Quarterly Report • Jul 23, 2025
Quarterly Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Business position Capital and earnings Risk position Funding Liquidity
Anchor bbb
This report does not constitute a rating action.
0
1
Adequate Strong
Adequate Adequate
CRA adjustment 0 Sovereign support 0
ALAC--Additional loss-absorbing capacity. CRA--Comparable ratings analysis. GRE-- Government-related entity. ICR--Issuer credit rating. SACP--Stand-alone credit profile.
ALAC support 0
GRE support 0
| Key strengths | Key risks | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leading mortgage bank in Israel. | High exposure to geopolitical and security risk. | ||||
| Resilient profitability and strong efficiency despite weakened economic environment. |
High exposure to the real estate sector. | ||||
| Large domestic customer base and resilient access to the domestic capital market. |
Strong and fast growth in the business sector during the turning cycle. |
The war has added significant risks to Israel's economic outlook. In this context, mortgagefocused Mizrahi is better positioned than the rest of the sector to face higher economic risk, in our view. About two-thirds of Mizrahi's book is mortgages, which we see as more resilient than Israel's construction and commercial real estate sectors because we continue to expect it to benefit from still-strong housing demand and low unemployment. That said, the very high focus on real estate-related lending exacerbates tail risk.
Milan 39-0272111208 regina.argenio @spglobal.com
Ramat-Gan 44-20-7176-0106 matan.benjamin @spglobal.com
Paris 33-14-075-2513 Pierre.Hollegien @spglobal.com
0 0 Group support 0 BBB+/Stable/A-2 Adequate
Profitability should support the bank's capitalization. We expect Mizrahi's risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratio to gradually improve to about 10% in 2027 from 9.3% on Dec. 31, 2024.
A large and granular deposit base supports Mizrahi's funding profile. In addition, we believe the bank's stock of liquid assets is sufficient to comfortably cover its liquidity needs.
The stable outlook balances geopolitical and economic risks and Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd.'s concentration in real estate-related lending with the benefits from its strong financial performance. We expect the bank's profitability to remain resilient, with its RAC to reach 10% from about 9.3% on Dec. 31, 2024, and the bank maintaining a risk profile aligned with that of peers.
We could lower our rating if we downgraded Israel, and the bank failed to maintain its solid risk profile and its asset quality metrics weakened materially over the next 12-24 months. This could happen if the impact of the conflict is more significant than anticipated, accentuating the stress on real estate developers and households, or if lending growth accelerates and jeopardizes Mizrahi's capitalization, with its RAC ratio staying materially below 10%.
An upgrade over the next 12-24 months is unlikely and would hinge on a material improvement of the security risk in the country and the bank strengthening its profitability, efficiency, and capital buffers, while diversifying its loan book.
| --Fiscal year ended Dec. 31 -- |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | 2022a 2023a 2024a | 2025f | 2026f | |||
| Growth in operating revenue | 29.2 | 11.2 | -0.3 (1.1)-(1.3) | 1.0-1.2 | ||
| Growth in customer loans | 13.4 | 6.2 | 9.9 | 6.3-7.7 | 7.2-8.8 | |
| Net interest income/average earning assets (NIM) | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 2.8-3.0 | 2.6-2.9 | |
| Cost-to-income ratio | 46.4 | 37.7 | 35.4 | 35.7- 37.5 |
36.3- 38.2 |
|
| Return on average common equity | 20.1 | 19.2 | 18.6 | 14.1-15.6 | 13.9- 15.4 |
|
| New loan loss provisions/average customer loans | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2-0.2 | 0.2-0.2 | |
| Gross nonperforming assets/customer loans | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4-1.6 | 1.1-1.2 | |
| Risk-adjusted capital ratio | 10.2 | 10.7 | 9.3 | 9.4-9.8 | 9.6-10.1 | |
All figures include S&P Global Ratings' adjustments. a--Actual. e--Estimate. f--Forecast. NIM--Net interest margin.
Israel faces very high geopolitical and security risks following the onset of the Israel-Hamas. We forecast real economic growth recover to 3.3% this year. While this remains below potential, it also suggests the resilience of the structure of the Israeli economy, which is centered on hightech services exports, somewhat cushioning the impact of security disruptions. Asset quality has remained under control amid strong government support and large credit availability. Israel's real estate sector, which represents a large portion of banks' loan books, is among the most vulnerable to current developments, in addition to tourism, and small businesses. In this context, we expect credit losses to remain above than historical level at about 30 basis points (bps)-35bps in 2025-2026.
