Environmental & Social Information • Apr 8, 2024
Environmental & Social Information
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer

| How we create value | 8 |
|---|---|
| EU taxonomy for sustainable activities | 9 |
| Materiality analysis, stakeholder engagement and dialogue | 10 |

| 03 Sustainability |
13 |
|---|---|
| Our sustainability approach | 14 |
| Contents | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 Introduction |
3 | 05 Social |
38 | |
| About this report | 4 | Ensuring safe and secure activities | 39 | |
| Who we are | 5 | Empowering people | 42 | |
| Letter from the CEO | 6 | Respecting human rights | 49 | |
| Deliver value to society | 53 |
| Our sustainability approach | 14 |
|---|---|
| OKEA and the Sustainable Development Goals | 15 |
| Sustainability governance and management | 16 |

| Energy transition and climate change | 21 |
|---|---|
| Protecting environment and ecosystems | 32 |
| ce | Appendix | |
|---|---|---|
| 06 Governance |
58 |
|---|---|
| Responsible and ethical business practices | 59 |
| ESG Performance data | 64 |
| 07 Appendix |
76 |
|---|---|
| TCFD Disclosures | 77 |
| GRI Disclosures | 78 |
| Restatements | 90 |
| Statement on GHG accounting and reporting | 91 |
| Auditor's report | 95 |
and stakeholders
and stakeholders
Sustainability Environment Social Governance Appendix
materiality
4
This report presents OKEA's material ESG topics including key performance metrics for the calendar year 2023. OKEA has reported in accordance with the GRI Oil and Gas Sector Standard 2021 for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2023, unless otherwise stated.
We use several reporting standards, recommendations, and guidelines to identify and report on material environmental, social and governance (ESG) topics, including:
References have, where adequate, also been made to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The report discloses several reporting requirements required by Norwegian law, including:
The scope of our sustainability reporting is centred around assets over which OKEA exercises operational control. Unless specified the report does not include data from equity interest fields/projects, such as joint ventures, where we are not the operator.
This report has been reviewed by management at various levels, representing relevant assets and business units. It has also been reviewed by the Sustainability and technical risk committee (STR), Audit committee (AC), and the People and organisation committee (P &O), prior to approval by the board of directors. PwC has provided limited assurance on 2023 greenhouse gas emissions data marked with "✓" in this report.
For additional data supporting this ESG Report, see OKEA's annual report for 2023, which provides information about financial performance and our business in general. For more information about our disclosures reporting standards and reporting requirements, reference is made in the appendix.
2023 performance highlights
8.97 million barrels
Barrels produced
8,885 million NOK
Revenue

Taxes paid

Female recruitment
85 scale of 0 to 100
Employee engagement score


7,863 million NOK gross committed
Purchase of goods and services

Direct suppliers engaged

17,165 tonnes CO2 e reduced
GHG emissions reduction

frequency of total recordable injuries per million hours worked
Total recordable injury frequency
OKEA is a pure-play independent exploration and production (E&P) company, and a leading mid- to late-life operator on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS). OKEA finds value where others divest and has an ambitious strategy built on growth, value creation and capital discipline. OKEA is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange.
The company's activity level in 2023 has been high. Completion of the Hasselmus project, several drilling campaigns to increase production at Brage, securing government approval of the power from shore project and completion of the acquisition of 28 percent working interest in the Statfjord area were important achievements during the year which supports the company's growth strategy.
OKEA is headquartered in Trondheim, Norway and has offices in Bergen, Kristiansund, Oslo and Stavanger. OKEA operates the Draugen and Brage assets and has ownership interests in partner-operated assets comprising Yme, Statfjord area, Nova, Gjøa and Ivar Aasen.
Read more about OKEA in the 2023 annual report available on www.okea.no/investor.
We dare to share information openly. We meet each other with understanding and positivity. We are always being honest. We dare to be proud. We drive clarity in what we say and do. We actively encourage collaboration.
We are always personally invested in our activities. We strive for development, improvement and innovation – both in OKEA and personally. We care about each other and how we work together.
We always act with integrity. We have ownership to own and joint results. We are reliable in our actions – do what we say we will do. We behave with respect when meeting others within and outside OKEA.
We aim high – together. We dare to take chances and innovate to drive progress. We actively work to improve ourselves and our colleagues. We are always willing to try new ways of working and new technology.

Figure 1. OKEA's assets and offices
OKEA supports Europe's demand for energy through our growth strategy. At the same time as we have an uncertain geopolitical situation in Europe, the pressure from the EU to produce more oil and gas is increasing. In parallel, the political focus on combatting climate change that we have seen in recent years continues. OKEA supports the Norwegian government's plan to reduce Norway's climate emissions by 55 percent by 2030. As Norway's largest industry, the oil and gas sector has a clear responsibility to contribute achieving these targets. OKEA is committed to contribute to this joint effort and to play a role in the ongoing energy transition.
In OKEA, we recognise our responsibility to contribute and collaborate. In 2023 we followed up our decarbonisation strategy for our operated assets in production, Draugen
If we are to become the leading operator of mid-to late life assets, we need the best people.
and Brage. The Ministry of Energy approved the revised plan for development and operation (PDO) for the power from shore and electrification of the Draugen and Njord A platforms. This is a collaboration between OKEA, Equinor and the respective licence partners. The project will reduce emissions by a total of 330,000 tonnes of CO2 e per year and increase value creation from the Norwegian continental shelf. In addition to reduce CO2 e emissions, the project will result in lower production expense and prolong the economic lifetime of the fields. The Draugen licence's application for a licence extension until 2040 was approved in 2024.
Expected completion of the power from shore project is the first quarter of 2027, and Draugen will be a «near zero-emission unit» from 2027. Electrification of oil and gas fields is crucial to reach Norway's ambitions to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Production from the Hasselmus gas discovery commenced on 1 October 2023. As a subsea Mid- to late-life assets, such as Draugen and Brage, will typically have higher GHG emissions per barrel than less mature fields. It is important for us to minimise these emissions and innovative technical solutions.
without a highly skilled and experienced operating organisation. The operational efficiency reduces production costs and emissions while increasing profitability.
Safeguarding the well-being of all personnel will always be a key priority for OKEA and our objective is to ensure that all our activities are carried out with zero harm to people. The adverse trend noted on safety performance in 2023 is taken seriously, and we remain committed to our focus on improving HSE performance.
tie back to the Draugen platform, Hasselmus is expected to add more than 4,800 barrels of oil equivalents per day in production at plateau. Hasselmus restarted export of associated gas and NGL from Draugen. The Hasselmus project was the first development project for OKEA as operator. The project is important for the long-term development of Draugen and further demonstrates our ability to extend the life of mature fields to maximise value creation on the NCS. In 2023, OKEA, together with licence partners, increased the production on the Brage field significantly. This would not be possible through efficient field management processes Taking our ESG responsibility seriously is an important element for OKEA's «licence to operate». Our objective is to set ambitious decarbonisation goals for our assets while also considering the economic constraints associated with operating mid- to late-life assets. Our success in developing sustainable and smart solutions will also enhance our profitability in the long term. Through close collaboration with the government, our partners and colleagues in the industry, we will continue to focus on our people's safety and security, and the security of our systems, data, and assets.
and stakeholders

and stakeholders
Sustainability Environment Social Governance Appendix
materiality
8
OKEA is positioned in the upstream value chain of the petroleum industry. We produce crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGL) which is sold to the market.
Downstream
Processing Marketing
Upstream
Exploration Development Production Decommissioning

| 1 | |
|---|---|
| L | - 11 ■ |
| 1 | |
Midstream
Transport Storage

Our talented and diverse team of 435 employees live our core values every day as they help to realise our strategy and ambitions. OKEA believes that engaged people, collaborating to reach our goals in an open and inclusive environment are key to the company's success.
| Resol |
|---|

Our people bring key skills and capabilities to our business and in turn, we must keep them safe and engaged while offering interesting career paths.

OKEA is committed to contribute to the communities where we operate and strengthen local business and work actively to recruit workforce from the regions where we are based.
OKEA aims at achieving and maintaining long-term relationships with contractors and operators based on integrated teams with shared objectives and incentives.

OKEA is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange with an ambition to create value for our shareholders.
Resources
Our business relies on natural resources. Our aim is to develop oil and gas resources efficiently and responsibly and convert discoveries into reserves and production in a sustainable manner.
| Financial | ||
|---|---|---|
| capital |
We have a strong financial position and an ambitious growth strategy built on value creation and capital discipline.

and stakeholders
The EU Taxonomy classifies environmentally sustainable economic activities.
The EU Taxonomy Regulation was enacted in Norway in late 2021 and applicable from 1 January 2023 for non-financial undertakings which are public-interest entities (i.e. listed) with more than 500 employees. OKEA will be required to report under the EU Taxonomy from 1 January 2025. The EU Taxonomy requires reporting on the "Taxonomy-eligible" and "Taxonomy aligned" portions of revenue, capital expenditures (CAPEX), and certain operational expenditures (OPEX). Our interdisciplinary team has assessed eligible activities, including those related to both producing assets and projects under development.
Our main economic activity is related to production and sale of oil and gas which is not covered by the current EU Taxonomy Consequently, OKEA's Taxonomy-eligible revenue is and will be zero. We have not completed our analysis of CAPEX and OPEX related to economic activities eligible under the EU Taxonomy. We closely monitor the EU taxonomy's ongoing development and continually review OKEA's eligibility and alignement.


and stakeholders

Additionally, in preparation for the new EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the materiality analysis also considered the financial materiality perspective. This perspective identifies sustainability matters that pose risks and opportunities to OKEA and may have financial impacts on the company's future. The results of the materiality analysis are presented in the table on the next page.
In 2023, OKEA conducted a materiality analysis to identify the most relevant sustainability issues for the company and its stakeholders. This analysis followed the GRI 3 Standard, which considers material topics based on the organisation's significant impacts (both positive and negative) on the economy, environment, people, and human rights (referred to as the "Impact Materiality" perspective). The identification and prioritisation of material topics are informed by our understanding of relevant risk factors, consultation with internal and external subject matter experts, and ongoing stakeholder engagement (summarised in the stakeholder engagement table). Ultimately, the CEO and board of directors approve the content of the ESG report, including the selection and disclosure of material topics. More detailed information on these material topics can be found in the environment, social, and governance sections of the report.
and stakeholders
| Material topic | Impact materiality Positive impact |
Negative impact | Where the impact occurs in our value chain |
Impact materiality |
Financial materiality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy transition and climate change |
• Reducing emissions through decarbonisation strategies, energy management and technology development • Addressing reduction in our scope 3 emissions in dialogue with our suppliers |
• Climate-changing emissions from operating activities or within the value chain |
High | High | |
| Protecting biodiversity and ecosystems |
• Re-use of materials and plants for the benefit of local communities and the circular economy |
• Environmental damage, loss of aquatic habitats and biodiversity depletion |
High | Medium | |
| Ensure safe and secure activities |
• Training and awareness-raising activities on health and safety; reduction of accidents and injuries with use of new technology, research, and development • Improving cybersecurity competence and awareness in dialogue with employees, partners, and supply chain |
• Injuries, occupational disease and/or damage to health due to non-compliance with regulations; breakdown and/or malfunction of assets; exposure to hazardous substances • Unauthorised access and modification of systems and information, leading to breach of confidentiality, integrity, and availability |
High | High | |
| Empowering people |
• Expanding employees' skills and improving career opportunities through continuous training • Increasing employee well-being through adequate welfare and equal opportunity |
• Inadequate employee training, non-compliance with contractual rules |
Medium | Medium | |
| Respecting human rights |
• Protection and respect of human rights through due diligence on corporate activities and those of suppliers and business partners |
• Suppliers violation of workers' rights and negative environmental impact due to OKEA's failure to monitor them |
Medium | Medium | |
| Responsible and ethical business practice |
• Sharing environmental and social sustainability principles through the involvement of suppliers and supply chain partners • Countinuing training in code of conduct (including anti corruption) |
• Incidents with fraud, corruption, non-compliance with legal regulations and Code of Conduct with possible reputational damage |
Medium | Medium | |
| Value to society | • Development of communities and local entrepreneurship, including partnerships and business agreements with local suppliers • Creation of economic value in the communities of presence with wages, payment of taxes and royalties |
• Temporarily use of land to carry out construction and decommissioning work, with possible risk of contamination soil and water recipients |
Medium | Medium |
occurs in our value chain Impact materiality Financial High High High Medium High High Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Development and

*The table shows the results of the materiality analysis; it also shows selected potential positive and negative impacts that could materialise in our value chain.
construction Operation Decommissioning
OKEA's relationship with its key stakeholders is a critical aspect of our business model. That is why we continuously work to identify and understand their information needs, concerns, and feedback. We do this through active listening and strive to have a systematic approach to engage with a broad set of relevant stakeholders for our business and the communities where we operate. Our stakeholder map is regularly updated. The table to the right gives an overview of OKEA's key stakeholder relationships and how we have engaged in the past year.
| Stakeholder group | Arena for dialogue | Issues raised | OKEA's response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investors, shareholders, and owners |
• Investor meetings • Company presentations • Shareholder general meetings • ESG report |
• Profitability • Capital allocation • Transparency |
• Good practices of corporate governance and compliance with laws and regulations • Transparent and available information • Clear and consistent reporting |
| Employees, including Unions and employee representatives |
• Day to day interactions • Feedback and development conversations • Employee surveys and courses |
• Safe and secure workplaces • Employee development • Competitive salaries • Health and well-being • Psychological safety • Diversity and inclusion • Learning culture based on employee engagement. • Engagement with trade unions and activation of employees |
• Zero harm ambition • Internal and external communication measures • Competitive conditions • Competence programmes and on-the-job training activities |
| Authorities | • Dialogue meetings and conferences • Compliance with laws and regulations • Reporting on progress • Supervision, audits, and verifications public consultation • Submissions • Environmental and climate reporting |
• Compliance with laws and regulations • Health, safety and environment, energy, and climate measures • Comprehensive risk management |
• Reporting on progress/ sustainability reporting • Clear goals and ambitions for ESG • Proactive dialogue with authorities |
| Suppliers and contractors |
• Supplier meetings • Enquiries • Negotiation meetings • Day-to-day operations • Audits and verifications |
• ESG weighting in tenders • Sourcing • Predictability/ long-term perspective |
• Act based on a long-term perspective and predictability in the market • Qualifying suppliers based on criteria regarding ESG, quality and code of conduct |
| Society and local communities |
• Local media • Close contact with upper secondary school/ universities • Conferences and events |
• Support local business • Apprentice schemes • Transparency on matters that impact local communities • Participation in local support and sponsorship measures |
• Apprentice programme • Sponsorship and partnerships • Social media • Meetings and discussions • Quarterly and annual report |
| Licence partners1 | • Licence meetings • Direct management meetings • Development projects |
• Compliance with agreements • Responsible operator and partner |
• Balanced and long-term agreements • Communication and transparency |
Table 2. Stakeholder engagement and dialogue
1 Production licences on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS) are granted to consortiums of companies. For more information on OKEA's licences and licence partners, reference is made to The Petroleum Act and the licensing system - Norwegianpetroleum.no (norskpetroleum.no).

Sustainability Environment Social Governance Appendix
and stakeholders materiality
As part of our strategy, we maintain a clear, credible, and consistent approach to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) management. The management of ESG matters is deeply ingrained in our business and operational activities, serving as a critical element of our licence to operate. We strive to maximise value by efficiently utilising available resources, actively reducing emissions, and remaining an attractive investment for our shareholders. In the years ahead, we aim to generate substantial cash flow from our oil and gas production. This cash flow will contribute to expand our portfolio and create value for both shareholders and society.
Our vision is to be the leading mid- to late-life operator on the NCS, aimed at creating longterm value for our shareholders and society. The vision is founded on our strategic belief that the world needs affordable, sustainable, and reliable energy. Our strategic priorities and enablers are illustrated above.
Our goal is to ensure safe and responsible operations while creating long-term value for our shareholders. We are committed to minimising our impact on the natural environment and upholding the highest standards of corporate governance and business ethics.
Sustainability performance management is seamlessly integrated into our strategy, business planning, risk management, and decision-making processes. Our strategic priorities drive a range of initiatives, including specific ones related to ESG. These initiatives are accompanied by corresponding key performance indicators (KPIs) for the upcoming year. Notably, three of these KPIs focus on critical ESG aspects: safety, reducing GHG emissions through power from shore to Draugen, and employee engagement scores.
| OKEA's performance management system is widely employed across the company to |
|---|
| track and report progress on initiatives and |
| corresponding KPIs. Successful delivery on |
| these initiatives and KPIs directly influences |
| OKEA's bonus program, where monetary |
| rewards are calculated based on performance. |
| These bonuses are distributed to senior |
| management, including the CEO and other |
| employees. |

and stakeholders
OKEA actively supports the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), using them as a reference when defining our sustainability priorities. By focusing on SDGs where we can maximise our impact, we successfully implement our strategic plan and address material issues. The following SDGs are most relevant to OKEA:

