Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

NNN REIT, INC. Annual Report 2010

Feb 24, 2011

30741_10-k_2011-02-24_81ccf140-72e1-4f1f-8314-7828bece8b80.zip

Annual Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number 001-11290

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 56-1431377 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

450 South Orange Avenue, Suite 900

Orlando, Florida 32801

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (407) 265-7348

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class: Common Stock, $0.01 par value 7.375% Series C Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value Name of exchange on which registered: New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2010 was $1,766,742,768.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 15, 2011 was 83,759,282.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Registrant incorporates by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K portions of National Retail Properties, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Regulation 14A. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I
Item 1. Business 1
Item 1A. Risk Factors 8
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 18
Item 2. Properties 18
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 18
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved] 18
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 19
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 21
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations 23
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 43
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 44
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure 82
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 82
Item 9B. Other Information 84
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 85
Item 11. Executive Compensation 85
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters 85
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 85
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 85
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 86
Signatures 92

Table of Contents

PART I

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms “registrant” or “NNN” or the “Company” refer to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including the documents that are incorporated by reference, that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Also, when NNN uses any of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” or similar expressions, NNN is making forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon present expectations and reasonable assumptions, NNN’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those NNN anticipates or projects are described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any document incorporated herein by reference. NNN undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1. Business

The Company

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable, and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”).

Real Estate Assets

NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 1,195 Investment Properties (including 11 properties with retail operations that NNN operates), with an aggregate leasable area of 12,972,000 square feet, located in 46 states. Approximately 97 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio were leased or operated as of December 31, 2010.

The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 17 Inventory Properties.

Competition

NNN generally competes with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors, including but not limited to, insurance companies, pension funds and financial institutions, that own, manage, finance or develop retail and net leased properties.

1

Table of Contents

Employees

As of January 31, 2011, NNN employed 58 full-time associates including executive and administrative personnel.

Other Information

NNN’s executive offices are located at 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 900, Orlando, Florida 32801, and its telephone number is (407) 265-7348. NNN has an Internet website at www.nnnreit.com where NNN’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) can be downloaded free of charge.

The common shares of National Retail Properties, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “NNN.” The depositary shares, each representing 1/100 th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series C Preferred Stock”), of NNN are traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “NNNPRC.”

Business Strategies and Policies

The following is a discussion of NNN’s operating strategy and certain of its investment, financing and other policies. These strategies and policies have been set by management and/or the Board of Directors and, in general, may be amended or revised from time to time by management and/or the Board of Directors without a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Operating Strategies

NNN’s strategy is to invest primarily in retail real estate that is typically well located for its tenants’ lines of trade within each local market. Management believes that these types of properties, generally pursuant to triple-net leases, provide attractive opportunities for a stable current return and the potential for increased returns and capital appreciation. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay property operating expenses such as real estate taxes, assessments and other government charges, insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance and capital expenditures. Initial lease terms are generally 15 to 20 years.

In some cases, NNN’s investment in real estate is in the form of mortgages, structured finance investments or other loans which may be secured by real estate, a borrower’s pledge of ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These investments may be subordinated to senior loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans.

NNN holds investment real estate assets until it determines that the sale of such a property is advantageous in view of NNN’s investment objectives. In deciding whether to sell a real estate investment asset, NNN may consider factors such as potential capital appreciation, net cash flow, tenant credit quality, market lease rates, potential use of sale proceeds and federal income tax considerations.

NNN acquires and/or develops inventory real estate assets primarily for the purpose of resale.

NNN’s management team considers certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN may include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio (including but not limited to tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios, profitability measures, industry trends and performance of competitors compared to that of NNN.

The operating strategies employed by NNN have allowed it to increase the annual dividend (paid quarterly) per common share for 21 consecutive years.

2

Table of Contents

Investment in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate

NNN’s management believes that single tenant, freestanding net lease retail properties will continue to be attractive investment opportunities and that NNN is well suited to take advantage of these opportunities because of its experience in accessing capital markets, ability to underwrite and acquire properties, and because of management’s experience in seeking out, identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions.

In evaluating a particular acquisition, management may consider a variety of factors, including:

• the location, visibility and accessibility of the property,

• the geographic area and demographic characteristics of the community, as well as the local real estate market, including potential for growth, market rents, and existing or potential competing properties or retailers,

• the size of the property,

• the purchase price,

• the non-financial terms of the proposed acquisition,

• the availability of funds or other consideration for the proposed acquisition and the cost thereof,

• the compatibility of the property with NNN’s existing portfolio,

• the potential for, and current extent of, any environmental problems,

• the quality of construction and design and the current physical condition of the property,

• the property level operating history,

• the financial and other characteristics of the existing tenant,

• the tenant’s business plan, operating history and management team,

• the tenant’s industry,

• the terms of any existing leases, and

• the rent to be paid by the tenant.

NNN intends to engage in future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of its status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and that will not make NNN an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Equity investments in acquired properties may be subject to existing mortgage financings and other indebtedness or to new indebtedness which may be incurred in connection with acquiring or refinancing these investments.

Investments in Real Estate Mortgages, Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, and Securities of or Interests in Persons Engaged in Real Estate Activities

While NNN’s primary business objectives and Investment Properties emphasize retail properties, NNN may invest in (i) a wide variety of property and tenant types, (ii) leases, mortgages, commercial mortgage residual interests and other types of real estate interests, (iii) loans secured by personal property, (iv) loans secured by membership interests, or (v) securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities. For example, NNN from time to time has made investments in mortgage loans or held mortgages on properties that NNN has sold and has made structured finance investments and other loans related to properties acquired or sold.

3

Table of Contents

Financing Strategy

NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategies while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to its stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional retail properties with cash from its $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 40 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately two percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 34 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances.

NNN anticipates it will be able to obtain additional financing for short-term and long-term liquidity requirements as further described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity.” However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy at any time. NNN has not engaged in trading, underwriting or agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and does not intend to do so.

Strategies and Policy Changes

Any of NNN’s strategies or policies described above may be changed at any time by NNN without notice to or a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Investment Portfolio

As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 1,195 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 12,972,000 square feet, located in 46 states. Approximately 97 percent of total properties in the Investment Portfolio were leased or operated by NNN as of December 31, 2010.

The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Properties as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

High Low Average Acquisition Cost (2) — High Low Average
Land 2,223 5 101 $ 8,882 $ 5 $ 974
Building 135 1 11 19,917 44 1,435
(1) Approximate square feet. (2) Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

In connection with the development of 28 Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $68,746,000. As of December 31, 2010, NNN had funded $50,196,000 of these commitments, with $18,550,000 remaining to be funded.

4

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental income.

Leases

Although there are variations in the specific terms of the leases, the following is a summary of the general structure of NNN’s leases. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide for initial terms of 15 to 20 years. As of December 31, 2010, the weighted average remaining lease term was approximately 12 years. The Investment Properties are generally leased under net leases pursuant to which the tenant typically will bear responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. In addition, the majority of NNN’s leases provide that the tenant is responsible for roof and structural repairs. The leases of the Investment Properties provide for annual base rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $6,000 to $1,876,000 (average of $199,000). Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), and/or, to a lesser extent, increases in the tenant’s sales volume.

Generally, the Investment Property leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions provided under the initial lease. Some of the leases also provide that in the event NNN wishes to sell the Investment Property subject to that lease, NNN first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the Investment Property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which NNN intends to accept for the sale of the Investment Property.

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2010:

2011 1.5% 18 260,000 2017 3.9% 28 682,000
2012 3.1% 35 520,000 2018 2.6% 24 345,000
2013 4.4% 40 839,000 2019 4.0% 41 618,000
2014 4.4% 42 577,000 2020 4.0% 83 694,000
2015 4.5% 72 1,011,000 Thereafter 65.4% 745 6,167,000
2016 2.2% 19 407,000
(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31,
2010. (2) Approximate square feet.

5

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the diversification of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

| | Top 10 Lines of Trade | % of Annual Base
Rent (1) — 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Convenience Stores | 23.7% | 26.7% | 25.7% |
| 2. | Restaurants – Full Service | 10.1% | 9.2% | 8.7% |
| 3. | Automotive Parts | 7.8% | 6.8% | 5.1% |
| 4. | Theaters | 5.7% | 6.3% | 6.1% |
| 5. | Automotive Service | 5.3% | 5.7% | 8.9% |
| 6. | Sporting Goods | 4.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| 7. | Restaurants – Limited Service | 4.1% | 3.5% | 3.3% |
| 8. | Drug Stores | 4.0% | 4.1% | 4.0% |
| 9. | Books | 3.8% | 4.1% | 4.0% |
| 10. | Grocery | 2.7% | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| | Other | 28.3% | 27.5% | 28.3% |
| | | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| (1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of
the respective year. | | | | |

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located as of December 31, 2010:

1. State — Texas 220 18.7%
2. Florida 93 10.0%
3. Illinois 47 6.7%
4. North Carolina 73 6.2%
5. Georgia 60 5.0%
6. Indiana 39 4.4%
7. Ohio 38 4.1%
8. Pennsylvania 84 3.9%
9. Tennessee 33 2.9%
10. Missouri 28 2.9%
Other 480 35.2%
1,195 100.0%
(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31,
2010.

Mortgages and Notes Receivable

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets and include structured finance investments which are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

Mortgages and notes receivable 2010 — $ 29,750 $ 41,707
Accrued interest receivables, net of reserves 644 269
Unamortized discount (63 ) -
$ 30,331 $ 41,976

6

Table of Contents

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests

Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”), a wholly owned and consolidated subsidiary of NNN, holds the residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven commercial real estate loan securitizations. Each of the Residuals is reported at fair value based upon an independent valuation; unrealized gains or losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. The Residuals had an estimated fair value of $15,915,000 and $20,153,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

For more information regarding NNN’s Investment Portfolio, see Note 23 of NNN’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Inventory Portfolio

NNN’s Inventory Portfolio, which is owned by the TRS, is held with the intent to sell the properties to purchasers who are looking for replacement like-kind exchange property or to other purchasers with different investment objectives. As of December 31, 2010, the Inventory Portfolio consisted of 10 completed development projects and seven land parcels.

The following table summarizes the completed Inventory Portfolio as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

High Low Average Acquisition Cost (2) — High Low Average
Land 527 17 106 $ 2,248 $ 108 $ 953
Building 42 4 12 7,159 341 1,849
(1) Approximate square feet. (2) Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

For more information regarding NNN’s Inventory Portfolio, see Note 23 of NNN’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Governmental Regulations Affecting Properties

Property Environmental Considerations. Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability on the part of the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous substances emanating from the property, regardless of fault. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.

As of February 15, 2011, NNN has 59 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The Investment and Inventory Properties, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and similar state and local laws and regulations (collectively, the “ADA”). Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance with the ADA. The tenants will typically have primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, but NNN may incur costs if the tenant does not comply. As of February 15, 2011, NNN has not

7

Table of Contents

been notified by any governmental authority of, nor is NNN’s management aware of, any non-compliance with the ADA that NNN’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position or results of operations.

Other Regulations. State and local fire, life-safety and similar requirements regulate the use of NNN’s Investment and Inventory Properties. NNN’s leases generally require each tenant to undertake primary responsibility for complying with regulations, but failure to comply could result in fines by governmental authorities, awards of damages to private litigants, or restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. If any of the events or developments described below were actually to occur, NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Current financial and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on NNN, its tenants, and commercial real estate in general.

Current financial and economic conditions continue to be challenging and volatile and any worsening of such conditions, including any disruption in the capital markets, could adversely affect NNN’s business and results of operations and the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or the institutions that hold NNN’s cash balances and short-term investments, which may expose NNN to increased risks of default by these parties.

There can be no assurance that actions of the United States Government, Federal Reserve or other government and regulatory bodies intended to stabilize the economy or financial markets will achieve their intended effect. Additionally, some of these actions may adversely affect financial institutions, capital providers, retailers, consumers or NNN’s financial condition, results of operations or the trading price of NNN’s shares.

Potential consequences of the current financial and economic conditions include:

• the financial condition of NNN’s tenants operating in the retail industry may be adversely affected, which may result in tenant defaults under the leases due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failures or for other reasons;

• the ability to borrow on terms and conditions that NNN finds acceptable may be limited or unavailable, which could reduce NNN’s ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce NNN’s returns from acquisition and development activities, reduce NNN’s ability to make cash distributions to its shareholders and increase NNN’s future interest expense;

• reduced values of NNN’s properties which may limit NNN’s ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices and may reduce the availability of buyer financing;

• the value and liquidity of NNN’s short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold NNN’s cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which NNN has made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for NNN’s short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investments or other factors; and

• one or more lenders under the Credit Facility could fail and NNN may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all.

8

Table of Contents

NNN may be unable to obtain debt or equity capital on favorable terms, if at all.

NNN may be unable to obtain capital on favorable terms, if at all, to further its business objectives or meet its existing obligations. Nearly all of NNN’s debt, including the Credit Facility, is subject to balloon principal payments due at maturity. These maturities range between 2011 and 2017. The ability of NNN to make these scheduled principal payments may be adversely impacted by NNN’s inability to extend or refinance the Credit Facility, the inability to dispose of assets at an attractive price or the inability to obtain additional debt or equity capital. Capital that may be available may be materially more expensive or available under terms that are materially more restrictive than NNN’s existing capital which would have an adverse impact on NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Loss of revenues from tenants would reduce NNN’s cash flow.

NNN’s five largest tenants accounted for an aggregate of approximately 29 percent of NNN’s annual base rent as of December 31, 2010. The default, financial distress, bankruptcy or liquidation of one or more of NNN’s tenants could cause substantial vacancies among NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Vacancies reduce NNN’s revenues, increase property expenses and could decrease the ultimate sale value of each such vacant property. Upon the expiration of the leases that are currently in place, the tenant may choose not to renew the lease and/or NNN may not be able to re-lease the vacant property at a comparable lease rate or without incurring additional expenditures in connection with such renewal or re-leasing.

A significant portion of the source of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is heavily concentrated in specific industry classifications, tenants and in specific geographic locations.

As of December 31, 2010, approximately,

• 53 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five retail lines of trade, including convenience stores (24 percent) and full-service restaurants (10 percent),

• 29 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five tenants, including The Pantry, Inc. (eight percent) and Susser Holdings Corp. (eight percent),

• 47 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five states, including Texas (19 percent) and Florida (10 percent).

Any financial hardship and/or economic changes in these lines of trade, tenants or states could have an adverse effect on NNN’s results of operations.

Owning real estate and indirect interests in real estate carries inherent risks.

NNN’s economic performance and the value of its real estate assets are subject to the risk that if NNN’s properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet its operating expenses, including debt service, NNN’s cash flow and ability to pay distributions to its shareholders will be adversely affected. As a real estate company, NNN is susceptible to the following real estate industry risks, which are beyond its control:

• changes in national, regional and local economic conditions and outlook,

• decreases in consumer spending and retail sales,

• economic downturns in the areas where NNN’s properties are located,

• adverse changes in local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply of space, reduction in demand for space, intense competition for tenants, or a geographic shift in the market away from NNN’s properties,

• changes in tenant preferences that reduce the attractiveness of NNN’s properties to tenants,

• changes in zoning, regulatory restrictions, or tax laws, and

• changes in interest rates or availability of financing.

9

Table of Contents

All of these factors could result in decreases in market rental rates and increases in vacancy rates, which could adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

NNN’s real estate investments are illiquid.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, NNN’s ability to adjust the portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions is limited. Certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including: (i) debt service (if any), (ii) real estate taxes, and (iii) operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings and could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

Costs of complying with changes in governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

NNN cannot predict what other laws or regulations will be enacted in the future, how future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, or how future laws or regulations will affect NNN’s properties, including, but not limited to environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with new laws or regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may require NNN, its retail tenants, or consumers to incur significant expenditures or impose significant liability and could cause a material adverse effect on NNN’s results of operation.

NNN may be subject to known or unknown environmental liabilities and hazardous materials on properties owned by NNN.

There may be known or unknown environmental liabilities associated with properties owned or acquired in the future by NNN. Certain particular uses of some properties may also have a heightened risk of environmental liability because of the hazardous materials used in performing services on those properties, such as convenience stores with underground petroleum storage tanks or auto parts and auto service businesses using lube, paint and machine solvents. Some of NNN’s properties may contain asbestos or asbestos-containing materials, or may contain or may develop mold or other bio-contaminants. Asbestos-containing materials must be handled, managed and removed in accordance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations. Mold and other bio-contaminants can produce airborne toxins, may cause a variety of health issues in individuals and must be remediated in accordance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.

As part of its due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property it acquires. In cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the contamination in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance. Although sellers or tenants may be contractually responsible for remediating hazardous materials on a property and may be responsible for indemnifying NNN for any liability resulting from the use of a property and for any failure to comply with any applicable environmental laws, rules or regulations, NNN has no assurance that sellers or tenants shall be able to meet their remediation and indemnity obligations to NNN. A tenant or seller may not have the financial ability to meet its remediation and indemnity obligations to NNN when needed. Furthermore, NNN may have strict liability to governmental agencies or third parties as a result of the existence of hazardous materials on properties, whether or not NNN knew about or caused such hazardous materials to exist.

As of February 15, 2011 NNN has 59 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties.

10

Table of Contents

If NNN is responsible for hazardous materials located on its properties, NNN’s liability may include investigation and remediation costs, property damage to third parties, personal injury to third parties, and governmental fines and penalties. Furthermore, the presence of hazardous materials on a property may adversely impact the property value or NNN’s ability to sell the property. Significant environmental liability could impact NNN’s results of operations, ability to make distributions to shareholders, and its ability to meet its debt obligations.

In order to mitigate exposure to environmental liability, NNN has an environmental insurance policy on certain of its convenience store and travel plaza properties which expires in August 2013. However, the policy is subject to exclusions and limitations and does not cover all of the properties owned by NNN, and for those properties covered under the policy, insurance may not fully compensate NNN for any environmental liability. NNN has no assurance that the insurer on its environmental insurance policy will be able to meet its obligations under the policy. NNN may not desire to renew the environmental insurance policy in place upon expiration or a replacement policy may not be available at a reasonable cost, if at all.

NNN may not be able to successfully execute its acquisition or development strategies.

NNN may not be able to implement its investment strategies successfully. Additionally, NNN cannot assure that its property portfolio will expand at all, or if it will expand at any specified rate or to any specified size. In addition, investment in additional real estate assets is subject to a number of risks. Because NNN expects to invest in markets other than the ones in which its current properties are located or properties which may be leased to tenants other than those to which NNN has historically leased properties, NNN will also be subject to the risks associated with investment in new markets or with new tenants that may be relatively unfamiliar to NNN’s management team.

NNN’s development activities are subject to, without limitation, risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks from factors beyond NNN’s control, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages), the risk of finding tenants for the properties and the ability to obtain both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken or provide a tenant the opportunity to terminate a lease. Any of these situations may delay or eliminate proceeds or cash flows NNN expects from these projects, which could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

NNN may not be able to dispose of properties consistent with its operating strategy.

NNN may be unable to sell properties targeted for disposition (including its Inventory Properties) due to adverse market conditions. This may adversely affect, among other things, NNN’s ability to sell under favorable terms, execute its operating strategy, achieve target earnings or returns, retire or repay debt or pay dividends.

A change in the assumptions used to determine the value of commercial mortgage residual interests could adversely affect NNN’s financial position.

As of December 31, 2010, the Residuals had a carrying value of $15,915,000. The value of these Residuals is based on assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. These assumptions include discount rate, loan loss, prepayment speed and interest rate assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. If actual experience differs materially from these assumptions, the actual future cash flow could be less than expected and the value of the Residuals, as well as NNN’s earnings, could decline.

11

Table of Contents

NNN may suffer a loss in the event of a default or bankruptcy of a borrower.

If a borrower defaults on a mortgage, structured finance loan or other loan made by NNN, and does not have sufficient assets to satisfy the loan, NNN may suffer a loss of principal and interest. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN may not be able to recover against all or any of the assets of the borrower, or the assets of the borrower may not be sufficient to satisfy the balance due on the loan. In addition, certain of NNN’s loans may be subordinate to other debt of a borrower. These investments are typically loans secured by a borrower’s pledge of its ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These agreements are typically subordinated to senior loans secured by other loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans. As of December 31, 2010, mortgages and notes receivables had an outstanding principal balance of $29,750,000. If a borrower defaults on the debt senior to NNN’s loan, or in the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN’s loan will be satisfied only after the borrower’s senior creditors’ claims are satisfied. Where debt senior to NNN’s loans exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit NNN’s ability to amend loan documents, assign the loans, accept prepayments, exercise remedies and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy proceedings and litigation can significantly increase the time needed for NNN to acquire underlying collateral, if any, in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process.

Certain provisions of NNN’s leases or loan agreements may be unenforceable.

NNN’s rights and obligations with respect to its leases, structured finance loans, mortgage loans or other loans are governed by written agreements. A court could determine that one or more provisions of such an agreement are unenforceable, such as a particular remedy, a loan prepayment provision or a provision governing NNN’s security interest in the underlying collateral of a borrower or lessee. NNN could be adversely impacted if this were to happen with respect to an asset or group of assets.

Property ownership through joint ventures and partnerships could limit NNN’s control of those investments.

Joint ventures or partnerships involve risks not otherwise present for direct investments by NNN. It is possible that NNN’s co-venturers or partners may have different interests or goals than NNN at any time and they may take actions contrary to NNN’s requests, policies or objectives, including NNN’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. Other risks of joint venture or partnership investments include impasses on decisions because in some instances no single co-venturer or partner has full control over the joint venture or partnership, respectively, or the co-venturer or partner may become insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise unable to contribute to the joint venture or partnership, respectively. Further, disputes may develop with a co-venturer or partner over decisions affecting the property, joint venture or partnership that may result in litigation, arbitration or some other form of dispute resolution.

Competition with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors may impede NNN’s ability to grow.

NNN may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to complete suitable property acquisitions or developments on advantageous terms due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment activities. NNN’s inability to successfully acquire or develop new properties may affect NNN’s ability to achieve anticipated return on investment or realize its investment strategy, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.

12

Table of Contents

Operating losses from retail operations on certain Investment Properties may adversely impact NNN’s results of operations.

In June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on certain Investment Properties. A third party manages and staffs these operations on behalf of NNN. The results of business operations from these properties are subject to the typical execution risks inherent with many retail operations including: merchandising, pricing, customer service, competition, consumer preferences and behavior, safety, compliance with various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, environmental contamination, unfavorable weather conditions, or other trends in the markets they serve. These factors could negatively impact NNN’s results of operations from these certain Investment Properties.

Uninsured losses may adversely affect NNN’s ability to pay outstanding indebtedness.

NNN’s properties are generally covered by comprehensive liability, fire, and extended insurance coverage. NNN believes that the insurance carried on its properties is adequate in accordance with industry standards. There are, however, types of losses (such as from hurricanes, wars or earthquakes) which may be uninsurable, or the cost of insuring against these losses may not be economically justifiable. If an uninsured loss occurs or a loss exceeds policy limits, NNN could lose both its invested capital and anticipated revenues from the property, thereby reducing NNN’s cash flow.

Acts of violence, terrorist attacks or war may affect the markets in which NNN operates and NNN’s results of operations.

Terrorist attacks or other acts of violence may negatively affect NNN’s operations. There can be no assurance that there will not be terrorist attacks against businesses within the United States. These attacks may directly impact NNN’s physical facilities or the businesses or the financial condition of its tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or financial institutions with which NNN has a relationship. The United States is engaged in armed conflict, which could have an impact on these parties. The consequences of armed conflict are unpredictable, and NNN may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on its business.

More generally, any of these events or threats of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economies. They also could result in, or cause a deepening of, economic recession in the United States or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have an adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition or results of operations.

Vacant properties or bankrupt tenants could adversely affect NNN’s business or financial condition.

As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 37 vacant, un-leased Investment Properties, which accounted for approximately three percent of total Investment Properties held in NNN’s Investment Portfolio. NNN is actively marketing these properties for sale or lease but may not be able to sell or lease these properties on favorable terms or at all. The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from the rejection by any bankrupt tenant of any of their respective leases with NNN could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations of NNN if NNN is unable to re-lease the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of January 31, 2011, approximately one percent of the total gross leasable area of NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased to four tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and have the right to reject or affirm their lease with NNN.

13

Table of Contents

The amount of debt NNN has and the restrictions imposed by that debt could adversely affect NNN’s business and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2010, NNN had total mortgage debt outstanding of approximately $24,269,000, total unsecured notes payable of $948,416,000 and $161,000,000 outstanding on the unsecured Credit Facility. NNN’s organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that it may incur. If NNN incurs additional indebtedness and permits a higher degree of leverage, debt service requirements would increase and could adversely affect NNN’s financial condition and results of operations, as well as NNN’s ability to pay principal and interest on the outstanding indebtedness or cash dividends to its stockholders. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk that NNN may default on its debt obligations.

The amount of debt outstanding at any time could have important consequences to NNN’s stockholders. For example, it could:

• require NNN to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, real estate investments and other appropriate business opportunities that may arise in the future,

• increase NNN’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions,

• limit NNN’s ability to obtain any additional financing it may need in the future for working capital, debt refinancing, capital expenditures, real estate investments, development or other general corporate purposes,

• make it difficult to satisfy NNN’s debt service requirements,

• limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends in cash on its outstanding common and preferred stock,

• limit NNN’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the factors that affect the profitability of its business, and

• limit NNN’s flexibility in conducting its business, which may place NNN at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms.

NNN’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest on its debt, or to retire or refinance such debt will depend primarily on its future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to the creditworthiness of its tenants, competition, and economic, financial, and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that NNN’s business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service its debt or meet its other cash needs. If NNN is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from its business, it may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, sell assets or obtain additional financing to meet its debt obligations and other cash needs.

NNN cannot assure stockholders that any such refinancing, sale of assets or additional financing would be possible or, if possible, on terms and conditions, including but not limited to the interest rate, which NNN would find acceptable or would not result in a material decline in earnings.

14

Table of Contents

NNN is obligated to comply with financial and other covenants in its debt that could restrict its operating activities, and the failure to comply with such covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt.

As of December 31, 2010, NNN had approximately $1,133, 685,000 of outstanding indebtedness, of which approximately $24,269,000 was secured indebtedness. NNN’s unsecured debt contains various restrictive covenants which include, among others, provisions restricting NNN’s ability to:

• incur or guarantee additional debt,

• make certain distributions, investments and other restricted payments,

• enter into transactions with certain affiliates,

• create certain liens,

• consolidate, merge or sell NNN’s assets, and

• pre-pay debt.

NNN’s secured debt generally contains customary covenants, including, among others, provisions:

• relating to the maintenance of the property securing the debt,

• restricting its ability to sell, assign or further encumber the properties securing the debt,

• restricting its ability to incur additional debt,

• restricting its ability to amend or modify existing leases, and

• relating to certain prepayment restrictions.

NNN’s ability to meet some of its debt covenants, including covenants related to the condition of the property or payment of real estate taxes, may be dependent on the performance by NNN’s tenants under their leases.

In addition, certain covenants in NNN’s debt, including its Credit Facility, require NNN, among other things, to:

• limit certain leverage ratios,

• maintain certain minimum interest and debt service coverage ratios, and

• limit investments in certain types of assets.

NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.

15

Table of Contents

The market value of NNN’s equity and debt securities is subject to various factors that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility.

As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of NNN’s equity and debt securities depends on various factors, which may change from time-to-time and/or may be unrelated to NNN’s financial condition, operating performance or prospects that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility in such prices. These factors, among others, include:

• general economic and financial market conditions including the weak economic environment,

• level and trend of interest rates,

• NNN’s ability to access the capital markets to raise additional capital,

• the issuance of additional equity or debt securities,

• changes in NNN’s funds from operations or earnings estimates,

• changes in NNN’s debt ratings or analyst ratings,

• NNN’s financial condition and performance,

• market perception of NNN compared to other REITs, and

• market perception of REITs compared to other investment sectors.

NNN’s failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes could result in significant tax liability.

NNN intends to operate in a manner that will allow NNN to continue to qualify as a REIT. NNN believes it has been organized as, and its past and present operations qualify NNN as a REIT. However, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could successfully assert that NNN is not qualified as such. In addition, NNN may not remain qualified as a REIT in the future. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within NNN’s control. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for NNN to qualify as a REIT or avoid significant tax liability.

If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT, it would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and would become subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. In this event, NNN could be subject to potentially significant tax liabilities and penalties. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, NNN would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost.

Even if NNN remains qualified as a REIT, NNN may face other tax liabilities that reduce operating results and cash flow.

Even if NNN remains qualified for taxation as a REIT, NNN may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes, such as mortgage recording taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease earnings and cash available for distribution to stockholders. In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, NNN holds some of its assets through the TRS.

16

Table of Contents

Adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes could reduce NNN’s earnings, cash flow and market price of NNN’s common stock.

At any time, the federal and state income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may change. Any such changes may have retroactive effect, and could adversely affect NNN or its stockholders. For example, legislation enacted in 2003 and extended in 2006 generally reduced the federal income tax rate on most dividends paid by corporations to individual investors to a maximum of 15 percent (through 2012). REIT dividends, with limited exceptions, will not benefit from the rate reduction, because a REIT’s income generally is not subject to corporate level tax. As such, this legislation could cause shares in non-REIT corporations to be a more attractive investment to individual investors than shares in REITs, and could have an adverse effect on the value of NNN’s common stock.

Compliance with REIT requirements, including distribution requirements, may limit NNN’s flexibility and negatively affect NNN’s operating decisions.

To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, NNN must meet certain requirements on an on-going basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts NNN distributes to its stockholders and the ownership of its shares. NNN may also be required to make distributions to its stockholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when NNN’s funds are otherwise needed to fund capital expenditures or debt service requirements. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely impact NNN’s or NNN’s tenants’ reported financial performance.

Accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how NNN records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Commission, who create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of NNN’s financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on NNN’s reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, NNN could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements. Similarly, these changes could have a material impact on NNN’s tenants’ reported financial condition or results of operations and affect their preferences regarding leasing real estate.

NNN’s failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. If NNN fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, NNN may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for NNN to produce reliable financial reports and to maintain its qualification as a REIT and are important in helping to prevent financial fraud. If NNN cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its business and operating results could be harmed, REIT qualification could be jeopardized, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, and the trading price of NNN’s shares could drop significantly.

17

Table of Contents

NNN’s ability to pay dividends in the future is subject to many factors.

NNN’s ability to pay dividends may be impaired if any of the risks described in this section were to occur. In addition, payment of NNN’s dividends depends upon NNN’s earnings, financial condition, maintenance of NNN’s REIT status and other factors as NNN’s Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Please refer to Item 1. “Business.”

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various legal actions that management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]

18

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The common stock of NNN currently is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NNN.” Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) for the five year period commencing December 31, 2005 and ending December 31, 2010. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2005.

Comparison to Five-Year Cumulative Total Return

19

Table of Contents

For each calendar quarter indicated, the following table reflects respective high, low and closing sales prices for the common stock as quoted by the NYSE and the dividends paid per share in each such period.

2010 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Year
High $ 23.73 $ 24.59 $ 25.94 $ 28.11 $ 28.11
Low 19.19 20.50 20.82 24.85 19.19
Close 22.83 21.44 25.11 26.50 26.50
Dividends paid per share 0.375 0.375 0.380 0.380 1.510
2009
High $ 17.52 $ 19.48 $ 22.80 $ 21.59 $ 22.80
Low 12.26 14.95 15.85 18.87 12.26
Close 15.84 17.35 21.47 21.22 21.22
Dividends paid per share 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 1.500

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

Ordinary dividends 2010 — $ 1.072446 71.0229% 2009 — $ 1.495182 99.6788%
Qualified dividends 0.081661 5.4080% - -
Capital gain 0.000861 0.0570% 0.003051 0.2034%
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain 0.000498 0.0330% 0.001767 0.1178%
Nontaxable distributions 0.354534 23.4791% - -
$ 1.510000 100.0000% $ 1.500000 100.0000%

NNN intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its stockholders, although all future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, NNN’s financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

In February 2011, NNN paid dividends to its stockholders of $31,678,000 or $0.38 per share of common stock.

On January 31, 2011, there were 1,848 stockholders of record of common stock.

