AI assistant
MIDAS MINERALS LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2023
Oct 26, 2023
65345_rns_2023-10-26_ddf06839-2161-4fc2-91b5-9b93eab31a0e.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX / MEDIA ANNOUNCEMENT 27 October 2023
==> picture [118 x 68] intentionally omitted <==
Midas stakes Reid-Aylmer Lithium Project NWT, Canada
Highlights
-
Midas has staked 15 claims totalling 157km[2] in Northwest Territories, Canada, known as the Reid-Aylmer Lithium Project, following a regional review
-
Project claims are between 180km-300km NE of the Company’s Yellowknife Lithium Project, also in NWT
-
Located proximal to the large Diavik and Gahcho Kué diamond mines
-
Numerous pegmatite swarms considered prospective for lithium have been identified by Midas’ technical team within the Project claims
-
Midas has collected and submitted 39 samples from surface sampling of these pegmatite outcrops, results expected March quarter 2024
-
Midas has received grant of nine of the new claims, with six recent applications pending
-
Results from sampling at Yellowknife Lithium Project expected by mid-November 2023.
Midas Minerals Ltd (“Midas”, or “the Company”) ( ASX: MM1 ) is pleased to announce it has staked 15 mineral claims totalling 157km[2] in the Northwest Territories, Canada.
The claims representing the Reid-Aylmer Lithium Project (“RALP”) were staked over pegmatite swarms considered prospective for lithium.
The Project is located in the NWT diamond field, located 180-300km northeast of Midas’ Yellowknife Lithium Project. Access from the city of Yellowknife is via sealed and predominately ice roads that service the large Ekati, Diavik, and Gahcho Kué diamond mines and various exploration bases and former mine sites.
The Reid Lake and Aylmer Lake region is known for lithium occurrences and is geologically similar to the Yellowknife pegmatite field.
Midas has staked areas following a detailed regional geology review and ground truthing by the Company’s technical team. Nine of the claims have been granted, with six recent applications pending.
Importantly, Midas will have 100% interest in these claims upon granting, which will continue to strengthen its asset base in the region.
Midas has completed initial sampling, with 39 pegmatite samples submitted for analysis. Results are expected in the March quarter of 2024. Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations.
Midas Managing Director Mark Calderwood commented: “The Reid-Aylmer Project represents Midas’ second lithium project in the NWT, expanding our lithium portfolio in the region. The Project is representative of our in-house ability to secure new properties through geological vectors and good science. The Company will provide an update for the project following receipt of sampling results expected in first quarter of 2024.
“We expect to receive further assay results from sampling on the Yellowknife Lithium Project within a month”.
LEGAL58475620.1 Midas Minerals Limited* | Level 2, 8 Richardson Street, West Perth WA 6005 P: +61 8 6383 6595 | E: [email protected] www.midasminerals.com
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [489 x 458] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Reid-Aylmer Lithium Project Claim Locations
2
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [345 x 328] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Reid Lake Claim Locations
==> picture [346 x 331] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: King Lake Claim Locations
3
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [489 x 465] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Aylmer Lake Claims
The Board of Midas Minerals Limited authorised this release.
For more information: Mark Calderwood Nathan Ryan Managing Director Media / Investor Relations E: [email protected] E: [email protected]
4
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
About Midas
Midas Minerals is a junior mineral exploration company with a primary focus on lithium and gold. Midas’ Board and management has a strong track record of delivering value for shareholders through mineral discoveries and mine development and growing microcap explorers into successful ASX100-ASX300 companies. The Company has three projects located in Western Australia (refer below), as well as the Greenbush Project in Ontario, Canada and the Yellowknife Lithium Project and Reid-Aylmer Lithium Project, in the Northwest Territories, Canada.
==> picture [249 x 245] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [230 x 242] intentionally omitted <==
Midas Minerals Canadian Projects Midas Minerals Western Australia Projects Location Map Location Map
Yellowknife Lithium Project: The Company can earn up to 80% of 718km[2] of mineral claims and applications located outside Yellowknife City, Northwest Territories. Large numbers of pegmatites associated with multiple fertile granite intrusions of Slave Cration. Several known lithium and tantalum occurrences on the project and a number of significant lithium deposits located nearby. Exploration has commenced to map and sample pegmatite swarms.
