AI assistant
Mont Royal Resources — Capital/Financing Update 2019
Sep 26, 2019
48584_rns_2019-09-26_32450776-a51a-418b-832e-5583d37ffd54.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT ASX : MRZ | 27-09-2019
MONT ROYAL RESOURCES Drill results confirm regional-scale anomaly
Highlights
-
All results returned from the maiden drill program at the Edjudina Project, WA
-
Drilling completed on broad 400x160m and 800x160m spaced drill centres
-
Results confirm the location of a mineralised zone, coincident with elevated shearing and quartz veining
-
Multiple kilometre-scale anomalies generated
-
Structural zone anomalous over 4.5km.
Mont Royal Resources Limited (“ Mont Royal ” or the “ Company ”)( ASX:MRZ ) is pleased to report all assays from the recently completed aircore program have been returned from the Edjudina Gold Project in Western Australia.
Mont Royal Resources Limited’s Executive Director Peter Ruse commented:
“The Company’s maiden wide-spaced drilling program has generated multiple kilometre-scale anomalies which warrant further investigation.”
EDJUDINA PROJECT
Executive Director Michael O’Keeffe
Aircore Drilling
A total of 74 AC holes for 4,168m was completed on broad 400 x 160m and 800 x 160m drill patterns, with geochemical drilling designed to confirm the location of the Pinjin Fault as well as define the nature and spatial continuity of associated Au mineralisation. Completed drilling coupled with historic drilling has confirmed a ~300m wide structural corridor as well as defined a broad 4.5km long northwest trending anomaly ( Figure 1 ).
The first-pass drilling tested approximately 10km of prospective Archaen greenstone, centred on targets identified from the Company’s initial sub-audio magnetics (SAM) survey. Multiple low-level anomalies have been generated that support historic intersections with best results including 5m@84ppb Au (EDAC026) and 1m@74ppb Au (EDAC014), with full results shown in Table 1.
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [471 x 670] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Plan view of drillhole results
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Table 1: Significant intersections shown below with all assays reported above 25ppb.
| HOLE_ID | Max_Depth | mFrom | mTo | Interval | Au(ppb) | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDAC001 | 78 | 77 | 78 | 1 | 57 | End of Hole |
| EDAC006 | 60 | 25 | 30 | 5 | 31 | |
| EDAC014 | 84 | 83 | 84 | 1 | 74 | End of Hole |
| EDAC018 | 89 | 87 | 89 | 2 | 49 | End of Hole |
| EDAC020 | 56 | 50 | 55 | 5 | 56 | |
| EDAC026 | 58 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 84 | |
| EDAC026 | 58 | 40 | 45 | 5 | 28 | |
| EDAC031 | 47 | 46 | 47 | 1 | 25 | End of Hole |
All defined anomalies to date show very little supergene enrichment or dispersion, with many of the elevated gold values being returned from the end of hole (EOH) within fresh rock. The lack of dispersion in the regolith has implications for any future drill design as closer spaced drill centres will likely be required to ensure the core of the anomaly is tested adequately.
Bottom of hole multi-element geochemistry results will be used to update and refine the Company’s regional geological and structural model. Results of this will be used to plan followup desktop study and will be presented to the Mont Royal board for consideration regarding future fieldwork programs. The Company looks forward to keeping shareholders informed on the interpretation of this data once it’s received.
Edjudina Geology
The geology of the Edjudina Project consists of supracrustal sequences, comprising metamorphosed sedimentary and volcanic rocks in greenstone belts of lower greenschist to mid-upper amphibolite facies adjacent to regional granitoid and migmatitic gneisses. The area is almost entirely covered by transported material consisting of colluvium, subordinate laterite, alluvium, dunes and playas lake clays. The greenstone and granitoids are dominated by north–north westerly trending folds, and parallel fault zones that commonly mark apparent truncations of the lithostatigraphy.
