AI assistant
MACRO METALS LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2025
Apr 21, 2025
65283_rns_2025-04-21_1ba73fb1-2961-474e-839c-12d6a3a65f0c.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT 22 April 2025
==> picture [84 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
Macro Wins Mining Services Contract
Highlights
-
Macro Mining Services Pty Ltd (MMS) awarded mining services contract at the Extension Iron Ore Project located in the East Pilbara Region of Western Australia (Project)
-
Contract runs for life of mine during which Macro will provide the following services:
-
Exclusively provide technical services including exploration and permitting for the Project on cost plus 15%
-
Undertake mine site establishment, drill and blast, mining and load & haul in conjunction with strategic partner and head Project contractor, RE:GROUP Pty Ltd, on cost plus 15%
-
Exclusively perform crushing and screening under build own operate model on prevailing market terms
-
Project consists of three granted mining leases covering an area of 27.6Km[2] located 2km north of BHP Group Ltd’s (ASX:BHP) Yandi Iron Ore Operations and 20km west-north west of Rio Tinto’s (ASX: RIO) Yandicoogina Iron Ore Operations
-
Mineral resource estimate completed in 2019 defined an Indicated Resource of 16.1 Mt at 54.2% Fe (60.49% Ca Fe), 5.7% SiO2, 5.6% Al2O3, 0.046% P and 10.4% LOI using a 53% Fe Cut Off Grade
-
MMS’ technical services scope includes validating previous Project metallurgical test work that indicated dry screening out <1mm size fraction leaves 11.29Mt at 57.16% Fe, (63.84% Ca Fe), 3.6% SiO2, 4.63% Al2O3, 0.05% P and 10.44% LOI
-
Project execution plan envisages utilising Macro’s logistics, accommodation & raw materials hub located 28km to the east of Port Hedland’s Utah Point Bulk Handling Facility for off port stockpile and potential product blending opportunities
-
MMS’ contract value to be provided to market upon MMS completing Project development schedule and execution plan as part of its technical service scope of work
-
Macro Metals Limited to be granted call option to acquire 27.3% Project equity stake held privately by Managing Director
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, West Perth, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|] Page 1 of 53
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Macro Metals Limited ( ASX:M4M ) ( Macro or the Company ) is pleased to announce that RE:GROUP Pty Ltd has awarded Macro’s wholly owned subsidiary, Macro Mining Services Pty Ltd ( MMS ), a mining services contract at the Extension Iron Ore Project ( Project ).
The Project comprises three granted mining leases covering a land area of 27.6km[2] and is located 270km south-south-east of Port Hedland in the Eastern Pilbara Region of Western Australia; well within economic trucking distance of the Utah Point Bulk Handling Facility in Port Hedland ( UPBHF ).
==> picture [479 x 338] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Location Plan of Extension Iron Ore Project
A mineral resource estimate completed in 2019 outlined an Indicated Mineral Resource of 16.1 Mt at 54.2% Fe, 5.7% SiO2, 5.6% Al2O3, 0.046% P and 10.4% LOI using a 53% Fe Cut Off Grade.
A key component of the technical services scope of work that MMS will undertake is validating metallurgical test work conducted by the former project holder that established that 11.29Mt of iron ore with specifications of 57.16% Fe, 3.6% SiO2, 4.63% Al2O3, 0.05% P and 10.44% LOI would remain after dry screening and removing the <1mm size fraction.
Mr Tolga Kumova, Chairman of Macro stated: “The award of this life of mine, mining services contract to Macro Mining Services at the Extension Iron Ore Project by RE:GROUP is testament to the level of professionalism and expertise that the Macro team has demonstrated to the market.
Pleasingly, we will immediately begin generating cashflow from the contract as our team commences providing the technical services required to expedite Project approvals and development.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
As soon as Macro secures full permitting for the Project, our team will, in conjunction with the team at RE:GROUP Pty Ltd, transition the Project into operations whereby we will jointly undertake mine site establishment, drill and blast, mining and load and haul operations to the ROM pad for life of mine of the Project. In addition, Macro will exclusively provide ROM management, crushing and screening services under a build own operate model for life of mine of the Project.
This Project is ideally located to take advantage of Macro’s strategic logistics hub that provides an off-port storage solution just on the outskirts of Port Hedland. The favourably low phosphorous content of the Extension Project iron ore offers an attractive blending proposition to higher phosphorus content products currently being exported over Utah Point and the logistics hub, located just 28kms east of the port, provides an ideal product blending location.”
In addition to validating previous metallurgical test work, the MMS team will engage with the Pilbara Ports Authority ( PPA ) as part of Project planning works to determine availability of an annualised export allocation of 1.5-2 million tonnes per annum ( Mtpa ) for the Project.
The MMS exploration team will also shortly begin assessing the exploration upside potential of several currently untested mineralisation outcrops on the Project tenements, with the aim of increasing the life of mine.
Mr Simon Rushton, Managing Director of Macro stated: “I am delighted to have negotiated this mining services contract with our partners at RE:GROUP. Their team is highly capable and very well regarded and I am very pleased to be formally embarking on our first operational project together.
Our two teams have already built an extremely strong working relationship since our businesses strategically aligned last year and this relationship will only strengthen in the weeks and months ahead as we continue to jointly work on a range of other bulk commodity contracting opportunities and initiatives across the Pilbara.
This life of mine, mining services contract with RE:GROUP locks in revenue and margins for our business and creates a very solid foundation for the contracting order book we are currently building. MMS’ scope of work under this contract is firmly aligned with the business model we are pursuing; namely that we look to perform as many aspects of the supply chain as possible from pit to customer.
Outside of this project, the MMS team has been incredibly busy over the past four months building the foundations of our mining services division. The volume of EOI and tender work we have been involved in across the WA mining industry, from tier 1 Pilbara iron ore companies through to Goldfields’ gold companies, has been significant and the feedback received regarding the quality of our submissions has been nothing short of exemplary.
The award of this contract follows MMS recently achieving first revenue after successfully mobilising to an ASX-listed client’s site and quickly diagnosing and safely repairing their crushing plant to return it to service. While only a small scope of work, it was a demonstration of the MMS crushing team’s vast experience and technical knowledge and their capability to safely service tier 1 mining and resources clients across WA.”
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Project and contracting details
Project owner, Project Rusty Pty Ltd ( Rusty ) has appointed RE:GROUP Pty Ltd the head mining services contract for the Project. RE:GROUP Pty Ltd’s scope of work includes the full suite of technical, developmental and operational services required to secure all remaining Project approvals, to establish the mine site and thereafter to operate the mine and deliver the saleable iron ore product to the Utah Point Bulk Handling Facility for life of mine.
RE:GROUP Pty Ltd has appointed MMS to exclusively perform all technical services work at the Project as well as the crushing and screening services for life of mine. In addition, the mining services contract also requires MMS to jointly perform mine site establishment works as well as ongoing mining, drill & blast and load & haul operations for life of mine in conjunction with RE:GROUP Pty Ltd.
The technical services aspect of MMS’ scope of work as well as the mine site establishment, drill & blast, mining and load & haul services that MMS will jointly perform with RE:GROUP Pty Ltd will be remunerated on a cost plus 15% mark-up basis. The crushing and screening services that MMS will exclusively provide at the Project will be on prevailing market remuneration terms utilising a build own operate model.
The expected revenue to be generated by MMS from its contract with RE:GROUP Pty Ltd over the life of mine of the Project will be reported to the market as soon as possible after MMS completes its technical services scope of work, which will include preparation of a mine plan that in turn will enable mining and processing costs (and contract revenue for MMS) to be accurately forecasted.
Rusty is a privately held company. Macro Directors, Mr Simon Rushton and Mr Rob Jewson, each hold 27.3% of the issued share capital.
Subject to receipt of shareholder approval under ASX Listing Rule 10.1, Mr Rushton has agreed to grant Macro an option to acquire his 27.3% shareholding in Rusty. Subject to shareholder approval under ASX Listing Rule 10.11, and any applicable regulatory approvals, Macro may exercise its option at any time on or prior to commercial production at the Project. The consideration payable by Macro to Mr Rushton if Macro exercises the option is the issue of 175,000,000 fully paid ordinary Macro shares.
Next Steps
MMS has commenced preparing a detailed scope of work and cost estimation for the Project to undertake the permitting and development activities required to commence operations at the Project. Key aspects of the initial phase of MMS’ works under the mining services contract include:
-
Evaluation of current permitting and approvals status to finalise the approvals pathway and expedite final Project approvals with the aim of commencing commercial production as soon as possible.
-
Application for bulk sample permitting to facilitate trial shipments.
-
Exploration program to evaluate potential of increasing resource base.
-
Liaising with PPA to secure between 1.5 – 2Mtpa of allocation at the UPBHF for life of mine of the Project.
-
Optimisation of haulage corridor and logistics between the Project and Port Hedland (to be completed in conjunction with RE:GROUP Pty Ltd who will provide haulage services).
-
Development of the Project execution plan, mine plan and mine schedule.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Directors.
For further information, please contact:
Simon Rushton Managing Director Macro Metals Limited +61 3 6143 6707 [email protected]
About Macro Metals Limited
Macro is a mineral exploration, development and mining services company focussed on delivery of shareholder value through the economic development of natural resource assets.
Macro owns directly a portfolio of iron ore and manganese assets which are undergoing active exploration programs, with the aim of providing future production opportunities.
Separately, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Macro Mining Services Pty Ltd, the Company offers bespoke, safe and highly value accretive mining services across a range of commodity groups and through the entire pit to customer supply chain, including mining, crushing and screening, processing, haulage, ship loading and shipping services.
Macro is a diversified mining and mining services business.
Competent Person’s Statement
The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Lynn Widenbar. Mr Widenbar, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, is a fulltime employee of Widenbar and Associates and produced the Mineral Resource Estimate based on data and geological information supplied by Maiden Iron Pty Ltd (Former Project Owner). Mr Widenbar has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Minerals Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Widenbar consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context that the information appears.
The information in this announcement that relates to exploration results at the Extension Iron Ore Project is based on and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Robert Jewson, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, Director and Shareholder of Project Rusty Pty Ltd and a Non-Executive Director of Macro Metals Limited. Mr Jewson has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity which he has undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Jewson consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Jewson is a shareholder of Macro Metals Ltd.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Overview of Extension Iron Project
Widenbar and Associates (“WAA”) was commissioned by Maiden Iron Pty Ltd (MI) (Former owner) to produce a Resource Estimate for the Extension Iron Ore Deposit in July 2019 and is reported in accordance by Macro Metals Ltd in accordance with the requirements of ASX Listing Rule 5.8 in this announcement.
The Extension deposit lies in the central portion of the Hamersley Ranges, and is located 3km north of BHPB’s Yandicoogina Mine and near to established mine service infrastructure in the Central Pilbara.
A total of 56 diamond core holes were drilled for 501 metres. The majority of these holes were drilled in the Initial Mining Area (IMA), in the east of the resource, to increase the density of drilling to a 100 by 100m spacing. The remainder of the holes were drilled to “twin” existing reverse circulation holes previously drilled by Iron Ore Holdings and nominally spaced at 200 by 100m.
Iron mineralisation within the project area is present as predominantly fluvial pisolite channel iron deposits (CID) with minor reworked CID and canga deposits.
The deposit has been previously modelled by Iron Ore Holdings (IOH - Widenbar, 2007 and subsequently updated in 2014. The improved drilling data from MI’s diamond programme within the IMA has now been used to recalculate the resource within the IMA. The resource outside of the IMA remains that same as that determined previously.
An Inverse Distance interpolation method was used to estimate the updated part of the resource. Ordinary Kriging was used to estimate the older, IOH resource. No grade capping was applied. Search ellipses applied in the estimate were based on variography, drill hole spacing and the interpreted geological continuity and orientation of the deposits.
The resource estimate has been classified in the Indicated category as defined by the 2012 edition of the JORC code. The Mineral Resource at a 53% Fe cut off grade is reported below:
| Classification | Tonnage |
Fe (%) |
P (%) | SiO2 (%) | Al2O3 (%) | LOI (%) | CaFe (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Mt) | |||||||
| Indicated | 16.1 | 54.2 | 0.046 | 5.74 | 5.64 | 10.4 | 60.49 |
| Total | 16.1 | 54.2 | 0.046 | 5.74 | 5.64 | 10.4 | 60.49 |
The Competent Persons deem that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction ( RPEEE ) of iron mineralisation on the following basis:
-
The detrital iron mineralisation has been delineated by reverse circulation percussion ( RCP ) and diamond core drilling over an approximately 3.8km by 3.9km area. The vast majority of the resource is exposed near surface and therefore amenable to initial simple open pit mining.
-
The iron mineralisation when crushed and screened to remove the <1mm size fraction is relatively comparable in iron grade to Pilbara products - Robe River Fines, FMG Blend Fines and Super Specials Fines, that are benchmarked under the Platts 58% Fines Index.
