AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

NCC GROUP PLC

Annual Report Dec 23, 2025

4869_10-k_2025-12-23_6db506f4-b2e1-444b-9f70-d17d8fe5d988.pdf

Annual Report

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

Unlocking our potential

NCC Group is a people-powered, tech‑enabled global Cyber Security and software escrow business.

We harness our collective insight, intelligence and innovation to power end-to-end cyber services that protect our clients from cyber threat.

A global delivery engine as a differentiated and scalable service for clients around the world

Find out more:

p2

A single technology stack and the opportunity to leverage our scalable full‑circle cyber services

Find out more:

p8

A network of partners and strategic alliances to optimise solutions for clients

Find out more:

p12

In this report

Strategic report

Governance

  • 58 Chair's introduction to governance
  • 61 Governance framework
  • 62 Board of Directors
  • 64 Board composition and division of responsibilities
  • 70 Shareholder engagement
  • 71 Audit Committee report
  • 77 Nomination Committee report
  • 79 Cyber Security Committee report
  • 81 Remuneration Committee report
  • 94 Directors' report
  • 98 Directors' responsibilities statement

Audited consolidated financial statements

  • 99 Independent auditors' report
  • 104 Consolidated income statement
  • 104 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
  • 105 Consolidated balance sheet
  • 106 Consolidated cash flow statement
  • 107 Consolidated statement of changes in equity
  • 108 Company balance sheet
  • 109 Company statement of changes in equity
  • 110 Notes to the Financial Statements

Additional information

  • 157 Appendix 1
  • 159 Glossary of terms other terms
  • 161 Other information
  • 162 Financial calendar

Highlights for the year ended 30 September 2025

IFRS measures1

Revenue (£m)

£305.4m

Profit/(loss) before taxation (£m)

£20.6m

Basic EPS (p)

5.6p

Alternative Performance Measures

Net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities3 (£m)

£13.1m

Adjusted operating profit   (£m)

£23.7m

Adjusted EPS3 (p)

4.7p

Highlights

  • Group revenue on a constant currency basis3 (excluding non-core disposals2 ) has declined by 2.6% to £293.9m with Escode experiencing growth of 2.2% to £66.5m, offset by a Cyber Security decline of 4.0% to £227.4m.
  • Revenue performance in H2 2025 on a constant currency basis1 (excluding non-core disposals2 ) for both Escode and Cyber Security improved from the position in H1 2025, with Escode H2 2025 growth of 2.5% vs H2 2024 compared to H1 2025 growth of 1.8% vs H1 2024, and Cyber Security H2 2025 decline of 1.6% vs H2 2024 compared to H1 2025 6.3% decline vs H1 2024. Escode has now delivered 12 consecutive quarters of year-on-year revenue growth and Cyber Security has returned to growth in Q4 FY25 providing momentum into FY26.
  • Gross margins (excluding non-core disposals2 ) year on year have improved to 44.5% from 43.9% as the Group maintained operational discipline, with Escode gross margin improving by 2.6% pts at 71.4% and Cyber Security declining slightly by 0.4% pts to 36.6%.
  • The Group reported Adjusted EBITDA3 (excluding non-core disposals2 ) of £40.6m, down from £42.1m in the 12 months to 30 September 2024, in line with Board's expectations (down from £51.6m for the 16 month period ending 30 September 2024 (including non-core disposals2 )).
  • Profit before taxation grew to £20.6m from a loss of £17.8m in the year ended 30 September 2024, as a result of a reduction in non-core disposals2 trading (£4.7m), underlying reduction in Adjusted EBITDA trading performance (£1.5m), a one-off profit (£11.4m in H1 2025) from the sale of our Fox Crypto business for a total consideration of £65.6m completed in March 2025, a reduction in other Individually Significant Items (£29.5m), excluding the £11.4m profit on disposal of Fox Crypto, reduction in depreciation and amortisation (£2.2m) and finance costs (£1.3m).

  • The disposal of Fox Crypto in March 2025 was part of the strategic plan to simplify our business and focus on creating a pure play cyber service proposition for clients. It has also helped us transform our Balance Sheet to eliminate Group borrowings, with net cash of £13.1m at 30 September 2025 compared to net debt of £45.3m on 30 September 2024. In conjunction with our successful refinancing in April 2025 to a new four year, £120m multi-currency revolving credit facility (RCF) and an uncommitted £50m accordion option, this supports strategic options for a recently announced share buy-back programme and value enhancing M&A opportunities.

  • As announced on 28 April 2025, the Group confirmed that it was investigating several options for its Escode business, including a potential sale ('Escode review'). If a transaction were to be successfully concluded it would enable the Group to consider a significant return of capital to shareholders over and above the recently announced share buy-back programme. The Board will provide updates as and when appropriate.
  • Further to the announcement on 16 July 2025, the Board confirms the process to review all options for the Group's Cyber Security business also continues and is independent from both the process and outcome of the Escode review. Our focus remains on operational excellence and continuing our transformation journey as we ensure the operating model is aligned to support our clients and the underlying Cyber Security strategy.
  • The Board is proposing an unchanged final dividend of 3.15p per ordinary share, marking 20 consecutive years of dividend payments for shareholders.
  • The Board anticipates that revenue (including recent non-core disposals2 ) for the year ended 30 September 2026 is expected to grow marginally, with Escode and Cyber Security experiencing low single-digit growth as pipeline continues to build. FY26 Group Adjusted EBITDA1 (after the adjustment for non-core disposals2 ) is expected to be in line with Board expectations – growing faster than revenue and the Board remains confident in delivering the Group's medium-term financial goals as it continues to improve operational discipline and transform our cyber security engine.

1 The statutory results for the audited year (and the audited prior period of 16 Months to 30 September 2024) present the Group's Escode business as discontinued operations. Therefore, the tables below show the Group's continuing operations results, with Escode added back to ensure full comparability of the Group's performance.

2 Non-core disposals refer to the disposals of Fox-IT Crypto and Fox DetACT. The disposal of Fox-IT Crypto and Fox DetACT completed on 28 March 2025 and 30 April 2024 respectively.

3 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted operating profit, Adjusted basic EPS, net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities and cash conversion are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

We are NCC Group plc

What we do

Founded in 1999, we are a global leader in cyber security and business resilience. Our colleagues are relied upon by the world's leading companies and governments to help them manage risk, strengthen resilience and build lasting trust.

Against a backdrop of continued, fast-paced technological change and increasing interconnectedness, we help companies to manage risk and face into the future with confidence.

NCC Group has two main divisions: a people-powered, tech-enabled Cyber Security company (nccgroup.com), and a market-leading IP and software escrow business, Escode (escode.com). Working together with our clients, we create a more secure digital future.

Cyber Security

Protecting today. Shaping tomorrow. Creating a more secure digital future.

NCC Group is a leading global Cyber Security and resilience company, trusted for over 25 years by leading businesses and governments.

With roots in offensive security and defence, and a heritage built on research and threat intelligence, we uncover thousands of risks each year, bringing deep insight into vulnerabilities, attack patterns and adversary behaviours.

With significant market presence in the UK, Europe, North America and Asia Pacific we deliver full-spectrum cyber resilience to governments and businesses to protect what matters most – the cars we drive, the energy in our homes, and the phones in our pockets, and critical infrastructures worldwide. We build resilience and deliver impactful, forward‑thinking solutions that help create a safer digital future.

For more information visit our Cyber Security website: nccgroup.com

Leaders in regulatory and complex testing

Digital Forensics and Incident Response

Managed Security including MXDR

Consultancy and Implementation

Escode

We give organisations the legal right and practical means to access, rebuild, and maintain business-critical software and intellectual property when a supplier is no longer able to support it.

Our independent escrow and verification services support organisations in four key ways:

  • Resilience for organisations when software suppliers falter, code shows weaknesses or disruption strikes
  • Confidence that continuity and compliance are built into both on-premise and cloud solutions
  • Secure storage and long-term access to essential software and data
  • Technical assurance that the materials held in escrow can be successfully rebuilt and function as intended when it matters most
  • For more information visit our Escode website: escode.com

Escrow agreements for both cloud and on-premise

Testing and verification services

Where we operate

We operate as one global business, with in-country delivery tailored to local needs and cultures, as well as a global delivery team to respond quickly to our clients' challenges.

Group revenues

UK and Asia Pacific

£163.8m

(20241: £209.8m)

North America

£89.6m

(20241: £136.2m)

Europe

£52.0m

(20241: £83.5m)

Cyber Security revenue

£238.9m

(20241: £342.1m)

  • Technical Assurance Services (TAS): £88.4m (20241: £141.4m)
  • Consulting and Implementation (C&I): £48.5m (20241: £55.2m)
  • Managed Services (MS): £76.4m (20241: £91.8m)
  • Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR): £13.1m (2024¹: £20.6m)
  • Other services: £12.5m (20241: £33.1m)

Escode revenue

£66.5m

(20241: £87.4m)

  • Escrow contracts: £43.0m (20241: £57.2m)
  • Verification services: £23.5m (20241: £30.2m)

1 2024 represents the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024 (audited)

Unlocking our potential

When I reflect on the past year at NCC Group, I am reminded that progress is rarely linear. It is shaped by the challenges we face, the decisions we make, and – most importantly – the people who come together to move us forward. This year has been a testament to the resilience, adaptability and shared purpose that defines our Group. And I want to begin by expressing my heartfelt thanks to every colleague, client and shareholder, as well as our partners, who continue to be a part of our journey.

Chris Stone Non-Executive Chair

Navigating change with purpose

We continue to make bold decisions as we navigate the changing landscape all businesses are operating in. I'm proud of the way the management team and the wider Group embrace these as opportunities to continue to grow and strengthen the overall business.

In March 2025, we completed the sale of the Fox-IT Crypto business for a gross consideration of £65.6m, a milestone that not only reflects our commitment to simplifying the Group's proposition, deriving great value to our shareholders and reducing net debt, but also our willingness to evolve in a rapidly shifting digital landscape.

And this commitment continued as we announced in April 2025 that we were exploring a range of strategic options for our Escode business, including a potential sale (Escode review). The decision is one that was not taken lightly by the Board. The Board will provide updates as and when it is practicable and appropriate to do so.

If a sale of Escode were to be successfully concluded, the Group would become a focused, people-powered, tech-enabled global Cyber Security business. It would also enable the Board to consider a significant return of capital to shareholders over and above the recently announced initial share buy-back programme.

As a result of this decision, we announced in July 2025 that we had started to explore options for our Cyber business should the Escode sale proceed. This was about looking ahead and anticipating what our people, our clients and shareholders will need in years to come, and we believe it is right that we keep all options open.

Deepening relationships and building trust

In May we hosted a unique experience for shareholders, analysts and partners, demonstrating our ongoing commitment to transparency and engagement. Guests were invited to step into our world and experience first-hand decisions that management teams must make in response to cyber threats. It was a powerful reminder of the trust our clients place in us, and of course the expertise and dedication that runs through every part of our business.

These moments of connection, where we open our doors and share our story, are vital. They build understanding, foster trust and remind us all of the critical role NCC Group plays in keeping our digital world safer and more secure.

I'm proud that we've continued to strengthen our relationships with clients, focusing on strategic partnerships that go beyond transactions, which you'll see from Mike's review on pages 6 and 7. Our teams work tirelessly to understand the evolving needs of our clients, offering not just technical solutions but genuine partnership and support. In a world where digital risks are ever-present, our role as a trusted advisor has never been more important.

Our people: the heart of NCC Group

If there is one thing that stands out year after year, it is the extraordinary commitment and talent of our people. The pace of change has been relentless, and yet our colleagues have responded with professionalism and creativity, focused on our client's needs. Whether adapting to new ways of working, supporting clients through complex challenges, or driving innovation from within, our teams have shown what is possible when we pull together.

Our investment in people is matched by our commitment to sustainability and responsible business. As we nurture talent and foster a positive culture, we also strive to make a meaningful impact on the environment and society. Our Manila operations have gone from strength to strength, bringing new perspectives and capabilities to our global front and back-office teams. I am proud of the progress we have made, but even more excited about what lies ahead.

Identity at the core: Strengthening cyber resilience with end-to-end access governance and expertise

Poorly maintained access control processes are among the leading causes of cyber breaches and regulatory non-compliance. Up to 80% of security incidents involve compromised credentials and insufficient safeguards, giving attackers the keys to infiltrate networks, steal sensitive data, and disrupt operations. The cost? Millions in lost revenue, reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and recovery downtime.

AI and autonomous agents amplify identity risks by increasing access across systems, making an already complex task even more challenging. We help our clients manage every aspect of Identity and Access Management (IDAM), ensuring human and non-human accounts are governed, monitored, secured, and maintained across the entire lifecycle. With NCC Group's expertise and strategic partnerships, you gain resilience, confidence, and continuity so you can focus on what matters most: running your business securely.

Commitment to sustainability and responsible business

This year, we took significant steps forward on our climate action agenda, responding to changing requirements and also client requests. We published our Carbon Reduction Plan, developed in partnership with Positive Planet, which sets out our path to net zero and commits us to ambitious, science-based targets. We are on track to achieve SBTi verification by March 2026 and will update our plan to reflect our progress. Our partnership with Positive Planet led to the creation of a bespoke Carbon Literacy Training programme, and I am delighted that my fellow Board member Lynn Fordham was among the first to achieve certification.

We are now working towards verification of our science-based targets, a further demonstration of our commitment to collaborating with other businesses to reduce our impact on the environment and will update the Carbon Reduction Plan in early 2026.

This holistic approach to sustainability is reflected in our governance practices. The Board remains focused on upholding the highest standards and ensuring that our values are embedded in every decision we make, and you can read more about our progress on this from page 58.

Governance and Board Leadership

The Board has played an active and engaged role, providing challenge, support and guidance as we continue to navigate this critical time for the Group. We are committed to upholding the highest standards of governance, ensuring that our decisions are grounded in integrity, transparency and a long-term perspective. Our focus has been on supporting the management team, overseeing strategic reviews and ensuring that the interests of all stakeholders are represented.

We have also continued to review and strengthen our governance practices, learning from best practice and adapting to the evolving needs of our business. This includes ongoing engagement with our shareholders, listening to their views and incorporating their feedback into our decision making.

Looking to the future

With strong foundations in place – strategic clarity, stakeholder trust, empowered people and robust governance – we are well positioned to embrace the future with confidence. We are continuing to build strategic client relationships, scan the market for smart acquisition opportunities and focus on operational efficiencies that will make us stronger and more agile. Our partnerships are deepening, our Manila office is flourishing and our global teams are united by a shared sense of purpose.

I am confident that we have the right people, the right strategy and the right values to succeed. Together, we are building a stronger, more resilient NCC Group – one that is ready to seize the opportunities of tomorrow.

Share buy-back programme

Reflecting the Board's continued confidence in the future prospects of the Group and the strength of the Balance Sheet, regardless of the outcome of the Escode review, we announced in October 2025 our intention to commence an initial share buy-back programme. This will be carried out utilising our current shareholder authority and in accordance with our capital allocation policy, and relevant legal and regulatory obligations. It was also noted that the initial share buy-back programme would not launch before 11 December 2025.

Dividends

During the year, total dividends of £19.0m were paid (2024: £14.5m), an increase due to the change in our year end and the additional dividend we gave for the four month period to 30 September 2024.

The Board is proposing an unchanged final dividend of 3.15p per ordinary share for the year ended 30 September 2025, as it remains mindful of the continued need to invest in the Group's strategy, marking 20 consecutive years of dividend payments for shareholders.

The final dividend will be paid on 10 April 2026, subject to approval at the AGM on 3 March 2026, to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 13 March 2026. The ex-dividend date is 12 March 2026.

Our existing dividend policy will remain unchanged by any share buy-back programme noted above.

Closing thoughts

In closing, I want to thank everyone who has been part of our journey this year. To our colleagues: your dedication, creativity and resilience inspire me every day. To our clients: thank you for your trust and partnership. And to our shareholders: thank you for your continued support and belief in our vision.

We do not take any of these relationships for granted. As we move forward, we will continue to listen, learn and adapt – always with the goal of creating lasting value for all our stakeholders.

Chris Stone

Non-Executive Chair 11 December 2025

Strategic progress positions the Group for return to profitable growth

As we reflect on FY25, I want to begin by recognising the continued commitment and expertise of our colleagues across the globe. The work they do for clients is extraordinary and they have continued to demonstrate their resilience and adaptability navigating change and at times an uncertain economic environment. Our purpose – to create a safer digital future – remains at the heart of everything we do, and our progress this year is a testament to the strength of our people and the trust our clients place in us.

Mike Maddison Chief Executive Officer

Strategic progress and transformation

FY25 has been a year of disciplined execution against the strategy we originally established back in 2023 to transform and reshape the Group. We have made significant progress to simply the Group and built our two distinct businesses – Cyber Security, with Managed Services at the centre, and Escode, our software escrow service.

We have improved profitability, materially reduced and eliminated net debt, and repositioned the Group's portfolio around core, scalable activities. More timely and granular financial and operational information has strengthened decision making, however there is more work to do.

A major event this year was the successful sale of our Fox-IT Crypto business in March 2025 that strengthened our Balance Sheet, providing us with the financial flexibility to invest in growth, while removing the management distraction of a non-core business.

In April 2025, the Group confirmed that it was investigating several options for its Escode business, including a potential sale. The Board will provide updates as and when it is practicable and appropriate to do so.

If a sale of Escode were to be successfully concluded, the Group would become a focused, people-powered, tech-enabled global Cyber Security business. It would also enable the Board to consider a significant return of capital to shareholders over and above the recently announced initial share buy-back programme.

Our investments in new capabilities such as Operational Technology and Digital Identity have allowed us to win further strategic projects during the year. Our global operating model, including our expanding office in Manila with exceptional cyber and operational talent, has

enabled us to scale, win more opportunities and serve clients more efficiently. We will continue to invest in our people, technology and strategic partnerships – underpinned by our leading intelligence, innovation and insight, we remain at the forefront of an evolving cyber threat landscape.

Market environment and client needs

As a B2B service provider, demand for many of our services reflects the macro-economic cycle and the confidence of our clients to invest. During the year this cycle and the geopolitical environment remained complex, particularly in the first half. We saw this reflected in cautious client behaviour, which naturally lengthen sales cycles. Despite these headwinds, demand for cyber resilience and regulatory assurance continues to grow, particularly in highly regulated sectors such as financial services, healthcare and businesses running critical infrastructure.

Our clients are increasingly seeking expert-led, end-to-end solutions that address the full spectrum of cyber risk – from Identity and Access Management to Operational Technology security and Managed Detection and Response. Our differentiated capabilities, global delivery and strategic alliances with leading technology partners position us strongly to meet these needs.

Financial performance

As expected, we saw Group revenue for FY25 decline by 2.6% on a constant currency basis (excluding non-core disposals), with Escode delivering growth on a constant currency basis of 2.2% and Cyber Security declining on a constant currency basis by 4.0% when compared to the previous 12 months. Importantly, as I reflect on all of this, half-to-half performance was markedly stronger with revenue performance improving in the second half, a reflection of the positive impact of our strategic focus and operational discipline together with the strong order book we indicated in our December 2024 results.

Gross margins (excluding non-core disposals) overall strengthened to 44.5% with Escode margin reaching 71.4% and Cyber Security broadly flat at 36.6%. Adjusted EBITDA (excluding non-core disposals) was in line with Board expectations and amounted to £40.6m when compared to the previous 12 months. Our Balance Sheet remains robust, with net cash of approximately £13m at year end, a marked improvement from the net debt of £79.6m as at 31 May 2023 and now providing a strong foundation for future investment and capital returns.

Sales and commercial execution

We continued to strengthen our business in FY25 with management action focused on strategic change to build the necessary technical capability in cyber and to strengthen our commercial organisation in both the Escode and Cyber Security businesses.

In Escode, we:

  • Reorganised our sales structure by industry verticals to deliver deeper sector expertise and create greater value for customers in finance, critical infrastructure, and commercial markets
  • Established a dedicated new customer acquisition team focused on ideal customer profiles within our priority growth sectors in the UK and US
  • Expanded our software verification offering to include fully independent builds of cloud-hosted solutions, ensuring greater reliability and trust
  • Broadened our regional presence with an extended market focus into the Middle East

In Cyber Security, we:

  • Invested in strategic sales capability
  • Enhanced client propositions with embedded technology
  • Put foundations in place for global account management to deepen relationships and unlock revenue opportunities
  • Have improved Management Information with our global sales operation
  • Have fully implemented global scheduling, timesheets and pricing tools
  • Have fully separated Fox DetACT and Fox Crypto

These actions are already delivering results, an improved sales pipeline visibility, deeper client engagement and a positive shift in revenue mix towards higher value, recurring contracts. We remain focused on further evolving our sales model to ensure stronger linkage between sales execution and service delivery, and to drive deeper penetration in our priority sectors globally: financial services, insurance, healthcare, industrials, and the public sector.

Operational highlights

  • Transformation: Continued progress in repositioning the Cyber Security business towards higher value, recurring revenue streams, supported by a single technology stack and scalable global delivery
  • Strategic partnerships: Recognition from key partners, including Splunk and Microsoft, underscores our reputation as a trusted advisor and innovator
  • Talent: Our ability to attract and develop top cyber talent remains a competitive advantage, supported by our academy and training programmes
  • Escode: The business continues to deliver consistent growth and profitability, with discussions regarding its future strategic direction ongoing
  • Public Research: Our leading technical expertise including Cryptography, Hardware and AI/ML Security was engaged by leading companies including Meta, Whatsapp and Google, to review and publish public reports into their emerging technology

Market trends and regulatory landscape

The environment in which NCC Group operates is shaped by a complex interplay of macro-economic, geopolitical and technological forces. Regulatory momentum has intensified across all our core territories and key customer verticals. The EU Cyber Resilience Act, which came into force in December 2024 and the UK's AI Cyber Security Code of Practice will embed secure-by-design requirements up through the software supply chain, while NIS2, DORA and sector-specific requirements in energy and transport expand the range of organisations that must evidence robust cyber controls and incident-reporting disciplines. These developments are complemented by similar requirements in the US, Australia and APAC, signalling a global consensus for higher standards.

Demand for strategic advisory and independent validation against these emerging frameworks is fuelling growth in our consulting and assurance work across OT environments and heavily regulated industries. NCC Group's recognised contribution to the UK government's AI and CRA initiatives underpins our reputation as a leading provider of regulatory advisory and assurance services.

The worldwide shortage in qualified cyber security professionals is both widening and coming more acute. This structural gap is most evident in highly specialised skills, including advanced testing, Operational Technology, and Identity and Access Management disciplines. This is expected to drive outsourcing to third party Cyber Security services. Clients need around-the-clock expert coverage without inflating their cost base as a cost of employment and our global delivery hubs meet this need. Additionally, the strong reputation that we have among cyber professionals positions us to attract the best talent using our academy/ training ability to further expand and strengthen this talent base.

The combination of hybrid working and using personal devices at work has shifted the security perimeter from the edge of the Enterprise network to the individual user and their devices. Identity and Access Management and Zero-Trust architectures are consequently commanding a growing share of security budgets. This is further driven by requirements to demonstrate granular access controls under NIS2, the EU's updated cyber security directive and other critical infrastructure regulations. Our dedicated Digital Identity service is supporting clients through this transition, covering strategy, implementation and day-to-day identity operations.

Lastly, the attack surface is expanding and becoming more complex, with cloud migrations accelerating, SaaS solution proliferation and AI adoption continuing, as well as early discussions ongoing regarding the potential implications of quantum computing. Each new platform expands the potential for malicious attacks and reinforces the need for security to be embedded earlier into development pipelines. Demand is therefore rising for secure-by-design assessments, supply chain software assurance and Managed Extended Detection and Response (MXDR) coverage that spans traditional IT, cloud and OT environments. The breadth of clients we serve across industries, geographies and IT and OT environments has allowed us to build unique IP to help clients secure this expanding attack surface.

Outlook

Looking ahead, we remain confident in our strategy and the mediumterm growth prospects for both businesses. While we expect the current challenging economic conditions to endure in the near term, our pipeline is building, and we anticipate a return to Cyber Security revenue growth in FY26 as our continued transformation delivers further benefits to both our competitive positioning and stakeholders.

On 28 April 2025, the Board confirmed that it was investigating a number of options for its Escode business including a potential sale (Escode review). We currently remain in that process and we will provide a further update in due course.

Further to a subsequent announcement on 16 July 2025, the Board confirms that the Group remains in the early stages of a review of all strategic options for its Cyber business should the Escode business be sold, this includes a range of potential outcomes including potential offers for the entire issued and to be issued share capital of the Company, and that no decision has been made regarding which options will be pursued. Our focus remains on operational excellence, innovation and supporting existing and new clients as they navigate an increasingly complex digital threat landscape.

In closing, I would like to thank our colleagues, clients and partners for their continued trust and support. Together, we are building a stronger, more resilient NCC Group, well positioned for sustainable growth and long-term success.

Mike Maddison Chief Executive Officer

11 December 2025

Transforming for global growth

For decades, we've developed thousands of cyber experts and explored emerging technologies. Now, as a global, client-focused business, we continue to evolve, delivering groundbreaking projects for leading companies and governments. Our collective expertise sits at the forefront of cyber resilience, shaping a more secure digital future.

Read more on market outlook on pages 10 and 11

Inputs

Sustainable growth strategy

In a fast-moving and complex environment, our strategy puts clients' needs first, with a roadmap of investments designed to develop future capabilities and a global delivery model to provide clients with the best solution.

People-powered, tech-enabled

We are a diverse global community of talented and creative individuals, working together and united by the same goal – to create a more secure digital future.

Culture of innovation

With our roots stretching back to the 1990s we have a track record of being at the cutting edge of innovation. NCC Group was created in 1999 when the National Computing Centre sold its commercial divisions to its existing management; from there we continued to grow through acquisitions. And while history is important, so is the future, with innovation, insights and intelligence the drivers of differentiation and woven into the DNA of who we are.

Stronger partner relationships

We are active members of the global cyber community, working in collaboration and in partnership with key industry players. Many successful global partnerships have delivered integrated, seamless solutions to clients.

Market-leading reputation

We're recognised by leading analysts for excelling in our understanding of CISO needs, building strong partnerships with clients and being called to solve complex problems.

Read more on our strategy on pages 12 and 13

Two distinct businesses

Cyber Security

As a leading global Cyber Security services company we are trusted to protect what matters most – the cars we drive, the energy in our homes, and the phones in our pockets, and critical infrastructures worldwide.

With roots in deep offensive security and defence and a heritage built on research and threat intelligence, we deliver full-spectrum cyber resilience to governments and businesses.

From tracking threat actors and uncovering vulnerabilities to responding to ransomware, we don't just defend, we are actively building a more secure digital future. Through our end-to-end cyber capabilities, we empower organisations to counter threats, manage disruption and navigate regulations with confidence.

Escode

We provide specialist escrow and verification solutions for business-critical IP, technology and software applications.

Our services help companies and government organisations manage supplier risk, sustain business continuity and give confidence that essential third party software can be accessed and redeployed when required. Our cloud services bring clarity to application management, making the transition to the cloud straightforward and controlled.

INSIGHT INTELLIGENCE INNOVATION

Value creation

Colleagues

Our people are leading the industry with innovative solutions protecting clients and society from growing cyber threats. As a people-powered, tech-enabled organisation, our talent strategy builds future-ready skills, strengthens leadership and fosters an inclusive culture of high performance, aligned with our business goals.

We're committed to helping every colleague thrive – through inclusive practices, targeted development and a focus on colleague experience – driving commercial success through empowered, engaged teams.

Read more on our sustainability strategy: nccgroupplc.com/sustainability

Clients

Our cyber security and software escrow solutions enable clients to confidently innovate and embrace new technologies, and build responsible, sustainable and resilient organisations that thrive and succeed.

Our network

We're the collaborators, the co‑ordinators, the conveners, and you will find us bringing together our global community to drive our industry forward and create a more secure digital future. We invest 1,100 days of research each year and engage proactively to ensure our insights and vision deliver the best societal outcomes, bringing partners together in support of our clients as well as policymakers and regulators to help shape future cyber policy.

Shareholders

We have a dedicated Investor Relations programme providing shareholders and financial analysts with regular updates on our performance. Engagement activities include results presentations, roadshows with the CEO and CFO, Capital Markets events, site visits, RNS and email updates.

Read more on stakeholder engagement on pages 14 and 15

Intensifying regulatory momentum versus a worldwide shortage of qualified talent

Global market trends, threats and opportunities

The environment in which NCC Group operates is shaped by a complex interplay of macro-economic, geopolitical and technological forces. We remain confident our transformation strategy will deliver growth underpinned by the range of services, geographic coverage, and breadth and depth of offering. Cautious client behaviour and the lengthening sales and onboarding cycles reported in December 2024 have impacted our first half results. This is also against a backdrop of macro-economic uncertainty, IT and security budgets being under scrutiny and competitive pricing.

We continue to see cyber resilience elevated as a core business risk agenda item to the C-suite as opposed to a purely IT consideration. Cyber continues to be elevated as a core business risk for boards, as opposed to just an IT consideration. This pivot is most evident in highly regulated verticals – financial services, healthcare, government and critical infrastructure – where regulatory scrutiny and heightened director liability is driving materially larger, multi-year security programmes. Within Operational Technology (OT) in particular, full risk reviews and resilience roadmaps are being commissioned as the potential business interruption cost of an OT outage becomes clearer. Our global delivery model ensures that these international operators can obtain expert support around the clock, irrespective of time zone or geography. Strategically, our global delivery engine is a differentiated and scalable service that enables us to be competitive.

Ransomware remains widespread and we have seen a marked uplift in AI-enabled phishing and double extortion campaigns, including the more recent high profile retail sector cases in the UK. This evolving threat landscape is leading organisations to favour Managed (Extended) Detection and Response (MDR/MXDR) solutions that provide continuous monitoring across endpoint, cloud, identity and OT telemetry. In addition, businesses are requesting OT-specific MDR to counter the increase in attacks against industrial control environments.

NCC Group named 'Strong Performer' in the 2025 Forrester assessment of European MDR providers: tinyurl.com/5n8rc9uc

Regulatory momentum intensified across all our core territories and key customer verticals. The EU Cyber Resilience Act and UK's software and AI security Codes of Practice will drive secure-by-design requirements up the supply chain, while NIS2, DORA and sector‑specific mandates in energy and transport expand the range of organisations that must evidence robust cyber controls and incident-reporting disciplines. These developments are complemented by comparable moves in the US and APAC, signalling a global consensus for higher standards.

Read our leading Global Cyber Policy Radar: tinyurl.com/522my5vc

Demand for strategic advisory and independent validation against these emerging frameworks is fuelling growth in our consulting and assurance work across OT environments and heavily regulated industries. NCC Group's recognised contribution to the UK government's cyber resilience initiatives underpins our reputation as a leading provider of regulatory advisory and assurance services.

The UK Government's Industrial Strategy calls out NCC Group as a company exporting world-leading cyber solutions: tinyurl.com/yefadasr

The worldwide shortfall in qualified cyber security professionals continues to become more acute. This structural gap is most evident in highly specialised skills, including advanced testing, OT and Identity and Access Management disciplines. This is expected to drive outsourcing to third party Cyber Security services. Clients are relying on our global delivery hubs to ensure around-the-clock expert coverage without inflating their cost base as a cost of employment. Additionally, the strong reputation that we have among cyber professionals positions us to attract talent more easily than our competitors, with our academy/training ability allowing us to further expand and strengthen this talent base.

Hybrid working and personal device policies have shifted the security perimeter from the edge of the Enterprise network to the user and their devices. Identity and Access Management and Zero-Trust architectures are consequently commanding a growing share of security budgets. This is further driven by requirements to demonstrate granular access controls under NIS2 and other critical infrastructure regulations. Our dedicated Digital Identity service is supporting clients through this transition, covering strategy, implementation and day-to-day identity operations.

OT/IT Cyber Safety Webinar series

Between December 2024 and February 2025, NCC Group's OT/IT Cyber Safety Webinar series explored the critical intersection of IT and OT cyber security convergence and the safety considerations in industrial environments, addressing the unique challenges and opportunities that arise when legacy operational technologies meet modern digital systems amid rising cyber threats.

Watch our YouTube video series here: tinyurl.com/4c6s96tm

Lastly, the attack surface is expanding, with cloud migrations accelerating, SaaS proliferation and AI adoption continuing, and early discussions ongoing regarding the implications of quantum computing. Each new platform expands the potential for malicious attacks and reinforces the need for security to be embedded earlier into development pipelines. Demand is therefore rising for secure-by-design assessments, supply chain software assurance and MXDR coverage that spans traditional IT, cloud and OT environments. The breadth of clients we serve across industries, geographies and IT and OT environments has allowed us to build unique IP to help clients secure this expanding attack surface.

NCC Group's

respondent survey reveals the critical issues driving supply chain security in 2025

of organisations expect the severity and scale of supply chain attacks to escalate further

experienced a cyber security breach in the prior 12 months

were concerned about visibility over their supply chain

Read more: www.nccgroup.com/the-state-of-supply-chain-security

A range of services and geographies

and breadth of offering Strategic priority Progress in FY25 Future outlook Link to risks:

Our clients

Deeper client engagement on the most pressing Cyber Security and software escrow needs

  • Appointed a CCO to align the global go-to-market strategy with overall business objectives
  • Hired new Market Leads to drive and implement regional strategies
  • Redefined the global markets organisational structure to support growth and enhance sales performance
  • Streamlined internal processes to sharpen focus on clients and execution of the go-to-market strategy

Our proposition

Offering a broader service portfolio addressing the full Cyber Security lifecycle

  • Strengthened our Managed Services business by expanding client adoption of our MXDR platform and adding enhanced detection and response capabilities
  • Built momentum in Digital Identity and Operational Technology practices, winning new client mandates
  • Continued to leverage technology partnerships to extend our propositions and global reach
  • Drove margin improvement within Technical Assurance, particularly in North America, through delivery model optimisation

Global delivery

Transitioning from an international to a fully global business

  • Rolled out global scheduling tool (Kantata) across all key regions, improving resource visibility and planning
  • Manila office scaled significantly, now an established hub for delivery and enabling functions
  • Introduced new ways of working within global delivery to improve efficiency and management information (MI) for decision making

Brands

Creating distinct and relevant brands for our Cyber Security and Escode businesses

  • Launched a distinct brand refresh for NCC Group Cyber Security business while establishing and embedding Escode
  • Celebrated 25 years of cutting-edge research and delivered market-leading thought leadership such as our monthly Threat Intelligence series and global Cyber Policy Radar
  • Recognised by leading industry analysts such as Forrester, Gartner and IDC citing our ability to solve complex security challenges with trusted CISO partnerships

FY25 financial framework goals

Sustainable revenue growth Improved gross margin Efficiency for growth Capital deployment supporting growth

• Deliver underlying growth in Cyber Security

  • Increase Managed Services revenue as a proportion of total Cyber Security
  • Maintain momentum in Escode

  • Maintain utilisation %

  • Smart pricing and margin investment decision making
  • Globalise technical resource footprint

  • • Drive deeper penetration in financial services, insurance, healthcare, industrials and public sector globally

  • If the potential sale of Escode does not occur, we will continue scaling Escode with a focus on critical infrastructure and regulated sectors
  • Evolve Cyber Security sales model to ensure stronger linkage between sales execution and service delivery
  • Accelerate Managed Services growth and further differentiate our MXDR proposition
  • Continue scaling Digital Identity and Operational Technology practices into core markets
  • Build repeatable propositions and intellectual property across Consulting and Implementation to improve delivery efficiency and client impact
  • Continue embedding global delivery model to enhance utilisation and efficiency
  • Leverage shared service hubs for scalable and cost effective delivery
  • Develop global KPIs and dashboards to drive consistent performance management across regions
  • Build on increasing media share of voice (SoV) and continue to grow thought leadership, research activity and industry engagement in cyber
  • Become the go-to Cyber Security and business resilience advisor to C-suite and boards

  • Simplify operating model to generate efficiencies
  • Drive towards consistent profit conversion in every market
  • Eliminate stranded costs resulting from non-core disposals

Strategic priority Progress in FY25 Future outlook Link to risks:

  • Read more on our risks on pages 29 to 37
  • A Strategy
  • B Cyber and information security
  • D People and partners
  • E Market and competition
  • F Brand and reputation
  • G Quality and delivery
  • H Legal, regulatory compliance and governance
  • A Strategy
  • B Cyber and information security
  • C Innovation and product development
  • D People and partners
  • E Market and competition
  • F Brand and reputation
  • G Quality and delivery
  • H Legal, regulatory compliance and governance
  • A Strategy
  • B Cyber and information security
  • D People and partners
  • G Quality and delivery
  • A Strategy
  • C Innovation and product development
  • E Market and competition
  • F Brand and reputation
  • G Quality and delivery

Sustainable revenue growth Improved gross margin Efficiency for growth Capital deployment supporting growth

  • Strong cash conversion
  • Ensure appropriate liquidity and debt facilities
  • Maintain dividend
  • Accretive acquisition opportunities

View our financial results: www.nccgroupplc.com/ investor-relations/ results‑media

Investing in stakeholder engagement

We have a responsibility to listen to our stakeholders, understand their priorities and apply insights and learning to guide how we make important decisions.

Colleagues

We are a people-powered, tech-enabled business. Our colleagues worldwide all play a vital role in creating a more secure digital future. Their expertise, commitment and innovation drive our success.

The opportunity

We're committed to creating an environment where every colleague can thrive and contribute meaningfully. This means:

  • Every colleague understands their impact and is connected to our commercial success
  • Managers invest time in their people, offering tailored support, coaching and feedback to further unlock potential
  • Colleagues have resources and opportunities to succeed and grow
  • Expectations are clear and fair, supported by structured performance management

How we listen and engage

Strong engagement underpins our inclusive, high performance culture. Listening and acting on feedback is central to how we operate.

• We enable regular, structured dialogue at all levels, from team huddles to global townhalls

  • Managers play a pivotal role in engagement, dedicating time to understand strengths, support growth and drive performance
  • Internal news platforms and collaboration tools keep colleagues informed, connected and able to contribute in real time
  • We gather feedback through pulse surveys, listening sessions and feedback loops to shape policies and programmes

Highlights in 2024/25

  • Made people operations seamless: Unified global processes and automated over 220 workflows to make it easier and faster for colleagues to get support
  • Accelerated leadership growth: Equipped senior and people leaders with targeted development to boost performance and leadership maturity
  • Built talent foundations: Rolled out consistent job levels with enhanced clarity around expectations for each level of role, and designed new frameworks to support internal mobility

Clients

Rooted in our sector knowledge, we develop solutions tailored to the unique needs of our clients. Bringing our in-depth understanding of the threat and regulatory landscape, we assist our clients in addressing their complex cyber security challenges.

The opportunity

  • Shift the transactional business to a subscription model, enabling sales teams to prioritise long-term client value and deeper engagement over short-term outcomes
  • Refresh the go-to-market portfolio to better meet customer needs, enhance solution relevance and drive stronger business impact
  • Leverage our expertise in AI and language models to support customers in their integration journeys
  • Utilise our world-class Managed Services capabilities to enhance customers' visibility and control over their assets and data

How we listen and engage

  • Through an integrated account management strategy and value-driven quarterly business reviews
  • Client satisfaction surveys and a formal global process are used to capture client feedback, ensuring a closed-loop response

Highlights in 2024/25

  • Established a new global and regional leadership team to drive effective strategy implementation
  • Launched new Cyber Security business branding, strengthening market recognition and reinforcing our position as a trusted partner in Cyber Security
  • Introduced new Managed Services branding (iMXDR) and refreshed proposition, with an updated go-to-market strategy that differentiates us in the market
  • Reviewed and redesigned data, processes and tools to improve internal insight, streamline operations and enable faster mobilisation at enhanced margins

Link to strategy:

Suppliers

We engage with many different suppliers across our global business and value the critical role our supply chain plays in supporting responsible business operations. Our procurement operations are maturing in line with industry best practice and we proactively work with an optimised supply chain network to drive competitive advantage through accessing innovation, delivering commercial value and managing risk.

The opportunity

  • Long-term trusted partnerships, facilitating sustainable operating cost reduction and cost of sale margin improvement
  • Fit for purpose contracts and payment terms, ensuring a safe, compliant and responsible supply chain with suppliers delivering to required service levels and protecting NCC Group from long-term commercial inflation

How we listen and engage

  • Regular joint business reviews held with key suppliers to mutually understand strategy and future forecasting
  • Supplier due diligence completed at onboarding

Highlights in 2024/25

  • Implemented Workday Strategic Sourcing to centralise investment requests
  • Introduced Investment Control Board (ICB) weekly review to understand and challenge investment requests to ensure either enabling revenue or reducing cost
  • New global procurement strategy launched to enable revenue, control costs and manage risk
  • Launch of new travel supplier to improve colleague experience and safety, reduce costs and accommodate diverse requirements
  • Investment in a transactional team based in Manila to develop into Purchase to Pay (P2P) specialists, collaborating with finance to drive supplier payments on time and improve the supplier experience, releasing working capital down the supply chain

Shareholders

We are committed to engaging with our shareholders, creating an opportunity to understand our business, the market, how we are responding

The opportunity

  • Financial performance
  • Dividend
  • Responsible long-term sustainable strategy
  • Sound corporate governance and stewardship

and the opportunity to deliver sustainable growth.

How we listen and engage

  • Strategic and financial updates issued via RNS Reach and RNS respectively
  • Regular meetings with investor relations, management and Board members
  • Investor roadshows after the full and half-year results

  • Open-door policy with investors and analysts (taking into account "offer period" restrictions and protocols)

  • AGM

Highlights in 2024/25

  • Hosted a live in-person Capital Market event to help investors and financial analysts understand what happens in a cyber attack and how to respond
  • Completed the disposal of Fox Crypto B.V. for total gross consideration of £65.6m to CR Group Nordic AB
  • Marked 20 consecutive years of dividend payments for shareholders
  • Announced a share buy-back programme

Network

Our expertise plays a pivotal role in shaping evidence-based policy decisions and convening the cyber community. We proactively engage, contribute to public-private partnerships and harness our experience and insights to contribute meaningfully towards a more secure digital society.

The opportunity

  • Building on our technology heritage and our role as a trusted advisor to governments and regulators we provide independent, technical expertise to improve cyber resilience policies
  • By understanding and shaping new and emerging regulations and policy proposals we can develop the right solutions to prepare for our clients' future needs and requirements

How we listen and engage

  • Building alliances with global think tanks and foundations, publicprivate partnerships, trade associations and campaign groups to pool resources, amplify our messages and maximise impact
  • Strategic relationships with national technical authorities, and support for government initiatives across all our regions through direct engagement

• Representation on senior government and parliamentary advisory panels

Highlights in 2024/25

  • Cited in the UK government's Industrial Strategy for cyber industry growth and chosen for cyber resilience at the 2025 NATO Summit
  • Recognised as a key convener of the UK cyber community through collaboration with the National Cyber Security Centre and contributing to Project Melissa – a leading public-private partnership in the Netherlands to combat ransomware threats in Europe
  • Published the Global Cyber Policy Radar Report, providing insights on global cyber regulations
  • Influenced global cyber policy by speaking at top conferences and briefing EU leaders and providing evidence to UK parliament on public-private partnerships

A resilient future

We strive for a resilient future through sustainable business practices, and take responsibility for identifying and managing the impact we have on people and the planet.

Read our Sustainability Report: nccgroupplc.com/sustainability

Our sustainability strategy

People-led, technology-enabled

We can only lead with our purpose through our greatest asset, the exceptional people we employ. They are at the forefront of our industry, developing solutions that protect our clients and society from the growing threat of cyber crime.

Responsible business

Our desire to improve the world we live in is encapsulated in our purpose. Embedding responsible business into our everyday activities is central to achieving this aim.

Action on climate

Taking urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts supports our purpose. Decarbonising our business and embedding climate considerations into our commercial offering are crucial elements in our support for the net zero transition.

2024/25 highlights

  • Enhanced our colleague benefits, including the launch of an improved Employee Assistance Programme in Europe.
  • Published our draft Carbon Reduction Plan and launched our verified Carbon Literacy Training programme.
  • Successful migration of Fox-IT onto the NCC Group certification for ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 27001:2022, resulting in a reduction of overall costs and consistent ways of working.

Why sustainability matters

Sustainability is about doing the right thing in the right way, and this is reflected in our Code of Ethics and embedded into our everyday ways of working. It's important to our clients, who trust us to help secure their digital assets; it's important to our colleagues, who are critical to the value we bring to our clients; and it's important to our shareholders, who entrust their investments to NCC Group, relying on us to deliver returns to their shareholders. It also matters to our political stakeholders who turn to us for trusted and independent advice and insights that improve cyber rules and regulations around the world.

We live in a rapidly evolving digital world, where the concept of sustainability extends to how we operate in totality. Not only are we supporting our clients to meet their governance requirements through our cyber security and escrow solutions, we are also helping to advance technologies that are at the forefront of fighting climate change, as well as other UN Sustainable Development Goals.

This means systems, networks and infrastructures need to be resilient, secure and long lasting. Cyber Security and sustainability are inherently intertwined, which means cyber threats pose a significant risk not only to individual businesses but to our very way of life too. The decisions we make today have far-reaching implications for the future.

Securing our future

As our lives become more digitally interconnected, the risk landscape broadens. From smart homes to smart cities, from online banking to telehealth services, from power grids to water supplies – they all rely on complex digital infrastructures. If these systems are compromised, the repercussions can be devastating. Hence, securing these infrastructures is an essential part of ensuring a sustainable future.

Our ability to protect against cyber threats, through the work we do for our clients, plays a pivotal role in guaranteeing that our world remains functional, reliable and consistent for generations to come. Indeed, we believe strongly that we can't build a resilient economy without resilient cyberspace, and we can't have a resilient cyberspace without 21st century laws and an infrastructure to tackle cyber threats, which is why we share our expertise with policymakers to improve cyber rules and regulations meaningfully.

Our sustainability framework

While the primary focus of our industry has always been about security, we recognise our operations have a broader environmental and societal impact. Our sustainability framework has two core tenets focused on people and the planet, underpinned by being a responsible employer and supply chain partner.

This framework is the foundation to start making tangible progress in addressing material topics for our stakeholders. We believe that this is a journey, not a race. We place sustainability at the heart of our strategy – not just securing the digital world, but securing the future for ourselves and for generations to come.

We invite our stakeholders to join us, working together to build a future that is not only secure but also sustainable.

VIEWPOINT

If we are to meaningfully reduce our carbon footprint we need to engage our stakeholders in the conversation

Building on our partnership with Positive Planet, and as part of developing our Carbon Reduction Plan, we designed and had certified our own Carbon Literacy Training programme. This certified, one-day programme will enable us to build knowledge around the business of what the climate crisis is, and what we can do individually and collectively to take action to reduce the impact we have.

The first cohort of delegates on this course included Lynn Fordham, our Non-Executive Director responsible for Sustainability; Guy Ellis, Chief Financial Officer; and Michelle Van de Velde, Chief People Officer, along with senior members of the procurement, communications and marketing, HR and sales and technical delivery teams.

Over 400 colleagues have signed up to undertake the course, and we have developed our own certified in-house training capability to do this.

Non-financial and sustainability information statement

The following table provides readers with an index of where to further find relevant non‑financial information within this Annual Report and Accounts, in line with the Financial Reporting Directive requirements contained in sections 414CA and 414CB of the Companies Act. Where relevant, additional information is signposted to further support the requirements.

The Group considers that it complies with the disclosure requirements under section 414CB(2A) of the Companies Act 2006 and has included climate-related financial disclosures that are partially consistent with the TCFD recommendations.

Reporting topic Policies and standards
which govern our approach
Annual Report and Accounts
section reference
Page Website resources
Climate-related
disclosures
• Environmental policy • Sustainability Report
• TCFD Report
• Risk Management
• Stakeholder Engagement
22
29
14
• Sustainability Report
• Streamlined Energy and
Carbon Report
Colleagues
Social and
community matters
• Whistleblowing policy
• Code of Ethics
• Disciplinary Policy
• Grievance Policy
• Modern Slavery Statement
• Code of Ethics
• Supply chain Code of Conduct
• Giving back policy
• Matched funding policy
• Sustainability Report
• Stakeholder Engagement
• Remuneration Committee Report
• Culture
• Sustainability Report
• Stakeholder Engagement
14
81
19
14
• Sustainability Report
• Sustainability Report
Respect for
human rights
• Modern Slavery Statement
• Data privacy policy
• Global equal opportunities
and diversity policy
• Sustainability Report
• Stakeholder Engagement
• Culture
14
19
• Sustainability Report
Anti-bribery
and corruption
• Anti-bribery and corruption policy
• Gifts and entertainment policy
• Sustainability Report
• Audit Committee Report
71 • Sustainability Report

Our people

At NCC Group we embrace difference and are connected by our purpose to create a more secure digital future. Across our global operations we form a phenomenal network, working together, collaborating and innovating to support our clients.

We are guided by our Code of Ethics and our values, which define our behaviours – treating everyone and everything with respect. This is the foundation of our culture, and we strive to create an environment where everyone is welcome, feels safe and can be successful.

Progress in 2024/25

  • Continued investment in leadership and management development with leadership development rolled out across the organisation, and additional manager-focused development sessions
  • Enhanced our colleague benefits, including the launch of an improved Employee Assistance Programme in Europe
  • Enhanced focus on actions resulting from colleague engagement survey feedback

A global team

As of 30 September 2025, we have 2,073 colleagues (including contractors) across the world supporting our clients, made of three core groups – Sales, Delivery and Enabling Functions. Circa 98% of colleagues are permanent and the remainder are contractors to provide support on projects.

People-powered, technology-enabled

We want everyone here to feel safe – psychologically, emotionally and physically – so they can be themselves, share their experiences and have equal opportunities to succeed. Our team reflects the diversity of the world around us, and this is how we live our values: working together and being brilliant.

Our approach to diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I)

We acknowledge our opportunities to contribute to diversity in the technology sector, with inclusion and diversity principles incorporated into our hiring and talent management processes. To further support DE&I, we've formed partnerships with external organisations such as Disability Confident and the Business Disability Forum in the UK to increase accessibility, not only for our current colleagues, but also a broader candidate pool.

Unconscious bias training is included as part of our Global Onboarding programme via a specific session entitled "Working Across Cultures". Furthermore, through our Manager Skills Boost sessions we reiterate the importance of awareness of unconscious bias in support of diversity, equity and inclusion. All colleagues complete the ethics module as part of our mandatory annual compliance training, which includes dignity and respect at work. We continue to support our core

colleague resource groups (gender, LGBTQIA+, neurodiversity, accessibility, and race and ethnicity) to provide input on workplace practices, engagement, education and representation for under‑represented communities across our global business.

As of 30 September 2025, the Board of Directors comprised four males and three females. The wider Group employed 554 females, 1,444 males and 94 individuals whose gender was not disclosed. For the purpose of this disclosure, the Group defines its senior management as the Executive Committee, which consisted of four males and three females as of 30 September 2025. These figures for the Executive Committee include colleagues who also serve as statutory directors of subsidiary companies, where relevant.

Talent development

Innovation and continuous learning are central to NCC Group's culture, supported by investments in skill development and leadership growth, fostering personal and professional development through structured programmes and new digital platforms to enhance colleague capabilities globally.

We combine on-the-job learning, mentoring, self-study and formal training with personal development plans, supporting colleagues to gain certifications and advance their careers. In England, we leverage the Modern Apprenticeship Levy, with 4.3% of our colleague population undertaking apprenticeship learning – an increase of 60% of eligible colleagues year on year. FY25 was the first year we partnered with Co-op Levy Share to donate our excess levy funds, pledging £150k over the next two to three years. Currently, we're supporting eight UK employers and 21 learners, with donations to date totalling £27k.

We continued to invest in our leadership and management populations, and by June 2025 had delivered Enabling Performance, our Leadership programme, to 75 leaders and managers across the Group, including 73% of our senior leaders. Throughout FY26/FY27 we plan to upskill specific leaders and people team colleagues to enable us to roll out this programme across the remainder of the senior leaders and our middle manager population.

Sustainability continued

Talent development continued

In October 2024, we launched our Skills Boost series, available to all leaders and managers globally. These 90-minute, virtual sessions focus on key leadership skill areas, e.g. effective performance management, leading cross-culturally, and leading through change. Where relevant, we replicated models from Enabling Performance, e.g. clean talk for difficult conversations and the GROW model for coaching. In FY25, we delivered 66 sessions across six key skill areas, with 943 individual attendances, and circa 40% of leaders and managers regularly attending sessions. Across all sessions, feedback is collected via an online form, including an NPS-specific question: "Would you recommend this session to your colleagues at NCC Group?" All sessions secured an "excellent" (+70–100) NPS score.

In July 2025 we launched our Compass Management Development programme, leveraging Saville leadership profiling to offer a dedicated learning pathway focused on self-awareness through a series of virtual and face-to-face workshops building leadership capability, supplemented by group coaching and mentoring to enable colleagues to embed their learning into their day-to-day roles. Workshops are delivered in concentrated cohorts of 12–15 delegates to facilitate a semi‑personalised programme and are available to colleagues in people manager roles with less than two years' experience. Following the launch in the final quarter of FY25 we engaged 25 attendees across two cohorts.

We launched our first Learning Experience Platform, Spark, in April 2025, and while it's still being embedded, 93% of colleagues have engaged with content on the platform to date.

In FY25 we facilitated a talent review to identify potential successors to the Executive Committee. The five leaders identified worked with our partner, Saville Assessment, completing Saville Wave and 360 Leadership Impact

assessments, and creating a talent profile outlining their strengths and areas for development. They will be supported on their development, with regular one-to-one meetings with their Executive Committee member and Talent Development partner to discuss progress. To date, two of the five leaders have advanced into more senior roles, with one joining the Executive Committee.

Engagement

We have several mechanisms to measure colleague engagement (see page 14), including MyVoice, our biannual engagement survey using the Viva Glint platform. In our March 2025 survey, 1,489 colleagues responded, an increase in our engagement score of two points from March 2024.

In addition to the survey, Senior Non-Executive Director Julie Chakraverty hosts quarterly Colleague Listening Sessions, ensuring the Board has a direct link to colleagues and decision making takes into account their voices. In FY25, over 80 colleagues met with Julie, who in turn reported feedback to the Board.

Speaking up

Colleagues have a number of opportunities to speak up – sharing feedback or raising concerns. A global Speak Up framework outlines channels and resources available for doing this, guidance on who to engage with on different types of feedback, and how to ensure confidentiality. A whistleblowing helpline and policy are also available – the policy is published in multiple languages on our website.

This ensures colleagues are encouraged to speak up, safe from fear of reprisals, and with the reassurance that any concerns will be listened to and acted on appropriately.

Enhancing the colleague experience through competitive reward and wellbeing propositions

Each country we operate in has its own prevailing market conditions, and as such we align our benefit and wellbeing propositions locally, while ensuring they are competitively benchmarked, enabling us to retain and attract the best talent. Our Global Benefits Strategy focuses on four key pillars aligned with colleague feedback and global best practice:

Finance and protection

We understand the importance of financial stability benefits to support colleagues when making choices about their and their families' current and future financial status.

Health and wellbeing

We're committed to fostering a culture of wellness by offering preventative and supportive resources, programmes and initiatives that promote healthy lifestyles, family-work-life balance, and stress management.

Investment and savings

Our strategy supports colleagues in planning for the future, enabling them through different investment options to strengthen their financial wellbeing.

Lifestyle and flexibility

We recognise the importance of maintaining a healthy work-life balance and offer flexible work arrangements, paid time off and family friendly policies.

Continually reviewing our reward offering in each country ensures we retain and attract the best talent. In FY25, we built on our reward offering to remain competitive, including:

  • In Canada we changed the pension provider, with lower management fees, which means greater levels of investment for colleagues.
  • In Manila, we launched our Philippines Share Plan to all colleagues post-probation and expanded our medical offering to dependants,

helping to retain and attract colleagues in a competitive marketplace.

  • Across Europe, we enhanced our Employee Assistance Programmes, providing enhanced health and wellbeing support to all.
  • In the UK we rolled out our health cash plan, providing all colleagues with financial support to access dental, optical and medical treatments.

To find out more about our support of colleagues, please see our sustainability strategy on page 16

Action on climate

We're committed to taking proportionate climate action as a responsible employer, a trusted supply chain partner, and a business focused on long-term value creation for all stakeholders.

Progress in 2024/25

  • Published our draft Carbon Reduction Plan
  • Working with Positive Planet, designed and launched NCC Group's own certified Carbon Literacy Training programme and launched annual and onboarding mandatory climate action training for all colleagues
  • Partnered with Climategames to fund climate action projects through our wellbeing initiatives

In addition to our support of the net zero transition (read more on our sustainability strategy at nccgroupplc.com/sustainability), our action on climate has three pillars, starting with our own operations and extending to the support we give to clients operating in the energy transition sector and the contribution we make to their endeavours:

  • Supporting the net zero transition
  • Decarbonising energy use
  • Developing sustainable solutions

The biggest impact occurs in our business travel, both for client and non-client related travel, and our leased office spaces and is the focus for our reporting.

Decarbonising energy use

Our total annual Scope 1 and 2 emissions associated with our business operations were 1,232 tCO2 e for our full year 2025. See page 28 for further detail.

We continue to review our leased office space requirements, considering client and colleague needs. Considerations are given to collaboration, health and safety, personal wellbeing and the impact emissions have on the environment. This includes taking into consideration commuting for colleagues and the accessibility of public transport networks.

We review office usage monthly as part of the executive team operations review, which, alongside colleague feedback and engagement, and consideration of client needs, informs the real estate strategy.

On travel, all colleagues are required to book through our travel partner, Gray Dawes. This provides us with global tracking and improves our data collection for emissions as well as improving how we respond to any social or climate-related issues that colleagues may face.

Domestic flights within the UK and European countries are by exception only, with rail travel the preferred option. As a result, any train journey more than three hours in duration in total is travelled by first class to ensure the health, safety and wellbeing of colleagues.

Climategames partnership

During the financial year, we partnered with Climategames, bringing both wellbeing and climate action together to engage colleagues and give back.

We chose to invest in two projects – a sea kelp forestation initiative off the coast of British Columbia, and a social enterprise in Asia, including the Philippines, that prevents plastic from entering the ocean in the first place.

In the initial launch during the summer of 2025 we funded the equivalent of planting 1,020 trees and removing 16.1kg of plastic from the ocean.

Financial donations are made in return for colleagues taking part in physical challenges – from Group activities to local and team‑based events. This is a great way to engage colleagues in our climate action activities as well as facilitating wellbeing conversations.

Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

In alignment with the UK Listing Rules, which mandates climate-related disclosure for all UK listed companies, we have produced a comprehensive TCFD Report. Our report covers the four pillars recommended by TCFD: governance, strategy, risk management and metrics/targets, and the 11 disclosures recommended by TCFD except as noted below.

To ensure consistency across our report, we adhered to section C of the TCFD Annex, titled "Guidance for All Sectors".

As a result the following are documented as partially consistent, with further detail available within this report:

Strategy B and C – these disclosures have not been fully met due to prioritising drafting our Carbon Reduction Plan, which will use FY25 as our baseline year to enable reduction targets aligned to science-based targets.