20

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Historical Financial Highlights

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Gross revenues (1) 2010 — $ 237,062 $ 243,932 $ 247,352 $ 208,629 $ 180,877
Earnings from continuing operations 71,202 56,129 97,858 76,642 58,739
Earnings including noncontrolling interests 73,353 56,399 119,971 155,743 184,422
Net earnings attributable to NNN 72,997 54,810 117,153 154,599 181,800
Total assets 2,713,575 2,590,962 2,649,471 2,539,673 1,917,516
Total debt 1,133,685 987,346 1,027,391 1,049,154 890,127
Total stockholders’ equity 1,527,483 1,564,240 1,566,860 1,417,647 1,109,479
Cash dividends declared to:
Common stockholders 125,391 120,256 110,107 92,989 76,035
Series A preferred stockholders - - - - 4,376
Series B convertible preferred stockholders - - - - 419
Series C preferred stockholders 6,785 6,785 6,785 6,785 923
Weighted average common shares:
Basic 82,715,645 79,846,258 74,249,137 66,152,437 57,428,063
Diluted 82,849,362 79,953,499 74,344,231 66,263,980 57,965,508
Per share information:
Earnings from continuing operations:
Basic $ 0.77 $ 0.60 $ 1.22 $ 1.05 $ 0.88
Diluted 0.77 0.60 1.22 1.05 0.88
Net earnings:
Basic 0.80 0.60 1.48 2.23 3.05
Diluted 0.80 0.60 1.48 2.22 3.03
Cash dividends declared to:
Common stockholders 1.51 1.50 1.48 1.40 1.32
Series A preferred stockholders - - - - 2.45625
Series B convertible preferred stockholders - - - - 41.875
Series C preferred depositary stockholders 1.84375 1.84375 1.84375 1.84375 0.250955
Other data:
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities $ 187,914 $ 149,502 $ 237,459 $ 130,147 $ 1,676
Investing activities (220,260 ) (28,063 ) (256,304 ) (536,717 ) (90,099 )
Financing activities 19,169 (108,840 ) (6,028 ) 432,394 81,864
Funds from operations – diluted (2) 108,328 89,506 132,996 110,589 86,749

(1) Gross revenues include revenues from NNN’s continuing and discontinued operations. In accordance with FASB guidance on Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, NNN has classified the revenues related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interest which expired, (ii) all Inventory Properties which generated revenues prior to disposition, and (iii) all Investment and Inventory Properties which generated revenue and were held for sale at December 31, 2010, as discontinued operations.

(2) The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as a relative non-GAAP financial measure of performance of a REIT in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). FFO is defined by NAREIT and is used by NNN as follows: net earnings (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus depreciation and amortization of assets unique to the real estate industry, excluding gains (or including losses) on the disposition of certain assets and NNN’s share of these items from NNN’s unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

FFO is generally considered by industry analysts to be the most appropriate measure of operating performance of real estate companies. FFO does not necessarily represent cash provided by operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of NNN’s operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Management considers FFO an appropriate measure of operating performance of an equity REIT because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the real estate assets diminishes

21

Table of Contents

predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as an operating performance measure. NNN’s computation of FFO may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO used by other equity REITs, and therefore, may not be comparable to such other REITs.

NNN has earnings from discontinued operations in both of its financial segments; investment assets and inventory assets. All property dispositions from NNN’s investment segment are classified as discontinued operations. In addition, certain properties in NNN’s inventory segment that have generated revenues before disposition are classified as discontinued operations. These inventory properties have not historically been classified as discontinued operations, therefore, prior period comparable consolidated financial statements have been restated to include these properties in its earnings from discontinued operations. These adjustments resulted in a decrease in NNN’s reported total revenues and total and per share earnings from continuing operations and an increase in NNN’s earnings from discontinued operations. However, NNN’s total and per share net earnings available to common stockholders is not affected.

The following table reconciles FFO to their most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings for the years ended December 31:

2010
Reconciliation of funds from operations:
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders $ 72,997 $ 54,810 $ 117,153 $ 154,599 $ 181,800
Real estate depreciation and amortization:
Continuing operations 43,464 42,838 40,336 28,632 19,099
Discontinued operations 186 1,438 1,454 1,750 3,320
Partnership/joint venture real estate depreciation 178 178 177 31 463
Partnership gain on sale of asset - - - - (262 )
Gain on disposition of equity investment - - - - (11,373 )
Gain on disposition of investment assets (1,134 ) (2,392 ) (9,980 ) (56,625 ) (91,332 )
Gain on disposition of inventory assets (578 ) (581 ) (9,359 ) (11,013 ) (9,667 )
FFO 115,113 96,291 139,781 117,374 92,048
Series A preferred stock dividends (1) - - - - (4,376 )
Series B convertible preferred stock dividends (1 ) - - - - (419 )
Series C preferred stock dividends (6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 ) (923 )
FFO available to common stockholders – basic 108,328 89,506 132,996 110,589 86,330
Series B convertible preferred stock dividends, if dilutive - - - - 419
FFO available to common stockholders – diluted $ 108,328 $ 89,506 $ 132,996 $ 110,589 $ 86,749

(1) The Series A and Series B preferred stock are no longer outstanding.

For a discussion of material events affecting the comparability of the information reflected in the selected financial data, refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

22

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Item 6. Selected Financial Data,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the forward-looking disclaimer language in italics before “Item 1. Business.”

The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Overview

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable, and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”).

As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 1,195 Investment Properties (including 11 properties with retail operations that NNN operates), with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 12,972,000 square feet, located in 46 states. Approximately 97 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased or operated as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 17 Inventory Properties.

NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, and industry trends and performance compared to that of NNN.

NNN continues to maintain its diversification by tenant, geography and tenant’s line of trade. NNN’s highest lines of trade concentrations are the convenience store and restaurant (including full and limited service) sectors. These sectors represent a large part of the freestanding retail property marketplace and NNN’s management believes these sectors present attractive investment opportunities. NNN’s Investment Portfolio is geographically concentrated in the south and southeast United States, which are regions of historically above-average population growth. Given these concentrations, any financial hardship within these sectors or geographic locations, respectively, could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and operating performance of NNN.

As of year end December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, Investment Properties have remained at least 96 percent leased. The Investment Portfolio’s average remaining lease term of 12 years has remained fairly constant over the past three years which, coupled with its net lease structure, provides enhanced probability of maintaining occupancy and operating earnings.

The weak economic environment during the past three years has made it more difficult and more expensive to obtain debt and equity capital, and has reduced the pace of investments in new acquisitions or developments as well as the volume of dispositions. Additionally, the weak economic and retail environment has resulted in more retailers filing for bankruptcy and has made it more difficult to lease properties, which may have an adverse impact on NNN’s occupancy.

23

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements in conformance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments on assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as other disclosures in the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments; however, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, which in turn could have a material impact on NNN’s financial statements. A summary of NNN’s accounting policies and procedures are included in Note 1 of NNN’s consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio. NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease . In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases, and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, generally including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method – Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rental revenue varies during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method – Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio . The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS also includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.

Impairment – Real Estate. Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value

24

Table of Contents

of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market condition or the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value . Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value. In 2010, NNN acquired the 21.1% non-controlling interest in its majority owned and controlled subsidiary, OAMI, for $1,603,000 pursuant to which OAMI became a wholly owned subsidiary of NNN. NNN accounted for the transaction as an equity transaction in accordance with the FASB guidance on consolidation.

Revenue Recognition . Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance on accounting for leases, based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

New Accounting Pronouncements. Refer to Note 1 to the December 31, 2010, Consolidated Financial Statements.

Use of Estimates. Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, the recoverability of the income tax benefit, the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income and capitalized overhead relating to development projects. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Results of Operations

Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio

General. The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Portfolio as of December 31:

Investment Properties Owned:
Number 1,195 1,015 1,005
Total gross leasable area (square feet) 12,972,000 11,373,000 11,251,000
Investment Properties:
Leased 1,147 966 972
Operated 11 12 -
Percent of Investment Properties – leased and operated 97% 96% 97%
Weighted average remaining lease term (years) 12 12 13
Total gross leasable area (square feet) – leased and operated 12,215,000 10,508,000 10,728,000

25

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2010:

2011 1.5% 18 260,000 2017 3.9% 28 682,000
2012 3.1% 35 520,000 2018 2.6% 24 345,000
2013 4.4% 40 839,000 2019 4.0% 41 618,000
2014 4.4% 42 577,000 2020 4.0% 83 694,000
2015 4.5% 72 1,011,000 Thereafter 65.4% 745 6,167,000
2016 2.2% 19 407,000
(1) Based on the annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31,
2010. (2 ) Approximate square feet.

The following table summarizes the diversification of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

1. Lines of Trade — Convenience Stores 23.7% 26.7% 25.7%
2. Restaurants – Full Service 10.1% 9.2% 8.7%
3. Automotive Parts 7.8% 6.8% 5.1%
4. Theaters 5.7% 6.3% 6.1%
5. Automotive Service 5.3% 5.7% 8.9%
6. Sporting Goods 4.5% 3.2% 3.3%
7. Restaurants – Limited Service 4.1% 3.5% 3.3%
8. Drug Stores 4.0% 4.1% 4.0%
9. Books 3.8% 4.1% 4.0%
10. Grocery 2.7% 2.9% 2.6%
Other 28.3% 27.5% 28.3%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the
respective year.

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located in as of December 31, 2010:

1. State — Texas # of Properties — 220 18.7%
2. Florida 93 10.0%
3. Illinois 47 6.7%
4. North Carolina 73 6.2%
5. Georgia 60 5.0%
6. Indiana 39 4.4%
7. Ohio 38 4.1%
8. Pennsylvania 84 3.9%
9. Tennessee 33 2.9%
10. Missouri 28 2.9%
Other 480 35.2%
1,195 100.0%
(1) Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31,
2010.

26

Table of Contents

Property Acquisitions. The following table summarizes the Investment Property acquisitions for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010 2009 2008
Acquisitions:
Number of Investment Properties 194 8 109
Gross leasable area (square feet) 1,700,000 290,000 868,000
Total dollars invested (1) $ 256,077 $ 36,335 $ 355,107
(1) Includes dollars invested on projects under construction for each respective
year.

Property Dispositions. The following table summarizes the Investment Properties sold by NNN for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010 2009 2008
Number of properties 14 9 19
Gross leasable area (square feet) 100,000 234,000 290,000
Net sales proceeds $ 15,980 $ 15,621 $ 59,796
Net gain $ 1,134 $ 2,392 $ 9,980

NNN typically uses the proceeds from property sales either to pay down the outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) or reinvest in real estate.

Property Analysis – Inventory Portfolio

General. The following table summarizes the number of properties held for sale in NNN’s Inventory Portfolio as of December 31:

Completed Inventory Properties 10 13 24
Properties under construction - - 1
Land parcels 7 6 7
Total Inventory Properties 17 19 32

NNN transferred 11 properties from the Inventory Portfolio to the Investment Portfolio in December 2009.

Property Acquisitions. The following table summarizes the property acquisitions and dollars invested in the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010 2009 2008
Number of properties acquired - 2 7
Total dollars invested (1) $ 493 $ 2,633 $ 29,539
(1) Includes dollars invested in projects under construction or tenant improvements for each
respective year.

27

Table of Contents

Property Dispositions. The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized from the disposition of real estate held for sale included in earnings from continuing and discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

# of Properties Gain # of Properties Gain # of Properties Gain
Continuing operations 2 $ 641 2 $ 37 1 $ 21
Noncontrolling interest (320 ) (14 ) (10 )
Total continuing operations attributable to NNN 321 23 11
Discontinued operations 2 300 2 558 24 12,644
Noncontrolling interest (43 ) - (3,297 )
Total discontinued operations attributable to NNN 257 558 9,347
4 $ 578 4 $ 581 25 $ 9,358

Revenue from Continuing Operations Analysis

General. During the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN’s rental income increased primarily due to the acquisition of Investment Properties (See “Results of Operations – Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio – Property Acquisitions”). NNN anticipates increases in rental income will continue to come from additional property acquisitions and increases in rents pursuant to lease terms.

The following summarizes NNN’s revenues from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

2010 2009 2008
2010 2009 2008
Rental Income (1) $ 215,132 $ 213,666 $ 209,541 93.9% 92.6% 92.3% 0.7% 2.0%
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants 7,438 8,361 6,980 3.3% 3.6% 3.1% (11.0 )% 19.8%
Interest and other income from real estate transactions 3,026 4,535 5,807 1.3% 2.0% 2.6% (33.3 )% (21.9 )%
Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests 3,460 4,252 4,636 1.5% 1.8% 2.0% (18.6 )% (8.3 )%
Total revenues from continuing operations $ 229,056 $ 230,814 $ 226,964 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% (0.8 )% 1.7%
(1) Includes rental income from operating leases, earned income from direct financing leases
and percentage rent from continuing operations (“Rental Income”).

28

Table of Contents

Revenue from Operations by Source of Income. NNN has identified two primary operating segments, and thus, sources of revenue: (i) earnings from NNN’s Investment Assets, and (ii) earnings from NNN’s Inventory Assets. NNN revenues from continuing operations come primarily from Investment Assets. The revenues generated from NNN’s Inventory Assets are typically classified as discontinued operations.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2010 to Year Ended December 31, 2009.

Rental Income. Rental Income remained relatively stable in amount and as a percent of the total revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009.

Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants. Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to 2009 but remained fairly consistent as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations. The decrease is primarily attributable to the increase in reimbursed tax assessments in 2009 as compared to 2010.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions. Interest and other income from real estate transactions decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to 2009, primarily due to a lower weighted average principal balance and a lower weighted average interest rate on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments during the year ended December 31, 2010. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the weighted average outstanding principal balance and interest rates on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments was $31,925,000 at 9.04% and $38,968,000 at 9.50%, respectively. The decrease was also due to two defaulted loans at December 31, 2010.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests . Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to December 31, 2009, but remained fairly stable as a percent of total revenue from continuing operations. The decrease in interest income on Residuals is primarily the result of declining loan balances from prepayments and scheduled loan amortization.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008.

Rental Income. Rental Income increased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, due to a full year of Rental Income from the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet which were acquired during 2008. Additionally, eight Investment Properties were acquired in 2009 with an aggregate gross leasable area of 290,000 square feet. In addition, NNN recorded $5,072,000 as compared to $2,671,000 in lease termination fees and rent settlement fees during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants. Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants increased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008. The increase is attributable to the reimbursements from certain properties acquired in 2008 as well as reimbursements resulting from the re-leasing of existing vacancies.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions. Interest and other income from real estate transactions decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, primarily due to a lower weighted average principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments during the year ended December 31, 2009. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments was $38,968,000 and $57,475,000, respectively.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests . Interest income on Residuals decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to December 31, 2008 but remained stable as a percent of total revenue from continuing operations. The decrease in interest income on Residuals is primarily the

29

Table of Contents

result of the increase in the loan delinquencies and asset amortization, which is partially offset by a decrease in loan prepayments.

Analysis of Expenses from Continuing Operations

General. During 2010, operating expenses from continuing operations decreased primarily due to lower impairment losses and other charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. The following summarizes NNN’s expenses from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

General and administrative 2010 — $ 22,778 2009 — $ 21,773 2008 — $ 24,875
Real estate 13,534 13,642 10,152
Depreciation and amortization 48,328 46,539 43,668
Impairment losses and other charges 7,458 36,080 1,234
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation 3,995 498 758
Restructuring costs - 731 -
Total operating expenses $ 96,093 $ 119,263 $ 80,687
Interest and other income $ (1,513 ) $ (1,371 ) $ (3,748 )
Interest expense 65,179 62,151 63,964
Loss on interest rate hedge - - 804
Total other expenses (revenues) $ 63,666 $ 60,780 $ 61,020
2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008
General and administrative 23.7% 18.3% 30.8% 9.9% 9.4% 11.0% 4.6% (12.5)%
Real estate 14.1% 11.4% 12.6% 5.9% 5.9% 4.5% (0.8)% 34.4%
Depreciation and amortization 50.2% 39.0% 54.1% 21.1% 20.2% 19.2% 3.8% 6.6%
Impairment losses and other charges 7.8% 30.3% 1.5% 3.3% 15.6% 0.5% (79.3)% 2,823.8%
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment 4.2% 0.4% 1.0% 1.7% 0.2% 0.3% 702.2% (34.3)%
Restructuring costs - 0.6% - - 0.3% - (100.0)% N/C (1)
Total operating expenses 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 41.9% 51.6% 35.5% (19.4)% 47.8%
Interest and other income (2.4)% (2.3)% (6.1)% (0.7)% (0.6)% (1.7)% 10.4% (63.4)%
Interest expense 102.4% 102.3% 104.8% 28.5% 26.9% 28.2% 4.9% (2.8)%
Loss on interest rate hedge - - 1.3% - - 0.4% - (100.0)%
Total other expenses (revenues) 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 27.8% 26.3% 26.9% 4.7% (0.4)%
(1) Not calculable (“N/C”)

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2010 to Year Ended December 31, 2009.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009 and increased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010, is primarily attributable to an increase in noncash long-term incentive compensation. This increase is partially offset by a decrease in lost pursuit costs and capitalized overhead.

30

Table of Contents

Real Estate. Real estate expenses increased as a percentage of total operating expenses, but remained stable as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased as a percentage of total operating expenses but remained fairly stable as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The dollar increase is primarily a result of an increase in the amortization of loan costs associated with a credit agreement NNN entered into in November 2009.

Impairment Losses and Other Charges. Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN determines a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The decrease in impairment losses and other charges is primarily due to real estate impairments of $28,884,000 recorded in 2009, as compared to zero in 2010.

Impairment – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation. In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $3,995,000 and $498,000, respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Restructuring Costs. During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000 in connection with a workforce reduction. No such costs were incurred during 2010.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, and increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations but remained relatively stable as a percentage of total operating expenses.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

(i) the repurchase of $11,000,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028 with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in 2009,

(ii) the repurchase of $8,800,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.840% in 2009,

(iii) the payoff of the $20,000,000 8.5% notes payable in September 2010,

(iv) the increase of $7,037,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009,

(v) the increase in the weighted average interest rate on the Credit Facility from 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009, to 3.80% during the year ended December 31, 2010,

(vi) the decrease of $626,000 in capitalized interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, and

(vii) the increase of $850,000 in amortization of loan commitment fees related to the Credit Facility entered into November 2009.

31

Table of Contents

Comparison of Year End December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008 and decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, is primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation of personnel and a decrease in lost pursuit costs.

Real Estate. Real estate expenses remained fairly stable as a percentage of total operating expenses, but increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, is primarily attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursable real estate expenses from 2008 acquisitions as well as an increase in expenses related to un-leased properties.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The dollar increase is primarily a result of depreciation recognized on the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet acquired in 2008. This increase is partially offset by the additional amortization in connection with the termination of certain leases during 2008.

Impairment Losses and Other Charges. Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long-lived assets for impairments, for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, NNN recorded real estate impairments totaling $28,884,000 and $1,234,000, respectively. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recognized a loss on a note receivable foreclosure of $7,196,000.

Impairment – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation. In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $498,000 and $758,000 respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Restructuring Costs. During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000 in connection with a workforce reduction. No such costs were incurred during 2008.

Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, and decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to a decrease of $99,907,000 in weighted average long-term debt outstanding.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

(i) repurchase of $11,000,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028 with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in 2009,

(ii) repurchase of $8,800,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.840% in 2009,

(iii) issuance of $234,035,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028, with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in March 2008,

32

Table of Contents

(iv) payoff of the $100,000,000 7.125% notes payable in March 2008,

(v) payoff of the $12,000,000 10.00% secured note payable in February 2008,

(vi) the decrease of $78,860,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, and

(vii) the decrease in weighted average interest rate on the Credit Facility from 3.83% during the year ended December 31, 2008, to 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Discontinued Operations

Earnings (Loss)

NNN classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to its Investment Properties that were sold, its leasehold interests that expired or were terminated and any Investment Properties that were held for sale at December 31, 2010. NNN also classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses of its Inventory Properties that generated rental revenues. NNN records discontinued operations by NNN’s identified segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following table summarizes the earnings from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

# of Sold Properties Gain Earnings/ (Loss) 2009 — # of Sold Properties Gain Earnings/ (Loss) # of Sold Properties Gain Earnings/ (Loss)
Investment Assets 14 $ 1,134 $ 1,859 9 $ 2,392 $ 1,776 19 $ 9,980 $ 12,914
Inventory Assets 2 300 292 2 558 (1,506 ) 24 12,644 9,199
Noncontrolling interests - - 11 - - (166 ) - - (2,722 )
16 $ 1,434 $ 2,162 11 $ 2,950 $ 104 43 $ 22,624 $ 19,391

NNN periodically sells Investment Properties and may reinvest the sales proceeds to purchase additional properties. NNN evaluates its ability to pay dividends to stockholders by considering the combined effect of income from continuing and discontinued operations.

Impairment Losses and Other Charges. NNN periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. During the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, NNN recognized real estate impairments on discontinued operations of $5,630,000, and $4,426,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN did not recognize any real estate impairments on discontinued operations.

Impact of Inflation

NNN’s leases typically contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on NNN’s results of operations. Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or, to a lesser extent, increases in the tenant’s sales volume. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.

33

Table of Contents

The Investment Properties are leased to tenants under long-term, net leases which typically require the tenant to pay certain operating expenses of a property, thus, NNN’s exposure to inflation is reduced. Inflation may have an adverse impact on NNN’s tenants.

Liquidity

General . NNN’s demand for funds has been and will continue to be primarily for (i) payment of operating expenses and cash dividends; (ii) property acquisitions and development; (iii) origination of mortgages and notes receivable; (iv) capital expenditures; (v) payment of principal and interest on its outstanding indebtedness; and (vi) other investments.

NNN expects to meet these requirements (other than amounts required for additional property investments, mortgages and notes receivable) through cash provided from operations and NNN’s Credit Facility. NNN utilizes the Credit Facility to meet its short-term working capital requirements. As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000. NNN anticipates that any additional investments in properties, mortgages and notes receivables during the next 12 months will be funded by the Credit Facility, cash provided from operations, the issuance of long-term debt or the issuance of common or preferred equity or other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for common or preferred equity. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. The table below summarizes NNN’s cash flows for each of the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

2010 2008
Cash and cash equivalents:
Provided by operating activities $ 187,914 $ 149,502 $ 237,459
Used in investing activities (220,260) (28,063) (256,304)
Provided by (used in) financing activities 19,169 (108,840) (6,028 )
Increase (decrease) (13,177 ) 12,599 (24,873 )
Net cash at beginning of period 15,225 2,626 27,499
Net cash at end of period $ 2,048 $ 15,225 $ 2,626

Cash provided by operating activities represents cash received primarily from rental income from tenants, proceeds from the disposition of Inventory Properties and interest income less cash used for general and administrative expenses, interest expense and acquisition of its Inventory Properties. NNN’s cash flow from operating activities, net of cash used in and provided by the acquisition and disposition of its Inventory Properties, has been sufficient to pay the distributions for each period presented. NNN uses proceeds from its Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of its Inventory Properties. The change in cash provided by operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, is primarily the result of changes in revenues and expenses as discussed in “Results of Operations.” Cash generated from operations is expected to fluctuate in the future.

Changes in cash for investing activities are primarily attributable to the acquisitions and dispositions of Investment Properties.

NNN’s financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010, included the following significant transactions:

• $125,391,000 in dividends paid to common stockholders,

• $6,785,000 in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series C Preferred Stock,

34

Table of Contents

• $17,631,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 793,759 shares of common stock in connection with the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”), and

• $161,000,000 in net proceeds from NNN’s Credit Facility,

• $6,453,000 in repayments of mortgages, and

• $20,000,000 in repayment of notes payable.

Financing Strategy. NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategy while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to NNN’s stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional Investment Properties with cash from its Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 40 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately two percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 34 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances. The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments . The information in the following table summarizes NNN’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2010. The table presents principal cash flows by year-end of the expected maturity for debt obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

Expected Maturity Date (dollars in thousands) — Total 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Thereafter
Long-term debt (1) $ 986,004 $ 139,798 (3) $ 69,290 $ 223,898 (3) $ 150,881 $ 150,917 $ 251,220
Credit Facility 161,000 - 161,000 - - - -
Operating lease 3,666 917 945 973 831 - -
Total contractual cash obligations (2) $ 1,150,670 $ 140,715 $ 231,235 $ 224,871 $ 151,712 $ 150,917 $ 251,220
(1) Includes amounts outstanding under the mortgages payable, convertible notes payable and
notes payable and excludes unamortized note discounts. (2) Excludes $7,342 of accrued interest
payable. (3) Maturity dates are based on put option dates under NNN’s convertible
notes.

In addition to the contractual obligations outlined above, in connection with the development of 28 Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $68,746,000. As of December 31, 2010, NNN had funded $50,196,000 of this commitment, with $18,550,000 remaining to be funded. As of December 31, 2010, NNN did not have any funding commitments relating to the development of Inventory Properties.

As of December 31, 2010, NNN had outstanding letters of credit totaling $647,000 under its Credit Facility.

35

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010, NNN did not have any other material contractual cash obligations, such as purchase obligations, financing lease obligations or other long-term liabilities other than those reflected in the table. In addition to items reflected in the table, NNN has issued preferred stock with cumulative preferential cash distributions, as described below under “Dividends.”

Management anticipates satisfying these obligations with a combination of NNN’s cash provided from operations, current capital resources on hand, its Credit Facility, debt or equity financings and asset dispositions.

Generally the Investment Properties are leased under long-term net leases. Therefore, management anticipates that capital demands to meet obligations with respect to these Investment Properties will be modest for the foreseeable future and can be met with funds from operations and working capital. Certain of NNN’s Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses associated with the Investment Property. Management anticipates the costs associated with NNN’s vacant Investment Properties or those Investment Properties that become vacant will also be met with funds from operations and working capital. NNN may be required to borrow under its Credit Facility or use other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.

The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from vacant properties or uncollectibility of lease revenues could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations if NNN is unable to release the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 37 vacant, un-leased Investment Properties which accounted for approximately three percent of total Investment Properties held in NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Additionally, as of January 31, 2011, approximately one percent of the total gross leasable area of NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased to four tenants that filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, these tenants have the right to reject or affirm their leases with NNN.

In February 2011, one of NNN’s tenants, Borders Group, Inc. (“Borders”), which leased five Investment Properties from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In February 2011, Borders moved to reject three leases with NNN and retains the right to reject the remaining two leases with NNN.

In February 2011, one of NNN’s tenants, Robb & Stucky, LTD, which leases 1 Investment Property from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and retains the right to reject its lease with NNN.

On April 20, 2009, one of NNN’s tenants, Titlemax Holdings, LLC and its affiliated companies (“Titlemax”), which leased 30 Investment Properties from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In January 2010, Titlemax assumed all of its leases with NNN. In April 2010, Titlemax’s plan of reorganization was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and Titlemax exited bankruptcy. Titlemax’s Chapter 11 filing did not have an effect on NNN’s operations or financial position.

In June 2010, one of NNN’s tenants, Majestic Liquor Stores, Inc. (“Majestic”), which leased 13 Investment Properties from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In addition, in June 2010, the principals of Majestic, (the “Majestic Principals”), which are the borrowers on a loan from NNN secured by one Majestic property, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In June 2010, Majestic elected to reject the leases of four properties owned by NNN and the one property securing the loan to the Majestic Principals. In November 2010 NNN foreclosed on the property securing the loan to the Majestic Principals. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN recorded a $5,625,000 charge in connection with the loan to the Majestic Principals. In December 2010, Majestic assumed all 9 of the remaining leases with NNN. Also in December 2010

36

Table of Contents

Majestic and Majestic Principals plan of reorganization was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy court and Majestic and the Majestic Principals exited bankruptcy.

Dividends. NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, as amended, and related regulations and intends to continue to operate so as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost. Such an event could materially adversely affect NNN’s income and ability to pay dividends.

One of NNN’s primary objectives, consistent with its policy of retaining sufficient cash for reserves and working capital purposes and maintaining its status as a REIT, is to distribute a substantial portion of its funds available from operations to its stockholders in the form of dividends. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common stockholders of $125,391,000, $120,256,000 and $110,107,000, respectively, or $1.51, $1.50 and $1.48 per share, respectively, of common stock.

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

Ordinary dividends 2010 — $ 1.072446 71.0229% 2009 — $ 1.495182 99.6788% 2008 — $ 1.480000 100.0000%
Qualified dividends 0.081661 5.4080% - - - -
Capital gain 0.000861 0.0570% 0.003051 0.2034% - -
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain 0.000498 0.0330% 0.001767 0.1178% - -
Nontaxable distributions 0.354534 23.4791% - - - -
$ 1.510000 100.0000% $ 1.500000 100.0000% $ 1.480000 100.0000%

In February 2011, NNN paid dividends to its common stockholders of $31,678,000, or $0.38 per share of common stock.

Holders of NNN’s preferred stock issuance are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions based on the stated rate and liquidation preference per annum.

NNN declared and paid dividends to its Series C Preferred stockholders of $6,785,000 or $1.84375 per depository share during each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such preferred stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

Ordinary dividends 2010 — $ 1.703170 92.3753% 2009 — $ 1.837828 99.6788% 2008 — $ 1.843750 100.0000%
Qualified dividends 0.140580 7.6247% - - - -
Capital gain - - 0.003750 0.2034% - -
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain - - 0.002172 0.1178% - -
$ 1.843750 100.0000% $ 1.843750 100.0000% $ 1.843750 100.0000%

37

Table of Contents

Capital Resources

Generally, cash needs for property acquisitions, mortgages and notes receivable investments, debt payments, dividends, capital expenditures, development and other investments have been funded by equity and debt offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties and, to a lesser extent, by internally generated funds. Cash needs for other items have been met from operations. If available, future sources of capital include proceeds from the public or private offering of NNN’s debt or equity securities, secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, as well as undistributed funds from operations.

Debt

The following is a summary of NNN’s total outstanding debt as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

Line of credit payable 2010 — $ 161,000 14.2% 2009 — $ - -
Mortgages payable 24,269 2.2% 25,290 2.6%
Notes payable – convertible 349,534 30.8% 343,380 34.8%
Notes payable 598,882 52.8% 618,676 62.6%
Total outstanding debt $ 1,133,685 100.0% $ 987,346 100.0%

Indebtedness. NNN expects to use indebtedness primarily for property acquisitions and development of single-tenant retail properties, either directly or through investment interests, and mortgages and notes receivable.

Line of Credit Payable. NNN’s $400,000,000 revolving Credit Facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of $17,861,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 3.8% during the year ended December 31, 2010. In November 2009, NNN entered into a credit agreement for a new $400,000,000 credit facility, replacing the former revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures November 2012, with an option to extend maturity to November 2013. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 280 basis points with a 1.0% LIBOR floor; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN’s debt credit rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature for NNN to increase, at its option, the facility size up to $500,000,000. As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding, and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000.

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage, and (iv) investment limitations. At December 31, 2010, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. In the event that NNN violates any of these restrictive financial covenants, it could cause the indebtedness under the Credit Facility to be accelerated and may impair NNN’s access to the debt and equity markets and limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends to its common and preferred stockholders, each of which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations.

38

Table of Contents

Mortgages Payable. The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

Entered Carrying Value of Encumbered Asset(s) (1) Outstanding Principal Balance at December 31,
2010 2009
December 2001 (2) 623 9.00 % April 2014 $ 734 $ 215 $ 267
December 2001 (2) 698 9.00 % April 2019 1,186 364 392
December 2001 (2) 485 9.00 % April 2019 1,152 187 201
June 2002 21,000 6.90 % July 2012 24,051 18,841 19,170
February 2004 (2) 6,952 6.90 % January 2017 11,522 4,038 4,554
March 2005 (2) 1,015 8.14 % September 2016 1,322 624 706
$ 39,967 $ 24,269 $ 25,290

(1) Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2010.

(2) Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

(3) Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

Notes Payable – Convertible . Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands, except conversion price):

Terms — Issue Date 2026 Notes (1)(2)(4) — September 2006 2028 Notes (2)(5) (6) — March 2008
Net Proceeds $ 168,650 $ 228,576
Stated Interest Rate ( 8 ) 3.950% 5.125%
Debt Issuance Costs $ 3,850 (3) $ 5,459 (7)
Earliest Conversion Date September 2025 June 2027
Earliest Put Option Date September 2011 June 2013
Maturity Date September 2026 June 2028
Original Principal $ 172,500 $ 234,035
Repurchases (33,800 ) (11,000 )
Outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2010 $ 138,700 $ 223,035

(1) NNN repurchased $8,800 and $25,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, for a purchase price of $6,994 and $19,188, respectively, resulting in a gain of $1,565 and $4,961, respectively.

(2) Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

(3) Includes $463 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $33,800 of the 2026 Notes.

(4) The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 41.9803 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $23.8207 per share of common stock.

(5) The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 39.3620 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $25.4052 per share of common stock.

(6) NNN repurchased $11,000 in 2009 for a purchase price of $8,588 resulting in a gain of $1,867.

(7) Includes $219 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $11,000 of the 2028 Notes, respectively.

(8) With the adoption of the new accounting guidance on convertible debt securities, the effective interest rate for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

39

Table of Contents

The carrying amounts of the Company’s debt and equity balances are summarized in the table below as of December 31, (dollars in thousands):

Carrying value of equity component 2010 — $ (33,873 ) 2009 — $ (33,873 )
Principal amount of convertible debt 361,735 361,735
Remaining unamortized debt discount (12,201 ) (18,355 )
Net carrying value of convertible debt $ 315,661 $ 309,507

As of December 31, 2010, the remaining amortization periods for the debt discount were approximately nine months and 18 months for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes, respectively.

The adjusted effective interest rates for the liability components of the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes were 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively. The Company recorded noncash interest-related charges of $6,154,000, $5,809,000 and $5,481,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company recorded contractual interest expense of $16,909,000, $17,046,000 and $16,548,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, relating to the 2026 Notes and 2028 Notes.

The if-converted values that exceed the principal amount as of December 31, 2010, are $15,601,000 and $9,611,000 for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the if-converted amount did not exceed the value of the principal amount.