-
Although the Mineral Resource is not of a scale to justify the capital expenditure of a standalone rail infrastructure, smaller tonnage Pilbara iron trucking operations to the shared Port Hedland Utah Point have operated successfully - Mineral Resources’ Wonmunna and Iron Valley are examples.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
A summary of the total Extension Resource at various cutoffs is presented below:
Table 1: Extension Indicated Resource Summary
| Cutoff | Volume | Tonnes | Density | Fe% | **Si02% ** | **Al203% ** | LOI% | P% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 1,563 | 4,266 | 2.73 | 60.39 | 2.61 | 4.11 |
6.23 | 0.072 |
| 59 | 8,976 | 24,504 | 2.73 | 59.49 | 2.45 | 3.55 |
8.45 | 0.049 |
| 58 | 42,241 | 115,318 | 2.73 | 58.6 | 3.10 | 3.38 |
9.19 | 0.041 |
| 57 | 158,410 | 432,460 | 2.73 | 57.72 | 3.56 | 3.85 |
9.51 | 0.041 |
| 56 | 410,562 | 1,120,833 | 2.73 | 56.94 | 3.90 | 4.28 |
9.86 | 0.044 |
| 55 | 1,017,415 | 2,777,528 | 2.73 | 56.02 | 4.43 | 4.76 |
10.08 | 0.046 |
| 54 | 2,861,876 | 7,812,846 | 2.73 | 54.99 | 5.19 | 5.29 |
10.19 | 0.046 |
| 53 | 5,902,231 | 16,112,770 | 2.73 | 54.22 | 5.74 | 5.64 |
10.35 | 0.046 |
| 52 | 8,597,178 | 23,469,446 | 2.73 | 53.69 | 6.17 | 5.87 |
10.39 | 0.047 |
| 51 | 10,162,730 | 27,741,924 | 2.73 | 53.36 | 6.46 | 6.01 |
10.42 | 0.047 |
| 50 | 11,076,518 | 30,232,619 | 2.73 | 53.14 | 6.68 | 6.07 |
10.46 | 0.047 |
| 49 | 11,278,827 | 30,767,143 | 2.73 | 53.08 | 6.74 | 6.10 |
10.46 | 0.046 |
| 48 | 11,932,831 | 32,504,810 | 2.72 | 52.83 | 6.96 | 6.20 |
10.47 | 0.046 |
| 47 | 13,322,105 | 36,182,991 | 2.72 | 52.28 | 7.45 | 6.46 |
10.47 | 0.044 |
| 46 | 15,739,241 | 42,592,714 | 2.71 | 51.41 | 8.22 | 6.89 |
10.45 | 0.043 |
| 45 | 18,930,911 | 51,139,353 | 2.70 | 50.42 | 9.13 | 7.33 |
10.43 | 0.041 |
| 44 | 22,307,850 | 60,206,689 | 2.70 | 49.53 | 9.99 | 7.71 |
10.42 | 0.04 |
| 43 | 25,218,989 | 68,083,198 | 2.70 | 48.83 | 10.62 | 8.04 |
10.42 | 0.039 |
| 42 | 27,394,998 | 73,977,993 | 2.70 | 48.33 | 11.06 | 8.30 |
10.44 | 0.038 |
| 41 | 29,109,081 | 78,599,683 | 2.70 | 47.93 | 11.39 | 8.51 |
10.45 | 0.038 |
| 40 | 30,244,489 | 81,659,878 | 2.70 | 47.65 | 11.64 | 8.65 |
10.46 | 0.038 |
| 0 | 32,705,992 | 88,160,280 | 2.70 | 46.94 | 12.34 | 8.98 |
10.43 | 0.037 |
Location
The Extension deposit is located in Project Rusty Pty Ltd’s tenements M47/1353 to M47/1355 inclusive.
==> picture [263 x 186] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Location Plan of Extension Iron Ore Project
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Drilling and Sampling
Drilling
IOH drilled 333 RC holes at Extension for a total of 3,992 metres. Drilling was on a nominal spacing of 200m by 100m using a Hydco 150 RC drill rig with an onboard riffle splitter operated by the drilling contractor.
Maiden has subsequently drilled 56 diamond holes for a total of 501 metres. Drill hole locations are illustrated below. In the Initial Mining Area these holes twinned the 200m x 100 m IOH and infilled to 100m by 100m spacing.
Collar Location
All holes have been surveyed by DGPS, which has an expected relative accuracy of 0.02m East and North and 0.05m RL for the control, and 0.05m East, North and RL for the collars. A drill hole location plans are shown below.
==> picture [492 x 300] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Drill Hole Location Plan
Drill Hole Sampling
IOH Sampling
Samples were collected every 2 metres down hole, riffle split for routine assaying (3kg) and retention (1 litre plastic jar) with the remainder (about 45 kg) as the drill reject sample left on site. Additional drill sample treatment was carried out for quality control purposes.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Maiden Iron Sampling
Diamond core samples were targeted at a nominal 250mm interval constrained to geologically identified boundaries where appropriate. The core was photographed before the whole core samples were sent to be analysed.
Sample Preparation and Assaying
IOH Sample Preparation and Assaying
The sample preparation method consisted of initial drying at 105° then jaw crushing the whole sample followed by vibrating disk pulverization to -200 mesh. As part of quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedure, laboratory instigated duplicate pulp and standard/certified reference material (CRM) analysis was undertaken randomly every 24 samples.
Drill samples were analysed using the X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) method by Ultra Trace Laboratories in Perth for Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, MnO, CaO, P, S, MgO, Zn, K2O, Sn, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, As, Pb, Ba, Cl and Sr. In addition, loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by Thermo-Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) between 105°C and 1000°C and reweighing for content of combined water and carbon dioxide with results being reported on a dry sample basis.
Maiden Iron Sample Preparation and Assaying
Drill samples were analysed using the X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) method for Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, MnO, CaO, P, S, MgO, Zn, K2O, Sn, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, As, Pb, Ba, Na2O, Cl, Sr and LOI.
QAQC
IOH QAQC
IOH QAQC procedures and results are documented in Widenbar, 2012. Results are acceptable for the classification category proposed.
Maiden Iron QAQC
Company instigated blanks, standards and duplicate samples were inserted at approximately 25 metre intervals. Laboratory instigated standards were also introduced as well as repeat samples. Results are acceptable for the classification category proposed.
Geological Interpretation
Project Area Geology
The project area lies on the flanks of the regional east-southeast trending Yandicoogina Syncline which plunges shallowly to the east and is flanked on both limbs by Lower Proterozoic Brockman Iron Formation underlying shale, dolerite and BIF of the Weeli Wolli Formation exposed in the core. The economically important Tertiary Marillana channel iron deposit was deposited in a meandering palaeochannel in the synclinal core alongside the present Marillana Creek.
Local Geology
The deposit area is underlain by Proterozoic basement rocks of the Brockman Iron Formation and Weeli Wolli Formation which are unconformably overlain by a Cainozoic sedimentary cover sequence. The cover sequence comprises lower Tertiary residual deposits of hematite goethite in bedrock, eluvial deposits of canga and mixed canga/CID, palaeochannel iron deposits of Robe Pisolite and valley fill deposits of colluvium derived from the dissection and erosion of the Hamersley Surface, an elevated and dissected peneplaned surface of probably Mesozoic to early Tertiary age overlain by Quaternary scree deposits and talus slopes, superficial deposits containing pisolites and alluvial deposits.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Channel iron deposits infill northerly and southerly trending palaeotributaries joining the major Tertiary Marillana palaeochannel which formed approximately in the same position as the present Marillana Creek drainage.
A detailed geological mapping and rock sampling program was carried out at Extension during the 2013-2014 drilling program.
Mineralisation
Iron mineralisation within the project area is present as predominantly fluvial pisolite channel iron deposits with minor residual bedded hematite-goethite and eluvial canga deposits. The channel iron deposits infill palaeotributary channels which are genetically related to the Marillana Formation/Yandi CID occupying the main palaeochannel which occurs alongside the present day Marillana Creek system. The Yandi CID is traceable for some 80 kilometres in the Marillana Creek catchment and is 450 to 750 meters wide and up to 80 meters thick. It comprises largely of 1-2 mm size subrounded to rounded ooids, pisoids and peloids with red ochreous hematite (turgite) cores rimmed by concretionary vitreous goethite and larger 5-10mm size fossil wood fragments in subvitreous goethite cement.
The channel iron deposits within the project area occupy perched or hanging palaeotributary channels joining the main Marillana palaeochannel. During incision of the Hamersley Surface to form the main palaeovalley, meandering of the mature ancestral stream caused its tributaries to form discordant junctions resulting in perched or hanging palaeochannels which were later infilled with CID. As a result, the CID is more elevated and thinner within the palaeotributary channels. The CID is texturally and mineralogically similar to the Yandi CID although sedimentary structures are rarer in distribution. It is exposed over widths from 250 to 1500 meters and lengths up to 6 kilometres with thickness at CID margins ranging from 1 to 20 meters.
Sub-economic canga mineralisation occurs as usually small sized podiform bodies lying along the margins and at the base of the channel iron deposits. High grade bedded hematite-goethite mineralisation with prominent biscuit texture occupies small, shallow depressions or synclines within the Weeli Wolli Formation bedrock.
Geological Logging
Drill hole core was logged and coded for Domain, Colour, Pisolite nature, Washable Clay, Vughs and filling, Mineralogy and core competency (for DD holes). Domain coding is summarised below.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [395 x 595] intentionally omitted <==
Table 2: Detailed Logging Descriptions
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Geological Interpretation
For use in resource estimation, the detailed geological logging has been summarised into the following major codes.
| Code | Stratigraphy |
|---|---|
| QA | QuaternaryAlluvium |
| CAN | Canga |
| RCID | Reworked CID |
| UCID | Upper CID |
| LCID | Lower CID |
| LGC | Basal Conglomerate |
Table 3: Stratigraphy Codes
Data Preparation and Database
Raw Data
MI supplied validated drill hole data in Micromine format. Collar, assay and coded geology data files were provided. A detailed topography digital terrain model (DTM) updated in August 2012 was also provided.
==> picture [497 x 289] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Extension Topography and Drill Hole Locations
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
All drill hole data was validated using the Micromine software package, including:
-
Checks for duplicate collars
-
Checks for missing samples
-
Checks for down hole from-to interval consistency
-
Checks for overlapping samples
-
Checks for samples beyond hole depth
==> picture [493 x 287] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Extension Topography and Maiden Iron Drill Hole Locations- Initial Mining Area
Data Preparation and Database
The summary domain coding has been used to automatically generate basal surfaces for all of the major zones, using the lowest occurrence of each domain in each drill hole.
Section 7,490,400 North is shown below, illustrating the drill domain coding and auto-generated wireframe surfaces.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 252] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6: Section 7,490,400 North
Drill holes EXDC40, EXDC 41 and EXDC 43 had an occurrence of higher-grade CID within the Lower CID unit, which was separately coded and modelled to honour this minor CID boundary. The zone is illustrated below, on Section 7,490,600 North.
==> picture [493 x 250] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 7: Section 7,490,600 North Minor CID
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Metallurgy
Metallurgical testing was undertaken by the former owner, Maiden Iron in 2014 and 2015 utilising diamond drill core from the 2014 program. This test work confirmed that the removal of the 1mm size fraction upgrades the iron ore significantly. Based on this test work a marketable product above 57% Fe with very low phosphorus can be produced.
| Classification | Mt | Fe% | **Si02% ** | **Al203% ** | LOI% | P% | Ca Fe% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicated | 11.3 | 57.2 | 3.60 | 4.63 | 10.4 | 0.05 | 63.84 |
Statistical Analysis
Sample Length and Compositing
The large majority of samples are between 0.20m and 0.30m (particularly in the CID domains), and since they have been specifically selected to identify detailed geology, they have not been composited.
==> picture [493 x 256] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 8: Assay Length Distribution (All Data)
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 262] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 9: Assay Length Distribution Upper CID
==> picture [493 x 257] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 10: Assay Length Distribution Lower CID
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Summary Statistics
Summary statistics have been calculated for the major elements within each domain. Key statistics for the CID domain are tabulated below.
| Domain | Fe | **SiO2% ** | **Al203% ** | LOI | P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QA | 41.96 | 21.54 | 11.28 | 5.24 | 0.037 | |||||
| LCID | 53.66 | 5.3 | 5.89 | 11.46 | 0.052 | |||||
| LGC | 45.68 | 11.92 | 9.91 | 11.92 | 0.034 | |||||
| RCID | 44.51 | 13.4 | 11.98 | 9.64 | 0.038 | |||||
| UCID | 54.09 | 5.51 | 6.15 | 10.36 | 0.048 | |||||
| BOC | 40.29 | 21.93 | 8.83 | 10.75 | 0.022 |
Table 4: Summary Statistics by Domain
Distribution Statistics
Distribution statistics have been used to review the statistical nature of the main domains and ensure that the domains represent coherent and separate populations.
==> picture [493 x 302] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 11: Fe by Domain
In general, the main elements show very similar populations for the Upper and Lower CID units, while all other domains differ significantly.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 304] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 12: SiO2 by Domain
==> picture [493 x 305] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 13: Al2O3 by Domain
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Variography
Variography has been carried out for Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, P and LOI for both the Upper and Lower CID units.
Downhole variograms were used to define nugget effect and first and second sills, while global horizontal variograms were used to define the main ranges. Examples for Fe from the Upper CID are shown below; a full set of variograms is in Appendix 1.
==> picture [493 x 302] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 14: Fe Downhole Variogram
Generally, nugget effect is relatively low to moderate (typically 10 to 20%) while horizontal ranges are of the order of 120m to 150m. Downhole ranges are very limited, typically around 2m.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 303] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 15: Fe Horizontal Variogram
Rock Models
An “empty” rock model was created for the Initial Mining Area using the topographic and geological surfaces as constraints. Block model parameters are summarised below. Sub-cells to a minimum of 1.25m by 1.25m were used to spatially honour geological and topographical boundaries. Typical sections through the rock model are illustrated below.
==> picture [387 x 103] intentionally omitted <==
Table 5: Block Model Setup Parameters
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 252] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 16: Rock Model Section 7,490,400 North
==> picture [493 x 251] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 17: Rock Model Long Section 711,800 East
Resource Model Estimation
Block Model Interpolation
An Inverse Distance Cubed interpolation method was used to estimate all elements. No grade capping was applied. Search ellipses applied in the estimate were based on down hole variography, drill hole spacing and the interpreted geological continuity and orientation of the deposits. ID3 was
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
preferred over kriging as it gave better validation results and the horizontal variograms were not particularly good quality. The low nugget effect observed in the down hole variograms confirms use of the cubed power in the inverse distance interpolation.
The primary search ellipse had radii of 125m horizontally and 1.5m vertically. A minimum of 2 samples and a maximum of 16 samples were required in the search pass. A maximum of 4 samples per drill hole was used. Where blocks were not informed in the first pass, a second search was used with radii of 250m horizontally and 5m vertically. A minimum of 1 sample and a maximum of 16 samples were required in this search pass.
Approximately 95 % of blocks were informed in the first pass.
On advice from MI densities were taken from Ammtec’s report (2008) and applied on the basis of domains.
| Domain | Density |
|---|---|
| **QA ** | 2.00 |
| RCID | 2.56 |
| UCID | 2.73 |
| MCID | 2.73 |
| LCID | 2.73 |
| LGC | 2.85 |
| Basement | 2.65 |
Table 6: Density by Domain
Typical sections through the resource model showing Fe grade are illustrated below.