The board of directors serves as the highest managing body, responsible for shaping and executing the company's strategy, including sustainability targets. Our experienced board members bring diverse backgrounds, enriched by their professional work and executive roles. They possess valuable expertise in evaluating and making decisions related to sustainability matters. Continuously, they enhance their knowledge of environmental, social, and governance issues relevant to the company. More detailed information about each board member's personal and professional characteristics can be found on OKEA's website and in the annual report for 2023. Our board comprises four women and six men, with three members elected by employees, ensuring the necessary independence as per Norwegian statutes and regulations.
The figure to the right gives an overview of the roles, and responsibilities of the board of directors and senior management in relation to ESG topics.
Defines the strategic lines and the objectives for the company, including ESG strategy.
Reviews or approves corporate governance and compliance documents and related policies, guidelines of the internal control and risk management system (including ESG risks and opportunities), and financial and non-financial reporting.
• prepares matters to be considered by the board and to support the board in the exercise of its management and supervisory responsibilities relating to financial reporting, statutory audit, internal control, and collaboration with the Financial Supervisory Authorities
Overall responsibility for the organisation to deliver on the company's strategy, including sustainability efforts
OKEA's management has established a reporting and meeting structure to ensure that risks and performance are reviewed weekly, monthly, and quarterly with engagement of relevant stakeholders in the business. The risk and performance reviews include evaluation of progress and results on climate, compliance, human rights, and other sustainability-related activities. The senior management team shall also ensure the effectiveness of the risk management processes and review mitigation efforts for identified impacts.
Figure 2. Roles and responsibilities in relation to ESG topics
2 100% of the senior management team are hired from the local community
The six core commitments in our ESG strategy and their supporting KPIs and targets, represent the sustainability issues where OKEA can create the most significant impact, and which are critical to the success of our business strategy. For each of the ESG topics, KPIs/ monitoring indicators have been identified, and clear ambitions have been set.
The effectiveness of our management approach for sustainability issues is evaluated through performance reviews at several management levels, and at board level, including in the relevant board committees.
The KPI table to the left summarises our ESG topics and provides a high-level overview of our progress towards targets in 2023.
| Sustainability indicators | 2023 ambition | 2023 performance |
|---|---|---|
| Energy transition and climate change | ||
| Absolute GHG emissions scope 1 (tonnes CO2 e) reductions |
Reduce absolute scope 1 emissions by 390,000 tonnes vs. 2019 (portfolio) by 20304 |
24,996 accumulated 2020-2023 |
| Protecting biodiversity and ecosystems | ||
| Serious accidental spills5 | Zero serious acute spills to the environment | 0 |
| Ensure safe and secure operations | ||
| Serious incidents | Zero actual serious incidents | 1 |
| Empowering people | ||
| Engagement score | Top quartile score on engagement | 85 out of 100 |
| Female recruitment | 30 percent female recruitments | 26 percent |
| Respecting human rights | ||
| Confirmed instances of discrimination and human right violations |
Zero confirmed instances of discrimination and human rights violations |
0 |
| Responsible and ethical business practice | ||
| Confirmed instances of corruption and bribery | Zero confirmed instances of corruption and bribery | 0 |
| Employees who signed-off the Code of Conduct | All employees have signed off the code of conduct | 95 percent |
Table 3. Key performance indicators
3 Key performance indicators (KPIs) are selected based on the topics identified as most significant and collected on an annual basis.
4 Our ambition regarding reducing absolute emissions by 2030 has been updated. For more information reference is made to the chapter "Energy transition and climate change"
5 The ambition refers to all hydrocarbon and chemical spills in category A and B from our operated assets
| OKEA ESG Report 2023 | Introduction | Value, materiality and stakeholders |
Sustainability | Environment | Social | Governance | Appendix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
• Robust HSEQ management system in place • Regular HSEQ training, drills, and audits
| management) standard and is consistent company wide. For detailed information on OKEA's business and industry risks, |
|---|
| pages 14-16 of this report. |
| Mitigation measures |
| Inside-out: Spills from our operations could trigger a negative chain effect on ocean ecosystems, with potential degradation and loss of (for example in the event of spills). stand-by vessels |
| Inside-out: Soil and water contamination could give a negative effect on the healthy ecosystem, like environmental pollution, with a negative progress |
| Inside-out: Accidents during operational activities can lead to severe |
| Inside-out and outside-in: Integrity failure risks could lead to operational • Audits (internal and third party) disruptions, fires, explosions, and water contamination. These factors may cause environmental harm and significant financial impacts, including • Improvement projects business interruption, higher costs, regulatory consequences, legal • Planned turnarounds • Qualified and trained personnel • Insurance coverage |
| significant risks to OKEA. These include attacks by hackers, computer viruses, insider threats, and errors by employees. Such threats could lead to production losses, compromise sensitive information, and impact safety and the environment. OKEA may also face regulatory actions, • Detecting unwanted activity legal liability, reputational damage, and revenue loss if these threats • Incident response and recover |
Within our Integrated Risk Management System, we identify and assess the most significant ESG risks and opportunities. These are summarised in the table below. Additionally, for risks related to energy transition and climate change, please see pages 14-16 of this report.
• Diversity targets as part of department scorecards • Focus on female talent in succession planning process across the
• Diversity awareness and unconscious bias training for all employees
• Building robust talent pipelines by cooperating with universities and offering internships and other programs
• Yearly summer job opportunities in various departments
• Undertaking ongoing human rights due diligence in the supply chain • Implementation of Supplier Code of Conduct
| Sustainability issue | Related risks | Effect description (outside-in/inside-out) | Mitigation measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main risks and opportunities related to "Empowering people" | |||
| Diversity, equal opportunity, and inclusion concerns |
Threat: Risk of failing to reach OKEA's diversity target and failing to foster and maintain an inclusive and diverse workforce. |
Outside-in: Missing OKEA's diversity target heightens the risk of reduced employee engagement, higher attrition rates, and the potential loss of female top talent. Additionally, this situation could result in reputational damage. |
company. |
| Employee attraction, talent management & retention concerns |
Threat: The oil and gas industry faces a significant challenge: a shortfall of experienced technical professionals due to attrition and retirement. This risk encompasses both the number of workers retiring and the availability of qualified replacements. |
Outside-in: OKEA faces the risk of unfilled key roles, leading to short or negative handovers. This could result in departmental performance decline. Moreover, uncertainties surrounding the future of the oil and gas industry, the demand for new capabilities, and intensified competition for talent all pose risks to securing the right workforce competence and capacity. |
|
| Main risks and opportunities related to "Respecting human rights" | |||
| Human rights concerns | Threat: Risk of human rights abuse within our operations, business, or joint ventures. This risk is equally about the risk of poor labour practices, as well as child labour, forced labour, insufficient grievance mechanism, or any other violation of human rights. |
Inside-out and outside-in: Poor labour practices can significantly affect workers' mental and physical health. This, in turn, increases the risk to personal health and safety—and in extreme cases, even injury or even death—which poses a threat to OKEA's reputation. |
monitoring |
| Threat: The risk of human rights abuse within our operations, business, or joint ventures encompasses numerous factors. These include the risk of poor labour practices, as well as issues related to child labour, forced labour, insufficient grievance mechanisms, and other potential violations of human rights. |
Outside in: Deterioration of OKEA's relationship with local stakeholders, due to lack of compensation or environmental negative impacts, resulting in reputational damage. |
||
| Sustainable and responsible supply chain |
Opportunity: Ensure that sustainability risks and opportunities are addressed in the supply chain. |
Inside-out: Addressing sustainability risks and opportunities in our supply chain strengthens stakeholders' trust and prepares us for regulation of due diligence in supply chains. |
and low- carbon initiatives |
| Main risks and opportunities related to "Responsible and ethical business practice" | |||
| Business integrity and ethical misconduct concerns |
Threat: Fraud, corruption, non-compliance with legal regulations, Code of Conduct, and policies. |
Inside-out and outside-in: The risk of unethical business conduct in our operations or supply chain could result in reputational damage, affecting our licence to operate and growth. Non-compliance with regulations may also lead to additional taxes |
whistleblowing |
| Environmental non compliance concerns |
Threat: Non-compliance with environmental laws or regulations caused by unexpected changes in our operations. |
Outside- in: This could lead to additional OPEX or CAPEX needed to upgrade facilities or extra taxes having to be paid. |
and upheld |
• Integration of human rights in business processes, e.g., HSSE contractor management, project management, supplier prequalification and
• Training for employees in specific functions to develop skills. • Professional human rights and social impact assessment • Professional community relations & project development management
• Engaging with strategic suppliers regarding sustainable procurement and low- carbon initiatives
• Undertaking due diligence in the supply chain
• Mandatory e-learning for all employees and the board covering compliance-related topics such as anti-corruption, bribery, and
• Supplier Code of Conduct Declaration
• Undertaking due diligence in supply chain
• Risk based audits on suppliers
• Engagement with regulators to ensure laws are correctly interpreted
Table 4. Specific ESG risks and opportunities structured by our material topics cont.
and stakeholders
Sustainability Environment Social Governance Appendix
and stakeholders materiality
Reducing emissions from own operations and supply chain.
OKEA has significant Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions from our operating activities and energy products.
Absolute GHG emissions scope 1 (tonnes CO2 e)
Reduce absolute scope 1 GHG emissions by 230 000 tonnes CO2 e by 2030.
Reduction of 24,996 tonnes CO2 e since 2019
POLICY ESG strategy
OKEA recognises climate change as a critical global challenge and and supports the goals of the Paris Agreement. We grapple with the "energy trilemma," balancing the need to decarbonise the energy mix while ensuring a reliable and affordable energy supply. Despite optimistic energy transition scenarios, the world will continue relying on oil and gas for energy and petrochemicals for decades. Hence, it will be crucial to continue producing hydrocarbon resources with the lowest possible carbon footprint.
OKEA has established short, medium, and long-term GHG emission ambitions to reduce its operational carbon footprint. Achieving these ambitions necessitates collaboration with partners and suppliers through strategic partnerships.
Our ESG strategy focuses on reducing operational GHG emissions, energy consumption, and associated air emissions.
Internal management ensures our energy management systems are aligned with the ISO 50001 Energy management standard, including energy performance improvements across all our activities.

and stakeholders
In 2023, we established a Technology forum responsible for coordinating technological research and development. Additionally, we have implemented energy reduction plans as part of our asset management systems.
The STR committee oversees OKEA's sustainability reporting and assesses our ESG strategy, which includes our climate policy statement.
OKEA's primary goal is to reduce direct (scope 1) operational control emissions by 230,000 tonnes CO2 e by 2030, from a base level of 420,000 tonnes CO2 e. To achieve this, OKEA is following a decarbonisation pathway based on specific business targets outlined in our strategic plan. This strategy prioritises optimising the asset portfolio, focusing on
already productive assets and projects that develop profitable reserves at moderate crude oil prices. These projects have shorter life cycles and lower carbon intensity. During this decade, until 2030, we will offset the natural decline in field production by developing reserves and contingent resources already discovered. We pay particular attention to reduce direct emissions from our assets through energy efficiency measures, electrification, and minimising methane emissions and flaring.
OKEA is committed to align its plans and investment decisions with the decarbonisation pathway. The evolution towards a more decarbonised product portfolio will be supported by investments dedicated to low and zero carbon activities, as outlined in the table on the next page.
Scope 1: direct emissions from owned
or controlled sources.
Scope 2: indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity,
steam, heating, and cooling.
Scope 3: all other indirect emissions that occur in a company's value chain.
| Area | Short term commitments 2024 |
Medium term commitments 2025-2026 |
Long term commitments 2030 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational control | |||||
| Absolute GHG emissions reduction scope 16 |
Achieve at least 25 000 tonnes (accumulated from 2019) of CO2 e reductions from operated assets. |
Achieve at least 10 000 tonnes of yearly CO2 e reductions in 2025–2026 from operated assets. |
Reduce absolute emissions by 230,000 tonnes CO2 e by 2030. |
||
| Scope 3 emission reduction |
Identify the top five suppliers that contribute most to our scope 3 emissions and establish dialogue to reduce addressable emissions. |
By 2026 100% of OKEA's strategic suppliers will be assessed according to their path of sustainable development and whether they have carbon reduction targets and plans in place. |
Continue to promote decarbonisation measures in close collaboration with our suppliers and contractors. |
||
| Energy and emission reduction initiatives |
Conduct four energy reducing initiatives per asset in accordance with asset specific plans. |
Continue to carry out energy reducing initiatives in accordance with asset specific plans. |
6 Base year 2019

Figure 3. OKEA decarbonisation pathway 2019 – 2030

and stakeholders
In 2023, our operated scope 1 GHG emissions totalled 394,163 tonnes CO2 e, marking 17,165 tonnes decrease from the previous year with full year Brage operations included. Notable emission reduction initiatives included:
In addition to emissions from OKEA-operated assets, a significant portion of GHG emissions related to our asset portfolio comes from the equity share of emissions from partneroperated assets. All our partner-operated fields align with the KonKraft ambition to reduce total emissions from oil and gas production on the Norwegian continental shelf. We actively contribute to achieve this ambition by supporting the implementation of costeffective measures to reduce GHG emissions from our partner-operated assets.
In 2023, OKEA's equity CO2 e emissions, excluding Statfjord, totalled 182,881 tonnes CO2 e, an increase from the 138,290 tonnes CO2 e reported in 2022. Largest change is full year Brage emissions is included in 2023 compared to only two months in 2022. This year for the first time, we provided field-based emissions disclosure for both our operated asset emissions and our partner-operated assets, as outlined in the table above. We will continue working with our partners to encourage emissions disclosure on a field basis.
Energy management is a critical issue for OKEA, including both the company's focus on reducing its environmental footprint, as well as enabling it to run more cost-efficient operations. The company's aim of increasing energy efficiency affects how we conduct our operations and is dependent on collaborative efforts from multiple stakeholders in our supply chain, maintenance management programs and energy optimisation projects. We work continuously to reduce our energy consumption and related emissions by implementing measures identified through efforts are driven by established energy teams within each asset. The total energy consumption in OKEA's operated assets was 4,842 GWh in 2023. This is a reduction compared to the 4,979 GWh consumed in 2022 with full year Brage production included. REDUCING FLARING AND METHANE EMISSIONS Reducing flaring and methane emissions is crucial for resource efficiency and long-term economic success. Given natural gas's role in the energy transition, minimising methane
energy improvement opportunities. These emissions throughout the gas chain is vital.
| Committed investment | OKEA share million NOK | Asset | OKEA equity share | Unit | 2023 | Operator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power from shore Draugen | 1,872 | Brage | 35.2% | t CO2 e |
69,911 | OKEA ASA |
| Draugen | 44.56% | t CO2 e |
87,138 | OKEA ASA | ||
| Nova | 6% | t CO2 e |
1,082 | Wintershall DEA | ||
| Gjøa | 12% | t CO2 e |
5,246 | Vår Energi Norge AS | ||
| Table 5. Committed carbon investments 2024-2030 (OKEA share million NOK) | Ivar Aasen | 9.2385% | t CO2 e |
1,040 | Aker BP ASA | |
| Yme | 15% | t CO2 e |
18,464 | Repsol Norge AS |
KonKraft is a collaboration platform for Offshore Norway, the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise, the Norwegian Shipowners' Association, the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO), and the Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO), with the LO unions Fellesforbundet and Industri Energi. The Emission Reduction Goal for KonKraft is that the oil and gas industry in Norway are to reduce emissions by 50 percent by 2030 compared to 2005 levels, and towards zero emissions by 2050.
Table 6. Equity emissions disclosure

are the primary contributors. Our ongoing efforts focus on energy reduction measures, operational optimisation, and adopting new technologies. For more details, reference is made to our ESG performance data in the appendix. Draugen. Tie-back production of gas from Hasselmus to Draugen has also increased the methane content. SCOPE 2 EMISSIONS Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are
Performance review In 2023, we revised our goals for reducing absolute scope 1 emissions. To achieve our ambition of reducing absolute scope 1 emissions by 230,000 tonnes of CO2 e by 2030 compared to our base year 2019 emissions of 420,000 tonnes, we are prioritising several key projects. These projects include electrification of our assets by power from shore and floating wind turbines, reducing safety flaring to a minimum and other energy efficiency initiatives. We have already reduced our emissions by 24,996 tonnes CO2 e since 2019. In the years to come we will continue to carry out operational improvements and energy reducing initiatives in accordance with asset specific plans. calculated based on the energy consumption within an organisation. Specifically, these emissions arise from the use of electricity, heating, and cooling in our office spaces. Accurately accounting for Scope 2 emissions is essential, and we calculate emissions based on the emissions intensity of the local grid area where electricity usage occur. Our Scope 2 (location based) emissions were 37.9 tonnes in 2023 compared to 39.3 in 2022. SCOPE 3 EMISSIONS In 2023, we evaluated our supplier base systematically to assess emission reduction potential and supplier decarbonisation plans. We will collaborate with the top suppliers contributing to OKEA's scope 3 emissions to reduce addressable emissions. We aim to increase transparency and reduce emissions
| Category | Operation control/ equity basis |
Tonnes CO2e |
|---|---|---|
| Category 1: Purchased goods and services | Operational control | 369,022 |
| Category 2: Capital goods | Operational control | 163,031 |
| Category 3: Fuel- and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or 2) |
Operational control | 46,695 |
| Category 4: Upstream transportation and d istribution of products | Operational control | 85,105 |
| Category 5: Waste generated in operations | Operational control | 138 |
| Category 6: Business travel | Operational control | 2509 |
| Category 7: Employee commuting | Operational control | - |
| Category 8: Upstream leased assets | Operational control | 49,589 |
| Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution of products Operational control | - | |
| Category 10: Processing of sold products | Operational control | - |
| Category 11: Use of sold products7 | Operational control | 3,847,973 |
| Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products7 | Operational control | 67,139 |
| Category 13: Downstream leased assets | Operational control | - |
For 2023 we set a target of reducing scope across our value chain by working with all suppliers. In the table to the left, Scope 3
Table 7. Scope 3 emissions distribution
3 emissions related to purchasing and transportation of goods by 5 percent. This target was not met, due to a change of fuel used on the PSV Siem Pride (from LNG to diesel) in the first half of 2023. For 2024 our ambition is to identify the top five suppliers that contribute the most to our scope 3 emissions and to establish a dialogue with suppliers to reduce addressable emissions. emissions for 2023 per category are presented. MARITIME VESSELS As part of the KonKraft climate strategy, we aim to contribute to the reduction of offshore maritime sector emissions by 50 percent by 2030. Within scope 3 category 1 emission sources, platform supply vessels (PSVs)
7 Operational control sold products refers to equity share of all fields as the oil and gas is lifted by OKEA and under OKEA's control
Leak detection using thermal infrared cameras helps reduce fugitive hydrocarbon emissions from process systems. In 2023, 267 GWh of energy was released from flaring gas from operated assets. This is a reduction compared to the 291 GWh released in 2022 with full year Brage production included.
OKEA's methane intensity accounted for 3,7 percent of total GHG emissions. The emission of methane increased by 728 tonnes CO2 e from 2022 to 2023, with full year Brage production included for 2022. This increase is due to factors like cold venting of gas from Brage (with higher methane content) and improved reporting routines for methane and NMVOC emissions from cold flaring on
and stakeholders
Power from shore – reducing GHG emissions by 200,000 tonnes per year from Draugen

— FEATURED CASE
and stakeholders
In December, the Ministry of Energy approved the revised plans for development and operation for the electrification of the Draugen and Njord A platforms. The project will reduce GHG emissions by a total of 330,000 tonnes of CO2 per year compared to estimated 2027 emissions and increase value creation from the Norwegian continental shelf.
The development plans were delivered to the Ministry of Oil and Energy in December 2022.
Norway has an ambition to cut GHG emissions by 55 per cent by 2030. Achieving this ambition will not be possible without the electrification of oil and gas fields.
The licence partners in the Draugen and Njord platforms have a common goal of long-term value creation and at the same time reducing their carbon footprint. The electrification project will provide an annual reduction of 200,000 tonnes CO2 e emissions from Draugen and 130,000 tonnes from Njord, says project director Terje Åshamar.
In addition to reducing GHG emissions, the project will result in lower operating costs and an extension of the field's economic lifespan.
The Draugen licencee has applied for a licence extension until 2040. The electrification of Draugen will also increase the attractiveness of potential future resources in the area, says Asset manager for Draugen, Kirsti Flatval.
The electrification of the Draugen and Njord A platforms is a collaborative project, where OKEA will be responsible for developing the power infrastructure from shore to Draugen. Equinor will be responsible for the cable from Draugen to Njord and modifications and upgrades on Njord A.
Draugen and Njord will require up to 80 MW of capacity and will be connected to the power grid at Tensio's transformer station at Straum in Åfjord municipality, which has an annual
capacity of 200 MW. Statnett assesses the connection as operationally sound without the need for reinforcements of the existing power grid.
OKEA has entered into a long-term agreement of 10 years with TrønderEnergi Kraft for the purchase of hydropower for the electrification of Draugen. The long-term nature of the agreement reflects OKEA's desire for secure and stable access to clean power.
Electrification of Draugen will significantly contribute to economic activity and job creation in the surrounding areas and supplier industry. The total investment for the Draugen project alone will be in the order of NOK 5 billion. Of this, over a billion kroner is related to direct supplier goods and services in the region. In the period up until 2027, the construction phase will employ around 1,400 man-years.
Expected completion of the project is the second quarter of 2027.
Terje Åshamar Project director
The long-term nature of the agreement reflects OKEA's desire for secure and stable access to clean power
and stakeholders


