AI assistant
Matrix IT Ltd. — Investor Presentation 2026
Mar 25, 2026
6905_rns_2026-03-25_cee71fef-78ca-460f-a1dc-39988cf4f2a7.pdf
Investor Presentation
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
matrix
Investor Meeting
matrix
Financial Statements as of December 31, 2025
The information contained in this Investors presentation constitutes a convenience translation. The Hebrew version was submitted by the Company to the relevant authorities pursuant to Israeli law and represents the binding version and the only one having legal effect.
matrix
DISCLAIMER
The presentation contains forecasts, estimates and plans of the Company regarding its operations and other information about future events and matters, which constitute forward-looking information, as defined in the Securities Law, 1968, and materialization thereof is uncertain and may be affected by factors that are unforeseeable or beyond the Company's control. Therefore, the Company is uncertain whether its forecasts and/or estimates and/or plans will be realized, in whole or in part, or whether they will be realized differently than expected, inter alia, due to factors beyond its control, changes in market conditions and the business and competition environment, as well as materialization of any of the Company's risk factors.
The presentation includes, inter alia, information from various publications as well as data received from external sources, and macroeconomic facts and figures, the contents of which have not been reviewed by the Company independently, including slides relating to analyst ratings, all as known by the Company at the time of preparation of the presentation. For the avoidance of doubt, we note that the Company does not undertake to update and/or change the information included in this presentation. This presentation was prepared as a summary and for convenience only, and is not intended to be in lieu of a review of the reports publicized by the Company, including its financial statements. The information contained in this presentation is subject to that stated in the Company's relevant reports.
This presentation should not be viewed as an offer or invitation to acquire the Company's securities. The information included in the presentation is not a recommendation or opinion to invest in the Company and is not in lieu of a potential investor's judgment.
Agenda
Financial Statements 2025
matrix




Ranit Zexer – CTO, Matrix

Major General (Res.) Nitzan Alon – Chairman of Matrix Defense
Operation Roaring Lion
As of the report’s publication date, Matrix employs approximately 17,000 employees worldwide. Approximately 3,500 of them are overseas, of which 2,500 are in the US.
About 500 of the Company's employees in Israel are enlisted in reserve duty. Most of the Company's employees in Israel are working from home. As of this date, the impact of the war on the Company's results is not material.

matrix
IT AWARDS
2025
Outstanding Vendor Award
מפגן כוח ב-IT Awards: זכויות רבות במיוחד ל- מהקרקס
36 לקוחות מטריקס קטפו פרסי הצטיינות • אות מנכ"ל מצטיין למוטי נוטמן • וגם - אות הספק המצטיין!
DailyMaily 23.02.26
matrix*