==> picture [493 x 250] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 18: Fe Section 7,490,400 North through Resource Model
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 252] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 19: Fe Long Section 711,800 East through Resource Model
Resource Model Validation
Block model validation has been carried out by several methods, including:
-
Drill Hole Section Review
-
Model versus Data Statistics by Domain
-
Swathe Plots
Examples of swathe plots for Fe and Al2O3 in Upper, Lower and Reworked CID units are illustrated below.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 303] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 20: Level Swathe Plot Fe in Upper CID
==> picture [493 x 302] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 21: Level Swathe Plot Fe in Lower CID
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 302] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 22: Level Swathe Plot Fe in Reworked CID
==> picture [493 x 301] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 23: Level Swathe Plot Al2O3 in Upper CID
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [493 x 303] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 24: Level Swathe Plot Al2O3 in Lower CID
==> picture [493 x 301] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 25: Level Swathe Plot Al2O3 in Reworked CID
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Combination of IOH and MI Resource Models
The updated area of the model based on new MI drilling has been inserted into the overall IOH resource model, replacing the older model.
Resource Classification
The Extension Mineral Resource has been classified as Indicated, in accordance with the 2012 Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code). A range of criteria has been considered in determining this classification including:
-
Geological continuity;
-
Data quality;
-
Drill hole spacing; and
-
Modelling technique.
Geological Continuity
Geological continuity is understood with reasonable confidence given detailed logging and mapping. The classification reflects this level of confidence.
Data Quality
Resource classification is based on information and data provided from the MI database. Descriptions of drilling techniques, survey, sampling/sample preparation, analytical techniques and database management/validation provided for both the IOH and MI Data indicate that data collection and management is well within industry standards. Widenbar considers that the database represents an accurate record of the drilling undertaken at the project.
Drilling Spacing
Drill hole spacing of the diamond drill holes in the model update area is 100 by 100m with close spaced sampling at 0.25m intervals. In the other parts of the resource area drilling is nominally 200m x 100m.
Modelling Technique
The Extension update resource model was generated using an ID3 interpolation method, with a multi-pass search approach. The first search ellipsoid had dimensions of 125 x 125 x 1.5m with a minimum of 2 samples and a maximum of 16. The second search, used where not enough data was found in the first search had dimensions 250m x 250m x 5m. 95% of blocks were estimated in the first search pass.
The search pass used, the number of samples used and the average distance of samples from each block, were all stored in the block model.
In general the search pass and average distance are all broadly correlated with a combination of drill hole spacing and domain thickness.
The above parameters were used as a guide in combination with drill spacing to arrive at a final resource classification.
Final Classification
All CID domains have been allocated to the Indicated category.
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Resource Estimates
Reasonable Prospects Hurdle
Clause 20 of the JORC Code (2012) requires that all reports of Mineral Resources must have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction (RPEEE), regardless of the classification of the Mineral Resource. The Competent Person believes there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction of the Mineral Resources based on the following:
-
The detrital iron mineralisation has been delineated by reverse circulation percussion (RCP) and diamond core drilling over an approximately 3.8km by 3.9km area. The vast majority of the resource is exposed near surface and therefore amenable to initial simple open pit mining.
-
The iron mineralisation when crushed and screened to remove the <1mm size fraction is relatively comparable in iron grade to Pilbara products - Robe River Fines, FMG Blend Fines and Super Specials Fines, that are benchmarked under the Platts 58% Fines Index.
-
Although the Mineral Resource is not of a scale to justify the capital expenditure of a standalone rail infrastructure, smaller tonnage Pilbara iron trucking operations to the shared Port Hedland Utah Point have operated successfully - Mineral Resources’ Wonmunna and Iron Valley are examples.
Current Resource Estimates
A summary of the current resource estimate for Extension, including the updated Initial Mining Area at various cutoffs is shown below (including all CID units, excluding QA).
| Cutoff | Volume | Tonnes | Density | Fe% | **Si02% ** | **Al203% ** | LOI% | P% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 1,563 | 4,266 | 2.73 | 60.39 | 2.61 | 4.11 |
6.23 | 0.072 |
| 59 | 8,976 | 24,504 | 2.73 | 59.49 | 2.45 | 3.55 |
8.45 | 0.049 |
| 58 | 42,241 | 115,318 | 2.73 | 58.6 | 3.10 | 3.38 |
9.19 | 0.041 |
| 57 | 158,410 | 432,460 | 2.73 | 57.72 | 3.56 | 3.85 |
9.51 | 0.041 |
| 56 | 410,562 | 1,120,833 | 2.73 | 56.94 | 3.90 | 4.28 |
9.86 | 0.044 |
| 55 | 1,017,415 | 2,777,528 | 2.73 | 56.02 | 4.43 | 4.76 |
10.08 | 0.046 |
| 54 | 2,861,876 | 7,812,846 | 2.73 | 54.99 | 5.19 | 5.29 |
10.19 | 0.046 |
| 53 | 5,902,231 | 16,112,770 | 2.73 | 54.22 | 5.74 | 5.64 |
10.35 | 0.046 |
| 52 | 8,597,178 | 23,469,446 | 2.73 | 53.69 | 6.17 | 5.87 |
10.39 | 0.047 |
| 51 | 10,162,730 | 27,741,924 | 2.73 | 53.36 | 6.46 | 6.01 |
10.42 | 0.047 |
| 50 | 11,076,518 | 30,232,619 | 2.73 | 53.14 | 6.68 | 6.07 |
10.46 | 0.047 |
| 49 | 11,278,827 | 30,767,143 | 2.73 | 53.08 | 6.74 | 6.10 |
10.46 | 0.046 |
| 48 | 11,932,831 | 32,504,810 | 2.72 | 52.83 | 6.96 | 6.20 |
10.47 | 0.046 |
| 47 | 13,322,105 | 36,182,991 | 2.72 | 52.28 | 7.45 | 6.46 |
10.47 | 0.044 |
| 46 | 15,739,241 | 42,592,714 | 2.71 | 51.41 | 8.22 | 6.89 |
10.45 | 0.043 |
| 45 | 18,930,911 | 51,139,353 | 2.70 | 50.42 | 9.13 | 7.33 |
10.43 | 0.041 |
| 44 | 22,307,850 | 60,206,689 | 2.70 | 49.53 | 9.99 | 7.71 |
10.42 | 0.04 |
| 43 | 25,218,989 | 68,083,198 | 2.70 | 48.83 | 10.62 | 8.04 |
10.42 | 0.039 |
| 42 | 27,394,998 | 73,977,993 | 2.70 | 48.33 | 11.06 | 8.30 |
10.44 | 0.038 |
| 41 | 29,109,081 | 78,599,683 | 2.70 | 47.93 | 11.39 | 8.51 |
10.45 | 0.038 |
| 40 | 30,244,489 | 81,659,878 | 2.70 | 47.65 | 11.64 | 8.65 |
10.46 | 0.038 |
| 0 | 32,705,992 | 88,160,280 | 2.70 | 46.94 | 12.34 | 8.98 |
10.43 | 0.037 |
Table 7: Extension Total Indicated Resource
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole East North ing RL Dep th |
Fro m To Inter val Fe% SiO2 % Al2O3 % TiO2 % MnO % CaO % P% S% LOI10 00% |
|---|---|
| EXDC 013 7113 00 7490 400 625. 645 10 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 014 7114 05 7490 400 623. 951 6 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 015 7114 95 7490 400 622. 594 5 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 016 7116 00 7490 400 626. 382 7 |
0.3 7 6.7 53.60 5.42 5.23 0.34 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.03 12.08 |
| EXDC 017 7117 00 7490 400 625. 246 8 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 018 7118 00 7490 395 626. 515 8 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 019 7119 00 7490 400 628. 472 9 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 020 7120 00 7490 400 629. 493 11 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 021 7121 00 7490 400 630. 346 9 |
1.1 6.9 5.8 54.03 5.19 6.06 0.27 0.00 0.08 0.04 0.03 10.86 |
| EXDC 022 7122 00 7490 400 630. 914 10 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 023 7122 95 7490 400 631. 634 9.5 |
|
| EXDC 024 7123 98 7490 399 632. 394 12. 5 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 025 7124 98 7490 399 632. 859 9.1 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 026 7126 00 7490 400 632. 729 10 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 027 7126 96 7490 401 632. 033 6.1 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 028 7128 04 7490 394 628. 099 1.5 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 029 7118 00 7490 395 626. 515 6.5 |
0.4 6.1 5.7 54.31 4.48 5.79 0.24 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.02 11.46 |
| EXDC 030 7118 97 7490 402 628. 397 8 |
0 2.5 2.5 51.67 7.30 7.95 0.26 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.04 10.28 |
| 3.9 7.3 3.4 54.47 5.18 5.64 0.22 0.00 0.10 0.04 0.06 10.71 |
|
| EXDC 031 7117 00 7490 397 625. 158 6.5 |
0.4 5.3 4.9 55.47 3.73 4.99 0.19 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 11.51 |
| EXDC 032 7120 99 7490 200 632. 214 10 |
3.4 8.9 5.5 54.52 5.63 4.52 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.07 11.14 |
| EXDC 033 7119 99 7490 200 630. 57 9.1 |
1.6 5 8.4 5 6.8 54.01 6.24 5.54 0.22 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.04 10.52 |
| EXDC 034 7119 01 7490 200 628. 128 7.8 |
1.4 5 5.4 3.95 54.91 4.15 5.63 0.26 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.05 11.11 |
| EXDC 035 7118 00 7490 200 625. 977 6 |
1.8 5 4.8 2.95 55.20 3.83 4.87 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.05 11.91 |
| EXDC 036 7117 00 7490 200 624. 368 4 |
0.4 1.2 5 1.25 54.86 4.11 5.34 0.21 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.03 11.72 |
| EXDC 037 7118 00 7490 000 624. 994 6.7 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 038 7117 00 7489 800 626. 102 9.3 |
Not Assayed |
| EXDC 039 7120 05 7490 600 630. 12 10. 5 |
2 9.1 7.1 56.04 3.90 5.46 0.22 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.03 10.08 |
| EXDC 040 7119 00 7490 600 629. 64 12. 3 |
2 3.9 5 1.95 52.13 6.25 8.58 0.47 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.03 9.92 |
| EXDC 041 7118 10 7490 600 628. 303 11. 5 |
0.8 10. 15 9.35 53.68 4.38 6.88 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.08 11.36 |
| EXDC 042 7117 00 7490 600 629. 113 13 |
0.6 5 11. 75 11.1 54.60 5.45 5.61 0.34 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.04 10.13 |
| EXDC 043 7116 00 7490 600 628. 405 12 |
2.9 7.8 4.9 52.61 6.81 5.18 0.36 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04 12.04 |
| EXDC 044 7116 00 7490 700 628. 905 10. 2 |
0.2 9.1 5 8.95 53.29 5.53 6.19 0.52 0.01 0.09 0.06 0.05 11.06 |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro | To | Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | |||||||
| EXDC | 7117 | 7490 | 629. | 13. | 1.5 | 10. | 9.2 | 53.85 |
5.46 |
6.00 |
0.35 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
10.94 |
| 045 | 00 | 700 | 134 |
3 | 7 | |||||||||||
| EXDC | 7118 | 7490 | 629. | 12. | 1 | 9.7 | 8.75 | 53.35 |
5.93 |
6.47 |
0.39 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
10.62 |
| 046 | 00 | 700 | 46 |
3 | 5 | |||||||||||
| EXDC | 7119 | 7490 | 630. | 12. | 2 | 7.3 | 5.3 | 53.65 |
5.15 |
6.38 |
0.32 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
11.22 |
| 047 | 00 | 700 | 476 |
2 | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7120 | 7490 | 631. | 11 | 4.1 | 9 | 4.85 | 52.32 |
4.87 |
7.40 |
0.37 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
12.32 |
| 048 | 00 | 700 | 109 |
5 | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7120 | 7490 | 629. | 8.8 | 2.2 | 8.8 | 6.6 | 55.41 |
4.41 |
5.82 |
0.38 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
9.88 |
| 049 | 00 | 400 | 493 |
|||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7121 | 7490 | 629. | 9 | 1.1 | 6.5 | 5.4 | 51.50 |
4.82 |
8.66 |
0.27 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
0.08 |
12.26 |
| 050 | 00 | 500 | 094 |
|||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7120 | 7490 | 628. | 9.5 | 2.6 | 8.9 | 6.35 | 56.24 |
2.85 |
5.26 |
0.16 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
10.95 |
| 051 | 00 | 500 | 515 |
5 | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7119 | 7490 | 628. | 11 | 0.4 | 9.8 | 9.35 | 54.56 |
4.37 |
5.77 |
0.21 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.07 |
0.05 |
11.40 |
| 052 | 00 | 500 | 193 |
5 | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7118 | 7490 | 627. | 10. | 0 | 7.6 | 7.65 | 55.44 |
4.26 |
4.96 |
0.20 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.05 |
0.07 |
11.12 |
| 053 | 00 | 500 | 32 |
4 | 5 | |||||||||||
| EXDC | 7117 | 7490 | 628. | 11 | 0.1 | 10. | 10.0 | 53.78 | 6.42 |
5.44 |
0.29 |
0.02 |
0.07 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
10.49 |
| 054 | 00 | 500 | 548 |
5 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||
| EXDC | 7116 | 7490 | 628. | 10 | 0.7 | 9.7 | 9 | 53.73 |
8.07 |
4.36 |
0.29 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
10.12 |
| 055 | 00 | 500 | 085 |
5 | 5 | |||||||||||
| EXDC | 7117 | 7490 | 624. | 6.1 | 0 | 2.8 | 2.85 | 57.19 |
3.31 |
3.87 |
0.18 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
10.64 |
| 056 | 00 | 300 | 804 |
5 | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7118 | 7490 | 627. | 6.9 | 0.1 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 53.57 |
4.91 |
5.96 |
0.22 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
11.99 |
| 057 | 00 | 300 | 261 |
5 | 5 | |||||||||||
| EXDC | 7119 | 7490 | 628. | 8.4 | 1.5 | 7.3 | 5.75 | 55.03 |
4.42 |
5.43 |
0.19 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
11.06 |
| 058 | 00 | 300 | 972 |
5 | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7120 | 7490 | 630. | 10. | 0.8 | 9.8 | 9 | 55.33 |
5.06 |
4.58 |
0.16 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
10.95 |
| 059 | 00 | 300 | 322 |
5 | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7121 | 7490 | 631. | 10 | 2.3 | 7.9 | 5.55 | 53.39 |
5.66 |
6.05 |
0.26 |
0.00 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
11.42 |
| 060 | 00 | 300 | 337 |
5 | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7117 | 7490 | 623. | 5 | Not | |||||||||||
| 061 | 00 | 100 | 863 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7118 | 7490 | 625. | 6 | Not | |||||||||||
| 062 | 00 | 100 | 095 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7119 | 7490 | 627. | 8 | Not | |||||||||||
| 063 | 00 | 100 | 375 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7117 | 7490 | 629. | 14 | Not | |||||||||||
| 064 | 00 | 800 | 637 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7110 | 7491 | 631. | 13 | Not | |||||||||||
| 065 | 05 | 000 | 934 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7113 | 7491 | 634. | 16 | Not | |||||||||||
| 066 | 00 | 205 | 777 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7112 | 7491 | 631. | 11. | Not | |||||||||||
| 067 | 05 | 400 | 465 |
5 | Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXDC | 7111 | 7491 | 629. | 8 | Not | |||||||||||
| 068 | 00 | 600 | 17 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7122 | 7490 | 631. | 8 | Not | |||||||||||
| 069 | 95 | 400 | 634 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7107 | 7488 | 616. | 3 | Not | |||||||||||
| 070 | 00 | 405 | 672 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7106 | 7488 | 619. | 5 | Not | |||||||||||
| 071 | 95 | 600 | 045 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXDC | 7107 | 7488 | 617. | 4 | Not | |||||||||||
| 072 | 00 | 800 | 941 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7489 | 624. | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 001 | 99.1 | 402 | 597 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7489 | 624. | 19 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 002 | 00.5 | 399 | 842 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7489 | 624 | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 003 | 98.5 | 399 | Assays | |||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7489 | 622. | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 004 | 98.6 | 401 | 944 |
Assays |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro | To | Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | |||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7489 | 621. | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 005 | 99.9 | 400 | 325 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7489 | 619. | 19 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 50.55 |
7.35 |
7.39 |
0.53 |
- |
- | 0.02 | 0.04 |
12.28 |
| 006 | 97.8 | 398 | 531 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7489 | 622. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 007 | 98.4 | 404 | 384 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7489 | 620. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 008 | 22.2 | 402 | 5 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7488 | 616. | 19 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 53.70 |
