AI assistant
LTC — Interim / Quarterly Report 2013
Dec 6, 2013
51997_rns_2013-12-06_34c52fd7-e841-4961-93b1-77c0d1236007.pdf
Interim / Quarterly Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Lite-On Technology Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and Independent Accountants’ Review Report
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REVIEW REPORT
The Board of Directors and Shareholders Lite-On Technology Corporation
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lite-On Technology Corporation (“Parent Company”) and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Group”) as of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and changes in equity and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Parent Company’s management. Our responsibility is to issue a report on these consolidated financial statements based on our reviews.
Except as stated in the following paragraph, we conducted our reviews in accordance with Statement of Auditing Standards No. 36 “Review of Financial Statements” issued by the Auditing Standards Committee of the Accounting Research and Development Foundation of the Republic of China. A review consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the Republic of China, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
As stated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, we did not review the financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 of some consolidated subsidiaries. The assets of these subsidiaries were 31.91% (NT$65,628,304 thousand) and 35.70% (NT$68,925,120 thousand) of the consolidated total assets as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The liabilities of these subsidiaries were 22.66% (NT$29,418,577 thousand) and 22.93% (NT$24,402,604 thousand) of the consolidated total liabilities as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The comprehensive incomes of these subsidiaries were 26.66% (NT$567,308 thousand), 47.79% (NT$1,835,566 thousand), 25.63% (NT$2,221,476 thousand) and 47.62% (NT$2,098,058 thousand) of the total comprehensive income in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Also, as stated in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the Group had other investments accounted for by the equity method. The carrying values of these investments of NT$1,888,587 thousand and NT$1,885,315 thousand as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and share of the loss of associates and joint ventures amounting to NT$30,674 thousand, NT$9,770 thousand, NT$74,867 thousand, and NT$7,434 thousand in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and related investment amounts as well as additional disclosures in Note 35 were based on these investees’ unreviewed financial statements for the same reporting periods as those of the Group.
- 1 -
Based on our reviews, except for the adjustments that might have been determined to be necessary had the subsidiaries and other equity-method investees’ financial statements mentioned in the preceding paragraph been reviewed, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements of Lite-On Technology Corporation and its subsidiaries referred to above for them to be in conformity with the Regulations Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers issued by the Financial Supervisory Commission of the Republic of China, and International Financial Reporting Standard 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” and International Accounting Standard 34 “Interim Financial Reporting” endorsed by the Financial Supervisory Commission of the Republic of China.
November 12, 2013
Notice to Readers
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are intended only to present the consolidated financial position, financial performance and cash flows in accordance with accounting principles and practices generally accepted in the Republic of China and not those of any other jurisdictions. The standards, procedures and practices to review such consolidated financial statements are those generally applied in the Republic of China.
For the convenience of readers, the independent accountants’ review report and the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been translated into English from the original Chinese version prepared and used in the Republic of China. If there is any conflict between the English version and the original Chinese version or any difference in the interpretation of the two versions, the Chinese-language independent accountants’ review report and consolidated financial statements shall prevail.
