AI assistant
MRG METALS LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2021
Apr 5, 2021
65374_rns_2021-04-05_a3daa331-b864-468b-b962-91b4c8bf2de1.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
06 April 2021
HIGH GRADE INFILL AIRCORE DRILLING SUCCESS AT NHACUTSE
==> picture [461 x 11] intentionally omitted <==
Key Highlights
-
A 17 hole Infill Aircore drilling program at Nhacutse has delivered consistently high grade visual Heavy Mineral Sands (HMS) results, delineating 2 very high grade mineralised zones.
-
The program warranted 3 more aircore holes than initially planned (refer ASX Announcement 17 February 2021) and a further 3 twin aircore holes for Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) purposes, to support a Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) to follow (Table 1, Figure 3).
-
Combined area of the 2 high grade zones increased to over 2.5 sq km, representing an excellent opportunity for MRG to supply +100 Mt of very high grade resource to the Corridor inventory, at THM grades higher than its existing JORC compliant Koko Massava Resource.
-
Mineralogical study from composites in 4 previous Aircore holes is nearing completion, with additional mineralogical samples to be collected from this most recent aircore drilling program to understand the % Valuable Heavy Mineral (VHM) in the Heavy Mineral Composite (HMC), representative of these high grade zones.
-
Significant VIS EST THM aircore highlights from the current program, with all holes demonstrating mineralisation from surface, include:
-
20CSAC665 0 – 39m 39m @ VIS EST 5.1% THM Including 0 – 24m 24m @ VIS EST 5.9% THM;
-
20CSAC673 0 – 46.5m 46.5m @ VIS EST 6.0% THM;
-
• 20CSAC675 0 – 39m 39m @ VIS EST 5.7% THM including 0 – 30m 30m @ VIS EST 6.1% THM; and
-
• 20CSHA676 0 – 45m 45m @ VIS EST 6.5% THM.
-
A smaller high grade zone north-east of the town of Nhacutse has now been confirmed as a viable target by the VIS EST THM results from aircore holes 20CSAC661 and 20CSAC662, warranting further infill/extension drilling in this area (Table 1, Figure 3).
-
30 hole aircore infill drilling program has commenced and progressing well at Koko Massava targeting the very high grade area within the current mineral resource estimated (MRE) (refer ASX Announcement 10 March 2021).
-
Hand auger drilling at MRG’s Marao (6842L) licence (refer ASX Announcement 18 March 2021) has temporarily been halted due to staff optimisation and will recommence soon.
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
MRG Metals Limited (“ MRG ” or “ the Company ”) ( ASX Code: MRQ ) is pleased to announce the visually estimated (VIS EST) results of its recently completed Infill Aircore drilling program at the Company’s Nhacutse High to Very High Grade mineralised areas within its Corridor South (6621L) exploration license (Figure 1).
The aircore program targeted 2 high to very high grade zones (Figures 2 and 3), where very high THM assay grades were returned from previous hand auger (refer ASX Announcement 3 July 2020) and Aircore drilling programs (refer ASX Announcements 3 July 2020 on Hand Auger drilling, 24 November 2020, 7 January 2021 and 27 January 2021).
Several aircore holes with VIS EST grades of >5.5 and up to 6.5% THM over significant intersections with grades from surface, as well as numerous very high individual VIS EST intersections of 10% THM or more (Figure 4), were identified (Table 1). With the high grade assay results from 13 previous Aircore holes within these 2 zones returning weighted average grades of 5.66 % THM over 32.0m from surface and the excellent VIS EST THM results from the current drilling program, MRG is confident this target area represents an excellent opportunity to present the Company’s second MRE and resource report, with current grades from aircore holes within the areas indicating a higher grade than from the Koko Massava MRE of 1.423 Mt @ 5.2% THM (refer ASX Announcement 22 April 2020).
MRG Metals Chairman, Mr Andrew Van Der Zwan said: “It is pleasing that our targeted program has confirmed our desired 100+MT high grade target from surface (with potential higher grade zones within) in addition to identifying other expansion opportunities which we will now follow up. The lab results will likely confirm this outcome in the following weeks and the pending assemblage analysis will help quantify the potential inground value of the early mine life resource.