matrix
IT AWARDS
2025
Excellence Award for 36 Matrix client projects

Among the winning projects:
Al chatbot for Ramat Gan residents | 'Shibbolet' system of the Cyber Directorate – population management during crisis | Data management system and integration for pharmacy, HR, equipment and infrastructure, hospitalization, and other processes at the Ministry of Health | Establishing a private cloud for the 'Beit B'Lev' network | Implementation of the Priority ERP system at Shikun & Binui Group and the IDF Disabled Veterans Organization | Payment initiation and open banking for vehicle purchases at Avis | Israel's new payment core at Masav | Oncological data transformation in personalized medicine at Hadassah | Establishing and implementing advanced browsing protection on a healthcare network | A revolution in the delivery room: a clinical decision support system for real-time prediction of caesarean surgery probability at Hadassah | End-to-end implementation of a monitoring and control system at Leumit | Self-service laboratory stations at Maccabi, and more...
matrix
Summary of Q4
and the Period Ended December 31, 2025
2025
matrix
January – December
2025
Continued growth to record performance across all financial metrics
Revenues +11.8% growth to a record of approximately NIS 6.2 billion – 15.4% growth after adjusting for the increase in revenues recognized on a net basis (*)
Gross profit +12.8% growth to a record of approximately NIS 940 million – with an improvement in its margin to 15.1%
Operating income +16% growth to a record of approximately NIS 522 million – with an improvement in its margin to 8.4%
Net income +14.6% growth to a record of approximately NIS 330 million – with an improvement in its margin to 5.3%
Net income attributable to shareholders +12.8% growth to a record of approximately NIS 307 million – at a margin of 4.9%
EBITDA +13.2% growth to a record of approximately NIS 721 million – with an improvement in its margin to 11.6%
Cash flows from operating activities +34.9% growth to a record of approximately NIS 835 million
(*) In 2025 revenues accounted for on a net basis continued to increase. This affects the Company's revenues, revenue growth rate and profit margin.
matrix
Fourth Quarter 2025
Continued growth to record performance across all profitability and cash flow metrics
Revenues +16.4% growth to approximately NIS 1.6 billion
Gross profit +13.4% growth to a record of approximately NIS 248 million – at a margin of 15.5%
Operating income +15% growth to a record of approximately NIS 138 million – at a margin of 8.6%
Net income +20.5% growth to a record of approximately NIS 89 million – with an improvement in its margin to 5.6%
Net income attributable to shareholders +15.6% growth to a record of approximately NIS 81 million – at a margin of 5.1%
EBITDA +10.6% growth to a record of approximately NIS 187 million – at a margin of 11.7%
Cash flows from operating activities +69.1% growth to a record of approximately NIS 566 million
matrix
Open recruitment positions at Matrix as of March 2026
| Field | Details | Number of positions |
|---|---|---|
| Development | Programmers (309), Development Team Leaders, Architects, QA Testers | 432 |
| System, Infrastructure, Cloud and DevOps (Platform Engineering) | Support personnel, System and Cloud professionals, Communications and Infrastructure experts, DevOps engineers | 272 |
| Project/Product Management and Systems Analysts | Project Management, Product Management and Systems Analysts | 206 |
| Cyber and Information Security | SOC personnel, information security and cyber implementers, cyber defense and information security experts, cyber researchers | 194 |
| Data & AI | ML/AI professionals, various Data and BI roles | 142 |
| Security & Defense positions | Various positions requiring high security clearance for candidates with existing clearance or undergoing a new security clearance process | 125 |
| Core Systems | Priority / ERP / SAP / Salesforce / CRM Dynamics | 91 |
| Total: 1,462 |
matrix
Financial Statements
31.12.2025
matrix
Key P&L Highlights – FY 2025 compared to the corresponding period
Key results (NIS millions)
| FY 2025 | FY 2024 | % Growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues | 6,239 | 5,580 | 11.8% |
| Gross profit | 940 | 833 | 12.8% |
| SG&A | 418 | 383 | 9% |
| Operating income | 522 | 450 | 16% |
| Financial expenses, net | 85 | 67 | 26.6% |
| Tax expenses | 107 | 95 | 12.8% |
| Net income | 330 | 288 | 14.6% |
| Net income attributable to shareholders | 307 | 272 | 12.8% |
| EBITDA | 721 | 637 | 13.2% |
| Gross profit margin | 15.1% | 14.9% | |
| SG&A margin | 6.7% | 6.9% | |
| Operating income margin | 8.4% | 8.1% | |
| EBITDA margin | 11.6% | 11.4% | |
| Net income margin | 5.3% | 5.2% |
- 15.4% growth net of increase in revenues accounted for on a net basis
- 10.7% organic growth adjusted for increase in revenues accounted for on a net basis
- 11.2% organic growth in operating income
matrix
Key P&L Highlights– Q4 2025 compared to the corresponding quarter
Key results (NIS millions)
| Q4 2025 | Q4 2024 | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues | 1,600 | 1,374 | 16.4% |
| Gross profit | 248 | 219 | 13.4% |
| SG&A | 110 | 99 | 11.5% |
| Operating income | 138 | 120 | 15% |
| Financial expenses, net | 20 | 19 | 4.1% |
| Tax expenses | 29 | 27 | 7.7% |
| Net income | 89 | 74 | 20.5% |
| Net income attributable to shareholders | 81 | 70 | 15.6% |
| EBITDA | 187 | 169 | 10.6% |
| Gross profit margin | 15.5% | 15.9% | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SG&A margin | 6.9% | 7.2% | |
| Operating income margin | 8.6% | 8.7% | |
| EBITDA margin | 11.7% | 12.3% | |
| Net income margin | 5.6% | 5.4% |
12.2% organic revenue growth
10.5% organic profit growth
matrix
Revenue brakdown by customer sectors
- ☺ Hi-Tech 18%
- 🔋 Government & Public Sector 17%
- 🚴 Financial Institutions 17%
- 🚲 Healthcare & Transportation 17%
- 🚫 Aerospace & Defense 12%
- 🚶 Industry, Communications & Retail 12%
- 🚫 Other 7%

Based on revenues for 2025
FY 2025 Summary
matrix
Ongoing improvement in financial results over time. Consistent growth to record revenues and profits (NIS millions)
Revenues (*)

Gross profit

Operating income (**)

() Adjusted for the increase in revenues recognized on a net basis, revenue growth was 15.4% (*) In 2022 – excluding profit from the realization of an investment in a subsidiary (NIS 150 million)
FY 2025 Summary
matrix
Ongoing improvement in financial results over time. Consistent growth to record revenues and profits (NIS millions)
EBITDA

(*) In 2022 – excluding profit from the realization of an investment in a subsidiary (NIS 150 million), net of tax (approximately NIS 121 million)

Net income (*)

Net income to shareholders(*)
Q4 2025 Summary
matrix
Ongoing improvement in financial results over time. Consistent growth to record profits (NIS millions)

(*) Revenues

Gross profit

Operating income
(*) The effect of adjusting for the increase in revenues recognized on a net basis during the quarter was negligible
Q4 2025 Summary
matrix
Ongoing improvement in financial results over time. Consistent growth to record profits (NIS millions)

EBITDA

Net income

Net income to shareholders
matrix
Israeli Market
matrix
Operating Segments in Israel
Key financial results (NIS millions)

