Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

Nova Minerals Ltd Regulatory Filings 2021

Jun 7, 2021

34115_rns_2021-06-07_138e5bce-228a-41a5-9af9-208cb5630a5a.pdf

Regulatory Filings

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT ASX: NVA, OTC: NVAAF, FSE: QM3

==> picture [124 x 73] intentionally omitted <==

8 June 2021

Significant Early Results at Korbel Main South East Zone

Infill drilling at Korbel Main SE returning impressive results which include:

KBDH-066

o 67m @ 1.0 g/t Au o 44m @ 1.5 g/t Au o 13m @ 3.9 g/t Au o 6m @ 8.0 g/t Au o 3m @ 12.3 g/t Au

(KBDH-066 returned an overall average grade of 0.4 g/t Au over 314m from 15m within the Korbel mineralized intrusive containing multiple high-grade zones)

KDBH-068

o 27m @ 0.6 g/t Au o 6m @ 1.4 g/t Au o 3m @ 2.3 g/t Au

  • Wide zones of mineralized intrusive containing internal higher grade “blow out” zones continue to be intersected in infill drilling South East of the Korbel Main deposit.

  • Infill and Extension drilling are ongoing at Korbel Main currently focusing on higher grade SE zone with the goal of substantially increasing the 4.7Moz Resource (ASX: 7 April 2021) and upgrading the Resource confidence to expedite project feasibility studies.

  • Trade-off studies considering a range of potential processing options are progressing rapidly to determine capital and operating costs whilst allowing the greatest operational flexibility as part of the forthcoming interim scoping study.

  • Mobilization of the third diamond drilling rig to the RPM prospect is imminent.

NVA CEO, Mr. Christopher Gerteisen commented:

“The significance of these grades obtained this early in the infill program further confirms a highergrade feeder zone within the SE Block B area of the Korbel Main deposit. Our expectation is that we will start to consistently intersect internal high-grade ‘blow-out’ zones, and that is exactly what these results show. This could mean a significant upgrade to the resource, with the next update to be released later this year. It will also have a major impact on our pit optimizations moving forward. As such, we see this upcoming interim scoping study as a ‘snap-shot in time’, a starting point, one which we are only set to grow from. The South East high-grade ‘zone still remains wide open with drilling to continue on infill as well as extensional drilling stepping out further along strike, potentially extending the strike of Korbel Main an additional 500m further South of the

Nova Minerals Limited ACN: 006 690 348 ASX: NVA OTC: NVAAF

Office: Suite 602, 566 St Kilda Road Melbourne, VIC, 3004 Australia

Contact: P: +61 3 9537 1238 E: [email protected] W : www.novaminerals.com.au

Nova Minerals Ltd is a dynamic Australian explorer and developer of its expanding flagship 4.7Moz Estelle Gold project situated in Alaska

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

South-East Zone. We are starting to get a clearer structure of the deposit, which bodes for our move into PFS after this interim scoping study, where we will continue to hone and improve our capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operating expenditure (OPEX) estimates.

These results and further from the ongoing drilling since April 2021 resource update will be included in the next resource update due for delivery later this year.

In addition to the exciting things happening at Korbel, another major milestone is in the cross hairs. The third diamond drill rig will be mobilised to the RPM prospect within days, commencing a drilling program which has the potential to add significant ounces to the Estelle Project resource inventory. We have plan to release a Maiden Resource Estimate for this program later this year.

These results are just the beginning of drilling related news flow for 2021. A consistent stream drilling samples are now coming through and will continue to be fed to the lab with results to follow in due course.”

Nova Minerals Limited ( ASX: NVA, OTC: NVAAF, FSE: QM3 ) is pleased to announce that the significant grades at Korbel Main, within the Company's flagship Estelle Gold Project located in the prolific Tintina Gold Belt.