Greenbush Lithium Project: 102km[2] of mining claims located proximal to infrastructure, with little outcrop and no historic drilling. A 15m by 30m spodumene bearing pegmatite outcrop was discovered in 1955 on the northeast shore of a lake and initial sampling by Midas has returned results up to 3.82% Li ₂ O from the main outcrop and surrounds, as well as anomalous tantalum occurrences demonstrating regional upside potential (refer ASX release dated 13 July 2023). Further mapping and sampling are planned in parallel with seeking drilling permits. Midas also holds the 2.1km[2] Barbara Lake Project about 130km northeast of Thunder Bay.
Newington Lithium-Gold Project: 316km[2] of tenements located at the north end of the Southern Cross and Westonia greenstone belts, prospective for lithium and gold. Exploration in 2022 has outlined anomalous lithium and LCT indicator elements over at least 20km strike. Initial drilling intercepted pegmatites that are laterally extensive, wide and gently dipping. The project also has a number of gold targets and includes significant prior drill intercepts that justify follow-up exploration.
Weebo Gold Project: Tier 1 location within the Yandal greenstone belt with 323km[2] of tenements between the Thunderbox and Bronzewing gold mines, prospective for gold and nickel. Drilling in 2022 intercepted significant gold mineralisation on several prospects. A number of additional gold and nickel geochemical and geophysical anomalies have been defined.
Challa Gold, Nickel-Copper-PGE Project: 907km[2] of tenement and applications with limited but successful exploration to date. A number of significant PGE and gold-copper exploration targets have been defined.
5
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to new Exploration Results is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation prepared by Mr Mark Calderwood, the managing director of the Company. Mr Calderwood is a Competent Person and is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Calderwood has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (“JORC Code”). Mr Calderwood consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information and supporting documents in the form and context in which it appears.
Mr Calderwood is a shareholder of the Company and the Company does not consider this to constitute an actual or potential conflict of interest to his role as Competent Person due to the overarching duties he owes to the Company. Mr Calderwood is not aware of any other relationship with Midas which could constitute a potential for a conflict of interest.
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement may contain certain forward-looking statements and projections, including statements regarding Midas’ plans, forecasts and projections with respect to its mineral properties and programmes. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this release reflect management’s current beliefs based upon information currently available to management and based upon what management believes to be reasonable assumptions, such forward looking statements/projections are estimates for discussion purposes only and should not be relied upon. They are not guarantees of future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors many of which are beyond the control of the Company.
The forward looking statements/projections are inherently uncertain and may therefore differ materially from results ultimately achieved. For example, there can be no assurance that Midas will be able to confirm the presence of Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves, that Midas’ plans for development of its mineral properties will proceed, that any mineralisation will prove to be economic, or that a mine will be successfully developed on any of Midas’ mineral properties. The performance of Midas may be influenced by a number of factors which are outside the control of the Company, its directors, staff or contractors.
The Company does not make any representations and provides no warranties concerning the accuracy of the projections, and disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward looking statements/projects based on new information, future events or otherwise except to the extent required by applicable laws.
6
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
APPENDIX A: PEGMATITE LOCATIONS
| E | N | Source | Comments | Mineralisation1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 612727 | 7117387 |
Midas |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 610896 | 7131468 |
Midas |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 611439 | 7130493 |
Midas |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 561559 | 7084518 |
Midas |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 614300 | 7134300 |
In drill core |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 513812 | 7073554 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 513458 | 7073005 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 513423 | 7072981 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 512980 | 7072817 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 511782 | 7070038 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 512400 | 7072075 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 550450 | 7073568 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 550432 | 7073417 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 550417 | 7073276 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 550468 | 7073155 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 551044 | 7072512 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | granite pegmatite, mineralogy not recorded |
| 552658 | 7071570 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 552623 | 7077642 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 552756 | 7077806 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 552803 | 7077783 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 552818 | 7077746 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 552691 | 7077850 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 614961 | 7115033 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 613393 | 7117533 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 611308 | 7114716 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 610446 | 7114577 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 614205 | 7115789 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 611865 | 7114808 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 611465 | 7115805 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 551329 | 7073519 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis | ||||
| 551232 | 7073457 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis |
7
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
| E | N | Source | Comments | Mineralisation1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 551117 | 7073418 |
Prior Mapping |
Pegmatites may be singular or multiple | quartz, feldspar, muscovite, LCT mineralogy |
| pending analysis |
Notes:
1. Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. The Company will provide an update for the project following receipt of sampling results expected in first quarter of 2024.
