), Omnia expects further delays in conducting on-ground exploration at the Ord Basin Project. The Company will continue to monitor the situation over the coming weeks and months and will update the market as more information comes to light.

The Salt Creek Project covers an area of approximately 223km[2] and is prospective for copper, nickel and gold mineral systems. The Company is currently completing a 9,000m drilling program at the Salt Creek Project targeting gold and nickel-copper mineralisation.

Omnia reaffirms its commitment to complete the exploration programs as outlined in the Company Prospectus.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report which relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Dr. James Warren, a Competent Person who is a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Dr. Warren is the Managing Director of Omnia Metals Group Ltd. Dr. Warren has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australian Code of Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Dr. Warren consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.

Forward Looking Statements

Statements contained in this release, particularly those regarding possible or assumed future performance, costs, dividends, production levels or rates, prices, resources, reserves or potential growth of Omnia Metals Group Limited, are, or may be, forward looking statements. Such statements relate to future events and expectations and, as such, involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements depending on a variety of factors.

8

==> picture [114 x 35] intentionally omitted <==

References

BANDYAYERA, B. 2022. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (MERN). Lac des Montagnes Group. Quebec Stratigraphic Lexicon. https://gq.mines.gouv.qc.ca/lexique-stratigraphique/province-du-superieur/groupedu-lac-des-montagnes_en

BANDYAYERA, D., CARON-CÔTÉ, E., 2019. Geology of the Montagnes Lake area, La Grande, Nemiscau and Opatica subprovinces, Eeyou Istchee James Bay, Quebec, Canada. MERN; BG 2019-03 , 1 plan.

BELAND, C. 2011. Geochemistry and Geochronology of the Whabouchi Pegmatite Dykes as Revealed Through Zircon. University of Toronto; end of study project, 103 pages.

VALIQUETTE, G. 1963. Geology of the Lac des Montagnes region, Mistassini territory. MNR. RP 500 , 12 pages, 1 plan.

9

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report template

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Sampling	• Nature and quality of sampling (eg	•	No sampling completed by the Company.
techniques	cut channels, random chips, or	•	Work pertaining to the release has	involved
	specific specialised industry		geological interpretation of publicly available
	standard measurement tools		datasets which are available	through
	appropriate to the minerals under		sigeom.mines.gouv.qc.ca
	investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to	• • • • •	Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (MERN), the Quebec geological survey, has completed mapping with rock types descriptions made publicly available and provided in Table 1. Sample locations are outlined in Table 1. No assay data is available for MERN rock samples referred to in the body of the text. The Company is to complete reconnaissance work to verify publicly available data. The Company acquired 1600Km2 Archived
	the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be		DigitalGlobe / 50cm Panchromatic & 2.0m 4- Band Multispectral / Collected 2010-2021 through Satellite Imaging Corporation, Houston
	relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other	•	Texas. For the new collections, in areas with cloud cover in archive imagery, the Gokturk 50cm sensor will be used in the upcoming spring/summer seasons.
	cases more explanation may be
	required, such as where there is
	coarse gold that has inherent
	sampling problems. Unusual
	commodities or mineralisation types
	(eg submarine nodules) may
	warrant disclosure of detailed
	information.
Drilling	• Drill type (eg core, reverse	•	No drilling completed
techniques	circulation, open-hole hammer,
	rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
	sonic, etc) and details (eg core
	diameter, triple or standard tube,
	depth of diamond tails, face-
	sampling bit or other type, whether
	core is oriented and if so, by what
	method, etc).
Drill sample	• Method of recording and assessing	•	Not applicable
recovery	core and chip sample recoveries
	and results assessed.
	• Measures taken to maximise
	sample recovery and ensure
	representative nature of the
	samples.
	• Whether a relationship exists
	between sample recovery and grade
	and whether sample bias may have
	occurred due to preferential
	loss/gainof fine/coarse material.