- 2 -
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars, Except Par Value) (Reviewed, Not Audited)
| ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents (Note 6) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss - current (Notes 4 and 7) Available-for-sale financial assets - current (Notes 4, 5 and 8) Debt investments with no active market - current (Notes 4 and 10) Notes receivable (Note 4) Trade receivables, net (Notes 4, 5 and 11) Trade receivables from related parties (Notes 4, 5 and 31) Other receivables Other receivables from related parties (Note 31) Inventories, net (Notes 4, 5 and 12) Construction in progress in excess of progressive billings (Notes 4 and 13) Non-current assets held for sale (Notes 4 and 14) Other current assets (Note 18) Total current assets NONCURRENT ASSETS Available-for-sale financial assets - noncurrent (Notes 4, 5 and 8) Debt investments with no active market - noncurrent (Notes 4, 10 and 32) Investments accounted for by the equity method (Notes 4 and 15) Property, plant and equipment, net (Notes 4, 5 and 16) Intangible assets (Notes 4, 5 and 17) Deferred tax assets (Notes 4 and 5) Refundable deposits Prepayments for investments Other noncurrent assets (Note 18) Total noncurrent assets TOTAL |
September 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | September 30, 2012 | January 1, 2012 Amount % LIABILITIES AND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES $ 52,882,246 26 Short-term borrowings (Note 19) Financial liabilities at fair value through profit 111,584 - or loss - current (Notes 4 and 7) Notes payable 9 - Trade payables Trade payables to related parties (Note 31) 3,633,137 2 Other payables 82,039 - Other payables to related parties (Note 31) 45,841,608 22 Current tax liabilities (Notes 4 and 5) Provisions - current (Notes 4, 5 and 21) 1,099 - Current portion of long-term borrowings (Note 19) 1,590,264 1 Finance lease payables - current (Notes 4 and 20) 955 - Advance receipts 27,659,384 13 Total current liabilities 38,294 - - - NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 4,429,820 2 Derivative financial liabilities for hedging - noncurrent (Notes 4, 5 and 9) 136,270,439 66 Long-term borrowings, net of current portion (Note 19) Deferred tax liabilities (Notes 4 and 5) Finance lease payables, net of current portion 4,271,326 2 (Notes 4 and 20) Accrued pension liabilities (Notes 4 and 5) 108,107 - Guarantee deposits received 3,514,672 2 Total noncurrent liabilities 38,886,577 19 Total liabilities 16,303,412 8 2,116,283 1 EQUITY ATTRIBUTABLE TO OWNERS OF THE 314,903 - COMPANY 74,843 - Share capital 3,755,388 2 Ordinary shares Advance receipts for common stock 69,345,511 34 Total share capital Capital surplus Additional paid-in capital from share issuance in excess of par value Bond conversion Treasury stock transactions Difference between consideration and carry amounts adjusted arising from changes in percentage of ownership in subsidiaries Arising from share of changes in capital surplus of associates or joint venture Merger Employee stock options Total capital surplus Retained earnings Legal reserve Special reserve Unappropriated earnings Total retained earnings Other equity Exchange differences on translating foreign operations Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale financial assets Unrealized loss on cash flow hedging Total other equity Treasury shares Total equity attributable to owners of the Company NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS Total equity $ 205,615,950 100 TOTAL |
September 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | September 30, 2012 | January 1, 2012 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount % $ 59,113,445 29 20,427 - 11 - 1,081,972 - 165,491 - 48,761,114 24 91,585 - 1,560,957 1 17,457 - 24,502,664 12 75,023 - 23,452 - 6,614,215 3 142,027,813 69 2,441,897 1 106,196 - 3,435,478 2 36,891,365 18 15,843,257 8 2,350,153 1 376,643 - - - 2,187,390 1 63,632,379 31 $ 205,660,192 100 |
Amount % $ 51,224,870 26 13,023 - 10 - 9,365,207 5 119,941 - 44,799,940 23 83,421 - 1,559,231 1 2,231 - 20,566,117 10 72,527 - - - 5,058,662 2 132,865,180 67 2,154,465 1 102,560 - 3,508,782 2 37,697,741 19 16,033,575 8 2,215,617 1 311,277 1 13,155 - 2,153,262 1 64,190,434 33 $ 197,055,614 100 |