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [443 x 519] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Location of the Edjudina Project
Table 2: Collar details
| HOLE_ID | **Hole_Type ** | NAT_Grid_ID | NAT_EAST | NAT_NORTH | NAT_RL | Max_Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDAC001 | AC | MGA94_51 | 457883 | 6715256 | 415 | 78 |
| EDAC002 | AC | MGA94_51 | 457559 | 6715244 | 415 | 30 |
| EDAC003 | AC | MGA94_51 | 457397 | 6715240 | 415 | 43 |
| EDAC004 | AC | MGA94_51 | 457243 | 6715244 | 415 | 34 |
| EDAC005 | AC | MGA94_51 | 457073 | 6715243 | 415 | 63 |
| EDAC006 | AC | MGA94_51 | 459281 | 6712855 | 415 | 60 |
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
| HOLE_ID | **Hole_Type ** | NAT_Grid_ID | NAT_EAST | NAT_NORTH | NAT_RL | Max_Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDAC007 | AC | MGA94_51 | 459122 | 6712856 | 415 | 86 |
| EDAC008 | AC | MGA94_51 | 458960 | 6712843 | 415 | 64 |
| EDAC009 | AC | MGA94_51 | 458806 | 6712854 | 415 | 87 |
| EDAC010 | AC | MGA94_51 | 458641 | 6712848 | 415 | 95 |
| EDAC011 | AC | MGA94_51 | 458480 | 6712850 | 415 | 85 |
| EDAC012 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460754 | 6711053 | 415 | 69 |
| EDAC013 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460593 | 6711053 | 415 | 86 |
| EDAC014 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460520 | 6711054 | 415 | 84 |
| EDAC015 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460410 | 6711047 | 415 | 81 |
| EDAC016 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460335 | 6711046 | 415 | 84 |
| EDAC017 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460192 | 6711044 | 415 | 83 |
| EDAC018 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460018 | 6711051 | 415 | 89 |
| EDAC019 | AC | MGA94_51 | 459880 | 6711079 | 415 | 90 |
| EDAC020 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460931 | 6709958 | 415 | 56 |
| EDAC021 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460806 | 6709954 | 415 | 64 |
| EDAC022 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460633 | 6709952 | 415 | 54 |
| EDAC023 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460492 | 6709957 | 415 | 61 |
| EDAC024 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461218 | 6709087 | 415 | 22 |
| EDAC025 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461074 | 6709093 | 415 | 20 |
| EDAC026 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460914 | 6709097 | 415 | 58 |
| EDAC027 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460753 | 6709104 | 415 | 39 |
| EDAC028 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460596 | 6709088 | 415 | 33 |
| EDAC029 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461804 | 6708697 | 415 | 87 |
| EDAC030 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461647 | 6708707 | 415 | 59 |
| EDAC031 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461474 | 6708701 | 415 | 47 |
| EDAC032 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461314 | 6708705 | 415 | 19 |
| EDAC033 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461169 | 6708697 | 415 | 29 |
| EDAC034 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461001 | 6708699 | 415 | 74 |
| EDAC035 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460845 | 6708698 | 415 | 31 |
| EDAC036 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460687 | 6708700 | 415 | 34 |
| EDAC037 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460526 | 6708710 | 415 | 34 |
| EDAC038 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460363 | 6708693 | 415 | 67 |
| EDAC039 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460202 | 6708697 | 415 | 54 |
| EDAC040 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460117 | 6708699 | 415 | 71 |
| EDAC041 | AC | MGA94_51 | 459972 | 6708707 | 415 | 79 |
| EDAC042 | AC | MGA94_51 | 459798 | 6708697 | 415 | 90 |
| EDAC043 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462889 | 6707801 | 415 | 42 |
| EDAC044 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462742 | 6707806 | 415 | 39 |
| EDAC045 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462586 | 6707800 | 415 | 36 |
| EDAC046 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462421 | 6707802 | 415 | 79 |
| EDAC047 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462260 | 6707800 | 415 | 28 |
| EDAC048 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462102 | 6707799 | 415 | 56 |
| EDAC049 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461783 | 6707798 | 415 | 51 |
==> picture [596 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
| HOLE_ID | **Hole_Type ** | NAT_Grid_ID | NAT_EAST | NAT_NORTH | NAT_RL | Max_Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDAC050 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461620 | 6707800 | 415 | 23 |
| EDAC051 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461464 | 6707801 | 415 | 22 |
| EDAC052 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461297 | 6707800 | 415 | 25 |
| EDAC053 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461153 | 6707800 | 415 | 37 |
| EDAC054 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460991 | 6707800 | 415 | 50 |
| EDAC055 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460821 | 6707799 | 415 | 63 |
| EDAC056 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460657 | 6707809 | 415 | 75 |
| EDAC057 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460504 | 6707797 | 415 | 83 |
| EDAC058 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460348 | 6707802 | 415 | 55 |
| EDAC059 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460316 | 6707407 | 415 | 72 |