27
Climate change directly and indirectly impacts our business activities. We have analysed these effects across the short, medium, and the long term. OKEA considers various scenarios, including a 2°C reference scenario aligned with limiting global temperature increase. We're mindful of the risk of stranded assets if reserves can't be fully exploited due
to exceeding the global carbon budget. Our strategy development accounts for economic, technological, and social developments, shaping the energy market and our business.
As a part of the TCFD (Task Force on Climaterelated Financial Disclosures) climate risk and opportunity assessment a sensitivity test of OKEA's portfolio against IEA's energy scenarios from the World Energy Outlook (WEO) report
OKEA has included the financial consequences of climate-related policies in our decision-making processes as follows:

▶ Stated policies scenario reflects current announced by governments around the world.
was performed. IEA's current three scenarios are: «Stated policies», «Announced pledges» and «Net zero by 2050»: policy settings based on a sector-by-sector assessment of the specific policies that are in place, as well as those that have been ▶ Announced pledges scenario assumes that all climate commitments made by governments around the world, including Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and longer-term net zero targets, will be met in full and on time. ▶ Net zero scenario sets out a narrow but achievable pathway for the global energy sector to achieve net zero CO2 emissions by
2050.
and stakeholders
The aim of the scenario analysis is to aid our understanding of how the pace and nature of the energy transition may affect the global energy system and test whether our corporate strategy is robust and resilient to the range of uncertainty we face.
These scenarios represent different future pathways depending on varying climate policies and have different oil, gas, and carbon price assumptions used to test the resilience of our portfolio compared to our base assumptions. A gradual development from 2023 actuals towards the IEA milestones have been assumed. For the total carbon price (EUA quota + NCS tax) a linear escalation in line with the expectations of the Norwegian government (2,000 NOK/tonne by 2030 stated in real 2020 terms) was assumed for all scenarios.
The scenarios are compared in terms of the change in net present value after tax (NPV) discounted by 8 per cent (real terms), that corresponds to 10% nominal discount rate. The OKEA portfolio consists of producing assets, sanctioned and optional (non-sanctioned)
| projects. Exploration activities are excluded for this purpose. The results show that the «Net zero» scenario will result in decreased NPV, while the remaining two IEA scenarios will result in increased NPV when compared to OKEA's base assumptions, both for the sanctioned and optional portfolio of projects. |
|---|
| Assets in the sanctioned portfolio have also |
| been analysed individually to assess the |
| risk of early cease of production (CoP) due |
| to restrictions under the IEA scenarios. This |
| analysis was performed by assessing pre |
| tax cashflows excluding any abandonment |
| obligations. CoP is then set to the time when |
| cashflow turns negative. IEA's «Net zero» |
| results in the largest impact, while the other |
| two scenarios have limited effect on the estimated CoP. |
| The table above illustrates the estimated CoP |
| per asset, comparing the base assumption to different scenarios: |
| These results are based on producing assets, including sanctioned projects and initiatives. |


Figure 6. Percentage change in NPV relative to base

| Asset | Base | Stated policies | Announced pledges | Net zero | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRAUGEN | 2040 | 2040 | 2040 | 2038 | |
| BRAGE* | 2030 | 2030 | 2030 | 2027 | |
| GJØA | 2028 | 2036 | 2036 | 2032 | |
| IVAR AASEN | 2035 | 2035 | 2035 | 2033 | |
| YME | 2027 | 2027 | 2027 | 2027 | |
| NOVA** | 2035 | 2035 | 2035 | 2032 | *Dependent on infill drilling (drilling until 2026 included) |
| STATFJORD | 2038 | 2038 | 2038 | 2030 | **Dependent on OPEX-share level at host |
Table 8. Estimated cease of production
For Draugen, additional resources and projects were sanctioned in 2023. The Power from Shore-project has a positive effect on Draugen's long term cash flow. Brage production depends on continuous infill drilling which is included until 2026 for the purpose of this analysis. Tail end production at Yme is sensitive to lower prices and increased taxes as in the "Net zero" scenario. Implications on other assets are limited.
The magnitude of carbon costs in each scenario is illustrated below and shows the percentage change in carbon costs before tax, relative to the portfolio value before tax, for the full lifetime of the portfolio.
The energy transition and climate change are increasingly crucial for OKEA in the medium and long term. Our risk assessment relies on the IEA's three scenarios: Announced Pledges Scenario (APS), Sustainable Development Scenario (SDS), and Net Zero Emissions (NZE). Climate risks can impact us either positively or negatively, depending on our strategies for risk mitigation and adaptation to these scenarios. Importantly, the scenarios also signal the emergence of potential business opportunities.
We are committed to transparency regarding GHG emissions across all scopes, our transition pathways, and climate-related risks and opportunities. Our reporting framework aligns with the TCFD recommendations.
For a detailed overview of our disclosure in line with TCFD recommendations, please refer to the separate TCFD report on page 77.
Looking ahead to 2040 and 2050, exposure to climate risks will intensify. Uncertainty associated with risk factors and the scale at which these factors may materialise will increase. However, this also opens opportunities that can be harnessed. We have summarised the potential risks (categorised as threats and opportunities) on the subsequent pages.
Management of climate related risks and opportunities, both physical and transition risks, are managed and mitigated in the same way as other business risks to which OKEA is exposed. However, the fact that they are emerging risks, means that they will require ongoing and more in-depth examination in the medium and long term.

Figure 7. Carbon cost relative to value of portfolio
and stakeholders
| Type of risk | Risk | Risk description | Risk level | Level of influence |
Time horizon | Financial impact | Mitigation measures |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market | Reduction in demand and prices for petroleum products |
Price of renewable energy decreases and affects oil and gas demand and subsequently oil price. |
Medium-high | Low | Medium/ Long term |
Impacts in terms of lower financial results and shareholders returns. |
• Application of internal carbon pricing, scenario analysis and sensitivity testing • Cost reduction initiatives • Implementation of energy and emission efficiency programmes and emission reduction projects • Exploring low-carbon technologies such as CCS and floating wind power to support decarbonisation efforts |
| Policy and regulatory |
Increased pricing of GHG emissions and taxes |
EU ETS prices increase to reach EU's 2030 climate goal. Uncertainty relating to the development in actual quota prices going forward, and timing of ramp-up of the total CO2 cost/ taxes towards 2030. |
Low-Medium | Low | Short/ Medium term |
Impacts in terms of increasing of costs related to higher CO2 costs and taxes. |
• Implementation of energy and emission efficiency programmes and emission reduction projects • Inclusion of anticipated developments in carbon cost in all investment assessments and forecasting |
| Governmental interventions |
Regulation on production, development and/or emissions (e.g., operating restrictions (volumes), caps on emissions, reduction in exploration licensing or net zero development project requirements. |
Low-medium | Low | Medium/Long term |
Impacts in terms of reduced access to new exploration acreage, combined with restrictions on developing proven resources, would limit growth opportunities in the long term and lower financial results. |
• Be a prudent operator with a clear and credible ESG position. • Continued engagement with external stakeholders, including the Norwegian authorities. • Electrification, using hydro power from shore, or, where feasible, from offshore floating wind power |
|
| Reputational | Increased scrutiny from financial sector on oil and gas industry globally |
Negative assessment of sustainable business strategy and sustainability/ESG performance by financial stakeholders. |
Medium-high | Medium | Short/medium term |
Impacts in terms of increasing cost of capital for the company and/or limit our potential access to new capital. |
• Engagement activities with financial stakeholders. |
| Reduced attractiveness of the oil and gas sector |
The industry's attractiveness can deteriorate making it difficult to attract and retain the right talent. |
Low-medium | Medium | Medium/ Long term |
Impacts in terms of reduced access to competent employees can limit growth opportunities and in a long term lower financial result. |
• Maintaining OKEA as an attractive employer • External engagement and communication |
|
| Technology | Increase of costs in connection with implementation of ESG-related technologies (e.g., hydro power from shore |
Increased costs in the supply chain due to increased competition, new regulations, increased energy prices and increased costs related to raw materials (e.g., steel). |
Medium | High | Low-medium | Erosion of project margins or weakening of ESG related business cases due to higher prices for power, increased supplier, and raw material costs. |
• As above • Energy efficiency initiatives |
| Physical risk | Acute extreme weather |
Extreme weather events such as storms and heavy rain affecting own production and supply chain logistics. |
Low | Low | Medium | Impacts in terms of increased operating costs, delays in operational activities and reduced project margins due to potential 5-10% increased downtime (waiting on weather). |
• Regular updates of meteorology and oceanography data used in project and operational planning. • Insurance coverage • Inclusion of contract clauses related to weather events |
Table 9. Climate related risks
| OKEA ESG Report 2023 | Introduction | Value, materiality |
|---|---|---|
| ---------------------- | -------------- | -------------------- |
and stakeholders
Through the scenario development and assessment process, OKEA has identified three climate-related opportunities arising from a changing market and technological development. These opportunities also present ways of mitigating the identified risks and enabling continued growth. The opportunities have not been fully quantified at this time, as they vary significantly on a case-by-case basis.
| OKEA ESG Report 2023 | Introduction | Value, materiality and stakeholders |
Sustainability | Environment | Social | Governance | Appendix | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opportunity | Risk description | Time horizon | Financial impact | Mitigation measures | ||||
| Efficient use of resources Increased revenues in operation of aging oil and gas fields, versus building new ones |
We expect that transaction activity on the NCS will increase over the next years as companies divest ageing assets. This could represent an opportunity for OKEA in realising the growth strategy and becoming the leading mid- to late-life operator on the NCS. |
Short term/ medium Term | Impacts associated with our key capabilities as an operator to unlock upsides and implement cost-efficient solutions to extend life-of-field. |
• Carrying out energy assessments to |
identify appropriate solutions and maximise savings; designing and implementing measures and actions to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions |
|||
| Increased revenues in circular economy projects (e.g., Decommissioning, and green steel) |
Utilise circular economy opportunities and increased profits through resale of steel and other metals from future decommissioning projects. |
Short term/ medium term | Impacts associated with increased revenues / reduced costs. |
• Collaboration with decommissioning stakeholders |
• Waste management and sorting optimalisation |
|||
| Energy and climate efficient operations | ||||||||
| Reduction of costs through initiatives aimed at reducing climate related impacts (e.g., offshore wind) |
Energy efficiency measurements and renewable energy implemented in own operations. |
Medium term | Reduction of fuel and electricity consumption costs through the implementation of energy efficiency solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. |
• Innovation and R&D collaborations and partnerships. |
activities also through |
Table 10. Climate related opportunities
Preventing the loss of biodiversity and minimising negative environmental impacts from our operations through operating within acceptable risk limits identified in environmental risk assessments (ERA) for our activities.
Our activities have actual and potential impacts on nature. These include the potential for serious uncontrolled discharges, as well as operations near protected areas.
Acute spills to the environment (number)
Zero serious acute spills to the environment
No serious acute spills to the environment in 2023
OKEA places great importance on safeguarding the environment and ecosystems. We recognise our duty to minimise adverse environmental impacts resulting from our operations, ensuring compliance with regulations, and meeting the expectations of our stakeholders.
Furthermore, the transition toward a resourceefficient, circular economy is a focal point that aligns with stakeholder expectations and commercial agreements. Notably, this shift is evident in initiatives like the EU Task Force on Nature-related Finance Disclosures (TNFD).
OKEA is dedicated to environmental stewardship and minimising our impact on nature. Here are the key aspects of our approach:

and stakeholders
33
We update our HSE plans annually, incorporating external environmental improvement activities and relevant KPIs.
| Area | Short term commitments 2024 |
Medium term commitments 2025-2026 |
Long term commitments 2030 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water withdrawal | Optimise water reinjection strategy and seek opportunities for increased injection rates. |
Continue to increase share of re-injected produced water | ||
| Spill prevention | Zero acute spills8 to the environment | Zero acute spills to the environment | ||
| Protecting biodiversity and ecosystems |
Plan and conduct our activities causing no harm to species and habitats of environmental importance9 |
Continue to participate in joint industry initiatives related to biodiversity preservation. |
7 The ambition refers to all hydrocarbon and chemical spills from our operated assets
8 The ambition refers to species and habitats as outlined in Norway's national biodiversity plan

OKEA conducts oil and gas operations offshore on the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS), which holds the potential to impact habitats, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. The extent of OKEA's impact on biodiversity depends on project complexity, the natural environment's existing value, and the specific context of our activities.
One of the most significant impacts across all OKEA assets relates to land or sea use changes due to the physical presence of equipment and infrastructure. These changes can lead to habitat removal, degradation, or fragmentation, affecting various species. For
detailed information on potential impacts, refer to the table on page 68.
We systematically follow the mitigation hierarchy, prioritising preventive measures over corrective actions. Our goal is to achieve no net loss or net gain of biodiversity, depending on project-specific risks and context.
In 2023, OKEA conducted no operations in protected areas or habitats. Additionally, no IUCN Red List species or national conservation list species with habitats in these areas were affected by our operations. Restoration efforts were not undertaken during this period.
We diligently monitor and survey the local marine environment in accordance with national environmental guidelines. Collaborating with other operators, we develop methods for environmental monitoring of the water column and seabed.
OKEA actively participates in research activities within the petroleum industry. These include monitoring health effects on marine species and ecosystems, as well as developing analytical methods to identify naphthenic acid discharged via produced water.
In 2023, OKEA contributed to the SEATRAC phase III project, part of the SEAPOP program—a collaboration involving Norwegian authorities, research institutions, and the oil and gas industry. This project enhances mapping of seabird wintering areas and migration routes in the North Atlantic waters. Notably, SEAPOP observed significant nesting populations of kittiwakes at several offshore installations on the NCS, with the highest number documented at Draugen.
Every third year, in cooperation with other operators, we conduct an extensive offshore environmental monitoring program according to regulations near both Draugen and Brage. This program tracks environmental conditions over time, aiming to safeguard the marine environment and indicate development trends in the environmental conditions. The monitoring program was last conducted on Brage in 2022 and on Draugen in 2021 which also included baseline survey for Hasselmus.
| FRESH WATER (MARINE SALT WATER) |
|---|
| Water and energy share an intrinsic connection. At OKEA, we recognise the |
| significance of sustainable water resource |
| management. Our commitment extends |
| to optimising water usage and minimising |
| freshwater withdrawal. |
| Most of our withdrawn water originates |
| from the ocean and serves as pressure |
| support in our offshore industrial processes. |
| Importantly, all our operations are situated on |
| the Norwegian continental shelf (NCS), where |
| freshwater withdrawal is limited and non |
| existent. Our assets are equipped with water making units that produce fresh water for |
| internal consumption. |
| While Norway enjoys abundant freshwater availability, we remain steadfast in managing and minimising freshwater use. In 2023, our |
| marine saltwater withdrawal totalled 43,800 |
| m³ compared to 13,819 m3 in 2022. OKEA is not involved in oil and gas production or water |
| withdrawal from areas characterised by high |
| or extremely high baseline water stress, as |
| defined by the World Resources Institute's |
| Aqueduct® tool. |
| Our commitment to responsible water |
| management ensures a sustainable balance |
| between industry needs and environmental |
| preservation. |
and stakeholders
OKEA is committed to preventing, reducing, and managing the discharge of effluents. Our primary objective is to minimise the environmental impact from oil and chemicals present in produced water and avoiding accidental discharges of oil or chemicals. Produced water and discharged cooling water may have a potential impact on the fauna in the water column in the direct vicinity of the discharge point.
We manage effluent discharges (including produced water, drain water, and displaced water) and necessary chemicals according to Norwegian regulations. Our facilities incorporate a multiple barrier system that ensures safe operations, intercepts potentially harmful substances, and minimises their release. There were no exceedances of the regulatory discharge limit for oil-in-water concentration (30 mg/l) from produced water generated by our installations in 2023.
Produced water that is not re-injected is discharged to the sea after treatment using the best available techniques and in compliance with regulatory requirements. We measure and monitor discharged effluents on a daily basis, continually evaluating optimisation possibilities. The impact of our produced water discharge is regularly modelled and calculated using an environmental impact factor (EIF). Effluents (produced water) are managed through daily measurements of oil-in-water concentration or continuous online monitoring.
Our total volume of produced water remains stable, with a strong focus on re-injection to minimise volume discharged to the sea. In 2023, our reinjection rate reached 47 per cent a decrease from 54 per cent in 2022. Increasing this rate remains a priority as it is the most efficient way for our assets to minimise environmental impact on the sea.
Furthermore, we actively work to substitute chemicals with products that have less environmental impact in our operations, drilling activities, and contractor-related tasks.
Oil and chemical spills pose a significant environmental challenge for our industry. At OKEA, we prioritise spill prevention through rigorous operational practices and incident management. Our commitment is to minimise spills from occurring in the first instance.
In 2023, OKEA had 8 minor chemical spills, and 2 of them was notified to authorities. All of them risk rated in category D and E, and none of the spills are evaluated to have an environmental consequence. OKEA successfully avoided any serious incidents of hydrocarbon or chemical spills.
OKEA recognises the critical importance of protecting air quality for both human health and the environment. Our air quality management efforts primarily target emissions of sulphur dioxide (SO2 ), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
As part of our comprehensive environmental management program, we continuously monitor non-GHG air emissions and implement measures to reduce potential impacts from our activities. Our emission limits are clearly defined in the discharge permits issued by the regulator.
To achieve this, we employ the best available technologies to minimize air emissions from our processes. Additionally, we conduct

