Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

MIDDLEBY Corp Interim / Quarterly Report 2008

May 8, 2008

30844_10-q_2008-05-08_b603906d-0653-4be7-84c4-73c3ca7dc627.zip

Interim / Quarterly Report

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

10-Q 1 v113221_10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 29, 2008

or

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File No. 1-9973

THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware 36-3352497
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation
or Organization)

| 1400
Toastmaster Drive, Elgin, Illinois | 60120 |
| --- | --- |
| (Address
of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip
Code) |

Registrant's Telephone No., including Area Code (847) 741-3300

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of May 2, 2008, there were 16,960,896 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding.

THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

QUARTER ENDED MARCH 29, 2008

INDEX

DESCRIPTION PAGE
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March
29, 2008 and December 29, 2007 1
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EARNINGS
March
29, 2008 and March 31, 2007 2
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
March
29, 2008 and March 31, 2007 3
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS 4
Item
2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and
Results of Operations 21
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 29
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures 32
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1A. Risk
Factors 33
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 33
Item
6. Exhibits 33

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts In Thousands, Except Share Data)

(Unaudited)

Mar. 29, 2008
ASSETS
Current
assets:
Cash
and cash equivalents $ 5,518 $ 7,463
Accounts
receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $6,443 and
$5,818 83,928 73,090
Inventories,
net 81,513 66,438
Prepaid
expenses and other 12,571 10,341
Prepaid
taxes 16,159 17,986
Current
deferred taxes 15,630 16,643
Total
current assets 215,319 191,961
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $42,339 and
$41,114 45,883 36,774
Goodwill 211,612 109,814
Other
intangibles 125,686 52,522
Deferred
tax assets 5,800 16,929
Other
assets 2,526 3,079
Total
assets $ 606,826 $ 411,079
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current
liabilities:
Current
maturities of long-term debt $ 2,661 $ 2,683
Accounts
payable 36,904 26,576
Accrued
expenses 84,607 95,581
Total
current liabilities 124,172 124,840
Long-term
debt 269,996 93,514
Other
non-current liabilities 15,472 9,813
Stockholders'
equity:
Preferred
stock, $0.01 par value; nonvoting; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued
Common
stock, $0.005 par value; 47,500,000 shares authorized; 20,817,536
and
20,732,836 shares issued in 2008 and 2007, respectively 120 120
Paid-in
capital 105,947 104,782
Treasury
stock at cost; 3,859,913 and 3,855,044 shares in 2008 and 2007,
respectively (90,014 ) (89,641 )
Retained
earnings 180,077 166,896
Accumulated
other comprehensive income 1,056 755
Total
stockholders' equity 197,186 182,912
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 606,826 $ 411,079

See accompanying notes

1

THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

( Unaudited )

Three Months Ended — Mar. 29, 2008 Mar. 31, 2007
Net
sales $ 160,883 $ 105,695
Cost
of sales 101,981 64,590
Gross
profit 58,902 41,105
Selling
and distribution expenses 16,245 11,116
General
and administrative expenses 16,641 11,183
Income
from operations 26,016 18,806
Interest
expense and deferred financing amortization, net 3,703 1,244
Other
expense (income), net 387 (107 )
Earnings
before income taxes 21,926 17,669
Provision
for income taxes 8,745 6,949
Net
earnings $ 13,181 $ 10,720
Net
earnings per share:
Basic $ 0.82 $ 0.69
Diluted $ 0.77 $ 0.64
Weighted
average number of shares
Basic 16,055 15,510
Dilutive
stock options 1 1,115 1,230
Diluted 17,170 16,740

1 There were no anti-dilutive stock options excluded from common stock equivalents for any period presented.

See accompanying notes

2

THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

( Unaudited )

Three Months Ended — Mar. 29, 2008 Mar. 31, 2007
Cash
flows from operating activities-
Net
earnings $ 13,181 $ 10,720
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation
and amortization 3,533 1,318
Deferred
taxes 2,512 25
Non-cash
share-based compensation 2,350 1,322
Unrealized
loss on derivative financial instruments 204
Cash
effects of changes in -
Accounts
receivable, net 815 (2,121 )
Inventories,
net (1,558 ) (4,823 )
Prepaid
expenses and other assets 3,767 (697 )
Accounts
payable 5,461 907
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities (17,702 ) (11,086 )
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities 12,563 (4,435 )
Cash
flows from investing activities-
Net
additions to property and equipment (2,124 ) (598 )
Acquisition
of Star (188,068 )
Net
cash (used in) investing activities (190,192 ) (598 )
Cash
flows from financing activities-
Net
p roceeds
(repayments) under revolving credit facilities 176,350 9,450
Repayments
under senior secured bank notes (3,750 )
Repayments
under foreign bank loan (245 ) (1,077 )
Debt
issuance costs (162 )
Purchase
of treasury stock (373 )
Net
proceeds from stock issuances 37 925
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities 175,607 5,548
Effect
of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 77 4
Changes
in cash and cash equivalents-
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (1,945 ) 519
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year 7,463 3,534
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of quarter $ 5,518 $ 4,053
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest
paid $ 2,359 $ 1,038
Income
tax payments $ 245 $ 4,411

See accompanying notes

3

THE MIDDLEBY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 29, 2008

( Unaudited )

1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

A) Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by The Middleby Corporation (the "company"), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial statements are unaudited and certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in the company's 2007 Form 10-K.

In the opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the company as of March 29, 2008 and December 29, 2007, and the results of operations for the three months ended March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007 and cash flows for the three months ended March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007.

B) Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation expense is calculated by estimating the fair value of market based stock awards and stock options at the time of grant and amortized over the stock options’ vesting period. Share-based compensation expense was $2.4 million and $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively.

4

C) Income Tax Contingencies

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). This interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. FIN 48 states that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable, based on its technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax benefit from an uncertain position was previously recognized if it was probable of being sustained. Under FIN 48, the liability for unrecognized tax benefits is classified as non-current unless the liability is expected to be settled in cash within 12 months of the reporting date. FIN 48 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. The company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on the first day of fiscal 2007 as required.

