AI assistant
NIPPON ACTIVE VALUE FUND PLC — Annual Report 2022
Apr 13, 2023
5034_10-k_2023-04-13_fc1131ff-a2a3-46b1-bf0d-b7641bc17398.xhtml
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Annual Report and Accounts For the year ended 31 December 2022
RISING SUN MANAGEMENT LTD
Nippon Active Value Fund plc
Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022
4 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
Section 1 – Strategic Report
Contents
- Section 1 – Strategic Report
- Investment Objective, Financial Information and Performance Summary 2
- Chairman’s Statement 3
- Investment Adviser’s Report 5
- Portfolio 8
- Investment Policy, Results and Other Information 9
- Risks and Risk Management 11
- Section 172 Statement 15
- Section 2 – Governance
- Directors’ Report 17
- Corporate Governance Statement 23
- Directors’ Remuneration Report 29
- Report of the Audit Committee 34
- Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 36
- Independent Auditor’s Report 37
- Section 3 – Financial Statements
- Statement of Comprehensive Income 44
- Statement of Financial Position 45
- Statement of Changes in Equity 46
- Statement of Cash Flows 47
- Notes to the Accounts 48
- Section 4 – Other information
- Alternative Performance Measures (“APMS”) 63
- Glossary 65
- Company Information 67
- Notice of Annual General Meeting 68
- Notes to Notice of Annual General Meeting 70
2 Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022
Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
Investment Objective, Financial Information and Performance Summary
Investment Objective
The investment objective of the Company is to provide Shareholders with attractive capital growth through the active management of a focused portfolio of quoted companies which have the majority of their operations in, or revenue derived from, Japan and that have been identified by the Investment Adviser as being undervalued.
Financial Information
| At 31 December 2022 | At 31 December 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Net assets – (millions) | £158.7 | £156.0 |
| Net asset value (“NAV”) per Ordinary Share (“Share”) – (pence)¹ | 140.5 | 137.90 |
| Share price – (pence)¹ | 117.5 | 134.00 |
| Share price discount to NAV² | 16.3% | 2.8% |
| Ongoing charges² | 1.41% | 1.37% |
Performance Summary
| For the year to 31 December 2022 | For the year to 31 December 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| NAV total return per Share² | +3.5% | +22.3% |
| Share price total return per Share² | -10.9% | +26.8% |
| MSCI Japan Small Cap index (sterling terms) | -1.6% | -1.4% |
Source: Bloomberg
1 This is measured on a cum income basis.
2 These are Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”), which is “a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows, other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable financial reporting framework”. Definition of these and other APMs used in this report, together with how these APMs have been calculated are disclosed on pages 63 and 64 of this report.
3 Total returns are stated in GBP, including dividend reinvested.
Section 1 – Strategic Report 3
Chairman’s Statement
Overview of the Year
I am pleased to present the third annual report of Nippon Active Value Fund plc (the “Company” or “NAVF”), covering the period from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022 (the “Year”).
At the end of the Year total assets were £158.7 million and NAV per Share was 140.5p, reflecting a rise of +3.5% over the Year and a cumulative increase of +43.7% since the Company’s launch on 21 February 2020. While we do not target a particular index benchmark, for comparison, the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index returned -1.6% in sterling terms over the Year and +7.4% since the launch date. The returns since inception assume dividends were reinvested.
The closing share price on 31 December 2022 was 117.5p, reflecting a discount of 16.4% to NAV. The average discount to NAV over the Year was 8.9% and the Shares traded in wide range from a premium of 5.2% to a discount of 16.7% to NAV. Since the end of the Year the discount has narrowed and stood at 6.7% as at 3 April 2023, the latest practicable date before publishing this report.
Global markets struggled through the Year in the face of geopolitical tensions, rising inflation and corresponding interest rate increases and general nervousness resulted in outflows from open-ended funds and wider discounts in closed-end equity funds.
One factor specific to Japan was the weakness of the yen. Although consumer price inflation in Japan also rose, to 4% in December, the Bank of Japan continued to intervene in bond markets to keep rates within a tight range around its target 10-year rate of 0%. Since 2016, the Central Bank has kept that range at 0.25% around the target. As rates rose elsewhere, the interest rate differential put extreme pressure on the yen, which fell to its lowest point against the US dollar in over 30 years. Market commentators generally expected the Governor of the Bank of Japan (‘BOJ’) to maintain the policy for the duration of his tenure, which is scheduled to end in the first quarter of 2023. As reiterated in the most recent Interim Report, the Company does not hedge the currency and the returns reflect the full impact of the yen’s weakness.
In mid-December the central bank unexpectedly announced it would allow bonds to trade within 0.5% of the target, though the target was held at 0%. The yen bounced by more than 4% against the USD on the day of the announcement. December’s volatility provides an illustration of the added risks hedging at this point would entail.
Your Company’s portfolio is a concentrated one, with a focus on undervalued targets, mostly small market capitalisation stocks, where engagement with management could unlock value to all shareholders. We expect returns to be relatively lowly correlated to the broader market. We utilise the research input of our sub-advisors at Dalton KK in Tokyo and now have two members of the Rising Sun Management team based in Tokyo. With the re-opening of Japan’s borders the overseas-based officers have also been able to arrange in-person meetings with target companies. Their report, which follows, includes highlights of the Year’s engagement.
Dividend
The Company’s intention is to achieve its returns primarily through capital appreciation. As such, no specific dividend policy has been established and any distributions will be made entirely at the discretion of the Board, taking into consideration the requirement to ensure the Company’s compliance with the rules relating to investment trusts.
The Board is pleased to have declared on 5 April 2023, an interim dividend for the year ended 31 December 2022 of 3.20 pence (2021: 1.95 pence) per Ordinary Share. The dividend will be payable on 26 May 2023 to Shareholders who appear on the register by close of business on 21 April 2023, with an ex-dividend date of 20 April 2023.
The Board will not target a dividend for future years but will substantially pay out distributable income for any particular period by way of dividend.
Co-Investment
As detailed in previous reports, from time to time the Company invests alongside other vehicles advised by Rising Sun Management. In mid-2022 we also announced a memorandum of understanding with Dalton Investments, to allow holdings in common. This enables NAVF to build significant positions in slightly larger companies in which NAVF on its own would not be able to build a large enough position to command the attention of management. At the end of 2022 your Company held thirteen investments also owned by Dalton or RSM-advised entities.
4 Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022
Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
Gearing
The Company has arranged a borrowing facility of £30 million to provide the Investment Adviser with flexibility to gear the portfolio when appropriate. At the end of December 2022, this facility had not been drawn down and the portfolio held £31,738,000 (31 December 2021: £15,815,000) in cash. As at 3 April 2023, the latest practicable date prior to publication of this report cash comprised 30.4% of the Company’s assets.
Japanese Corporate Governance Developments
The trend of increasing shareholder activism is intact and there are increasing numbers of domestic participants. According to IR Japan, the number of activist funds operating in Japan has risen from 17 in 2017 to 65 in May 2022. While U.S. and European funds are still the largest group, over that period domestic activist funds have increased from fewer than 5 to 18.
The number of shareholder proposals presented to AGMs in 2022 rose by 80% to 293 and the number of companies subject to proposals rose by 60%, to 77. About half of the proposals are related to balance sheet efficiency such as share buybacks or dividend increases. More of them were supported by over 20% of shareholders compared to 2021, (26 vs 13).
This Company was among those submitting resolutions and examples are included in the Investment Adviser’s Report which follows.
The first stage of the reorganisation of the Tokyo Stock Exchange has begun. There is an extended transition period before companies that fail to meet the new listing criteria are excluded from the new Prime Market, but more details were clarified in 2022 and progress, though slow, has begun. Our Investment Adviser expects that the possibility of an eventual demotion from the more prestigious market segment will encourage target companies to support recommendations designed to increase their market capitalisation and returns to all stakeholders.
Annual General Meeting (the “AGM”)
Your Company’s AGM is scheduled for 8 June 2023 at 4pm to be held at the Company’s registered office located at Apex Group, 6th Floor, 125 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5AS. The Board strongly encourages all shareholders to exercise their votes by completing their proxy forms in advance of the Meeting. For more details, please see enclosed AGM Notice. Those shareholders who are unable to attend the AGM in person are welcome to submit questions to the Board or their Investment Adviser at [email protected].# Outlook
The Company seeks to take advantage of the corporate governance reforms in Japan introduced over the past fifteen years and we believe that an activist strategy will continue to generate superior returns compared to the broader market. Rising Sun Management focuses on companies that have excess capital over and above that required for the operation of their business and seeks to persuade companies to distribute excess cash to shareholders by repurchasing their shares in the market or paying out larger cash dividends. We have begun to see the benefits of co-investment with other funds, as described below in the Investment Adviser’s Report. We remain confident of the potential for significant returns from our current investment portfolio and of the prospects of identifying attractive new targets. Our Investment Adviser will continue to seek out undervalued opportunities with the potential to unlock value to all Shareholders, a strategy which we believe can generate strong absolute returns in a wide range of market environments.
Rosemary Morgan
Chairman
5 April 2023
Chairman’s Statement continued
Section 1 – Strategic Report 5
Performance since inception (excluding dividends re-invested)
| Cumulative Period | Sterling/Yen FX Change | GBP | JPY | FX GBP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 February 2020 to 31 Dec 2020 | 1.39% | 13.58% | 12.19% | 1.39% |
| Year Ending 31 December 2021 | -12.77% | 21.41% | 50.54% | -12.64% |
| 1st Quarter 31 March 2022 | -2.28% | -7.30% | 42.99% | -15.15% |
| 2nd Quarter 30 June 2022 | -3.07% | -5.33% | 39.76% | -18.73% |
| 3rd Quarter 30 September 2022 | 2.24% | 8.37% | 48.33% | -17.17% |
| 4th Quarter 31 December 2022 | 1.90% | 7.09% | 56.04% | -15.58% |
| Year Ending 31 December 2022 | -1.79% | 1.86% | 56.04% | -15.58% |
Overview
Thanks to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, 2022 was, as the late Queen once said, an ‘annus horribilis’ for most of the world, and for markets in particular. Japan was no exception. The benchmark Nikkei index was down 9.4% over the course of the year, while the MSCI Japanese Smaller Companies index (which, though not a comparator for the Company, at least incorporates the sea in which NAVF fishes, was off 11.7% in yen terms) over the same period. And the Yen suffered the largest decline against major currencies for 40 years. Against this difficult backdrop, NAVF did well. It was the top performing Japanese (Japanese Smaller companies peer group) fund in the UK, even with a discount to NAV averaging over 10% and an additional cumulative currency drag of another 25% or so. The Net Asset Value per share (NAV) on 4 January 2022, the first trading day of the year, was 136.81p, by 30 December it had reached 140.46p and net assets under management (AUM) totalled £158,744,650. The good news is that 2023 has started much better for the Company. As of 3 April 2023 (the last practicable date) the Company’s NAV is above 151.71p and AUM are over £171.5 million.
Portfolio Composition
In my interim half-year report, I described the success we have enjoyed with several companies who have acted, in one way or another, to improve their capital allocation policies following our prompting with written submissions at their Annual General Meetings (AGMs). The most successful of these, because they did everything we recommended and more, was Mitsuboshi Belting. On 7 September 2022 I gave an interview to Kohei Onishi, a journalist with the Nikkei in Tokyo, and we spoke, amongst other topics, about Mitsuboshi Belting. Afterwards, Onishi-san, in further research for his article, followed up with the company directly. They told him that they had considered our recommendations and had concluded that they were sitting on excess cash that they were not planning to use in the business. They therefore decided to institute the changes under discussion – a restricted stock programme, a large share repurchase and a 100% payout ratio for dividends both now and in the future – and asked us to withdraw our AGM submission, which we were happy to do. They now expressed themselves pleased with the constructive dialogue they had with RSM and I am pleased to say this has continued. This article appears to have had both a reassuring and galvanizing effect on several other of our portfolio companies. Daiichi Kensetsu announced a buyback of 3.45% of outstanding shares. On 31 October 2022 Vital KSK announced all of the following:
- Paying out a dividend on equity of at least 2%
- A total pay-out ratio of 50% or more (estimated at Y45 per share, considering EPS of Y90 per share)
- Continued share repurchases until reaching the highest PBR among drug distributors
- Selling 50% of their current cross-shareholdings within five years
- Changing their ROE target to 5% in 2023, 5.2% in 2024, and NAVF’s recommended 8% by 2031
- Creating an Audit Committee and implementing a restricted share compensation programme (subject to June 2023 approval), as recommended by RSM
- Declaring the intention to spend Y60bn of surplus net cash with – Y10 billion of buybacks – Y30 billion of investments in the Osaka distribution centre and updates to existing allocations – Y20 billion growth in capex and M&A
The shares rose by 15% (the maximum allowed) on the day of the announcement. In the second half of the year we decided to rationalise the portfolio. The portfolio currently consists of 18 core holdings. There were several reasons for the choice of stocks to be jettisoned – too illiquid, stocks in FEFTA Category 3 (the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act category which imposes the most restrictions on foreign shareholders), companies that had already implemented our recommendations and/or reached our target valuation, etc – but, overriding all of these, was the desire to build up liquidity in the portfolio to permit the more vigorous pursuit of our goals. It has given us enhanced capacity to build larger positions, launch tender offers, and generally speak with a louder, if still ‘friendly’, voice to our more recalcitrant management teams. While we were selling out of the names above, we also added to one or two favourites, principally Ihara Science (which is discussed below). Our universe of potential targets for engagement remains in the hundreds, and recent announcements by the TSE, pushing lowly-valued companies to augment their share prices so they no longer trade below book value, is yet another comforting breeze at our backs. The regulators continue, at least as far as the big picture is concerned, to be the activists’ best friends.
Recent Developments
In December, and in anticipation of the retirement of Mr Kuroda as Governor of the central bank, the Yen started to react to the prospect of higher interest rates. The long journey towards the normalisation of the currency has begun, with the conundrum of how to control the unwinding of decades’ long manipulation landed squarely on the shoulders of the newly appointed Mr Ueda. This is all good news for NAVF and will provide another support to its valuation, as the currency discount that was such a drag on performance in 2022 gradually unwinds. Early in the current financial year, NAVF, in conjunction with Michael 1925 and Hikari Acquisition, launched a tender offer (TOB) for between 40-44% of T&K Toka. The group, in combination with Dalton Investments, who have owned around 20% of the company’s outstanding shares for over twelve years, sought to help management improve their capital allocation policies. Regrettably, the TOB has fallen short, but the dialogue will continue, and the company’s cage will continue to be rattled by its largest shareholder(s). The costs were born by Rosenwald Capital. Following a presentation from RSM’s CIO, Jamie Rosenwald, and our Tokyo-based partner, Masumi Nishida, in November 2022, the President of Ihara Science, Tokuo Nakano, has launched an MBO to take the company private. Following Sakai Ovex, this is the second example of a portfolio company responding positively to our MBO recommendation.
Investment Adviser’s Report continued
Section 1 – Strategic Report 7
Outlook
We are encouraged by recent positive comments about the Company in the UK press. NAVF has recently been tipped by Questor in the Daily Telegraph (for whom it is the Investment Trust of the Year) and by the Midas column in the Mail on Sunday. Both these articles will be very helpful in promoting the Fund’s attraction to UK retail investors, whom we have been seeking to target for some time. Institutional marketing continues, with buyers from as far afield as Australia and the US showing increasing interest. At the Fund’s third anniversary, it is the top performing Japanese investment trust in the UK, now with the second lowest discount in the sector. With a large cash position and plenty of interesting candidates for our attention, there is everything to play for in a continually improving macro environment. As markets continue to recover from last year’s weakness, it is hoped the Investment Trust sector will become once more ‘in vogue’ and that discounts will begin to narrow. NAVF is in a good position to take advantage of an improving mood amongst investors, and we aim to grow the fund through new issuance when appropriate. The fund has been growing steadily, we would like to see this really accelerate to capitalise on what has already been achieved. Fingers crossed – 2023 could be shaping up to be an ‘annus mirabilis’.
Paul ffolkes Davis
Rising Sun Management Limited
5 April 2023
Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022 8
Portfolio
As at 31 December 2022
Top ten holdings as a percentage of net assets as of 31 December 2022
| Company | Sector | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Intage Holdings | Industrial | 12.0 |
| 2. Mitsuboshi Belting | Industrial | 10.9 |
| 3. Ihara Science | Engineering | 8.7 |
| 4. Nippon Fine Chemical | Industrial | 8.0 |
| 5. Ebara Jitsugyo | Engineering | 7.7 |
| # 7. Vital KSK Pharmaceutical 4.3 | ||
| # 8. Ishihara Chemical Industrial 3.7 | ||
| # 9. Bunka Shutter Industrial 3.5 | ||
| # 10. Konishi Industrial 2.9 |
Sector breakdown
| Industrials | Health Care | Materials | Cash | Communication Services | Financials |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.1% | 2.1% | 19.1% | 20.3% | 4.3% | 12.1% |
Section 1 – Strategic Report 9
Investment objective
The investment objective of the Company is to provide Shareholders with attractive capital growth through the active management of a focused portfolio of quoted companies which have the majority of their operations in, or revenue derived from, Japan and that have been identified by the Investment Adviser as being undervalued.