Notes Payable. Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Notes Issue Date Principal Net Price Maturity Date
2012 (1) June 2002 $ 50,000 287 $ 49,713 7.750% 7.833% June 2012
2014 (1)(2)(5) June 2004 150,000 440 149,560 6.250% 5.910% June 2014
2015 (1) November 2005 150,000 390 149,610 6.150% 6.185% December 2015
2017 (1)(6) September 2007 250,000 877 249,123 6.875% 6.924% October 2017

(1) The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

(2) The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

(3) The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

(4) Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

(5) NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

(6) NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

Each series of notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. The notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the note and convertible note offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,226,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the terms of the indentures, pursuant to which NNN’s notes and convertible notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios, and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2010, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

40

Table of Contents

NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.

In September 2010, NNN repaid the 8.500% $20,000,000 notes that were due in September 2010.

Debt and Equity Securities

NNN has used, and expects to use in the future, issuances of debt and equity securities primarily to pay down its outstanding indebtedness and to finance investment acquisitions. NNN has maintained investment grade debt ratings from Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Service and Fitch Ratings on its senior, unsecured debt since 1998. In June 2008, NNN’s debt rating was upgraded by Moody’s Investor Service. In February 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) which was automatically effective and permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.

A description of NNN’s outstanding series of publicly held notes is found under “Debt – Notes Payable – Convertible” and “Debt – Notes Payable” above.

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock . In October 2006, NNN issued 3,680,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100 th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $92,000,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

Common Stock Issuances. In October 2008, NNN issued 3,450,000 shares of common stock in a registered, underwritten public offering at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees. NNN used the net proceeds to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility and to acquire Investment Properties.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. In June 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement which was automatically effective, with the Commission for its DRIP, which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. NNN’s DRIP provides an economical and convenient way for current stockholders and other interested new investors to invest in NNN’s common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to NNN’s DRIP for each of the years ended December 31:

2010 2009 2008
Shares of common stock 793,759 3,766,452 2,146,640
Net proceeds $ 17,623,000 $ 67,354,000 $ 47,372,000

The proceeds from the issuances were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness under NNN’s Credit Facility.

41

Table of Contents

Mortgages and Notes Receivable.

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

Mortgages and notes receivable 2010 — $ 29,750 $ 41,707
Accrued interest receivable, net of reserves 644 269
Unamortized discount (63 ) -
$ 30,331 $ 41,976

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.

In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, NNN adjusted the carrying value of the Residuals to reflect such fair value as of December 31, 2010. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation changed several valuation assumptions. The following table summarizes the changes to the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of December 31:

Discount rate 25% 25%
Average life equivalent CPR speeds range 4.35% to 20.37% CPR 14.5% to 20.7% CPR
Foreclosures:
Frequency curve default model 0.1% - 15.0% range 6% average rate
Loss severity of loans in foreclosure 20% 20%
Yield:
LIBOR Forward 3-month curve Forward 3-month curve
Prime Forward curve Forward curve

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010 2009 2008
Unrealized gains $ 1,273 $ - $ 2,009
Unrealized losses - 1,640 -
Other than temporary valuation impairment 3,995 498 758

Business Combination.

In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of its tenants, in June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. The note foreclosure resulted in a loss of $7,816,000. NNN recorded the value of the assets received at fair value. No liabilities were assumed. The fair value of the assets resulted in goodwill of $3,400,000. In connection with the review of goodwill for impairment, NNN recognized a noncash impairment charge of $1,900,000.

42

Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

NNN is exposed to interest rate risk primarily as a result of its variable rate Credit Facility and its fixed rate debt which is used to finance NNN’s development and acquisition activities, as well as for general corporate purposes. NNN’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, NNN borrows at both fixed and variable rates on its long-term debt. As of December 31, 2010, NNN had no outstanding derivatives.

The information in the table below summarizes NNN’s market risks associated with its debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. The table presents principal payments and related interest rates by year for debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2010. The variable interest rates shown represent weighted average rate for the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2010. The table incorporates only those debt obligations that existed as of December 31, 2010, and it does not consider those debt obligations or positions which could arise after this date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not presented in the table below, the information presented therein has limited predictive value. As a result, NNN’s ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, NNN’s hedging strategies at that time and interest rates. If interest rates on NNN’s variable rate debt increased by one percent, NNN’s interest expense would have increased by less than one percent for the year ended December 31, 2010.

| Debt Obligations (dollars in
thousands) | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Variable Rate Debt | | Fixed Rate Debt | | | | |
| Credit Facility | | Mortgages | | Unsecured Debt (1) | | |
| Debt Obligation | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Debt Obligation | Weighted Average Interest Rate | Debt Obligation | Effective Interest Rate | |
| 2011 | $ - | - | $ 1,098 | 7.20% | $ 136,857 | 5.84% |
| 2012 | 161,000 | 3.80% | 19,290 | 6.92% | 49,945 | 7.83% |
| 2013 | - | - | 863 | 7.35% | 212,677 | 7.19% |
| 2014 | - | - | 881 | 7.27% | 149,817 | 5.91% |
| 2015 | - | - | 917 | 7.22% | 149,777 | 6.19% |
| Thereafter | - | - | 1,220 | 7.47% | 249,343 | 6.92% |
| Total | $ 161,000 | 3.80% | $ 24,269 | 7.00% | $ 948,416 | 6.60% |
| Fair Value: | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2010 | $ 161,000 | | $ 24,269 | | $1,044,621 | |
| December 31, 2009 | $ - | | $ 25,290 | | $ 987,275 | |
| (1) Includes NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes payable, each net of unamortized
discounts. NNN uses Bloomberg to determine the fair value. | | | | | | |

NNN is also exposed to market risks related to NNN’s Residuals. Factors that may impact the market value of the Residuals include delinquencies, loan losses, prepayment speeds and interest rates. The Residuals, which are reported at market value based upon an independent valuation, had a carrying value of $15,915,000 and $20,153,000 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Losses are considered other than temporary and reported as a valuation impairment in earnings from operations if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows that leads to a loss in value.

43

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and our report dated February 24, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida

February 24, 2011

44

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statements schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), National Retail Property Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida

February 24, 2011

45

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

ASSETS December 31, 2010 December 31, 2009
Real estate, Investment Portfolio:
Accounted for using the operating method, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization $ 2,519,950 $ 2,328,576
Accounted for using the direct financing method 29,773 31,317
Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, held for sale 32,076 72,423
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate 4,515 4,703
Mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable, net of allowance 30,331 41,976
Commercial mortgage residual interests 15,915 20,153
Cash and cash equivalents 2,048 15,225
Receivables, net of allowance of $1,750 and $583, respectively 3,403 1,946
Accrued rental income, net of allowance of $3,609 and $2,875, respectively 25,535 25,745
Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization of $11,198 and $6,870, respectively 9,366 13,884
Other assets 40,663 35,014
Total assets $ 2,713,575 $ 2,590,962
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Line of credit payable $ 161,000 $ -
Mortgages payable 24,269 25,290
Notes payable – convertible, net of unamortized discount of $12,201 and $18,355, respectively 349,534 343,380
Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $1,118 and $1,324, respectively 598,882 618,676
Accrued interest payable 7,342 7,471
Other liabilities 43,774 29,283
Total liabilities 1,184,801 1,024,100
Commitments and contingencies (Note 26)
Equity:
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 15,000,000 shares
Series C, 3,680,000 depositary shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $25 per share 92,000 92,000
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 190,000,000 shares; 83,613,289 and 82,427,560 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively 838 825
Excess stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 205,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding - -
Capital in excess of par value 1,429,750 1,408,491
Retained earnings 3,234 62,413
Accumulated other comprehensive income 1,661 511
Total stockholders’ equity of NNN 1,527,483 1,564,240
Noncontrolling interests 1,291 2,622
Total equity 1,528,774 1,566,862
Total liabilities and equity $ 2,713,575 $ 2,590,962

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

46

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended December 31, — 2010 2009 2008
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases $ 211,172 $ 209,256 $ 205,334
Earned income from direct financing leases 3,001 3,070 3,103
Percentage rent 959 1,340 1,104
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants 7,438 8,361 6,980
Interest and other income from real estate transactions 3,026 4,535 5,807
Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests 3,460 4,252 4,636
229,056 230,814 226,964
Disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio:
Gross proceeds 5,600 953 4,900
Costs (4,959 ) (916 ) (4,879 )
Gain 641 37 21
Retail operations:
Revenues 32,958 15,595 -
Operating expenses (31,647 ) (15,176 ) -
Net 1,311 419 -
Operating expenses:
General and administrative 22,778 21,773 24,875
Real estate 13,534 13,642 10,152
Depreciation and amortization 48,328 46,539 43,668
Impairment losses and other charges 7,458 36,080 1,234
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment 3,995 498 758
Restructuring costs - 731 -
96,093 119,263 80,687
Earnings from operations 134,915 112,007 146,298
Other expenses (revenues):
Interest and other income (1,513 ) (1,371 ) (3,748 )
Interest expense 65,179 62,151 63,964
Loss on interest rate hedge - - 804
63,666 60,780 61,020
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax benefit (expense), equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate and gain
on extinguishment of debt 71,249 51,227 85,278
Income tax benefit (expense) (475 ) 1,049 7,255
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate 428 421 364
Gain on extinguishment of debt - 3,432 4,961
Earnings from continuing operations 71,202 56,129 97,858
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 18):
Real estate, Investment Portfolio, net of income tax expense 1,859 1,776 12,914
Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, net of income tax expense 292 (1,506 ) 9,199
2,151 270 22,113

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

47

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended December 31, — 2010 2009 2008
Earnings including noncontrolling interests $ 73,353 $ 56,399 $ 119,971
Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Continuing operations (367 ) (1,423 ) (96 )
Discontinued operations 11 (166 ) (2,722 )
(356 ) (1,589 ) (2,818 )
Net earnings attributable to NNN 72,997 54,810 117,153
Other comprehensive income (loss) 1,150 (1,903 ) 1,688
Total comprehensive income $ 74,147 $ 52,907 $ 118,841
Net earnings attributable to NNN $ 72,997 $ 54,810 $ 117,153
Series C preferred stock dividends (6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 )
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders $ 66,212 $ 48,025 $ 110,368
Net earnings per share of common stock:
Basic:
Continuing operations $ 0.77 $ 0.60 $ 1.22
Discontinued operations 0.03 - 0.26
Net earnings $ 0.80 $ 0.60 $ 1.48
Diluted:
Continuing operations $ 0.77 $ 0.60 $ 1.22
Discontinued operations 0.03 - 0.26
Net earnings $ 0.80 $ 0.60 $ 1.48
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic 82,715,645 79,846,258 74,249,137
Diluted 82,849,362 79,953,499 74,344,231

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

48

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

| Balances at December 31, 2007 | Series C Preferred Stock — $ 92,000 | Common Stock — $ 725 | Capital in Excess
of Par Value — $ 1,189,564 | $ | 134,383 | $ | 975 | $ | 1,417,647 | $ | 2,956 | $ | 1,420,603 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Net earnings | - | - | - | | 117,153 | | - | | 117,153 | | 2,818 | | 119,971 | |
| Dividends declared and paid: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| $1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock | - | - | - | | (6,785 | ) | - | | (6,785 | ) | - | | (6,785 | ) |
| $1.48 per share of common stock | - | 4 | 8,472 | | (110,107 | ) | - | | (101,631 | ) | - | | (101,631 | ) |
| Issuance of common stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3,523,285 shares | - | 35 | 80,633 | | - | | - | | 80,668 | | - | | 80,668 | |
| 1,753,201 shares – discounted stock purchase program | - | 18 | 38,878 | | - | | - | | 38,896 | | - | | 38,896 | |
| Issuance of 217,397 shares of restricted common stock | - | 2 | (2 | ) | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
| Stock issuance costs | - | - | (3,582 | ) | - | | - | | (3,582 | ) | - | | (3,582 | ) |
| Equity component of convertible debt | - | - | 20,467 | | - | | - | | 20,467 | | - | | 20,467 | |
| Amortization of deferred compensation | - | - | 2,588 | | - | | - | | 2,588 | | - | | 2,588 | |
| Interest rate hedge termination | - | - | - | | - | | (162 | ) | (162 | ) | - | | (162 | ) |
| Amortization of interest rate hedges | - | - | - | | - | | (109 | ) | (109 | ) | - | | (109 | ) |
| Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests | - | - | - | | - | | 1,760 | | 1,760 | | 249 | | 2,009 | |
| Stock value adjustment | - | - | - | | - | | (50 | ) | (50 | ) | - | | (50 | ) |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | | - | | - | | - | | 41 | | 41 | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | | - | | | | - | | (5,483 | ) | (5,483 | ) |
| Other | - | - | - | | - | | - | | - | | 1,505 | | 1,505 | |
| Balances at December 31, 2008 | $ 92,000 | $ 784 | $ 1,337,018 | $ | 134,644 | $ | 2,414 | $ | 1,566,860 | $ | 2,086 | $ | 1,568,946 | |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

49

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

| Balances at December 31, 2008 | Series C Preferred Stock — $ 92,000 | Common Stock — $ 784 | Capital in Excess
of Par Value — $ 1,337,018 | $ | 134,644 | $ | 2,414 | $ | 1,566,860 | $ | 2,086 | $ | 1,568,946 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Net earnings | - | - | - | | 54,810 | | - | | 54,810 | | 1,589 | | 56,399 | |
| Dividends declared and paid: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| $1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock | - | - | - | | (6,785 | ) | - | | (6,785 | ) | - | | (6,785 | ) |
| $1.50 per share of common stock | - | 1 | 1,797 | | (120,256 | ) | - | | (118,458 | ) | - | | (118,458 | ) |
| Issuance of common stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 99,738 shares | - | 1 | 1,435 | | - | | - | | 1,436 | | - | | 1,436 | |
| 3,664,182 shares – discounted stock purchase program | - | 36 | 65,519 | | - | | - | | 65,555 | | - | | 65,555 | |
| Issuance of 262,546 shares of restricted common stock | - | 3 | (3 | ) | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
| Stock issuance costs | - | - | (113 | ) | - | | - | | (113 | ) | - | | (113 | ) |
| Equity component of extinguishment of convertible debt | - | - | (795 | ) | - | | - | | (795 | ) | - | | (795 | ) |
| Amortization of deferred compensation | - | - | 3,443 | | - | | - | | 3,443 | | - | | 3,443 | |
| Amortization of interest rate hedges | - | - | - | | - | | (159 | ) | (159 | ) | - | | (159 | ) |
| Unrealized loss – commercial mortgage residual interests | - | - | - | | - | | (1,744 | ) | (1,744 | ) | 104 | | (1,640 | ) |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | | - | | - | | - | | 152 | | 152 | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | | - | | - | | - | | (552 | ) | (552 | ) |
| Other | - | - | 190 | | - | | - | | 190 | | (757 | ) | (567 | ) |
| Balances at December 31, 2009 | $ 92,000 | $ 825 | $ 1,408,491 | $ | 62,413 | $ | 511 | $ | 1,564,240 | $ | 2,622 | $ | 1,566,862 | |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

50

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

| Balances at December 31, 2009 | Series C Preferred Stock — $ 92,000 | Common Stock — $ 825 | Capital in Excess
of Par Value — $ 1,408,491 | $ | 62,413 | $ | 511 | $ | 1,564,240 | $ | 2,622 | $ | 1,566,862 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Net earnings | - | - | - | | 72,997 | | - | | 72,997 | | 356 | | 73,353 | |
| Dividends declared and paid: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| $1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock | - | - | - | | (6,785 | ) | - | | (6,785 | ) | - | | (6,785 | ) |
| $1.51 per share of common stock | - | 3 | 7,350 | | (125,391 | ) | - | | (118,038 | ) | - | | (118,038 | ) |
| Issuance of common stock: | | | | | | | - | | | | | | | |
| 39,872 shares | - | 1 | 697 | | - | | - | | 698 | | - | | 698 | |
| 491,705 shares – discounted stock purchase program | - | 5 | 10,272 | | - | | - | | 10,277 | | - | | 10,277 | |
| Issuance of 377,164 shares of restricted common stock | - | 4 | (4 | ) | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
| Stock issuance costs | - | - | (1 | ) | - | | - | | (1 | ) | - | | (1 | ) |
| Performance incentive plan | - | - | (1,634 | ) | - | | - | | (1,634 | ) | - | | (1,634 | ) |
| Amortization of deferred compensation | - | - | 5,119 | | - | | - | | 5,119 | | - | | 5,119 | |
| Amortization of interest rate hedges | - | - | - | | - | | (165 | ) | (165 | ) | - | | (165 | ) |
| Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests | - | - | - | | - | | 1,272 | | 1,272 | | (26 | ) | 1,246 | |
| Contributions from noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | | - | | - | | - | | 43 | | 43 | |
| Distributions to noncontrolling interests | - | - | - | | - | | - | | - | | (861 | ) | (861 | ) |
| Purchase of noncontrolling interest | - | - | (404 | ) | - | | - | | (404 | ) | (1,199 | ) | (1,603 | ) |
| Other | - | - | (136 | ) | - | | 43 | | (93 | ) | 356 | | 263 | |
| Balances at December 31, 2010 | $ 92,000 | $ 838 | $ 1,429,750 | $ | 3,234 | $ | 1,661 | $ | 1,527,483 | $ | 1,291 | $ | 1,528,774 | |

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

51

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31, — 2010 2009 2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Earnings including noncontrolling interests $ 73,353 $ 56,399 $ 119,971
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Performance incentive plan expense 5,756 4,172 3,299
Stock options expense – tax effect 122 190 -
Depreciation and amortization 49,084 48,485 45,347
Impairment losses and other charges 7,458 41,710 5,660
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation 3,995 498 758
Amortization of notes payable discount 6,360 6,006 5,670
Amortization of deferred interest rate hedges (166 ) (159 ) (162 )
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (428 ) (421 ) (364 )
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates 578 607 439
Gain on disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio (1,134 ) (2,392 ) (9,980 )
Gain on extinguishment of debt - (3,432 ) (4,961 )
Gain on disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio (941 ) (595 ) (12,665 )
Deferred income taxes (2,544 ) (16,649 ) (5,593 )
Income tax valuation allowance 3,121 14,900 -
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business
combinations:
Additions to real estate, Inventory Portfolio (478 ) (2,457 ) (33,745 )
Proceeds from disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio 42,817 6,276 128,785
Decrease in real estate leased to others using the direct financing method 1,544 1,378 1,195
Decrease (increase) in work in process (755 ) (786 ) 47
Increase in mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable (467 ) (10 ) (217 )
Decrease (increase) in receivables (219 ) 941 243
Decrease (increase) in commercial mortgage residual interests 1,516 (291 ) -
Decrease (increase) in accrued rental income 124 (2,061 ) (978 )
Decrease (increase) in other assets (53 ) (172 ) 951
Decrease in accrued interest payable (129 ) (137 ) (3,635 )
Decrease in other liabilities (431 ) (2,930 ) (1,463 )
Increase (decrease) in current tax liability (169 ) 432 (1,143 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 187,914 149,502 237,459
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from the disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio 10,312 14,588 60,027
Additions to real estate, Investment Portfolio:
Accounted for using the operating method (230,928 ) (44,433 ) (352,618 )
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate - - (901 )
Increase in mortgages and notes receivable (8,564 ) (959 ) (29,934 )
Principal payments on mortgages and notes receivable 13,818 4,009 64,589
Cash received from commercial mortgage residual interests - - 3,591
Payment of lease costs (1,324 ) (451 ) (922 )
Other (3,574 ) (817 ) (136 )
Net cash used in investing activities (220,260 ) (28,063 ) (256,304 )

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

52

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands)

Year Ended December 31, — 2010 2009 2008
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from line of credit payable $ 278,900 $ 132,400 $ 516,000
Repayment of line of credit payable (117,900 ) (158,900 ) (619,300 )
Repayment of mortgages payable (6,453 ) (1,000 ) (1,190 )
Proceeds from notes payable – convertible - - 234,035
Repurchase of notes payable – convertible – debt component - (14,785 ) (18,420 )
Repurchase of notes payable – convertible – equity component - (795 ) (768 )
Repayment of notes payable – secured - - (12,000 )
Repayment of notes payable (20,000 ) - (100,000 )
Payment of debt costs (75 ) (6,275 ) (5,813 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 17,692 68,060 127,328
Payment of Series C preferred stock dividends (6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 )
Payment of common stock dividends (125,391 ) (120,256 ) (110,107 )
Noncontrolling interest distributions (861 ) (552 ) (5,483 )
Noncontrolling interest contributions 43 152 41
Stock issuance costs (1 ) (104 ) (3,566 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 19,169 (108,840 ) (6,028 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (13,177 ) 12,599 (24,873 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 15,225 2,626 27,499
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 2,048 $ 15,225 $ 2,626
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized $ 62,386 $ 61,475 $ 69,395
Taxes paid (received) $ 472 $ (63 ) $ 3,441
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Issued 392,474, 262,546 and 225,517 shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan $ 6,889 $ 4,290 $ 3,796
Issued 10,092, 6,594 and 12,766 shares of common stock in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, to directors pursuant to NNN’s
performance incentive plan $ 236 $ 118 $ 262
Issued 25,066, 41,604 and 26,879 shares of common stock in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s Deferred
Director Fee Plan $ 401 $ 611 $ 449
Surrender of 2,520 shares of restricted common stock in 2008 $ - $ - $ 58
Change in other comprehensive income $ 1,150 $ (1,903 ) $ 1,439
Change in lease classification (direct financing lease to operating lease) $ - $ - $ 300
Transfer of real estate from Inventory Portfolio to Investment Portfolio $ - $ 16,058 $ 29,948
Note and mortgage receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions $ 5,950 $ 1,550 $ 24,245
Mortgages payable assumed in connection with real estate transactions $ 5,432 $ - $ -
Real estate acquired in connection with mortgage receivable foreclosure $ 6,250 $ 4,240 $ 2,497
Assets received in note receivable foreclosure $ - $ 5,527 $ -
Note receivable foreclosures $ - $ (17,013 ) $ -

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

53

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Organization and Nature of Business – National Retail Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries. These taxable subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”).

Investment Portfolio:
Total properties (including retail operations) 1,195
Gross leasable area (square feet) 12,972,000
States 46

The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 17 Inventory Properties.

Principles of Consolidation – NNN’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of each of the respective majority owned and controlled affiliates, including transactions whereby NNN has been determined to be the primary beneficiary in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance included in Consolidation. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated. NNN applies the equity method of accounting to investments in partnerships and joint ventures that are not subject to control by NNN due to the significance of rights held by other parties.

The TRS develops real estate through various joint venture development affiliate agreements. NNN consolidates the joint venture development entities listed in the table below based upon either NNN being the primary beneficiary of the respective variable interest entity or NNN having a controlling interest over the respective entity. NNN eliminates significant intercompany

54

Table of Contents

balances and transactions and records a noncontrolling interest for its other partners’ ownership percentage. The following table summarizes each of the investments as of December 31, 2010:

Date of Agreement Entity Name
November 2002 WG Grand Prairie TX, LLC 60%
February 2003 Gator Pearson, LLC 50%
February 2006 CNLRS BEP, L.P. 50%
September 2006 NNN Harrison Crossing, L.P. 50%

In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”) with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, LP.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease – In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on the determination of the fair values of these assets. The as-if-vacant fair value of a property is provided to management by a qualified appraiser.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as other assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease, including the probability of renewal periods. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases unless the Company believes that it is likely that the tenant would renew the option whereby the Company would amortize the value attributable to the renewal over the renewal period. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, determined as set forth above. The value of in-place leases exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off.

The value of tenant relationships is reviewed on individual transactions to determine if future value was derived from the acquisition.

55

Table of Contents

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method – Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rentals vary during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method – Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. In accordance with the FASB guidance included in Real Estate , the TRS classifies its real estate held for sale as discontinued operations for each property in which rental revenues are generated.

Impairment – Real Estate – Based upon events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market condition and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are currently vacant or become vacant. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Real Estate Dispositions – When real estate is disposed of, the related cost, accumulated depreciation or amortization and any accrued rental income for operating leases and the net investment for direct financing leases are removed from the accounts and gains and losses from the dispositions are reflected in income. Gains from the disposition of real estate are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the FASB guidance included in Real Estate Sales , provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and any subsequent involvement by NNN with the real estate sold are met. Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases are cancelled and NNN no longer has a continuing obligation to provide services to the former tenants.

56

Table of Contents

Valuation of Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest – The allowance related to the mortgages, notes and accrued interest is NNN’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses. The allowance is determined on an individual note basis in reviewing any payment past due for over 90 days. Any outstanding amounts are written off against the allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted.

Investment in an Unconsolidated Affiliate – NNN accounts for its investment in an unconsolidated affiliate under the equity method of accounting.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value – Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.

In 2010, NNN acquired the 21.1% non-controlling interest in its majority owned and controlled subsidiary, OAMI, for $1,603,000, pursuant to which OAMI became a wholly owned subsidiary of NNN. NNN accounted for the transaction as an equity transaction in accordance with the FASB guidance on consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – NNN considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market accounts. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.

Cash accounts maintained on behalf of NNN in demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds may exceed federally insured levels; however, NNN has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Valuation of Receivables – NNN estimates of the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to rents, expense reimbursements and other revenues. NNN analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.

Goodwill – Goodwill arises from business combinations and represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net fair value amounts that were assigned to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. In accordance with the FASB guidance included in Goodwill , NNN performs impairment testing on goodwill by comparing fair value to carrying amount annually.

Debt Costs – Debt costs incurred in connection with NNN’s $400,000,000 line of credit and mortgages payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective loan commitment using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Debt costs incurred in connection with the issuance of NNN’s notes payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective debt obligation using the effective interest method.

57

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition – Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance included in Leases, based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

Earnings Per Share – Earnings per share have been computed pursuant to the FASB guidance included in Earnings Per Share . Effective January 1, 2009, the guidance requires classification of the Company’s unvested restricted share units which contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, as participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In applying the two-class method, undistributed earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities based on the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share using the two-class method for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010
Basic and Diluted Earnings:
Net earnings attributable to NNN $ 72,997 $ 54,810 $ 117,153
Less: Series C preferred stock dividends (6,785 ) (6,785 ) (6,785 )
Net earnings available to NNN’s common stockholders 66,212 48,025 110,368
Less: Earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares (299 ) (290 ) (485 )
Net earnings used in basic earnings per share 65,913 47,735 109,883
Reallocated undistributed income (loss) - (1 ) -
Net earnings used in diluted earnings per share $ 65,913 $ 47,734 $ 109,883
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding 83,320,921 80,486,215 74,732,844
Less: Unvested restricted stock (605,276 ) (639,957 ) (483,707 )
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share 82,715,645 79,846,258 74,249,137
Effects of dilutive securities:
Common stock options 3,814 9,037 35,900
Directors’ deferred fee plan 129,903 98,204 59,194
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share 82,849,362 79,953,499 74,344,231

The potential dilutive shares related to convertible notes payable were not included in computing earnings per common share because their effects would be antidilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation – On January 1, 2006, NNN adopted the FASB guidance included in Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees , under the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted after the adoption of this standard and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that are outstanding as of that date. In accordance with the FASB guidance, NNN estimates the fair value of restricted stock and stock option grants at the date of grant and amortizes those amounts into expense on a straight line basis or amount vested, if greater, over the appropriate vesting period.

Income Taxes – NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and related regulations. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders,

58

Table of Contents

providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

NNN and its taxable REIT subsidiaries have made timely TRS elections pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. A taxable REIT subsidiary is able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain activities of NNN which occur within its TRS entities are subject to federal and state income taxes (See Note 17). All provisions for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and to OAMI’s built-in-gain tax liability.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as required by the FASB guidance included in Income Taxes . Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences based on estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Fair Value Measurement – NNN’s estimates of fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:

• Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 – Valuation is based upon inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

New Accounting Pronouncements – In June 2009, FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities. The revised guidance reflects the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity. The guidance also replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach that is primarily qualitative. The new guidance requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity as well as additional disclosures. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009.

59

Table of Contents

The adoption of the standard did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements . This update requires new disclosures for transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2, as well as disclosure about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for Level 1 and 2. In addition, activity in Level 3 should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis (rather than as one net number). A reporting entity should provide fair value measurements disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the standard did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2010, the FASB issued Subsequent Events, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements . An entity that files Exchange Act reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and requirements of the Commission. The scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements is refined to include revised financial statements only. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised either as a result of correction of an error or retrospective application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All of the amendments in this are effective upon issuance of the final update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The adoption of the standard did not have an impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Use of Estimates – Management of NNN has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant estimates include provision for impairment and allowances for certain assets, accruals, useful lives of assets and capitalization of costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassification – Certain items in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.

Note 2 – Real Estate – Investment Portfolio:

Leases – The following outlines key information for NNN’s Investment Property leases at December 31, 2010:

Lease classification:
Operating 1,159
Direct financing 16
Building portion – direct financing / land portion – operating 7
Weighted average remaining lease term 12 Years

The leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. Generally, the tenant is also required to pay all property taxes and assessments, substantially maintain the interior and exterior of the building and carry property and liability insurance coverage. Certain of NNN’s

60

Table of Contents

Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses of the property. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions, including rent increases, consistent with the initial lease term.

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method – Real estate subject to operating leases consisted of the following as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

Land and improvements 2010 — $ 1,122,243 $ 1,054,889
Buildings and improvements 1,592,752 1,450,348
Leasehold interests 1,290 1,290
2,716,285 2,506,527
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (222,921 ) (183,948 )
2,493,364 2,322,579
Work in progress 26,586 5,997
$ 2,519,950 $ 2,328,576

Some leases provide for scheduled rent increases throughout the lease term. Such amounts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN recognized collectively in continuing and discontinued operations, $(93,000), $2,102,000 and $1,020,000, respectively, of such income, net of reserves. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the balance of accrued rental income, net of allowances of $3,609,000 and $2,875,000, respectively, was $25,535,000 and $25,745,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2010, in connection with the development of Investment Properties, NNN has the following funding commitments (dollars in thousands):

Investment Portfolio
(1) Includes land and construction costs.

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on noncancellable operating leases at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

2011 225,328
2012 222,547
2013 214,526
2014 204,970
2015 196,748
Thereafter 1,641,387
$ 2,705,506

Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the initial lease terms. In addition, this table does not include amounts for potential variable rent increases that are based on the CPI or future contingent rents which may be received on the leases based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales.

61

Table of Contents

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Direct Financing Method – The following lists the components of net investment in direct financing leases at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

Minimum lease payments to be received 2010 — $ 37,699 $ 42,244
Estimated unguaranteed residual values 12,297 12,297
Less unearned income (20,223 ) (23,224 )
Net investment in direct financing leases $ 29,773 $ 31,317

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on direct financing leases held for investment at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

2011 4,531
2012 4,558
2013 4,508
2014 3,750
2015 3,457
Thereafter 16,895
$ 37,699

The above table does not include future minimum lease payments for renewal periods, potential variable CPI rent increases or contingent rental payments that may become due in future periods (see Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method).

Note 3 – Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio :

As of December 31, 2010, the TRS owned 17 Inventory Properties: 10 completed inventory and seven land parcels. As of December 31, 2009, the TRS owned 19 Inventory Properties: 13 completed inventory and six land parcels. The real estate Inventory Portfolio consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010
Inventory:
Land $ 19,734 $ 37,088
Building 18,487 47,684
38,221 84,772
Less impairment (6,145 ) (12,349 )
$ 32,076 $ 72,423

62

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized on the disposition of Inventory Properties included in continuing and discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

# of Properties Gain # of Properties Gain # of Properties Gain
Continuing operations 2 $ 641 2 $ 37 1 $ 21
Noncontrolling interest (320 ) (14 ) (10 )
Total continuing operations attributable to NNN 321 23 11
Discontinued operations 2 300 2 558 24 12,644
Noncontrolling interest (43 ) - (3,297 )
Total discontinued operations attributable to NNN 257 558 9,347
4 $ 578 4 $ 581 25 $ 9,358

Note 4 – Impairments – Real Estate :

Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets, NNN recognized the following real estate impairments for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010 2009 2008
Continuing operations $ - $ 28,884 $ 1,234
Discontinued operations - 5,630 4,426
$ - $ 34,514 $ 5,660

The valuation of impaired assets is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis, income capitalization, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. NNN may consider a single valuation technique or multiple valuation techniques, as appropriate, when measuring the fair value of its real estate.

Note 5 – Business Combinations :

In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of its tenants, in June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. The note foreclosure resulted in a loss of $7,816,000. NNN recorded the value of the assets received at fair value. No liabilities were assumed. The fair value of the assets resulted in goodwill of $3,400,000. In connection with the annual review of goodwill for impairment, NNN recognized a noncash impairment charge of $1,900,000 included in Impairment losses and other charges in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings during the year ended December 31, 2010.

63

Table of Contents

Note 6 – Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest Receivable :

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

Mortgages and notes receivable 2010 — $ 29,750 $ 41,707
Accrued interest receivables, net of reserves 644 269
Unamortized discount (63 ) -
$ 30,331 $ 41,976

In connection with the evaluation of the collectibility of its mortgages and notes receivable, during the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN recorded a valuation reserve of $5,625,000.