Q4 2025


FY 2025

(*) Including immaterial operations in Europe
14.5% growth adjusted for growth in revenues accounted for on a net basis
matrix
Operating Segments in Israel – 2025
(NIS thousands)
| Revenues | Operating income | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | % | 2025 | 2024 | % | |
| IT Solutions and Services, Consulting, and Management in Israel | 3,821,242 | 3,337,267 | 14.5% | 291,476 | 250,113 | 16.5% |
| Profit margin (%) | 7.6% | 7.5% |
- High double-digit growth (primarily organic) driven by increased activity in DATA & AI, digital, and core systems.
- Continued growth in operations with the defense sector (including G2G transactions) and in operations with the financial sector.
- Mega projects in the field of IT and engineering – providing growth and high visibility over time.
- First-time consolidation of Gav Systems also contributed to the segment’s results.
matrix
Operating Segments in Israel – 2025
(NIS thousands)
| Revenues | Operating income | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | % | 2025 | 2024 | % | |
| IT Solutions and Services, Consulting, and Management in Israel | 3,821,242 | 3,337,267 | 14.5% | 291,476 | 250,113 | 16.5% |
| Profit margin (%) | 7.6% | 7.5% | ||||
| Cloud and Computing Infrastructures | 1,645,349 | 1,515,931 | 8.5% | 125,813 | 106,405 | 18.2% |
| Profit margin (%) | 7.6% | 7% |
- Growth in the volume, driven by marketing and integration of computing systems, and by marketing implementation and support of advanced technological solutions.
- Continued increase in the volume of EDP cloud transactions, whose revenues are accounted for on a net basis – multi-year engagements that contribute to high profits visibility over time.
- A favorable mix of higher-margin transactions drove profitability growth, despite the negative impact of USD depreciation
- Segment results were also positively affected by the first-time consolidation of Ortec.
matrix
Operating Segments in Israel – 2025
(NIS thousands)
| Revenues | Operating income | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | % | 2025 | 2024 | % | |
| IT Solutions and Services, Consulting, and Management in Israel | 3,821,242 | 3,337,267 | 14.5% | 291,476 | 250,113 | 16.5% |
| Profit margin (%) | 7.6% | 7.5% | ||||
| Cloud and Computing Infrastructures | 1,645,349 | 1,515,931 | 8.5% | 125,813 | 106,405 | 18.2% |
| Profit margin (%) | 7.6% | 7% | ||||
| Marketing and Support of Software Products | 440,382 | 456,765 | (3.6%) | 55,107 | 45,364 | 21.5% |
| Profit margin (%) | 12.5% | 9.9% |
■ Accelerated customer demand for software and AI solutions (including AI software products and communication equipment), as well as cyber security, digital transformation, and cloud solutions.
■ Revenue decline alongside a sharp increase in operating income and profit margin, primarily driven by the transaction mix.
matrix
US Market
matrix
IT Solutions and Services in the US
2025 (NIS thousands)
| Revenues | Operating income | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | % | 2025 | 2024 | % | |
| Segmental results in USD | 132,864 | 124,588 | 6.6% | 20,097 | 18,073 | 11.2% |
| Profit margin (%) | 15.1% | 14.5% | ||||
| Segmental results NIS | 458,646 | 460,939 | (0.5%) | 69,376 | 66,865 | 3.8% |
| Profit margin (%) | 15.1% | 14.5% |
- Continued strong growth in activity volumes, driven by the GRC activities in the financial sector, Data & AI and the gradual onboarding of new, higher-margin projects.
- The impact of the first-time consolidation of Alacer’s results was positive but immaterial.
- Results in NIS were materially impacted by USD depreciation compared to the the comparative period
matrix
IT Solutions and Services in the US
Q4 2025 (NIS thousands)
| Revenues | Operating income | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 2024 Q4 | % | 2025 Q4 | 2024 Q4 | % | |
| Segmental results in USD | 35,692 | 30,357 | 17.4% | 4,968 | 4,449 | 11.5% |
| Profit margin (%) | 13.9% | 14.7% | ||||
| Segmental results in NIS | 116,699 | 112,350 | 3.9% | 16,136 | 16,466 | (2%) |
| Profit margin (%) | 13.8% | 14.7% |
Breakdown of Contribution to Revenues and Profit
By Operating Segments – FY 2025
- IT Solutions and Services in Israel
- Cloud and Computing Infrastructures
- IT Solutions and Services in the US
- Software Products


matrix
Financial expenses
Financial expenses, net (NIS thousands)
| Q4 2025 | Q4 2024 | 1-12 2025 | 1-12 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest, commissions, and other (net) | 6,180 | 6,088 | 92 | 24,927 | 25,442 | (515) |
| FX differences | 6,689 | 4,598 | 2,091 | 23,090 | 14,321 | 8,769 |
| Accounting financial expenses | 7,229 | 8,612 | (1,383) | 36,674 | 27,109 | 9,565 |
| Total financial expenses (net) | 20,098 | 19,298 | 800 | 84,691 | 66,872 | 17,819 |
FY 2025 – The increase in financial expenses in 2025 is mainly due to an increase in non-cash accounting expenses (mainly due to Put options granted to minority shareholders in subsidiaries), as well as to FX differences resulting from the depreciation of the USD/ILS exchange rate (about 12.5% in the period).
Q4 2025 – The increase in financial expenses in the fourth quarter is mainly attributable to FX differences (about 3.5% in the quarter), which were partially offset by a decrease in accounting financial expenses.
matrix
Breakdown of Financial Expenses
(NIS millions)
Despite the changes in accounting expenses and FX-difference expenses, cash interest expenses remain stable
| 2024 | 2025 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | |||||||
| 31.3.24 | |||||||
| ✓ | Q2 | ||||||
| 30.6.24 | Q3 | ||||||
| 30.9.24 | |||||||
| ✓ | Q4 | ||||||
| 31.12.24 | |||||||
| ✓ | Q1 | ||||||
| 31.3.25 | |||||||
| ✓ | Q2 | ||||||
| 30.6.25 | |||||||
| ✓ | Q3 | ||||||
| 30.9.25 | |||||||
| ✓ | Q4 | ||||||
| 31.12.25 | |||||||
| ✓ | |||||||
| 16.6 | |||||||
| 8.9 | |||||||
| 7.7 | 14.8 | ||||||
| 9.0 | |||||||
| 5.8 | 16.1 | ||||||
| 10.2 | |||||||
| 5.9 | 19.3 | ||||||
| 13.2 | |||||||
| 6.1 | 19.4 | ||||||
| 13.0 | |||||||
| 6.4 | 25.4 | ||||||
| 19.2 | |||||||
| 6.2 | 19.8 | ||||||
| 13.7 | |||||||
| 6.1 | 20.1 | ||||||
| 13.9 | |||||||
| 6.2 |
matrix
Accounting financial expenses and FX differences
Interest expenses (net) and commissions
matrix
Financial Indexes
Financial Indexes
(NIS millions)
| 31.12.25 | 31.12.24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash equivalents | 903 | 668 |
| Unutilized credit facilities* | 1,235 | 1,229 |
| Total liquid assets | 2,138 | 1,897 |
- Of which, NIS 300 million are committed credit facilities
Aa3 credit rating from Midroog (Moody's) (confirmed – March 2025)

