Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

MADER GROUP LIMITED Governance Information 2020

Sep 28, 2020

65288_rns_2020-09-28_79d2ca87-bf60-4570-9b71-394ed722dbd1.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

MADER GROUP LIMITED ACN 159 340 397

(Company)

2020 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

This Corporate Governance Statement discloses the extent to which the Company followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council in its publication Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations 3[rd] Edition ( Recommendations ) during the reporting period from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020 ( Reporting Period ). The Recommendations are not mandatory, however the Recommendations that have not been followed for any part of the Reporting Period have been identified and reasons provided for not following them along with what (if any) alternative governance practices were adopted in lieu of the Recommendation during that period.

The Company has adopted Corporate Governance Policies which provide written terms of reference for the Company’s corporate governance practices.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies are available on the Company’s website at www.madergroup.com.au.

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RDEDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
Recommendation 1.1
A listed entity should disclose the respective roles of its
board and management and those matters expressly
reserved to the board and those delegated to
management.
Yes The Company has adopted a Board Charter that sets out the specific roles and responsibilities
of the Board, the Chair and management and those matters expressly reserved to the Board
and those delegated to management.
The Board Charter is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 1.2
A listed entity should undertake appropriate checks before
appointing a person, or putting forward to security holders
a candidate for election, as a director and provide security
holders with all material information in its possession
relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-
elect a director.
Yes The Company has adopted a Procedures for Selection and Appointment of Directors policy to
ensure that appropriate checks are undertaken before appointing a person, or putting
forward to security holders a candidate for election as a Director, including providing all
material information relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a Director.
The Procedures for Selection and Appointment of Directors policy is available on the
Company’s website.
Recommendation 1.3
A listed entity should have a written agreement with each
director and senior executive setting out the terms of their
appointment.
Yes The Company has in place written agreements with each Director and senior executive, which
sets out the terms and conditions of their appointment.
Recommendation 1.4
The company secretary of a listed entity should be
accountable directly to the board, through the chair, on all
matters to do with the proper functioning of the company.
Yes The Board Charter provides that the Company Secretary is accountable directly to the Board,
through the Chair, on all matters to do with the proper functioning of the Board.
The Board Charter is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 1.5
A listed entity should:
(a) have a diversity policy which includes the
requirements for the board or a relevant committee
of the board to set measurable objectives for
achieving gender diversity and to assess annually
both the objectives and the entity’s progress in
achieving them;
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it; and
(c) disclose as at the end of each reporting period the
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity
set by the board or a relevant committee of the
board in accordance with the entity’s diversity policy
and it progress towards achieving them and either:
(1) the respective portions of men and women on
the board, in senior executive positions and
across the whole organisation (including how the
entity has defined “senior executive” for these
purposes); or
(2) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the
Workplace Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most
recent “Gender Equality Indicators”, as defined in
and published under that Act.
No
(
(a) The Company has adopted a Diversity Policy which provides a framework for the
Company to establish and achieve measurable diversity objectives, including in respect
of gender diversity. Under the Diversity Policy, the Board will set measurable gender
diversity objectives and will annually assess both the objectives, if any, that have been
set and the Company’s progress in achieving them.
(b) The Diversity Policy is available on the Company’s website.
(c)
The Board has not yet set measurable gender diversity objectives given the current size
and stage of its operations. As the Company grows it will seek to develop diversity
objectives and a reporting framework to report the Company’s progress against the
objectives and strategies for achieving a diverse work place and which can be used as a
guide to identify new Directors, senior executives and employees.
d)
As at the date of this statement, the respective proportions of women on the Board, in
senior executive positions and across the whole organisation were:
Board: 0%
Senior Executive (comprising the Company’s Key Management Personnel, other than
Directors, as disclosed in the 2020 Annual Report): 0%
Whole Organisation (including Board and Senior Executive): 5%
Recommendation 1.6
A listed entity should have and disclose a process for
periodically evaluating the performance of the board, its
committees and individual directors and disclose in
relation to each reporting period, whether a performance
evaluation was undertaken in the reporting period in
accordance with that process.
Yes (a) The Company’s Nomination and Remuneration Committee (currently comprising the full
Board) is responsible for evaluating the performance of the Board, its committees and
individual Directors on an annual basis. It may do so with the aid of an independent
advisor.
The Performance Evaluation Practices for this are set out in the Company’s Corporate
Governance Plan, which is available on the Company’s website.
(b) The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan requires the Company to disclose whether
or not performance evaluations were conducted during the relevant reporting period.
Given the Company has only recently listed on ASX, the Company has not yet formally
performed any such evaluations however it intends to complete performance
evaluations in respect of the Board, its committees and individual Directors for future
financial years in accordance with the above process.
Recommendation 1.7
A listed entity should have and disclose a process for
periodically evaluating the performance of its senior
executives and disclose in relation to each reporting
period, whether a performance evaluation was
undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with
that process.
Yes (a) The Company’s Nomination and Remuneration Committee (currently comprising the full
Board) is responsible for evaluating the performance of the Company’s senior executives
on an annual basis. A senior executive, for these purposes, means Key Management
Personnel (as defined in the Corporations Act) other than a non-executive Director.
The Performance Evaluation Practices for this are set out in the Company’s Corporate
Governance Plan, which is available on the Company’s website.
(b) Given the Company has only recently listed on ASX, it has not yet formally performed
any such evaluations however the Company intends to complete performance
evaluations in respect of the senior executives for future financial years in accordance
with the applicable processes.
Principle 2: Structure the board to add value
Recommendation 2.1
The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a nomination committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director;
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
Partially The Board established a Nomination and Remuneration Committee on 27 February 2019.
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee currently comprises the full Board. It is
chaired by independent Director, Mr Jim Walker. Its membership does not currently
comprise a majority of independent Directors (see commentary in Recommendation 2.3
below) however, the Board has formed the view that the current membership of the
Committee is appropriate for the Company at its current stage. The Board will review this on
an ongoing basis.
The Company has established a Procedures for the Selection and Appointment of Directors
policy which includes:
  • (4) the members of the committee; and