Note 7 – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests :

OAMI holds the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven securitizations. The following table summarizes the investment interests in each of the transactions:

Securitization Investment Interest — Company (1) OAMI (2) 3 rd Party
BYL 99-1 - 59.0% 41.0%
CCMH I, LLC 42.7% 57.3% -
CCMH II, LLC 44.0% 56.0% -
CCMH III, LLC 36.7% 63.3% -
CCMH IV, LLC 38.3% 61.7% -
CCMH V, LLC 38.4% 61.6% -
CCMH VI, LLC - 100.0% -
(1) NNN owned these investment interests prior to its acquisition of the equity interest in
OAMI. (2) Effective July 1, 2010, NNN owns 100 percent of OAMI’s investment
interest.

Each of the Residuals is recorded at fair value based upon an independent valuation. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation adjusted several valuation assumptions related to prepayment speeds and default curves during 2010.

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010 2009 2008
Unrealized gains $ 1,272 $ - $ 2,009
Unrealized losses - 1,640 -
Other than temporary valuation impairment 3,995 498 758

64

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the changes to the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of December 31:

Discount rate 25% 25%
Average life equivalent CPR speeds range 4.35% to 20.37% CPR 14.5% to 20.7% CPR
Foreclosures:
Frequency curve default model 0.1% - 15.0% range 6% average rate
Loss severity of loans in foreclosure 20% 20%
Yield:
LIBOR Forward 3-month curve Forward 3-month curve
Prime Forward curve Forward curve

The following table shows the effects on the key assumptions affecting the fair value of the Residuals at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

Residuals
Carrying amount of retained interests $ 15,915
Discount rate assumption:
Fair value at 27% discount rate $ 15,261
Fair value at 30% discount rate $ 14,357
Prepayment speed assumption:
Fair value of 1% increases above the CPR Index $ 15,910
Fair value of 2% increases above the CPR Index $ 15,909
Expected credit losses:
Fair value 2% adverse change $ 15,658
Fair value 3% adverse change $ 15,503
Yield Assumptions:
Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 25 basis points $ 16,262
Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 50 basis points $ 16,623

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation of a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Note 8 – Line of Credit Payable :

NNN’s $400,000,000 revolving credit facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of $17,861,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 3.8% during the year ended December 31, 2010. In November 2009, NNN entered into a credit agreement for a new $400,000,000 revolving credit facility, replacing the existing revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures November 2012, with an option to extend maturity to November 2013. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 280 basis points with a 1.0% LIBOR floor; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN’s debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature for NNN to increase, at its option, the facility size up to $500,000,000. As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding, and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000.

65

Table of Contents

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) maximum leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage and (iv) investment and dividend limitations. At December 31, 2010, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

Note 9 – Mortgages Payable :

The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

Entered Initial Balance Carrying Value of Encumbered Asset(s) (1) Outstanding Principal Balance at December
31, 2010 2009
December 2001 (2) $ 623 9.00% April 2014 $ 734 $ 215 $ 267
December 2001 (2) 698 9.00% April 2019 1,186 364 392
December 2001 (2) 485 9.00% April 2019 1,152 187 201
June 2002 21,000 6.90% July 2012 24,051 18,841 19,170
February 2004 (2) 6,952 6.90% January 2017 11,522 4,038 4,554
March 2005 (2) 1,015 8.14% September 2016 1,322 624 706
$ 39,967 $ 24,269 $ $25,290

(1) Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2010.

(2) Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

(3) Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

The following is a schedule of the annual maturities of NNN’s mortgages payable at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

2011 1,098
2012 19,290
2013 863
2014 881
2015 917
Thereafter 1,220
$ 24,269

66

Table of Contents

Note 10 – Notes Payable – Convertible :

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands, except conversion price):

Terms — Issue Date 2026 Notes (1)(2)(4) — September 2006 2028 Notes (2)(5) (6) — March 2008
Net Proceeds $ 168,650 $ 228,576
Stated Interest Rate 3.950% 5.125%
Debt Issuance Costs $ 3,850 (3) $ 5,457 (7)
Earliest Conversion Date September 2025 June 2027
Earliest Put Option Date September 2011 June 2013
Maturity Date September 2026 June 2028
Original Principal $ 172,500 $ 234,035
Repurchases (33,800 ) (11,000 )
Outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2010 $ 138,700 $ 223,035

(1) NNN repurchased $8,800 and $25,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, for a purchase price of $6,994 and $19,188, respectively, resulting in a gain of $1,565 and $4,961, respectively.

(2) Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

(3) Includes $463 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $33,800 of the 2026 Notes.

(4) The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 41.9803 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $23.8207 per share of common stock.

(5) The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 39.3620 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $25.4052 per share of common stock.

(6) NNN repurchased $11,000 in 2009 for a purchase price of $8,588 resulting in a gain of $1,867.

(7) Includes $219 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $11,000 of the 2028 Notes, respectively.

(8) With the adoption of the new accounting guidance on convertible debt securities, the effective interest rate for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date and (ii) the make whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s debt and equity balances are summarized in the table below as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

Carrying value of equity component 2010 — $ (33,873 ) 2009 — $ (33,873 )
Principal amount of convertible debt 361,735 361,735
Remaining unamortized debt discount (12,201 ) (18,355 )
Net carrying value of convertible debt $ 315,661 $ 309,507

As of December 31, 2010, the remaining amortization periods for the debt discount were approximately nine months and 18 months for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes, respectively.

The adjusted effective interest rates for the liability components of the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes were 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively. The Company recorded noncash interest charges of $6,154,000, $5,809,000 and $5,481,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company recorded contractual interest expense of $16,909,000,

67

Table of Contents

$17,046,000 and $16,548,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, relating to the 2026 Notes and 2028 Notes.

The if-converted values which exceed the principal amount as of December 31, 2010, are $15,601,000 and $9,611,000 for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the if-converted amount did not exceed the value of the principal amount.

Note 11 – Notes Payable :

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Notes Issue Date Principal Discount (3) Net Price Maturity Date
2012 (1) June 2002 $ 50,000 $ 287 $ 49,713 7.750% 7.833% June 2012
2014 (1)(2)(5) June 2004 150,000 440 149,560 6.250% 5.910% June 2014
2015 (1) November 2005 150,000 390 149,610 6.150% 6.185% December 2015
2017 (1) (6) September 2007 250,000 877 249,123 6.875% 6.924% October 2017

(1) The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

(2) The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

(3) The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

(4) Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

(5) NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

(6) NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

Each series of the notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. Each of the notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the debt offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,226,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In September 2010, NNN repaid the $20,000,000 8.5% notes payable that were due in September 2010.

In accordance with the terms of the indenture, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2010, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

68

Table of Contents

Note 12 – Preferred Stock :

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. In October 2006, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,680,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100 th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $92,000,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

Note 13 – Common Stock :

In October 2008, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,450,000 shares (including 450,000 shares in connection with the underwriters’ over allotment) of common stock at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In February 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission which permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. In June 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the DRIP for the years ended December 31:

2010 2009 2008
Shares of common stock 793,759 3,766,452 2,146,640
Net proceeds $ 17,623,000 $ 67,354,000 $ 47,372,000

Note 14 – Employee Benefit Plan :

Effective January 1, 1998, NNN adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) covering substantially all of the employees of NNN. The Retirement Plan permits participants to defer up to a maximum of 60 percent of their compensation, as defined in the Retirement Plan, subject to limits established by the Code. NNN matches 60 percent of the participants’ contributions up to a maximum of eight percent of a participant’s annual compensation. NNN’s contributions to the Retirement Plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 totaled $297,000, $302,000 and $385,000, respectively.

69

Table of Contents

Note 15 – Dividends :

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of common stock dividends paid to stockholders for the years ended December 31:

2010 2009 2008
Ordinary dividends $ 1.072446 $ 1.495182 $ 1.480000
Qualified dividends 0.081661 - -
Capital gain 0.000861 0.003051 -
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain 0.000498 0.001767 -
Nontaxable distributions 0.354534 - -
$ 1.510000 $ 1.500000 $ 1.480000

During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common shareholders of $125,391,000, $120,256,000 and $110,107,000, respectively, or $1.51, $1.50 and $1.48 per share, respectively, of common stock.

On January 14, 2011, NNN declared a dividend of $0.38 per share, which is payable February 15, 2011 to its common stockholders of record as of January 31, 2011.

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of preferred stock dividends per share paid to stockholders for the year ended December 31:

2010 2009 2008
Ordinary dividends $ 1.703170 $ 1.837828 $ 1.843750
Qualified dividends 0.140580 - -
Capital gain - 0.003750 -
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain - 0.002172 -
$ 1.843750 $ 1.843750 $ 1.843750

NNN declared and paid dividends to its Series C Preferred stockholders of $6,785,000 or $1.84375 per depository share during each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.

Note 16 – Restructuring Costs :

During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000, related to the reduction of its workforce in January 2009.

Note 17 – Income Taxes :

NNN treats some depreciation expense and certain other items differently for tax than for financial reporting purposes. The principal differences between NNN’s effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and the statutory rates relate to state taxes and nondeductible expenses.

For income tax purposes, NNN has taxable REIT subsidiaries in which certain real estate activities are conducted. In 2010, NNN acquired the 21.1% non-controlling interest in its majority owned and controlled subsidiary, OAMI, pursuant to which OAMI became a wholly owned subsidiary of NNN. OAMI has remaining tax liabilities relating to the built-in gain of its assets.

In June 2009, NNN incurred a new deferred income tax item as a result of NNN acquiring the operations of 12 auto service businesses. See Note 5 – Business Combinations. The new deferred tax item is goodwill. The amount of the tax deductible goodwill is approximately $11,216,000. It is

70

Table of Contents

amortized for tax purposes using a straight-line method, over 15 years, beginning with the month incurred.

The components of the net income tax asset consist of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010 2009
Temporary differences:
Built-in gain $ (4,068 ) $ (4,731 )
Depreciation (772 ) (385 )
Cost basis 256 1,796
Deferred income 230 464
Other 56 (268 )
Reserves 13,160 10,892
Goodwill 3,239 2,801
Excess interest expense carryforward 5,678 5,678
Net operating loss carryforward 5,398 4,484
Net deferred income tax asset 23,177 20,731
Valuation allowance (18,021 ) (14,900 )
Total deferred income tax asset $ 5,156 $ 5,831

In assessing the ability to realize a deferred tax asset, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The net operating loss carryforwards were generated by NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2027. Based upon the level of historical taxable income, projections for future taxable income, and tax strategies available to NNN over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes, with the exception of certain impairments and losses, it is more likely than not that NNN will realize all of the benefits of these deductible differences that existed as of December 31, 2010. NNN believes it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain impairment charges and losses will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, NNN has provided a valuation allowance of $18,021,000 on the deferred tax assets relating to the impairments and losses. The income tax benefit consists of the following components for the years ended December 31 (as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):

Net earnings before income taxes 2010 — $ 74,097 $ 53,930 $ 113,859
Provision for income tax benefit (expense):
Current:
Federal (254 ) (419 ) (1,936 )
State and local (48 ) (79 ) (364 )
Deferred:
Federal (744 ) 1,110 4,539
State and local (54 ) 268 1,055
Total benefit (expense) for income taxes (1,100 ) 880 3,294
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders $ 72,997 $ 54,810 $ 117,153

In June 2006, the FASB issued additional guidance, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements included in Income Taxes . The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax

71

Table of Contents

return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

NNN, in accordance with FASB guidance included in Income Taxes , has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions. NNN believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. Additionally, NNN believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to the FASB guidance. In addition, NNN did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of the FASB guidance.

NNN has had no increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits for current or prior years since the date of adoption. Further, no interest or penalties have been included since no reserves were recorded and no significant increases or decreases are expected to occur within the next 12 months. When applicable, such interest and penalties will be recorded in non-operating expenses. The periods that remain open under federal statute are 2007 through 2010. NNN also files in many states with varying open years under statute.

Note 18 – Earnings from Discontinued Operations :

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN classified the revenues and expenses related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interests which expired, and (ii) all Investment Properties that were held for sale as of December 31, 2010, as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Investment Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases $ 1,181 $ 4,786 $ 5,655
Earned income from direct financing leases - - 100
Percentage rent - - 25
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants 48 208 208
Interest and other income from real estate transactions 21 118 429
Interest and other income from non-real estate transactions - 5 2
1,250 5,117 6,419
Operating expenses:
General and administrative 16 7 (71 )
Real estate 309 784 374
Depreciation and amortization 186 1,438 1,454
Impairment losses and other charges - 3,536 1,730
511 5,765 3,487
Earnings (loss) before gain on disposition of real estate and income tax benefit (expense) 739 (648 ) 2,932
Gain on disposition of real estate 1,134 2,392 9,980
Income tax benefit (expense) (14 ) 32 2
Earnings from discontinued operations attributable to NNN $ 1,859 $ 1,776 $ 12,914

72

Table of Contents

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – NNN has classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to (i) Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues prior to disposition, and (ii) Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues and were held for sale as of December 31, 2010. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

2010 2008
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases $ 3,369 $ 4,975 $ 8,646
Percentage rent - - 139
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants 1,358 1,513 867
Interest and other from real estate transactions 513 141 561
5,240 6,629 10,213
Disposition of real estate:
Gross proceeds 37,470 5,402 151,713
Costs (37,170 ) (4,844) (139,069)
Gain 300 558 12,644
Operating expenses:
General and administrative 71 116 22
Real estate 1,755 2,169 1,468
Depreciation and amortization 159 323 226
Impairment losses and other charges - 2,094 2,696
1,985 4,702 4,412
Other expenses (revenues):
Interest and other income (3 ) - (8 )
Interest expense 2,655 3,790 5,291
2,652 3,790 5,283
Earnings (loss) before income tax expense 903 (1,305 ) 13,162
Income tax expense (611 ) (201 ) (3,963 )
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations including noncontrolling interests 292 (1,506 ) 9,199
Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests 11 (166 ) (2,722 )
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to NNN $ 303 $ (1,672 ) $ 6,477

Note 19 – Derivatives :

In accordance with the guidance on derivatives and hedging, NNN records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

NNN’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, NNN primarily uses treasury locks, forward swaps (“forward hedges”) and interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Treasury locks and forward starting swaps are used to hedge forecasted debt issuances. Treasury locks designated as cash flow hedges lock in the yield/price of a treasury security. Forward swaps also lock the associated swap spread. Interest rate swaps

73

Table of Contents

designated as cash flow hedges hedging the variable cash flows associated with floating rate debt involve the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount.

For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.

NNN discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is re-designated as a hedging instrument or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, NNN continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings or may choose to cash settle the derivative at that time.

In February 2008, NNN terminated its interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedge when terminated was a liability of $804,000, which NNN recorded as a loss on interest rate hedge.

In September 2007, NNN terminated two interest rate hedges with a combined notional amount of $100,000,000 that were hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedges when terminated was a liability of $3,260,000, of which $3,228,000 was deferred in other comprehensive income.

In June 2004, NNN terminated its forward-starting interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $94,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate swaps when terminated was an asset of $4,148,000, which was deferred in other comprehensive income.

As of December 31, 2010, $715,000 remains in other comprehensive income related to the effective portion of NNN’s previous interest rate hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN reclassed $165,000, $159,000 and $162,000, respectively, out of other comprehensive income as a reduction to interest expense. Over the next 12 months, NNN estimates that an additional $172,000 will be reclassified as a reduction in interest expense. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on NNN’s long-term debt.

NNN does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes or currently have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges. NNN had no derivative financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2010.

74

Table of Contents

Note 20 – Performance Incentive Plan :

In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Commission which permits the issuance of up to 5,900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan replaced NNN’s previous Performance Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan allows NNN to award or grant to key employees, directors and persons performing consulting or advisory services for NNN or its affiliates, stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights, Phantom Stock Awards, Performance Awards and Leveraged Stock Purchase Awards, each as defined in the 2007 Plan.

The following summarizes NNN’s stock-based compensation activity for each of the years ended December 31:

2010 2009 2008
Outstanding, January 1 12,154 77,004 118,804
Options granted - - -
Options exercised (4,654 ) (51,500 ) (28,000 )
Options surrendered - (13,350 ) (13,800 )
Outstanding, December 31 7,500 12,154 77,004
Exercisable, December 31 7,500 12,154 77,004

The following represents the weighted average option exercise price information for each of the years ended December 31:

2010 2009 2008
Outstanding, January 1 $ 13.72 $ 14.00 $ 13.64
Granted during the year - - -
Exercised during the year 13.08 13.72 11.17
Outstanding, December 31 14.11 13.72 14.00
Exercisable, December 31 14.11 13.72 14.00

The following summarizes the outstanding options and the exercisable options at December 31, 2010:

Total
Outstanding options:
Number of shares 7,500
Weighted-average exercise price $ 14.11
Weighted-average remaining contractual life in years 1.8
Exercisable options:
Number of shares 7,500
Weighted-average exercise price $ 14.11

One-third of the option grant to each individual becomes exercisable at the end of each of the first three years of service following the date of the grant and the options’ maximum term is 10 years. At December 31, 2010, the intrinsic value of options outstanding was $93,000. All options outstanding at December 31, 2010, were exercisable. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN received proceeds totaling $61,000, $707,000 and $313,000, respectively, in connection with the exercise of options. NNN issued new common stock to satisfy share option exercises. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, was $43,000, $240,000 and $327,000, respectively.

75

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, NNN has granted and issued shares of restricted stock to certain officers, directors and key associates of NNN. The following summarizes the activity for the year ended December 31, 2010, of such grants.

Non-vested restricted shares, January 1 668,010 $ 16.95
Restricted shares granted 392,474 21.38
Restricted shares vested (142,637 ) 19.80
Restricted shares forfeited (15,310 ) 11.23
Non-vested restricted shares, December 31 902,537 $ 18.52

During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2008, a total of 15,310 and 2,520, respectively, of restricted shares were forfeited. No shares were forfeited in 2009.

Compensation expense for the restricted stock which is not contingent upon NNN’s performance goals is determined based upon the fair value at the date of grant, assuming a 1.3% forfeiture rate, and is recognized as the greater of the amount amortized over a straight lined basis or the amount vested over the vesting periods. Vesting periods for officers and key associates of NNN range from four to seven years and generally vest yearly on a straight line basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN granted 81,330 performance based shares with a weighted average grant price of $8.00 to certain executive officers of NNN. The compensation expense for the grant is based upon fair market value of the grant calculated by a third party using a lattice model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free rate of 3.48%, (ii) a dividend rate of 6.50%, (iii) a term of five years, and (iv) a volatility of 19.89%. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of NNN’s stock and other factors. The vesting of these shares is contingent upon the achievement of certain performance goals by January 1, 2013.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN granted 91,000 performance based shares subject to its earnings based growth after a three year period relative to its peers. The shares were granted to certain executive officers and had weighted average grant price of $23.12 per share. Once the performance criteria are met and the actual number of shares earned is determined, the shares vest immediately. NNN considers the likelihood of meeting the performance criteria based upon management’s estimates and analysis of future earnings based growth relative to its peers from which it determines the amounts to be recognized. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period.

The following summarizes other grants made during the year ended December 31, 2010, pursuant to the 2007 Plan.

Weighted Average Share Price
Other share grants under the 2007 Plan:
Directors’ fees 10,092 $ 23.38
Deferred Directors’ fees 25,066 23.54
35,158 $ 23.50
Shares available under the 2007 Plan for grant, end of period 4,860,190

76

Table of Contents

The total compensation cost for share-based payments for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, totaled $5,310,000, $4,172,000 and $3,341,000, respectively, of such compensation expense. At December 31, 2010, NNN had $9,366,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements under the 2007 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

Note 21 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments :

NNN believes the carrying value of its Credit Facility approximates fair value based upon its nature, terms and variable interest rate. NNN believes that the carrying value of its cash and cash equivalents, mortgages, notes and other receivables, mortgages payable and other liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009, approximate fair value based upon current market prices of similar issues. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the carrying value and fair value of NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes payable, collectively, was $1,044,621,000 and $987,275,000, respectively, based upon the quoted market price.

Note 22 – Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) :

The following table outlines NNN’s quarterly financial data (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

2010 — Revenues as originally reported First Quarter — $ 56,626 $ 56,496 $ 56,656 $ 59,440
Reclassified to discontinued operations (101 ) (54 ) (7 ) -
Adjusted revenue $ 56,525 $ 56,442 $ 56,649 $ 59,440
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders $ 16,365 $ 21,207 $ 21,210 $ 14,215
Net earnings per share ( 1 ) :
Basic $ 0.18 $ 0.23 $ 0.23 $ 0.15
Diluted 0.18 0.23 0.23 0.15
2009
Revenues as originally reported $ 57,963 $ 58,681 $ 57,035 $ 57,750
Reclassified to discontinued operations 114 (546 ) 59 (242 )
Adjusted revenue $ 58,077 $ 58,135 $ 57,094 $ 57,508
Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN’s stockholders $ 26,804 $ 18,090 $ 22,443 $ (12,527 )
Net earnings (loss) per share ( 1 ) :
Basic $ 0.32 $ 0.21 $ 0.26 $ (0.18 )
Diluted 0.32 0.20 0.26 (0.17 )
(1) Calculated independently for each period and consequently, the sum of the quarters may
differ from the annual amount.

77

Table of Contents

Note 23 – Segment Information :

NNN has identified two primary financial segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following tables represent the segment data and reconciliation to NNN’s consolidated totals for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):

2010 — External revenues Investment Assets — $ 223,870 $ (40 ) Eliminations (Intercompany) — $ - Consolidated Totals — $ 223,830
Intersegment revenues 671 534 (1,205 ) -
Interest revenue 3,231 48 - 3,279
Interest revenue on Residuals 3,460 - - 3,460
Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio - 426 215 641
Retail operations, net 1,311 - - 1,311
Interest expense 67,834 (1,450 ) (1,205 ) 65,179
Depreciation and amortization 48,320 8 - 48,328
Operating expenses 31,983 4,329 - 36,312
Impairment losses and other charges 7,458 260 (260 ) 7,458
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment 3,995 - - 3,995
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate (372 ) - 800 428
Income tax benefit (expense) (1,434 ) 959 - (475 )
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations 71,147 (1,220 ) 1,275 71,202
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense 1,859 292 - 2,151
Earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests 73,006 (928 ) 1,275 73,353
Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations (9 ) (358 ) - (367 )
Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations - 11 - 11
Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN $ 72,997 $ (1,275 ) $ 1,275 $ 72,997
Assets $ 2,846,036 $ 38,997 $ (171,458 ) $ 2,713,575
Additions to long-lived assets:
Real estate $ 230,928 $ 478 $ - $ 231,406

78

Table of Contents

2009 — External revenues Investment Assets — $ 223,262 $ 194 Eliminations (Intercompany) — $ - Consolidated Totals — $ 223,456
Intersegment revenues 3,035 1,042 (4,077 ) -
Interest revenue 4,447 30 - 4,477
Interest revenue Residuals 4,252 - - 4,252
Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio - 5 32 37
Retail operations, net 419 - - 419
Interest expense 66,018 188 (4,055 ) 62,151
Depreciation and amortization 46,529 10 - 46,539
Operating expenses 30,335 5,080 - 35,415
Impairment losses and other charges 29,367 6,713 - 36,080
Impairments – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment 498 - - 498
Restructuring costs 731 - - 731
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (12,280 ) - 12,701 421
Gain on extinguishment of debt 3,432 - - 3,432
Income tax benefit 462 587 - 1,049
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations 53,551 (10,133 ) 12,711 56,129
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense 1,776 (1,506 ) - 270
Earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests 55,327 (11,639 ) 12,711 56,399
Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations (517 ) (906 ) - (1,423 )
Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations - (166 ) - (166 )
Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN $ 54,810 $ (12,711 ) $ 12,711 $ 54,810
Assets $ 2,588,408 $ 237,715 $ (235,161 ) $ 2,590,962
Additions to long-lived assets:
Real estate $ 44,433 $ 2,457 $ - $ 46,890

79

Table of Contents

2008 — External revenues Investment Assets — $ 217,682 $ 204 Eliminations (Intercompany) — $ - Consolidated Totals — $ 217,886
Intersegment revenues 12,727 606 (13,333 ) -
Interest revenue 8,190 - - 8,190
Interest revenue on Residuals 4,636 - - 4,636
Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio - (308 ) 329 21
Interest expense 69,763 7,442 (13,241 ) 63,964
Depreciation and amortization 43,626 42 - 43,668
Operating expenses 25,489 9,538 - 35,027
Impairment losses and other charges 1,234 - - 1,234
Impairments – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment 758 - - 758
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (2,785 ) - 3,149 364
Loss on derivative instrument (804 ) - - (804 )
Gain on extinguishment of debt 4,961 - - 4,961
Income tax benefit 1,329 5,926 - 7,255
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations 105,066 (10,594 ) 3,386 97,858
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense 12,914 9,199 - 22,113
Earnings including noncontrolling interests 117,980 (1,395 ) 3,386 119,971
Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations (827 ) 731 - (96 )
Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations - (2,722 ) - (2,722 )
Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN $ 117,153 $ (3,386 ) $ 3,386 $ 117,153
Assets $ 2,650,040 $ 128,916 $ (129,485 ) $ 2,649,471
Additions to long-lived assets:
Real estate $ 352,618 $ 33,745 $ - $ 386,363

80

Table of Contents

Note 24 – Fair Value Measurements :

NNN currently values its Residuals based upon an independent valuation which provides a discounted cash flow analysis based upon prepayment speeds, expected loan losses and yield curves. These valuation inputs are generally considered unobservable; therefore, the Residuals are considered Level 3 financial assets. The table below presents a reconciliation of the Residuals during the year ended December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

Balance at beginning of period $
Total gains (losses) – realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings (3,995 )
Included in other comprehensive income 1,272
Interest income on Residuals 3,460
Cash received from Residuals (4,975 )
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net -
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 -
Balance at end of period $ 15,915
Changes in gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to a change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still
held at the end of period $ (133 )

Note 25 – Major Tenants :

As of December 31, 2010, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental and earned income.

Note 26 – Commitments and Contingencies :

As of December 31, 2010, NNN had letters of credit totaling $647,000 outstanding under its Credit Facility.

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various other legal actions which management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Note 27 – Subsequent Events :

NNN reviewed all subsequent events and transactions that have occurred after December 31, 2010, the date of the consolidated balance sheet. There were no subsequent events or transactions.

81

Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Process for Assessment and Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financing Reporting.

NNN carried out an assessment as of December 31, 2010, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) require NNN to present the conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer about the effectiveness of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the conclusions of NNN’s management about the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

CEO and CFO Certifications. Included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forms of “Certification” of NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The forms of Certification are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K that stockholders are currently reading is the information concerning the assessment referred to in the Section 302 certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in NNN’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to NNN’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and affected by NNN’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and procedures that:

• pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of NNN’s assets;

• provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that NNN’s receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of management or the Board of Directors; and

• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NNN’s assets that could have a material adverse effect on NNN’s financial statements.

82

Table of Contents

Scope of the Assessments. The assessment by NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the assessment by NNN’s management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting included a review of procedures and discussions with NNN’s management and others at NNN. In the course of the assessments, NNN sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken.

NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is also assessed on an ongoing basis by personnel in NNN’s Accounting department and by NNN’s internal auditors in connection with their internal audit activities. The overall goals of these various assessment activities are to monitor NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting and to make modifications as necessary. NNN’s intent in this regard is that the disclosure controls and procedures and the internal control over financial reporting will be maintained and updated (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant. Management also sought to deal with other control matters in the assessment, and in each case if a problem was identified, management considered what revision, improvement and/or correction was necessary to be made in accordance with NNN’s on-going procedures. The assessments of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is done on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning effectiveness of those controls can be reported in NNN’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Assessment of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for NNN. Management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework to assess the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Ernst & Young LLP, NNN’s independent registered public accounting firm, audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued an attestation report on NNN’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, there were no changes in NNN’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NNN’s internal control for financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures or NNN’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of

83

Table of Contents

controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within NNN have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

84

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Nominees,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Executive Officers,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Code of Business Conduct” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information,” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and the information in such section is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal II: Proposal to Ratify Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

85

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report.

(1) FinancialStatements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 44
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 46
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 47
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 49
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 52
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 54
(2) FinancialStatement Schedules
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and Notes as of December 31, 2010
Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Notes as of December 31, 2010

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.

  1. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1 First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2 Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

86

Table of Contents

3.3 Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; second amendment filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

  1. Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.1 Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

4.2 Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.3 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4 Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.6 Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.7 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

87

Table of Contents

4.8 Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.9 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.10 Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.11 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.12 Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.13 Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.14 Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.15 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.16 Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

88

Table of Contents

4.17 Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.18 Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

  1. Material Contracts

10.1 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.6 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.7 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

89

Table of Contents

10.8 Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.9 Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.10 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed herewith).

10.11 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed herewith).

10.12 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed herewith).

10.13 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed herewith).

10.14 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed herewith).

  1. Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

  2. Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

  3. Consent of Independent Accountants

23.1 Ernst & Young LLP dated February 24, 2011 (filed herewith).

  1. Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

  2. Section 302 Certifications

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

90

Table of Contents

  1. Section 906 Certifications

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

  1. Additional Exhibits

99.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

  1. Interactive Data File

101.1 The following materials from National Retail Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) condensed consolidated balance sheets, (ii) condensed consolidated statements of earnings, (iii) condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).

91

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 24 th day of February, 2011.

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
By: /s/ Craig Macnab
Craig Macnab
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

92

Table of Contents

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints each of Craig Macnab and Kevin B. Habicht as his attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report and to file same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, granting unto such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signature Title Date
/s/ Craig Macnab Craig
Macnab Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) February 24, 2011
/s/ Ted B. Lanier Ted
B. Lanier Lead Director February 24, 2011
/s/ Don DeFosset Don DeFosset Director February 24, 2011
/s/ David M. Fick David
M. Fick Director February 24, 2011
/s/ Dennis E. Gershenson Dennis E. Gershenson Director February 24, 2011
/s/ Richard B. Jennings Richard B. Jennings Director February 24, 2011
/s/ Robert C. Legler Robert C. Legler Director February 24, 2011
/s/ Robert Martinez Robert Martinez Director February 24, 2011
/s/ Kevin B. Habicht Kevin B. Habicht Director, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), Executive Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer February 24, 2011

93

Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

  1. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1 First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2 Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.3 Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; second amendment filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

  1. Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

4.1 Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

4.2 Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.3 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.4 Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.5 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the

94

Table of Contents

Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.6 Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.7 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.8 Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.9 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.10 Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.11 Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.12 Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.13 Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.14 Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed

95

Table of Contents

with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.15 Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.16 Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.17 Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.18 Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

  1. Material Contracts

10.1 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

96

Table of Contents

10.6 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.7 Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.8 Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.9 Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.10 Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed herewith).

10.11 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed herewith).

10.12 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed herewith).

10.13 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed herewith).

10.14 Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed herewith).

  1. Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

  2. Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

  3. Consent of Independent Accountants

23.1 Ernst & Young LLP dated February 24, 2011 (filed herewith).

  1. Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

  2. Section 302 Certifications

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

97

Table of Contents

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

  1. Section 906 Certifications

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

  1. Additional Exhibits

99.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

  1. Interactive Data File

101.1 The following materials from National Retail Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) condensed consolidated balance sheets, (ii) condensed consolidated statements of earnings, (iii) condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).