| periodic Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) |
|---|
| campaigns to control and minimise fugitive |
| emissions. High sealing systems are also |
| installed to prevent the leakage of volatile |
| organic compounds. Our emissions to air |
| have increased from 2022, primarily due to |
| the inclusion of Brage air emissions in our |
| disclosure data for the entire calendar year. |
| In our operations, we use KFK gases primarily |
| as refrigerants in our kitchens. We are actively |
| transitioning to less harmful alternatives for all |
| our products. |
| Our commitment to responsible waste management ensures that we minimise |
|---|
| environmental impact while adhering to the highest standards. |
| The figures to the left illustrate the handling of all hazardous and non-hazardous waste, generated by OKEA in 2023. |
| In 2023, OKEA achieved a total waste recovery rate of 18.8 per cent for both hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Our commitment to minimising waste generation and maximising resource utilisation is ongoing. |
| To further strengthen our efforts, OKEA is actively embracing a circular economy approach. Recently, we published a new circular economy policy. Within OKEA, we have implemented the 6Rs rule based on the "ReSOLVE Framework". |
OKEA conducts offshore operational activities, and all significant production waste, both hazardous and non-hazardous, is returned to shore for recycling or disposal. This includes general waste, paper, glass, empty metal and plastic drums, oils, sludge, and chemicals.
The largest fractions of hazardous waste, in terms of weight, originate from our drilling operations. When we drill wells, the rock cuttings contaminated with mud and drilling fluids are transported onshore for appropriate handling.
Our waste management plan meticulously outlines the handling and disposal procedures for process-related waste. Waste transported to shore is managed by an approved and experienced waste contractor.
OKEA aims to maximise the residual value of mature assets to seize all opportunities to reconvert plants and reuse their components.
| Life extension of assets | Recycling of materials | Reuse of components |
|---|---|---|
| Identification of opportunities for extending the life of assets with targeted actions to optimise production and contain operating costs. |
Recycling of ferrous and non-ferrous materials with the adoption of adequate contractual solutions for the sale of steel, copper, aluminium, and other fundamental resources for industrial processes. |
Evaluation of equipment and components to be reused. OKEA is part of Virtual Inventory an accessible centralised repository where we can share our inventory and spare parts with other operators on the NCS. |
Figure 8. Hazardous waste generated (tonnes)
Figure 9. Non-hazardous waste generated (tonnes)


and stakeholders
These six areas guide businesses toward circular economy principles:
Additionally, we recognise that decommissioning and restoration offer opportunities aligned with the principles of keeping products and materials in use. By adopting these practices, we contribute to a more sustainable future.
When oil and gas fields reach the end of their production life, it is our obligation as the facility's operator to decommission and dismantle the facilities and equipment. The disposal of these structures is subject to cessation plans approved by the authorities and handled by receiving facilities. This includes the equipment and surroundings of both on- and offshore facilities.
For more information related to our environmental performance data, see ESG performance data in appendix.
In 2023, OKEA did not have direct Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) specifically measuring biodiversity. However, we evaluated our impact on biodiversity using the environmental KPI related to serious acute spills to the environment, and there were 0 serious acute spills during the year. Looking ahead to 2024, we aim to further refine our commitment to biodiversity. This includes understanding external and internal frameworks, such as the UN Biodiversity Conference (COP15), and establishing specific biodiversity KPIs.
The waste sorting rates for Draugen and Brage in 2023 were 85.6 per cent and 78.6 per cent, respectively, with the yearly target of 85 per cent partially achieved. To improve waste sorting, we implemented several measures, including monthly waste bin audits and a waste-reduction campaign on Draugen and Brage.
We continue to optimise water management in our operations. As a next step, we plan to establish quantitative targets to further enhance water management practices.
In terms of emergency preparedness, in 2023, we conducted a large-scale exercise in March alongside NOFO (The Norwegian Clean Seas Association for Operating Companies) and other operators on the NCS. We have continued to enhance OKEA's emergency response plans to be better prepared for any potential accidental oil spills at sea.

and stakeholders
Sustainability Environment Social Governance Appendix
and stakeholders materiality
Safety and security at work are fundamental human rights. At OKEA, we prioritise the well-being of employees and anyone on our sites. Vigilance in safety and managing major accident risks remains our top priority. Our materiality assessment underscores that risks related to safety, environment, and security can also impact OKEA financially.
Ensuring a safe and healthy working environment is fundamental in all our activities. At OKEA, our main priority is to maintain secure operations as a reliable energy supplier
OKEA's overall Quality, Health, Safety, Security and Environment (QHSSE) objectives are simply stated: Safe production – no harm – no leaks; based on the conviction that all accidents and work-related illnesses are preventable, through proactive identification, implementation, and maintenance of key barriers to continuously manage risk and eliminate loss.
OKEA follows an integrated occupational health and safety management system based on the ISO 45001 Health and safety standard. Our QHSSE system draws on collective organisational knowledge. It ensures safe execution of activities and clearly defines roles and responsibilities.

Ensure health, safety and security of people, environment, and assets.
Our activities have actual and potential impacts on people, environment, and assets. These include the potential of injury, work related illness and major accidents.
Serious Incident Frequency (SIF) - actual (number per million hours worked)
Zero actual serious incidents
In November, we experienced a serious safety incident on the Brage asset
▶ 3: Good health and well-being
and stakeholders
| Area | Short term commitments 2024 |
Medium term commitments 2025-2026 |
Long term commitments 2030 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health, safety and working environment |
No actual serious accidents, losses or cyber incidents | |||
| Learning sessions are completed for all serious incidents (actual and potential incidents) |
Commitment to continuous improvement of HSE management, ensuring targeted actions and activities based on performance data, analyses of trends and understanding of context. Robust and transparent risk management. |
|||
| Ensure that all offshore crew complete the mandatory OKEA HSE training course |
||||
| Security and cyber security |
Employees meet requirements for IT/ cyber security training defined for relevant position |
Ensuring that relevant and adequate security measures are implemented and operational, maintaining a security level corresponding with the perceived risk and threat landscape. |
||
Our internal functions diligently oversee compliance with regulations and internal policies, ensuring coordination of health and safety topics across the company. Annually, we create a QHSSE activity plan that encompasses inclusive work life activities. This plan is presented and discussed in our Working Environment Committee (WEC), where employee representatives actively participate. Additionally, we maintain emergency preparedness and response plans for all project activities and operations.
Collaboration is essential for safety improvement, and at OKEA, we firmly believe in it. As part of this commitment, we are proud members of Offshore Norway and OFFB (The Operator's Association for Emergency Response).
To ensure preparedness, we establish emergency response capabilities that limit the consequences of potential incidents. Our organisation is equipped to handle
emergencies and hazardous situations effectively, aiming to prevent dangerous scenarios from escalating into accidents and minimising consequences when necessary.
At OKEA, our employees and contractors play a crucial role in our success. We prioritise their psychological, physical, and social well-being as a central element of our operations.
Our approach includes rigorous risk management and systematic monitoring of work-related illnesses, considering factors such as chemicals, noise, ergonomic workplaces, and psychosocial aspects. We conduct monthly reviews of registered cases and gather insights from our people survey, which covers psychosocial and organisational health risk factors. Additionally, we closely track illness trends, particularly work-related illnesses. All employees exposed to occupational risks, as determined by work environment risk assessments, participate in our health surveillance program.
Furthermore, we provide tailored safety risk and working environment training for all employees, ensuring their preparedness. Health and safety remain integral themes in our introductory program for new team members.
At OKEA, safeguarding our people, assets, information, and reputation is paramount. As an energy supplier, we diligently collaborate to identify, deter, prevent, and mitigate a range of
| potential threats to our personnel, facilities, and operations. These risks include cyber-attacks, illegal activism, theft of intellectual property, and fraud, which could lead to production losses, compromise sensitive information, and impact safety and the environment. |
|---|
| Our core commitments on security and cyber security are outlined in OKEA corporate management system. We have implemented control mechanisms to address the elevated security threats impacting the industry. Additionally, we maintain close collaboration |
| with relevant private and public actors. To ensure operational resilience, we monitor international sanctions and trade control legislation, especially regarding potential supply chain interruptions and third-party services. |
| We prioritise employee awareness through regular and intensive learning exercises. Our efforts cover general information security topics, ad-hoc demands, and formats like mandatory e learnings, knowledge checks, and anti phishing email campaigns. Fortunately, we have not experienced any serious security or cybersecurity incidents. In 2023, we focused on key security enhancements, including targeted projects to enhance technical and procedural measures related to information security capabilities and continuous evaluation of our IT maturity level. |
| For more details, reference is made to our ESG performance data in the appendix. |
and stakeholders
In November, we experienced a serious safety incident on the Brage asset. There were eleven medical treatment cases during 2023. The total recordable injuries frequency (TRIF) increased to 8,99 in 2023 compared with 5,12 in 2022. The aforementioned serious incident took place on the Brage platform in November 2023. One person incurred a skeletal injury during planned maintenance (pressure testing) in the well area. The injured person received initial care by the company nurse at site and was then transported to shore by search and rescue helicopter, in accordance with the emergency response plan. The person is back at work. Ensuring The occurrence of this serious incident meant we did not meet our corporate KPI target for health and safety in 2023. Additionally, in 2023 we also observed an increase in the corporate TRIF rate, indicating a higher frequency of recordable injuries compared with the previous year. We recognise this situation as unsatisfactory, as OKEA remains convinced that all accidents and incidents are preventable. Targeted measures are identified both on company and asset level to improve our safety management and performance. Our safety objectives remain a priority for OKEA's management. The rate of recordable work-related illness was 0 in 2023 and consistent with last year's result.
a comprehensive understanding of the incident, with associated direct and underlying causes, is an important basis for identifying focus areas for improvement with corresponding actions. As a result, the incident is thoroughly investigated by OKEA, in line with our corporate framework. The incident is also investigated by The Norwegian Ocean Industry Authority (Havtil). Considering these outcomes, we view our continuous and systematic efforts to improve the working environment as satisfactory. In 2023, we successfully achieved our target of keeping absence due to sickness below 5 per cent, and we continue to proactively address sickness absence.

Attracting, developing, and retaining talents and skilled employees and teams is a key factor to succeed in achieving OKEA's ambitious strategy and vision. We are working systematically to have the right capability and to secure and develop capacity and competence.
We are focusing on organisational development and building one common culture based on our values, where each employee understands how they contributes to our success.
At OKEA, we are committed to building a scalable and optimised organisation with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Our structure is designed to drive both organic and inorganic growth.
In 2023, we took significant steps to enhance our organisational framework:
Creating a diverse and inclusive place to work where equal opportunities and human capital development is fostered, and discrimination is not tolerated in any form.
OKEA employs a diverse workforce of 435 employees, with offices in several places in Norway and two offshore locations.

Our workforce planning process includes a manpower projection plan (MPP) for strategic growth scenarios. We ensure that our growth is timely and well-aligned. As we observe a demographic shift in parts of the organisation, we strategically recruit both emerging talent and experienced hires. Additionally, our comprehensive succession process identifies and prepares employees to step into critical roles when others retire or leave.
We prioritise employee engagement and psychological safety at work. Our employee survey, which consistently receives high response rates, provides valuable insights into employees' views. In 2023, our employee engagement index score ranked in the top 15 per cent compared to other companies in the survey.
To create an exceptional workplace, we actively involve our people in the company's development through cross-functional collaboration, engagement with union representatives, and safety delegates.
OKEA is committed to Diversity & Inclusion based on fundamental principles of non discrimination and equal opportunity. We ensure that all our people are treated fairly, regardless of differences in gender, nationality, sexual orientation, physical abilities, or age. In 2023, we implemented a new diversity and inclusion strategy.
We strictly adhere to the Norwegian Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act, which mandates that all employers actively promote equality and prevent discrimination in the workplace. Our approach involves a recommended fourstep working method, as required by the act. The results of our efforts are integrated into our inclusive working life plan, developed in
collaboration with employee representatives through the company's working environment committee (WEC) and endorsed by the company's management. This plan sets annual goals and targets across various areas, including equality, non-discrimination, harassment, and senior policy.
To ensure a fair and inclusive workplace, we employ various methods, including:
| Area | Short term commitments 2024 |
Medium term commitments 2025-2026 |
Long term commitments 2030 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversity | 30 per cent female recruitments | 30 per cent female in management and leadership positions |
30 per cent female employees in OKEA |
|
| 15 per cent of employees under the age of 35 by 2024 |
Continue to recruit emerging talent and experienced hires. | Initiate mitigating actions for potential findings |
||
| Training | > 90 per cent of employees have completed the internal ESG course |
Updating skills in line with business and technological developments. | ||
| Engagement | Employee engagement score of 90 (employee survey scale of 0 to 100) |
| Our commitment to equality and diversity drives us toward a more inclusive and supportive work environment. |
|---|
| OKEA has established ambitions related to improved gender balance. As per year end 2023, 26 per cent of employees are females. 26 per cent of new recruits in 2023 were |
| female, and 30 per cent in management and leadership positions were female. Two |
| employees attended the Female Future |
| leadership development programme in 2023. |
| From 2024 onward, we are focused on recruiting more young people into the organisation. In 2023, 14 per cent of new recruits were under the age of 30. |

Figure 10. How we work for equality and non-discrimination
and stakeholders
Remuneration policies for OKEA's employees provides a foundation for fair and competitive conditions. Salary progression is based exclusively on meritocratic criteria related to performance and market benchmarks. OKEA has remuneration standards well above the legal/contractual minimums as part of company policy. We annually check our positioning in terms of remuneration, adjusting as required.
At least annually, OKEA monitors the gender pay gap (gender pay ratio), using a comparison methodology of similar role and seniority

Figure 11. Gender balance and age distribution of 435 employees


levels, in accordance with the UN principle of "equal pay for equal work".
The figure on the next page illustrates the pay ratio between females and males in total and for each employee category. In 2023 the gender base pay ratio is 97 per cent when adjusted for equal categories and seniority. We continue to focus on closing the gaps though relevant processes (promotions and salary reviews). Internal assessments show room for improvement for diverse representation in the organisation, including management positions and particularly within the offshore organisation.
| Work life balance | • Flexible working hours and possibility to work from home • Vacation of 5 weeks annually for all employees, additional vacation for those over 60 |
|---|---|
| Employee and parental benefits | • Full pay during parental leave • Sick pay, up to 12 months full pay • Annual bonus program • Extensive insurance package covering occupational injury, occupational disability, travel, health, and loss of licence. • Company defined contribution pension plan at the maximum tax favourable level of 25.1%, capped at approximately NOK 1.4 million according to the pension legislation. |
| Health prevention and employee welfare | • Occupational health service |
• Extensive insurance package covering occupational injury, occupational disability, travel, health, and loss of licence.
At OKEA, we place great faith in the Norwegian model of tri-partite cooperation. We actively maintain a transparent dialogue with elected staff representatives, including labour unions and safety delegates. We believe that early involvement of staff representatives and all employees leads to better and safer decisions. It also fosters a higher degree of employee engagement and is a natural part of change management.
We have several formal forums for involvement and consultation, including a company committee from 2023 (Norwegian: Bedriftsutvalg) where union representatives have direct access to senior executive management. Our working environment committee also serve as well-established arena for employee representation and participation.
OKEA employees (both full time and part time employees) are offered a variety of benefits as listed in the figure on the right.

Figure 13. Ratio of payment of females to males in total and for each employee category
Definition of levels of employees in the organisation:
Most offshore employees are part of the CBU, meaning they are paid based on a collective salary matrix. For salary assessment this matrix is based on the defined job-level and number of years of experience.
Figure 14. Main welfare initiatives
According to Norwegian legislation, all employees are entitled to statutory parental leave. The total period during which parental benefit is paid is 49 weeks with 100 per cent salary coverage. It is an option to elect 59 weeks with 80 per cent coverage, and there are rules on how the weeks should be shared between the parents. OKEA offers full pay during parental leave. In 2023, nine males and 15 females took paid parental leave. The return to work and retention rate of employees that took paid parental leave in 2023 was 100 per cent.
We prioritise continuous learning and skill development for our employees. In the 2023 survey, competence development received high scores, reflecting our valued investments in this area.
We follow the 70:20:10 model, emphasising onthe-job learning (70%), social interactions (20%), and formal training (10%). Our training includes e-learning, classroom sessions, and tailored programs for each employee's role.
Strengthening leadership capabilities is a priority, and we support employees taking on new roles. Annual appraisal and development dialogues provide a solid foundation for employee growth. In 2023, 90 per cent of employees completed their development dialogues.
For more details, reference is made to our ESG performance data in the appendix.
| We consider our performance as satisfactory for our ambition to be acknowledged as an attractive employer, with good access to the right candidates, and low turnover. Attracting the right employees, talent management and retention continue to be central elements for us. |
|---|
| We need continued focus on diversity to reach our ambition particularly on gender balance. This is partly a challenge in the industry in general, but we see that the right focus internally and a systematic approach helps us towards achieving the ambition. |
| The employee survey shows that harassment and bullying scores are low (3,6 per cent) compared to the average in the private sector in Norway (10,2 per cent). This is an area where the ambition is zero, so we continue our efforts both through the general focus on culture, but also with more specific actions. |
| We are proud to see that the employee engagement stays very high, particularly since we are growing fast and have welcomed many new employees during the year. We |
| believe our focus on empowering people and building a strong culture is important to keep the engagement high. Building the right performance culture on the basis of our values, to reach our goals and aim high together is key to our success. |
47
Summer students in OKEA

— FEATURED CASE
and stakeholders
Finding and helping to develop new talent for the industry is a task that is important to OKEA. In 2023, we had the pleasure of having a total of 15 summer students employed.
Arnt Vegard Arntzen has studied Petroleum Engineering at NTNU in Trondheim. This was Arnt Vegard's second year as a summer student at OKEA.
In OKEA, the summer students are given meaningful assignments. Tora Essen studies Petroleum Geoscience and Engineering at NTNU and has worked with the team at Drilling and Wells at the office in Trondheim.
you can actually see the processes that I hear about and read about every day. You get different perspectives from what you sit and work with on paper.
OKEA has had summer students in many different fields. Ida Otterdal Larsen has been working from the office in Oslo but has had the opportunity to go around to our locations to, among other things, create content for the company's social media.