Amount % $ 46,693,628 24 59,615 - 11 - 8,574,753 4 91,251 - 45,597,890 24 94,331 - 1,600,070 1 1,442 - 20,684,591 11 44,081 - - - 4,708,535 2 128,150,198 66 2,221,526 1 101,218 - 3,423,930 2 38,294,004 20 16,132,275 9 1,973,461 1 264,575 - 103,592 - 2,416,521 1 64,931,102 34 $ 193,081,300 100 |
Amount % $ 11,287,855 5 43,376 - 376,513 - 54,301,320 26 384,746 - 18,462,138 9 15,229 - 1,710,371 1 1,604,746 1 11,988,711 6 69,307 - 1,332,477 1 101,576,789 49 54,773 - 24,850,524 12 2,770,404 2 187,562 - 313,697 - 70,046 - 28,247,006 14 129,823,795 63 23,206,877 11 39,675 - 23,246,552 11 9,026,088 4 7,540,388 4 430,242 - - - 14,869 - 10,120,217 5 8,286 - 27,140,090 13 8,601,391 4 689,913 - 9,525,127 5 18,816,431 9 1,418,525 1 171,549 - (54,773) - 1,535,301 1 (1,334,660) - 69,403,714 34 6,432,683 3 75,836,397 37 $ 205,660,192 100 |
Amount % $ 7,010,394 4 35,239 - 240,009 - 51,989,611 26 137,923 - 16,304,341 8 20,173 - 2,042,444 1 1,691,373 1 4,411,168 2 62,381 - 826,445 1 84,771,501 43 101,563 - 19,956,634 10 2,170,053 1 232,716 - 312,768 1 89,068 - 22,862,802 12 107,634,303 55 22,953,154 12 6,840 - 22,959,994 12 8,551,730 4 7,540,388 4 370,703 - 146,193 - 16,645 - 10,120,217 5 6,112 - 26,751,988 13 7,847,905 4 - - 13,654,612 7 21,502,517 11 128,872 - (446,848 ) - (101,563) - (419,539) - (1,334,660) (1) 69,460,300 35 19,961,011 10 89,421,311 45 $ 197,055,614 100 |
Amount % $ 8,160,766 4 47,135 - 169,679 - 50,532,638 26 267,055 - 16,329,785 9 17,862 - 1,576,894 1 1,795,752 1 3,938,109 2 55,372 - 853,872 - 83,744,919 43 119,667 - 19,932,801 11 2,085,604 1 254,133 - 173,430 - 93,062 - 22,658,697 12 106,403,616 55 22,952,613 12 540 - 22,953,153 12 8,534,288 5 7,540,388 4 374,631 - 146,193 - 3,261 - 10,120,217 5 5,924 - 26,724,902 14 7,847,905 4 - - 11,459,813 6 19,307,718 10 (175,003 ) - (296,804 ) - (119,667) - (591,474) - (1,334,660) (1) 67,059,639 35 19,618,045 10 86,677,684 45 $ 193,081,300 100 |
Amount % $ 4,737,488 2 42,274 - 498,568 - 60,896,796 30 317,508 - 18,074,382 9 43,058 - 2,165,581 1 1,493,339 1 1,173,473 1 84,360 - 1,154,215 - 90,681,042 44 165,225 - 23,294,964 12 2,137,938 1 320,907 - 142,158 - 85,224 - 26,146,416 13 116,827,458 57 23,099,801 11 - - 23,099,801 11 8,533,185 4 7,641,499 4 416,974 - - - - - 10,255,921 5 4,602 - 26,852,181 13 7,125,313 3 - - 12,392,930 6 19,518,243 9 1,625,560 1 (142,004 ) - (165,225) - 1,318,331 1 (2,088,230) (1) 68,700,326 33 20,088,166 10 88,788,492 43 $ 205,615,950 100 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
(With Deloitte & Touche review report dated November 12, 2013)
- 3 -
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars, Except Earnings Per Share) (Reviewed, Not Audited)
| OPERATING REVENUE Sales (Notes 4, 5, 24 and 31) Less: Sales allowance Sales returns Other operating revenue Total operating revenue OPERATING COSTS Cost of goods sold (Notes 12, 16, 17, 22 and 31) Other operating cost Total operating costs GROSS PROFIT OPERATING EXPENSES (Notes 16, 17, 22 and 31) Selling and marketing expenses General and administrative expenses Research and development expenses Total operating expenses OPERATING INCOME NONOPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES Share of profit (loss) of associates and joint ventures (Note 15) Interest income (Note 4) Dividend income (Note 4) Government grants (Note 4) Other income (Note 31) Gain on disposal of intangible assets Gain (loss) on disposal of investments, net Net gain (loss) on foreign currency exchange (Note 4) Valuation gain (loss) on financial assets (Notes 4 and 7) Gain on reversal of impairment loss (Note 16) Interest expense Other expenses Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment Loss on disposal of intangible assets Impairment loss (Notes 8, 14, 15 and 16) Total nonoperating income and expenses |
For the Three Months EndedSeptember 30 | For the Three Months EndedSeptember 30 | For the Three Months EndedSeptember 30 | For the Nine Months | EndedSeptember 30 | EndedSeptember 30 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| Amount % $ 57,851,729 101 554,018 1 261,655 - 41,456 - 57,077,512 100 48,711,394 86 30,176 - 48,741,570 86 8,335,942 14 2,072,934 3 1,572,543 3 1,645,407 3 5,290,884 9 3,045,058 5 (10,135 ) - 322,615 - 9,653 - - - 300,850 - 390 - 957 - (17,654 ) - 10,580 - - - (242,336 ) - (182,108 ) - (87,847 ) - - - (114,228) - (9,263) - |
Amount % $ 56,132,923 101 658,313 1 110,594 - 105,376 - 55,469,392 100 47,462,596 86 76,689 - 47,539,285 86 7,930,107 14 1,841,366 3 1,660,235 3 1,303,111 2 4,804,712 8 3,125,395 6 6,029 - 303,357 1 4,818 - - - 259,076 - 7 - 104,359 - (64,155 ) - 97,800 - 5,454 - (96,461 ) - (465,763 ) (1 ) (33,912 ) - - - - - 120,609 - |