Our assessments indicate a low risk of exposure to physical and transitional climate changes, thanks to our business model. However, we acknowledge the high importance of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, which emerged as a priority from stakeholder feedback as part of our "ongoing assessment" of double materiality in accordance with European Sustainability Reporting Standards.

In FY25 we appointed a new partner – Positive Planet – to support the design and publication of our global Carbon Reduction Plan and to calculate and verify our GHG emissions.

We recognise the considerable opportunities presented by the growing climate-focused market. Our collaborations with clients in industries such as electric vehicles, renewable energy, Operational Technology and other climate-friendly technologies underscore our readiness to seize these opportunities for sustainable growth.

Governance TCFD recommended disclosure Consistency NCC Group disclosure Focus area of FY26

Governance A. Describe the Board's oversight of climaterelated risk and opportunities Consistent • The Board's Head of the Audit Committee is the lead Non-Executive Director responsible for sustainability. Monthly updates are provided via the CFO report to the Board as well as directly from quarterly meetings with the VP, Investor Relations and Sustainability and the lead NED, including an update on progress against the Group's goals and targets where appropriate • The Board takes overall accountability for the management of climate-related risks and opportunities and considers them as part of its overall risk review processes • Introduce reporting aligned to the Carbon Reduction Plan targets to reflect, discuss and ensure actions are being taken B. Describe the management's role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities Consistent • The VP, Investor Relations and Sustainability reports to the Chief Financial Officer, providing advice and updates to the Executive Committee on climaterelated issues as and when relevant • An Executive Risk Management (ERM) Committee meets quarterly and addresses any climate risks as part of that process where appropriate • Roll out Climate Literacy Training to all ExCom members and senior leaders during FY26 • Continue to embed climate action into key business decisions • Assign accountabilities and

Lynn Fordham, the lead Non-Executive Director for Sustainability, was appointed by the NCC Group Board Chair. In addition to her position as the Head of the Audit Committee, Lynn's role is to oversee the Company's sustainability strategy, ensure its integration with the overall business strategy and provide regular sustainability updates to the Board.

While there is no specific Board committee for environmental issues, an Executive Risk Management (ERM) Committee chaired by the SVP, Global Governance, Procurement and Estates addresses these issues. The ERM meets bi-monthly and is attended by our CEO and CFO. It discusses, among other risks, sustainability and environmental challenges where relevant, which are then reported to the Board.

The results from our ongoing double-materiality assessment continue to inform our sustainability framework. With the changes in requirements for CSRD and the fact our business operations are not in scope for the foreseeable future, we do not intend to report voluntarily against the standards. We will continue to review and assess to ensure we can bid competitively for work within Europe.

track progress resulting from the Carbon Reduction Plan

The Board is committed to communicating its dedication to addressing climate change. By way of example Lynn Fordham along with Guy Ellis, CFO, attended NCC Group's inaugural Carbon Literacy Training and received their certification in August 2025. They continue to champion training and action in their respective roles.

Strategy

TCFD recommended disclosure Consistency NCC Group disclosure Focus area of FY26
Strategy
A. Describe the climate-related
risks and opportunities the
organisation has identified
over the short, medium
and long term
Consistent • See the tables below and on page 24 describing
risks and opportunities, which were selected based
on the location of our existing business and known
climate change risks affecting the broader region
we operate in
• Monitor actions arising from
the risk register
B. Describe the impact
of climate‑related
risks and opportunities
on the organisation's
business strategy and
financial planning
Partially
consistent
• Climate-related taxes, or fines for non-compliance,
could impact the business if we fail to take action
• Our ability to raise capital to invest in growth may be
restricted if we fail to make progress on climate
related action, if this is a requirement of any future
sustainable lending requirements
• Assess financial implications
of climate scenarios in our
financial planning
C. Describe the resilience
of the organisation's
strategy, taking into
consideration different
climate-related scenarios,
including a 2°C or
lower scenario
Partially
consistent
• We have conducted an initial quantitative analysis
against two scenarios of 1.5°C and 4°C
• Develop initial scenario analysis
and integrate into NCC Group's
strategy development through
implementation of the Carbon
Reduction Plan

Our focus is not limited to risk mitigation but extends to exploring opportunities where we can make a positive impact. This includes improving the energy efficiency of our operations, collaborating with our landlords and requesting renewable energy sources, and identifying ways our technology solutions can contribute to our clients' sustainability efforts. As we continue our climate change journey, we are committed to regularly reporting our progress against these objectives, showing transparency in our endeavours, and constantly seeking ways to better our efforts.

Climate-related risks

Our comprehensive risk management framework (summarised in the Risk Management section of the Annual Report on pages 29 to 37) is instrumental in identifying and assessing climate-related risks. We categorise these risks into:

  • Short term (less than one year) based on short-term regulatory or policy changes impacting climate-related risks and opportunities as well as existing forecasting processes considered by management which are reviewed and evaluated on an annual basis
  • Medium term (one to five years) based on regulatory changes that may affect climate-related risks and opportunities
  • Long term (more than five years) based on the likely timeline of international agreements and commitments, technological trends and changes to policy or carbon pricing and their impact on our operations, client services and supply chain

For instance, short-term risks might include immediate regulatory changes or extreme weather events, while long-term risks could be major shifts in our industry driven by the transition to a low carbon economy. Each identified risk is paired with corresponding mitigation measures, such as implementing energy-efficient technologies or diversifying our supply chain, aimed to reduce our vulnerability.

It's critical that we remain flexible in our approach but focused on taking responsibility for the emissions we generate and seek to reduce what we can control.

While these risks apply to the Group as a whole, we do recognise that certain locations face unique challenges. For example, our operations in coastal areas are more susceptible to rising sea levels and increased frequency of extreme weather events.

For a more detailed understanding of the climate-related risks and opportunities we face, please refer to the table below. It provides a snapshot of the specific challenges we're addressing and the strategic responses we have undertaken.

Risk Risk impact Short/medium/
long term
Regions
impacted
Mitigating activities
Physical risks
Extreme weather
(acute)
Causing business disruption and loss of
service delivery if colleagues or clients
are impacted adversely, which would in
turn potentially impact revenue
Short to medium
term
All but
particularly
Europe
(Rijswijk and
Amsterdam)
• Business interruption cover
• Business continuity plans
• Remote working in place
• Dutch flood defences in place
Sea level rises
(chronic)
Increased likelihood of flooding in
Delft and Amsterdam offices causing
increased insurance premiums to
mitigate against business interruption
and material loss
Long term Europe
– Rijswijk and
Amsterdam
offices

<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->

Sustainability continued

TCFD continued

Climate-related risks continued

Risk Risk impact Short/medium/
long term
Regions
impacted
Mitigating activities
Transition risks
Increase in taxes
and levies for
greenhouse gas
emissions
Increased costs to implement control
and monitor/measurement processes
as well as actual cost of taxes
and levies
Medium term Depends
on local
legislation
• Implement actions identified in our
Carbon Reduction Plan and monitor
Move to net zero Increased costs required to
lower emissions
Long term Global • Remote delivery of client services
where possible
• Green car scheme for UK colleagues
• Annual calculation of Scope 1 and 2
emissions and a Carbon Reduction
Plan in place
• Rigorous and transparent budget setting
will identify increasing costs associated
with carbon emissions reduction
Margin risk Impact on results due to extra costs
incurred to lower emissions
Medium term Global • Accounting policies regularly reviewed
• Rigorous and transparent budget setting
will identify increasing costs associated
with carbon emissions reduction
Reputation risk Increased stakeholder concern and
changing client behaviours
Medium term Global • Rolling out Carbon Literacy Training to
colleagues, starting with key decision
makers and senior client-facing
colleagues to empower them to
engage in the conversation
• Ongoing dialogue with investors
• Participation in reporting frameworks
such as CDP, EcoVadis, FTSE4Good, etc.
• ESG information publicly available
Supply chain risk Substitution of existing products and
services with lower emission options
Medium to long
term
Global • Building climate change reporting
and activity into supplier onboarding
• Business continuity plans
• Continuing to review our estate
provision and taking steps to move
out of leases where there is no client
or business benefit to being there
• Implementation of our estates policy,
which incorporates environment
considerations alongside the health,
safety and security of colleagues

Resource efficiency: By embracing more efficient modes of transport, promoting recycling, encouraging hybrid working models and operating within efficient buildings, we can lessen our environmental footprint, improve colleague satisfaction and reduce operational costs. For instance, removing unnecessary travel not only reduces our carbon emissions but also empowers colleagues with more control over their work-life balance, contributing to improved morale and productivity (anticipated medium to long-term benefits).

Energy source: Our transition to lower emission energy sources, underpinned by our electric/hybrid car scheme for all UK colleagues, demonstrates our commitment to sustainable practices. By giving colleagues access to green car options, we are mitigating our exposure to future fossil fuel price fluctuations and regulations. It also addresses our colleagues' material concerns, fostering a culture of environmental responsibility and enhancing overall job satisfaction (medium to long-term impact).

Market: As industries evolve in response to climate change, we're strategically positioned to leverage these transformations. For example, by partnering with companies transitioning to alternative energy sources or working on projects involving smart meters, electric vehicles, IoT technology for waste reduction and cloud data centres, we anticipate strengthening our market position and enhancing our reputation as a sustainable and innovative enterprise (short to medium-term outlook).

Resilience: Our sustainable business model increases our resilience to climate-related risks, demonstrating our commitment to being a responsible and ethical supply chain partner. This commitment to sustainability not only aligns us with an increasingly eco-aware market but also empowers us to lead in the space, fostering a culture of innovation and responsible business practices (short to long‑term perspective).

Scenario analysis

To understand the risks and opportunities our business faces considering climate change, we conducted a quantitative scenario analysis using two distinct scenarios: a "<2°C" scenario ("Scenario 1"), where global warming is limited to less than 2°C with net zero achieved by 2050, and a "4°C" scenario ("Scenario 2"), where the goal of net zero by 2050 is not reached. A summary of the scenarios selected is provided in the diagram below.

These scenarios are chosen to reflect the diverse spectrum of possibilities that could unfold due to different levels of global effort to curb climate change. In the context of these scenarios, "transition risks" refer to the challenges associated with the shift towards a lower carbon economy, while "physical risks" denote the potential damage caused by climate change itself.

In terms of the risks selected, these were based on physical locations and the nature of our business in key locations of North America, the UK, Europe and Asia Pacific. We are in the process of flowing this into our financial planning and will continue to do so as we mature our climate action planning and reporting.

Under Scenario 1, we anticipate higher transition risks due to rapid shifts in regulatory and market conditions, but the physical risks would be significantly reduced due to the effective global action on climate change. Conversely, Scenario 2 predicts lower transition risks but considerably higher physical risks due to the lack of substantial progress towards climate goals.

We've further broken down these risks by timeline, classifying them as short term (less than one year), medium term (one to five years) and long term (more than five years). The table below offers a comprehensive overview of NCC Group's potential exposure to both transition and physical risks under each scenario.

While our current analysis is qualitative, we are working towards quantifying these risks and opportunities as we progress towards our net zero targets and continually improve our data collection across Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions. At this point, we don't foresee a significant impact on our Financial Statement disclosures based on our materiality assessment results and known near to mid-term regulatory developments. However, we will continuously monitor both transition and physical risks, adjusting our mitigation strategy as necessary.

Risk type Risk Risk impact Scenario Short-term risk
(<1 year 2025)
Medium-term risk
(1–5 years 2026 to 2031)
Long-term risk
(>5 years 2031)
Physical
risk
Rising sea
levels
Risk to NCC Group offices
located in high risk areas, as well
1 Low Low High
as colleagues' homes and clients'
business premises, resulting in
business disruption
2 Low High High
Transition Increase in Disruption and increased
costs to ensure compliance
1 Low Medium High
risk
taxes and levies
with new legislation 2 Low Low Low
Margin risk Impact on results due to extra
costs incurred to lower emissions
Low Medium High
2 Low Low Low
Reputation risk Increased stakeholder concern 1 Medium High High
and changing client behaviours 2 Low High High
Supply chain risk Substitution of existing Low Medium High
products and services with
lower emission options
2 Low Low High

Financial planning

We recognise the potential implications of climate-related risks and opportunities on our financial planning. We anticipate shifts in our future business model and strategy in response to evolving market conditions due to climate change. We foresee potential changes in client preferences towards more sustainable products and services, along with possible disruptions in our supply chain due to extreme weather events. These factors are thoroughly considered in our business strategy development.

Our business strategy has been designed to be resilient to future economic and climate-related scenarios. And by running regular scenarios we can test that resilience and ensure it's considered in future business strategy development, enabling us to adapt accordingly, without disrupting or negatively impacting current operations.

The scenarios are based on industry insights, which are used in the expert input into our ongoing materiality assessment.

During FY24 we prioritised drafting our Carbon Reduction Plan working with Positive Planet. We set interim reduction targets based on FY24 GHG emissions, with the final base being set by our FY25 GHG emissions. Targets are aligned to science-based targets and at this stage we have chosen not to verify these.

The publication of our Carbon Reduction Plan will enable us to begin work on integrating climate considerations into our financial planning process when appropriate. Our aim continues to be to incorporate climate considerations to influence future investment decisions by the Group, reducing our carbon footprint, and gradually divesting areas that carry high climate-related risks.

For now though, we are actively working to improve our operational efficiency and addressing things we can directly influence to reduce our impact on the environment and realise cost savings.

Sustainability continued

TCFD continued

Risk management

TCFD recommended disclosure Consistency NCC Group disclosure Focus area of FY26
Risk management
A. Describe the organisation's processes
for identifying and assessing
climate-related risks
Consistent • Climate-related risks are managed through
our Enterprise Risk Management framework
• Monitor actions arising
from the risk register
B. Describe the organisation's processes
for managing climate-related risks
Consistent • Climate-related risks are documented,
mitigating actions are considered, a risk
rating is assigned and associated actions
are documented and followed up
• Monitor actions arising
from the risk register
C. Describe how processes for identifying,
assessing and managing climate-related
risks are integrated into the organisation's
overall risk management
Consistent • Climate-related risks are managed through
our Enterprise Risk Management framework
• Monitor actions arising
from the risk register

Climate-related risks are managed through our NCC Group Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework. This framework, which is detailed in the Risk Management section of the Annual Report on page 30, uses a sophisticated risk model to assess and score each risk based on likelihood and impact. Risks are re-evaluated consistently to ensure we're responsive to evolving circumstances.

Our risk management approach combines "top-down strategic" and "bottom-up operational" perspectives, fostering collaboration and promoting efficient risk identification. With respect to climate-related risks, we have outlined our strategies and targets for GHG emissions reduction and biodiversity preservation.

These climate-related risks are integrated into our Principal Risks section (pages 29 to 37). The Executive Risk Management Committee plays an active role in the ongoing review of these risks and their mitigations, controls and associated actions. This Committee meets on a regular basis and follows a stringent process for identifying, assessing, responding to and escalating serious concerns related to these risks.

We firmly believe that this integrated and transparent approach will ensure effective risk management aligned with the principles of TCFD, while driving our strategic objectives for sustainability.

Metrics and targets

To achieve net zero, we will be aiming to reduce emissions in line with the latest guidance from the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi). Targets are defined as "science based" when they align with the scale of reductions required to limit global temperature increases to 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial temperatures. Adopting the SBTi framework ensures our decarbonisation efforts are aligned with the latest climate science and global best practices. The SBTi provides a clear, credible pathway for reducing emissions at a pace and scale consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

For the time being our targets will be aligned with SBTi guidance, although we will not be seeking validation at this time.

We anticipate reducing our Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by 63% by 2035, which will be validated using FY25 as our base year. We will also consider setting an intensity‑based Scope 3 target depending on growth targets. An intensity-based target is a commitment to reduce emissions per economic unit or physical unit.

We are committed to reach net zero by 2045. Please see our Carbon Reduction Plan for more information www.nccgroupplc.com/sustainability

TCFD recommended disclosure Consistency NCC Group disclosure Focus areas for FY26
Metrics and targets
A. Disclose the metrics used by the
organisation to assess climate-related
risks and opportunities in line with its
strategy and risk management process
Partially
consistent
• Reporting of Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope
3 greenhouse gas emissions for FY25
compared to prior years while taking into
account improvements in our methodology
• Prioritisation and
ownership of Carbon
Reduction Plan actions
B. Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2 and, if
appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas
emissions and the related risks
Partially
consistent
• Publication of Scope 1 and 2 GHG
emissions for FY25 vs FY24
• Full Scope 3 emissions relevant to our
business operations
• Review of our data
collection in line with
the new action areas
identified within the
Carbon Reduction Plan
C. Describe the targets used by the
organisation to manage climate
related risks and opportunities
and performance against target
Partially
consistent
• Draft Carbon Reduction Plan target to
reduce Scope 1 by 63%, Scope 2 by 63%
and Scope 3 by 63% by 2035
• Publish the final Carbon
Reduction plan using
FY25 GHG emissions
as the baseline
• Validate targets with SBTi

VIEWPOINT

The state of supply chain security NCC Group thought leadership shows 68% of organisations expect supply chain attacks to grow more severe

Global supply chains are under mounting pressure, suffering a series of high profile breaches in 2025. As the attack surface and threat increases, organisations are complacent and over reliant on compliance frameworks.

NCC Group's 'State of supply chain security' report investigated this overlooked area of risk and found deeply concerning evidence of overconfidence, a gap in responsibility and the rising threat posed by artificial intelligence.

At NCC Group, we help clients tackle these challenges through expert-led assessments, robust third party risk management, and tailored strategies that embed security across the supply chain, ensuring organisations can operate confidently in an increasingly hostile digital landscape.

The full report is available at: www.nccgroup.com/the-state-of‑ supply-chain-security

Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting (SECR)

The period under review is from 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025 and the reporting boundary includes the full Group. Emissions are calculated in line with the GHG Protocol, as detailed in our SECR report on the Sustainability section of our website. Emissions are reported as CO2, using 100-year Global Warming Potential values. For FY25, NCC Group's report covers SECR-relevant categories only. Data sources used include meter readings, supplier invoices, and transport mileage records.

Total GHG G tCO 2 e tCO 2 e %
Source 2024 2025 change from
previous year
change from
previous year
Scope 1
Gas 344.4 109.5 (234.9) (68%)
Company vehicles
Diesel A 0.8 _ N/A N/A
Petrol A 11.3 _ N/A N/A
Diesel/petrol 12.1 349.3 B 337.2 2,787%
Hybrid - _ _ _
Fleet fuel – petrol _
Total Scope 1 356.5 458.8 102.3 29%
Scope 2
Electricity A 1,280.5 _ N/A N/A
Company vehicles – electric A 8.9 _ N/A N/A
Purchased electricity 1,289.40 727.30 (562.1) (44%)
Heat and steam 40.9 45.9 5 12%
Total Scope 2 1,330.3 773.2 (557.1) (42%)
Total Scope 1 and 2 1,686.8 1,232.0 (454.8) (27%)
Scope 3
Business travel A 1,257.5 _ N/A N/A
Transmission and distribution losses A 82.3 _ N/A N/A
Heat and steam transmission and distribution losses A 2.8 _ N/A N/A
Fleet transmission and distribution losses A 0.8 _ N/A N/A
Transport 1,343.40 88.7 (1,254.7) (93%)
Commuting A 225.4 _ N/A N/A
Data centre electricity A 71.7 _ N/A N/A
Purchased goods and services A 5,713.7 _ N/A N/A
Total Scope 3 7,354.2 88.7 (7,265.5) (99%)
Total Scope 1, 2 and 3 9,041.0 1,320.7 (7,720.3) (85%)

Underlying energy use

The table below shows the proportion of energy use that occurs in the UK and non-UK countries alongside the total carbon emissions. In FY25, 27% of the Group's energy consumption and 21% of carbon emissions arose from the UK.

FY25 energy u se FY25 carbon emissions
Area kWh % of global energy use Total emissions tCO 2 e % of global emissions
UK 1,340,628.6 27% 279.1 21%
Non-UK 3,587,490.3 73% 1,041.6 79%
Global purchased goods and services _ _
Total A 4.928.118.9 100% 1,320.7 100%

Intensity metric

Total per £m turnover – location based

_ - Islander zin tamerer i seation zacea
Amount
kWh
Turnover
£m
Total emissions
tCO 2 e
Intensity per turnover $tCO_2e$
1 October 2023–30 September 2024 6,326,920.9 329.2 9,041.0 27.5
1 October 2024–30 September 2025 A 4,928,118.9 305.4 1,320.7 4.3
Comparison (22.1%) (7.2%) (85.4%) (84.3)

A In accordance with SECR requirements and on the professional advice of NCC Group's newly appointed sustainability consultancy, Positive Planet, the FY25 data disclosure includes only the mandatory information prescribed by legislation. This disclosure provides a concise summary of NCC Group's energy consumption, carbon emissions and related performance metrics. A more comprehensive view, including supplementary information and analysis, will be provided in the 2025 Carbon Reduction Plan and Sustainability Report. This approach ensures transparency and accessibility while maintaining compliance with regulatory obligations.

B Reflecting NCC Group's ongoing commitment to strengthen transparency and completeness in emissions reporting, fleet emissions data for the Netherlands has been sourced and included in the FY25 SECR disclosure for the first time.

Risk management

Risk is an inherent part of doing business, and risk management is a fundamental aspect of good corporate governance. A successful risk management process balances risk and reward and is underpinned by sound judgement regarding the impact and likelihood of risks. The Board holds overall responsibility for ensuring that NCC Group has an effective risk management framework that aligns with its business objectives.

The Board has established an Enterprise Risk Management policy, which has established protocols, including:

  • • Roles and responsibilities for the risk management framework
  • • A risk scoring framework
  • • A definition of risk appetite
  • The integrated approach to risk management diagram on page 30 summarises the Group's overall approach to risk management

NCC Group's approach to risk management

NCC Group adopts both a "top-down" and "bottom-up" approach to risk, to manage risk exposure across the Group to enable the effective pursuit of strategic objectives. The approach is summarised in the diagram on page 30.

The approach is one of collaboration, which supports our comprehensive approach to risk identification, from the "top down" and "bottom up". The Group believes that this is the most efficient and effective way to identify its business risks.

Top down

The Board, Audit Committee and Cyber Security Committee review risks on an ongoing basis and are supported by the Executive Committee and subject matter specialists (including Escode, Cyber

Security, information security, data protection and health and safety). The Board considers the Group's strategic objectives and any barriers to their achievement.

Bottom up

The Board and senior leadership team engage with colleagues at every level of the Group in recognition of the importance of their expertise, contribution and views.

Risk management model

The Board has overall responsibility for ensuring that NCC Group adopts an effective risk management model, which is aligned to our objectives and promotes good risk management practice. We have therefore adopted the model described in this section and summarised in the diagram above.

Managing risk from the top down

Top down Strategic risk management

Bottom up Operational risk management

• Establishing guidance on the Group's approach to risk management and establishing the parameters for risk appetite and associated decision making

  • Identification, review and management of identified Group strategic risks and associated actions
  • Ongoing consideration of:
  • IT and cyber-centric risk
  • Environmental risk

• Implementing and embedding the Group's Enterprise Risk Management policy and approach

  • Directing the delivery of the Group's identified actions associated with managing/ mitigating risk
  • Identification of key risk indicators, monitoring and taking timely action where appropriate

Board Audit Committee Cyber Security Committee

  • Periodically assessing the effectiveness of the embedded Group risk management process
  • Challenging the content of the strategic risk register to support a comprehensive and balanced assessment of risk
  • Reporting on the principal risks and uncertainties of the Group

Executive Committee Leadership team

  • Responsible for reviewing the operational risks across the business units and Group
  • Challenging the appropriateness and adequacy of proposed action plans to mitigate risk
  • Giving due consideration to the aggregation of risk across the Group
  • Provisioning suitable cross-functional/ business unit resource to effectively manage risk where appropriate

Managing risk from the bottom up

• Instrumental in developing the risk management framework adopted by the Board

  • Conduit between the Board and the business units – providing training and support where appropriate
  • Developing and executing a risk-based Internal Audit Plan to assess the management of risks

Global Governance function

  • Ongoing monitoring and reporting to the Board in relation to the progress being made by the business units in implementing agreed action plans to mitigate strategic risk
  • Close cross-functional relationships with the Global Technical Services (GTS) security operations team to facilitate the identification, management, monitoring and reporting of data security risks

• Execution of the delivery of the Group's identified actions associated with managing risk

  • Timely reporting on the implementation and progress of agreed action plans
  • Provision of key risk indicator updates

Business units

  • Identification and reporting of strategic risk to the Board
  • Provision of reports and data relating to significant emerging risks to the Group (internal and external)
  • Implementation of risk management approach which promotes the ongoing identification, evaluation, prioritisation, mitigation and monitoring of operational risk

Effective pursuit of strategic objectives

Risk management model continued

The Board, Audit Committee, Cyber Security Committee and Executive Committee review risks on an ongoing basis throughout the period. The appropriateness and relevance of the risks are monitored by the Global Governance function to ensure they continue to be updated, meet the needs of the Group and remain in line with good risk management practice. In addition, there is a robust process in place for monitoring and reporting the implementation of agreed actions.

We are satisfied that the Enterprise Risk Management policy, framework and model currently in place are sufficient to manage risk across the Group.

The key areas of identifying, assessing, addressing and monitoring risks are explained in more detail overleaf.

Identify

Risks exist within all areas of our business, and it is important for us to identify and understand the degree to which their impact and likelihood of occurrence will affect the delivery of our key objectives. This is achieved through day-to-day working practices and incorporates risks in both the internal and external environment.

All identified risks are initially assessed for their "inherent" risk (risk with no controls in place), using a scoring mechanism that accounts for the

likelihood of an event occurring and the impact that it may have on the Group. The scoring mechanism adopted takes account of high impact, low likelihood events and these risks are managed in a timely manner.

In addition to ongoing risk identification, an annual exercise is undertaken to review the Group's strategic risk universe by the Board. This exercise is reliant on the "top-down", "bottom-up" approach discussed earlier.

Assess

Post-identification of the Group's inherent risk exposure, a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of current mitigating controls is undertaken. This exercise takes account of the design of the current control environment and the application of these controls prior to assessing the Group's current exposure to risk – the mitigated risk score. The Board uses a number of sources of information to support the scoring of risk and these include, but are not limited to:

  • Management updates
  • Action tracking and reporting
  • Control environment policies and procedures
  • Independent audit activity
  • Project monitoring reports

Address

Having identified and assessed the risks faced by the Group, the risks are scored according to likelihood of occurring and impact to the business should they occur.

An assessment of whether additional actions are required to reduce our risk exposure is undertaken, with actions falling into one of four categories:

  • Treat develop an action plan (applying responsibility, deadlines and prioritisation) that may include the implementation of additional controls, or increase the requirement for additional assurance over the adequacy and effectiveness of the existing controls
  • Transfer use a third party specialist to undertake the activity, thus mitigating the risk
  • Tolerate determine the risk is within appetite
  • Terminate exit the activity

The output from the evaluation of strategic risks has resulted in milestone plans owned by senior business leaders or has been used in the development of the Group's transformation programme.

Monitor

Ongoing monitoring of risks and related actions is key to the implementation of our risk management model and, therefore, NCC Group is committed to making enterprise-wide risk management part of business as usual. Examples of ongoing monitoring of business risks include, but are not limited to:

  • Annual review of the external audit strategy and plan by the Audit Committee and Chief Financial Officer to ensure inclusion of key financial risks
  • Review of the annual Internal Audit Plan to validate that it incorporates key areas of business risk
  • A review of internal audit reports issued during the period, including a summary of progress against previously raised management actions at each Audit Committee meeting
  • Annual review of the strategic risk register by the Enterprise Risk Management Steering Group and Board to ensure that it includes risks arising in the period

Internal control

While risk management identifies threats to the Group achieving its strategic objectives, internal controls are designed to provide assurance that these objectives are being achieved, such as the effectiveness and efficiency of operations and delivery, accurate and reliable financial reporting, and compliance with applicable laws and regulation.

NCC Group has established a robust internal control framework, which is made up of a number of components:

Control environment

The control environment has primarily been established taking account of the Group's values (working together, being brilliantly creative, embracing difference and taking responsibility), and its Code of Ethics, which sets the foundations for the expected behaviours, values and competencies for all colleagues across the Group. The Board, Executive Committee and extended leadership team lead by example and strive to maintain effective control environments, while also maintaining integrity and transparency.

Risk assessments

Risk assessments are conducted at both a strategic and operational level of the Group and support the Group in understanding the risks that it faces and the controls in place to mitigate them. Importantly, they provide a mechanism to identify operational improvements and are vital in our transformational programmes.

Policies and procedures

Established policies communicate expected behaviours and are supported by procedures and guidelines that define required processes and controls. This, in turn, helps the business to adopt efficient and effective control environments.

Information and communications

Access to accurate and timely data is essential for supporting our colleagues in making informed decisions and effectively managing and controlling their areas of responsibility.

Activity monitoring

The minimum financial controls framework was established in FY20. Further enhancement of the framework is being designed and implemented to align with the UK Corporate Governance Reform and upcoming Directors' attestation of internal controls.

In preparation for new legislative requirements relating to failure to prevent fraud, key anti-fraud controls have been identified and these are supported by red flag reporting and ongoing trend analysis to enhance the existing control environment to ensure compliance with the Economic Crime and Transparency Act (2023).

Financial accounting and reporting follow generally accepted accounting practices.

Group review and approval procedures exist in relation to major areas of risk and require Executive Committee/Board approval, including mergers and acquisitions, major contracts, capital expenditure, litigation, treasury management and taxation policies. The approval procedures are captured within a global delegation of authority (DoA) matrix which is disseminated across the Group.

Compliance with all legislation, current and new, is closely monitored.

Risk and control reporting structure

NCC Group has embedded the "three lines of defence" to provide a robust internal controls structure that will support the Board, Audit Committee, Cyber Security Committee, Executive Committee and extended leadership team with accurate and reliable information in relation to the systems of internal control.

Three lines of defence:

  • First line Group policies and procedures
  • Second line information security, data protection, health and safety, and legal
  • Third line risk and assurance, incorporating internal audit, standards and support, assessing compliance with standards and external audit, both financial and operational, providing independent challenge and assessment

Risk management continued

Principal risks and uncertainties

During the period, the Board has completed a robust assessment of the Company's emerging and principal risks. This has included the Board reassessing and rescoring the principal risks, with changes to the risks noted below. The overall number of principal risks has reduced from 24 in FY24 to 14 in FY25 primarily due to risks being combined where the operating risks overlapped or where they were considered sub-risks.

The Group continues to operate in a particularly dynamic and evolving marketplace. The current risk register has been developed to reflect

these factors and includes risks that could threaten the Group's business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. Detailed descriptions of the current principal risks and uncertainties faced by the Group, along with their potential impact and the mitigating processes and controls, are set out below.

The strategic risks are based on the four pillars of our strategy: our clients, our capabilities, global delivery and differentiated brands.

Extraordinary risk during the period

A. Strategy

1. Inability to execute the Group's strategy including the diversification of market sector, region, product/service or client VR

Link to strategy: Our clients Our capabilities Global delivery Differentiated brands

Previous risk names

Inability to execute the Group strategy and over-reliance on market sector, product/service or client

Risk owner

Mike Maddison, CEO

Risk impact

Ineffective execution of a strategy could have a material negative impact on the Group's financial performance and value.

It would potentially weaken the Group compared to its competitors and risk the Group's established position in the marketplace.

Key controls and mitigating factors

Strategic transformation plans are in place.

Disposal of Crypto and DetACT.

The Manila office is fully operational.

Risk impact and movement

2. Inability of the Group to absorb the people, process and technological transformation change

Link to strategy: Our clients Our capabilities Global delivery Differentiated brands

Previous risk name

Poor adoption of change management mechanisms

Risk owner

Mike Maddison, CEO

Risk impact

Failure to successfully deliver strategic outcomes caused by projects failing because they deliver late, don't deliver, fail to deliver the right things or fail to achieve the expected benefits.

Risk impact and movement

Key controls and mitigating factors

Transformation delivery centre is in place.

Business cases linked to principal risks underpinned by robust financial and legal due diligence which clearly articulates project objectives including delivery metrics.

Programme sponsors are accountable for delivery of outcomes.

Project SteerCo's in place.

Risk movement:

Increased Decreased Unchanged

Risk impact:

High Medium Low

Viability risk: VR

New risk: NR

A. Strategy continued

3. Commercial models (contractual and pricing) do not reflect the flexibility required by clients or drive the optimal commercial outcome for NCC Group VR

Link to strategy: Our clients Our capabilities Global delivery

Previous risk name

N/A

Risk owner

Peter Vorley, CCO

Risk impact

Inability to transact, operate and deliver profitable services resulting in loss of revenue and negative impact on share price.

Risk impact and movement NR

Key controls and mitigating factors

Finance review of margins.

Legal review of contracts.

Approval is required for low margin jobs.

Regular review of services is offered.

Client engagement and feedback to enhance the portfolio of product and services.

B. Cyber and information security

Increased Decreased Unchanged

4. Cyber attack VR

Link to strategy: Our capabilities Global delivery Differentiated brands

Previous risk name

N/A

Risk owner

Guy Ellis, CFO

Risk impact

Data breach leading to fines from regulators and reputational damage.

Lack of availability in systems.

Inability to operate services resulting in loss of customer trust, resulting in loss of revenue and negative impact on share price.

Impact on national security due to our work with government clients.

Risk impact and movement

Increased due to increase in high profile cyber attacks and change to geopolitical landscape.

Key controls and mitigating factors

The Board operates a Cyber Security Committee chaired by a NED.

All colleagues globally are required to undertake annual and ongoing security training to alert them to potential methods of security breach and to their responsibilities in safeguarding information and reporting potential issues.

Security testing is regularly carried out on the Group's infrastructure and there are extensive response plans, which are tested.

Comprehensive plans are in place and being delivered associated with discharging our data protection obligations.

Deployed an Information Security Management System (ISO 27001). All key locations are certified.

Risk movement:

Risk impact:

High Medium Low

Viability risk: VR

Risk management continued

Principal risks and uncertainties continued

B. Cyber and information security continued

5. Significant business systems failure VR

Link to strategy: Our capabilities Global delivery Differentiated brands

Previous risk name

N/A

Risk owner Guy Ellis, CFO

Risk impact

Inability to transact, operate and deliver services resulting in loss of customer trust, resulting in loss of revenue and negative impact on share price.

Risk impact and movement

Increased due to a lot of ongoing transformational change and the general increase in cyber attacks.

Key controls and mitigating factors

Deployed an Information Security Management System (ISO 27001). All key locations are certified.

IT strategy of continued cloud migration which has greater resilience and availability.

Business continuity plans, including crisis management, are in place and tested regularly.

A change management process is in place within IT which assists a reduction in incidents caused by human error.

Backups are in place and single points of failure are identified and mitigated in the event of prolonged loss of systems.

Regular vulnerability assessments (perimeter scanning) and penetration testing are undertaken.

Global systems are in place.

6. Loss of client/colleague data

Link to strategy: Our capabilities Differentiated brands

Previous risk name

Merged with intellectual property theft or exposure

Risk owner

Guy Ellis, CFO

Risk impact

Data breach leading to fines from regulators and reputational damage.

Reputational damage from losing client data and industrial espionage, resulting in loss of revenue and loss of competitive advantage from threat of malicious actors.

Risk impact and movement

Key controls and mitigating factors

Deployed an Information Security Management System (ISO 27001). All key locations are certified.

Regular compliance training, including data protection, is provided to all colleagues at least annually.

Information classification and handling and data privacy policies are in place.

7. Insufficient quality, integrity and availability of management information VR

Link to strategy: Our clients Our capabilities Global delivery

Previous risk name

N/A

Risk owner Guy Ellis, CFO

Risk impact

Suboptimal business decision making and performance as key financial performance data is not available or trusted.

Risk impact and movement

Key controls and mitigating factors

We are ISO 9001 accredited across key locations.

Standardised business process control standards are in place and subject to regular review by the global standards and support team.

Increased focus on implementing global systems to support global strategy.

Risk movement:

Risk impact:

Increased Decreased Unchanged

High Medium Low

New risk: NR

C. Innovation and product development

8. Technology changes render services obsolete/technology disruption impacts pace of change

Link to strategy: Our clients Our capabilities Global delivery Differentiated brands

Previous risk name

Merged with lack of innovation, ineffectual product/service management and failure to capture on partnership ecosystem

Moved from strategy theme to innovation theme

Risk owner

Mike Maddison, CEO

Risk impact

Failure to stay updated with technological changes can erode competitive advantage, leading to a decline in market share and revenue.

Failure to deliver the Group strategy.

Increased cost base eroding margins.

Risk impact and movement

Key controls and mitigating factors

Market intelligence and competitive intelligence reporting.

Strategic partnerships and technology partners to ensure alignment with emerging trends and technology changes.

Research and development budgets and culture which proactively embraces new trends and technologies.

Cross-functional collaboration via working groups to promote innovation.

Client engagement and feedback to enhance the portfolio of products and services.

D. People

9. Insufficient strategic workforce planning, including technological development and training of colleagues VR

Link to strategy: Our capabilities

Previous risk name

Inability to retain/recruit colleagues to meet the resource needs of the business and unable to meet the resource needs of the business and client

Risk owner

Michelle Van de Velde, CPO

Risk impact

Inability to deliver to clients resulting in loss of revenue and reputational damage.

Loss of colleague morale and risk of "burnout".

Loss of key colleagues or significant colleague turnover could result in a lack of necessary expertise or continuity to execute the Group's strategy.

Inability to attract and retain sufficient high calibre colleagues could become a barrier to the continued success and growth of NCC Group.

Risk impact and movement

Increased due to a lot of ongoing transformational change.

Key controls and mitigating factors

Workforce resourcing is managed by the Chief People Officer.

A full review of workforce requirements is undertaken as part of the strategic review.

Job level framework is implemented.

Colleagues are offered an industry aligned salary and benefits package including share schemes, salary sacrifice car scheme and retail discount offerings.

The Manila office is fully operational and has reduced the cost base to further meet the needs of our clients.

E. Market and competition

10. Global socio-political risk

Link to strategy: Our clients Our capabilities Global delivery Differentiated brands

Previous risk names

Geopolitical risk and undertaking work with disreputable clients in sanctioned or undesirable jurisdictions

Risk owner

Kevin Brown, COO

Risk impact

Failure to comply with changing global regulations may cause disruption to our business.

Reputational damage and legal implications if we work with disreputable clients.

Risk impact and movement

Increased due to it being difficult to control and a lot of change and uncertainty.

Key controls and mitigating factors

The strategy is focused on globalisation and thus the resource structure is being designed to promote global delivery.

A country risk index is in place with risk assessments performed for business in higher risk countries.

Risk movement:

Increased Decreased Unchanged

Risk impact:

High Medium Low

New risk: NR

Viability risk: VR

Risk management continued

Principal risks and uncertainties continued

F. Brand and reputation

11. Adverse publicity in news and social media

Link to strategy: Differentiated brands

Previous risk name

N/A

Risk owner Angela Brown, CMO Risk impact

Reputational damage leading to loss of existing and potential clients resulting in loss of revenue.

Risk impact and movement

Key controls and mitigating factors

Policies and procedures are in place which follow good practice and ethics.

Annual compliance training.

Research quality review process.

G. Quality and delivery

12. Inability to effectively compete in the market VR

Link to strategy: Our clients Our capabilities

Previous risk names

Service delivery does not achieve established quality standards, loss of internationally recognised quality and security standards and lack of market strength versus competition

Risk owner

Kevin Brown, COO

Risk impact

Clients don't renew, have their SLA breached or cancel mid-service leading to loss of revenue.

Negligence in delivery leading to legal action or loss of revenue and reputational damage.

Failure to retain internationally recognised quality and security standards resulting in a loss of clients and revenue and the ability to operate.

Risk impact and movement

Key controls and mitigating factors

Global standards and support team performs internal audits and manages the ISO accreditations.

External assessors conduct audits at least annually confirming the retention of our quality and security standards.

ISO standards extended to more locations in FY25.

Policies and procedures are in place and audited against the design and application.

Quality assurance processes are in place.

Standard methodologies and procedures are followed.

Customer feedback and complaints process.

Ongoing internal training programmes.

Risk movement:

Increased Decreased Unchanged

Risk impact:

High Medium Low

New risk: NR

Viability risk: VR

H. Legal, regulatory compliance and governance 13. Criminal and civil corporate legal action resulting in fines and incarceration VR Link to strategy: Our clients Global delivery Differentiated brands Previous risk name N/A Risk owner Guy Ellis, CFO Risk impact Reputational damage from legal action being taken and financial impact of the fines and the impact it may have on key customer accounts. Risk impact and movement Key controls and mitigating factors The legal team reviews customer contracts. Annual compliance training is undertaken including ethics, economic crime, health and safety, information security and data protection.

We have removed the lack of visibility in the workplace risk, within the brand and reputation risk theme, as the Board deemed this was no longer a strategic risk.

In addition to identifying the Group principal risks, we continuously review and monitor emerging risks through horizon scanning; publications; assessing regulatory changes and how they may impact the Group; and ensuring adequate oversight over significant projects.

Examples of identification include horizon scanning for emerging risks such as increasing energy costs, takeover risks, legislative and market changes and geopolitical risks.

Viability statement

In line with Provision 31 of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code, this Viability Statement outlines the Directors' assessment of the Group's ability to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the designated assessment period (factoring in the Group's continuing operations), drawing attention to any qualifications or assumptions, as necessary. This evaluation considers our current financial position, outlook and principal risks and uncertainties, as well as the critical judgements and estimates underpinning the Financial Statements. The Directors' assessment is grounded in the Group's business model and strategic plan, which are reviewed and approved annually by the Board with a focus on a sustainable growth strategy derived from two distinct businesses, increasing shareholder value, and enhancing our service offering. For further details, please see the Strategic Report on pages 8 and 9.

The Group's strategic priorities, detailed on pages 12 and 13 of the Strategic Report, provide a foundation for this outlook. Additionally, the effective management of principal risks and uncertainties, as outlined on pages 29 to 37, underscores those factors that could theoretically pose a threat to the Group's operational or financial resilience, particularly those carrying the viability risk (VR) designation.

The assessment period

The Directors have assessed the viability of the Group over a three year period ending in September 2028. This timeframe aligns with the Group's strategic planning horizon and reflects a practical planning period, considering the pace of industry change and evolving customer demands.

Assessment of viability

The viability of the Group has been assessed based on its current financial position, available banking facilities, and the Board-approved FY26 budget and three year strategic plan (factoring in the Group's continuing operations). The Group's base case budget for FY26 incorporates recent growth trends across geographical regions and operating segments, as well as relevant growth opportunities driven by existing offerings. Management has also performed base case modelling inclusive of the potential disposal of its Escode business (incorporating any associated impact on the Group's banking facilities and expected net cash position). This assessment also accounts for current macro-economic conditions where applicable.

Additionally, the Group remains in the early stages of reviewing a number of strategic options for its Cyber business, however no decision has been made on which option will be pursued as of 11 December 2025. No material issues impacting the Group's viability assessment as of 11 December 2025.

In April 2025, the Group refinanced its borrowing arrangements by entering into a new four year £120m multi-currency revolving credit facility, replacing the previous facility due to expire in December 2026. The new facility, which expires in April 2029, provides additional liquidity headroom and has been factored into the Group's viability assessment.

Additionally, the Directors have modelled the impact of severe, yet plausible, scenarios associated with the Group's principal viability risks, which could have the most significant potential impact on viability over the three year period, as outlined in the table below. These sensitivities have been assessed against the Group's projected cash flow position, available banking facilities, and compliance with financial covenants throughout the viability period. Under these scenarios, the Group has assessed and concluded that sufficient headroom exists to support its operations and meet its liabilities as they fall due. Further details on the Group's financing arrangements can be found in Note 1 of the Financial Statements.

The applied sensitivities demonstrate sufficient levels of headroom, indicating that no mitigating actions are necessary under the severe but plausible scenarios modelled by management. Nevertheless, should additional headroom be needed, available measures within the Directors' control include reducing planned capital expenditure, adjusting headcount, freezing pay and recruitment, and suspending dividend payments to shareholders.

As outlined on page 32, the Board has undertaken a robust assessment of the Company's principal risks, resulting in an overall reduction in the number of identified risks. This reassessment included a review of the Group's principal risks that are also considered viability risks, and any changes identified during the year are clearly highlighted on pages 32 to 37.

Conclusions

Based on the severe but plausible scenarios modelled (inclusive of the planned disposal of Escode), the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the three year period of assessment. The Directors have considered this assumption as part of their viability assessment and believe it to be reasonable based on the Group's financial position.

Viability risk Risk as applied to viability assessment Specifics of scenario modelled Potential impact
Inability to execute
the Group's strategy
including the
diversification of
market sector, region,
product/service
or client
Insufficient strategic
workforce planning,
including technological
development and
training of colleagues
The ineffective execution of a strategy could have a
material negative impact on the Group's financial
performance and value.
It would potentially weaken the Group compared to its
competitors and risk the Group's established position
in the marketplace.
Inability to deliver to clients could result in revenue loss and
reputational damage, hindering the Group's ability to execute
its strategy.
Loss of key colleagues or significant colleague turnover could
result in a lack of necessary expertise or continuity to execute
the Group's strategy.
Inability to attract and retain sufficient high calibre colleagues
could become a barrier to the continued success and growth
of NCC Group.
In order to consider the
impact of the risks identified,
management has modelled
the following scenario:
A reduction in future trading
performance within Cyber
Security, specifically in the
Group's Technical Assurance
Services (TAS).
This scenario models
an annualised reduction of
£10.6m in revenue and £3.8m
in profitability over the three
year viability period.
The impact of this
sensitivity has been
assessed against the
Group's projected
cash flow, available
banking facilities,
and compliance with
financial covenants
over the three year
viability period.
The scenario applied
indicates sufficient
headroom throughout
this period, confirming
that no mitigating
actions are necessary.
Insufficient quality,
integrity and
availability of
management
information
Suboptimal business decision making, and performance
as key financial performance data is not available or trusted.
These suboptimal decisions could prevent the Group from
achieving its strategic goals.
Commercial models
(contractual and
pricing) do not reflect
the flexibility required
by clients or drive the
optimal commercial
outcome for
NCC Group
Inability to transact, operate and deliver profitable
services resulting in loss of revenue and negative impact
on share price.
In order to consider the
impact of the risks identified,
management has modelled
the following scenario:
A loss in key customers
resulting in an annualised
reduction of £8.9m in revenue
and £2.6m in profitability over
The impact of this
sensitivity has been
assessed against the
Group's projected
cash flow, available
banking facilities,
and compliance with
financial covenants
Cyber attack Data breach leading to fines from regulators and
reputational damage.
Lack of availability in systems.
Inability to operate services resulting in loss of customer
trust, resulting in loss of revenue and negative impact
on share price.
Impact on national security due to our work with
government clients.
Each of the above could result in a loss of customers
and revenue.
the three year viability period. over the three year
viability period.
The scenario applied
indicates sufficient
headroom throughout
this period, confirming
that no mitigating
actions are necessary.
Significant business
systems failure
Inability to transact, operate and deliver services resulting
in loss of customer trust, resulting in loss of revenue and
negative impact on share price.
Inability to effectively
compete in the market
Client non-renewal, SLA breaches, or mid-service
cancellations could result in revenue loss.
Delivery negligence could lead to legal action, reputational
damage, and loss of customers and revenue.
Failure to maintain internationally recognised quality and
security standards could result in client loss, revenue decline,
and operational restrictions.
Criminal and civil
corporate legal action
resulting in fines
and incarceration
Reputational damage from legal action being taken and
financial impact of the fines and the impact it may have on
key customer accounts.

Delivering on our financial framework

Guy Ellis Chief Financial Officer

Highlights – financial framework

As we assess our performance against the FY25 financial framework published in December 2024, it is encouraging to see that we have continued to deliver throughout the year against most of the framework. The key points to note are as follows:

Sustainable revenue growth

  • Delivering underlying growth in Cyber Security (excluding non-core disposals) – 2025 Cyber Security revenue declined compared to the year ended 30 September 2024 on both constant currency 1 (-4.0%) and at actual rates (-4.9%). However, H2 2025 demonstrated positive momentum versus H1 2025, delivering growth of +3.0%.
  • Increase Managed Services revenue as a proportion of total Cyber Security (excluding Crypto and DetACT) – 2025 MS revenue proportion increased by +2.2%pts at constant currency (actual rates: +2.5%pts), compared to the year ended 30 September 2024.
  • Maintaining momentum in Escode achieved 12 consecutive quarters of revenue growth (on a constant currency basis) and increased year on year by +2.2% on a constant currency basis (+0.8% actual rates).

Improved gross margin

  • Improved utilisation the Group's average utilisation rate for the year across TAS and C&I (all locations) amounts to 70.4%, with the Manila team average increasing as more activity is onboarded into its delivery model.
  • Smart pricing and margin investment decision making Kantata resource reporting tool now implemented globally and regular reporting of profitability by engagement and client has been implemented with further benefits to be realised.

• Globalised technical resource footprint – from a global delivery perspective the Group continues to invest in its Manila office and delivery resourcing is planned and tracked on a single system.

Efficiency for growth

  • Simplify operating model to generate efficiencies finance and IT processes globalised and centralised around hubs in Manchester and Manila. We continue to monitor our transformation journey as we ensure the operating model is market aligned, and delivery is focused to support the underlying Cyber Security business strategy.
  • Drive towards consistent profit conversion in every market improvement in North American GM% by 6.3% pts to 28.4% year on year, despite a revenue decline of 12.9% at constant currency, in part as a result of increased delivery from Manila and cost control.
  • Eliminate stranded costs resulting from non-core disposals the Fox-IT Crypto disposal completed on 28 March 2025. In October 2025, the simplified Fox-IT Cyber Security operations further separated from the Fox-IT Crypto business by moving into its own offices, following the opening of the new Rijswijk office (the "Den"). We continue to review Group wide for any stranded costs from all non-core disposals (including the potential disposal of Escode).

Capital deployment supporting growth

  • Strong cash conversion FY25 cash conversion of 91.3%, reflecting an improvement from H1 2025 cash conversion of 62.3%, with H2 2025 cash conversion being 119.4%.
  • Ensure appropriate liquidity and debt facilities net cash effectively managed at 30 September 2025 to £13.1m, with non-core disposal of Fox-IT Crypto generating £65.6m gross cash consideration. Agreed a new four year £120m multi-currency revolving credit facility in April 2025.
  • Maintaining dividend final FY25 dividend maintained at 3.15p, as the Board prioritises investment in the strategy.
  • Expected commencement of initial share buy-back programme in December 2025/January 2026.
  • Accretive acquisition opportunities continue to scan the market for accretive cyber opportunities with a clear strategic and operational fit.

Overview of financial performance

Throughout this Financial Review, references are made to a number of reporting periods. Any references to the year ended 30 September 2025 or the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024 relate to audited figures (unless stated otherwise). References to the year ended 30 September 2024, the six months ("H1") to 31 March 2025 (and comparative six months to 31 March 2024), and the six months ("H2") to 30 September 2025 (and comparative six months to 30 September 2024) relate to unaudited figures.

This approach continues to support comparability of the Group's new year end performance (following the year end change in FY24) and, importantly, provides visibility on the current trajectory.

Year ended 30 September 2025 compared to the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024

The following table summarises the Group's performance for the year ended 30 September 2025, following the results for the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024, which reflected the Group's change in financial year end to 30 September in the prior period. The results for the year (and the prior period) present the Group's Escode business as discontinued operations. Therefore, the table below shows the Group's continuing operations results, with Escode added back to ensure full comparability of the Group's performance.

During the year ended 30 September 2025, the Group explored a number of options for its Escode business, including a potential sale, eventually initiating an active programme to locate a potential buyer. As at 30 September 2025, the sale was considered highly probable, so the related assets and liabilities were reclassified as held for sale. Since Escode is a separate major line of business and classified as held for sale, it is presented also presented as a discontinued operation.

Year ended 30 September 2025 16 month period ended 30 September 2024
Cyber
Security
£m
Central
and
head office
£m
Continuing
operations3
:
Sub-total
£m
Discontinued
operations3
:
Escode
£m
Group
£m
Cyber
Security
£m
Central
and
head office
£m
Continuing
operations3
:
Sub-total
£m
Discontinued
operations3
:
Escode
£m
Group
£m
Revenue
Cost of sales
238.9
(150.5)

238.9
(150.5)
66.5
(19.0)
305.4
(169.5)
342.1
(224.1)

342.1
(224.1)
87.4
(26.7)
429.5
(250.8)
Gross profit
Gross margin %
Administrative expenses 3
Share-based payments
88.4
37.0%
(68.4)
(0.2)


(4.4)
(2.6)
88.4
37.0%
(72.8)
(2.8)
47.5
71.4%
(16.4)
(0.2)
135.9
44.5%
(89.2)
(3.0)
118.0
34.5%
(97.3)
(0.1)


(3.4)
(2.0)
118.0
34.5%
(100.7)
(2.1)
60.7
69.5%
(24.1)
(0.2)
178.7
41.6%
(124.8)
(2.3)
Adjusted EBITDA1,2
Depreciation and
amortisation
Amortisation of acquired
intangibles
19.8
(7.8)
(1.0)
(7.0)
(3.1)
(2.1)
12.8
(10.9)
(3.1)
30.9
(1.0)
(5.0)
43.7
(11.9)
(8.1)
20.6
(10.9)
(1.4)
(5.4)
(5.3)
(4.0)
15.2
(16.2)
(5.4)
36.4
(0.6)
(7.1)
51.6
(16.8)
(12.5)
Adjusted operating
profit/(loss)1,2
Individually Significant Items
11.0
(3.9)
(12.2)
5.8
(1.2)
1.9
24.9
23.7
1.9
8.3
(41.4)
(14.7)
(6.4)
(41.4)
28.7
(0.1)
22.3
(41.5)
Operating profit/(loss) 7.1 (6.4) 0.7 24.9 25.6 (33.1) (14.7) (47.8) 28.6 (19.2)
Operating margin % 3.0% N/A 0.3% 37.4% 8.4% (9.7%) N/A (14.0%) 32.7% (4.5%)
Finance costs (5.0) (8.3)
Profit/(loss) before
taxation
Taxation
20.6
(3.5)
(27.5)
(5.0)
Profit/(loss) after taxation 17.1 (32.5)
EPS
Basic EPS
Adjusted basic EPS1,2
5.6p
4.7p
(10.4p)
3.4p

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted operating profit, Adjusted basic EPS, net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities and cash conversion are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

On the basis we are comparing a 12 month period to a 16 month period, revenue decreased by 28.0% on a constant currency basis (actual rates: 28.9%), with total Cyber Security revenue decreasing 29.3% on a constant currency basis (actual rates: 30.2%) and Escode decreasing by 22.8% on a constant currency basis (actual rates: 23.9%).

Encouragingly, when you directly compare our overall gross margins, we have improved since the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024 with gross margin percentage increasing to 44.5% (2024: 41.6%). This +2.9% pts in gross margin is driven by improved utilisation and operational efficiencies within Cyber Security, together with a

continued shift in the service mix, as Managed Services accounts for a growing proportion of overall revenue at a higher margin. This has also been boosted by an improvement in Escode gross profit margin, increasing to 71.4% from 69.5% due to the continued benefits arising from previous investments within Escode. Administrative expenses (excluding share-based payments, depreciation and amortisation, and amortisation of acquired intangibles) have decreased from £124.8m in the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024 to £89.2m. This is predominantly driven by lower payroll related costs on the basis we are comparing a 12 month period to a 16 month period.

2 The Group reports only one adjusted item: Individually Significant Items (which includes the £11.4m profit on disposal of Fox Crypto and £9.5m of fundamental re-organisation, strategic review of Escode and strategic review of the Cyber business costs). For further details, please refer to unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review, which include an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, along with a reconciliation to statutory information.

3 Management have allocated £6.8m of these costs to Escode which have been included within the administrative expenses above. To reconcile to Escode's statutory operating profit, these costs are reallocated to central and head office administrative expenses in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 5 on discontinued operations. This is due to the fact that if an operation is disposed of, the relevant central overheads may not decrease in the short term.

Financial review continued

Overview of financial performance continued Year ended 30 September 2025 compared to the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024 continued

A profit before taxation of £20.6m (inclusive of Escode) for the year was recognised after incurring £1.9m (credit) of Individually Significant Items (including the profit on disposal of Fox Crypto, fundamental re-organisation costs and the strategic review of both the Escode and Cyber businesses). This profit before taxation was driven in part by the £11.4m gain on disposal of Fox Crypto, following completion during the year. This gave rise to a basic EPS of 5.6p and diluted EPS of 5.5p (2024: basic and diluted (10.4p)). Adjusted basic EPS1 amounted to 4.7p and 4.6p (2024: basic and diluted 3.4p).

Net cash excluding lease liabilities1 amounts to £13.1m (2024: net debt excluding lease liabilities1 of £45.3m), reflecting the repayment of the Group's borrowings following the successful completion of the Fox Crypto disposal.

The Group's Balance Sheet remains strong following the successful refinancing completed in April 2025. At that time, the Group entered into a new four year, £120m multi-currency revolving credit facility (RCF) with a syndicate of four banks and including an uncommitted £50m accordion option. This new unsecured facility replaces the previous £162.5m RCF due to expire in December 2026.

Year ended 30 September 2025 compared to pro forma 12 months to 30 September 2024

The following table summarises the results for the year ended 30 September 2025 compared to the unaudited 12 month pro forma period ended 30 September 2024.