With drilling at Koko Massava proceeding well, we remain confident that we will be able to add multiple 100+MT zones to the enormous resource already identified at Koko Massava. With commodity prices improving, we anticipate moving to an MRE at Nhacutse and Koko Massava should lab results confirm our expectations.”
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 250] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Map of the location of the MRG projects, work took place in Corridor South (6621L).
Nhacutse Infill Drilling
Drilling during this aircore program focused on the main very high grade area north of the town of Nhacutse, and a high grade target north-east of Nhacutse. MRG completed 17 aircore holes (Figures 2 and 3), 3 more than initially planned (refer ASX Announcement 10 March 2021), for a total of 699m drilled. An additional 3 twin aircore holes for 87m were drilled for QAQC comparison during MRE work (Figures 2 and 3). A Total of 543 samples at 1.5m intervals were collected (inclusive of QAQC samples and samples from the Twin holes) and are currently being prepared for the analytical laboratory. The excellent VIS EST THM results have caused an increase in the size of the mineralisation outline from 2.4 sq km to >2.5 sq km.
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890 12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 579] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Map of the Corridor Central (6620L) and Corridor South (6621L) Projects showing the locations of the various Prospects and the drilled aircore holes.
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
Very High Grade Zone North of Nhacutse
14 of the 17 aircore holes were drilled at the main very high grade zone north of the town of Nhacutse. Drilling was focused on testing the open north-eastern extension of this zone (21CSAC664, ‘665 and ‘677), the mineralisation outline of the zone (21CSAC666, ‘667, ‘668, ‘669, ‘670, ‘672, ‘674, ‘676) and filling in minor gaps within the main very high grade zone (21CSAC671, ‘673 and ‘675).
High grade VIS EST THM values were returned from the aircore holes drilled within the very high grade zone. Hole 21CSAC673 is especially encouraging, with VIS EST of 6.0% THM over 46.5m, with mineralisation from surface. Two individual 1.5m intervals of VIS EST 10% THM (Figure 4) each were intersected in the hole. Aircore hole 21CSAC675 also returned excellent VIS EST THM grades, with VIS EST 5.7% THM over 39.0m from surface to the end of the hole at 39.0m, a higher grade section of VIS EST 6.1% THM over 30.0m is found from surface to 30.0m, with individual VIS EST grades as high as 11.5% THM (Figure 5).
Very positive VIS EST THM results from the north-eastern extension was returned from especially 21CSAC665, with VIS EST grade of 5.1% THM over 39.0m for the entire hole from surface, with a higher grade intersection from surface to 24.0m of VIS EST 5.9% THM over 24m. An individual 1.5m interval of VIS EST 11% THM was also intersected. The very high grade zone has now been extended to the north-east, it is also still open in this direction (Figure 5).
The aircore drilling focusing on defining the outline of the very high grade zone also returned some excellent VIS EST results in holes expected to be lower grades, with especially 21CSAC667 returning VIS EST results of 6.5% THM over 45.0m from surface to the end of the hole, while an individual 1.5m interval of VIS EST 12% THM was also intersected. The very high grade zone is open in the area northwest of this hole, additional drilling will be conducted to define the outline in this area.
High Grade Target North-east of Nhacutse
This area was represented by 2 high grade THM aircore holes, 20CSAC547 and ‘548, with assay intervals from assay results of 5.92% THM over 33m from surface for the entire hole and 5.33% THM over 30m from surface for the entire hole. 3 Aircore holes, 21CSAC661, ‘662 and ‘663 were drilled to test this target area. Holes 21CSAC661 returned VIS EST results of 5.3% THM over 36.0m from surface, with individual VIS EST grades as high as 11.0% THM (Figure 4), and 21CSAC662 returned VIS EST results of 5.0% THM over 34.5m from surface. The drilling has confirmed this zone as a high grade target for further drilling.
Mineralogical Studies
Heavy Mineral Concentrate ( HMC ) samples are currently being investigated from 4 Aircore holes spread throughout the Nhacutse VHG zones to determine the percentage Valuable Heavy Mineral ( VHM ) (refer previous ASX Announcements 26 August and 31 August 2020). The results from this
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
study are imminent and will be combined with additional mineralogical work to support the commissioning of a MRE.