==> picture [219 x 328] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [57 x 51] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Figures 1
and 2:
Cross
Sections
----- End of picture text -----

==> picture [223 x 329] intentionally omitted <==

Page 2

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [408 x 613] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

KORBEL MAIN
----- End of picture text -----

Figure 3: Korbel Main Plan view

Page 3

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Korbel Drilling is ongoing with almost 10,000m drilled to date and further results to follow in the near term. Geologically, some of these samples are looking very promising, showing encouraging gold grade indicators in terms mineralogy and high vein densities as revealed in hole KBDH-066. We are currently establishing an on-site sample prep-lab facility which will result in reduced cost per assay and faster turnaround.

==> picture [411 x 286] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 4. Korbel Main Drill Hole Layout

Competent Person Statements

Mr Dale Schultz P.Geo., Principle of DjS Consulting, who is Nova groups Chief Geologist and COO of Nova Minerals subsidiary Snow Lake Resources Ltd., compiled and evaluated the technical information in this release and is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan (APEGS), which is ROPO, accepted for the purpose of reporting in accordance with ASX listing rules. Mr Schultz has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the ‘Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Schultz consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Generally, any statements that are not historical facts may contain forward-looking information, and forward looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget” “scheduled”,

Page 4

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

“estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or indicates that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be” taken, “occur” or “be achieved.” Forward-looking information is based on certain factors and assumptions management believes to be reasonable at the time such statements are made, including but not limited to, continued exploration activities, Gold and other metal prices, the estimation of initial and sustaining capital requirements, the estimation of labour costs, the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, assumptions with respect to currency fluctuations, the timing and amount of future exploration and development expenditures, receipt of required regulatory approvals, the availability of necessary financing for the Project, permitting and such other assumptions and factors as set out herein.

Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to: risks related to changes in Gold prices; sources and cost of power and water for the Project; the estimation of initial capital requirements; the lack of historical operations; the estimation of labour costs; general global markets and economic conditions; risks associated with exploration of mineral deposits; the estimation of initial targeted mineral resource tonnage and grade for the Project; risks associated with uninsurable risks arising during the course of exploration; risks associated with currency fluctuations; environmental risks; competition faced in securing experienced personnel; access to adequate infrastructure to support exploration activities; risks associated with changes in the mining regulatory regime governing the Company and the Project; completion of the environmental assessment process; risks related to regulatory and permitting delays; risks related to potential conflicts of interest; the reliance on key personnel; financing, capitalisation and liquidity risks including the risk that the financing necessary to fund continued exploration and development activities at the Project may not be available on satisfactory terms, or at all; the risk of potential dilution through the issuance of additional common shares of the Company; the risk of litigation.

Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended, there can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Forward looking information is made as of the date of this announcement and the Company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking information this is included herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

This announcement has been authorised for release by the Executive Directors.

- Ends -

Further information:

Christopher Gerteisen Ian Pamensky CEO and Executive Director Company Secretary E: [email protected] E: [email protected] P: +61 3 9537 1238 P: +61 414 864 746

Page 5

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1. Table if Intercepts for KBDH-066 and KBDH-068

Page 6

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 2. The following table 1 is provided to ensure compliance with the JORC Code (2012) requirements for the reporting of the exploration results for the Estelle Gold Project – Alaska

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels,
random chips, or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments,
etc.). These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken to ensure
sample representivity and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.
• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
that are Material to the Public Report.
• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has
been done this would be relatively simple (e.g.
‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases more explanation may be required, such as
where there is coarse Au that has inherent
sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules)
may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
• Rock chip samples were
collected from outcrop in-
situ lithology or local float
where noted
• Rock samples collected
were representative
• Sampling practice is
appropriate and complies
with industry best practice.
• Sample preparation and
analysis was performed by
ALS laboratories in
Fairbanks, following
industry best practice
standards.
Drilling
techniques
• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-
hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented andifso, bywhatmethod, etc.).
• Not Applicable – no
drilling reported

Page 7

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Drill
sample
recovery
• Method of recording and assessing core and
chip
sample recoveries and results assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery
and
ensure representative nature of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between sample
recovery and grade and whether sample bias may
have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material
• Not Applicable – no
drilling reported
Logger • Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a level
of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.)
photography.
• The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.
• For rock chip samples
logging is qualitative and
descriptive.