Year ended 30 September 2025 12 month pro forma period ended 30 September 2024
Cyber
Security
£m
Central
and
head
office
£m
Sub
total
£m
Crypto
and
DetACT
£m
Sub
total
£m
Discontinued
operations3:
Escode
£m
Group
£m
Cyber
Security
£m
Central
and
head
office
£m
Sub
total
£m
Crypto
and
DetACT
£m
Sub
total
£m
Discontinued
operations:
Escode
£m
Group
£m
Revenue
Cost of sales
227.4
(144.1)

227.4
(144.1)
11.5 238.9
(6.4) (150.5)
66.5 305.4
(19.0) (169.5)
239.2
(150.7)

239.2
(150.7)
24.0 263.2
(15.0) (165.7)
66.0 329.2
(20.6) (186.3)
Gross profit
Gross margin %
Administrative
83.3
36.6%
83.3
— 36.6% 44.3%
5.1 88.4
37.0%
47.5
71.4%
135.9
44.5%
88.5
37.0%

88.5
37.0%
9.0
37.5%
97.5
37.0%
45.4
68.8%
142.9
43.4%
expenses3
Share-based
(66.4) (4.4) (70.8) (2.0) (72.8) (16.4) (89.2) (69.9) (3.2) (73.1) (1.4) (74.5) (16.9) (91.4)
payments (0.2) (2.6) (2.8) (2.8) (0.2) (3.0) (0.1) (1.6) (1.7) (1.7) (0.1) (1.8)
Adjusted
EBITDA1,2
Depreciation
16.7 (7.0) 9.7 3.1 12.8 30.9 43.7 18.5 (4.8) 13.7 7.6 21.3 28.4 49.7
and amortisation
Amortisation of
acquired
(7.6) (3.1) (10.7) (0.2) (10.9) (1.0) (11.9) (8.5) (3.7) (12.2) (0.1) (12.3) (0.5) (12.8)
intangibles (0.9) (2.1) (3.0) (0.1) (3.1) (5.0) (8.1) (1.1) (3.0) (4.1) (4.1) (5.3) (9.4)
Adjusted
operating
profit/(loss)1,2
Individually
Significant Items
8.2
(3.9)
(12.2)
5.8
(4.0)
1.9
2.8
(1.2)
1.9
24.9
23.7
1.9
8.9
(38.9)
(11.5)
(2.6)
(38.9)
7.5
4.9
(38.9)
22.6
(0.1)
27.5
(39.0)
Operating
profit/(loss)
4.3 (6.4) (2.1) 2.8 0.7 24.9 25.6 (30.0) (11.5) (41.5) 7.5 (34.0) 22.5 (11.5)
Operating
margin %
1.9% N/A (0.9%) 24.3% 0.3% 37.4% 8.4% (12.5%) N/A (17.3%) 31.3% (12.9%) 34.1% (3.5%)
Finance costs (5.0) (6.3)
Profit/(loss)
before taxation
Taxation
20.6
(3.5)
(17.8)
(7.3)
Profit/(loss)
after taxation
17.1 (25.1)
EPS
Basic EPS
5.6p (8.1p)
Adjusted basic
EPS1,2
4.7p 5.2p
  • 1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted operating profit, Adjusted basic EPS, net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities and cash conversion are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.
  • 2 The Group reports only one adjusted item: Individually Significant Items (which includes the £11.4m profit on disposal of Fox Crypto and £9.5m of fundamental re-organisation, strategic review of Escode and strategic review of Cyber costs). For further details, please refer to unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review, which include an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, along with a reconciliation to statutory information.
  • 3 Management have allocated £6.8m of these costs to Escode which have been included within the administrative expenses above. To reconcile to Escode's statutory operating profit, these costs are reallocated to central and head office administrative expenses in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 5 on discontinued operations. This is due to the fact that if an operation is disposed of, the relevant central overheads may not decrease in the short term.

Total revenue has decreased by 6.2% on a constant currency basis (actual rates: (7.2%)), with Cyber Security revenue (excluding non-core disposals) decreasing by 4.0% on a constant currency basis (actual rates: (4.9%)) and Escode growing by 2.2% on a constant currency basis (actual rates: 0.8%). The Escode revenue increase has predominantly been driven by favourable price increases and volume during the year within verification services

Turning to Cyber Security revenue trajectory during the year, the UK and APAC declined by 0.6% at constant currency (actual rates: (0.8%)), and North America declined by 12.9% (actual rates: (15.4%)). These reductions have been driven primarily by declines in their respective TAS markets, as demand has recovered more slowly than expected year on year. Encouragingly, the UK and APAC improved by 5.5% at actual rates when comparing H2 2025 with H1 2025, driven primarily by improvements within the UK's C&I business.

Year on year we have experienced continued growth in our Managed Services performance by 2.8% at constant currency (actual rates: 2.6%) which has mainly been driven by our European MS business, with this growth continuing when comparing H2 2025 with H1 2025. Additionally, we have seen year-on-year growth in our C&I business of 16.6% at constant currency (actual rates: 14.9%) which has been driven by increased demand within our UK markets. Similarly to our MS business from a trajectory perspective we have seen continued growth within our UK C&I business when comparing H2 2025 to H1 2025.

Year-on-year gross profit has decreased by 4.9% to £135.9m; however, gross profit margin has favourably increased to 44.5% (reflecting an increase of 1.1% pts) mainly driven by an improvement in Escode of 2.6% pts (noting Cyber Security excluding non-core disposals has remained broadly flat at c.37%). Encouragingly, comparing H2 2025 with H1 2025 Cyber Security gross margin has increased by 2.0% pts to 38.0% reflecting the increased shift in mix towards the higher margin Managed Services business.

Administrative expenses (excluding share-based payments, depreciation and amortisation, and amortisation of acquired intangibles) have decreased by 2.4% from £91.4m to £89.2m, after taking into account inflationary wage increases. This movement was primarily driven by lower payroll costs (following the globalisation of certain back office functions to Manila) and savings in rent and rates during the year, offset by unfavourable exchange rate movements.

Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)

Throughout this Financial Review, certain APMs are presented. The APMs used by the Group are not defined terms under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable with similarly titled measures reported by other companies. They are not intended to be a substitute for, or superior to, IFRS measures. This presentation is also consistent with the way that financial performance is measured by management

and reported to the Board, and the basis of financial measures for senior management's compensation scheme, and provides supplementary information that assists the user in understanding the financial performance, position and trends of the Group.

We believe these APMs provide readers with important additional information on our business, and this information is relevant for use by investors, securities analysts and other interested parties as supplemental measures of future potential performance. However, since statutory measures can differ significantly from the APMs and may be assessed differently by the reader, we encourage you to consider these figures together with statutory reporting measures noted. Specifically, we would note that APMs may not be comparable across different companies and that certain profit related APMs may exclude recurring business transactions (e.g. acquisition related costs) that impact financial performance and cash flows.

As previously reported, the Group only discloses one adjusted item: "Individually Significant Items" (which includes the £11.4m profit on disposal of Fox Crypto and £9.5m of fundamental re-organisation, strategic review of Escode costs and strategic review of the Cyber business costs). As the £11.4m profit on disposal of Crypto represents a material gain, it has been disclosed separately on the face of the statutory income statement within the Group's consolidated Income Statement. The Group has the following APMs/non-statutory measures:

  • Adjusted EBITDA (reconciled below)
  • Adjusted operating profit (reconciled below)
  • Adjusted profit for the year (reconciled below)
  • Adjusted basic EPS (pence) (reconciled below)
  • Net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities (reconciled below)
  • Net cash/(debt) (reconciled below)
  • Cash conversion which includes Adjusted EBITDA (reconciled below)
  • Constant currency revenue (reconciled below)

The above APMs are consistent with those reported for the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024.

The Group reports certain geographic regions and service capabilities on a constant currency basis to reflect the underlying performance considering constant foreign exchange rates period on period. This involves translating comparative numbers to current period rates for comparability to enable a growth factor to be calculated. As these measures are not statutory revenue numbers, management considers these to be APMs; see unaudited Appendix 1 for further details.

The following tables reconciles how these changes have affected the historical measures of Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted operating profit, Adjusted profit for the period, Adjusted basic EPS and cash conversion, which includes Adjusted EBITDA:

Financial review continued

Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) continued Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted operating profit1

Adjusted EBITDA1 and Adjusted operating profit1,2 are reconciled to statutory measures below:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
Operating profit/(loss) from continuing operations 3 0.7 (47.8)
Operating profit from discontinuing operations 3 24.9 28.6
Operating profit/(loss) 25.6 (19.2)
Depreciation and amortisation 11.9 16.8
Amortisation of acquired intangibles 8.1 12.5
Individually Significant Items (1.9) 41.5
Adjusted EBITDA1,2 43.7 51.6
Depreciation, amortisation and amortisation charge on acquired intangibles (20.0) (29.3)
Adjusted operating profit1,2 23.7 22.3
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
%
change
Cyber Security (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 16.7 18.5 (9.7%)
Central and head office (7.0) (4.8) (45.8%)
Escode (discontinued operations) 30.9 28.4 8.8%
Total Adjusted EBITDA1,2 (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 40.6 42.1 (3.6%)
Crypto and DetACT 3.1 7.6 (59.2%)
Total Adjusted EBITDA1,2 43.7 49.7 (12.1%)

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted operating profit, Adjusted basic EPS, net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities and cash conversion are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

Revenue summary

Comparing the year ended 30 September 2025 with the prior 16 month period ended 30 September 2024, overall revenue is analysed as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Cyber Security revenue
Escode (discontinued operations)
238.9
66.5
342.1
87.4
(30.2%)
(23.9%)
238.9
66.5
338.0
86.1
(29.3%)
(22.8%)
Total revenue 305.4 429.5 (28.9%) 305.4 424.1 (28.0%)

Comparing year on year, overall revenue is analysed as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 227.4 239.2 (4.9%) 227.4 236.8 (4.0%)
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 24.0 (52.1%) 11.5 23.7 (51.5%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 238.9 263.2 (9.2%) 238.9 260.5 (8.3%)
Escode (discontinued operations) 66.5 66.0 0.8% 66.5 65.1 2.2%
Total revenue 305.4 329.2 (7.2%) 305.4 325.6 (6.2%)

2 The Group reports only one adjusted item: Individually Significant Items (includes the £11.4m profit on disposal of Fox Crypto and £9.5m of re-organisation, strategic review of Escode costs and strategic review of the Cyber business costs). For further details, please refer to unaudited Appendix 1 and the Financial Review, which includes an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, along with a reconciliation to statutory information.

3 During the year, Escode incurred £6.8m (2024: £9.6m) of allocated head office overheads, which have been included within Escode's administrative expenses. To reconcile to Escode's statutory operating profit, these costs are reallocated to central and head office administrative expenses in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 5 on discontinued operations.

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 227.4 239.2 (4.9%) 227.4 236.8 (4.0%)
Escode (discontinued operations) 66.5 66.0 0.8% 66.5 65.1 2.2%
Total revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 293.9 305.2 (3.7%) 293.9 301.9 (2.6%)
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 24.0 (52.1%) 11.5 23.7 (51.5%)
Total revenue 305.4 329.2 (7.2%) 305.4 325.6 (6.2%)

Comparing the two halves of the year against their respective prior period comparatives is as follows:

6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
31 March
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 112.0 120.8 (7.3%) 112.0 119.5 (6.3%)
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 13.1 (12.2%) 11.5 12.7 (9.4%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 123.5 133.9 (7.8%) 123.5 132.2 (6.6%)
Escode (discontinued operations) 33.3 32.9 1.2% 33.3 32.7 1.8%
Total revenue 156.8 166.8 (6.0%) 156.8 164.9 (4.9%)
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 115.4 118.4 (2.5%) 115.4 117.3 (1.6%)
Crypto and DetACT 10.9 (100.0%) 11.0 (100.0%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 115.4 129.3 (10.8%) 115.4 128.3 (10.1%)
Escode (discontinued operations) 33.2 33.1 0.3% 33.2 32.4 2.5%
Total revenue 148.6 162.4 (8.5%) 148.6 160.7 (7.5%)

From an overall revenue trajectory perspective by originating region, the following tables compare H2 2025 performance with H1 2025:

6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
% change
at actual rates
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 115.4 112.0 3.0%
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 (100.0%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 115.4 123.5 (6.6%)
Escode (discontinued operations) 33.2 33.3 (0.3%)
Total revenue 148.6 156.8 (5.2%)

1 Revenue at constant currency is an unaudited Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not an IFRS measure. See unaudited Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

Financial review continued

Gross profit summary

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2025
% margin
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
% margin
% pts
change
Cyber Security gross profit (excluding Crypto and DetACT)
Escode (discontinued operations)
83.3
47.5
36.6%
71.4%
88.5
45.4
37.0%
68.8%
(0.4%)
2.6%
Total gross profit (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 130.8 44.5% 133.9 43.9% 0.6%
Crypto and DetACT 5.1 44.3% 9.0 37.5% 6.8%
Total gross profit and % margin 135.9 44.5% 142.9 43.4% 1.1%

Divisional performance

The following sections summarise the Group's divisional performance for the year ended 30 September 2025, following the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024. It also compares the results for the year ended 30 September 2025 with the unaudited 12 months to 30 September 2024, including an analysis of each year's composition by reviewing the first and second halves and their respective comparative periods (unaudited).

Cyber Security

The Cyber Security division accounts for 78.2% of Group revenue (16 month period ended 30 September 2024: 79.7%) and 65.0% of Group gross profit (16 month period ended 30 September 2024: 66.0%).

Cyber Security revenue analysis – by originating region:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
UK and APAC 134.4 173.3 (22.4%) 134.4 172.8 (22.2%)
North America 56.7 90.7 (37.5%) 56.7 88.0 (35.6%)
Europe 47.8 78.1 (38.8%) 47.8 77.2 (38.1%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 238.9 342.1 (30.2%) 238.9 338.0 (29.3%)

Cyber Security revenue, analysed year on year by originating region, is as follows:

Total Cyber Security revenue 238.9 263.2 (9.2%) 238.9 260.5 (8.3%)
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 227.4 239.2 (4.9%) 227.4 236.8 (4.0%)
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 24.0 (52.1%) 11.5 23.7 (51.5%)
UK and APAC 134.4 135.5 (0.8%) 134.4 135.2 (0.6%)
North America 56.7 67.0 (15.4%) 56.7 65.1 (12.9%)
Europe (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 36.3 36.7 (1.1%) 36.3 36.5 (0.5%)
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1

Comparing the two halves of the year against their respective prior period comparatives, Cyber Security revenue by originating region is analysed as follows:

6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
31 March 2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
UK and APAC 65.4 69.1 (5.4%) 65.4 69.0 (5.2%)
North America 28.6 33.4 (14.4%) 28.6 32.9 (13.1%)
Europe (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 18.0 18.3 (1.6%) 18.0 17.6 2.3%
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 112.0 120.8 (7.3%) 112.0 119.5 (6.3%)
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 13.1 (12.2%) 11.5 12.7 (9.4%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 123.5 133.9 (7.8%) 123.5 132.2 (6.6%)
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
UK and APAC 69.0 66.4 3.9% 69.0 66.2 4.2%
North America 28.1 33.6 (16.4%) 28.1 32.2 (12.7%)
Europe (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 18.3 18.4 (0.5%) 18.3 18.9 (3.2%)
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 115.4 118.4 (2.5%) 115.4 117.3 (1.6%)
Crypto and DetACT 10.9 (100.0%) 11.0 (100.0%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 115.4 129.3 (10.8%) 115.4 128.3 (10.1%)

From a Cyber Security revenue trajectory perspective by originating region, the following tables compare H2 2025 performance with H1 2025:

6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March 2025
£m
% change
at actual rates
UK and APAC 69.0 65.4 5.5%
North America 28.1 28.6 (1.7%)
Europe (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 18.3 18.0 1.7%
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 115.4 112.0 3.0%
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 (100.0%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 115.4 123.5 (6.6%)

Cyber Security revenue analysis – by type of service and capability:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency
1
Technical Assurance Services (TAS) 88.4 141.4 (37.5%) 88.4 138.9 (36.4%)
Consulting and Implementation (C&I) 48.5 55.2 (12.1%) 48.5 54.6 (11.2%)
Managed Services (MS) 76.4 91.8 (16.8%) 76.4 91.2 (16.2%)
Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) 13.1 20.6 (36.4%) 13.1 20.4 (35.8%)
Other services 12.5 33.1 (62.2%) 12.5 32.6 (61.7%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 238.9 342.1 (30.2%) 238.9 333.7 (28.4%)

Cyber Security revenue, analysed year on year by service and capability, is as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Technical Assurance Services (TAS) 88.4 105.6 (16.3%) 88.4 104.0 (15.0%)
Consulting and Implementation (C&I) 48.5 42.2 14.9% 48.5 41.6 16.6%
Managed Services (MS) 76.4 74.5 2.6% 76.4 74.3 2.8%
Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) 13.1 15.1 (13.2%) 13.1 15.0 (12.7%)
Other services 1.0 1.8 (44.4%) 1.0 1.9 (47.4%)
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 227.4 239.2 (4.9%) 227.4 236.8 (4.0%)
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 24.0 (52.1%) 11.5 23.7 (51.5%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 238.9 263.2 (9.2%) 238.9 260.5 (8.3%)

Financial review continued

Divisional performance continued

Cyber Security continued

Comparing the two halves of the year against their respective prior period comparatives, Cyber Security revenue by service and capability is analysed as follows:

6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
31 March 2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Technical Assurance Services (TAS) 45.6 52.9 (13.8%) 45.6 52.2 (12.6%)
Consulting and Implementation (C&I) 21.9 22.7 (3.5%) 21.9 22.5 (2.7%)
Managed Services (MS) 37.7 36.9 2.2% 37.7 36.6 3.0%
Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) 6.3 7.7 (18.2%) 6.3 7.6 (17.1%)
Other services 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 (16.7%)
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT)
Crypto and DetACT
112.0
11.5
120.7
13.2
(7.2%)
(12.9%)
112.0
11.5
119.5
12.7
(6.3%)
(9.4%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 123.5 133.9 (7.8%) 123.5 132.2 (6.6%)
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Technical Assurance Services (TAS) 42.8 52.8 (18.9%) 42.8 51.8 (17.4%)
Consulting and Implementation (C&I) 26.6 19.5 36.4% 26.6 19.1 39.3%
Managed Services (MS) 38.7 37.5 3.2% 38.7 37.7 2.7%
Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) 6.8 7.4 (8.1%) 6.8 7.4 (8.1%)
Other services 0.5 1.4 (64.3%) 0.5 1.3 (61.5%)
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT)
Crypto and DetACT
115.4
118.6
10.7
(2.7%)
(100.0%)
115.4
117.3
11.0
(1.6%)
(100.0%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 115.4 129.3 (10.8%) 115.4 128.3 (10.1%)

From a Cyber Security revenue trajectory perspective by service and capability, the following tables compare H2 2025 performance with H1 2025:

6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
% change
at actual
rates
Technical Assurance Services (TAS) 42.8 45.6 (6.1%)
Consulting and Implementation (C&I) 26.6 21.9 21.5%
Managed Services (MS) 38.7 37.7 2.7%
Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) 6.8 6.3 7.9%
Other services 0.5 0.5
Cyber Security revenue (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 115.4 112.0 3.0%
Crypto and DetACT 11.5 (100.0%)
Total Cyber Security revenue 115.4 123.5 (6.6%)

1 Revenue at constant currency is an unaudited Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not an IFRS measure. See unaudited Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->

Cyber Security gross profit is analysed as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2025
% margin
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
% margin
% pts
change
UK and APAC 54.2 40.3% 72.5 41.8% (1.5%)
North America 16.1 28.4% 18.4 20.3% 8.1%
Europe 18.1 37.9% 27.1 34.7% 3.2%
Cyber Security gross profit and % margin 88.4 37.0% 118.0 34.5% 2.5%

Cyber Security gross margins increased overall by +2.5 percentage points, driven by improvements in North American and European margins, which

Cyber Security gross profit and % margin 43.9 38.0% 44.5 36.0% 2.0%
Crypto and DetACT 5.1 44.3% (44.3%)
Cyber Security (excluding Crypto and DetACT) 43.9 38.0% 39.4 35.2% 2.8%
North America
Europe
9.7
6.6
34.5%
36.1%
6.4
6.4
22.4%
35.6%
12.1%
0.5%
UK and APAC 27.6 40.0% 26.6 40.7% (0.7%)
30 September
2025
£m
30 September
2025
% margin
31 March
2025
£m
31 March
2025
% margin
% pts
change
6 month
period ended
6 month
period ended
6 month
period ended
6 month
period ended
Cyber Security gross profit and % margin 43.9 38.0% 48.5 37.5% 0.5%
Cyber Security gross profit (excluding Crypto and DetACT)
Crypto and DetACT
43.9
38.0%
43.3
5.2
36.6%
47.7%
1.4%
(47.7%)
Europe 6.6 36.1% 6.0 32.6% 3.5%
UK and APAC
North America
27.6
9.7
40.0%
34.5%
29.9
7.4
45.0%
22.0%
(5.0%)
12.5%
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
% margin
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
% margin
% pts
change
Cyber Security gross profit and % margin 44.5 36.0% 49.0 36.6% (0.6%)
Cyber Security gross profit (excluding Crypto and DetACT)
Crypto and DetACT
39.4
5.1
35.2%
44.3%
45.2
3.8
37.4%
29.0%
(2.2%)
15.3%
UK and APAC
North America
Europe
26.6
6.4
6.4
40.7%
22.4%
35.6%
31.4
7.4
6.4
45.4%
22.2%
35.0%
(4.7%)
0.2%
0.6%
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
% margin
6 month
period ended
31 March
2024
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March 2024
% margin
% pts
change
Cyber Security gross profit and % margin 88.4 37.0% 97.5 37.0%
Cyber Security gross profit (excluding Crypto and DetACT)
Crypto and DetACT
83.3
5.1
36.6%
44.3%
88.5
9.0
37.0%
37.5%
(0.4%)
6.8%
Europe 13.0 35.8% 12.4 33.8% 2.0%
UK and APAC
North America
54.2
16.1
40.3%
28.4%
61.3
14.8
45.2%
22.1%
(4.9%)
6.3%
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2025
% margin
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
% margin
% pts
change

Financial review continued

Divisional performance continued

Escode (discontinued operations)

During the year, the Escode division accounted for 21.8% of Group revenue (16 month period ended 30 September 2024: 20.3%) and 35.0% of Group gross profit (16 month period ended 30 September 2024: 34.0%).

Escode revenue analysis – by originating region:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period
ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
%
change at
constant
currency
UK 29.4 36.5 (19.5%) 29.4 36.5 (19.5%)
North America 32.9 45.5 (27.7%) 32.9 44.3 (25.7%)
Europe 4.2 5.4 (22.2%) 4.2 5.3 (20.8%)
Total Escode revenue 66.5 87.4 (23.9%) 66.5 86.1 (22.8%)

Escode revenue, analysed year on year by originating region, is as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
Year ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
UK
North America
Europe
29.4
32.9
4.2
28.0
33.9
4.1
5.0%
(2.9%)
2.4%
29.4
32.9
4.2
28.0
33.1
4.0
5.0%
(0.6%)
5.0%
Total Escode revenue 66.5 66.0 0.8% 66.5 65.1 2.2%

Escode revenue has increased by 2.2% at constant currency (0.8% at actual rates), which has predominantly been driven by favourable price increases and volume during the year within verification services

Escode has seen consistent growth for the same reasons when comparing each half of the year, as reflected in the tables below. The following analysis compares the two halves of the year against their respective prior period comparatives, showing Escode revenue by originating region:

6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
UK 14.5 14.0 3.6% 14.5 13.9 4.3%
North America 16.5 17.1 (3.5%) 16.5 16.5
Europe 2.2 2.0 10.0% 2.2 2.0 10.0%
Total Escode revenue 33.2 33.1 0.3% 33.2 32.4 2.5%

From an Escode revenue trajectory perspective by originating region, the following tables compare H2 2025 performance with H1 2025:

6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
31 March 2025
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
UK 14.5 14.9 (2.7%) 14.5 14.9 (2.7%)
North America 16.5 16.4 0.6% 16.5 15.5 6.5%
Europe 2.2 2.0 10.0% 2.2 2.1 4.8%
Total Escode revenue 33.2 33.3 (0.3%) 33.2 32.5 2.2%

Escode revenues analysed by service line:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Escrow contracts
Verification services
43.0
23.5
57.2
30.2
(24.8%)
(22.2%)
43.0
23.5
56.5
29.6
(23.9%)
(20.6%)
Total Escode revenue 66.5 87.4 (23.9%) 66.5 86.1 (22.8%)

Escode revenue, analysed year on year by service line, is as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Escrow contracts
Verification services
43.0
23.5
43.0
23.0

2.2%
43.0
23.5
42.5
22.6
1.2%
4.0%
Total Escode revenue 66.5 66.0 0.8% 66.5 65.1 2.2%

Comparing the two halves of the year against their respective prior period comparatives, Escode revenue by service line is analysed as follows:

6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
31 March 2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Escrow contracts
Verification services
22.0
11.3
22.0
10.9

3.7%
22.0
11.3
21.8
10.9
0.9%
3.7%
Total Escode revenue 33.3 32.9 1.2% 33.3 32.7 1.8%
Constant
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Escrow contracts
Verification services
21.0
12.2
21.0
12.1

0.8%
21.0
12.2
20.7
11.7
1.4%
4.3%
Total Escode revenue 33.2 33.1 0.3% 33.2 32.4 2.5%

From an Escode service line revenue trajectory perspective the following tables compare H2 2025 against H1 2025 performance:

Financial review continued

Divisional performance continued Escode (discontinued operations) continued

6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
% change
at actual rates
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
Constant
currency1
6 month
period ended
31 March 2025
£m
% change at
constant
currency1
Escrow contracts
Verification services
21.0
12.2
22.0
11.3
(4.5%)
8.0%
21.0
12.2
21.4
11.1
(1.9%)
9.9%
Total Escode revenue 33.2 33.3 (0.3%) 33.2 32.5 2.2%

1 Revenue at constant currency is an unaudited Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not an IFRS measure. See unaudited Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

Escode gross margin, by originating region, is analysed as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2025
% margin
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
% margin
% pts
change
UK 20.6 70.1% 24.8 67.9% 2.2%
North America 23.9 72.6% 32.6 71.6% 1.0%
Europe 3.0 71.4% 3.3 61.1% 10.3%
Escode gross profit and % margin 47.5 71.4% 60.7 69.5% 1.9%

Escode gross margin, analysed year on year by originating region, is as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2025
% margin
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
12 month
period ended
30 September
2024
% margin
% pts
change
UK 20.6 70.1% 19.0 67.9% 2.2%
North America 23.9 72.6% 24.1 71.1% 1.5%
Europe 3.0 71.4% 2.3 56.1% 15.3%
Escode gross profit and % margin 47.5 71.4% 45.4 68.8% 2.6%

Escode gross margin has increased by +2.6% pts, with UK and North America increasing by +2.2% pts and +1.5% pts respectively and Europe increasing by +15.3%. This is due to the continued benefits arising from previous investments enabling Escode to achieve sustainable revenue growth and gross margin improvements. The improvement in gross margin was driven primarily by favourable price increases and operating efficiencies.

Comparing the two halves of the year against their respective prior period comparatives, Escode gross profit by originating region is analysed as follows:

6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2025
% margin
6 month
period ended
31 March
2024
£m
6 month
period ended
31 March
2024
% margin
% pts
change
UK
North America
Europe
10.2
11.7
1.4
68.5%
71.3%
70.0%
9.5
11.7
1.2
67.9%
69.6%
57.1%
0.6%
1.7%
12.9%
Escode gross profit and % margin 23.3 70.0% 22.4 68.1% 1.9%
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2025
% margin
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
6 month
period ended
30 September
2024
% margin
% pts
change
UK
North America
Europe
10.4
12.2
1.6
71.7%
73.9%
72.7%
9.5
12.4
1.1
67.9%
72.5%
55.0%
3.8%
1.4%
17.7%

When comparing H2 2025 performance to H1 2025, the following table summarises the gross margin trajectory:

6 month 6 month 6 month 6 month
period ended period ended period ended period ended
30 September 30 September 31 March 31 March
2025 2025 2025 2025 % pts
£m % margin £m % margin change
UK 10.4 71.7% 10.2 68.5% 3.2%
North America 12.2 73.9% 11.7 71.3% 2.6%
Europe 1.6 72.7% 1.4 70.0% 2.7%
Escode gross profit and % margin 24.2 72.9% 23.3 70.0% 2.9%

Overall Escode gross margin has increased by 2.9% in H2 2025 compared to H1 2025. This is predominantly driven by an improvement in UK and North America Escode which have increased by 3.2% and 2.6% respectively. These improvements continue to reflect an increased shift towards a more global operating model for Escode, following the change in sales team structure during the year.

Individually Significant Items

During the year, the Group has incurred a £1.9m credit in Individually Significant Items (ISIs) (2024: £41.5m) as follows:

2025
£m
2024
£m
Fundamental re-organisation costs 3.9 9.4
Costs associated with strategic review of
Escode business 3.8 0.1
Costs associated with strategic review of
Cyber business 1.8
Profit on disposal of DetACT/DDI (1.5)
North America Cyber Security
goodwill impairment 31.9
Transaction costs of Fox Crypto 1.6
Total ISIs (excluding profit on disposal
of Fox Crypto) 9.5 41.5
Profit on disposal of Fox Crypto (11.4)
Total ISIs (1.9) 41.5

The £11.4m gain on disposal of Fox Crypto recognised in the year ended 30 September 2025 is calculated as cash consideration of £65.6m, less net assets disposed of £52.3m, and less £2.0m of transaction costs incurred during the year. The difference between the £11.4m gain recorded in the year and the £9.8m overall gain (see Note 31) reflects £1.5m of transaction costs incurred in the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024, which are not included in the current year. In addition, £0.1m of TSA income has been accrued during the year. As this represents a material gain on disposal, it has been separately disclosed on the face of the Groups statutory consolidated Income Statement.

ISIs also include £3.9m (2024: £9.4m) of fundamental re-organisation costs as we continue to reshape the Group in line with its strategy, with the current intention to complete the final phase by December 2025. However, this will continue to be monitored as the transformation strategy progresses as we ensure the operating model is market aligned, and delivery is focused to support the underlying Cyber Security business strategy.

£3.8m (2024: £0.1m) of professional fees in relation to the ongoing strategic review of Escode have also been incurred during the year.

Regarding the strategic review of Cyber (the "Cyber Review"), professional fees of £1.8m (2024: £nil) have been incurred during the year.

Finance costs

The Group's finance costs (including discontinued operations of £0.1m) for the year ended 30 September 2025 were £5.0m (2024: £8.3m). This annualised reduction in finance costs resulted from the Group's repayment of external borrowings part way through the year, following the receipt of gross cash proceeds of £65.6m from the completion of the Fox Crypto disposal in March 2025.

Finance costs include lease financing costs of £1.1m (2024: £1.7m), with a reduction due to the Group's property rationalisation.

FY26 finance costs are expected to amount to c£1.8m, following the Group's expected net cash position.

Taxation

The Group's effective statutory tax rate is 17.0% (2024: 18.2%), with the Group's adjusted tax rate is 22.5% (2024: 24.3%).

Earnings/(loss) per share (EPS)

Year ended
30 September
2025
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
Statutory
Statutory profit/(loss) for the year/period
from continuing operations 17.1 (32.5)
Basic earnings/(loss) per share 5.6p (10.4p)
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share 5.5p (10.4p)
Adjusted1
Adjusted profit for the year/period 14.5 10.6
Basic EPS 4.7p 3.4p
Diluted EPS 4.6p 3.4p
Weighted average number of
shares (million)
Basic 307.1 311.7
Diluted 312.3 313.2

1 See Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the composition of how the Group's statutory profit/(loss) for the year/period is comprised between continuing operations and discontinued operations.

Financial review continued

Earnings/(loss) per share (EPS) continued

Adjusted basic EPS1 is reconciled as follows:

Year ended
30 September
2025
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
Statutory profit/(loss) for the year/period 17.1 (32.5)
Individually Significant Items (Note 4) 2 9.5 39.9
(Profit on disposal)/transaction costs of Fox Crypto (Note 4) 2 (11.4) 1.6
Tax effect of Individually Significant Items (0.7) (5.8)
North America deferred tax asset derecognition (adjusting item) 7.4
Adjusted profit for the year/period 14.5 10.6

Reconciliation of net debt1

The table below summarises the Group's cash flow and net debt1 (including discontinued operations):

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended 30
September
2024
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
Operating cash inflow before movements in working capital 38.7 50.6 48.5
Movement in working capital and non-payables 1.2 (2.6) (10.1)
Cash generated from operating activities before interest and taxation 39.9 48.0 38.4
Interest element of lease payments (1.1) (1.6) (1.7)
Finance interest paid (3.3) (5.9) (6.0)
Taxation paid (2.0) (2.1) (4.3)
Net cash generated from operating activities 33.5 38.4 26.4
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (4.7) (4.3) (6.2)
Software and development expenditure (0.4) (1.3) (2.6)
Acquisition of trade and assets as part of a business combination (1.0)
Sale proceeds from business disposals 61.4 10.4 12.4
Equity dividends paid (19.0) (14.5) (14.5)
Repayment of lease liabilities (principal amount) (6.8) (7.9) (10.2)
Acquisition of treasury shares (5.8) (5.8) (5.8)
Proceeds from the issue of ordinary share capital 0.3 0.3 0.3
Net movement 58.5 15.3 (1.2)
Opening net debt (excluding lease liabilities)1 (45.3) (67.5) (49.6)
Non-cash movements (release of deferred issue costs) (0.5) (0.5) (0.6)
Foreign exchange movement 0.4 7.4 6.1
Closing net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities1 13.1 (45.3) (45.3)
Lease liabilities (19.5) (27.6) (27.6)
Closing net debt1 (6.4) (72.9) (72.9)

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted operating profit, Adjusted basic EPS, net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities and cash conversion are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

2 The Group reports only one adjusted item: Individually Significant Items (which includes the £11.4m profit on disposal of Fox Crypto and £9.5m of fundamental re-organisation, strategic review of Escode and strategic review of Cyber costs). For further details, please refer to unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review, which includes an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, along with a reconciliation to statutory information. The gain on disposal of Fox Crypto was non-taxable.

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
Cash and cash equivalents 16.4 29.8
Bank overdraft (13.6)
Borrowings (net of deferred issue costs) – continuing operations (3.3) (61.5)
Net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities1 13.1 (45.3)
Lease liabilities (19.5) (27.6)
Net debt1 (6.4) (72.9)

Net cash/(debt), excluding lease liabilities, for discontinued and continuing operations is presented below:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
Net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities1
– continuing operations
Net cash excluding lease liabilities1
– discontinuing operations
9.2
3.9
(47.3)
2.0
Net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities1 13.1 (45.3)

Net debt1 can be reconciled as follows:

Reconciliation of net change in cash and cash equivalents to movement in net debt1

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (inc. bank overdraft) (1.0) (18.4)
Change in net debt1
resulting from cash flows (net of deferred issue costs)
59.2 17.2
Release of deferred issue costs (0.5) (0.6)
Issue costs related to borrowings (non-cash) 0.3
Effect of foreign currency on cash flows 1.2 2.3
Foreign currency translation differences on borrowings (0.8) 3.8
Change in net debt1
during the year/period
Net debt1
at start of period excluding lease liabilities
58.4
(45.3)
4.3
(49.6)
Net cash/(debt)1
at end of period excluding lease liabilities
Lease liabilities
13.1
(19.5)
(45.3)
(27.6)
Net debt1
at end of year/period
(6.4) (72.9)

1 Net cash/(debt) and Net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

The reduction in net debt is predominantly driven by the completion of the Fox Crypto disposal in March 2025, where the Group received sale proceeds (net of cash disposed of) of £61.4m. This amount has been utilised to reduce the Group's borrowings during the year.

Financial review continued

Reconciliation of net debt1 continued

The calculation of the cash conversion ratio1 is set out below:

Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
Year ended
30 September
2024
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
Operating cash flow before interest and taxation
Adjusted EBITDA1,2
39.9
43.7
48.0
49.7
38.4
51.6
Cash conversion ratio1,2 (%) 91.3% 96.6% 74.4%

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted operating profit, Adjusted basic EPS, net cash/(debt) excluding lease liabilities and cash conversion are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

Cash conversion has improved by 16.9% pts to 91.3% as at 30 September 2025 (when compared to the previous audited period), primarily driven by stronger performance in the second half of the year and favourable movements in the Group's working capital, reflecting improved collectability. For reference, cash conversion was 62.3% in H1 2025 and 119.4% in H2 2025.

Cash capital expenditure during the period was £5.1m (2024: £8.8m), which includes tangible asset expenditure of £4.7m (2024: £6.2m) and capitalised software and development costs of £0.4m (2024: £2.6m). Following the opening of our new Fox-IT office in October 2025, the Group incurred £1.6m of tangible capital expenditure during the year to fit out the premises and make the office operational.

During the year, the Company acquired treasury shares (4,000,000 ordinary shares) for £5.8m, this follows shares (4,000,000 ordinary shares) purchased in the prior period 2024 for £5.8m. The shares are held in the EBT, which is a discretionary trust for the benefit of the Group's colleagues. The shares will be used to satisfy the future vesting requirements of share plans the Company operates under the Long Term Incentive Plan, the Restricted Share Plan and other discretionary share plans. Following this purchase, and as at 30 September 2025, the EBT holds a total of 8,485,195 ordinary shares (2024: 5,158,090), equating to 2.69% of the Company's issued share capital.

As announced on 21 October 2025, the Board will commence an initial share buy-back programme in December 2025/January 2026. This will be carried out under our existing shareholder authority and in line with our capital allocation policy, as well as all relevant legal and regulatory requirements. Our current dividend policy will remain unchanged by the share buy-back programme.

Dividends

During the year, total dividends of £9.2m were recognised and paid (2024: £14.5m). In addition, the interim dividend of £9.8m for the period ended 30 September 2024 (3.15p per share) was recognised in the prior period and paid during the year on 1 October 2024.

The Board is proposing a final dividend of 3.15p per ordinary share for the year ended 30 September 2025, as it remains mindful of the continued need to invest in the Group's strategy, marking 20 consecutive years of dividend payments for shareholders.

The final dividend of 3.15p per ordinary share, which, together with the interim dividends of 1.50p and 1.50p per ordinary share paid on 4 April 2025 and 1 August 2025 respectively, makes a total dividend of 6.15p for the year ended 30 September 2025.

The final dividend will be paid on 10 April 2026, subject to approval at the AGM on 3 March 2026, to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 13 March 2026. The ex-dividend date is 12 March 2026. The dividend has not been included as a liability as at 30 September 2025. The payment of this dividend will not have any tax consequences for the Group.

2 The Group reports only one adjusted item: Individually Significant Items (which includes the £11.4m profit on disposal of Fox Crypto and £9.5m of fundamental re-organisation, strategic review of Escode and strategic review of Cyber costs). For further details, please refer to unaudited Appendix 1 and this Financial Review, which includes an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, along with a reconciliation to statutory information.

Our FY26 framework

Looking forward to FY26, we will measure ourselves against the following goals:

Sustainable revenue growth

  • Deliver underlying growth in Cyber Security
  • Deliver return on sales investment in Cyber Security
  • Drive C&I and MS as a proportion of revenue
  • Maintain momentum in Escode

Improved gross margin

  • Increase Cyber utilisation from 70% to 75%
  • Data driven pricing and margin investment decision making
  • Drive enhanced benefits from globalised technical resource footprint

Efficiency for growth

  • Simplify operating model in Cyber and Escode to generate efficiencies
  • Drive consistent profit conversion in every market

Capital deployment supporting growth

  • Strong cash conversion
  • Sustain appropriate liquidity and debt facilities
  • Execute share buy-back programme
  • Dividend policy

Guy Ellis

Chief Financial Officer

11 December 2025

Chair's introduction to governance

Chris Stone Non-Executive Chair

Dear Shareholder

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the Corporate Governance Report for the year ended 30 September 2025. Throughout the year the Board has worked cohesively as a team and I would like to thank each Director for their wise counsel and continued efforts during this time. The Board is composed of highly skilled and experienced Directors from a diverse range of industries and backgrounds, all of whom contribute towards the long-term success of the Company and show commitment and enthusiasm in the performance of their roles and duties.

I would like to thank all of my Board colleagues for their commitment, support and flexibility over the past year. We now meet as a Board predominantly face to face, but we still use virtual meetings for shorter update meetings or when we need to meet at short notice. This continued hybrid way of working has enabled us to maintain strong governance and robust decision making, delivering against our strategy. We had the opportunity during the year to hold a number of Board dinners either the night before or following Board meetings. This informal time together as a Board, which often has other colleagues from across the business in attendance, allows us to talk matters through and also fosters a culture of team and togetherness away from the more formal setting of the boardroom.

The Board is committed to creating and maintaining a culture where strong levels of governance thrive throughout the organisation, specifically ensuring that we send out consistent messages on our values and principles for our colleagues, our customers, our suppliers and our advisers.

Governance standards

The Board is committed to high standards of corporate governance and is pleased to confirm that throughout the year ended 30 September 2025, the Company complied with all relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code other than the fact that we have not undertaken a formal Board and Committee evaluation (the reasons why are set out below). A key focus of the Code is culture and ensuring it aligns with the Group's purpose, strategy and values. Culture has been high on the Board's agenda for a long time and the Board considers culture to be an essential ingredient in meeting our long-term, sustainable returns to all stakeholders.

The Board, the Executive Committee and senior management continue to promote our culture and standards throughout the business and lead by example to provide a strong corporate governance framework.

One of the most significant parts of the Code affecting NCC Group is in respect of workforce engagement. Our main stakeholder is our colleagues and we continue to maintain meaningful mechanisms to ensure that we, as a Board, have constructive and regular dialogue with our dedicated and committed workforce. This then puts us in a strong position to deliver our strategy.

During the year, Julie Chakraverty, Senior Independent Director and designated Non-Executive Director for workforce engagement, has been continuing to reach out to colleagues across the business. As a people business, insights from our colleagues are invaluable; therefore, colleague engagement is a crucial area for us to continue to focus on and continue to get right. We have not let distance or differing time zones be a barrier to hearing our colleagues' opinions around the Board table.

Our approach

The Directors have acted in a way they consider, in good faith, to be most likely to promote the long-term success of the Company. Our role as the Board is to set the strategy of the Group and ensure that management operates the business in accordance with our priorities. We believe this approach will promote the Group's long-term success and our customers' interests as well as creating value for shareholders and having regard to our other key stakeholders such as our colleagues.

The Board's intention is to hand over the business to our successors in a better and more sustainable position for the future. We recognise the continued focus on the contribution that a successful company can make to wider society in general, in addition to generating value for shareholders, and as a Board we want to ensure that we have effective engagement with, and encourage participation from, shareholders and other stakeholders. The Board acknowledges that there are competing priorities for different stakeholders but strives to balance the priorities, while ensuring decisions made are in the best interests of the Company.

Board composition and diversity

The biographies of all the Board members can be found on pages 62 and 63. There have been no changes to the Board during the year. With regard to our current diversity, I am satisfied that we have an appropriately diverse Board in terms of experience, skills and personal attributes among our Board members. The Directors have many years of experience gained across a variety of industries and sectors, ensuring a mix of views and providing a broad perspective.

We recognise that we still have some progress to make in terms of improving the diversity of the Board and our executive team (and indeed our workforce as a whole). During the year ended 31 May 2021, we made the firm commitment that by 2024, we will have at least 33% female representation on our Board and at least one person of colour.

We have now delivered on our commitment and are also on course to meet the FTSE Women Leaders Review and Listing Rules target of 40% female representation by the end of 2025. Although this is best practice for FTSE 350 companies, we have committed to this target regardless of which share index we are in. Our Board now has 43% female representation (three out of seven) and we will look to improve this further still during any future appointments to the Board.

Improvements in diversity are often not a quick process but we are very mindful of the need to take positive action, and the matter continues to remain high on our agenda, as can be seen with the progress we have made over recent years. Accessing the candidates we require to reach this target will involve us looking beyond the obvious pool of existing board directors within the UK and we intend to ensure that we extend our talent search to other sectors and countries enabling us to find a diverse pool of candidates from which to choose to provide us with true diversity around our Board table.

To confirm, as at 30 September 2025, we complied with the following:

  • At least 40% of the individuals on our Board of Directors are women.
  • At least one of the senior positions on our Board of Directors is held by a woman (our Senior Independent Director).
  • At least one individual on our Board of Directors is from a minority ethnic background.

Effectiveness

As Chair, I am responsible for providing leadership to ensure that the Board operates effectively. I have been supported in this by all the Directors, but in particular our Senior Independent Director (Julie Chakraverty).

The annual reviews of Board effectiveness help the Board to consider how it operates and how its operations can be improved. This year, we have not undertaken a formal review of the Board and its Committees. Building on our inaugural externally facilitated Board evaluation in 2023, we undertook a comprehensive internally facilitated Board and Committee evaluation in 2024, where we took significant time to discuss the output and agree actions in January 2025. We felt that we wanted further time to embed the actions from previous evaluations into how we operate and work together as a Board and felt that pausing the formal review process for a year was a sensible course of action. In addition, a significant amount of Board time and focus was taken up by a number of strategic considerations, as well as being in an "offer period" since mid-July 2025. We concluded that undertaking a Board and Committee evaluation process at this time would not be appropriate, given the significant level of activity currently underway. In reaching this decision, the Board considered the importance of maintaining focus on critical strategic and operational priorities during a period of heightened activity. While evaluations are an integral component of good governance and support continuous improvement, the timing of such a process must ensure that it adds value rather than creating unnecessary burden or distraction. The Board remains committed to undertaking a comprehensive evaluation when circumstances allow, in line with best practice. Our intention is for our next review to be externally facilitated and we will look to undertake this during 2026. As a reminder, Board succession planning remains a priority, particularly as we look to ensure the Board and Executive Committee have the right set of skills and experience to support the Group as the business evolves.

Chair's introduction to governance continued

Board tenure as at 30 September 2025

Chris Stone
8 years 6 months
Mike Maddison
3 years 3 months
Guy Ellis
2 years 3 months
Julie Chakraverty
3 years 9 months
Jennifer Duvalier
7 years 5 months
Mike Ettling
8 years 0 months
Lynn Fordham
3 years 1 month
30 September:
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Our investors

We are in regular contact with our large investors through a scheduled programme of meetings attended by our CEO, CFO and Chair. Julie Chakraverty (Senior Independent Director), Lynn Fordham (Audit Committee Chair) and Jennifer Duvalier (Remuneration Committee Chair) are also available to meet with investors should the need arise. In May 2025, we hosted an immersive experience to help our shareholders and analysts, along with other industry professionals from insurance brokers and financial services, to understand how we would help clients respond to cyber incidents. Particular highlights during the year were NCC Group winning the IR Society award for "Best IR Programme 2024 (Small Cap)", and also being shortlisted for the IR Society award for "Best Communication of Sustainability 2024 (Small Cap)".

I continue to meet with our larger investors and report my findings to Board colleagues. Investor engagement has remained a priority throughout the year and has been conducted in full compliance with Offer Period regulations. In addition, our brokers have undertaken investor surveys following the half-year results, and the findings were presented and discussed at a Board meeting. Our objective is to maintain open, transparent, and meaningful dialogue with our shareholders.

Ensuring that the Directors' remuneration packages align the Directors' and senior managers' interests with the long-term interests of NCC Group and its shareholders is always a key area of interest for investors. The 2024 Directors' Remuneration Policy received 89.61% of votes in favour at the 2025 AGM, and it was pleasing that our 2024 Directors' Remuneration Report received 80.33% of votes in favour, recognising the continued appreciated support of our shareholders for our approach to executive remuneration.

Statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code

The Company measures itself against the requirements of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the "Code"), which is available on the Financial Reporting Council website (www.frc.org.uk).

I can confirm that the Board has applied the principles and complied with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 throughout the year to 30 September 2025 other than the fact that we have not undertaken a formal Board and Committee evaluation for the reasons explained earlier.

Thank you

We are immensely proud of our colleagues for their continuing extraordinary efforts, always acting in the best interests of our customers and our stakeholders. I would like to thank all our colleagues for their incredible contribution in stepping up and meeting the challenges that the Group has faced over the past year.

Chris Stone

Non-Executive Chair 11 December 2025

The different parts of the Company's governance framework are shown below, with a description of how they operate and the linkages between them.

Board

(The Board has collective responsibility to promote the long-term sustainable success of the Group, ensuring due regard is paid to the interests of its stakeholders.)

Provides leadership and is responsible for the overall management of NCC Group, and its strategy, long-term objectives and risk management. It ensures the right Company structure is in place to deliver long-term value to shareholders and other stakeholders.

Board Committees

(The Board oversees the Group's operations through a unitary Board and four principal Committees, being Audit, Nomination, Remuneration and Cyber Security. The terms of reference for these Committees can be found on our website. Further information on the work of these Committees can be found in later sections of this Annual Report and Accounts.)

Support the Board in its work with specific areas of review and oversight objectives and risk management. They ensure the right Company structure is in place to deliver long-term value to shareholders and other stakeholders.

Primary function is to assist the Board in fulfilling its financial and risk responsibilities. It also reviews financial reporting, the internal controls in place and the external audit process.

Read more on pages 71 to 76

Nomination Committee

Responsible for considering the Board's structure, size, composition, diversity and succession planning.

Read more on pages 77 and 78

Cyber Security Committee

Responsible for overseeing and advising on the Group's exposure to cyber risk, its future cyber risk strategy, its Cyber Security breach response, its crisis management plan and the review of reports on any Cyber Security incidents.

Read more on pages 79 and 80

Remuneration Committee

Responsible for determining the overall remuneration of the Executive Directors and the remuneration of senior managers (ExCom) within the broader institutional context of remuneration practice.

Read more on pages 81 to 93

Chief Executive Officer

(Manages the day-to-day operations of the Group, prioritising and allocating resources. The CEO is supported by the Executive Committee.)

Has responsibility for managing the business and overseeing the implementation of the strategy agreed by the Board.

Executive Committee ("ExCom")

Currently comprises the Group's most senior business and operational Executives. It is responsible for assisting the Chief Executive Officer in the performance of its duties including:

  • Developing the budget
  • Monitoring the performance of the different divisions of the Company against the plan
  • Carrying out a formal risk review process
  • Reviewing the Company's policies and procedures
  • Prioritisation and allocation of resources
  • Overseeing the day-to-day running of the Company
  • Being responsible for people, talent and culture
  • For further details on Board composition and division of responsibilities, see pages 64 to 69

Our business is led by our Board of Directors

Biographical and other details of the Directors are as follows:

Chris Stone Non-Executive Chair

Mike Maddison Chief Executive Officer

Guy Ellis Chief Financial Officer

Appointment to the Board 6 April 2017

Career experience

Chris has held various Non-Executive Director and Chief Executive roles at listed and private equity backed technology companies. He was CEO of Northgate Information Solutions plc from 1999 to 2008, until its sale, and stayed as CEO until 2011. From 2013 to 2016, he was CEO of Radius Worldwide. Chris was also a Non-Executive Director of CSR plc, and Chair of the Remuneration Committee, from 2012 until its sale in 2015. Chris was also Chair of AIM listed CityFibre plc from January 2017 until June 2018, when it was sold to private equity buyers. Chris has also been Chair of Everynet B.V., a privately owned Internet of Things infrastructure business.

External appointments

Chris is currently Chair of AIM listed Idox plc.

Appointment to the Board

7 July 2022

Career experience

Mike served as Head of EY's Cyber Security, privacy and trusted technology practice for EMEA from 2017, achieving sustained growth across 97 countries and strengthening EY's standing as a leading adviser in the field. Prior to this, he led PwC's risk services practice in the Middle East, following a decade as Head of Deloitte's EMEA Cyber Security consultancy, where he also delivered substantial growth.

External appointments

Mike does not currently have any external appointments.

Appointment to the Board

30 June 2023

Career experience

Guy joined NCC Group in 2021, as Director of Commercial Finance as well as serving as Interim Managing Director of our Escode business, and most recently as Interim Managing Director of our UK Cyber Security business.

Guy has over 25 years' experience in finance and commercial roles in the retail sector for brands including Asda and Specsavers. This experience and the recent interim roles in NCC Group have given him a breadth of understanding of the commercial drivers and operations across the whole business.

External appointments

Guy does not currently have any external appointments.

During the year a number of Directors took on additional appointments outside of their role with NCC Group. The Board considered these appointments and concluded that these appointments did not conflict with NCC Group, and the Director would have sufficient time to devote to NCC Group following the additional appointments, and that the appointments did not result in the Directors concerned being "overboarded".

View our Executive Committee: nccgroupplc.com/our-board-executive-committee/

Other Directors during the year

No other Directors served on the Board during the year.

Committee key:

Julie Chakraverty Senior Independent Non‑Executive Director (and designated Non‑Executive Director for workforce engagement)

1 January 2022 Career experience Julie has a wealth of plc board experience, formerly serving as a Non-Executive Director on the boards of Santander UK and Abrdn plc (formerly Standard Life Aberdeen plc, having been Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Risk and Innovation Committees for Aberdeen Asset Management plc prior to merging). She has also been Chair of the Remuneration Committee for the global insurer MS Amlin plc, a Non-Executive Director for Spirit Pub Company Limited and a Trustee for The Girls' Day School Trust. During her executive career, Julie was a board member of UBS Investment Bank, where she held a number of global leadership positions and won industry awards for innovation every year from 2001–2009 for her "CreditDelta" technology product. Julie was also a Director and founder of Rungway Limited, an employee engagement platform used by leading

Appointment to the Board

Jennifer Duvalier Independent Non-Executive Director

Appointment to the Board 25 April 2018

Career experience Jennifer was Executive Vice President of People at ARM Holdings plc, with responsibility for all people and internal communications activity globally, from September 2013 to

External appointments

March 2017.

Jennifer is currently the Senior Independent Director of Trainline plc (where she is also a member of the Audit and Risk, Nomination and Remuneration Committees) and an Independent Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Remuneration Committee of Mitie Group plc (as well as being a member of its Nomination Committee she is also the designated Non-Executive Director for colleague engagement at both companies). She is also a Non-Executive Director of The Cranemere Group Ltd and a Trustee of Somerset House (a UK-based charity), an adviser to New York Presbyterian hospitals group in the US, and an external adviser to the People and Remuneration Committee of the Wellcome Trust.

Mike Ettling Independent Non-Executive Director

Appointment to the Board 22 September 2017

Career experience

Mike has strong sector and non-executive experience. He has had an extensive career in global technology businesses including Unit4, SAP-Sucessfactors, NorthgateArinso, Unisys, Synstar and EDS and was formerly a Non-Executive Director of Backoffice Associates LLC, a US PE backed data business, and also formerly a Non-Executive Director of Telkom BCX Ltd, a South African IT and telecommunications business. Mike has also served as a Non-Executive Director with Topia Inc, a Silicon Valley cloud relocation software business. He has also served as a Non‑Executive Director of Impellam plc, an AIM listed recruitment business.

External appointments

Mike is currently an Operating Partner at Advent International and Chair of Syspro Ltd, and is also an Independent Non‑Executive Director of Optima Health Plc.

Lynn Fordham Independent Non-Executive Director (and lead Non-Executive Director for Sustainability)

Appointment to the Board 1 September 2022

Career experience

Lynn, a Chartered Accountant, was most recently Managing Partner of private investment firm Larchpoint Capital LLP, a position she held from 2017 to 2021. Prior to joining Larchpoint, Lynn was CEO of SVG Capital for eight years, having previously served as CFO. Before that she held senior finance, risk and strategy positions at Barratt Developments, BAA, Boots, ED&F Man, BAT and Mobil Oil. She also served as a Non‑Executive Director on the board of Fuller, Smith & Turner for seven years until 2018, chairing its Audit Committee. Lynn was also a supervisory board member of VARO Energy B.V.

External appointments

Lynn is currently Chair and a member of the Nomination Committee of NewRiver REIT plc and Pollen Street Group Limited. She serves as a Non-Executive Director and Chair of the Finance, Risk and Audit Committees at Enfinium Group Limited (private). From 17 September 2025, Lynn is also a Special Adviser to the Board of Domino's Pizza Group, having stepped down from the Board as the Senior Independent Director at the same date. Lynn additionally chairs RMA – The Royal Marines Charity.

External appointments

global firms.

Julie is currently an Independent Non-Executive Director of easyJet plc, AJ Bell plc and Starling Bank Limited.

Board composition and division of responsibilities

The Board has agreed a clear division of responsibilities with the responsibilities of the Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Independent Director and other Directors clearly defined so that no individual has unrestricted powers of decision and no small group of Directors can dominate the Board's decision making.

Role Responsibilities
Chair of the Board
(Chris Stone)
Is responsible for the running and leadership of the Board, setting its agenda and ensuring its effectiveness
in all aspects of its role, and promoting a culture of openness, debate and the highest standards of corporate
governance. The Chair, in conjunction with the CEO and other Board members, plans the agendas, which are
issued with the supporting Board papers in advance of the Board meetings. These supporting papers provide
appropriate information to enable the Board to discharge its duties, which include monitoring, assessing and
challenging the executive management of the Group.
Chief Executive Officer
(Mike Maddison)
Together with the senior management team (ExCom), is responsible for the day-to-day running of the Group's
business, implementing the strategy and policies approved by the Board, and regularly providing performance
reports to the Board. The role of CEO is separate from that of the Chair to ensure that no one individual has
unfettered powers of decision.
Chief Financial Officer
(Guy Ellis)
Works closely with the CEO with specific responsibility for all financial matters, including Group accounting
policies, financial control, tax and treasury management, risk management and financial probity. The CFO is
also accountable for the transparency and appropriateness of management information and key performance
indicators, internally and externally.
Senior Independent
Director
(Julie Chakraverty)
Provides a sounding board for the Chair and serves as an intermediary for other Directors, colleagues and
shareholders when necessary. The main responsibility is to be available to the shareholders should they have
concerns that they have been unable to resolve through normal channels or when such channels would
be inappropriate.
Non-Executive Directors
(Jennifer Duvalier,
Mike Ettling and
Lynn Fordham)
Bring experience and independent judgement to the Board. Maintain an ongoing dialogue with the Executive
Directors, which includes constructive challenge of performance and the Group's strategy.
Designated
Non-Executive Director
for engagement with
the workforce
(Julie Chakraverty)
Leads on Board engagement with the workforce (please see separate section on page 14).
Company Secretary
(Jonathan Williams)
Ensures good information flows within the Board and its Committees and between senior management and
Non-Executive Directors. The Company Secretary is responsible for facilitating the induction of new Directors and
assisting with their professional development as required. All Directors have access to the advice and services of
the Company Secretary to enable them to discharge their duties as Directors. The Company Secretary is responsible
for ensuring that Board procedures are complied with and for advising the Board via the Chair on governance
matters. The appointment and removal of the Company Secretary is a matter for the Board as a whole.

Gender identity or sex as at 30 September 2025

No. of Board
members
% of
the Board
No. of senior positions on the
Board (CEO, CFO, SID, Chair)
No. in executive
management (ExCom)
% of
executive management
Men 4 57% 3 5 71%
Women 3 43% 1 2 29%
Not specified/prefer not to say

Ethnic background as at 30 September 2025

No. of Board
members
% of
the Board
No. of senior positions on the
Board (CEO, CFO, SID, Chair)
No. in executive
management (ExCom)
% of
executive management
White British or other White
(including minority White groups)
5 72% 3 6 86%
Mixed/multiple ethnic groups
Asian/Asian British 1 14% 1 1 14%
Black/African/Caribbean/Black British
Other ethnic group, including Arab
Not specified/prefer not to say 1 14%

Meetings and attendance

The Board considers that each Director is able to allocate sufficient time to the Company to discharge their responsibilities effectively. The Non-Executive Directors are contracted to spend a minimum of 24 days per annum on the Group's affairs, and the Chair 60 days.

A summary of each current Director's attendance at meetings that they were eligible to attend of the Board and its Committees during the financial year ended 30 September 2025 is shown below. Unless otherwise indicated, all Directors held office throughout the year.

For the avoidance of doubt, no concerns have been raised about the attendance record of any Directors, nor their continued commitment to their work and NCC Group.

Board Audit Nomination Cyber Security Remuneration
Chris Stone 9 1
8
N/A 1 *
1
1
1
N/A
Mike Maddison 9
9
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Guy Ellis 9
9
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Lynn Fordham 9
9
4 *
4
1
1
1
1
5
5
Julie Chakraverty 9
9
4 2
3
1
1
1 *
1
5 2
4
Jennifer Duvalier 9
9
N/A 1
1
1
1
5 *
5
Mike Ettling 9
9
4
4
N/A N/A N/A

At all times, all of the Board and Committee meetings remained quorate.

  • Meetings attended
  • Possible meetings
  • * Committee Chair

N/A Director is not required to attend the meeting, but may have attended by invitation.

  • 1 Was unable to make one meeting due to an important personal matter that could not be rearranged.
  • 2 Unable to make one Committee meeting because of a pre-existing business commitment (scheduled before NCC Group set its Board and Committee meeting dates) that could not be rearranged.