Investment policy
The Company will invest in a highly concentrated portfolio of shares issued by quoted companies which have the majority of their operations in, or revenue derived from Japan, and which the Investment Adviser deems attractive and undervalued and typically where (i) cash constitutes a significant proportion of the investee company’s market capitalisation; and (ii) the relevant company has no controlling or majority shareholders. The Board will not set any limits on sector weightings or stock selection within the portfolio. The Board will apply the following restrictions on the size of its investments:
- not more than 30 per cent. of the Gross Asset Value at the time of investment will be invested in the securities of a single issuer (such restriction does not, however, apply to investment of cash held for working capital purposes and pending investment or distribution in near cash equivalent instruments including securities issued or guaranteed by a government, government agency or instrumentality of any EU or OECD Member State or by any supranational authority of which one or more EU or OECD Member States are members); and
- the value of the four largest investments at the time of investment will not constitute more than 75 per cent. of the Gross Asset Value.
The Company will not be constrained by any index benchmark in its asset allocation. Additionally, while the Company intends that the majority of its investments will be in quoted companies, it may also make investments in unquoted companies and the Company may become invested in unquoted companies as a result of corporate actions or commercial transactions undertaken by quoted companies. The Company will only make investments in unquoted companies in order to maintain or improve its position in relation to a business which operated through a quoted entity at the time of the Company’s initial investment in that business. In any event, the Company will only make an investment in an unquoted company if the aggregate interest of the Company in unquoted companies at the time of such investment is not more than 10 per cent. of the Net Asset Value of the Company at that time. This will mean if a quoted portfolio company is delisted or an unquoted investment is revalued with the effect of increasing the Company’s interest in unquoted investments to above 10 per cent. of the Company’s Net Asset Value at that time, the Company will not be in breach of its investment policy and will not have to divest itself of any unquoted investments. However, while the Company’s interest in unquoted investments remains above 10 per cent. of its Net Asset Value, the Company will not be able to make any further investments in unquoted companies.
Investment restrictions
There are no restrictions placed on the market capitalization of investee companies, but it is expected that the portfolio will be weighted towards small cap companies with market capitalization of up to US$1 billion. Once fully invested, the portfolio is expected to have up to 20 holdings although there is no guarantee that this will be the case and it may contain a lesser or greater number of holdings at any time. The Company intends to acquire large minority stakes of typically 4.9 to 25.0 per cent. in each investee company. Nevertheless, in certain limited circumstances the Company may acquire a larger stake in an investee company if the investment case so warrants. The Company will not, however, acquire any stake which could cause a change in its status as an investment trust under Chapter 4 of Part 24 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. The Company will comply with the following investment restrictions for so long as they remain requirements of the Listing Rules (relevant elements of which the Company has voluntarily undertaken to comply):
- neither the Company, nor any of its subsidiaries will conduct any trading activity which is significant in the context of the Group as a whole;
- no more than 10 per cent., in aggregate, of the value of the total assets of the Company will be invested in other listed closed-ended investment funds; and
Investment Policy, Results and Other Information 10 Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
- the Company must, at all times, invest and manage its assets in a way which is consistent with its object of spreading investment risk and in accordance with the published investment policy.
Treasury policy
Until the Company is fully invested, and pending re-investment or distribution of cash receipts, the Company will invest in cash, cash equivalents, near cash instruments and money market instruments. The Company expects to maintain any non-operational cash balances in Japanese yen. The Company may also use derivatives for gearing and efficient portfolio management purposes.
Gearing Policy
The Company may use borrowings and other gearing to seek to enhance investment returns at a level (not exceeding 20 per cent. of the Company’s net assets calculated at the time of drawdown) which the Directors, the AIFM and Rising Sun consider to be appropriate. It is expected that gearing will primarily comprise bank borrowings, public bond issuance or private placement borrowings, although overdraft or revolving credit facilities may be used to increase acquisition and cash flow flexibility.
Hedging Policy
Although the Company does not currently intend to enter into any arrangements to hedge its underlying currency exposure to investments denominated in Japanese yen, it may in future, at its discretion, enter into currency hedging arrangements using futures, forwards, swaps or other derivative instruments.
Dividend policy
The Company’s intention is to look to achieve its results primarily through capital appreciation. As such, no specific dividend policy has been established and any distributions will be made entirely at the discretion of the Board.
Distribution policy
The Company believes that the substantial undervaluation of Japanese equities, coupled with an activist strategy designed to unlock underlying value should allow the Company to achieve significant investment results over time. Given the nature of this strategy, however, it is possible that such returns could be “lumpy” and unpredictable. Accordingly, the Company will target results primarily through capital appreciation. No specific dividend policy will be established in the first instance and any distributions will be made entirely at the discretion of the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company will make such distributions as may be required to ensure compliance with the rules relating to investment trusts.
Key performance indicators (“KPIs”)
The Board measures the Company’s success in attaining its investment objective by reference to the following KPIs:
(i) Long-term capital growth
The Board considers the NAV and Share price total return figures to be the best indicator of performance over time and this therefore is the main indicator of performance used by the Board. The NAV and Share price total return for the year ended 31 December 2022 were +3.5% and -10.9% respectively (31 December 2021: +22.3% and +26.8% respectively).
(ii) Revenue return per Share
The Company’s revenue return per Ordinary Share based on the weighted average number of shares in issue during the year was 3.43p (31 December 2021: 2.15p).
(iii) Discount/premium to NAV
The discount/premium relative to the NAV per Share represented by the share price is closely monitored by the Board. The Share price closed at a 16.35% discount to the NAV as at 31 December 2022 (31 December 2021: discount of 2.83%).
(iv) Control of the level of ongoing charges
The Board monitors the Company’s operating costs carefully. Based on the Company’s average net assets for the year ended 31 December 2022, the Company’s ongoing charges figure calculated in accordance with the AIC methodology was 1.41% (31 December 2021: 1.37%).
Investment Policy, Results and Other Information continued Section 1 – Strategic Report 11
Risks and Risk Management
Principal and emerging risks and uncertainties
The Company has carried out a robust assessment of its principal and emerging risks and the procedures in place to identify any emerging risks are described below.
Procedures to identify principal or emerging risks
The Board regularly reviews the Company’s risk matrix and focuses on ensuring that the appropriate controls are in place to mitigate each risk. The experience and knowledge of the Board is important, as is advice received from the Board’s service providers, specifically the Alternative Investment Fund Manager (“AIFM”), who is responsible for the risk and portfolio management services and outsources the portfolio management to the Investment Adviser. The following is a description of the work that each service provider highlights to the Board on a regular basis.
- Investment Adviser: the Investment Adviser provides a report to the Board at least quarterly or periodically as required on industry trends, insight to future challenges in the Japanese equity sector including the regulatory, political and economic changes likely to impact the sector;
2.# Risk and Risk Management
Service Providers' Roles
The Company’s key service providers play a crucial role in supporting the Board in its oversight of the Company’s risks. Their roles include:
- AIFM: following advice from the Investment Adviser and other service providers, the AIFM maintains a register of identified risks including emerging risks likely to impact the Company;
- Broker: provides advice periodically specific to the Company on the Company’s sector, competitors and the investment company market whilst working with the Board and Investment Adviser to communicate with shareholders;
- Company secretary and auditor: briefs the Board on forthcoming legislation/regulatory change that might impact on the Company. The auditor provides relevant briefings at least annually; and
- Association of Investment Companies (“AIC”): The Company is a member of the AIC, which provides regular technical updates as well as drawing members’ attention to forthcoming industry and regulatory issues.
Procedure for Oversight
The Board is responsible for the management of risks faced by the Company. The principal and emerging risks, together with a summary of the processes and internal controls used to manage and mitigate risks where possible are outlined below.
| Risk | Possible consequences | Possible Impact | Risk Mitigation # Section 1 – Strategic Report 15
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006
This section of the Annual Report covers the Board’s considerations and activities in discharging their duties under s.172(1) of the Companies Act 2006, in promoting the success of the Company for the benefit of its members as a whole. This statement includes consideration of the likely consequences of the decisions of the Board in the longer term, how the Board has taken wider stakeholders’ needs into account and the impact of the Company’s operations on the environment.
Company’s operating model
The Directors are required to describe how they have had regard to matters set out in section 172 of the Companies Act 2006.
Company sustainability and stakeholders
As an externally managed investment company, the Company does not have any employees. Its main stakeholders are as set out in the following paragraphs, which explain the relationship between the Company and each of its stakeholders. The Company’s Shares are listed on the Special Fund Segment of the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. The Board is aware of the need to foster the Company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and other key stakeholders through its stakeholder management activities as described below.
Stakeholder Management
Investors
The Investment Adviser and Board feel it is important for the Company’s continued success to have the potential access to equity capital in order to expand the Company’s portfolio over time to further diversify the investment portfolio, to create economies of scale and to help manage any discount or premium at which the Company’s Shares trade against its NAV. Additionally, the Board looks to attract long-term investors in the Company and, in doing so, the Board will seek opportunities to meet with Shareholders to gauge the opinion of investors on the Company’s activities. To help the Board in its aim to act fairly between the Company’s members, it seeks to ensure effective communication is provided to all Shareholders. The Board invites Shareholders to attend the AGM to be held on 8 June 2023. The Annual and Interim reports will be issued to Shareholders and made available on the Company’s website. Monthly factsheets are also available on the Company’s website. The Investment Adviser and the Company’s brokers have met with a number of the Company’s larger Shareholders during the year under review. Members of the Board would be happy to arrange meetings with shareholders upon request to the Company’s Broker, Shore Capital. Shareholders’ views are considered by the Board at their quarterly Board meetings.
Investment Adviser
The Investment Adviser is the most significant service provider to the Company and a description of its role, along with that of the AIFM, can be found on page 18. The Board receives regular reports from the Investment Adviser and discusses the portfolio at each Board meeting but maintains an ongoing dialogue between scheduled meetings. Representatives of the Investment Adviser attend Board meetings. The Investment Adviser’s remuneration is based on the NAV of the Company which aligns their interests with those of Shareholders. The Management Engagement Committee reviews the performance and resources of the Investment Advisor at least annually. The last review was in November 2022.
Service providers
As an investment trust, the Company does not have any employees and is reliant on third-party service providers for its operational requirements. Each service provider has an established track record and has in place suitable policies and procedures to ensure they maintain high standards of business conduct and corporate governance. The Board believes that positive relationships with each of the Company’s service providers are important to support the Company’s long-term success.
Section 172 Statement
16 Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
In order to build and maintain strong working relationships, the Company’s key service providers (notably the Investment Adviser, AIFM, and Company Secretary/Administrator) are invited to attend quarterly Board meetings to present their respective reports. This enables the Board to exercise effective oversight of the Company’s activities. In addition, the Company’s external auditor is invited to attend at least one Audit Committee meeting per year. The Chair of the Audit Committee maintains regular contact with the auditor, Investment Adviser and Administrator to ensure that the audit process is undertaken effectively. The Board has also spent time engaging with the Company’s key service providers outside of scheduled Board meetings to develop its working relationship with those service providers and ensure the smooth operational function of the Company. The Board and its advisers seek to maintain constructive relationships with the Company’s key service providers on behalf of the Company through regular communications, meetings and the provision of relevant information and update meetings. Another significant service provider for the Company’s long-term success is the AIFM, who has engaged the Investment Adviser for the purpose of providing investment advisory services to the Company. The Board regularly monitors the Company’s investment performance in relation to its objectives, investment policy and strategy. The Board receives and reviews regular reports and presentations from both the AIFM and Investment Adviser and seeks to maintain regular contact to foster a constructive working relationship.
Investments
RSM has combined capabilities in origination, evaluation and transaction execution with expertise across equities, shareholder activism and active portfolio management. RSM maintains a management committee (the “Management Committee”) that is responsible for reviewing and evaluating potential investment opportunities. RSM screens investment opportunities to identify potential investments that meet the Company’s investment objective and comply with its investment policy. Through this screening process, RSM will determine whether to proceed with detailed due diligence and evaluation of the investee company. After a potential investment opportunity has been identified and screened against the target investment criteria and if it determines to proceed then RSM will perform a detailed due diligence review of the investee company. RSM employs a robust due diligence process applying principles of quantitative analysis to stress test assumptions, price capital structures, and determine risk-adjusted returns. Where an investment opportunity proceeds to the execution phase, RSM will manage the transaction process, including co-ordinating the work of other professional advisers and service providers, including agents, valuers, lawyers, accountants, and tax advisers.
Key Board decisions during the Year
- Declared an interim dividend in respect of the year to 31 December 2021 of 1.95 pence per ordinary share.
- Approved the continuing appointment of the Investment Adviser and other key advisers, following an annual formal assessment.
- Provided continuous support to the Investment Adviser’s activism.
Conclusion
The Board is mindful of the directors’ duties as described by section 172 of the Companies Act 2006, when deliberating all important decisions.
Section 2 – Governance 17
Strategic report
The Directors’ Report should be read in conjunction with the Strategic Report on pages 2 to 15.
Corporate governance
The Corporate Governance Statement on pages 23 to 28 forms part of this report.
Risks and Risk Management
The Company’s principal and emerging risks and Risk Management report can be found on pages 11 to 14 of this report.
Legal and taxation status
The Company is an investment company within the meaning of Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006. The Company conducts its affairs in order to meet the requirements for approval as an investment trust under section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. The Company has received initial approval as an investment trust and the Company must meet eligibility conditions and ongoing requirements in order for investment trust status to be maintained. In the opinion of the Directors, the Company has met the conditions and requirements for approval as an investment trust for the year ended 31 December 2022.
Market information
The Company’s Ordinary Shares are listed on the Specialist Fund Segment of the main market of the London Stock Exchange. The unaudited NAV of the Ordinary Shares of the Company is published daily through RNS.
Retail distribution of investment company shares via financial advisers and other third-party promoters
As a result of the FCA rules determining which investment products can be promoted to retail investors, certain investment products are classified as “non-mainstream pooled investment products” and face restrictions on their promotion to retail investors. The Company has concluded that the distribution of its Shares, being shares in an investment trust, is not restricted as a result of the FCA rules described above. The Company currently conducts its affairs so that the Shares issued by the Company can be recommended by financial advisers to retail investors and intends to continue to do so for the foreseeable future.# Articles of association
Amendments to the Company’s Articles of Association require a Special Resolution to be passed by the Company’s Shareholders (requiring a majority of at least 75%) of the persons voting on the relevant resolution.
Management
The Board
The Board is entirely comprised of independent non-executive directors who are responsible to Shareholders for the overall management of the Company and is chaired by Rosemary Morgan. Alicia Ogawa acts as Senior Independent Director. The Board has adopted a Schedule of Matters Reserved for the Board which sets out the division of responsibilities between the Board and its various committees, together with the duties of the Board, further details can be found on page 25. Through the Committees and the use of external independent advisers, the Board manages risk and governance of the Company.
Appointment and replacement of the Board
The rules concerning the appointment and replacement of Directors are contained in the Company’s Articles of Association which require that all Directors shall be subject to election at the first AGM after appointment and re-election annually thereafter. Further details of the Board’s process for the appointment and replacement of Board members can be found on page 25.
Directors’ Report
18 Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
Alternative Investment Fund Portfolio Managers Directive
In accordance with The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”), the AIFM must ensure that an annual report containing certain information on the Company is made available to investors for each financial year. The investment funds sourcebook of the FCA (the “Sourcebook”) details the requirements of the annual report. All the information required by those rules is included in this Annual Report or will be made available on the Company’s website.
Alternative Investment Fund Manager (“AIFM”)
The Company is classified as an Alternative Investment Fund under the AIFMD and has appointed FundRock Management Company (Guernsey) Limited (formerly Sanne Fund Management (Guernsey) Limited) as its AIFM. The AIFM is responsible for portfolio management of the Company, including the following services:
- Risk management – Portfolio management is delegated to the Investment Adviser;
- Review financial reporting prepared by the Administrator;
- Ensuring compliance with AIFMD regulations and reporting; and
- Monitor and ensure compliance with investment and cash restrictions and debt covenants.
The AIFM is entitled, with effect from First Admission to an annual fee calculated at a rate of 0.04 per cent. per annum of NAV up to £250 million, plus 0.025 per cent. per annum of NAV in excess of £250 million. The AIFM fee is subject to a minimum fee of £70,000 per annum.
The AIFM Agreement shall continue in force until terminated by either the AIFM or the Company by giving to the other no less than sixth months’ prior written notice, provided that such notice may not be served earlier than the date being 12 months from the date of the AIFM Agreement. The AIFM Agreement may be terminated earlier by either party with immediate effect in certain circumstances, including, if the other party shall go into liquidation or an order shall be made or a resolution shall be passed to put the other party into liquidation or the other party has committed a material breach of any obligation the AIFM Agreement, and in the case of a breach which is capable of remedy fails to remedy it within 30 days.