Page 8

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Sub-
sampling
techniques
and
sample
preparation
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half
or all core taken.
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary
split,
etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grainsize ofthematerialbeing sampled.
• Rock samples were
collected in dry conditions.
• Insertion of standards
and blanks by the
company was not
necessary for the type of
sampling undertaken.
Routine QA/QC processes
at the ALS Laboratory
included insertion of
duplicates, blanks and
standards as per standard
procedures.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld
XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in
determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been
established.
• Samples are tested for
gold using ALS Fire Assay
Au-ICP21 technique. This
technique has a lower
detection limit of 0.001 g/t
with an upper detection
limit of 10 g/t. If samples
have grades in excess of
10 g/t then Au-GRA21 is
used to determine the over
detect limit. Au-GRA21 has
a detection limit of 0.05 g/t
and an upper limit of 1000
g/t.
Verification
of
sampling
and
assaying
•The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
•The use of twinned holes. Documentation of
primary data, data entryprocedures, data
verification, data storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
• Assay data are compiled
by the CP and then verified
by corporate management
prior to the release to the
public.
Location of
data points
•Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate
drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys),
trenches, mine workings and other locations used
in Mineral Resource estimation.
• Specification of the grid system used.
• Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
• All maps and locations
are in UTM grid (NAD83
Z5N) and have been
measured by hand-held
GPS with a lateral
accuracy of ±4 metres and

Page 9

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

a vertical accuracy of ±10
metres.
Data
spacing
and
distribution
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
• Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation
procedure(s) and classifications applied.
• Whether sample compositing has been applied.
• Rock samples were taken
for areas that were
previously sampled in
2018 with the focus on
collecting material from
Quartz-Arsenopyrite Veins.
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiased sampling of possible structures and the
extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
• If the relationship between the drilling orientation
and the orientation of key mineralised structures
is considered to have introduced a sampling bias,
this should be assessed andreportedif material.
• Several structural
measurements were taken
for the veins where
possible. The veins
dominant orientations was
320 degrees dipping
steeply to the southwest
Sample
security
• The measures taken to ensure sample security • A secure chain of custody
protocol has been
established with the site
geologist locking samples
in secure shipping
container at site until
loaded on to aircraft and
shipped to the secure
restricted access room at
Fairbanks ALS Laboratory
for core processing by
Nova Minerals staff
geologists.
Audits or
Reviews
• The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.
• No review has been
undertaken at this time.

Page 10

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
• Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
• The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
• The Estelle project is
comprised of Three
hundred and Sixty eight
(368) State of Alaska
mining claims consisting of
220km2 for the entire claim
group.
• The mining claims are
wholly owned by AKCM
(AUST) Pty Ltd. (an
incorporated Joint venture
(JV Company between
Nova Minerals Ltd and AK
Minerals Pty Ltd) via 100%
ownership of Alaskan
incorporate company AK
Custom Mining LLC.
AKCM (AUST) Pty Ltd is
owned 85% by Nova
Minerals Ltd, 15% by AK
Minerals Pty Ltd. AK
Minerals Pty Ltd holds a
2% NSR (ASX
Announcement: 20
November 2017)
• Nova owns 85% of the
project through the joint
venture agreement.
• The Company is not
aware of any other
impediments that would
prevent an exploration or
mining activity.
Exploration
done by other
parties
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by
other parties.
• Geophysical, Soil testing,
and drilling was completed
by previous operators in
the past. Nova Minerals
has no access to this data.
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
Nova Minerals is primarily
exploring for Intrusion
Related Gold System
(IRGS) type deposit within
the Estelle Project

Page 11

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Drill hole
Information
• A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results including
a tabulation of the following information for all
Material drill holes:
- easting and northing of the drill hole collar
- elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar
- dip and azimuth of the hole
- down hole length and interception depth
-hole length.
• If the exclusion of this information is justified on
the
basis that the information is not Material and this
exclusion does not detract from the understanding
of the report, the Competent Person should
clearly explain why this is the case.
• Not Applicable
Data
aggregation
methods
• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum
grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and
cut-off grades are usually Material and should be
stated.
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of
low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be shown
in detail.
• The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalentvalues should be clearly stated.
• Raw assay information
was reported without any
aggregation.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
• These relationships are particularly important in
the reporting of Exploration Results.
• If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect
to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should
be reported.
• If it is not known and only the down hole lengths
are reported, there should be a clear statement to
this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not
known’).
• Not Applicable

