AI Terminal

MODULE: AI_ANALYST
Interactive Q&A, Risk Assessment, Summarization
MODULE: DATA_EXTRACT
Excel Export, XBRL Parsing, Table Digitization
MODULE: PEER_COMP
Sector Benchmarking, Sentiment Analysis
SYSTEM ACCESS LOCKED
Authenticate / Register Log In

Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd.

Regulatory Filings Dec 13, 2023

6932_rns_2023-12-13_87266b5e-287e-4306-a07d-5ba1127b92d9.pdf

Regulatory Filings

Open in Viewer

Opens in native device viewer

Fitch Maintains Mizrahi Tefahot Bank's 'A' IDR on Rating Watch Negative

Fitch Ratings - London - 13 Dec 2023: Fitch Ratings is maintaining Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd's (UMTB) ratings, including its 'A' Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and its 'a' Government Support Rating (GSR), on Rating Watch Negative (RWN). The bank's Viability Rating (VR) has been affirmed at 'a-'.

Key Rating Drivers

State Support Drives Ratings: UMTB's IDRs reflect Fitch's view of a very high probability that Israel (A+/F1+ on RWN) would provide support to the bank. Fitch believes Israel's ability and propensity to support UMTB are very high, particularly given the systemic importance of the bank, which holds almost 20% of the country's banking system assets.

Uncertain Economic Environment: The Israel-Hamas war has caused an initial contraction of economic activity. Our negative outlook on the operating environment reflects the uncertainty around the severity, duration and longer-term impact of the war. The Israeli government and the Bank of Israel have provided a variety of measures to support the economy and the most affected borrowers. Rising interest rates have supported net interest income, but Fitch believes this benefit peaked in 1H23 and will subsequently recede due to rising deposit costs and the Bank of Israel's decision to maintain the key interest rate at 4.75% in November.

Strong Mortgage Franchise: UMTB has a strong franchise in Israel as the third-largest bank by total assets. The ratings reflect conservative underwriting, resilient asset quality and adequate capitalisation. UMTB's business model is less diversified than its two larger peers, but is particularly strong in residential mortgages as the largest mortgage lender.

Close Regulatory Oversight: Underwriting standards are conservative, helped by tight regulatory limits and oversight, particularly for mortgage loans, and construction and real estate lending. Like other Israeli banks, UMTB has material exposure to the residential real estate market through mortgages as well as construction loans, but this is mitigated by the low indebtedness of Israeli households as well as high population growth that drives demand for new construction.

Asset-Quality Pressures: UMTB's impaired loans ratio increased slightly to 0.9% at end-September 2023 from 0.8% at end-2022. Fitch expects asset quality to be affected by the macroeconomic impact of the Israel-Hamas war. UMTB's loan impairment charge of ILS694 million in 3Q23 reflects the bank's assessment of the likely impact of the war on its loan portfolio and is comparable in size to the provisions taken at the start of the coronavirus pandemic in 1Q20.

Despite increased credit risk, we expect the impaired loans ratio to remain below 1.5% over the next two years due to sound underwriting and Israel's resilient operating environment.

Earnings to Weaken: The bank's profitability has benefited from higher interest rates, though net interest margins appear to have peaked. Cost efficiency has benefited from the successful integration of Union Bank. We expect improving efficiency to only partly mitigate lower loan growth in 2024, but we expect risk-adjusted operating profit to remain above 2% of risk-weighted assets (RWAs) over the next two years.

In our view, prudent underwriting and provisioning policies would reduce the impact on profitability from higher loan arrears should the war result in a more severe macroeconomic deterioration than we currently expect.

Adequate Capital Buffers: Capital headroom is limited. UMTB's common equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 10.12% at end-9M23 is the lowest among domestic peers', though it has been fairly stable. UMTB calculates RWAs using the standardised approach, which resulted in RWAs at 62% of total assets at end-9M23, which is conservative for the bank's high proportion of lower-risk mortgage loans. Our assessment also considers improved internal capital generation and a prudent decrease in the dividend pay-out ratio to 15% for 3Q23.

Stable Deposit Base: UMTB's 93% loans/deposits ratio at end-9M23 is higher than that of domestic peers, reflecting greater use of wholesale funding. However, UMTB's funding benefits from the bank's stable and granular retail and SME deposit base, and liquidity is sound, with a quarterly average liquidity coverage ratio of 138% in 3Q23. Since the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war, the bank has not noted material change in its liquidity ratios or funding mix.

UMTB's 'F1+' Short-Term IDR is the higher of two possible options that map to a 'A' Long-Term IDR. This is because we view the sovereign's propensity to support as more certain in the near term.

Rating Sensitivities

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/ Downgrade

A downgrade of the sovereign rating is likely to result in a downgrade of UMTB's GSR and IDRs.

A sharp deterioration of asset quality as a result of the war that would result in an impaired loan ratio of above 2% for an extended period, combined with the CET1 ratio declining below current levels, and weakening internal capital generation, funding stability or liquidity could result in a VR downgrade. Given the bank's exposure to the real estate sector, a sharp decline in real estate prices would put pressure on asset quality and therefore on the VR.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade

UMTB's GSR and IDRs are likely to be affirmed and removed from RWN if Israel's ratings are affirmed and removed from RWN. An upgrade of the GSR and IDRs is unlikely due to the war and the RWN on

the sovereign IDRs.