The Company has granted to the AIFM and certain other indemnified parties, a customary indemnity against losses which may arise in relation to the AIFM’s performance of its duties under the AIFM Agreement. The Investment Advisory Agreement is governed by the laws of England and Wales.
Investment Adviser
The Company, the AIFM and Investment Adviser entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement on 7 January 2020, pursuant to which Rising Sun Management Limited will provide investment advisory services to the AIFM and the Company, and shall be entitled, with effect from First Admission, to receive an annual fee calculated as 0.85 per cent. of the Company’s net assets (exclusive of VAT) from the Company, in respect of the services provided under the Investment Advisory Agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, Rising Sun Management Limited may resign by giving the Company not less than 12 months’ written notice (although no such notice may be given within the first four years from First Admission). Further, the Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated by the AIFM and the Company, or the Company by itself, in certain limited circumstances, such as where the Investment Adviser is in material breach of the Investment Advisory Agreement and such breach is not remedied. The Board would, in such circumstances, have to find a replacement investment advisory services provider for the Company and may be unable to appoint a replacement with the necessary skills and experience on terms acceptable to the Company. If the Investment Advisory Agreement is terminated and a suitable replacement is not secured in a timely manner, this could have an adverse effect on the value of the Portfolio, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and prospects, with a consequential adverse effect on the returns to Shareholders and the market value of the Shares.
The Company has delegated responsibility for day-to-day management of the investments comprised in the Company’s portfolio to the AIFM (which has in turn delegated portfolio management activities to the Investment Adviser). The Directors have responsibility for exercising supervision of the AIFM and the Investment Adviser.
Directors’ Report continued
Section 2 – Governance 19
Company Secretary and Administrator
Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited (previously Sanne Fund Services (UK) Limited) has been appointed to provide company secretarial and administration services to the Company.
Custodian
The Northern Trust Company has been appointed by the Company to act as custodian of certain assets.
Appointment of service providers
The Board has undertaken an annual review of its service providers through the Management Engagement Committee, to ensure that their continued appointment is in the best long-term interests of the Company’s Shareholders. The last review was held in December 2022.
Capital structure, voting rights and restrictions
At the financial year end, the Company’s issued share capital comprised 113,021,433 Ordinary Shares of 1p nominal value. Each Ordinary Share held entitles the holder to one vote. All Ordinary Shares carry equal voting rights and there are no restrictions on those voting rights. Voting deadlines are stated in the Notice of the AGM and Form of Proxy and are in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Restrictions
There are no restrictions on the transfer of Shares, nor are there any limitations or special rights associated with regards to control attached to the Ordinary Shares. There are no agreements between holders regarding their transfer known to the Company, no restrictions on the distribution of dividends and the repayment of capital, and no agreements to which the Company is a party that might affect its control following a successful takeover bid.
Results and Dividend
The Company’s revenue profit after tax for the year amounted to £3,878,000 (31 December 2021: £2,232,000). The Company made a capital profit after tax of £1,217,000 (31 December 2021: £24,033,000). Therefore, the total profit for the year of the Company was £5,095,000 (31 December 2021: £26,265,000).
The Board has declared an interim dividend of 3.2p per Ordinary share in respect of the year ended 31 December 2022, which will be payable on 28 April 2023 to Shareholders on the register on 21 April 2023. The Board will not target a dividend for future years but will substantially pay out distributable income for any particular period by way of dividend.
Substantial shareholders
As at 31 December 2022, the Directors have been formally notified of the following interests in the Company’s Ordinary Shares, comprising 3% or more of the issued share capital of the Company, in accordance with Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule 5.1.2:
| Shareholder | Holding | Percentage Held* | Date Notified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rosenwald Capital Management, Inc. | 38,460,001 | 34.03% | 2 December 2021 |
- Based on number of Ordinary Shares in issue of 113,021,433 at the Company’s year end.
Since the year end, the Company has not been notified of any interests in the Company’s Ordinary Shares, comprising 3% or more of the issued share capital of the Company.
Political donations
There were no donations made during the financial year to 31 December 2022.
Settlement of Ordinary Share transactions
Ordinary Share transactions in the Company are settled by the CREST share settlement system.
20 Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
Appointment of auditor
The Company’s auditors, BDO LLP, having expressed their willingness to continue in office as auditors, will be put forward for re-appointment at the Company’s AGM and the Board will seek authority to determine their remuneration for the forthcoming year.
Going concern
The Directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements. The following is a summary of the Directors’ assessment of the going concern status of the Company. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the period assessed by the Directors, being at least 12 months from the date the financial statements were authorised for issue. This assessment took account of the war in Ukraine and the recovery of the COVID-19 pandemic. These uncertainties have created supply chain disruption and exacerbated inflationary pressures worldwide.# Directors' Report
The Directors do not foresee any immediate material risk to the Company’s investment portfolio. A prolonged and deep market decline could lead to falling values in the underlying business or interruptions to cashflow, however the Company currently has more than sufficient liquidity available to meet any future obligations. An explanation of the market, liquidity and credit risks and how they are managed is contained in note 15 to the financial statements.
The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for at least twelve months from the date of this report. In reaching this conclusion, the Directors have considered the liquidity of the Company’s portfolio of investments as well as its cash position, income and expense flows.
The Company’s net assets at 31 December 2022 were £158,745,000 (31 December 2021: £155,854,000). As at 31 December 2022, the Company held £31,738,000 (31 December 2021: £15,815,000) in cash. The total expenses for the year ended 31 December 2022 were £2,055,000 (31 December 2021: £1,792,000), which represented approximately 1.41% (31 December 2021: 1.37%) of average net assets during the year. At the date of approval of this document, based on the aggregate of investments and cash held, the Company has substantial operating expenses cover.
Auditor information
Each of the Directors at the date of the approval of this report confirms that:
* so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditors are unaware; and
* the Director has taken all steps that he/she ought to have taken as director to make himself/herself aware of any relevant information and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of that information.
This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of Section 418 of the Companies Act 2006.
Shareholder engagement
The Board is mindful of the importance of engaging with the Company’s Shareholders to gauge their views on topics affecting the Company. The Company reports formally to shareholders twice a year and meetings with key investors are held as required. The key discussion points of such meetings are relayed for the Board to consider further. Results of AGMs are announced by the Company promptly after the relevant meeting and also published on the Company’s website. Additionally, other notices and information are provided to shareholders on an ongoing basis through the Company’s website in order to assist in keeping shareholders informed such as the monthly Factsheets.
This year, the Company’s AGM will be held on 8 June 2023 and the Chairman’s Statement on page 3 and the enclosed AGM Notice sets out the arrangements for the meeting.
Directors’ Report continued
Section 2 – Governance
Annual General Meeting
The following information is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt about the action you should take, you should seek advice from your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant, or other financial adviser authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
Resolutions relating to the following items of special business will be proposed at the AGM to be held on 8 June 2023 at 4pm.
Renewal of general authority to issue Ordinary Shares and to dis-apply pre-emption rights
At the forthcoming AGM, the Board is seeking authority to allot up to a maximum of 11,302,143 Ordinary Shares (representing approximately 10% of the Ordinary Shares in issue at the date of this document) and to dis-apply pre-emption rights when allotting those Ordinary Shares at the forthcoming AGM. Authority granted under both resolutions will expire at the conclusion of the AGM to be held in 2024 unless renewed prior to this date via a General Meeting. The full text of resolutions 11 and 12 is set out in the Notice of Meeting on pages 68 and 69. The authority granted by Shareholders to issue Ordinary Shares will provide flexibility to grow the Company and further expand the Company’s list of assets. Ordinary Shares will only be issued at a premium to the NAV (cum income) after the costs of issue. Ordinary Share issues are at the discretion of the Board.
Renewal of general authority to purchase Ordinary Shares
During the year ended 31 December 2022, the Company did not utilise its authority to purchase its own Shares. The existing authority to make market purchases will expire at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM of the Company. The Directors recommend that a new authority to purchase up to 16,941,913 Ordinary Shares (subject to the condition that not more than 14.99% of the Ordinary Shares in issue, excluding treasury shares, at the date of this document are purchased) be granted and a resolution to that effect will be put to the AGM. Any Ordinary Shares purchased will either be cancelled or, if the Directors so determine, held in treasury. The full text of resolution 13 is set out in the Notice of Meeting on pages 70 and 71.
The Companies Act 2006 permits companies to hold shares acquired by way of market purchase as treasury shares, rather than having to cancel them. This provides the Company with the ability to re-issue Ordinary Shares quickly and cost effectively, thereby improving liquidity and providing the Company with additional flexibility in the management of its capital base. No Ordinary Shares will be sold from treasury at a price less than the (cum-income) NAV per existing Ordinary Share at the time of their sale unless they are first offered pro rata to existing Shareholders. At the period end the Company did not hold any shares in treasury. Unless otherwise authorised by Shareholders, Ordinary Shares will not be issued at less than NAV and Ordinary Shares held in treasury will not be sold at less than NAV.
Notice of general meetings
Resolution 13 in the notice to the AGM is required to reflect the requirements of the Shareholder Rights Directive. The Company is currently able to call General Meetings, other than an AGM, on 14 clear days’ notice and would like to preserve this ability. In order to be able to do so, shareholders must have given their prior approval. Resolution 13 seeks such approval, which would be effective until the Company’s next AGM, when it is intended that a similar resolution will be proposed. The Company will ensure that it offers the facility for shareholders to vote by electronic means, and that this facility is accessible to all shareholders, if it is to call general meetings on 14 days’ notice. Short notice of this kind will be used by the Board only under appropriate circumstances.
Regulatory Disclosures – information to be disclosed in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.4.
The Listing Rules require listed companies to report certain information in a single identifiable section of their Annual Reports or a cross reference table indicating where the information is set out. The Directors confirm that only LR 9.8.4(7) (issue of shares) is applicable during the year under review.
Environmental and Social Governance (“ESG”)
The Company is a closed-ended investment company which has no employees therefore its own direct environmental impact is minimal. Consequently, the Company consumed less than 40,000kWh of energy during the year in respect of which the Directors’ Report is prepared and therefore is exempt from disclosure under the Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting. It outsources all of its key operations to reputable, third-party service providers, who are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in the jurisdiction in which they operate, and take account of social, environmental, ethical and human rights factors, as appropriate.
The Company has no direct greenhouse gas emissions to report from its operations, nor does it have responsibility for any other emissions-producing sources under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013 (including those within its underlying holdings).
The Board notes that the underlying companies in which the Company invests will have a social and environmental impact over which the Board has no control. However, it expects its Investment Advisor to be mindful of any associated risks when making their investments and reviews updated ESG policies from the Investment Advisor annually. The Company aims to conduct itself responsibly, ethically, and fairly in its investments and dealings with stakeholders.
Modern slavery disclosure
The Company aims to act to the highest standards, and is committed to integrating responsible business practices throughout its operations. The prevention of modern slavery is an important part of good corporate governance. As an investment trust, the Company does not offer goods or services to consumers and deals predominantly with professional advisers and service providers in the financial services industry. As such the Board considers that the Company is out of scope of the Modern Slavery Act 2015. The Board requires all third-party providers to report on their compliance with the Modern Slavery Act as part of the annual review by the Management Engagement Committee.
Anti-bribery and corruption
The Company’s policy is to conduct all of its business in an honest and ethical manner. The Company takes a zero-tolerance approach to bribery and corruption and is committed to acting professionally, fairly and with integrity in all its business dealings and relationships. The Company’s policy and the procedures are designed to support that commitment.
Prevention of the facilitation of tax evasion
The Board has a zero-tolerance approach to the facilitation of tax evasion.The Report was approved by the Board on 5 April 2023 and signed on its behalf:
By order of the Board
Maria Matheou
Company Secretary
For and on behalf of Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited
5 April 2023
Directors’ Report continued
Section 2 – Governance 23
This Corporate Governance statement forms part of the Directors’ Report. The Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the UK Listing Authority require listed companies to disclose how they have applied the principles and complied with the provisions of The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the “UK Code”), as issued by the Financial Reporting Council (“FRC”). The UK Code can be viewed on the FRC’s website.
The Board has considered the principles and provisions of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance 2019 (the “AIC Code”) which addresses those set out in the UK Code, as well as setting out additional provisions on issues that are of specific relevance to the Company. The Board considers that reporting against the AIC Code, which has been endorsed by the FRC, provides more relevant information to shareholders. The AIC Code is available on the AIC website (www.theaic.co.uk). It includes an explanation of how the AIC Code adapts the Principles and Provisions set out in the UK Code to make them relevant for investment companies.
The Company has complied with the AIC Code and the relevant provisions of the UK Code, except as set out below.
The UK Code includes provisions relating to:
* the role of the chief executive;
* the need for an internal audit function; and
* executive Directors’ remuneration
The Board considers these provisions are not relevant to the position of the Company, being an externally managed investment company with no executive directors or employees. The Company has therefore not reported further in respect of these provisions.
The Board has concluded that the annual report for the year ended 31 December 2022, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for Shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy.
Board Composition
At the date of this report, the Board consists of five non-executive Directors, all of whom were independent upon appointment. The Board believes that during the year ended 31 December 2022 its composition was appropriate for an investment company of the Company’s nature and size. All of the Directors are independent of the Investment Adviser and AIFM and are able to allocate sufficient time to the Company to discharge their responsibilities effectively. The Directors have a broad range of relevant experience to meet the Company’s requirements and their biographies are given below.
Rosemary Morgan – Appointed 14 November 2019
Non-Executive Director, Chairman of the Board and Management Engagement Committee
Rosemary is an independent non-executive director and Chair of JP Morgan India Investment Trust. Rosemary studied Japanese at the Australian National University in Canberra before being awarded the Monbusho Scholarship at Kobe University in Japan and then studying for a Master of Arts in Japanese Literature at Harvard University in the United States. After university, Rosemary worked as a Japanese equity fund manager for 16 years at John Govett before joining the institutional client team at Fidelity International and then moving to the Royal Bank of Scotland as Head of Asia and Emerging Markets (Multi Manager Funds), where she managed long only and alternative funds of funds, specialising in Japan and Emerging Markets.
Corporate Governance Statement 24 Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
Chetan Ghosh – Appointed 22 October 2019
Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Audit Committee
Chetan has recently joined Schroders in May 2022. Previously, he was the Chief Investment Officer for Centrica’s pension scheme arrangements and was responsible for providing support to the investment committee and continues this role under an outsourced arrangement within Schroders. Prior to joining Centrica in 2009, Chetan worked in a number of roles, ranging from pensions actuary at Towers Perrin to investment consultant at Aon Hewitt and Lane Clark & Peacock. Whilst at the financial services firm Alexander Forbes, Chetan developed a fiduciary management offering to improve client governance structures. Chetan has a first-class degree in Mathematics from Kings College London.
Rachel Hill – Appointed 22 October 2019
Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee
Since 2006, Rachel has been a director of Dragon Capital Markets (Europe) Limited and has been responsible for the European marketing of London Stock Exchange listed Vietnam Enterprise Investments Ltd and the Vietnam Equity (UCITS) fund. Rachel was also previously on the board of Dalton Asia Fund, which is a long/short Asian Investment fund managed by Dalton Investments LLC. Rachel has 28 years of experience in respect of equity and equity fund sales in Asian markets. In addition, Rachel also currently serves on the board of DC Developing Market Strategies Ltd, a Dublin regulated UCITS fund investing in Vietnam and Quaero Capital Luxembourg Fund, a Luxembourg regulated UCITS platform with various sub funds investing in equities and bonds. Rachel holds a BA (Hons) MA in Natural Science from Trinity Hall, Cambridge University and is also a Chartered Member of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment.
Alicia Ogawa – Appointed 14 November 2019
Non-Executive Director and Senior Independent Director
Alicia is a director of the Project on Japanese Corporate Governance and Stewardship at the Center on Japanese Economy and Business (CJEB), Columbia Business School, NYC and has over 30 years of experience in the Japanese financial markets. She also serves on the board of The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation, Misaki Capital (from December 2019), and a member on the board of Pure Earth an NGO which deals with lead and mercury pollution and also recently joined the board of a Tokyo-based governance consulting company called Questhub. She also is an Assistant Adjunct Faculty, Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs as well as being a consultant for activist funds. In her role as director of the Project on Japanese Corporate Governance and Stewardship, Alicia has been a featured speaker on Japanese financial markets issues for public and private sector conferences such as Goldman Sachs, SIFMA, Council of Institutional Investors, Japan Securities Dealers Association, CSIS, Peterson Institute, and Japan Society. Prior to 2006, Alicia was a Managing Director and the Director of Global Research Product, Lehman Brothers, NYC and was tasked with leading the global analysts in development of a globally themed equity research product focused on specific market sectors. Alicia holds a M.I.A from the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs in East Asian Studies and International Finance.