Arnt Vegard Arntzen

Tora Essen




and stakeholders
Respecting human rights in our activities and supply chain
OKEA has subcontractors in countries where human and labour rights might be at risk
▶ Human rights concerns
Confirmed instances of discrimination and human rights violations
Zero instances of discrimination and human rights violations
No instances of discrimination or violations
▶ 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
Many aspects of how we run our business affect human rights, including our employees' working conditions, health and safety and our supplier's business practises. We recognise that our activities can have a significant impact on society, both positive and negative, and we continuously work to prevent, mitigate, or remediate those impacts appropriately in each situation.
OKEA is committed to safeguarding the human rights of our employees and those directly affected by our business, including suppliers, communities, indigenous peoples, and society at large. Our responsibilities encompass a wide range of areas, such as equality, nondiscrimination, fair wages, working hours, employee representation, labour rights in the supply chain, land rights, and ensuring free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC).
OKEA ensures compliance with international human rights standards throughout its value chain. We adhere to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, which provide non-binding principles and standards for responsible business conduct within a global context. These guidelines help us avoid and address negative impacts while contributing to sustainable development.

and stakeholders
Our responsibility entails having systems and procedures to identify and address actual or potential adverse impacts where we are involved. We take measures to cease, prevent, and mitigate these impacts. Our code of conduct, supplier code of conduct, and human and labour rights policy, approved by the board of directors, mandates that human rights must be respected by our employees, consultants, suppliers, contractors, and business partners. Our human and labour rights policy were updated in 2023 and are communicated both internally and externally on our website.
We focus on training and awareness to uphold our human rights commitment. OKEA's code of conduct e-learning module covers topics like discrimination, harassment, diversity, inclusion, bribery, and corruption. In 2023, we conducted a third-party facilitated course for supply chain professionals and company representatives, emphasising labour rights, ethics, anti-corruption, and human rights.
We prioritise human rights issues based on severity, scope, and remediation feasibility. Our approach aligns with the Norwegian Transparency Act, OECD Guidelines, and UN Guiding Principles for business and human rights. We gather information from risk analysis, supplier audits, grievance mechanisms, and stakeholder consultations. Our ongoing human rights risk assessment identifies key areas, with a strong focus on our supply chain. Additionally,
| Area | Short term commitments | Medium term commitments | Long term commitments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2025-2026 | 2030 | ||
| Human rights |
Zero instances of discrimination and human right violations | |||
| Due | Identify two improvement | Continue to strengthen the due diligence process to prevent | ||
| diligence | areas after lessons learned | and identify risks |
| Human rights in the workplace |
• Discrimination and equal treatment • Safe and healthy working conditions |
|
|---|---|---|
| Human rights in the supply chain |
• Freedom of association and collective bargaining • Safe and healthy working conditions • Working conditions (wages and working hours) • Forced or compulsory labour and child labour |
|
| Human rights in com munities |
• Land rights • Environmental impacts that affect livelihood, or rights of indigenous people |
specific projects undergo human rights impact
| assessments to assess their exposure to human rights-related risks. |
|---|
| OKEA is mindful of the potential for human rights infringements within our workplace, supply chain, and projects. The potential human rights infringements are outlined in the figure on the left. |
| DUE DILIGENCE ON HUMAN RIGHTS |
| Our human rights due diligence process centres on addressing risks and impacts related to our business activities, including the rights of our workforce, and affected communities. The model is multi-disciplinary, |
| integrated into corporate processes, and |
| employs a risk-based approach to identify, |
| prevent, mitigate, and report on adverse |
| human rights impacts. OKEA's due diligence |
| model is outlined in the figure on the next page. |
| HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE |
| Respecting workers' rights is crucial for lasting relationships. OKEA adheres to internationally recognised human and labour rights standards, including the International Bill of Human Rights and the International Labour Organisation's Declaration on Fundamental |
| Principles and Rights at Work. OKEA employs a comprehensive framework to manage human |
| rights, ensuring effective risk prevention in workforce management. As a result of our |
| corporate human rights risk assessment, we |
| have identified adverse impacts that require |
| further assessment and follow-up. |
Working environment: We comply with local working time and overtime provisions, which is essential for creating a professional working environment. Part-time employees receive the same benefits as full-time employees.
Periods: While Norwegian law doesn't specify a minimum notice period for operational changes, significant impacts on employment require a notice period of one to six months. In all situations regarding operational changes, we prioritise early involvement of employee representatives in decision-making.
safeguards personal data rights for all individuals associated with the company. Our internal data protection procedure ensures compliance with privacy standards and regulations.
bargaining agreements: We respect employees' right to organise collectively. Approximately 80% of OKEA employees belong to formal unions, ensuring fair representation. These unions are: Industri Energi, Tekna, Safe, Lederne or Nito. Nonunionised employees are still covered by collective bargaining agreements.
These findings underscore our commitment to proactively address human rights concerns and ensure responsible business practices. By closely monitoring and addressing these impacts, we aim to uphold our commitment to respecting human rights in the workplace.
OKEA places a strong emphasis on workers' rights, aligning with the International Labour Organisation's (ILO) fundamental conventions. We extend this commitment to our contractors, suppliers, and joint ventures, ensuring that they adhere to the same high standards.
Through our human rights risk assessment, impact assessment reports and information obtained from relevant sources, we have identified key human rights areas that are relevant to our operations with the key focus area being human rights in our supply chain.
In 2023, OKEA collaborated with a third-party provider to collect comprehensive human rights-related data across our supply chain. The initial risk assessment at the country level helped us identify potential at-risk suppliers. By combining industry-specific and countrylevel risks, we are able to evaluate risks and create follow-up plans to address any identified issues.
While our primary operations are in low-risk Norway, we acknowledge that tier 2 and 3 suppliers may face increased risks.
Figure 15. OKEAs due diligence model

Cease, prevent or mitigate adverse impacts

To mitigate these risks, we actively engage with our suppliers, conduct thorough verifications, track corrective actions, and maintain an ongoing dialogue.
Notably, 12 capability assessment audits conducted in 2023 revealed no human rights issues. Additionally, according to the Transparency Act, there were no information requests during the same period.
OKEA is dedicated to mitigating potential adverse effects resulting from its operations. We conduct comprehensive environmental, social, health, and impact assessments (ESHIA) before commencing any project. These analyses offer insights into the project's impact across multiple dimensions, including environmental and human rights aspects. The goal is to minimise risks and enhance opportunities for all stakeholders involved.
Whenever our development activities have the potential to impact communities or their land, we consult with relevant stakeholders and obtain the necessary permissions. We prioritise fair and transparent procedures when it comes to land use and compensation in local communities.
For higher-risk projects, we conduct specific human rights impact assessments (HRIA). These assessments help us identify any potential negative impacts.

For ongoing projects, we monitor business partners and suppliers to ensure human rights compliance. This includes spot checks, HSSE walks, and adherence to human and labour rights policies and supplier codes of conduct. If any adverse impacts are identified, we promptly create concrete action plans for mitigation. In 2023, our assessments uncovered no detrimental effects on communities or the rights of indigenous peoples.
OKEA is committed to providing remedies for adverse human rights impacts it may
have caused or contributed to. We also strive to promote the same objective when impacts are directly related to our operations, products, or services. Under the Norwegian Transparency Act, we have established a grievance mechanism for stakeholders. Reports and complaints are promptly verified and addressed through our whistleblowing channel. Fortunately, no eligible grievances were received across our operated assets in 2023 according to our internal procedures
For more details about human rights and grievances, refer to our ESG performance data in the appendix.
| In 2023, we lacked direct KPIs for measuring |
|---|
| human rights performance. However, our |
| KPI related to "Confirmed instances of |
| discrimination and human rights violations" |
| indicated no such instances occurred during |
| the year. The challenge remains to find |
| meaningful and objective assessments within |
| the business and human rights field. |
| For 2024, we will persist in integrating human rights into existing due diligence processes and enhance our focus on identifying relevant risks through third-party due diligence. |
and stakeholders
Creating value for society through generating revenue, job opportunities and local purchasing.
OKEA makes substantial payments to governments and can influence socio-economic development where it operates. OKEA is a large employer of local and non-local workers to carry out construction, operations, and decommissioning work in the areas we have operations.
▶ Business integrity and ethical misconduct concerns
▶ 98% of procurement committed spend locally
Code of conduct, Human and labour rights policy, Communication policy
OKEA creates substantial long-term value from the natural resources available to us. The value creation achieved by OKEA, including generating revenue, job opportunities and economic wellbeing through procurement and tax revenue, is distributed to our owners and the society in the form of shareholder returns.
Host communities and value chain partners play a crucial role in recognising and providing societal value. The process of identifying opportunities begins during the initial phases of business development. Collaborating with local authorities allows us to gain insights into the needs and expectations of our host communities. These insights, in turn, inform our business models and project strategies, enabling us to create lasting value for the community and support our activities.
Our economic impacts on society are primarily in the form of taxes and other payments to governments, purchases of goods and services, wages, and employee benefits, rather than social investments. Listed in the table on the following page are both direct and indirect impacts:

and stakeholders
In addition to tax contributions, OKEA actively supports local engagement by creating jobs and fostering local businesses in our operating communities. Our efforts begin with engaging students and young individuals in these locations. In 2023, we had seven apprentices/ trainees and 15 summer students.
We remain committed to local procurement, giving local contractors and suppliers opportunities within a competitive bidding process. Additionally, we aim to develop local suppliers and promote local hiring as needed.
Our community investments focus on economic development and education, carefully selected to benefit the local communities where we operate.
We assess our performance through tax contributions, procurement spending, sponsorships, and donations.
| Area | Short term commitments 2024 |
Medium term commitments 2025-2026 |
Long term commitments 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local opportunities |
15 summer students, 1-2 trainees, 5 apprentices |
Continue to secure predicable jobs through long-term alliances with key supplier and partnership with local schools and regional universities, to recruit future talent |
|
| Local spend | 80% committed spend domestically. |
Continue to enable local value creation through local spend and collaboration with key suppliers |

| Direct effect | Indirect effect | |
|---|---|---|
| Purchases | Local purchases: increased production due to purchases made directly by OKEA through national suppliers |
Local purchases along the supply chain: increase from production due to purchasing from OKEA's suppliers through national suppliers |
| Employment | Local people employed by OKEA in business activities and related wages |
Local employed throughout the supply chain and related wages |
| Tax revenue | Local taxes: taxes paid by OKEA to the communities where we operate |
Local taxes throughout the supply chain: taxes associated with production of goods and services along the supply chain |
Table 11. OKEA's impact to economy and community
In addition to tax contributions, we deliver socioeconomic benefits through procurement spending, sponsorships and donations, as outlined in the table table below left.
| OKEA tax payment 2023 | Million NOK | OKEA share | OKEA % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social security tax | 145 | ||
| CO2 tax* |
244 | 97 | 39.53 % |
| CO2 quotas* |
290 | 118 | 40.87 % |
| NO2 fee* |
30 | 12 | 40.41 % |
| Profit before tax | 1 099 | ||
| Profit after tax | -935 | ||
| Taxes paid | 1 253 | ||
| Total operating income | 8 885 | ||
| EBITDA | 5 756 |
OKEA's business activities generate a substantial amount and variety of direct and indirect taxes. The company also collects and pays withholding tax for employees, as outlined in the table to the left. PROCUREMENT, SPONSORSHIP AND Our performance in delivering value to society is satisfactory. We contribute significantly through tax payments, local employment, and procurement spending. In 2023, 98% of our total spending was committed locally, fostering value creation within the community. Additionally, OKEA paid NOK 1,253 million in income taxes and royalty fees to local and national governments.
Table 12. OKEA's tax contributions in million NOK
In 2024, we will:
| Total procurement committed | 7,863 million NOK |
|---|---|
| National committed spend | 7,799 million NOK |
| Global committed spend | 64 million NOK |
| Social investment, sponsorships, and donations |
24 million NOK |
OKEA contributes to the local communities
and stakeholders

OKEA is committed to contribute to the communities where we operate. In 2023, we have contributed to creating activity in our local areas by allocating sponsorship funds to over 20 beneficial and important initiatives. It is important to OKEA that the regions we operate are perceived as attractive to our employees, and we want to support activities and organisations that contribute to this.
The main strategy is to have two major sponsorship agreements in each region that support important activities in children's and youth sports, culture, and education. Since 2018, OKEA has been a sponsor of the handball cup OKEA Cup in Kristiansund. This is the largest handball cup for children and young people in central Norway with around 200 teams and 2,000 players aged 10-20. In 2023, OKEA entered into a sponsorship agreement with Bjarg Handball in Bergen, which is building up OKEA Cup Bjarg under the same model as the OKEA Cup in Kristiansund. In Trondheim, OKEA has entered a partnership with Ranheim Football on the OKEA Cup Ranheim. This is Trøndelag's second biggest football cup.
the growing conditions of our members and for those who come to participate in the cup. We are looking forward to an exciting journey together with OKEA", says Frank Robert Saltvik, Development Manager in Ranheim.
In September 2023, the tournament was organised for the first time with 173 participating teams and over 1,500 children who had a great experience.
OKEA is also proud to have sponsored the national alpine ski race for youth. The championship was held in Vassfjellet Winter Park in March and was a great success with many young talents taking part.

OKEA has over many years supported cultural life in Trondheim and Kristiansund. In 2023, we have contributed to activities in the Opera in Kristiansund and Opera Trøndelag. The operas are important institutions for the education and practice of classical music and dance for children and young people.
Recruitment of new talent from NTNU is important for further development of the industry. In 2023, OKEA entered into an agreement as the main sponsor of the Bergstuderendes Forening at NTNU. The contribution from OKEA contributes to healthy and meaningful leisure activities for the students in petroleum, geology, material technology and geosciences. The agreement will promote increased well-being for the students and stimulate increased application numbers and prevent dropouts from important fields of study for the oil and gas industry.
and stakeholders
and stakeholders
Sustainability Environment Social Governance Appendix
materiality
Ensuring responsible and ethical business practices is embedded across the company through our values, Code of Conduct, and compliance systems.
Unethical business activities distorts competition, ruins reputations and can result in criminal penalties.
▶ 16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
Our commitment to applying ethical business practices, and compliance with legal requirements and regulations throughout our organisation and supply chain is essential to maintain our licence to operate.
In OKEA we conduct our business in a lawful manner, responsibly and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. OKEA has a management system in place to ensure that our internal and external obligations are properly fulfilled. We have central management functions responsible for continuously assessing compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

and stakeholders
| Area | Short term commitments | Medium term commitments | Long term commitments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2025-2026 | 2030 | |
| Corruption and bribery |
Zero confirmed instances of corruption and bribery | ||
| Code of | All employees have completed the Code of Conduct course every other year and are committed to | ||
| conduct | comply with it. | ||
| Supply chain | Risk based audit of a minimum of 10 suppliers through the Magnet JQS Audit program. |
Keep 100% of new major suppliers assessed according to social impact criteria through Magnet JQS. |
The code of conduct outlines expectations, commitments, and ethical requirements for all individuals working on behalf of the company. It is endorsed by the sustainability and technical risk committee (STR) and subsequently approved by the board of directors. The code undergoes annual reviews, and any changes are discussed with employee representatives. The code of conduct is available on http://www.okea.no/.
We do not tolerate any breach of applicable laws and regulations, the code of conduct, associated policies, and procedures. Employees and others working on behalf of the company are encouraged to seek advice from their manager or the legal department, and to report relevant matters considered to conflict with laws and regulations, the company's guidelines, and the general perception of what is justifiable or ethically acceptable. In 2023 we had no recorded breaches or violations of the code of conduct.
The Code of Conduct at OKEA places a duty on individuals to report possible violations of the Code or other incidents of unethical conduct. We've established accessible routines for handling concerns in accordance with applicable legal regulations. Furthermore, our management system includes processes for reporting and handling non-conformities and driving improvements.
Reporting can be done both through internal channels and a third-party service for whistleblowing, accessible to both employees, suppliers, and other stakeholders on http://www.okea.no/.
Internal reporting can be made via a line manager, to members of the senior management, to the vice president legal, to the chair of the audit committee or to the CEO. Pursuant to applicable law, reporting can also be made to the chairman of the board. The legal department, together with the P&O
department are responsible for maintaining the reporting mechanism.
OKEA provides a third-party whistleblowing service accessible to both employees and external parties. This service ensures confidentiality of reports and tailors the case process to individual circumstances. All documentation adheres to relevant policies for data retention, protection, and destruction. Reported complaints or concerns are handled in accordance with established and We have zero tolerance for corruption in any form, including but not limited to bribery, facilitation payments, and trading in influence. Routines and procedures for anti-corruption work are included in our code of conduct. As of 31 December 2023, 100% of the company's operations are in Norway. Norway has extensive legal regulation for anti-corruption and is currently ranked second globally on Transparency International's corruption perceptions index.
communicated routines. Reports are given an introductory assessment and based on this VP P&O together with the legal department will set a course of action and dedicate resources to investigate. Following necessary investigations, the dedicated resources will conclude with a report and potential corrective measures. In 2023 we had no reported events of misconduct /whistle blower events or reported incidents of discrimination, including harassment, and corrective actions required to be undertaken. In line with the zero-tolerance principle in the Code of conduct, OKEA has a system of rules, controls, and organisational monitoring to prevent corrupt practices, which is also useful to prevent money laundering in the context of non-financial activities. In 2023 we have no confirmed incidents of corruption or actions required to be undertaken.
OKEA is committed to protecting fair and open competition, and to competing in a fair and ethical manner. We do not tolerate any violations of applicable rules relating to competition. Our code of conduct also addresses the requirement to comply with applicable competition and antitrust laws. In 2023 we have not been subject to any legal actions for anti-competitive behaviour, antitrust, and/or monopoly practices.
OKEA has adopted a structured compliance risk assessment and monitoring process aimed at identifying, assessing, and tracking corruption risks within the scope of our value chain, and periodically analysing the performance of the identified risks, by running specific controls. We have not identified any non- compliance with laws or regulations in the social and economic area in 2023.
We do not have any contracts with governments and do not have any political involvement or take part in any lobbying activities.
Environmental compliance is considered a baseline minimum at OKEA, and we have robust systems in place to ensure that all operations adhere to stringent environmental standards. Our environmental accounting system closely monitors the evaluation of environmental performance and compliance with laws and regulations for operational fields.
| To drive continuous improvement, we: |
|---|
| ▶ Set annual environmental targets and KPIs. ▶ Incorporate external environmental enhancement activities into our Annual HSE plans. ▶ Strive for improved environmental |
| performance. |
| Our internal KPI is zero breaches of Norwegian Environment Agency (NEA) permit conditions. |
| However, in 2023, we encountered four breaches, all related to deviations from |
| regulatory limits within the framework permits on Draugen and Brage. All breaches were |
| followed up in close dialog with NEA and |
| updated permits applied and received during |
| 2023. Notably, in the same year, we incurred no |
| monetary fines and faced no non-monetary |
| sanctions or dispute resolution cases related to environmental compliance. |
| COMPLIANCE WITH LAW AND REGULATIONS |
| In 2023, OKEA was subject to several external |
| supervision activities from the authorities, with |
| no significant incidences of non-compliance. |
| We had zero monetary fines, no non-monetary |
| sanctions or cases brought through dispute |
resolution mechanisms related to compliance
with law and regulations.