As of December 29, 2007, the total amount of liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to federal, state and foreign taxes was approximately $7.7 million plus approximately $1.0 million of accrued interest and $1.3 million of penalties. As of March 29, 2008, the corresponding balance of liability for unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $8.0 million plus approximately $1.0 million of accrued interest and $1.3 million of penalties. The company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, which is consistent with reporting in prior periods.

The company does not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to any settlement of audits and the expiration of statute of limitations within the next twelve months.

The company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions; both within the United States and outside of the United States, and faces audits from various tax authorities. The Company remains subject to examination until the statute of limitations expires for the respective tax jurisdiction. Within specific countries, the company and its operating subsidiaries may be subject to audit by various tax authorities and may be subject to different statute of limitations expiration dates. A summary of the tax years that remain subject to examination in the company’s major tax jurisdictions are:

| United
States – federal | 2005
- 2007 |
| --- | --- |
| United
States – states | 2001
- 2007 |
| China | 2006
- 2007 |
| Denmark | 2006
- 2007 |
| Mexico | 2006
- 2007 |
| Philippines | 2004
- 2007 |
| South
Korea | 2004
- 2007 |
| Spain | 2005
- 2007 |
| Taiwan | 2005
- 2007 |
| United
Kingdom | 2006
- 2007 |

5

D) Fair Value Measures

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in general accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This statement is effective for interim reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company adopted SFAS No. 157 on December 30, 2007 (first day of fiscal year 2008). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 ” delays the effective date of the application of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a non-recurring basis. The company adopted SFAS No. 157 with the exception of the application of the statement to non-recurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities. Non-recurring nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities for which the company has not applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157 primarily include those measured at fair value in goodwill and long-lived asset impairment testing, those initially measured at fair value in a business combination, and nonfinancial liabilities for exit or disposal activities.

SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into the following levels:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2 – Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs based on assumptions.

The company’s financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized using the fair value hierarchy and liabilities at March 29, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):

| Level
1 | | Fair
Value — Level
2 | Fair
Value — Level
3 | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Financial
Assets: | | | | |
| None | — | — | — | — |
| Financial
Liabilities: | | | | |
| Interest
rate swaps | — | $ 1,353 | — | $ 1,353 |

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on the financial statements. Upon adoption, the company has not elected to apply SFAS No. 159 to measure selected financial instruments and certain other items; therefore, there was no impact to the financial statements upon adoption. Subsequent to the initial adoption of SFAS No. 159, the company has not made any elections during the three months ended March 29, 2008.

6

2) Acquisitions and Purchase Accounting

Jade

On April 1, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations of Jade Products Company (“Jade”), a leading manufacturer of commercial and residential cooking equipment from Maytag Corporation ("Maytag") for an aggregate purchase price of $7.4 million in cash plus transaction expenses. The purchase price is subject to adjustment based upon a working capital provision within the purchase agreement.

The company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method to record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities and intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.

The preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Jade acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):

| Current
assets | Apr. 1, 2007 — $ 6,727 | $ | 217 | $ | 6,944 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Property,
plant and equipment | 2,029 | | (172 | ) | 1,857 | |
| Goodwill | 250 | | (250 | ) | — | |
| Other
intangibles | 1,590 | | (135 | ) | 1,455 | |
| Deferred
tax assets | — | | 841 | | 841 | |
| Current
liabilities | (3,205 | ) | (113 | ) | (3,318 | ) |
| Total
cash paid | $ 7,391 | $ | 388 | $ | 7,779 | |

Other intangibles of $1.3 million associated with the trade name, are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, from the date of acquisition. Other intangibles of $0.2 million allocated to customer relationships are to be amortized over a periods of 10 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Jade are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Carter-Hoffmann

On June 29, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations of Carter-Hoffmann (“Carter-Hoffmann”), a leading manufacturer of commercial cooking and warming equipment, from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration Inc., a subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies Corporation, for an aggregate purchase price of $15.9 million in cash plus transaction expenses.

The company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method to record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities and intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.

7

The preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Carter-Hoffmann acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):

| Current
assets | Jun.
29, 2007 — $ 7,912 | $ | (795 | ) | Mar.
29, 2008 — $ 7,117 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Property,
plant and equipment | 2,264 | | — | | 2,264 | |
| Goodwill | 9,452 | | (6,950 | ) | 2,502 | |
| Other
intangibles | — | | 3,910 | | 3,910 | |
| Deferred
tax assets | — | | 4,199 | | 4,199 | |
| Current
liabilities | (3,646 | ) | (50 | ) | (3,696 | ) |
| Other
non-current liabilities | (54 | ) | — | | (54 | ) |
| Total
cash paid | $ 15,928 | $ | 314 | | $ 16,242 | |

The goodwill and $2.3 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other intangibles also includes $1.6 million allocated to customer relationships are to be amortized over a period of 4 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Carter-Hoffmann are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

MP Equipment

On July 2, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations of MP Equipment (“MP Equipment”), a leading manufacturer of food processing equipment for a purchase price of $15.0 million in cash plus transaction expenses. An additional deferred payment of $2.0 million is also due to the seller at the earlier of three years or upon the achievement of reaching certain profit targets. An additional contingent payment of $1.0 million is also payable if the business reaches certain target profits.

The company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method to record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities and intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.

The preliminary allocation of cash paid for the MP Equipment acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):

| Current
assets | Jul. 2, 2007 — $ 5,315 | $ | 114 | $ | 5,429 | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Property,
plant and equipment | 297 | | — | | 297 | |
| Goodwill | 9,290 | | (4,682 | ) | 4,608 | |
| Other
intangibles | 6,420 | | (770 | ) | 5,650 | |
| Deferred
tax assets | — | | 5,414 | | 5,414 | |
| Other
assets | 16 | | — | | 16 | |
| Current
liabilities | (4,018 | ) | — | | (4,018 | ) |
| Other
non-current liabilities | (2,127 | ) | — | | (2,127 | ) |
| Total
cash paid | $ 15,193 | $ | 76 | $ | 15,269 | |

8

The goodwill and $3.3 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other intangibles also includes $0.3 million allocated to backlog, $0.3 million allocated to developed technology and $1.8 million allocated to customer relationships which are to be amortized over periods of 6 months, 5 years and 5 years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of MP Equipment are allocated to the Food Processing Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

Wells Bloomfield

On August 3, 2007, the company completed its acquisition of the assets and operations of Wells Bloomfield (“Wells Bloomfield”), a leading manufacturer of commercial cooking and beverage equipment from Carrier Commercial Refrigeration Inc., a subsidiary of Carrier Corporation, which is a unit of United Technologies Corporation, for an aggregate purchase price of $28.4 million in cash plus transaction expenses.