Corporate Governance continued
Section 2 – Governance 25
Ayako Hirota Weissman
Non-Executive Director
Appointed 14 November 2019
Ayako is a senior portfolio manager and director of Asia Strategy at Horizon Kinetics LLC. With over 30 years of investment experience, Ayako was previously a founder and Chief Investment Officer of AS Hirota Capital Management, LLC. Ayako’s prior experience also includes acting as a portfolio manager specializing in Japanese securities for Kingdon Capital Management, LLC, a New York based hedge fund, two years as a partner and Portfolio Manager of Feirstein Hirota Japan Partners and 12 years at Salomon Smith Barney Asset Management, as a Managing Director and Senior Portfolio manager in the U.S. value equity group. Ayako is a member of the U.S. - Japan Council and serves on its investment committee. She also serves as a co-chairperson of Japan committee of National Museum for Women in Arts. Ayako is a director of Toshiba Corporation. Ayako received an MBA from the International Institute for Management Development (IMD) in Lausanne, Switzerland and a BA in Liberal Arts from International Christian University in Tokyo, Japan. Ayako is a CFA charter holder.
Re-election of Directors
The Board recommends all the Directors for re-election at the forthcoming AGM for the reasons highlighted above and in the performance appraisal section of this report. The Directors have appointment letters which do not provide for any specific term. Copies of the Directors’ appointment letters are available on request from the company secretary. Upon joining the Board, any new Director will receive an induction and relevant training is available to Directors on an ongoing basis.
Role of the Board
All Board members are independent non-executive Directors, who continue to be independent of the Investment Manager. The Board is responsible for the governance of the Company, notwithstanding any delegation of responsibilities to third parties. It has oversight over the management and conduct of the Company’s business, strategy and development. The Board determines the Investment Objective and Investment Policy as well as risk appetite and has overall responsibility for the Company’s activities, including review of investment activity and performance. The Board ensures the maintenance of a sound system of internal controls and risk management (including financial, operational and compliance controls) and reviews the overall effectiveness of systems in place. The Board is responsible for approval of any changes to the capital, corporate and/or management structure of the Company. The Board Members offer strategic guidance and specialist advice; whilst providing constructive and effective challenge, especially to the decisions of the Investment Adviser.# Section 2 – Governance
The Board scrutinises and assesses the performance of third-party service providers (including the Investment Adviser and AIFM). The Board’s main focus is to promote the sustainable long-term success of the Company, to deliver value for Shareholders and contribute to wider society. The Board does not routinely involve itself in day-to-day business decisions. The AIFM is responsible for the risk management of the Company pursuant to AIFMD and the Investment Adviser for portfolio management.
Board Committees
The Company has three committees to assist with its operations; the Audit Committee, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and the Management Engagement Committee. Each Committee’s delegated responsibilities are clearly defined in formal terms of reference, which are reviewed at least annually and are available on the Company’s website. The Board decides upon the membership and chairs of its committees.
Audit Committee
All the Directors are members of the Audit Committee, which is chaired by Chetan Ghosh. A report on pages 34 and 35 provides details of the role and composition of the Audit Committee together with a description of the work of the Audit Committee in discharging its responsibilities.
Nomination and Remuneration Committee
All of the Directors are members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, which is chaired by Rachel Hill. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee has been established to meet formally on at least an annual basis to consider the fees of the non-executive Directors and for the purpose of reviewing the performance of the Board and its committees, the remuneration of Directors and succession planning, including identifying and putting forward candidates for the office of Director of the Company. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee considers job specifications and assesses whether candidates have the necessary skills and time available to devote to the job. The Board has formulated a succession plan which was reviewed and maintained through the Nomination and Remuneration Committee to promote regular refreshment and diversity, whilst maintaining stability and continuity of skills and knowledge on the Board. The Directors’ Remuneration Implementation Report is included on pages 30 and 31 of this report.
Management Engagement Committee
All of the Directors are members of the Management Engagement Committee, which is chaired by Rosemary Morgan. The Management Engagement Committee has been established to conduct a formal annual review of the Investment Adviser, assessing investment and other performance, the level and method of the Investment Adviser’s remuneration and the continued appointment of the Investment Adviser. The Management Engagement Committee met and reviewed the Investment Adviser’s performance and remuneration structure. In conclusion, the Management Engagement Committee’s recommendation to the Board was that it was in the best interests of Shareholders as a whole to continue with the Investment Adviser’s engagement and that the current fee structure remained appropriate (See page 5 for further details). In addition, the Management Engagement Committee conducted a performance evaluation of the Company’s key service providers and no material deficiencies were noted. The Management Engagement Committee reviewed the fees payable to other key service providers to the Company and concluded they remained appropriate.
Meeting attendance
| Quarterly Board | Audit Committee | Management Engagement Committee | Nomination and Remuneration Committee | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of meetings held | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Rosemary Morgan | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Chetan Ghosh | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Rachel Hill | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Alicia Ogawa | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Ayako Weissman | 4 | 2 | – | – |
In addition, there were a number of ad hoc Board meetings to deal with administrative matters and the formal approval of documents.
Board diversity
The Board’s policy for the appointment of non-executive directors is based on its belief in the benefits of having a diverse range of experience, skills, length of service and backgrounds including, but not limited to, gender and diversity. The policy is always to appoint the best person for the job and there will be no discrimination on the grounds of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, age, or physical ability. The overriding aim of the policy is to ensure that the Board is composed of the best combination of people for ensuring effective oversight of the Company and constructive support and challenge to the Investment Adviser. Directors have a range of business, financial and asset management skills as well as experience relevant to the direction and control of the Company. Brief biographical details of the Directors are shown on pages 23 to 25.
As an externally managed investment company, the Board employs no executive staff, and therefore does not have a chief executive officer (CEO) or a chief financial officer (CFO), both of which are deemed senior board positions by the FCA. The Chair and Senior Independent Director are regarded by the Board as the senior board positions and the following disclosure is made on this basis. The information has been provided by each Director directly and there have been no changes since 31 December 2022.
Board diversity as at 31 December 2022
| Number of Board members | Percentage of the Board | Number of senior positions on the Board | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Men | 1 | 20% | – |
| Women | 4 | 80% | 2 |
| Prefer not to say | – | – | – |
| Number of Board members | Percentage of the Board | Number of senior positions on the Board | |
| White British or Other White (including minority-white groups) | 3 | 60% | 1 |
| Ethnic minority background | 2 | 40% | 1 |
| Prefer not to say | – | – | – |
Statement
The Board’s composition currently meets the FCA’s new targets:
• two senior positions on the board are held by women (Board Chairman and Nomination & Remuneration Committee Chair); and
• two individuals on the board are from a ethnic minority background.
The Board undertakes an appraisal of its performance and skills, as well as independence and diversity, on an annual basis. The Board believes its composition is appropriate for the Company’s circumstances. However, in line with the Board’s succession planning and tenure policy, or should strategic priorities change, the Board will review and, if required, adjust its composition.
Tenure policy
It is the Board’s policy that all Directors, including the Chairman, shall normally have tenure limited to nine years from their first appointment to the Board, except that the Board may determine otherwise if it is considered that the continued participation on the Board of an individual Director, is in the best interests of the Company and its Shareholders. This is also subject to the Director’s re-election annually by Shareholders. The Board considers that this policy encourages regular refreshment and is conducive to fostering diversity.
Board and Chairman evaluation
The Directors are aware that they need to monitor and improve Board performance continuously and recognise that this can be achieved through regular Board evaluation, which provides a valuable feedback mechanism for improving Board effectiveness. An internal performance appraisal process was performed by the Company Secretary and overseen by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee regarding the performance of the Board, its committees and the Board Chairman. The results of the recent performance evaluation were positive and no material issues were identified.
Insurance and indemnity provisions
A policy of insurance against Directors’ and Officers’ liabilities is maintained by the Company. A procedure has been adopted for Directors, in the furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice at the expense of the Company.
Internal control
The AIC Code requires the Board to review the effectiveness of the Company’s system of internal controls. The Board recognises its ultimate responsibility for the Company’s system of internal controls and for monitoring its effectiveness. The system of internal controls is designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve business objectives. It can provide only reasonable assurance against material misstatement or loss. The Board has undertaken a review of the aspects covered by the guidance and has identified risk management controls in the key areas of business objectives, accounting, compliance, operations and secretarial as being matters of particular importance upon which it requires reports. The Board believes that the existing arrangements, set out below, represent an appropriate framework to meet the internal control requirements. Through these procedures, the Directors have kept under review the effectiveness of the internal control systems throughout the period and up to the date of this report.
Financial aspects of internal control
These are detailed in the Report of the Audit Committee.
Other aspects of internal control
The Board holds at least four regular meetings each year, plus additional meetings as required. Between these meetings there is regular contact with the Investment Adviser and the Company’s Secretary and Administrator. The Board has agreed policies with the Investment Adviser on key operational issues and the Investment Adviser reports in writing to the Board on operational and compliance issues prior to each meeting, and otherwise as necessary. The Investment Adviser reports direct to the Audit Committee concerning the internal controls applicable to the Investment Adviser’s dealing, investment and general office procedures. The Directors receive quarterly updates from the Investment Adviser which details the holdings in the portfolio and investment transactions.# Directors’ Remuneration Report
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is responsible for reviewing the remuneration payable to the Directors taking into account the relevant circumstances of the Company, the time commitment and relevant experience and skills of the Board and the average fees paid to the Board of the Company’s competitors. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is chaired by Rachel Hill and consists of all the Directors. The Remuneration Report for the period to 31 December 2022 has been prepared in accordance with sections 420-422 of the Companies Act 2006. The law requires the Company’s auditor to audit certain sections of the Remuneration Report; where this is the case the relevant section has been indicated as such.
AGM approval of the Remuneration policy and remuneration implementation report
In accordance with the requirements of Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, as amended (the “Regulations”), the Board is required to put forward for Shareholder approval at its first AGM, and on a triennial basis thereafter, a Remuneration Policy. Accordingly, the Remuneration Policy of the Company set out below was last approved by Shareholders at the AGM held in 2022.
The Remuneration Implementation Report requires approval via an ordinary resolution on an annual basis. This resolution is put to Shareholders on an advisory, non-binding, basis which means that, if the resolution were to fail to attract sufficient votes in favor, the Board would continue to be entitled to be remunerated and would not be required to amend their contractual relationship with the Company. However, if the Remuneration Implementation Report were to be voted down by Shareholders, the Board would be required to resubmit the Remuneration Policy to Shareholders at the AGM following the AGM at which the Remuneration Implementation Report failed.
Remuneration consideration
The Board’s original remuneration was set prior to the Company’s incorporation on 22 October 2019 and was revised at the Nomination and Remuneration Committee on 3 December 2021. In considering the remuneration of the Board and each key role, the Board and its advisers considered the Board pay of the Company’s peers, the expected time commitment of each Board member, the experience and skills of each Board member and the market expectation of the remuneration paid to the Company’s Board. The Board also considered whether it was appropriate to set performance measures and it was agreed that it was not, in accordance with market practice.
Remuneration consultants
Remuneration Consultants were not engaged by the Company during the year under review and in respect of the Remuneration Report.
Loss of office
There are no agreements in place to compensate the Board for loss of office.
Remuneration policy
All the Directors are non-executive directors, and the Company has no other employees. The components of the remuneration package for non-executive directors, which are contained in the Remuneration Policy are as detailed below:
Current and future policy
| Component | Director | Purpose of reward | Operation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fee | Chairman of the Board | For services as Chairman of a Plc | Determined by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee |
| Annual fee | Other Directors | For services as non-executive Directors of a Plc | Determined by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee |
| Additional fee | Chair of Audit Committee | For additional responsibility and time commitment | Determined by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee |
| Expenses | All Directors | Reimbursement of expenses incurred in the performance of duties | Submission of appropriate documentation |
In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, Board fees in aggregate cannot exceed £400,000 per annum, unless Shareholders approve via an ordinary resolution at a General Meeting such other sum.
Directors’ service contracts
The Directors do not have service contracts with the Company but have letters which outline the terms of their appointment. In accordance with the Articles and AIC Code, the Board will seek annual re-election.
Fees payable on recruitment
The Board will not pay any incentive fees to any person to encourage them to become a Director of the Company. The Board may, however, pay fees to external agencies to assist the Board in the search and selection of Directors. No such external agency was engaged during the period under review.
Effective date
The Remuneration Policy is effective from the date of approval by Shareholders.
Remuneration Implementation Report (Audited)
The table below provides a single figure for the total remuneration of each Director for the period 31 December 2022.
| Director | Director Fees to 31 December 2022 (£’000) | Director Fees to 31 December 2021 (£’000) | Change (%) from 2021 to 2022 | Change (%) from 2020 to 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosemary Morgan | 41.0 | 35.0 | 17.1% | Nil |
| Chetan Ghosh | 33.0 | 30.0 | 10.0% | Nil |
| Rachel Hill | 27.8 | 27.0 | 3.0% | Nil |
| Alicia Ogawa | 27.8 | 27.0 | 3.0% | Nil |
| Ayako Weissman | 27.8 | 27.0 | 3.0% | Nil |
| Total | 157.4 | 146.0 | 7.8% | Nil |
Directors receive fixed fees and are not entitled to receive from the Company:
* performance related remuneration;
* any benefits in kind except reasonable travel expenses in the course of travel to attend meetings and duties undertaken on behalf of the Company;
* share options;
* rewards through a long-term incentive scheme;
* a pension or other retirement benefit; or
* compensation for loss of office.
Fees
With effect from 1 January 2022, the Board remuneration is outlined in the table below:
| Position | Fee per annum* (GBP) |
|---|---|
| Board Chairman | 41,000 |
| Director | 27,810 |
| Audit Committee Chair (additional fee) | 5,190 |
- Following a review of the Directors’ fees in November 2022, it was decided that no changes would apply for the financial year ending 31 December 2023.
Directors’ indemnities
Subject to the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, the Company has agreed to indemnify each Director against all liabilities which any Director may suffer or incur arising out of or in connection with any claim made or proceedings taken against him/her, or any application made by him/her, on the grounds of his/her negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the Company or any Associated Company.
Performance
The following chart shows the performance of the Company’s NAV and share price (total return) by comparison for the period since the Company was listed, assuming 100p was invested at the point the Company was listed. The Company does not have a specific benchmark but has deemed the MSCI Japan Small Cap index to be the most appropriate comparator for its performance.

Relative importance of spend on pay
The following table sets out the total level of Directors’ remuneration compared to the distributions to Shareholders by way of dividends and the operating expenses and Investment Adviser’s fees and operating expenses incurred by the Company
| Year to 31 December 2022 (GBP) | Period to 31 December 2021 (GBP) | Change % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend income | 5,487,000 | 3,512,000 | 56.2% |
| Spend on Directors’ fees | 157,000 | 146,000 | 7.5% |
| Company’s operating expenses and Investment Adviser’s fees | 2,055,000 | 1,792,000 | 14.7% |
| Dividends and payable to Shareholders | 3,617,000 | 2,204,000 | 64.1% |
The disclosure of the information in the table above is required under The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 with the exception of operating expenses which have been included to show the total expenses of the Company.
Directors’ holdings (Audited)
At 31 December 2022 and as at the date of this report the Directors had the following holdings in the Company. There is no requirement for Directors to hold shares in the Company. All holdings were beneficially owned.# Report of the Audit Committee
Section 2 – Governance
Director Ordinary Shares
| Director | Ordinary Shares As at 31 December 2022 | Ordinary Shares As at 31 December 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| Rosemary Morgan | 40,000 | 40,000 |
| Chetan Ghosh | 40,000 | 40,000 |
| Rachel Hill | 115,791 | 115,791 |
| Alicia Ogawa | 25,000 | 25,000 |
| Ayako Weissman | 27,000 | 27,000 |
Statement
On behalf of the Board and in accordance with Part 2 of Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013, I confirm that the above Remuneration Policy and Remuneration Implementation Report summarises, as applicable, for the year to 31 December 2022:
• the major decisions on Directors’ remuneration;
• any substantial changes relating to Directors’ remuneration made during the period; and
• the context in which the changes occurred and decisions have been taken.
Rachel Hill
Chair of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee
5 April 2023
Role of the Audit Committee
The AIC Code recommends that Boards should establish an audit committee consisting of at least three, or in the case of smaller companies, two independent non-executive directors. The Board is required to satisfy itself the audit committee as a whole should have competence relevant to the sector in which the company operates. The main role and responsibilities of the audit committee are set out in the Committee’s terms of reference covering certain matters described in the AIC Code. The Company complies with the AIC Code. The terms of reference are available on the Company’s website or on request from the company secretary.
Composition
The Audit Committee comprises all members of the Board and is chaired by Chetan Ghosh. The AIC Code permits the Chairman of the Board to be a member of, but not chair the Audit Committee if they were independent on appointment. The Chairman of the Board was independent on appointment and continues to be, and in view of the size of the Board, the Directors feel it is appropriate for the Chairman of the Board to be a member of the Audit Committee.
Meetings of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee meets formally at least twice a year for the purpose, amongst other things, of advising the Board on the appointment, effectiveness, independence, objectivity, and remuneration of the external auditor. The Audit Committee monitors the integrity of the financial statements of the Company and any formal announcements relating to the Company’s financial performance, reviewing significant financial reporting judgements contained in them. The Audit Committee also reviews the Company’s internal financial controls and its internal control, risk management systems and reviews the whistleblowing arrangements of the Investment Adviser, AIFM and Administrator. The provision of non-audit services by the auditor are reviewed against the Committees policy described below.