Amount % $ 156,099,039 101 1,621,812 1 822,922 - 200,886 - 153,855,191 100 131,079,354 85 146,225 - 131,225,579 85 22,629,612 15 6,186,985 4 4,441,697 3 4,575,979 3 15,204,661 10 7,424,951 5 (42,903 ) - 903,992 - 29,102 - 527,893 - 943,206 - - - 11,898 - 132,547 - (49,173 ) - - - (561,459 ) - (479,663 ) - (82,982 ) - (758 ) - (526,761) - 804,939 - |
Amount % $ 165,208,423 101 1,833,261 1 523,110 - 297,732 - 163,149,784 100 140,112,233 86 216,719 - 140,328,952 86 22,820,832 14 6,006,549 4 4,812,103 3 3,993,931 2 14,812,583 9 8,008,249 5 17,523 - 780,891 - 41,901 - - - 1,122,526 1 - - 400,442 - (7,079 ) - 70,139 - - - (423,573 ) - (955,015 ) (1 ) (62,338 ) - (174 ) - (484,029) - 501,214 - (Continued) |
- 4 -
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars, Except Earnings Per Share) (Reviewed, Not Audited)
| OPERATING PROFIT BEFORE INCOME TAX INCOME TAX EXPENSE (Notes 4, 5 and 25) NET PROFIT FOR THE PERIOD OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Exchange differences on translating foreign operations Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale financial assets Cash flow hedges Income tax relating to the components of other comprehensive income (expense) Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of income tax TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE PERIOD NET PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO: Owner of the parent company Noncontrolling interests TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO: Owner of the parent company Noncontrolling interests EARNINGS PER SHARE (NEW TAIWAN DOLLARS; Note 26) Basic Diluted |
For the Three Months EndedSeptember 30 | For the Three Months EndedSeptember 30 | For the Three Months EndedSeptember 30 | For the Nine Months | EndedSeptember 30 | EndedSeptember 30 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| Amount % $ 3,035,795 5 719,685 1 2,316,110 4 (338,887 ) - 76,395 - 16,404 - 57,609 - (188,479) - $ 2,127,631 4 $ 2,419,608 4 (103,498) - $ 2,316,110 4 $ 1,787,108 3 340,523 1 $ 2,127,631 4 $1.06 $1.05 |
Amount % $ 3,246,004 6 673,904 1 2,572,100 5 1,580,335 3 (58,406 ) - 15,218 - (268,657) (1) 1,268,490 2 $ 3,840,590 7 $ 1,980,698 4 591,402 1 $ 2,572,100 5 $ 1,441,086 3 2,399,504 4 $ 3,840,590 7 $0.87 $0.87 |
Amount % $ 8,229,890 5 1,796,503 1 6,433,387 4 1,873,086 1 632,525 1 46,790 - (318,426) - 2,233,975 2 $ 8,667,362 6 $ 6,235,935 4 197,452 - $ 6,433,387 4 $ 8,191,070 6 476,292 - $ 8,667,362 6 $2.73 $2.71 |
Amount % $ 8,509,463 5 1,893,122 1 6,616,341 4 (2,526,249 ) (1 ) (159,059 ) - 45,558 - 429,462 - (2,210,288) (1) $ 4,406,053 3 $ 5,085,144 3 1,531,197 1 $ 6,616,341 4 $ 3,177,769 2 1,228,284 1 $ 4,406,053 3 $2.24 $2.21 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
(With Deloitte & Touche review report dated November 12, 2013)
(Concluded)
- 5 -
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars) (Reviewed, Not Audited)
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
| BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2012 Appropriation of the 2011 earnings Legal reserve Cash dividends - NT$2.27 Stock dividends - NT$0.05 Change in Non-controlling interests Other changes in capital surplus Partial disposal of interests in subsidiaries Change in capital surplus from investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for by the equity method Stock dividends of employee transfer to capital Issue of common shares under employee share options Change in capital from cash dividends of the Parent Company paid to subsidiaries Net profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 Other comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net of income tax Total comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 Canceled of treasury shares BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2013 Appropriation of the 2012 earnings Legal reserve Special reserve Cash dividends - NT$2.35 Stock dividends - NT$0.05 Change in Non-controlling interests Other changes in capital surplus Additional acquisition of partially owned subsidiaries Change in capital surplus from investments in associates and joint ventures accounted for by the equity method Stock dividends of employee transfer to capital Issue of common shares under employee share options Change in capital from cash dividends of the Parent Company paid to subsidiaries Net profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 Other comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net of income tax Total comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 |