The company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method to record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities and intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.

The preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Wells Bloomfield acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):

Cash Aug. 3, 2007 — $ 2 $ $ 2
Current
assets 15,133 1,226 16,359
Property,
plant and equipment 3,961 (5 ) 3,956
Goodwill 5,835 (4,965 ) 870
Other
intangibles 8,130 (200 ) 7,930
Deferred
tax assets 5,579 5,579
Other
assets 21 21
Current
liabilities (4,277 ) (1,534 ) (5,811 )
Total
cash paid $ 28,805 $ 101 $ 28,906

The goodwill and $5.5 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other intangibles of $2.4 million allocated to customer relationships are to be amortized over a period of 4 years. Goodwill and other intangibles of Wells Bloomfield are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

9

Star

On December 31, 2007, subsequent to the company’s fiscal 2007 year end, the company acquired the stock of New Star International Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Star”), a leading manufacturer of commercial cooking for an aggregate purchase price of $188.4 million in cash plus transaction expenses. The purchase price is subject to adjustment based upon a working capital provision within the purchase agreement.

The company has accounted for this business combination using the purchase method to record a new cost basis for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recorded as goodwill in the financial statements. The allocation of the purchase price to the assets, liabilities and intangible assets is under review and is subject to change based upon finalization of the valuation of the assets and liabilities acquired.

The preliminary allocation of cash paid for the Star acquisition is summarized as follows (in thousands):

Cash Mar. 29, 2008 — $ 376
Current
assets 27,783
Property,
plant and equipment 8,225
Goodwill 101,365
Other
intangibles 75,150
Other
assets 71
Current
liabilities (11,394 )
Deferred
tax liability (8,837 )
Other
non-current liabilities (4.295 )
Total
cash paid $ 188,444

The goodwill and $47.0 million of other intangibles associated with the trade name are subject to the non-amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142. Other intangibles also includes $0.4 million allocated to backlog, $3.8 million allocated to developed technology and $24.0 million allocated to customer relationships which are to be amortized over periods of 1 month, 7 years and 7 years, respectively. Goodwill and other intangibles of Star are allocated to the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group for segment reporting purposes. These assets are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

3) Stock Split

On May 3, 2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized a two-for-one split of the company’s common stock in the form of a stock dividend. The stock dividend was paid on June 15, 2007 to company shareholders of record as of June 1, 2007. The company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on June 18, 2007. All references in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto to net earnings per share and the number of shares have been adjusted to reflect this stock split.

10

4) Litigation Matters

From time to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance coverage. The reserve requirement may change in the future due to new developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the company.

5) Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

In December 2007, the FAS issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations”. This statement provides companies with principles and requirements on how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. This statement also requires certain disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination will generally be expensed as incurred. This statement is effective for business combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption of FASB Statement No. 141R is not permitted. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this guidance will have on the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

11

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Upon its adoption, effective as of the beginning of the company’s 2009 fiscal year, noncontrolling interests will be classified as equity in the company’s financial statements and income and comprehensive income attributed to the noncontrolling interest will be included in the company’s income and comprehensive income. The provisions of this standard must be applied retrospectively upon adoption. The company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material impact on its financial statements. The Company will adopt this statement for acquisitions consummated after the statements effective date.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This statement amends SFAS No. 133 to require enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this guidance will have on the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

6) Other Comprehensive Income

The company reports changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investment by owners and distribution to owners, in accordance with SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income."

Components of other comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended — Mar. 29, 2008 Mar. 31, 2007
Net
earnings $ 13,181 $ 10,720
Currency
translation adjustment 845 32
Unrealized
loss on
interest
rate swaps, net of tax (544 ) (136 )
Comprehensive
income $ 13,482 $ 10,616

Accumulated other comprehensive income is comprised of minimum pension liability of $(0.9) million, net of taxes of $(0.6) million, as of March 29, 2008 and December 29, 2007, foreign currency translation adjustments of $2.5 million as of March 29, 2008 and $1.7 million as of December 29, 2007, and an unrealized loss on interest rate swaps of $0.5 million, net of taxes of $0.4 million, as of March 29, 2008.

12

7) Inventories

Inventories are composed of material, labor and overhead and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Costs for inventory at two of the company's manufacturing facilities have been determined using the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. These inventories under the LIFO method amounted to $16.6 million at March 29, 2008 and $16.4 million at December 29, 2007 and represented approximately 20% and 25% of the total inventory in each respective period. Costs for all other inventory have been determined using the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. The company estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based on its judgment of future realization. Inventories at March 29, 2008 and December 29, 2007 are as follows:

Mar. 29, 2008
(in thousands)
Raw
materials and parts $ 24,882 $ 25,047
Work-in-process 20,426 11,033
Finished
goods 36,616 30,669
81,924 66,749
LIFO
adjustment (411 ) (311 )
$ 81,513 $ 66,438

8) Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

Mar. 29, 2008 Dec, 29, 2007
(in thousands)
Accrued
payroll and related expenses $ 13,707 $ 21,448
Accrued
warranty 13,326 12,276
Accrued
customer rebates 8,970 16,326
Advance
customer deposits 7,948 7,971
Accrued
product liability and workers comp 7,946 6,978
Other
accrued expenses 32,710 30,582
$ 84,607 $ 95,581

13

9) Warranty Costs

In the normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made as changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.

A rollforward of the warranty reserve is as follows:

Three Months Ended
Mar. 29, 2008
(in thousands)
Beginning
balance $ 12,276
Warranty
reserve related to acquisitions 1,030
Warranty
expense 3,625
Warranty
claims (3,605 )
Ending
balance $ 13,326

10) Financing Arrangements

Mar. 29, 2008 Dec. 29, 2007
(in thousands)
Senior
secured revolving credit line $ 267,700 $ 91,350
Foreign
loan 4,957 4,847
Total
debt $ 272,657 $ 96,197
Less:
Current maturities of long-term debt 2,661 2,683
Long-term
debt $ 269,996 $ 93,514

During the fourth quarter of 2007 the company entered into a new senior secured credit facility. Terms of the senior credit agreement provide for $450.0 million of availability under a revolving credit line. As of March 29, 2008, the company had $267.7 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The company also has $4.1 million in outstanding letters of credit, which reduces the borrowing availability under the revolving credit line.

Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate at 1.25% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate and the Federal Funds Rate. At March 29, 2008 the average interest rate on the senior debt amounted to 4.21%. The interest rates on borrowings under the senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based on the company’s defined indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis. Additionally, a commitment fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged on the unused portion of the revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee amounted to 0.25% as of March 29, 2008.

14

In August 2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno A/S in Denmark. This acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with borrowings in Danish Krone. On March 29, 2008 these facilities amounted to $5.0 million in US dollars, including $2.6 million outstanding under a revolving credit facility and $2.4 million of a term loan. The interest rate on the revolving credit facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR, which amounted to 5.41% on March 29, 2008. The term loan matures in 2013 and the interest rate is assessed at 5.62%.

The company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for fixed rates. As of March 29, 2008 the company had the following interest rate swaps in effect:

Notional Fixed — Interest Effective Maturity
Amount Rate Date Date
$
10,000,000 5.030 % 03/03/06 12/21/09
$ 10,000,000 2.520 % 2/13/2008 2/19/2009
$ 20,000,000 2.635 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2009
$ 25,000,000 3.350 % 1/14/2008 1/14/2010
$ 10,000,000 2.920 % 2/1/2008 2/1/2010
$ 10,000,000 2.785 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2010
$ 10,000,000 3.033 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2011
$ 10,000,000 2.820 % 2/1/2008 2/1/2009

The terms of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios of indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides that if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse change in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties, condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of the company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default; or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. The credit facility is secured by the capital stock of the company’s domestic subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of the company’s foreign subsidiaries and substantially all other assets of the company. At March 29, 2008, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its borrowing agreements.

15

11) Financial Instruments

In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". SFAS No. 133, as amended, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments. The statement requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities and measure those instruments at fair value. Derivatives that do not qualify as a hedge must be adjusted to fair value in earnings. If the derivative does qualify as a hedge under SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair value will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments or recognized in other accumulated comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a hedge's change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings.

Foreign Exchange : The company has entered into derivative instruments, principally forward contracts to reduce exposures pertaining to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. As of March 29, 2008 the company had no forward contracts outstanding.

The company has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of its variable-rate debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for a fixed rates. The company has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and all changes in fair value of the swaps are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of March 29, 2008, the fair value of these instruments was $1.4 million. The change in fair value of these swap agreements in the first three months of 2008 was a loss of $0.5 million, net of taxes.

Notional Fixed — Interest Effective Maturity Fair Value Changes — In Fair Value
Amount Rate Date Date Mar. 29, 2008 (net of taxes)
$
10,000,000 5.030 % 03/03/06 12/21/09 $ (462,000 ) $ (9,000 ) 1
$
10,000,000 2.520 % 2/13/2008 2/19/2009 $ (28,000 ) $ (17,000 )
$
20,000,000 2.635 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2009 $ (65,000 ) $ (39,000 )
$
25,000,000 3.350 % 1/14/2008 1/14/2010 $ (464,000 ) $ (278,000 )
$
10,000,000 2.920 % 2/1/2008 2/1/2010 $ (106,000 ) $ (64,000 )
$
10,000,000 2.785 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2010 $ (47,000 ) $ (28,000 )
$
10,000,000 3.033 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2011 $ (81,000 ) $ (49,000 )
$
10,000,000 2.820 % 2/1/2008 2/1/2009 $ (100,000 ) $ (60,000 )

1 Previous to the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008, this swap had not been designated as an effective cash flow hedge. The swap was designated as an effective cash flow hedge during the quarter ended March 29, 2008. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the net reduction of $0.2 million in the fair value of this swap prior to the designation date has been recorded as a loss in earnings for the first quarter 2008.

16

12) Segment Information

The company operates in three reportable operating segments defined by management reporting structure and operating activities.

The Commercial Foodservice Equipment business group manufactures cooking equipment for the restaurant and institutional kitchen industry. This business segment has manufacturing facilities in California, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Denmark and the Philippines. The Commercial Foodservice Equipment group manufactures conveyor ovens, convection ovens, fryers, ranges, toasters, combi ovens, steamers, broilers, deck ovens, baking ovens, proofers, beverage systems and beverage dispensing equipment, counter-top cooking and warming equipment. This business segment’s principal product lines include Middleby Marshall® and CTX® conveyor oven equipment, Blodgett® convection ovens, conveyor ovens, deck oven equipment, Blodgett Combi® cooking equipment, Blodgett Range® ranges, Nu-Vu® baking ovens and proofers, Pitco Frialator® fryer equipment, Southbend® ranges, convection ovens and heavy-duty cooking equipment, Toastmaster® toasters and counterline cooking and warming equipment, Jade Range® ranges and ovens, Carter Hoffmann® warming, holding and transporting equipment, Bloomfield® beverage systems and beverage dispensing equipment, Wells® convection ovens, counterline cooking equipment and ventless cooking systems, Star® light duty cooking equipment, Holman® toasting equipment, Lang® ovens and ranges, Houno® combi-ovens and baking ovens and MagiKitch'n® charbroilers and catering equipment.

The Food Processing Equipment business group manufactures cooking and packaging equipment for the food processing industry. This business segment has manufacturing facilities in Georgia and Wisconsin. Its principal products include Alkar ® batch ovens, conveyorized ovens and continuous process ovens, RapidPak ® food packaging machinery and MP Equipment ® breading, battering, mixing, forming, and slicing equipment.

The International Distribution Division provides integrated sales, export management, distribution and installation services through its operations in China, India, Lebanon, Mexico, the Philippines, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. The division sells the company’s product lines and certain non-competing complementary product lines throughout the world. For a local country distributor or dealer, the company is able to provide a centralized source of foodservice equipment with complete export management and product support services.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The chief decision maker evaluates individual segment performance based on operating income. Management believes that intersegment sales are made at established arms-length transfer prices.