Financial statements and significant accounting matters
The Audit Committee reviewed the financial statements and considered the following significant accounting matters in relation to the Company’s financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2022.
Valuation and existence of investments
The Company holds all of its assets in quoted investments. The existence and valuation of these investments is the most material matter in the production of the financial statements. The Audit Committee reviewed the procedures in place for ensuring accurate valuation and existence of investments and discussed the valuation of the Company’s investments at the period end with the Investment Adviser and reviewed their existence with the Administrator and other service providers. Investments are valued using independent pricing sources and the holding quantities at the period end were agreed to the Company’s custodian’s records.
Recognition of income
Income may not be accrued in the correct period and/or incorrectly allocated to revenue or capital. The Audit Committee reviewed the Administrator’s procedures for recognition of income and reviewed the treatment of any special dividends receivable in the year.
Financial statement presentation
The Audit Committee obtained assurances from the Investment Adviser and the Company Secretary that the financial statements had been prepared appropriately.
Going concern
The financial statements could be prepared on an incorrect accounting basis which might result in an incorrect valuation of financial assets and liabilities. The Audit Committee reviewed the Company’s financial resources and concluded that it is appropriate for the Company’s financial statements to be prepared on a going concern basis as described in the Directors’ Report on page 17.
Conclusion with respect to the annual report and financial statements
The Audit Committee has concluded that the annual report for the period ended 31 December 2022, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for Shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business model and strategy. The Audit Committee has reported its conclusions to the Board. The Audit Committee reached this conclusion through a process of review of the document and enquiries of the various parties involved in the production of the annual report, and the external auditor’s report thereon.
Auditor
Provision of non-audit services
The Audit Committee has put a policy in place on the supply of any non-audit services provided by the external auditor. Such services are considered on a case-by-case basis and may only be provided to the Company if the provision of such services is at a reasonable and competitive cost and does not constitute a conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest which would prevent the auditor from remaining objective and independent. No non-audit services were provided by the auditor during the year.
Effectiveness of external audit
BDO LLP has performed the audit of the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2022. The Audit Committee reviewed the audit planning and the standing, skills and experience of the firm and the audit team. The Audit Committee also considered the independence of BDO and the objectivity of the audit process. BDO has confirmed that it is independent of the Company and has complied with relevant auditing standards. No modifications were required to the external audit approach. The Audit Committee received a presentation of the audit plan from the external auditor prior to the commencement of the 2022 audit and a presentation of the results of the audit following completion of the main audit testing. Additionally, the Audit Committee received feedback from the Investment Adviser and Administrator regarding the effectiveness of the external audit process. The Audit Committee is satisfied that BDO LLP has provided effective independent challenge in carrying out its responsibilities. After due consideration, the Audit Committee recommends the re-appointment of BDO LLP, and their re-appointment will be put forward to the Company’s Shareholders at the 2023 AGM.
Internal audit
The Audit Committee has considered the need for an internal audit function and considers that this is not appropriate given the nature and circumstances of the Company. The Audit Committee keeps the need for an internal function under periodic review. The Investment Adviser reports the key conclusions of their internal audit report to the Company’s Audit Committee.
Committee evaluation
The Audit Committee’s activities fell within the scope of the review of Board effectiveness performed in the period. Details of this process can be found under ‘Board and Chairman evaluation’ on pages 27 and 28.
Chetan Ghosh
Chair of the Audit Committee
5 April 2023
The Directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards and applicable law and regulations. Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors are required to prepare the Company’s financial statements in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards. Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of the profit or loss for the company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:
• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
• state whether they have been prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
• prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the company will continue in business; and
• prepare a Directors’ report, a Strategic report and Directors’ remuneration report which comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.# Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for ensuring that the annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced, and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model and strategy.
Website publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and the financial statements are made available on a website. Financial statements are published on the Company website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the company’s website is the responsibility of the directors. The Directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the financial statements contained therein.
Directors’ responsibilities pursuant to DTR4
The Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge:
* The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit and loss of the company.
* The Annual Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the financial position of the company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.
Directors’ Statement as to the Disclosure of Information to Auditors
All of the current Directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any information needed by the Company’s auditors for the purposes of their audit and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information. The Directors are not aware of any relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware.
For and on behalf of the Board
Rosemary Morgan
Chairman of the Board of Directors
5 April 2023
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Nippon Active Value Fund plc
Opinion on the financial statements
In our opinion the financial statements:
* give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2022 and of its profit for the year then ended;
* have been properly prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards; and
* have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements of Nippon Active Value Fund plc (the ‘Company’) for the year ended 31 December 2022 which comprise the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Cash Flows and notes to the accounts, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and UK adopted international accounting standards.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee.
Independence
Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were appointed by the Board of Directors on 27 August 2020 to audit the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement including retenders and reappointments is 3 years, covering the years ended 31 December 2020 to 31 December 2022. We remain independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. The non- audit services prohibited by that standard were not provided to the Company.
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
* Evaluating the appropriateness of the Director’s method of assessing going concern in light of market volatility and present uncertainties due to the current geo-political situation by analysing the company’s going concern using current economic assumptions and multiple worst case scenarios;
* Assessing the liquidity profile of the investment portfolio by checking the theoretical realisation period of investments, to meet the future obligations and operating expenses for the next twelve months;
* Challenging the Director’s assumptions and judgements made in their forecasts by performing multiple downside scenarios testing to analyse the cash reserve to cover ongoing expenses and liabilities;
* Assessing the appropriateness of the Directors’ assumptions and judgements made in their base case and stress tested forecasts including consideration of the available cash resources relative to forecast expenditure and committments.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue. In relation to the Company’s reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting. Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022
Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
Overview
| 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Key audit matters | Valuation and ownership of quoted investments | ✔ |
| Materiality | Company financial statements as a whole | £1.59m (2021: £1.56m) based on 1% (2021: 1%) of Net assets |
An overview of the scope of our audit
Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Company and its environment, including the Company’s system of internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of material misstatement.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit, and directing the efforts of the engagement team. This matter was addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on this matter.
| Key audit matter | How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter \
The Directors are responsible for ensuring that the annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced, and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model and strategy. Website publication The Directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and the financial statements are made available on a website. Financial statements are published on the Company website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the company’s website is the responsibility of the directors. The Directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the financial statements contained therein. Directors’ responsibilities pursuant to DTR4 The Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge: • The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit and loss of the company. • The Annual Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the financial position of the company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face. Directors’ Statement as to the Disclosure of Information to Auditors. All of the current Directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any information needed by the Company’s auditors for the purposes of their audit and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information. The Directors are not aware of any relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware. For and on behalf of the Board Rosemary Morgan Chairman of the Board of Directors 5 April 2023 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities Section 2 – Governance 37 Opinion on the financial statements In our opinion the financial statements: • give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2022 and of its profit for the year then ended; • have been properly prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards; and • have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006. We have audited the financial statements of Nippon Active Value Fund plc (the ‘Company’) for the year ended 31 December 2022 which comprise the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Cash Flows and notes to the accounts, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and UK adopted international accounting standards. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee. Independence Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were appointed by the Board of Directors on 27 August 2020 to audit the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement including retenders and reappointments is 3 years, covering the years ended 31 December 2020 to 31 December 2022. We remain independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. The non- audit services prohibited by that standard were not provided to the Company. Conclusions relating to going concern In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included: • Evaluating the appropriateness of the Director’s method of assessing going concern in light of market volatility and present uncertainties due to the current geo-political situation by analysing the company’s going concern using current economic assumptions and multiple worst case scenarios; • Assessing the liquidity profile of the investment portfolio by checking the theoretical realisation period of investments, to meet the future obligations and operating expenses for the next twelve months; • Challenging the Director’s assumptions and judgements made in their forecasts by performing multiple downside scenarios testing to analyse the cash reserve to cover ongoing expenses and liabilities; • Assessing the appropriateness of the Directors’ assumptions and judgements made in their base case and stress tested forecasts including consideration of the available cash resources relative to forecast expenditure and committments. Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue. In relation to the Company’s reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting. Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report. Independent auditor’s report to the members of Nippon Active Value Fund plc 38 Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022 Overview 2022 2021 Key audit matters Valuation and ownership of quoted investments ✔ ✔ Materiality Company financial statements as a whole £1.59m (2021: £1.56m) based on 1% (2021: 1%) of Net assets An overview of the scope of our audit Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Company and its environment, including the Company’s system of internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of material misstatement. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit, and directing the efforts of the engagement team. This matter was addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on this matter. Key audit matter How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter Valuation and ownership of quoted investments (note 3 on page 52) The investment portfolio at the year-end comprised of quoted equity investments. There is a risk that the prices used for the quoted investments held by the Company are not reflective of fair value. There is also a risk that errors made in the recording of investment holdings result in the incorrect reflection of investments owned by the Company and as a result fair value recognised due to the incorrect holdings. Therefore we considered the valuation and ownership of quoted investments to be the most significant audit area as the quoted investments also represent the most significant balance in the financial statements and underpin the principal activity of the entity. Furthermore, we considered the valuation disclosures to be a significant area as they are expected to be a key area of interest for the users of the financial statements. For these reasons and the materiality of the balance in relation to the financial statements as a whole, we considered this to be a key audit matter. We responded to this matter by testing the valuation and ownership of 100% of the quoted investments population. We performed the following procedures: Confirmed the year-end bid price was used in the calculation of fair value by agreeing the prices to externally independent quoted prices; Assessed if there were contra indicators, such as liquidity considerations, to suggest bid price is not the most appropriate indication of fair value by considering the realisation period for individual holdings; Obtained direct confirmation of the number of shares held per quoted investment from the custodian regarding all investments held at the balance sheet date; and Recalculated the valuation by multiplying the number of shares held per the statement obtained from the custodian by the valuation per share. We also considered the completeness and accuracy of investment-related disclosures against the requirements of relevant accounting standard.
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for ensuring that the annual report and accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced, and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model and strategy.
Website publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and the financial statements are made available on a website. Financial statements are published on the Company website in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the company’s website is the responsibility of the directors. The Directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the financial statements contained therein.
Directors’ responsibilities pursuant to DTR4
The Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge:
* The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit and loss of the company.
* The Annual Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the financial position of the company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face.
Directors’ Statement as to the Disclosure of Information to Auditors
All of the current Directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any information needed by the Company’s auditors for the purposes of their audit and to establish that the auditors are aware of that information. The Directors are not aware of any relevant audit information of which the auditors are unaware.
For and on behalf of the Board
Rosemary Morgan
Chairman of the Board of Directors
5 April 2023
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Nippon Active Value Fund plc
Opinion on the financial statements
In our opinion the financial statements:
* give a true and fair view of the state of the Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2022 and of its profit for the year then ended;
* have been properly prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards; and
* have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements of Nippon Active Value Fund plc (the ‘Company’) for the year ended 31 December 2022 which comprise the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Statement of Financial Position, the Statement of Changes in Equity, the Statement of Cash Flows and notes to the accounts, including a summary of significant accounting policies. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and UK adopted international accounting standards.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee.
Independence
Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were appointed by the Board of Directors on 27 August 2020 to audit the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2020 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement including retenders and reappointments is 3 years, covering the years ended 31 December 2020 to 31 December 2022. We remain independent of the Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. The non- audit services prohibited by that standard were not provided to the Company.
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
* Evaluating the appropriateness of the Director’s method of assessing going concern in light of market volatility and present uncertainties due to the current geo-political situation by analysing the company’s going concern using current economic assumptions and multiple worst case scenarios;
* Assessing the liquidity profile of the investment portfolio by checking the theoretical realisation period of investments, to meet the future obligations and operating expenses for the next twelve months;
* Challenging the Director’s assumptions and judgements made in their forecasts by performing multiple downside scenarios testing to analyse the cash reserve to cover ongoing expenses and liabilities;
* Assessing the appropriateness of the Directors’ assumptions and judgements made in their base case and stress tested forecasts including consideration of the available cash resources relative to forecast expenditure and committments.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue. In relation to the Company’s reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting. Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Factsheet/ 28 th February 2022
Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
Overview
| 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Key audit matters | Valuation and ownership of quoted investments | ✔ |
| Materiality | Company financial statements as a whole | £1.59m (2021: £1.56m) based on 1% (2021: 1%) of Net assets |
An overview of the scope of our audit
Our audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Company and its environment, including the Company’s system of internal control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of material misstatement.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit, and directing the efforts of the engagement team. This matter was addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on this matter.
| Key audit matter | How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter # Independent auditor’s report to the members of Nippon Active Value Fund plc
Continued Section 2 – Governance
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the financial statements. In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality level, performance materiality, to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole and performance materiality as follows:
| Company financial statements | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 £m | 2021 £m | |
| Materiality | 1.59 | 1.56 |
| Basis for determining materiality | 1% of Net assets | 1% of Net assets |
| Rationale for the benchmark applied | As an investment trust, the net asset value is the key measure of performance for users of the financial statements. | As an investment trust, the net asset value is the key measure of performance for users of the financial statements. |
| Performance materiality | 1.11 | 1.09 |
| Basis for determining performance materiality | 70% of materiality | 70% of materiality |
| Rationale for the percentage applied for performance materiality | The level of performance materiality applied was set after having considered a number of factors including the expected total value of known and likely misstatements and the level of transactions in the year. | The level of performance materiality applied was set after having considered a number of factors including the expected total value of known and likely misstatements and the level of transactions in the year. |
Lower testing threshold
We determined that for net revenue return before tax, a misstatement of less than materiality for the financial statements as a whole, could influence users of the financial statements as it is a measure of the Company’s performance of income generated from its investments after expenses. As a result, we determined a lower testing threshold for those items impacting revenue return of £220,000 (2021: £129,000) based on 5% of revenue return before tax (2021: 5% of revenue return before tax).
Reporting threshold
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all individual audit differences in excess of £31,000 (2021: £31,000). We also agreed to report differences below this threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
| 2022 £m | 2021 £m | |
|---|---|---|
| Materiality | 1.59 | 1.56 |
| Performance materiality | 1.11 | 1.09 |
Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the annual report and accounts other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit.
Going concern and longer-term viability
- The Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting and any material uncertainties identified set out on page 20; and
- The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Company’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate set out on page 14.
Other Code provisions
- Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 23;
- Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on page 11;
- The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems set out on page 28; and
- The section describing the work of the audit committee set out on page 34.
Other Companies Act 2006 reporting
Based on the responsibilities described below and our work performed during the course of the audit, we are required by the Companies Act 2006 and ISAs (UK) to report on certain opinions and matters as described below.
Strategic report and Directors’ report
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
- the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and
- the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Company and its environment obtained in the course of the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in the strategic report or the Directors’ report.
Directors’ remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
- adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
- the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
- certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
- we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
We gained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the Company and the industry in which it operates, and considered the risk of acts by the Company which were contrary to applicable laws and regulations, including fraud.# Independent auditor’s report to the members of Nippon Active Value Fund plc
We considered the significant laws and regulations to be the Companies Act 2006, the FCA listing and DTR rules, the principles of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance, industry practice represented by the AIC SORP, the applicable accounting framework, and the Company’s qualification as an Investment Trust under UK tax legislation as any non-compliance of this would lead to the Company losing various deductions and exemptions from corporation tax. We focused on laws and regulations that could give rise to a material misstatement in the Company financial statements. Our procedures included: • agreement of the financial statement disclosures to underlying supporting documentation; • enquiries of management and those charged with governance relating to the existence of any non-compliance with laws and regulations; • review of minutes of board meetings throughout the period throughout the period for instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations; • obtaining an understanding of the control environment in monitoring compliance with laws and regulations; and • reviewing the calculation in relation to Investment Trust compliance to check that the Company was meeting its requirements to retain its Investment Trust Status.
We assessed the susceptibility of the financial statement to material misstatement including fraud. Our risk assessment procedures included: • Enquiry with management, those charged with governance and the Audit Committee, regarding any known or suspected instances of fraud; • Obtaining an understanding of the Company’s policies and procedures relating to: – Detecting and responding to the risks of fraud; and – Internal controls established to mitigate risks related to fraud. • Review of minutes of meeting of those charged with governance for any known or suspected instances of fraud; and • Discussion amongst the engagement team as to how and where fraud might occur in the financial statements.
Based on our risk assessment, we considered the areas most susceptible to be classification of the revenue and management override of controls. Our tests included: • The procedures set out in the Key Audit Matters section above; • Recalculating investment management fees in total; • Checking the portfolio of dividends received against corporate actions and special dividends to challenge if these have been appropriately accounted for as income or capital; • Analysing the whole population of dividend receipts to identify any unusual items that could indicate a capital distribution, for example where a dividend represents a particularly high yield; • Obtaining independent confirmation of bank balances; and • Testing journals which met a defined risk criteria by agreeing to supporting documentation.