| EDAC060 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460015 | 6707402 | 415 | 90 |
| EDAC061 | AC | MGA94_51 | 459859 | 6707398 | 415 | 59 |
| EDAC062 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460180 | 6707412 | 415 | 38 |
| EDAC063 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460181 | 6707803 | 415 | 49 |
| EDAC064 | AC | MGA94_51 | 460020 | 6707797 | 415 | 68 |
| EDAC065 | AC | MGA94_51 | 459859 | 6707803 | 415 | 73 |
| EDAC066 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462587 | 6706487 | 415 | 88 |
| EDAC067 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462501 | 6706488 | 415 | 31 |
| EDAC068 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462422 | 6706500 | 415 | 60 |
| EDAC069 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462333 | 6706494 | 415 | 39 |
| EDAC070 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462242 | 6706499 | 415 | 35 |
| EDAC071 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462177 | 6707397 | 415 | 37 |
| EDAC072 | AC | MGA94_51 | 462107 | 6707386 | 415 | 42 |
| EDAC073 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461943 | 6707406 | 415 | 27 |
| EDAC074 | AC | MGA94_51 | 461848 | 6707400 | 415 | 23 |
ENDS.
For and on Behalf of the Board
Shaun Menezes | Company Secretary
Competent Person’s Statement
The information in this report that relates to exploration results is based on information compiled by Mr Toby Wellman, a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (“AusIMM”). Mr Wellman is a consultant to the Company. Mr Wellman has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that is being undertaken to qualify as a competent person as defined in the JORC Code 2012. Mr Wellman consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on the information in the form and context in which it appears.
About Mont Royal Resources
Mont Royal Resources Limited is an Australian company incorporated for the purpose of pursuing various mining opportunities in the resources sector designed to add shareholder value by acquiring, exploring, evaluating and exploiting mineral resource project opportunities. Since incorporation, the Company has acquired a 100% interest in four exploration licences in Western Australia comprising the Edjudina Project which is considered to be prospective for Archaean lode style gold deposits. The tenements comprising the Edjudina Project are held in the name of the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Mont Royal Exploration Australia Pty Ltd. For further information regarding Mont Royal Resources Limited please visit the ASX platform ( ASX:MRZ ) or the Company’s website www.montroyalres.com
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or | •Aircore (AC) drill chips collected through a cyclone laid out on 1m |
| techniques | specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate | intervals. Samples taken via a scoop on 5m composite intervals. |
| to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma | •Cyclone is cleaned regularly during drilling | |
| sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should | •Sampling equipment is cleaned regularly | |
| not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. | •Mineralisation determined qualitatively through rock type, sulphide | |
| • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity | and quartz content and intensity of alteration. | |
| and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems | •Mineralisation determined quantitatively via assay (aqua-regia digest | |
| used. | followed by ICP-MS for gold and four-acid digest for multi-element | |
| • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the | data). | |
| Public Report. | •Samples pulverized to 75 μm | |
| • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be | ||
| relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 | ||
| m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge | ||
| for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, | ||
| such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling | ||
| problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg | ||
| submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | ||
| Drilling | • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air | •87mm aircore blade drilling with occasional face sampling hammer |
| techniques | blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple | |
| or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other | ||
| _type, whether core is oriented and ifso, by what method, etc). _ | ||
| Drill sample | • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries | •Recoveries recorded at the time of logging and stored in MRZ |
| recovery | and results assessed. | database |
| • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure | •Cyclone is cleaned at the end of each rod to ensure no sample | |
| representative nature of the samples. | contamination. | |
| • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade | •No known relationship between sample recovery and grade. | |
| and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential | ||
| loss/gainof fine/coarse material. | ||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and | •Holes logged to a level of detail to support future mineral resource |
| geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate | estimation: lithology; alteration; mineralization; structural | |
| Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical | •Qualitative: lithology, alteration, foliation | |
| studies. | •Quantitative: vein percentage; mineralization (sulphide) percentage | |