17

Net Sales Summary

(dollars in thousands)

Three Months Ended
Mar. 29, 2008 Mar. 31, 2007
Sales Percent Sales Percent
Business
Divisions:
Commercial
Foodservice $ 134,016 83.3 $ 90,539 85.7
Food
Processing 19,888 12.4 12,196 11.5
International
Distribution(1) 15,793 9.8 13,576 12.8
Intercompany
sales (2) (8,814 ) (5.5 ) (10,616 ) (10.0 )
Total $ 160,883 100.0 % $ 105,695 100.0 %

(1) Consists of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products manufactured by third parties.

(2) Represents the elimination of sales from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International Distribution Division .

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the company's business segments (1) (in thousands):

| | Commercial — Foodservice | Food — Processing | International — Distribution | Corporate — and
Other (2) | Eliminations (3) | | | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Three
months ended March 29, 2008 | | | | | | | | |
| Net
sales | $ 134,016 | $ 19,888 | $ 15,793 | $ — | $ | (8,814 | ) | $ 160,883 |
| Operating
income | 30,547 | 2,789 | 1,074 | (8,442 | ) | 48 | | 26,016 |
| Depreciation
expense | 1,269 | 104 | 52 | 37 | | — | | 1,462 |
| Net
capital expenditures | 1,899 | 51 | 152 | 22 | | — | | 2,124 |
| Total
assets | 475,583 | 68,202 | 29,887 | 43,634 | | (10,480 | ) | 606,826 |
| Long-lived
assets (4) | 335,317 | 37,766 | 713 | 17,711 | | — | | 391,507 |
| Three
months ended March 31, 2007 | | | | | | | | |
| Net
sales | $ 90,539 | $ 12,196 | $ 13,576 | $ — | $ | (10,616 | ) | $ 105,695 |
| Operating
income | 21,788 | 2,400 | 846 | (6,282 | ) | 54 | | 18,806 |
| Depreciation
expense | 695 | 127 | 43 | 36 | | — | | 901 |
| Net
capital expenditures | 520 | 6 | 11 | 61 | | — | | 598 |
| Total
assets | 217,440 | 49,241 | 29,430 | 1,985 | | (6,523 | ) | 291,573 |
| Long-lived
assets (4) | 129,492 | 27,736 | 433 | 8,878 | | — | | 166,539 |

(1) Non-operating expenses are not allocated to the operating segments. Non-operating expenses consist of interest expense and deferred financing amortization, foreign exchange gains and losses and other income and expense items outside of income from operations.

(2) Includes corporate and other general company assets and operations.

(3) Includes elimination of intercompany sales, profit in inventory and intercompany receivables. Intercompany sale transactions are predominantly from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International Distribution Division.

(4) Long-lived assets of the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group includes assets located in the Philippines which amounted to $1,907 and $1,975 in first quarter 2008 and 2007, respectively and assets located in Denmark which amounted to $2,625 and $1,042 in first quarter 2008 and 2007, respectively.

18

Net sales by major geographic region, including those sales from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group direct to international customers, were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended — Mar. 29, 2008 Mar. 31, 2007
United
States and Canada $ 132,953 $ 86,032
Asia 7,152 5,473
Europe
and Middle East 16,371 10,777
Latin
America 4,407 3,413
Net
sales $ 160,883 $ 105,695

13) Employee Retirement Plans

(a) Pension Plans

The company maintains a non-contributory defined benefit plan for its union employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility. Benefits are determined based upon retirement age and years of service with the company. This defined benefit plan was frozen on April 30, 2002 and no further benefits accrue to the participants beyond this date. Plan participants will receive or continue to receive payments for benefits earned on or prior to April 30, 2002 upon reaching retirement age. The employees participating in the defined benefit plan were enrolled in a newly established 401K savings plan on September 30, 2002, further described below.

The company also maintains a retirement benefit agreement with its Chairman. The retirement benefits are based upon a percentage of the Chairman’s final base salary. Additionally, the company maintains a retirement plan for non-employee directors. The plan provides for an annual benefit upon a change in control of the company or retirement from the Board of Directors at age 70, equal to 100% of the director’s last annual retainer, payable for a number of years equal to the director’s years of service up to a maximum of 10 years.

Contributions under the union plan are funded in accordance with provisions of The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. There are no contributions expected to be made in 2008. Contributions to the directors' plan are based upon actual retirement benefits as they retire.

(b) 401K Savings Plans

The company maintains two separate defined contribution 401K savings plans covering all employees in the United States. These two plans separately cover the union employees at the Elgin, Illinois facility and all other remaining union and non-union employees in the United States. The company makes profit sharing contributions to the various plans in accordance with the requirements of the plan. Profit sharing contributions for the Elgin Union 401K savings plans are made in accordance with the agreement.

19

14) Subsequent Events

On April 22, 2008, the company completed its acquisition of Giga Grandi Cucine, S.r.l for 12.9 Euro including 6.2 million Euro paid in cash at closing, 3.4 million of deferred payments due to the sellers, and 3.3 million Euro in assumed debt. Giga is a leading European manufacturer of a broad line of commercial cooking equipment, including ranges, ovens and steam cooking equipment.

On April 23, 2008, the company completed its acquisition of the net assets and related business operations of FriFri aro SA from the Franke Group. FriFri is a leading European manufacturer of frying systems.

20

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Informational Note

This report contains forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company cautions readers that these projections are based upon future results or events and are highly dependent upon a variety of important factors which could cause such results or events to differ materially from any forward-looking statements which may be deemed to have been made in this report, or which are otherwise made by or on behalf of the company. Such factors include, but are not limited to, volatility in earnings resulting from goodwill impairment losses which may occur irregularly and in varying amounts; variability in financing costs; quarterly variations in operating results; dependence on key customers; international exposure; foreign exchange and political risks affecting international sales; ability to protect trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property; changing market conditions; the impact of competitive products and pricing; the timely development and market acceptance of the company’s products; the availability and cost of raw materials; and other risks detailed herein and from time-to-time in the company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including the company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

21

Net Sales Summary

(dollars in thousands)

Three Months Ended
Mar. 29, 2008 Mar. 31, 2007
Sales Percent Sales Percent
Business
Divisions:
Commercial
Foodservice $ 134,016 83.3 $ 90,539 85.7
Food
Processing 19,888 12.4 12,196 11.5
International
Distribution(1) 15,793 9.8 13,576 12.8
Intercompany
sales (2) (8,814 ) (5.5 ) (10,616 ) (10.0 )
Total $ 160,883 100.0 % $ 105,695 100.0 %

(1) Consists of sales of products manufactured by Middleby and products manufactured by third parties.