  • (5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or

  • (b) if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs to address board succession issues and to ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively.

Recommendation 2.2

A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership.

Recommendation 2.3

A listed entity should disclose:

  • (a) the names of the directors considered by the board to be independent directors;

  • (b) if a director has an interest, position, association or relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 of the Recommendations but the board is of the opinion that it does not compromise the independence of the director, the nature of the interest, position, association or relationship in question and an explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and

  • (c) the length of service of each director.

==> picture [54 x 167] intentionally omitted <==

Yes

Yes

  • (i) processes to address succession issues and to ensure the Board has the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the entity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively;

  • (ii) devoting time at least annually to discuss Board succession issues and updating of the Company’s Board skills matrix; and

  • (iii) all Board members being involved in the Company’s nomination process, to the maximum extent permitted under the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules.

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website. The Company report the number of times the Committee met throughout the reporting period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings in its FY2020 Annual Report on page 25.

  • The Company has sought to have a Board which brings a mix of skills to the Company’s leadership. The Board has established a formal board skills matrix which identifies a mix of skills the Board should collectively hold across its membership including leadership, ASX, industry, financial, strategic, risk management, legal and compliance, OH&S, ESG, investor relations, marketing and IT experience. Any gaps identified in the collective skills of the Board will be regularly reviewed by the Board as a whole, with the Board proposing new candidates for directorships having regard to the desired skills and experience required by the Company as well as the proposed candidates’ diversity of background.

  • (a) The Board Charter requires the disclosure of the names of Directors considered by the Board to be independent. The Board currently considers Mr Jim Walker and Justin Nuich to be independent Directors. The Company does not consider Luke Mader and Craig Burton to be independent because they are each a significant shareholder of the Company (either directly or through controlled entities). Mr Mader is also an executive Director and founder of the Company. Mr Patrick Conway is not considered to be independent as he is the chief executive officer of the Company.

  • (b) There are no independent Directors who fall within this category.