| • _Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or _ |
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| costean, channel, etc) photography. | •All holes logged for the entire length of hole. | |
| • _The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. _ | ||
| Sub-sampling | • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core |
•Not applicable as no core taken |
| techniques | taken. | •Samples are not split. Samples are taken by representative scoop |
| and sample | • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and | into a composite 5m sample, with smaller composites taken at the |
| preparation | whether sampled wet or dry. | end of hole. Samples are taken regardless of wet or dry, and moisture |
| • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the | content is not noted in logs. | |
| sample preparation technique. | •The entire ~3kg AC sample is pulverized to 75μm (85% passing). | |
| • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to | This is considered best practice and is standard throughout the | |
| maximise representivity of samples. | industry. | |
| • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in | •Pulp duplicates taken at the pulverising stage and selective repeats |
|
| situ material collected, including for instance results for field | conducted at the laboratory’s discretion | |
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | •Duplicates taken every 20th sample | |
| • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material | •Sample size appropriate for grain size of samples material |
|
| _being sampled. _ | ||
| Quality of | • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and | •Aqua-regia digest with ICP-MS finish is considered an industry |
| assay data | laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered | standard technique and is considered appropriate for gold. |
| and | partial or total. | •No Geophysical tool used |
| laboratory | • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, | •Certified reference material standards were inserted by the laboratory |
| tests | the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument | at their discretion. |
| make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their | •Laboratory blanks were inserted by the laboratory at their discretion. | |
| derivation, etc. | •No results reported at this stage, so accuracy levels unable to be | |
| • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, | established | |
| duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels | ||
| _of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. _ | ||
| Verification of | • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or |
•All sampling is routinely inspected by senior geological staff. No |
| sampling and | alternative company personnel. | significant intersections have been returned to date as all assay |
| assaying | • The use of twinned holes. | results are pending. |
| • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data | •No twinned holes were drilled during this drill program | |
| verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. | •Mont Royal data is hard keyed into Excel Spreadsheet data capture | |
| • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | software and merged into an Access Database. | |
| •Visual checks of data are completed within Micromine software by | ||
| company geologists. | ||
| •No adjustments made to assay data as no data has been received |
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Location of | • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and | •Collars: surveyed with GPS with expected relative accuracy of |
| data points | down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations | approximately 5m. |
| used in Mineral Resource estimation. | •Downhole: no downhole surveys taken. Collar setup is checked by | |
| • Specification of the grid system used. | the supervising geologist upon commencement of each hole | |
| • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | •Holes are located in MGA Zone 51 | |
| •Estimated RLs were assigned during drilling and are to be corrected | ||
| at a later stage. | ||
| Data spacing | • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | •Holes were drilled on a collar spacing of 160m on section, with |
| and | • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the | sections spaced 1between 400-900m along strike. |
| distribution | degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral | •AC drilling is considered first-pass in nature, with data spacing not |
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and | relevant to a Mineral Resource Estimate. | |
| classifications applied. | •Samples taken on a 5m composite basis. Smaller composites taken | |
| • Whether sample compositing has been applied. | at the end of hole where remaining samples are less than 5m | |
| Orientation of | • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of | •Based on the current information at Edjudina the drilling is designed |
| data in | possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering | to be approximately perpendicular to the strike of the target structure |
| relation to | the deposit type. | and lithology. |
| geological | • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation | •No sampling bias resulting from a structural orientation is known at |
| structure | of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a | this stage |
| sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. | ||
| Sample | • The measures taken to ensure sample security. | •All samples are selected and bagged in a tied numbered calico bag, |