(2) Represents the elimination of sales from the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group to the International Distribution Division.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of earnings items as a percentage of net sales for the periods.

Mar. 29, 2008 Mar. 31, 2007
Net
sales 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost
of sales 63.4 61.1
Gross
profit 36.6 38.9
Selling,
general and administrative expenses 20.4 21.1
Income
from operations 16.2 17.8
Net
interest expense and deferred financing amortization 2.3 1.2
Other
(income) expense, net 0.2 (0.1 )
Earnings
before income taxes 13.7 16.7
Provision
for income taxes 5.5 6.6
Net
earnings 8.2 % 10.1 %

22

Three Months Ended March 29, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2007

NET SALES . Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 were $160.9 million as compared to $105.7 million in the first quarter of 2007.

Net sales at the Commercial Foodservice Equipment Group amounted to $134.0 million in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to $90.5 million in the prior year quarter.

Net sales from the acquisitions of Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, Wells Bloomfield and Star which were acquired on April 1, 2007, June 29, 2007, August 3, 2007 and December 31, 2007, respectively, accounted for an increase of $45.6 million during the first quarter of 2008. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales of commercial foodservice equipment were flat, reflecting the impact of deferred customer purchases due to slowed economic conditions.

Net sales for the Food Processing Equipment Group amounted to $19.9 million in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to $12.2 million in the prior year quarter. Net sales of MP Equipment, which was acquired on July 2, 2007, accounted for an increase of $9.7 million. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, net sales of food processing equipment decreased $2.0 million due to delayed customer purchases as a result of economic uncertainties and quarterly variations which occur as a result of the timing of large orders .

Net sales at the International Distribution Division increased by $2.2 million to $15.8 million or 16%, reflecting higher sales in Asia, Europe and Latin America. Increased international sales reflect increased business with restaurant chains and increased pricing competitiveness driven by the weakened US dollar.

GROSS PROFIT . Gross profit increased to $58.9 million in the first quarter of 2008 from $41.1 million in the prior year period, reflecting the impact of higher sales volumes. The gross margin rate was 36.6% in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to 38.9% in the prior year quarter. The net decrease in the gross margin rate reflects:

· Acquisition accounting adjustments of $1.5 million to revalue inventories related to Star which reduced gross margins in the first quarter.

· The adverse impact of steel costs which have risen significantly from the prior year quarter.

· Lower margins at the newly acquired Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment, Wells Bloomfield and Star operations which are in the process of being integrated within the company.

23

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES . Combined selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $22.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $32.9 million in the first quarter of 2008. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses decreased from 21.1% in the first quarter of 2007 to 20.4% in the first quarter of 2008. Selling expenses increased from $11.1 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $16.2 million in the first quarter of 2008, reflecting $5.2 million of incremental costs associated with the acquisitions of Jade completed on April 1, 2007, Carter-Hoffmann, completed June 29, 2007, MP Equipment, completed July 2, 2007, Wells Bloomfield, completed August 3, 2007 and Star completed on December 31, 2007. General and administrative expenses increased from $11.2 million in the first quarter of 2007 to $16.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. General and administrative expenses reflects $4.5 million of costs associated with the acquired operations of Jade, Carter-Hoffmann, MP Equipment, Wells Bloomfield and Star. Increased general and administrative costs also include increased non-cash stock compensation costs which increased by $1.2 million from the prior year first quarter.

NON-OPERATING EXPENSES. Interest and deferred financing amortization costs increased to $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2007, due to increased borrowings resulting from recent acquisitions. Other expense of $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2008 compared unfavorably to other income of $0.1 million in the prior year first quarter. Other expense in the first quarter of 2008 included $0.2 million of unrealized losses on financing derivatives and $0.2 million of foreign exchange losses.

INCOME TAXES . A tax provision of $8.7 million, at an effective rate of 40%, was recorded during the first quarter of 2008, as compared to a $6.9 million provision at a 39% effective rate in the prior year quarter.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

During the three months ended March 29, 2008, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $2.0 million to $5.5 million at March 29, 2008 from $7.5 million at December 29, 2007. Net borrowings increased from $96.2 million at December 29, 2007 to $272.7 million at March 29, 2008.

OPERATING ACTIVITIES . Net cash provided by operating activities was $12.6 million for the three-month period ended March 29, 2008 compared to cash used of $4.4 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007.

During the three months ended March 29, 2008, working capital levels changed due to normal business fluctuations, including the impact of increased seasonal working capital needs. The changes in working capital included a $0.8 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $1.6 million increase in inventory, a $3.8 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets and a $5.5 million increase in accounts payable. Accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities also decreased by $17.7 million reflecting first quarter payout of customer rebates and incentive compensation related to prior year programs.

INVESTING ACTIVITIES . During the three months ended March 29, 2008, net cash used in investing activities amounted to $190.2 million. This includes $188.1 million associated with the acquisition of Star, $1.2 million associated with the purchase of a manufacturing facility for Carter Hoffmann which had been leased and $0.9 million of capital expenditures associated with additions and upgrades of production equipment.

24

FINANCING ACTIVITIES. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $175.6 million during the three months ended March 29, 2008. The net increase in debt includes $176.3 million in borrowings under the company’s $450 million revolving credit facility and $0.2 million of repayments of foreign bank loans.

At March 29, 2008, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its borrowing agreements. Management believes that future cash flows from operating activities and borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility will provide the company with sufficient financial resources to meet its anticipated requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and debt amortization for the foreseeable future.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on the financial statements.

In December 2007, the FAS issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations”. This statement provides companies with principles and requirements on how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. This statement also requires certain disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination will generally be expensed as incurred. This statement is effective for business combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption of FASB Statement No. 141R is not permitted. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this guidance will have on the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company will adopt this statement for acquisitons consummated after the statements effective date.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Upon its adoption, effective as of the beginning of the company’s 2009 fiscal year, noncontrolling interests will be classified as equity in the company’s financial statements and income and comprehensive income attributed to the noncontrolling interest will be included in the company’s income and comprehensive income. The provisions of this standard must be applied retrospectively upon adoption. The company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material impact on its financial statements.