98

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2010

(Dollars in thousands)

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
7-Eleven:
Land O’ Lakes, FL — 1,077 817 — — 1,077 817 1,894 244 1999 10/98 (g) 40 years
Tampa, FL — 1,081 917 — — 1,070 917 1,987 270 1999 12/98 (g) 40 years
A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.:
Dover, NJ — 1,138 3,238 — — 1,138 3,238 4,376 982 1995 11/98 40 years
Academy:
Beaumont, TX — 1,424 2,449 — — 1,424 2,449 3,873 722 1992 03/99 40 years
Houston, TX — 2,311 1,628 — — 2,311 1,628 3,939 480 1976 03/99 40 years
Pasadena, TX — 900 2,181 — — 900 2,181 3,081 643 1994 03/99 40 years
Franklin, TN — 1,807 2,108 — — 1,807 2,108 3,915 389 1999 06/05 30 years
Ace Hardware and Lighting:
Bourbonnais, IL — 298 1,329 — — 298 1,329 1,627 335 1997 11/98 37 years
Advance Auto Parts:
Miami, FL — 867 — 1,035 — 867 1,035 1,902 143 2005 12/04 (g) 40 years
All Star Sports:
Wichita, KS — 3,275 1,631 — — 3,275 1,631 4,906 148 1988 05/07 40 years
Wichita, KS — 1,551 965 — — 1,551 965 2,516 87 1987 05/07 40 years
Amazing Jake’s:
Plano, TX — 5,705 17,049 — — 5,705 17,049 22,754 1,198 1982 07/08 35 years
AMC Theatre:
Bloomington, IN — 2,338 4,000 — — 2,338 4,000 6,338 527 1987 09/07 25 years
Brighton, CO — 1,070 5,491 — — 1,070 5,491 6,561 452 2005 09/07 40 years
Castle Rock, CO — 2,905 5,002 — — 2,905 5,002 7,907 412 2005 09/07 40 years
Evansville, IN — 1,300 4,269 — — 1,300 4,269 5,569 401 1999 09/07 35 years
Galesburg, IL — 1,205 2,441 — — 1,205 2,441 3,646 201 2003 09/07 40 years
Machesney Park, IL — 3,018 8,770 — — 3,018 8,770 11,788 722 2005 09/07 40 years
Michigan City, IN — 1,996 8,422 — — 1,996 8,422 10,418 693 2005 09/07 40 years
Muncie, IN — 1,243 5,512 — — 1,243 5,512 6,755 454 2005 09/07 40 years
Naperville, IL — 6,141 11,624 — — 6,141 11,624 17,765 957 2006 09/07 40 years
New Lenox, IL — 6,778 10,980 — — 6,778 10,980 17,758 904 2004 09/07 40 years
Chicago, IL — 7,257 10,955 — — 7,257 10,955 18,212 810 2007 01/08 40 years
Johnson Creek, WI — 1,433 3,932 — — 1,433 3,932 5,365 332 1997 01/08 35 years
Lake Delton, WI — 2,063 8,366 — — 2,063 8,366 10,429 707 1999 01/08 35 years
Quincy, IL — 1,297 2,850 — — 1,297 2,850 4,147 241 1982 01/08 35 years
Schererville, IN — 6,619 14,225 — — 6,619 14,225 20,844 1,403 1996 01/08 30 years
American Payday Loans:
Des Moines, IA — 108 379 — — 108 379 487 53 1979 06/05 40 years
AmerUs Group Warehouse:
Des Moines, IA — 28 85 — — 28 85 113 47 1949 06/05 10 years
Amoco:
Miami, FL — 969 — — — 969 (i ) 969 (i ) (i ) 05/03 (i )
Sunrise, FL — 949 — — — 949 (i ) 949 (i ) (i ) 06/03 (i )
Amscot:
Tampa, FL — 1,160 352 — — 1,160 352 1,512 46 1981 10/05 40 years
Orlando, FL — 764 — 866 — 764 866 1,630 100 2006 12/05 40 years
Orlando, FL — 664 1,011 — — 664 1,011 1,675 106 2006 12/05 40 years
Orlando, FL — 358 — 922 — 358 922 1,280 103 2006 02/06 (g) 40 years
Orlando, FL — 546 — 938 — 546 938 1,484 103 2006 02/06 (g) 40 years
Clearwater, FL — 456 332 — — 456 332 788 36 1967 09/06 (g) 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 1

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Anna’s Linens:
Harlingen, TX — 317 756 — — 317 756 1,073 212 1999 11/98 (f) 40 years
Applebee’s:
Ballwin, MO — 1,496 1,404 — — 1,496 1,404 2,900 317 1995 12/01 40 years
Cincinnati, OH — 312 898 — — 312 898 1,210 11 2002 08/10 30 years
Crestview Hills, KY — 1,069 1,367 — — 1,069 1,367 2,436 21 1993 08/10 25 years
Danville, KY — 641 1,645 — — 641 1,645 2,286 21 2003 08/10 30 years
Florence, KY — 1,075 1,488 — — 1,075 1,488 2,563 22 1988 08/10 25 years
Frankfort, KY — 862 1,610 — — 862 1,610 2,472 20 1993 08/10 30 years
Georgetown, KY — 809 1,437 — — 809 1,437 2,246 18 2001 08/10 30 years
Hilliard, OH — 808 1,846 — — 808 1,846 2,654 23 1998 08/10 30 years
Mason, OH — 545 941 — — 545 941 1,486 12 1997 08/10 30 years
Maysville, KY — 513 1,387 — — 513 1,387 1,900 15 2005 08/10 35 years
Nicholasville, KY — 454 1,077 — — 454 1,077 1,531 13 2000 08/10 30 years
Troy, OH — 645 862 — — 645 862 1,507 13 1996 08/10 25 years
Grove City, OH — 511 1,415 — — 511 1,415 1,926 10 1990 10/10 30 years
Kettering, OH — 359 1,043 — — 359 1,043 1,402 6 2005 10/10 35 years
Mesa, AZ — 748 1,734 — — 748 1,734 2,482 12 1998 10/10 30 years
Mesa, AZ — 974 1,514 — — 974 1,514 2,488 11 1992 10/10 30 years
Mt. Sterling, KY — 510 1,392 — — 510 1,392 1,902 8 2000 10/10 35 years
Phoenix, AZ — 458 1,099 — — 458 1,099 1,557 7 2004 10/10 35 years
Phoenix, AZ — 781 1,456 — — 781 1,456 2,237 10 1995 10/10 30 years
Arby’s:
Colorado Springs, CO — 206 534 — — 206 534 740 121 1998 12/01 40 years
Thomson, GA — 268 504 — — 268 504 772 114 1997 12/01 40 years
Washington Courthouse, OH — 157 546 — — 157 546 703 123 1998 12/01 40 years
Whitmore Lake, MI — 171 469 — — 171 469 640 106 1993 12/01 40 years
Arizona Oil:
Casa Grande, AZ — 2,340 1,894 — — 2,340 1,894 4,234 142 1993 05/08 35 years
Gilbert, AZ — 1,317 1,304 — — 1,317 1,304 2,621 98 1996 05/08 35 years
Glendale, AZ — 1,817 2,415 — — 1,817 2,415 4,232 158 2001 05/08 40 years
Mesa, AZ — 2,219 2,140 — — 2,219 2,140 4,359 140 2000 05/08 40 years
Mesa, AZ — 1,332 1,367 — — 1,332 1,367 2,699 120 1986 05/08 30 years
Miami, AZ — 762 2,148 — — 762 2,148 2,910 161 1998 05/08 35 years
Peoria, AZ — 860 1,117 — — 860 1,117 1,977 98 1987 05/08 30 years
Prescott, AZ — 1,266 1,261 — — 1,266 1,261 2,527 95 1997 05/08 35 years
Scottsdale, AZ — 1,529 1,373 — — 1,529 1,373 2,902 103 1999 05/08 35 years
Sedona, AZ — 1,281 1,324 — — 1,281 1,324 2,605 87 2000 05/08 40 years
Tucson, AZ — 1,105 1,336 — — 1,105 1,336 2,441 100 1992 05/08 35 years
Tucson, AZ — 1,457 1,619 — — 1,457 1,619 3,076 121 1995 05/08 35 years
Tucson, AZ — 1,223 1,911 — — 1,223 1,911 3,134 143 1996 05/08 35 years
Tucson, AZ — 1,083 1,599 — — 1,083 1,599 2,682 120 1992 05/08 35 years
Ashley Furniture:
Altamonte Springs, FL — 2,906 4,877 315 — 2,906 5,192 8,098 1,695 1997 09/97 40 years
Louisville, KY — 1,667 4,989 — — 1,667 4,989 6,656 722 2005 03/05 40 years
AT&T:
Cincinnati, OH — 297 443 331 — 297 774 1,071 133 1999 06/98 (f) 40 years
Babies “R” Us:
Arlington, TX — 831 2,612 — — 831 2,612 3,443 947 1996 06/96 40 years
Independence, MO — 1,679 2,302 115 — 1,679 2,417 4,096 532 1996 12/01 40 years
Barnes & Noble:
Brandon, FL — 1,476 1,527 — — 1,476 1,527 3,003 610 1995 08/94 (f) 40 years
Glendale, CO — 3,245 2,722 — — 3,245 2,722 5,967 1,106 1994 09/94 40 years
Houston, TX — 3,308 2,396 — — 3,308 2,396 5,704 913 1995 10/94 (f) 40 years
Plantation, FL 4,596 (p) 3,616 — — — 3,616 (c ) 3,616 (c ) 1996 05/95 (f) (c )
Freehold, NJ (n) — 2,917 2,261 — — 2,917 2,261 5,178 843 1995 01/96 40 years
Dayton, OH — 1,413 3,325 — — 1,413 3,325 4,738 1,110 1996 05/97 40 years
Redding, CA — 497 1,626 — — 497 1,626 2,123 550 1997 06/97 40 years
Memphis, TN — 1,574 2,242 — — 1,574 2,242 3,816 388 1997 09/97 40 years
Marlton, NJ — 2,831 4,319 — — 2,709 4,319 7,028 1,309 1995 11/98 40 years
Bealls:
Sarasota, FL — 1,078 1,795 — — 1,078 1,795 2,873 325 1996 09/97 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 2

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Beautiful America Dry Cleaners:
Orlando, FL 47 (o) 40 111 — — 40 111 151 19 2001 02/04 40 years
Bed Bath & Beyond:
Richmond, VA 2,634 (p) 1,184 2,843 179 — 1,184 3,021 4,205 613 1997 06/98 40 years
Glendale, AZ — 1,082 — 2,758 — 1,082 2,758 3,840 790 1999 12/98 (g) 40 years
Midland, MI — 231 — 2,702 — 231 2,702 2,933 279 2006 07/03 40 years
Best Buy:
Brandon, FL — 2,985 2,772 — — 2,985 2,772 5,757 962 1996 02/97 40 years
Cuyahoga Falls, OH — 3,709 2,359 — — 3,709 2,359 6,068 799 1970 06/97 40 years
Rockville, MD — 6,233 3,419 — — 6,233 3,419 9,652 1,150 1995 07/97 40 years
Fairfax, VA — 3,052 3,218 — — 3,052 3,218 6,270 1,076 1995 08/97 40 years
St. Petersburg, FL 4,204 (p) 4,032 2,611 — — 4,032 2,611 6,643 640 1997 09/97 35 years
Pittsburg, PA — 2,331 2,293 — — 2,331 2,293 4,624 719 1997 06/98 40 years
Denver, CO — 8,882 4,373 — — 8,882 4,373 13,255 1,043 1991 06/01 40 years
Best Smoke & Gas:
Abbottstown, PA — 55 200 — — 55 200 255 25 2000 01/06 40 years
Billy Bob’s:
Gresham, OR — 817 108 — — 817 108 925 24 1993 12/01 40 years
BJ’s Wholesale Club:
Orlando, FL 3,762 (o) 3,271 8,627 367 — 3,271 8,993 12,264 1,539 2001 02/04 40 years
Black Fox Beauty Supply:
Corpus Christi, TX — 116 137 195 — 125 332 457 69 1967 11/93 40 years
Blockbuster Video:
Conyers, GA — 320 556 — — 320 556 876 188 1997 06/97 40 years
Alice, TX — 318 578 — — 318 578 896 131 1995 12/01 40 years
Gainesville, GA — 295 612 — — 295 612 907 138 1997 12/01 40 years
Glasgow, KY — 303 561 — — 303 561 864 127 1997 12/01 40 years
Kingsville, TX — 499 458 30 — 499 487 986 106 1995 12/01 40 years
Mobile, AL — 491 498 — — 491 498 989 113 1997 12/01 40 years
Mobile, AL — 843 562 — — 843 562 1,405 127 1997 12/01 40 years
BMW:
Duluth, GA — 4,434 4,080 6,559 — 4,504 10,639 15,143 1,435 1984 12/01 40 years
Borders:
Wilmington, DE — 3,031 6,062 — — 2,994 6,062 9,056 2,429 1994 12/94 40 years
Richmond, VA — 2,177 2,600 — — 2,177 2,600 4,777 1,011 1995 06/95 40 years
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 4,428 (p) 3,165 3,319 — — 3,165 3,319 6,484 863 1995 02/96 33 years
Bangor, ME — 1,547 2,487 — — 1,547 2,487 4,034 903 1996 06/96 40 years
Altamonte Springs, FL — 1,947 — — — 1,947 (c ) 1,947 (c ) 1997 09/97 (c )
Borough of Abbottstown:
Abbottstown, PA — 55 200 — — 55 200 255 25 2000 01/06 40 years
Boston Market:
Burton, MI — 620 707 — — 620 707 1,327 160 1997 12/01 40 years
Geneva, IL — 1,125 1,037 — — 1,125 893 2,018 204 1996 12/01 40 years
N. Olmsted, OH — 602 461 — — 602 389 991 89 1996 12/01 40 years
Novi, MI — 836 651 — — 836 298 1,134 72 1995 12/01 40 years
Orland Park, IL — 562 556 — — 562 377 939 88 1995 12/01 40 years
Warren, OH — 562 468 — — 562 468 1,030 106 1997 12/01 40 years
Buccaneer Car Wash:
Tampa, FL — 541 829 — — 541 829 1,370 23 1978 04/10 25 years
Buck’s:
St. Louis, MO — 776 — 3,822 — 776 3,822 4,598 163 2009 12/07 (m) 40 years
Buffalo Wild Wings:
Michigan City, IN — 163 492 — — 163 492 655 111 1996 12/01 40 years
Bugaboo Creek:
Rochester, NY — 792 1,535 — — 792 1,535 2,327 136 1995 06/07 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 3

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Burger King:
Colonial Heights, VA — 662 610 — — 662 610 1,272 138 1997 12/01 40 years
Camping World:
Vacaville, CA — 2,467 6,575 — — 2,467 6,575 9,042 86 2008 07/10 35 years
North Little Rock, AR — 1,198 3,348 — — 1,198 3,348 4,546 28 2007 09/10 35 years
Strafford, MO — 1,278 3,694 — — 1,278 3,694 4,972 31 2007 09/10 35 years
Carl’s Jr.:
Spokane, WA — 471 530 — — 471 530 1,001 120 1996 12/01 40 years
Chandler, AZ — 729 644 — — 729 644 1,373 178 1984 06/05 20 years
Tucson, AZ — 681 536 103 — 681 639 1,320 344 1988 06/05 10 years
CarQuest:
Abbeville, LA — 23 148 — — 23 148 171 — 1970 12/10 20 years
Abbotsford, WI — 56 163 — — 56 163 219 — 1984 12/10 25 years
Aberdeen, SD (n) — 71 329 — — 71 329 400 1 1961 12/10 20 years
Addison, IL — 76 314 — — 76 314 390 1 1971 12/10 25 years
Alsip, IL — 57 323 — — 57 323 380 1 1972 12/10 20 years
Anaconda, MT — 35 307 — — 35 307 342 1 1965 12/10 20 years
Ann Arbor, MI — 25 241 — — 25 241 266 1 1970 12/10 20 years
Antigo, WI — 96 294 — — 96 294 390 — 1998 12/10 30 years
Appleton, WI (n) — 85 438 — — 85 438 523 1 1995 12/10 30 years
Arden, NC — 42 281 — — 42 281 323 — 1989 12/10 25 years
Baker, MT — 12 140 — — 12 140 152 — 1965 12/10 20 years
Bakersfield, CA — 77 484 — — 77 484 561 1 1945 12/10 20 years
Bangor, ME — 51 339 — — 51 339 390 1 1985 12/10 25 years
Bangor, ME (n) — 53 356 — — 53 356 409 1 1945 12/10 15 years
Bartlett, TN — 40 293 — — 40 293 333 — 1989 12/10 25 years
Bay City, MI — 14 100 — — 14 100 114 — 1942 12/10 15 years
Bay City, MI — 41 282 — — 41 282 323 — 1989 12/10 25 years
Bay City, MI — 106 521 — — 106 521 627 1 1920 12/10 15 years
Bellevue, NE — 29 142 — — 29 142 171 — 1965 12/10 20 years
Bend, OR — 125 245 — — 125 245 370 1 1935 12/10 15 years
Biddeford, ME — 60 320 — — 60 320 380 1 1968 12/10 20 years
Billings, MT — 31 188 — — 31 188 219 — 1970 12/10 25 years
Bismarck, ND — 25 136 — — 25 136 161 — 1985 12/10 25 years
Bozeman, MT — 28 257 — — 28 257 285 1 1964 12/10 20 years
Brunswick, ME — 41 254 — — 41 254 295 — 1985 12/10 25 years
Bucksport, ME — 19 114 — — 19 114 133 — 1976 12/10 20 years
Burlington, NC — 47 229 — — 47 229 276 — 1994 12/10 30 years
Carol Stream, IL — 103 515 — — 103 515 618 1 1960 12/10 20 years
Chicago, IL — 83 383 — — 83 383 466 1 1987 12/10 25 years
Chippewa Falls, WI — 33 328 — — 33 328 361 — 1996 12/10 30 years
Cody, WY (n) — 146 253 — — 146 253 399 — 1999 12/10 30 years
Colstrip, MT — 39 275 — — 39 275 314 — 1981 12/10 25 years
Connersville, IN — 28 171 — — 28 171 199 — 1920 12/10 15 years
Corapolis, PA (n) — 74 316 — — 74 316 390 1 1980 12/10 20 years
Cut Bank, MT — 9 115 — — 9 115 124 — 1937 12/10 20 years
Devils Lake, ND — 38 276 — — 38 276 314 — 1999 12/10 30 years
Dillon, MT — 24 204 — — 24 204 228 — 1973 12/10 20 years
Dodge City, KS (n) — 43 166 — — 43 166 209 — 1948 12/10 15 years
Eau Claire, WI — 33 204 — — 33 204 237 — 1956 12/10 20 years
Elgin, IL — 88 311 — — 88 311 399 1 1965 12/10 20 years
Enterprise, AL — 25 184 — — 25 184 209 — 1988 12/10 25 years
Escanaba, MI — 40 283 — — 40 283 323 — 1982 12/10 25 years
Evansville, IN — 60 301 — — 60 301 361 1 1980 12/10 25 years
Fairbanks, AK — 292 545 — — 292 545 837 1 2003 12/10 35 years
Gainesville, FL (n) — 47 362 — — 47 362 409 1 1957 12/10 15 years
Glasgow, MT — 48 275 — — 48 275 323 1 1972 12/10 20 years
Great Falls, MT — 17 173 — — 17 173 190 — 1967 12/10 20 years
Greenville, OH — 63 193 — — 63 193 256 1 1910 12/10 15 years
Hamilton, MT — 24 242 — — 24 242 266 — 1991 12/10 25 years
Harlem, MT — 17 116 — — 17 116 133 — 1983 12/10 25 years
Havre, MT — 22 311 — — 22 311 333 1 1964 12/10 20 years
Hayward, WI — 57 333 — — 57 333 390 1 1980 12/10 25 years
Helena, MT — 31 282 — — 31 282 313 — 1987 12/10 25 years
Houlton, ME — 38 219 — — 38 219 257 1 1915 12/10 10 years
Irving, TX — 182 208 — — 182 208 390 — 1984 12/10 20 years
Kalispell, MT (n) — 59 645 — — 59 645 704 1 1998 12/10 30 years
Kennedale, TX — 88 283 — — 88 283 371 1 1959 12/10 20 years
Lafayette, LA — 51 357 — — 51 357 408 — 1996 12/10 30 years
Laurel, MS — 74 202 — — 74 202 276 1 1959 12/10 15 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 4

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Lewistown, MT — 19 180 — — 19 180 199 — 1964 12/10 25 years
Libby, MT — 33 262 — — 33 262 295 1 1965 12/10 20 years
Livingston, MT — 34 261 — — 34 261 295 1 1976 12/10 20 years
Lufkin, TX (n) — 94 229 — — 94 229 323 — 1986 12/10 20 years
Madison, TN — 78 179 — — 78 179 257 — 1988 12/10 25 years
Madison, WI — 57 409 — — 57 409 466 1 1973 12/10 25 years
Malta, MT — 19 181 — — 19 181 200 — 1976 12/10 25 years
Marshfield, WI — 60 282 — — 60 282 342 1 1940 12/10 20 years
Medford, WI — 37 229 — — 37 229 266 — 1988 12/10 25 years
Memphis, TN — 38 199 — — 38 199 237 — 1987 12/10 25 years
Metamora, IL — 69 292 — — 69 292 361 — 1996 12/10 30 years
Midland, MI — 44 336 — — 44 336 380 — 1986 12/10 30 years
Midland, TX — 36 212 — — 36 212 248 1 1960 12/10 15 years
Montello, WI — 26 173 — — 26 173 199 — 1997 12/10 30 years
Muskegon, MI — 38 257 — — 38 257 295 — 1990 12/10 30 years
Neillsville, WI — 26 145 — — 26 145 171 — 1979 12/10 25 years
Nicholasville, KY — 54 241 — — 54 241 295 — 1988 12/10 25 years
Ocala, FL — 78 416 — — 78 416 494 1 1971 12/10 15 years
Olathe, KS — 78 235 — — 78 235 313 1 1950 12/10 15 years
Oshkosh, WI — 99 224 — — 99 224 323 — 1999 12/10 30 years
Overland, MO — 68 370 — — 68 370 438 1 1961 12/10 20 years
Owosso, MI — 50 264 — — 50 264 314 — 1986 12/10 25 years
Pearl, MS — 43 195 — — 43 195 238 — 1989 12/10 30 years
Phillips, WI — 23 177 — — 23 177 200 — 1992 12/10 30 years
Powell, WY — 37 182 — — 37 182 219 — 1978 12/10 25 years
Rhinelander, WI — 28 115 — — 28 115 143 — 1958 12/10 20 years
River Falls, WI — 42 234 — — 42 234 276 — 1976 12/10 20 years
Riverton, WY — 99 300 — — 99 300 399 1 1978 12/10 25 years
Rockford, IL — 61 376 — — 61 376 437 1 1962 12/10 25 years
Roundup, MT — 23 205 — — 23 205 228 — 1972 12/10 20 years
Schofield, WI — 41 425 — — 41 425 466 1 1968 12/10 20 years
Sheboygan, WI — 77 370 — — 77 370 447 — 2007 12/10 35 years
Shelby, MT — 20 208 — — 20 208 228 — 1976 12/10 20 years
Shelbyville, KY — 52 224 — — 52 224 276 — 1982 12/10 25 years
Sidney, MT (n) — 42 395 — — 42 395 437 1 1962 12/10 20 years
Spartanburg, SC — 53 252 — — 53 252 305 — 1972 12/10 25 years
Spokane, WA — 66 201 — — 66 201 267 — 1965 12/10 20 years
Spokane, WA — 93 373 — — 93 373 466 1 1972 12/10 20 years
St. Peter, MN — 17 259 — — 17 259 276 — 1999 12/10 30 years
Stayton, OR — 88 312 — — 88 312 400 — 1994 12/10 30 years
Stevens Point, WI (n) — 61 405 — — 61 405 466 1 1975 12/10 25 years
Sulphur, LA — 31 216 — — 31 216 247 — 1984 12/10 20 years
Thornton, CO — 414 536 — — 414 536 950 1 1996 12/10 30 years
Troy, AL — 15 52 — — 15 52 67 — 1966 12/10 15 years
Wasilla, AK — 227 504 — — 227 504 731 1 2002 12/10 35 years
Wausau, WI — 52 300 — — 52 300 352 — 1989 12/10 25 years
Wautoma, WI — 18 106 — — 18 106 124 — 1959 12/10 20 years
Waynesboro, MS — 15 71 — — 15 71 86 — 1962 12/10 15 years
West Columbia, SC — 41 159 — — 41 159 200 — 1962 12/10 20 years
West Memphis, AR — 58 294 — — 58 294 352 — 1987 12/10 25 years
Whitefish, MT — 30 227 — — 30 227 257 — 1993 12/10 30 years
Williston, ND — 35 297 — — 35 297 332 — 1999 12/10 30 years
Windom, MN — 5 137 — — 5 137 142 — 1950 12/10 20 years
Wisconsin Rapids, WI — 41 215 — — 41 215 256 — 1975 12/10 20 years
Yakima, WA — 50 321 — — 50 321 371 1 1965 12/10 20 years
Carvers:
Centerville, OH — 851 1,059 — — 851 1,059 1,910 239 1986 12/01 40 years
Certified Auto Sales:
Albuquerque, NM — 1,113 — 1,419 — 1,113 1,419 2,532 194 2005 04/04 (f) 40 years
Champps:
Alpharetta, GA — 3,033 1,642 — — 3,033 1,642 4,675 371 1999 12/01 40 years
Irving, TX — 1,760 1,724 — — 1,760 1,724 3,484 390 2000 12/01 40 years
Char-Hut:
Sunrise, FL — 287 424 — — 287 424 711 70 1979 05/04 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 5

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Checkers:
Orlando, FL — 257 — — — 257 (c ) 257 (c ) 1988 07/92 (c )
Cheddar’s Cafe:
Baytown, TX — 858 2,251 — — 858 2,251 3,109 2 2010 12/10 40 years
Chili’s:
Camden, SC — 627 1,888 — — 627 1,888 2,515 250 2005 09/05 40 years
Milledgeville, GA — 516 1,997 — — 516 1,997 2,513 264 2005 09/05 40 years
Sumter, SC — 800 1,717 — — 800 1,717 2,517 216 2004 12/05 40 years
Hinesville, GA — 921 1,898 — — 921 1,898 2,819 184 2006 02/07 40 years
Albany, GA — 615 — 1,984 — 615 1,984 2,599 159 2007 06/07 (m) 40 years
Statesboro, GA — 703 — 1,888 — 703 1,888 2,591 147 2007 06/07 (m) 40 years
Florence, SC — 889 1,715 — — 889 1,715 2,604 152 2007 06/07 40 years
Valdosta, GA — 716 — 1,871 — 716 1,871 2,587 142 2007 07/07 (m) 40 years
Tifton, GA — 454 1,550 — — 454 1,550 2,004 86 2008 06/08 (m) 40 years
Evans, GA — 700 — 1,511 — 700 1,511 2,211 71 2009 10/08 (m) 40 years
Jefferson City, MO — 305 898 — — 305 898 1,203 27 2003 12/09 35 years
Merriam, KS — 853 981 — — 853 981 1,834 34 1998 12/09 30 years
Wichita, KS — 420 623 — — 420 623 1,043 22 1995 12/09 30 years
China 1:
Cohoes, NY — 16 87 6 — 16 93 109 14 1994 09/04 40 years
China Wok:
Carlisle, PA — 90 107 — — 90 107 197 13 1988 01/06 40 years
Cinemark:
Draper, UT — 1,523 — — — 1,523 (e ) 1,523 (e ) (e ) 08/10 (m) (e )
Claim Jumper:
Roseville, CA — 1,557 2,014 — — 1,557 2,014 3,571 455 2000 12/01 40 years
Tempe, AZ — 2,531 2,921 — — 2,531 2,921 5,452 660 2000 12/01 40 years
Continental Rental:
Lapeer, MI — 88 633 — — 88 633 721 53 2007 10/05 40 years
Cool Crest:
Independence, MO — 1,838 1,534 — — 1,838 1,534 3,372 139 1988 05/07 40 years
CORA Rehabilitation Clinics:
Orlando, FL 93 (o) 80 221 — — 80 221 301 38 2001 02/04 40 years
CVS:
San Antonio, TX — 441 — — — 441 (c ) 441 (c ) 1993 12/93 (c )
Lafayette, LA — 968 — — — 968 (c ) 968 (c ) 1995 01/96 (c )
Midwest City, OK — 673 1,103 — — 673 1,103 1,776 409 1996 03/96 40 years
Pantego, TX — 1,016 1,449 — — 1,016 1,449 2,465 491 1997 06/97 40 years
Flower Mound, TX — 932 881 — — 831 881 1,712 152 1996 09/97 40 years
Arlington, TX — 2,079 — 1,397 — 2,079 1,397 3,476 432 1998 11/97 (g) 40 years
Leavenworth, KS — 726 — 1,331 — 726 1,331 2,057 417 1998 11/97 (g) 40 years
Lewisville, TX — 789 — 1,335 — 789 1,335 2,124 410 1998 04/98 (g) 40 years
Forest Hill, TX — 692 — 1,175 — 692 1,175 1,867 363 1998 04/98 (g) 40 years
Garland, TX — 1,477 — 1,400 — 1,477 1,400 2,877 424 1998 06/98 (g) 40 years
Oklahoma City, OK — 1,581 — 1,471 — 1,581 1,471 3,052 440 1999 08/98 (g) 40 years
Dallas, TX — 2,618 — 2,571 — 2,618 2,571 5,189 463 2003 06/99 40 years
Gladstone, MO — 1,851 — 1,740 — 1,851 1,740 3,591 451 2000 12/99 (g) 40 years
Dave & Buster’s:
Hilliard, OH — 934 4,689 — — 934 4,689 5,623 484 1998 11/06 40 years
Tulsa, OK — 1,862 — 2,105 — 1,862 2,105 3,967 103 2009 04/08 (m) 40 years
Wauwatosa, WI — 5,694 — 5,638 — 5,694 5,638 11,332 112 2010 12/08 (m) 40 years
Orlando, FL — 8,114 — — — 8,114 (e ) 8,114 (e ) (e ) 06/10 (m) (e )
Denny’s:
Columbus, TX (n) — 428 817 — — 428 817 1,245 185 1997 12/01 40 years
Alexandria, VA — 604 196 — — 604 196 800 42 1981 09/06 20 years
Amarillo, TX — 590 632 — — 590 632 1,222 136 1982 09/06 20 years
Arlington Heights, IL — 470 228 — — 470 228 698 49 1977 09/06 20 years
Austintown, OH — 466 397 — — 466 397 863 85 1980 09/06 20 years
Boardman Township, OH — 497 258 — — 497 258 755 55 1977 09/06 20 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 6

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Campbell, CA — 460 238 — — 460 238 698 51 1976 09/06 20 years
Carson, CA — 1,246 157 — — 1,246 157 1,403 34 1975 09/06 20 years
Chehalis, WA — 415 287 — — 415 287 702 62 1977 09/06 20 years
Chubbuck, ID — 350 394 — — 344 394 738 85 1983 09/06 20 years
Clackamas, OR — 468 407 — — 468 407 875 87 1993 09/06 20 years
Collinsville, IL — 676 283 — — 676 283 959 61 1979 09/06 20 years
Colorado Springs, CO — 585 390 — — 585 390 975 84 1978 09/06 20 years
Colorado Springs, CO — 321 377 — — 321 377 698 81 1984 09/06 20 years
Corpus Christi, TX — 345 776 300 — 345 1,076 1,421 192 1980 09/06 20 years
Dallas, TX — 497 150 — — 497 150 647 32 1979 09/06 20 years
Enfield, CT — 684 229 — — 684 229 913 49 1976 09/06 20 years
Fairfax, VA — 768 683 — — 768 683 1,451 147 1979 09/06 20 years
Federal Way, WA — 543 193 — — 543 193 736 41 1977 09/06 20 years
Florissant, MO — 443 238 — — 443 238 681 51 1977 09/06 20 years
Ft. Worth, TX — 392 314 — — 392 314 706 67 1974 09/06 20 years
Hermitage, PA — 321 420 — — 321 420 741 90 1980 09/06 20 years
Hialeah, FL — 432 175 — — 432 175 607 38 1978 09/06 20 years
Houston, TX — 504 348 — — 504 348 852 75 1976 09/06 20 years
Indianapolis, IN — 310 590 — — 310 590 900 127 1981 09/06 20 years
Indianapolis, IN — 326 511 — — 326 511 837 110 1978 09/06 20 years
Indianapolis, IN — 358 767 — — 358 767 1,125 165 1978 09/06 20 years
Indianapolis, IN — 231 511 — — 231 511 742 110 1974 09/06 20 years
Kernersville, NC — 407 557 — — 407 557 964 120 2000 09/06 20 years
Lafayette, IN — 424 773 — — 416 773 1,189 166 1978 09/06 20 years
Laurel, MD — 528 379 — — 528 379 907 81 1976 09/06 20 years
Little Rock, AR — 672 77 — — 672 77 749 16 1979 09/06 20 years
Little Rock, AR — 703 180 — — 703 180 883 39 1979 09/06 20 years
Maplewood, MN — 630 271 — — 630 271 901 58 1983 09/06 20 years
Merriville, IN — 368 813 — — 368 813 1,181 174 1976 09/06 20 years
Middleburg Heights, OH — 497 260 — — 497 260 757 56 1976 09/06 20 years
N. Miami, FL — 855 151 — — 855 151 1,006 32 1977 09/06 20 years
Nampa, ID — 357 729 — — 357 729 1,086 156 1979 09/06 20 years
North Richland Hills, TX — 500 130 — — 500 130 630 28 1970 09/06 20 years
Novi, MI — 545 305 — — 545 305 850 66 1979 09/06 20 years
Omaha, NE — 496 314 — — 496 314 810 67 1994 09/06 20 years
Pompano Beach, FL — 436 394 — — 436 394 830 84 1976 09/06 20 years
Portland, OR — 764 161 — — 764 161 925 35 1977 09/06 20 years
Provo, UT — 519 216 — — 519 216 735 46 1978 09/06 20 years
Pueblo, CO — 475 302 — — 475 302 777 65 1980 09/06 20 years
Raleigh, NC — 1,094 482 — — 1,094 482 1,576 103 1984 09/06 20 years
Southfield, MI — 401 330 — — 401 330 731 71 1980 09/06 20 years
St. Louis, MO — 520 266 — — 520 266 786 57 1973 09/06 20 years
Sugarland, TX — 315 334 — — 315 334 649 72 1997 09/06 20 years
Tacoma, WA — 580 201 — — 580 201 781 43 1984 09/06 20 years
Tucson, AZ — 922 290 — — 922 290 1,212 62 1979 09/06 20 years
Wethersfield, CT — 884 176 — — 884 176 1,060 38 1978 09/06 20 years
Worcester, MA — 383 493 — — 383 493 876 106 1978 09/06 20 years
Boise, ID — 514 477 — — 514 477 991 96 1983 12/06 20 years
St. Louis, MO — 635 303 — — 635 303 938 60 1980 01/07 20 years
Virginia Gardens, FL — 793 133 — — 793 133 926 26 1977 01/07 20 years
Dick’s Sporting Goods:
Taylor, MI — 1,920 3,527 — — 1,920 3,527 5,447 1,260 1996 08/96 40 years
White Marsh, MD — 2,681 3,917 — — 2,681 3,917 6,598 1,400 1996 08/96 40 years
Dimitri’s Family Restaurant:
Indianapolis, IN — 223 483 — — 223 483 706 104 1979 09/06 20 years
Dollar General:
Memphis, TN — 266 1,136 46 — 266 1,182 1,448 329 1998 12/97 40 years
High Springs, FL — 432 — — — 432 (e ) 432 (e ) (e ) 07/10 (m) (e )
Inverness, FL — 459 — — — 459 (e ) 459 (e ) (e ) 08/10 (m) (e )
Cocoa, FL — 406 — — — 406 (e ) 406 (e ) (e ) 08/10 (m) (e )
Palm Bay, FL — 355 — — — 355 (e ) 355 (e ) (e ) 08/10 (m) (e )
Deland, FL — 585 — — — 585 (e ) 585 (e ) (e ) 11/10 (m) (e )
Seffner, FL — 659 — — — 659 (e ) 659 (e ) (e ) 12/10 (m) (e )
Dollar Tree:
Garland, TX — 239 626 — — 239 626 865 149 1994 02/94 40 years
Copperas Cove, TX — 242 512 194 — 242 706 948 200 1972 11/98 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 7