==> picture [388 x 500] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Map of the Nhacutse Project within Corridor South (6621L) showing the VIS EST THM results of the drilled aircore holes within the 2 very high grade target areas, the position of the 3 twin QAQC drillholes, the expected / targeted outline of the very high grade mineralisation at Nhacutse north and the historic results from all previous auger and aircore drilling in the area.
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [221 x 200] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [218 x 206] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [217 x 201] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [216 x 207] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Images of some of the high grade intersections, photos done at the drill rig of the pans used for geological logging and VIS EST of the THM. Reference sample bags with the drill intersection, as well as the BH and sample ID (2166122 shows the 21 as drill year, 661 as the BH ID and 22 as the sample number).
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 488] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Longitudinal through the very high grade zone north of Nhacutse, showing historic aircore holes with assay data and the current aircore holes (21CSAC675, ‘667 and 665) as VIS EST THM data.
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
Table 1 : Summary collar and visual estimated THM% results for aircore drill data for Nhacutse drilling completed during March 2020.
==> picture [452 x 501] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
HIGH
DOWNHOLE
UTM UTM GRADED MIN % MAX %
EOH ELEV'N AVG % VIS INTERSECTION
HOLE ID EAST NORTH TARGET DRILL TYPE AVG % VIS EST VIS EST
(M) (M) EST THM FOR (M)
WGS84 WGS84 VIS EST THM THM
ENTIRE HOLE
THM
Nhacutse High Grade 4.7 0-42 1.0 11.0
21CSAC661 7247839 574264 42 83 AIRCORE
East
5.3 0-36 5.0 11.0
Nhacutse High Grade 4.7 0-39 1.5 7.5
21CSAC662 7247721 574044 39 82 AIRCORE
East
5.0 0-34.5 3.0 7.5
Nhacutse High Grade
21CSAC663 7247608 573812 39 84 AIRCORE 4.1 0-39 2.5 6.0
East
Nhacutse High Grade 3.4 0-39 0.2 6.5
21CSAC664 7249497 572707 39 85 AIRCORE
North 3.8 0-31.5 3.0 6.5
Nhacutse High Grade 5.1 0-39 2.5 11.0
21CSAC665 7249665 572524 39 72 AIRCORE
North 5.9 0-24 3.0 11.0
Nhacutse High Grade
21CSAC666 7249405 572174 42 69 AIRCORE 3.6 0-42 1.0 7.5
North
Nhacutse High Grade 4.6 0-42 2.0 7.0
21CSAC667 7248953 571844 42 73 AIRCORE
North
5.0 0-28.5 3.5 7.0
Nhacutse High Grade 4.0 0-39 0.5 6.5
21CSAC668 7249351 571828 39 118 AIRCORE
North
4.7 0-28.5 2.5 6.5
Nhacutse High Grade 4.1 0-39 1.5 6.5
21CSAC669 7249081 572088 39 70 AIRCORE
North
4.8 28.5 2.5 6.5
Nhacutse High Grade
21CSAC670 7248439 572565 42 79 AIRCORE 5.0 0-42 1.5 8.5
North
Nhacutse High Grade 4.7 0-42 2.5 8.5
21CSAC671 7248521 572237 42 76 AIRCORE
North
5.0 33.0 3.0 8.5
Nhacutse High Grade
21CSAC672 7248107 572177 45 71 AIRCORE 4.5 0-45 2.5 11.0
North
Nhacutse High Grade 5.9 0-48 2.5 10.0
21CSAC673 7248192 571814 48 80 AIRCORE
North
6.0 46.5 3.0 10.0
Nhacutse High Grade 3.8 0-39 0.2 5.0
21CSAC674 7247979 571964 39 72 AIRCORE
North
4.6 0-33 3.0 5.0
Nhacutse High Grade 5.7 0-39 2.5 11.5
21CSAC675 7248284 571079 39 76 AIRCORE
North
6.1 0-30 2.5 11.5
Nhacutse High Grade
21CSAC676 7248471 570908 45 76 AIRCORE 6.5 0-45 3.5 12.0
North
5.0 0-39 2.0 10.0
21CSAC677 7249832 572335 39 73 Nhacutse High Grade AIRCORE 5.2 0-37.5 2.0 10.0
North
5.6 0-18 4.0 7.0
----- End of picture text -----
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
==> picture [595 x 125] intentionally omitted <==
Competent Persons’ Statement
The information in this report, as it relates to Mozambique Exploration Results is based on information compiled and/or reviewed by Mr JN Badenhorst, who is a member of the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP) and the Geological Society of South Africa (GSSA). Mr Badenhorst is a contracted employee of the Company and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposits under consideration and to the activity which has been undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Badenhorst consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which they appear.