We also communicated relevant identified laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members, who were all deemed to have appropriate competence and capabilities, and remained alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, recognising that the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Justin Chait (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor
London, UK
5 April 2023
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
Section 2 – Governance 43
Section 3 – Financial Statements 45
Statement of Comprehensive Income
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | Revenue £’000 | Capital £’000 | Total £’000 | Year ended 31 December 2021 | Revenue £’000 | Capital £’000 | Total £’000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gains on investments 3 | – | 1,274 | 1,274 | – | 26,666 | 26,666 | |
| Income 4 | 5,487 | – | 5,487 | 3,512 | – | 3,512 | |
| Foreign exchange gains/(losses) | – | 938 | 938 | – | (1,770) | (1,770) | |
| Investment adviser fees 5 | (248) | (995) | (1,243) | (216) | (863) | (1,079) | |
| Other operational expenses 6 | (812) | – | (812) | (713) | – | (713) | |
| Profit before taxation | 4,427 | 1,217 | 5,644 | 2,583 | 24,033 | 26,616 | |
| Taxation 7 | (549) | – | (549) | (351) | – | (351) | |
| Profit and comprehensive income for the year | 3,878 | 1,217 | 5,095 | 2,232 | 24,033 | 26,265 | |
| Earnings per Ordinary Share – Basic and diluted (pence) 12 | 3.43p | 1.08p | 4.51p | 2.15p | 23.11p | 25.26p |
There is no other comprehensive income and therefore the return for the year is also the total comprehensive income for the year. The total column of the above statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations. Both the supplementary revenue and capital columns are both prepared in accordance with Statement of Recommended Practice (“SORP”) issued by Association of Investment Companies (“AIC”). The notes on pages 48 to 62 form part of these financial statements.
Statement of Financial Position
| Note | As at 31 December 2022 £’000 | As at 31 December 2021 £’000 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | ||
| Investments at fair value through profit or loss 3 | 126,284 | 138,626 |
| Current assets | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 31,738 | 15,815 |
| Trade and other receivables 9 | 1,240 | 1,831 |
| 32,978 | 17,646 | |
| Current liabilities | ||
| Trade and other payables 10 | (517) | (418) |
| (517) | (418) | |
| Net current assets | 32,461 | 17,228 |
| Net assets | 158,745 | 155,854 |
| Capital and reserves attributable to Shareholders | ||
| Share capital 11 | 1,130 | 1,130 |
| Share premium 11 | 115,349 | 115,349 |
| Capital reserve 38,324 | 37,107 | |
| Revenue reserve 3,942 | 2,268 | |
| Total equity | 158,745 | 155,854 |
| NAV per Ordinary Share (pence) 13 | 140.46p | 137.90p |
Approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 5 April 2023 and signed on their behalf by:
Rosemary Morgan
Director
Nippon Active Value Fund plc is incorporated in England and Wales with registration number 12275668. The notes on pages 48 to 62 form part of these financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Equity
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | Note | Share capital £’000 | Share premium £’000 | Capital reserve £’000 | Revenue reserve £’000 | Total £’000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 January 2022 | 1,130 | 115,349 | 37,107 | 2,268 | 155,854 | |
| Profit and comprehensive income for the year | – | – | 1,217 | 3,878 | 5,095 | |
| Dividends paid 8 | – | – | – | (2,204) | (2,204) | |
| Balance at 31 December 2022 | 1,130 | 115,349 | 38,324 | 3,942 | 158,745 |
| Year ended 31 December 2021 | Note | Share capital £’000 | Share premium £’000 | Capital reserve £’000 | Revenue reserve £’000 | Total £’000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at 1 January 2021 | 1,030 | 101,970 | 13,074 | 912 | 116,986 | |
| Issue of Ordinary Shares 11 | 100 | 13,900 | – | – | 14,000 | |
| Share issue costs 11 | – | (521) | – | – | (521) | |
| Profit and comprehensive income for the year | – | – | 24,033 | 2,232 | 26,265 | |
| Dividends paid – | – | – | – | (876) | (876) | |
| Balance at 31 December 2021 | 1,130 | 115,349 | 37,107 | 2,268 | 155,854 |
The capital reserve as at 31 December 2022 is split between realised gains of £48,945,000 and unrealised losses of £10,621,000 (as at 31 December 2021: realised gains of £20,773,000 and unrealised gains of £16,334,000). The revenue reserve and realised element of the capital reserve represents the amount of the Company’s retained reserves. The notes on pages 48 to 62 form part of these interim financial statements.
Statement of Cash Flows
| Year ended 31 December 2022 £’000 | Year ended 31 December 2021 £’000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating activities cash flows | ||
| Profit before taxation* | 5,644 | 26,616 |
| Adjustment for: | ||
| Gains on investments 3 | (1,274) | (26,666) |
| Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables | 174 | (269) |
| (Decrease)/increase in trade and in other payables | (20) | 131 |
| Tax withheld on overseas income 7 | (549) | (351) |
| Net cash flow from/(used in) operating activities | 3,975 | (539) |
| Investing activities cash flows | ||
| Purchases of investments | (41,052) | (39,182) |
| Sales of investments | 55,204 | 30,288 |
| Net cash flow from/(used in) investing activities | 14,152 | (8,894) |
| Financing activities cash flows | ||
| Issue of Ordinary Share capital | – | 14,000 |
| Payment of Ordinary Share issue costs | – | (521) |
| Equity dividends paid 8 | (2,204) | (876) |
| Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities | (2,204) | 12,603 |
| Increase in cash and cash equivalents | 15,923 | 3,170 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | 15,815 | 12,645 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | 31,738 | 15,815 |
- Cash inflow from dividends received for the year is £5,161,000 (31 December 2021: £3,340,000). The notes on pages 48 to 62 form part of these financial statements.
1.# GENERAL INFORMATION
The Company is a closed-ended investment company incorporated on 22 October 2019 in England and Wales with registered number 12275668 and registered as an investment company under Section 833 of Companies Act 2006, as amended from time to time. The Company is an investment trust within the meaning of Chapter 4 of Part 24 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010, as amended. On 21 February 2020, the Company’s shares were admitted to the Specialist Fund Segment of the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. On the same day, trading of the Ordinary Shares commenced on the London Stock Exchange. The investment objective of the Company is to provide Shareholders with attractive capital growth through the active management of a focused portfolio of quoted companies which have the majority of their operations in, or revenue derived from, Japan and that have been identified by the Investment Adviser as being undervalued. The principal activity of the Company is that of an investment trust company within the meaning of section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010. FundRock Management Company (Guernsey) Limited (formerly Sanne Fund Management (Guernsey) Limited) acts as the Company’s Alternative Investment Fund Manager (the “AIFM”) for the purposes of Directive 2011/61/EU on Alternative Investment Fund Managers. The Company’s Investment Adviser is Rising Sun Management Limited. Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited (formerly Sanne Fund Services UK Limited), the Company’s appointed Administrator, (the “Administrator”) provides administrative and company secretarial services to the Company under the terms of an administration agreement between the Company and the Administrator. The Company’s registered office is: 6th Floor, 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
a) Basis of preparation
Statement of compliance
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards. The financial statements have also been prepared as far as is relevant and applicable to the Company in accordance with the Statement of Recommended Practice (“SORP”) issued in July 2022.
Going Concern
The Directors have adopted the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements. The following is a summary of the Directors’ assessment of the going concern status of the Company. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the period assessed by the Directors, being at least 12 months from the date the financial statements were authorised for issue. This assessment took account of Russia’s invasion into Ukraine and the recovery of the COVID-19. These uncertainties have created supply chain disruption and exacerbated inflationary pressures worldwide. The Directors do not foresee any immediate material risk to the Company’s investment portfolio. A prolonged and deep market decline could lead to falling values of the underlying business or interruptions to cashflow, however the Company currently has more than sufficient liquidity available to meet any future obligations. An explanation of the market, liquidity and credit risks and how they are managed is contained in note 15 to the financial statements.
Notes to the Accounts Section 3 – Financial Statements 49
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for at least twelve months from the date of this report. In reaching this conclusion, the Directors have considered the liquidity of the Company’s portfolio of investments as well as its cash position, income and expense flows. The Company’s net assets at 31 December 2022 were £158,745,000 (31 December 2021: £155,854,000). As at 31 December 2022, the Company held £31,738,000 (31 December 2021: £15,815,000) in cash. The total expenses for the year ended 31 December 2022 were £2,055,000 (31 December 2021: £1,792,000), which represented approximately 1.41% (31 December 2021: 1.37%) of average net assets during the year. At the date of approval of this document, based on the aggregate of investments and cash held, the Company has substantial operating expenses cover.
Use of estimates and judgements
The preparation of the financial statements and the manner in which they are presented requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. See below paragraph for judgement around determination of the functional and presentation currency. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an on-going basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the year in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. There have been no estimates, judgements or assumptions which have had a significant impact on the financial statements for the year.
Basis of measurement
The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss, which are measured at fair value.
Functional and presentation currency
The financial statements are presented in sterling, which is the Company’s functional currency. The Company’s investments are denominated in Japanese yen. However, the Company’s Shares are issued in sterling. In addition, a substantial majority of the Company’s expenses are paid in sterling. It is also expected that the Company’s dividend shall be declared and paid in sterling. All financial information presented in sterling has been rounded to the nearest thousand pounds. The Company is required to identify its functional currency, being the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates. The Board, having regard to the currency of the Company’s share capital and the predominant currency in which its shareholders operate, has determined that sterling is the functional currency. Sterling is also the currency in which the financial statements are presented.
New Standards, Interpretations and Amendments adopted from 1 January 2022
A number of new standards, amendments to standards are effective for the annual periods beginning after 1 January 2022. None of these has a significant effect on the measurement of the amounts recognised in the financial statements of the Company.
New Standards and Amendments issued but not yet Effective
The relevant new and amended standards and interpretations that are issued, but not yet effective, up to the date of issuance of the Company’s financial statements are disclosed below. These standards are not expected to have a material impact on the entity in future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions.
- Amendments to IAS 1: Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current
In January 2020, the IASB issued amendments to paragraphs 69 to 76 of IAS 1 to specify the requirements for classifying liabilities as current or non-current. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. - Definition of Accounting Estimates - Amendments to IAS 8
In February 2021, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 8, in which it introduces a definition of ‘accounting estimates’. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023.
50 Factsheet/ 28th February 2022 Nippon Active Value Fund plc | Annual Report & Accounts 2022
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
- Disclosure of Accounting Policies - Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2
In February 2021, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2 Making Materiality Judgements. The amendments to IAS 1 are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023.
b) Significant accounting policies
The following accounting policies have been applied consistently throughout the reporting year.
Investments
Upon initial recognition investments are classified by the Company “at fair value through profit or loss”. They are accounted for on the date they are traded and are included initially at fair value which is taken to be their cost. Subsequently quoted investments are valued at fair value, which is the bid market price, or if bid price is unavailable, last traded price on the relevant exchange. Subsequently investments are revalued at fair value, which is the bid market price for listed investments over the time until they are sold, any unrealised gains/losses are included in the fair value of the investments. Investments are derecognised on the trade date of their disposal, which is the point where the Company transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of the ownership of the financial asset. Changes in the fair value of investments held at fair value through profit or loss and gains or losses on disposal are included in the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income within “gains on investments”.
Taxation
Investment trusts which have approval under Section 1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are not liable for taxation on capital gains. The Company has been granted approval as an Investment Trust by HMRC. Irrecoverable withholding tax is recognised on any overseas dividends on an accruals basis using the applicable rate for the country of origin.
Segmental reporting
The Chief Operating Decision Maker, which is the Board, is of the opinion that the Company is engaged in a single segment of business. The financial information used by the Chief Operating Decision Maker to manage the Company presents the business as a single segment.
Dividends payable
Dividends to shareholders are recognised in the year of the ex-dividend date.# Notes to the Accounts continued
Section 3 – Financial Statements
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES continued
Foreign currency
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at the exchange rates as at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the period end are reported at the rates of exchange prevailing at the period end. Any gain or loss arising from a change in exchange rates subsequent to the date of the transaction is included as an exchange gain or loss to capital or revenue in the Income Statement as appropriate. Foreign exchange movements on investments are included in the Income Statement within gains on investments.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include deposits held at call with banks and other short-term deposits with original maturities of three months or less.
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are initially recognised at fair value, and subsequently re-measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method where necessary.
Nature and purpose of equity and reserves:
Share capital and share premium
Share capital represents the 1p nominal value of the issued share capital. Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares (that would have been avoided if there had not been a new issue of new shares) are recognised against the value of the ordinary share premium. The share premium account arose from the net proceeds of new shares and from the excess proceeds received on the sale of shares from treasury over the repurchase cost.
Capital reserve
Profits and losses achieved by selling investments, changes in fair value arising upon the revaluation of investments that remain in the portfolio and other capital expenditure are all charged to the capital column of the Statement of Comprehensive Income and allocated to the capital reserve. The capital reserve reflects any:
* gains or losses on the disposal of investments;
* exchange movements of a capital nature;
* the increases and decreases in the fair value of investments which have been recognised in the capital column of the
* income statement; and
* expenses which are capital in nature.
Any gains in the fair value of investments that are not readily convertible to cash are treated as unrealised gains in the capital reserve.
Revenue reserve
The revenue reserve reflects all income and expenditure recognised in the revenue column of the income statement and is distributable by way of dividends. The Company’s distributable reserve consists of the capital reserve attributable to realised profit and the revenue reserve.
| As at 31 December 2022 £’000 | As at 31 December 2021 £’000 | |
|---|---|---|
| 3. INVESTMENTS | ||
| (a) Investment at fair value through profit or loss | ||
| Listed on a recognised overseas exchange | 126,284 | 138,626 |
| Total | 126,284 | 138,626 |
(b) Movements during year
| Year ended 31 December 2022 £’000 | Year ended 31 December 2021 £’000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Book cost at the beginning of the year | 106,935 | 87,548 |
| Investment holding gains at beginning of the year | 31,691 | 15,357 |
| Valuation at beginning of the year | 138,626 | 102,905 |
| Investment purchases, at cost | 41,134 | 39,160 |
| Investment sales, at cost | (42,855) | (19,773) |
| Closing book cost | 105,214 | 106,935 |
| Investment holding gains | 21,070 | 31,691 |
| Closing valuation | 126,284 | 138,626 |
These investments have been revalued over time and until they were sold any unrealised gains/losses were included in the fair value of the investments. Transaction costs on investment purchases for the year ended 31 December 2022 amounted to £36,000 (2021: £39,000) and on investment sales for the year amounted to £54,000 (2021: £21,000).
(c) Gains on investments
| Year ended 31 December 2022 £’000 | Year ended 31 December 2021 £’000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Realised gains on disposal of investments | 11,985 | 10,391 |
| Investment holding (losses)/ gains | (10,621) | 16,334 |
| Net transactions costs | (90) | (59) |
| Total gains on investments held at fair value | 1,274 | 26,666 |
Fair Value Measurements of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The financial assets and liabilities are either carried at their fair value, or the amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value (due from brokers, dividends receivable, accrued income, due to brokers, expense accruals and cash and cash equivalents). Categorisation within the hierarchy has been determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the Fair Value measurement of the relevant asset as follows:
- Level 1 – valued using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
- Level 2 – valued by reference to valuation techniques using observable inputs including quoted prices.
- Level 3 – valued by reference to valuation techniques using inputs that are not based on observable market data.
The valuation techniques for investments used by the Company are explained in the accounting policies notes 2 (b and c). The table below sets out fair value measurements using the Fair Value Hierarchy.
As at 31 December 2022
| Level 1 £’000 | Level 2 £’000 | Level 3 £’000 | Total £’000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets: | ||||
| Equity investments | 126,284 | – | – | 126,284 |
| Total | 126,284 | – | – | 126,284 |
There were no transfers between levels during the year. There are no Level 3 investments as at 31 December 2022.
As at 31 December 2021
| Level 1 £’000 | Level 2 £’000 | Level 3 £’000 | Total £’000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets: | ||||
| Equity investments | 138,626 | – | – | 138,626 |
| Total | 138,626 | – | – | 138,626 |
4. INVESTMENT INCOME
| Year ended 31 December 2022 £’000 | Year ended 31 December 2021 £’000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Income from investments: | ||
| Overseas dividends | 5,487 | 3,512 |
| Total | 5,487 | 3,512 |
5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEES
| Year ended 31 December 2022 £’000 | Year ended 31 December 2021 £’000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Basic fee: | ||
| 20% charged to revenue | 248 | 216 |
| 80% charged to capital | 995 | 863 |
| Total | 1,243 | 1,079 |
The Company’s Investment Adviser is Rising Sun Management Ltd. The Investment Adviser is entitled, with effect from First Admission, to receive an annual fee from the Company of 0.85% per annum of NAV.