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Donato’s:
Medina, OH — 405 464 — — 405 464 869 105 1996 12/01 40 years
Dr. Clean Dry Cleaners:
Monticello, NY — 20 72 — — 20 72 92 10 1996 03/05 40 years
Easyhome:
Cohoes, NY — 64 348 242 — 64 590 654 69 1994 09/04 40 years
Ecotech Institute:
Aurora, CO — 5,076 13,874 6,043 — 5,076 19,917 24,993 1,294 1986 04/07 40 years
El Tapatio Grill:
Hammond, LA — 248 814 62 — 248 627 875 156 1997 12/01 40 years
Enterprise Rent-A-Car:
Wilmington, NC — 218 327 33 — 218 360 578 76 1981 12/01 40 years
Express Oil Change:
Birmingham, AL — 470 695 — — 470 695 1,165 49 2008 02/08 (f) 40 years
Florence, AL — 110 381 — — 110 381 491 37 1987 02/08 30 years
Helena, AL — 363 628 — — 363 628 991 45 1998 02/08 40 years
Muscle Shoals, AL — 168 624 — — 168 624 792 60 1985 02/08 30 years
Opelika, AL — 547 680 — — 547 680 1,227 49 2006 02/08 40 years
Cordova, TN — 639 785 — — 639 785 1,424 40 2000 12/08 40 years
Horn Lake, MS — 326 611 — — 326 611 937 36 1998 12/08 35 years
Lakeland, TN — 186 489 — — 186 489 675 25 2000 12/08 40 years
Memphis, TN — 402 721 — — 402 721 1,123 37 2001 12/08 40 years
Fallas Paredes:
Arlington, TX — 318 1,680 242 — 318 1,923 2,241 623 1996 06/96 38 years
Family Dollar:
Albany, NY (n) — 34 824 — — 34 824 858 130 1992 09/04 40 years
Cohoes, NY — 94 507 33 — 94 540 634 80 1994 09/04 40 years
Hudson Falls, NY — 51 380 — — 51 380 431 60 1993 09/04 40 years
Monticello, NY — 96 352 — — 96 352 448 51 1996 03/05 40 years
Famous Footwear:
Lapeer, MI — 163 835 — — 163 835 998 69 2007 10/05 40 years
Fantastic Sams:
Eden Prairie, MN — 65 181 81 — 65 261 326 56 1997 12/01 40 years
Fazoli’s:
Bay City, MI — 647 634 — — 647 634 1,281 143 1997 12/01 40 years
Ferguson:
Destin, FL — 554 1,012 253 — 554 1,265 1,819 111 2006 03/07 40 years
First Watch Restaurant:
Tulsa, OK — 325 314 34 — 325 382 707 68 1978 09/06 20 years
Flash Markets:
Lebanon, TN — 582 — 2,063 — 582 2,063 2,645 148 2007 03/07 40 years
Food 4 Less:
Chula Vista, CA — 3,569 — — — 3,569 (c ) 3,569 (c ) 1995 11/98 (c )
Food Fast:
Bossier City, LA — 883 658 — — 883 658 1,541 155 1975 06/07 15 years
Brownsboro, TX — 328 385 — — 328 385 713 45 1990 06/07 30 years
Flint, TX — 272 411 — — 272 411 683 58 1985 06/07 25 years
Forney, TX — 545 707 — — 545 707 1,252 83 1989 06/07 30 years
Forney, TX — 473 654 — — 473 654 1,127 77 1990 06/07 30 years
Gun Barrel City, TX — 242 467 — — 242 467 709 66 1988 06/07 25 years
Gun Barrel City, TX — 270 386 — — 270 386 656 55 1986 06/07 25 years
Jacksonville, TX — 660 632 — — 660 632 1,292 149 1976 06/07 15 years
Kemp, TX — 581 505 — — 581 505 1,086 72 1986 06/07 25 years
Longview, TX — 403 572 — — 403 572 975 81 1985 06/07 25 years
Longview, TX — 426 382 — — 426 382 808 54 1984 06/07 25 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 8

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Longview, TX — 360 535 — — 360 535 895 76 1983 06/07 25 years
Longview, TX — 178 236 — — 178 236 414 42 1977 06/07 20 years
Longview, TX — 252 304 — — 252 304 556 43 1983 06/07 25 years
Longview, TX — 271 431 — — 271 431 702 51 1990 06/07 30 years
Mabank, TX — 229 494 — — 229 494 723 70 1986 06/07 25 years
Mt. Vernon, TX — 292 666 — — 292 666 958 94 1990 06/07 25 years
Shreveport, LA — 361 250 — — 361 250 611 59 1969 06/07 15 years
Tyler, TX — 302 455 — — 302 455 757 81 1981 06/07 20 years
Tyler, TX — 316 545 — — 316 545 861 64 1989 06/07 30 years
Tyler, TX — 258 419 — — 258 419 677 74 1978 06/07 20 years
Tyler, TX — 542 403 — — 481 403 884 57 1984 06/07 25 years
Tyler, TX — 323 283 — — 323 283 606 50 1978 06/07 20 years
Tyler, TX — 488 831 — — 488 831 1,319 147 1980 06/07 20 years
Tyler, TX — 256 542 — — 256 542 798 96 1980 06/07 20 years
Tyler, TX — 742 546 — — 742 546 1,288 77 1985 06/07 25 years
Tyler, TX — 188 329 — — 188 329 517 47 1984 06/07 25 years
Fresenius Medical Care:
Houston, TX — 422 1,915 — — 460 1,915 2,375 241 1995 08/06 40 years
Fresh Market:
Gainesville, FL — 317 1,248 656 — 317 1,904 2,221 287 1982 03/99 40 years
Fuel-On:
Bloomsburg, PA — 541 146 — — 541 146 687 39 1967 08/05 20 years
Dallas, PA — 677 1,091 — — 677 1,091 1,768 293 1995 08/05 20 years
Emporium, PA — 380 569 — — 380 569 949 153 1996 08/05 20 years
Hazleton, PA — 2,529 728 — — 2,529 728 3,257 196 2001 08/05 20 years
Johnsonburg, PA — 781 504 — — 781 504 1,285 135 1978 08/05 20 years
Kane, PA — 478 592 — — 356 — 356 — 1984 08/05 20 years
Luzerne, PA — 171 415 — — 171 415 586 112 1989 08/05 20 years
Ridgway, PA — 382 259 — — 382 259 641 70 1975 08/05 20 years
St. Mary’s, PA — 274 261 — — 274 261 535 70 1979 08/05 20 years
White Haven, PA — 486 867 — — 486 867 1,353 233 1990 08/05 20 years
Yeagertown, PA — 142 180 — — 142 180 322 48 1977 08/05 20 years
Carlisle, PA — 170 202 — — 170 202 372 25 1988 01/06 40 years
Clairton, PA — 215 701 — — 215 701 916 139 1986 01/06 25 years
Danville, PA — 180 359 — — 180 359 539 45 1988 01/06 40 years
Houtzdale, PA — 541 500 — — 356 — 356 — 1977 01/06 15 years
Minersville, PA — 680 582 — — 680 582 1,262 72 1974 01/06 40 years
Pittsburgh, PA — 905 1,346 — — 905 1,346 2,251 167 1967 01/06 40 years
Summerville, PA — 93 272 — — 93 272 365 34 1988 01/06 40 years
Zelienople, PA — 160 437 — — 160 437 597 54 1988 01/06 40 years
Furr’s Family Dining:
Las Cruces, NM — 947 — 2,182 — 947 2,182 3,129 234 2006 01/06 (m) 40 years
Tucson, AZ — 1,116 — — — 1,116 (e ) 1,116 (e ) (e ) 07/06 (e )
Moore, OK — 939 — 2,429 — 939 2,429 3,368 195 2007 03/07 (m) 40 years
Arlington, TX — 1,061 — — — 1,061 (e ) 1,061 (e ) (e ) 04/10 (m) (e )
Gander Mountain:
Amarillo, TX — 1,514 5,781 — — 1,514 5,781 7,295 885 2004 11/04 40 years
DeForest, WI — 2,798 10,953 — — 2,798 10,953 13,751 91 2008 09/10 35 years
Springfield, IL — 1,717 7,622 — — 1,717 7,622 9,339 64 2009 09/10 35 years
Onalaska, WI — 1,963 — — — 1,963 (e ) 1,963 (e ) (e ) 10/10 (m) (e )
Ocala, FL — 3,315 8,908 — — 3,315 8,908 12,223 53 2008 10/10 35 years
Gate Petroleum:
Concord, NC — 852 1,201 — — 852 1,201 2,053 166 2001 06/05 40 years
Rocky Mount, NC — 259 1,164 — — 259 1,164 1,423 161 2000 06/05 40 years
Gen-X Clothing:
Federal Way, WA — 2,037 1,662 257 — 2,037 1,919 3,956 567 1994 06/98 40 years
Golden Corral:
Lake Placid, FL — 115 305 54 — 115 359 474 246 1985 05/85 35 years
Brandon, FL — 1,188 1,339 — — 1,188 1,339 2,527 303 1998 12/01 40 years
Dallas, TX — 1,138 1,025 — — 1,138 1,025 2,163 232 1994 12/01 40 years
Temple Terrace, FL — 1,330 1,391 — — 1,330 1,391 2,721 314 1997 12/01 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 9

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Goodyear Truck & Tire:
Park City, KS — 214 687 — — 214 687 901 190 1989 06/05 20 years
Anthony, TX — (l ) 1,242 — — (l ) 1,242 1,242 107 2007 02/07 40 years
Great Clips:
Lapeer, MI — 27 194 — — 27 194 221 16 2007 10/05 40 years
Green Light Convenience:
Moosic, PA — 323 309 — — 323 309 632 83 1980 08/05 20 years
Guitar Center:
Roseville, MN — 1,599 1,419 — — 1,599 1,419 3,018 179 1994 08/06 40 years
GymKix:
Copperas Cove, TX — 204 432 171 — 204 603 807 170 1972 11/98 40 years
H&R Block:
Swansea, IL — 46 132 69 — 46 201 247 45 1997 12/01 40 years
Hastings:
Nacogdoches, TX — 397 1,257 — — 397 1,257 1,654 381 1997 11/98 40 years
Havertys Furniture:
Clearwater, FL — 1,184 2,526 44 — 1,184 2,570 3,754 1,125 1992 05/93 40 years
Orlando, FL — 820 2,441 6 — 820 2,448 3,268 1,001 1992 05/93 40 years
Pensacola, FL — 633 1,595 — — 603 1,595 2,198 579 1994 06/96 40 years
Bowie, MD — 1,966 4,221 — — 1,966 4,221 6,187 1,256 1997 12/97 39 years
Health Source Chiropractic:
Houston, TX — 112 509 — — 112 509 621 65 1995 08/06 40 years
Healthy Pet:
Suwanee, GA — 175 1,038 — — 175 1,038 1,213 105 1997 12/06 40 years
Colonial Heights, VA — 160 746 — — 160 746 906 74 1996 01/07 40 years
Heilig-Meyers/The Room Store:
Baltimore, MD — 470 813 — — 470 813 1,283 246 1968 11/98 40 years
Glen Burnie, MD — 632 932 — — 632 932 1,564 282 1968 11/98 40 years
Hog Pit:
Tucson, AZ — 827 305 18 — 845 305 1,150 79 1974 12/01 40 years
Hollywood Feed:
Ridgeland, MS — 343 411 362 — 343 773 1,116 53 1997 08/06 40 years
Home Decor:
Memphis, TN — 549 540 364 — 549 904 1,453 247 1998 12/97 40 years
Home Depot:
Sunrise, FL — 5,149 — — — 5,149 (i ) 5,149 (i ) (i ) 05/03 (i )
HomeGoods:
Fairfax, VA — 971 756 1,585 — 971 2,341 3,312 552 1995 12/95 40 years
Hooters:
Tampa, FL — 784 505 — — 784 505 1,289 114 1993 12/01 40 years
Humana:
Sunrise, FL — 800 253 — — 800 253 1,053 42 1984 05/04 40 years
Hy-Vee:
St. Joseph, MO — 1,580 2,849 — — 1,580 2,849 4,429 591 1991 09/02 40 years
Int’l House of Pancakes:
Midwest City, OK — 407 — — — 407 (i ) 407 (i ) (i ) 11/00 (i )
Ankeny, IA — 693 515 — — 693 515 1,208 95 2002 06/05 30 years
J & J Insurance:
Hollywood, FL — 195 44 18 — 119 — 119 — 1960 12/05 15 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 10

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Jack in the Box:
Plano, TX — 1,055 1,237 — — 1,055 1,237 2,292 171 2001 06/05 40 years
Jacobson Industrial:
Des Moines, IA — 61 112 — — 61 112 173 31 1973 06/05 20 years
Jared Jewelers:
Richmond, VA — 955 1,336 — — 955 1,336 2,291 302 1998 12/01 40 years
Brandon, FL — 1,197 1,182 — — 1,197 1,182 2,379 255 2001 05/02 40 years
Lithonia, GA — 1,271 1,216 — — 1,271 1,216 2,487 262 2001 05/02 40 years
Houston, TX — 1,676 1,440 — — 1,676 1,440 3,116 289 1999 12/02 40 years
Jazzercise Fitness Center:
Orlando, FL 42 (o) 37 101 — — 37 101 138 18 2001 02/04 40 years
Jin’s Asian Cafe:
Sealy, TX — 67 74 — — 67 74 141 22 1982 03/99 40 years
Jo-Ann etc:
Corpus Christi, TX — 818 896 12 — 818 909 1,727 389 1967 11/93 40 years
St. Peters, MO — 1,741 5,406 — — 1,741 5,406 7,147 738 2005 06/05 (g) 40 years
Johnny Carino’s:
Lewisville, TX — 1,370 1,019 — — 1,370 1,019 2,389 230 1994 12/01 40 years
Lubbock, TX — 1,007 1,206 — — 1,007 1,206 2,213 272 1995 12/01 40 years
S. Beaumont, TX — 439 1,363 — — 439 1,363 1,802 308 2000 12/01 40 years
Kangaroo Express:
Carthage, NC — 485 354 — — 485 354 839 39 1989 08/06 40 years
Sanford, NC — 1,638 1,371 — — 1,638 1,371 3,009 150 2003 08/06 40 years
Sanford, NC — 666 661 — — 666 661 1,327 72 2000 08/06 40 years
Siler City, NC — 586 645 — — 586 645 1,231 71 1998 08/06 40 years
West End, NC — 426 516 — — 426 516 942 56 1999 08/06 40 years
Belleview, FL — 471 1,451 — — 471 1,451 1,922 159 2006 08/06 40 years
Jacksonville, FL — 683 1,362 — — 683 1,362 2,045 149 1969 08/06 40 years
Jacksonville, FL — 807 1,239 — — 807 1,239 2,046 136 1975 08/06 40 years
Destin, FL — 1,366 1,192 — — 1,366 1,192 2,558 128 2000 09/06 40 years
Niceville, FL (n) — 1,434 1,124 — — 1,434 1,124 2,558 121 2000 09/06 40 years
Kill Devil Hills, NC — 490 741 — — 490 741 1,231 78 1995 10/06 40 years
Kill Devil Hills, NC — 679 552 — — 679 552 1,231 58 1990 10/06 40 years
Interlachen, FL — 519 1,500 — — 519 1,500 2,019 105 2007 10/06 40 years
Clarksville, TN — 276 955 — — 276 955 1,231 96 1999 12/06 40 years
Clarksville, TN — 521 710 — — 521 710 1,231 72 1999 12/06 40 years
Gallatin, TN — 474 757 — — 474 757 1,231 76 1999 12/06 40 years
Midland City, AL — 729 2,538 — — 729 2,538 3,267 256 2006 12/06 40 years
Naples, FL — 3,195 1,403 — — 3,195 1,403 4,598 142 2001 12/06 40 years
Oxford, MS — 440 1,097 — — 440 1,097 1,537 111 1998 12/06 40 years
Columbiana, AL — 771 989 — — 771 989 1,760 98 1982 01/07 40 years
Naples, FL — 3,162 1,597 — — 3,162 1,597 4,759 155 1995 02/07 40 years
Longs, SC — 745 758 — — 745 758 1,503 72 2001 03/07 40 years
Kentwood, LA — 985 891 — — 985 891 1,876 84 2001 03/07 40 years
Dothan, AL — 774 1,886 — — 774 1,886 2,660 179 2007 03/07 40 years
Naples, FL — 2,412 1,589 — — 2,412 1,589 4,001 144 2000 05/07 40 years
Montgomery, AL — 666 1,185 — — 666 1,185 1,851 105 1998 06/07 40 years
Cary, NC — 1,314 2,125 — — 1,314 2,125 3,439 179 2007 08/07 40 years
Kash n’ Karry:
Seffner, FL — 322 1,222 — — 322 1,222 1,544 220 1983 03/99 40 years
Keg Steakhouse:
Lynnwood, WA — 1,256 649 — — 1,256 649 1,905 147 1992 12/01 40 years
Tacoma, WA — 527 795 — — 527 795 1,322 180 1981 12/01 40 years
KFC:
Fenton, MO — 307 496 — — 307 496 803 279 1985 07/92 33 years
Erie, PA — 517 496 — — 517 496 1,013 112 1996 12/01 40 years
Marysville, WA — 647 546 — — 647 546 1,193 123 1996 12/01 40 years
Evansville, IN — 370 767 — — 370 767 1,137 89 2004 05/06 40 years
Kohl’s:
Florence, AL — 818 1,047 — — 818 1,047 1,865 111 2006 06/04 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 11

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Kum & Go:
Omaha, NE — 393 214 — — 393 214 607 59 1979 06/05 20 years
Kwik Pik:
Bradford, PA — 184 762 — — 184 762 946 205 1983 08/05 20 years
Coraopolis, PA (n) — 476 347 — — 476 347 823 93 1983 08/05 20 years
St Clair, PA — 212 475 — — 212 475 687 128 1984 08/05 20 years
Beech Creek, PA — 477 613 — — 477 613 1,090 76 1988 01/06 40 years
Canisteo, NY — 142 485 — — 142 485 627 60 1983 01/06 40 years
Curwensville, PA — 226 608 — — 226 608 834 75 1983 01/06 40 years
Ellwood City, PA — 196 526 — — 196 526 722 65 1987 01/06 40 years
Hastings, PA — 199 455 — — 199 455 654 56 1989 01/06 40 years
Jersey Shore, PA — 515 381 — — 515 381 896 47 1960 01/06 40 years
Leeper, PA — 286 644 — — 286 644 930 80 1987 01/06 40 years
Lewisberry, PA — 412 534 — — 412 534 946 66 1988 01/06 40 years
Mercersburg, PA — 672 746 — — 672 746 1,418 93 1988 01/06 40 years
New Florence, PA — 298 812 — — 298 812 1,110 101 1989 01/06 40 years
Newstead, NY — 255 835 — — 255 835 1,090 104 1990 01/06 40 years
Philipsburg, PA — 428 269 — — 428 269 697 33 1978 01/06 40 years
Plainfield, PA — 244 383 — — 244 383 627 47 1988 01/06 40 years
Reynoldsville, PA — 113 328 — — 113 328 441 41 1983 01/06 40 years
Port Royal, PA — 238 635 — — 238 635 873 142 1989 07/06 20 years
LA Fitness:
Centerville, OH — 2,700 — 8,572 — 2,700 8,572 11,272 330 2009 06/08 (m) 40 years
Warren, MI — 2,360 6,674 — — 2,360 6,674 9,034 299 2009 07/08 (m) 40 years
Cincinnati, OH — 5,145 — 9,011 — 5,145 9,011 14,156 347 2009 08/08 (m) 40 years
Lawrence, IN — 1,604 5,867 — — 1,604 5,867 7,471 55 2010 01/10 (m) 40 years
Laveen, AZ — 1,665 — — — 1,665 (e ) 1,665 (e ) (e ) 02/10 (m) (e )
Kennesaw, GA — 3,653 — — — 3,653 (e ) 3,653 (e ) (e ) 07/10 (m) (e )
Las Margaritas:
Indianapolis, IN — 640 1,107 — — 640 1,107 1,747 239 1996 12/01 40 years
Lil’ Champ:
Gainesville, FL — 900 — 1,800 — 900 1,800 2,700 171 2006 07/05 (m) 40 years
Jacksonville, FL — 2,225 3,265 — — 2,225 3,265 5,490 211 2006 08/05 40 years
Ocala, FL — 846 — 1,564 — 846 1,564 2,410 138 2006 02/06 (m) 40 years
Logan’s Roadhouse:
Alexandria, LA — 1,218 3,049 — — 1,218 3,049 4,267 314 1998 11/06 40 years
Beckley, WV — 1,396 2,405 — — 1,396 2,405 3,801 248 2006 11/06 40 years
Cookeville, TN — 1,262 2,271 — — 1,262 2,271 3,533 234 1997 11/06 40 years
Fort Wayne, IN — 1,274 2,110 — — 1,172 2,110 3,282 218 2003 11/06 40 years
Greenwood, IN — 1,341 2,105 — — 1,341 2,105 3,446 217 2000 11/06 40 years
Hurst, TX — 1,858 1,916 — — 1,858 1,916 3,774 198 1999 11/06 40 years
Jackson, TN — 1,200 2,246 — — 1,200 2,246 3,446 232 1994 11/06 40 years
Lake Charles, LA — 1,285 2,202 — — 1,285 2,202 3,487 227 1998 11/06 40 years
McAllen, TX — 1,608 2,178 — — 1,608 2,178 3,786 225 2005 11/06 40 years
Opelika, AL — 1,028 1,753 — — 1,028 1,753 2,781 181 2005 11/06 40 years
Roanoke, VA — 2,302 1,947 — — 2,302 1,947 4,249 201 1998 11/06 40 years
San Marcos, TX — 837 1,453 — — 837 1,453 2,290 150 2000 11/06 40 years
Sanford, FL — 1,678 1,730 — — 1,678 1,730 3,408 178 1999 11/06 40 years
Smyrna, TN — 1,335 2,047 — — 1,335 2,047 3,382 211 2002 11/06 40 years
Warner Robins, GA — 905 1,534 — — 905 1,534 2,439 158 2004 11/06 40 years
Franklin, TN — 2,519 1,705 — — 2,519 1,705 4,224 172 1995 12/06 40 years
Southhaven, MS — 1,298 1,338 — — 1,298 1,338 2,636 135 2005 12/06 40 years
Columbus, MS — 707 — — — 707 (e ) 707 (e ) (e ) 11/10 (m) (e )
Lancaster, TX — 987 — — — 987 (e ) 987 (e ) (e ) 12/10 (m) (e )
Lowe’s:
Memphis, TN — 3,215 9,170 24 — 3,215 9,194 12,409 1,960 2001 06/02 40 years
M & T Bank:
Carlisle, PA — 87 103 — — 87 103 190 13 1988 01/06 40 years
Magic China Café:
Orlando, FL 47 (o) 40 111 — — 40 111 151 19 2001 02/04 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 12

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Magic Mountain:
Columbus, OH — 5,380 2,693 — — 5,380 2,693 8,073 238 1990 06/07 40 years
Columbus, OH — 2,076 1,906 — — 2,076 1,906 3,982 169 1990 06/07 40 years
Majestic Liquors:
Coffee City, TX — 1,330 3,858 — — 1,330 3,858 5,188 567 1996 02/05 40 years
Ft. Worth, TX — 988 2,368 — — 988 2,368 3,356 348 1997 02/05 40 years
Ft. Worth, TX — 1,652 2,018 — — 1,652 2,018 3,670 296 2000 02/05 40 years
Ft. Worth, TX — 2,505 2,138 — — 2,505 2,138 4,643 314 1988 02/05 40 years
Ft. Worth, TX — 611 1,609 — — 579 1,609 2,188 236 1974 02/05 40 years
Hudson Oaks, TX — 361 1,029 — — 361 1,029 1,390 151 1993 02/05 40 years
Granbury, TX — 786 1,234 — — 786 1,234 2,020 148 2006 05/05 (g) 40 years
Azle, TX — 648 859 — — 648 859 1,507 76 1970 06/07 40 years
Ft. Worth, TX — 575 933 — — 575 933 1,508 83 1982 06/07 40 years
Mattress Firm:
Baton Rouge, LA — 609 914 — — 609 914 1,523 343 1995 12/95 40 years
MC Sports:
Lapeer, MI — 408 2,086 — — 408 2,086 2,494 172 2007 10/05 40 years
Merchant’s Tires:
Hampton, VA — 180 427 — — 180 427 607 62 1986 03/05 40 years
Newport News, VA — 234 259 — — 234 259 493 38 1986 03/05 40 years
Norfolk, VA — 398 508 — — 398 508 906 74 1986 03/05 40 years
Rockville, MD — 1,030 306 — — 1,030 306 1,336 44 1974 03/05 40 years
Washington, DC — 624 578 — — 624 578 1,202 84 1983 03/05 40 years
Mi Pueblo Foods:
Palo Alto, CA — 2,272 3,405 28 — 2,272 3,433 5,705 1,004 1998 12/98 (f) 40 years
Michaels:
Fairfax, VA — 992 773 1,369 — 992 2,141 3,133 527 1995 12/95 40 years
Grapevine, TX (n) — 1,018 2,067 — — 1,018 2,067 3,085 648 1998 06/98 40 years
Plymouth Meeting, PA — 2,911 2,595 — — 2,911 2,595 5,506 696 1999 10/98 (g) 40 years
Michael’s Family Restaurant:
Sherman, TX — 233 126 24 — 233 150 383 29 1969 09/06 20 years
Mister Car Wash:
Anoka, MN — 212 214 — — 212 214 426 53 1968 04/07 15 years
Brooklyn Park, MN — 438 778 — — 438 778 1,216 115 1985 04/07 25 years
Cedar Rapids, IA — 391 816 — — 391 816 1,207 121 1989 04/07 25 years
Clive, IA — 1,141 935 — — 1,141 935 2,076 173 1983 04/07 20 years
Cottage Grove, MN — 274 485 — — 274 485 759 72 1992 04/07 25 years
Des Moines, IA — 249 596 — — 249 596 845 74 1990 04/07 30 years
Des Moines, IA — 213 476 — — 213 476 689 88 1964 04/07 20 years
Eden Prairie, MN — 865 751 — — 865 751 1,616 139 1984 04/07 20 years
Edina, MN — 894 687 — — 894 687 1,581 127 1985 04/07 20 years
Houston, TX — 1,846 1,592 — — 1,846 1,592 3,438 236 1983 04/07 25 years
Houston, TX — 624 1,108 — — 624 1,108 1,732 137 1988 04/07 30 years
Houston, TX — 5,126 1,267 — — 5,126 1,267 6,393 134 1995 04/07 35 years
Houston, TX — 796 678 — — 796 678 1,474 101 1986 04/07 25 years
Houston, TX — 1,347 1,702 — — 1,347 1,702 3,049 210 1984 04/07 30 years
Houston, TX — 1,960 1,145 — — 1,960 1,145 3,105 170 1983 04/07 25 years
Houston, TX — 3,193 1,305 — — 3,193 1,305 4,498 138 1995 04/07 35 years
Houston, TX — 288 466 — — 288 466 754 115 1970 04/07 15 years
Houston, TX — 2,260 1,806 — — 2,260 1,806 4,066 268 1975 04/07 25 years
Humble, TX — 1,204 1,517 — — 1,204 1,517 2,721 161 1993 04/07 35 years
Plymouth, MN — 827 182 — — 827 182 1,009 67 1955 04/07 10 years
Roseville, MN — 861 564 — — 861 564 1,425 104 1963 04/07 20 years
Spokane, WA — 214 580 — — 214 580 794 72 1990 04/07 30 years
Spokane, WA — 1,253 1,146 — — 1,253 1,146 2,399 121 1997 04/07 35 years
St. Cloud, MN (n) — 243 391 — — 243 391 634 73 1986 04/07 20 years
Stillwater, MN — 289 214 — — 289 214 503 53 1971 04/07 15 years
Sugarland, TX — 3,789 1,972 — — 3,789 1,972 5,761 209 1995 04/07 35 years
West St Paul, MN — 836 236 — — 836 236 1,072 44 1972 04/07 20 years
Rochester, MN — 319 451 — — 319 451 770 36 1994 10/07 40 years
Rochester, MN — 1,055 2,327 — — 1,055 2,327 3,382 187 2003 10/07 40 years
Birmingham, AL — 2,378 2,145 — — 2,378 2,145 4,523 223 1985 11/07 30 years
Clearwater, FL — 825 765 — — 825 765 1,590 96 1969 11/07 25 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 13

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Mesquite, TX — 1,596 2,201 — — 1,596 2,201 3,797 275 1987 11/07 25 years
Seminole, FL — 2,166 1,496 — — 2,166 1,496 3,662 156 1985 11/07 30 years
Tampa, FL — 2,993 1,669 — — 2,993 1,669 4,662 209 1969 11/07 25 years
Vestavia Hills, AL — 1,009 956 — — 1,009 956 1,965 119 1967 11/07 25 years
El Paso, TX — 1,424 1,306 — — 1,424 1,306 2,730 132 1986 12/07 30 years
El Paso, TX — 988 1,046 — — 988 1,046 2,034 80 1998 12/07 40 years
El Paso, TX — 1,399 1,468 — — 1,399 1,468 2,867 112 1991 12/07 40 years
El Paso, TX — 664 824 — — 664 824 1,488 63 1991 12/07 40 years
El Paso, TX — 1,807 2,287 — — 1,807 2,287 4,094 175 1983 12/07 40 years
Muchas Gracias Mexican Restaurant:
Salem, OR — 556 736 — — 556 736 1,292 166 1996 12/01 40 years
My Big Fat Greek Restaurant:
Tucson, AZ — 996 2,742 — — 996 2,742 3,738 226 2007 12/06 (m) 40 years
Olathe, KS — 525 731 — — 525 731 1,256 6 2005 09/10 35 years
Nitlantika:
Hollywood, FL — 383 88 37 — 234 — 234 — 1960 12/05 15 years
Office Depot:
Arlington, TX — 596 1,411 — — 596 1,411 2,007 597 1994 01/94 40 years
Richmond, VA — 889 1,948 — — 889 1,948 2,837 710 1996 05/96 40 years
Hartsdale, NY — 4,509 2,454 — — 4,509 2,454 6,963 408 1996 09/97 40 years
Gastonia, NC — 1,554 2,367 — — 1,554 2,367 3,921 357 2004 12/04 40 years
OfficeMax:
Cincinnati, OH — 543 1,575 — — 543 1,575 2,118 649 1994 07/94 40 years
Evanston, IL — 1,868 1,758 — — 1,868 1,758 3,626 684 1995 06/95 40 years
Altamonte Springs, FL — 1,690 3,050 — — 1,690 3,050 4,740 1,135 1995 01/96 40 years
Cutler Bay, FL — 989 1,479 — — 989 1,479 2,468 536 1995 06/96 40 years
Sacramento, CA — 1,144 2,961 — — 1,144 2,961 4,105 1,037 1996 12/96 40 years
Salinas, CA — 1,353 1,829 — — 1,353 1,829 3,182 635 1995 02/97 40 years
Redding, CA — 667 2,182 — — 667 2,182 2,849 739 1997 06/97 40 years
Kelso, WA — 868 — 1,806 — 868 1,806 2,674 585 1998 09/97 (g) 40 years
Lynchburg, VA — 562 — 1,851 — 562 1,851 2,413 569 1998 02/98 (m) 40 years
Leesburg, FL — 640 — 1,929 — 640 1,929 2,569 581 1998 08/98 (m) 40 years
Tigard, OR — 1,540 2,247 — — 1,540 2,247 3,787 681 1995 11/98 40 years
Griffin, GA — 685 — 1,802 — 685 1,802 2,487 527 1999 11/98 (g) 40 years
Old River Cabinets:
Fairfax, VA — 194 365 29 — 194 394 588 73 1995 12/95 40 years
Orlando Metro Gymnastics:
Orlando, FL — 428 1,345 — — 428 1,345 1,773 200 2003 01/05 40 years
Palais Royale:
Sealy, TX — 457 504 1,634 — 462 2,134 2,596 259 1982 03/99 40 years
Pantry I Petroleum:
Avis, PA — 392 326 — — 392 326 718 88 1976 08/05 20 years
Howard, PA — 136 375 — — 136 375 511 46 1987 01/06 40 years
Patriot Fuels:
Vinita, OK — 72 368 — — 72 368 440 24 1972 07/09 20 years
Pennstar Bank:
Dallas, PA — 214 345 — — 214 345 559 93 1995 08/05 20 years
Pep Boys:
Chicago, IL — 1,077 3,756 — — 1,077 3,756 4,833 335 1993 11/07 35 years
Cicero, IL — 1,341 3,760 — — 1,341 3,760 5,101 336 1993 11/07 35 years
Cornwell Heights, PA — 2,058 3,102 — — 2,058 3,102 5,160 388 1972 11/07 25 years
East Brunswick, NJ — 2,449 5,026 — — 2,449 5,026 7,475 524 1987 11/07 30 years
Guayama, PR — 1,729 2,732 — — 1,729 2,131 3,860 70 1998 11/07 33 years
Jacksonville, FL — 810 2,331 — — 810 2,331 3,141 208 1989 11/07 35 years
Joliet, IL — 1,506 3,727 — — 1,506 3,727 5,233 333 1993 11/07 35 years
Lansing, IL — 869 3,440 — — 869 3,440 4,309 307 1993 11/07 35 years
Las Vegas, NV — 1,917 2,530 — — 1,917 2,530 4,447 226 1989 11/07 35 years
Marietta, GA — 1,311 3,556 — — 1,311 3,556 4,867 370 1987 11/07 30 years
Marlton, NJ — 1,608 4,142 — — 1,608 4,142 5,750 431 1983 11/07 30 years
Philadelphia, PA — 1,300 3,830 — — 1,300 3,830 5,130 342 1995 11/07 35 years
Quakertown, PA — 1,129 3,252 — — 1,129 3,252 4,381 290 1995 11/07 35 years
Reading, PA — 1,189 3,367 — — 1,189 2,819 4,008 109 1989 11/07 28 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 14