The low funding risk and the proactive regulator support the industry. The Israeli banking sector benefits from a strong, largely domestic funding profile and a net external creditor position, which provide a cushion in the challenging environment. Prudent regulatory oversight somewhat mitigates risks of concentration and geopolitical instability. Israel-based banks' profitability benefits from high interest rates, and continual cost-cutting initiatives. Competition among banks and nonbank financial institutions somewhat constrains margins and fees.
With assets totaling NIS498 billion as of March 31, 2025, the bank is the third largest in Israel with a solid market share in loans and deposits (see charts 1 and 2).
Market share of domestic loans as of end-March 2025

Source: S&P Global Ratings, bank interim reports.
Copyright © 2025 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.
Market share of domestic deposits as of end-March 2025

Source: S&P Global Ratings, bank interim reports.
Mizrahi's revenue distribution 2020-2024
Copyright © 2025 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.
Mizrahi has a solid leading position in mortgage lending in Israel, with a 36% market share in this segment as of March 31, 2025. Despite fierce competition in the segment, we expect Mizrahi to retain its stable market shares, in line with the 2025-2027 strategic plan announced in June 2025, supporting stability in its revenue stream (see chart 3).

Resilient households revenue provided stability to its revenues stream
Source: S&P Global Ratings, bank reports.
Copyright © 2025 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.
Mizrahi is primarily a retail-focused bank, but has accelerated its growth efforts in businesses segments, reaching about 11.7% market share in 2024, also thanks to the acquisition of Union bank in 2020. It reitered this goal in its new strategic plan, targeting a market share of about 15%-16% by 2027. We consider the target ambitous and indicating higher risk appetite. The segment is highly competitive and the construction and real estate segment is among the biggest contributors to Mizrahi's higher penetration of the business segment. It rose to 11.6% of the lending portfolio as of March-end 2025, up from 9.2% as of March-end 2021. While we note that that Mizrahi remains less exposed to the construction segment than other Israeli domestic champions, we are cautious amid the strong and fast growth in the sector during the turning cycle and the intense competition.
Mizrahi targets a 17%-18% return on equity in 2025-2027, according to its updated business plan. We think achieving this goal depends on the evolution of the economic and operating environment in Israel and is challenged by margin compression due to competition. That said, we acknowledge that Mizrahi is structurally more efficient than most of its peers, which should support its performance through the war. Following the Union Bank merger, Mizrahi has been focusing on realizing synergies through closing of branches and headcount cuts. The bank now displays one of the Israeli banking system's best efficiency ratios, at 37.7% as of end-March 2025, by our metrics.
Mizrahi's profitability has benefited from increased interest rates and strong loan growth, which boosted revenue over the past three years, and resilient asset quality. In 2024, despite geopolitical turmoil and economic slowdown, Mizrahi posted a strong 18.6% return on equity (ROE).
We assume the recent increase in geopolitical risks remains short term and contained. We acknowledge that it's highly uncertain how the conflict will unfold, and a prolonged or widespread conflict could hit Israeli banks' profitability, including Mizrahi's.
In our baseline, we expect Mizrahi's ROE to moderately decline while remaining resilient, thus helping its RAC ratio to gradually rise to about 10.0% in 2027 from 9.3% on Dec. 31, 2024. Our forecasts factor in:
We expect management to calibrate dividend distributions and growth of risk-weighted assets to safeguard capital. We are factoring in a 35% dividend payout over 2025-2027.
With about 62% of its book in mortgage loans, Mizrahi displays high concentration (see chart 4).
3% Mizrahi's loan book distribution by segment as of end-March 2025

Source: S&P Global Ratings, bank interim report.
Copyright © 2025 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.
Over the past two decades, Mizrahi has demonstrated strong resilience in its mortgage portfolio. This can be attributed to the low unemployment rate in Israel, the stability of the residential property market, the contained payment-to-income ratios of Mizrahi's borrowers and the low loan-to-value (LTV) ratios of its mortgage book . Typically, Mizrahi caps the LTV for a mortgage loan at 75%. As of March 31, 2025, about 60% of the portfolio had an LTV ratio below 60% and about 38% between 60%-75%. This effectively secures the loans even in the event of a substantial decline in the value of the property pledged as collateral.