25

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” This statement amends SFAS No. 133 to require enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The company is evaluating the impact the application of this guidance will have on the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, the company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition. The company recognizes revenue on the sale of its products when risk of loss has passed to the customer, which occurs at the time of shipment, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The sale prices of the products sold are fixed and determinable at the time of shipment. Sales are reported net of sales returns, sales incentives and cash discounts based on prior experience and other quantitative and qualitative factors.

At the food processing equipment group, the company enters into long-term sales contracts for certain products. Revenue under these long term sales contracts is recognized using the percentage of completion method prescribed by Statement of Position No. 81-1 due to the length of time to fully manufacture and assemble the equipment. The company measures revenue recognized based on the ratio of actual labor hours incurred in relation to the total estimated labor hours to be incurred related to the contract. Because estimated labor hours to complete a project are based upon forecasts using the best available information, the actual hours may differ from the original estimates. The percentage of completion method of accounting for these contracts most accurately reflects the status of these uncompleted contracts in the company’s financial statements and most accurately measures the matching of revenues and expenses. At the time a loss on a contract becomes known, the amount of the estimated loss is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

Property and equipment: Property and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the assets will be utilized to benefit the operations of the company. The useful lives are estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into account anticipated technological or other changes. The company periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property and equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened, resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense in future periods.

Long-lived assets: Long-lived assets (including goodwill and other intangibles) are reviewed for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of the company's long-lived assets, the company considers changes in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments based on the company's experience and knowledge of operations. These estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation, competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the company's estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the company may be required to record impairment charges.

Warranty: In the normal course of business the company issues product warranties for specific product lines and provides for the estimated future warranty cost in the period in which the sale is recorded. The estimate of warranty cost is based on contract terms and historical warranty loss experience that is periodically adjusted for recent actual experience. Because warranty estimates are forecasts that are based on the best available information, claims costs may differ from amounts provided. Adjustments to initial obligations for warranties are made as changes in the obligations become reasonably estimable.

26

Litigation: From time to time, the company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to products, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The company maintains insurance to partially cover product liability, workers compensation, property and casualty, and general liability matters. The company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after assessment of each matter and the related insurance coverage. The reserve requirements may change in the future due to new developments or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. The company does not believe that any pending litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Income taxes: The company operates in numerous foreign and domestic taxing jurisdictions where it is subject to various types of tax, including sales tax and income tax. The company's tax filings are subject to audits and adjustments. Because of the nature of the company’s operations, the nature of the audit items can be complex, and the objectives of the government auditors can result in a tax on the same transaction or income in more than one state or country. The company initially recognizes the financial statement effects of a tax position when it more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examiniation. For tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the company initially and subsequently measures its tax positions as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon effective settlement with the taxing authority. As part of the company's calculation of the provision for taxes, the company has recorded liabilities on various tax positions that are currently under audit by the taxing authorities. The liabilities may change in the future upon effective settlement of the tax positions.

Contractual Obligations

The company's contractual cash payment obligations as of March 29, 2008 are set forth below (in thousands):

Deferred Idle Total — Contractual
Acquisition Long-term Operating Facility Cash
Costs Debt Leases Leases Obligations
Less
than 1 year $ — $ 2,661 $ 2,661 $ 332 $ 5,654
1-3
years 2,000 482 3,350 793 6,625
3-5
years 1,814 903 870 3,587
After
5 years 267,700 53 1,031 268,784
$ 2,000 $ 272,657 $ 6,967 $ 3,026 $ 284,650

Idle facility leases consists of an obligation for a manufacturing location that was exited in conjunction with the company's manufacturing consolidation efforts. This lease obligation continues through June 2015. This facility has been subleased. The obligation presented above does not reflect any anticipated sublease income from the facilities.

27

The projected benefit obligation of the company’s defined benefit plans exceeded the plans’ assets by $4.6 million at the end of 2007 as compared to $3.5 million at the end of 2006. The unfunded benefit obligations were comprised of a $0.6 million under funding of the company's union plan and $4.0 million of under funding of the company's director plans. The company does not expect to contribute to the director plans in 2008. The company made minimum contributions required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) of $0.1 million in 2007 to the company's union plan. The company does not expect to make contributions in 2008 to the union plan.

The company has $4.1 million in outstanding letters of credit, which expire on March 29, 2009, to secure potential obligations under insurance programs.

The company places purchase orders with its suppliers in the ordinary course of business. These purchase orders are generally to fulfill short-term manufacturing requirements of less than 90 days and most are cancelable with a restocking penalty. The company has no long-term purchase contracts or minimum purchase obligations with any supplier.

The company has contractual obligations under its various debt agreements to make interest payments. These amounts are subject to the level of borrowings in future periods and the interest rate for the applicable periods, and therefore the amounts of these payments is not determinable.

The company has an obligation to make $2.0 million of purchase price payments to the sellers of MP Equipment that were deferred in conjunction with the acquisition.

The company has no activities, obligations or exposures associated with off-balance sheet arrangements.

28

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

The company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. The following table summarizes the maturity of the company’s debt obligations.

Fixed Variable
Rate Rate
Twelve Month Period Ending Debt Debt
(in
thousands)
March
29, 2009 $ — $ 2,661
March
29, 2010 241
March
29, 2011 241
March
29, 2012 241
March
29, 2013 269,273
$ — $ 272,657

During the fourth quarter of 2007 the company entered into a new senior secured credit facility. Terms of the senior credit agreement provide for $450.0 million of availability under a revolving credit line. As of March 29, 2008, the company had $267.7 million of borrowings outstanding under this facility. The company also has $4.1 million in outstanding letters of credit, which reduces the borrowing availability under the revolving credit line.

Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are assessed at an interest rate at 1.25% above LIBOR for long-term borrowings or at the higher of the Prime rate and the Federal Funds Rate. At March 29, 2008 the average interest rate on the senior debt amounted to 4.21%. The interest rates on borrowings under the senior bank facility may be adjusted quarterly based on the company’s defined indebtedness ratio on a rolling four-quarter basis. Additionally, a commitment fee, based upon the indebtedness ratio is charged on the unused portion of the revolving credit line. This variable commitment fee amounted to 0.25% as of March 29, 2008.