Page 12

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for
any significant discovery being reported These
should include, but not be limited to a plan view of
drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
• Plan view Map in Figure
1 shows the location of the
RPM prospect with respect
to other prospects within
the Estelle Project.
Balanced
Reporting
• Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid
misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
• Does not apply. All Nova
results have been
disclosed to the ASX via
news releases.
Other
substantive
exploration data
• Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but not
limited to): geological observations; geophysical
survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment;
metallurgical test results; bulk density,
groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
• No other substantive
exploration data has been
collected
Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided
this information is not commercially sensitive.
• Diamond drilling is
ongoing. Project planned is
for up to 80,000 metres in
2021 across Korbel Valley
and RPM.

==> picture [527 x 96] intentionally omitted <==

Page 13

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

List of results KBDH-066 and KBDH-068

HoleID **FROM_M ** **TO_M ** Au
KBDH-066 1.42 9.91 0.059
KBDH-066 9.91 11.58 0.061
KBDH-066 11.58 14.63 0.048
KBDH-066 14.63 17.68 1.055
KBDH-066 17.68 20.73 0.119
KBDH-066 20.73 23.77 0.062
KBDH-066 23.77 26.82 0.183
KBDH-066 26.82 29.87 0.114
KBDH-066 29.87 32.92 0.184
KBDH-066 32.92 35.97 0.077
KBDH-066 35.97 39.01 0.107
KBDH-066 39.01 42.06 0.188
KBDH-066 42.06 45.11 0.131
KBDH-066 45.11 48.16 0.068
KBDH-066 48.16 51.21 0.033
KBDH-066 51.21 54.25 0.041
KBDH-066 54.25 57.30 0.069
KBDH-066 57.30 60.35 0.009
KBDH-066 60.35 63.40 0.035
KBDH-066 63.40 66.45 0.108
KBDH-066 66.45 69.49 0.011
KBDH-066 69.49 72.54 0.12
KBDH-066 72.54 75.59 0.123
KBDH-066 75.59 78.64 0.134
KBDH-066 78.64 81.69 0.161
KBDH-066 81.69 84.73 0.107
KBDH-066 84.73 87.78 0.033
KBDH-066 87.78 90.83 0.131
KBDH-066 90.83 93.88 0.095
KBDH-066 93.88 96.93 0.08
KBDH-066 96.93 99.97 0.163
KBDH-066 99.97 103.02 0.365
KBDH-066 103.02 106.07 0.325
KBDH-066 106.07 109.12 0.201
KBDH-066 109.12 112.17 0.427
KBDH-066 112.17 115.21 0.256
KBDH-066 115.21 118.26 0.426

Page 14

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

HoleID **FROM_M ** **TO_M ** Au
KBDH-066 118.26 121.31 0.103
KBDH-066 121.31 124.36 0.22
KBDH-066 124.36 127.41 0.846
KBDH-066 127.41 130.45 0.287
KBDH-066 130.45 133.50 0.154
KBDH-066 133.50 136.55 0.18
KBDH-066 136.55 139.60 0.117
KBDH-066 139.60 142.65 0.381
KBDH-066 142.65 145.69 0.506
KBDH-066 145.69 148.74 0.144
KBDH-066 148.74 151.79 0.345
KBDH-066 151.79 154.84 3.01
KBDH-066 154.84 157.89 0.411
KBDH-066 157.89 160.93 0.413
KBDH-066 160.93 163.98 0.132
KBDH-066 163.98 167.03 0.084
KBDH-066 167.03 170.08 0.143
KBDH-066 170.08 173.13 0.453
KBDH-066 173.13 176.17 0.436
KBDH-066 176.17 179.22 0.073
KBDH-066 179.22 182.27 0.215
KBDH-066 182.27 185.32 1.24
KBDH-066 185.32 188.37 0.231
KBDH-066 188.37 191.41 0.22
KBDH-066 191.41 194.46 0.063
KBDH-066 194.46 197.51 0.456
KBDH-066 197.51 200.56 2.44
KBDH-066 200.56 203.61 0.355
KBDH-066 203.61 206.65 0.513
KBDH-066 206.65 209.70 0.129
KBDH-066 209.70 212.75 0.492
KBDH-066 212.75 215.80 0.476
KBDH-066 215.80 218.85 0.098
KBDH-066 218.85 221.89 0.161
KBDH-066 221.89 222.72 0.11
KBDH-066 222.72 225.33 0.001
KBDH-066 225.33 227.99 0.115
KBDH-066 227.99 231.04 0.135
KBDH-066 231.04 234.09 0.143