An upgrade of UMTB's VR is unlikely given the bank's geographical concentration and would require a material and structural improvement in profitability that allows it to generate stronger and more stable operating profit/RWAs while maintaining materially higher capital ratios, which we do not expect.

OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: KEY RATING DRIVERS

Subordinated Debt: UMTB's Tier 2 instruments are rated two notches below its VR, reflecting poor recovery prospects in the event of a failure of the bank, in line with Fitch's base-case notching for Tier 2 debt.

IDRs (xgs): The Long-Term IDR (xgs) of 'A-(xgs)' is at the level of the VR. The Short-Term IDR (xsg) of 'F2(xgs)' is the lower of two possible options that map to a 'A- (xgs)' Long-Term IDR (xgs) due to UMTB's 'a-' funding & liquidity score.

OTHER DEBT AND ISSUER RATINGS: RATING SENSITIVITIES

Subordinated Debt

-The ratings are sensitive to changes in the bank's VR

IDRs (xgs)

-The IDRs (xgs) are sensitive to changes in the bank's VR

VR ADJUSTMENTS

The operating environment score of 'a' is below the 'aa' implied category score due to the following adjustment reasons: sovereign rating (negative), size and structure of economy (negative).

The business profile score of 'a-' is above the 'bbb' implied category score due to the following adjustment reason: market position (positive).

The capitalisation & leverage score of 'a-' is above the 'bbb' implied category score due to the following adjustment reason: leverage and risk weight calculation (positive).

The funding & liquidity score of 'a-' is above the 'bbb' implied category score due to the following adjustment reason: deposit structure (positive).

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.

Public Ratings with Credit Linkage to other ratings

UMTB's IDRs and GSR reflect Fitch's expectation of a very high probability of state support from Israel.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visithttps://www.fitchratings.com/topics/esg/products#esg-relevance-scores.

Fitch Ratings Analysts

Michael Bojko, CFA

Director Primary Rating Analyst +44 20 3530 2723 Fitch Ratings Ltd 30 North Colonnade, Canary Wharf London E14 5GN

Rory Rushton

Analyst Secondary Rating Analyst +44 20 3530 1919

Patrick Rioual

Senior Director Committee Chairperson +33 1 44 29 91 21

Media Contacts

Peter Fitzpatrick

London +44 20 3530 1103 [email protected]

Rating Actions

ENTITY/DEBT RATING RECOVERY PRIOR
Mizrahi
Tefahot Bank
Ltd
LT IDR A Rating Watch
Maintained
A
ST IDR F1+ Rating Watch F1+
ENTITY/DEBT RATING RECOVERY PRIOR
Maintained
Viability a- Affirmed a
Government
Support
a Rating Watch
Maintained
a
LT IDR (xgs) A-(xgs) Affirmed A-(xgs)
ST IDR (xgs) F2(xgs) Affirmed F2(xgs)

subordinated
LT
BBB Affirmed BBB

RATINGS KEY OUTLOOK WATCH

POSITIVE
NEGATIVE
EVOLVING
STABLE

Applicable Criteria

Bank Rating Criteria (pub.01 Sep 2023) (including rating assumption sensitivity)

Additional Disclosures

Solicitation Status

Endorsement Status

Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd UK Issued, EU Endorsed

DISCLAIMER & DISCLOSURES

All Fitch Ratings (Fitch) credit ratings are subject to certain limitations and disclaimers. Please read these limitations and disclaimers by following this link: https://www.fitchratings.com/ understandingcreditratings. In addition, the following https://www.fitchratings.com/rating-definitionsdocument details Fitch's rating definitions for each rating scale and rating categories, including definitions relating to default. ESMA and the FCA are required to publish historical default rates in a central repository in accordance with Articles 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 and The Credit Rating Agencies (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 respectively.

Published ratings, criteria, and methodologies are available from this site at all times. Fitch's code of conduct, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, affiliate firewall, compliance, and other relevant policies and procedures are also available from the Code of Conduct section of this site. Directors and shareholders' relevant interests are available at https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory. Fitch may have provided another permissible or ancillary service to the rated entity or its related third parties. Details of permissible or ancillary service(s) for which the lead analyst is based in an ESMA- or FCA-registered Fitch Ratings company (or branch of such a company) can be found on the entity summary page for this issuer on the Fitch Ratings website.

In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. Fitch Ratings makes routine, commonly-accepted adjustments to reported financial data in accordance with the relevant

criteria and/or industry standards to provide financial metric consistency for entities in the same sector or asset class.

The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Fitch also provides information on best-case rating upgrade scenarios and worst-case rating downgrade scenarios (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in each direction) for international credit ratings, based on historical performance. A simple average across asset classes presents best-case upgrades of 4 notches and worst-case downgrades of 8 notches at the 99th percentile. Sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are listed in more detail at https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10238496

The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US\$1,000 to US\$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US\$10,000 to US\$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001.Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical

Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.

dv01, a Fitch Solutions company, and an affiliate of Fitch Ratings, may from time to time serve as loan data agent on certain structured finance transactions rated by Fitch Ratings.

Copyright © 2023 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved.

Endorsement policy

Fitch's international credit ratings produced outside the EU or the UK, as the case may be, are endorsed for use by regulated entities within the EU or the UK, respectively, for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU CRA Regulation or the UK Credit Rating Agencies (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, as the case may be. Fitch's approach to endorsement in the EU and the UK can be found on Fitch's Regulatory Affairs page on Fitch's website. The endorsement status of international credit ratings is provided within the entity summary page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are updated on a daily basis.

Talk to a Data Expert

Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.