  • (c) The length of service of each Director, as at the end of the Reporting Period is: Mr Walker: Since 1 January 2019 Mr Conway: Since 8 November 2018 Mr Mader: Since 4 July 2012 Mr Burton: Since 6 July 2012 Mr Nuich: Since 1 January 2019

Recommendation 2.4
A majority of the board of a listed entity should be
independent directors.
Recommendation 2.4
A majority of the board of a listed entity should be
independent directors.
No The Board does not comprise a majority of independent Directors. The current Board is
comprised of three non-independent Directors and two independent non-executive Directors
as outlined in Recommendation 2.3 above. The Board considers the industry, operations and
technical experience the executive Directors Messrs Mader and Conway and the commercial
experience Mr Burton brings will assist the Company in meeting its corporate objectives and
therefore a majority of independent Directors is not required. This will be reviewed as the
Company develops.
The Board does not comprise a majority of independent Directors. The current Board is
comprised of three non-independent Directors and two independent non-executive Directors
as outlined in Recommendation 2.3 above. The Board considers the industry, operations and
technical experience the executive Directors Messrs Mader and Conway and the commercial
experience Mr Burton brings will assist the Company in meeting its corporate objectives and
therefore a majority of independent Directors is not required. This will be reviewed as the
Company develops.
Recommendation 2.5
The chair of the board of a listed entity should be an
independent director and, in particular, should not be the
same person as the CEO of the entity.
Yes The Board Charter provides that, where practical, the Chair of the Board should be an
independent Director and should not be the CEO/Managing Director.
The Chair of the Company is an independent non-executive Director, Mr Jim Walker.
Recommendation 2.6
A listed entity should have a program for inducting new
directors and provide appropriate professional
development opportunities for directors to develop and
maintain the skills and knowledge needed to perform their
role as directors effectively.
Yes Pursuant to the Company’s Board Induction and Professional Development Plan, when
appointed to the Board, a new director will receive an induction appropriate to their
experience. Directors are also entitled to undertake appropriate professional development
opportunities to develop and maintain the skills and knowledge needed to perform their roles
as Directors effectively.
The Company has a program for inducting new Directors and providing appropriate
professional development opportunities for Directors to develop and maintain the skills and
knowledge needed to perform their role as Directors effectively.
Principle 3: Act ethically and responsibly
Recommendation 3.1
A listed entity should have a code of conduct for its
directors, senior executives and employees and disclose
that code or a summary of it.
Yes The Company has established a Code of Conduct for its Directors, senior management,
employees and contractors.
The Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s website.
Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in corporate reporting
Recommendation 4.1
The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have an audit committee which:
(1) has at least three members, all of whom are
non-executive directors and a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
Partially (a) The Board established an Audit and Risk Committee on 27 February 2019. The Audit
and Risk Committee currently comprises the full Board. It is chaired by independent
Director, Mr Justin Nuich. Its membership does not currently comprise only non-
executive Directors or a majority of independent Directors (see commentary in
Recommendation 2.3 above). The Board has formed the view that the current
membership of the Committee is appropriate for the Company at its current stage but
will review this on an ongoing basis.
(2) is chaired by an independent director, who is
not the chair of the board,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the relevant qualifications and experience of
the members of the committee; and
(5) in relation to each reporting period, the number
of times the committee met throughout the
period and the individual attendances of the
members at hose meetings; or
(b) if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs that
independently verify and safeguard the integrity of
its corporate reporting
(b) The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan contains an Audit and Risk Committee
Charter that provides for the creation of an Audit and Risk Committee (if it is
considered it will benefit the Company), with at least three members, all of whom must
be independent Directors, and which must be chaired by an independent Director.
A copy of the Audit and Risk Committee Charter is available on the Company’s
website.
(c) The qualifications of Committee members are set out on pages 22 to 24 of the 2020
Annual Report. The Board is of the view that the qualifications and experience of the
members of the Audit and Risk Committee are sufficient to ensure that all significant
financial reporting matters are appropriately addressed and actioned, including the
appointment and removal of external auditors and rotation of the audit engagement
partner.
(d) The Company reports the number of times the Committee met throughout the
Reporting Period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings in
its FY2020 Annual Report on page 25.
As the operations of the Company develop, the Board will reassess the composition of
Audit and Risk Committee.
Recommendation 4.2
The board of a listed entity should, before it approves
the entity’s financial statements for a financial period,
receive from its CEO and CFO a declaration that, in their
opinion, the financial records of the entity have been
properly maintained and that the financial statements
comply with the appropriate accounting standards and
give a true and fair view of the financial position and
performance of the entity and that the opinion has been
formed on the basis of a sound system of risk
management and internal control which is operating
effectively.
Yes The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the CEO and CFO (or, if none,
the person(s) fulfilling those functions) to provide a sign off on these terms.
During the Reporting Period, the Board has, before approving the Company’s financial
statements, received from its CEO and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial
records of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial statements
comply with the appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the
financial position and performance of the entity and that the opinion has been formed on
the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating
effectively.
Recommendation 4.3
A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its
external auditor attends its AGM and is available to
answer questions from security holders relevant to the
audit.
Yes The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan provides that the Board must ensure the
Company’s external auditor attends its Annual General Meeting and is available to answer
questions from security holders relevant to the audit.
The Company seeks to ensure its external auditor attends the Company’s Annual General
Meetings.

Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure

Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure
Recommendation 5.1
A listed entity should have a written policy for complying
with its continuous disclosure obligations under the
Listing Rules and disclose that policy or a summary of it.
Yes The Company has adopted a Continuous Disclosure Policy which details the disclosure
requirements as required by the ASX Listing Rules and other relevant legislation.
The Continuous Disclosure Policy is available on the Company website.
Principle 6: Respect the rights of security holders
Recommendation 6.1
A listed entity should provide information about itself
and its governance to investors via its website.
Yes The Company’s website forms a key part of its communications platform to security holders
and the broader investment community and contains information about the Company’s,
Directors and management and corporate governance practices, policies and charters.
Current and past ASX announcements, presentations and reports will be available for
review on the Company’s website following its listing on ASX. These announcements,
presentations and reports are posted on the Company’s website shortly after they have
been released to the market.
Recommendation 6.2
A listed entity should design and implement an investor
relations program to facilitate effective two-way
communications with investors.
Yes The Company has adopted a Shareholder Communications Strategy which aims to promote
and facilitate effective two-way communication with investors. The Strategy outlines a
range of ways in which information is communicated to shareholders and is available on
the Company’s website as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan.
Recommendation 6.3
A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes
it has in place to facilitate and encourage participation of
security holders.
Yes The Company has established a Shareholder Communication policy which is designed to
ensure that the Company provides current and relevant information to its security holders
and recognises the value created through the facilitation of security holder access to market
briefings and meetings with management.
The Company will encourage participation of security holders at its Annual General Meeting
each year. The Annual General Meeting represents a key opportunity for security holders
to meet the Board and ask questions of the Directors. Security holders have an opportunity
to address the Board and vote on resolutions before an Annual General Meeting on
important matters such as election and re-election of Directors, any changes to the
Company’s Constitution and the adoption of annual financial statements. Key members of
senior management, including the CEO, are present and available. Security holders who
are not able to attend the Annual General Meeting in person are encouraged to lodge a
direct proxy vote or appoint proxies to represent them at the meeting.
Notices of meetings and explanatory material will be available on the Company’s website.
The Shareholder Communication policy is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 6.4
A listed entity should give security holders the option to
receive communications from, and send communications
to, the entity and its security registry electronically.
Yes The Company’s share registry provides a facility whereby security holders can provide email
addresses to receive correspondence from the Company electronically and security holders
have the option to contact the share register via telephone, facsimile or email. On an
ongoing basis, the Company works closely with its share registry to monitor and review the
opportunities available to the Company to better utilise electronic means of
communication with investors.
Contact details are provided on the Company’s website.
Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk
Recommendation 7.1
The board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a committee or committees to oversee risk,
each of which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director.
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances of the members at those meetings;
or
(b) if it does not have a risk committee or committees
that satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the
processes it employs for overseeing the entity’s risk
management framework.
Partially (a)
The Board established an Audit and Risk Committee on 27 February 2019. The Audit
and Risk Committee currently comprises the full Board. It is chaired by independent
Director, Mr Justin Nuich. Membership does not currently comprise only non-
executive Directors or a majority of independent Directors (see commentary in
Recommendation 2.3 above). The Board has formed the view that the current
membership of the Committee is appropriate for the Company at this stage but will
review this on an ongoing basis.
(b)
The Company reports the number of times the Committee met throughout the
Reporting Period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings in
its FY2020 Annual Report on page 25.
(c)
The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan contains an Audit and Risk Committee
Charter that provides for the creation of an Audit and Risk Committee (if it is
considered it will benefit the Company), with at least three members, all of whom
must be independent Directors, and which must be chaired by an independent
Director.
(d)
The identification and proper management of the Company's risks are an important
priority of the Board, and the Company is committed to designing and implementing
systems and methods appropriate to minimise and control its risks.
(e)
The Board has adopted a Risk Management and Internal Compliance and Control
Policy which sets out the accountabilities and responsibilities of the Board, the
Managing Director, senior Management, the Company Secretary and all other
employees of the Company in relation to risk management.
(f)
Pursuant to this policy, the Board has overall responsibility for the identification,
understanding and monitoring of key strategic risks affecting the Company.
As the operations of the Company develop, the Board will reassess the composition of the
Audit and Risk Committee.
Recommendation 7.2
The board or a committee of the board should:
(a) review the entity’s risk management framework at
least annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be
sound; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period,
whether such a review has taken place.
Yes The Company has a Risk Management and Internal Compliance and Control policy in place
that is reviewed at least annually to ensure that the Company’s material risks are managed
effectively.
A formal review of the Company’s Risk Management and Internal Compliance and Control
policy and risk management framework was undertaken in FY2020.
Recommendation 7.3
The listed entity should disclose:
(a) if it has an internal audit function, how the function
is structured and what role it performs; or
(b) If it does not have an internal audit function, that
fact and the processes is employs for evaluating and
continually improving the effectiveness of its risk
management and internal control processes.
Yes The Company does not have an internal audit function given its present size and level of
complexity of its operations. The Board, through the Audit and Risk Committee, is
responsible for the oversight of its risk management and internal compliance and control
process. Responsibility for risk management and control is delegated to the appropriate
level of management within the Company, with the CEO having overall responsibility for the
risk management and control processes.
Recommendation 7.4
A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material
exposure to economic, environmental and social
sustainability risks and, if it does, how it manages or
intends to manage those risks.
Yes The Company has exposure to economic risks, including general economic risks and risks
associated with the economic cycle.
There may be a requirement in the future for the Company to raise additional funding to
pursue its business objectives. The Company’s ability to raise capital may be affected by
these economic risks.
The Company has in place risk management processes and procedures to identify, manage
and minimise its exposure to these economic risks where appropriate.
The Board currently considers that the Company does not have any material exposure to
environmental risks.
The Board currently considers that the Company does not have any material exposure to
social sustainability risk. The Company’s Code of Conduct outlines the Company’s
commitment to integrity and fair dealing in its business affairs. The Code of Conduct sets
out the principles covering appropriate conduct in a variety of contexts and outlines the
minimum standard of behavior expected from employees when dealing with stakeholders.

Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly

Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly
Recommendation 8.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a remuneration committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director.
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met throughout
the period and the individual attendances of the
members of those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a remuneration committee,
disclose that fact and the processes it employs for
setting the level and composition of remuneration
for directors and senior executives and ensuring
that such remuneration is appropriate and not
excessive.
Partially The Board established a Nomination and Remuneration Committee on 27 February 2019
comprising the full Board of the Company. The Committee has established processes to
set the level of composition of remuneration for Directors and senior executives to ensure
that such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive.
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee currently comprises the full Board. It is
chaired by independent Director, Mr Jim Walker. Its membership does not currently
comprise a majority of independent Directors. However, the Board has formed the view
that the current membership of the Committee is appropriate for the Company at this stage
but will review this on an ongoing basis (see commentary in Recommendation 2.3 above).
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee Charter is available on the Company’s
website. The Company reports the number of times the Committee met throughout the
Reporting Period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings in its
FY2020 Annual Report on page 25.
Recommendation 8.2
A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive
directors and the remuneration of executive directors
and other senior executives.
Yes The Company has a Remuneration Policy which separately discloses its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive Directors and the remuneration of
executive Directors and other senior executives.
The Remuneration Policy is available on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 8.3
A listed entity which has an equity-based incentive
remuneration scheme should have a policy on whether
participants are permitted to entity into transactions
(whether through the use of derivatives or others) which
limit the economic risk of participating in the scheme and
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
Yes The Company does not currently have an equity-based remuneration scheme. However,
should one be introduced, the Securities Trading Policy contains a hedging prohibition
which states that members of Key Management Personnel must not enter into an
arrangement with anyone if that arrangement would have the effect of limiting exposure
of the member to risk relating to an element of the member’s remuneration that has not
vested in the member or has vested in the member but remains subject to a holding lock.
The Securities Trading Policy is available on the Company’s website.