8
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
APPENDIX B: JORC CODE 2012 EDITION, TABLE 1 FOR EXPLORATION RESULTS
Section 1 – Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • | Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, | Not applicable, no sample results being reported. |
| techniques | random chips, or specific specialised industry | ||
| standard measurement tools appropriate to the | |||
| minerals under investigation, such as d own hole | |||
| gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). | |||
| These examples should not be taken as limiting the | |||
| broad meaning of sampling. | |||
| • | Include reference to measures taken to ensure | ||
| sample representativity and the appropriate | |||
| calibration of any measurement tools or systems | |||
| used. | |||
| • | Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that | ||
| are Material to the Public Report. In cases where | |||
| ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would | |||
| be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling | |||
| was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg | |||
| was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire | |||
| assay’). In other cases more explanation may be | |||
| required, such as where there is coarse gold that | |||
| has inherent sampling problems. Unusual | |||
| commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine | |||
| nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed | |||
| information. | |||
| Drilling | • | Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole | Not applicable as no drilling has been undertaken. |
| techniques | hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) | ||
| and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard | |||
| tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or | |||
| other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by | |||
| what method, etc.). | |||
| Drill sample | • | Method of recording and assessing core and chip | Not applicable as no drilling has been undertaken. |
| recovery | sample recoveries and results assessed. | ||
| • | Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and | ||
| ensure representative nature of the samples. | |||
| • | Whether a relationship exists between sample | ||
| recovery and grade and whether sample bias may | |||
| have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of | |||
| fine/coarse material. | |||
| Logging | • | Whether core and chip samples have been | Not applicable, no sample results being reported. |
| geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of | |||
| detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource | |||
| estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. | |||
| • | Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in | ||
| nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) | |||
| photography | |||
| • | The total length and percentage of the relevant | ||
| intersections logged. |
9
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub- | • | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, | Not applicable, no sample results being reported. |
| sampling | half or all core taken. | ||
| techniques and sample preparation |
• • |
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and |
|
| appropriateness of the sample preparation | |||
| technique. | |||
| • | Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- | ||
| sampling stages to maximise representivity of | |||
| samples. | |||
| • | Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is | ||
| representative of the in situ material collected, | |||
| including for instance results for field | |||
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | |||
| • | Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain | ||
| size of the material being sampled. | |||
| Quality of | • | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the | Not applicable, no sample results being reported. |
| assay data | assaying and laboratory procedures used and | ||
| and | whether the technique is considered partial or total. | ||
| laboratory tests |
• | For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in |
|
| determining the analysis including instrument make | |||
| and model, reading times, calibrations factors | |||
| applied and their derivation, etc. | |||
| • | Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. | ||
| standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory | |||
| checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy | |||
| (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been | |||
| established. | |||
| Verification | • | The verification of significant intersections by either | Not applicable as no new drilling is being |
| of sampling | independent or alternative company personnel. | reported. | |
| and assaying |
• • |
The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry |
|
| procedures, data verification, data storage (physical | |||
| and electronic) protocols. | |||
| • | Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | ||
| Location of | • | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill | Any grid references are presented in UTM Zone |
| data points | holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, | 12 NAD 83 | |
| mine workings and other locations used in Mineral | |||
| Resource estimation. | |||
| • | Specification of the grid system used. | ||
| • | Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | ||
| Data | • | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | Not applicable as no new drilling is being |
| spacing and distribution |
• |
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and |
reported. |
| grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral | |||
| Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) | |||
| and classifications applied. | |||
| • | Whether sample compositing has been applied. |
10
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orientation | • | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves | Not applicable as no new drilling is being |
| of data in | unbiased sampling of possible structures and the | reported. | |
| relation to | extent to which this is known, considering the | ||
| geological | deposit type. | ||
| structure | • | If the relationship between the drilling orientation | |
| and the orientation of key mineralised structures is | |||
| considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this | |||
| should be assessed and reported if material. | |||
| Routine | • | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | Not applicable, no sample results being reported. |
| Sample | |||
| security | |||
| Audits or | • | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling | Not applicable as no new drilling is being |