This release is authorized by the Board of MRG Metals Ltd.
For more Information please contact:
MRG Metals Investor Relations Andrew Van Der Zwan Victoria Humphries Chairman NWR Communications M: +61 (0) 400 982 987 M: +61 (0) 431 151 676 E: [email protected] E: [email protected]
MRG Metals Limited ABN: 83 148 938 532 / ASX Code: MRQ Phone: +61 3 5330 5800 / Fax: +61 3 53330 5890
12 Anderson Street West, Ballarat VIC 3350 / PO Box 237 Ballarat VIC 3353 www.mrgmetals.com.au / [email protected]
Appendix 1
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | **JORC Code explanation ** | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or | •Aircore drilling was used to obtain samples at 1.5m intervals. |
| techniques | specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate | •The larger 1.5m interval aircore drill samples were homogenized by |
| to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma | rotating the sample bag prior to being grab sampled for panning. | |
| sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should | •A sample of sand, approximately 20g, was scooped from the sample | |
| not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | bag of each sample interval for wet panning and visual estimation. | |
| • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity | •The same sample mass is used for every pan sample visual | |
| and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems | estimation. | |
| used. | •The consistent sized pan sample is to ensure visual calibration is | |
| • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the | maintained for consistency in percentage visual estimation of total | |
| Public Report. | heavy mineral (THM). | |
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be | •Images of pan concentrate samples with associated laboratory THM | |
| relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 | results are used in the field as comparisons to further refine visual | |
| m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge | estimation of THM. | |
| for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling |
•Geologists enter the laboratory THM results for each sample on field log sheets against the visual estimation of THM to refine and further |
|
| problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg | calibrate field visual estimation of THM. | |
| submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | •Geotagged photographs are taken of each panned sample with the | |
| corresponding sample bag to enable easy reference at a later date. | ||
| •A sample ledger is kept at the drill rig for recording sample intervals | ||
| and sample mass, and photographs are taken of samples for each | ||
| hole to cross-reference with logging. | ||
| •The large 1.5m drill samples have an average of about 7kg, range 1- | ||
| 21kg, and are being split down in Mozambique to approximately 300- | ||
| 600g using a three tier riffle splitter for export to the Primary | ||
| processing laboratory. | ||
| Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air | •Reverse Circulation ‘Aircore’ drilling with inner tubes for sample return |
| techniques | blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple | was used. |
| or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other | •Aircore drilling is considered a standard industry technique for heavy | |
| type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). | mineral sand (HMS) mineralization. Aircore drilling is a form of | |
| reverse circulationdrillingwhere the sampleis collected at theface |
1
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| and returned inside the inner tube. | ||
| •Aircore drill rods used were 3m long. | ||
| •Drill rods used were 76mm in diameter and NQ diameter (80mm) | ||
| Harlsan aircore drill bits were used. | ||
| •All drill holes were drilled vertical. | ||
| •The drilling onsite is governed by an Aircore Drilling Guideline to | ||
| ensure consistency in application of the method between geologists. | ||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries | •Drill sample recovery is monitored by measuring and recording the |
| recovery | and results assessed. | total mass of each 1.5m sample at the drill rig with a standard spring |
| • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure | balance. | |
| representative nature of the samples. | •While initially collaring the hole, limited sample recovery can occur in | |
| • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade | the initial 0.0m to 3.0m sample intervals owing to sample and air loss | |
| and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential | into the surrounding loose soil. | |
| loss/gain of fine/coarse material. | •The initial 0.0m to 3.0m sample intervals are drilled very slowly in | |
| order to achieve optimum sample recovery. | ||
| •The entire 1.5m sample is collected at the drill rig in large numbered | ||
| plastic bags for dispatch to the onsite initial split preparation facility. | ||
| •At the end of each drill rod, the drill string is cleaned by blowing down | ||
| with air to remove any clay and silt potentially built up in the sample | ||
| pipes and cyclone. | ||
| •The twin-tube aircore drilling technique is known to provide high | ||
| quality samples from the face of the drill hole. | ||
| •Wet and moist samples are placed into large plastic basins to dry | ||
| prior to splitting. | ||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and | •The 1.5m aircore drill intervals are logged onto paper field log sheets |
| geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate | at the drill site prior to transcribing into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet | |
| Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical | at the field office. Field paper logs are scanned and archived digitally | |
| studies. | on a cloud storage site with the broader geological database. | |
| • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or | •The aircore samples were logged for lithology, colour, grainsize, | |
| costean, channel, etc) photography. | rounding, sorting, estimated %THM, estimated %slimes and any | |
| • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. | relevant comments, such as slope and vegetation. | |
| •A representative portion of every sample interval is collected in a | ||
| chip-tray and archived at the field base for any additional logging. A | ||
| photograph is collected of the chip tray related to each hole and is | ||
| digitally archived on a cloud storage site. | ||
| •Geological logging is governed by an Aircore Drilling Guideline | ||
| document with predefined log codes and guidance of what to include | ||
| in data fields to ensure consistencybetween individuals loggingdata. |
2
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | Data is backed-up each day at the field office to a cloud storage site. | ||
| • | Data from the Microsoft Excel spreadsheets is imported into a | ||
| Microsoft Access database and the data is subjected to numerous | |||
| validationqueries to ensure data quality. | |||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core |
• | The entire 1.5m aircore drill sample collected at the rig was |
| techniques | taken. | dispatched to a sample preparation facility to split with a three tier | |
| and sample | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and | riffle splitter to reduce sample mass. | |
| preparation | whether sampled wet or dry. | • | The water table depth was noted in all geological logs if intersected. |
| • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the | • | Employees undertaking the primary sampling and splitting are closely | |
| sample preparation technique. | monitored by a geologist to ensure sampling quality is maintained. | ||
| • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to | • | Almost all of the samples are sand, silty sand, sandy silt, clayey sand | |
| maximise representivity of samples. | or sandy clay and this sample preparation method is considered | ||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in | appropriate. | ||
| situ material collected, including for instance results for field | • | The sample sizes were deemed suitable to reliably capture THM, | |
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | slime, and oversize characteristics, based on industry experience of | ||
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material | the geologists involved and consultation with laboratory staff. | ||
| being sampled. | • | Field duplicates of the samples are completed at a frequency of 1 per | |
| 25 primary samples. | |||
| • | Standard Reference Material (SRM) samples are inserted into the | ||
| sample streamat afrequency of 1per50 samples. | |||
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and | • | The wet panning of samples provides an estimate of the %THM |
| assay data | laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered | content within the sample which is sufficient for the purpose of | |
| and | partial or total. | determining approximate concentrations of %THM. | |
| laboratory | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, | • |
The field derived visual panned THM estimates are compared to a |
| tests | the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument | range of laboratory derived THM images of pan concentrates. This | |
| make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their | allows the field geologists to calibrate the field panned visual | ||
| derivation, etc. | estimated THM with known laboratory measured THM grades. | ||
| • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, | • | ||
| duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels | |||
| _of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. _ | |||
| Verification of | • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or |
• | Selected visual estimated THM field data are checked by the Chief |
| sampling and | alternative company personnel. | Geologist. | |
| assaying | • The use of twinned holes. | • | Significant visual estimated THM >5% are verified by the Chief |
| • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data | Geologist. This is done either in the field or via field photographs of | ||
| verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. | the pan sample. | ||
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | • | The Chief Geologist has made numerous visits to the field drill sites to | |
| train and embed process and procedure with field staff. | |||
| • | Twin aircore drilling of three (3) holes will be used to compare results | ||
| fromthe analytical laboratory betweendifferent drilling programs. |
3
| Criteria | **JORC Code explanation ** | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| •The geologic field data is manually transcribed into a master | ||
| Microsoft Excel spreadsheet which is appropriate for this stage in the | ||
| exploration program. | ||
| •The raw field data is checked in the Microsoft Excel format first to | ||
| identify any obvious errors or outlier data. The data is then imported | ||