| security | grouped into larger polyweave bags and cable tied. Polyweave bags | |
| are placed into a larger Bulky Bags with a sample submission sheet | ||
| and tied shut. Consignment note and delivery address details are | ||
| written on the side of the bag and dispatched from Edjudina Pastoral | ||
| Station in a Hamptons Vehicle. The bags are delivered directly to | ||
| MinAnalytical in Kalgoorlie, WA and further freighted on the | ||
| MinAnalytical in Canning Vale. MinAnalytical are NATA accredited for | ||
| compliance with ISO/IEC17025:2005. | ||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | •No audits or reviews have occurred as there have been no assay |
| reviews | results returned to date. |
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
|---|---|
| Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any _known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate inthe area. _ |
•Completed drilling was conducted within tenements E39/1992-1994, part of the 100% owned Edjudina Gold Project. |
| Exploration done by other parties • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. |
•The Edjudina Project has been explored previously by numerous explorers including Newcrest Mining, Aberfoyle Resources, PacMin Mining Corporation, Gutnick resources, Sons of Gwalia, Great Gold Mines, St Barbara Mines, Hawthorn Resources and Saracen Gold Mines. |
| Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. |
• The Edjudina Project is located in the Eastern Goldfields portion of the Yilgarn Craton, more specifically, within the Kurnalpi Terrane of the eastern portion ofthe Norseman-Wiluna Greenstone Belt. • The Archaean rocks in the area consists of supracrustal sequences, comprising metamorphosed sedimentary and volcanic rocks in greenstone belts of lower greenschist to mid-upper amphibolite facies adjacent to regional granitoid and migmatitic gneisses. The area is almost entirely covered by transported material consisting of colluvium, subordinate laterite, alluvium, dunes and playas lake clays. The greenstone and granitoids are dominated by north–north westerly trending folds, and parallel fault zones that commonly mark apparent truncations of the lithostatigraphy. |
| Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collaro elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level inmetres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole |
• Please refer to Table 2 in the body of this announcement for drillhole details. All drillholes were drilled at -60⁰ towards 90⁰. |
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
o down hole length and interception depth |
||
o hole length. |
||
| • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the | ||
| information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from | ||
| the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly | ||
| _explain why this is the case. _ | ||
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, | • No top-cuts have been applied when reporting results. |
| aggregation methods |
maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. |
• The primary gold determination is reported where any secondary assaying has occurred. • The intervals referred to in this announcement are taken as values >= 1m @ 25ppb Au with a maximum of 2m internal dilution (< 25ppb Au). |
| • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values | • No metal equivalent values are used for reporting exploration | |
| should be clearly stated. | results. | |
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of | • Controls on mineralisation are not well known at this stage of |
| between mineralisation widths and |
Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. |
exploration and it is not yet possible to report on the orientation of mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle. |
| intercept | • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there | |
| lengths | should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true | |
| _width not known’). _ | ||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of | • Drill hole location maps are attached. |
| intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being | ||
| reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of | ||
| _drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. _ | ||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not | • All significant intercepts and summary of drill hole assay information |
| reporting | practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of _Exploration Results. _ |
are presented in the body of this announcement within Table 1 and Figure 1. |
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported | • All meaningful and material information has been included in the |
| substantive exploration data |
including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, |
body of the text • No metallurgical assessments have been completed. |
| _groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential _ |
==> picture [842 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| _deleterious or contaminating substances. _ | ||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral | • Infill and extensional aircore drilling of the anomalies is being |
| extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | planned and is likely to commence in the next quarter. | |
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, | ||
| including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, | ||
| _provided this information is not commercially sensitive. _ |