Page 15

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

HoleID **FROM_M ** **TO_M ** Au
KBDH-066 234.09 237.13 0.074
KBDH-066 237.13 240.18 0.669
KBDH-066 240.18 243.23 0.093
KBDH-066 243.23 246.28 0.243
KBDH-066 246.28 249.33 0.046
KBDH-066 249.33 252.37 0.694
KBDH-066 252.37 255.42 0.236
KBDH-066 255.42 258.47 0.131
KBDH-066 258.47 261.52 0.352
KBDH-066 261.52 264.57 0.259
KBDH-066 264.57 268.07 0.187
KBDH-066 268.07 270.36 0.001
KBDH-066 270.36 272.52 0.005
KBDH-066 272.52 273.41 0.528
KBDH-066 273.41 275.69 0.62
KBDH-066 275.69 276.76 0.444
KBDH-066 276.76 279.81 0.301
KBDH-066 279.81 282.85 3.63
KBDH-066 282.85 285.90 12.3
KBDH-066 285.90 288.95 0.2
KBDH-066 288.95 292.00 0.171
KBDH-066 292.00 295.05 0.34
KBDH-066 295.05 298.09 0.309
KBDH-066 298.09 301.14 0.112
KBDH-066 301.14 304.19 0.279
KBDH-066 304.19 307.24 0.32
KBDH-066 307.24 310.29 0.252
KBDH-066 310.29 313.33 0.51
KBDH-066 313.33 316.38 0.573
KBDH-066 316.38 319.43 0.217
KBDH-066 319.43 322.48 0.167
KBDH-066 322.48 325.53 0.124
KBDH-066 325.53 328.57 0.986
KBDH-066 328.57 331.62 0.177
KBDH-066 331.62 334.67 0.474
KBDH-066 334.67 337.72 0.113
KBDH-066 337.72 340.77 0.2
KBDH-066 340.77 343.81 0.086
KBDH-066 343.81 346.86 0.207

Page 16

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

HoleID **FROM_M ** **TO_M ** Au
KBDH-066 346.86 349.91 0.166
KBDH-066 349.91 352.96 0.281
KBDH-066 352.96 356.01 0.062
KBDH-066 356.01 359.05 0.259
KBDH-066 359.05 362.10 0.027
KBDH-066 362.10 365.15 0.012
KBDH-066 365.15 368.20 0.106
KBDH-066 368.20 371.25 0.026
KBDH-066 371.25 374.29 0.0005
KBDH-066 374.29 377.34 0.015
KBDH-066 377.34 380.39 0.0005
KBDH-066 380.39 383.44 0.0005
KBDH-066 383.44 386.49 0.004
KBDH-066 386.49 389.53 0.006
KBDH-066 389.53 392.58 0.004
KBDH-066 392.58 395.63 0.019
KBDH-066 395.63 398.68 0.034
KBDH-066 398.68 401.73 0.017
KBDH-066 401.73 404.77 0.065
KBDH-066 404.77 407.82 0.038
KBDH-066 407.82 410.87 0.022
KBDH-066 410.87 413.92 0.0005
KBDH-066 413.92 416.97 0.0005
KBDH-066 416.97 420.01 0.324
KBDH-066 420.01 421.84 0.005
KBDH-068 0.91 1.80 0.061
KBDH-068 1.80 4.57 0.354
KBDH-068 4.57 7.62 0.407
KBDH-068 7.62 10.67 0.57
KBDH-068 10.67 13.72 0.642
KBDH-068 13.72 16.76 0.104
KBDH-068 16.76 19.81 0.477
KBDH-068 19.81 22.86 0.1
KBDH-068 22.86 25.91 0.231
KBDH-068 25.91 28.96 0.161
KBDH-068 28.96 32.00 0.283
KBDH-068 32.00 35.05 0.294
KBDH-068 35.05 38.10 0.074