Cash flows from operating activities
Increase of about 35% in cash flows from operating activities to a record of approximately NIS 835 million
matrix
Financial Indexes
(NIS millions)
Equity
Commercial Securities due by February 2030
Loans from financial institutions
Bonds Series B

| 31.12.25 | 31.12.24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | 1,215 | 1,144 |
| % of total balance sheet | 26.4% | 25.5% |
| Gross financial debt | 753 | 785.1 |
| financial net debt (net cash) | (149.9) | 116.6 |
| Current ratio | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Financial net debt (net cash) to balance sheet ratio | (3.3%) | 2.6% |
| Financial net debt (net cash) to EBITDA ratio | (0.26) | 0.23 |
On February 4, 2026, the Company issued convertible Bonds (Series 2) (for a period of 5 years, at an annual interest rate of 0.5%) in an amount of approximately NIS 300 million. Most of the proceeds from the issuance were used to repay higher-cost financial debt at Magic.
matrix
32
Backlog
(NIS millions)
| Backlog, December 31, 2025 | Backlog, December 31, 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Backlog for the upcoming year | 5,479 | 4,968 | |
| % change | 10.3% | ||
| Beyond the current year | 2,014 | 2,061 | |
| Total backlog | 7,493 | 7,029 | |
| % change | 6.6% |
- For details regarding the Company's assumptions in the calculation of the backlog, see Section 8 of Chapter A (Description of the Corporation's Business) in the 2025 Annual Report
matrix
matrix
Backlog – by Operating Segments
(NIS millions)
| Expected Revenue Recognition Period | Backlog as of December 31, 2025 | Backlog as of December 31, 2024 | Rate of Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consulting, and Management in Israel | For the upcoming year | 3,564 | 3,134 | 13.7% |
| Beyond the current year | 1,647 | 1,747 | ||
| Total Backlog | 5,211 | 4,881 | 6.8% | |
| IT Solutions and Services in the US | For the upcoming year | 418 | 363 | 15% |
| Beyond the current year | 21 | 10 | ||
| Total Backlog | 439 | 373 | 17.4% | |
| Marketing and Support of Software Products | For the upcoming year | 333 | 323 | 2.9% |
| Beyond the current year | 108 | 83 | ||
| Total Backlog | 441 | 406 | 8.6% | |
| Cloud and Computing Infrastructures | For the upcoming year | 1,165 | 1,147 | 1.6% |
| Beyond the current year | 237 | 222 | ||
| Total Backlog | 1,402 | 1,369 | 2.4% |
Dividend
matrix
Matrix maintains its regular dividend policy:
Distribution of up to 75% of profits to the Company's shareholders
Dividend declared for Q4 2025
Representing 75% of Matrix's and Magic's profit for Q4 2025
73.1 NIS million
0.79 NIS per share
Dividends distributed in the last 5 years – NIS 1.011 billion
Dividends distributed in the last 10 years – NIS 1.525 billion
Company Merger Transaction
magic®
- matrix®
36
COMPILATION OF THE MERGER TRANSACTION
MAPC
matrix
Completion of the Merger Transaction
- On February 24, 2026, the merger transaction was completed after all conditions precedent were fulfilled
- Accordingly, Matrix acquired the entire share capital of Magic (by way of a reverse triangular merger), in consideration for the allocation of Matrix shares to Magic's shareholders. Magic's shares were delisted from trading on NASDAQ and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.
- Magic became a private company wholly owned by Matrix.
The Merger Transaction
matrix + magic