6.70 |
6.53 |
0.47 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
8.92 |
| 009 | 00.3 | 404 | 712 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7488 | 615. | 19 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 56.12 |
5.10 |
5.53 |
0.45 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
8.39 |
| 010 | 00.9 | 401 | 194 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7488 | 617. | 16 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 53.15 |
7.25 |
6.71 |
0.45 |
0.01 |
0.23 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
9.22 |
| 011 | 97.5 | 603 | 941 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7488 | 619. | 15 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 57.55 |
5.15 |
4.58 |
0.41 |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
7.28 |
| 012 | 95.8 | 603 | 065 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7488 | 617. | 16 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 52.72 |
6.83 |
7.04 |
0.41 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
10.17 |
| 013 | 75.6 | 597 | 607 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7488 | 620. | 10 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 53.24 |
7.91 |
6.64 |
0.55 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
8.47 |
| 014 | 97.3 | 603 | 5 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7488 | 617. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 015 | 11.7 | 592 | 21 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7488 | 615. | 13 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 51.20 |
6.58 |
8.12 |
0.62 |
- |
0.02 | 0.03 |
0.03 |
10.92 |
| 016 | 94 | 793 | 724 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7488 | 618 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 54.10 |
5.04 |
6.89 |
0.68 |
- |
- | 0.03 | 0.04 |
9.48 |
| 017 | 98.3 | 798 | ||||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7488 | 619. | 13 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 52.77 |
7.07 |
7.28 |
0.57 |
- |
0.05 | 0.03 |
0.03 |
9.18 |
| 018 | 98.4 | 800 | 69 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7489 | 620. | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 019 | 94.6 | 005 | 053 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7489 | 621. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 020 | 96.1 | 003 | 51 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7489 | 620. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 021 | 02.1 | 002 | 869 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7489 | 623. | 13 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 51.23 |
7.56 |
8.86 |
0.89 |
- |
0.02 | 0.03 |
0.03 |
9.02 |
| 022 | 96.2 | 194 | 045 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7489 | 624. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 023 | 97.8 | 198 | 166 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7489 | 624. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 024 | 95 | 199 | 119 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7489 | 622. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 025 | 98.2 | 199 | 766 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7489 | 618. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 026 | 00.2 | 195 | 46 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7489 | 620. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 027 | 97.7 | 196 | 771 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7489 | 620. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 028 | 97.3 | 197 | 646 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7102 | 7489 | 617. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 029 | 99.1 | 599 | 273 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7489 | 624. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 030 | 13.1 | 598 | 746 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7489 | 622. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 031 | 00.8 | 601 | 774 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7489 | 622. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 032 | 99.5 | 600 | 802 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7489 | 623. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 033 | 99.8 | 600 | 887 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7489 | 623. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 034 | 99.7 | 600 | 717 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7489 | 622. | 13 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 50.75 |
7.62 |
6.97 |
0.57 |
- |
0.01 | 0.02 |
0.03 |
12.15 |
| 035 | 02.5 | 601 | 066 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7489 | 621. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 036 | 03.4 | 602 | 02 |
Assays |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro To |
Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | ||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7489 | 621. | 13 | 0 4 |
4 | 51.54 |
12.27 |
3.99 |
0.55 |
- |
0.02 | 0.02 |
0.02 |
9.19 |
| 037 | 02.4 | 803 | 564 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7490 | 623. | 13 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 038 | 02.4 | 000 | 274 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7490 | 622. | 13 | 1 2 |
1 | 53.38 |
12.40 |
2.96 |
0.39 |
- |
0.05 | 0.02 |
0.01 |
7.50 |
| 039 | 00.1 | 203 | 982 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7490 | 621. | 13 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 040 | 98.1 | 203 | 844 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7490 | 623. | 8 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 041 | 98.8 | 198 | 59 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7490 | 624. | 13 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 042 | 02.4 | 201 | 375 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7490 | 622. | 13 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 043 | 07 | 200 | 819 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7489 | 620. | 13 | 0 1 |
1 | 54.82 |
8.36 |
3.73 |
0.36 |
- |
0.02 | 0.03 |
0.03 |
8.84 |
| 044 | 04.7 | 997 | 838 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7490 | 623. | 13 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 045 | 01.5 | 400 | 822 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7490 | 625. | 13 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 046 | 01.6 | 400 | 323 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7490 | 626. | 13 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 047 | 99.2 | 400 | 356 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7490 | 625. | 19 | Not | ||||||||||
| 048 | 00.8 | 400 | 655 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7490 | 623. | 13 | Not | ||||||||||
| 049 | 03.4 | 400 | 989 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7490 | 622. | 13 | Not | ||||||||||
| 050 | 94.9 | 398 | 647 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7490 | 626. | 19 | Not | ||||||||||
| 051 | 99.7 | 401 | 453 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7490 | 622. | 13 | 0 1 |
1 | 50.91 |
12.22 |
5.10 |
0.57 |
- |
0.05 | 0.02 |
0.02 |
8.66 |
| 052 | 09.3 | 196 | 434 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7117 | 7490 | 625. | 16 | Not | ||||||||||
| 053 | 00 | 397 | 263 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7117 | 7490 | 626. | 13 | Not | ||||||||||
| 054 | 99.7 | 395 | 449 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7118 | 7490 | 628. | 16 | Not | ||||||||||
| 055 | 96.9 | 402 | 371 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7119 | 7490 | 629. | 16 | Not | ||||||||||
| 056 | 98.7 | 402 | 435 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7120 | 7490 | 630. | 16 | Not | ||||||||||
| 057 | 99.1 | 399 | 325 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7122 | 7490 | 630. | 16 | Not | ||||||||||
| 058 | 00.6 | 398 | 92 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7122 | 7490 | 631. | 16 | Not | ||||||||||
| 059 | 96.4 | 400 | 631 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7123 | 7490 | 632. | 13 | Not | ||||||||||
| 060 | 98.2 | 399 | 37 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7124 | 7490 | 632. | 13 | Not | ||||||||||
| 061 | 97.9 | 400 | 823 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7125 | 7490 | 632. | 16 | Not | ||||||||||
| 062 | 99.8 | 400 | 715 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7126 | 7490 | 632. | 10 | Not | ||||||||||
| 063 | 95.9 | 401 | 063 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7128 | 7490 | 627. | 7 | Not | ||||||||||
| 064 | 03.7 | 394 | 915 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7125 | 7490 | 634. | 10 | Not | ||||||||||
| 065 | 98.9 | 201 | 131 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7125 | 7490 | 637. | 6 | Not | ||||||||||
| 066 | 02.8 | 202 | 175 |
Assayed | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7124 | 7490 | 636. | 7 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 067 | 04.5 | 202 | 263 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7123 | 7490 | 635. | 12 | 7 10 |
3 | 51.59 |
7.07 |
6.28 |
0.38 |
- |
0.08 | 0.06 |
0.07 |
11.79 |
| 068 | 00 | 202 | 161 |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro | To | Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | |||||||
| EXRC | 7121 | 7490 | 633. | 16 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 51.64 |
7.70 |
6.89 |
0.72 |
- |
0.06 | 0.05 |
0.02 |
10.20 |
| 069 | 97.6 | 198 | 764 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7120 | 7490 | 632. | 16 | Not | |||||||||||
| 070 | 99.5 | 199 | 22 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7119 | 7490 | 630. | 16 | Not | |||||||||||
| 071 | 97.9 | 201 | 524 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7119 | 7490 | 628. | 13 | Not | |||||||||||
| 072 | 00.9 | 200 | 167 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7117 | 7490 | 625. | 10 | Not | |||||||||||
| 073 | 96 | 200 | 932 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7117 | 7490 | 624. | 10 | Not | |||||||||||
| 074 | 00.9 | 201 | 397 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7490 | 622. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 075 | 93.5 | 017 | 09 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7116 | 7490 | 623. | 11 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 50.98 |
7.51 |
6.50 |
0.60 |
- |
- | 0.03 | 0.03 |
12.12 |
| 076 | 96.2 | 004 | 299 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7117 | 7490 | 624. | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 51.83 |
8.10 |
6.76 |
0.72 |
- |
0.02 | 0.05 |
0.04 |
9.61 |
| 077 | 97.3 | 001 | 919 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7119 | 7490 | 626. | 10 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 51.25 |
8.31 |
7.07 |
0.24 |
- |
- | 0.09 | 0.03 |
10.51 |
| 078 | 00.3 | 001 | 715 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7119 | 7490 | 628. | 12 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 079 | 99.6 | 001 | 888 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7120 | 7490 | 631. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 080 | 96.5 | 001 | 769 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7121 | 7490 | 635. | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 53.79 |
8.41 |
6.24 |
0.27 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.03 |
7.52 |
| 081 | 96.7 | 004 | 815 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7122 | 7489 | 638. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 082 | 97.3 | 998 | 88 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7123 | 7489 | 641. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 083 | 96.6 | 998 | 462 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7124 | 7489 | 643. | 4 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 084 | 98.9 | 997 | 477 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7118 | 7489 | 627. | 7 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 53.78 |
9.35 |
5.07 |
0.15 |
- |
0.06 | 0.08 |
0.03 |
7.95 |
| 085 | 03 | 807 | 683 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7117 | 7489 | 626. | 10 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 56.64 |
5.45 |
4.39 |
0.23 |
- |
0.01 | 0.10 |
0.03 |
8.50 |
| 086 | 02.8 | 802 | 182 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7489 | 623. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 087 | 97.1 | 797 | 945 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7489 | 623. | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 50.49 |
8.68 |
10.13 |
1.79 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
6.63 |
| 088 | 92.4 | 605 | 388 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7489 | 623. | 10 | Not | |||||||||||
| 089 | 00.8 | 598 | 5 |
Assayed | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7489 | 622. | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 50.96 |
7.83 |
9.03 |
0.51 |
- |
- | 0.03 | 0.03 |
9.22 |
| 090 | 99.5 | 437 | 194 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7488 | 617 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0.5 | 56.25 |
4.45 |
4.88 |
0.30 |
- |
0.01 | 0.03 |
0.08 |
9.56 |
| 091 | 02.8 | 398 | ||||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7112 | 7488 | 618. | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 53.83 |
5.61 |
6.21 |
0.26 |
- |
0.03 | 0.04 |
0.04 |
10.53 |
| 092 | 94.6 | 606 | 105 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7488 | 619. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 093 | 89.8 | 602 | 659 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7488 | 619. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 094 | 00.9 | 600 | 647 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7488 | 620. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 095 | 88.4 | 598 | 495 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7488 | 619. | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 53.99 |
7.50 |
7.55 |
1.31 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
6.16 |
| 096 | 04.2 | 794 | 761 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7489 | 620. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 097 | 97.2 | 011 | 946 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7488 | 620. | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 52.53 |
6.79 |
6.89 |
0.39 |
- |
- | 0.03 | 0.03 |
10.63 |
| 098 | 01.4 | 997 | 683 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7488 | 612. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 099 | 15.7 | 992 | 241 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7489 | 620. | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 51.22 |
8.25 |
6.53 |
0.36 |
- |
0.03 | 0.02 |
0.02 |
11.75 |
| 100 | 94.3 | 197 | 981 |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole East North ing RL Dep th |
Fro m To Inter val Fe% SiO2 % Al2O3 % TiO2 % MnO % CaO % P% S% LOI10 00% |
|---|---|
| EXRC 101 7127 94.2 7490 605 632. 303 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 102 7126 97.5 7490 602 631. 49 13 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 103 7126 01.1 7490 606 630. 179 10 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 104 7125 01.9 7490 596 631. 16 10 |
0 2 2 52.41 6.90 8.09 0.54 - 0.05 0.04 0.03 9.34 |
| EXRC 105 7123 98.9 7490 601 632. 319 16 |
4 5 1 55.27 5.88 5.15 0.17 - 0.06 0.04 0.07 9.49 |
| EXRC 106 7123 04.1 7490 601 632. 024 13 |
4 7 3 54.95 5.49 4.93 0.39 - 0.08 0.04 0.05 10.49 |
| EXRC 107 7122 02.4 7490 603 631. 356 10 |
3 7 4 53.72 6.33 6.47 0.44 - 0.05 0.04 0.04 9.70 |
| EXRC 108 7121 05 7490 601 630. 167 13 |
2 8 6 53.05 5.26 6.94 0.31 - 0.03 0.07 0.03 11.50 |
| EXRC 109 7120 04.4 7490 603 630. 18 13 |
Not Assayed |
| EXRC 110 7119 07.7 7490 603 629. 732 16 |
Not Assayed |
| EXRC 111 7118 08.9 7490 603 628. 381 16 |
Not Assayed |
| EXRC 112 7117 05 7490 599 629. 099 16 |
Not Assayed |
| EXRC 113 7116 04.5 7490 603 628. 548 13 |
Not Assayed |
| EXRC 114 7114 94 7490 603 624. 729 13 |
2 6 4 52.03 9.85 5.14 0.52 - - 0.03 0.05 9.69 |
| 4 6 2 53.52 9.84 3.84 0.46 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.02 9.19 |
|
| EXRC 115 7114 03.4 7490 598 625. 708 13 |
6 8 2 53.58 9.82 3.32 0.25 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.01 9.69 |
| EXRC 116 7113 01.8 7490 597 627. 397 16 |
0 1 1 50.35 15.00 4.05 0.39 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.02 8.06 |
| EXRC 117 7111 98.2 7490 597 630. 603 19 |
10 11 1 52.49 11.89 3.17 0.30 - 0.07 0.01 0.02 9.29 |