Page 17

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

HoleID **FROM_M ** **TO_M ** Au
KBDH-068 38.10 41.15 0.357
KBDH-068 41.15 44.20 0.027
KBDH-068 44.20 47.24 0.236
KBDH-068 47.24 50.29 0.144
KBDH-068 50.29 53.34 0.031
KBDH-068 53.34 56.39 0.111
KBDH-068 56.39 59.44 0.098
KBDH-068 59.44 62.48 0.032
KBDH-068 62.48 65.53 0.072
KBDH-068 65.53 68.58 0.055
KBDH-068 68.58 71.63 0.071
KBDH-068 71.63 74.68 0.157
KBDH-068 74.68 77.72 0.064
KBDH-068 77.72 80.77 0.078
KBDH-068 80.77 83.82 0.492
KBDH-068 83.82 86.87 0.156
KBDH-068 86.87 89.92 0.16
KBDH-068 89.92 92.96 0.35
KBDH-068 92.96 96.01 0.424
KBDH-068 96.01 99.06 0.29
KBDH-068 99.06 102.11 0.516
KBDH-068 102.11 105.16 2.34
KBDH-068 105.16 108.20 0.463
KBDH-068 108.20 111.25 0.194
KBDH-068 111.25 114.30 0.146
KBDH-068 114.30 117.35 0.033
KBDH-068 117.35 120.40 0.158
KBDH-068 120.40 123.44 0.45
KBDH-068 123.44 126.49 0.32
KBDH-068 126.49 129.54 0.486
KBDH-068 129.54 132.59 0.459
KBDH-068 132.59 135.64 0.16
KBDH-068 135.64 138.68 0.197
KBDH-068 138.68 141.73 0.142
KBDH-068 141.73 144.78 0.103
KBDH-068 144.78 147.83 0.153
KBDH-068 147.83 150.88 0.2
KBDH-068 150.88 153.92 0.11
KBDH-068 153.92 156.97 0.145

Page 18

==> picture [103 x 60] intentionally omitted <==

HoleID **FROM_M ** **TO_M ** Au
KBDH-068 156.97 160.02 0.149
KBDH-068 160.02 163.07 0.094
KBDH-068 163.07 166.12 0.117
KBDH-068 166.12 169.16 0.11
KBDH-068 169.16 172.21 0.154
KBDH-068 172.21 175.26 0.174
KBDH-068 175.26 178.31 0.114
KBDH-068 178.31 181.36 0.126
KBDH-068 181.36 184.40 0.111
KBDH-068 184.40 187.45 0.147
KBDH-068 187.45 190.50 0.105
KBDH-068 190.50 193.55 0.078
KBDH-068 193.55 196.60 0.017
KBDH-068 196.60 199.64 0.12
KBDH-068 199.64 202.69 0.053
KBDH-068 202.69 205.74 0.063
KBDH-068 205.74 208.79 0.097
KBDH-068 208.79 211.84 0.099
KBDH-068 211.84 214.88 0.064
KBDH-068 214.88 217.93 0.083
KBDH-068 217.93 220.98 0.104
KBDH-068 220.98 224.03 0.172
KBDH-068 224.03 227.08 0.2
KBDH-068 227.08 230.12 0.232
KBDH-068 230.12 233.17 0.36
KBDH-068 233.17 236.22 0.184
KBDH-068 236.22 239.27 0.101
KBDH-068 239.27 242.32 0.066
KBDH-068 242.32 245.36 0.321
KBDH-068 245.36 248.41 0.127
KBDH-068 248.41 251.46 0.114

Page 19