What principal decisions have been made and what have we looked at as a Board during 2024/25? Section 172 statement

Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires a director of a company to act in the way they consider, in good faith, would most likely promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, but having regard to a range of factors set out in section 172(1)(a)–(f) of the Companies Act 2006. In discharging our section 172 duty, we have regard for these factors, taking them into consideration when decisions are made.

The Board understands the importance of stakeholder engagement and, through regular updates from the Executive Directors and other senior managers, it has provided challenge and oversight throughout the year. The Company's stakeholders are set out on pages 14 and 15, with an overview of how we engage with them, how they relate to our strategy and highlights from the previous year.

Principal decisions made during the year

Throughout this Annual Report, we have provided examples of how we have thought about the likely consequences of long-term decisions and detailed below is how the Board considered stakeholders, and the information we received through engagement, in a number of its key decisions in 2024/25.

When making each decision, the Board carefully considered how it impacted on the success of the Group and its long-term (financial and non-financial) impact and had due regard to the other matters set out in section 172(1)(a)–(f) of the Companies Act 2006.

The below should be read in conjunction with our Stakeholder Engagement section on pages 14 and 15, along with other sections of the Annual Report where appropriate.

Topic Stakeholder group Decision taken Engagement process Reference
Approving a new
four year £120m
multi-currency
revolving
credit facility
Colleagues,
shareholders,
clients, suppliers
During the year, the decision was
taken to approve a new four year
£120m multi-currency revolving
credit facility (RCF), with a £50m
uncommitted accordion option,
provided by a syndicate of four banks.
The new RCF facility will expire on
28 April 2029 and replaces the
Group's previous RCF, which had an
expiry date of 22 December 2026.
We communicated the new RCF
via an RNS announcement.
The new RCF will provide our
stakeholders with the reassurance
that NCC Group has appropriate and
sufficient financial facilities through
to April 2029, along with the financial
flexibility and means to pursue its
strategy both now and in the
coming years.
Strategic Report
on page 38

Board composition and division of responsibilities continued

What have we looked at as a Board during 2024/25?

At every meeting the Board reviews the minutes from the previous meeting and the status of any outstanding actions. Colleague engagement is a standing agenda item presented by Julie Chakraverty as our designated Non-Executive Director for workforce engagement. The CEO and CFO present their monthly performance update reports, which are also circulated to Board members in months where there is no scheduled Board meeting.

The Board has also reviewed the following during 2024/25:

Leadership and colleagues

  • Received an update on colleague engagement and the results of the annual colleague engagement survey, and any questions colleagues have raised on executive remuneration and how this aligns with the wider Company pay policy
  • Continued with the colleague engagement programme, led by an appointed designated Non-Executive Director, with an update to the Board at every Board meeting
  • Been updated on senior management changes to the Executive Committee
  • Spent time with the new Chief Commercial Officer, and the newly promoted Chief People Officer
  • Spent informal time with wider colleagues during Board meetings and visits held at our offices

Strategy

  • Continued to be kept informed of progress with the Group's strategy
  • Held a dedicated strategy session
  • Discussed the strategy session and the key points arising out of it, along with regular check-ins on progress against strategy
  • Had a number of post-acquisition reviews of acquisitions that the Group had made over the past few years
  • Kept updated on the progress of a non-core disposal in the Netherlands (the Fox Crypto business)

Governance

  • Continued with the colleague engagement programme, with an appointed designated NED leading the Board's engagement activities
  • Considered and approved a number of amendments to the Group's delegated authority/authorised signatory matrix
  • Discussed and approved the Group's Modern Slavery Statement
  • Received reports on any material litigation and colleague litigation issues affecting the Group
  • Reviewed and approved a number of country risk assessments for work in certain countries
  • Held a dedicated Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Board workshop facilitated by the Director of Global Governance and Global Head of Risk and Assurance

• Introduced new standing Board agenda item of having a "meeting reflections" session at the end of each Board meeting to play back what had been discussed at the meeting, and suggest topics for future Board meetings

Financial

  • Reviewed and approved the Annual Report and Accounts, ensuring that it is fair, balanced and understandable
  • Discussed and approved the full-year and half-year results and associated presentations to investors
  • Approved the interim and final dividends, and discussed the dividend policy
  • Noted and approved the Group insurance cover renewal
  • Discussed and approved the 2025/26 budget
  • Considered and approved the market purchase of shares to fund future discretionary share plan maturities
  • Received external presentations on shareholder perspectives on the Company, including receiving regular updates from investor meetings and noting circular investor letters
  • Considered and approved the Group's new refinancing arrangements

Other Group business

  • Kept updated on a number of strategic projects
  • Discussed a number of M&A opportunities
  • Approved a number of major customer contracts and bids
  • Had two presentations on NCC Group's AI proposition and service offerings

Independent advice

All Directors have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary and Directors are entitled to take independent professional advice if necessary, at the expense of the Company.

Conflicts of interest

The Companies Act 2006 requires Directors to avoid situations where they have, or could have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts or potentially conflicts with the interests of the Company. The Company's Articles of Association require any Director with a conflict or potential conflict to declare this to the Board.

That Director will not then be involved in the discussions relating to the proposal, transaction, contract or arrangement in which they have an interest, unless agreed otherwise by the Directors of the Company in the limited circumstance specified in the Articles of Association, nor will they be counted in the quorum or be permitted to vote on any issue in which they have an interest. Directors are required to inform the Board without delay should they be aware of any actual or potential conflicts of interest and a check on conflicts is undertaken each year with a report to the Board.

Colleague engagement

Julie Chakraverty is the Board's designated Non-Executive Director to lead the Board's colleague engagement programme and is committed to understanding the views of our colleagues and ensuring they are incorporated into the Board's decision-making process.

In addition, there is also opportunity for colleagues to ask any questions they have on executive remuneration and how this aligns with the wider Company pay policy.

Prior to meeting with Julie at one of the engagement sessions, colleagues are introduced to Julie via our internal social channels where she explains her role through a video and written communications. Julie has access to these channels to enable her to engage fully outside of the formal events.

We were keen to build on the momentum generated in previous years and Julie is sometimes joined by our Chair, Chris Stone, or other Non-Executive Directors, to meet colleagues, all of whom are invited from below the mid-management level and all parts of the business to ensure diversity of thought. We ensure that no one has their line manager in either the physical or the virtual room to ensure they can speak freely and tell Julie what is on their mind.

Feedback from each session's participants is shared anonymously to the Board and to our CEO. This enables action to be taken, further strengthening the value of listening. Colleagues attending are invited to give their feedback and, so far, results have been positive and valued.

Board independence

As required by the Code, at least 50% of the Board, excluding the Chair, are Independent Non-Executive Directors. The Board comprises two Executive Directors, four Independent Non-Executive Directors and the Non-Executive Chair.

The Board has debated and considers that all of the current Non-Executive Directors are independent, and in so doing considered the profile of all of the individuals, concluding that none of them:

  • Have ever been a colleague of the Group
  • Have ever had a material business relationship with the Group or receive any remuneration other than their salary or fees
  • Have close family ties with the advisers, other Directors or senior management of the Group that could reasonably be expected to cause a conflict
  • Hold cross-directorships or have significant links with other Directors through involvement with other companies or bodies
  • Represent a significant shareholder
  • Have, at the point of this report, served on the Board for more than nine years from the date of their first election

The Non-Executive Directors provide a strong independent element on the Board and are well placed to constructively challenge and help develop proposals on strategy and succession planning. Between them, they bring an extensive and broad range of experience to the Group.

Details of the Directors' respective experience are set out in their biographical profiles on pages 62 and 63.

The terms and conditions of appointment of Non-Executive Directors are available for inspection at the Company's registered office during normal business hours.

Diversity

The principle of Board diversity (and indeed diversity across the Group) is strongly supported by the Board. It is the Board's policy that appointments to the Board will always be based on merit so that the Board has the right balance of individuals in place. The Board recognises that diversity of thought, approach and experience are important considerations and it is therefore one of the selection criteria used to assess candidates prior to any Board appointments.

The Company's policy is to find, develop and maintain a diverse workforce at all levels with an initial focus on developing a culture where women can achieve and retain senior positions.

Annual re-election

In accordance with the Code, any Directors appointed in the financial year are subject to election by shareholders at the AGM and, in line with best practice, all the other Directors are subject to re‑election annually.

Director induction, training and development

New Directors are provided with an induction on appointment, which would include visits to the Group's operations and meetings with operational and executive management. Each Director's induction is tailored to their experience and background with the aim of enhancing their understanding of the Group's strategy, business, operating divisions, colleagues, customers, suppliers and advisers, and the role of the Board in setting the tone of our culture and governance standards.

The Company acknowledges the importance of developing the skills of the Directors to run an effective Board. To assist in this, Directors are given the opportunity to attend relevant courses and seminars to acquire additional skills and experience to enhance their contribution to the ongoing progress of the Group. All of the Directors attend sessions which are aimed at updating the Board on trends and developments in corporate governance.

Board composition and division of responsibilities continued

Board and Committee effectiveness review

As described earlier, this year we have not undertaken a formal review of the Board and its Committees. Building on our inaugural externally facilitated Board evaluation in 2023, we undertook a comprehensive internally facilitated Board and Committee evaluation in 2024, where we took significant time to discuss the output and agree actions in January 2025. We felt that we wanted further time to embed the actions from previous evaluations into how we operate and work together as a Board and felt that pausing the formal review process for a year was a sensible course of action. Our intention is for our next review to be externally facilitated and we will look to undertake this during the 2026 calendar year. As a reminder, Board succession planning remains a priority, particularly as we look to ensure the Board and Executive Committee have the right set of skills and experience to support the Group as the business evolves. As a reminder, a number of observations and recommendations were noted from previous evaluations, which are detailed below.

Area Recommendation/observation
Board composition • Considering the next NED appointment and the skills and experience required to complement those already around
the Board table
Board agendas/
papers
• Although it was felt that the Board papers had improved significantly, it was agreed that hearing further client
feedback in a more systematic manner, including information on sales pipelines and the external perspective,
was important
• A suggestion that more colleagues from NCC Group's global operations could join Board meetings virtually and
present updates
• A suggestion of a "reflections" session at the end of each Board meeting to play back what had been discussed
at the meeting, and suggest topics for future Board meetings
• Take papers as read – focus time on discussion and debate
• More briefings and training on AI and cyber developments/emerging threats
Board meetings • Consideration should be given to the frequency and number of Board meetings, i.e. was there an opportunity to have
fewer meetings?
• More white space (no agenda) time in Board meetings
• Spend more time visiting other NCC Group offices
• Ideally have one guest presenter/speaker at Board meetings
• ExCom presenters at Board meetings to bring a guest from the next level down (or a more junior level) for experience
and exposure to the Board
Strategy • Consider and discuss strategy and risks together
• Build on the excellent progress of the last few annual strategy days and continue to hold dedicated Board strategy
sessions, as well as check in on progress regularly
Succession
planning
• Continue to focus on talent and ensuring the Board gets opportunities to meet colleagues within the business, both
within Board meetings and in more informal settings such as Board dinners
Stakeholder
management
• An appreciation that investor relations had improved significantly over recent years and that it was important to
maintain this level of momentum and trajectory
• Receive more external perspectives on how NCC Group is viewed, particularly by clients/prospective clients
Information flows • Keep focusing on timeliness of papers; although this had improved, it was important to maintain discipline around this
Committees • Audit Committee – ensure the Committee is briefed on key changes to accounting policies and Corporate
Governance Code developments
• Remuneration Committee – spend time discussing remuneration perspectives beyond the UK, i.e. internationally in
the areas NCC Group competes for talent, along with new remuneration ideas that the Committee might consider in
the future
• Remuneration Committee – spend time considering from a Committee perspective how effectively the wider pay and
benefits policy aligns with NCC Group's strategy and talent agenda, and the implications of this for pay at the top of
the organisation
• Nomination Committee – spend more time over the annual cycle exploring the development actions that are in
progress to actualise the potential of those on the succession plan to CEO/CFO and ExCom roles
• Cyber Security Committee – make sure the education content on emerging trends, threats and opportunities
is a focus for the Committee

Operation of governance framework Role of the Board

The Board is responsible for reviewing, challenging and approving the strategic direction of the Group, while providing strong values-based leadership of the Company, within a framework of prudent and effective controls which enable risk to be assessed and appropriately managed. The Board reviews the Group's business model and strategic objectives to ensure that the necessary financial and human resources are in place to achieve these objectives, to sustain them over the long term and to review management's performance in their delivery.

The Board sets the tone of the Company's values and ethical standards and manages the business in a manner to meet its obligations to shareholders and other stakeholders.

The Board receives information on at least a monthly basis to enable it to review trading performance, forecasts and strategy and it has a schedule of matters specifically reserved for its decision. The most significant of these are:

  • Approval of strategic plans, the annual budget and any material changes to them
  • Oversight of the Group's operations, ensuring competent and prudent management, sound planning and an adequate system of internal control and governance
  • Through the Audit Committee, oversight of financial reporting systems and information and adherence to appropriate accounting policies
  • Changes to the structure, size and composition of the Board and Executive Committee, and oversight of the Company culture and the ethical standards of the leadership and the independence of Non-Executive Directors, taking into consideration prudent succession planning
  • Approval of the acquisition or disposal of subsidiaries and major investments and capital projects
  • Approval of the dividend, treasury and banking policies, including the Group's capital structure
  • Through the Remuneration Committee, the delivery of an effective executive and senior management Remuneration Policy
  • Receiving reports on the views of shareholders and approval of all documents put to shareholders at a general meeting or circulated to shareholders
  • Approval of the appointment of key advisers

The Board has a schedule of specific matters reserved for its decision where it feels they are critical to the ongoing success of the business and are of a significant nature to merit the Board having such a decision reserved to it. The Group also has a Group authority matrix (which documents the levels of authority delegated from the Board to various role holders within the Group). The schedule of matters reserved for decision by the Board and the Group authority matrix are complementary documents and are designed to ensure that decisions are either made by the Board or delegated to an appropriate senior colleague within the Group.

As noted above, the operational management of the Group is delegated to the Executive Committee. The Board also delegates other matters to Board Committees and management as appropriate.

Risk management

The Board has ultimate responsibility for ensuring that business risks are effectively managed. The Board has delegated regular review of the risk management procedures to the Cyber Security Committee in relation to cyber risks, and to the Audit Committee in relation to all other risks. The Board reviews the overall risk environment on at least an annual basis. The day-to-day management of business risks is the responsibility of the Executive Committee ("ExCom").

Internal control

The Group has a system of internal controls which aims to support the delivery of the Group's strategy by managing the risk of failing to achieve business objectives and to protect the stewardship of the Group's assets. As with all such systems, the goal is to manage risk within acceptable parameters, rather than to eliminate risk entirely. The Group can therefore only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance that the business objectives and asset stewardship will be delivered successfully.

In addition, the Group insures against various risks, but certain risks remain difficult to insure, due to the breadth and cost of cover. In some cases, external insurance is not available at all, or at least not at an economically viable price. The Group regularly reviews both the type and amount of external insurance that it buys in conjunction with its insurance brokers. For a more detailed review of risk management processes, the principal risks faced by the Group and their mitigation, see pages 29 to 37.

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the effectiveness of the risk management and internal control systems. The steps it takes in relation to the review are set out on page 74.

The Audit Committee makes recommendations to the Board on the effectiveness of risk management and internal controls, which the Board considers, together with reports from the Cyber Security Committee, in forming its own view on the effectiveness of the risk management and internal control systems.

During the year ended 30 September 2025, the Board reviewed the effectiveness of the Group's risk management and internal control systems together with internal control findings issued by our auditor. We confirm that the processes outlined above and on page 74 have been in place for the year under review and up to the date of this Annual Report and Accounts, and that these processes accord with the UK Corporate Governance Code and the FRC Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting. While we have had a number of improvements identified through our internal audit reports issued throughout the year, management has agreed the required actions and is working to close these down. We report on these regularly to the Audit Committee and are working with local management to continuously improve controls and processes across the business.

Executive remuneration

During the year, we operated within the Remuneration Policy approved by shareholders. Details of how the Remuneration Policy has been applied during this financial year are set out on pages 81 to 93 of the Remuneration Committee Report.

Shareholder engagement

Share capital structure

The Company's issued share capital at 30 September 2025 consists of 315,006,079 ordinary shares of 1p each. There are no special control rights or restrictions on share transfer or special rights pertaining to any of the shares in issue and the Company does not have preference shares.

As far as is reasonably known to the Board, the Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another company or by any government.

Board engagement with shareholders

Communications with shareholders are given high priority. There is a regular dialogue with institutional investors including presentations after the Company's year end and half-year results announcements.

A programme of meetings takes place throughout the year with major institutional shareholders, and private shareholders have the opportunity to meet the Board face to face and ask questions at the AGM.

We are in regular contact with our large investors through a regular scheduled programme of meetings attended by either our CEO or CFO or both of them. Julie Chakraverty, our Senior Independent Director, and I are also available to meet with investors should the need arise. After meeting our larger investors, I feed back my findings to Board colleagues at the next Board meeting. In addition, our brokers undertake investor surveys on the back of our half and full-year results and the results of these were presented and discussed at Board meetings. Our aim is to engage with our shareholders in an open and meaningful way. During the financial year, the Directors held a number of meetings with shareholders as set out below.

Board shareholder updates

Feedback from major institutional shareholders is provided to the Board on a regular basis and, where appropriate, the Board takes steps to address their concerns and recommendations.

Investor meetings

One-to-one meetings

157

Group meetings

40

Substantial shareholdings

As at 30 September 2025, the Company had been notified of the following interests of 3% or more in the issued share capital of the Company under the UK Disclosure and Transparency Rules:

Shareholder Number of
ordinary
shares
% of
NCC Group's
total share
capital
Aberforth Partners 40,057,799 12.72%
Richard Griffiths 32,671,106 10.37%
Odyssean Investment Trust 20,000,000 6.35%
BlackRock 18,312,987 5.81%
Vanguard Group 15,624,408 4.96%
Harwood Capital 15,362,500 4.88%
First Trust Advisors 15,299,695 4.86%
NFU Mutual 13,151,529 4.18%
Artemis Investment Management 10,888,638 3.46%
Kestrel Partners 9,932,261 3.15%
Canaccord Wealth (Inst) 9,750,000 3.10%
Schroder Investment Management 9,471,825 3.01%

There were no changes to the above notified to the Company between 30 September 2025 and 11 December 2025.

Directors' shareholdings

For details of Directors' shareholdings, remuneration and interests in the Company's shares and options, together with information on service contracts, see pages 81 to 93 of the Directors' Remuneration Report.

AGM

The AGM is an opportunity for shareholders to vote on certain aspects of Group business and provides a useful forum for one-to-one communication with private shareholders. At the AGM shareholders receive presentations on the Company's performance and may ask questions of the Board. The Chair seeks to ensure that the Chairs of the Audit, Remuneration, Nomination and Cyber Security Committees are available at the meeting to answer questions and all Directors attend.

The Company prepares separate resolutions on each substantially separate issue to be voted upon at the AGM. The result of the vote on each resolution is published on the Company's website after the AGM and will be announced via the regulatory information service. At the 2025 AGM, shareholders representing over 65% of the Company's issued share capital returned their proxy votes.

On behalf of the Board

Chris Stone

Non-Executive Chair 11 December 2025

Audit Committee report

Lynn Fordham Chair, Audit Committee

I am pleased to present the Audit Committee Report for the year ended 30 September 2025 to explain how we have discharged our responsibilities with an overview of our principal activities and their outcomes.

Committee membership, attendees' access and objectives

I have been Chair of the Audit Committee since 1 September 2022 and I am a Chartered Accountant with diverse sector experience across listed companies, private equity and financial services in several disciplines including risk management, internal control and financial reporting. I am also currently Chair of NewRiver REIT plc and Pollen Street Group and Non-Executive Director of Enfinium Group. From 17 September 2025, I became a Special Adviser to the Board of Domino's Pizza Group, having stepped down from the Board as the Senior Independent Director at the same date. The Board therefore considers that I have the recent and relevant financial experience required by the Code.

Mike Ettling, Julie Chakraverty and I all served on the Committee throughout the period. All members of the Committee are considered to be independent, and the Committee as a whole continues to have competence in the technology sector.

Summary biographies of each member of the Committee are included on pages 62 and 63.

The purpose of the Audit Committee is to provide oversight of an organisation's financial reporting, internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations, ensuring transparency and accountability in financial operations on behalf of the Board. The Committee also provides a forum for reporting by the external auditor. Cyber risk and controls are considered by the Cyber Security Committee. A full copy of the Committee's terms of reference can be found in the Investor Relations section of the Group's website.

Meeting frequency and attendance

The terms of reference for the Committee require at least three meetings per year. During this financial year, the Committee met four times. As well as the members of the Committee, standing invitations are given to the Company Chair, the other Independent Non-Executive Directors, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the SVP, Group Finance and the SVP, Global Governance, Procurement and Estates, with other attendees also attending by invitation. The external auditor also attends each meeting. During the year, the Committee held meetings with the external auditor and the SVP, Global Governance, Procurement and Estates and the Head of Risk and Assurance without the Executive Directors and management being present.

In April 2025, the role of the Director of Global Governance was extended to include Procurement and Estates. As a result, to ensure independence from operational functions, the role of Chief Audit Executive (CAE) transferred to the Head of Risk and Assurance.

Attendance during the year of individual Audit Committee members is shown in the table on page 65.

Significant accounting areas and areas of significant management judgement or estimation uncertainty

The table below summarises the significant accounting issues, judgements and estimates considered by the Committee during the year in relation to the Financial Statements. These are categorised as either recurring items the Committee regularly reviews or current year focus areas. The table also indicates the level of judgement or estimation applied to each item. Items with a "low" judgement level typically have extensive independent third party evidence, while those requiring "high" judgement rely more on management estimates and historical trends than third party evidence.

Review items Accounting
judgement?
Estimation
required?
Goodwill carrying value N/A High
Discontinued operations and
held-for-sale classification Low N/A

Significant issues considered during the year in relation to the Financial Statements

During the year, the Committee reviewed and considered the following areas in respect of financial reporting and the preparation of the interim and annual Financial Statements:

  • The appropriateness of the accounting policies used
  • Compliance with external and internal financial reporting standards and policies
  • Significant areas of management judgement or estimation
  • Assumptions and models used to determine fair value of all key business units for the Group's annual impairment review
  • Assessed the quality of earnings by reviewing one-off, out of period or non-trading items arising over the year
  • Continued focus on the adherence to the Individually Significant Items (ISIs) accounting policy and presentation of ISIs
  • Accounting for the disposal of non-core operations (Fox Crypto) during the year
  • Accounting for the Group's Escode business as discontinued operations and asset held for sale
  • Disclosure and presentation of GAAP and Alternative Performance Measures (APMs)
  • The effectiveness and changes to the financial control environment
  • Whether the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary to assess the Group's financial position, performance, business model and strategy
  • Revenue recognition on material contracts to the Group
  • Going Concern and Viability Statement considering the potential implications of the Group's Escode Business as Discontinued operations and Held-for-Sale Classification and the ongoing Strategic Review of the Cyber Business

In carrying out this review the Committee challenged the significant estimates and judgements made by the Group's finance team and considered the external auditor's reports setting out its views on the accounting treatments and judgements included in the Financial Statements.

Audit Committee report continued

Principal duties delegated to the Audit Committee

Areas delegated to
the Audit Committee
Committee responsibilities Activities during the year
Financial
reporting
• Monitoring the integrity of the Financial Statements
relating to the Group's financial performance and their
compliance with the provisions of IFRS, the Companies
Act, the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Disclosure
Guidance Transparency Rules and other regulations
• Reviewing material information and significant accounting
judgements contained in the Annual Report and Accounts
• Advising the Board on the continuing appropriateness of
the Group's existing accounting policies and the
application of any new or modified accounting and
reporting standards
• Continued focus on quality of earnings and adherence to
Individually Significant Items accounting policy
• Reviewed all significant accounting areas and areas of key
estimation. Reviewed PwC audit conclusions in these areas
with significant discussions around the Group's annual
impairment review, assumptions and resultant disclosures
Narrative
reporting
• Advising the Board on the effectiveness of the processes
ensuring that the Annual Report and Accounts, when
taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable
• Considered recent technical updates including guidance
issued by the Financial Reporting Council
• Reviewed management's Going Concern and Viability
Statement assessment, including macro-economic
considerations. Reviewed PwC audit conclusions in
these areas
• Reviewed a summary of why management considers the
Annual Report is fair, balanced and understandable
Internal controls
and risk
management
systems
• Reviewing the effectiveness of the Group's internal
control systems
• Reviewing the nature and extent of significant financial
risks and how they can be mitigated
• Received regular briefings from the SVP, Global
Governance, Procurement and Estates summarising risk
management and control issues
• Received a self-assessment of the finance controls
highlighting enhancements made during the year, areas
of continuous improvement and specific actions to
implement minimum control standards
• Planning for regulatory changes arising from the new
corporate governance reform requirements, including
identifying material controls and other legislation such as
the failure to prevent fraud
• Monitoring ESG reporting, including progress on TCFD
and CSRD, and embedding sustainability into the business
Compliance,
whistleblowing
and fraud
• Reporting to the Board on the procedures for responding
to whistleblowing, fraud or potential breaches of
anti-bribery legislation
• Received a summary of regulatory updates covering
whistleblowing, fraud and anti-bribery as well as health and
safety updates documenting new initiatives and activities
• Review of the failure to prevent fraud legislation including
updating our policies, risk assessment and training
• Review of any whistleblowing findings resulting
from investigations
Internal audit • Reviewing the internal audit reports discussing any major
control failures or weaknesses
• Reviewed the findings from the internal audit assignments
conducted during the year and approved the Internal
Audit Plan for the forthcoming year
• Approved the Internal Audit Charter
• Commissioned an External Quality Assessment of the risk
and assurance function, required every five years per the
new CIIA Standards
External audit • Reviewing the audit findings with the external auditor
including discussing any major issues that arise during
an audit, the accounting and audit judgements made,
the level of any errors identified during the audit and the
effectiveness of the audit process itself
• Making recommendations to the Board in relation to
the appointment of the external auditor, approving its
remuneration and terms of engagement
• Overseeing the relationship with the external auditor
including, but not limited to, assessing its independence,
objectivity and effectiveness
• Reviewed the findings from the audit for the year ended
30 September 2025
• Following the completion of PwC's FY24 audit, the
Committee was informed that the FRC's Audit Quality
Review (AQR) team had chosen the Group's audit for its
review. The Committee has received a copy of the review
and was pleased to note that it did not identify any key
findings and only one limited improvement is required

Goodwill carrying value

(Recurring item: see Note 11 to the Financial Statements)

The Group has significant balances relating to goodwill as at 30 September 2025 as a result of acquisitions of businesses in previous years. The carrying value of goodwill at 30 September 2025 is £46.3m (30 September 2024: £156.5m). Goodwill balances are tested annually for impairment. The Group allocated goodwill to cash generating units (CGUs) which represent the lowest level of asset groupings that generate separately identifiable cash inflows that are not dependent on other CGUs.

The Group completed its annual impairment review as at 30 September 2025 and concluded that no impairment of goodwill balances was required.

Fair value less costs to sell

In accordance with IAS 36, during the year ended 30 September 2025, tests for impairment are based on the calculation of a fair value less costs to sell (FVLCTS) which has been used to establish the recoverable amount of the CGU. The FVLCTS valuation of each standalone CGU has been calculated by determining sustainable earnings, which are based on Adjusted EBITDA1 , and applying a reasonable market multiple on the calculated sustainable earnings. Estimated sustainable earnings have been determined taking into account past experience and includes expectations based on a market participant view of maintainable performance of the business based on market volatility and uncertainty as at 30 September 2025. The sustainable earnings input is a level 3 measurement; level 3 measurements are inputs which are normally unobservable to market participants.

The sustainable earnings figures used in this calculation include key assumptions regarding sustainable revenues and costs for the business. If the assumptions and estimates used in this valuation prove to be incorrect, the carrying value of goodwill may be overstated.

During this year, the Committee has reviewed the Group's latest available forecasts, along with its ongoing execution of the new strategy and management's future action plans, as part of its consideration of the utilised sustainable earnings figures.

The Group incurs certain overhead costs in respect of support services provided centrally to the CGUs. Such support services include Finance, Human Resources, Legal, Information Technology and additional central management support in respect of stewardship and governance. In calculating sustainable earnings these overhead costs have been allocated to the CGUs based on the extent to which each CGU has benefited from the services provided. This allocation is primarily based on the time spent by the relevant central department in supporting each CGU, informed by headcount or another reasonable proxy where available. Where possible, specific cost allocations have been applied. The methodology remains consistent with the prior period to ensure the allocation reflects the Group's operating model.

The Adjusted EBITDA1 multiple used in the calculations is based on an independent third party assessment of the implied enterprise value (from a market participant perspective as at 30 September 2025) of each CGU based on a population of comparable companies and precedent transactions. The estimated cost to sell was based on other recent transactions that the Group has undertaken.

The Committee reviewed the FVLCTS calculations, including the sustainable earnings assumptions and the applied multiple. This review considered independent third-party valuations as at 30 September 2025, which reflect a market participant view of business performance in light of prevailing market volatility and uncertainty.

Impairment conclusions

The Committee assessed the recoverable amount of each CGU using fair value less costs to sell as at 30 September 2025, after applying the methodology described above. The Committee concurred with management's view that, in all cases, the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying amount and, accordingly, no impairment losses were recognised for the year ended 30 September 2025.

Sustainable earnings include a key assumption regarding the achievement of forecast revenue within each CGU assessment.

The Committee reviewed the sensitivity analysis prepared by management, focusing on reasonably possible changes to this key revenue assumption. In particular, the Committee considered the impact of a 10% shortfall in forecast revenue (after factoring in controllable variable cost reductions and maintaining margins) and concurred with management's view that, under this scenario, the recoverable amount of each CGU would continue to exceed its carrying amount, and no material impairment would arise.

Discontinued operations and held-for-sale classification

(New item: see Note 16 to the Financial Statements)

Held-for-sale classification

Under IFRS 5, a disposal group is classified as held for sale when management is committed to a plan to sell, the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition, the sale is highly probable and expected to complete within 12 months, and the disposal group is measured at the lower of its carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

During the year, the Group committed to a plan to dispose of its Escode business, which met the above criterion and has therefore been classified as held for sale as at 30 September 2025. Management determined the sale to be highly probable and expected to complete within 12 months. Accordingly, assets of £198.0m and associated liabilities of £39.8m relating to the Group's Escode business have been presented as held for sale as at 30 September 2025.

The Committee reviewed and concurred with management's assessment of the held-for-sale classification, including the appropriateness of the measurement basis and related disclosures.

Discontinued operations

Under IFRS 5, a disposal Group is classified as a discontinued operation when:

  • It is a component of the entity
  • It has either been disposed of or is classified as held for sale
  • It represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations, or is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of such a component

Escode represents a major line of business within one of the Group's two reportable segments, contributing 21.8% of Group revenue (2024: 20.3%) and 35.0% of Group gross profit (2024: 34.0%). Given Escode also met the criteria for classification as held for sale at 30 September 2025 (as described above), the Committee reviewed and concurred with management's assessment that the requirements for discontinued operations were satisfied as at 30 September 2025, including the adequacy of all related disclosures.

1 Adjusted EBITDA are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See unaudited Appendix 1 and the Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->

Audit Committee report continued

The Group's approach to materiality

In considering the materiality of any individual issue or issues in aggregate, the Group looks at a range of qualitative and quantitative measures to assess whether omitting, misstating or obscuring information could reasonably be expected to influence decisions that the primary users of general-purpose Financial Statements make on the basis of those Financial Statements. The range of measures includes (but is not limited to) the primary Financial Statements themselves, the individual line item in question, and whether the issue moves the result from one side of an inflection point to another (for example, turning a profit into a loss or a net asset into a net liability). Qualitative and quantitative measures are both considered, as is any potential impact on remuneration or banking arrangements such as debt covenants.

Internal audit

The risk and assurance function is responsible for internal audit, and the provision of assurance in relation to financial, operational and quality systems and processes. The team is responsible for supporting the implementation of risk management across the business and monitors the implementation of related action plans. During the year, 19 internal audit reports were issued to the Audit Committee covering a range of risk areas including but not limited to key financial controls, backup controls, HR and payroll processes, including IR35, expenses and business cases.

The Audit Committee maintains an ongoing review of the risk and assurance function, which reports directly into the Chair of the Committee. The Committee is responsible for approving the content and coverage of the Internal Audit Plan, which documents the links to the Group's strategic risks, key controls and associated assurance coverage. In addition, the risk and assurance team has a co-source arrangement as required for IT specialist audits and also utilises the cyber experts from within the business. The members of the risk and assurance team are all qualified in ACA, ACCA, CIMA, or hold the CIIA qualification. The Internal Audit Plan also includes time for the continual professional development of the team.

The work of the risk and assurance function is a regular standing agenda item at all Committee meetings where a full update is provided including updates on audit and assurance activities, progress against the Internal Audit Plan, and commentary and tracking of the implementation of agreed management actions to address deficiencies in an expedited manner. All internal audit reports are provided to the PwC external audit team and discussed during regular catch-up meetings. The Internal Audit Plan is reviewed to ensure continued relevance, or is adjusted to the current environment taking a risk‑based approach.

In FY25, the risk and assurance team has carried out a gap analysis against the 2024 CIIA Standards and commissioned an external quality assessment which is required once every five years. The output will be shared with the Audit Committee in early FY26.

Internal controls and risk management

The Board is responsible for establishing, maintaining and monitoring the Group's system of risk management and internal control and reviewing its effectiveness. The Committee monitors the performance of management in this area.

We have an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the principal risks faced by the Group, which has been in place for the year under review and is deemed effective up to the date of approval of the Annual Report and Accounts.

The Group's non-Cyber Security risks are monitored by the Audit Committee on behalf of the Board, which sets aside time for an in-depth discussion of notable or changing risks to the business.

A description of the process for managing risk, together with a description of the principal risks and strategies to manage those risks, is provided on pages 29 to 37. Cyber risks are reviewed by the Cyber

Security Committee; the Cyber Security Committee Report can be found on pages 79 and 80.

Internal control systems are designed to meet the needs of the Group and the risks to which it is exposed. By their nature, however, internal control systems are designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure and can provide only reasonable but not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. Key elements of the risk management and internal control system are described below.

Controls relating to financial reporting and preparation of the Annual Report and Accounts

  • Information provided to management covering financial performance and key performance indicators, including non-financial measures
  • A robust internal review process to ensure the integrity of the preparation of the Annual Report and Accounts
  • A detailed budgeting process where business units prepare plans for the coming year
  • Procedures for the approval of capital expenditure and investments and acquisitions
  • Monthly operational reviews to monitor and reforecast results as required against the annual operating plan, with major variances followed up and management action taken where appropriate
  • The Group finance manual

Other controls

  • Defined management structure and delegation of authority to Committees of the Board, subsidiary boards and associated business units
  • Regional governance committees have been established to provide management with ongoing oversight
  • Recruitment standards and compliance training to ensure the integrity and competence of staff
  • Annual economic crime, ethics, data protection, information security, health and safety, export controls, sexual harassment and climate change mandatory training for all colleagues
  • Clearly documented internal procedures set out in the Group's ISO 9001-2015-accredited quality manual
  • Regular internal audits of key processes and procedures under the Group's ISO 9001 and ISO 27001-accredited quality assurance process
  • Monitoring of any whistleblowing or fraud reports

The external auditor regularly reports its findings on those areas of internal control which it assesses as part of the external audit to the Board and the Audit Committee.

Our internal control effectiveness is assessed through the performance of regular checks, which in the year ended 30 September 2025 included:

  • Assessment of the identification and management of risks connected to the Group's strategy and management of strategic change
  • Reviewing and testing the Group's financial reporting processes
  • Performing compliance monitoring activities for travel, expenses and health and safety
  • Assessment of the Group's processes for identifying and mitigating potential conflicts of interest
  • Monitoring the completion of the Group's mandatory compliance training

Following these regular checks, it was deemed that the controls were effective and the internal control systems are designed to meet the needs of the Group and its risks.

Compliance with the revised Corporate Governance Code is being reviewed with a dry run planned for FY26. This will be discussed with the Audit Committee and progress updates communicated throughout FY26.

Whistleblowing and confidential reporting procedures

The Group operates a confidential reporting and whistleblowing procedure (known as our "whistleblowing policy"). The policy aims to support the stewardship of the Group's assets and the integrity of the Financial Statements as well as protecting colleague welfare. The procedure is reviewed annually by the Committee to ensure that it remains fit for purpose.

The Group has appointed an independent third party reporting agent to be the first point of contact for those who do not wish to use normal internal line management channels for reporting their concerns. This is advertised both internally, via colleague noticeboards and our intranet, and externally on the website. Colleagues are asked to undertake mandatory training on an annual basis including a reminder on the Code of Ethics policy and the whistleblowing helpline.

The Committee reviews any whistleblowing or confidential reporting of concerns raised during the year with respect to their nature, scale and any associated or consequential risks.

Review of the Audit Committee's effectiveness

For the reasons described in the Chair's Introduction to Governance, no Board or Committee evaluation was carried out during the year.

External auditor appointment

The Committee is responsible for overseeing the relationship with the external auditor, including recommending to the Board their appointment, reappointment and removal, assessing their independence on an ongoing basis and approving the statutory audit fees. The Committee notes the publication in May 2023 of the FRC's Audit Committees and the External Audit: Minimum Standard. In making these recommendations the Committee considers:

  • The experience, industry knowledge and expertise of the auditor
  • The scope and planning of the audit and any variations from the plan
  • The quality of the processes adopted
  • The auditor's explanations of significant risks to audit quality by reference to the Company's specific circumstances and changes to the risks
  • The fees charged
  • Its attitude to, and handling of, key audit judgements
  • Its ability to challenge and communicate effectively with management
  • The quality of the final report
  • The FRC's Audit Quality Review report relating to the auditor
  • The appropriate and effective use of experts and specialists

PwC were appointed as the Group's external auditors during the 16-month period ended 30 September 2024. The current audit engagement partner has now served for two periods.

The external audit

As part of the Board's responsibility to ensure the integrity of the Company's financial reporting and audit processes, the Audit Committee undertook a review of the effectiveness of the external audit.

PwC is engaged to express an opinion on the Financial Statements. It reviews the data contained in the Financial Statements to the extent necessary to express its opinion. It discusses with management the reporting of results and the financial position of the Company and presents findings to the Committee. Where it makes recommendations in its report to the Committee, the Committee reviews them and agrees with management the manner and extent to which they should be implemented.

Each of the Directors in office at the date of this report is not aware of any relevant information that has not been made available to PwC and each Director has taken steps to be aware of all such information and to ensure it is available to PwC. PwC's audit report is published on pages 99 to 103.

Auditor's independence and objectivity

The Audit Committee confirms that the Company has complied with the provisions of the Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Investigation Order 2014 during the financial year.

The Committee received a formal statement of independence from the external auditor.

The Committee recognises the importance of ensuring that the independence and objectivity of the external auditor is not impaired through the provision of non-audit services. We have in place robust policies on the use of auditors for non-audit work. Additionally, the Audit Committee's approval is also required for any fees for any non-audit work undertaken by the auditor.

During the year, the Group paid PwC £80,000 (2024: £80,000) for its review of the interim Financial Statements and £2,000 (2024: £2,000) for access to a generic online accounting manual (both of which are non-audit services). These represented 5.1% (2024: 4.9%) of the total audit fees. No other non-audit services were provided by the external auditor.

All significant pieces of non-audit work are put to informal tender to suitable parties that, if appropriate, can include the external auditor. Upon review as to suitability and price, the work will then be placed with the service provider recommended. If this is the external auditor, then Audit Committee approval is required. The external auditor was not engaged during the year to provide any services which may have given rise to a conflict of interest. The Committee is satisfied that the overall levels of audit and non-audit fees are not material relative to the income of the external auditor as a whole and therefore that the objectivity and independence of the external auditor were not compromised.

During the year, our external auditor received ad hoc Cyber Security services in the ordinary course of business, totalling £13,431 (2024: £151,861). The Committee is satisfied that this work is immaterial and provided on normal commercial terms to both the external auditor and the Company and therefore the objectivity and independence of the external auditor are not compromised.

External auditor's effectiveness

Since its appointment, PwC has been fully engaged with both management and the Audit Committee to ensure a smooth and effective implementation of the audit. This has included:

  • Audit planning: PwC presented a detailed audit plan for the financial year ended 30 September 2025, which included its approach to significant areas of risk.
  • Independence: PwC has confirmed its independence in accordance with applicable regulations and has established rigorous controls to ensure this is maintained throughout its engagement.
  • Engagement with management: Feedback from management indicates that PwC has adopted a thorough and collaborative approach to understanding the business's operations, processes and risk areas.

During the financial year, I attended regular meetings with PwC's engagement partner without management being present. This provided the opportunity for open dialogue. The engagement partner demonstrated her understanding of the Group's business risks and the consequential impact on the Financial Statements.

The Audit Committee will continue to closely monitor PwC's performance throughout the audit period and conduct a post-audit review to assess its effectiveness in delivering a high quality and independent audit.

In line with the UK Corporate Governance Code, the Audit Committee will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the external audit process annually, ensuring that the Company's auditor continues to meet the highest standards of independence, audit quality and service.

Audit Committee report continued

Related party transactions and other fees approved by the Committee

Refer to Note 29 for related party transactions during the year.

Fair, balanced and understandable

At the request of the Board, the Committee considered whether the 2025 Annual Report and Accounts, when taken as a whole, was fair, balanced and understandable (FBU) and whether it provided the necessary information for shareholders to assess NCC Group's position and performance, business model and strategy. The reviews outlined in the diagram below include reviews of all material matters, as reported elsewhere in this Annual Report and Accounts, and reviews of the balance of good and bad news and ensure the Annual Report and Accounts correctly reflects:

  • The Group's position and performance as described on pages 6 and 7 and 40 to 57
  • The Group's business model as described on pages 8 and 9
  • The Group's strategy as described on pages 12 and 13

The independent reviewers were not major contributors to the Annual Report and Accounts but, at the same time, as members of the Executive Committee or other senior colleagues, are deemed to be sufficiently well informed on the Group's activities to be able to give appropriate feedback on the FBU criteria. They undertake a qualitative review of disclosures and internal consistency throughout the Annual Report and Accounts. The Directors' statement on an FBU Annual Report and Accounts is set out on page 98.

Lynn Fordham

Chair, Audit Committee 11 December 2025

Fair, balanced and understandable

The following process was followed by the Committee in making its assessment:

1. Financial information

  • Prepared by individual business units
  • Consolidated by Group finance team
  • Reviewed by SVP Group Finance and CFO

2. Narrative disclosures

  • Prepared by Group finance team
  • Reviewed by SVP Group Finance and CFO
  • Various reports prepared by Committee Chairs, CEO and CFO

3. Independent reviewers

  • Senior members of the Executive Committee, Global Leadership Team and/or other senior colleagues
  • Those who have not been major contributors

4. Audit Committee Chair

  • Review of detailed verification documents
  • Review of findings and observations from independent reviewers

Nomination Committee report

Chris Stone Chair, Nomination Committee

The members of the Nomination Committee are Julie Chakraverty, Jennifer Duvalier and Lynn Fordham, along with me.

The Nomination Committee's objectives and responsibilities

The Nomination Committee is responsible for reviewing the size, structure, balance, composition and progressive refreshing of the Board and its Committees and as such its duties include:

  • Reviewing the structure of the Board
  • Evaluating the balance of skills, knowledge, experience and diversity on the Board
  • Making recommendations for further recruitment to the Board or proposing changes to the existing structure of the Board, or individual Directors
  • Reviewing the leadership needs of the Company, both Executive and Non-Executive
  • Succession planning for Directors and other senior Executives within the business
  • Recruiting, appointing and exiting of Directors
  • Overseeing membership of, and succession to, the various Board Committees
  • Reviewing the time commitment required from the Non-Executive Directors on NCC Group business

The Chair of the Board leads the process for the appointment of new Non-Executive Directors to the Board and for the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer, in conjunction with the Chair, leads the process for the Chief Financial Officer. The Senior Independent Director leads the process for a new Chair of the Board.

In relation to an appointment to the Board, the Committee draws up a specification and assesses the capabilities and experience required for such a role, taking into account the Board's existing composition, including relevant experience and understanding of our stakeholder groups.

We also assess the time commitment required. Candidates are sought by third party executive search consultants and, where appropriate, through the assessment of internal candidates and are then formally considered by the Nomination Committee. Extensive external referencing is also completed.

Board succession

The Committee is tasked with overseeing the succession planning process and providing recommendations to the Board. It adopts a long-term perspective on succession planning, consistently evaluating Board tenure and diversity (with an emphasis on gender, cultural background and experience), and identifying the skills necessary

for the Board to effectively support the Company's strategy both in the immediate future and over several years.

The Committee's efforts in succession planning played a crucial role in recruitment activities over the years. In the forthcoming year, the Committee will continue to prioritise the establishment of suitable succession plans for various timeframes.

Diversity

Our objective is to have a broad range of skills, backgrounds, experiences and personal attributes within the Board as this ensures the Board is best placed to serve the Company.

All appointments are made on merit and against objective criteria with due regard for the benefits of diversity on the Board, including gender identity, nationality and educational and professional background, as well as individual characteristics which will enhance diversity of thinking on the Board. NCC Group and the Committee value the aims and objectives of the FTSE Women Leaders Review (formerly the Hampton‑Alexander Review on FTSE women leaders) and the Parker Review on ethnic diversity of UK boards and support and apply the Group's diversity policy.

The Committee is also mindful of the Group's diversity policy when making appointments to the Board Committees (Audit, Cyber Security, Nomination and Remuneration), ensuring an appropriate range of backgrounds across Committee members to enhance quality decision making.

The Group's gender diversity statistics are set out on page 19. At Board level, we currently have three females, one of whom is a person of colour; however, we note that diversity extends beyond the measurable statistics of gender and ethnicity. We continue to take diversity in its wider context into account, having regard to the diversity policy, and recommend only the most appropriate candidates for appointment to the Board.

During the year ended 31 May 2021, we made the firm commitment that by 2024, we would have at least 33% female representation on our Board and at least one person of colour. In 2022 we delivered on our commitment and we will also meet the FTSE Women Leaders Review target of 40% by the end of 2025. Although this is best practice for FTSE 350 companies, we have committed to this target regardless of which share index we are in. Our Board now has 43% female representation.

We remain focused on ensuring diversity within our leadership population and will continue to address this during future Board and Executive Committee appointments. Improvements in diversity are often not a quick process; however, we are very mindful of the need to continue to take positive action, and the matter remains an ongoing priority on our agenda. Accessing the candidates we require to reach this target will involve us looking beyond the obvious pool of existing board directors within the UK and we are committed to ensuring that we extend our talent search to other sectors and locations globally to ensure we find a diverse pool of candidates to provide us with true diversity of thought, culture and lived experience, around our Board table.

When a new Director is appointed, they receive a full, formal and tailored induction into the Company and discuss with the Chair to identify any immediate and longer-term training requirements.

The Committee's terms of reference can be found in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website. The terms of reference are reviewed annually and updated when necessary.

Committee meetings

During this financial year, the Committee held one scheduled meeting.

The attendance of individual Committee members at Nomination Committee meetings is shown in the table on page 65.

Nomination Committee report continued

Activities during the year

During the year, the Committee:

  • Evaluated the skills, knowledge and experience around the Board table
  • Reviewed the structure, size and composition of the Board
  • Reviewed the Directors' length of service
  • Reviewed the diversity of the Board
  • Reviewed the memberships of all Committees
  • Reviewed the expected time commitment of the Chair and the Non-Executive Directors

During the year, the Nomination Committee has had an in-depth presentation from the Chief People Officer, focused on leadership, succession planning and talent management and development, informed by insights from our data analysis and the external environment. These presentations looked at the overall current position, and in particular senior succession, i.e. the Executive Committee and its direct reports.

Presentations and updates during the year

This year the Committee has had a number of presentations and updates on various colleague matters across the Group, including:

  • Undertook a deep dive into Board composition and succession, inclusive of Chair succession
  • Reviewed achievements over the previous year for the global people team and looked forward to priorities for the year ahead
  • Reviewed our ongoing development of capability, with a particular focus on senior succession and talent
  • Reviewed our approach to collecting colleague diversity data, with a focus on building colleague sentiment
  • Considered the generational perspectives of colleagues within the Group and their diverse needs from an organisational and leadership perspective
  • Received comprehensive colleague engagement briefings on survey results from the "MyVoice" survey (which utilises the Glint platform), along with the agreed next steps and future commitments in response to colleague feedback. Exit interview data and key themes were also presented to the Committee
  • Reviewed both present and former colleague sentiment on Glassdoor and LinkedIn
  • Explored our current global leadership KPIs and discussed opportunities for improvement

To support the ambition and our commitment to improving global diversity, we continue to focus on:

Processes

  • Removing barriers to entry and making our talent attraction and acquisition experience best in class, leading to a review of our selection methodology and a new framework being developed, to help level the playing field for under-represented communities, remove bias and create a robust and valid way of identifying and selecting talent
  • The ongoing review of our policies, processes and documentation to ensure all bias is removed (including adverts and job descriptions), and ensuring the use of inclusive language wherever possible

Culture

  • We continue to embed our behavioural framework into the business via our global, hiring, onboarding and manager capability programmes
  • We completed the rollout of our Enabling Performance Leadership programme to our Group leadership team (GLT)/extended leadership team (ELT) populations. We also delivered a series of other management development interventions to support leadership and manager capability
  • Our colleague resource groups have continued to meet regularly and there has been some investment with external partnerships and events. The intention is to continue to have an ExCom sponsor to provide support for our DEI colleague resource to make a positive change and build awareness, to foster inclusion, awareness and meaningful conversations while empowering colleagues to make positive change and cultivate an inclusive working environment
  • Moments that Matter continues to embed and evolve as a suite of supportive, people-focused policies designed around our colleagues and their needs

Colleague voice

  • Committed to an ongoing open dialogue with our colleagues, through our biannual engagement survey ("MyVoice"), colleague forums, live leadership "Ask Me Anything" sessions, Board engagement sessions with colleagues, our colleague resource groups, listening sessions and our whistleblowing lines which all play an active role in creating a great place to work (for further information, please see the Stakeholder Engagement section on pages 14 and 15)
  • We have a "Speak Up" framework which was launched globally the previous year to provide clear guidance and signposting to colleagues, covering the various routes to raise concerns, and the relevant policies to address these issues where required, as well as to share colleague feedback
  • NCC Diamonds, our annual colleague recognition programme, completed its fifth cycle. NCC Diamonds provides colleagues across the organisation with the opportunity to nominate individuals or teams for the incredible work they do, recognising the brilliance and accomplishments of their peers. Nominations are linked to our NCC Group values, followed by regional and global judging panels, with each category winner receiving a "money can't buy" experience

Long term

  • We continue to develop our employer brand to broaden our attraction strategies to ensure we remain current and attractive in an extremely competitive global tech talent market
  • Building strategic partnerships with organisations to support our commitment to create an inclusive and diverse environment
  • Connecting the initiatives at every stage of colleagues' lives and careers to create enriched career pathways and achieve the best return for investment with improved colleague retention. Initiatives include work experience, the Next Generation Talent programme, mentoring and CyberFirst bursaries and alumni programmes

Committee effectiveness

For the reasons described in the Chair's Introduction to Governance, no Board or Committee evaluation was carried out during the year.

External search consultancies

During the year, no external search agencies were engaged.

Chris Stone

Chair, Nomination Committee 11 December 2025

Cyber Security Committee report

Julie Chakraverty Chair, Cyber Security Committee

The Cyber Security Committee was formed to focus specifically on the cyber and data protection risks faced by the Group. This reflects the significant threat posed by cyber risks, the nature of our business and the potential damage to the business as a high value target for malicious acts. The Committee's activities aim to challenge and support improvements to the Group's information security and data protection policies, defences and controls, so as to comply with global data protection regulations around the world, and ensure that the Group looks after its own information, and the information that its customers entrust to it, with the proper care and attention.

The Committee was formed in November 2016 and I have been Chair since July 2022.

Jennifer Duvalier and Lynn Fordham (both Independent Non-Executive Directors) served as members of the Committee throughout the year. Chris Stone (Company Chair) is also a member of the Committee.

The Group's SVP, Global Governance, Estates and Procurement, the Director of Internal Security (DIS), and the Group General Counsel (also Head of Data Governance) (GC) are standing invitees of the Committee. The Executive Directors are invited to attend Committee meetings when the Committee considers it to be appropriate, as are the Data Protection and Governance Officers.

The Cyber Security Committee's objectives and responsibilities

The Cyber Security Committee is responsible for assessing the performance of the Group's internal security and defences and as such its duties are to:

  • Oversee and advise the Board on the current cyber risk exposure of the Group and future cyber risk strategy
  • Review at least annually the Group's Cyber Security breach response and crisis management plan
  • Review reports on any Cyber Security incidents and the adequacy of resulting actions
  • Receive and consider the regular update reports from the DIS and GC and ensure the DIS and GC are given the right of direct access to the Committee
  • Consider and recommend actions in respect of all cyber and data protection risk issues escalated to it
  • Keep under review the effectiveness of the Group's controls, services and products to analyse potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited
  • Regularly assess what the Group's most valuable intangible assets are and the most sensitive Group and customer information and assess whether the controls in place sufficiently protect those assets and information
  • Review the Group's ability to identify and manage new cyber risks
  • Assess the adequacy of resources and funding for data protection and Cyber Security defence and control activities
  • Regularly review the cyber and data protection risk posed by third parties including outsourced IT and other partners
  • Oversee Cyber Security and data protection due diligence undertaken as part of an acquisition and advise the Board of the risk exposure
  • Annually assess the adequacy of the Group's cyber insurance cover

The Committee's terms of reference can be found in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website. The terms of reference are reviewed annually and updated when necessary.

Cyber Security Committee report continued

Committee effectiveness

For the reasons described in the Chair's Introduction to Governance, no Board or Committee evaluation was carried out during the year.

During the year the Committee, along with the Board, reaffirmed that Cyber Security and data protection are sufficiently important risks for the business and that the Committee should remain focused on this specific set of risks. Therefore, the current structure in which the responsibility for broader risk management remains with the Audit Committee will continue.

Committee activities during the year

The continuing focus, in terms of Cyber Security, was ensuring the risks to the Group remained well documented and the types of threats and attacks were well understood, building on a risk analysis which was performed during the year before to ensure cyber risks map to the enterprise risk architecture, and the work of the Global Technical Services (GTS) security team was tailored to the highest value areas.

Training has been a critical area once again this year, with an increased emphasis on identifying phishing emails as this is an attack vector that is frequently observed. All colleagues now partake in monthly phishing exercises that cycle through difficulty levels to target different attacker sophistication, with educational assistance sent out post-exercise to help identify suspicious elements of an email that may indicate a phishing attack. Board training and updates on developments within Cyber Security are also provided regularly.

Turning to data protection, the regulatory landscape is continually evolving – this past year saw regulatory updates including the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (UK), the phased implementation of certain aspects of the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act), and changes to Australia's Privacy Act coming into effect, to name a few. The data protection and governance team, along with colleagues in the Group legal team, is working closely to stay abreast of such changes and support the business accordingly. The team has also continued to experience a number of Data Subject Rights Requests it receives as individuals become more aware of their rights under GDPR.

Noteworthy highlights since our previous report include:

  • All Rights Requests received this year have been fulfilled within legally compliant time periods.
  • Considerable work has gone into our public facing policies and notices. The transparency of information provided to the public and colleagues has significantly improved in line with best practice. This includes the candidate notice (which is available in English, Spanish and, in the coming weeks, Dutch) and sub-processor and third party processor information, amongst others.
  • The project to transfer our Records of Processing Activities into a unified system nears completion.

Following last year's work on the standard terms and conditions, further work has been done to strengthen the Group's data protection position in client contracts through updates to the data processing agreements. Additionally, appendices have been drafted for each service line. This provides clarity to clients and ensures a tailored and commercial approach.

Committee meetings

During this financial year, although the Committee only met once, meetings were held in September 2024 and October 2025 in the weeks just preceding and following the financial year. The attendance of individual Committee members at the Cyber Security Committee meetings is shown in the table on page 65.

Julie Chakraverty

Chair, Cyber Security Committee 11 December 2025

Remuneration Committee report

Jennifer Duvalier Chair, Remuneration Committee

On behalf of your Board, I am pleased to present our Directors' Remuneration Report (DRR) for the year ended 30 September 2025.

The report is divided into three sections: the Remuneration Committee Chair's Statement, a brief summary of the shareholder approved Directors' Remuneration Policy for the period 2025–2028, and the Annual Report on Remuneration for FY25.

At the AGM in January 2025, 80.33% of shareholders voted in favour of the Directors' Remuneration Report and 89.61% of shareholders voted in favour of the Directors' Remuneration Policy, and I would like to thank shareholders for their continuing support on both these areas.

Annual statement

The Committee comprised Julie Chakraverty, Lynn Fordham and me as Chair. Our Board Chair, Chris Stone, also attended all meetings. Our remuneration consultants, Chief People Officer, Director of Reward and Benefits, CEO and other Executives, including the SVP, Group Finance, were invited to meetings as required, although we always ensure that we have time without Executives present, and no Executive was present when decisions relating to their own reward were made.

The Committee closely monitors shareholder guidance and feedback on remuneration. Shareholder voting on AGM remuneration resolutions is reviewed annually, shareholders are consulted when changes to policy are being considered and major shareholders have the opportunity to provide annual feedback to the Board and Remuneration Committee on NCC Group's remuneration approach at annual engagement meetings.

Remuneration Policy and changes

Throughout the year ended 30 September 2025, we operated both within the Remuneration Policy that was approved by shareholders at the AGM in November 2021 (until 28 January 2025), and then the Remuneration Policy that was approved by shareholders at the AGM in January 2025 (from 28 January 2025).

The main changes to our Remuneration Policy were summarised within the 2024 Remuneration Report, along with information as to how we dealt with our change in year end from 31 May to 30 September, and how we dealt with a longer 16 month accounting period to 30 September 2024.

Base salaries

During the year ended 30 September 2025, the Committee reviewed and benchmarked both the CEO's and CFO's salary. The Committee increased the CEO's base salary by 2.5% taking Mike's salary from £561,350 to £575,384, with effect from 1 June 2025, which was slightly lower than the increase for the wider workforce (circa 2.9%).

After due deliberation, the Committee agreed to increase Guy Ellis's base salary by 9.6% from £312,000 to £342,000 with effect from 1 June 2025. As a reminder, on appointment (in June 2023), Guy's salary was set somewhat below the benchmark level (against similar sized peers operating in IT services and adjacent sectors). Since then, Guy has not just settled into the role but has exceeded expectations with positive engagement with shareholders and significant contribution to various initiatives. For these reasons we felt it was appropriate to award an above workforce rate increase. Alongside this increase, the Committee also increased Guy's notice period from 6 to 12 months, recognising his contribution to the business and the need to retain him for the medium to long term.