| EXRC 118 7111 09.1 7490 600 631. 431 19 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 119 7110 01.4 7490 600 624. 419 9 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 120 7109 03.1 7490 603 622. 948 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 121 7108 05.2 7490 613 623. 558 13 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 122 7107 04.1 7490 610 623. 14 10 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 123 7106 01.3 7490 602 624. 574 10 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 124 7105 00 7490 599 625. 291 9 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 125 7103 98.3 7490 602 626. 14 10 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 126 7103 01.7 7490 599 628. 711 10 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 127 7102 01 7490 602 627. 698 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 128 7100 86.1 7490 600 628. 093 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 129 7100 02.5 7490 599 628. 806 4 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 130 7098 98.7 7490 597 632. 118 4 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 131 7098 05 7490 603 630. 406 4 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 132 7097 00.5 7490 601 635. 336 4 |
1 3 2 53.02 9.40 4.98 0.27 0.02 0.21 0.17 0.02 8.67 |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole East North ing RL Dep th |
Fro m To Inter val Fe% SiO2 % Al2O3 % TiO2 % MnO % CaO % P% S% LOI10 00% |
|---|---|
| EXRC 133 7090 88 7490 796 636. 324 4 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 134 7091 89.2 7490 800 640. 403 4 |
4 6 2 51.55 12.31 4.46 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.14 0.01 8.74 |
| EXRC 135 7092 93 7490 798 642 10 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 136 7095 00 7490 601 639. 748 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 137 7094 00.5 7490 601 642. 284 7 |
0 1 1 54.41 6.54 6.44 1.98 0.08 0.04 0.02 6.75 |
| EXRC 138 7093 01.3 7490 598 643. 415 7 |
0 1 1 51.56 7.16 8.43 1.69 0.03 0.05 0.03 9.00 |
| 6 7 1 52.68 14.49 3.55 0.12 0.06 0.13 0.00 5.78 |
|
| EXRC 139 7092 09.4 7490 598 644. 502 7 |
3 4 1 60.31 4.51 2.33 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.01 6.23 |
| EXRC 140 7091 01.7 7490 602 641. 9 4 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 141 7093 97.4 7490 798 641. 554 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 142 7094 92.6 7490 797 641. 501 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 143 7095 93.9 7490 802 639. 412 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 144 7096 91.9 7490 800 636. 916 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 145 7097 93 7490 800 633. 675 4 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 146 7098 93.9 7490 794 630. 518 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 147 7099 95.1 7490 803 630. 833 10 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 148 7100 97.3 7490 799 632. 698 11 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 149 7101 94.1 7490 799 638. 718 19 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 150 7102 97.9 7490 803 630. 72 13 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 151 7103 95.8 7490 795 631 16 |
2 3 1 51.03 7.38 7.41 0.59 0.07 0.03 0.03 11.48 |
| EXRC 152 7105 00.9 7490 797 627. 468 10 |
2 4 2 52.25 6.97 6.08 0.38 0.03 0.03 0.03 11.34 |
| EXRC 153 7105 95.1 7490 799 627. 767 13 |
1 8 7 54.42 5.14 4.94 0.35 0.03 0.04 11.40 |
| EXRC 154 7106 96.2 7490 801 628. 802 13 |
9 16 7 53.07 5.67 6.10 0.30 0.05 0.05 0.04 11.64 |
| EXRC 155 7107 98.9 7490 801 635. 844 19 |
7 15 8 54.04 5.96 5.29 0.32 0.04 0.04 0.03 10.86 |
| EXRC 156 7108 94.9 7490 800 635. 042 19 |
8 9 1 52.82 7.63 6.94 0.43 0.06 0.03 0.02 8.88 |
| EXRC 157 7109 96.7 7490 798 633. 803 18 |
5 10 5 54.91 5.52 4.76 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 10.63 |
| EXRC 158 7111 02.2 7490 799 630. 636 13 |
7 10 3 52.12 6.49 6.36 0.37 0.10 0.03 0.02 11.72 |
| EXRC 159 7112 11 7490 797 628. 801 13 |
6 8 2 53.98 10.15 3.23 0.47 0.09 0.02 0.02 8.60 |
| EXRC 160 7112 97.7 7490 794 627. 318 13 |
2 7 5 52.14 6.66 6.91 0.44 0.03 0.04 11.20 |
| EXRC 161 7113 98.2 7490 801 625. 959 14 |
1 4 3 50.77 8.41 7.42 0.48 0.04 0.04 0.04 10.68 |
| EXRC 162 7114 97.3 7490 797 627. 293 10 |
2 4 2 52.84 6.70 7.07 0.61 0.11 0.05 0.05 9.57 |
| EXRC 163 7115 92 7490 801 629. 728 13 |
6 7 1 50.28 11.33 4.98 0.51 0.08 0.04 0.06 10.94 |
| EXRC 164 7116 97.5 7490 798 629. 673 16 |
2 6 4 53.12 5.76 7.25 0.53 0.02 0.05 0.04 9.98 |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole East North ing RL Dep th |
Fro m To Inter val Fe% SiO2 % Al2O3 % TiO2 % MnO % CaO % P% S% LOI10 00% |
|---|---|
| EXRC 165 7117 95.2 7490 795 630. 516 7 |
2 11 9 54.39 4.56 6.38 0.37 0.05 0.06 10.51 |
| EXRC 166 7118 93.9 7490 798 631. 338 13 |
4 13 9 51.94 6.34 7.74 0.52 0.02 0.04 0.04 10.77 |
| EXRC 167 7118 10 7490 799 630. 698 16 |
1 9 8 52.10 6.86 7.63 0.44 0.04 0.04 10.15 |
| EXRC 168 7119 99.9 7490 800 632. 206 13 |
1 4 3 54.80 6.31 4.99 0.39 0.03 0.03 0.03 9.62 |
| EXRC 169 7120 95.7 7490 796 632. 884 10 |
5 13 8 51.78 8.33 6.55 0.65 0.15 0.04 0.04 9.90 |
| EXRC 170 7121 99.9 7490 797 633. 437 13 |
5 9 4 55.31 6.45 4.58 0.14 0.11 0.04 0.06 9.34 |
| EXRC 171 7122 99.5 7490 800 634. 543 13 |
7 10 3 54.17 6.58 5.11 0.58 0.18 0.05 0.08 9.66 |
| EXRC 172 7123 96.1 7490 795 634. 736 13 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 173 7125 00.5 7490 799 633. 279 7 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 174 7126 01.2 7490 801 636. 33 6 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 175 7122 04 7491 002 637. 474 10 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 176 7122 99.4 7491 002 639. 207 4 |
4 9 5 52.36 10.13 4.80 1.81 0.05 0.05 0.07 7.66 |
| EXRC 177 7121 07.4 7490 999 635. 461 13 |
5 9 4 51.03 10.42 7.66 1.57 0.09 0.04 0.05 7.07 |
| EXRC 178 7120 04.4 7491 000 633. 774 13 |
7 10 3 52.88 6.97 8.05 1.78 0.07 0.05 0.04 7.32 |
| EXRC 179 7119 05.4 7491 000 632. 857 13 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 180 7118 03.7 7491 000 632. 187 10 |
2 4 2 51.70 5.51 8.73 0.55 0.05 0.06 11.11 |
| EXRC 181 7117 04.4 7490 999 631. 553 13 |
No Significant Assays |
| EXRC 182 7116 03.3 7490 999 632. 175 13 |
2 8 6 54.32 6.15 4.66 0.87 0.02 0.10 0.04 0.04 10.32 |
| EXRC 183 7114 99.2 7491 002 632. 426 13 |
2 3 1 50.33 8.32 7.20 0.58 0.05 0.05 0.04 11.64 |
| 5 8 3 51.88 5.84 7.51 0.54 0.05 0.04 0.04 11.82 |
|
| EXRC 184 7114 02.6 7491 001 631. 027 13 |
0 1 1 50.56 8.93 8.43 0.66 0.04 0.03 0.04 9.69 |
| EXRC 185 7113 06.8 7490 997 628. 849 13 |
3 8 5 51.43 8.38 5.93 0.43 0.03 0.05 0.03 11.58 |
| EXRC 186 7111 99.3 7491 002 630. 487 16 |
2 3 1 51.25 9.31 6.91 0.53 0.13 0.03 0.06 9.82 |
| 5 12 7 54.56 6.08 4.16 0.26 0.07 0.04 0.02 11.11 |
|
| EXRC 187 7111 04.9 7490 998 630. 378 19 |
3 12 9 52.39 6.72 6.75 0.43 0.05 0.04 0.04 10.98 |
| EXRC 188 7110 04.4 7491 000 631. 998 18 |
1 8 7 53.10 5.02 7.09 0.53 0.06 0.06 11.17 |
| EXRC 189 7109 08.5 7491 002 630. 818 14 |
5 12 7 54.28 7.38 4.45 0.28 0.04 0.04 0.03 10.12 |
| EXRC 190 7108 00.9 7490 998 633. 909 19 |
6 13 7 52.56 7.55 5.61 0.44 0.03 0.06 0.03 10.94 |
| EXRC 191 7106 99.8 7491 003 635. 999 19 |
9 9.5 1 50.36 8.02 8.87 0.64 0.01 0.05 0.04 10.41 |
| EXRC 192 7106 01.6 7491 000 635. 382 19 |
10 16 6 53.99 7.40 4.88 0.34 0.03 0.04 0.02 10.10 |
| EXRC 193 7104 98 7490 995 639. 503 19 |
11 16 5 53.52 7.06 5.38 0.37 0.04 0.03 0.02 10.62 |
| EXRC 194 7104 09.3 7491 005 641. 046 22 |
3 6 3 52.99 7.92 4.65 0.26 0.02 0.02 11.39 |
| EXRC 195 7103 10 7490 999 632. 837 10 |
8 11 51.90 9.48 5.18 0.34 0.06 0.02 0.01 10.63 |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro To |
Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | ||||||
| EXRC | 7101 | 7490 | 636. | 19 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 196 | 99.1 | 996 | 22 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7101 | 7491 | 646. | 25 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 197 | 20.1 | 010 | 445 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7100 | 7491 | 638. | 17 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 198 | 02.9 | 001 | 732 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7099 | 7491 | 635. | 14 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 199 | 06.7 | 003 | 129 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7098 | 7491 | 633. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 200 | 01 | 005 | 315 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7096 | 7490 | 632. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 201 | 97.8 | 997 | 986 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7096 | 7490 | 635. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 202 | 02.5 | 998 | 123 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7095 | 7491 | 638. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 203 | 06.1 | 002 | 16 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7094 | 7491 | 640. | 7 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 204 | 00.8 | 003 | 47 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7093 | 7491 | 642. | 7 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 205 | 01.8 | 002 | 317 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7092 | 7491 | 642. | 4 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 206 | 05.1 | 002 | 95 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7091 | 7490 | 643. | 4 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 207 | 04.2 | 999 | 092 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7090 | 7491 | 643. | 4 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 208 | 10.1 | 002 | 262 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7089 | 7491 | 646. | 4 | 0 1 |
1 | 51.91 |
9.29 |
7.58 |
1.29 |
0.06 | 0.06 |
0.02 |
7.10 |
|
| 209 | 91.9 | 199 | 464 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7090 | 7491 | 643. | 7 | 3 4 |
1 | 50.29 |
11.69 |
6.79 |
1.14 |
0.35 | 0.04 |
0.01 |
7.39 |
|
| 210 | 89.7 | 199 | 416 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7091 | 7491 | 640. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 211 | 99.3 | 197 | 634 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7092 | 7491 | 639. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 212 | 94.4 | 199 | 802 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7094 | 7491 | 638. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 213 | 03.9 | 203 | 928 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7095 | 7491 | 639. | 13 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 214 | 02.8 | 200 | 349 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7095 | 7491 | 637. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 215 | 94.3 | 198 | 771 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7096 | 7491 | 638. | 16 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 216 | 93.1 | 199 | 766 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7097 | 7491 | 639. | 12 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 217 | 95.1 | 198 | 933 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7098 | 7491 | 650. | 19 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 218 | 99.5 | 200 | 514 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7099 | 7491 | 646. | 10 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 219 | 85.7 | 203 | 649 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7100 | 7491 | 643. | 22 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 220 | 92.6 | 198 | 362 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7101 | 7491 | 642. | 21 | 13 16 |
3 | 52.22 |
9.17 |
4.97 |
0.33 |
0.03 | 0.03 |
0.01 |
10.36 |
|
| 221 | 91.6 | 198 | 597 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7102 | 7491 | 640. | 18 | 10 13 |
3 | 53.76 |
6.46 |
4.68 |
0.41 |
0.02 | 0.05 |
0.01 |
11.02 |
|
| 222 | 97.3 | 201 | 691 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7103 | 7491 | 637. | 19 | 9 10 |
1 | 51.18 |
9.78 |
6.13 |
0.57 |
0.03 | 0.01 |
9.95 |
||
| 223 | 97.8 | 196 | 316 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7491 | 635. | 19 | 9 12 |
3 | 52.04 |
8.70 |
5.33 |
0.44 |
0.04 | 0.03 |
0.01 |
10.79 |
|
| 224 | 97.2 | 195 | 712 |
||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7491 | 636. | 19 | 10 10. |
0.5 | 50.24 |
8.75 |
7.17 |
0.75 |
0.04 | 0.05 |
0.03 |
11.27 |
|
| 225 | 01.9 | 199 | 317 |
5 | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7491 | 636. | 16 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 226 | 96.5 | 200 | 587 |
Assays | |||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7491 | 637. | 16 | No Significant | ||||||||||
| 227 | 96.2 | 203 | 431 |
Assays |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro | To | Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | |||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7491 | 636. | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 228 | 94.2 | 202 | 25 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7491 | 637. | 19 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 52.81 |
6.36 |
6.23 |
0.56 |
0.07 | 0.04 |
0.04 |
11.04 |
|
| 229 | 98.3 | 196 | 808 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7491 | 634. | 16 | 5 | 12 | 7 | 54.32 |
4.97 |
5.67 |
0.49 |
0.04 | 0.04 |
10.86 |
||
| 230 | 91.7 | 196 | 738 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7491 | 632. | 17 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 54.59 |
5.31 |
6.14 |
0.55 |
0.07 | 0.05 |
0.03 |
9.46 |
|
| 231 | 97 | 197 | 118 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7491 | 634. | 19 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 50.73 |
7.78 |
7.52 |
0.58 |
0.02 |
0.12 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
11.07 |
| 232 | 01 | 205 | 834 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7491 | 634. | 13 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 54.08 |
6.46 |
6.09 |
0.57 |
0.06 | 0.05 |
0.06 |
9.08 |
|
| 233 | 97.4 | 194 | 659 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7491 | 633. | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 50.75 |
6.61 |
8.28 |
0.82 |
0.04 | 0.04 |
0.06 |
11.22 |
|
| 234 | 94.8 | 198 | 066 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7491 | 631. | 13 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 52.23 |
7.44 |
7.48 |
0.54 |
0.02 | 0.04 |
0.05 |
9.41 |
|
| 235 | 98.7 | 199 | 427 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7116 | 7491 | 631. | 16 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 53.44 |
6.27 |
5.90 |
0.69 |
0.02 | 0.04 |
0.05 |
10.16 |
|
| 236 | 89.7 | 199 | 625 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7117 | 7491 | 633. | 13 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 50.34 |
8.96 |
8.38 |
1.06 |
0.08 | 0.03 |
0.09 |
9.10 |
|
| 237 | 93.4 | 201 | 119 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7118 | 7491 | 634. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 238 | 93.5 | 198 | 439 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7119 | 7491 | 636. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 239 | 92.7 | 199 | 129 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7120 | 7491 | 638. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 240 | 97 | 199 | 676 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7121 | 7491 | 641. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 241 | 94.1 | 200 | 935 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7122 | 7491 | 644. | 4 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 242 | 93 | 197 | 886 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7120 | 7491 | 638. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 243 | 00.5 | 400 | 191 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7120 | 7491 | 639. | 10 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 50.85 |
11.59 |
9.12 |
2.00 |
0.02 | 0.04 |
0.03 |
4.53 |
|
| 244 | 91.5 | 398 | 72 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7119 | 7491 | 636. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 245 | 01.5 | 403 | 467 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7117 | 7491 | 634. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 246 | 97.5 | 401 | 419 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7116 | 7491 | 632. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 247 | 99.7 | 400 | 492 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7116 | 7491 | 631. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 248 | 02.3 | 399 | 183 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7491 | 629. | 10 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 54.54 |
5.04 |
5.94 |
0.43 |
0.03 | 0.05 |
0.05 |
10.46 |
|
| 249 | 03.4 | 398 | 904 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7491 | 630. | 11 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 52.26 |
7.35 |
6.00 |
0.49 |
0.06 | 0.06 |
0.03 |
11.12 |
|
| 250 | 05.3 | 400 | 307 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7491 | 631. | 13 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 54.10 |
6.59 |
5.76 |
0.50 |
0.02 |
0.07 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
9.61 |
| 251 | 07 | 401 | 817 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7112 | 7491 | 631. | 13 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 53.87 |
5.43 |
6.51 |