Equity Attributa | ble toOwners of | th | eCompany | Total $ 68,700,326 - (5,174,335 ) - - 143,763 (2,779 ) 156,080 2,962 55,853 5,085,144 (1,907,375) 3,177,769 - $ 67,059,639 $ 69,460,300 - - (5,400,265 ) - - (3,553,050 ) (506 ) 171,009 475,008 60,148 6,235,935 1,955,135 8,191,070 $ 69,403,714 |
Non-controlling Interests (Notes 23 and 28) $ 20,088,166 - - - (1,842,840 ) 144,435 - - - - 1,531,197 (302,913) 1,228,284 - $ 19,618,045 $ 19,961,011 - - - - (450,532 ) (13,554,088 ) - - - - 197,452 278,840 476,292 $ 6,432,683 |
Total Equity $ 88,788,492 - (5,174,335 ) - (1,842,840 ) 288,198 (2,779 ) 156,080 2,962 55,853 6,616,341 (2,210,288) 4,406,053 - $ 86,677,684 $ 89,421,311 - - (5,400,265 ) - (450,532 ) (17,107,138 ) (506 ) 171,009 475,008 60,148 6,433,387 2,233,975 8,667,362 $ 75,836,397 |
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share Capital (Note 22) $ 23,099,801 - - 113,972 - - - 44,215 275 - - - - (305,650) $ 22,952,613 $ 22,953,154 - - - 114,899 - - - 36,689 102,135 - - - - $ 23,206,877 |
Advance Receipts for Common Stock $ - - - - - - - - 540 - - - - - $ 540 $ 6,840 - - - - - - - - 32,835 - - - - $ 39,675 |
CapitalS | urplus(Notes 23 and | 28) | Retained E | arnings (Notes 23 an | d 28) | Other E | quity (Notes 23 and | 28) Cash Flow Hedges $ (165,225 ) - - - - - - - - - - 45,558 45,558 - $ (119,667) $ (101,563 ) - - - - - - - - - - - 46,790 46,790 $ (54,773) |
Treasury Stock (Note 23) $ (2,088,230 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - 753,570 $ (1,334,660) $ (1,334,660 ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ (1,334,660) |
||||||||||||
| Additional Paid-in Capital from Share Issuance in Excess of Par Value $ 8,533,185 - - - - - - 111,865 2,147 - - - - (112,909) $ 8,534,288 $ 8,551,730 - - - - - - - 134,320 340,038 - - - - $ 9,026,088 |
Bond Conversion $ 7,641,499 - - - - - - - - - - - - (101,111) $ 7,540,388 $ 7,540,388 - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ 7,540,388 |
f Treasury Stock Transactions $ 416,974 - - - - - - - - 55,853 - - - (98,196) $ 374,631 $ 370,703 - - - - - - (609 ) - - 60,148 - - - $ 430,242 |
Difference Between Consideration and Carry Amounts Adjusted Arising rom Change in Percentage of Ownership in Subsidiaries $ - - - - - 146,193 - - - - - - - - $ 146,193 $ 146,193 - - - - - (146,193 ) - - - - - - - $ - |
Arising from Share of Changes in Capital Surplus of Associates or Joint Venture $ - - - - - - 3,261 - - - - - - - $ 3,261 $ 16,645 - - - - - - (1,776 ) - - - - - - $ 14,869 |
Merger $ 10,255,921 - - - - - - - - - - - - (135,704) $ 10,120,217 $ 10,120,217 - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ 10,120,217 |
Employee Stock Options $ 4,602 - - - - - 1,322 - - - - - - - $ 5,924 $ 6,112 - - - - - - 2,174 - - - - - - $ 8,286 |
|||||||||||||||||
| Exchange Differences on Translating Foreign Operations $ 1,625,560 - - - - (2,430 ) - - - - - (1,798,133) (1,798,133) - $ (175,003) $ 128,872 - - - - - - (295 ) - - - - 1,289,948 1,289,948 $ 1,418,525 |
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available- for-sale Financial Assets $ (142,004 ) - - - - - - - - - - (154,800) (154,800) - $ (296,804) $ (446,848 ) - - - - - - - - - - - 618,397 618,397 $ 171,549 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Legal Reserve $ 7,125,313 722,592 - - - - - - - - - - - - $ 7,847,905 $ 7,847,905 753,486 - - - - - - - - - - - - $ 8,601,391 |
Special U Reserve $ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - 689,913 - - - - - - - - - - - $ 689,913 |
nappropriated Earnings $ 12,392,930 (722,592 ) (5,174,335 ) (113,972 ) - - (7,362 ) - - - 5,085,144 - 5,085,144 - $ 11,459,813 $ 13,654,612 (753,486 ) (689,913 ) (5,400,265 ) (114,899 ) - (3,406,857 ) - - - - 6,235,935 - 6,235,935 $ 9,525,127 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
(With Deloitte & Touche review report dated November 12, 2013)
- 6 -
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars) (Reviewed, Not Audited)