Suppliers and strategic partnerships play a significant role in OKEA's operations and value creation processes. We recognise that longterm partnerships are key to growth, securing our licence to operate, and driving successful projects. Our integrated supply chain function actively contributes to the company's sustainable development by embedding sustainability considerations into our processes and procedures.
One of the UN's sub-goals toward stopping climate change by 2030 is to promote sustainable procurement arrangements. As a company, our procurement decisions significantly impact the climate and environment. Therefore, we prioritise understanding how we can promote sustainable solutions in practice. Our procurement employees are required to complete sustainability courses to enhance their awareness and knowledge.
We recognise that the supply chain presents specific ESG risks and can also contribute to local economies where we operate. Our suppliers must comply with regulations and best practices, and our contractors are expected to align their behaviour with the OKEA Suppliers Code of Conduct.
Our commitment to responsible supply chain management ensures a positive impact on both our business and the environment. OKEA's supply chain risk management are outlined in the figure above.
We collaborate with our suppliers to implement initiatives related to relevant ESG issues. Our approach to supplier collaboration and ESG practices are summarised below:
| Due diligence scoring | Procurement and recruitment | Performance assessment |
|---|---|---|
| • Registration of suppliers and contractors in Magnet Joint Qualification System, including screening for social criteria such as human rights, forced labour, child labour, anti-corruption, and other financial crime. • Adopting Suppliers Code of Conduct • Reputational analysis of all suppliers through Descartes Denied Party Screening (DPS) • Validation of HSE and environmental criteria |
• Accepting OKEA's general terms of contract, which include the obligation to comply with current regulations and practices |
• Assessment performance in management of human rights, environment, and safety over the term of the contract • Applying corrective measures if requirements are not met |
| ▶ Our supply chain professionals have |
|---|
| completed a 6-module training course on |
| sustainable procurement, covering labor |
| rights, ethics, anti-corruption, and human |
| rights. |
| ▶ Sustainable procurement and low-carbon |
| initiatives were included in the agenda of all |
| annual strategic supplier meetings in 2023. |
| Our commitment to responsible supply |
| chain practices ensures alignment with ESG |
| principles and risk mitigation. |
Figure 17. OKEAs supply chain risk management
In 2023, we utilised the Code of Conduct signoff and the number of confirmed instances of corruption and bribery as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure our performance regarding "Responsible and ethical business practices". Our Code of Conduct outlines our commitment and requirements for conducting business at OKEA. Notably, 95 per cent of our employees have signed off on the code of conduct, which aligns with our target.
There were no confirmed instances of corruption and bribery in 2023. Moving forward, we remain steadfast in our commitment to ethical, socially responsible, and transparent business conduct.
However, we acknowledge that our compliance with environmental regulations fell short in terms of exceedances and deviations from regulatory limits specified in the NEA framework permits. To address this, we have initiated mitigating measures
| , רו | ||
|---|---|---|
aimed at improving our practices. Ensuring alignment with environmental laws and regulations remains of utmost importance. All deviations, observations, and nonconformities are meticulously recorded and addressed within our internal nonconformity management system, emphasising our dedication to continuous improvement.
OKEA is committed to being a responsible company, including a professionally executed tax risk management, tax compliance and planning aligned with business purposes. Our approach is to engage with relevant expertise and tax authorities to ensure high quality and full transparency in all reporting and correspondence regarding our tax payments.
OKEA's tax strategy is based on the principles of transparency, honesty, fairness, and good faith set forth in the "OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises" and has as its primary objective the timely and correct payment of taxes, aware of its significant contribution to the tax revenues, supporting local economic and social development. For mor information related to our tax management, see our disclosures against the GRI 207 (2019) tax standard in the ESG performance data contained in the appendix.
Given the nature of the oil and gas industry, OKEA is affected by policies and framework conditions directly or indirectly related to energy production on the Norwegian continental shelf. We promote our views on issues of importance either through direct interaction with public authorities or through various industry associations. We do not have any contracts with governments and do not have any political involvement or participate directly in lobbying activities.
For more details, reference is made to our ESG performance data in the appendix.