6. OTHER EXPENSES
| Year ended 31 December 2022 £’000 | Year ended 31 December 2021 £’000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Directors’ fees | 157 | 146 |
| Administration fees | 86 | 84 |
| Auditor’s remuneration | 45 | 30 |
| AIFM fees | 70 | 70 |
| Broker retainer fees | 50 | 49 |
| Custodian fees | 75 | 74 |
| D&O insurance | 24 | 17 |
| Marketing fees | 51 | – |
| Legal Fees | 40 | 36 |
| Regulatory fees | 41 | 33 |
| Secretarial fees | 47 | 47 |
| Miscellaneous expenses | 126 | 127 |
| Other expenses – Revenue | 812 | 713 |
7. TAXATION
(a) Analysis of tax charge in the year:
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | Year ended 31 December 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue £’000 | Capital £’000 | |
| Overseas withholding tax | 549 | – |
| Total tax charge for the year (see note 7(b)) | 549 | – |
(b) Factors affecting the tax charge for the year:
The tax charge assessed for the year to 31 December 2022 is lower than the Company’s applicable rate of corporation tax of 19% (2021: 19%). The differences are explained below:
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | Year ended 31 December 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue £’000 | Capital £’000 | |
| Profit before taxation | 4,427 | 1,217 |
| UK corporation tax at 19% (2021: 19%) | 841 | 231 |
| Effects of: | ||
| Overseas withholding tax suffered | 549 | – |
| Non-taxable overseas dividends | (1,043) | – |
| Capital gains not subject to tax | – | (242) |
| Unutilised management expenses | 189 | |
| Unutilised finance costs | 13 | – |
| Foreign exchange losses not subject to tax | – | (178) |
| Total tax charge | 549 | – |
The Company is not liable to pay tax on capital gains due to its status as an investment trust. The company has an unrecognised deferred tax asset of £1,339,000 (2021: £825,000) based on the long-term prospective corporation tax rate of 25% (2021: 25%). The March 2021 Budget announced an increase to the main rate of corporation tax to 25% from 1 April 2023. This increase in the standard rate of corporation tax was substantively enacted on 24 May 2021 and became effective from 2 June 2021. This asset has accumulated because deductible expenses exceeded taxable income for the year ended 31 December 2022.No asset has been recognised in the financial statements because, given the composition of the Company’s portfolio, it is not likely that this asset will be utilised in the foreseeable future.
8. DIVIDEND
(i). Dividend paid during the year is detailed in the below table:
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | Year ended 31 December 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Type – respective financial year end – dividend rate (pence) | Pence per Ordinary share | £’000 | Pence per Ordinary share |
| Interim dividend – paid on 26 April 2022 (2021: paid on 30 April 2021) | 1.95p | 2,204 | 0.85p |
| Total | 1.95p | 2,204 | 0.85p |
(ii). The dividend relating to the year ended 31 December 2022, which is the basis on which the requirements of Section 1159 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered is detailed below:
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | Year ended 31 December 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pence per Ordinary share | £’000 | Pence per Ordinary share | £’000 |
| Interim dividend – payable 26 May 2023* (2021: paid 26 April 2022) | 3.20p | 3,617 | 1.95p |
| Total | 3.20p | 3,617 | 1.95p |
*Not included as a liability in the year ended 31 December 2022 accounts.
The Directors have declared an interim dividend for the financial year ended 31 December 2022 of 3.20p per Ordinary Share. The dividend will be paid on 26 May 2023 to Shareholders on the register at the close of business on 21 April 2023.
9. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
| As at 31 December 2022 | £’000 | As at 31 December 2021 | £’000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trade receivables | 773 | 1,190 | |
| Accrued income | 212 | 435 | |
| Other receivables | 255 | 206 | |
| Total | 1,240 | 1,831 |
Notes to the Accounts continued
10. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
| As at 31 December 2022 | £’000 | As at 31 December 2021 | £’000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amounts falling due within one year: | |||
| Trade payables | 256 | 138 | |
| Accrued expenses | 261 | 280 | |
| Total | 517 | 418 |
11. SHARE CAPITAL
Share capital represents the nominal value of shares that have been issued. The share premium includes any premiums received on issue of share capital. Any transaction costs associated with the issuing of shares are deducted from share premium.
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | £’000 | Year ended 31 December 2021 | £’000 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of shares | No. of shares | ||||
| Allotted, issued & fully paid: | |||||
| Opening balance | 113,021,433 | 1,130 | 103,000,001 | 1,030 | |
| Ordinary Shares of 1p each (‘Ordinary Shares’) issued | – | – | 10,021,432 | 100 | |
| Closing balance | 113,021,433 | 1,130 | 113,021,433 | 1,130 |
Share capital movement during the year
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | £ | Year ended 31 December 2021 | £ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of shares | Nominal value of shares | No. of shares | Nominal value of shares | ||
| Allotted, issued & fully paid: | |||||
| Opening balance | 113,021,433 | 1,130,214.33 | 103,000,001 | 1,030,000.01 | |
| – | – | 10,021,432* | 100,214.32 | ||
| Closing balance | 113,021,433 | 1,130,214.33 | 113,021,433 | 1,130,214.33 |
- Fundraise on 22 November 2021
Rights attaching to the Ordinary Shares
- Dividend rights: All Ordinary Shares are entitled to participate in dividends which the Company declares from time to time in respect of the Ordinary Shares, proportionate to the amounts paid or credited as paid on such Ordinary Shares.
- Rights as respect to capital: On a winding-up or a return of capital, in the event that the Directors resolve to make a distribution to Shareholders, all Ordinary Shares are entitled to a distribution of capital in the same proportions as capital is attributable to them.
- Voting rights: Every Shareholder shall have one vote for each Ordinary Share held.
12. EARNINGS PER ORDINARY SHARE
Total return per Ordinary Share is based on the return on ordinary activities, including income, for the year after taxation of £5,095,000 (2021: 26,265,000). Based on the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in issue for the year to 31 December 2022 of 113,021,433 (2021: 103,985,715), the returns per share were as follows:
| Year ended 31 December 2022 | Year ended 31 December 2021 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | £’000 | Capital | £’000 | Total | £’000 | Revenue | £’000 |
| Return per Ordinary Share | 3.43p | 1.08p | 4.51p | 2.15p | 23.11p | 25.26p |
13. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
Total equity and the NAV per share attributable to the Ordinary Shareholders at the year-end calculated in accordance with the Articles of Association were as follows:
| As at 31 December 2022 | As at 31 December 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| NAV (£) | 158,745,000 | 155,854,000 |
| Ordinary Shares in issue | 113,021,433 | 113,021,433 |
| NAV per Ordinary Share | 140.46p | 137.90p |
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the Investment Adviser
The fees for the year are disclosed in note 5 and amounts outstanding at the year ended 31 December 2022 were £nil. A key member of the RSM team is a major shareholder of Rosenwald Capital Management, Inc. Further details of Rosenwald Management Inc,’s shareholding is disclosed on page 19. Rosenwald Capital Management Inc, receives dividends paid by the Company based on its shareholding.
Directors’ fees and shareholdings
Directors’ fees are payable at the rate of £27,810 per annum for each Director other than the Chairman, who is entitled to receive £41,000. The Chairman of the Audit Committee is also entitled to an additional fee of £5,190 per annum. The Directors had the following shareholdings in the Company, all of which were beneficially owned.
| As at 31 December 2022 | As at 31 December 2021 | |
|---|---|---|
| Rosemary Morgan | 40,000 | 40,000 |
| Chetan Ghosh | 40,000 | 40,000 |
| Rachel Hill | 115,791 | 115,791 |
| Alicia Ogawa | 25,000 | 25,000 |
| Ayako Weissman | 27,000 | 27,000 |
Notes to the Accounts continued
15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CAPITAL DISCLOSURES
Risk Management Policies and Procedures
As an investment trust the Company invests in equities for the long term in order to achieve its investment objective stated on page 2. In pursuing its investment objective, the Company is exposed to a variety of risks that could result in either a reduction in the Company’s net assets or a reduction of the profits available for dividends. These risks include market risk (comprising currency risk, interest rate risk, and other price risk), liquidity risk, credit risk and the Directors’ approach to the management of them are set out follows. The objectives, policies and processes for managing the risks and the methods used to measure the risks, are set out below.
Market risk
- Economic conditions
Changes in economic conditions in Japan (for example, interest rates and rates of inflation, industry conditions, competition, political and diplomatic events and other factors) and in the countries in which the Company’s investee companies operate could substantially and adversely affect the Company’s prospects. - Sectoral diversification
The Company is not subject to restrictions on the amount it may invest in any particular sector. Although the portfolio is expected to be diversified in terms of sector exposures, the Company may have significant exposure to portfolio companies from certain sectors from time to time. As there is no hard limit on the amount the Company may invest in any sector the entire Portfolio may, at certain times, be invested solely in one sector. Greater concentration of investments in any one sector may result in greater volatility in the value of the Company’s investments and consequently its NAV and may materially and adversely affect the performance of the Company and returns to Shareholders. - Management of market risks
The Company is invested in a diversified portfolio of investments. The Board will not set any limits on sector weightings or stock selection within the portfolio. The Board will apply the following restrictions on the size of its investments:- not more than 30 per cent. of the Gross Asset Value at the time of investment will be invested in the securities of a single issuer; and
- the value of the four largest investments at the time of investment will not constitute more than 75 per cent. of the Gross Asset Value.
(a) Currency risks
The majority of the Company’s assets will be denominated in a currency other than sterling (predominantly in Japanese yen) and changes in the exchange rate between sterling and Japanese yen may lead to a depreciation of the value of the Company’s assets as expressed in sterling and may reduce the returns to the Company from its investments and, therefore, negatively impact the level of dividends paid to Shareholders.
- Management of currency risks
The Company does not currently intend to enter into any arrangements to hedge its underlying currency exposure to investment denominated in Japanese yen, although the Investment Adviser and the Board may review this from time to time.
Foreign currency exposures
An analysis of the Company’s equity investments that are priced in a foreign currency is:
| As at 31 December 2022 | £’000 | As at 31 December 2021 | £’000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio of investments: yen | 126,284 | 138,626 | ||
| Trade and other receivables: yen | 985 | 1,625 | ||
| Cash: yen | 31,762 | 15,131 | ||
| Total | 159,031 | 155,382 |
Foreign currency sensitivity
If the Japanese yen had appreciated or depreciated by 10% as at 31 December 2022 then the value of the portfolio as at that date would have increased or decreased as shown below.
| Increase in Fair Value | As at 31 December 2022 | £’000 | Decrease in Fair Value | As at 31 December 2022 | £’000 | Increase in Fair Value | As at 31 December 2021 | £’000 | Decrease in Fair Value | As at 31 December 2021 | £’000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact on portfolio – increase/(decrease) | 12,628 | (12,628) | 13,863 | (13,863) | ||||||||
| Impact on NAV – increase/(decrease) | 15,903 | (15,903) | 15,538 | (15,538) |
(b) Interest rate risks
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk specifically through its cash holdings. Interest rate movements may affect the level of income receivable from any cash on deposit with banks.# Notes to the Accounts continued
Section 3 – Financial Statements
15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CAPITAL DISCLOSURES continued
The effect of interest rate changes on the earnings of the companies held within the portfolio may have a significant impact on the valuation of the Company’s investments. Management of interest rate risks Prevailing interest rates are taken into account when deciding on borrowings. Interest rate exposure The exposure at 31 December 2022 of financial assets and liabilities to interest rate risk is shown by reference to floating interest rates – when the interest rate is due to be reset.
| As at 31 December 2022 £’000 | As at 31 December 2021 £’000 |
|---|---|
| Exposure to floating interest rates: | |
| Floating rate on cash balance: yen | 31,762 |
(c) Price risks
Price risk includes changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk, which may affect the value of equity investments.
Management of price risk
The Board meets on at least four occasions each year to consider the asset allocation of the portfolio and the risk associated with particular industry sectors. The investment management team has responsibility for monitoring the portfolio, which is selected in accordance with the Company’s investment objective and seeks to ensure that individual stocks meet an acceptable risk/reward profile.
Price risk exposure
The Company’s total exposure to changes in market prices at 31 December 2022 comprises its holdings in equity investments as follows:
| As at 31 December 2022 £’000 | As at 31 December 2021 £’000 |
|---|---|
| Investments held at fair value through profit or loss | 126,284 |
The effect on the portfolio of a 10.0% increase or decrease in the value of the Investments held at fair value through profit or loss would have resulted in an increase or decrease of £12,628,000 (2021: £13,862,000).
Liquidity risks
The securities of small-to-medium-sized (by market capitalisation) companies may have a more limited secondary market than the securities of larger companies. Accordingly, it may be more difficult to effect sales of such securities at an advantageous time or without a substantial drop in price than securities of a company with a large market capitalisation and broad trading market. In addition, securities of small-to-medium-sized companies may have greater price volatility as they can be more vulnerable to adverse market factors such as unfavourable economic reports.
Management of liquidity risks
The Company’s Investment Adviser monitors the liquidity of the Company’s portfolio on a regular basis.
Liquidity risk exposure
The undiscounted gross cash outflows of the financial liabilities as at 31 December 2022, based on the earliest date on which payment can be required, were as follows:
| As at 31 December 2022 less than 3 months | As at 31 December 2021 less than 3 months |
|---|---|
| Creditors: amounts falling due within one year | – |
| Trade and other payables | 517 |
| Total | 517 |
Liquidity risk is minimised by holding sufficient liquid investments which can be readily realised to meet liquidity demands. The Company’s liquidity risk is managed on a daily basis by the Investment Adviser in accordance with established policies and procedures in place. Liquidity risk is not significant as the majority of the Company’s assets are investments in quoted equities that are readily realisable.
15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CAPITAL DISCLOSURES continued
Credit risks
Cash and other assets held by the depositary Cash and other assets that are required to be held in custody will be held by the custodian or its sub-custodians. Cash and other assets may not be treated as segregated assets and will therefore not be segregated from any custodian’s own assets in the event of the insolvency of a custodian. Cash held with any custodian will not be treated as client money subject to the rules of the FCA and may be used by a custodian in the course of its own business. The Company will therefore be subject to the creditworthiness of its custodians. In the event of the insolvency of a custodian, the Company will rank as a general creditor in relation thereto and may not be able to recover such cash in full, or at all.
Management of credit risks
The Company has appointed Northern Trust as its custodian. The credit rating of Northern Trust was reviewed at the time of appointment and will be reviewed on a regular basis by the Investment Adviser and/or the Board. The Investment Adviser monitors the Company’s exposure to its counterparties on a regular basis and the position is reviewed by the directors at Board meetings. In summary, the exposure to credit risk as at 31 December 2022 was as follows:
| As at 31 December 2022 £’000 | As at 31 December 2021 £’000 |
|---|---|
| Cash at bank | 31,738 |
| Trade and other receivables | 1,240 |
| Total | 32,978 |
(d) Capital Management Policies and Procedures
The Company’s capital management objectives are:
* to ensure that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern; and
* to provide dividend income combined with capital growth, mainly through investment in equities listed or quoted in Japan.
The key performance indicators are contained in the strategic report on page 10. The Company is subject to several externally imposed capital requirements:
* As a public company, the Company has to have a minimum share capital of £50,000.
* In order to be able to pay dividends out of profits available for distribution by way of dividends, the Company has to be able to meet one of the two capital restriction tests imposed on investment companies by company law.
The Company’s capital at 31 December 2022 comprises called-up share capital and reserves totalling £158,745,000 (2021: £155,854,000). The Board regularly monitors, and has complied with, the externally imposed capital requirements.
16. POST YEAR END EVENTS
Since 31 December 2022, there are no post balance sheet events which would require adjustment of or disclosure in the financial statements.
Section 4 – Other Information
Alternative Performance Measures (“APM”)
Discount
The amount, expressed as a percentage, by which the share price is less than the NAV per Ordinary Share.
| As at 31 December 2022 | Page | (Pence) |
|---|---|---|
| NAV per Ordinary Share | a | 2 |
| Share price | b | 2 |
| Discount | (b÷a)-1 |
| As at 31 December 2021 | Page | (Pence) |
|---|---|---|
| NAV per Ordinary Share | a | 2 |
| Share price | b | 2 |
| Discount | (b÷a)-1 |
Total return
A measure of performance that includes both income and capital returns. This takes into account capital gains and reinvestment of dividends paid out by the Company into its Ordinary Shares on the ex-dividend date.
Year end 31 December 2022
| Share price | NAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening (pence) | a | 134.0 |
| Closing (pence) | b | 117.5 |
| Movement (b÷a)-1 | c | -12.3% |
| Dividend reinvestment factor | d | 1.4% |
| Total return (c+d) | -10.9% |
Year end 31 December 2021
| Share price | NAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening (pence) | a | 106.5 |
| Closing (pence) | b | 134.0 |
| Movement (b÷a)-1 | c | 25.8% |
| Dividend reinvestment factor | d | 1.0% |
| Total return (c+d) | 26.8% |
Alternative Performance Measures (“APMs”) continued
Ongoing charges
A measure, expressed as a percentage of average NAV, of the regular, recurring annual costs of running an investment company.