0.91 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
9.91 |
| 252 | 04.1 | 401 | 441 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7491 | 632. | 13 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 51.93 |
7.03 |
6.24 |
0.64 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
11.48 |
| 253 | 03.3 | 404 | 788 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7491 | 633. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 254 | 99.7 | 399 | 789 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7491 | 633. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 255 | 98 | 402 | 66 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7491 | 636. | 19 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 256 | 00.2 | 399 | 66 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7491 | 636. | 19 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 257 | 00.8 | 403 | 159 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7491 | 638. | 19 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 258 | 03.9 | 400 | 771 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7491 | 638. | 19 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 259 | 95.7 | 401 | 876 |
Assays |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro | To | Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | |||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7491 | 642. | 22 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 260 | 01.7 | 397 | 773 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7103 | 7491 | 645. | 25 | 13 | 16 | 3 | 50.40 |
12.72 |
4.24 |
0.22 |
0.03 | 0.02 |
0.03 |
10.59 |
|
| 261 | 03.4 | 401 | 371 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7102 | 7491 | 641. | 22 | 15 | 15. | 1 | 50.72 |
9.70 |
6.24 |
0.53 |
0.02 | 0.03 |
0.03 |
10.45 |
|
| 262 | 05.3 | 395 | 835 |
5 | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7101 | 7491 | 644. | 25 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 263 | 02.7 | 397 | 085 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7100 | 7491 | 648. | 28 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 264 | 01.9 | 399 | 572 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7099 | 7491 | 637. | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 265 | 09.1 | 409 | 537 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7097 | 7491 | 640. | 16 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 50.23 |
12.44 |
5.53 |
0.37 |
0.05 | 0.06 |
0.02 |
9.09 |
|
| 266 | 98.3 | 402 | 228 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7097 | 7491 | 639. | 19 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 267 | 01.7 | 401 | 904 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7096 | 7491 | 640. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 268 | 05.9 | 405 | 423 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7095 | 7491 | 639. | 13 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 50.84 |
9.62 |
5.93 |
0.27 |
0.02 | 0.04 |
0.02 |
11.36 |
|
| 269 | 05.1 | 397 | 202 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7094 | 7491 | 637. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 270 | 03.4 | 399 | 965 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7093 | 7491 | 635. | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 50.83 |
8.29 |
6.11 |
0.27 |
0.03 | 0.02 |
12.10 |
||
| 271 | 07 | 402 | 633 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7092 | 7491 | 640. | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50.43 |
11.01 |
8.36 |
0.75 |
0.06 | 0.06 |
0.02 |
7.23 |
|
| 272 | 04.9 | 401 | 313 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7091 | 7491 | 642. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 273 | 05.2 | 404 | 449 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7090 | 7491 | 644. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 274 | 01.9 | 398 | 204 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7094 | 7491 | 637. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 275 | 02.2 | 606 | 427 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7094 | 7491 | 639. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 276 | 97.6 | 598 | 779 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7096 | 7491 | 641. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 277 | 00.4 | 601 | 598 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7096 | 7491 | 638. | 7 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 50.95 |
7.16 |
7.19 |
0.43 |
0.04 | 0.04 |
0.03 |
11.94 |
|
| 278 | 90.5 | 602 | 632 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7099 | 7491 | 635. | 10 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 50.89 |
10.96 |
5.36 |
0.16 |
0.23 | 0.03 |
0.03 |
9.78 |
|
| 279 | 01.3 | 602 | 585 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7099 | 7491 | 635. | 13 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 50.03 |
11.98 |
6.17 |
0.28 |
0.04 | 0.04 |
0.03 |
10.04 |
|
| 280 | 89.9 | 602 | 806 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7100 | 7491 | 640. | 19 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 51.06 |
10.41 |
6.05 |
0.30 |
0.03 | 0.03 |
9.87 |
||
| 281 | 98 | 599 | 36 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7101 | 7491 | 639. | 19 | 17 | 18 | 1 | 50.36 |
9.31 |
6.79 |
0.77 |
0.07 | 0.05 |
0.02 |
10.61 |
|
| 282 | 93.1 | 600 | 333 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7102 | 7491 | 644. | 25 | 17 | 19 | 2 | 54.18 |
10.07 |
4.33 |
0.77 |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
6.66 |
| 283 | 98.3 | 593 | 422 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7103 | 7491 | 643. | 25 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 284 | 87.8 | 592 | 248 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7491 | 638. | 19 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 50.44 |
10.86 |
5.69 |
0.52 |
0.02 | 0.03 |
0.01 |
10.31 |
|
| 285 | 96.7 | 602 | 745 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7491 | 637. | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 286 | 98.8 | 608 | 04 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7491 | 633. | 10 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 50.28 |
6.95 |
7.54 |
0.78 |
0.01 | 0.07 |
0.04 |
12.33 |
|
| 287 | 91.2 | 611 | 687 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7491 | 632. | 10 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 52.45 |
7.79 |
6.73 |
1.12 |
0.04 | 0.06 |
0.04 |
8.70 |
|
| 288 | 95 | 612 | 263 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7491 | 631. | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 50.29 |
6.53 |
8.62 |
0.97 |
0.02 | 0.06 |
0.05 |
11.51 |
|
| 289 | 92 | 604 | 806 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7491 | 630. | 10 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 55.14 |
5.70 |
4.56 |
0.27 |
0.05 | 0.04 |
0.03 |
10.17 |
|
| 290 | 96.7 | 598 | 232 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7491 | 629. | 13 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 50.92 |
5.17 |
7.75 |
1.27 |
0.09 | 0.10 |
12.38 |
||
| 291 | 98.7 | 598 | 176 |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro | To | Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | |||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7491 | 628. | 10 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 53.04 |
5.08 |
5.44 |
0.98 |
0.04 | 0.10 |
0.04 |
12.19 |
|
| 292 | 97 | 605 | 241 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7112 | 7491 | 629. | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 51.06 |
7.75 |
9.44 |
2.18 |
0.03 | 0.05 |
0.02 |
7.27 |
|
| 293 | 95.4 | 603 | 196 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7491 | 627. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 294 | 98.4 | 602 | 546 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7491 | 631. | 16 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 295 | 07.4 | 600 | 078 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7115 | 7491 | 633. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 296 | 96.8 | 603 | 231 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7491 | 629. | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 51.27 |
7.69 |
7.07 |
0.88 |
0.01 | 0.05 |
0.04 |
11.01 |
|
| 297 | 97.3 | 803 | 884 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7114 | 7491 | 625. | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 54.65 |
4.37 |
6.01 |
0.98 |
0.04 | 0.06 |
0.03 |
10.40 |
|
| 298 | 01.7 | 795 | 987 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7113 | 7491 | 627. | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 52.00 |
6.20 |
8.88 |
0.92 |
0.05 | 0.03 |
9.65 |
||
| 299 | 03.5 | 805 | 277 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7491 | 626. | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 50.04 |
8.64 |
8.72 |
0.73 |
0.03 | 0.03 |
0.03 |
10.31 |
|
| 300 | 03.9 | 803 | 701 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7491 | 628. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 301 | 05.8 | 803 | 606 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7491 | 629. | 10 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 51.61 |
8.74 |
6.64 |
0.88 |
0.00 | 0.05 |
0.01 |
9.79 |
|
| 302 | 05 | 805 | 713 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7491 | 629. | 10 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 53.00 |
6.85 |
5.55 |
0.66 |
0.04 | 0.03 |
10.99 |
||
| 303 | 04.7 | 800 | 829 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7491 | 631. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 304 | 09.1 | 799 | 226 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7491 | 633. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 305 | 98.7 | 808 | 721 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7491 | 635. | 13 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 306 | 96.4 | 802 | 335 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7491 | 636. | 10 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 50.82 |
10.07 |
6.74 |
0.61 |
0.03 | 0.04 |
0.02 |
9.59 |
|
| 307 | 00.2 | 799 | 831 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7103 | 7491 | 632. | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 51.75 |
9.13 |
6.12 |
0.30 |
0.05 | 0.03 |
0.03 |
10.05 |
|
| 308 | 01.8 | 797 | 869 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7102 | 7491 | 632. | 10 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 51.02 |
7.63 |
7.62 |
0.59 |
0.01 | 0.04 |
0.04 |
11.00 |
|
| 309 | 05.7 | 800 | 528 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7101 | 7491 | 632. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 310 | 04.8 | 804 | 945 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7099 | 7491 | 619. | 4 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 311 | 98.2 | 807 | 448 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7096 | 7491 | 633. | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 50.98 |
6.18 |
8.80 |
0.50 |
0.03 | 0.05 |
0.02 |
11.46 |
|
| 312 | 92.7 | 809 | 817 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7098 | 7491 | 633. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 313 | 94.9 | 804 | 379 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7103 | 7491 | 628. | 4 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 314 | 02 | 993 | 596 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7103 | 7491 | 631. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 315 | 97.3 | 999 | 052 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7492 | 634. | 10 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 52.08 |
8.45 |
6.04 |
0.72 |
0.03 | 0.04 |
0.02 |
10.07 |
|
| 316 | 96.2 | 001 | 188 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7106 | 7492 | 635. | 11 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 317 | 05.9 | 001 | 137 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7492 | 633. | 10 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 50.67 |
10.91 |
9.59 |
1.29 |
0.03 | 0.04 |
0.04 |
5.44 |
|
| 318 | 00.3 | 003 | 253 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7492 | 632. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 319 | 93.5 | 003 | 391 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7492 | 634. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 320 | 02 | 003 | 585 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7492 | 634. | 7 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 51.39 |
10.68 |
6.53 |
0.92 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
7.92 |
| 321 | 00.4 | 006 | 587 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7110 | 7491 | 630. | 11 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 322 | 96.7 | 998 | 957 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7111 | 7491 | 627. | 7 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 52.26 |
6.46 |
5.27 |
0.44 |
0.06 | 0.05 |
12.46 |
||
| 323 | 95.8 | 997 | 978 |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Hole | East | North | RL | Dep | Fro | To | Inter | Fe% | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | MnO | CaO | P% | S% | LOI10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ing | th | m | val | % | % | % | % | % | 00% | |||||||
| EXRC | 7102 | 7492 | 630. | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 50.12 |
6.49 |
8.76 |
0.80 |
0.03 | 0.04 |
0.03 |
12.19 |
|
| 324 | 99.1 | 205 | 411 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7103 | 7492 | 631. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 325 | 95.8 | 202 | 865 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7492 | 635. | 8 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 326 | 95.3 | 196 | 127 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7492 | 635. | 10 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 327 | 86.6 | 204 | 231 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7492 | 635. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 328 | 05.5 | 201 | 122 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7107 | 7492 | 637. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 329 | 92.7 | 203 | 895 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7108 | 7492 | 639. | 12 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 330 | 98.2 | 198 | 5 |
Assays | ||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7109 | 7492 | 637. | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 51.92 |
7.34 |
8.41 |
0.96 |
0.03 | 0.05 |
0.02 |
8.60 |
|
| 331 | 99.4 | 201 | 7 |
|||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7105 | 7492 | 633 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 51.81 |
7.39 |
7.56 |
0.68 |
0.04 | 0.04 |
0.03 |
10.08 |
|
| 332 | 84.2 | 399 | ||||||||||||||
| EXRC | 7104 | 7492 | 632. | 7 | No Significant | |||||||||||
| 333 | 93.9 | 396 | 688 |
Assays |
Table 8: Collar and Intercept Details
Notes
-
Coordinates are reported in MGA 94 Zone 50
-
All drill holes completed were vertical
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
==> picture [84 x 67] intentionally omitted <==
22 April 2025
JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling techniques | • Nature and quality of sampling (eg | IOH Programmes |
||
| cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. |
• |
Samples were collected every 1 metre from RC Drill Holes. Samples were collected every 2 metres down hole, riffle split for routine assaying (3kg) and retention (1 litre plastic jar) with the remainder (about 45 kg) as the drill reject sample left on site |
||
| • Include reference to measures | Maiden Iron Programme |
|||
| taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ |
• |
Samples were collected from diamond drill holes. Diamond core samples were targeted at a nominal 250mm interval constrained to geologically identified boundaries where appropriate |
||
| work has been done this would be | ||||
| relatively simple (eg ‘reverse |
||||
| circulation drilling was used to | ||||
| obtain 1 m samples from which 3 | ||||
| kg was pulverised to produce a 30 | ||||
| g charge for fire assay’). In other | ||||
| cases more explanation may be | ||||
| required, such as where there is | ||||
| coarse gold that has inherent | ||||
| sampling problems. Unusual |
||||
| commodities or mineralisation |
||||
| types (eg submarine nodules) | ||||
| may warrant disclosure of detailed | ||||
| information. | ||||
| Drilling techniques | • Drill type (eg core, reverse |
IOH Programmes |
||
| circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). |
• |
A total of 333 reverse circulation holes were drilled for 3992 meters during the period 21/9/2006 to 10/12/2006 on an exploration grid of 200m by 100m using a Hydco 150 RC drill rig with an onboard riffle splitter operated |
||
| by drilling contractor, Mt |
||||
| Magnet Drilling Pty Ltd. | ||||
| Maiden | Iron Programme | |||
| • | Maiden has subsequently |
|||
| drilled 56 diamond holes for a | ||||
| totalof501 metres. Drill hole |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, West Perth, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|] Page 42 of 53