For the forthcoming financial year, the Committee has taken the decision to increase Guy's salary by a further 9.6% from £342,000 to £375,000, with effect from 1 October 2025. The Committee was very mindful that this increase follows shortly after the previous increase. However, since the departure of the CIO, Guy is now also responsible for the Global Technical Services (GTS) function. This is a significant change and step up in Guy's scope of responsibilities for which the Committee wanted to ensure he was appropriately remunerated. It is anticipated at this stage that future increases for Guy will be aligned to those for the workforce.

Performance related pay – annual bonus

The annual bonus targets for the year ended 30 September 2025 for both the CEO and CFO were based on the satisfaction of stretching financial and strategic targets.

The financial target of Group Adjusted operating profit for the year to 30 September 2025 had a weighting of 60%. Group Adjusted operating profit was £23.7m and this resulted in a payout of 24.8% of the 60%. The strategic objectives had a weighting of 40% and covered a number of areas supporting the pillars of the strategy, together with people and operational excellence objectives.

The Committee determined that the strategic element should pay out at 36.5% for the CEO, and 40% for the CFO. Further detail on performance against strategic objectives is provided later in the report. This resulted in a total bonus for the year of 61.3% for the CEO and 64.8% for the CFO of maximum resulting in a bonus payout of £433,719 for the CEO and £260,820 for the CFO.

For both the CEO and CFO, 35% of the aggregate bonus in excess of £50,000 earned over the year to 30 September 2025 will be deferred into shares and will vest after two years. Clawback and malus provisions are also in place for the bonus.

The Committee considered whether it should exercise any discretion to the bonus outcomes. The Committee concluded that the aggregate outcomes from the financial and the strategic, non-financial elements were a fair reflection of the performance in the relevant areas, and the Committee therefore decided not to exercise any discretion.

For 2025/26, the Committee has considered the weighting of metrics in the annual bonus. The Committee concluded that the weighting on the Group Adjusted operating profit should be maintained at 60% of maximum, to continue to give appropriate emphasis to this metric. The remaining 40% will apply to key strategic metrics, with stretching targets. These will include targets linked to the pillars of the strategy, together with people and operational excellence objectives. These will be fully disclosed in the Remuneration Report for 2025/26.

Annual statement continued

Performance related pay – LTIP

During the year ended 30 September 2025, no LTIP awards were made to either the CEO or CFO. As reported in the 2024 Directors' Remuneration Report, for the LTIP awards made in June 2024, the Committee proposed an uplift to the award opportunity for all long-term incentive participants of four months to allow for a smoother transition between LTIP grants given the change to the accounting reference date. In the future, awards will be granted in January with the performance period starting on 1 October. Our next cycle of LTIP awards is scheduled to take place in either December 2025 or January 2026. The performance period for these LTIP awards will be 1 October 2025 to 30 September 2028.

The 2022 LTIP (in which only the CEO participated) vested at 20% of maximum. This was based on the cash conversion element (weighting 20%) being achieved in full, but with below-threshold achievement of the EPS growth and TSR metrics. The Committee considered whether any downward discretion should be applied to the overall vesting outcome. It concluded that it remained important to recognise and continue to incentivise strong levels of cash conversion and that it would not be appropriate to apply discretion to the payment outcome given the relatively low weighting on this element. The Committee also considered NCC Group's underlying performance and the experience of both our shareholders and wider workforce.

Non-Executive Director and Chair's fees

In accordance with our Remuneration Policy, the fees for Non‑Executive Directors were reviewed by the Company Chair, CEO and CFO, based on data provided by our remuneration consultants. After careful consideration, it was determined that these would be increased by 5% during 2024/25 with the increases being effective 1 October 2024. This was against benchmarked data and the fact that Non-Executive Directors had not had any increases to base fees since 1 June 2022.The base fee was increased from £51,500 to £54,000.

The Remuneration Committee also conducted a review of the fees for the Board Chair, utilising data provided by our remuneration consultants. After careful consideration, it was determined that these would be increased by 5% during 2024/25 with the increases being effective 1 October 2024. This was against benchmarked data and the fact that the Chair fee had not had any increases since 1 June 2022. The base fee was increased from £154,500 to £162,225. In addition, in December 2025 the Committee increased the Chair's base fee by 2.5% taking Chris's fee from £162,225 to £166,280, with effect from 1 October 2025, which was slightly lower than the increase for the wider workforce (circa 2.9%).

Details of these fees and allowances are given in the Annual Report on Remuneration on page 92

Grants of shares under a below-Board Restricted Share Plan to broaden colleague share ownership

We remain committed to broadening share ownership throughout the Group, both as a reward and a retention tool. During the year, we made further grants to over 170 colleagues under our Restricted Share Plan (RSP) in January 2025, and in July 2025 made an inaugural grant to all colleagues, around 120, in the Philippines who had passed their probation period.

In addition, we also offered colleagues the opportunity to participate in our Save As You Earn/stock purchase share plans in the UK, the US, Canada, the Netherlands, Australia, Spain and (for the first time) the Philippines. Once again, these proved popular with high take-up levels.

The Group also continues to operate and actively promote the Share Incentive Plan (SIP) for UK-based colleagues, further increasing our commitment to cost effective colleague share ownership.

Colleague engagement

There are a number of existing channels of communication with colleagues with regard to NCC Group's remuneration policies and executive remuneration. Our engagement survey enables colleagues to provide feedback confidentially on many employment issues, including remuneration. Our designated NED for workforce engagement also held a number of colleague engagement sessions during the year in which colleagues were invited to provide feedback and comments on any issue, including executive remuneration and broader remuneration policies. In particular, a question and answer discussion is always held on executive remuneration and how this aligns with the wider Company pay policy. Our designated NED also reminds colleagues where the information can be located and answers any questions as they arise. The Committee also receives regular feedback from the Chief People Officer and the Director of Reward and Benefits on how colleagues perceive our remuneration policies and practices in the context of recruitment, retention and motivation. This information is used by the Committee in its monitoring and development of remuneration policies.

Conclusion

The 2025 Directors' Remuneration Report will be put to the usual annual advisory vote at the AGM on 3 March 2026. The Committee is committed to engagement and transparency and I welcome the opportunity for discussion of the Group's remuneration with shareholders, at our AGM or at any other time during the year, and look forward to your continuing support.

Jennifer Duvalier

Chair, Remuneration Committee

11 December 2025

Remuneration at a glance

The Directors' Remuneration Policy was approved by shareholders at the AGM on 28 January 2025 and our approach to implementing this for our Executive Directors can be found below:

Element Approach Approach for FY25 Approach for FY26
Salary Reviewed annually taking into account Group Salaries from 1 October 2024: Salaries from 1 October 2025:
and personal performance. Increases are
normally in line with the wider workforce but
also take into account other factors such as
• Mike Maddison (CEO) –
£561,350
• Mike Maddison (CEO) –
£575,384
changes to responsibility, development and
complexity of the role.
• Guy Ellis (CFO) – £312,000
until 1 June 2025, £342,000
from 1 June 2025
• Guy Ellis (CFO) – £375,000
Benefits Benefits principally include private
medical insurance, income protection
and life assurance.
As per the policy. No change for FY26.
Pension Pensions for FY25 were in line with
the maximum employer contribution available
to the majority of the workforce.
Pensions in line with the
workforce rate of 4.5% of salary.
No change for FY26.
Annual bonus Maximum annual bonus of 125% of salary. Maximum annual bonus of 125% No change for FY26.
35% of any bonus payment in excess of of salary.
£50,000 is normally deferred into shares or
nominal cost share options which vest after
Performance measures:
a two year period. • 60% Adjusted operating profit
Malus and clawback provisions apply. • 40% strategic objectives
Long Term Maximum annual award levels: For FY25, neither of the LTIP awards are expected to
Incentive Plan • Mike Maddison (CEO) – 175% of base salary
• Guy Ellis (CFO) – 150% of base salary
Executive Directors were
granted awards.
be made in December 2025/
January 2026 during the financial
year ending 30 September 2026,
Awards have a performance period of at least
three years and are normally subject to a further
holding period of two years.
which will be for performance
period 1 October 2025 to
30 September 2028.
Malus and clawback provisions apply.
Shareholding 200% of salary. As per the policy. No change for FY26.
requirement Post-cessation shareholding guidelines of 200% of
salary for year one and 100% of salary for year
two after stepping down as an Executive Director.

FY25 annual bonus outcome

Performance measure Threshold (20%) Target (40%) Maximum (60%) Actual Weighting Outcome achieved
Adjusted
operating profit
£23.1m £25.6m £29.1m £23.7m 60% 24.8%
Strategic The strategic targets were set individually for the Executive
Directors based on key strategic objectives for the year in their
area of responsibility – more details can be found on page 86.
Strategic
(see page 86)
40% CEO – 36.5%
CFO – 40.0%
Total 100% 100% CEO – 61.3%
CFO – 64.8%

2022 LTIP award outcomes

Performance measure Threshold
(15% vesting)
Target
(50% vesting)
Maximum
(100% vesting)
Actual Weighting Outcome achieved
Adjusted EPS growth 6% N/A 18% (31%) 60% 0%
Cash conversion 80% 85% 90% 92% 20% 20%
TSR Median N/A Upper quartile Lower quartile 20% 0%
Total 100% 20%

Annual Report on Remuneration

This part of the report has been prepared in accordance with Part 3 of The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 as amended and 9.8.8R of the Listing Rules.

The following report will be subject to an advisory shareholder vote at the AGM, which is scheduled to be held on 3 March 2026. The information on pages 81 to 93 has been audited where indicated.

How the Remuneration Policy has been implemented in the year ended 30 September 2025

This section sets out how the Remuneration Policy was implemented in 2024/25. The key implementation decisions during the year related to:

  • Review of salaries for the Executive Directors
  • The determination of bonus outcomes for the 2024/25 performance period
  • The performance outcome of the 2022–2025 LTIP

Further detail on these decisions, together with other information on payments made to Directors, is set out in the following sections.

Single total figure of remuneration (audited)

The detailed emoluments received by the Executive and Non-Executive Directors for the year ended 30 September 2025 are below. For ease of comparison, a 12 month period to 30 September 2024 has also been shown (these figures are, however, unaudited, with the audited figures being the 16 month period to 30 September 2024).

Director Period ended Salary/
Non-Executive
Director fees1
£000
Benefits2
£000
Pension
benefits3
£000
Total
fixed pay
£000
Annual
bonus4
£000
Long-term
incentive5
£000
Total
variable
pay
£000
Total
£000
Chris Stone 30 Sept 2025 171 171 171
12 months to
30 Sept 2024
163 163 163
16 months to
30 Sept 2024
217 217 217
Mike Maddison 30 Sept 2025 566 7 26 599 434 127 561 1,160
12 months to
30 Sept 2024
550 7 24 581 582 582 1,163
16 months to
30 Sept 2024 710 14 32 756 757 757 1,513
Guy Ellis8 30 Sept 2025 322 6 14 342 261 261 603
12 months to 30
Sept 2024
304 6 14 324 301 301 625
16 months to 30
Sept 2024
379 8 17 404 380 380 784
Julie Chakraverty6 30 Sept 2025 88 88 88
12 months to
30 Sept 2024
85 85 85
16 months to
30 Sept 2024 114 114 114
Jennifer Duvalier 30 Sept 2025 70 70 70
12 months to
30 Sept 2024
67 67 67
16 months to
30 Sept 2024
90 90 90
Lynn Fordham7 30 Sept 2025 70 70 70
12 months to
30 Sept 2024
67 67 67
16 months to 30
Sept 2024 90 90 90
Mike Ettling 30 Sept 2025 59 59 59
12 months to
30 Sept 2024
16 months to
56 56 56
30 Sept 2024 75 75 75
Tim Kowalski 30 Sept 2025
12 months to
30 Sept 2024
16 months to
30 Sept 2024 28 2 1 31 31
Chris Batterham 30 Sept 2025
12 months to
30 Sept 2024








16 months to
30 Sept 2024 28 28 28
Total 30 Sept 2025 1,346 13 40 1,399 695 127 822 2,221
12 months to
30 Sept 2024
1,292 13 38 1,343 883 883 2,226
16 months to
30 Sept 2024
1,731 24 50 1,805 1,137 1,137 2,942
  • 1 The Chair and Non-Executive Directors each receive an allowance paid as part of their base fees of £8,200 and £4,750 respectively, to cover all travel and expenses related to their roles on the Board.
  • 2 Benefits currently include the provision to every Executive Director of private medical insurance, income protection and life assurance. Benefits also include the discount to market value (plus savings bonus) of the SAYE option granted to Guy Ellis during the financial year.
  • 3 Executive Directors are entitled to a Company pension contribution, which is paid into the Group defined contribution personal pension scheme. They can also opt to have the same level of contribution made in the form of a cash contribution.
  • 4 Annual bonus payments for performance in the relevant financial year 35% of this bonus above £50,000 is deferred into nominal cost share options for two years. Dividend equivalents accrue on these shares. Awards are subject to service conditions but there are no further performance conditions.
  • 5 Long-term incentive awards vesting under the LTIP 87,281 shares vested to Mike Maddison with respect to the LTIP granted in 2022 which had a performance period ending on 30 September 2025. These have been valued using a share price of £1.45, which is the three month average share price over July, August and September 2025. These shares were awarded based on a share price of £2.005 on the day before the date of grant. As a result, the change in share price since the date of grant has resulted in an loss in value of £48,441. Guy Ellis did not have any LTIP awards vesting during the year to 30 September 2025.

The awards made to Tim Kowalski are covered within payments to former Directors.

  • 6 Julie Chakraverty joined the Board on 1 January 2022 and took over from Jennifer Duvalier as the designated Non-Executive Director for workforce engagement on behalf of the Board. On 1 July 2022, Julie took over from Chris Stone as Chair of the Cyber Security Committee, and on 1 February 2023 she took over from Chris Batterham as the Senior Independent Director.
  • 7 Lynn Fordham was appointed to the Board on 1 September 2022 and became Chair of the Audit Committee on 1 February 2023.
  • 8 Guy Ellis was appointed CFO on 30 June 2023.

Additional information in respect of the single total figure of remuneration Pension and benefits

The CEO's and CFO's pension provisions are in line with the level of the wider workforce, which is currently 4.5% of salary. These are either paid as pension contributions, or cash in lieu of pension.

Annual bonus (audited)

2024/25 annual bonus (audited)

For the year ended 30 September 2025, the maximum annual bonus opportunity for Mike Maddison and Guy Ellis was 125% of salary. For the 12 months ended 30 September 2025, bonuses of 61.3% for the CEO and 64.8% for the CFO of maximum were payable, being £433,719 and £260,820 respectively for Mike Maddison and Guy Ellis. In accordance with the Remuneration Policy, 35% of each payment (above £50,000) will be deferred into nominal cost share options for two years (these shares are subject to service conditions but there are no further performance conditions), with the remaining 65% paid in cash in December 2025. The performance measures and targets are set out below.

Financial targets – up to 60% of the annual bonus for the financial year to 30 September 2025 (audited)

Performance targets Mike Maddison Guy Ellis
Threshold
(20%)
Target
(40%)
Max.
(60%)
Actual Weighting Outturn Weighting Outturn
Adjusted operating
profit1
, target for CEO
and CFO
£23.1m £25.6m £29.1m £23.7m 60% 24.8% 60% 24.8%
Strategic The strategic targets were set individually for the Executive
Directors based on key strategic objectives for the year
in their area of responsibility – see below.
40%
40%
Total payout (% of bonus) 100% 61.3% 100% 64.8%
Bonus opportunity £707,535 £402,500
Total bonus for the year to 30 September 2025 £433,719 £260,820
Amount paid in cash (65%) £299,417
Amount deferred in shares (35%) £134,302 £187,033
£73,787

1 Adjusted operating profit – previous measure is an Alternative Performance Measure (APM) and not an IFRS measure. (See Note 3 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items.)

Annual Report on Remuneration continued

Additional information in respect of the single total figure of remuneration continued Annual bonus (audited) continued

Strategic targets – up to 40% of the annual bonus for the financial year to 30 September 2025 (audited)

The table below highlights the key strategic targets and achievements for each Executive Director. Bonus target ranges have been disclosed to the extent possible, but the achievement of some areas is determined by the Committee based on its judgement of performance.

Bonus award (% of
maximum total bonus)
Year ended
30 September 2025
Target and performance conditions Outcome Weighting Outcome
CEO targets
Our clients Ensure that the organisation is better equipped to grow sales in key areas of focus. 10% 10%
Our capabilities Improve NCC Group's revenue trajectory in agreed investment areas of our four
cyber capabilities.
7.5% 6.5%
Global delivery Ensure the successful rollout of Kantata and effective use of our global resources. 7.5% 7.5%
Differentiated brands Build profile (top of the funnel) to drive greater demand within key markets.
Drive demand within key markets to build pipeline. 5% 5%
People and operational excellence Simplify business operations and structure, globalise processes, and reduce costs.
Set up and operate during FY25 regional operating and governance/compliance
boards in all regions.
Demonstrate a commitment to improving engagement across the business
by taking action on opportunities identified through Glint surveys.
Focus on developing a client-focused culture, driving service excellence. 5% 5%
Insight, innovation and intelligence Develop innovative services that capitalise on advances in AI, data sharing
and/or automation, to build reputation, grow thought leadership and research
activity and improve revenue growth and profitability.
5% 2.5%
CEO outcome 40% 36.5%
CFO targets
Our clients Ensure that we are selling and delivering work that drives improved margins. 5% 5%
Global delivery Ensure the successful rollout of Kantata and effective use of our global resources. 7.5% 7.5%
People and operational excellence Simplify business operations and structure, globalise processes, and reduce costs.
Set up and operate during FY25 regional operating and governance/compliance
boards in all regions.
Demonstrate a commitment to improving engagement across the business
by taking action on opportunities identified through Glint surveys.
Focus on developing a client-focused culture, driving service excellence. 27.5% 27.5%
CFO outcome 40% 40%

Governance

Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) vesting (audited)

The LTIP awards made in October 2022 (with a performance period of 1 June 2022 to 30 September 2025) will vest in December 2025. Mike Maddison was a beneficiary of these and achieved a vesting of 20% of the award of 436,408 shares, being 87,281 shares.

Executive Number of
LTIP awards
Basis Performance period
Mike Maddison
436,408
175% of base salary
1 June 2022 to 30 September 2025
The performance conditions for these awards are set out below:
Weighting Component Metric Threshold
(15%
vesting)
Maximum
(100%
vesting)
Actual
performance
Actual %
vested
Vesting basis
60% Adjusted basic
EPS – previous
measure2,3
CAGR growth over a
three year period
6% 18% (31%) 0% Straight line between
threshold and maximum
20% Cash conversion
– previous
measure2,4
Average cash conversion4
ratio
– previous measure over a
three year period
80% 90% 92% 20% Straight line between
threshold and target, then
target and maximum
20% TSR TSR over three years vs FTSE
250 comparator group
(excluding investment trusts)
Median Upper
quartile
Lower
quartile
0% Straight line between
threshold and maximum
Total 20%

Long-term incentives granted during the financial year to 30 September 2025 (audited)

During the financial year to 30 September 2025, neither of the Executive Directors were granted awards.

SAYE options granted in the year ended 30 September 2025 (audited)

The Group operates an HMRC-approved SAYE scheme. All eligible colleagues, including Executive Directors, may be invited to participate on similar terms for a fixed period of three years. During the year, Guy Ellis joined the 2025 SAYE scheme (which will mature on 1 September 2028) and has options over 9,668 shares with an option price of £1.1387. No awards vested this year for either Executive Director.

Payments for loss of office and to past Directors (audited)

No payments were made for loss of office during the year. Tim Kowalski stepped down as CFO on 30 June 2023. The LTIP awards made in October 2022 (with a performance period of 1 June 2022–30 September 2025) will vest in December 2025. Tim Kowalski was a beneficiary of these and achieved a vesting of 20% of the award of 97,951 shares, being 19,590 shares (the original number of shares granted was 248,857 shares which was pro-rated for service). These awards are subject to the post-employment shareholding guideline.

Directors' interests in shares (audited)

The tables below set out details of the Executive Directors' outstanding share awards, which will vest in future years subject to performance conditions and/or continued service.

Summary of maximum LTIP awards outstanding

Total LTIP
options held at
30 September
20241
Granted
during the
year
Exercised
during the
year
Share price
on date of
exercise
Lapsed
during the
year
Total LTIP
options
held at
30 September
20251
Mike Maddison
Guy Ellis
2,399,730
845,639


N/A
N/A
349,127
2,050,603
845,639

1 Includes only unvested and unexercised LTIP options.

All awards granted under the LTIP are subject to continued employment and the satisfaction of the performance conditions as set out above. The awards were all nil-cost options.

2 Adjusted basic EPS – previous measure3, cash conversion – previous measure4 , and cash conversion ratio – previous measure are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See Appendix 1 and Financial Review for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items.

3 Adjusted basic EPS – previous measure is statutory basic EPS before share-based payments, amortisation of acquired intangibles and Individually Significant Items and the tax effect thereon.

4 Cash conversion – previous measure ratio percentage of net cash flow from operating activities before interest and tax divided by Adjusted EBITDA – previous measure.

Annual Report on Remuneration continued

Share ownership (audited)

The beneficial and non-beneficial interests of the current Directors in the share capital of NCC Group plc at 30 September 2025 are set out below. (Details of Executive Director shareholding requirements and achievement against these are set out below.)

Beneficial interests
in ordinary shares1
Nil-cost options subject
to performance2
SAYE options3 Deferred bonus nil‑cost
options4
Vested
but unexercised
nil‑cost options
Total
30 Sept
2025
30 Sept
2024
30 Sept
2025
30 Sept
2024
30 Sept
2025
30 Sept
2024
30 Sept
2025
30 Sept
2024
30 Sept
2025
30 Sept
2024
30 Sept
2025
30 Sept
2024
Chris Stone 756,195 712,843 756,195 712,843
Mike Maddison 171,707 148,063 1,963,322 2,399,730 18,699 18,699 189,683 130,190 87,281 2,430,692 2,696,682
Guy Ellis 1,602 3,533 845,639 845,639 9,668 98,967 70,901 955,876 920,073
Julie Chakraverty 63,914 63,914 63,914 63,914
Jennifer Duvalier 19,115 19,115 19,115 19,115
Mike Ettling 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Lynn Fordham 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

1 This information includes holdings of any connected persons.

Following the year ended 30 September 2025, the following Directors dealt shares under the colleague HMRC approved UK Share Incentive Plan. The number of shares traded are shown below:

  • On 17 October 2025, Mike Maddison and Guy Ellis purchased 113 and 56 shares respectively at £1.4527.
  • On 17 November 2025, Mike Maddison and Guy Ellis purchased 114 and 57 shares respectively at £1.4487.

Shareholding requirements (audited)

The Executive Directors are expected to build and retain a shareholding in the Group equivalent to at least 200% of base salary. Executives will normally be required to retain all vested deferred bonus shares and LTIP shares released from the holding period, until they have attained the minimum shareholding requirement and, even then, only when they have held vested LTIP shares for a minimum period of two years. Executive Directors will also be required to retain all shares vesting from SAYE schemes. For the avoidance of doubt, Executive Directors are permitted to sell sufficient shares in order to meet any tax obligation arising from vesting shares.

The table below sets out the Executive Directors' shareholding requirements and achievement against these. The percentages within this table have been calculated using a three month average share price (1 July 2025 to 30 September 2025) of £1.45, and include all unvested deferred bonus plans on a net of tax and National Insurance basis.

Shareholding
requirements
(% of salary)
Shareholding
as at
30 September
2025
(% of salary)
Requirement
met
Mike Maddison 200% 69% No
Guy Ellis 200% 21% No

Relative importance of the spend on pay

The table below presents the percentage change in total colleague remuneration relative to total dividends (interim and final) for the current and prior financial periods.

12 month
financial
year to
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
financial
period to
30 September
2024
£m
% change
Colleague remuneration costs1 203.3 283.6 (28.3%)
Dividends for the period 14.5 24.3 (40.3%)

1 Based on the figure shown in Note 6 to the consolidated Financial Statements.

2 These awards represent the outstanding LTIP interests, included in the table above, which are due to vest after 30 September 2025.

3 Representative SAYE scheme interests, which will vest after the end of the three year savings period in 2027, or 2028.

4 Nominal cost share options granted under the deferred bonus plans, subject to a service condition, tax and National Insurance (for Guy Ellis, awards made under the Restricted Share Plan of 9,450 shares made prior to his promotion to CFO are also included in this figure). During the year, awards were made under the Deferred Annual Bonus Schemes to the CEO and CFO of 59,493 shares and 33,066 shares respectively, which had a face value of £81,864 and £45,500 respectively.

Governance

Percentage change in the remuneration of Directors

The table below shows the movement in the salary or fees, benefits and annual bonus for each Director over the last five financial years compared to the equivalent changes for all colleagues of the Company.

The comparator group for salaries and benefits is all colleagues in the UK. During the year, UK-based colleagues were provided with a medical cash plan, along with the addition of critical illness cover. There are no employees of NCC Group plc.

The comparator group for the bonus is those in the senior management population who also have an annual scheme and excludes those on commission and incentive plans.

Executive Directors

Year Mike Maddison (CEO) Guy Ellis (CFO) All colleagues
% increase 2024/25 2.5% 9.6% 4.67%
in salary 2023/24 (16 months) 18.6% 7.4%
2023/24 (12 months) 16.5% 6.7%
2022/23 7.9%
2021/22 5.1%
2020/21 5.1%
% increase 2024/25 139%
in benefits 2023/24 (16 months) 950.0%
2023/24 (12 months) 1,000.0%
2022/23
2021/22
2020/21
% increase in 2024/25 (17.0%) 2.0% (19.0%)
annual bonus 2023/24 (16 months) 1,841.0% 561.0%
2023/24 (12 months) 1,241.0% 412.0%
2022/23 (89.0%)
2021/22 (40.0%)
2020/21 1.0%

Non-Executive Directors

Non-Executive Directors do not receive benefits and are not eligible to participate in the annual bonus and therefore do not have those rows in the table below.

Year Chris
Stone
Julie
Chakraverty
Jennifer
Duvalier
Lynn
Fordham
Mike
Ettling
% increase 2024/25 4.7% 2.9% 3.7% 3.7% 4.4%
in salary 2023/24 (16 months) 9.6% 46.7%
2023/24 (12 months) 9.0% 45.7%
2022/23 3.0% 225.0% 2.0% 2.0%
2021/22 14.0% 29.0% 20.0%
2020/21 (5.0%) 2.0% (8.0%)

The decrease and subsequent increase of NED fees in 2020/21 and 2021/22 are the results of the removal and reintroduction of the travel allowance and a review of NED fee levels. The travel allowance was removed in 2020/21 due to the lower levels of travel resulting from the reaction to the pandemic and then was reintroduced in 2021/22. The combination of these factors results in changes which are not reflective of changes to NED fee levels. The changes are also affected by the comparison of fees for a full year to fees for a part year when a Director joins or leaves. The increase for the CEO's / CFO's salary has been explained within the Committee Chair's opening statement.

The significant increase in CEO bonus in 2023/24 from the previous year was caused by the 2022/23 bonus paying out at a very low level, with the 2023/24 bonus being paid out at a much higher level. For the 2023/24 16 month comparison, this has been annualised to provide a meaningful comparison to the prior year.

To note that for the 2022/23 year, Mike Maddison (CEO) joined on 7 July 2022 hence the 2022/23 year is not a full year for comparison purposes.

To note that for the 2023/24 year, Guy Ellis (CFO) was appointed on 30 June 2023 hence the 2023/24 period is not a full year for comparison purposes and there is no prior year comparator.

The increase to the CFO's salary above the average increase to colleagues during the year has been explained earlier in the Chair's introductory letter.

Annual Report on Remuneration continued

Chief Executive pay compared to pay of UK colleagues

The following table shows the ratio between the single total figure of remuneration (STFR) of the Chief Executive for 2024/25 and the lower quartile, median and upper quartile pay of our UK colleagues. The salary and total pay and benefits for the lower quartile, median and upper quartile colleagues are also shown.

Total pay ratio

Financial year Method 25th
percentile
pay ratio
50th
percentile
pay ratio
75th
percentile
pay ratio
2019/20 Option B 18:1 12:1 8:1
2020/21 Option B 27:1 18:1 11:1
2020/21 Option C 26:1 16:1 12:1
2021/22 Option C 23:1 14:1 10:1
2022/23 Option C 22:1 14:1 10:1
2023/24 Option C 25:1 16:1 11:1
2023/24 (16 months) Option C 26:1 17:1 11:1
2024/25 Option C 22:1 15:1 9:1
Financial year to 30 September 2025 Mike Maddison,
CEO
25th
percentile
50th
percentile
75th
percentile
Salary (£000)
Total pay and benefits (£000)
566
1,160
45
52
69
79
68
122

CEO pay ratio

The CEO pay ratio has been calculated using Option C, which we deem the most appropriate methodology for NCC Group. Under Option C, we have used the most recent P60 information (for the 2024/25 tax year) to determine the relevant colleague at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile. As such the data was correct as of 5 April 2025. As in prior years, we have omitted joiners and leavers from the data to ensure that the data is on a like-for-like basis. This option was chosen in preference to the other possibilities as it uses the most accurate and comprehensive data currently available and provides a fair reflection of the total pay received by colleagues. We are satisfied that the applicable colleagues chosen are a fair representation of the workforce.

The CEO pay ratio has marginally decreased due to the following reasons: the CEO had a lower than workforce average pay increase for the reasons explained within the Committee Chair's opening statement, the business adopted a real living wage approach, and is also considering joining the "Living Wage Foundation", and the pay review philosophy this year was to focus on lower paid colleagues more affected by the continued cost of living pressures.

The pay ratio is consistent with the pay, reward and progression policies currently in place at NCC Group.

Performance graph and table

The following graph shows the total shareholder return, with dividends reinvested, from 1 October 2015 against the corresponding changes in a hypothetical holding in shares in both the FTSE All Share and FTSE 250 Indices.

The FTSE All Share and FTSE 250 Indices represent broad equity indices. The Company is a constituent member of the FTSE 250 and FTSE All Share Index and the Committee has adopted the FTSE 250 Index for part of its LTIP performance measure. Both indices give a market capitalisation-based perspective.

During the financial year ended 30 September 2025, the Company's share price varied between £1.27 and £1.73 and ended the financial year at £1.48.

Ten year historical TSR performance is the growth in the value of a hypothetical £100 holding over ten years. It has been calculated for NCC Group plc and the FTSE All Share, FTSE 250 and FTSE Small Cap Indices (excluding investment trusts) based on spot values.

The share price was £1.73 on 1 October 2024 and £1.48 on 30 September 2025.

The table below shows the total remuneration for the Chief Executive over the same ten year period, including share awards valued at the date they vested.

Period ended1,2,3,4 Incumbent Total remuneration
£000
Annual bonus
% of maximum5
Long-term incentives
% of maximum6
30 September 2025 Mike Maddison 1,160 61 20
31 May/30 September 2024 Mike Maddison 1,081/1,513 80/100
31 May 20231 Mike Maddison 1,005 7.5
31 May 20232 Adam Palser 26 30
31 May 2022 Adam Palser 1,081 60 59
31 May 2021 Adam Palser 1,110 92 40
31 May 2020 Adam Palser 861 23 52
31 May 2019 Adam Palser 679 48
31 May 20183 Adam Palser 2923 32
31 May 20184 Brian Tenner 2574 32
31 May 2017 Rob Cotton 610
31 May 2016 Rob Cotton 1,091 70 20
  • 1 Mike Maddison was appointed on 7 July 2022. The amount above is in respect of the period from 7 July 2022 to 31 May 2023. Mike Maddison was not eligible for long-term incentives vesting in 2023 and 2024. However, LTIP awards vested at 30% and 30% in 2023 and 2024 respectively.
  • 2 Adam Palser stepped down from the Board on 17 June 2022. The amount above is in respect of the period from 1 June 2022 to 17 June 2022.
  • 3 Adam Palser was appointed on 1 December 2017. The total remuneration figure above is in respect of the period from 1 December 2017 to 31 May 2018.
  • 4 During the year ended 31 May 2018, Brian Tenner acted as Interim Chief Executive Officer for the period 1 June 2017 to 30 November 2017. The total remuneration figure above is the total remuneration received in relation to that six month period.
  • 5 Note that this shows the annual bonus payments as a percentage of the maximum opportunity. (For 2024, 80% relates to the 12 months to 31 May 2024, and 100% relates to the four months to 30 September 2024. Two figures are shown due to the change in financial year end and the 16 month financial period.)
  • 6 This shows the LTIP vesting level as a percentage of the maximum opportunity.

Membership and attendance

The Remuneration Committee membership consists solely of Non-Executive Directors and comprises Jennifer Duvalier, Julie Chakraverty and Lynn Fordham.

The Company Chair, Chief Executive Officer, SVP, Group Finance, Chief People Officer, Director of Reward and Benefits and Company Secretary attend the Remuneration Committee meetings by invitation of the Chair of the Committee from time to time and assist the Committee with its considerations. No Director is involved in setting their personal remuneration.

The attendance of individual Committee members at Remuneration Committee meetings is shown within the table on page 65.

Committee effectiveness

For the reasons described in the Chair's Introduction to Governance, no Board or Committee evaluation was carried out during the year.

Adviser to the Committee

During the year, the Committee received advice on senior executive remuneration from Mercer and was comfortable that the advice was objective and independent. Mercer was appointed via an open tender process. Mercer is a founding member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and is a signatory to its Code of Conduct. The total fee charged in 2024/25 for providing advice in relation to executive remuneration was £75,364 with fees being determined on a time and expenses basis.

Service contracts and letters of appointment

The service contracts and letters of appointment of the current Directors include the following terms:

Date of contract Notice period
Executive
Mike Maddison 28 April 2022 12 months
Guy Ellis 30 June 2023 12 months
Non-Executive
Chris Stone 31 March 2017 3 months
Julie Chakraverty 27 October 2021 3 months
Jennifer Duvalier 25 April 2018 3 months
Mike Ettling 21 September 2017 3 months
Lynn Fordham 19 July 2022 3 months

Annual Report on Remuneration continued

How will the Remuneration Policy be implemented in the year ending 30 September 2026? Executive Directors' base salaries

Increases were made to the base salaries of both Executive Directors for the year ended 30 September 2025. The table below details the Executive Directors' salaries as at 30 September 2025 and salaries which are in force on 1 October 2025, with the next review of salaries taking place during the year ending 30 September 2026, in line with the wider workforce.

Base salary
at 30
September
2025
£000
Base salary
at 1 October
2025
£000
% change
Chief Executive Officer – Mike Maddison 575 575 0%
Chief Financial Officer – Guy Ellis 342 375 9.6%

Pension

Pensions will remain aligned with the level for other colleagues.

Annual bonus

The annual bonus maximum in 2025/26 will be 125% of salary for the Chief Executive Officer and 125% for the Chief Financial Officer, with 60% based on the achievement of Adjusted operating profit targets and 40% based on the achievement of strategic targets. These targets are commercially sensitive and will be disclosed in the next Annual Report.

Awards will also be subject to the Committee's assessment of the overall financial health of the business.

In addition, to ensure that this bonus opportunity results in shareholder alignment and provides greater retention value, 35% of any bonus payment will be deferred into nominal cost share options over £50,000 for a period of two years.

The bonus, nominal cost share options and associated dividend equivalents are also subject to malus and clawback provisions.

Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

LTIP awards were granted in June 2024, and no further awards were made under the LTIP scheme for the year ended 30 September 2025, with the next round of LTIP awards expected to be made in December 2025/January 2026 during the financial year ending 30 September 2026, which will be for performance period 1 October 2025 to 30 September 2028.

Non-Executive Directors' fees

In line with the current policy, Non-Executive Director fees are reviewed annually. The last increase to Non-Executive Director fees was applied on 1 June 2022. During the financial year ended 30 September 2025, a review was carried out of Non-Executive Directors' fees and the decision was taken to increase them by 5%, effective 1 October 2024. Fees will be reviewed again in the financial year ending 30 September 2026:

FY26 FY25
Chair fee (excluding travel allowance of £8,200) £166,280 £162,225
Non-Executive Director base fee (excluding travel allowance of £4,750) £54,000 £54,000
Supplemental fees for additional responsibilities:
SID £10,000 £10,000
Audit Committee Chair £11,000 £11,000
Remuneration Committee Chair £11,000 £11,000
Cyber Security Committee Chair £8,000 £8,000
Designated NED for workforce engagement £11,000 £11,000

Statement of shareholder voting

The following votes were received from the shareholders in respect of the Directors' Remuneration Report and in respect of the Remuneration Policy:

Remuneration Report
(2025 AGM)
Remuneration Policy
(2025 AGM)
Total number of votes % of votes cast Total number of votes % of votes cast
For1 165,819,347 80.33 219,536,691 89.61
Against 40,605,441 19.67 25,454,793 10.39
Total votes cast (for and against excluding
withheld votes)
206,424,788 244,991,484
Votes withheld2 43,886,409 5,319,714
Total votes cast (including withheld votes) 250,311,197 250,311,198

1 Includes Chair's discretionary votes.

Approved by the Board and signed on its behalf:

Jennifer Duvalier

Chair, Remuneration Committee

11 December 2025

2 A vote withheld is not a vote in law and is not counted in the calculation of the proportion of votes cast "for" and "against" a resolution.

Directors' report

The Directors present their report and the audited Group and Company Financial Statements of NCC Group plc (the "Company") and its subsidiaries (together, the "Group") for the financial year ended 30 September 2025.

Principal activities

The Company is a public limited company incorporated in England, registered number 4627044, with its registered office at XYZ Building, 2 Hardman Boulevard, Spinningfields, Manchester M3 3AQ.

The principal activity of the Group is the provision of independent advice and services to customers through the provision of software resilience and Cyber Security services. The principal activity of the Company is that of a holding company.

Going concern

At the time of approving the Financial Statements, the Board of Directors is required to formally assess that the business has adequate resources to continue in operational existence and as such can continue to adopt the "going concern" basis of accounting.

To support this assessment, the Board is required to consider the Group's current financial position, its strategy, the market outlook, and its principal risks. The Group's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position, are set out in the Business Review and Financial Review. The Group's financial position, cash and borrowing facilities are also described within these sections.

The Financial Statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which the Directors consider to be appropriate for the following reasons.

The Directors have prepared cash flow and covenant compliance forecasts for 12 months from the date of approval of the Financial Statements which indicate that, taking account of severe but plausible downsides on the operations of the Group and its financial resources, the Group will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due for that period.

The going concern period is required to cover a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of the Financial Statements and the Directors still consider this 12 month period to be an appropriate assessment period due to the Group's financial position and trading performance and that its current borrowing facilities do not expire until April 2029 (following the Group successfully refinancing in April 2025 – see below and Note 22). The Directors have considered whether there are any significant events beyond the 12 month period which would suggest this period should be longer but have not identified any such conditions or events.

In April 2025, the Group refinanced its borrowing arrangements by entering into a new four year £120m multi-currency revolving credit facility (RCF), with an uncommitted £50m accordion option. This new unsecured facility replaces the previous £162.5m RCF (which was in existence as at 30 September 2024), which was due to expire in December 2026 and included an uncommitted accordion option of

up to £75m. The uncommitted accordion option has not been included in the Group's going concern assessment as it remains subject to lender approval and is therefore not guaranteed at the date of approval of these Financial Statements.

As of 30 September 2025, net cash (excluding lease liabilities) was £13.1m, comprising cash and cash equivalents of £16.4 m, a bank overdraft of £nil, and a drawn revolving credit facility of £5.2m (excluding £1.9 m of unamortised borrowing fees). The Group also had £114.8 m of undrawn committed facilities, excluding an uncommitted accordion facility of £50.0 m. The Group's day-to-day working capital requirements are met through existing cash resources, the revolving credit facility and receipts from its continuing business activities. The Group is required to comply with financial covenants for leverage (net debt to Adjusted EBITDA)1 and interest cover (Adjusted EBITDA1 to interest charge) that are tested biannually on 31 March and 30 September each year.

As of 30 September 2025, leverage amounted to 0.0x and net interest cover amounted to 8.1x compared to a maximum of 3.0x and a minimum of 3.5x respectively. The terms and ratios are specifically defined in the Group's banking documents (in line with normal commercial practice) and are materially similar to amounts noted in these Financial Statements with the exceptions being net debt which excludes IFRS 16 lease liabilities and Adjusted EBITDA1 . The Group was in compliance with the terms of all its facilities during the year, including the financial covenants on 30 September 2025, and, based on forecasts, expects to remain in compliance over the going concern period. In addition, the Group has not sought or is not planning to seek any waivers to its financial covenants noted above.

Management has performed base case modelling derived from the FY26 Board-approved budget and forecasts beyond this budgeted period, reflecting scenarios both with and without the potential disposal of its Escode business (incorporating any associated impact on the Group's banking facilities and expected net cash position). In addition, management has prepared forecasts reflecting severe but plausible downside scenarios, considering the principal risks faced by the Group, such as the loss of key customers and further reductions in the Group's Technical Assurance Services ('TAS') Cyber business. These forecasts, including all scenarios modelled, have been reviewed by the Directors, support their expectation that the Group will operate within its available committed banking facilities and meet its liabilities as they fall due throughout the assessment period. The assumptions underpinning these forecasts (and severe yet plausible downside scenarios) are set out in more detail in the Viability Statement on pages 38 and 39.

Having reviewed the current trading performance, forecasts, debt servicing requirements, total facilities and risks, the Directors are confident that the Group will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of Financial Statements. This period is referred to as the going concern period. Accordingly, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the Group's Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2025.

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA and net debt excluding lease liabilities are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

Additionally, the Group remains in the early stages of reviewing a number of strategic options for its Cyber business, however no decision has been made on which option will be pursued as of 11 December 2025. Accordingly, no material uncertainties have been identified that would cast significant doubt on the Group's ability to continue as a going concern in relation to this ongoing process.

From a Company perspective, the Company places reliance on other Group trading entities for financial support. The Company controls these Group entities and therefore has the ability to direct the financial activities of the Group. Having reviewed the current trading performance, forecasts, debt servicing requirements, total facilities and risks, the Directors are confident that the Company and the Group will have sufficient funds to continue to meet their liabilities as they fall due for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of these consolidated Financial Statements, which is determined as the going concern period. Accordingly, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the Group's Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2025.

There are no post-Balance Sheet events which the Directors believe will negatively impact the going concern assessment.

Results and dividends

The Group's and Company's audited Financial Statements for the financial year ended 30 September 2025 are set out on pages 104 to 158.

The Directors propose a final dividend of 3.15p per ordinary share, which, together with the interim dividend of 1.5p per ordinary share paid on 1 August 2025, makes a total dividend of 4.65p for the year ended 30 September 2025.

The final dividend will be paid on 10 April 2026, subject to approval at the AGM on 3 March 2026, to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 13 March 2026. The ex-dividend date is 12 March 2026.

Share capital and control

At the AGM held on 28 January 2025, the Directors were granted authority to allot up to 104,913,324 ordinary shares representing approximately one-third of the Company's issued share capital. In addition, the Directors were granted authority to allot a further 104,913,324 ordinary shares, again representing approximately one-third of the Company's issued share capital, solely to be used in connection with a pre-emptive rights issue.

As at 30 September 2025, the Company's issued ordinary share capital comprised 315,006,079 ordinary shares with a nominal value of 1p each.

During the financial year ended 30 September 2025, 481,449 shares in the Company were issued further to the exercise of options pursuant to the Company's share option schemes.

The holders of ordinary shares are entitled, among other rights, to receive the Company's Annual Reports and Accounts, to attend and speak at general meetings of the Company, to appoint proxies and to exercise voting rights.

Details of the movements of the called up share capital of the Company are set out in Note 25 to the Financial Statements and the information in this note is incorporated by reference and forms part of this Directors' Report.

All rights and obligations attaching to the Company's ordinary shares are set out in the Company's Articles of Association (the "Articles"), copies of which can be obtained from the Companies House website or by writing to the Company Secretary. Unless otherwise provided in the Articles, the terms of issue of any shares, any restrictions from time to time imposed by laws or regulations (for example insider trading laws) or pursuant to the UK Market Abuse Regulation whereby certain Directors, officers and colleagues of the Group require the approval of the Company to deal in ordinary shares of the Company, any shareholder may transfer any or all of their shares.

The Company is not aware of any agreements between shareholders that may result in restrictions on the transfer of securities and/or voting rights.

The Directors may refuse to register a transfer of shares in certificated form that are not fully paid up or otherwise in accordance with the Articles.

Authority to purchase own shares

At the AGM held on 28 January 2025, shareholders authorised the Company to make market purchases of up to 31,473,997 ordinary shares representing approximately 10% of the issued share capital. At the 2026 AGM, shareholders will be asked to give a similar authority.

During the year, the Employee Benefit Trust purchased 4m shares in connection with the Company's employee share plans.

Directors

Biographical details of the Company's current Directors are set out on pages 62 and 63 together with the names of Directors that have held office during the year. Subject to law and the Company's Articles of Association, the Directors may exercise all of the powers of the Company and may delegate their power and discretion to Committees.

The Company's Articles of Association give the Directors power to appoint and replace Directors. Under the terms of reference of the Nomination Committee, any appointment to the Board of the Company must be recommended by the Nomination Committee for approval by the Board. The Articles of Association also require one-third of the Directors to retire by rotation each year end and each Director must offer themselves for re-election at least every three years. However, in accordance with previous years and in accordance with best practice, all Directors will submit themselves for re-election at the AGM each year. During the year, no Director had any material interest in any contract of significance in the Group's business.

Offer period

On 16 July 2025, the Company confirmed that it is in the early stages of commencing a review of all strategic options for its Cyber business (Cyber Review) and that such Cyber Review includes a range of potential outcomes including potential offers for the entire issued and to be issued share capital of the Company (Announcement). The Company gave notice, in accordance with Rule 2.11 of the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Code), that it was in an 'Offer Period' pursuant to the Code. At the time of approval of these Accounts, the Company remains in this Offer Period.

Directors' report continued

Directors' and Officers' insurance and indemnities

The Company maintains Directors' and Officers' liability insurance, which provides appropriate cover for any legal action brought against its Directors (including those who served as Directors or Officers during 2024/25). This cover was in place throughout the financial year ended 30 September 2025 and up to the date of this Directors' Report. The Directors of the Company have also entered into individual deeds of indemnity with the Company which constitute as qualifying third‑party indemnity provisions for the purposes of section 234 of the Companies Act 2006.

The deeds were in effect during the course of the financial year ended 30 September 2025 for the benefit of the Directors and, at the date of this report, are in force for the benefit of the Directors in relation to certain losses and liabilities which they may incur (or have incurred) in connection with their duties, powers or office.

Colleagues

The Group uses a number of ways to engage with its colleagues on matters that impact them and the performance of the Group. These include briefings by members of the Executive Committee, regular team meetings, the Group's intranet site, global communications and update emails which together provide, among other information, an awareness of the financial and economic factors affecting the Company's performance. Further information on how the Directors engage with colleagues along with how colleague interests are taken into account during decision making can be found within the Corporate Governance Report on pages 58 to 70. We also conduct colleague engagement surveys to ensure all colleagues are given a voice in the organisation.

We offer colleagues the opportunity to purchase ordinary shares in the Company through participation in either the Company's Save As You Earn (SAYE) scheme or Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). Colleagues in the UK also have the opportunity to purchases shares through a Share Incentive Plan (SIP). All these schemes help to encourage colleague interest in the performance of the Group.

Business relationships with suppliers, customers and others

The Directors have summarised how they have fostered the Company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others on pages 14 and 15. In addition, on page 65 the Directors have included the principal decisions taken by the Company during the financial year.

Equal opportunities

The Group is committed to providing equality of opportunity to all colleagues without discrimination and applies fair and equitable employment policies which seek to promote entry into and progression within the Group. Appointments are determined solely by application of job criteria, personal ability, behaviour and competency.

In the opinion of the Directors, all colleague policies are deemed to be effective and in accordance with their intended aims.

Disabled persons

Disabled persons have equal opportunities when applying for vacancies, with due regard to their aptitudes and abilities. Procedures ensure that disabled colleagues are fairly treated in respect of training and career development. For those colleagues becoming disabled during the course of their employment, the Group is supportive so as to provide an opportunity for them to remain with the Group, wherever reasonably practicable.

Political donations and expenditure

NCC Group believes in the rights of individuals to engage in the democratic process; however, it is NCC Group's policy not to make political donations. There were no political donations made or political expenditure incurred during the financial year ended 30 September 2025.

To be clear, it is not the Company's policy to make political donations, the Company has not made a political donation in the past, and the Company has no intention either now or in the future of changing its policy or making any political donation or incurring any political expenditure in respect of any political party, political organisation or independent election candidate. The resolution is put forward to allow the Company to support the community and put forward its views to wider business and government entities without running the risk of being in inadvertent breach of the law.

Sustainability Report

The Company's Sustainability Report provides an update on the Group's policies and activities in respect of its wider stakeholders, including colleagues; community, environmental, ethical and health and safety issues; and modern slavery.

Overseas branches

As at 30 September 2025, the Group had no overseas branches.

Research and development

We are committed to using innovative, cost effective and practical solutions for providing high quality services and we recognise the importance of ensuring that we focus our investment on the development of technology. The Group's research and development expenditure is predominantly associated with computer and software systems.

Change of control

In the event of a change of control of the Company, the Group and each of its lenders shall enter into negotiation for a period to determine how the Group's loan facilities may continue and if after negotiation there is no agreement the lender has the right to cancel the commitment.

There are no agreements between the Company and its Directors or colleagues providing for compensation for loss of office or employment (whether through resignation, purported redundancy or otherwise) that occurs because of a takeover bid.

Disclosure of information to the auditor

The Directors who held office at the date of approval of this Directors' Report confirm that, so far as they are each aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's auditor is unaware; and each Director has taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as a Director to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company's auditor is aware of that information.

Reappointment of auditor

In accordance with section 489 of the Companies Act 2006, a resolution for the reappointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as auditor of the Company is to be proposed at the forthcoming AGM.

AGM

The Notice of the Company's AGM to be held at 1pm on 3 March 2026 at XYZ Building, 2 Hardman Boulevard, Spinningfields, Manchester M3 3AQ, along with details of the business to be proposed and explanatory notes, will be available on the Group's website together with the Annual Report and Accounts. All shareholders will be notified by post or email, at their request, when the documents have been made available.

The Board recognises that the AGM provides an important opportunity to engage with shareholders. Therefore, the Company will ensure that shareholders can submit any questions in writing prior to the AGM as outlined in the Notice of AGM.

The result of the poll vote will be made available as soon as possible after the meeting on our website.

Capitalised interest

During the year, no interest was capitalised by the Group (2024: £nil). The tax benefit on this amount was £nil (2024: £nil).

Reporting requirements

The following sets out the location of additional information forming part of the Directors' Report, which is incorporated by reference into this report:

Reporting requirement Location
Board's assessment of the Group's internal control systems Corporate Governance Report on page 69 and Audit Committee Report
on page 74
Details of uses of financial instruments and specific policies
for managing financial risk
Note 23 (Financial Instruments) on pages 144 to 147
Directors' interests Remuneration Committee Report on page 88
Directors' Responsibilities Statement Directors' Responsibilities Statement on page 98
Directors' remuneration including disclosures required by Schedule
5 and Schedule 8 of SI2008/410 – Large and Medium-sized
Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008
Remuneration Committee Report on pages 81 to 93
DTR 4.1.8.R – Management Report – the Directors' Report
and Strategic Report comprise the Management Report
Directors' Report on pages 94 to 97 and Strategic Report on pages 1 to 57
Going Concern Statement Directors' Report on pages 94 and 95 and Going Concern section within
Note 1 on pages 111 and 112
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption TCFD Report on pages 22 to 27
Likely future developments of the business and Group Strategic Report on pages 1 to 57
LR 9.8.4 (4) – Long-term incentive schemes Remuneration Committee Report on pages 81 to 93
LR 9.8.6 (2) – Substantial shareholders Shareholder Engagement section of Corporate Governance Report
on page 70
Statement on corporate governance Corporate Governance Report, Audit Committee Report, Nomination
Committee Report and Remuneration Committee Report on pages 58
to 93. Statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code
is on page 60
Strategic Report – Companies Act 2006 section 414A–D Strategic Report on pages 1 to 57

The Strategic Report on pages 1 to 57 and this Directors' Report on pages 94 to 97 have been approved and authorised for issue by the Board. They were signed on its behalf by:

Mike Maddison Guy Ellis Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer

11 December 2025 11 December 2025

Directors' responsibilities statement

Statement of Directors' responsibilities in respect of the Financial Statements

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulation.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare Financial Statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have prepared the Group Financial Statements in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards and the Company Financial Statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 'Reduced Disclosure Framework', and applicable law).

Under company law, Directors must not approve the Financial Statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing the Financial Statements, the Directors are required to:

  • Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently
  • State whether applicable UK-adopted International Accounting Standards have been followed for the Group Financial Statements and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101, have been followed for the Company Financial Statements, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the Financial Statements
  • Make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent
  • Prepare the Financial Statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and Company will continue in business

The Directors are responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group and Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

The Directors are also responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group's and Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group and Company and enable them to ensure that the Financial Statements and the Directors' Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006.

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Company's website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

Directors' confirmations

The Directors consider that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group's and Company's position and performance, business model and strategy.

Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed in the Board of Directors section of this report, confirms that, to the best of their knowledge:

  • The Group Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group
  • The Company Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the Company
  • The Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Group and Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face

In the case of each Director in office at the date the Directors' Report is approved:

  • So far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Group's and Company's auditor is unaware
  • They have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken as a Director in order to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Group's and Company's auditor is aware of that information

For and on behalf of the Board

Mike Maddison Guy Ellis 11 December 2025 11 December 2025

Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer

<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->

Independent auditors' report

to the members of NCC Group plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements

Opinion

In our opinion:

  • NCC Group plc's group financial statements and company financial statements (the "financial statements") give a true and fair view of the state of the group's and of the company's affairs as at 30 September 2025 and of the group's profit and the group's cash flows for the year then ended;
  • the group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international accounting standards as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006;
  • the company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 "Reduced Disclosure Framework", and applicable law); and
  • the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual report and accounts (the "Annual Report"), which comprise: the Consolidated and Company balance sheets as at 30 September 2025; the Consolidated income statement, the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the Consolidated cash flow statement and the Consolidated and Company statements of changes in equity for the year then ended; and the notes to the financial statements, comprising material accounting policy information and other explanatory information.

Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee.

Basis for opinion

We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) ("ISAs (UK)") and applicable law. Our responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence

We remained independent of the group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, which includes the FRC's Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC's Ethical Standard were not provided.

Other than those disclosed in Audit Committee report, we have provided no non-audit services to the company or its controlled undertakings in the period under audit.

Our audit approach Overview

Audit scope

  • The group is organised into 52 management reporting units. The group financial statements are a consolidation of these reporting units and its centralised consolidation adjustments.
  • Of the 52 reporting units, we identified one reporting unit which, in our view, required an audit of its complete financial information. We also identified further seven management reporting units that required specific audit procedures to be performed over selected financial statement line items. We also performed audit procedures over the consolidation adjustments.
  • The entities where we conducted audit work, together with audit work performed at the consolidated level, accounted for approximately 87% (2024: 91%) of the group's total revenue.
  • For the remaining 44 management reporting units which were not subject to further audit procedures, we performed analytical procedures over 10 of these reporting units to respond to any potential risks of material misstatement in the group financial statements. The remaining 34 reporting units were considered to be inconsequential for the group's financial statements.
  • Included within above are the management reporting units relating to the group's Escode business, which has been reclassified as held for sale and presented as a discontinued operation. Our audit scope included performing specific audit procedures relating to the presentation of the Escode business, including Escode specific consolidation adjustments.

Key audit matters

  • Recoverability of goodwill in UK and APAC Cyber Security cash generating unit (group)
  • Recoverability of Investments in subsidiary undertakings (parent)

Materiality

  • Overall group materiality: £3,000,000 (2024: 3,200,000) based on 1% of total revenue (including discontinued operations).
  • Overall company materiality: £3,200,000 (2024: £3,400,000) based on 1% of total assets.
  • Performance materiality: £2,250,000 (2024: 2,400,000) (group) and 2,400,0000 (2024: 2,500,000) (company).

The scope of our audit

As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements.

Key audit matters

Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors' professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

This is not a complete list of all risks identified by our audit.

Recoverability of goodwill in UK and APAC Cyber Security cash generating unit is a new key audit matter this year. Recoverability of goodwill in North America Cyber Security cash generating unit, which was a key audit matter last year, is no longer included because of the goodwill relating to the cash generating unit was fully impaired in the previous year. Otherwise, the key audit matters below are consistent with last year.

Independent auditors' report continued

to the members of NCC Group plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements continued

Our audit approach continued Key audit matters continued

Key audit matter How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Recoverability of goodwill in UK and APAC Cyber Security cash generating unit (group)

Refer to notes 2 and 11 in the group financial statements. The carrying value of goodwill at 30 September 2025 is £46.3m (2024: £156.5m). Goodwill of £44.3 million (2024: £44.3 million) is allocated to the UK and APAC Cyber Security CGU.

The group's CGUs are assessed for impairment annually or more frequently if indicators of impairment have been identified. The performance of these impairment reviews require determining the recoverable amounts of the CGUs and comparing these calculations against the carrying values of the groups CGUs.

The fair value less cost to sell ("FVLCS") model utilised to determine the recoverable amount of the UK and APAC Cyber Security CGU required management judgement around determining reasonable market multiples and sustainable earnings assumptions. Given the judgement associated with determining these assumptions, we considered the recoverability of goodwill in the UK and APAC Cyber Security CGU to be of most significance in our audit of the financial statements and therefore we have included this as a key audit matter.

In assessing the appropriateness of management's impairment assessment for the UK and APAC Cyber Security CGU, we have performed the following procedures:

We obtained management's impairment model and compared the actual results with previous forecasts to assess the historical accuracy of management forecasts.

We held discussions and challenged management on the sustainable earnings, in particular focusing on short-term revenue forecasts, and agreed these assumptions to audit evidence.

We compared key assumptions around revenue growth rates to external market research on industry market growth rates to identify any inconsistencies.

We assessed management's assumptions for operating margins by comparing to historical data.

We considered management bias throughout the assumptions used and considered any contradictory evidence.

We engaged our internal valuations experts to review the FVLCS model and assess the assumptions for the market multiple by comparing their assessment against external market data and comparable companies.

We evaluated the competency, independence and objectivity of the experts engaged by management who supported management in the determination of the reasonable market multiples.

We assessed the mathematical accuracy of the impairment assessment and board approved forecasts.

We evaluated the appropriateness of disclosures included in the financial statements.

As a result of these procedures, we were satisfied the recoverable amount of the CGU exceeded the carrying amount.

Recoverability of Investments in subsidiary undertakings (parent)

Refer to note 30 in the Company financial statements. The Company financial statements have investment in subsidiaries of £293.2 million (2024: £291.1 million).

The investment is held in NCC Group Holdings Limited which subsequently holds an investment in other subsidiary undertakings in the group. An assessment is performed annually to identify whether there are internal or external factors that indicate the investment in subsidiary undertakings may be impaired. If indicators of impairment are identified, the Company would proceed to evaluate the recoverable amount of its investment in subsidiary undertakings. No indicators of impairment were noted by management from their assessment.