Year end 31 December 2022
| Average NAV | Annual expenses | Ongoing charges (b÷a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | 145,955,840 | ||
| b | 2,055,000 | ||
| 1.41% |
Year end 31 December 2021
| Average NAV | Annualised expenses | Ongoing charges (b÷a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | 130,449,346 | ||
| b | 1,792,000 | ||
| 1.37% |
Glossary
- Administrator The Company’s administrator, the current such administrator being Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited.
- AIC Association of Investment Companies
- Alternative Investment Fund or “AIF” An investment vehicle under AIFMD. Under AIFMD (see below) the Company is classified as an AIF.
- Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive or “AIFMD” A European Union Directive which came into force on 22 July 2013 and has been implemented in the UK.
- Custodian An entity that is appointed to safeguard a company’s assets.
- Depositary Certain AIFs must appoint depositaries under the requirements of AIFMD. A depositary’s duties include, inter alia, safekeeping of the Company’s assets and cash monitoring. Under AIFMD the depositary is appointed under a strict liability regime.
- Dividend Income receivable from an investment in shares.
- Discount The amount, expressed as a percentage, by which the share price is less than the NAV per share.
- Ex-dividend date The date from which you are not entitled to receive a dividend which has been declared and is due to be paid to Shareholders.
- Financial Conduct Authority or “FCA” The independent body that regulates the financial services industry in the UK.
- Gearing A way to magnify income and capital returns, but which can also magnify losses. A bank loan is a common method of gearing.
- Index A basket of stocks which is considered to replicate a particular stock market or sector.
- Investment company A company formed to invest in a diversified portfolio of assets.
- Investment trust A closed-end investment company which is based in the UK and which meets certain tax conditions which enables it to be exempt from UK corporation tax on its capital gains. This Company is an investment trust.
- Market liquidity The extent to which investments can be bought or sold at short notice.
- Net assets An investment company’s assets less its liabilities.
- Net Asset Value (NAV) per Ordinary Share Net assets divided by the number of Ordinary Shares in issue (excluding any shares held in treasury).
- Ordinary Shares The company’s Ordinary Shares in issue.# Section 4 – Other Information
Company Information
Board of Directors
- Rosemary Morgan (Chairman)
- Chetan Ghosh
- Rachel Hill
- Alicia Ogawa
- Ayako Weissman
Registered Office
6th Floor, 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS
Administrator & Company Secretary
Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited (formerly Sanne Fund Services (UK) Limited)
6th Floor, 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS
Principal Bankers
The Northern Trust Company
50 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London E14 5NT
Custodian
The Northern Trust Company
50 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London E14 5NT
Company Security Identifiers
- ISIN: GB00BKLGLS10
- Ticker: NAVF
- SEDOL: BKLGLS1
- Website: www.nipponactivevaluefund.com
- LEI: 213800JOFEGZJYS21P75
- GIIN: WB82JR.99999.SL.826
Investment Adviser
Rising Sun Management Limited
c/o Appleby Global Services (Cayman) Limited
71 Fort Street
PO Box 500
George Town
Grand Cayman KY1-1106
Cayman Islands
Rising Sun Management Team
- James B. Rosenwald, III
- Gifford Combs
- Paul ffolkes Davis
- Kazutaka Mizuochi
Alternative Investment Fund Manager
FundRock Management Company (Guernsey) Limited (formerly Sanne Fund Management (Guernsey) Limited)
Sarnia House
Le Truchot
St Peter Port
Guernsey GY1 1GR
Broker
Shore Capital & Corporate Limited
Cassini House
57 St James’s Street
London SW1A 1LD
Legal Adviser
Travers Smith LLP
10 Snow Hill
Farringdon
London EC1A 2AL
Registrar
Computershare Investor Services PLC
The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol BS13 8AE
Auditors
BDO LLP
55 Baker Street
London W1U 7EU
Notice of Annual General Meeting
In line with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006, the Company will hold an Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) of shareholders to consider the resolutions laid out in the Notice of Meeting below. Even if you intend to attend the AGM, all shareholders are encouraged to cast their vote by proxy and to appoint the “Chair of the Meeting” as their proxy. Details of how to vote, either electronically, by proxy form or through CREST, can be found in the Notes to the Notice of AGM below. Shareholders are invited to send any questions for the Board or Investment Adviser in advance by email to [email protected] by close of business on 6 June 2023. Should any changes be required to be made to the arrangements for the AGM, they will be announced via a regulatory information service and included on the Company’s website, https://www.nipponactivevaluefund.com/. Alternatively, shareholders can contact the Registrar, Computershare Investor Services PLC, for updated information (please see Notes to the Notice of AGM for the Registrar’s contact details).
Notice of Meeting
Notice is hereby given that the AGM of Nippon Active Value Fund plc will be held at the offices of Apex Group located at 6th Floor, 125 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5AS on 8 June 2023 at 4.00 p.m. for the following purposes:
To consider and if thought fit pass the following resolutions of which resolutions 1 to 11 will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and resolutions 12 to 14 will be proposed as special resolutions.
- To receive the Company’s Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 December 2022 (the “Annual Report”).
- To approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report included in the Annual Report.
- To re-elect Chetan Ghosh as a director of the Company.
- To re-elect Rachel Hill as a director of the Company.
- To re-elect Rosemary Morgan as a director of the Company.
- To re-elect Alicia Ogawa as a director of the Company.
- To re-elect Ayako Weissman as a director of the Company.
- To re-appoint BDO LLP as auditor to the Company.
- To authorise the Directors to fix the remuneration of the auditor until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company.
- That the Directors be authorised to declare and pay all dividends of the Company as interim dividends and for the last dividend referable to a financial year not be categorised as a final dividend that is subject to shareholder approval.
- That the Directors be and are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised to exercise all powers of the Company to allot ordinary shares of 1 penny each in the Company (“Ordinary Shares”) up to an aggregate nominal value of £113,021 (equivalent to 10% of the issued share capital of the Company as at the date of this notice of this annual general meeting) and that this authority shall expire (unless previously varied, revoked or renewed by the Company in general meeting) at the conclusion of the annual general meeting of the Company to be held in 2024 or, if earlier, on the expiry of 15 months from the passing of this resolution, save that the Company may, at any time prior to the expiry of such authority, make an offer or enter into an agreement which would or might require the allotment of Ordinary Shares in pursuance of such an offer or agreement as if such authority had not expired.
- That, subject to the passing of resolution 11, in addition to any existing power under sections 570 and 573 of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Companies Act”) but without prejudice to the exercise of any such power prior to the date hereof, the Directors be and are hereby empowered, pursuant to sections 570 and 573 of the Companies Act, to allot Ordinary Shares and/or sell Ordinary Shares from treasury, in each case for cash pursuant to the authority conferred by resolution 11 up to an aggregate nominal value of £113,021 (equivalent to 10% of the issued share capital of the Company as at the date of this notice of annual general meeting) as if section 561 of the Companies Act did not apply to such allotment or sale and that this power shall expire (unless previously varied, revoked or renewed by the Company in general meeting) at the conclusion of the annual general meeting of the Company to be held in 2024 or, if earlier, on the expiry of 15 months from the passing of this resolution, save that the Company may, at any time prior to the expiry of such authority, make an offer or enter into an agreement which would or might require the allotment or sale of Ordinary Shares in pursuance of such an offer or agreement as if such authority had not expired.
- That the Company be and is hereby generally and unconditionally authorised in accordance with section 701 of the Companies Act to make market purchases (within the meaning of section 693(4) of the Companies Act) of Ordinary Shares, provided that:
- (a) the maximum number of Ordinary Shares hereby authorised to be purchased shall be 16,941,912 (representing 14.99% of the Company’s issued share capital of the Company at the date of this notice of annual general meeting);
- (b) the minimum price (exclusive of any expenses) which may be paid for an Ordinary Share is 1 penny;
- (c) the maximum price (exclusive of any expenses) which may be paid for each Ordinary Share is not more than the higher of (i) 5% above the average of the middle market quotations for the Ordinary Shares for the five business days immediately before the day on which that Ordinary Share is contracted for purchases and (ii) the higher of the price of the last independent trade and the highest then current independent bid for the Ordinary Shares on the trading venue where the purchase is carried out;
- (d) the authority hereby conferred shall expire at the conclusion of the annual general meeting of the Company to be held in 2024 or, if earlier, on the expiry of 15 months from the passing of this resolution, unless such authority is renewed or revoked by the Company prior to such time; and
- (e) the Company may make a contract to purchase Ordinary Shares under the authority hereby conferred prior to the expiry of such authority, which will or may be executed wholly or partly after the expiration of such authority and may purchase Ordinary Shares pursuant to any such contract as if the authority had not expired.
- That a general meeting of the Company other than an annual general meeting may be called on not less than 14 clear days’ notice, provided that this authority shall expire at the conclusion of the Company’s next annual general meeting after the date of the passing of this resolution.
By order of the Board
Registered Office:
6th Floor, 125 London Wall
London, EC2Y 5AS
Maria Matheou
For and on behalf of Apex Listed Companies Services (UK) Limited
Company Secretary
5 April 2023
Notes
- Holders of ordinary shares of one penny each in the capital of the Company (“Shares”) are entitled to attend, speak and vote at the AGM. A Shareholder entitled to attend, speak and vote at the AGM may appoint one or more persons as his/her proxy to attend, speak and vote on his/her behalf at the AGM. A proxy need not be a shareholder of the Company. If multiple proxies are appointed, they must not be appointed in respect of the same Shares.# Notice of Annual General Meeting
Section 4 – Other Information
- To be effective, the enclosed form of proxy (“Form of Proxy”), together with any power of attorney or other authority under which it is signed or a certified copy thereof, should be lodged at the office of the Company’s Registrar, Computershare Investor Services PLC, The Pavilions, Bridgwater Road, Bristol BS99 6ZY by no later than 4.00 p.m. on 6 June 2023.
- If you return more than one proxy appointment, either by paper or electronic communication, that validly received last by the Registrar before the latest time for the receipt of proxies will take precedence. You are advised to read the terms and conditions of use carefully. Electronic communication facilities are open to all shareholders and those who use them will not be disadvantaged.
- As an alternative to completing the Form of Proxy, shareholders can appoint a proxy electronically via the Registrar’s online voting portal www.investorcentre.co.uk/eproxy. For an electronic proxy appointment to be valid, your appointment must be received by the Registrar no later than 4.00 p.m. on 6 June 2023.
- The appointment of a proxy will not normally prevent a Shareholder from attending the AGM, speaking and voting if he/she so wishes, however there are currently restrictions on attendance as set out above. The Articles provide that (subject to certain exceptions) at the AGM each Shareholder present in person or by proxy shall have one vote on a show of hands and on a poll every Shareholder present in person or by proxy shall have one vote for every Share of which he/she is the holder. The termination of the authority of a person to act as proxy must be notified to the Company in writing by no later than 4.00 p.m. on 6 June 2023. Amended instructions must be received by the Registrar by the deadline for receipt of proxies. Where you have appointed a proxy using the Form of Proxy and would like to change the instructions using another hard-copy Form of Proxy, please contact the Registrar’s helpline on 0370 707 1235 (or +44 370 707 1235 from outside the UK). Lines are open 8.30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Monday to Friday (excluding public holidays in England and Wales).
- To appoint more than one proxy, Shareholders will need to complete a separate Form of Proxy in relation to each appointment, stating clearly on each Form of Proxy the number of Shares in relation to which the proxy is appointed. A failure to specify the number of Shares to which each proxy appointment relates or specifying an aggregate number of Shares in excess of those held by the Shareholder will result in the proxy appointment being invalid. Please indicate if the proxy instruction is one of multiple instructions being given. If you require additional Forms of Proxy, please contact the Registrar’s helpline on 0370 707 1235 (or +44 370 707 1235 from outside the UK). Lines are open 8.30 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Monday to Friday (excluding public holidays in England and Wales). All Forms of Proxy must be signed and should be returned together in the same envelope if possible.
- In the case of joint holders, where more than one of the joint holders purports to appoint a proxy, only the appointment submitted by the most senior holder will be accepted. Seniority is determined by the order in which the names of the joint holders appear in the Company’s register of members in respect of the joint holders (the first named being the most senior).
- Only those Shareholders registered in the register of members of the Company as at 6.30 p.m. on 6 June 2023 (the “specified time”) shall be entitled to vote at the AGM in respect of the number of Shares registered in their name at that time. Changes to entries on the relevant register of securities after 6.30 p.m. on 6 June 2023 shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to vote at the AGM. If the AGM is adjourned to a time not more than 48 hours after the specified time applicable to the original meeting, that time will also apply for the purpose of determining the entitlement of Shareholders to vote (and for the purpose of determining the number of votes they may cast) at the adjourned meeting. If, however, the AGM is adjourned for a longer period then, to be so entitled, Shareholders must be entered on the Company’s register of members at the time which is 48 hours before the time fixed for the adjourned meeting, or if the Company gives notice of the adjourned meeting, at the time specified in that notice.
- Shareholders who hold their Shares electronically may submit their votes through CREST. Instructions on how to vote through CREST can be found by accessing the following website: www.euroclear.com.
- CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies by utilising the CREST electronic proxy appointment service may do so for the AGM and any adjournment(s) thereof by following the procedures described in the CREST manual (available via www.euroclear.com). CREST personal members or other CREST sponsored members, and those CREST members who have appointed a voting service provider(s), should refer to their CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s), who will be able to take the appropriate action on their behalf.
- In order for a proxy appointment or instruction made by means of CREST to be valid, the appropriate CREST message (a “CREST Proxy Instruction”) must be properly authenticated in accordance with Euroclear UK & Ireland Limited’s specifications and must contain the information required for such instructions, as described in the CREST manual (available via www.euroclear.com). The message, in order to be valid, must be transmitted so as to be received by the Company’s agent, ID: 3RA50, by the latest time for receipt of proxy appointments specified in note 1 above. For this purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to be the time (as determined by the timestamp applied to the message by the CREST Applications Host) from which the Company’s agent is able to retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST in the manner prescribed by CREST. After this time, any change of instructions to proxies appointed through CREST should be communicated to the appointee through other means. Notice of Annual General Meeting continued Section 4 – Other Information 71
- CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting service providers should note that Euroclear UK & Ireland Limited does not make available special procedures in CREST for any particular messages. Normal system timings and limitations will therefore apply in relation to the input of CREST Proxy Instructions. It is the responsibility of the CREST member concerned to take (or, if the CREST member is a CREST personal member or sponsored member or has appointed a voting service provider(s), to procure that his/her CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s) take(s)) such action as shall be necessary to ensure that a message is transmitted by means of the CREST system by any particular time.
- In this connection, CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting service providers are referred, in particular, to those sections of the CREST manual concerning practical limitations of the CREST system and timings.
- The Company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy Instruction in the circumstances set out in Regulation 35(5) (a) of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001.
- A person to whom this Notice of AGM is sent who is a person nominated under section 146 of the Companies Act 2006 to enjoy information rights (a “Nominated Person”) may, under an agreement between him/her and the Shareholder by whom he/she was nominated, have a right to be appointed (or to have someone else appointed) as a proxy for the AGM. If a Nominated Person has no such proxy appointment right or does not wish to exercise it, he/she may, under any such agreement, have a right to give instructions to the Shareholder as to the exercise of voting rights. The statements of the rights of members in relation to the appointment of proxies in note 1above do not apply to a Nominated Person. The rights described in those notes can only be exercised by registered Shareholders of the Company. Shareholders and Nominated Persons are reminded that there are restrictions on attendance at the AGM, as set out in these Notes.
- As at the date of this Notice, the Company’s issued share capital amounted to 113,021,433 Shares carrying one vote each. No Shares were held in treasury. Therefore, the total voting rights of the Company as at the date of this Notice of AGM were 113,021,433.
- Any corporation which is a Shareholder may appoint one or more corporate representatives who may exercise on its behalf all of its powers as a Shareholder provided that they do not do so in relation to the same Shares. However, before deciding to elect to appoint a corporate representative, Shareholders should take note of the restrictions on attendance at the AGM, as set out in this Notice of AGM. Corporate shareholders may also appoint one or more proxies in accordance with note 6.
- While Shareholders are invited to submit questions in advance by email to [email protected] by the close of business on 6 June 2023. The Company must cause to be answered any question asked by a Shareholder relating to the business being dealt with at the meeting unless: (a) answering the question would interfere unduly with the preparation for the meeting or involve the disclosure of confidential information; (b) the answer has already been given on a website in the form of an answer to a question; or (c) it is undesirable in the interests of the Company or the good order of the meeting that the question be answered.
-
Any person holding 3% or more of the total voting rights of the Company who appoints a person other than the Chair of the meeting as his/her proxy is to ensure that both he/she and his/her proxy comply with their respective disclosure obligations under the UK Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules.
19.This Notice of AGM, the information required by section 311A of the Companies Act 2006 and, if applicable, any members’ statements, members’ resolutions or members’ matters of business received by the Company after the date of this Notice of AGM, will be available on the Company’s website at https://www.nipponactivevaluefund.com/. -
Shareholders may not use any electronic address provided either in the Notice of AGM or any related documents (including the Form of Proxy) to communicate with the Company for any purpose other than those expressly stated.
Factsheet/ 28th February 2022