©1bn EBITDA

6,000+ Clients

©8.4bn Annual revenue 22% Total International 17% USA

17,000+ Employees

14 Proprietary Software Systems and Solutions

50+ Countries International Presence
matrix
Pro-Forma Financial Information (Unaudited) – Consolidated Results (Matrix + Magic) for 2024–2025 (NIS millions)
| Ft 2025 | Ft 2024 | % Growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenues | 8,387 | 7,602 | 10.3% |
| Cost of revenues | 6,860 | 6,182 | 11% |
| Gross profit | 1,527 | 1,420 | 7.5% |
| Gross profit margin (%) | 18.2% | 18.7% | |
| R&D expenses | 45 | 49 | (9.4%) |
| Selling and marketing expenses | 385 | 352 | 9.3% |
| General and administrative expenses | 348 | 342 | 1.8% |
| Operating income | 749 | 677 | 10.8% |
| Operating income margin (%) | 8.9% | 8.9% | |
| Financial expenses | 98 | 82 | 18.5% |
| Income before taxes | 652 | 594 | 9.7% |
| Tax expenses | 153 | 137 | 11.6% |
| The Company's share in profits (losses) of associates | 1 | 1 | |
| Net income | 498 | 456 | 9.2% |
| Net income margin (%) | 5.9% | 6% | |
| Net income attributable to Equity holders of the Company | 444 | 412 | 7.7% |
| Non-controlling interests | 54 | 44 | 23.7% |
| EBITDA | 1,022 | 937 | 9.1% |
| EBITDA margin (%) | 12.2% | 12.3% |
Key assumptions and adjustments to the pro-forma information:
- The results are adjusted to exclude costs of ~NIS 20 m recognized at Magic in connection with the merger transaction (under G&A expenses), including in respect of adjustments to accounting policies and estimates to Matrix's policy
- The results are after adjustments of accounting policy in the treatment of PUT options for minority holders in subsidiaries
- Translation of Magic’s results into NIS is based on the average exchange rate for the period (Reflecting a decrease of approximately 6.7% compared to the prior year).
- Profit attributable to shareholders is presented as if Magic had always been held in full (100%) by Matrix
- The data presented is unaudited.
magic
matrix
The Merger Transaction
- Positioning Matrix among the 10 largest public IT service companies in the world (1)
- A significant leap for Matrix in international expansion
- A technological force multiplier in the fields of ERP, Cyber, Cloud, Data, Digital, and AI
- Strengthening operations in the defense sector, crossing the revenue threshold of approximately NIS 1 billion per year
- Expanding Matrix's service and solutions portfolio to all leading sectors: Aerospace & Defense, Public Sector, Financial institutions, High-Tech, Healthcare
- Expanding the portfolio of proprietary IP solutions with high profitability and high Stickiness level
- Improvement in profit margins and Capital structure
- A unique transaction – no financing costs and no accounting M&A amortizations (As Pooling)
- Integration of an excellent and experienced management team into the Company
(1) Based on Market Cap, by Jefferies
matrix
matrix FORWARD
matrix FORWARD
matrix
International growth
– the aggregate annual revenue run-rate from Global markets totaled ~USD 500 million (of which a small portion – ~USD 45 million – relates to Magic’s development tools). Matrix’s current positioning in the international market, and in the US in particular, reinforced by Magic’s subsidiaries’ assets in the areas of cloud, cyber, ICT infrastructure, and proprietary software products, enables accelerated growth through competitive synergies among our service and product lines. In addition, we intend to accelerate our acquisition pace overseas, mainly in the US, and anchor our organic growth on strengthening services to existing Fortune 500 clients.
matrix FORWARD
matrix
A surge in demand for services and products in the areas of cyber, cloud, DATA and AI both in the defense and commercial sectors.
We are targeting continued organic growth at Matrix and its acquired companies, which serve as force multipliers for our activities in the $\mathrm{A}^{1}\mathrm{D}^{2}\mathrm{C}^{3}$ lines of business and around proprietary software products (company-owned), as well as in the fields of embedded systems development, communications infrastructure, data centers and Command and Control systems.
matrix FORWARD
matrix
We aim to maintain the aggregate operating income margin at a level of 9% and above, inter alia, due to operational improvements resulting from the merger and the higher profitability in international operations.
matrix FORWARD
matrix
Defense Division – matrix Defense, led by Major General Nitzan Alon, is among the leading defense companies in Israel, with over NIS 1 billion in revenues and more than 1,800 professionals, including 2 Israel Defense Prize laureates.
In the defense sector, Matrix enjoys sustained double-digit growth, driven by deep and broad technological expertise in cyber and AI, and strong demand for unique projects and solutions in the techno-operational and systems engineering domain.
Our subsidiary Commit (80% controlled), which joined through the Magic transaction, is on an equally impressive growth trajectory, adding a force multiplier to our defense division in complementary areas such as communications, ICT, C2, and real-time systems (Embedded – hardware/software).
We intend to accelerate acquisitions in the defense sector, where we see significant growth potential.
matrix
Matrix's Defense Sector
General (Res.) Nitzan Alon, Active Chairman – Matrix Defense
matrix
Fast Facts – Matrix’s Defense Sector

12% of total revenue
~NIS 1 billion
in revenue in 2025

Status
Defense industry directly guided by MALMAB (Defense Ministry R&D administration)

Human capital: ~1,800+ employees
Including hundreds of strategic advisors in performance research and intelligence.
Graduates of security units, academics and researchers.

Core activities: Advanced AI solutions, C2 (command and control) systems development, operational knowledge management, and cyber for the defense sector.

Hundreds of successful flagship strategic projects for defense clients in Israel and worldwide

History: 2003,
SIBAM Ltd., led by Brig. Gen. (ret.) Dr. Aviam Sela, was acquired by Matrix
matrix
Ecosystem and synergy – end-to-end solution
Techno-operational strategic consulting
| Cyber | Cloud | R&D | G2G Projects | Data & AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education & Implementation | Joint management | Consulting, Research & Development | ||
| Communications labs, edge devices and tactical communications | Software products, hardware and communications equipment – Cloud + On Prem |
matrix
Core Offerings
AI & Data
AI Applications for Defense and Security
- NLP including OCR
- GIS – including automated mapping
- Audio and SIGINT
- Video and imagery
- Supervised learning + unsupervised learning
- Custom and embedded hardware
- Data center applications (DCDL)
Cyber - Cyber Defense and Intelligence
R&D - Systems Development
Strategic Advantage for the Defense Industry
matrix
Core Offerings
AI - AI Applications for Defense and Security
Cyber Cyber Defense and Intelligence
- Security research
- Proof of concept sales (POCs)
- Embedded devices
- Mobile platforms
- Network protocols
- Holistic threat analysis systems
- Attribution system
- Cyber threat collaboration system
- Custom cyber systems
R&D - Systems Development
Strategic Advantage for the Defense Industry
matrix
Core Offerings
AI - AI Applications for Defense and Security
Cyber - Cyber Defense and Intelligence
R&D Systems Development
- G2G projects
- Systems engineering
- Custom projects
- Cyber and intelligence systems
- Oversight and control
- Simulation and analytics systems
- Cloud-based solutions
- Artificial intelligence and big data
Strategic Advantage for the Defense Industry
matrix
Core Offerings
AI - AI Applications for Defense and Security
Cyber - Cyber Defense and Intelligence
R&D - Systems Development
Strategic Advantage for the Defense Industry
- Strategic planning
- Operational research
- Systems analysis
- Defense industry research
- Technology assessment
- Competitive intelligence
- Business plan development
matrix
Strategic projects worldwide
Defense, Homeland Security and G2G
Cyber and national security
Innovation and R&D projects
Complex cloud and ICT projects – Information and Communication Technology