Given the magnitude of this balance, and the management judgement involved in determining whether any indicators for impairment exist, we have considered the risk of impairment of these assets as a key audit matter.

In assessing the appropriateness of the investment valuation of NCC Group Holdings Limited, we performed the following procedures:

We obtained a schedule of investments in subsidiary undertakings and ensured this is reconciled to the financial statements.

We reviewed the assessment of the indicators of impairment and compared this assessment to external market factors, the results of the group's annual goodwill impairment review and the ongoing Cyber and Escode strategic reviews.

We compared the carrying value of the investment to the group's market capitalisation at the reporting date.

We reviewed the disclosures included within note 30 of the financial statements and consider these to be appropriate.

As a result of these procedures, we were satisfied with the conclusion that no indicators of impairment were identified.

How we tailored the audit scope

We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the group and the company, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which they operate.

The group is split into two main reporting segments being Cyber Security and Escode. These reportable segments are organised into 52 management reporting units in a range of different geographies which are structured mainly across Europe and North America. Certain functions relevant for financial reporting are managed by the group's head office. The financial statements are a consolidation of the group's management reporting units and its centralised consolidation entries.

As the group is headquartered and its principal finance offices are in Manchester, United Kingdom, the group engagement team is also based in Manchester. All audit work was completed by the group engagement team.

The management reporting units vary in size. We identified one reporting unit (NCC Group Security Services Limited) that required an audit of its complete financial information due to its size. We also identified a further seven management reporting units that required specific audit procedures to be performed over selected financial statement line items which included Fox-IT Holding B.V, NCC Group Security Services Inc, NCC Group Corporate Limited, NCC Group plc, NCC Services Limited, NCC Group (Solutions) Limited, and NCC Group Software Resilience (NA) LLC.

Report on the audit of the financial statements continued

Our audit approach continued How we tailored the audit scope continued

We also performed audit procedures over the consolidation adjustments. The entities where we conducted audit work accounted for approximately 87% (2024: 91%) of the group's revenue.

For the remaining 44 management reporting units which were not subject to further audit procedures, we performed analytical procedures over 10 of these reporting units to respond to any potential risks of material misstatement in the group financial statements. The remaining 34 reporting units were considered to be inconsequential for the group's financial statements.

Included within above are the management reporting units relating to the group's Escode business, which has been reclassified as held for sale and presented as a discontinued operation. Our audit scope included performing specific audit procedures relating to the presentation of the Escode business, including Escode specific consolidation adjustments.

The parent company is comprised of one reporting unit which was subject to a full scope audit for the purposes of the company financial statements.

The impact of climate risk on our audit

We made enquiries of management to understand the process they have adopted to assess the extent of the potential impact of climate risk on the group's financial statements. The key areas of the financial statements

where management evaluated that climate risk has a potential impact are set out in note 1 to the financial statements. The directors have reached the overall conclusion that there has been no material impact on the financial statements for the current period from the potential impact of climate change.

We used our knowledge of the group to challenge management's assessment. We particularly considered how climate risk would impact the assumptions made in the forecasts prepared by management used in their goodwill impairment analysis, going concern and viability. We also considered the consistency of the disclosures in relation to climate change (including the disclosures in the Non-Financial and Sustainability Information Statement) within the Annual Report with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained from our audit.

Our procedures did not identify any material impact in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, or on our key audit matters for the year ended 30 September 2025.

Materiality

The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole.

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

Financial statements – group Financial statements – company
Overall materiality £3,000,000 (2024: 3,200,000). £3,200,000 (2024: £3,400,000).
How we determined it 1% of total revenue (including discontinued operations) 1% of total assets
Rationale for
benchmark applied
We considered materiality in a number of different ways and used our professional
judgement having applied 'rule of thumb' percentages to a number of potential
benchmarks. On the basis of this, we concluded that 1% of total revenue (including
discontinued operations) is an appropriate level of materiality considering the
overall scale of the business.
The company does not trade and
therefore total assets is considered to be
the most appropriate benchmark.

For each component in the scope of our group audit, we allocated a materiality that is less than our overall group materiality. The range of materiality allocated across components was between £879,000 and £2,325,000. Certain components were audited to a local statutory audit materiality that was also less than our overall group materiality.

We use performance materiality to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds overall materiality. Specifically, we use performance materiality in determining the scope of our audit and the nature and extent of our testing of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures, for example in determining sample sizes. Our performance materiality was 75% (2024: 75%) of overall materiality, amounting to £2,250,000 (2024: 2,400,000) for the group financial statements and 2,400,0000 (2024: 2,500,000) for the company financial statements.

In determining the performance materiality, we considered a number of factors - the history of misstatements, risk assessment and aggregation risk and the effectiveness of controls - and concluded that an amount in the middle of our normal range was appropriate.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £150,000 (group audit) (2024: £160,000) and £160,000 (company audit) (2024: £170,000) as well as misstatements below those amounts that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.

Conclusions relating to going concern

Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the group's and the company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:

  • We obtained directors' latest going concern assessment, which included reasonably possible scenarios for a) the potential sale of the Escode business is completed within the going concern period; and b) the sale of the Escode business is not completed within the going concern period.
  • We tested the mathematical integrity of the directors' going concern forecast models.
  • We evaluated and assessed the directors' key assumptions, including assumptions relating to revenue and operating margins, in the going concern assessment over the period to the end of December 2026, which included consideration of the severe but plausible downside scenarios.
  • We evaluated and challenged management on the impact of the potential sale of the Escode business to the group's going concern assessment, which included evaluating the impact of the sale to the group's net debt position and committed financing facilities.
  • We evaluated the appropriateness of the severe but plausible downside scenarios which took into account the principal risks faced by the group, including the loss of key customers and further reductions in the group's Technical Assurance Services (TAS) business.
  • We obtained the terms of the group's revolving credit facility and the covenants in place in relation to this facility and determined that the directors' forecasts in reasonably possible scenarios identified by management demonstrated compliance with all covenant conditions for at least 12 months from the date of the approval of the financial statements.
  • We agreed the opening net debt position within the forecast to bank statements and revolving credit facility statements.
  • We reviewed the disclosures made in respect of going concern included in the financial statements.

Independent auditors' report continued

to the members of NCC Group plc

Report on the audit of the financial statements continued

Conclusions relating to going concern continued

Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the group's and the company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least twelve months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.

In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements is appropriate.

However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, this conclusion is not a guarantee as to the group's and the company's ability to continue as a going concern.

In relation to the directors' reporting on how they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the directors' statement in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.

Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.

Reporting on other information

The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors' report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this report, any form of assurance thereon.

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.

With respect to the Strategic report and Directors' report, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK Companies Act 2006 have been included.

Based on our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006 requires us also to report certain opinions and matters as described below.

Strategic report and Directors' report

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic report and Directors' report for the year ended 30 September 2025 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.

In light of the knowledge and understanding of the group and company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, we did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic report and Directors' report.

Annual Report on Remuneration

In our opinion, the part of the Annual Report on Remuneration to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.

Corporate governance statement

The Listing Rules require us to review the directors' statements in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the corporate governance statement relating to the company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for our review. Our additional responsibilities with respect to the corporate governance statement as other information are described in the Reporting on other information section of this report.

Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement, included within the Governance section of the Annual Report is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit, and we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to:

  • The directors' confirmation that they have carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks;
  • The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those principal risks, what procedures are in place to identify emerging risks and an explanation of how these are being managed or mitigated;
  • The directors' statement in the financial statements about whether they considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing them, and their identification of any material uncertainties to the group's and company's ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the financial statements;
  • The directors' explanation as to their assessment of the group's and company's prospects, the period this assessment covers and why the period is appropriate; and
  • The directors' statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.

Our review of the directors' statement regarding the longer-term viability of the group and company was substantially less in scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors' process supporting their statement; checking that the statement is in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code; and considering whether the statement is consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge and understanding of the group and company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit.

In addition, based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the corporate governance statement is materially consistent with the financial statements and our knowledge obtained during the audit:

  • The directors' statement that they consider the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable, and provides the information necessary for the members to assess the group's and company's position, performance, business model and strategy;
  • The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control systems; and
  • The section of the Annual Report describing the work of the Audit Committee.

We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when the directors' statement relating to the company's compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the Code specified under the Listing Rules for review by the auditors.

Report on the audit of the financial statements continued

Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements

As explained more fully in the Directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view. The directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the group's and the company's ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the group or the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.

Auditors' responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors' report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.

Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud, is detailed below.

Based on our understanding of the group and industry, we identified that the principal risks of non-compliance with laws and regulations related to employment laws in the countries where the group has more significant operations and data protection laws and regulations, and we considered the extent to which non-compliance might have a material effect on the financial statements. We also considered those laws and regulations that have a direct impact on the financial statements such as local and international tax laws and the Companies Act 2006. We evaluated management's incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the financial statements (including the risk of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries to overstate financial performance and revenue recognition and management bias within accounting estimates. Audit procedures performed by the engagement team included:

  • discussions with management, the Audit Committee and internal audit, including consideration of known or suspected instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations and fraud;
  • reviewing minutes of meetings of those charged with governance;
  • auditing the tax computations to evaluate compliance with tax legislation;
  • identifying and testing journal entries, in particular any journal entries posted with unusual account combinations impacting revenue recognition;
  • challenging assumptions and judgements made by management in their critical accounting estimates and presentation of individually significant items; and
  • reviewing financial statement disclosures and testing to supporting documentation where appropriate to assess compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above.

We are less likely to become aware of instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations that are not closely related to events and transactions reflected in the financial statements. Also, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion.

Our audit testing might include testing complete populations of certain transactions and balances, possibly using data auditing techniques. However, it typically involves selecting a limited number of items for testing, rather than testing complete populations. We will often seek to target particular items for testing based on their size or risk characteristics. In other cases, we will use audit sampling to enable us to draw a conclusion about the population from which the sample is selected.

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC's website at: www.frc.org.uk/ auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors' report.

Use of this report

This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the company's members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.

Other required reporting

Companies Act 2006 exception reporting

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

  • we have not obtained all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
  • adequate accounting records have not been kept by the company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not visited by us; or
  • certain disclosures of directors' remuneration specified by law are not made; or
  • the company financial statements and the part of the Annual Report on Remuneration to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns.

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.

Appointment

Following the recommendation of the Audit Committee, we were appointed by the directors on 7 March 2024 to audit the financial statements for the 16-month period ended 30 September 2024 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is two periods, covering the period ended 30 September 2024 and the year ended 30 September 2025.

Other matter

The company is required by the Financial Conduct Authority Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules to include these financial statements in an annual financial report prepared under the structured digital format required by DTR 4.1.15R - 4.1.18R and filed on the National Storage Mechanism of the Financial Conduct Authority. This auditors' report provides no assurance over whether the structured digital format annual financial report has been prepared in accordance with those requirements.

Hazel Macnamara (Senior Statutory Auditor) for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors Manchester

11 December 2025

Consolidated income statement

for the year ended 30 September 2025

Continuing operations Note Year
ended
30
September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
Restated*
£m
Revenue
Cost of sales
3
3
238.9
(150.5)
342.1
(224.1)
Gross profit 3 88.4 118.0
Administrative expenses
Individually Significant Items
Depreciation and amortisation
Other administrative expenses
4
5
3
(9.5)
(14.0)
(82.4)
(41.4)
(21.6)
(112.4)
Total administrative expenses (105.9) (175.4)
Profit on disposal of Fox Crypto 4 11.4
Operating loss
Finance costs
3
7
(6.1)
(4.9)
(57.4)
(8.2)
Loss before taxation
Taxation
5
8
(11.0)
1.9
(65.6)
(1.6)
Loss from continuing operations
Profit from discontinued operations
16 (9.1)
26.2
(67.2)
34.7
Profit/(loss) for the year/period attributable to owners of the Company 17.1 (32.5)
Loss per ordinary share from continuing operations
Basic EPS
Diluted EPS
10 (3.0p)
(3.0p)
(21.6p)
(21.6p)

* Comparatives have been restated to present Escode as a discontinued operation. See Note 16 for further details.

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income

for the year ended 30 September 2025

Year
ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
Restated*
£m
Profit/(loss) for the year/period attributable to the owners of the Company 17.1 (32.5)
Other comprehensive loss
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss (net of tax)
Reclassification of currency translation reserve on disposal of foreign operations
Foreign exchange translation differences from continuing operations
Exchange differences on translation of discontinued operations (Note 16)
(7.9)
4.9
(0.1)

(2.8)
(10.2)
Total other comprehensive loss (3.1) (13.0)
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year/period (net of tax) attributable to the owners of
the Company
14.0 (45.5)
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year/period attributable to owners of the Company arises from:
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
(12.1)
26.1
(70.0)
24.5
14.0 (45.5)

* Comparatives have been restated to present Escode as a discontinued operation. See Note 16 for further details.

The accompanying Notes 1 to 32 are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated balance sheet

at 30 September 2025

30 September
2025
30 September
2024
Note £m £m
Non-current assets
Goodwill 11 46.3 156.5
Intangible assets 11 3.6 89.2
Property, plant and equipment 12 10.5 11.6
Right-of-use assets 13 13.8 15.7
Deferred tax asset 15 1.0 0.6
Total non-current assets 75.2 273.6
Current assets
Trade and other receivables 14 31.8 32.2
Contract assets 21 19.4 20.1
Current tax receivable 5.5 2.9
Cash and cash equivalents 22 12.5 29.8
Derivative financial instruments 23 0.9
Assets classified as held for sale 16 198.0 61.5
Total current assets 268.1 146.5
Total assets 343.3 420.1
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 17 43.1 46.8
Bank overdraft 22 13.6
Lease liabilities 18 4.1 5.7
Current tax payable 0.8 1.6
Derivative financial instruments 23 0.8
Provisions 19 0.3 1.4
Contract liabilities – deferred revenue 20 25.7 50.7
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale 16 39.8 5.7
Total current liabilities 113.8 126.3
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 22 3.3 61.5
Lease liabilities 18 15.4 21.9
Deferred tax liabilities 15 0.2 0.5
Provisions 19 1.9 1.9
Contract liabilities – deferred revenue 20 2.2 2.8
Total non-current liabilities 23.0 88.6
Total liabilities 136.8 214.9
Net assets 206.5 205.2
Equity
Share capital 25 3.1 3.1
Share premium 25 224.7 224.4
Merger reserve 25 42.3 42.3
Currency translation reserve 25 21.4 24.5
Retained earnings 25 (85.0) (89.1)

The accompanying Notes 1 to 32 are an integral part of these consolidated Financial Statements.

These Financial Statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 11 December 2025. They were signed on its behalf by:

Mike Maddison Guy Ellis Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer 11 December 2025 11 December 2025

Consolidated cash flow statement

for the year ended 30 September 2025

Cash flows from operating activities
Loss for the year/period of continuing operations
(9.1)
(67.2)
Profit for the year/period from discontinued operations1
16
26.2
34.7
Profit/(loss) for year/period including discontinued operations
17.1
(32.5)
Adjustments for:
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
12
4.3
5.4
Depreciation of right-of-use assets
13
5.5
8.1
Amortisation of customer contracts and relationships
11
8.1
12.5
Amortisation of software and development costs
11
2.1
3.3
Impairment of goodwill
11

31.9
Impairment of non-current assets included in ISIs
4
0.3
3.9
Disposals of non-current assets included in administrative costs
12
1.2

Impairment reversal of non-current assets included in administrative costs
5

0.9
Impairment reversal of non-current assets included in ISIs
4
(0.2)
(0.8)
Share-based payments
24
2.1
2.3
Lease financing costs
18
1.1
1.7
Other financing costs
7
3.8
6.6
Foreign exchange loss
5
2.7
1.9
Gain on disposal of derecognised lease liabilities
5
(1.9)

Profit on disposal of right-of-use-assets
5

(0.1)
Profit on disposal of businesses
31
(11.3)
(1.6)
Profit on disposal of investment
30

(0.1)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets

0.1
Loss on disposal of intangible assets
11
0.3

Income tax expense
8
3.5
5.0
Cash inflow for the year/period before changes in working capital
38.7
48.5
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
(5.4)
1.3
Decrease/(increase) in contract assets
0.4
(5.9)
Decrease in inventories

0.2
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
10.3
(11.9)
(Decrease)/increase in contract liabilities
(1.1)
5.5
(Decrease)/increase in provisions
(3.0)
0.7
Cash generated from operating activities before interest and taxation
39.9
38.4
Interest element of lease payments
18
(1.1)
(1.7)
Other interest paid
(3.3)
(6.0)
Taxation paid
(2.0)
(4.3)
Net cash generated from operating activities
33.5
26.4
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of trade and assets as part of business combinations

(1.0)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
12
(4.7)
(6.2)
Software, development and customer contract expenditure
(0.4)
(2.6)
Sale proceeds of business disposals (net of cash disposed of)
4, 30, 31
61.4
12.4
Net cash generated from investing activities
56.3
2.6
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from the issue of ordinary share capital
25
0.3
0.3
Acquisition of treasury shares
(5.8)
(5.8)
Principal element of lease payments
18
(6.8)
(10.2)
Drawdown of borrowings (net of deferred issue costs)
21.1
57.8
Issue costs related to borrowings
(0.3)

Repayment of borrowings
(80.3)
(75.0)
Equity dividends paid
9
(19.0)
(14.5)
Net cash used in financing activities
(90.8)
(47.4)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (inc. bank overdraft)
(1.0)
(18.4)
Cash and cash equivalents (inc. bank overdraft) at beginning of year/period
16.2
32.3
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes
1.2
2.3
Cash and cash equivalents2
(inc. bank overdraft) at end of year/period
16, 22
16.4
16.2
Note Year ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m

1 See Note 16 for the operation, financing and investing cash flows of discontinued operations.

The accompanying Notes 1 to 32 are an integral part of these consolidated Financial Statements.

2 Inclusive of £3.9m of cash and cash equivalents classified as asset held for sale – see Note 16.

Consolidated statement of changes in equity

for the year ended 30 September 2025

Note Share
capital
£m
Share
premium
£m
Merger
reserve
£m
Currency
translation
reserve
£m
Retained
earnings
£m
Total
£m
Balance at 1 June 2023 3.1 224.1 42.3 37.5 (28.8) 278.2
Loss for the period (32.5) (32.5)
Foreign currency translation differences (13.0) (13.0)
Total comprehensive loss for the period (13.0) (32.5) (45.5)
Transactions with owners recorded directly
in equity
Dividends to equity shareholders 9 (24.3) (24.3)
Share-based payments 24 2.3 2.3
Acquisition of treasury shares (5.8) (5.8)
Shares issued 25 0.3 0.3
Total contributions by and distributions to owners 0.3 (27.8) (27.5)
Balance at 30 September 2024 3.1 224.4 42.3 24.5 (89.1) 205.2
Profit for the year 17.1 17.1
Reclassification of currency translation reserve on
disposal of foreign operations
Foreign currency translation differences
31


(7.9)
4.8

(7.9)
4.8
Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the year (3.1) 17.1 14.0
Transactions with owners recorded directly
in equity
Dividends to equity shareholders 9 (9.2) (9.2)
Share-based payments 24 2.1 2.1
Current and deferred tax on share-based payments (0.1) (0.1)
Acquisition of treasury shares (5.8) (5.8)
Shares issued 25 0.3 0.3
Total contributions by and distributions to owners 0.3 (13.0) (12.7)
Balance at 30 September 2025 3.1 224.7 42.3 21.4 (85.0) 206.5

The accompanying Notes 1 to 32 are an integral part of these consolidated Financial Statements.

Company balance sheet

at 30 September 2025

Company no: 04627044

Note 30 September
2025
£m
30 September
2024
£m
Non-current assets
Investments in subsidiary undertakings
Trade and other receivables
30
14
293.2
34.2
291.1
43.1
Total non-current assets 327.4 334.2
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
22 9.8
Total current assets 9.8
Total assets 327.4 344.0
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
17 9.9
Total current liabilities 9.9
Total liabilities 9.9
Net assets 327.4 334.1
Equity
Share capital
Share premium
Merger reserve
Retained earnings
25
25
25
25
3.1
224.7
42.3
57.3
3.1
224.4
42.3
64.3
Total equity 327.4 334.1

During the year ended 30 September 2025, the Parent Company reported a profit of £0.1m (2024: £38.7m).

The accompanying Notes 1 to 32 are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

These Financial Statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 11 December 2025. They were signed on its behalf by:

Mike Maddison Guy Ellis Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer

11 December 2025 11 December 2025

Company statement of changes in equity

for the year ended 30 September 2025

Note Share
capital
£m
Share
premium
£m
Merger
reserve
£m
Retained
earnings
£m
Total
£m
Balance at 1 June 2023 3.1 224.1 42.3 47.6 317.1
Profit for the period 38.7 38.7
Total comprehensive income for the period 38.7 38.7
Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity
Dividends to equity shareholders
Increase in subsidiary investment for share-based charges
Shares issued
9
25




0.3


(24.3)
2.3
(24.3)
2.3
0.3
Total contributions by and distributions to owners 0.3 (22.0) (21.7)
Balance at 30 September 2024 3.1 224.4 42.3 64.3 334.1
Profit for the year 0.1 0.1
Total comprehensive income for the year 0.1 0.1
Transactions with owners recorded directly in equity
Dividends to equity shareholders
Increase in subsidiary investment for share-based charges
Shares issued
9
25




0.3


(9.2)
2.1
(9.2)
2.1
0.3
Total contributions by and distributions to owners 0.3 (7.1) (6.8)
Balance at 30 September 2025 3.1 224.7 42.3 57.3 327.4

The accompanying Notes 1 to 32 are an integral part of these Financial Statements.

Notes to the Financial Statements

for the year ended 30 September 2025

1 Material accounting policies

Basis of preparation

NCC Group plc (the "Company") is a public company incorporated in the UK, with its registered office at XYZ Building, 2 Hardman Boulevard, Spinningfields, Manchester M3 3AQ. The Group Financial Statements consolidate those of the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the "Group"). NCC Group plc is a listed public company, limited by shares, and the Company registration number is 04627044. The principal activity of the Group is the provision of independent advice and services to customers through the supply of Cyber Security and Escode services. The Parent Company Financial Statements present information about the Company as a separate entity and not about the Group. These Financial Statements have been approved for issue by the Board of Directors on 11 December 2025.

The Group Financial Statements have been prepared and approved by the Directors in accordance with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards (UK-adopted IFRS) and with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 as applicable to companies reporting under those standards.

The Parent Company Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with FRS 101 'Reduced Disclosure Framework' (FRS 101), under the historical cost convention, and in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and other applicable law. The Company transitioned from UK-adopted International Financial Reporting Standards to FRS 101 in the prior period. The impact of this transition on the net assets of the Parent Company was £nil, as disclosed in the prior period Financial Statements.

As permitted by FRS 101, the Parent Company has taken advantage of the disclosure exemptions available under that standard in relation to standards not yet effective and presentation of a cash flow statement. The accounting policies adopted for the Parent Company are otherwise consistent with those used for the Group as set out within this note. The Company has also taken advantage of the following disclosure exemptions under FRS 101:

  • The requirements of paragraphs 91–99 of IFRS 13 'Fair Value Measurement'
  • The requirements of IFRS 7 'Financial Instruments: Disclosure'
  • The requirements of 45(b) and 46–52 of IFRS 2 'Share-based Payment'
  • The requirements in IAS 24 'Related Party Disclosures' to disclose related party transactions entered into between two or more members of a group, provided that any subsidiary which is a party to the transaction is wholly owned by such a member

On publishing the Parent Company Financial Statements here together with the Group Financial Statements, the Company is also taking advantage of the exemption in section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to present its individual Income Statement and related notes that form a part of these approved Financial Statements.

The accounting policies set out below have, unless otherwise stated, been applied consistently to all periods presented in these Financial Statements.

Climate change

The Directors have reviewed the potential impact of climate change and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) on the consolidated Financial Statements. During the year, the Group has reviewed its materiality assessment to identify which environmental, social and governance issues are most material and significant to the NCC Group business and stakeholders to aid our commitment to achieving net zero by 2050. Our overall exposure to physical and transitional climate change is considered low in the short to medium term due to the nature of the business and cyber assurance industry. The Group continues to evolve its sustainability agenda with further details on its short, medium, medium to long and long-term goals contained within the Non-Financial and Sustainability Information Statement on page 18 of the Annual Report.

The Directors have considered climate change in the following areas of the consolidated Financial Statements (including critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty), noting no material financial impact in each area:

  • Going concern assessment
  • Property, plant and equipment economic life and residual values
  • Impairment of assets (including right-of-use assets) the impact of environmental change on growth rates and projected cash flows
  • Provisions recognition of new liabilities or contingent liabilities arising from climate change and the Group physical and transition risks of:
  • Greenhouse gas emissions increased costs associated with more taxes and levies
  • Move to net zero increased costs required to lower emissions
  • Margin risk impact on delivery day rates and associated erosion of profit margin due to increased costs
  • Reputational risk failure to comply with regulations resulting in negative impact on the Group
  • Supply chain increased supply costs and delayed deliveries impacting customer contracts/provision of services
  • Extreme weather or rising sea levels reduction in revenue and increased costs
  • Fair value measurement climate change variables being incorporated into market participant valuations
  • Financial instruments expected credit losses and risk of default on Group borrowings (RCF and term loan)

New and amended accounting standards that have been issued and are effective from 1 January 2025

At the date of authorisation of these Financial Statements, the following new accounting pronouncements have been issued and are effective from 1 January 2025:

• Amendments to IAS 21 'The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates', issued in August 2023 and effective from 1 January 2025

These IFRSs are not expected to have a material impact on the Group's consolidated or the Company's financial position or performance.

Other new accounting pronouncements

In addition to the above, the following new accounting pronouncements have also been issued which are not yet effective, but the Group is not expecting them to have a significant impact on the Group's consolidated Financial Statements:

  • IFRS 19 'Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures', issued in May 2024 and effective from 1 January 2027
  • Amendments to IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments' and IFRS 7 'Financial Instruments: Disclosures', issued in May 2024 and effective from 1 January 2026
  • Annual improvements to the following IFRS Accounting Standards amendments to: IFRS 1 'First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards', IFRS 10 'Consolidated Financial Statements' and IAS 7 'Statement of Cash Flows', issued in July 2024 and effective from 1 January 2026

In addition to the above new standards, the Group also continues to evaluate the potential impact from IFRS 18 'Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements', issued in April 2024 and effective from 1 January 2027.

Basis of measurement

The consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the revaluation of certain financial instruments.

Functional and presentation currency

The Group and Company Financial Statements are presented in millions of Pounds Sterling (£m) because that is the currency of the principal economic environment in which the Group operates.

Items included in the Financial Statements of each of the Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the "functional currency").

Going concern

At the time of approving the Financial Statements, the Board of Directors is required to formally assess that the business has adequate resources to continue in operational existence and as such can continue to adopt the "going concern" basis of accounting.

To support this assessment, the Board is required to consider the Group's current financial position, its strategy, the market outlook, and its principal risks. The Group's business activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future development, performance and position, are set out in the Business Review and Financial Review. The Group's financial position, cash and borrowing facilities are also described within these sections.

The Financial Statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which the Directors consider to be appropriate for the following reasons.

The Directors have prepared cash flow and covenant compliance forecasts for 12 months from the date of approval of the Financial Statements which indicate that, taking account of severe but plausible downsides on the operations of the Group and its financial resources, the Group will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due for that period.

The going concern period is required to cover a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of the Financial Statements and the Directors still consider this 12 month period to be an appropriate assessment period due to the Group's financial position and trading performance and that its current borrowing facilities do not expire until April 2029 (following the Group successfully refinancing in April 2025 – see below and Note 22). The Directors have considered whether there are any significant events beyond the 12 month period which would suggest this period should be longer but have not identified any such conditions or events.

In April 2025, the Group refinanced its borrowing arrangements by entering into a new four year £120m multi-currency revolving credit facility (RCF), with an uncommitted £50m accordion option. This new unsecured facility replaces the previous £162.5m RCF (which was in existence as at 30 September 2024), which was due to expire in December 2026 and included an uncommitted accordion option of up to £75m. The uncommitted accordion option has not been included in the Group's going concern assessment as it remains subject to lender approval and is therefore not guaranteed at the date of approval of these Financial Statements.

As of 30 September 2025, net cash (excluding lease liabilities) was £13.1m, comprising cash and cash equivalents of £16.4 m, a bank overdraft of £nil, and a drawn revolving credit facility of £5.2m (excluding £1.9 m of unamortised borrowing fees). The Group also had £114.8 m of undrawn committed facilities, excluding an uncommitted accordion facility of £50.0 m. The Group's day-to-day working capital requirements are met through existing cash resources, the revolving credit facility and receipts from its continuing business activities. The Group is required to comply with financial covenants for leverage (net debt to Adjusted EBITDA)1 and interest cover (Adjusted EBITDA1 to interest charge) that are tested bi-annually on 31 March and 30 September each year.

As of 30 September 2025, leverage amounted to 0.0x and net interest cover amounted to 8.1x compared to a maximum of 3.0x and a minimum of 3.5x respectively. The terms and ratios are specifically defined in the Group's banking documents (in line with normal commercial practice) and are materially similar to amounts noted in these Financial Statements with the exceptions being net debt which excludes IFRS 16 lease liabilities and Adjusted EBITDA1 . The Group was in compliance with the terms of all its facilities during the year, including the financial covenants on 30 September 2025, and, based on forecasts, expects to remain in compliance over the going concern period. In addition, the Group has not sought or is not planning to seek any waivers to its financial covenants noted above.

Management has performed base case modelling derived from the FY26 Board-approved budget and forecasts beyond this budgeted period, reflecting scenarios both with and without the potential disposal of its Escode business (incorporating any associated impact on the Group's banking facilities and expected net cash position). In addition, management has prepared forecasts reflecting severe but plausible downside scenarios, considering the principal risks faced by the Group, such as the loss of key customers and further reductions in the Group's Technical Assurance Services ('TAS') Cyber business. These forecasts, including all scenarios modelled, have been reviewed by the Directors, support their expectation that the Group will operate within its available committed banking facilities and meet its liabilities as they fall due throughout the assessment period. The assumptions underpinning these forecasts (and severe yet plausible downside scenarios) are set out in more detail in the Viability Statement on pages 38 and 39.

Having reviewed the current trading performance, forecasts, debt servicing requirements, total facilities and risks, the Directors are confident that the Group will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of Financial Statements. This period is referred to as the going concern period. Accordingly, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the Group's Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2025.

Additionally, the Group remains in the early stages of reviewing a number of strategic options for its Cyber business, however no decision has been made on which option will be pursued as of 11 December 2025. Accordingly, no material uncertainties have been identified that would cast significant doubt on the Group's ability to continue as a going concern in relation to this ongoing process.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

1 Material accounting policies continued

Going concern continued

From a Company perspective, the Company places reliance on other Group trading entities for financial support. The Company controls these Group entities and therefore has the ability to direct the financial activities of the Group. Having reviewed the current trading performance, forecasts, debt servicing requirements, total facilities and risks, the Directors are confident that the Company and the Group will have sufficient funds to continue to meet their liabilities as they fall due for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of these consolidated Financial Statements, which is determined as the going concern period. Accordingly, the Directors continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the Group's Financial Statements for the year ended 30 September 2025.

There are no post-Balance Sheet events which the Directors believe will negatively impact the going concern assessment.

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA and net debt excluding lease liabilities are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

Business combinations

Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method at the acquisition date, which is the date on which control is transferred to the Group. The Group controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.

Acquisitions and disposals

The Group measures goodwill at the acquisition date as:

  • The fair value of the consideration transferred
  • The recognised amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree
  • If the business combination is achieved in stages, the fair value of the existing equity interest in the acquiree
  • The fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed

When the excess is negative, a bargain purchase gain is recognised immediately in profit or loss. The consideration transferred does not include amounts related to the settlement of pre-existing relationships. Such amounts are generally recognised in the Income Statement.

Costs related to the acquisition, other than those associated with the issue of debt or equity securities, are expensed as incurred.

Any deferred or contingent consideration payable is recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity, it is not remeasured, and settlement is accounted for within equity. Otherwise, subsequent changes to the fair value of contingent consideration are recognised in the Income Statement. On a transaction-by-transaction basis, the Group elects to measure non-controlling interests either at their fair value or at their proportionate interest in the recognised amount of the identifiable net assets of the acquiree at the acquisition date.

The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the period are included in the Consolidated Income Statement from the effective date of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal, as applicable. Comparatives are only restated if a disposed business meets the definition of a discontinued operation under IFRS 5 'Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations'. This restatement occurs only when the disposal represents a separate major line of business or geographical area, or is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of such a line or area.

Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Financial Statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated Financial Statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases. Control is achieved where the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an investee entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. Intercompany transactions and balances between subsidiaries are eliminated on consolidation.

Intangible assets and goodwill

Goodwill represents the amounts arising from the acquisition of subsidiaries, as well as from the acquisition of trade and assets. In respect of business acquisitions that have occurred since 1 June 2004, goodwill represents the difference between the cost of the acquisition and the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired including identifiable intangible assets. Identifiable intangibles are those which can be sold separately, or which arise from legal rights regardless of whether those rights are separable.

Goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is allocated to cash generating units (CGUs) and is not amortised but is tested annually for impairment. In respect of equity accounted investees, the carrying amount of goodwill is included in the carrying amount of the investment in the investee.

Research and development

Expenditure on research activities is recognised in the Income Statement as an expense as incurred. Expenditure on development activities is capitalised as "development costs" if the product or process is technically and commercially feasible, if the Group has the technical ability and sufficient resources to complete development, if future economic benefits are probable and if the Group can measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development. Development activities involve a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products or processes.

Subsequent expenditure is capitalised only when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates. All other expenditure, including expenditure on internally generated goodwill, is recognised in the Income Statement as an expense as incurred.

Software costs

The Group capitalises software costs in accordance with the criteria of IAS 38. Software costs comprise third party costs and internal colleague time costs for internal system developments. Capitalised amounts are initially measured at cost and amortised on a straight-line basis over the period for which the developed system is expected to be in use as a business platform. Software costs incurred as part of a service agreement are only capitalised when it can be evidenced that the Group has control over the resources defined in the arrangement.

The expenditure capitalised includes the cost of materials, direct labour, overhead costs that are directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use and capitalised borrowing costs. Other development expenditure is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement as an expense as incurred. Software costs are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and less accumulated impairment losses.

Software costs continued

When the Group incurs customisation and configuration costs, as part of a service agreement for Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), Infrastructure-asa-Service (IaaS) or Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS), judgement is applied in assessing whether the Group has control over the resources defined in the arrangement. These costs are treated in accordance with the March 2019 IFRIC update with regard to the Customer's Right to Receive Access to the Supplier's Software Hosted on the Cloud (IAS 38 'Intangible Assets') and the IFRIC interpretation ratified by the Interpretations Committee in April 2021 with regard to Configuration or Customisation Costs in a Cloud Computing Arrangement, as follows:

  • In specific circumstances, development costs incurred may give rise to an identifiable asset, for example where code/intellectual property hosted on third party cloud infrastructure is controlled by the Group and the cost of moving the asset to another provider or bringing on-premise is not prohibitive.
  • Amounts paid to the cloud vendor or third party for configuration and customisation that are not distinct from access to the cloud software are expensed over the contract term.
  • In all other instances, configuration and customisation costs will be expensed as the customisation and configuration services are received, for example a cloud provider's monthly subscription.

Intangible assets

Expenditure on internally generated goodwill is recognised in the Income Statement as an expense as incurred. Intangible assets that are acquired by the Group are stated at cost less accumulated amortisation and less accumulated impairment losses.

Amortisation

Amortisation is charged to the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful economic lives of intangible assets unless such lives are indefinite. Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life and goodwill are systematically tested for impairment at each Balance Sheet date. Intangible assets are amortised from the date they are available for use. The estimated useful lives are as follows:

Acquired customer contracts and relationships – between three and twenty years Software – between three and five years Capitalised development costs – between three and five years

Impairment of non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of the Group's non-financial assets, other than deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. For goodwill, and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives or that are not yet available for use, the recoverable amount is estimated each year at the same time. The Group performed its annual impairment review at 30 September 2025.

The recoverable amount of an asset or cash generating unit is the greater of its value in use (VIU) and its fair value less costs to sell (FVLCTS). FVLCTS has been used for all CGUs for the year ended 30 September 2025 and the comparative period for the period ended 30 September 2024. The FVLCTS valuation of each standalone CGU has been calculated by determining sustainable earnings, which are based on the Adjusted EBITDA1 , and applying a reasonable market multiple on the calculated sustainable earnings.

For the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be tested individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the "cash generating unit"). The goodwill acquired in a business combination, for the purpose of impairment testing, is allocated to cash generating units (CGUs). Subject to an operating segment ceiling test, for the purposes of goodwill impairment testing, CGUs to which goodwill has been allocated are aggregated so that the level at which impairment is tested reflects the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal reporting purposes. Goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated to groups of CGUs that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.

An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or its CGU exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised in the Income Statement. Impairment losses recognised in respect of CGUs are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units, and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis. An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets, impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA and net debt excluding lease liabilities are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

Related party transactions

A related party is a person or entity that is related to the Group or Company. Related party transactions are the transfer of resources, services or obligations between parties regardless of whether a price is charged. In these circumstances, the Group or Company will disclose the nature of the related party relationship as well as information about the transactions and outstanding balances necessary for an understanding of the potential effect of the relationship on the Financial Statements in accordance with IAS 24 'Related Party Transactions'.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment assets are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and any recognised impairment in value. To the extent that borrowing costs relate to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset, borrowing costs are capitalised as part of the cost of that asset. Depreciation is charged to the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful economic lives of each part of an item of plant and equipment as follows:

Computer equipment – between three and five years Fixtures, fittings and equipment – between three and five years

Motor vehicles – four years

Property, plant and equipment is also tested for impairment whenever there is an indication of potential impairment.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

1 Material accounting policies continued

Leases

At inception of a contract, the Group assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To assess whether a contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset, the Group assesses whether:

  • The contract involves use of the identified asset. This may be specified explicitly or implicitly and should be physically distinct or represent substantially all of the capacity or a physically distinct asset. If the supplier has a substantive substitution right, then the asset is not identified.
  • The Group has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the asset and throughout the period of use the Group has the right to direct the use of the asset. The Group has this right when it has the decision-making rights that are most relevant to changing how and for what purpose the asset is used. In rare cases where all the decisions about how and for what purpose the asset is used are predetermined, the Group has the right to direct the use of the asset if either:
  • The Group has the right to operate the asset.
  • The Group designed the asset in a way that predetermines how and for what purpose it will be used.

The Group recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date. The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, and an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying asset or the site on which it is located, less any lease incentives received.

The right-of-use asset is subsequently depreciated using the straight-line method from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. The estimated useful lives of right-of-use assets are determined on the same basis as those of property, plant and equipment. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any, and adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease liability.

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Group's incremental borrowing rate.

The lease liability is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Group's estimate of the amount expected to be payable, or if the Group changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option.

When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset or is recorded in the Income Statement if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero. The Group has elected not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less and leases of low value assets, including certain IT equipment. The Group recognises the lease payments associated with these leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Lease rental costs in respect of short-term leases (less than one year) and low value assets which are exempt from being accounted for under IFRS 16 are charged to the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.

Investments

Investments in subsidiaries are carried at cost less impairment. Investments in property and unlisted shares are carried at cost less impairment, which is based on the fair value at acquisition.

Financial instruments

Financial assets and financial liabilities, in respect of financial instruments, are recognised in the Group and Parent Company Balance Sheet when the Group or Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities

Classification of financial assets is generally based on the business model in which the financial asset is managed and its contractual cash flow characteristics. A financial asset is measured at amortised cost if it is held with the objective of collecting the contractual cash flows and its contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. All other financial assets are measured at fair value through other comprehensive income or the Income Statement.

Financial assets at amortised cost

Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables are classified as financial assets at amortised cost in accordance with IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments'. This classification is applied to receivables such that the asset is to collect contractual cash flows.

Trade and other receivables are initially recognised at their fair value, which is typically the transaction price. Subsequently, these assets are measured at amortised cost, less any provision for expected credit losses (ECLs).

Under the IFRS 9 "expected credit loss" model, a credit event (or impairment "trigger") no longer needs to occur before credit losses are recognised.

The Group analyses the risk profile of trade receivables based on past experience and an analysis of the receivables' current financial position, potential for a default event to occur, adjusted for specific factors, forward-looking general economic conditions of the industry in which the receivables operate, and assessment of both the current and the forecast direction of conditions at the reporting date. A default event is considered to occur when information is obtained that indicates that a receivable is unlikely to be paid to the Group.

Credit risk is regularly reviewed by management to ensure the expected credit loss (ECL) model is being appropriately applied. The Group has performed the calculation of ECL separately for each business unit.

Financial liabilities at amortised cost

Trade payables

Trade payables are other financial liabilities initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost.

1 Material accounting policies continued Financial liabilities at amortised cost continued

Borrowings

Interest-bearing bank loans are initially recorded at their fair value and subsequently held at amortised cost. Transaction costs incurred are amortised over the term of the loan.

Assets held for sale

Assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount is to be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable within one year from the date of classification and the assets are available for sale in their present condition. Assets held for sale are stated at the lower of the carrying amount and fair value less costs to dispose.

Discontinued operations

A discontinued operation is a component of the Group that has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operation.

In accordance with IFRS 5, the post-tax results of discontinued operations and any post-tax gain or loss on disposal or remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell are presented as a single amount in the Consolidated Income Statement.

When classified as held for sale, the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations are presented separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Cash flows relating to discontinued operations are disclosed separately in Note 16, including operating, investing and financing activities. Further disclosures, including a breakdown of the Income Statement components and earnings per share from discontinued operations, are provided in the Notes to the Financial Statements.

Revenue recognition

Summary

The Group provides independent global Cyber Security and Escode services.

Cyber Security

During the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024, as part of the Group's ongoing transformation and the implementation of its new strategy, the Group began to analyse Cyber Security revenue in greater detail by service type and capability, which replaced the previous revenue streams of Global Managed Services (GMS) and Global Professional Services (GPS), as reflected within the prior year segmental information note (Note 3).

This change in analysis enables the Group to better focus on existing customers, as well as on simplifying operations and the core services it provides. During the year ended 30 September 2025, the Group has updated its revenue recognition policy to better align with the revenue streams disclosed in Note 3 (segmental information).

This update has no impact on the timing or recognition of revenue under IFRS 15 for the current year or prior period.

The revenue streams in relation to Cyber Security include:

  • Managed Services (MS) operational cyber defence, scanning, simulation and managed security operations centres (SOCs) including Microsoft XDR (Sentinel) propositions. In the prior period, this revenue stream was reported under the Global Managed Services revenue recognition accounting policy, as disclosed in Note 1 of the 2024 Annual Report.
  • Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) incident response including rapid global support during and after cyber attacks. In the prior period, this revenue stream was reported under the Global Managed Services revenue recognition accounting policy, as disclosed in Note 1 of the 2024 Annual Report.
  • Technical Assurance Services (TAS) and Consulting and Implementation (C&I) global Cyber Security consultancy services. In the prior period, these revenue streams were reported under the Global Professional Services revenue recognition accounting policy, as disclosed in Note 1 of the 2024 Annual Report.
  • Other services sale of own manufactured and/or resale of third party products. In the prior period, this revenue stream was reported under the product sales revenue recognition accounting policy, as disclosed in Note 1 of the 2024 Annual Report.

Escode

The revenue streams in relation to Escode include:

  • Escrow contract services securely maintain in "escrow" the long-term availability of business-critical software and applications.
  • Verification services verify source code, and provide a fully managed secure service and result validation.

While the detailed recognition is contract specific, and set out in the table on pages 116 to 119, in most cases:

  • TAS, C&I and DFIR revenues are recognised on an input method over time.
  • MS revenues are bifurcated according to the separated performance obligations (see pages 116 and 117).
  • Other services revenues are recognised when control passes, usually on delivery.
  • Escrow contract revenues are recognised over time.
  • Verification services are recognised on the completion of the verification service.

Revenue is presented net of VAT and other sales related taxes.

Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with a customer. The Group recognises revenue when it transfers control over a good or service to a customer.

The Group does not have any material obligations in respect of returns, refunds or warranties. The impact of any financing component within contracts with customers has been assessed and concluded to be immaterial.

On contract inception, the probability of collectability is assessed across the Group and, unless there is a significant change in facts and circumstances, revenue is recognised. During the year or prior period, no instances have been identified where the collectability has had to be reassessed, nor have there been any new contracts with customers for which the collection of consideration has not been assessed at inception as probable.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

1 Material accounting policies continued

Revenue recognition continued

Detailed policies

The following table provides information about the nature and timing of the satisfaction of performance obligations in contracts with customers by reportable segment, including significant payment terms, and the related revenue recognition policies.

Timing of satisfaction of performance obligations and significant payment terms

Revenue recognition policies, including determination of transaction price and rationale

Revenue stream Nature

Cyber Security

Managed Services (MS)

These services provide operational cyber defence, scanning, simulation and managed security operations centres (SOCs).

Services are typically for an extended delivery duration, with contract lengths varying up to a maximum of five years.

The proposition often provides the customer with the software licence(s) to enable these services to occur.

On this basis, the Group operates two types of contracts:

  • A Managed Service Provider (MSP) model whereby the customer is supplied with one complete integrated service including the software licence(s)
  • A reseller model whereby the Group sources the software licence(s) on behalf of the customer and provides the Managed Detection and Response services

These services will also include set-up fees. Set-up fees represent workshops, design and configuration to create a "connection" between systems.

The Group also provides a certain level of professional service consultancy days (including post-go-live fees) based on day rates.

The customer will benefit from the services over the period of the contract.

However, the type of contract will depend on how the customer benefits from the software licence(s).

Where an MSP model is selected by the customer, the Group generally recognises three performance obligations:

  • Set-up fees
  • Combined monitoring cyber and licence service
  • Post-go-live fees

Where the licence and monitoring services terms are not coterminous, they are treated as separate performance obligations.

The MSP model is considered to be under a principal arrangement whereby the Group controls the service prior to transfer.

Where a reseller model is selected by the customer, the Group recognises four performance obligations:

  • Sourced software licence(s)
  • Set-up fees
  • Monitoring cyber service
  • Post-go-live fees

The reseller model is considered to be under an agency arrangement whereby the customer receives the benefit and control of the licence on delivery.

Invoices are raised based on an agreed invoicing profile with the customer.

Invoices are usually payable within 30 days.

Where the Group provides professional services, the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (including payment terms) is the same as described within the TAS and C&I revenue recognition policy.

The amount of revenue recognised in relation to the software licence(s) depends on whether the Group acts as an agent or as a principal.

The Group acts as principal when the Group controls the specified software licence or service prior to transfer (MSP model).

When the Group acts as a principal the revenue recorded is the gross amount billed. The transaction price is determined by a contract price (cost plus mark-up). The transaction price for the overall service is outlined within the customer contract. In certain scenarios, the contract will outline the price for each performance obligation, which is considered to be the standalone selling price of the services/goods, and the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on this basis. Where the contract does not stipulate the price per performance obligation, management determines the relative standalone selling price for each performance obligation based on the residual approach. This is assessed by reference to the total transaction price less the sum of the observable standalone selling prices of the other services promised in the contract. The contract transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation in proportion to those standalone selling prices.

Under a reseller model, the Group's responsibility is to arrange for a third party to provide a specified software licence(s) to the customer. In these cases, the Group is acting as an agent, and the Group does not control the relevant licence(s) before it is transferred to the customer. In particular, the Group does not have inventory risk, have access to its source code or hold the IP rights.

When the Group is acting as an agent, the revenue is recorded at the net amount retained (commission) at a point in time as the customer receives immediate benefit from access to the licence and the Group does not have any further obligations in relation to the provision of the licence. The commission transaction value represents the mark-up on the licence provided.

The majority of set-up fees relate to the MSP model. Set-up fees are recognised over time of the set-up. The set-up activities are completed by a separate deployment team that typically spans a period of one to four months. The set-up activities do not customise the licence provided by the third party but only allow a link between the client's infrastructure and the software to allow monitoring services to be provided by the Group once the set-up process is completed. On this basis, the client can benefit from each of the goods and services either on their own or together with the other goods and services that are readily available and the promise to transfer the goods or service is distinct.

Revenue recognition continued

Detailed policies continued

Timing of satisfaction of performance obligations and significant payment terms

Revenue recognition policies, including determination of transaction price and rationale

Revenue stream Nature Cyber Security continued

Managed Services (MS) continued

The set-up fees are based on day rates incurred (defined by an in-house day rate sales pricing matrix). Accordingly, the charge out rates are recognised and allocated to these tasks when performed akin to technical professional day rate services. These rates are considered to be the standalone selling prices and are not discounted or reduced for other services.

Post-go-live fees are recognised on delivery of consultancy services over time as the customer obtains incremental benefit from the hours provided. Revenue is recognised on an input basis (day rates) to measure the satisfaction of performance obligations over time.

Transaction price is determined by fixed contract rates based upon day rates and number of post-go-live consultancy days.

Where one performance obligation, being a combined monitoring cyber and licence service, is identified in relation to the MSP model monitoring service, revenue is recognised over the contract length as the software and monitoring process is an overall service, whereby the Group retains control of the licence and provides a complete monitoring service to the customer. If the customer cancels the contract, the Group will retain control of the licence.

Where separate performance obligations are identified for monitoring services and the licence, revenue is recognised over the period the respective services are offered, in line with the underlying contract.

The customer benefits from a 24/7 monitoring service whereby benefit is obtained daily and therefore revenue is recognised on straight-line basis as the performance obligation is satisfied over time.

The transaction price is determined by fixed contract rates for the services.

Revenue in relation to the reseller model monitoring service is recognised over the contract length on a straight-line basis as the performance obligation is satisfied over time. The customer benefits from a 24/7 monitoring service whereby benefit is obtained daily on straight-line basis.

Where the Group provides professional services, the revenue recognition (including the determination of transaction prices) is the same as described within the TAS and C&I revenue recognition policy.

Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR)

DFIR services provide rapid global support during and after cyber attacks, minimising disruption, containing threats, protecting data and enabling swift recovery.

DFIR contracts are generally structured on a retainer basis, providing customers with access to DFIR services over a defined contractual period.

The provision of DFIR services on a retainer basis constitutes a series of distinct services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer. One performance obligation is identified.

The customer will benefit from the services over the period of the contract.

Invoices are raised based on an agreed invoicing profile with the customer.

Invoices are usually payable within 30 days.

The transaction price is the fixed retainer fee, which is predetermined within the contract, based on its standalone selling price and spread evenly over the contract duration.

Revenue is recognised over time, consistent with the nature of the performance obligation. The entity satisfies its obligation by standing ready to provide DFIR services over the contract term.

Accordingly, revenue is recognised on a straight-line basis over the contractual period.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

1 Material accounting policies continued

Revenue recognition continued

Detailed policies continued

Revenue stream Nature

Timing of satisfaction of performance obligations and significant payment terms

Revenue recognition policies, including determination of transaction price and rationale

Cyber Security continued

Technical Assurance Services (TAS) and Consulting and Implementation (C&I)

These revenue streams represent the Group's core consulting services, delivered by consultants providing Cyber Security services to customers either over time or based on specific deliverables. Namely:

  • TAS provides proactive defence of digital assets through vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, adversary simulation, training, third party assurance and ongoing security monitoring.
  • C&I services deliver collaboration to assess security needs, develop tailored strategies, and execute solutions that strengthen organisational security posture and protect critical assets from potential threats.

Contracts with multiple services identify each as a separate performance obligation, and the transaction price allocated to each of these is determined using a fixed contract rate based upon day rates, being the relative standalone selling price basis.

Each revenue stream (TAS and C&I) can include the following product types:

  • Annuity contracts performed over a fixed contract period
  • Fixed price contracts based on a fixed contract value (derived from day rates)
  • Time and materials contracts based on actual days incurred and agreed day rates

In certain situations the Group operates on agreed customer terms, which allow the Group to recover any abortive revenue from its customer in the event that a customer terminates a contract before the contract or deliverable is complete.

For annuities, the customer simultaneously receives the benefits of the services provided by the Group over the contract term and one promise (performance obligation) is identified. The performance obligation is satisfied evenly over the length of the contract.

For fixed price contracts, the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits over time as services provided by the Group are delivered, and one performance obligation is identified. This is done according to the number of days worked, in comparison to the expected total number of days to fulfil the performance obligation.

For time and materials contracts (based upon consultants' time and expenses), the customer simultaneously receives the benefits of the services provided by the Group in the period over which the work is performed and one promise (performance obligation) is identified. Work is performed on a daily basis.

For all product types referenced above, invoices are raised based on an agreed invoicing profile with the customer.

Invoices are usually payable within 30 days.

No material discounts or retrospective rebates are provided.

For annuities, revenue is recognised on a straight-line basis over the contract term, reflecting the continuous provision of security services. The customer receives benefits evenly over time.

The transaction price is predetermined within the contract, based on its standalone selling price and spread evenly over the contract duration.

For fixed price contracts, revenue is recognised over time based on an input method that measures progress towards fulfilling the performance obligation. This is calculated using the percentage of project days completed – comparing the number of days actually worked to the total estimated days required to satisfy the obligation. Since the work is performed daily (for example, conducting a security assessment of a customer's environment), revenue recognition aligns with the ongoing daily effort.

The transaction price is fixed upfront, based on agreedupon day rates that reflect the standalone selling price.

For time and materials contracts, revenue is recognised on an input basis by multiplying the actual days delivered by agreed daily rates. The customer benefits daily as services are performed.

The transaction price varies with actual days worked and is based on day rates (defined by an in-house day rate sales pricing matrix), reflective of the standalone selling price.

It is considered that, as the customer benefits over time based on consultants' time, the input method faithfully depicts the Group's performance towards complete satisfaction of the single performance obligation.

Invoices in relation to any abortive revenue will be recognised when aborted.

Other services This revenue represents the sale of own manufactured and/ or resale of third party products with no connection to other Group services.

The customer only benefits from the products on delivery.

Invoices are raised based on an agreed invoicing profile with the customer.

Invoices are usually payable within 30 days.

Revenue is recognised when control of the product is transferred to the customer. This occurs upon delivery under the contractual terms.

On certain sales of third party products, the control of the product is considered to pass from the vendor to the end customer and in these cases the Group acts as an agent, and hence only records a commission on sale as opposed to gross revenue and costs of sale.

Revenue recognition continued

Detailed policies continued

Revenue stream Nature Timing of satisfaction of performance
obligations and significant payment
terms
Revenue recognition policies, including determination of transaction
price and rationale
Escode
Escrow contract
services
These services securely
maintain in "escrow" the
long-term availability of
business-critical software and
applications while protecting
the intellectual property rights
(IPR) of technology partners.
The service will include set-up
time, which is administrative
in nature.
The customer benefits from the
escrow service evenly over a
contract period, usually at least
a year and potentially up to
three years.
The service represents one
performance obligation.
Invoices are raised based on
an agreed invoicing profile with
the customer.
Invoices are usually payable
within 30 days.
Revenue is recognised over time on a straight-line basis
representing the service delivery agreement. The nature
of the agreement gives rise to the customer having the
benefit of Escode if and when required over the contract
period. Revenue is recognised on a straight-line basis
as the pattern of benefit to the customer as well as the
Group's efforts to fulfil the contract are generally even
throughout the period.
The transaction price is determined by a contract price.
Set-up time is not considered distinct or a separate
performance obligation due to the administrative nature
and therefore is recognised over the period of the contract.
Verification
services
These services verify source
code based upon an agreed
scope between all parties and
provide a fully managed secure
service and result validation,
typically delivered over a short
period of time (days).
These include SaaS services
and ICANN services.
The customer benefits from
the verification service on
completion because the source
code will only have been fully
verified/validated at that point.
The service represents one
performance obligation.
Invoices are raised monthly or
based on an agreed invoicing
profile with the customer.
Revenue is recognised on completion of the
verification services.
Transaction price is determined by fixed contract rates
based upon day rates and number of verification days.
Invoices are usually payable

Contract costs

Contract costs comprise incremental sales commissions paid to sales agents or external third parties, which can be directly attributed to an acquired or retained contract. Capitalised commission costs are amortised on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the services when the related revenues are recognised. In all other cases, all internal and external costs of obtaining the contract are recognised as incurred.

within 30 days.

Costs directly incurred in fulfilling a contract with a customer, which comprise labour hours on long-term contracts, are recognised as an asset to the extent they are recoverable. Such costs are amortised on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the services when the related revenues are recognised.

Accrued income (contract asset)

Accrued income represents the Group's rights to consideration for work completed but not billed at the reporting date. Remaining balances are transferred to receivables when the rights become unconditional.

Deferred revenue (contract liability)

Deferred revenue represents advanced consideration received from customers for which revenue is recognised over time as services are rendered.

Determination and presentation of operating segments

The Group determines and presents operating segments based on the information that is provided to the Board, which acts as the Group's Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) in order to assess performance and to allocate resources. An operating segment is a component of the Group that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate to transactions with any of the Group's other components. An operating segment's results are reviewed regularly by the CODM to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and to assess its performance.

The Group reports its business in two key segments: the Cyber Security division and the Escode division. The two reporting segments provide distinct types of service. Within each of the reporting segments the operating segments provide a homogeneous group of services. The operating segments are grouped into the reporting segments on the basis of how they are reported to the CODM. Operating segments are aggregated into the two reportable segments based on the types and delivery methods of services they provide, common management structures, and their relatively homogeneous commercial and strategic market environments. Both of the Group's divisions (segments) are run by a senior executive team; those teams make all decisions on resource allocation, product development, marketing and areas for focus and investment.

Where the CODM continues to review the results of a discontinued operation, the related financial information is included within the segmental disclosures in Note 3.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

1 Material accounting policies continued

Allocation of central costs

Some costs are collected and managed in one location but are actually incurred on behalf of multiple operating segments or reporting segments. These costs are then allocated to the reporting segments. The allocation is based on logical or activity driven cost algorithms. The allocation is necessary to give an accurate picture of the consumption of resources by each reporting segment.

Where discontinued operations are identified, central overheads that continue to be incurred by the Group (and would be incurred by the Group regardless of a planned disposal) are allocated entirely to continuing operations.

Individually Significant Items (ISIs)

ISIs are identified as those items or projects that based on their size and nature and/or incidence are assessed to warrant separate disclosure to provide supplementary information to support the understanding of the Group's financial performance. Where a project spans a reporting period(s) the total project size and nature are considered in totality. ISIs typically comprise costs/profits/losses on material acquisitions/disposals/business exits, fundamental reorganisation/restructuring programmes and other significant one-off events (including material impairments). ISIs are considered to require separate presentation in the Notes to the Financial Statements in order to fairly present the financial performance of the Group. See Note 4 for further information.

Foreign currencies

Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded using the appropriate monthly exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated using the exchange rate ruling at the Balance Sheet date and the gains or losses on translation are included in the Income Statement.

The assets and liabilities of overseas subsidiaries denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the exchange rate ruling at the Balance Sheet date. The income statements of overseas subsidiary undertakings are translated at the average exchange rates for the financial year. Gains and losses arising on the retranslation of overseas subsidiary undertakings are taken to the currency translation reserve. They are released to the Income Statement upon disposal of the subsidiary to which they relate.

Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting

The Group holds derivative financial instruments to hedge its foreign currency risk exposures. Derivatives are initially measured at fair value. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivatives are measured at fair value, and changes therein are generally recognised in profit or loss. The Group designates certain derivatives as hedging instruments to hedge the variability in cash flows associated with highly probable forecast transactions arising from changes in foreign exchange rates. At inception of designated hedging relationships, the Group documents the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. The Group also documents the economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instrument, including whether the changes in cash flows of the hedged item and hedging instrument are expected to offset each other.

Cash flow hedges

When a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedging instrument, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognised in OCI and accumulated in the hedging reserve. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative that is recognised in OCI is limited to the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged item, determined on a present value basis, from inception of the hedge. Any ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognised immediately in profit or loss.

The Group designates only the change in fair value of the spot element of forward exchange contracts as the hedging instrument in cash flow hedging relationships. The change in fair value of the forward element of forward exchange contracts (forward points) is separately accounted for as a cost of hedging and recognised in a cost of hedging reserve within equity.

When the hedged forecast transaction subsequently results in the recognition of a non-financial item, the amount accumulated in the hedging reserve and the cost of hedging reserve is included directly in the initial cost of the non-financial item when it is recognised.

For all other hedged forecast transactions, the amount accumulated in the hedging reserve and the cost of hedging reserve is reclassified to profit or loss in the same period or periods during which the hedged expected future cash flows affect profit or loss.

If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting or the hedging instrument is sold, expires, is terminated or is exercised, then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. When hedge accounting for cash flow hedges is discontinued, the amount that has been accumulated in the hedging reserve remains in equity until, for a hedge of a transaction resulting in the recognition of a non-financial item, it is included in the non-financial item's cost on its initial recognition or, for other cash flow hedges, it is reclassified to profit or loss in the same period or periods as the hedged expected future cash flows affect profit or loss. If the hedged future cash flows are no longer expected to occur, then the amounts that have been accumulated in the hedging reserve and the cost of hedging reserve are immediately reclassified to profit or loss.

Defined contribution pensions

The Group operates a defined contribution pension scheme. The assets of the scheme are kept separate from those of the Group in an independently administered fund. The amount charged as an expense in the Income Statement represents the contributions payable to the scheme in respect of the accounting period.

Short-term benefits

Short-term colleague benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognised for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus or profit-sharing plans if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the colleague and the obligation can be estimated reliably.

Share-based payment transactions

Share-based payments in which the Group receives goods or services as consideration for its own equity instruments are accounted for as equity settled share-based payment transactions, regardless of how the equity instruments are obtained by the Group.

The grant date fair value of share-based payment awards granted to colleagues is recognised as a colleague expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period that the colleagues become unconditionally entitled to the awards. The fair value of the options granted is measured using an option valuation model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted.

Share-based payment transactions continued

The amount recognised as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of awards for which the related service and non-market vesting conditions are expected to be met, such that the amount ultimately recognised as an expense is based on the number of awards that do meet the related service and non-market performance conditions at the vesting date. For share-based payment awards with non-vesting conditions and market conditions, the grant date fair value of the share-based payment is measured to reflect such conditions and there is no true-up for differences between expected and actual outcomes.

Share-based payment transactions in which the Group receives goods or services by incurring a liability to transfer cash or other assets that is based on the price of the Group's equity instruments are accounted for as cash settled share-based payments. The fair value of the amount payable to colleagues is recognised as an expense, with a corresponding increase in liabilities, over the period in which the colleagues become unconditionally entitled to payment. The liability is remeasured at each Balance Sheet date and at settlement date. Any changes in the fair value of the liability are recognised as personnel expense within the Income Statement.

Where the Company grants options over its own shares to the colleagues of a subsidiary it recognises in its individual Financial Statements, an increase in the cost of investment in that subsidiary equivalent to the equity settled share-based payment charge is recognised in respect of that subsidiary in its consolidated Financial Statements with the corresponding credit being recognised directly in equity.

Holiday or vacation pay

The Group recognises a liability in the Balance Sheet for any earned but not yet taken holiday entitlement for staff. Earned holiday is calculated on a straight-line basis over a holiday year, which can vary by business unit. Taken holiday is based on actually taken holiday. Any movement in the liability between the opening and closing balance in the period is recorded as a colleague cost or a reduction in colleague costs in the Income Statement in the period.

Borrowings

Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value less attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, borrowings are stated at amortised cost with any difference between cost and redemption value being recognised in the Income Statement over the period of the borrowings on an effective interest basis.

Finance costs

Finance costs are recognised within the Income Statement in the period in which they are incurred.

Provisions

Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recognised as finance cost.

Taxation

Taxation on the profit or loss for the year/period comprises current and deferred taxation. Taxation is recognised in the Income Statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in equity.

Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the period, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the Balance Sheet date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years.

Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following temporary differences are not provided for: the initial recognition of goodwill; the initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit other than in a business combination; and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future. The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the Balance Sheet date. A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilised.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and where the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority. Current tax assets and tax liabilities are offset where the entity has a legally enforceable right to offset and intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

UK research and development expenditure credits (RDECs) are recognised for the UK tax jurisdiction within administrative expenses and R&D US tax credits within income tax for the US tax jurisdiction.

Intra-group financial instruments

From time to time, the Company enters into financial guarantee contracts to guarantee the indebtedness of its subsidiaries. The Company accounts for these contracts under IFRS 9. Financial guarantee contracts are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at the higher of fair value and the expected credit loss.

Intercompany loans within the Company are repayable on demand and are classified as financial assets. Interest income is recognised using the effective interest method in accordance with IFRS 9.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand and deposits repayable on demand. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand form part of the Group's cash management and are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose only of the Statement of Cash Flows. These facilities are considered to form an integral part of the treasury management of the Group and can fluctuate from positive to negative balances during the period.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

1 Material accounting policies continued

Treasury shares

The Group operates an Employee Share Ownership Trust (ESOT), which holds shares for the benefit of employees under the Group's share-based payment schemes. Shares held by the ESOT are classified as treasury shares in the consolidated Financial Statements and are presented as a deduction from equity. Consideration received for the sale of such shares is also recognised in equity, with any difference between the proceeds from sale and the original cost being taken to reserves. No gain or loss is recognised in the Income Statement on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of equity shares.

To the extent the Company makes funds available to the ESOT under the terms of a formal loan arrangement, this loan arrangement is recognised as an intergroup loan receivable within current assets. The recoverability of this loan receivable is reviewed at each reporting date, and where objective evidence of impairment exists, an impairment loss is recognised in accordance with IFRS 9 'Financial Instruments'.

2 Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

The preparation of Financial Statements requires management to exercise judgement in applying the Group's accounting policies. Different judgements would have the potential to change the reported outcome of an accounting transaction or Balance Sheet. It also requires the use of estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis, with changes recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. The table below shows the area of critical accounting judgement and estimation that the Directors consider material and that could reasonably change significantly in the next year.

Accounting area Accounting judgement? Accounting estimate?
Carrying value of goodwill No Yes

2.1 Critical accounting judgements

No critical accounting judgements have been made in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effects on the amounts recognised in the consolidated Financial Statements.

2.2 Key sources of estimation uncertainty

Information about estimation uncertainties that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying values of assets and liabilities within the next financial year is addressed below.

While every effort is made to ensure that such estimates and assumptions are reasonable, by their nature they are uncertain, and as such changes in estimates and assumptions may have a material impact. Estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Financial Statements are continually reviewed and revised as necessary as at each reporting date.

The Directors have considered the impact of climate change on the following estimation uncertainties. Due to nature of the climate change impact on the Group, no material impact has been identified.

The key sources of estimation uncertainty disclosed in the Group's consolidated Financial Statements for the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024 remain applicable for the year ended 30 September 2025. These primarily relate to the carrying value of goodwill.

Carrying value of goodwill

The Group has significant goodwill balances as at 30 September 2025, arising from acquisitions in previous years. The carrying value of goodwill at 30 September 2025 is £46.3m (30 September 2024: £156.5m). Goodwill is tested for impairment annually on 30 September. The Group allocates goodwill to cash generating units (CGUs), representing the lowest level of asset groupings that generate independent cash inflows.

For the year ended 30 September 2025, tests for impairment are based on the calculation of a fair value less costs to sell (FVLCTS) which has been used to establish the recoverable amount of each CGU. The FVLCTS valuation of each standalone CGU has been calculated by determining sustainable earnings, which are based on the Adjusted EBITDA1 , and applying a reasonable market multiple on the calculated sustainable earnings. The sustainable earnings figures used in this calculation include a key assumption regarding achievable forecast revenue. Reasonable changes in the key assumptions used to determine the sustainable earnings can materially impact the outcomes of the impairment reviews and the impairment charges recognised. An analysis of the Group's goodwill, the methodology used to test for impairment and sensitivity analysis relating to the sustainable earnings are set out in Note 11.

Regarding the prior period, the two principal areas of estimation uncertainty (whereby reasonable changes in their assumptions could materially impact their respective outcomes) related to:

  • The impairment of goodwill within the North America Cyber Security CGU
  • The reallocation of goodwill within the Europe Cyber Security CGU

Impairment of goodwill – North America Cyber Security

This estimate involved a calculation of sustainable earnings, within which the gross margin used was a key assumption, which had the potential to result in material adjustments to the carrying amounts of goodwill. No impact was noted in the current year, given the full goodwill balance was impaired in the prior period.

Reallocation of goodwill – Europe Cyber Security

This estimate involved an allocation of goodwill between the Fox Crypto CGU and the remaining Europe Cyber Security CGU. This was based on a calculation of adjusted relative fair values, within which the revenue used was a key assumption. The goodwill allocated to the Fox Crypto CGU was reclassified as an asset held for sale at 30 September 2024 and was derecognised on 28 March 2025 following the completion of the disposal of Fox Crypto (see Note 31).

No further impairments or changes to goodwill allocations have occurred in the year ended 30 September 2025. For further information on the Group's impairment methodology and sensitivity analyses, refer to Note 11.

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA, and net debt excluding lease liabilities are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) rather than IFRS measures. For an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reference to the reconciliation with statutory information, please see Appendix 1.

3 Segmental information

The Group is organised into the following two (2024: two) reportable segments: Cyber Security and Escode. The two reporting segments provide distinct types of service. Within each of the reporting segments the operating segments provide a homogeneous group of services. These operating segments are deemed to hold similar economic characteristics. The operating segments are grouped into the reporting segments on the basis of how they are reported to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) for the purposes of IFRS 8 'Operating Segments', which is considered to be the Board of Directors of NCC Group plc.

Operating segments are aggregated into the two reportable segments based on the types and delivery methods of services they provide, common management structures, and their relatively homogeneous commercial and strategic market environments. Performance is measured based on reporting segment profit, with interest and tax not allocated to business segments. There are no intra-segment sales.

During the year, the Group's Escode business has been classified as a discontinued operation as described in Note 16. As the CODM continues to assess the performance of this operation, its results are included in the segmental information presented below.

The central and head office cost centre is not considered to be a separate operating segment nor part of any other operating segment as it does not generate any revenues. Included within central and head office are assets and liabilities not specifically allocated to the reporting segments and include investments, head office tangible and intangible assets, deferred tax assets and liabilities, right-of-use assets and associated lease liabilities, Parent Company cash balances, the RCF and certain provisions. Central and head office assets and liabilities are disclosed to allow a reconciliation back to the Group's assets and liabilities.

Continuing
operations
Discontinued
operations
Segmental analysis for the year ended 30 September 2025 Central and
head office
£m
Cyber
Security
£m
Sub-total
£m
Escode
£m
Group
£m
Revenue
Cost of sales

238.9
(150.5)
238.9
(150.5)
66.5
(19.0)
305.4
(169.5)
Gross profit
Gross margin %
Administrative expenses*
Share-based payments
Depreciation
Amortisation of software and development costs
Amortisation of acquired intangibles
Individually Significant Items (Note 4)


(11.2)
(2.6)
(2.5)
(0.6)
(2.1)
(5.6)
88.4
37.0%
(68.4)
(0.2)
(6.6)
(1.2)
(1.0)
(3.9)
88.4
37.0%
(79.6)
(2.8)
(9.1)
(1.8)
(3.1)
(9.5)
47.5
71.4%
(9.6)
(0.2)
(0.7)
(0.3)
(5.0)
135.9
44.5%
(89.2)
(3.0)
(9.8)
(2.1)
(8.1)
(9.5)
Total administrative expenses (24.6) (81.3) (105.9) (15.8) (121.7)
Profit on disposal of Fox Crypto 11.4 11.4 11.4
Operating (loss)/profit
Finance costs
(13.2) 7.1 (6.1) 31.7 25.6
(5.0)
Profit before taxation
Taxation
20.6
(3.5)
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Company 17.1

* In accordance with IFRS 5, £6.8m of head office overheads incurred by the discontinued Escode division during the year have been reallocated to central and head office within continuing operations. This is due to the fact that if an operation is disposed of, the relevant central overheads may not decrease in the short term.

<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->

for the year ended 30 September 2025

3 Segmental information continued

Discontinued
operations
Segmental analysis for the period ended 30 September 2024 (restated) Central and
head office
£m
Cyber
Security
£m
Sub-total
£m
Escode
£m
Group
£m
Revenue 342.1 342.1 87.4 429.5
Cost of sales (224.1) (224.1) (26.7) (250.8)
Gross profit 118.0 118.0 60.7 178.7
Gross margin % 34.5% 34.5% 69.5% 41.6%
Administrative expenses* (13.0) (97.3) (110.3) (14.5) (124.8)
Share-based payments (2.0) (0.1) (2.1) (0.2) (2.3)
Depreciation (3.5) (9.4) (12.9) (0.6) (13.5)
Amortisation of software and development costs (1.8) (1.5) (3.3) (3.3)
Amortisation of acquired intangibles (4.0) (1.4) (5.4) (7.1) (12.5)
Individually Significant Items (Note 4) (41.4) (41.4) (0.1) (41.5)
Total administrative expenses (24.3) (151.1) (175.4) (22.5) (197.9)
Operating (loss)/profit
Finance costs
(24.3) (33.1) (57.4) 38.2 (19.2)
(8.3)
Loss before taxation
Taxation
(27.5)
(5.0)
Loss for the period attributable to owners of the Company (32.5)

* In accordance with IFRS 5, £9.6m of head office overheads incurred by the discontinued Escode division during the prior period have been reallocated to central and head office within continuing operations, restating the prior period Escode and central and head office administrative expenses. This is due to the fact that if an operation is disposed of, the relevant central overheads may not decrease in the short term. See Note 16 for further details.

Continuing
operations
Segmental analysis as at 30 September 2025 Central and
head office
£m
Cyber
Security
£m
Total
£m
Escode
£m
Group
£m
Additions to non-current assets 3.5 7.8 11.3 0.3 11.6
Reportable segment assets 28.9 116.4 145.3 198.0 343.3
Reportable segment liabilities (32.0) (65.0) (97.0) (39.8) (136.8)
Continuing
operations
Discontinued
operations
Segmental analysis as at 30 September 2024 Central and
head office
£m
Cyber
Security
£m
Total
£m
Escode
£m
Group
£m
Additions to non-current assets
Reportable segment assets
Reportable segment liabilities
4.0
37.5
(113.0)
12.6
183.8
(77.2)
16.6
221.3
(190.2)
1.6
198.8
(24.7)
18.2
420.1
(214.9)

The net book value of non-current assets is analysed geographically as follows:

30 September
2025
30 September
2024
Continuing operations £m £m
UK 57.5 57.5
APAC 4.8 5.4
North America 1.6 2.0
Europe 11.3 8.6
Total non-current assets 75.2 73.5
Discontinued operations 30 September
2025
£m
30 September
2024
£m
UK 24.5 28.4
APAC
North America 156.4 162.3
Europe 7.6 9.4
Total non-current assets* 188.5 200.1

* Non-current assets associated with the Escode division have been reclassified to current assets given it meets the definition of an asset held for sale as at 30 September 2025.

3 Segmental information continued

Revenue is disaggregated by primary geographical market, by category and by timing of revenue recognition as follows:

APAC 8.6 14.4 0.1 8.7 14.4
Revenue by originating country
UK
125.8 158.9 29.3 36.5 155.1 195.4
Continuing operations
Cyber
Security
2025
£m
Cyber
Security
2024
£m
Discontinued operations
Escode
2025
£m
Escode
2024
£m
2025
Total
£m
2024
Total
£m
Continuing operations Discontinued operations
Cyber
Security
2025
£m
Cyber
Security
2024
£m
Escode
2025
£m
Escode
2024
£m
2025
Total
£m
2024
Total
£m
Revenue by category
Services 236.0 337.5 66.5 87.4 302.5 424.9
Products 2.9 4.6 2.9 4.6
Total revenue 238.9 342.1 66.5 87.4 305.4 429.5
Continuing operations Discontinued operations
Cyber
Security
2025
£m
Cyber
Security
2024
£m
Escode
2025
£m
Escode
2024
£m
2025
Total
£m
2024
Total
£m
Timing of revenue recognition
Services and products transferred over time 219.6 322.1 42.9 57.9 262.5 380.0
Services and products transferred at a point in time 19.3 20.0 23.6 29.5 42.9 49.5
Total revenue 238.9 342.1 66.5 87.4 305.4 429.5

The total future revenue from the remaining term of the Group's continuing operations contracts, for performance obligations not yet delivered as of 30 September 2025, is £232.8m (2024 restated*: £224.2m). The equivalent from discontinued operations is £24.7m (2024: £22.4m). The Group expects this revenue to be recognised over the respective contract terms between FY26 and FY30. The prior period amounts have been restated following the Escode division being classed as a discontinued operation in 2025.

As part of the Group's ongoing transformation and the implementation of its new strategy, Cyber Security revenue continues to be analysed in greater detail by service type and capability. This change in analysis enables the Group to better focus on existing customers, as well as on simplifying operations and the core services provided. The analysis is as follows:

Continuing operations 2025
£m
2024
£m
Technical Assurance Services (TAS) 88.4 141.4
Consulting and Implementation (C&I) 48.5 55.2
Managed Services (MS) 76.4 91.8
Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) 13.1 20.6
Other services 12.5 33.1
Total Cyber Security revenue 238.9 342.1

In compliance with IFRS 8, the Group had one external customer contributing £33.7m of revenue for the year ended 30 September 2025, representing more than 10% of the Group's total revenue. This revenue is attributable to the Cyber Security reportable segment. There were no individual external customers contributing more than 10% of revenue in the prior period.

* The prior period number has been restated, following a review that identified £4.8m had been incorrectly included.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

3 Segmental information continued

Revenues from the Escode business, classified as a discontinued operation for the year ended 30 September 2025, have been analysed by service line:

Discontinued operations 2025
£m
2024
£m
Escrow contracts
Verification services
43.0
23.5
57.2
30.2
Total Escode revenue 66.5 87.4

4 Individually Significant Items (ISIs)

The Group separately identifies items as Individually Significant Items. Each of these is considered by the Directors to be sufficiently unusual in terms of nature or scale so as not to form part of the underlying performance of the business. They are therefore separately identified and excluded from adjusted results (as explained in Appendix 1).

Reference 2025
£m
2024
£m
Fundamental reorganisation costs a 3.9 9.4
Costs associated with strategic review of Escode business b 3.8 0.1
Costs associated with strategic review of Cyber business c 1.8
Profit on disposal of DetACT/DDI d (1.5)
North America Cyber Security goodwill impairment e 31.9
Transaction costs of Fox Crypto f 1.6
Total ISIs (excluding profit on disposal of Fox Crypto) 9.5 41.5
Profit on disposal of Fox Crypto f (11.4)
Total ISIs (1.9) 41.5

(a) Fundamental reorganisation costs

In order to implement the next chapter of the Group's strategy to enhance future growth, certain strategic actions are required including reshaping the Group's global delivery and operational model. This reshaping is considered a fundamental reorganisation and restructuring programme that will span reporting periods, and the total project size and nature are considered in totality. The programme commencement was accelerated following the Group experiencing specific market conditions that validated the rationale of the next chapter of the Group's strategy. The programme included three planned phases (with phase 3 remaining in progress as at 30 September 2025) as follows:

  • Phase 1 (March–April 2023) initial reduction in global delivery and operational headcount, and c.7% reduction of the Group's global headcount.
  • Phase 2 (June–September 2023) a further reduction in the global delivery, operational and corporate functions' headcount prior to opening our offshore operations and delivery centre in Manila.
  • Phase 3 (October 2023–December 2025) the Group's intention remains for phase 3 of the reorganisation to complete by December 2025; however, this will continue to be monitored as the transformation strategy progresses as we ensure the operating model is market aligned, and delivery is focused to support the underlying Cyber Security business strategy.

Costs of £3.9m (2024: £9.4m) and a cash outflow of £3.8m (2024: £6.0m) have been incurred in relation to the implementation of this reorganisation. These costs primarily consist of severance payments, associated taxes, and professional fees for advisory and legal services.

The reorganisation costs include £0.3m (2024: £3.4m) related to property rationalisation. This comprises £0.1m (2024: £3.5m) in property closure impairment charges and £nil (2024: £0.4m) in fixed asset impairment charges, both relating to non-current assets. Additionally, £nil (2024: £0.7m) relates to non-rental provision costs.

Offsetting these costs are £0.2m (2024: £0.8m) in non-current asset impairment reversals and £nil (2024: £0.4m) in provision reversals. These costs and reversals reflect the impact of a reduction in the Group's global headcount, leading to decreased office utilisation and a re-evaluation of the global property portfolio.

It is expected that costs will continue to be incurred into FY26. The Group will need to exercise judgement in assessing whether restructuring items should be classified as ISIs. This assessment will consider the nature of the item, its cause, the scale of its impact on reported performance, the resulting benefits, and alignment with the original reorganisation programme's principles and plans.

(b) Costs associated with strategic review of Escode business

In February 2023, the Group announced the commencement of a strategic review of its Escode business and other core and non-core assets. The review of the Escode business was subsequently stopped in June 2023, which was reinforced within the Group's 2024 Annual Report and Accounts. However, during the year ended 30 September 2025, the Group confirmed that it was exploring a number of options for its Escode business, including a potential sale. This was subsequently reinforced by the Group's trading update issued on 21 October 2025.

Professional fees of £3.8m (2024: £0.1m) have been incurred during the year, primarily relating to advisory support services. These costs meet the Group's policy for inclusion as ISIs, having been incurred as part of the wider restructuring and reorganisation activities ongoing within the Group. Costs of £3.8m (2024: £0.1m) and a cash outflow of £1.8m (2024: £0.1m) have been incurred.

(c) Costs associated with strategic review of Cyber business

On 28 April 2025, the Group confirmed that it was investigating a number of options for its Escode business including a potential sale. On 16 July 2025 the Company confirmed that it was in the early stages of commencing a review of all strategic options for its Cyber business in the event the sale of the Escode business is agreed (the "Cyber Review"). This was subsequently reinforced by the Group's trading update issued on 21 October 2025. This process remains at a very early stage, and as at 30 September 2025, no decisions had been made regarding which option will be pursued.

4 Individually Significant Items (ISIs) continued

(c) Costs associated with strategic review of Cyber business continued

During the year the Group has incurred professional fees of £1.8m (2024: £nil) in relation to the Cyber review, primarily relating to advisory support services. Costs of £1.8m (2024: £nil) and a cash outflow of £0.9m (2024: £nil) have been incurred.

(d) Profit on disposal of DetACT/DDI

In the prior period, on 30 April 2024, the Group disposed of its DetACT business for cash consideration of £8.2m. A profit of £1.6m was recognised in relation to this disposal. There has been no impact in the current year.

On 31 December 2022, the Group disposed of its DDI business for a total consideration of £5.8m, consisting of a cash payment of £2.0m and contingent consideration of £3.8m. This disposal resulted in a profit of £nil (2024: £nil) directly attributable to the DDI business sale. Further details are available in the 2024 Annual Report. The Group classified these proceeds under ISIs due to the material profit on disposal. During the period ended 30 September 2024 the £3.8m contingent consideration identified in 2023 was received, and a £0.1m reclassification related to the final tranche payment was recorded. No additional contingent consideration payments were received in the year ended 30 September 2025.

(e) North America Cyber Security goodwill impairment

Following the impairment review of goodwill as at 31 May 2024, an impairment of £31.9m was recognised in North America Cyber Security for the period ended 30 September 2024.

No further impairment has been recognised in the year ended 30 September 2025. For further details, please refer to Note 11.

(f) Profit on disposal/transaction costs of Fox Crypto B.V.

On 28 March 2025, the Group completed the disposal of Fox Crypto B.V. to CR Group Nordic AB for a gross cash consideration of £65.6m.

A gain on disposal of £11.3m has been recognised within ISIs in the year ended 30 September 2025, calculated as cash consideration of £65.6m, less net assets disposed of £52.3m and transaction costs of £2.0m incurred in the year.

An additional £1.5m of related transaction costs were recognised in ISIs in the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024. After accounting for these, the total gain on disposal amounts to £9.8m. Refer to Note 31 for further details, including a reconciliation of the gain on disposal. A further £0.1m of other transaction costs was included in the prior period that did not relate to Fox Crypto.

As this represents a material gain on disposal, this has been classified as a separate line item within the Income Statement.

Since completion of the deal, £0.1m (2024: £nil) of income has been earned under a six month transactional services agreement (TSA), bringing the overall impact relating to Fox Crypto to £11.4m.

5 Expenses and auditor's remuneration

Auditor's remuneration Group
2025
£m
Profit/(loss) before taxation is stated after charging:
Amounts receivable by auditor and its associates in respect of:
Audit of the Parent and consolidated annual Financial Statements 1.5
Audit of Financial Statements of subsidiaries pursuant to legislation 0.1
Other assurance services (see Audit Committee Report on page 71 for further information) 0.1
Total audit1 1.7
Continuing
operations
2025
£m
Discontinued
operations
2025
£m
Group
2025
£m
Profit/(loss) before taxation is stated after charging/(crediting):
Amortisation of software costs (Note 11) 1.4 1.4
Amortisation of acquired intangibles (Note 11) 3.1 5.0 8.1
Amortisation of development costs (Note 11) 0.4 0.3 0.7
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (Note 12) 4.1 0.2 4.3
Depreciation of right-of-use assets (Note 13) 5.0 0.5 5.5
Loss on disposal of non-current assets (Note 12) 1.2 1.2
Other impairment charge of non-current assets (Note 13) 0.3 0.3
Impairment reversal of non-current assets (Note 13) (0.2) (0.2)
Profit on disposal of Fox Crypto B.V. (Note 4) (11.4) (11.4)
Individually Significant Items (ISIs) (Note 4) 9.5 9.5
Net impairment gains on financial and contract assets (Note 21) (0.3) (0.3)
Foreign exchange losses 2.7 2.7
Research and development UK tax credits 0.4 0.4
Gain on disposal following derecognition of lease liabilities (1.9) (1.9)

for the year ended 30 September 2025

5 Expenses and auditor's remuneration continued

Auditor's remuneration Group
2024
£m
Profit/(loss) before taxation is stated after charging:
Amounts receivable by auditor and its associates in respect of:
Audit of the Parent and consolidated annual Financial Statements 1.6
Audit of Financial Statements of subsidiaries pursuant to legislation 0.1
Other assurance services (see Audit Committee Report on page 71 for further information) 0.1
Total audit1 1.8
Continuing
operations
2024
£m
Discontinued
operations
2024
£m
Group
2024
£m
Profit/(loss) before taxation is stated after charging/(crediting):
Amortisation of development costs (Note 11) 1.3 1.3
Amortisation of software costs (Note 11) 2.0 2.0
Amortisation of acquired intangibles (Note 11) 5.4 7.1 12.5
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (Note 12) 5.1 0.3 5.4
Depreciation of right-of-use assets (Note 13) 7.8 0.3 8.1
Other impairment charge of non-current assets 0.5 0.4 0.9
Individually Significant Items (ISIs) (Note 4) 41.4 0.1 41.5
Net impairment losses on financial and contract assets (Notes 14 and 21) 0.4 0.4
Cost of inventories recognised as an expense 0.8 0.8

Foreign exchange losses 1.9 — 1.9 Research and development UK tax credits (0.3) (0.2) (0.5) Profit on disposal of right-of-use assets (0.1) — (0.1)

6 Staff numbers and costs

Directors' emoluments are disclosed in the Remuneration Committee Report. Total aggregate emoluments of the Directors in respect of the year ended 30 September 2025 were £2.5m (2024: £3.4m). Employer contributions to pensions for Executive Directors for qualifying periods were £40,000 (2024: £50,000). The Company provided pension payments in lieu of pension contributions for two (2024: three) Executive Directors during the year ended 30 September 2025. The aggregate net value of share awards granted to the Directors in the year was £nil (2024: £3.7m). The net value has been calculated by reference to the closing mid-market price of the Company's shares on the day before the date of grant. During the year, no (2024: 5,000) share options were exercised by Directors and their gain on exercise of share options was £nil (2024: £5,000).

The average monthly number of persons employed by the Group during the year, including Executive Directors and discontinued operations, is analysed by category as follows:

Number of colleagues
2025 2024
Operational
Administration
1,642
498
1,733
468
Total 2,140 2,201
2025
£m
2024
£m
Wages and salaries 177.2 247.4
Share-based payments (Note 24) 2.1 2.3
Social security costs 16.6 25.9
Other pension costs (Note 28) 7.4 8.0
Total payroll costs 203.3 283.6

1 The only non-audit services provided by the auditor were the interim review for the half year ended 31 March 2025, for which the fee was £80,000 (31 May 2024 interim review: £80,000), and access to a generic online accounting manual, for which the fee was £2,000 (2024: £2,000).

7 Finance costs

Continuing operations 2025
£m
2024
Restated*
£m
Interest payable on bank loans and overdrafts
Interest expense on lease liabilities *
3.8
1.1
6.6
1.6
Total Finance costs 4.9 8.2

* Comparatives have been restated to present Escode as a discontinued operation. Refer to Note 16 for further details.

The above finance costs relate entirely to liabilities not at fair value through profit or loss.

8 Taxation

Recognised in the Income Statement

2025 2024
Restated*
£m £m
Current tax expense
Current year/period 1.7 1.6
Overseas current tax for the year/period 2.5 6.0
Impact of prior period US R&D tax credits (1.0) (1.8)
Adjustments in respect of prior periods 1.0 (2.6)
Total current tax 4.2 3.2
Deferred tax expense
Origination and reversal of temporary differences (0.9) (1.2)
Impact of prior period US R&D tax credits 0.3 (0.2)
Adjustment to tax expense in respect of prior periods (0.1) 3.2
Total deferred tax (0.7) 1.8
Total tax expense 3.5 5.0
Tax (credit)/expense is attributable to:
Loss from continuing operations (1.9) 1.6
Profit from discontinued operations 5.4 3.4
3.5 5.0

* Comparatives have been restated to present Escode as a discontinued operation. See Note 16 for further details.

Reconciliation of taxation

2025
£m
2024
Restated*
£m
Loss before taxation from continuing operations
Profit before taxation from discontinued operations
(11.0)
31.6
(65.6)
38.1
20.6 (27.5)
Current tax using the UK effective corporation tax rate of 25% (2024: 25%) 5.2 (6.9)
Effects of:
Items not deductible for tax purposes 1.7 5.0
Adjustment to tax charge in respect of prior periods 0.9 0.6
Impact of prior period US R&D tax credits (0.7) (2.0)
Impact of current year/period US R&D tax credits (0.1) 0.3
Differences between overseas tax rates 0.2 (0.6)
Movements in temporary differences not recognised (0.9) 8.6
Profit on disposal of Fox Crypto (2.8)
Total tax expense 3.5 5.0

* Comparatives have been restated to present Escode as a discontinued operation. See Note 16 for further details.

During the prior period, a deferred tax asset of £7.1m was generated in North America, which was derecognised. This reflected an assessment of the recoverability of the Group's North American deferred tax assets, based on latest available forecasts and expectations of future taxable profits in the region. The decision not to recognise these assets was made in accordance with IAS 12 'Income Taxes', which required that deferred tax assets be recognised only to the extent it is probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to utilise the deductible temporary differences. As of 30 September 2024, the criteria for recognition were not met. This recognition criterion continued not to be met as at 30 September 2025, with no changes identified from the prior-period assessment during the year. The unrecognised deferred tax asset as at 30 September 2025 is £6.1m.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

8 Taxation continued

Reconciliation of taxation continued

As this prior period derecognition related to the historical performance of our North America Cyber Security business, where the recovery in demand was less consistent than expected, it was directly tied to the prior period goodwill impairment of £31.9m at 31 May 2024 (taken to ISIs; see Note 4). The Group included this adjustment as an adjusted item within the taxation line in the Income Statement. For reconciliation to statutory measures, please see page 53. No current year impact has been noted.

The UK government introduced legislation in the Finance Bill 2021 to increase the main rate of UK corporation tax from 19% to 25% with effect from 1 April 2023. The legislation was substantively enacted on 24 May 2021 and therefore UK deferred tax balances as at the Balance Sheet date are generally measured at a rate of 25%.

Tax uncertainties

The tax expense reported for the current year and prior period is affected by certain positions taken by management where there may be uncertainty. The most significant source of uncertainty arises from claims for US R&D tax credits relating to the current and previous periods. Uncertainty relates to the interpretation of US legislation applicable to periods where the statute of limitations has not expired. As at 30 September 2025, the gross cumulative amount of US R&D tax credits amounts to £9.0m (2024: £9.5m), of which a cumulative tax benefit has been recognised of £7.6m (2024: £6.7m). The unrecognised benefit is £1.4m (2024: £2.8m).

9 Dividends

Dividend policy

Dividends are the way the Company makes distributions from the Company's distributable reserves to shareholders. The Board determines the dividend level at each half-year reporting period (i.e. 31 March and 30 September). If an interim or final dividend is declared, the Company pays the dividend approximately eight weeks after the results announcement. A dividend is paid for each share, with the amount received depending on the number of shares owned.

2025
£m
2024
£m
Dividends paid and recognised in the year/period 9.2 14.5
Dividends recognised but not paid in the year/period 9.8
Dividends per share paid and recognised in the year/period 3.0p 4.65p
Dividends per share recognised but not paid in the year/period 3.15p
Dividends per share proposed but not recognised in the year/period 3.15p 1.50p

An interim dividend of £9.8m for the period ended 30 September 2024 of 3.15p per ordinary share was paid on 1 October 2024. It was recognised in the prior period but not paid until the current financial year and was therefore included within non-trade payables as at 30 September 2024 (see Note 17).

The final dividend of £4.6m for the period ended 30 September 2024 of 1.50p per ordinary share was recommended by the Board on 5 December 2024 and was subsequently paid on 4 April 2025.

The interim dividend of £4.6m for the year ended 30 September 2025 of 1.50p per ordinary share was recommended by the Board on 19 June 2025 and was subsequently paid on 1 August 2025.

The proposed final dividend for the year ended 30 September 2025 of 3.15p per ordinary share was recommended by the Board on 8 December 2025 and will be paid on 10 April 2026 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 13 March 2026. The ex-dividend date is 12 March 2026. The dividend will be recommended to shareholders at the AGM on 3 March 2026. The dividend has not been included as a liability as at 30 September 2025.

10 (Loss)/earnings per ordinary share

2025
£m
2024
£m
Loss for the year/period from continuing operations
Profit for the year/period from discontinued operations
(9.1)
26.2
(67.2)
34.7
Profit/(loss) for the year/period attributable to owners of the Company 17.1 (32.5)
Number
of shares
2025
m
Number
of shares
2024
m
Weighted average number of shares in issue
Less: weighted average holdings by Group ESOT
314.8
(7.7)
313.3
(1.6)
Basic weighted average number of shares in issue
Dilutive effect of share options
307.1
5.2
311.7
1.5
Diluted weighted average shares in issue 312.3 313.2

10 (Loss)/earnings per ordinary share continued

For the purposes of calculating the dilutive effect of share options, the average market value is based on quoted market prices for the period during which the options are outstanding. Where losses have been reported in the current year or prior period, the diluted EPS does not include the dilutive effect of share options.

dilutive effect of share options.
2025
Pence
2024
Pence
Basic (loss)/earnings per ordinary share
From continuing operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company (3.0) (21.6)
From discontinued operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company 8.5 11.1
2025
Pence
2024
Pence
Diluted (loss)/earnings per ordinary share
From continuing operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company (3.0) (21.6)
From discontinued operations attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the Company 8.4 11.1
11 Goodwill and intangible assets
Customer
Goodwill Software Development
costs
contracts and
relationships
Intangibles
sub-total
Total

Cost At 1 June 2023 324.6 21.2 13.8 179.2 214.2 538.8 Additions — 1.4 1.0 0.2 2.6 2.6 Disposals (see Note 31) (5.9) (0.6) (9.9) — (10.5) (16.4) Assets classified as held for sale (Note 16) (52.1) — (2.5) — (2.5) (54.6) Effects of movements in exchange rates (9.4) (0.2) (0.1) (9.4) (9.7) (19.1) At 30 September 2024 257.2 21.8 2.3 170.0 194.1 451.3 Additions — 0.4 — — 0.4 0.4 Reclassification — (0.8) 0.2 0.6 — — Assets classified as held for sale (Note 16) (110.2) (3.8) — (95.1) (98.9) (209.1) Effects of movements in exchange rates — — 0.6 1.0 1.6 1.6 At 30 September 2025 147.0 17.6 3.1 76.5 97.2 244.2 Accumulated amortisation and impairment At 1 June 2023 (68.8) (14.5) (11.1) (77.7) (103.3) (172.1) Charge for period — (2.0) (1.3) (12.5) (15.8) (15.8) Impairment (31.9) — — — — (31.9) Disposals — — 8.8 — 8.8 8.8 Assets classified as held for sale (Note 16) — — 2.4 — 2.4 2.4 Effects of movements in exchange rates — — 0.1 2.9 3.0 3.0

At 30 September 2024 (100.7) (16.5) (1.1) (87.3) (104.9) (205.6) Charge for year — (1.4) (0.7) (8.1) (10.2) (10.2) Assets classified as held for sale (Note 16) — 1.8 — 21.0 22.8 22.8 Effects of movements in exchange rates — — (0.4) (0.9) (1.3) (1.3)

for the year ended 30 September 2025

11 Goodwill and intangible assets continued Cash generating units (CGUs)

Goodwill and intangible assets are allocated to CGUs in order to be assessed for potential impairment. CGUs are defined by accounting standards as the lowest level of asset groupings that generate separately identifiable cash inflows that are not dependent on other CGUs.

The CGUs presented are consistent with the year ended 30 September 2024, with the exception of the Fox Crypto CGU, which was disposed of during the year (with associated goodwill of £52.1m classified as held for sale as at 30 September 2024).

The CGUs and the allocation of goodwill to those CGUs are shown below:

Cash generating units – continuing operations Goodwill
2025
£m
Goodwill
2024
£m
UK and APAC Cyber Security 44.3 44.3
North America Cyber Security
Europe Cyber Security 2.0 2.2
Total Cyber Security 46.3 46.5

The Escode division, which was classified as a discontinued operation during the year, includes the following CGUs and associated allocated goodwill:

Cash generating units – discontinued operations Goodwill
2025
£m
Goodwill
2024
£m
UK Escode 22.8 22.8
North America Escode 80.0 80.1
Europe Escode 7.4 7.1
Total Escode 110.2 110.0

Impairment review

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually at the level of the CGU to which it is allocated. An impairment review was carried out at 30 September 2025. The recoverable amount of all CGUs was measured on a fair value less costs to sell basis.

Capitalised development and software costs are included in the CGU asset bases when performing the impairment review. Capitalised development projects and software intangible assets are also considered, on an asset-by-asset basis, for impairment where there are indicators of impairment.

Fair value less costs to sell

The methodology described below has been applied consistently for the impairment reviews carried out as at 30 September 2024 and 30 September 2025.

The recoverable amount of all CGUs has been determined on a fair value less costs to sell basis for the purposes of the impairment review.

The valuation under FVLCTS is expected to exceed the valuation under VIU because uncommitted restructurings and resulting operating efficiencies are not considered within a VIU valuation in line with the requirements of IAS 36.

The FVLCTS valuation of each standalone CGU has been calculated by determining sustainable earnings, which are based on the Adjusted EBITDA1 , and applying a reasonable market multiple on the calculated sustainable earnings. Estimated sustainable earnings have been determined taking into account a Board-approved forecast which considers past performance. The sustainable earnings used include expectations based on a market participant view of sustainable performance of the business based on market volatility and uncertainty as at the Balance Sheet date. The sustainable earnings input is a level 3 measurement; level 3 measurements are inputs which are normally unobservable to market participants.

The Group incurs certain overhead costs in respect of support services provided centrally to the CGUs. Such support services include Finance, Human Resources, Legal, Information Technology and additional central management support in respect of stewardship and governance. In calculating sustainable earnings these overhead costs have been allocated to the CGUs based on the extent to which each CGU has benefited from the services provided. Commonly this is driven by time spent by the relevant central department in supporting the CGU, informed by headcount or where possible specific cost allocations have been made.

The Adjusted EBITDA1 multiple used in the calculations is based on an independent third party assessment of the implied enterprise value of each CGU based on a population of comparable companies as at the Balance Sheet date. The estimated cost to sell was based on other recent transactions that the Group has undertaken.

Current year impairment

The Board assessed the recoverable amount of each CGU using fair value less costs to sell as at 30 September 2025, applying the methodology described above. In all cases, the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying amount, and no impairment losses have been recognised for the year ended 30 September 2025.

Current year sensitivity analysis – impairment

The FVLCTS valuation of each standalone CGU has been calculated by determining sustainable earnings, based on Adjusted EBITDA¹, and applying a reasonable market multiple. The sustainable earnings figures include a key assumption regarding achieving forecast revenue within each CGU assessment.

The Board has reviewed sensitivity analysis on the FVLCTS calculations for each CGU, considering reasonably possible changes in the key assumption of revenue. Assuming a 10% shortfall in forecast revenue (after factoring in controllable variable cost reductions and maintaining margins), no material impairment would arise.

11 Goodwill and intangible assets continued

Fair value less costs to sell continued

Prior period impairment

In the prior period the Board assessed the recoverable amount of the North America Cyber Security CGU based on its FVLCTS as at 31 May 2024 as described above. Based on that assessment, the carrying amount of this CGU exceeded its recoverable amount and therefore an impairment loss of £31.9m was recognised, reducing the value of goodwill allocated to this CGU to £nil.

This impairment relates to our North America Cyber Security business, as the recovery in demand was less consistent than expected.

This amount was recognised as an Individually Significant Item (see Note 4). The impairment charge recognised resulted in a reduction in the carrying value of goodwill only.

Prior period sensitivity analysis – impairment

The FVLCTS valuation of each standalone CGU has been calculated by determining sustainable earnings, which are based on the Adjusted EBITDA1 , and applying a reasonable market multiple on the calculated sustainable earnings. The sustainable earnings figures used in this calculation include a key assumption regarding a sustainable gross margin percentage for the business.

The table below shows the sensitivity of headroom to reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions, by reflecting the additional impairment that would have been required from a decrease in gross margin of 0.5 percentage points. This additional impairment would have been after the £31.9m impairment in the North America Cyber Security CGU during May 2024. As goodwill has been impaired to £nil, any further impairment would be applied to other assets allocated to the CGU.

CGU Decrease in gross margin of 0.5 percentage points £m

North America Cyber Security 2.9

As the goodwill in the North America Cyber Security CGU was fully impaired as at 31 May 2024, no further sensitivity analysis was provided as at 30 September 2024.

With the exception of the North America Cyber Security CGU, the Board did not identify any reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions that would cause the carrying values of the other CGUs to exceed their respective recoverable amounts at 30 September 2024.

Prior period goodwill reallocation

During June 2024, as part of the expected disposal of the Fox Crypto B.V. entity, the Group reorganised its reporting structure to separate out the Fox Crypto entity from the Europe Cyber Security CGU. On this basis the Europe Cyber Security goodwill was reallocated between the newly created Fox Crypto CGU and the remaining Europe Cyber Security CGU.

Goodwill was reallocated based on relative values of the two CGUs, but having made adjustment to reflect that the Fox Crypto CGU is less asset intensive than the remaining Europe Cyber Security CGU.

The value of each CGU was based on FVLCTS. For the Fox Crypto CGU, the FVLCTS was based on the expected consideration to be received on disposal (see Note 18 of the 2024 Annual Report and Accounts) of this business less estimated selling costs. For the remaining Europe Cyber Security CGU the fair value was calculated using a methodology consistent with that used in the goodwill impairment review and described above.

Based on this assessment, goodwill of £51.9m was reallocated to the Fox Crypto CGU, leaving £2.2m as reallocated to the EU Cyber Security CGU. Goodwill reallocated to the Fox Crypto CGU was reclassified to assets held for sale (see Note 16). There was no change in the allocated goodwill following completion of the disposal in the current year.

Prior period sensitivity analysis – goodwill reallocation

The FVLCTS valuation of each standalone CGU was calculated by determining sustainable earnings, which were based on the Adjusted EBITDA1 , and applying a reasonable market multiple on the calculated sustainable earnings. The sustainable earnings figures used in this calculation included a key assumption regarding forecast revenue for the business.

The table below shows the sensitivity of the goodwill reallocation to reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions, by reflecting the additional goodwill that would have been allocated to the Europe Cyber Security CGU from an increase in revenue of 5% with no increased costs. This additional goodwill would be after the allocation of £2.2m of goodwill to the Europe Cyber Security CGU.

CGU 5% increase in revenue £m Europe Cyber Security 13.3

1 Adjusted EBITDA is an Alternative Performance Measure (APM) and not an IFRS measure. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

12 Property, plant and equipment

Computer
equipment
£m
Fixtures,
fittings and
equipment
£m
Assets
under
construction
£m
Total
£m
Cost
At 1 June 2023 27.5 20.4 47.9
Additions 3.8 2.4 6.2
Disposals (0.1) (0.2) (0.3)
Assets classified as held for sale (Note 16) (1.1) (1.2) (2.3)
Movement in foreign exchange rates (0.3) (0.2) (0.5)
At 30 September 2024 29.8 21.2 51.0
Additions 2.6 0.5 1.6 4.7
Disposals (1.8) (1.8)
Assets classified as held for sale (Note 16) (1.1) (0.2) (1.3)
Movement in foreign exchange rates (0.8) (0.8)
At 30 September 2025 30.5 19.7 1.6 51.8
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 June 2023 (23.0) (12.4) (35.4)
Charge for period (3.4) (2.0) (5.4)
Impairment (0.4) (0.4)
On disposals 0.1 0.1 0.2
Assets classified as held for sale (Note 16) 0.9 0.3 1.2
Movement in foreign exchange rates 0.2 0.2 0.4
At 30 September 2024 (25.2) (14.2) (39.4)
Charge for year (2.7) (1.6) (4.3)
On disposals 0.6 0.6
Assets classified as held for sale (Note 16) 1.0 0.1 1.1
Movement in foreign exchange rates 0.6 0.1 0.7
At 30 September 2025 (26.3) (15.0) (41.3)
Net book value
At 30 September 2024 4.6 7.0 11.6
At 30 September 2025 4.2 4.7 1.6 10.5

13 Right-of-use assets

Land and
buildings
£m
Motor
vehicles
£m
Total
£m
Cost
At 1 June 2023 36.3 6.0 42.3
Additions 5.2 4.2 9.4
Disposals (1.7) (1.7)
Impairment (3.2) (3.2)
Assets classified as held for sale (0.4) (0.4)
At 30 September 2024 38.3 8.1 46.4
Additions 4.7 1.8 6.5
Disposals (1.4) (2.0) (3.4)
Impairment (0.3) (0.3)
Reversal of impairment 0.2 0.2
Assets classified as held for sale (5.9) (0.2) (6.1)
At 30 September 2025 35.6 7.7 43.3
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 June 2023 (19.0) (4.7) (23.7)
Charge for period (5.6) (2.5) (8.1)
Disposals 1.1 1.1
At 30 September 2024 (24.6) (6.1) (30.7)
Charge for year (3.8) (1.7) (5.5)
Disposals 1.3 1.3 2.6
Assets classified as held for sale 3.9 0.2 4.1
At 30 September 2025 (23.2) (6.3) (29.5)
Net book value
At 30 September 2024 13.7 2.0 15.7
At 30 September 2025 12.4 1.4 13.8

14 Trade and other receivables

Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
Current
Trade receivables 14.1 17.3
Prepayments 9.7 12.6
Contract costs – costs to obtain (see Note 21) 3.5 1.2
Contract costs – costs to fulfil (see Note 21) 3.5
Other receivables 1.0 1.1
Non-current
Amounts owed by Group undertakings 34.2 43.1
Total 31.8 32.2 34.2 43.1
Disclosed as follows:
Current assets 31.8 32.2
Non-current assets 34.2 43.1
31.8 32.2 34.2 43.1

The carrying value of trade and other receivables classified at amortised cost approximates fair value. No material credit losses have been recognised in respect of amounts owed by Group undertakings (Parent Company only) in the period (2024: £nil).

Amounts owed by Group undertakings in the Parent Company Balance Sheet have been disclosed as repayable after more than one year. Although these are repayable on demand, the disclosure as non-current is based on management's expectation of the timing of repayment.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

14 Trade and other receivables continued

The ageing of trade receivables and other receivables at the end of the reporting year was:

Group Gross
2025
£m
Expected
credit losses
2025
£m
Net
2025
£m
Gross
2024
Restated*
£m
Expected
credit losses
2024
£m
Net
2024
Restated*
£m
Trade receivables:
Not past due 10.5 10.5 13.8 13.8
Past due 0–30 days 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
Past due 31–90 days 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7
Past due more than 90 days 1.3 (0.7) 0.6 2.3 (1.6) 0.7
14.8 (0.7) 14.1 18.9 (1.6) 17.3
Other receivables:
Not past due 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
Total 15.8 (0.7) 15.1 20.0 (1.6) 18.4

* Prior period comparative ageing analysis has been restated following a review which identified that the 2024 analysis was prepared based on invoice date rather than due date.

The Company had no trade receivables (2024: £nil). The standard period for credit sales varies from 30 days to 60 days. The Group assesses the creditworthiness of all trade debts on an ongoing basis providing for expected credit losses in line with IFRS 9. The Group has considered credit risk rating grades; these are based on the ageing categories above. New customers are subject to stringent credit checks.

The movement in the expected credit losses of trade and other receivables (being the credit losses recognised on financial assets, specifically trade receivables) is as follows:

Transferred to assets held for sale 0.9
Balance at 30 September 2025 (0.7)
Balance at 30 September 2024 (1.6)
Balance at 1 June 2023 (2.0)
Provision utilised during the period 0.4
Expected
credit loss
provision
£m

15 Deferred tax assets and liabilities (Group)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet are offset in accordance with IAS 12. A summary of this, offset with significant jurisdictions, is shown for the Group (including discontinued operations) below:

2025
Asset/(liability) UK
£m
US
£m
Netherlands
£m
Total
£m
Plant and equipment 0.2 0.2
Short-term temporary differences 0.4 6.3 6.7
IFRS 16 assets 0.1 0.1
Intangible assets (0.6) (6.3) (0.5) (7.4)
Share-based payments 1.2 1.2
Tax losses
Deferred tax asset/(liability) 1.0 (0.2) 0.8
Analysed as follows:
Non-current assets 1.0 1.0
Non-current liabilities (0.2) (0.2)

Financial statements

15 Deferred tax assets and liabilities (Group) continued

Asset/(liability) 2024
UK
£m
US
£m
Netherlands
£m
Total
£m
Plant and equipment 0.3 0.3
Short-term temporary differences 0.5 3.1 3.6
Intangible assets (0.8) (3.1) (0.8) (4.7)
Share-based payments 0.9 0.9
Tax losses
Deferred tax asset/(liability) 0.6 (0.5) 0.1
Analysed as follows:
Non-current assets 0.6 0.6
Non-current liabilities (0.5) (0.5)

Movement in deferred tax during the year:

30 September
2024
£m
Recognised
in Income
Statement
£m
Exchange
differences
£m
Recognised
in equity
£m
30 September
2025
£m
Plant and equipment 0.3 (0.1) 0.2
Short-term temporary differences 3.6 3.1 6.7
IFRS 16 assets 0.1 0.1
Intangible assets (4.7) (2.6) (0.1) (7.4)
Share-based payments 0.9 0.2 0.1 1.2
Total 0.1 0.7 (0.1) 0.1 0.8
1 June
2023
£m
Recognised
in Income
Statement
£m
Exchange
differences
£m
Recognised
in equity
£m
Acquisition
£m
30 September
2024
£m
Plant and equipment 0.2 0.1 0.3
Short-term temporary differences 9.1 (5.7) 0.2 3.6
IFRS 16 assets/(liabilities) 0.5 (0.5)
Intangible assets (10.7) 5.8 0.2 (4.7)
Share-based payments 0.5 0.4 0.9
Tax losses 1.9 (1.9)
Total 1.5 (1.8) 0.4 0.1

In the year ended 30 September 2025 (as in the period ended 30 September 2024), the Group (including the Escode division) has not recognised a deferred tax asset in relation to tax losses (and certain other North American temporary differences) as management does not consider it probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they may be offset. The Group has not recognised a deferred tax asset on any element of £43.4m (2024: £19.9m) of tax losses carried forward in the United Kingdom (£8.2m), Denmark (£4.2m), Australia (£5.4m), Japan (£0.2m) and United States state taxes (£25.4m) due to current uncertainties over their future recoverability (and in the case of certain United Kingdom/United States losses because of specific legislative restrictions). The Group has not recognised a potential deferred tax asset in relation to short-term temporary differences (and other minor categories) of £20.3m (2024: £25.0m) in relation to the United States.

The unrecognised deferred tax asset on the above deductible temporary differences at 30 September 2025 is £10.8m (£10.9m at 30 September 2024):

2025
£m
2024
£m
Plant and equipment (0.1) (0.2)
Short-term temporary differences (5.1) (6.3)
Intangible assets (0.1)
Share-based payments (0.2) (0.3)
Tax losses (5.3) (4.1)
Total (10.8) (10.9)

A deferred tax asset of £1.1m (2024: £2.0m) in respect of R&D tax claims submitted in the United States has been partially provided against due to uncertainty about recoverability; an amount of £0.7m has been provided (2024: £1.2m). No deferred tax liability is recognised on temporary differences of £8.9m (2024: £8.1m) relating to the unremitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries as the Group can control the timing of the reversal of these temporary differences and it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

16 Discontinued operations and assets and liabilities held for sale Current year – Escode

In February 2023, the Group announced the commencement of a strategic review of its Escode business and other core and non-core assets. The review of the Escode business was subsequently stopped in June 2023. During the year ended 30 September 2025, the Group confirmed that it was exploring a number of options for its Escode business, including a potential sale. The Group initiated an active programme to locate a buyer for Escode during the year.

On this basis, as at 30 September 2025, the sale of Escode was considered highly probable and therefore the associated assets and liabilities were reclassified as held for sale as at 30 September 2025.

As the conditions for classification as "held for sale" were met, and given that Escode represents a separate major line of business within the Group, it is presented as a discontinued operation.

The financial performance and cash flow information relating to discontinued operations for the year ended 30 September 2025, including comparative figures, is presented below.

Discontinued operations Year
ended
30 September
2025
£m
16 month
period ended
30 September
2024
£m
Revenue (Note 3)
Cost of sales
66.5
(19.0)
87.4
(26.7)
Gross profit 47.5 60.7
Administrative expenses
Individually Significant Items
Depreciation and amortisation
Other administrative expenses

(6.0)
(9.8)
(0.1)
(7.7)
(14.7)
Total administrative expenses (15.8) (22.5)
Operating profit
Finance costs
31.7
(0.1)
38.2
(0.1)
Profit before taxation
Tax expense (Note 8)
31.6
(5.4)
38.1
(3.4)
Profit for the year/period from discontinued operations
Exchange differences on translation of discontinued operations
26.2
(0.1)
34.7
(10.2)
Other comprehensive income from discontinued operations 26.1 24.5
Net cash inflow from operating activities
Net cash outflow from investing activities
Net cash outflow from financing activities
39.6
(0.3)
(37.4)
37.0
(1.6)
(37.0)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash generated by the discontinued operations 1.9 (1.6)

16 Discontinued operations and assets and liabilities held for sale continued

Current year – Escode continued

The following assets and liabilities were reclassified as held for sale in relation to discontinued operations as at 30 September 2025:

30 September
2025
£m
Assets classified as held for sale:
Goodwill 110.2
Intangible fixed assets 76.1
Tangible fixed assets 0.2
Right-of-use assets 2.0
Trade and other receivables 5.1
Cash and cash equivalents 3.9
Contract assets 0.5
Total assets classified as held for sale 198.0
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale:
Lease liabilities (3.0)
Trade and other payables (6.2)
Provisions (0.3)
Deferred revenue (24.7)
Current tax liability (5.6)
Total liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale (39.8)

Prior period – Fox Crypto B.V.

On 1 August 2024, the Group announced the disposal of Fox Crypto B.V. for an initial expected gross consideration of €77.3m to CR Group Nordic AB. As at 30 September 2024, the disposal was yet to be finalised; however, the sale of this business was considered highly probable and, accordingly, Fox Crypto's assets and liabilities were reclassified as held for sale as at 30 September 2024. Fox Crypto B.V. did not meet the definition of discontinued operations.

On 28 March 2025, the Group completed the disposal of its entire 100% interest in Fox Crypto, a foreign operation, for total cash consideration of £65.6m. Following completion, all assets and liabilities held for sale were derecognised. The Group did not retain any interest in Fox Crypto, and no contingent consideration was recognised. For further details on the disposal see Note 31.

The table below sets out the assets held for sale balances as at 30 September 2024:

30 September
2024
£m
Assets classified as held for sale:
Goodwill 51.9
Intangible fixed assets 0.1
Right-of-use assets 0.4
Property, plant and equipment 1.1
Inventories 0.6
Trade and other receivables 4.3
Contract assets 3.1
Total assets classified as held for sale 61.5
Liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale:
Trade and other payables (1.4)
Deferred revenue (3.1)
Lease liabilities (0.4)
Provisions (0.8)
Total liabilities associated with assets classified as held for sale (5.7)

for the year ended 30 September 2025

17 Trade and other payables

Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
Trade payables 4.6 4.6
Non-trade payables 5.5 17.5 9.8
Accruals 33.0 24.7
Amounts owed to Group companies 0.1
Total 43.1 46.8 9.9

The carrying value of trade and other payables classified as financial liabilities measured at amortised cost approximates fair value.