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Income before income tax Adjustments for: Depreciation expenses Amortization expenses Impairment loss recognized (reversal of impairment loss) on trade receivables Net (gain) loss on fair value change of financial assets held for trading Finance costs Interest income Dividend income Share of (gain) loss of associates and joint ventures Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment Loss on disposal of intangible assets Net (gain) loss on disposal of available-for-sale financial assets Gain on disposal of associates Impairment loss recognized on financial assets Impairment loss recognized on non-financial assets Reversal of impairment loss recognized on non-financial assets Unrealized net gain on foreign currency exchange Recognition of provisions Changes in operating assets and liabilities Financial assets held for trading Notes receivable Trade receivables Trade receivables from related parties Other receivables Other receivables from related parties Inventories Construction in progress in excess of progressive billings Other current assets Notes payable Trade payables Trade payables from related parties Other payable Other payable from related parties Provisions Advance receipts Accrued pension liabilities Cash generated from operations Interest received Dividend received |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 8,229,890 4,873,407 379,777 (6,816) 49,173 561,459 (903,992) (29,102) 42,903 82,982 758 24,052 (35,950) 283,682 426,122 - (224,257) 670,862 (48,440) (45,550) (3,403,605) (8,164) 46,022 (15,226) (3,839,207) (2,496) (1,475,443) 136,504 1,275,464 246,823 1,857,545 (4,944) (757,489) 496,018 929 8,883,691 876,271 29,102 |
2012 $ 8,509,463 4,761,726 434,786 16,890 (70,139) 423,573 (780,891) (41,901) (17,523) 62,338 174 (400,442) - 537,619 - (341,068) (236,380) 855,049 126,969 (9,212) (773,693) (93,232) (39,073) (487) 6,800,492 (5,787) (394,160) (328,889) (9,290,100) (50,453) (2,061,841) (25,196) (548,195) (281,102) 31,272 6,770,587 771,676 41,901 (Continued) |
- 7 -
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars) (Reviewed, Not Audited)
| Interest paid Income tax paid Net cash generated from operating activities CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Acquisition of available-for-sale financial assets Proceeds on sales of available-for-sale financial assets Proceeds (purchase) of debt investments with no active market Net cash inflow on disposal of associates Payments for property, plant and equipment Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment (Increase) decrease in refundable deposits Payments for intangible assets (Increase) decrease in other noncurrent assets Acquisition of associates Net cash generated from (used in) investing activities CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from short-term borrowings Proceeds (repayments) of long-term borrowings Proceeds (refund) of guarantee deposits received Decrease in finance lease payables Payment cash interests Proceeds of the exercise of employee stock options Partial acquisition of subsidiaries Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests Partial disposal of interests in subsidiaries without losing control loss Net cash used in financing activities EFFECTS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON THE BALANCE OF CASH HELD IN FOREIGN CURRENCIES NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF THE PERIOD |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ (600,586) (1,662,761) 7,525,717 (4,460) 35,409 8,293,249 111,476 (4,197,286) 1,427,710 (65,366) (92,355) (4,087) (13,099) 5,491,191 4,187,338 12,181,036 (19,022) (38,228) (5,340,117) 475,008 (17,107,138) (450,532) - (6,111,655) 983,322 7,888,575 51,224,870 $ 59,113,445 |
2012 $ (445,217) (2,391,321) 4,747,626 - 1,534,798 (5,134,024) - (5,258,381) 1,680,737 50,328 (64,465) 1,281,146 - (5,909,861) 3,577,204 (116,508) 7,838 (95,762) (5,118,482) 2,962 - (1,842,840) 288,198 (3,297,390) (1,728,993) (6,188,618) 52,882,246 $ 46,693,628 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
(With Deloitte & Touche review report dated November 12, 2013)
(Concluded)
- 8 -
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012 (In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars, Unless Stated Otherwise) (Reviewed, Not Audited)
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
Lite-On Technology Corporation (the “Parent Company”) was established in March 1989. Its shares are traded on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. The Parent Company manufactures and markets (1) computer software, hardware, peripherals and components and (2) monitors, multifunction and all-in-one printers, cameras and Internet systems and image-processing equipment.