| into a Microsoft Access database where it is subjected to various | ||
| validation queries. | ||
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and | •Downhole surveys for these aircore holes are not required due to the |
| data points | down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations | relatively shallow nature. |
| used in Mineral Resource estimation. | •A handheld 16 channel Garmin GPS is used to record the positions of | |
| • Specification of the grid system used. | the aircore holes in the field. | |
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | •The handheld Garmin GPS has an accuracy of +/- 5m in the | |
| horizontal. | ||
| •The datum used for coordinates is WGS84 zone 36S. | ||
| •The accuracy of the drillhole locations is sufficient for this early stage | ||
| exploration. | ||
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | •Hole spacing on completion of this drill program will bring the spacing |
| and | • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the | in the main target areas to 250m - 500m. |
| distribution | degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral | •The spacing between aircore holes and between lines combined with |
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and | that of the previously drilled auger holes is sufficient to provide a good | |
| classifications applied. | degree of confidence in geological models and grade continuity | |
| • Whether sample compositing has been applied. | between holes for aeolian style HMS deposits. | |
| •Each aircore drill sample is a single 1.5m sample of sand intersected | ||
| down the hole. | ||
| •No compositing has been applied to values of THM, slime and | ||
| oversize. | ||
| Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of | •The aircore drilling was located at selected sites along the interpreted |
| data in | possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering | strike of mineralization defined by reconnaissance auger drill data |
| relation to | the deposit type. | and geophysical data interpretation. |
| geological | • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation | •Drill holes were vertical and the nature of the mineralisation is |
| structure | of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a | relatively horizontal. |
| sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. | •The orientation of the drilling is considered appropriate for testing the | |
| lateral and vertical extent of mineralization without any bias. | ||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample security. | •Field photographs are taken of each sample bag with corresponding |
| security | sample number and panned sample in order to track numbers of | |
| samples per hole and per batch. | ||
| •Aircore samplesremainedinthe custody ofCompanyrepresentatives |
4
| Criteria | **JORC Code explanation ** | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| while they were transported from the field drill site to Chibuto field | ||
| camp for splitting and other processing. | ||
| •Aircore samples remain in the custody of Company representatives | ||
| until they are transported to Maputo for final packaging and securing. | ||
| •The Company uses a commercial shipping company, Deugro or DHL, | ||
| to ship samples from Mozambique to Perth. | ||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | •Internal data and procedure reviews are undertaken. |
| reviews | •No external audits or reviews have been undertaken. |
5
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including | •The exploration work was completed on the Corridor South tenement |
| tenement and | agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint |
(6621L) which is 100% owned by the Company through its 100% |
| land tenure | ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, | ownership of its subsidiary, Sofala Mining & Exploration Limitada, in |
| status | historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental | Mozambique. |
| settings. | •All granted tenements have initial 5 year terms, renewable for 3 | |
| • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any | years. An application for renewal of tenement 6621L was submitted in | |
| known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | 23 September 2019 and is under review. | |
| •Traditional landowners and village Chiefs within the areas of influence | ||
| were consulted prior to the aircore drilling programme and were | ||
| supportive of the programme. | ||
| •Representatives from the Provincial Directorate of Mineral Resources | ||
| and Directorate of Lands, Environment and Rural Development, and | ||
| District Planning and Infrastructure Departments are also part of the | ||
| consent and consultation process. | ||
| •An Environment Management Plan was prepared by an independent | ||
| consultant and submitted to the Gaza Provincial Directorate of Lands, | ||
| Environment and Rural Development in accordance with Mining Law | ||
| and Regulations. An Environmental License has been obtained by the | ||
| Company. | ||
| Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | •Historic exploration work was completed by Corridor Sands Limitada, |
| done by other | a subsidiary of Southern Mining Corporation and subsequently | |
| parties | Western Mining Corporation, in 1999. BHP-Billiton acquired Western | |
| Mining Corporation and undertook a Bankable Feasibility Study of the | ||
| Corridor Deposit 1 about 15km north of the Company’s tenements. | ||
| •The Company has obtained digital data in relation to this historic | ||
| information. | ||