In August 2006, the company completed its acquisition of Houno A/S in Denmark. This acquisition was funded in part with locally established debt facilities with borrowings in Danish Krone. On March 29, 2008 these facilities amounted to $5.0 million in US dollars, including $2.6 million outstanding under a revolving credit facility and $2.4 million of a term loan. The interest rate on the revolving credit facility is assessed at 1.25% above Euro LIBOR, which amounted to 5.41% on March 29, 2008. The term loan matures in 2013 and the interest rate is assessed at 5.62%.

29

The company has historically entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively fix the interest rate on its outstanding debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for fixed rates. As of March 29, 2008 the company had the following interest rate swaps in effect:

Notional Fixed — Interest Effective Maturity
Amount Rate Date Date
$
10,000,000 5.030 % 03/03/06 12/21/09
$
10,000,000 2.520 % 2/13/2008 2/19/2009
$
20,000,000 2.635 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2009
$
25,000,000 3.350 % 1/14/2008 1/14/2010
$
10,000,000 2.920 % 2/1/2008 2/1/2010
$
10,000,000 2.785 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2010
$
10,000,000 3.033 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2011
$
10,000,000 2.820 % 2/1/2008 2/1/2009

The terms of the senior secured credit facility limit the paying of dividends, capital expenditures and leases, and require, among other things, certain ratios of indebtedness and fixed charge coverage. The credit agreement also provides that if a material adverse change in the company’s business operations or conditions occurs, the lender could declare an event of default. Under terms of the agreement a material adverse effect is defined as (a) a material adverse change in, or a material adverse effect upon, the operations, business properties, condition (financial and otherwise) or prospects of the company and its subsidiaries taken as a whole; (b) a material impairment of the ability of the company to perform under the loan agreements and to avoid any event of default; or (c) a material adverse effect upon the legality, validity, binding effect or enforceability against the company of any loan document. A material adverse effect is determined on a subjective basis by the company's creditors. The credit facility is secured by the capital stock of the company’s domestic subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of the company’s foreign subsidiaries and substantially all other assets of the company. At March 29, 2008, the company was in compliance with all covenants pursuant to its borrowing agreements.

30

Financing Derivative Instruments

The company has entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate applicable to certain of its variable-rate debt. The agreements swap one-month LIBOR for a fixed rates. The company has designated these swaps as cash flow hedges and all changes in fair value of the swaps are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. As of March 29, 2008, the fair value of these instruments was $1.4 million. The change in fair value of these swap agreements in the first three months of 2008 was a loss of $0.5 million, net of taxes.

A summary of the company’s interest rate swaps is as follows:

Notional Fixed — Interest Effective Maturity Fair Value Changes — In Fair Value
Amount Rate Date Date Mar. 29, 2008 (net of taxes)
$
10,000,000 5.030 % 03/03/06 12/21/09 $ (462,000 ) $ (9,000 ) 1
$
10,000,000 2.520 % 2/13/2008 2/19/2009 $ (28,000 ) $ (17,000 )
$
20,000,000 2.635 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2009 $ (65,000 ) $ (39,000 )
$
25,000,000 3.350 % 1/14/2008 1/14/2010 $ (464,000 ) $ (278,000 )
$
10,000,000 2.920 % 2/1/2008 2/1/2010 $ (106,000 ) $ (64,000 )
$
10,000,000 2.785 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2010 $ (47,000 ) $ (28,000 )
$
10,000,000 3.033 % 2/6/2008 2/6/2011 $ (81,000 ) $ (49,000 )
$
10,000,000 2.820 % 2/1/2008 2/1/2009 $ (100,000 ) $ (60,000 )

1 Previous to the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2008, this swap had not been designated as an effective cash flow hedge. The swap was designated as an effective cash flow hedge during the quarter ended March 29, 2008. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the net reduction of $0.2 million in the fair value of this swap prior to the designation date has been recorded as a loss in earnings for the first quarter 2008.

Foreign Exchange Derivative Financial Instruments

The company uses foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms of less than one year to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The company’s primary hedging activities are to mitigate its exposure to changes in exchange rates on intercompany and third party trade receivables and payables. The company does not currently enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. In managing its foreign currency exposures, the company identifies and aggregates naturally occurring offsetting positions and then hedges residual balance sheet exposures. There was no forward contract outstanding at the end of the quarter.

31

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of March 29, 2008, the company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the company's management, including the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of this period.

During the quarter ended March 29, 2008, there has been no change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting.

32

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

The company was not required to report the information pursuant to Items 1 through 6 of Part II of Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 29, 2008, except as follows:

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors as set forth in the company's 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

| December
30, 2007 to January 26, 2008 | 4,869 | - | 4,869 | 842,132 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| January
27, 2008 to February 23, 2008 | - | - | - | 842,132 |
| February
24, 2008 to March 29, 2008 | - | - | - | 842,132 |
| Quarter
ended March 29, 2008 | 4,869 | - | 4,869 | 842,132 |

In July 1998, the company's Board of Directors adopted a stock repurchase program that authorized the purchase of common shares in open market purchases. As of March 29, 2008, 957,868 shares had been purchased under the 1998 stock repurchase program. 4,869 shares were repurchased by the company during the three month period ended March 29, 2008.

Item 6. Exhibits

| Exhibits
– The
following exhibits are filed herewith: | |
| --- | --- |
| Exhibit
31.1 – | Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| Exhibit
31.2 – | Rule
13a-14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
| Exhibit
32.1 – | Certification
by the Principal Executive Officer of The Middleby Corporation
Pursuant to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350). |
| Exhibit
32.2 – | Certification
by the Principal Financial Officer of The Middleby Corporation
Pursuant to
Rule 13A-14(b) under the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C.
1350). |

33

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

| | THE
MIDDLEBY CORPORATION | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | (Registrant) | |
| Date
May 8, 2008 | By: | /s/
Timothy J. FitzGerald |
| | | Timothy
J. FitzGerald |
| | | Vice
President, |
| | | Chief
Financial Officer |

34