The recent fast expansion in other sectors could threaten Mizrahi's asset quality. We believe risks stem mainly from tourism, small and midsize enterprises, unsecured lending, and real estate and construction. The construction sector, which had previously benefited from strong post-pandemic momentum, faces significant headwinds. This is because of the increased cost of labor, owing to the severe shortage of Palestinian workers, higher funding costs, and an increase in unsold apartments. These factors ultimately narrow margins and constrain construction companies' financial flexibility. Mizrahi's exposure to the construction and real estate sector is more contained than peers', at about 11.9% of its total domestic loans.
With the outbreak of the war, Mizrahi extended relief and benefits to its customers impacted by the conflict. The amount of loans that were still benefiting from a change in terms and conditions due to the war was about 0.7% as of March 2025. At the same date, the value of relief and banking benefits already extended to customers was a contained NIS295 million.
Mizrahi's nonperforming loans amounted to about 1.3% of its total loans as of March 31, 2025, and we anticipate it will increase, but not exceed 2% in our base-case scenario.
Operational risks are material because of the geopolitical tensions in the region, the related potential damage, and other adverse events. We reflect these risks in our anchor for Israeli banks. At the same time, we consider that Israeli banks, including Mizrahi, actively protect themselves from cyber risks, thus limiting potential damage in case of a cyber attack.
Mizrahi is not materially exposed to other risks. In our view, its exposure to market risks is not significant, given the relatively small size of its nostro portfolio. The securities portfolio comprises highly-rated sovereign bonds. It is relatively small and unrealized losses are very limited. The bank has some unhedged exposure to inflation and interest-rate risk; only one-third of its mortgage loans are at variable rates and one-third are linked to inflation.
Mizrahi's deposit and funding base has been stable through the war. We believe the bank has a sound funding profile and liquidity, supported by its deep domestic funding sources, including a strong retail base. This translates into solid funding and liquidity metrics that have proven resilient to current conditions and also compared adequately with those of peers (see chart 5).
As of end-March 2025

*Fiscal year-end in March 2025. S&P calculations based on bank's regulatory disclosures. Source: S&P Global Ratings.
Mizrahi is mostly funded by domestic customer deposits, with core deposits forming about 90% of the funding base. It benefits from its comparatively high market share in deposits from retail customers, at about 22% at end-2024; as such, its depositor base also shows good granularity. In line with the sector, Mizrahi is seing its share of interest-bearing deposits increasing.
It has limited dependence on interbank and other wholesale funding, accounting for about 8.7% of total funding. It recourses to the market opportunistically depending on the relative pricing. These wholesale funding sources have longer maturities that align with the bank's asset profile and offer some consumer price index (CPI) hedging since most of them are CPI-linked.
It also maintains sound liquidity, with broad liquid banking assets accounting for 18% of total banking assets as of March 31, 2025. At the same date, our broad liquid assets covered Mizrahi's short-term wholesale funding by 6.6x, and the regulatory liquidity coverage ratio stood at 139%.
In our view, Mizrahi has high systemic importance in Israel and the government is supportive of the domestic banking sector. That said, at the current level of rating, this does not lead to an uplift to the SACP.
Additional loss-absorbing capacity (ALAC) methodology is currently not applicable for Israel and we continue to view the State of Israel as supportive of its banking sector. There is no resolution regime in Israel and we do not anticipate one to be created in the medium term.
Environmental, social, and governance credit factors have a neutral influence on our rating analysis of Mizrahi. We see its management as professional and experienced.
Environmental factors do not materially affect Mizrahi's credit quality, in line with industry peers. The bank is committed to reducing its operating carbon footprint by 40% by 2030 and reducing to zero the nostro portfolio exposure to the coal mining and oil drilling sectors.
Regarding social risk, we note that Mizrahi will continue its workforce optimization as part of its strategy to improve efficiency. We believe potential risks are limited, since most of the staff reduction will be done through early retirements and handled carefully.