| •The historic data comprises limited Aircore/Reverse Circulation | ||
| drilling. | ||
| •The historic results are not reportable under JORC 2012. | ||
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | •Two types of heavy mineral sand mineralisation styles are possible |
| along coastal Mozambique: | ||
| 1. Thin but high grade strandlines which may be related to marine | ||
| or fluvial influences, and | ||
| 2. Large but lowergrade deposits related to windblown sands. |
6
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| •The coastline of Mozambique is well known for | massive dunal | |||||||
| systems such as those developed near | Inhambane (Rio Tinto’s | |||||||
| Mutamba deposit), near Xai Xai (Rio Tinto’s Chilubane deposit) and | ||||||||
| in Nampula Province (Kenmare’s Moma deposit). Buried strandlines | ||||||||
| are likely in areas where palaeoshorelines can be defined along | ||||||||
| coastal zones. | ||||||||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the | •Summary drill hole information is presented within Table 1 of the main | ||||||
| Information | exploration results including a tabulation of the following information | body of text of this announcement. | ||||||
| for all Material drill holes: | ||||||||
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar |
||||||||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in |
||||||||
| metres) of the drill hole collar | ||||||||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
||||||||
o down hole length and interception depth |
||||||||
o hole length. |
||||||||
| • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the | ||||||||
| information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from | ||||||||
| the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly | ||||||||
| _explain why this is the case. _ | ||||||||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, | •No cut-offs were used in the downhole averaging of results. | ||||||
| aggregation | maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high | •The visual estimated THM% averaging | is grade-weighted. | |||||
| methods | grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. | •An example of data averaging is shown below. | ||||||
| • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used |
HOLE_ID | FROM | TO | PCT VIS THM |
Average visTHM |
Average visTHM |
||
| for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of | 19CCAC104 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | ||||
| such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. |
19CCAC104 19CCAC104 19CCAC104 19CCAC104 19CCAC104 19CCAC104 19CCAC104 19CCAC104 |
3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0 |
6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0 27.0 |
6.0 6.0 8.0 6.2 6.6 5.5 8.0 4.0 |
37.5m @ 4.9% | 27m @ 6.3% | ||
| 19CCAC104 | 27.0 | 30.0 | 2.5 | |||||
| 19CCAC104 | 30.0 | 33.0 | 2.0 | |||||
| 19CCAC104 | 33.0 | 36.0 | 1.7 | |||||
| 19CCAC104 | 36.0 | 37.5 | 1.5 | |||||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of | •The nature of the mineralisation is broadly horizontal, thus vertical | ||||||
| between | Exploration Results. | aircore holes are thought to represent close to true thicknesses of the | ||||||
| mineralisation | • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole |
mineralisation. | ||||||
| widths and | angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
7
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| intercept | • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there | •Downhole widths are reported. |
| lengths | should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true | |
| _width not known’). _ | ||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of | •Figures are displayed in the main text. |
| intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being | ||
| reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of | ||
| _drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. _ | ||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not | •A summary of the visual estimated THM% data is presented in Table |
| reporting | practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades | 1 of the main part of the announcement, comprising downhole |
| and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | averages, together with maximum and minimum estimated THM | |
| Exploration Results. | values in each hole. | |
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported | •No other material exploration information has been gathered by the |
| substantive | including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical | Company. |
| exploration | survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and | |
| data | method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, | |
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential | ||
| _deleterious or contaminating substances. _ | ||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral | •Further work will include heavy liquid separation analysis for |
| extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | quantitative THM% data. | |
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, | •Additional mineral assemblage and ilmenite mineral chemistry | |
| including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, | analyses will also be undertaken on suitable composite HM samples | |
| provided this information is not commercially sensitive. | to determine valuable heavy mineral components. | |
| •As the project advances, TiO2 and contaminant test work analyses | ||
| will also be undertaken. |
8