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Roswell, GA — 931 2,732 — — 931 2,732 3,663 285 2007 11/07 30 years
Turnersville, NJ — 990 3,494 — — 990 3,494 4,484 364 1986 11/07 30 years
Houston, TX — 734 3,028 — — 734 3,028 3,762 71 1994 04/10 30 years
Perkins Restaurant:
Des Moines, IA — 226 203 — — 226 203 429 113 1976 06/05 10 years
Des Moines, IA — 270 218 — — 270 218 488 121 1977 06/05 10 years
Des Moines, IA — 256 136 — — 256 136 392 75 1976 06/05 10 years
Newton, IA — 354 402 — — 354 402 756 223 1979 06/05 10 years
Urbandale, IA — 377 581 — — 377 581 958 161 1979 06/05 20 years
Pet Paradise:
Houston, TX — 417 2,306 — — 417 2,306 2,723 161 2008 03/08 40 years
Bunnell, FL — 316 881 — — 316 881 1,197 60 1997 04/08 40 years
Houston, TX — 535 — 3,426 — 535 3,426 3,961 146 2009 09/08 (m) 40 years
Charlotte, NC — 825 — 3,231 — 825 3,231 4,056 118 2009 11/08 (m) 40 years
Davie, FL — 1,138 1,069 — — 1,138 1,069 2,207 62 2003 12/08 35 years
Petco:
Grand Forks, ND — 307 910 — — 307 910 1,217 297 1996 12/97 40 years
Petro Express:
Charlotte, NC — 1,025 1,605 — — 1,025 1,605 2,630 198 1986 04/07 30 years
Belmont, NC — 1,508 1,622 — — 1,508 1,622 3,130 172 2001 04/07 35 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,697 2,419 — — 1,697 2,419 4,116 224 2005 04/07 40 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,258 1,560 — — 1,258 1,560 2,818 145 2004 04/07 40 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,810 2,570 — — 1,810 2,570 4,380 238 2004 04/07 40 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,030 1,725 — — 1,030 1,725 2,755 213 1983 04/07 30 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,037 1,468 — — 1,037 1,468 2,505 155 1997 04/07 35 years
Charlotte, NC — 2,316 2,064 — — 2,316 2,064 4,380 219 1996 04/07 35 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,291 1,839 — — 1,291 1,839 3,130 227 1988 04/07 30 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,340 1,790 — — 1,340 1,790 3,130 190 1998 04/07 35 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,458 2,047 — — 1,458 2,047 3,505 253 1987 04/07 30 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,323 870 — — 1,323 870 2,193 108 1982 04/07 30 years
Charlotte, NC — 507 698 — — 507 698 1,205 129 1967 04/07 20 years
Charlotte, NC — 629 876 — — 629 876 1,505 108 1986 04/07 30 years
Charlotte, NC — 429 425 — — 429 425 854 53 1983 04/07 30 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,778 1,977 — — 1,778 1,977 3,755 244 1992 04/07 30 years
Charlotte, NC — 2,165 1,965 — — 2,165 1,965 4,130 208 1997 04/07 35 years
Charlotte, NC — 2,784 3,720 — — 2,784 3,720 6,504 394 1998 04/07 35 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,532 1,973 — — 1,532 1,973 3,505 209 1998 04/07 35 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,293 1,837 — — 1,293 1,837 3,130 227 1987 04/07 30 years
Concord, NC — 2,144 1,986 — — 2,144 1,986 4,130 210 2000 04/07 35 years
Concord, NC — 1,828 1,677 — — 1,828 1,677 3,505 178 2002 04/07 35 years
Conover, NC — 917 1,275 — — 917 1,275 2,192 135 1999 04/07 35 years
Cornelius, NC — 1,653 2,664 — — 1,653 2,664 4,317 282 2000 04/07 35 years
Denver, NC — 2,317 1,750 — — 2,317 1,750 4,067 185 1999 04/07 35 years
Fort Mill, SC — 1,883 1,559 — — 1,883 1,559 3,442 193 1988 04/07 30 years
Fort Mill, SC — 3,825 2,554 — — 3,825 2,554 6,379 271 1998 04/07 35 years
Gastonia, NC — 745 760 — — 745 760 1,505 70 2003 04/07 40 years
Gastonia, NC — 1,070 1,185 — — 1,070 1,185 2,255 126 1990 04/07 35 years
Gastonia, NC — 965 1,228 — — 965 1,228 2,193 130 2001 04/07 35 years
Gastonia, NC — 335 545 — — 335 545 880 50 2000 04/07 40 years
Hickory, NC — 1,975 1,530 — — 1,975 1,530 3,505 162 2002 04/07 35 years
Kings Mountain,
NC — 1,210 982 — — 1,210 982 2,192 104 1988 04/07 35 years
Lake Wylie, SC — 1,972 1,283 — — 1,972 1,283 3,255 136 2003 04/07 35 years
Lake Wylie, SC — 1,381 2,061 — — 1,381 2,061 3,442 218 1998 04/07 35 years
Lincolnton, NC — 723 532 — — 723 532 1,255 66 1989 04/07 30 years
Lincolnton, NC — 2,359 1,771 — — 2,359 1,771 4,130 188 2000 04/07 35 years
Matthews, NC — 1,197 1,746 — — 1,197 1,746 2,943 216 1987 04/07 30 years
Mineral Springs, NC — 678 577 — — 678 577 1,255 54 2002 04/07 40 years
Monroe, NC — 709 796 — — 709 796 1,505 84 1999 04/07 35 years
Monroe, NC — 421 834 — — 421 834 1,255 88 1997 04/07 35 years
Monroe, NC — 857 1,023 — — 857 1,023 1,880 95 2004 04/07 40 years
Rock Hill, SC — 778 727 — — 778 727 1,505 90 1990 04/07 30 years
Rock Hill, SC — 2,119 1,886 — — 2,119 1,886 4,005 200 1998 04/07 35 years
Rock Hill, SC — 3,095 1,910 — — 3,095 1,910 5,005 202 1999 04/07 35 years
Statesville, NC — 1,886 2,182 — — 1,886 2,182 4,068 231 1999 04/07 35 years
Thomasville, NC — 994 1,761 — — 994 1,761 2,755 187 2000 04/07 35 years
Waxhaw, NC — 508 747 — — 508 747 1,255 69 2002 04/07 40 years
York, SC — 2,306 1,449 — — 2,306 1,449 3,755 154 1999 04/07 35 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,231 1,214 — — 1,231 1,214 2,445 110 1997 05/07 40 years
Charlotte, NC — 1,849 2,280 — — 1,849 2,280 4,129 207 2005 05/07 40 years
Rock Hill, SC — 3,108 2,146 — — 3,108 2,146 5,254 194 1999 05/07 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 15

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
PetSmart:
Chicago, IL — 2,724 3,566 — — 2,724 3,566 6,290 1,096 1998 09/98 40 years
Pier I Imports:
Anchorage, AK — 928 1,663 — — 928 1,663 2,591 617 1995 02/96 40 years
Memphis, TN — 713 822 — — 713 822 1,535 278 1997 09/96 (f) 40 years
Sanford, FL — 738 803 — — 738 803 1,541 257 1998 06/97 (f) 40 years
Valdosta, GA — 391 806 — — 391 806 1,197 224 1999 01/99 (f) 40 years
Pizza Hut:
Monroeville, AL — 547 44 — — 547 44 591 10 1976 12/01 40 years
Popeye’s:
Snellville, GA — 642 437 — — 642 437 1,079 99 1995 12/01 40 years
Pro Tip Nails & Spa:
Orlando, FL 47 (o) 40 111 — — 40 111 151 — 2001 02/04 40 years
Pull-A-Part:
Augusta, GA — 1,414 — 1,451 — 1,414 1,451 2,865 128 2007 08/06 (m) 40 years
Birmingham, AL — 1,165 2,090 — — 1,165 2,090 3,255 229 1964 08/06 40 years
Charlotte, NC — 2,913 1,724 — — 2,913 1,724 4,637 189 2006 08/06 40 years
Conley, GA — 1,686 1,387 — — 1,686 1,387 3,073 152 1999 08/06 40 years
Harvey, LA — 1,887 — 4,326 — 1,887 4,326 6,213 266 2008 08/06 (m) 40 years
Knoxville, TN — 961 2,384 — — 961 2,384 3,345 206 2007 08/06 (m) 40 years
Louisville, KY — 3,206 1,532 — — 3,206 1,532 4,738 168 2006 08/06 40 years
Nashville, TN — 2,164 1,414 — — 2,164 1,414 3,578 155 2006 08/06 40 years
Norcross, GA — 1,831 1,040 — — 1,831 1,040 2,871 114 1998 08/06 40 years
Cleveland, OH — 4,556 — 2,096 — 4,556 2,096 6,652 164 2007 08/06 (m) 40 years
Lafayette, LA — 1,036 — 2,226 — 1,036 2,226 3,262 169 2007 08/06 (m) 40 years
Montgomery, AL — 934 — 2,013 — 934 2,013 2,947 157 2007 11/06 (m) 40 years
Jackson, MS — 1,315 2,471 — — 1,315 2,471 3,786 162 2008 12/06 (m) 40 years
Baton Rouge, LA — 893 — 3,256 — 893 3,256 4,149 146 2009 01/07 (m) 40 years
Memphis, TN — 1,779 — 2,964 — 1,779 2,964 4,743 195 2008 05/07 (m) 40 years
Mobile, AL — 550 — 2,772 — 550 2,772 3,322 136 2009 06/07 (m) 40 years
Winston-Salem, NC — 846 — 2,449 — 846 2,449 3,295 125 2009 08/07 (m) 40 years
Lithonia, GA — 2,410 — 2,345 — 2,410 2,345 4,755 115 2009 08/07 (m) 40 years
Columbia, SC — 935 2,178 — — 935 2,178 3,113 107 2009 09/07 (m) 40 years
Akron, OH — 1,065 — 1,869 — 1,065 1,869 2,934 53 2009 10/08 (m) 40 years
QuikTrip:
Alpharetta, GA — 1,048 607 — — 1,048 607 1,655 84 1996 06/05 40 years
Clive, IA — 623 557 — — 623 557 1,180 103 1994 06/05 30 years
Des Moines, IA — 379 455 — — 379 455 834 84 1990 06/05 30 years
Des Moines, IA — 259 792 — — 259 792 1,051 146 1996 06/05 30 years
Gainesville, GA — 592 913 — — 592 913 1,505 169 1989 06/05 30 years
Herculaneum, MO — 856 1,613 — — 856 1,613 2,469 298 1991 06/05 30 years
Johnston, IA — 394 385 — — 394 385 779 71 1991 06/05 30 years
Lee’s Summit, MO — 374 1,224 — — 374 1,224 1,598 170 1999 06/05 40 years
Norcross, GA — 844 297 — — 839 297 1,136 55 1994 06/05 30 years
Norcross, GA — 948 294 — — 948 294 1,242 54 1989 06/05 30 years
Norcross, GA — 966 202 — — 966 202 1,168 37 1993 06/05 30 years
Olathe, KS — 793 1,392 — — 793 1,392 2,185 193 1999 06/05 40 years
Tulsa, OK — 1,225 650 — — 1,225 650 1,875 120 1990 06/05 30 years
Urbandale, IA — 340 764 — — 340 764 1,104 106 1993 06/05 40 years
Wichita, KS — 118 454 — — 113 454 567 84 1989 06/05 30 years
Wichita, KS — 127 543 — — 127 543 670 100 1990 06/05 30 years
Woodstock, GA — 488 1,042 — — 488 1,042 1,530 144 1997 06/05 40 years
Qwest Corporation Service Center:
Cedar Rapids, IA — 184 629 — — 184 629 813 174 1976 06/05 20 years
Decorah, IA — 72 272 — — 72 272 344 151 1974 06/05 10 years
Rallys:
Toledo, OH — 126 320 — — 126 320 446 153 1989 07/92 39 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 16

Table of Contents

Initial Cost to Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Life on Which
Company Acquisition Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
RBC Bank:
Altamonte Springs, FL — 1,316 2,014 — — 1,316 2,014 3,330 36 2007 05/10 35 years
REB Oil:
Deerfield Beach, FL — 770 274 — — 770 274 1,044 35 1980 12/05 40 years
Lake Placid, FL — 2,532 1,157 491 — 2,532 1,648 4,180 188 1990 12/05 40 years
Regal Theatre:
Bolingbrook, IL — 2,937 3,032 — — 2,937 3,032 5,969 333 1994 09/07 30 years
Reliable Life Insurance:
St. Louis, MO — 2,078 13,762 — — 2,076 13,762 15,838 2,224 1975 05/04 40 years
Retail Operations (h):
Bakersfield, CA — 3,664 3,709 — — 3,664 3,709 7,373 296 1994 03/08 35 years
Bakersfield, CA — 3,363 3,288 — — 3,363 3,288 6,651 230 2002 03/08 40 years
Bakersfield, CA — 2,043 3,520 — — 2,043 680 2,723 212 1988 03/08 30 years
Bakersfield, CA — 2,564 4,465 2,093 — 2,564 6,558 9,122 416 1988 03/08 30 years
Bakersfield, CA — 2,099 2,011 — — 1,759 — 1,759 93 1990 03/08 35 years
Bakersfield, CA — 3,346 6,016 — — 3,346 6,016 9,362 477 1998 03/08 35 years
Bakersfield, CA — 3,303 3,845 — — 1,978 — 1,978 268 1975 03/08 25 years
Bakersfield, CA — 2,798 5,260 — — 2,044 — 2,044 263 1997 03/08 35 years
San Fernando, CA — 6,630 2,706 — — 6,630 2,706 9,336 257 1988 03/08 30 years
Ventura, CA — 6,253 4,560 207 — 6,253 4,767 11,020 367 1994 03/08 35 years
Ventura, CA — 5,590 4,431 94 — 5,590 4,526 10,116 311 2001 03/08 40 years
Rite Aid:
Douglasville, GA — 413 995 — — 413 995 1,408 371 1996 01/96 40 years
Conyers, GA — 575 999 — — 575 999 1,574 338 1997 06/97 40 years
Augusta, GA — 569 1,327 — — 502 1,327 1,829 433 1997 12/97 40 years
Riverdale, GA — 1,089 1,707 — — 1,089 1,707 2,796 557 1997 12/97 40 years
Warner Robins, GA — 707 — 1,227 — 707 1,227 1,934 367 1999 03/98 (g) 40 years
Mobile, AL — 1,137 1,694 — — 1,137 1,694 2,831 383 2000 12/01 40 years
Orange Beach, AL — 1,410 1,996 — — 1,410 1,996 3,406 451 2000 12/01 40 years
Norfolk, VA — 2,742 1,797 — — 2,742 1,797 4,539 399 2001 02/02 40 years
Thorndale, PA — 2,261 2,472 — — 2,261 2,472 4,733 548 2001 02/02 40 years
West Mifflin, PA — 1,402 2,044 — — 1,402 2,044 3,446 453 1999 02/02 40 years
Albany, NY — 25 867 — — 25 867 892 136 1994 09/04 40 years
Saratoga Springs, NY — 762 591 30 — 762 621 1,383 93 1993 09/04 40 years
Monticello, NY 624 664 769 — — 664 769 1,433 111 1996 03/05 40 years
Rite Rug:
Columbus, OH — 1,596 934 13 — 1,605 939 2,544 144 1970 11/04 40 years
Road Ranger:
Springfield, IL — 705 1,500 — — 705 1,500 2,205 170 1997 06/06 40 years
Belvidere, IL — 748 1,256 — — 1,098 1,256 2,354 143 1997 06/06 40 years
Brazil, IN — 2,199 907 — — 2,199 907 3,106 103 1990 06/06 40 years
Cherry Valley, IL — 1,409 1,897 — — 1,409 1,897 3,306 215 1991 06/06 40 years
Cottage Grove, WI — 2,175 1,733 — — 2,175 1,733 3,908 197 1990 06/06 40 years
Decatur, IL — 815 1,314 — — 815 1,314 2,129 149 2002 06/06 40 years
Dekalb, IL — 747 1,658 — — 747 1,658 2,405 188 2000 06/06 40 years
Elk Run Heights, IA — 1,538 2,470 — — 1,538 2,470 4,008 280 1989 06/06 40 years
Lake Station, IN — 3,172 1,112 — — 3,172 1,112 4,284 126 1987 06/06 40 years
Mendota, IL — 959 1,296 — — 1,214 1,296 2,510 147 1996 06/06 40 years
Oakdale, WI — 1,844 1,663 — — 1,844 1,663 3,507 189 1998 06/06 40 years
Rockford, IL — 1,094 1,662 — — 1,094 1,662 2,756 189 1996 06/06 40 years
Rockford, IL — 623 1,331 — — 623 1,331 1,954 151 2000 06/06 40 years
Springfield, IL — 1,795 1,863 — — 1,795 1,863 3,658 211 1978 06/06 40 years
Champaign, IL — 3,241 2,008 — — 3,241 2,008 5,249 194 2006 02/07 40 years
DeKalb, IL — 505 1,503 — — 505 1,503 2,008 146 2004 02/07 40 years
Fenton, MO — 2,584 2,622 — — 2,584 2,622 5,206 254 2007 02/07 40 years
Hampshire, IL — 1,307 1,501 1,629 — 1,307 3,130 4,437 272 1988 02/07 (f) 40 years
Princeton, IL (n) — 1,141 3,066 — — 1,141 3,066 4,207 297 2003 02/07 40 years
South Beloit, IL — 3,824 2,309 — — 3,824 2,309 6,133 224 2002 02/07 40 years
Cedar Rapids, IA — 1,025 984 — — 1,025 984 2,009 93 1990 03/07 40 years
Marion, IA — 737 1,071 — — 737 1,071 1,808 102 1974 03/07 40 years
Okawville, IL — 930 1,147 — — 930 1,147 2,077 97 1997 08/07 40 years
Dubuque, IA — 561 1,941 — — 561 1,941 2,502 160 2000 09/07 40 years
Belvidere, IL — 521 1,053 — — 521 1,053 1,574 82 2008 09/07 (f) 40 years
South Beloit, IL — 1,182 1,324 — — 1,182 1,324 2,506 103 2008 09/07 (f) 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 17

Table of Contents

Initial Cost to Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Life on Which
Company Acquisition Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Alexandria, KY — 624 1,306 — — 624 1,306 1,930 101 1993 04/08 35 years
Covington, KY — 486 1,420 — — 486 1,420 1,906 110 1996 04/08 35 years
Dry Ridge, KY — 892 1,946 — — 892 1,946 2,838 176 1973 04/08 30 years
Florence, KY — 615 1,242 — — 615 1,242 1,857 96 1990 04/08 35 years
Florence, KY — 741 1,272 — — 741 1,272 2,013 98 1994 04/08 35 years
Florence, KY — 884 1,557 — — 884 1,557 2,441 121 1995 04/08 35 years
Hebron, KY — 1,522 2,984 — — 1,522 2,984 4,506 231 1996 04/08 35 years
Wilder, KY — 954 1,902 — — 954 1,902 2,856 147 1994 04/08 35 years
Robb & Stucky:
Ft. Myers, FL — 2,188 6,225 — — 2,188 6,225 8,413 2,052 1997 12/97 40 years
Roger & Marv’s:
Kenosha, WI — 1,918 3,431 — — 1,918 3,431 5,349 1,186 1992 02/97 40 years
Roni Deutch Tax Services:
Hollywood, FL — 203 46 19 — 124 — 124 — 1960 12/05 15 years
Ross Dress for Less:
Coral Gables, FL — 1,782 1,661 — — 1,782 1,661 3,443 557 1994 06/96 38 years
Lodi, CA — 614 1,415 — — 614 1,415 2,029 255 1984 03/99 40 years
Rue 21:
Lapeer, MI — 126 645 — — 126 645 771 53 2007 10/05 40 years
Sally Beauty Supply:
Lapeer, MI — 33 167 — — 33 167 200 14 2007 10/05 40 years
Saltgrass Steakhouse:
Beaumont, TX — 553 — — — 553 (e ) 553 (e ) (e ) 09/10 (m) (e )
Schlotzsky’s Deli:
Phoenix, AZ — 706 315 — — 706 315 1,021 71 1995 12/01 40 years
Scottsdale, AZ — 717 311 — — 717 311 1,028 70 1995 12/01 40 years
Season’s 52:
Schaumburg, IL — 2,065 1,311 — — 2,065 1,311 3,376 296 1998 12/01 40 years
Shek’s Chinese Express:
Eden Prairie, MN — 65 261 — — 65 261 326 56 1997 12/01 40 years
Shoes on a Shoestring:
Albuquerque, NM — 1,442 2,335 — — 1,442 2,335 3,777 791 1997 06/97 40 years
Shop’ n Save:
Homestead, PA — 1,139 — 2,158 (j) — 1,139 2,158 3,297 374 1994 02/97 31 years
Shop-a-Snak:
Bessemer, AL — 564 742 — — 564 742 1,306 86 2002 05/06 40 years
Chelsea, AL — 391 628 — — 391 628 1,019 73 1981 05/06 40 years
Jasper, AL — 551 747 — — 551 747 1,298 86 1998 05/06 40 years
Birmingham, AL — 490 769 — — 490 769 1,259 89 1992 05/06 40 years
Birmingham, AL — 361 744 — — 361 744 1,105 86 1989 05/06 40 years
Birmingham, AL — 446 672 — — 446 672 1,118 78 1989 05/06 40 years
Birmingham, AL — 439 704 — — 439 704 1,143 81 1989 05/06 40 years
Homewood, AL — 468 657 — — 468 657 1,125 76 1990 05/06 40 years
Hoover, AL — 764 1,157 — — 663 1,157 1,820 134 2005 05/06 40 years
Hoover, AL — 713 865 — — 713 865 1,578 100 1998 05/06 40 years
Trussville, AL — 272 542 — — 272 542 814 63 1992 05/06 40 years
Tuscaloosa, AL — 525 463 — — 525 463 988 54 1991 05/06 40 years
Tuscaloosa, AL — 386 733 — — 386 733 1,119 85 1991 05/06 40 years
Tuscaloosa, AL — 432 559 — — 432 559 991 65 1991 05/06 40 years
SOAKS Express Wash:
Ankeny, IA — 662 — — — 662 (e ) 662 (e ) (e ) 06/05 (e )
Sonic Automotive:
Charlotte, NC — 3,619 4,854 — — 3,619 4,854 8,473 440 1996 05/07 40 years
Spec’s Liquor and Fine Foods:
Corpus Christi, TX — 777 918 520 — 768 1,438 2,206 407 1967 11/93 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 18

Table of Contents

Initial Cost to Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Life on Which
Company Acquisition Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Spencer’s Air Conditioning & Appliance:
Glendale, AZ — 342 982 — — 342 982 1,324 281 1999 12/98 (g) 40 years
Sports Authority:
Tampa, FL — 2,128 1,522 — — 2,128 1,522 3,650 552 1994 06/96 40 years
Sarasota, FL — 1,428 1,703 — — 1,428 1,703 3,131 294 1988 09/97 40 years
Memphis, TN (n) — 820 — 2,598 — 820 2,598 3,418 786 1998 12/97 (g) 40 years
Little Rock, AR — 3,113 2,660 — — 3,113 2,660 5,773 817 1997 09/98 40 years
Iselin, NJ — 3,750 5,983 — — 3,750 5,983 9,733 1,190 1994 01/03 40 years
Stone Mountain Chevrolet:
Lilburn, GA — 3,027 4,685 — — 3,027 4,685 7,712 747 2004 08/04 40 years
Stop N Go:
Grand Prairie, TX — 421 685 — — 421 685 1,106 155 1986 12/01 40 years
Kennedale, TX — 400 692 — — 391 692 1,083 156 1985 12/01 40 years
Stripes:
Laredo, TX — 841 739 — — 841 739 1,580 93 2001 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 1,843 1,419 — — 1,843 1,419 3,262 179 2000 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 1,039 1,145 — — 1,039 1,145 2,184 144 2004 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 2,530 1,125 — — 2,530 1,125 3,655 142 1990 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 1,182 1,105 — — 1,182 1,105 2,287 139 2000 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 2,915 1,800 — — 2,915 1,800 4,715 227 2000 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 1,392 1,444 — — 1,392 1,444 2,836 182 2005 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 933 699 — — 933 699 1,632 88 1999 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 1,015 1,308 — — 1,015 1,308 2,323 165 2003 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 2,033 1,288 — — 2,033 1,288 3,321 162 1995 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 1,279 1,015 — — 1,279 1,015 2,294 128 1990 12/05 40 years
Brownsville, TX — 2,417 1,828 — — 2,417 1,828 4,245 230 2000 12/05 40 years
Corpus Christi, TX — 703 1,037 — — 703 1,037 1,740 131 1986 12/05 40 years
Corpus Christi, TX — 1,308 2,151 — — 1,308 2,151 3,459 271 1995 12/05 40 years
Corpus Christi, TX — 1,400 1,531 — — 1,400 1,531 2,931 193 1984 12/05 40 years
Corpus Christi, TX — 853 1,416 — — 853 1,416 2,269 179 2005 12/05 40 years
Corpus Christi, TX — 1,385 1,419 — — 1,385 1,419 2,804 179 1982 12/05 40 years
Donna, TX — 1,004 1,127 — — 1,004 1,127 2,131 142 1995 12/05 40 years
Edinburg, TX — 1,317 1,624 — — 1,317 1,624 2,941 205 1999 12/05 40 years
Edinburg, TX — 970 1,286 — — 970 1,286 2,256 162 2003 12/05 40 years
Falfurias, TX — 4,244 4,458 — — 4,213 4,458 8,671 562 2002 12/05 40 years
Freer, TX — 1,151 1,158 — — 1,151 1,158 2,309 146 1984 12/05 40 years
George West, TX — 1,243 695 — — 1,243 695 1,938 88 1996 12/05 40 years
Harlingen, TX — 755 601 — — 755 601 1,356 76 1987 12/05 40 years
Harlingen, TX — 754 1,152 — — 754 1,152 1,906 145 1999 12/05 40 years
Harlingen, TX — 906 953 — — 906 953 1,859 120 1991 12/05 40 years
La Feria, TX — 900 1,347 — — 900 1,347 2,247 170 1988 12/05 40 years
Laredo, TX — 736 670 — — 736 670 1,406 84 1984 12/05 40 years
Laredo, TX — 675 533 — — 675 533 1,208 67 1993 12/05 40 years
Laredo, TX — 1,553 1,775 — — 1,553 1,775 3,328 224 2000 12/05 40 years
Laredo, TX — 459 460 — — 459 460 919 58 1983 12/05 40 years
Laredo, TX — 1,495 1,400 — — 1,495 1,400 2,895 177 1993 12/05 40 years
Lawton, OK — 697 964 — — 697 964 1,661 122 1984 12/05 40 years
Los Indios, TX — 1,387 1,457 — — 1,387 1,457 2,844 184 2005 12/05 40 years
McAllen, TX — 975 1,030 — — 975 1,030 2,005 130 2003 12/05 40 years
McAllen, TX — 987 893 — — 987 893 1,880 113 1999 12/05 40 years
Mission, TX — 1,125 1,213 — — 1,125 1,213 2,338 153 2003 12/05 40 years
Mission, TX — 880 1,101 — — 880 1,101 1,981 139 1999 12/05 40 years
Olmito, TX — 3,688 2,880 — — 3,688 2,880 6,568 363 2002 12/05 40 years
Pharr, TX — 784 805 — — 784 805 1,589 101 2000 12/05 40 years
Pharr, TX — 2,426 1,881 — — 2,426 1,881 4,307 237 2003 12/05 40 years
Pharr, TX — 982 1,178 — — 982 1,178 2,160 148 1988 12/05 40 years
Port Isabel, TX — 2,062 1,299 — — 2,062 1,299 3,361 164 1994 12/05 40 years
Portland, TX — 656 915 — — 656 915 1,571 115 1983 12/05 40 years
Progreso, TX — 1,769 1,811 — — 1,769 1,811 3,580 228 1999 12/05 40 years
Riviera, TX — 2,351 2,158 — — 2,351 2,158 4,509 272 2005 12/05 40 years
San Benito, TX — 791 1,857 — — 791 1,857 2,648 234 1994 12/05 40 years
San Benito, TX — 1,103 1,586 — — 1,103 1,586 2,689 200 2005 12/05 40 years
San Juan, TX — 1,424 1,546 — — 1,424 1,546 2,970 195 2004 12/05 40 years
San Juan, TX — 1,124 1,172 — — 1,124 1,172 2,296 148 1996 12/05 40 years
South Padre Island, TX — 1,367 1,389 — — 1,367 1,389 2,756 175 1988 12/05 40 years
Wichita Falls, TX — 440 751 — — 440 751 1,191 95 1984 12/05 40 years
Wichita Falls, TX — 905 1,351 — — 905 1,351 2,256 170 2000 12/05 40 years
Wichita Falls, TX — 484 828 — — 484 828 1,312 104 1983 12/05 40 years
Palmview, TX — 835 1,372 — — 835 1,372 2,207 144 2005 10/06 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 19