Systems development and flagship projects

High-performance drone systems

Autonomous robotics systems

AI systems for video, image and sensor analysis

Air defense systems and aeronautics

R&D of command and control (C2) systems

R&D of embedded systems

G2G

AI R&D – dozens of projects
Systems development and flagship projects

Hardware and testing

Simulation and emulation

Sensory data, large-scale sensor data processing

Edge devices and AI

Mega Data projects

Tactical communications

End-to-end ICT and C4I systems
Operational C2 (command and control) solutions, collaboration and IoT


Connect

Expand

Discover

Route

Wireless

C2, voice, video, speech, chat, IoT and artificial intelligence.
Operations management, investigation and collaboration – combat-proven
Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) for Israel's defense and homeland security industries.
56
matrix
Among our clients


























matrix FORWARD
matrix
The deep synergy between Matrix across all its divisions, with commit creates a multidimensional techno-defense systems house, combining the power of a formidable operational organization with the agility of a technological “commando unit.”
Our unique value proposition provides an End-to-End solution – from defining the response to the operational need, through infrastructure, communications, hardware and software for edge systems.
Matrix thus establishes its position as a strategic partner to the security establishment and defense industries in Israel and around the world
matrix
NIS 1 billion in growing revenues – for the defense sector

High-tech 18%
Government & Public Sector 17%
Financial Institutions 17%
Health & Transportation 17%
Aerospace & Defense 12%
Industry, Communications & Retail 12%
Other 7%

Based on revenues for 2025
Thank You
matrix
matrix

“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity”
The Roman philosopher Seneca
The Jevons Paradox
matrix
Efficiency lowers the relative cost of using a resource.
When a resource becomes cheaper and more efficient, its use expands and creates demand that exceeds the original savings from the efficiency gains.
Efficiency also makes technology relevant in new domains.

More Fuel Efficient
Direct effect: less fuel per mile

More Energy Demand

AI-Native Teams
Direct effect: higher productivity

More Engineers Needed
matrix FORWARD
matrix
The significant changes in the world of AI provide a tremendous opportunity for Matrix.
We identify significant growth potential in our current areas of activity – infrastructure, integration, defense, software products, cyber defense, FinOps, DATA, professional training, and more.
The rapid pace of AI tool advancement will, in our assessment, lead to a shift in the mix of professions and the creation of new professions.
Thanks to high efficiency in software development, AI will, in our assessment, lead to growth in the number and scope of projects in the future.
Gartner
The We Serve
Our Solutions
Conferences
Webinar
AI Hub
New To Role
Forget Layoffs: AI Is Coming for Inefficiency, Not People
While headcount reductions specifically attributable to AI are elusive, the technology is bringing real productivity gains for teams that use it effectively.
By Randeep Rathindran | December 9, 2025
Put more effort into transforming jobs than eliminating them
AI investments come with lofty management expectations for productivity gains that could eventually lead to headcount reductions. Yet current evidence suggests those expectations are overblown.
While teams that deploy AI achieve time savings equivalent to five hours per person per week, most of this time saving tends to be spent on non-value-added tasks, as shown in the figure. Also, the productivity gains from AI are no higher than those captured by teams that implement other technologies. Nor are the productivity gains enough to drive net job reductions.
These factors and others suggest it's time to move the AI-productivity conversation away from headcount reduction and toward business value.
matrix
Luck is What Happens When
Preparation Meets Opportunity
Ranit Zexer – Matrix CTO
matrix
Artificial Intelligence, Human Panic
And Why Now Is Matrix's Biggest Opportunity
Ranit Zexer, Matrix CTO
matrix
So what actually happened?
| What was said? | Market Sentiments | The Ground Truth |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek is 10x cheaper than GPT-4 | Sell Nvidia and Microsoft shares!!! | Nvidia Reported record-breaking profits in Q1 2025. And its shares rose 25% from pre-crisis levels and 45% from the crisis peak |
| "Claude writes 90% of its own code" | Developers are obsolete!!! | Big Tech hiring freeze, while business sectors increase demand for technical roles (e.g., 16% growth in the financial sector in 2025*) |
| Anthropic announced that Claude Code can analyze and automatically convert COBOL code | COBOL is dead, IBM is doomed!!! | IBM is at a 20-year Mainframe revenue peak, and Claude Code is expected to be an ecosystem catalyst– not its killer |
| A hypothetical post by Cintrini** outlined a scenario (not a forecast) in which, by 2028, AI impacts white-collar jobs – leading to 10% unemployment and an economic crisis | System Integrators = white collar | |
| System Integrators are also Doomed!!! | Let’s talk about this... |
- According to Robert Half, the world’s largest specialized staffing firm, operating since 1948. Their analysis is based on 1.5 million job openings from 9,000 job boards
** Cintrini Research – a small, unregulated analyst firm
matrix
And the reality... is apparently different...
Recognize the pressure and reframe your AI-driven headcount expectations
Executive leaders are under intense pressure to deliver cost savings, often through headcount reduction... AI is frequently seen as the lever to make these cuts painless. The reality? AI productivity gains are rarely sufficient to enable frictionless reductions without risk.
Gartner predicts that, through 2028, AI investments can lead to a net headcount increase within an enterprise - potentially as high as 30% in some business units, but typically under 10% for knowledge worker roles as a whole, driven by decreases in certain jobs and increases in others. That’s because realizing value from everyday AI has little impact on headcount, while disruptive, game-changing AI that upends the business is often more likely to create new types of roles.
https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/ai-caused-headcount-change
matrix
And this is not the first time this happens
We’ve seen this movie before:
- The technology is real → The timing is exaggerated → The market prices in panic → The market resets, and those who understand the shift lead it ⚫
| The event | The big announcement | Crisis | Reality after 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dot-com 2000 | “The Internet will kill retail” | Nasdaq -78% | Amazon, eBay dominated – but it took 7 years |
| Cloud 2008-12 | Server rooms will close within a year | Hardware companies collapsed | The cloud and hardware – both are thriving |
matrix
Where Does Matrix Fit in an AI-Driven World?