1

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
Logging	• Whether core and chip samples	•	Not applicable
	have been geologically and
	geotechnically logged to a level of
	detail to support appropriate Mineral
	Resource estimation, mining studies
	and metallurgical studies.
	• Whether logging is qualitative or
	quantitative in nature. Core (or
	costean, channel, etc) photography.
	• The total length and percentage of
	_the relevant intersections logged. _
Sub-sampling	• If core, whether cut or sawn and	•	Not applicable
techniques	whether quarter, half or all core
and sample	taken.
preparation	• If non-core, whether riffled, tube
	sampled, rotary split, etc and
	whether sampled wet or dry.
	• For all sample types, the nature,
	quality and appropriateness of the
	sample preparation technique.
	• Quality control procedures adopted
	for all sub-sampling stages to
	maximise representivity of samples.
	• Measures taken to ensure that the
	sampling is representative of the in
	situ material collected, including for
	instance results for field
	duplicate/second-half sampling.
	• Whether sample sizes are
	appropriate to the grain size of the
	_material being sampled. _
Quality of	• The nature, quality and	•	Geophysical datasets and aerial imagery
assay data	appropriateness of the assaying and		was sourced from Ministère des Ressources
and	laboratory procedures used and		naturelles et des Forêts (MERN), the
laboratory	whether the technique is considered		Quebec geological survey.
tests	partial or total.	•	Interpretation of the geophysical dataset and
	• For geophysical tools,		aerial imagery was completed by the
	spectrometers, handheld XRF		Competent Person,
	instruments, etc, the parameters	•	The Company acquired 1600Km2 Archived
	used in determining the analysis		DigitalGlobe / 50cm Panchromatic & 2.0m 4-
	including instrument make and		Band Multispectral / Collected 2010-2021
	model, reading times, calibrations		through Satellite Imaging Corporation, Houston
	factors applied and their derivation,		Texas.
	etc.	•	MERN has completed mapping with rock type
	• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.	• •	descriptions and geological maps made publicly available through sigeom.mines.gouv.qc.ca The Company is to complete reconnaissance work to verify publicly available data. Omnia recently engaged APEX Geoscience (refer OM1 ASX release 23 February 2023) to assist in compiling all available geological,
			geochemical and geophysical data and creating
			a GIS data room that consists of all publicly
			available data relevant to the Project.
Verification of	• The verification of significant	•	The information pertaining to the release has
sampling and	intersections by either independent		been verified by the Competent Person and
assaying	or alternative company personnel.		APEX Geoscience geologists.
	• The use of twinned holes.
	• Documentation of primary data, data

2

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	entry procedures, data verification,
	data storage (physical and
	electronic) protocols.
	• Discuss any adjustment to assay
	_data. _
Location of	• Accuracy and quality of surveys	•The location of data points referred to in the
data points	used to locate drill holes (collar and	release have been verified by the Competent
	down-hole surveys), trenches, mine	Person and APEX Geoscience geologists.
	workings and other locations used in
	Mineral Resource estimation.
	• Specification of the grid system
	used.
	• Quality and adequacy of
	topographic control.
Data spacing	• Data spacing for reporting of	•Not applicable
and	Exploration Results.
distribution	• Whether the data spacing and
	distribution is sufficient to establish
	the degree of geological and grade
	continuity appropriate for the
	Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
	estimation procedure(s) and
	classifications applied.
	• Whether sample compositing has
	_been applied. _
Orientation of	• Whether the orientation of sampling	•Not applicable
data in	achieves unbiased sampling of
relation to	possible structures and the extent to
geological	which this is known, considering the
structure	deposit type.
	• If the relationship between the
	drilling orientation and the
	orientation of key mineralised
	structures is considered to have
	introduced a sampling bias, this
	should be assessed and reported if
	material.
Sample	• The measures taken to ensure	•Not applicable
security	sample security.
Audits or	• The results of any audits or reviews	•The Company has undertaken extensive due
reviews	of sampling techniques and data.	diligence on the Project, in consultation with
		APEX Geoscience, and believes the property to
		be highly prospective for LCT pegmatites.
		•The Company will be completing rock chip
		sampling and mapping programs in the coming
		months to test the prospectivity of the interpreted
		pegmatite targets.
		•Review of geological and geophysical maps and
		imagery was completed by the Competent
		Person in consultation with APEX Geoscience
		geologists.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number,	•Information pertaining to mineral claims under
tenement and	location and ownership including	the proposedAcquisition have beenpreviously