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| locations are illustrated below. | ||||||
| In the Initial Mining | Area | these | ||||
| holes twinned the 200m x 100 | ||||||
| m IOH and infilled to 100m by | ||||||
| 100m spacing. | ||||||
| Drill sample recovery | • Method of recording and |
IOH Programmes |
||||
| assessing core and chip sample | • |
RC recoveries are | not known | |||
| recoveries and results assessed. | at this point. | |||||
| • Measures taken to maximise | Maiden |
Iron Programme | ||||
| sample recovery and ensure |
• |
Diamond drill hole | recoveries | |||
| representative nature of the |
were recorded by the | field | ||||
| samples. | geologist | |||||
| • Whether a relationship exists | • |
There is no apparent relation | ||||
| between sample recovery and | between sample recovery and | |||||
| grade and whether sample bias | grade | |||||
| may have occurred due to |
||||||
| preferential loss/gain of |
||||||
| fine/coarse material. | ||||||
| Logging | • Whether core and chip samples | IOH Programmes |
||||
| have been geologically and |
• |
All RC chips were logged | ||||
| geotechnically logged to a level of | Maiden |
Iron Programme | ||||
| detail to support appropriate |
• |
All diamond core was logged in | ||||
| Mineral Resource estimation, |
detail and photographed. | |||||
| mining studies and metallurgical | ||||||
| studies. | ||||||
| • Whether logging is qualitative or | ||||||
| quantitative in nature. Core (or | ||||||
| costean, channel, etc) |
||||||
| photography. | ||||||
| • The total length and percentage of | ||||||
| the relevant intersections logged. | ||||||
| Sub-sampling techniques | • If core, whether cut or sawn and | IOH Programmes |
||||
| and sample preparation | whether quarter, half or all core | • |
The sample |
preparation | ||
| taken. | method consisted of | initial | ||||
| • If non-core, whether riffled, tube | drying at 105° |
then | jaw | |||
| sampled, rotary split, etc and | crushing the whole sample | |||||
| whether sampled wet or dry. | followed by vibrating |
disk | ||||
| • For all sample types, the nature, | pulverization to -200 mesh. | |||||
| quality and appropriateness of the | Maiden |
Iron Programme | ||||
| sample preparation technique. | • | Whole core was sent to | the | |||
| • Quality control procedures |
laboratory for analysis. | |||||
| adopted for all sub-sampling |
||||||
| stages to maximise representivity | ||||||
| of samples. | ||||||
| • Measures taken to ensure that the | ||||||
| sampling is representative of the | ||||||
| in situ material collected, including | ||||||
| for instance results for field | ||||||
| duplicate/second-half sampling. | ||||||
| • Whether sample sizes are |
||||||
| appropriate to the grain size of the | ||||||
| material being sampled. | ||||||
| Quality of assay data and | • The nature, quality and |
IOH Programmes |
||||
| laboratory tests | appropriateness of the assaying | • |
Drill samples were analysed | |||
| and laboratory procedures used | using theX-RayFluorescence |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and whether | the | technique is | Spectrometry (XRF) method by | ||||||
| considered partial or total. | Ultra Trace Laboratories in | ||||||||
| • For geophysical |
tools, | Perth for Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, P, | |||||||
| spectrometers, | handheld |
XRF |
S, Mn, TiO2, MgO, CaO and | ||||||
| instruments, | etc, the | parameters | K2O. In addition, loss on | ||||||
| used in determining the analysis | ignition (LOI) was determined | ||||||||
| including instrument | make and | by Thermo-Gravimetric |
|||||||
| model, reading | times, | calibrations | Analysis (TGA) between 105oC | ||||||
| factors applied |
and | their | and 1000oC and reweighing for | ||||||
| derivation, etc. | content of combined water and | ||||||||
| • Nature of |
quality | control | carbon dioxide with results | ||||||
| procedures | adopted | (eg | being reported on a dry sample | ||||||
| standards, | blanks, | duplicates, | basis. | ||||||
| external laboratory checks) and | • |
The sample preparation |
|||||||
| whether acceptable |
levels of |
method consisted of initial | |||||||
| accuracy (ie | lack | of | bias) and | drying at 105oC then jaw | |||||
| precision have been established. | crushing the whole sample | ||||||||
| followed by vibrating disk |
|||||||||
| pulverization to -200 mesh. | |||||||||
| • | Company instigated duplicate | ||||||||
| samples were collected by riffle | |||||||||
| splitting 1 in 24 drill reject | |||||||||
| samples to 3kg on site using a | |||||||||
| bench top size splitter. Results | |||||||||
| are acceptable for the |
|||||||||
| classification category |
|||||||||
| proposed. | |||||||||
| Maiden | Iron Programme | ||||||||
| • | Drill samples were analysed | ||||||||
| using the X-Ray Fluorescence | |||||||||
| Spectrometry (XRF) method | |||||||||
| for Fe, SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, | |||||||||
| MnO, CaO, P, S, MgO, Zn, | |||||||||
| K2O, Sn, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, As, | |||||||||
| Pb, Ba, Na2O, Cl, Sr and LOI. | |||||||||
| • | Company instigated blanks, | ||||||||
| standards and duplicate |
|||||||||
| samples were inserted at |
|||||||||
| approximately 25 metre |
|||||||||
| intervals. Laboratory instigated | |||||||||
| standards were also |
|||||||||
| introduced as well as repeat | |||||||||
| samples. Results are |
|||||||||
| acceptable for the |
|||||||||
| classification category |
|||||||||
| proposed. | |||||||||
| Verification of sampling | • The verification |
of | significant | IOH Programmes |
|||||
| and assaying | intersections | by | either | • |
All intervals were sampled; | ||||
| independent | or | alternative | there was no selective | ||||||
| company personnel. | sampling by intersection. | ||||||||
| • The use of twinned | holes. | • | No adjustments were made to | ||||||
| • Documentation | of | primary data, | assay data. | ||||||
| data entry |
procedures, | data |
• |
All collar, downhole assay and | |||||
| verification, data storage (physical | logged geology data was | ||||||||
| and electronic) | protocols. | entered into an Access | |||||||
| • Discuss any | adjustment to | assay | database and validated. | ||||||
| data. | Computer-generated drill hole | ||||||||
| logswere preparedfor holes |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|]
ASX:M4M
+61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| and printed and reviewed as | |||||||||
| part of the validation process. | |||||||||
| • | Collar, assay and logged | ||||||||
| geology tables were imported | |||||||||
| into Micromine software in | |||||||||
| preparation for resource | |||||||||
| estimation | |||||||||
| Maiden | Iron Programme | ||||||||
| • | All intervals were sampled; | ||||||||
| there was no selective | |||||||||
| sampling by intersection. | |||||||||
| • | No adjustments were made to | ||||||||
| assay data. | |||||||||
| • | All collar, downhole assay and | ||||||||
| logged geology data was | |||||||||
| entered into an Access | |||||||||
| database and validated. | |||||||||
| Computer-generated drill hole | |||||||||
| logs were prepared for holes | |||||||||
| and printed and reviewed as | |||||||||
| part of the validation process. | |||||||||
| • | Collar, assay and logged | ||||||||
| geology tables were imported | |||||||||
| into Micromine software in | |||||||||
| preparation for resource | |||||||||
| estimation | |||||||||
| Location of data points | • Accuracy and quality of surveys | IOH Programmes |
|||||||
| used to | locate drill | holes (collar | • |
All holes have been surveyed | |||||
| and | down-hole | surveys), | by DGPS. | ||||||
| trenches, mine workings and other | • |
All holes are vertical and | |||||||
| locations | used | in | Mineral | relatively short; there are no | |||||
| Resource estimation. | down hole surveys. | ||||||||
| • Specification of the | grid system | Maiden |
Iron Programme | ||||||
| used. | • | All holes have been surveyed | |||||||
| • Quality | and | adequacy | of | by DGPS, which has an | |||||
| topographic | control. | expected relative accuracy of | |||||||
| 0.02m East and North and | |||||||||
| 0.05m RL for the control, and | |||||||||
| 0.05m East, North and RL for | |||||||||
| the collars. | |||||||||
| • | All holes are vertical and | ||||||||
| relatively short; there are no | |||||||||
| down hole surveys. | |||||||||
| Data spacing and | • Data spacing for | reporting of | IOH Programmes |
||||||
| distribution | Exploration | Results. | • | Drill spacing is 200m (N) x | |||||
| • Whether | the data | spacing | and | 50m (E) | |||||
| distribution | is | sufficient | to | Maiden |
Iron Programme | ||||
| establish | the degree | of geological | • |
Infill drill spacing is 50m x | |||||
| and grade | continuity appropriate | 50m. | |||||||
| for the Mineral Resource and Ore | • |
Spacing is considered | |||||||
| Reserve | estimation | procedure(s) | satisfactory for the level of | ||||||
| and classifications | applied. | classification applied. | |||||||
| • Whether | sample compositing has | ||||||||
| been applied. |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orientation of data in | • Whether the orientation of |
• |
Mineralisation is sub- |
| relation to geological | sampling achieves unbiased |
horizontal; drill orientation is | |
| structure | sampling of possible structures | vertical. | |
| and the extent to which this is | • |
Sampling is considered | |
| known, considering the deposit | unbiased geologically. | ||
| type. | |||
| • If the relationship between the | |||
| drilling orientation and the |
|||
| orientation of key mineralised | |||
| structures is considered to have | |||
| introduced a sampling bias, this | |||
| should be assessed and reported | |||
| if material. | |||
| Sample security | • The measures taken to ensure | • |
Standard sampling protocols |
| sample security. | have been used to ensure | ||
| security. | |||
| Audits or reviews | • The results of any audits or | • |
No sampling audits have been |
| reviews of sampling techniques | carried out. | ||
| and data. |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral | • Type, reference name/number, location | • | The Extension deposit is located in |
| tenement and | and ownership including agreements or |
Maiden Iron’s tenements M47/1353 | |
| land tenure | material issues with third parties such as | to M47/1356. It lies in the central | |
| status | joint ventures, partnerships, overriding | portion of the Hamersley Ranges, | |
| royalties, native title interests, historical | and is located 3km north of BHPB | ||
| sites, wilderness or national park and | Yandicoogina Mine and near to | ||
| environmental settings. | established mine service |
||
| • The security of the tenure held at the time | infrastructure in the Central Pilbara. | ||
| of reporting along with any known | • | WA State Government royalty of | |
| impediments to obtaining a licence to | 7.5% of royalty value | ||
| operate in the area. | • | Derek Noel Ammon royalty of 1.25% | |
| FOB production | |||
| • | Martu Idja Banyjima (Native Title) | ||
| royalty of 0.5% | |||
| • | Iron Ore Holdings Royalty of 1.25% | ||
| to 2.5% of production, dependent on | |||
| prevailing prices and other factors. | |||
| Deferred consideration payment of | |||
| $1.75muponcommercialproduction | |||
| Exploration | • Acknowledgment and appraisal of | • | Exploration was carried out by IOH |
| done by other | exploration by other parties. |
and Maiden Iron Pty Ltd | |
| parties | |||
| Geology | • Deposit type, geological setting and style | • | Iron mineralisation within the project |
| of mineralisation. | area is present as predominantly | ||
| fluvial pisolite channel iron deposits | |||
| with minor residual bedded hematite- | |||
| goethite and eluvial canga deposits. | |||
| The channel iron deposits infill | |||
| palaeotributary channels which are | |||
| genetically related to the Marillana | |||
| Formation/Yandi CID occupying the | |||
| main palaeochannel which occurs | |||
| alongside the present day Marillana | |||
| Creeksystem. | |||
| Drill hole | • A summary of all information material to | •Full | table of intersections and results |
| Information | the understanding of the exploration | included in body of release | |
| results including a tabulation of the | |||
| following information for all Material drill | |||
| holes: | |||
o easting and northing of the drill hole |
|||
| collar | |||
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – |
|||
| elevation above sea level in metres) | |||
| of the drill hole collar | |||
o dip and azimuth of the hole |
|||
o down hole length and interception |
|||
| depth | |||
o hole length. |
|||
| • If the exclusion of this information is | |||
| justified on the basis that the information | |||
| is not Material and this exclusion does | |||
| not detract from the understanding of the | |||
| report, the Competent Person should | |||
| _clearly explain why this is the case. _ |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data | • In reporting Exploration Results, | • | Weighted averages of grade |
| aggregation | weighting averaging techniques, | intervals using a 50% Fe cut off | |
| methods | maximum and/or minimum grade | grade have been applied | |
| truncations (eg cutting of high grades) | • | Metal equivalent values have not | |
| and cut-off grades are usually Material | been utilised | ||
| and should be stated. | |||
| • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate | |||
| short lengths of high grade results and | |||
| longer lengths of low grade results, the | |||
| procedure used for such aggregation | |||
| should be stated and some typical | |||
| examples of such aggregations should be | |||
| shown in detail. | |||
| • The assumptions used for any reporting | |||
| of metal equivalent values should be | |||
| _clearly stated. _ | |||
| Relationship | • These relationships are particularly | •Drill holes are vertical with sub horizontal | |
| between | important in the reporting of Exploration | strata and therefore approximate true | |
| mineralisation | Results. |
widths of mineralisation | |
| widths and | • If the geometry of the mineralisation with | ||
| intercept | respect to the drill hole angle is known, | ||
| lengths | its nature should be reported. | ||
| • If it is not known and only the down hole | |||
| lengths are reported, there should be a | |||
| clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down | |||
| _hole length, true width not known’). _ | |||
| Diagrams | • Appropriate maps and sections (with | •Maps and diagrams have been utilised in | |
| scales) and tabulations of intercepts | the body of the release | ||
| should be included for any significant | |||
| discovery being reported These should | |||
| include, but not be limited to a plan view | |||
| of drill hole collar locations and | |||
| _appropriate sectional views. _ | |||
| Balanced | • Where comprehensive reporting of all | •All drill holes have been reported | |
| reporting | Exploration Results is not practicable, | including those with no significant results | |
| representative reporting of both low and | |||
| high grades and/or widths should be | |||
| practiced to avoid misleading reporting of | |||
| _Exploration Results. _ | |||
| Other | • Other exploration data, if meaningful and | •All meaningful exploration data included | |
| substantive | material, should be reported including | in body of release | |
| exploration | (but not limited to): geological | ||
| data | observations; geophysical survey results; | ||
| geochemical survey results; bulk samples | |||
| – size and method of treatment; | |||
| metallurgical test results; bulk density, | |||
| groundwater, geotechnical and rock | |||
| characteristics; potential deleterious or | |||
| _contaminating substances. _ | |||
| Further work | • The nature and scale of planned further | •Further mapping and sampling prior to | |
| work (eg tests for lateral extensions or | drill | testing of extensions to | |
| depth extensions or large-scale step-out | mineralisation | ||
| drilling). | •Drill planning will be conducted post | ||
| • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of | mapping program being completed |
||
| possible extensions, including the main | |||
| geological interpretations and future | |||
| drilling areas, provided this information is |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|]
ASX:M4M
+61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| not commercially sensitive. |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources (Criteria listed in section 1, and where relevant in section 2, also apply to this section.)