Table of Contents

Initial Cost to Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Life on Which
Company Acquisition Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Harlingen, TX — 638 1,807 — — 638 1,807 2,445 183 2006 12/06 40 years
Rio Grande City, TX — 1,871 1,612 — — 1,871 1,612 3,483 163 2006 12/06 40 years
San Juan, TX — 816 1,434 — — 816 1,434 2,250 145 2006 12/06 40 years
Zapata, TX — 1,333 1,773 — — 1,333 1,773 3,106 179 2006 12/06 40 years
Orange Grove, TX — 1,767 1,838 — — 1,767 1,838 3,605 170 2007 04/07 40 years
Harlingen, TX — 408 826 — — 408 826 1,234 86 1982 11/07 30 years
Laredo, TX — 698 1,169 — — 698 1,169 1,867 122 1981 11/07 30 years
Laredo, TX — 448 734 — — 448 734 1,182 77 1981 11/07 30 years
Laredo, TX — 348 1,168 — — 348 1,168 1,516 122 1983 11/07 30 years
Laredo, TX — 468 728 — — 468 728 1,196 76 1973 11/07 30 years
Laredo, TX — 584 958 — — 584 958 1,542 100 1981 11/07 30 years
San Benito, TX — 420 1,135 — — 420 1,135 1,555 118 1985 11/07 30 years
Del Rio, TX — 1,565 758 — — 1,565 758 2,323 59 1996 11/07 40 years
Kerrville, TX — 640 1,616 — — 640 1,616 2,256 126 1996 11/07 40 years
Monahans, TX — 2,628 2,973 — — 2,628 2,973 5,601 232 1996 11/07 40 years
Odessa, TX — 2,633 3,199 — — 2,633 3,199 5,832 250 2006 11/07 40 years
San Angelo, TX — 194 471 — — 194 471 665 37 1998 11/07 40 years
Pharr, TX — 573 1,229 — — 573 1,229 1,802 93 2000 12/07 40 years
Harlingen, TX — 329 935 — — 329 935 1,264 92 1980 01/08 30 years
Harlingen, TX — 277 808 — — 277 808 1,085 80 1983 01/08 30 years
Laredo, TX — 325 816 — — 325 816 1,141 80 1983 01/08 30 years
McAllen, TX — 643 1,776 — — 643 1,776 2,419 175 1980 01/08 30 years
Port Isabel, TX — 299 855 — — 299 855 1,154 84 1983 01/08 30 years
Brownsville, TX — 843 1,429 — — 843 1,429 2,272 94 2007 05/08 40 years
Edinburg, TX — 834 1,787 — — 834 1,787 2,621 117 2007 05/08 40 years
La Villa, TX — 710 2,166 — — 710 2,166 2,876 142 2007 05/08 40 years
Laredo, TX — 879 1,593 — — 879 1,593 2,472 105 2007 05/08 40 years
Laredo, TX — 1,183 1,934 — — 1,183 1,934 3,117 127 2007 05/08 40 years
McAllen, TX — 1,270 2,383 — — 1,270 2,383 3,653 208 1986 05/08 30 years
Houston, TX — 696 1,458 — — 696 1,458 2,154 74 2008 12/08 40 years
Lubbock, TX — 671 1,612 — — 671 1,612 2,283 82 2007 12/08 40 years
Subway:
Eden Prairie, MN — 54 150 67 — 54 218 272 47 1997 12/01 40 years
Albany, NY — 3 67 — — 3 67 70 10 1992 09/04 40 years
Cohoes, NY — 21 116 8 — 21 123 144 18 1994 09/04 40 years
Sunshine Energy:
Kansas City, MO — 517 720 — — 517 720 1,237 42 1993 07/09 25 years
Neosho, MO — 352 — — — 352 (c ) 352 (c ) 1992 07/09 (c )
Superior Petroleum:
Midway, PA — 311 708 — — 311 708 1,019 117 1990 01/06 30 years
Supervalu:
Huntington, WV — 1,254 761 — — 1,254 761 2,015 264 1971 02/97 40 years
Maple Heights, OH — 1,035 2,874 — — 1,035 2,874 3,909 997 1985 02/97 40 years
Susser:
Corpus Christi, TX — 630 3,131 — — 630 3,131 3,761 923 1983 03/99 40 years
Swansea Quick Cash:
Swansea, IL — 46 132 — — 46 132 178 30 1997 12/01 40 years
Taco Bell:
Ocala, FL — 275 755 — — 275 755 1,030 171 2001 12/01 40 years
Ormond Beach, FL — 632 526 — — 632 526 1,158 119 2001 12/01 40 years
Phoenix, AZ — 594 283 — — 594 283 877 64 1995 12/01 40 years
Bedford, IN — 797 937 — — 797 937 1,734 108 1989 05/06 40 years
Columbus, IN — 690 1,213 — — 690 1,213 1,903 140 2005 05/06 40 years
Columbus, IN — 1,257 2,055 — — 1,257 2,055 3,312 238 1990 05/06 40 years
Evansville, IN — 524 1,815 — — 524 1,815 2,339 210 2005 05/06 40 years
Evansville, IN — 221 828 — — 221 828 1,049 96 2003 05/06 40 years
Evansville, IN — 308 1,301 — — 308 1,301 1,609 150 2000 05/06 40 years
Fishers, IN — 990 486 — — 990 486 1,476 56 1998 05/06 40 years
Greensburg, IN — 648 1,079 — — 648 1,079 1,727 125 1998 05/06 40 years
Indianapolis, IN — 1,032 1,650 — — 1,032 1,650 2,682 191 2004 05/06 40 years
Indianapolis, IN — 547 703 — — 547 703 1,250 81 2004 05/06 40 years
Madisonville, KY — 682 1,193 — — 682 1,193 1,875 138 1999 05/06 40 years
Ownesboro, KY — 639 1,326 — — 639 1,326 1,965 153 2005 05/06 40 years
Shelbyville, IN — 670 1,756 — — 670 1,756 2,426 203 1998 05/06 40 years
Speedway, IN — 408 1,426 — — 408 1,426 1,834 165 2003 05/06 40 years
Terre Haute, IN — 1,037 1,656 — — 1,037 1,656 2,693 191 2003 05/06 40 years
Terre Haute, IN — 1,314 2,249 — — 1,314 2,249 3,563 260 2003 05/06 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 20

Table of Contents

Initial Cost to Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Life on Which
Company Acquisition Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Vincennes, IN — 502 880 — — 502 880 1,382 102 2004 05/06 40 years
Anderson, SC — 176 436 — — 176 436 612 1 2000 12/10 30 years
Anderson, SC — 273 820 — — 273 820 1,093 1 1989 12/10 25 years
Asheville, NC — 408 732 — — 408 732 1,140 1 1992 12/10 25 years
Asheville, NC — 252 483 — — 252 483 735 1 1993 12/10 25 years
Black Mountain, NC — 149 313 — — 149 313 462 1 1992 12/10 25 years
Blue Ridge, GA — 276 553 — — 276 553 829 1 1992 12/10 25 years
Cedartown, GA — 353 890 — — 353 890 1,243 1 1990 12/10 25 years
Duncan, SC — 280 483 — — 280 483 763 1 1999 12/10 30 years
Easley, SC (n) — 444 818 — — 444 818 1,262 1 1991 12/10 25 years
Fort Payne, AL — 362 533 — — 362 533 895 1 1989 12/10 25 years
Franklin, NC — 472 687 — — 472 687 1,159 1 1992 12/10 25 years
Gaffney, SC — 388 940 — — 388 940 1,328 1 1998 12/10 30 years
Greenville, SC — 169 330 — — 169 330 499 1 1990 12/10 25 years
Greenville, SC — 414 810 — — 414 810 1,224 1 1995 12/10 30 years
Hendersonville, NC — 569 1,163 — — 569 1,163 1,732 2 1988 12/10 25 years
Inman, SC — 223 502 — — 223 502 725 1 1999 12/10 30 years
Lavonia, GA — 122 359 — — 122 359 481 — 1999 12/10 30 years
Madison, AL — 498 886 — — 498 886 1,384 1 1985 12/10 25 years
Oneonta, AL — 362 881 — — 362 881 1,243 1 1992 12/10 25 years
Piedmont, SC — 249 702 — — 249 702 951 1 2000 12/10 30 years
Pisgah Forest, NC — 260 672 — — 260 672 932 1 1998 12/10 30 years
Rainsville, AL — 411 1,077 — — 411 1,077 1,488 1 1998 12/10 30 years
Seneca, SC — 304 807 — — 304 807 1,111 1 1993 12/10 25 years
Simpsonville, SC — 635 1,022 — — 635 1,022 1,657 2 1991 12/10 25 years
Spartanburg, SC — 239 496 — — 239 496 735 1 1992 12/10 30 years
Spartanburg, SC — 492 949 — — 492 949 1,441 1 1993 12/10 30 years
Sylva, NC — 580 786 — — 580 786 1,366 1 1994 12/10 30 years
Toccoa, GA — 201 600 — — 201 600 801 1 1993 12/10 30 years
Waynesville, NC — 395 585 — — 395 585 980 1 1998 12/10 30 years
Taverna Greek Grill:
Farmington, NM — 2,757 730 — — 2,757 730 3,487 48 2003 12/07 (m) 40 years
Texas Roadhouse:
Grand Junction, CO — 584 920 — — 584 920 1,504 208 1997 12/01 40 years
Thornton, CO — 599 1,019 — — 599 1,019 1,618 230 1998 12/01 40 years
TGI Friday’s:
Corpus Christi, TX — 1,210 1,532 — — 1,210 1,532 2,742 346 1995 12/01 40 years
Third Federal Savings:
Parma, OH — 370 238 1,100 — 370 1,338 1,708 135 1977 09/06 20 years
Thomasville:
Buford, GA — 1,267 2,406 — — 1,267 2,406 3,673 388 2004 07/04 40 years
TitleMax:
Aiken, SC — 442 646 — — 442 646 1,088 51 1989 08/08 30 years
Anniston, AL — 160 453 — — 160 453 613 27 2008 08/08 40 years
Berkeley, MO — 237 282 — — 237 282 519 33 1961 08/08 20 years
Cheraw, SC — 88 330 — — 88 330 418 31 1976 08/08 25 years
Columbia, SC — 212 319 — — 212 319 531 25 1987 08/08 30 years
Dalton, GA — 178 347 — — 178 347 525 33 1972 08/08 25 years
Darlington, SC — 47 267 — — 47 267 314 25 1973 08/08 25 years
Fairfield, AL — 133 178 — — 133 178 311 17 1974 08/08 25 years
Gadsden, AL — 250 389 — — 250 389 639 23 2007 08/08 40 years
Hueytown, AL — 135 93 — — 135 93 228 22 1948 08/08 10 years
Jonesboro, GA — 675 292 — — 675 292 967 28 1970 08/08 25 years
Lawrenceville, GA — 370 332 — — 370 332 702 26 1986 08/08 30 years
Lewisburg, TN — 70 298 — — 70 298 368 20 1998 08/08 35 years
Macon, GA — 103 290 — — 103 290 393 34 1967 08/08 20 years
Marietta, GA — 285 278 — — 285 278 563 33 1967 08/08 20 years
Memphis, TN — 226 444 — — 226 444 670 35 1986 08/08 30 years
Memphis, TN — 111 237 — — 111 237 348 19 1981 08/08 30 years
Montgomery, AL — 96 233 — — 96 233 329 22 1970 08/08 25 years
Nashville, TN — 268 276 — — 268 276 544 26 1978 08/08 25 years
Nashville, TN — 256 301 — — 256 301 557 24 1982 08/08 30 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 21

Table of Contents

Initial Cost to Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Life on Which
Company Acquisition Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Norcross, GA — 599 350 — — 599 350 949 33 1975 08/08 25 years
Pulaski, TN — 109 361 — — 109 361 470 29 1986 08/08 30 years
Riverdale, GA — 877 400 — — 877 400 1,277 38 1978 08/08 25 years
Snellville, GA — 565 396 — — 565 396 961 38 1977 08/08 25 years
Springfield, MO — 125 230 — — 125 230 355 22 1979 08/08 25 years
Springfield, MO — 220 400 — — 220 400 620 38 1979 08/08 25 years
St. Louis, MO — 134 398 — — 134 398 532 27 1993 08/08 35 years
St. Louis, MO — 244 288 — — 244 288 532 27 1971 08/08 25 years
Sylacauga, AL — 94 191 — — 94 191 285 15 1986 08/08 30 years
Taylors, SC — 299 372 — — 299 372 671 25 1999 08/08 35 years
Tony’s Tires:
Montgomery, AL — 593 1,187 43 — 593 1,229 1,822 150 1998 08/06 40 years
Top’s:
Lacey, WA — 2,777 7,082 — — 2,777 7,082 9,859 2,457 1992 02/97 40 years
Tractor Supply Co.:
Aransas Pass, TX — 101 1,399 200 — 100 1,599 1,699 428 1983 03/99 40 years
Tully’s:
Cheektowaga, NY — 689 386 — — 689 386 1,075 87 1994 12/01 40 years
Ultra Car Wash:
Mobile, AL — 1,071 1,086 — — 1,071 1,086 2,157 92 2005 08/07 40 years
Lilburn, GA — 1,396 1,119 — — 1,396 1,119 2,515 73 2004 05/08 40 years
Uni-Mart:
Bear Creek, PA — 191 230 — — 191 230 421 62 1980 08/05 20 years
Chambersburg, PA — 76 197 — — 76 197 273 53 1990 08/05 20 years
East Brady, PA — 269 583 — — 269 583 852 157 1987 08/05 20 years
Pleasant Gap, PA — 332 593 — — 332 593 925 159 1996 08/05 20 years
Port Vue, PA — 824 118 — — 824 118 942 32 1953 08/05 20 years
Punxsutawney, PA — 253 542 — — 253 542 795 146 1983 08/05 20 years
Shamokin, PA — 324 506 — — 324 506 830 136 1956 08/05 20 years
Shippensburg, PA — 204 330 — — 204 330 534 89 1989 08/05 20 years
Taylor, PA — 181 527 — — 181 527 708 142 1973 08/05 20 years
Wilkes-Barre, PA — 178 471 — — 178 471 649 127 1989 08/05 20 years
Wilkes-Barre, PA — 876 1,957 — — 876 1,957 2,833 526 1998 08/05 20 years
Wilkes-Barre, PA — 171 422 — — 171 422 593 114 1999 08/05 20 years
Williamsport, PA — 909 122 — — 909 122 1,031 33 1950 08/05 20 years
Ashland, PA — 355 545 — — 355 545 900 144 1977 09/05 20 years
Bear Creek, PA (n) — 689 275 — — 689 275 964 73 1980 09/05 20 years
Mountaintop, PA — 423 616 — — 423 616 1,039 163 1987 09/05 20 years
Effort, PA — 1,297 1,202 — — 1,297 1,202 2,499 149 2000 01/06 40 years
Export, PA — 222 215 — — 222 215 437 27 1988 01/06 40 years
Hughesville, PA — 290 566 — — 290 566 856 70 1977 01/06 40 years
McSherrystown, PA — 135 365 — — 135 365 500 45 1988 01/06 40 years
Milesburg, PA — 134 373 — — 134 373 507 46 1987 01/06 40 years
Nanticoke, PA — 175 482 — — 175 482 657 60 1988 01/06 40 years
Nuangola, PA — 1,062 1,203 — — 1,062 1,203 2,265 149 2000 01/06 40 years
Plains, PA — 204 401 — — 204 401 605 50 1994 01/06 40 years
Punxsutawney, PA — 294 650 — — 294 650 944 81 1983 01/06 40 years
Williamsport, PA — 295 379 — — 295 379 674 47 1988 01/06 40 years
Burnham, PA — 265 510 — — 340 435 775 97 1978 07/06 20 years
United Rentals:
Carrollton, TX — 478 535 — — 478 535 1,013 81 1981 12/04 40 years
Cedar Park, TX — 535 829 — — 535 829 1,364 125 1990 12/04 40 years
Clearwater, FL — 1,173 1,811 — — 1,173 1,811 2,984 273 2001 12/04 40 years
Fort Collins, CO — 2,057 978 — — 2,057 978 3,035 148 1975 12/04 40 years
Irving, TX — 708 911 — — 708 911 1,619 138 1984 12/04 40 years
La Porte, TX — 1,115 2,125 — — 1,115 2,125 3,240 321 2000 12/04 40 years
Littleton, CO — 1,743 1,944 — — 1,743 1,944 3,687 294 2002 12/04 40 years
Oklahoma City, OK — 744 1,265 — — 744 1,265 2,009 191 1997 12/04 40 years
Perrysburg, OH — 642 1,119 — — 642 1,119 1,761 169 1979 12/04 40 years
Plano, TX — 1,030 1,148 — — 1,030 1,148 2,178 173 1996 12/04 40 years
Temple, TX — 1,160 1,360 — — 1,160 1,360 2,520 205 1998 12/04 40 years
Ft. Worth, TX — 510 1,128 — — 510 1,128 1,638 168 1997 01/05 40 years
Ft. Worth, TX — 1,428 — — — 1,428 (i ) 1,428 (i ) (i ) 01/05 (i )
Melbourne, FL — 747 607 — — 747 607 1,354 85 1970 05/05 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 22

Table of Contents

Initial Cost
to Company Subsequent
to Acquisition Gross Amount at
Which Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Life on Which Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
United Trust Bank:
Bridgeview, IL — 673 744 — — 673 744 1,417 168 1997 12/01 40 years
Vacant Land:
Florence, AL — 1,034 — — — 748 (e ) 748 (e ) (e ) 06/04 (e )
Longwood, FL — 975 — — — 975 (e ) 975 (e ) (e ) 03/06 (e )
Vacant Property:
Arlington, TX — 435 2,300 334 — 435 2,634 3,069 845 1996 06/96 38 years
Sarasota, FL — 1,168 1,904 219 — 1,168 2,122 3,290 375 1996 09/97 40 years
Knoxville, TN — 467 735 — — 467 735 1,202 220 1999 01/98 (f) 40 years
Aransas Pass, TX — 90 1,241 — — 89 1,241 1,330 366 1983 03/99 40 years
Corpus Christi, TX — 224 2,159 — — 224 2,159 2,383 636 1983 03/99 40 years
Sarasota, FL — 471 1,344 312 — 471 1,656 2,127 243 1983 03/99 40 years
Sealy, TX — 820 905 — — 820 905 1,725 267 1982 03/99 40 years
Winfield, AL — 420 1,685 — — 420 1,685 2,105 497 1983 03/99 40 years
Augusta, GA — 177 674 — — 177 674 851 152 1998 12/01 40 years
Chandler, AZ — 655 791 — — 655 791 1,446 182 1997 12/01 40 years
Cincinnati, OH — 282 521 279 — 543 539 1,082 119 1998 12/01 40 years
Clifton, CO — 245 732 — — 245 732 977 166 1998 12/01 40 years
Columbus, OH — 1,032 1,107 — — 1,032 1,107 2,139 250 1998 12/01 40 years
Eden Prairie, MN — 76 211 94 — 76 305 381 66 1997 12/01 40 years
Jacksonville, FL — 987 856 — — 794 — 794 170 1996 12/01 40 years
Mesa, AZ — 153 400 — — 153 400 553 116 1997 12/01 40 years
Mesa, AZ — 43 113 363 — 43 476 519 32 1997 12/01 40 years
Montgomery, AL — 1,418 1,140 — — 1,418 1,044 2,462 244 1999 12/01 40 years
Southfield, MI — 405 644 — — 405 644 1,049 167 1976 12/01 40 years
Swansea, IL — 92 265 — — 92 265 357 60 1997 12/01 40 years
Florissant, MO — 2,490 2,937 — — 2,490 2,937 5,427 566 1996 04/03 40 years
Woodstock, GA — 1,937 1,285 — — 1,891 1,016 2,907 210 1997 05/03 40 years
Buford, GA — 1,925 5,035 — — 1,925 5,035 6,960 813 2003 07/04 40 years
Cohoes, NY — 27 145 9 — 27 154 181 23 1994 09/04 40 years
Cohoes, NY — 46 246 16 — 46 262 308 39 1994 09/04 40 years
Hudson Falls, NY — 57 780 39 — 57 819 876 126 1990 09/04 40 years
Ticonderoga, NY — 89 689 — — 89 689 778 108 1993 09/04 40 years
Gastonia, NC — 994 1,513 — — 994 1,513 2,507 229 2004 12/04 40 years
Dallas, TX — 2,407 2,299 — — 2,407 2,299 4,706 312 1971 06/05 40 years
Dallas, TX — 1,554 1,229 — — 1,554 1,229 2,783 170 1982 06/05 40 years
Olean, NY — 40 259 — — 40 259 299 70 1990 08/05 20 years
Fairview Heights, IL — 1,258 2,623 — — 1,258 2,623 3,881 342 1980 10/05 40 years
Lapeer, MI — 29 211 — — 29 211 240 18 2007 10/05 40 years
Lapeer, MI — 100 721 — — 100 721 821 61 2007 10/05 40 years
Lafayette, LA — 603 1,149 — — 603 1,149 1,752 145 1999 12/05 40 years
West Palm Beach, FL — 619 161 — — 619 161 780 35 1984 09/06 20 years
Hillman, MI — 167 823 — — 167 363 530 64 1952 10/06 40 years
Lithonia, GA — 923 1,276 — — 923 1,276 2,199 113 2002 06/07 40 years
Lubbock, TX — 2,606 2,898 — — 2,606 2,898 5,504 251 1983 07/07 40 years
Lubbock, TX — 1,293 1,211 — — 1,293 1,211 2,504 105 1983 07/07 40 years
Bakersfield, CA — 1,643 1,959 — — 530 — 530 137 1975 03/08 25 years
Bellingham, WA — 1,237 1,260 — — 1,237 408 1,645 61 1994 06/08 30 years
Lubbock, TX — 943 957 — — 943 957 1,900 12 1964 11/10 10 years
Value City Furniture:
White Marsh, MD — 3,762 — 3,006 — 3,762 3,006 6,768 961 1998 10/97 (g) 40 years
Vitamin Shoppe, The:
Cincinnati, OH — 297 443 368 — 297 810 1,107 134 1999 06/98 (f) 40 years
Walgreens:
Sunrise, FL — 1,958 1,401 — — 1,958 1,401 3,359 267 1994 05/03 40 years
Tulsa, OK — 1,193 3,056 — — 1,193 3,056 4,249 423 2003 06/05 40 years
Boise, ID — 792 1,875 — — 792 1,875 2,667 49 2000 03/10 30 years
Nampa, ID — 1,062 2,253 — — 1,062 2,253 3,315 59 2000 03/10 30 years
Wendy’s:
Sacramento, CA — 586 — — — 586 (i ) 586 (i ) (i ) 02/98 (i )
New Kensington, PA — 501 333 — — 501 333 834 75 1980 12/01 40 years
Whataburger:
Albuquerque, NM — 624 419 — — 624 419 1,043 95 1995 12/01 40 years

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 23

Table of Contents

Initial Cost to Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Life on Which
Company Acquisition Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Wherehouse Music:
Homewood, AL — 1,032 697 — — 1,032 697 1,729 158 1997 12/01 40 years
Independence, MO — 503 1,209 — — 503 1,209 1,712 152 1994 12/05 40 years
Wingfoot:
Beaverdam, OH — (l ) 1,521 — — (l ) 1,521 1,521 138 2004 05/07 40 years
Benton, AR — (l ) 309 — — (l ) 309 309 27 2001 05/07 40 years
Bowman, SC — (l ) 969 — — (l ) 969 969 100 1998 05/07 35 years
Dalton, GA — (l ) 1,541 — — (l ) 1,541 1,541 140 2004 05/07 40 years
Dandridge, TN — (l ) 1,030 — — (l ) 1,030 1,030 107 1989 05/07 35 years
Franklin, OH — (l ) 563 — — (l ) 563 563 58 1998 05/07 35 years
Gary, IN — (l ) 1,486 — — (l ) 1,486 1,486 135 2004 05/07 40 years
Georgetown, KY — (l ) 679 — — (l ) 679 679 82 1997 05/07 30 years
Mebane, NC — (l ) 561 — — (l ) 561 561 58 1998 05/07 35 years
Piedmont, SC — (l ) 567 — — (l ) 567 567 59 1999 05/07 35 years
Port Wentworth,
GA — (l ) 552 — — (l ) 552 552 57 1998 05/07 35 years
Valdosta, GA — (l ) 1,477 — — (l ) 1,477 1,477 134 2004 05/07 40 years
Temple, GA — (l ) 1,065 — — (l ) 1,065 1,065 83 2007 06/07 40 years
Whiteland, IN — (l ) 1,471 — — (l ) 1,471 1,471 127 2004 07/07 40 years
Des Moines, IA — (l ) 816 — — (l ) 816 816 71 1987 07/07 40 years
Robinson, TX — (l ) 1,183 — — (l ) 1,183 1,183 92 2007 07/07 40 years
Kearney, MO — (l ) 1,269 — — (l ) 1,269 1,269 110 2003 07/07 40 years
Oklahoma City, OK — (l ) 1,247 — — (l ) 1,247 1,247 90 2008 08/07 40 years
Amarillo, TX — (l ) 1,158 — — (l ) 1,158 1,158 74 2008 02/08 40 years
Jackson, MS — (l ) 1,281 — — (l ) 1,281 1,281 79 2008 03/08 40 years
Glendale, KY — (l ) 1,066 — — (l ) 1,066 1,066 59 2008 07/08 40 years
Lebanon, TN — (l ) 1,331 — — (l ) 1,331 1,331 68 2008 08/08 40 years
Laredo, TX — (l ) 1,238 — — (l ) 1,238 1,238 55 2009 11/08 (q) 40 years
Midland, TX — (l ) 1,148 — — (l ) 1,148 1,148 13 2010 04/10 (q) 40 years
Tuscaloosa, AL — (l ) 8 — — (l ) 8 8 — (q ) 08/10 (q) (q )
Kenly, NC — (l ) — — — (l ) — — — (q ) 11/10 (q) (q )
Winn-Dixie:
Columbus, GA — 1,023 1,875 — — 1,023 1,875 2,898 350 1984 07/03 40 years
Wireless Wizard:
Ridgeland, MS — 436 523 26 — 436 549 985 66 1997 08/06 40 years
Your Choice:
Hazleton, PA — 670 377 — — 670 377 1,047 101 1974 08/05 20 years
Montoursville, PA — 158 415 13 — 158 428 586 52 1988 01/06 40 years
Ziebart:
Maplewood, MN — 308 311 — — 308 311 619 46 1990 02/05 40 years
Middleburg Heights, OH — 199 148 — — 199 148 347 22 1961 02/05 40 years
Zio’s Italian Kitchen:
Aurora, CO (n) — 1,168 1,105 — — 1,168 1,105 2,273 210 2000 06/05 30 years
Leasehold Interests:
Lima, OH — 1,290 — — — 1,290 (e ) 1,290 1,055 (e ) 08/01 (e )
SUBTOTAL 20,524 1,127,836 1,463,619 151,411 — 1,123,517 1,592,756 2,716,273 222,921
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Direct Financing Leases:
Barnes & Noble:
Plantation, FL — — 3,498 — — — (c ) (c ) (c ) 1996 05/95 (f) (c )
Borders:
Altamonte Springs, FL — — 3,267 — — — (c ) (c ) (c ) 1997 09/97 (c )
Checkers:
Orlando, FL — — 287 — — — (c ) (c ) (c ) 1988 07/92 (c )
CVS:
San Antonio, TX — — 744 — — — (c ) (c ) (c ) 1993 12/93 (c )
Amarillo, TX — 159 855 — — (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1994 12/94 (d )
Lafayette, LA — — 949 — — — (c ) (c ) (c ) 1995 01/96 (c )
Oklahoma City, OK — (l ) 1,365 — — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1997 06/97 (c )
Oklahoma City, OK — (l ) 1,419 — — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1997 06/97 (c )

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 24

Table of Contents

Initial Cost to Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Life on Which
Company Acquisition Carried at Close of Period (a) (b) Depreciation &
Building, Building, Accumulated Amortization in
Improvements & Improvements & Depreciation Latest Income
Encumbrances Land Leasehold Interests Improvements Carrying Costs Land Leasehold Interests Total and Amortization Date
of Construction Date Acquired Statement
is Computed
Denny’s:
Stockton, CA — 940 509 — — (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1982 09/06 (d )
Food 4 Less:
Chula Vista, CA — — 4,266 — — — (c ) (c ) (c ) 1995 11/98 (c )
Heilig-Meyers/The Room Store:
York, PA — 279 1,110 — — (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1997 11/98 (d )
Marlow Heights, MD — 416 1,397 — — (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1968 11/98 (d )
Jared Jewelers:
Phoenix, AZ 215 (k) (l ) 1,242 — — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )
Toledo, OH — (l ) 1,458 — — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )
Oviedo, FL 364 (k) (l ) 1,500 — — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )
Lewisville, TX 187 (k) (l ) 1,503 — — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )
Glendale, AZ — (l ) 1,599 — — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 1998 12/01 (c )
Kash n’ Karry:
Valrico, FL 2,979 (p) 1,235 3,255 — — (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1997 06/02 (d )
Rite Aid:
Kennett Square, PA — (l ) — 1,984 — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 2000 12/00 (c )
Arlington, VA — (l ) 3,201 — — (l ) (c ) (c ) (c ) 2000 02/02 (c )
Sunshine Energy:
Altamont, KS — 124 142 — — (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1979 07/09 (d )
Chouteau, OK — 113 301 — — (d ) (d ) (d ) (d ) 1988 07/09 (d )
Neosho, MO — — 775 — — — (c ) (c ) (c ) 1992 07/09 (c )
SUBTOTAL 3,745 3,266 34,642 1,984 — — — — —
Real Estate Held for Sale the Company has Invested in:
Our Place:
North Richland Hills, TX — 584 180 184 — 596 342 938 — 1989 02/06 —
Power Center:
Midland, MI — 1,085 1,635 — — 1,085 1,635 2,720 — 2006 05/05 (g) —
Elmira, NY — 2,248 7,159 — — 2,248 5,291 7,539 — 2006 08/05 (g) —
Topsham, ME — 1,885 1,735 — — 1,885 62 1,947 — 2007 02/06 (g) —
Irving, TX — 951 1,090 — — 951 1,063 2,014 — 1987 02/06 —
Waxahachie, TX — 1,249 1,097 — — 1,249 1,069 2,318 — 1995 02/06 —
Harlingen, TX — 247 807 — — 247 807 1,054 — 2008 09/06 (g) —
Harlingen, TX. — 749 1,238 — — 749 1,238 1,987 — 2008 09/06 (g) —
Woodstock, GA — 261 701 — — 261 606 867 — 1997 07/08 —
Tutor Time:
Elk Grove, CA — 1,216 2,786 — — 1,216 2,741 3,957 — 2009 09/08 —
Vacant Land:
Grand Prairie, TX — 387 — — — 108 — 108 (e ) (e ) 12/02 —
Topsham, ME — 1,034 — — — 293 — 293 (e ) (e ) 02/06 —
Rockwall, TX — 900 — — — 900 — 900 (e ) (e ) 02/06 —
Fairfield Township, OH — 3,201 — — — 1,868 — 1,868 (e ) (e ) 08/06 —
Bonita Springs, FL — 112 — — — 25 — 25 (e ) (e ) 09/06 —
Lancaster, OH — 2,135 — — — 1,339 — 1,339 (e ) (e ) 01/08 —
Hadley, MA — 2,869 — — — 2,091 — 2,091 (e ) (e ) 02/08 —
SUBTOTAL — 21,113 18,428 184 — 17,111 14,854 31,965 —

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 25

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2010

(dollars in thousands)

(a) Transactions in real estate and accumulated depreciation during 2010, 2009, and 2008 are summarized as follows:

2010
Land, buildings, and leasehold interests:
Balance at the beginning of year $ 2,584,947 $ 2,605,288 $ 2,415,536
Acquisitions, completed construction and tenant improvements 248,438 35,924 410,787
Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests (58,438 ) (21,751 ) (215,542 )
Provision for loss on impairment of real estate — (34,514 ) (5,493 )
Balance at the close of year $ 2,774,947 $ 2,584,947 $ 2,605,288
Accumulated depreciation and amortization:
Balance at the beginning of year $ 183,949 $ 146,289 $ 111,080
Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests (2,071 ) (3,143 ) (2,591 )
Depreciation and amortization expense 41,043 40,803 37,800
Balance at the close of year $ 222,921 $ 183,949 $ 146,289

As of December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the detailed real estate schedule excludes work in progress of $26,699, $5,634, and $42,253, respectively, which is included in the above reconciliation.

(b) As of December 31, 2010, the leases are treated as either operating or financing leases for federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2010, the aggregate cost of the properties owned by NNN that are under operating leases were $2,641,832 and financing leases were $4,178.

(c) For financial reporting purposes, the portion of the lease relating to the building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.

(d) For financial reporting purposes, the lease for the land and building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.

(e) NNN owns only the land for this property.

(f) Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN purchased the buildings from the tenants upon completion of construction, generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.

(g) Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. NNN developed the buildings, generally completing construction within 12 months from the acquisition date of the land.

(h) In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of NNN’s tenants, in June of 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on certain Investment Properties.

(i) NNN owns only the land for this property, which is subject to a ground lease between NNN and the tenant. The tenant funded the improvements on the property.

(j) In 2005, there was a lease amendment to this property, resulting in a reclassification from a direct financing lease to an operating lease.

(k) NNN owns only the building for this property, which is encumbered by a fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

(l) NNN owns only the building for this property. The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party.

(m) Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.

(n) The tenant of this property has subleased the property. The tenant continues to be responsible for complying with all the terms of the lease agreement and is continuing to pay rent on this property to NNN.

(o) Property is encumbered as a part of NNN’s $6,952 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

(p) Property is encumbered as a part of NNN’s $21,000 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

(q) The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party. Pursuant to the lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the execution of the ground lease.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 26

Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

December 31, 2010

(dollars in thousands)

Description Face Amount of Mortgages Carrying Amount of Mortgages (f) Principal Amount of Loans Subject to Delinquent Principal or Interest
First mortgages on properties:
Paramus, NJ 9.000 % 2022 (b ) — $ 6,000 $ 4,971 $ —
Des Moines, IA 8.000 % 2013 (d ) — 400 269 —
Terre Haute, IN 7.000 % 2011 (c ) — 1,582 1,452 —
Cleveland, OH 10.000 % 2028 (c ) — 6,644 6,644 —
Milford, CT 8.000 % 2013 (c ) — 1,550 1,550 —
Hollywood, FL 6.000 % 2013 (c ) — 450 450 —
Taylorsville, NC 9.500 % 2013 (e ) — 352 352 —
4 properties in FL and GA 6.250 % 2014 (c ) — 5,500 5,450 —
$ 22,478 $ 21,138 (a) $ —

(a) The following shows the changes in the carrying amounts of mortgage loans during the years:

Balance at beginning of year 2010 — $ 34,707 $ 35,993 $ 49,336
New mortgage loans 6,302 (g) 2,259 (g) 17,028 (g)
Deductions during the year:
Collections of principal (7,148 ) (3,545 ) (27,874 )
Foreclosures (12,723 ) — (2,497 )
Balance at the close of year $ 21,138 $ 34,707 $ 35,993

(b) Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan.

(c) Interest only payments are due monthly. Principal is due at maturity.

(d) Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan with a principal balloon payment at maturity.

(e) Principal and interest is payable in full on the earlier of (i) specific events as outlined in the loan agreement, or (ii) maturity date.

(f) Mortgages held by NNN and its subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $21,138, $34,707, and $35,993, respectively.

(g) Mortgages totaling $6,302, $2,259, and $17,028, were accepted in connection with real estate transactions for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.