The starting point for the rating on the subordinated contingent convertible notes is the 'bbb+' SACP. The resulting 'BBB-' issue rating stands two notches below the SACP, encompassing:
| Mil. ILS | 2025* | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted assets | 497,919 | 485,526 | 448,056 | 428,114 | 392,063 | ||
| Customer loans (gross) | 368,777 | 362,412 | 329,895 | 310,674 | 274,008 | ||
| Adjusted common equity | 32,391 | 31,528 | 28,038 | 24,243 | 20,550 | ||
| Operating revenues | 3,551 | 14,737 | 14,781 | 13,294 | 10,292 | ||
| Noninterest expenses | 1,339 | 5,222 | 5,569 | 6,173 | 5,568 | ||
| Core earnings | 1,345 | 5,670 | 5,080 | 4,361 | 3,278 | ||
| *2025 data is for the 3 months to end-March. ILS--Israeli new shekel. |
| (%) | 2025* | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loan market share in country of domicile | 22.4 | 22.5 | 22.16 | 22.4 | 22.5 |
| Deposit market share in country of domicile | 19.0 | 18.4 | 18.3 | 18.4 | 17.9 |
| Total revenues from business line (currency in millions) | 3,551 | 14,737 | 14,781 | 13,673 | 10,310 |
| Commercial & retail banking/total revenues from business line | 101.8 | 95.8 | 91.2 | 76.3 | 79.5 |
| (%) | 2025* | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading and sales income/total revenues from business line | (1.8) | 4.2 | 8.8 | 23.7 | 20.5 |
| Corporate finance/total revenues from business line | - | - | - | - | - |
| Brokerage/total revenues from business line | - | - | - | - | - |
| Insurance activities/total revenues from business line | - | - | - | - | - |
| Agency services/total revenues from business line | - | - | - | - | - |
| Payments and settlements/total revenues from business line | - | - | - | - | - |
| Asset management/total revenues from business line | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other revenues/total revenues from business line | - | - | - | - | - |
| Investment banking/total revenues from business line | (1.8) | 4.2 | 8.8 | 23.7 | 20.5 |
| Return on average common equity | 16.3 | 18.6 | 19.2 | 20.1 | 16.1 |
| *2025 data is for the 3 months to end-March. |
| (%) | 2025* | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 10.4 | 10.4 | 10.3 | 9.9 | 10.0 |
| S&P Global Ratings' RAC ratio before diversification | N/A | N/A | 10.7 | 10.2 | 10.3 |
| Adjusted common equity/total adjusted capital | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Net interest income/operating revenues | 78.8 | 80.2 | 81.0 | 77.0 | 74.7 |
| Fee income/operating revenues | 15.0 | 14.0 | 13.7 | 15.4 | 18.9 |
| Market-sensitive income/operating revenues | 20.5 | 3.2 | 10.0 | 5.6 | 3.9 |
| Cost to income ratio | 37.7 | 35.4 | 37.7 | 46.4 | 54.1 |
| Preprovision operating income/average assets | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Core earnings/average managed assets | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| *2025 data is for the 3 months to end-March. N.M.--Not meaningful. |
Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd. Risk-Adjusted Capital Framework Data
| Government and central banks | EAD (1) | Basel III RWA (2) |
Average Basel III RW (%) |
S&P Global RWA |
Average S&P Global RW (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government and central banks | 101,157 | 2,410 | 2 | 1,781 | 2 |
| Of which regional governments and local authorities |
2,031 | 944 | 46 | 228 | 11 |
| Institutions and CCPs | 16,163 | 5,777 | 36 | 5,295 | 33 |
| Corporate | 131,545 | 118,000 | 90 | 172,229 | 131 |
| Retail | 250,808 | 143,655 | 57 | 106,117 | 42 |
| Of which mortgage | 222,165 | 122,008 | 55 | 81,157 | 37 |
| Securitization (3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other assets (4) | 7,137 | 10,147 | 142 | 14,530 | 204 |
| Total credit risk | 506,810 | 279,989 | 55 | 299,952 | 59 |
| Total credit valuation adjustment | -- | 1,421 | -- | 0 | -- |
| Equity in the banking book | 878 | 878 | 100 | 7,313 | 833 |
| Trading book market risk | -- | 1,675 | -- | 2,512 | -- |
| Government and central banks | EAD (1) | Basel III RWA (2) |
Average Basel III RW (%) |
S&P Global RWA |
Average S&P Global RW (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total market risk | -- | 2,553 | -- | 9,825 | -- |
| Total operational risk | -- | 23,402 | -- | 27,714 | -- |
| RWA before diversification | -- | 307,364 | -- | 337,491 | 100 |
| Total diversification/concentration Adjustments |
-- | -- | -- | 47,376 | 14 |
| RWA after diversification | '-- | 307,364 | -- | 384,867 | 114 |
| Tier 1 Capital |
Tier 1 ratio (%) | Total adjusted capital |
S&P Global RAC ratio (%) |
||
| Capital ratio before adjustments | 31,963 | 10.4 | 31,528 | 9.3 | |
| Capital ratio after adjustments (5) | 31,963 | 10.4 | 31,528 | 8.2 |
Footnotes: (1) EAD--Exposure at default. (2) RWA--Risk-weighted assets. (3) Securitization exposure includes the securitization tranches deducted from capital in the regulatory framework. (4) Other assets include deferred tax assets (DTAs) not deducted from ACE. (5) For Tier 1 ratio, adjustments are additional regulatory requirements (e.g. transitional floor or Pillar 2 add-ons).