3

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
land tenure	agreements or material issues with	announced, refer to OM1 ASX Release dated 7th
status	third parties such as joint ventures,	February 2023.
	partnerships, overriding royalties,
	native title interests, historical sites,
	wilderness or national park and
	environmental settings.
	• The security of the tenure held at the
	time of reporting along with any
	known impediments to obtaining a
	_licence to operate inthe area. _
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	•Geological		and	geophysical datasets were
done by other	exploration by other parties.	sourced		from	Ministère des		Ressources
parties		naturelles		et des	Forêts (MERN), the Quebec
		geological		survey.
		•Recently, MERN released a new 1:50,000 scale
		geological		map of	the Lac des Montagnes region
		which has defined			several new stratigraphic units
		and sub- units and led to significantly enhanced
		understanding of			the	economic geology of the
		belt.	Prospectivity analysis, for a				variety of
		commodities was completed as part of the
		process with prospective areas for lithium, gold
		and	base metal			mineralisation	identified
		(Bandyayera, 2022).
		•References are provided in the body					of the text
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and	•Regionally		the geology is dominated by Archean
	style of mineralisation.	mafic/ultramafic and sedimentary lithologies
		intruded by granites.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information	•Not applicable.
Information	material to the understanding of the
	exploration results including a
	tabulation of the following
	information for all Material drill holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill
	hole collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
	elevation above sea level in
	metres) of the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and
	interception depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the
	information is not Material and this
	exclusion does not detract from the
	understanding of the report, the
	Competent Person should clearly
	_explain why this is the case. _
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results,	•Not applicable.
aggregation	weighting averaging techniques,
methods	maximum and/or minimum grade
	truncations (eg cutting of high
	grades) and cut-off grades are
	usually Material and should be
	stated.
	• Where aggregate intercepts
	incorporate short lengths of high
	_grade results and longer lengths of _

4

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary	Commentary
	low grade results, the procedure
	used for such aggregation should be
	stated and some typical examples of
	such aggregations should be shown
	in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any
	reporting of metal equivalent values
	_should be clearly stated. _
Relationship	• These relationships are particularly	•	Not applicable.
between	important in the reporting of
mineralisation	Exploration Results.
widths and	• If the geometry of the mineralisation
intercept	with respect to the drill hole angle is
lengths	known, its nature should be
	reported.
	• If it is not known and only the down
	hole lengths are reported, there
	should be a clear statement to this
	effect (eg ‘down hole length, true
	_width not known’). _
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with	•	Appropriate diagrams are included in the body of
	scales) and tabulations of intercepts		the release.
	should be included for any
	significant discovery being reported
	These should include, but not be
	limited to a plan view of drill hole
	collar locations and appropriate
	_sectional views. _
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of	•	Not applicable,
reporting	all Exploration Results is not
	practicable, representative reporting
	of both low and high grades and/or
	widths should be practiced to avoid
	misleading reporting of Exploration
	_Results. _
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful	•	The Company continues to complete a thorough
substantive	and material, should be reported		geological review of all available data and will
exploration	including (but not limited to):		collate and interpret all available data as part of
data	geological observations; geophysical		the Company’s due diligence.
	survey results; geochemical survey	•	The Company is to complete reconnaissance
	results; bulk samples – size and		work to verify publicly available data.
	method of treatment; metallurgical	•	The Company acquired 1600Km2 Archived
	test results; bulk density,		DigitalGlobe / 50cm Panchromatic & 2.0m 4-
	groundwater, geotechnical and rock		Band Multispectral / Collected 2010-2021
	characteristics; potential deleterious		through Satellite Imaging Corporation, Houston
	or contaminating substances.		Texas.
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned	•	The Company plans to complete reconnaissance
	further work (eg tests for lateral		mapping and sampling initially.
	extensions or depth extensions or	•	The Company will update the market with
	large-scale step-out drilling).		proposed future work programs.
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the
	areas of possible extensions,
	including the main geological
	interpretations and future drilling
	areas, provided this information is
	_not commercially sensitive. _

5