matrix
Maslow's AI Pyramid
Gemini
Claude
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Copilot
matrix
Maslow's AI Pyramid

matrix
Driving real impact requires a full-stack approach
Responsible AI
- Compliance
- Interpretability & Explainability
- Bias & Fairness
- Safety
- Privacy
- Security
Engagement
- Marketing
- Contact Center
- Conversational
- Autonomous Agents
- Personalization
- ...
Business Applications
- Healthcare
- Finance
- Hi-Tech
- Retail
- Manufacturing
- ...
AI Models
- AI Training
- Build Models
- Validate Models
- Deliver Models
- AI OPs
Data
- Data Curation
- Data Ingestion
- Synthetic / De-Identified Data
- Data Storage
- Data Delivery
Infrastructure
- aws
- Public Cloud
- PwMSA
- SLiTE
- SSTS
- On-Prem
Reskilling & Upskilling
- Upskilling non-technical employees
- Reskilling nontechnical employees
- Upskilling development teams
- Train new related technical AI skills
matrix
Against Maslow's AI Pyramid: Where are Matrix's opportunities?
AI Enablers
Client opportunities
- Legacy Modernization
- AI Ready Data
- Cloud and Hardware Infrastructure
- New Business Process Design
- AI Development
- The client's opportunity = our opportunity
Client risks
- AI Compliance
- Privacy
- Cyber and AI Threats
- AI Governance & Safety
- The AI Talent /Skills Gap
- The client's risk = our opportunity
matrix
And zooming out to the full picture
| ### Value-added activities
Efficiency = increased profitability | ### AI Enablers
Growth | ### Activity domains unrelated to IT
Efficiency = increased profitability |
| --- | --- | --- |
BCG analyzed the threat vs. opportunity for technology services in the global market
We conducted a similar analysis based on Matrix's revenue map
EXHIBIT 1
Agentic AI's Impact on Tech Services Varies by Segment but the Net Effect Is Expansion

Sources: Gartner; expert interviews; BCG analysis.
BCG's analysis shows that agentic AI will ultimately expand the total addressable market for technology services—unlocking up to $200 billion in net new value pools in the next five years.
https://www.bcg.com/publications/2026/the-200-billion-dollar-ai-opportunity-in-tech-services
Heat map by threats and opportunities
| AI & Data (12%) | Engineering & Non-it (7%) | Integration Projects (6%) | |||||||
| PS and Offshore (26%) | Cyber (10%) | Infra Software (5%) | BPO & Call Centers & BPO (4%) | ||||||
| 3rd Party App (2%) | |||||||||
| Cloud (12%) | Hardware & Infra (9%) | ERP & Core App (5%) | Magic Low Code (2%) | ||||||
| Risk ☐ Low Risk ☐ Stable ☐ Opportunity ☐ High Opportunity ☐ |
Internet Data
One Paper LLC Technology Research
Heat map by threats and opportunities
| FI
21% | HC
15% | TEC
14% | TEC
51% | FI
18% | DEF
12% | IND
49% | TRN
17% | FI
39% | DEF
39% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HC
7% | GOV
6% | TRN
10% | GOV
15% | DEF
10% | TEC
8% | GOV
8% | TEC
5% | IND
4% | TRN
6% |
| GOV
21% | IND
4% | TRN
6% |
| AI & Data (12%) | Engineering & Non-IT (7%) | Integration Projects (6%) |
| IND
18% | DEF
7% | TRN
4% | IND
29% | FI
20% | DEF
10% | TEC
39% | IND
15% | DEF
14% | IND
46% | GOV
13% |
| TEC
20% | GOV
13% | HC
5% | TRN
9% | FI
21% | GOV
5% | HC
4% | FI
25% | TEC
4% |
| PS and Offshore (26%) | Cyber (10%) | Intra Software (5%) | BPO & Call Centers (4%) |
| TEC
58% | IND
18% | GOV
8% | GOV
26% | IND
18% | HC
9% | FI
7% | IND
39% | TRN
17% | FI
15% | IND
34% | TEC
15% | IND
51% |
| HC
7% | TEC
25% | DEF
10% | TRN
9% | HC
19% | GOV
7% | TEC
6% | FI
14% | TRN
9% | GOV
5% | TEC
29% | HI
12% |
| FI
9% | HE
12% | DEF
10% | HE
10% | GOV
4% | HE
10% |
| Cloud (12%) | Hardware & Infra (9%) | ERP & Core App (5%) | 3rd Party App (2%) | Maple
Low-Cone (2%) |
| Finance | GOVernment | INDustry & Services | HI-TECH | DEFense | TRN Transportation | HC Healthcare |
matrix
From a high-level view: opportunities vs. risks
- Major opportunity
- Opportunity
- Unchanged
- Minor threat
- Threat