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| Database | • Measures taken to ensure that data has | • All drill hole data was validated using the |
| integrity | not been corrupted by, for example, | Micromine software package, including: |
| transcription or keying errors, between its | • Checks for duplicate collars | |
| initial collection and its use for Mineral | • Checks for missing samples | |
| Resource estimation purposes. | • Checks for down hole from-to interval | |
| • Data validation procedures used. | consistency | |
| • Checks for overlapping samples | ||
| • Checks for samples beyond hole depth | ||
| Site visits | • Comment on any site visits undertaken | • Two site visits have been undertaken by the |
| by the Competent Person and the | CP, during 2007 and 2014. | |
| outcome of those visits. | ||
| • If no site visits have been undertaken | ||
| indicate why this is the case. | ||
| Geological | • Confidence in (or conversely, the | • Confidence is high in the geological |
| interpretation | uncertainty of ) the geological | interpretation |
| interpretation of the mineral deposit. | • The various geological domains can | |
| • Nature of the data used and of any | generally be clearly identified using both | |
| assumptions made. | visual and geochemical means. | |
| • The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral Resource |
• Alternative interpretations would be unlikely to materially affect the resource. |
|
| estimation. | ||
| • The use of geology in guiding and | ||
| controlling Mineral Resource estimation. | ||
| • The factors affecting continuity both of | ||
| grade and geology. | ||
| Dimensions | • The extent and variability of the Mineral | • The deposit is approximately 4 km North- |
| Resource expressed as length (along | South and varies from 2 km to 4km East- | |
| strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth | West |
|
| below surface to the upper and lower | • The deposit has typical overburden of 5m to | |
| limits of the Mineral Resource. | 10m and a thickness of 10m to 20m. | |
| Estimation | • The nature and appropriateness of the | • An Inverse Distance Cubed interpolation |
| and | estimation technique(s) applied and key | method was used to estimate all elements. |
| modelling | assumptions, including treatment of | Micromine 2014 software was used. |
| techniques | extreme grade values, domaining, | • Block model parameters are summarised |
| interpolation parameters and maximum | below. Sub-cells to a minimum of 1.25m by | |
| distance of extrapolation from data | 1.25m were used to spatially honour | |
| points. If a computer assisted estimation | geological and topographical boundaries. | |
| method was chosen include a description | ||
| of computer software and parameters | ||
| used. | ||
| • The availability of check estimates, | ||
| previous estimates and/or mine | ||
| production records and whether the | ||
| Mineral Resource estimate takes | ||
| appropriate account of such data. • The assumptions made regarding recovery of by-products. |
• No grade capping was applied. • Search ellipses applied in the estimate were based on down hole variography, drill |
|
| • Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables of economic significance (eg sulphur for acid mine |
hole spacing and the interpreted geological continuity and orientation of the deposits. • ID3 was preferred over kriging as it gave |
|
| drainage characterisation). | better validation results and the horizontal | |
| • In the case of block model interpolation, | variograms were not particularly good | |
| _the block size in relation to the average _ |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|]
ASX:M4M
+61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| sample spacing and the search | quality. The low nugget effect observed in | |
| employed. | the down hole variograms confirms use of | |
| • Any assumptions behind modelling of | the cubed power in the inverse distance | |
| selective mining units. | interpolation. | |
| • Any assumptions about correlation | • The primary search ellipse had radii of | |
| between variables. | 125m horizontally and 1.5m vertically. A | |
| • Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the |
minimum of 2 samples and a maximum of 16 samples were required in the search pass. A |
|
| resource estimates. | maximum of 4 samples per drill hole was | |
| • Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping. • The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of |
used. Where blocks were not informed in the first pass, a second search was used with radii of 250m horizontally and 5m vertically. A minimum of 1 sample and a maximum of 16 samples were required in this search |
|
| reconciliation data if available. | pass. | |
| Moisture | • Whether the tonnages are estimated on a | • Tonnages have been estimated on a dry |
| dry basis or with natural moisture, and | basis. No moisture factors have been | |
| the method of determination of the | applied. | |
| moisture content. | ||
| Cut-off | • The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) | • Cut-offs are based on preliminary economic |
| parameters | or quality parameters applied. | analysis, and review of similar deposits |
| nearby. | ||
| Mining | • Assumptions made regarding possible | • Mining is assumed to be by conventional |
| factors or | mining methods, minimum mining | open pit methods. |
| assumptions | dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, |
• No dilution or loss factors have been |
| external) mining dilution. It is always | applied to the Mineral Resource Estimate. | |
| necessary as part of the process of | ||
| determining reasonable prospects for | ||
| eventual economic extraction to consider | ||
| potential mining methods, but the | ||
| assumptions made regarding mining | ||
| methods and parameters when | ||
| estimating Mineral Resources may not | ||
| always be rigorous. Where this is the | ||
| case, this should be reported with an | ||
| explanation of the basis of the mining | ||
| assumptions made. | ||
| Metallurgical | • The basis for assumptions or predictions | • No metallurgical assumptions have been |
| factors or | regarding metallurgical amenability. It is | made. The deposit is of a type that is well |
| assumptions | always necessary as part of the process |
known and understood from many mining |
| of determining reasonable prospects for | operations in the Pilbara region; no major | |
| eventual economic extraction to consider | metallurgical issues are expected. | |
| potential metallurgical methods, but the | ||
| assumptions regarding metallurgical | ||
| treatment processes and parameters | ||
| made when reporting Mineral Resources | ||
| may not always be rigorous. Where this is | ||
| the case, this should be reported with an | ||
| explanation of the basis of the | ||
| metallurgical assumptions made. | ||
| Environmen- | • Assumptions made regarding possible | • No assumptions have been made regarding |
| tal factors or | waste and process residue disposal | environmental factors. |
| assumptions | options. It is always necessary as part of |
• The general area around the project has |
| the process of determining reasonable | seen extensive mining of similar type | |
| prospects for eventual economic | deposits. |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| extraction to consider the potential | ||||
| environmental impacts of the mining and | ||||
| processing operation. While at this stage | ||||
| the determination of potential | ||||
| environmental impacts, particularly for a | ||||
| greenfields project, may not always be | ||||
| well advanced, the status of early | ||||
| consideration of these potential | ||||
| environmental impacts should be | ||||
| reported. Where these aspects have not | ||||
| been considered this should be reported | ||||
| with an explanation of the environmental | ||||
| assumptions made. | ||||
| Bulk density | • Whether assumed or determined. If | • On advice from MI densities were taken | ||
| assumed, the basis for the assumptions. | from Ammtec’s report (2008) and | applied on | ||
| If determined, the method used, whether | the basis of domains. | |||
| wet or dry, the frequency of the | ||||
| measurements, the nature, size and | Domain Density |
|||
| representativeness of the samples. | QA 2.00 |
|||
| • The bulk density for bulk material must | RCID 2.56 |
|||
| have been measured by methods that | UCID 2.73 |
|||
| adequately account for void spaces | MCID 2.73 |
|||
| (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit. • Discuss assumptions for bulk density |
LCID 2.73 LGC 2.85 Basement 2.65 |
|||
| estimates used in the evaluation process | ||||
| of the different materials. | ||||
| Classification | • The basis for the classification of the |
|||
| Mineral Resources into varying | • The Extension Mineral Resource | has been | ||
| confidence categories. | classified as Indicated, in accordance with | |||
| • Whether appropriate account has been | The 2012 Australasian Code for Reporting of | |||
| taken of all relevant factors (ie relative | Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC | |||
| confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, | Code). A range of criteria has been | |||
| reliability of input data, confidence in | considered in determining this classification | |||
| continuity of geology and metal values, | including: | |||
| quality, quantity and distribution of the | • Geological Continuity | |||
| data). | • Geological continuity is understood with | |||
| • Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the |
reasonable confidence given detailed logging and mapping. The classification reflects this |
|||
| deposit. | level of confidence. | |||
| • Data Quality | ||||
| • Resource classification is based on | ||||
| information and data provided from the MI | ||||
| database. Descriptions of drilling techniques, | ||||
| survey, sampling/sample preparation, | ||||
| analytical techniques and database | ||||
| management/validation provided for both the | ||||
| IOH and MI Data indicate that data collection | ||||
| and management is well within industry | ||||
| standards. Widenbar considers that the | ||||
| database represents an accurate | record of | |||
| the drilling undertaken at the project. | ||||
| • Drilling Spacing | ||||
| • Drill hole spacing of the diamond | drill holes | |||
| in the model update area is 100 by | 100m | |||
| withclose spaced sampling at 0.25m |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M
==> picture [595 x 59] intentionally omitted <==
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | Commentary |
|---|---|---|
| intervals. In the other parts of the resource | ||
| area drilling is nominally 200m x 100m. | ||
| • Modelling Technique | ||
| • The Extension update resource model was | ||
| generated using an ID3 interpolation method, | ||
| with a multi-pass search approach. The first | ||
| search ellipsoid had dimensions of 125 x 125 | ||
| x 1.5m with a minimum of 2 samples and a | ||
| maximum of 16. The second search, used | ||
| where not enough data was found in the first | ||
| search had dimensions 250m x 250m x 5m. | ||
| 95% of blocks were estimated in the first | ||
| search pass. | ||
| • The search pass used, the number of | ||
| samples used and the average distance of | ||
| samples from each block, were all stored in | ||
| the block model. | ||
| • In general the search pass and average | ||
| distance are all broadly correlated with a | ||
| combination of drill hole spacing and domain | ||
| thickness. | ||
| • The above parameters were used as a | ||
| guide in combination with drill spacing to | ||
| arrive at a final resource classification. | ||
| • Final Classification | ||
| • All CID domains have been allocated to the | ||
| Indicated category. The classification criteria | ||
| for the previous IOH model are summarised | ||
| in Widenbar, 2012; the mineralised material | ||
| was classifiedintheIndicated Category | ||
| Audits or | • The results of any audits or reviews of | •There have been no audits or reviews |
| reviews | Mineral Resource estimates. | |
| Discussion | • Where appropriate a statement of the | • The relative accuracy of the Mineral |
| of relative | relative accuracy and confidence level in | Resource is reflected in the reporting of the |
| accuracy/ | the Mineral Resource estimate using an | Mineral Resource as being in line with the |
| confidence | approach or procedure deemed | guidelines of the 2012 JORC Code. |
| appropriate by the Competent Person. | • The statement relates to global estimates of | |
| For example, the application of statistical | tonnes and grade, with reference made to | |
| or geostatistical procedures to quantify | resources above a certain cut-off that are | |
| the relative accuracy of the resource | intended to assist mining studies. | |
| within stated confidence limits, or, if such | • No production data is available for | |
| an approach is not deemed appropriate, | comparisons | |
| a qualitative discussion of the factors that | ||
| could affect the relative accuracy and | ||
| confidence of the estimate. | ||
| • The statement should specify whether it | ||
| relates to global or local estimates, and, if | ||
| local, state the relevant tonnages, which | ||
| should be relevant to technical and | ||
| economic evaluation. Documentation | ||
| should include assumptions made and | ||
| the procedures used. | ||
| • These statements of relative accuracy | ||
| and confidence of the estimate should be | ||
| compared with production data, where | ||
| available. |
Macro Metals Limited ACN 001 894 033 Level 3, 25 Prowse Street, WA 6008 [|] +61 (0) 8 6143 6707 [|] [email protected] [|] www. macrometals.com.au [|]
ASX:M4M