18 Lease liabilities

Land and
buildings
£m
Motor
vehicles
£m
Total
£m
At 1 June 2023 26.3 3.7 30.0
Additions 4.7 4.2 8.9
Disposals (0.7) (0.7)
Lease payments (9.2) (2.7) (11.9)
Interest expense 1.3 0.4 1.7
Liabilities classified as held for sale (0.4) (0.4)
At 30 September 2024 23.1 4.5 27.6
Additions 2.9 1.6 4.5
Disposals (2.3) (0.5) (2.8)
Lease payments (5.8) (2.1) (7.9)
Interest expense 0.9 0.2 1.1
Liabilities classified as held for sale (3.0) (3.0)
At 30 September 2025 15.8 3.7 19.5

Analysed as follows:

2025
£m
2024
£m
Current 4.1 5.7
Non-current 15.4 21.9

The maturity of lease liabilities is as follows:

2025
£m
2024
£m
Less than one year 4.1 5.7
Two to five years 11.0 16.1
More than five years 4.4 5.8
Total lease liabilities 19.5 27.6

The total cash outflow for leases in the year was £7.9m (2024: £11.9m), which consists of £6.8m (2024: £10.2m) principal element of lease payments disclosed above, £1.1m (2024: £1.7m) interest element of lease payments and £nil (2024: £nil) lease payments charged to the Income Statement in respect of short-term leases. The Group has used its incremental borrowing rate of 6.53% (2024: 6.35%) as the discount rate for the calculation of the lease liabilities. Some leases contain break clauses or extension options to provide operational flexibility. Potential future undiscounted lease payments not included in the reasonably certain lease term, and hence not included in lease liabilities, total £1.2m (2024: £4.6m).

19 Provisions

Loss-making
contracts
£m
Onerous
property
costs
£m
Other
provisions
£m
Total
£m
Balance at 1 June 2023 1.0 1.4 0.3 2.7
Provisions created in the period
Provisions released during the period
Provisions utilised during the period
Transferred to assets held for sale
0.3

(0.5)
(0.8)
3.0
(0.2)
(1.0)
0.1

(0.3)
3.4
(0.2)
(1.8)
(0.8)
Balance at 30 September 2024 3.2 0.1 3.3
Provisions created in the year
Provisions released during the year
Provisions utilised during the year
Transferred to assets held for sale



1.3
(1.2)
(0.8)
(0.3)


(0.1)
1.3
(1.2)
(0.9)
(0.3)
Balance at 30 September 2025 2.2 2.2
Analysed as follows (2025):
Current
Non-current

0.3
1.9

0.3
1.9
Analysed as follows (2024):
Current
Non-current

1.3
1.9
0.1
1.4
1.9

The onerous property costs provision relates to unused and closed office spaces within the Group's property portfolio. The onerous property provision of £2.2m (2024: £3.2m) at 30 September 2025 includes £0.5m (2024: £2.0m) of non-rental costs relating to the onerous properties including service charges and insurance, as well as the estimated costs of disposing of or terminating these leases, which includes rent incentives and letting fees.

The provision at 30 September 2025 also includes estimated dilapidations liabilities of £1.7m (2024: £1.2m) relating to the Group's leased premises. Both of these provisions are expected to unwind over the period of the relevant leases (2026–2035).

Other provisions are £nil in the year ended 30 September 2025 (2024: £0.1m). These comprised accrued redundancy costs relating to the implementation of the reorganisation to which the Group was committed as of 30 September 2024. These costs were settled within the year ended 30 September 2025.

20 Contract liabilities – deferred revenue

Deferred revenue represents advanced consideration received from customers, for which revenue is recognised over time. Deferred revenue is analysed as follows and is considered a contract liability:

Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Analysed as follows:
Current 25.7 50.7
Non-current 2.2 2.8
27.9 53.5

Revenue recognised in the year ended 30 September 2025 that was included in the contract liability at 30 September 2024 amounted to £50.7m (2024: £54.9m). The non-current element as at 30 September 2024 is expected to unwind in the year ending 30 September 2026.

Contract liabilities primarily relate to advanced consideration received from customers, for which revenue is recognised over time in line with the respective performance obligation. See Note 3 for information regarding the remaining performance obligations as of 30 September 2025.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

21 Contract assets

The following table provides information about receivables and contract assets from contracts with customers.

Note Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Receivables, which are included in trade and other receivables
14
14.1 17.3
Contract assets – accrued income 19.4 20.1
Contract costs – costs to fulfil
14
3.5
Contract costs – costs to obtain
14
3.5 1.2

The Group has recognised £19.4m of contract assets (2024: £20.1m). All contract assets for the current year and the comparative period are presented within current assets.

The ageing of contract assets at the end of the reporting year was:

Group Gross
2025
£m
Expected
credit losses
2025
£m
Net
2025
£m
Gross
2024
£m
Expected
credit losses
2024
£m
Net
2024
£m
Contract assets:
Not past due
20.1 (0.7) 19.4 21.1 (1.0) 20.1
Total 20.1 (0.7) 19.4 21.1 (1.0) 20.1

The movement in the expected credit losses of contract assets (being the credit losses recognised on financial assets, specifically contract assets) is as follows:

Balance at 30 September 2025 (0.7)
Balance at 30 September 2024 (1.0)
Provision utilised during the year 0.3
Balance at 1 June 2023 (0.2)
Charged to the Income Statement (0.8)
Expected
credit loss
provision
£m

Accrued income of £19.4m (2024: £20.1m) is the Group's rights to consideration for work completed but not billed at the reporting date. The contract assets accrued in the prior year of £20.1m were fully recognised as trade receivables during the year ended 30 September 2025. Therefore, the balances as at 30 September 2025 were fully accrued during the year and will be transferred to receivables when the rights become unconditional. Expected credit losses of £0.7m (2024: £1.0m) have been recognised in respect of contract assets.

The contract assets are transferred to receivables when the rights become unconditional. This usually occurs when the Group issues an invoice to the customer. Invoices usually become payable within 30 days. The contract costs to obtain of £3.5m (2024: £1.2m) represent incremental sales commissions to obtain specific contracts and are amortised over the length of the contract.

Contract costs comprise (i) incremental costs of obtaining contracts of £3.5m (2024: £1.2m), which are expected to be recovered through future revenue, and (ii) costs to fulfil contracts of £3.5m (2024: £nil), which relate directly to future performance obligations and are expected to be recovered.

22 Cash and cash equivalents and borrowings

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:

Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
Cash and cash equivalents 12.5 29.8 9.8
Bank overdraft (13.6)
Total cash at bank and in hand 12.5 16.2 9.8

Borrowings are analysed as follows:

Maturity Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
Non-current liabilities
Revolving credit facility
2029 3.3 61.5
Total borrowings 3.3 61.5

The maturity profile is as follows:

Group Group Company Company
2025 2024 2025 2024
£m £m £m £m
Two to five years 3.3 61.5

The RCF is drawn in short to medium-term tranches of debt that are repayable within 12 months of drawdown. These tranches can be rolled over, provided certain conditions are met, including compliance with all loan terms. As at the year end, the Group has assessed its compliance with these conditions and considers it highly likely that it will continue to meet all requirements and be able to exercise its right to roll over the debt. The Directors believe the Group has both the ability and intent to roll over the drawn RCF amounts when due and, accordingly, have presented the RCF as a non-current liability in line with applicable IFRIC guidance.

In April 2025, the Group entered into a four year £120m multi-currency revolving credit facility replacing the previous £162.5m multi-currency revolving credit facility. Key terms of the facility are:

  • A £120m multi-currency revolving credit facility maturing in April 2029.
  • An additional £50m uncommitted accordion option, subject to bank approval.
  • In line with the previous facility, a net leverage covenant of 3.0x with an additional acquisition spike to 3.5x for up to 12 months of the date of any acquisition.
  • The bank margin is payable on a ratchet mechanism, with a margin payable above SONIA and SOFR in the range of 1.35% to 2.35% (previously 1.00% to 2.25%) depending on the level of the Group's leverage. The weighted average interest rate is 6.16% for the year ended 30 September 2025 (2024: 6.21%).
  • At the date of refinancing, unamortised arrangement fees relating to the previous RCF remained outstanding as the facility was refinanced before the end of its original term. The refinancing did not result in a substantial modification under IFRS 9. Accordingly, arrangement fees from the previous refinancing in December 2022 have been carried forward and are being amortised over the life of the new RCF term (four years to April 2029), together with new arrangement fees of £1.1m incurred directly with the lenders on refinancing.
  • Certain subsidiaries of the Group act as guarantors to the new facility to provide coverage based on aggregate Adjusted EBITDA1 and gross assets.

As at 30 September 2025, the Group had committed bank facilities of £120m (2024: £162.5m), of which £5.2m (2024: £62.4m) had been drawn, leaving £114.8m (2024: £100.1m) of undrawn facilities. Unamortised arrangement fees of £1.9m (2024: £0.9m) have been offset against the amounts drawn down, resulting in a carrying value of borrowings at 30 September 2025 of £3.3m (2024: £61.5m). The fair value of borrowings is not materially different to its amortised cost.

1 Adjusted EBITDA is an Alternative Performance Measure (APM) and not an IFRS measure. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

23 Financial instruments Loans and borrowings

Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
Non-current
Variable rate:
Revolving credit facility (3.3) (61.5)
Total loans and borrowings (excluding lease liabilities) (3.3) (61.5)
Current
Cash 12.5 29.8 9.8
Bank overdraft (13.6)
Net cash/(debt) (excluding lease liabilities)1 9.2 (45.3) 9.8
Non-current
Lease liabilities (15.4) (21.9)
Current
Lease liabilities (4.1) (5.7)
Net (debt)/cash1 (10.3) (72.9) 9.8

Lease liabilities of £3.0m classified as held for sale in Note 16 have been excluded from the net debt calculation.

Reconciliation of movements in liabilities to cash flows arising from financing activities

2025 2024
Group £m £m
Revolving credit facility/bank term loan:
Drawdown on facility 21.1 57.8
Repayment of facility (80.3) (75.0)
Release of deferred arrangement fees 0.2 0.6
Foreign exchange movement 0.8 (3.8)
Movement in borrowings (58.2) (20.4)
IFRS 16 lease liability:
New leases entered into 4.5 8.9
Disposals (2.8) (0.7)
Principal element of lease payments (6.8) (10.2)
Lease liabilities held for sale (see Note 16) (3.0) (0.4)
Movement in lease liabilities (8.1) (2.4)

Financial risk management

The Group has exposure to the following risks from its use of financial instruments:

  • Credit risk
  • Liquidity risk
  • Currency risk
  • Interest rate risk

The Board has overall responsibility for establishing appropriate management of exposure to risk. The Audit Committee oversees how management identifies and addresses risks to the Group.

Capital management

The Board's policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future development of the business.

The Group monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as net cash/(debt) 2 divided by total capital. Net cash/(debt) 1 is calculated as total borrowings as shown in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, less cash and cash equivalents. Total capital is calculated as equity, as shown in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, plus net debt 1 . As at 30 September 2025 the Group's gearing ratio was nil (2024: 17.8%).

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA and net debt excluding lease liabilities are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA and net debt excluding lease liabilities are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

23 Financial instruments continued

Financial instruments policy

All instruments utilised by the Company and Group are for financing purposes. The financial management and treasury activities of the Group are controlled centrally for all operations with local finance teams responsible for day-to-day banking activities.

Fair value of financial instruments

As at 30 September 2025, the Group and Company had no other financial instruments other than those disclosed below. In addition, no embedded derivatives have been identified. There have been no transfers between levels in the year.

The following table presents the Group's financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value by level of fair value hierarchy:

  • Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1)
  • Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2)
  • Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (level 3)

Borrowings are held at amortised cost, which is considered to equate to fair value. All other assets and liabilities are held at either fair value or their carrying value, which approximates to fair value.

2025 2024
Level 1
£m
Level 2
£m
Level 3
£m
Level 1
£m
Level 2
£m
Level 3
£m
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss 0.8
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 0.9
Total financial asset/liabilities 0.9 0.8

At 30 September 2025, the Group holds derivatives (financial assets) with a mark to market valuation of £0.9m (2024 financial liabilities: £0.8m) to mitigate currency risk, as described in Note 23.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations and arises principally from the Group's receivables from customers. The Group's exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer.

Exposure to credit risk

The carrying value of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:

Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
Trade receivables 14.1 17.3
Other receivables 1.0 1.1
Amounts owed by Group undertakings 34.2 43.1
Contract assets 19.4 20.1
Cash and cash equivalents 12.5 29.8 9.8
Total 47.0 68.3 34.2 52.9

The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade receivables and other receivables at the reporting date by geographic region was:

Trade and other receivables by geographical segment Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
UK 6.8 8.0
APAC 0.7 1.1
North America 5.1 4.9
Europe 2.5 4.4
Total 15.1 18.4

for the year ended 30 September 2025

23 Financial instruments continued

Exposure to credit risk continued

The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade and other receivables at the reporting date by business segment was:

Trade and other receivables by business segment Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
Cyber Security 14.8 15.7
Escode 2.5
Central and head office 0.3 0.2
Total 15.1 18.4

The trade receivables of the Group typically comprise many amounts due from a large number of customers and represent a spread of industry sectors. The largest amount due from a single customer at the reporting date represented 3.0% (2024: 2.5%) of total Group receivables. All of the Group's cash is held with financial institutions of high credit rating.

The provisions in respect of trade receivables are used to record expected credit losses. The Group has dedicated credit control teams, which regularly review customer debt balances to assess the risk of recovery.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group manages and minimises liquidity risk by using global cash management solutions and actively monitoring both actual and projected cash outflows to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due and have headroom to provide against unforeseen obligations.

Longer term, the Group has assessed its liquidity forecast as part of the viability assessment and its ability to continue trading as a going concern. For further detail on the Group's assessment of liquidity risk refer to the Viability Statement on pages 38 and 39.

The following are the undiscounted contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including interest payments, of the Group:

At 30 September 2025 Carrying
amount
£m
Contractual
cash flows
£m
<1 year
£m
1–2
years
£m
2–5
years
£m
5+
years
£m
Borrowings (3.3) (6.1) (0.3) (0.3) (5.5)
Lease liabilities (19.5) (16.7) (3.3) (3.7) (5.7) (4.0)
Trade and other payables (43.1) (43.1) (43.1)
At 30 September 2024 Carrying
amount
£m
Contractual
cash flows
£m
<1 year
£m
1–2
years
£m
2–5
years
£m
5+
years
£m
Borrowings (61.5) (73.9) (3.8) (3.8) (66.3)
Bank overdraft (13.6) (13.6) (13.6)
Lease liabilities (27.6) (32.5) (8.0) (6.6) (13.6) (4.3)
Trade and other payables (46.8) (46.8) (46.8)

The contractual cash flows for borrowings disclosed above relate to the Group's RCF for the year ended 30 September 2025, which expires in April 2029, and in the prior year includes the Term Loan Facility Agreement that was due to expire in December 2026. The contractual cash flows include an estimate of the interest payable based on the assumption that the borrowings remain drawn based upon 30 September 2025 levels, except that the term loan which existed at 30 September 2024 is repayable over its term. Interest is calculated based on SONIA/SOFR plus a margin based on the current leverage ratio.

Currency risk

The Group is exposed to currency risk on sales, purchases, cash and borrowings that are denominated in a currency other than the respective functional and presentational currency of the Group. The Group's management reviews the size and probable timing of settlement of all financial assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The Group's exposure to currency risk is as follows:

2025 2024
Sterling
£m
EUR
£m
USD
£m
Other
£m
Total
£m
Sterling
£m
EUR
£m
USD
£m
Other
£m
Total
£m
Trade receivables 8.4 2.9 1.9 0.9 14.1 7.6 2.0 7.4 0.3 17.3
Other receivables 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
Contract assets 7.8 3.8 6.1 1.7 19.4 7.9 3.4 6.5 2.3 20.1
Cash and cash equivalents 2.7 3.5 4.3 2.0 12.5 18.0 4.1 4.5 3.2 29.8
Bank overdraft (11.9) (1.7) (13.6)
Borrowings 1.9 (5.2) (3.3) (19.0) (42.5) (61.5)
Lease liabilities (9.7) (3.8) (3.0) (3.0) (19.5) (16.0) (3.2) (4.9) (3.5) (27.6)
Trade and other payables (28.7) (5.6) (6.2) (2.6) (43.1) (32.7) (3.9) (7.6) (2.6) (46.8)
Total (16.6) 0.8 (2.1) (1.0) (18.9) (45.0) 2.4 (38.3) (0.3) (81.2)

23 Financial instruments continued

Currency risk continued

The £1.9m of borrowings denominated in sterling relates to unamortised arrangement fees.

A 10% change in each of the respective exchange rates utilised during the year would impact revenue by £17.0m (2024: £23.6m) and borrowings by £0.5m (2024: £4.3m), either increasing or decreasing each by the stated amounts.

The Group's risk management policy is to hedge foreign currency exposure in respect of significant material transactions that may arise from time to time. No material hedges were in place at 30 September 2025 or at 30 September 2024. In order to manage shorter-term currency risk, the Group enters into short-term derivative arrangements.

The Group designates the spot element of forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge its currency risk and applies a hedge ratio of 1:1. The forward elements of forward exchange contracts are excluded from the designation of the hedging instrument and are separately accounted for as a cost of hedging, which is recognised in equity in a cost of hedging reserve. The Group's policy is for the critical terms of the forward exchange contracts to align with the hedged item.

The Group determines the existence of an economic relationship between the hedging instrument and hedged item based on the currency, amount and timing of their respective cash flows. Given the short-term nature of these hedges there is limited risk of ineffectiveness.

Interest rate risk

The Group and Company finance their operations through a combination of retained profits and bank borrowings. The Group borrows and invests surplus cash at floating rates of interest based upon bank base rate. The cash and cash equivalents of the Group and Company at the end of the financial year were as follows:

Group 2025
£m
2024
£m
Sterling denominated financial assets 2.7 18.0
Euro denominated financial assets 3.5 4.1
US Dollar denominated financial assets 4.3 4.5
Other denominated financial assets 2.0 3.2
Total 12.5 29.8

The financial assets and liabilities of the Company at the end of the financial year were as follows:

Company 2025
£m
2024
£m
Financial assets
Sterling denominated financial assets 9.8
Amounts owed by Group undertakings 34.2 43.1
Total 34.2 52.9
Financial liabilities
Sterling denominated financial liabilities 9.8
Amounts owed to Group undertakings 0.1
Total 9.9

A change of 100 basis points in interest rates would result in a difference in annual pre-tax profit of £nil (2024: £0.6m).

The financial liabilities of the Group (trade and other payables, borrowings and lease liabilities) and their maturity profile are as follows:

2025 2024
Sterling EUR USD Other Total Sterling EUR USD Other Total
£m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Less than one year (30.4) (6.3) (7.3) (3.2) (47.2) (34.9) (5.0) (9.1) (3.4) (52.4)
Two to five years (3.2) (1.8) (7.1) (2.2) (14.3) (28.6) (2.1) (46.0) (2.8) (79.5)
More than five years (3.0) (1.3) (0.1) (4.4) (4.0) (4.0)
Total (36.6) (9.4) (14.4) (5.5) (65.9) (67.5) (7.1) (55.1) (6.2) (135.9)

for the year ended 30 September 2025

24 Share-based payments

The Company has a number of share option schemes under which options to subscribe for the Company's shares have been granted to Directors and colleagues, details of which are illustrated in the tables below. Expected term of options represents the period over which the fair value calculations are based. The share-based payment charge for the year was £2.1m (2024: £2.3m), of which £2.1m (2024: £2.3m) related to equity settled payments and £nil (2024: £nil) to cash settled payments.

Company Share Option (CSOP) scheme – equity settled

Under the CSOP scheme, options will vest if the average EPS growth for the three years following their grant is greater than 10% per annum. Options granted in September 2019 do not have any performance criteria.

Date of grant Expected term of
options
Exercisable
between
Exercise
price
2025
Number
outstanding
August 2018 7 years August 2021–August 2028 £2.20
September 2019 7 years September 2022–September 2029 £1.79 106,136

Sharesave schemes – equity settled

The Company operates Sharesave schemes, which are available to all colleagues based in the UK, the Netherlands, Denmark, the Philippines, Spain and Australia, and full-time Executive Directors of the Group and its subsidiaries who have worked for a qualifying period.

Date of grant Expected term of
options
Exercisable
between
Exercise
price
2025
Number
outstanding
May 2021 3 years May 2024–October 2024 £2.15
May 2021 3 years May 2024–October 2024 £2.15
May 2022 3 years May 2025–October 2025 £1.52 98,445
May 2022 3 years May 2025–October 2025 £1.52 227,288
May 2023 3 years June 2026–November 2026 £1.26 99,093
May 2023 3 years June 2026–November 2026 £1.26 273,269
May 2024 3 years June 2027–November 2027 £0.99 264,400
May 2024 3 years June 2027–November 2027 £0.99 1,306,128
July 2025 3 years August 2028–January 2029 £1.14 168,854
July 2025 3 years August 2028–January 2029 £1.14 623,723

Colleague stock (ESPP) purchase plan – equity settled

The Company operates a stock purchase plan, which is available to all North American-based colleagues who have worked for a qualifying period. All options are to be settled by equity. Under the scheme the following options have been granted and are outstanding at the year end.

Date of grant Expected term of
options
Exercisable in Exercise
price
2025
Number
outstanding
May 2024 1 year May 2025 £1.09
July 2025 1 year July 2026 £1.23 61,478

Incentive Stock Option (ISO) scheme – equity settled

Under the ISO scheme, options granted will be subject to performance criteria. Options will vest if the average EPS growth for the three years following their grant is greater than 10% per annum. Options granted in September 2019 do not have any performance criteria.

Date of grant Expected term of
options
Exercisable
between
Exercise
price
2025
Number
outstanding
September 2019 7 years September 2022–September 2029 £1.82 16,482

Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) schemes – equity settled

Options granted between November 2017 and May 2021 have three separate vesting conditions as set out below:

  • 60% will vest based on achieving an average increase in Group EPS of 20% or more over a three year period. If growth is equal to an average of 9% (threshold), then 12% of the award will vest. If, however, growth is less than 9%, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 30% will vest based on achieving a cash conversion ratio1 expressed as a percentage over the measurement period of greater than 70% per annum on average. If cash conversion1 is greater than or equal to 80% per annum, then 100% of the award element will vest. If, however, cash conversion is less than 70% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 10% will vest based on the Group's total shareholder return (TSR) ranking when measured against the FTSE 250 (excluding investment trusts). If the Group's TSR is consistent with the median group, 20% of the award will vest; below this level, none of the award element will vest. If the TSR is within the upper quartile or above, 100% of the award element will vest; between the median and upper quartile, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.

<-- PDF CHUNK SEPARATOR -->

24 Share-based payments continued

Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) schemes – equity settled continued

Options granted in November 2021 have three separate vesting conditions as set out below:

  • 60% will vest based on achieving an average increase in Group EPS of 22.5% or more over a three year period. If growth is equal to an average of 9% (threshold), then 15% of the award will vest. If, however, growth is less than 9% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 30% will vest based on achieving a cash conversion ratio1 expressed as a percentage over the measurement period of greater than 70% per annum on average. If cash conversion1 is greater than or equal to 80% per annum, then 100% of the award element will vest. If, however, cash conversion is less than 70% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 10% will vest based on the Group's total shareholder return (TSR) ranking when measured against the FTSE 250 (excluding investment trusts). If the Group's TSR is consistent with the median group, 20% of the award will vest; below this level, none of the award element will vest. If the TSR is within the upper quartile or above, 100% of the award element will vest; between the median and upper quartile, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.

Options granted between October 2022 and November 2022 have three separate vesting conditions as set out below:

  • 60% will vest based on achieving an average increase in Group EPS of 18% or more over a three year period. If growth is equal to an average of 6% (threshold), then 15% of the award will vest. If, however, growth is less than 6% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 20% will vest based on achieving a cash conversion ratio1 expressed as a percentage over the measurement period of greater than 80% per annum on average. If cash conversion1 is greater than or equal to 90% per annum, then 100% of the award element will vest. If, however, cash conversion is less than 80% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 20% will vest based on the Group's total shareholder return (TSR) ranking when measured against the FTSE 250 (excluding investment trusts). If the Group's TSR is consistent with the median group, 15% of the award will vest; below this level, none of the award element will vest. If the TSR is within the upper quartile or above, 100% of the award element will vest; between the median and upper quartile, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.

Options granted between October 2023 and February 2024 have three separate vesting conditions as set out below:

  • 40% will vest based on achieving an average increase in Group EPS of 18% or more over a three year period. If growth is equal to an average of 6% (threshold), then 15% of the award will vest. If, however, growth is less than 6% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 20% will vest based on achieving a cash conversion ratio1 expressed as a percentage over the measurement period of greater than 80% per annum on average. If cash conversion1 is greater than or equal to 90% per annum, then 100% of the award element will vest. If, however, cash conversion is less than 80% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 40% will vest based on the Group's total shareholder return (TSR) ranking when measured against the FTSE 250 (excluding investment trusts). If the Group's TSR is consistent with the median group, 15% of the award will vest; below this level, none of the award element will vest. If the TSR is within the upper quartile or above, 100% of the award element will vest; between the median and upper quartile, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.

Options granted during or after June 2024 have three separate vesting conditions as set out below:

  • 30% will vest based on achieving an average increase in Group EPS of 18% or more over a three year period. If growth is equal to an average of 6% (threshold), then 15% of the award will vest. If, however, growth is less than 6% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 20% will vest based on achieving a cash conversion ratio1 expressed as a percentage over the measurement period of greater than 80% per annum on average. If cash conversion1 is greater than or equal to 90% per annum, then 100% of the award element will vest. If, however, cash conversion is less than 80% per annum, none of the award element will vest. Between these two points, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
  • 50% will vest based on the Group's total shareholder return (TSR) ranking when measured against the FTSE 250 (excluding investment trusts). If the Group's TSR is consistent with the median group, 15% of the award will vest; below this level, none of the award element will vest. If the TSR is within the upper quartile or above, 100% of the award element will vest; between the median and upper quartile, vesting is determined on a straight-line basis.
Date of grant Expected term
of options
Exercisable
between
Exercise
price
2025
Number
outstanding
March 2020 3 years June 2022–August 2024 £nil
May 2021 3 years June 2023–August 2025 £nil
November 2021 3 years June 2024–November 2031 £nil
October 2022 3 years October 2025–October 2032 £nil 677,916
November 2022 3 years November 2025–November 2032 £nil
October 2023 3 years October 2026–October 2033 £nil 1,606,795
February 2024 3 years February 2027–February 2034 £nil 65,412
June 2024 3 years October 2027–June 2034 £nil 2,839,374
January 2025 3 years January 2028–January 2035 £nil 78,185

1 Cash conversion is an Alternative Performance Measure (APM) and not an IFRS measure. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

24 Share-based payments continued

Restricted Share Plan (RSP) – equity settled

The vesting condition for the award of RSPs relates to colleagues remaining with the Group for a certain period of time, namely two years to receive 50% of the award, and a further year to receive the remaining 50%. There are no other performance conditions.

Date of grant Expected term
of options
Exercisable
between
Exercise
price
2025
Number
outstanding
May 2021 2/3 years 50% exercisable August 2022 to August 2031,
50% exercisable August 2023 to August 2031
£nil (£0.01 in the
US and Canada)
16,500
November 2021 2/3 years 50% exercisable October 2023 to August 2032,
50% exercisable October 2024 to August 2032
£nil (£0.01 in the
US and Canada)
52,950
October 2022 2/3 years 50% exercisable October 2024 to October 2032,
50% exercisable October 2025 to October 2032
£nil (£0.01 in the
US and Canada)
197,776
November 2022 2/3 years 50% exercisable November 2024 to November 2032,
50% exercisable November 2025 to November 2032
£nil (£0.01 in the
US and Canada)
October 2023 2/3 years 50% exercisable September 2025 to September 2033,
50% exercisable September 2026 to September 2033
£nil (£0.01 in the
US and Canada)
1,128,278
February 2024 2/3 years 50% exercisable February 2026 to February 2034,
50% exercisable February 2027 to February 2034
£nil (£0.01 in the
US and Canada)
42,636
January 2025 2/3 years 50% exercisable January 2027 to February 2035,
50% exercisable January 2028 to February 2035
£nil (£0.01 in the
US and Canada)
1,647,182
July 2025 2/3 years 50% exercisable July 2027 to July 2035,
50% exercisable July 2028 to July 2035
£nil (£0.01 in the
US and Canada)
145,132

Deferred share scheme – equity settled

At least 35% of any cash bonus payment is normally deferred into shares or nominal cost share options which vest after a two year period. Dividend equivalents are paid on vesting share options. From January 2025, 35% of any bonus payment earned in excess of £50,000 (the first £50,000 of any bonus will be paid in cash before any bonus deferral) is normally deferred into shares or nominal cost share options which vest after a two year period.

Date of grant Expected term
of options
Exercisable in Exercise
price
2025
Number
outstanding
October 2022 2 years October 2024 £nil
October 2023 2 years October 2025 £nil 12,207
August 2024 2 years August 2026 £nil 174,434
December 2024 2 years December 2026 £nil 92,559

Phantom schemes – cash settled

Phantom schemes are used to allow the grant of LTIPs or RSPs to members of the Executive Committee or other senior colleagues based in certain overseas locations at a time when the Group's option scheme rules are not structured to allow overseas grants. Options granted on or after September 2019 do not have any performance criteria.

Date of grant Expected term
of options
Exercisable
between
Exercise
price
2025
Number
outstanding
July 2021 3 years August 2022–July 2031 £nil
November 2021 3 years October 2023–November 2031 £nil
January 2025 3 years February 2026–November 2035 £nil 9,776

Measurement of fair values

The fair value of services received in return for share options is calculated with reference to the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The fair value is spread over the period during which the colleague becomes unconditionally entitled to the award, adjusted to reflect actual and expected levels of vesting.

The assumptions used in the models are illustrated in the tables below:

Scheme Grant date Option
expected term
Risk free
interest rate
CSOP scheme August 2018–September 2019 7 years 0.35%–2.00%
Sharesave scheme May 2021–July 2025 3 years 0.13%–5.53%
ESPP scheme May 2024–July 2025 1 year 4.63%–5.53%
ISO scheme September 2019 7 years 0.38%
LTIP scheme March 2020–January 2025 3 years 0.21%
RSP scheme May 2021–July 2025 10 years N/A
Deferred shares October 2022–December 2024 2 years N/A
Phantom schemes July 2021–January 2025 3 years 5.53%

Financial statements

24 Share-based payments continued Measurement of fair values continued

Scheme Grant date Fair value at
measurement date
Weighted average
fair value at
measurement date
Exercise
price
Weighted average
exercise value at
measurement date
Weighted average
fair value of options
granted during the
year
CSOP scheme August 2018–September 2019 £0.55–£0.63 £0.55 £1.79–£2.09 £1.79 N/A
Sharesave scheme May 2021–July 2025 £0.39–£0.86 £0.51 £0.99–£2.15 £1.12 £0.52
ESPP scheme May 2024–July 2025 £0.34–£0.37 £0.34 £1.09–£1.23 £1.23 £0.34
ISO scheme September 2019 £0.54 £0.54 £1.82 £1.82 N/A
LTIP scheme March 2020–January 2025 £0.90–£2.31 £1.30 £nil £nil £1.30
RSP scheme May 2021–July 2025 £0.90–£2.85 £1.22 £nil £nil £1.29
Deferred shares October 2022–December 2024 £1.11–£1.55 £1.46 £nil £nil £1.34
Phantom schemes July 2021–January 2025 £1.36–£2.87 £1.36 £nil £nil £1.36

LTIP schemes that include market conditions have been valued using a Monte Carlo simulation. All other schemes without market conditions have been valued using the Black-Scholes model.

The expected volatility has been based on an evaluation of the historical volatility of the Company's share price, particularly over the historical period commensurate with the expected term. The expected term of the instruments has been based on historical experience and general option holder behaviour. For the options granted in the year ended 30 September 2025, dividend yield assumed at the time of option grant is 3.62% (2024: 4.52%).

Reconciliation of outstanding share options

The options outstanding at 30 September 2025 have an exercise price in the range of £nil to £2.15 (2024: £nil to £2.15) and a weighted average contractual life of seven years (2024: seven years).

The following table illustrates the number and weighted average exercise prices (WAEP) of, and movements in, outstanding share awards during the year:

2025
Number
'000
2025
WAEP
2024
Number
'000
2024
WAEP
Outstanding at beginning of year/period 13,562 £0.33 11,220 £0.61
Granted during the year/period 2,997 £0.34 10,474 £0.23
Exercised during the year/period (1,156) £0.28 (2,049) £0.23
Forfeited in the year/period (3,371) £0.44 (6,083) £0.70
Outstanding at end of year/period 12,032 £0.31 13,562 £0.33
Exercisable at end of year/period 1,356 £0.53 1,690 £0.48
Scheme Number of
instruments
as at
1 October
2024
Instruments
granted
during
the year
Options
exercised in
the year
Forfeitures
in the year
Number of
instruments
as at
30 September
2025
CSOP schemes 161,998 (55,862) 106,136
Sharesave/SAYE schemes 3,142,015 824,011 (75,537) (829,289) 3,061,200
ESPP schemes 360,960 70,413 (204,492) (165,403) 61,478
ISO schemes 21,976 (5,494) 16,482
LTIP schemes 7,011,251 78,185 (158,772) (1,662,982) 5,267,682
RSP scheme 2,675,796 1,922,037 (715,543) (651,838) 3,230,452
Deferred shares 186,641 92,559 279,200
Phantom schemes 1,500 9,776 (1,500) 9,776
13,562,137 2,996,981 (1,155,844) (3,370,868) 12,032,406

The liability for cash settled share-based payments at 30 September 2025 was £nil (2024: £nil).

for the year ended 30 September 2025

25 Called up share capital and reserves

Allotted, called up and fully paid 2025
Number
of shares
2024
Number
of shares
2025
£m
2024
£m
Ordinary shares of 1p each at the beginning of the year/period
Ordinary shares of 1p each issued in the year/period
314,524,630
481,449
312,128,892
2,395,738
3.1
3.1
Ordinary shares of 1p each at the end of the year/period 315,006,079 314,524,630 3.1 3.1

During the year, 481,449 (2024: 2,395,738) new ordinary shares of 1p were issued as a result of the exercise of share options. The proceeds of £0.3m (2024: £0.3m) were credited to the share premium account.

As at 30 September 2025, 8,485,195 shares were held in treasury (2024: 5,158,090).

Share premium

The share premium account records the difference between the nominal amount of shares issued and the fair value of the consideration received. The share premium account may be used for certain purposes specified by UK law, including to write off expenses incurred on any issue of shares and to pay fully paid bonus shares. The share premium account is not distributable but may be reduced by special resolution of the Company's ordinary shareholders and with court approval.

Merger reserve

The merger reserve arose in 2015 from the acquisition of Accumuli plc through a share-for-share exchange in part consideration for the business.

Currency translation reserve

The results of overseas operations are translated at the average foreign exchange rates for the year, and their balance sheets are translated at the rates prevailing at the Balance Sheet date. Exchange differences arising on the translation of opening net assets and results of overseas operations are recognised in the currency translation reserve. All other exchange differences are included in the Income Statement.

On disposal of a foreign operation, the cumulative amount of exchange differences previously recognised in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity is reclassified to the Income Statement. See Note 31 for further details.

Retained earnings

Retained earnings for the Group are made up of accumulated reserves.

For the Company, retained earnings are made up of accumulated reserves.

26 Other financial commitments

At the end of the reporting year, the Group had no other financial commitments (2024: £nil).

27 Contingencies

There are no contingent liabilities not provided for at the end of the financial year (2024: £nil). Similarly, there are no contingent assets (2024: £nil).

The Company and its subsidiaries are party to cross guarantees securing certain bank loans. At 30 September 2025, there was no material impact that could arise for the Company from these cross guarantees.

28 Pension scheme

The Group operates a defined contribution pension scheme that is open to all eligible colleagues. The pension cost charge for the year represents contributions payable by the Group to the fund and amounted to £7.4m (2024: £8.0m).

For the Company, the pension cost charge for the year represents contributions payable by the Company to the fund and amounted to £nil (2024: £nil).

29 Related party transactions

Management has defined related party transactions as those involving key management personnel only.

Key management personnel have been assessed to be the Group's Board of Directors. During the year ended 30 September 2025 there were seven (2024: nine) key management personnel. Disclosures relating to remuneration of Directors are set out in the Remuneration Report on pages 81 to 93. The remuneration of the key management personnel is set out below:

Group
2025
£m
Group
2024
£m
Company
2025
£m
Company
2024
£m
Salary costs (including bonus) 2.2 2.7
Social security costs 0.3 0.4
Share-based payments 0.3
Total 2.5 3.4

There were no other related party transactions identified during the year. The amount of gains made by Directors on the exercise of share options is disclosed in the Remuneration Report on page 87.

30 Investments in subsidiary undertakings

Company Shares in Group
undertakings
£m
At 1 June 2023 279.1
Increase in subsidiary investment for share-based charges 2.3
Increase in subsidiary investment for below market value loan arrangement 9.7
At 30 September 2024 291.1
Increase in subsidiary investment for share-based charges 2.1
At 30 September 2025 293.2

In accordance with IAS 36 'Impairment of Assets', management annually reviews the carrying value of investments to ensure that it does not exceed the recoverable amount. The investment in subsidiary undertakings is held against the Company's direct subsidiary NCC Group Holdings Limited. In performing this assessment, management considered external market factors, such as the Group's market capitalisation, and internal factors, such as the results of the Group's annual goodwill impairment review. As of the reporting date, no indicators of impairment were noted.

The increase in subsidiary investment for share-based charges represents IFRS 2 'Share-based Payment' charges in respect of subsidiaries which will not be recharged.

Fixed asset investments are recognised at cost.

The undertakings in which the Company has a 100% interest at 30 September 2025 are as follows:

Subsidiary undertakings Country of incorporation Principal activity Registered office
NCC Group Holdings Limited England and Wales Holding company XYZ Building, 2 Hardman Boulevard,
Spinningfields, Manchester, England
M3 3AQ (XYZ1
)
NCC Group (Solutions) Limited England and Wales Holding company XYZ1
NCC Group Corporate Limited England and Wales Corporate cost centre XYZ1
NCC Group Finance Limited England and Wales Financing company XYZ1
The National Computing Centre Limited England and Wales Dormant XYZ1
NCC Group Software Resilience Limited England and Wales Holding company XYZ1
NCC Group Software Resilience (UK) Limited England and Wales Holding company XYZ1
NCC Services Limited England and Wales Escode XYZ1
NCC Group Escrow Limited England and Wales Dormant XYZ1
NCC Group Software Resilience (Europe) B.V. Netherlands Holding company Barbara Strozzilaan 201, 1083HN
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NCC Group GmbH Germany Escode c/o Deloitte Legal
Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH,
Rosenheimer Platz 6, 81669, Munich,
Bavaria, Germany
NCC Group Deutschland GmbH Germany Cyber Security Leopoldstrasse Business Centre GmbH,
Konrad-Zuse-Platz 8, 81829, Munich,
Germany
NCC Group Escrow Europe B.V. Netherlands Escode Barbara Strozzilaan 201, 1083HN
Amsterdam, Netherlands
NCC Group Escrow Europe (Switzerland) AG Switzerland Escode Ibelweg 18A, 6300 Zug, Switzerland
NCC Group Software Resilience (MEA-APAC) Limited England and Wales Holding company XYZ1
NCC Group FZ-LLC United Arab Emirates Escode F01-004, Building 5, Dubai, Media City,
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
NCC Group Cyber Security Limited England and Wales Holding company XYZ1
NCC Group Cyber Security (UK) Limited England and Wales Holding company XYZ1
NCC Group Security Services Limited England and Wales Cyber Security XYZ1
NCC Group Audit Limited England and Wales Cyber Security XYZ1
ArmstrongAdams Limited England and Wales Cyber Security XYZ1
NCC Group Signify Solutions Limited England and Wales Cyber Security XYZ1
NCC Group Accumuli Security Limited England and Wales Cyber Security XYZ1
NCC Group Cyber Security (Europe) B.V. Netherlands Holding company Olof Palmestraat 6, 2616 LM Delft,
Netherlands (Fox-IT3
)
NCC Group A/S Denmark Cyber Security Lautruphøj 1, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark
NCC Group Cyber Portuguesa, Unipessoal, LDA Portugal Cyber Security Av. António Augusto de Aguiar nº 19 –
4º, 1050-012 Lisboa, Portugal
NCC Group Security Services Espana SLU Spain Cyber Security Plaza Manuel Gómez Moreno, número 2,
Edificio Alfredo Mahou, planta 19ª, letra
B, 28020, Madrid, Spain

for the year ended 30 September 2025

30 Investments in subsidiary undertakings continued

Subsidiary undertakings Country of incorporation Principal activity Registered office
Cyber Assurance Sweden AB Sweden Cyber Security c/o Advokatfirman Delphi, P.O. Box
1432, 111 84 Stockholm
Fox-IT Holding B.V. Netherlands Holding company Olof Palmestraat 6, 2616 LM Delft,
Netherlands (Fox-IT3
)
Fox-IT Group B.V. Netherlands Holding company Fox-IT3
Fox-IT B.V. Netherlands Cyber Security Fox-IT3
NCC Group Cyber Security (APAC) Limited England and Wales Holding company XYZ1
NCC Group Pte Limited Singapore Cyber Security Unit #10-09 PLUS Building, 20 Cecil
Street, Singapore (049705)
NCC Group Pty Limited Australia Cyber Security Suite 23.01, Level 23, 45 Clarence
Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
Escode Australia Pty Limited Australia Software Resilience Suite 23.01, Level 23, 45 Clarence
Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
NCC Group Japan KK Japan Cyber Security Level 18, Yesibu Garden Place Tower,
4-20-3 Ebisu Shibuya-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
NCC Group (Americas) Inc. USA Holding company 11 East Adams Street, Suite 400
Chicago
IL 60603, USA
(North America HQ2
)
NCC Group, LLC USA Escode and central/
head office costs
North America HQ2
NCC Group Cyber Security (Americas), LLC USA Holding company North America HQ2
NCC Group Security Services, Inc. USA Cyber Security North America HQ2
NCC Group Secure Registrar, Inc. USA Domain services North America HQ2
NCC Group Domain Services, Inc. USA Domain services North America HQ2
NCC Group Security Services Corporation Canada Cyber Security Suite 2700, The Stack, 1133 Melville St,
Vancouver, BC V6E 4E5, Canada
Payment Software Company, Inc. USA Cyber Security North America HQ2
Payment Software Company Limited England and Wales Cyber Security XYZ1
NCC Group Software Resilience (Americas) LLC USA Holding company North America HQ2
NCC Group Escrow Associates, LLC USA Escode North America HQ2
NCC Group Software Resilience (NA), LLC USA Escode North America HQ2
NCC Group Asia, Inc. Philippines Cyber Security 37F Seven/NEO, 4th Avenue Bonifacio
Global City, Taguig City, Metro Manila,
1634, Philippines
Undertaking % interest Country of incorporation Principal activity
Deposit AB 24% Sweden Escode

The Directors consider the above ownership structure to give rise to no significant influence over the undertaking. There is no Board representation, and the Group has no power to participate in the operating and financial policy decisions of the undertaking. Accordingly, the undertaking of Deposit AB has not been consolidated.

  • 1 2 Hardman Boulevard, Spinningfields, Manchester, England M3 3AQ.
  • 2 11 East Adams Street, Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60603, USA.
  • 3 Olof Palmestraat 6, 2616 LM Delft, Netherlands.

Disposal of Group undertakings

During the prior period, the Group disposed of its 3.35% shareholding in an unlisted company. The shares were sold for a total consideration of £0.4m. A gain of £0.1m was recognised within the Income Statement in relation to this disposal. There has been no impact in the current year.

A further potential contingent consideration may be received after two years, subject to specific performance conditions. As this payment is not considered virtually certain at the reporting date, it has not been recognised in the current year's Financial Statements. If achieved, the maximum additional amount receivable would be £0.2m.

31 Disposals

Current year disposal of Fox Crypto business

At 30 September 2024, the assets and liabilities associated with the planned disposal of Fox Crypto were classified as held for sale (for further details please refer to Note 16).

On 28 March 2025, the Group completed the disposal of its entire 100% interest in Fox Crypto, a foreign operation, for total cash consideration of £65.6m. Following completion, no interest was retained in the entity, and no contingent consideration was recognised.

The disposal resulted in an overall gain of £9.8m, recognised within Individually Significant Items (see Note 4 for further details).

The assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal were as follows:

Total consideration 65.6
Cash and cash equivalents 65.6
Satisfied by:
Overall gain on disposal (Note 4) 9.8
Total transaction costs (3.5)
Gain on disposal – recognised as an Individually Significant Item (Note 4)
Transaction costs incurred during the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024
11.3
(1.5)
Transaction costs incurred in the year ended 30 September 2025 (2.0)
Total consideration 65.6
Net assets disposed of (52.3)
Cumulative currency translation adjustment 7.9
Provisions 0.6
Lease liabilities 0.6
Deferred revenue 2.8
Trade and other payables 2.7
Contract assets
Cash and cash equivalents
(2.2)
(4.2)
Trade and other receivables (6.2)
Inventories (0.5)
Right-of-use assets (0.6)
Tangible fixed assets (1.0)
Intangible fixed assets (0.1)
Attributable goodwill (52.1)
£m
2025

As part of the disposal, £7.9m of foreign currency translation reserve relating to Fox Crypto was reclassified from equity to the Income Statement and recognised within the gain on disposal. The net cash inflow on disposal was £61.4m, comprising gross consideration of £65.6m less £4.2m of cash disposed of on completion.

A gain on disposal of £11.3m has been recognised within ISIs in the year ended 30 September 2025. An additional £1.5m of related transaction costs were recognised in ISIs in the 16 month period ended 30 September 2024, bringing the total gain on disposal to £9.8m. Overall, total transaction costs total £3.5m, including the £2.0m incurred in the year ended 30 September 2025.

Since completion of the deal, £0.1m of income has been earned under a six month transactional services agreement (TSA); this brings the overall gain on disposal recognised in relation to the disposal of Fox Crypto within FY25's ISIs to £11.4m. Please refer to Note 4.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

31 Disposals continued

Prior period disposal of DetACT business

On 30 April 2024, the Group completed the disposal of its DetACT business for a total cash consideration of £8.2m.

The assets and liabilities included as part of the disposal were as follows:

2024
£m
Attributable goodwill (5.9)
Intangible fixed assets (1.4)
Trade and other receivables (1.5)
Trade and other payables 0.1
Deferred revenue 2.8
Deferred tax liability 0.3
Net assets disposed of (5.6)
Consideration 8.2
Transaction costs (1.0)
Gain on disposal – recognised as an Individually Significant Item (Note 4) 1.6
Satisfied by:
Cash and cash equivalents 8.2
Total consideration 8.2

32 Audit exemption

The subsidiary undertakings listed below are exempt from the Companies Act 2006 requirements relating to the audit of their individual accounts by virtue of section 479A of the Act as this Company has guaranteed the subsidiary company under section 479C of the Act.

Company name Company registration no.
NCC Group Software Resilience (MEA-APAC) Limited 13295784
ArmstrongAdams Limited 04270584
NCC Group Software Resilience Limited 13247183
NCC Group Software Resilience (UK) Limited 13298310
NCC Group Accumuli Security Limited 03203561
NCC Group Audit Limited 04323323
NCC Group Corporate Limited 13247138
NCC Group Cyber Security limited 13287219
NCC Group Cyber Security (APAC) Limited 13294684
NCC Group Holdings Limited 13325653
NCC Group Signify Solutions Limited 03915262
NCC Group (Solutions) Limited 03742757
Payment Software Company Limited 10059024
NCC Group Finance Limited 13350193
NCC Group Escrow Limited 03081952
The National Computing Centre Limited 04225835
NCC Group Cyber Security (UK) Limited 13294277

The Directors acknowledge their responsibility for complying with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 with respect to accounting records and preparation of accounts.

Financial statements

Appendix 1 – Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and adjusting items

The consolidated Financial Statements include Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) alongside statutory measures. APMs used by the Group are not defined under IFRS and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. They are not intended to replace or be superior to Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP) measures. All APMs relate to the current year's results and, where provided, comparative periods.

This presentation is consistent with how management measures financial performance and reports to the Board. It also forms the basis for financial measures used in senior management's compensation schemes and provides supplementary information to help users understand the Group's financial performance, position and trends. At all times, the Group aims to ensure that the Annual Report and Accounts gives a fair, balanced and understandable view of the Group's performance, cash flows and financial position. IAS 1 'Presentation of Financial Statements' requires the separate presentation of items that are material in nature or scale in order to allow the user of the Financial Statements to understand underlying business performance.

We believe these APMs provide readers with important additional information on our business, and this information is relevant for use by investors, securities analysts and other interested parties as supplemental measures of future potential performance. However, since statutory measures can differ significantly from the APMs and may be assessed differently by the reader we encourage you to consider these figures together with statutory reporting measures noted. Specifically, we would note that APMs may not be comparable across different companies and that certain profit related APMs may exclude recurring business transactions (e.g. acquisition related costs) that impact financial performance and cash flows.

The Group continues to internally manage its performance at an Adjusted operating profit level (before Individually Significant Items), which management believes represents the underlying trading of the business. This information is still disclosed as an APM within this Annual Report. This APM is reconciled to statutory operating profit, together with the consequently Adjusted basic EPS (before Individually Significant Items and the tax effect thereon) to statutory basic EPS. Please see page 54 of the Financial Review section.

The Group has the following APMs/non-statutory measures:

APM Closest equivalent
IFRS measure
Adjustments to reconcile
to IFRS measure
Definition, purpose and considerations made by the Directors
Income Statement measures:
Constant currency
revenue growth
rates
Revenue
growth rates
at actual rates
of currency
exchange
Retranslation of comparative numbers
at current period exchange rates to
provide constant currency
The Group reports certain geographic regions and service
capabilities on a constant currency basis to reflect the underlying
performance considering constant foreign exchange rates year on
year. This involves retranslating comparative numbers at current period
rates for comparability to enable a growth factor to be calculated.
Adjusted operating Operating profit
or loss
Operating profit or loss before
Individually Significant Items
Represents operating profit before Individually Significant Items.
profit This measure is to allow the user to understand the Group's
underlying financial performance as measured by management.
Individually Significant Items are items that are considered unusual
by nature or scale and are of such significance that separate
disclosure is relevant to understanding the Group's financial
performance and therefore requires separate presentation in the
Financial Statements in order to fairly present the financial
performance of the Group.
Adjusted profit
for the period
Profit or loss for
the period
Profit or loss for the period before
Individually Significant Items and
associated tax effects and adjusted
Represents profit or loss for the period before Individually
Significant Items and their associated tax effect and adjusted
tax items.
tax items This measure is to allow the user to calculate the Group's Adjusted
earnings per share.
Adjusted earnings
before interest, tax,
depreciation and
amortisation
(Adjusted EBITDA)
Operating profit
Operating profit or loss before ISIs,
or loss
depreciation and amortisation, finance
costs and taxation
Represents operating profit before the Group's one adjusting item
(ISIs), depreciation and amortisation to assist in the understanding
of the Group's performance.
Adjusted EBITDA is disclosed as this is a measure widely used by
various stakeholders and used by the Group to measure the cash
conversion ratio.
Adjusted basic
EPS
Statutory
basic EPS
Statutory basic EPS before Individually
Significant Items and their associated
tax effect and adjusted tax items
Represents basic EPS before Individually Significant Items and
their associated tax effect and adjusted tax items.
This measure is to allow the user to understand the Group's
underlying financial performance as measured by management,
reported to the Board and used as a financial measure in senior
management's compensation schemes.

for the year ended 30 September 2025

Appendix 1 – Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and adjusting items continued

APM Closest equivalent
IFRS measure
Adjustments to reconcile
to IFRS measure
Definition, purpose and considerations made by the Directors
Balance Sheet measures:
Net cash/debt
excluding lease
liabilities
Total
borrowings
(excluding
lease liabilities)
Represents total borrowings (excluding lease liabilities) offset by
cash and cash equivalents. It is a useful measure of the progress in
generating cash, strengthening of the Group Balance Sheet position,
overall net indebtedness and gearing on a like-for-like basis.
offset by cash
and cash
equivalents
Net cash/debt, when compared to available borrowing facilities, also
gives an indication of available financial resources to fund potential
future business investment decisions and/or potential acquisitions.
Net cash/debt
Total
borrowings
(including lease
liabilities) offset
by cash and
cash
equivalents
Represents total borrowings (including lease liabilities) offset by
cash and cash equivalents. It is a useful measure of the progress
in generating cash, strengthening of the Group's Balance Sheet
position, overall net indebtedness and gearing including
lease liabilities.
Net cash/debt, when compared to available borrowing facilities, also
gives an indication of available financial resources to fund potential
future business investment decisions and/or potential acquisitions.
Cash flow measures:
Cash conversion
ratio
Ratio % of net
cash flow from
operating
activities before
interest and tax
divided by
operating profit
Ratio % of net cash flow from
operating activities before interest and
tax divided by Adjusted EBITDA
The cash conversion ratio is a measure of how effectively
operating profit is converted into cash and effectively highlights
both non-cash accounting items within operating profit and also
movements in working capital.
It is calculated as net cash flow from operating activities before
interest and taxation (as disclosed on the face of the Cash Flow
Statement) divided by Adjusted EBITDA.
The cash conversion ratio is a measure widely used by various
stakeholders and hence is disclosed to show the quality of cash
generation and also to allow comparison to other similar companies.

Glossary of terms – other terms

Other terms Definition and usage
Code Guidance, issued by the Financial Reporting Council in 2016 and updated in 2018, on how companies
should be governed, applicable to UK listed companies including NCC Group plc.
Adjusted Any result described as adjusted excludes the impact of Individually Significant Items, and any tax on
any of these items.
Adjusted profit for the period Adjusted earnings are defined as statutory earnings before Individually Significant Items, net of the tax
effect of these items.
Adjusted operating profit margin1 Calculated as Adjusted operating profit divided by revenue.
AGM Annual General Meeting of shareholders of the Company held each year to consider ordinary and
special business as provided in the Notice of AGM.
Alternative Performance Measure
(APM)
An Alternative Performance Measure (which is denoted in each case or use thereof by a footnote)
is a non-GAAP performance metric used by management either internally or externally to present
management's view of the underlying business performance. They are not superior to GAAP-based
measures and are simply an alternative way of looking at performance. See Appendix 1 for further
information over the Group's APMs.
Board The Board of Directors of the Company (for more information see pages 62 and 63).
Cash conversion ratio1 Calculated as cash generated from operating activities before interest and taxation divided by Adjusted
EBITDA1
, expressed as a percentage.
CDO Cyber Defence Operations.
CEO Chief Executive Officer.
CFO Chief Financial Officer.
CISO Chief Information Security Officer.
Company, Group, NCC, we, our or us We use these terms, depending on the context, to refer to either NCC Group plc, the individual
Company, or to NCC Group plc and its subsidiaries collectively.
CPO Chief People Officer.
CTO Chief Technology Officer.
Directors, Executive Directors and
Non-Executive Directors
The Directors/Executive Directors and Non-Executive Directors of the Company whose names are set
out on pages 62 and 63 of this report.
EBIT Earnings before interest and tax.
EBIT margin % EBIT margin % is calculated as follows: Adjusted EBIT divided by revenue.
EBITDA Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. Calculated as operating profit before
Individually Significant Items and adding back depreciation and amortisation charged.
EBITDA margin % EBITDA divided by revenue.
EPS Earnings per share. Profit for the period attributable to equity shareholders of the Parent allocated to
each ordinary share.
FCA Financial Conduct Authority.
Financial year For NCC Group, following the change in year end in the prior period, this is an accounting period
ending on 30 September.
FRC Financial Reporting Council.
Free cash flow Net cash from operating activities less net capital expenditure and acquisition costs.
FRS A UK Financial Reporting Standard as issued by the UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC).
FVLCTS Fair value less costs to sell.
Gross profit Gross profit is revenue less direct costs of sale. It excludes costs considered to be overheads that are
supporting the business as a whole as opposed to a specific revenue item.
Gross margin % (GM %) Calculated as gross profit divided by revenue from continuing activities.
HMRC His Majesty's Revenue & Customs, the tax collecting authority of the UK.

Glossary of terms – other terms continued

Other terms Definition and usage
IAS or IFRS An International Accounting Standard or International Financial Reporting Standard, as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). IFRS is also used as the term to describe
international generally accepted accounting principles as a whole.
Individually Significant Items Items that the Directors consider to be material in nature, scale or frequency of occurrence that need to
be excluded when calculating some non-statutory performance measures in order to allow users of the
Financial Statements to gain a full understanding of the underlying business performance. See Note 4
for further information.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) The Company's external auditor, PwC LLP.
LTIP Long Term Incentive Plan established to align the interests of senior and executive management with
those of shareholders. The plan is formally known as the NCC Group Long Term Incentive Plan 2013
(approved by shareholders in 2013).
MD Managing Director.
MDR Managed Detection and Response.
Net debt1 Total borrowings offset by cash and cash equivalents.
Ordinary shares Voting shares entitling the holder to part ownership of a company.
SAYE/Sharesave Save As You Earn, being a tax efficient scheme to encourage colleague share ownership.
Escode Escode represents our escrow resilience services.
Subsidiary A company or other entity that is controlled by NCC Group.
TSC Technical Security Consulting.
TSR Total shareholder return, which is share price growth plus dividends reinvested (where applicable) over
a specified period of time, divided by the share price at the start of the period.

1 Revenue at constant currency, Adjusted EBITDA and net debt excluding lease liabilities are Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) and not IFRS measures. See Appendix 1 for an explanation of APMs and adjusting items, including a reconciliation to statutory information.

Additional information

Other information

Directors

Chris Stone – Non-Executive Chair Mike Maddison – Chief Executive Officer Guy Ellis – Chief Financial Officer

Julie Chakraverty – Senior Independent Non-Executive

Director

Jennifer Duvalier – Independent Non-Executive Director Mike Ettling – Independent Non-Executive Director Lynn Fordham – Independent Non-Executive Director

Company Secretary

Jonathan Williams

Registered Group and Company head office

XYZ Building 2 Hardman Boulevard Spinningfields Manchester England M3 3AQ

Registered number

04627044

Registered in England and Wales

Joint brokers and corporate finance advisers Investec Bank plc

30 Gresham Street London EC2V 7QP

Peel Hunt LLP

Moor House 120 London Wall London EC2Y 5ET

Independent auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

1 Hardman Square Manchester M3 3EB

Solicitors DLA Piper UK LLP

1 St Peter's Square Manchester M2 3DE

Registrar Equiniti

Aspect House Spencer Road Lancing West Sussex BN99 6DA

Bankers

HSBC UK Bank plc

2nd Floor 4 Hardman Square Spinningfields Manchester M3 3EB

National Westminster Bank plc

1 Hardman Boulevard Manchester M3 3AQ

Barclays Bank plc

1 Churchill Place London E14 5HP

Santander UK plc

2 Triton Square Regent's Place London NW1 3AN

Financial calendar

AGM 3 March 2026 Ex-dividend date 12 March 2026 Record date 13 March 2026 2026 half-year end 31 March 2026 Dividend payment date 10 April 2026 2026 interim statement June 2026 2026 year end 30 September 2026 2026 preliminary year end statement December 2026

These dates are provisional and may be subject to change.

NCC Group plc's commitment to environmental issues is reflected in this Annual Report, which has been printed on Amadeus, an FSC® certified material.

This document was printed by Pureprint Group using its environmental print technology, with 99% of dry waste diverted from landfill, minimising the impact of printing on the environment. The printer is a CarbonNeutral® company. Both the printer and the paper mill are registered to ISO 14001.

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.