And what is Matrix’s role in this new world?
But what will happen to all your developers? And your testers?
matrix
matrix
90% of Claude’s code is developed by Claude – but guided by whom?
Even when the machine generates 100% of the code, we haven’t saved 100% of the developer’s work – far from it
The developer’s role is changing – but not disappearing
Code Generation ≠ Software Engineering.
You need to define what should be built → Product Manager
You need to ensure it is built correctly from an engineering perspective → Development Engineer
Worth quoting:
The Developer Codes only 22% of its Time
Forrester Research
Matrix develops new capabilities and offers new ways to create value
The 70% Paradox
matrix
Forgive me, I'm going to dig in a bit more on my experiences with Claude Code, for two reasons: partly because I think we are truly living through an important chapter in history and I want to document my own small corner of it, and second, because this week I personally experienced the flip side of vibe coding. I've been such an enthusiastic ambassador for "everyone must try this," so it seems only fair to share what happens when you try it without knowing what you're doing. So here it goes:
The problem begins with the gap. The gap between the sense of potency – the feeling of omnipotence that working with Claude Code (and its equivalents; I'm not advertising Claude Code, it's just what I use) gives you – and reality. In reality, I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing, what Claude is doing, and above all whether it's good or not. I can track the features it's building, check whether they work properly, etc. That's the easy part.
What I truly don't know is what I don't know that I don't know. And that's a problem. Because I genuinely don't know that.
Shaul Amsterdamski
LLMs can produce very roughly like 70% of a working application very quickly, but they tend to struggle with that last 30%
Addy Osmani, Developer Experience Leader at Google Chrome
AI provides democratization of development: anyone can build a "coffee map of Jerusalem" app
But to develop an application within an organization that works – and works well – you need time, professionalism and deep understanding
Matrix handles (also) the 30%
matrix
Nothing beats a syste, that actually works
There is a difference between AI in a Greenfield environment and AI in a Brownfield environment.
In Brownfield, you need to understand business and human context.
And most of the systems operating in the world today are Brownfield.

The productivity boost in brownfield scenarios is much smaller – some engineers estimate only a 10 – 30% speed-up at best in these cases, and sometimes a slowdown if the AI suggestions lead you astray
Enrico Papalini
Matrix bridges the gap by accelerating Brownfield operations and integrating AI into legacy environments.
matrix
Would you trust 'AliExpress software'?
"It's so cheap and fast that when it doesn't work, we throw away what was built and start over"
R&D Manager at a startup company


Would you agree to let Ali Express software manage your money?

Would you agree to let Ali Express software fly the plane you're on?



In enterprise environments, off-the-shelf solutions (e.g., AliExpress) are not sufficient for certain tasks
Code quality rose by 3.4% with AI tools, but projects that relied too much on AI saw 41% more bugs and a 7.2% drop in system stability.
MIT Technology Review: AI coding is now everywhere. But not everyone is convinced
As AI accelerates development, the need for integration, engineering, oversight, and risk management increases – driving demand for Matrix
The "Autonomous Vehicle Trap":
Are we overestimating AI independence?
matrix
The legal imperative: Human in the loop (HITL)

According to strategic forecasts from Gartner and other analysts, we expect to see over 2,000 "Death by AI" or serious injury claims filed worldwide by the end of this year
AkatisSecurity
As AI makes more autonomous decisions, greater investment is required to integrate people with the necessary capabilities, expertise, and experience – which Matrix provides.
The Junioirs Crisis
matrix
Juniors have always been the pipeline: junior today, senior tomorrow.
If the pipeline closes, there are no future seniors.

Worth quoting:
IT and software engineering jobs—employment has declined 6% for workers aged 22-25, while it's increased 9% for workers aged 35-49. Hiring is happening, just not for people my age.
Stanford Digital Economy Study
The combination of integration activities and the training division enables Matrix to develop an AI-Ready Juniors model for Enterprise
matrix
A few closing thoughts...

The Sameness Trap
When AI gives everyone the same tools, efficiency becomes a commodity. Those who merely react to AI will look like everyone else.
Differentiation will not come from the tool, but from the question you ask before you open it.
Based on Dan Diasio | Global AI Leader & Americas CTO, EY Consulting | LinkedIn, FEB 2026

In a world where everyone has access to the same AI, competitive advantage doesn't come from the technology itself, but from how it is integrated into the core of the organization – and here too, Matrix has a role.
Matrix
Martech Law: technologies change exponentially, organizations logarithmically
AI increases the gap between technology and organizations

This gap is Matrix's primary growth engine
we close with a reminder of the Jevons Paradox
matrix
AI is not shrinking the IT services market; it is expanding it.

Growing demand for software and digital transformation is a growth engine for Matrix's Enterprise services
From panic to reality
AI doesn’t replace people. It changes how they work
And SI companies like Matrix not only assist with the required change, but also enable taking the remarkable capabilities of AI and turning them into business solutions that move the needle for organizations

Back to the panic:
A provocative campaign by the startup Artisan AI, launched in 2024
matrix
matrix
AI reflects a structural shift in the IT market
It lowers point-specific development barriers but does not eliminate systemic complexity
AI expands the scope of digital initiatives. It also increases the need for integration, governance, and ongoing operations.
It shifts value from commoditized services to areas rich in regulation, data and infrastructure
AI generates more software.
More software generates more complexity.
Complexity generates greater need for technology services.
matrix
Behind the scenes:
Was doesnused in preparing this presentation?
For Sure!
But we led the discussion – ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini conducted a brainstorming session with us (and we thank them from the bottom of our hearts...)
Summary
Record results
Financial Statements 2025
matrix

Force multiplier
magic



Thank you for listening!
matrix