and stakeholders
Energy transition and climate
| Energy transition and climate change |
Scope 1 Direct GHG emissions | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct GHG Emissions – all gases | 197,659 | 199,828 | 249,641 | 394,163 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| Third party verified direct CO2 emissions |
191,931 | 194,407 | 242,910 | 378,558 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| CH4 (Methane) | 5,381 | 5,061 | 6,127 | 14,434 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| N2 O (Nitrous oxide) |
347 | 361 | 605 | 1,170 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| Methane Intensity | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.7 | % of total Scope 1 emissions |
|
| Scope 1 emissions- by sources | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | |
| Flaring | 8,964 | 9,895 | 16,229 | 21,593 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| Venting and fugitive emissions | 4,396 | 3,709 | 5,511 | 13,518 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| Fuel combustion | 184,230 | 186,244 | 227,901 | 359,051 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| Methane fugitive emissions | 65 | 65 | 158 | 406 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| Continuously flared hydrocarbons | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| Other combustions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | tonnes CO2 e |
|
| Scope 1 GHG Intensity | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | |
| Gross operated GHG intensity | 31.0 | 34.4 | 42.1 | 37.7 | kg CO2 e/boe |
|
| Net share operated and non-operated assets GHG intensity | 16.7 | 17.9 | 21.2 | 20.1 | kg CO2 e/boe |
| Scope 2 Indirect GHG emissions | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indirect GHG Emissions (market based) 11 | 1,133 | 1,234 | 1,038 | 1,007 | tonnes CO2 e |
| Indirect GHG Emissions (location based) 12 | 48.7 | 53.0 | 39.3 | 37.9 tonnes CO2 e |
11 Market based factor: Electricity disclosure for power suppliers (in Norwegian).
12 Location based factor: Climate declaration for physically delivered electricity.
and stakeholders
| Scope 3 Indirect GHG emissions | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| change | Total CO2 emissions from scope 3 13 |
- | 25,218 | 52,086 | 4,631,201 | tonnes CO2 e |
| Energy | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | |
| Total energy consumption from non-renewable sources | 2,342 | 2,476 | 2,728 | 4,840 | GWh | |
| Gas | 1,715 | 2,290 | 2,558 | 4,300 | GWh | |
| Diesel | 508 | 54 | 102 | 273 | GWh | |
| Flare | 119 | 132 | 68 | 267 | GWh | |
| Total fuel consumed from renewable sources | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | GWh | |
| Electricity consumption | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | GWh | |
| Electricity | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2.0 | GWh | |
| District heating | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | GWh | |
| District cooling | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | GWh | |
| Electricity sold | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | GWh | |
| Total energy consumption within the organisation | 2,342 | 2,478 | 2,730 | 4,842 | GWh | |
| Energy intensity | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.46 | MWh/Production volume (boe) |
| Environment and ecosystems | Water and effluents14 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total freshwater withdrawals | 17,940 | 13,255 | 13,819 | 43,800 | m3 | |
| Total water withdrawals from area with water stress | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | m3 | |
| Total extracted produced water (upstream) | 11,555,464 | 11,300,972 | 15,205,971 | 21,372,238 | m3 | |
| Re-injected produced water volume | 5,503,901 | 5,822,374 | 7,751,783 | 10,074,486 | m3 | |
| 13 2021 and 2022 numbers are not updated to reflect updated calculation methods |
Percentage of produced water re- injected | 48 | 52 | 51 | 47 | % |
| Produced water discharged to sea volume | 6,051,563 | 5,478,598 | 7,455,054 | 11,291,789 | m3 | |
| 14 Fluid effluents generated in the processes and activities are subjected to purification treatment to minimise their |
Percentage of produced water discharged | 52 | 48 | 49 | 53 | % |
| potential impact of the discharge on the environment and to ensure compliance with legal requirements. The used treatment technologies are adjusted to the type of activity and the characteristics of the facility. |
Total freshwater discharges in water-stressed areas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | m3 |
| Hydrocarbons in wastewater | 106 | 75 | 88 | 157 | Tonnes | |
and stakeholders
| Environment and ecosystems | Spills | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of oil spills to sea (>0.1 m3 ) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | m3 | |
| Oil spills (>0.1 m3 ) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | m3 | |
| Operational oil spills/100% operated hydrocarbon gross productions (upstream) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | m3 /boe |
|
| Number of chemical spills to sea (>0.1 m3 ) |
1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Number | |
| Chemical spills (>0.1 m3 ) |
0.36 | 0.30 | 18.745 | 13.12 | m3 | |
| Number of hydrocarbon leaks (>0.1 kg/s) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Number | |
| Total mass of hydrocarbon leaks (>0.1 kg/s) | 0 | 0 | 306 | 0 | Kg | |
| Air emissions15 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | |
| NOx (Nitrogen oxides) | 1,023 | 1,090 | 1,271 | 1,757 | Tonnes | |
| NOx emissions/100% operated hydrocarbon gross production (upstream) | - | - | - | 1.68 · 10-4 | tonnes NOx/boe | |
| SOx (Sulphur oxides) | 17 | 3 | 10 | 10 | Tonnes | |
| SOx emissions/100% operated hydrocarbon gross production (upstream) | - | - | - | 9.10 · 10-7 | tonnes SOx/boe | |
| Non-methane VOC | 753 | 329 | 553 | 1,265 | Tonnes | |
| Waste | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | |
| Total weight hazardous waste | 176 | 86 | 1,761 | 5,773 | Tonnes | |
| Reuse | 0 | 0,058 | 3 | 1 | Tonnes | |
| Recycling | 49 | 24 | 252 | 13 | Tonnes | |
| Recovery, incl. energy recovery | 127 | 42 | 786 | 962 | Tonnes | |
| Landfill | 0,325 | 19 | 386 | 4,798 | Tonnes | |
| Total weight non-hazardous waste | 218 | 133 | 459 | 413 | Tonnes | |
| Reuse | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tonnes | |
| Recycling | 216 | 101 | 208 | 207 | Tonnes | |
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 176 | 86 | 1,761 | 5,773 | Tonnes |
| 0 | 0,058 | 3 | 1 | Tonnes |
| 49 | 24 | 252 | 13 | Tonnes |
| 127 | 42 | 786 | 962 | Tonnes |
| 0,325 | 19 | 386 | 4,798 | Tonnes |
| 218 | 133 | 459 | 413 | Tonnes |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tonnes |
| 216 | 101 | 208 | 207 | Tonnes |
| 0 | 29 | 206 | 198 | Tonnes |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Tonnes |
| 0 | 3 | 46 | 7 | Tonnes |
15 When the applicable regulations do not define a method of calculation or direct measurement, these emissions are calculated using the methodologies described in the internal guidelines for reporting environmental parameters..
and stakeholders
| Number of oil spills to sea (>0.1 m3 | |
|---|---|
| Oil spills (>0.1 m3 | |
| Number of chemical spills to sea (>0.1 m3 | |
| Chemical spills (>0.1 m3 | |
| Environment and ecosystems | Waste diverted from/to disposal | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total weight of waste diverted from disposal | 392 | 187 | 1,666 | 1,381 | Tonnes | |
| Total weight of hazardous waste diverted from disposal | 176 | 86 | 1,466 | 976 | Tonnes | |
| Total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted from disposal | 216 | 101 | 200 | 405 | Tonnes | |
| Total weight of waste diverted to disposal | 325 | 22 | 261 | 4,805 | Tonnes | |
| Total weight of hazardous waste diverted to disposal | 325 | 19 | 223 | 4,798 | Tonnes | |
| Total weight of non-hazardous waste diverted to disposal | 0 | 3 | 38 | 7 | Tonnes |
and stakeholders
Operations and activities within our industry can affect the natural and social environments where they take place. The following table contains the actual and potential impacts that they may have on biodiversity because of our operations.
| Area | Activity aspect | Description | Development and construction |
Operation | De-commissioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land use/use of area |
Physical presence | Physical on-site presence may generate a visual impact on the environment. Other related potential impacts include the alteration, fragmentation or loss of habitat and changes in the presence and distribution of local species |
Potential | Potential impact | Potential impact |
| Physical disturbance | Physical disturbance is an activity largely associated with the start and end of the life of an asset and may have a visual impact on the environment. Other related potential impacts include the alteration, fragmentation or loss of habitat and changes in the presence and distribution of local species |
impact | Unlikely or low potential impact |
Potential impact | |
| Consumption/ extraction of water |
Water consumption for use in processes can lead to reduced water availability and potentially affect the ecosystems and habitats of certain species |
High potential impact |
Potential impact | Unlikely or low potential impact |
|
| Noise and vibrations | Noise and vibrations caused by processes can disturb local marine wildlife. | Unlikely or low potential impact |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
Potential impact | |
| Light | The light emitted by our activities can generate a visual impact at night. | Potential impact | Potential impact | Unlikely or low potential impact |
|
| Emissions | Exhaust/ combustion emissions (GHG, NOx, SOx, VOC) |
Exhaust emissions associated with the operation of the fuel-burning equipment can impact local air quality and climate change on a global scale |
Potential impact | High potential impact |
Potential impact |
| Fugitive emissions and venting |
Unplanned fugitive emissions and venting can impact local air quality and climate change on a global scale. | Unlikely or low potential impact |
Potential impact | Unlikely or low potential impact |
|
| Flaring | Flaring can impact local air quality and climate change on a global scale. It can also have an associated thermal impact on the surrounding wildlife. |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
Potential impact | Unlikely or low potential impact |
|
| Discharges | Wastewater, grey water | The discharge of treated wastewater may cause changes in the quality of available water. | Potential impact | Potential impact | Potential impact |
| Waste | Hazardous waste | Groundwater/surface water, possibly impacting the ecosystems and habitats of certain species | Potential impact | Potential impact | Potential impact |
| Non-hazardous waste | Contamination of soil and groundwater/surface water, possibly impacting the ecosystems and habitats of certain species. |
Potential impact | Potential impact | Potential impact | |
| Accidental events |
Spills | Accidental events such as spills can lead to contamination of soil and groundwater/surface water, possibly impacting the ecosystems and habitats of certain species. |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
Potential impact | Unlikely or low potential impact |
| Fire or explosions | Accidental events such as fire or explosions can generate thermal and visual impacts on wildlife, affect local air quality, or lead to habitat alteration and fragmentation. |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
|
| Introduction of invasive species |
The unintentional introduction of invasive species can lead to changes in the occurrence and distribution of species within the area of operation. |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
Unlikely or low potential impact |
| Ensuring safe and secure operations | Item | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total recordable incidents (TRI) | 2 | 2 | 7 | 15 | Number | |
| Serious incident Frequency (SIF) – actual | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,59 | per mill exp. Hours | |
| Total recordable incidents per million manhours | 3,42 | 3,51 | 5,12 | 8,99 | TRIF | |
| Fatalities Employees | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Number | |
| Fatalities Contractors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Number | |
| Serious Injuries Employers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Number | |
| Serious Injuries Contractors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Number | |
| Lost time incidents Employees | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | Number | |
| Lost time incidents Contractors | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | Number | |
| Lost time incidents Employees + Contractors | 0 | 0 | 2.92 | 1.80 | per mill exp. Hours | |
| Medical treatment incidents Employees | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | Number | |
| Medical treatment incidents Contractors | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | Number | |
| Total Exposure hours | 584,688 | 569,618 | 1,367,687 | 1,668,813 | Hours | |
| Fatalities work-related ill health employee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Number | |
| Recordable work-related ill health employee | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Number | |
| Fatalities work-related ill health contractors | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Number | |
| Recordable work-related ill health contractors | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Number | |
| Absence due to sickness | 2,7 | 3,3 | 2,1 | 4,6 | Percent |
| All employees-Age | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | New hires - Age | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 30 | 7 | 1 | 17 | 23 | Number | Under 30 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | Number |
| 30-39 | 40 | 39 | 84 | 93 | Number | 30-39 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 17 | Number |
| 40-49 | 68 | 66 | 118 | 122 | Number | 40-49 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 25 | Number |
| Above 50 | 92 | 101 | 164 | 197 | Number | Above 50 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 15 | Number |
| Total | 207 | 213 | 383 | 435 | Number | Total | 8 | 16 | 35 | 66 | Number |
| All employees - Gender | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | New hires - Gender | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Male | 159 | 166 | 287 | 323 | Number | Male | 6 | 15 | 26 | 49 | Number |
| Female | 48 | 47 | 96 | 112 | Number | Female | 2 | 1 | 9 | 17 | Number |
| Total | 207 | 213 | 383 | 435 | Number | Total | 8 | 16 | 35 | 66 | Number |
| Part term employees* - Gender | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Turnover-Age | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Number | Under 30 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Number |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Number | 30-39 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | Number |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Number | 40-49 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | Number |
| *OKEA does not have any voluntary part term employees | Above 50 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | Number | |||||
| Total | 8 | 10 | 4 | 16 | Number | ||||||
| Temporary employees* – Gender | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | ||||||
| Male | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Number | ||||||
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Number | Turnover – Gender | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Number | Male | 6 | 8 | 4 | 15 | Number |
| *Temporary employees are engaged in cases where there is a temporary need for additional resources. | Female | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | Number | |||||
| Total | 8 | 16 | 4 | 16 | Number |
Total 100 100 100 100 %
| Average number of weeks – All employees |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Average number of weeks – Senior professionals* |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 16 | 15 | 28.8 | 9 | Number | Male | 12 | 5 | 0 | 9 | Number |
| Female | 27 | 22 | 12.5 | 15 | Number | Female *Senior professionals are defined as Principals, managers |
50 | 26 | 1 | 11 | Number |
| Average number of weeks – Senior management* |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Average number of weeks – Professionals* |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Number | Male | 19 | 15 | 1 | 17 | Number |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Number | Female | 3 | 35 | 0 | 23 | Number |
| *CEO and senior management group (SVPs and selected VPs) | *All employees below level 3 except collective bargain union (CBU) employees | ||||||||||
| Average number of weeks – Management* |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Average number of weeks – Offshore CBU* |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Male | 0 | 12 | 1 | 2 | Number | Male | 18 | 20 | 4 | 9 | Number |
| Female | 29 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Number | Female | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Number |
| *VPs and lead roles. | *Offshore employee | ||||||||||
| Employee training | |||||||||||
| Total hours of courses for off shore employees – Gender |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Average course hours for off shore employees - Gender |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Males | 2904 | 3941 | 7,807 | 6729 | Number | Male | 81 | 51 | 52 | 51 | Number |
| Females | 671 | 799 | 1,189 | 1611 | Number | Female | 19 | 80 | 35 | 47 | Number |
| Total | 3575 | 4740 | 8,996 | 8340 | Number | ||||||
| Males | 81 | 83 | 87 | 81 | % | ||||||
| Females | 19 | 17 | 13 | 19 | % |
| Board of directors – Gender | Senior management | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| spread | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | – Gender balance | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Male | 54,5 | 64 | 64 | 64 | % | Male | 5 | 2 | 7 | 6 | Number |
| Female | 45,5 | 36 | 36 | 36 | % | Female | 1 | 6 | 3 | 4 | Number |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % | Total | 6 | 8 | 10 | 10 | Number |
| Male | 83 | 75 | 70 | 60 | % | ||||||
| Board of directors – Age spread | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Female | 17 | 25 | 30 | 40 | % |
| Age 50+ | 82 | 91 | 91 | 91 | % | Total | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % |
| Age 30-49 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 9 | % | ||||||
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % | Management – Gender balance | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Male | 28 | 28 | 41 | 51 | Number | ||||||
| Senior management – Age | Female | 9 | 8 | 12 | 14 | Number | |||||
| spread | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Total | 37 | 36 | 53 | 65 | Number |
| Age 50+ | 3 | 3 | 50 | 70 | % | Male | 76 | 78 | 77 | 78 | % |
| Age 30-49 | 3 | 5 | 50 | 30 | % | Female | 24 | 22 | 23 | 22 | % |
| Total | 6 | 8 | 100 | 100 | % | Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % |
| Gender balance in OKEA | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | ||||||
| All employees (women share of total) | 23 | 22 | 25 | 26 | % | Senior professionals – Gender balance |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
| Senior management (women share of | Male | 28 | 33 | 69 | 74 | Number | |||||
| total) | 17 | 25 | 30 | 40 % | Female | 9 | 10 | 20 | 29 | Number | |
| Management (women share of total) | 24 | 22 | 23 | 22 % | |||||||
| Senior professionals (women share of | Total | 37 | 43 | 89 | 103 | Number | |||||
| total) | 24 | 23 | 22 | 28 | % | Male | 76 | 77 | 78 | 72 | % |
| Professionals (women share of total) | 41 | 40 | 41 | 34 | % | Female | 24 | 23 | 22 | 28 | % |
| Offshore CBU (women share of total) | 11 | 10 | 20 | 20 | % | Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % |
and stakeholders
| Ratio of payment of women to men – Senior management |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Ratio of payment of women to men – Professionals |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 92 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % | Male | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % |
| Female | 100 | 79 | 78 | 78 | % | Female | 94 | 92 | 93 | 96 | % |
| Professionals – Gender balance | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Offshore CBU – Gender balance | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 30 | 29 | 42 | 59 | Number | Male | 67 | 70 | 130 | 133 | Number |
| Female | 21 | 19 | 29 | 31 | Number | Female | 8 | 8 | 32 | 34 | Number |
| Total | 51 | 48 | 71 | 90 | Number | Total | 75 | 78 | 162 | 167 | Number |
| Male | 59 | 60 | 59 | 66 | % | Male | 89 | 90 | 80 | 80 | % |
| Female | 41 | 40 | 41 | 34 | % | Female | 11 | 10 | 20 | 20 | % |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 00 | % | Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % |
| Ratio of payment of women to men - Management |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units | Ratio of payment of women to men – Offshore CBU |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 95 | 93 | 99 | 100 | % | Male | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % |
| Female | 100 | 100 | 100 | 98 | % | Female | 97 | 97 | 94 | 95 | % |
| Ratio of payment of women to men – Senior professionals |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | % |
| Female | 99 | 99 | 99 | 95 | % |
| Item | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Negative social and environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Operations and suppliers in which the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at risk |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Reported human rights violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Reported incidents of violations involving rights of Indigenous peoples | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labour | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labour |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Item | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recorded breaches or violations of the code of conduct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Reported events of misconduct (whistle blower events) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Reported incidents of discrimination, including harassment, and corrective actions taken |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Legal actions for anti-competitive behaviour, anti-trust, and monopoly practices |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Identified non-compliance of laws or regulations in the social and economic area |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Financial or in-kind political contribution (directly or indirectly) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| Total monetary value of significant fines | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NOK |
| Number of non-monetary sanctions for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
| New suppliers that were screened using social and environmental criteria | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 % | |
| Negative social and environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | number |
Proper management of OKEA's tax obligations has a direct effect on the social and environmental areas. Aware of this challenge, OKEA has embraced the most rigorous international standards when it comes to tax disclosure, including those under GRI 207. Table summarising compliance with GRI 207:
| GRI 207 | Evidence of compliance |
|---|---|
| GRI 207-1 Tax approach | |
| Tax strategy | OKEA has a tax strategy in place. The CFO owns and implements our Tax Strategy. |
| Body tasked with reviewing the tax strategy OKEA's tax strategy is reviewed annually. The audit and risk committee also oversees compliance and the key aspects of tax matters and risks. | |
| Approach to regulatory compliance | Our approach is to engage with relevant expertise and tax authorities to ensure high quality and full transparency in all reporting and correspondence. |
| Link between tax approach, business strategy and sustainable development |
Our Tax Policy is aligned with the Company's mission and values. OKEA seeks to be recognised as a company of integrity and fiscal responsibility. Tax decisions are adopted responsibly in accordance with tax regulations and are aligned with the economic activity of the company. |
| GRI 207-2 Tax governance, control, and risk management | |
| Governing body responsible for compliance with tax strategy |
The Audit and risk committee is the governing body in charge of adopting OKEA's Tax Policy, which contains the tax strategy. |
| How the tax approach is integrated into the organisation |
The management of OKEA's tax affairs is conducted in line with internal taxation procedures and processes, aimed at mitigating the key tax risks. OKEA's finance department is made up of experts in a range of tax-related disciplines; these professionals are responsible for managing all the tax affairs of the company. |
| Tax risks, identification, management, and oversight |
Tax risk management in OKEA is embedded in the Integrated Risk Management System and is reflected in the existence of processes, systems, and internal controls. Our Financial department and dedicated tax experts are responsible for managing OKEA's tax risks, as the body responsible for tax compliance. In addition, OKEA operates robust information management systems that assure the integrity of the information and tax compliance processes while minimising the possibility of human error. |
| Evaluation of compliance with the tax governance and control framework |
Tax risk control and tax-related reporting are supplemented by procedures and controls that assure the integrity and reliability of the accounting information used in tax processes. One of the main functions of the Audit and Control Committee is to support the Board of Directors in its oversight duties. |
| Description of channels for reporting tax related concerns |
Any employee or third party may report any possible breach of the Code of Conduct, including any potentially unethical or illegal conduct that might affect the integrity of the organisation in relation to taxation. Any such matters may be communicated in a confidential and anonymous manner through the whistleblower channel managed by an independent third-party and set up for this purpose. |
| Tax content verification process | OKEA has a thorough process to prepare and review the tax return. This involves the finance group as well as a third-party accounting firm (Sumitup AS) who has specialised in petroleum tax in Norway. |
| GRI 207-3. Cooperative relations and advocacy | |
| Commitment to tax authorities | In accordance with the principles that guide our Tax Policy, OKEA is committed to supporting an effective tax system and maintaining cooperative relations with the tax authorities of the countries where it operates, based on mutual respect, transparency, and trust |
| Advocacy of public policy on taxation | The company has a transparent tax policy, and maintains a professional, open, and constructive relationship with relevant tax authorities as well as relevant authorities for the Norwegian oil and gas activities |
| GRI 207-3. Cooperative relations and advocacy | |
| Processes for eliciting and considering stakeholder opinions and concerns |
Key tax matters are presented for the board and/or the audit committee for discussion. OKEA also maintains close co-operation with the auditor (PwC) who undertakes a detailed review and signs the tax return as a part of the tax filing process. |
| GRI 207-4 Country-by-country reporting | |
| The latest published report provides the 2023 data, as presented to the Norwegian tax authorities in 2023 for automatic sharing with other tax authorities. The information is shared on www.okea.no/ investor/tax-information |
and stakeholders
Sustainability Environment Social Governance Appendix
and stakeholders materiality
| Governance | Page in this report |
|---|---|
| a) Describe the board's oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. b) Describe management's role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities. |
29 29 |
| Strategy | |
| a) Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium, and long term. b) Describe the impact of climate related risks and opportunities on the organisation's businesses, strategy, and financial planning. c) Describe the resilience of the organisation's strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario. |
30-31 30-31 27-29 |
| Risk Management | |
| a) Describe the organisation's processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks. b) Describe the organisation's processes for managing climate-related risks. c) Describe how processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organisation's overall |
29 29 29 |
| risk management. | |
| Metrics and Targets | |
a) Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process.
b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks. c) Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets.
| 64-65 |
|---|
| 64-65 22 |
| Disclosure | Location | Requirement omitted |
Reason for omission |
Explanation of omission |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR1 2. General disclosure 2021 | ||||||
| 2-1 Organisational details | page 5 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-2 Entities included in the organisation's sustainability reporting |
page 4 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-3 Reporting period, frequency, and contact point | Reporting period is 01.01.2023-31.12.2023. The report is issued yearly. Contact point can be found on our website. |
- | - | - | - | |
| 2-4 Restatements of information | page 88 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-5 External assurance | page 4 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-6 Activities, value chain and other business relationships |
page 4 & 8 | |||||
| 2-7 Employees | pages 44 & 69-73 | There is no employees in the organisation. |
involuntary part time | |||
| 2-8 Workers who are not employees | none | - | - | |||
| 2-9 Governance structure and composition | Annual report | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-10 Nomination and selection of the highest governance body |
Annual report | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-11 Chair of the highest governance body | Annual report | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-12 Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts |
page 16 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-13 Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts |
page 16 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-14 Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting |
page 16 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-15 Conflicts of interest | Annual report | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-7 Employees | pages 44 & 69-73 | organisation. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 Workers who are not employees | none | - | - | |
| 2-9 Governance structure and composition | Annual report | - | - | - - |
| 2-10 Nomination and selection of the highest governance body |
Annual report | - | - | - - |
| 2-11 Chair of the highest governance body | Annual report | - | - | - - |
| 2-12 Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts |
page 16 | - | - | - - |
| 2-13 Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts |
page 16 | - | - | - - |
| 2-14 Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting |
page 16 | - | - | - - |
| 2-15 Conflicts of interest | Annual report | - | - | - - |
| 2-16 Communication of critical concerns | Annual report | - | - | - - |
| Disclosure | Location | Requirement omitted |
Reason for omission |
Explanation of omission |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-17 Collective knowledge of the highest governance body |
page 16 | - | - | - | - |
| 2-18 Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body |
Annual report | - | - | - | - |
| 2-19 Remuneration policies | Annual report | - | - | - | - |
| 2-20 Process to determine remuneration | Annual report | - | - | - | - |
| 2-21 Annual total compensation ratio | Annual report | - | - | - | - |
| 2-22 Statement on sustainable development strategy page 14 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-23 Policy commitments | pages 21-63 | - | - | - | - |
| 2-24 Embedding policy commitments | pages 21-63 | - | - | - | - |
| 2-25 Processes to remediate negative impacts | pages 18, 19 & 21-63 | - | - | - | - |
| 2-26 Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns |
page 60 | ||||
| 2-27 Compliance with laws and regulations | page 61 | - | - | - | - |
| 2-28 Membership associations | - | - | - | - | |
| 2-29 Approach to stakeholder engagement | page 12 | - | - | - | - |
| 2-30 Collective bargaining agreements | page 51 | - | - | - | - |
| Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR1 3. Material topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-1 Process to determine material topics | pages 10-12 | - | - | - | - |
| 3-2 List of material topics | page 11 | - | - | - | - |
| Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic performance | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 5-9 & 14-19 | - | - | - | - |
| GRI 201: Economic performance 2016 | |||||
| 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed |
Annual report | - | - | - | - |
| 201-2 Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change |
page 29-31 & 77 | - | - | - | - |
| 201-3 Defined benefit plan obligations and other retirement plans |
page 45 | - | - | - | - |
| 201-4 Financial assistance received from government Annual report | - | - | - | - | |
| Market presence | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | GRI 3-3 | Not applicable | Not a material topic | - | |
| GRI 202: Market Presence 2016 | |||||
| 202-1 Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage |
Page 44 | - | - | No employees compensated based on wages subject to minimum wage rules |
- |
| 202-2 Proportion of OKEA's management hired from the local community |
page 12 | - | - | Senior management and its members have residence in Norway |
- |
| Indirect economic impacts | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | GRI 3-3 | Not applicable | Not a material topic | - | |
| GRI 203: Indirect Economic Impacts 2016 | |||||
| 203-1 Infrastructure investments and services supported |
pages 25-26 | - | - | - | - |
| 203-2 Significant indirect economic impacts | page 4 | - | - | - | - |
| Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procurement practices | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 53-55 | - | - | - | |
| GRI 204: Procurement Practices 2016 | |||||
| 204-1 Proportion of spending on local suppliers | page 55 | - | - | Definition of local is within Norway. |
- |
| Anti-corruption | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 59-61 | - | - | - | - |
| GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016 | |||||
| 205-1 Operations assessed for risks related to corruption |
pages 60-61 | - | - | - | - |
| 205-2 Communication and training about anti corruption policies and procedures |
pages 60-61 | - | - | - | - |
| 205-3 Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken |
There were no confirmed incidents of corruption in 2023 |
- | - | - | - |
| Anti-competitive behavior | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 60-61 | - | - | - | - |
| GRI 206: Anti-competitive Behavior 2016 | |||||
| 206-1 Legal actions for anti-competitive behaviour, anti-trust, and monopoly practices |
There were no confirmed legal actions for anti competitive behaviour, anti trust, and monopoly practices in 2023 |
- | - | - | - |
| Material topics | Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tax | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | page 63 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 207: Tax 2019 | ||||||
| 207-1 Approach to tax | page 75 | - | - | - | - | |
| 207-2 Tax governance, control, and risk management page 75 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 207-3 Stakeholder engagement and management of concerns related to tax |
page 75 | - | - | - | - | |
| 207-4 Country-by-country reporting | page 75 | - | - | - | - | |
| Energy | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | - | - | - | - | ||
| GRI 302: Energy 2016 | ||||||
| 302-1 Energy consumption within the organisation | page 65 | - | - | - | - | |
| 302-2 Energy consumption outside of the organisation |
302-2 | Information unavailable |
OKEA is working towards full disclosure of energy consumption outside of the organisation in alignment with its disclosure of Scope 3 GHG emissions |
- | ||
| 302-3 Energy intensity | page 65 | - | - | - | - | |
| 302-4 Reduction of energy consumption | page 65 | - | - | - | - | |
| 302-5 Reductions in energy requirements of products | Information | The information was not available at the |
| Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tax | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | page 63 | - | - | - | - |
| GRI 207: Tax 2019 | |||||
| 207-1 Approach to tax | page 75 | - | - | - | - |
| 207-2 Tax governance, control, and risk management page 75 | - | - | - | - | |
| 207-3 Stakeholder engagement and management of concerns related to tax |
page 75 | - | - | - | - |
| 207-4 Country-by-country reporting | page 75 | - | - | - | - |
| Energy | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 302: Energy 2016 | |||||
| 302-1 Energy consumption within the organisation | page 65 | - | - | - | - |
| 302-2 Energy consumption outside of the organisation |
302-2 | Information unavailable |
OKEA is working towards full disclosure of energy consumption outside of the organisation in alignment with its disclosure of Scope 3 GHG emissions |
- | |
| 302-3 Energy intensity | page 65 | - | - | - | - |
| 302-4 Reduction of energy consumption | page 65 | - | - | - | - |
| 302-5 Reductions in energy requirements of products and services |
302-5 | Information unavailable |
The information was not available at the time of reporting |
| Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water and effluents | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 32-35 | - | - | - | - |
| GRI 303: Water and Effluents 2018 | 11.6 | ||||
| 303-1 Interactions with water as a shared resource | pages 34-35 | - | - | - | - |
| 303-2 Management of water discharge-related impacts |
page 35 | - | - | - | - |
| 303-3 Water withdrawal | page 65 | - | - | - | - |
| 303-4 Water discharge | page 65 | - | - | - | - |
| 303-5 Water consumption | page 65 | - | - | - | - |
| Biodiversity | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 32-34 | - | - | - | - |
| GRI 304: Biodiversity 2016 | 11.4 | ||||
| 304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas |
page 33-34 | - | - | - | - |
| 304-2 Significant impacts of activities, products, and services on biodiversity |
page 80-81 | - | - | - | - |
| 304-3 Habitats protected or restored | page 33-34 | - | - | - | - |
| 304-4 IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations |
page 33-34 | - | - | - | - |
| Emissions | |||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 21-31 | - | - | - | - |
| GRI 305: Emissions 2016 | 111 | ||||
| Biogenic CO2 | No biogenic CO2 emissions within OKEA`s scope 1 |
| Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biogenic CO2 emissions |
Not applicable | No biogenic CO2 emissions within OKEA`s scope 1 emissions. |
305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions page 64
| Material topics | Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | page 64 | - | - | - | - | |
| 305-3 Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | page 65 | - | - | - | - | |
| 305-4 GHG emissions intensity | page 64 | - | - | - | - | |
| 305-5 Reduction of GHG emissions | pages 22-23 | - | - | - | - |
OKEA does not manufacture or market substances classified as "ozone depleting substances (ODS)", nor does its activity generate these substances as by-products. The presence of ODS substances is limited to some firefighting or refrigeration system equipment installed in the past, and the level of ODS emissions is estimated to be very low
| 305-6 | - | estimated to be very low |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| page 66 | - | - | - | - |
and stakeholders
| Material topics | Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effluents and waste | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | 11.5 | |||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 36-37 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 306: Waste 2020 | ||||||
| 306-1 Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts |
pages 66-67 | - | - | - | - | |
| 306-2 Management of significant waste-related impacts |
pages 36-37 | - | - | - | - | |
| 306-3 Waste generated | pages 66-67 | - | - | - | - | |
| 306-4 Waste diverted from disposal | pages 66-67 | - | - | - | - | |
| 306-5 Waste directed to disposal | pages 66-67 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 306 - Effluents and Waste 2016 | ||||||
| 306-3 Significant spills | page 66 | - | - | - | - | |
| Environmental compliance | ||||||
| GRI 307 - Environmental compliance | page 61 | - | - | - | - | |
| Supplier environmental assessment | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | page 62 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 308: Supplier Environmental Assessment 2016 | ||||||
| 308-1 New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria |
page 74 | - | - | - | - | |
| 308-2 Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken |
page 74 | - | - | - | - | |
| Material topics | Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employment | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 42-48 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 401: Employment 2016 | ||||||
| 401-1 New employee hires and employee turnover | page 70 | - | - | - | - | |
| 401-2 Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to part-time employee |
None | - | - | - | - | |
| 401-3 Parental leave | page 71 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 402: Labour/Management Relations 2016 | ||||||
| 402-1 Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes |
page 51 | |||||
| Occupational health and safety | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 39-41 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety 2018 | 11.8 | |||||
| 403-1 Occupational health and safety management system |
pages 39-40 | - | - | - | - | |
| 403-2 Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation |
pages 39-41 | - | - | - | - | |
| 403-3 Occupational health services | pages 39-41 | - | - | - | - | |
| 403-4 Worker participation, consultation, and communication on occupational health and safety |
pages 39-41 | - | - | - | - | |
| 403-5 Worker training on occupational health and safety |
pages 39-41 | - | - | Compulsory training courses is decided based on laws and regulations and discipline specific needs. |
- |
403-6 Promotion of worker health pages 39-41 - - - -
| Material topics | Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 403-7 Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships |
pages 39-41 | - | - | - | - | |
| 403-8 Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system |
pages 39-41 | - | - | - | - | |
| 403-9 Work-related injuries | page 69 | - | - | - | - | |
| 403-10 Work-related ill health | page 69 | - | - | - | - | |
| Training and education | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 46-48 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 404: Training and Education 2016 | ||||||
| 404-1 Average hours of training per year per employee |
page 71 | - | - | - | - | |
| 404-2 Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs |
pages 46-48 | - | - | - | - | |
| 404-3 Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews |
100% | - | - | - | - | |
| Diversity and equal opportunity | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 42-46 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 405: Diversity and Equal Opportunity 2016 | 11.11 | |||||
| 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees | page 11 | - | - | - | - | |
| 405-2 Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men |
page 73 | - | - | - | - | |
| Non-discrimination | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 42-46 | - | - | - | - |
| Material topics | Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRI 406: Non-discrimination 2016 | ||||||
| 406-1 Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken |
None | - | - | - | - | |
| Freedom of association and collective bargaining | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 49-52 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 407: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining 2016 | ||||||
| 407-1 Operations and suppliers in which the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at risk |
page 74 | - | - | - | - | |
| Child labour | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | pages 49-52 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 408: Child Labour 2016 | ||||||
| 408-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labour |
page 74 | - | - | - | - | |
| Forced or compulsory labour | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | page | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 409: Forced or Compulsory Labour 2016 | ||||||
| 409-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labour |
page 74 | - | - | - | - | |
| Local communities | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics page | pages 52-57 | - | - | - | - | |
| Material topics | Disclosure | Location | Requirement ommitted |
Reason for ommitance |
Explanation of ommittance |
GRI Sector standards ref. no |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRI 411: Rights of indigenous people 2016 | 11.17 | |||||
| 411-1 Incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous people |
page 74 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 412: Human rights Assessment | ||||||
| 412-1 Operations that have been subject to human rights reviews or impact assessments |
pages 50-52 | - | - | - | - | |
| 412-2 Employee training on human rights policies or procedures |
page 50 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 413: Local Communities 2016 | ||||||
| 413-1 Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs |
413-1 | Information unavailable |
Information to be included in future reporting where material |
|||
| 413-2 Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities |
413-2 | Information unavailable |
Information to be included in future reporting where material |
|||
| Supplier social assessment | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | page 62 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 414: Supplier Social Assessment 2016 | ||||||
| 414-1 New suppliers that were screened using social criteria |
page 74 | - | - | - | - | |
| 414-2 Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken |
page 62 | - | - | - | - | |
| Public policy | ||||||
| GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | ||||||
| 3-3 Management of material topics | page 63 | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 415: Public Policy 2016 | ||||||
| 415-1 Political contributions | Nil | - | - | - | - | |
| GRI 419: Socioeconomic Compliance | ||||||
| 419-1 Non-compliance with laws and regulations in the social and economic are as |
page 74 | - | - | - | - |
| KPI calculation methodology | KPI | Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute GHG emissions scope 1 (million tonnes CO₂e) reductions |
Scope 1: direct GHG emissions are those deriving from sources associated to the company's assets (e.g. combustion, flaring, fugitive, and venting), and include CO2, CH4 and N2O. |
|
| Accidental spills | Accidental spills are those deriving from unplanned release of oil and chemicals into the marine environment during operational activities. |
|
| Serious incidents frequencies (SIF) | Serious Incident Frequency (SIF) indicator measures the number of actual and potential unintentional serious incidents per million working hours. SIF includes major accident hazard and other serious safety accidents and near misses. Near misses are incidents with no actual consequences but with a serious potential. |
|
| Engagement score | Engagement score is a quantitative measure that represents the level of employee engagement within the organisation. It is a numerical value derived from the analysis of employee engagement survey data. |
|
| Female recruitment | The number of female employees recruited into the company during 2023. | |
| Conformed instances of discrimination and human right violations |
Confirmed instances of discrimination and human rights violations in 2023 refer to the number of reported and verified cases involving violations of human rights. These instances can range from discriminatory practices, racial profiling, gender-based violence, and other forms of unethical behaviour. |
|
| Confirmed instances of corruption and bribery |
Confirmed instances of corruption and bribery in 2023 pertain to the number of reported and verified cases involving illicit practices. These instances can range from bribery, embezzlement, fraud, or other forms of unethical behaviour. |
|
| Employees who signed-off the Code of Conduct |
Employees who have signed off the Code of Conduct refer to the percentage of employees who have formally acknowledged and committed to following our organisation's ethical guidelines |
|
| Committed spend locally | Committed spend locally in Norway during 2023 refers to the portion of procurement expenses that were allocated to local suppliers and businesses within the country. |
|
| Payment to government | In Norway, taxes and contributions constitute most of the revenues received by the government, municipalities, and county councils. taxes. Payment to government refers to the direct or indirect taxes paid to the Norwegian government during 2023. |
Correction of error, due to changes in office locations and emission factor.
| Restatements | Page | Original text/data in ESG 2022 | Corrections made in 2023 | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy transition and climate change | ||||
| Page 85 (table) | Scope 2 emissions (marked based) 1172 tonnes C02 e |
Scope 2 emissions (marked based) 1038 tonnes C02 e |
||
| Page 85 (table) | Scope 2 emissions (location based) 50,3 tonnes C02 e |
Scope 2 emissions (location based) 39,30 tonnes C02 e |
||
| Page 85 (table) | Gross operated GHG intensity 32.9 kg CO2 e/boe |
Gross operated GHG intensity 42.1 kg CO2 e/boe |
||
Correction of error, due to changes in office locations and emission factor
Correction of error
This section contains details of OKEA GHG performance, and the methodologies and processes used to account for emissions, relating to direct Scope 1, indirect Scope 2, and indirect Scope 3 GHG emissions associated with the operations and activities of the value chain of OKEA.
OKEA applies the operational control approach to set the GHG organisational reporting boundary for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. According to this approach, OKEA reports 100% of GHG emissions from assets over which it has operational control, that is, where OKEA can enforce its own operative policies and procedures, even when it holds less than 100% of the value.
For Scope 3 we use operational control on all categories. The Scope 3 emissions boundary is better explained in the dedicated section and table xx.
For the category 11, (use of sold products), which is the most relevant one, the reference boundary is the upstream equity hydrocarbons production sold.
In terms of operational boundaries, both Scope 1 and Scope 2 direct and indirect GHG emissions reporting encompasses the operations of OKEA's own operated assets.
OKEA does not have any emissions from Category no. 13 - Downstream leased assets, Category no.14 - Franchises and Category no. 15 - Investments.
OKEA has implemented a process to collect, account for and report GHG emissions based on the following elements:
▶ Internal procedures have been implemented for the identification of material GHG emission sources and for the identification of common methodologies to calculate GHG emissions.
GHG emissions are expressed in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent, using Global Warming Potential (IPCC, 4AR) as the conversion factors for CH4 and N2O.
Based on their physical origin, data are taken from: (i) fuel meter records; (ii) utility bills, e.g., for electricity consumption; (iii) direct measurement (such as LDARs for fugitive
| emissions). The calculation of emissions is derived from estimated Activity data (e.g., fuel consumed, electricity, distance travelled). |
|---|
| Emissions factors used are mostly calculated using the chemical composition of the gas (gas analysis) or taken from the literature, e.g., Offshore Norge 044, Christian Michelsen Research model (CRM), rig specific emission factors. |
| Finally, internal audits are provided for at various levels, also covering GHG emissions data. Appropriate measures are implemented, |
| where possible, to minimise the level of uncertainty associated with activity data |
| (consumption) and emission factors, such as: (i) the application of uniform standards |
| and the use of accredited laboratories for the analysis of fuel characteristics to determine emissions factors; (ii) the use of measurement |
| instruments, calibrated and periodically checked in accordance with international standards, to calculate energy consumption (activity data). |
and stakeholders
Stated Scope 1 GHG emissions come from sources owned or controlled by OKEA, including: emissions from "core" and support operations owned or controlled by OKEA; emissions from leased assets/operations (leased vehicles fleet). Scope 1 GHG emissions are classified in the following categories:
GHG emissions are expressed in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent, using Global Warming Potential (IPCC, 4AR) as the conversion factors for CH4 and N2 O.
The calculation of emissions is derived from estimated Activity data (e.g., fuel consumed, electricity, distance travelled). Based on their physical origin, data are taken from: (i) fuel meter records; (ii) utility bills, e.g., for electricity consumption; (iii) direct measurement (such as LDARs for fugitive emissions); (iv) other methods used at some OKEA sites and facilities.
Stated scope 2 emissions come from GHG emissions indirectly resulting from the generation of purchased energy. The general criterion for estimating emissions is the same as that used for Scope 1. Emissions are estimated by applying an approach based on the place of origin of the energy carriers, considering the average energy mix where third-party purchases occur (location-based approach) and a marked based approach. Norwegian power production is mainly from hydropower, resulting in a very low locationbased emission factor (2023: 19 g CO₂/kWh). The market-based emission factor reflects the contractual arrangement in place between an organisation and its energy supplier, or, alternatively, reflects the fact that such an agreement does not exist. The market-based emission factor in Norway (2023: 502 g CO₂/ kWh) is more than twenty times higher than the location-based emission factor.Emissions from imported electricity have been calculated with both factors.
GHG emissions from stationary combustion, mobile sources, and industrial process operations.
GHG emissions from the controlled combustion of hydrocarbons during flaring. This type of source includes emissions deriving from: routine flaring, non-routine, and emergency flaring.
GHG emissions from venting in Oil & Gas exploration and production operations, electricity generation and gas transportation operations. In detail: CO2 and CH4 within unburned gases discharged through venting and CO2 from oilfields associated with Upstream production
Leaks of hydrocarbon gas in equipment such as pumps, valves, compressor seals, etc
| GHG emissions connected with the OKEA value chain and not accounted for as either |
|---|
| Scope 1 or Scope 2 GHG emissions. Based on |
| the WBCSD/WRI GHG Protocol Corporate |
| Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and |
| Reporting Standard and the IPIECA standard, |
| Scope 3 indirect GHG emissions are classified |
| according to the categories listed in the table |
| below. For the Oil & Gas sector, the most |
| relevant category is that related to the refining |
| of and use of the products sold (cat. 10 and 11). |
| Id. | Category | Description | Calculation methodology | Data sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purchased goods and services (including capital goods) |
GHG emissions associated with goods and services purchased from the first level supply chain, through purchase contracts managed by OKEA's procurement department, that provides information on the type of purchases and associated expenditure. |
The 'spend-based' method as described in the Scope 3 Guidance is used to calculate these GHG emissions, with industry-average emission factors applied based on the economic value of the goods and services. Spend data is broken down according to OKEA's internal taxonomy codes and allocated to the most appropriate product group category available. Emission factors are derived from EXIOBASE . |
Annual spend data is extracted from OKEA's internal system that tracks external spend. |
| 2 | Capital goods | GHG emissions associated with capital goods purchased from the first level of the supply chain and through purchase contracts issued by OKEA's procurement department. |
As above | As above |
| 3 | Fuel and energy-related activities GHG emissions related to the extraction, production, and transportation of fuels and energy purchased or acquired by the reporting company in the reporting year, over which OKEA has operational control. |
These emissions are calculated on activity data provided in Scope 1 and 2. Emission factors are derived from DEFRA. |
Annual data is sourced from OKEA's internal database, with consumption of each type of fuel and energy being recorded by each of our operations. |
|
| 4 | Upstream transportation and distribution of products |
GHG emissions from purchased transportation and distribution services paid for by OKEA and carried out with vehicles not owned by OKEA, including: (i) crude oil and petroleum product maritime transportation, based on the fuel consumed in direct transportation (ii) equipment and materials transportation by vessels (Upstream). |
These emissions are calculated on spend data. We use spend from selected procurement categories, which are mapped to suppliers and accounts, and allocated to the most appropriate emission factor category. Emission factors are derived from EXIOBASE . |
Annual data on fuel consumed in direct transportation and vessels used is sourced from OKEA's internal system. |
| 5 | Waste generated in operations | GHG Emissions from waste management carried out by third parties, during disposal and treatment of waste generated in OKEA's operations (100% operated). |
These emissions are calculated from our onsite generated waste by waste disposal method, including both hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Emission factors are derived from DEFRA. |
Annual data on waste generated is sourced from OKEA's internal system. |
| 6 | Business travel | GHG emissions generated by vehicles not owned by OKEA used by OKEA's employees for business travel. Emissions from leased vehicles operated by OKEA are included in category 7. |
For purchased business travel services, the spend-based method is used to calculate associated emissions. Emission factors are derived from EXIOBASE . |
Purchased business travel service spend data is extracted from OKEA internal system that tracks external spend |
| 7 | Employee commuting | GHG emissions from commuting from home-workplace and back, carried out by OKEA's employees. |
To be evaluated | To be evaluated |
| 8 | Upstream leased assets | GHG emissions from assets not owned but leased by OKEA. Whenever an asset leased by OKEA falls within its organisational boundary, the relevant GHG emissions are accounted for as Scope 1 and those from electricity consumption as Scope 2 emissions. |
These emissions are calculated on spend data. We use spend from selected procurement categories, which are mapped to suppliers and accounts, and allocated to the appropriate emission factor. Emission factors are derived from EXIOBASE . |
Leased asset spend data is extracted from OKEA internal system that tracks external spend |
| N/A |
|---|
| Annual data on gross numbers of production are sourced from OKEA's internal system. |
| Annual data on gross numbers of production are sourced from OKEA's internal system. |
| Id. | Category | Description | Calculation methodology | Data sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Downstream transportation and distribution of products |
GHG emissions related to transport and distribution services for sold products (not paid for by OKEA). GHG emissions from transportation and distribution services purchased by OKEA are accounted for in Category 4, because the transportation occurs before they are sold to end users. Indeed, most of OKEA's products are fuels, so once sold to end users they are not transported or distributed. Moreover, this category is not expected to be material according to the IPIECA/API methodology for estimating Scope 3 emissions from the O&G Industry. |
To be evaluated | To be evaluated |
| 10 | Processing of sold products | GHG emissions from processing carried out by a third party of crude oil and natural gas sold by OKEA. |
The category is included in the emission factors used for category 11 that includes all emissions from production to combustion. |
N/A |
| 11 | Use of sold products | GHG emissions from the use of OKEA's finished products from quota production of oil and natural gas sold. Emissions are calculated considering the different types of products sold. |
We report emissions based on gross numbers of production. For the calculation a direct-use phase method was applied, where we take a conservative approach and assume all sold products are used for energy through combustion. Emission factors are derived from DEFRA and includes all emissions from production to combustion, and also includes emissions from scope 1 and 2. |
internal system. |
| 12 | End-of-life treatment of sold products |
GHG emissions associated with the end-of-life treatment of products not burned during their use. The calculation of emissions refers to the product transport and processing phases. |
These emissions are calculated on activity data from products not burned during their use. The only product not burned are bitumen. Emission factors are derived from DEFRA. |
internal system. |
| 13 | Downstream leased assets | GHG emissions from assets owned by OKEA but leased to third parties. The emissions in this category are not considered relevant for the Oil & Gas industry. OKEA does not account for Scope 3 emissions related to facilities and buildings not owned and not operated by OKEA due to the difficulties with traceability of the data. Furthermore, OKEA cannot control the emissions and does not have the opportunity to implement a mitigation project, so this source should be considered as not relevant. |
N/A | N/A |
| 14 | Franchises | This is not relevant for OKEA. OKEA has no downstream operations, nor fuel stations under franchises. |
N/A | N/A |
| 15 | Investments | Investment emissions are potentially material only for those companies with significant joint ventures that are not included within their Scope 1 and 2 emissions boundaries (inventory). OKEA has emissions from non-operated licences that are not under operational control that is applicable in this category, but these emissions are not calculated and reported as the information is not available. |
N/A | N/A |