| (%) | 2025* | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth in customer loans | 7.0 | 9.9 | 6.2 | 13.4 | 10.2 |
| Total diversification adjustment/S&P Global Ratings' RWA before diversification | N/A | N/A | 11.3 | 13.0 | 14.1 |
| Total managed assets/adjusted common equity (x) | 15.4 | 15.4 | 16.0 | 17.7 | 19.1 |
| New loan loss provisions/average customer loans | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | (0.1) |
| Net charge-offs/average customer loans | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Gross nonperforming assets/customer loans + other real estate owned | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Loan loss reserves/gross nonperforming assets | 86.2 | 83.6 | 97.5 | 95.8 | 78.9 |
| *2025 data is for the 3 months to end-March. |
| (%) | 2025* | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core deposits/funding base | 90.1 | 90.7 | 89.43 | 89.4 | 87.1 |
| Customer loans (net)/customer deposits | 91.3 | 91.1 | 90.9 | 89.3 | 88.3 |
| Long-term funding ratio | 96.7 | 97.1 | 96.4 | 96.0 | 95.3 |
| Stable funding ratio | 114.6 | 114.7 | 116.5 | 117.3 | 120.1 |
| Short-term wholesale funding/funding base | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 5.0 |
| Regulatory net stable funding ratio | 113.0 | 113.0 | 114.0 | 115.0 | 119.0 |
| Broad liquid assets/short-term wholesale funding (x) | 6.0 | 6.6 | 5.8 | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Broad liquid assets/total assets | 19.0 | 18.4 | 20.1 | 21.0 | 24.0 |
| Broad liquid assets/customer deposits | 23.7 | 22.8 | 25.1 | 26.1 | 30.6 |
| Net broad liquid assets/short-term customer deposits | 24.7 | 24.2 | 25.9 | 26.6 | 31.2 |
| Regulatory liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) (x) | 139.0 | 135.0 | 131.0 | 118.0 | 125.0 |
| Short-term wholesale funding/total wholesale funding | 35.9 | 33.6 | 36.7 | 40.4 | 38.3 |
| Narrow liquid assets/3-month wholesale funding (x) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
*2025 data is for the 3 months to end-March.
| Issuer Credit Rating | BBB+/Stable/A-2 |
|---|---|
| SACP | bbb+ |
| Anchor | bbb |
| Business position | Adequate (0) |
| Capital and earnings | Strong (1) |
| Risk position | Adequate (0) |
| Funding and liquidity | Adequate and Adequate (0) |
| Comparable ratings analysis | 0 |
| Support | 0 |
| ALAC support | 0 |
| GRE support | 0 |
| Group support | 0 |
| Sovereign support | 0 |
| Additional factors | 0 |
SACP--Stand-alone credit profile. ALAC--Additional loss-absorbing capacity. GRE--Governmentrelated entity.
| Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Issuer Credit Rating | BBB+/Stable/A-2 |
| Junior Subordinated | BBB |
| Issuer Credit Ratings History | |
| 29-May-2025 | BBB+/Stable/A-2 |
| 09-Oct-2024 | BBB+/Negative/A-2 |
| 31-Oct-2023 | A-/Negative/A-2 |
| 20-Jul-2023 | A-/Stable/A-2 |
| 21-Jul-2021 | A-/Positive/A-2 |
| 18-Mar-2021 | A-/Stable/A-2 |
| Sovereign Rating | |
Israel A/Negative/A-1
*Unless otherwise noted, all ratings in this report are global scale ratings. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings on the global scale are comparable across countries. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings on a national scale are relative to obligors or obligations within that specific country. Issue and debt ratings could include debt guaranteed by another entity, and rated debt that an entity guarantees.
Copyright © 2025 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved.
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Some of the Content may have been created with the assistance of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool. Published Content created or processed using AI is composed, reviewed, edited, and approved by S&P personnel.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.
STANDARD & POOR'S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.