| reviews | techniques and data. | reported. |
Section 2 - Reporting of Exploration Results
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • | Type, reference name/number, location and | The Reid-Aylmer Lithium Project area comprises |
| tenement and | ownership including agreements or material issues | 15 tenements blocks in three tenement groups in |
|
| land tenure | with third parties such as joint ventures, | which Midas Minerals Ltd has a 100% beneficial | |
| status | partnerships, overriding royalties, native title | interest in, detailed as follows: | |
| interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. |
KingClaim number: M11772 ReidClaim numbers: M11773-M11778 |
||
| • | The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. |
AlymerClaim numbers: M11770, M11771; Claim applications: M12374-M12379 Apart from Government Royalties there are no |
|
| third-party royalty obligations. | |||
| The active claims are issued through the Mining | |||
| Recorder’s Office, a division of the Department | |||
| of Industry, Tourism and Investment, and entitles | |||
| the owner to the underlying mineral rights and to | |||
| legal access to the Property. Permits from the | |||
| Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board | |||
| (“MVLWB”), a federal government organisation, | |||
| are necessary for certain activities that exceed a | |||
| threshold of land use. Other surface rights for | |||
| mine development are administered by the | |||
| Department of Lands, Government of NWT. | |||
| There are no current impediments to operate in | |||
| the project area however there may be additional | |||
| environmental conditions imposed. | |||
| Exploration | • | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by | No prior, specific exploration for lithium in the |
| done by other | other parties. | tenement areas is known. | |
| parties | |||
| Geology | • | Deposit type, geological setting and style of | The Reid-Aylmer claims lie within the Contwoyto |
| mineralisation. | and Hacket River Terranes of the Archean Slave | ||
| Craton. Bedrock geology is dominated by | |||
| amphibolite facies, quartz-biotite shist of the | |||
| Yellowknife supergroup, which is locally intruded | |||
| by various Neoarchean two-mica granites. | |||
| Importantly, these intrusions are known | |||
| correlatives of the fertile ‘Prosperous Granite | |||
| Suite’ (Tomascak 1991), recorded as the source | |||
| of lithium mineralisation within the emerging | |||
| Yellowknife District. |
11
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drill hole | • | A summary of all information material to the | No drilling activities are being reported. |
| Information | understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: |
The coordinates of all known pegmatites are included in Appendix A. |
|
oeasting and northing of the drill hole collar |
|||
oelevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation |
|||
| above sea level in metres) of the drill hole | |||
| collar | |||
odip and azimuth of the hole |
|||
odown hole length and interception depth |
|||
ohole length. |
|||
| • | If the exclusion of this information is justified on | ||
| the basis that the information is not Material and | |||
| this exclusion does not detract from the | |||
| understanding of the report, the Competent | |||
| Person should clearly explain why this is the case. | |||
| Data | • | In reporting Exploration Results, weighting | No analytical results are being reported. |
| aggregation | averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum | ||
| methods | grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and | ||
| cut-off grades are usually Material and should be | |||
| stated. | |||
| • | Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short | ||
| lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of | |||
| low grade results, the procedure used for such | |||
| aggregation should be stated and some typical | |||
| examples of such aggregations should be shown | |||
| in detail. | |||
| • | The assumptions used for any reporting of metal | ||
| equivalent values should be clearly stated. | |||
| Relationship | • | These relationships are particularly important in | No drilling activities are being reported. |
| between | the reporting of Exploration Results. | ||
| mineralisation widths and intercept lengths |
• • |
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported If it is not known and only the down hole lengths |
|
| are reported, there should be a clear statement to | |||
| this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not | |||
| known’). | |||
| Diagrams | • | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and | Figures 2-4 show project location, geology and |
| tabulations of intercepts should be included for any | the location of known pegmatites. |
||
| significant discovery being reported These should | |||
| include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill | |||
| hole collar locations and appropriate sectional | |||
| views. | |||
| Balanced | • | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration | All relevant and material exploration data for the |
| reporting | Results is not practicable, representative reporting | target areas discussed, has been reported or | |
| of both low and high grades and/or widths should | referenced. | ||
| be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | |||
| Exploration Results. | |||
| Other | • | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, | All relevant and material exploration data for the |
| substantive | should be reported including (but not limited to): | target areas discussed, has been reported or | |
| exploration | geological observations; geophysical survey | referenced. | |
| data | results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples | ||
| – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test | |||
| results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical | |||
| and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or | |||
| contaminating substances. |
12
ASX:MM1
==> picture [97 x 56] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code Explanation | JORC Code Explanation | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Further | work | • | The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. | Further exploration is warranted across the |
| tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or | tenements to improve the understanding of the | |||
| large-scale step-out drilling). | mineralisation. | |||
| • | Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible | |||
| extensions, including the main geological | ||||
| interpretations and future drilling areas, provided | ||||
| this information is not commercially sensitive. |
13
ASX:MM1