We have undertaken a limited assurance engagement in respect of OKEA ASA's GHG statement for the period 1 January 2023 – 31 December 2023, comprising GHG emissions marked with a separate symbol " " under "Energy transition and climate change" on page 64 and 65 in the OKEA ESG Report for 2023, and the Explanatory Notes related to scope 3 category specification included on page 24 and accounting and reporting principles included in section "Statement on GHG accounting and reporting (year 2023)" on page 91-94.
The applicable criteria against which the Greenhouse Gas Statement has been evaluated is the Greenhouse Gas Protocol - A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (2004) (Criteria), applied as explained in the section "Statement on GHG accounting and reporting (year 2023)". The GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, published by the World resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, is available at https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard.
Management is responsible for the preparation of the GHG statement in accordance with the applicable Criteria, applied as explained in the section "GHG Accounting Methodologies". This responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation of a Greenhouse Gas statement that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases.
We have complied with the independence and other ethical requirements as required by relevant laws and regulations in Norway and the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) issued by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA Code), which is founded on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality and professional behavior.
Our firm applies International Standard on Quality Management (ISQM) 1, and accordingly, maintains a comprehensive system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Our responsibility is to express a limited assurance conclusion on the GHG statement based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained. We conducted our limited assurance engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3410, Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. That standard requires that we plan and perform this engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the GHG statement is free from material misstatement.
A limited assurance engagement undertaken in accordance with ISAE 3410 involves assessing the suitability in the circumstances of OKEA ASA's use of the Criteria as the basis for the preparation of the GHG statement, assessing the risks of material misstatement of the GHG statement whether due to fraud or error, responding to the assessed risks as necessary in the circumstances, and evaluating the overall presentation of the GHG statement. A limited assurance engagement is substantially less in scope than a
PricewaterhouseCoopers AS, Kanalsletta 8, Postboks 8017, NO-4068 Stavanger T: 02316, org. no.: 987 009 713 MVA, www.pwc.no Statsautoriserte revisorer, medlemmer av Den norske Revisorforening og autorisert regnskapsførerselskap

reasonable assurance engagement in relation to both the risk assessment procedures, including an understanding of internal control, and the procedures performed in response to the assessed risks.
The procedures we performed were based on our professional judgment and, among others, included:
● Inquiries to obtain an understanding of OKEA ASA's control environment and information systems relevant to emissions quantification and reporting, but we did not evaluate the design of particular control activities, obtain evidence about their implementation or test operating effectiveness. ● Evaluation of whether OKEA ASA's methods for estimating emissions and emission factors are appropriate and have been consistently applied and reported.
● Reconciliation of data for estimating emissions based on spend to supplier cost data and reconciling data for estimating downstream emissions to production data used as basis for reported production in financial reporting.
● Assess the completeness of the reported emissions sources, data collection methods, source data and relevant assumptions applicable to estimate emissions from a selection of OKEA ASA's emission sources. The test procedures were chosen taking into consideration the emission sources' contribution to total emissions and our understanding of the risk of material errors in measurements and reporting of emissions.
● Limited substantive testing on a selective basis of the Greenhouse Gas scope 1, scope 2 and scope 3 emissions to check that data had been appropriately measured, recorded, collated and reported. The test procedures were chosen taking into consideration the emission sources' contribution to total emissions and our understanding of the risk of material errors in measurements
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than, for a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had we performed a reasonable assurance engagement. Accordingly, we do not express a reasonable assurance opinion about whether OKEA ASA's GHG statement has been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the criteria.
We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
conclusion.
Based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that OKEA ASA's GHG statement for the period 1 January 2023 – 31 December 2023, is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate accounting and Reporting Standard (2004) applied as explained in the section "Statement on GHG accounting and reporting (year 2023)".
Stavanger, 4 April 2024 PricewaterhouseCoopers AS
Per Arvid Gimre State Authorised Public Accountant
and stakeholders

Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.