The Parent Company merged with Lite-On Electronics, Inc., Silitek Corp. and GVC Corp., with the Parent Company as the survivor entity. The merger took effect on November 4, 2002, and the Parent Company thus assumed all rights and obligations of the three merged companies on that date. The Parent Company merged with its subsidiary, Lite-On Enclosure Inc., with the Parent Company as the survivor entity. The merger took effect on April 1, 2004, and the Parent Company thus assumed all rights and obligations of the three merged companies on that date.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in the Parent Company’s functional currency, New Taiwan dollars. For greater comparability and consistency of financial reporting, the consolidated financial statements are presented in New Taiwan dollars since the Parent Company’s stocks are listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange.
2. APPROVAL OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the board of directors and authorized for issue on November 12, 2013.
3. APPLICATION OF NEW AND REVISED STANDARDS, AMENDMENTS AND INTERPRETATIONS
- a. New and revised standards, amendments and interpretations in issue but not yet effective
In addition to the disclosure in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013, the Parent Company and its entire controlled subsidiaries (the “Group”) have not applied the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), International Accounting Standards (IAS), International Financial Reporting Interpretations (IFRIC), and Standing Interpretations (SIC) that have been issued by the IASB.
- 9 -
As of the date that the consolidated financial statements were approved and authorized for issue, the Financial Supervisory Commission (“FSC”) has not announced the effective dates for the following new and revised standards, amendments and interpretations:
new and revised standards, amendments and interpretations: |
|
|---|---|
| New, Revised Standards, Amendments and Interpretations Endorsed by the FSC but the effective date have not yet been determined by the FSC Not yet endorsed by the FSC Amendment to IAS 36 Impairment of Assets: Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets Amendment to IAS 39 Novation of Derivatives and Continuation of Hedge Accounting IFRIC 21 Levies |
Effective Date Announced by IASB (Note) |
| January 1, 2014 January 1, 2014 January 1, 2014 |
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the above new and revised standards, amendments and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning on or after the respective effective dates.
- b. Significant changes in accounting policy resulted from new and revised standards, amendments and interpretations in issue but not yet effective
In addition to the disclosure in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013, and except for the following, the initial application of the above new and revised standards, amendments and interpretations did not have any material impact on the Group’s accounting policies:
1) IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”
With regards to financial assets, all recognized financial assets that are within the scope of IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” to be subsequently measured at amortized cost or fair value. Specifically, financial assets that are held within a business model whose objective is to collect the contractual cash flows, and that have contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding are generally measured at amortized cost at the end of subsequent accounting periods. All other financial assets are measured at their fair values at the balance sheet date. However, the Group may make an irrevocable election to present subsequent changes in the fair value of an equity investment (that is not held for trading) in other comprehensive income, with only dividend income generally recognized in profit or loss.
-
2) New issued and revised standards related to Consolidation, Associates and Disclosure
-
a) IFRS 10 “Consolidated Financial Statements”
IFRS 10 replaces IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” and SIC 12 “Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities”. The Group considers its ability of control over other entities for consolidation. The Group has control over an investee if and only if it has a) power over the investee; b) exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and c) the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of its returns. Additional guidance has been included in IFRS 10 to explain when an investor has control over an investee.
- 10 -
b) IFRS 12 “Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities”
IFRS 12 is a new disclosure standard and is applicable to entities that have interests in subsidiaries, associates and/or unconsolidated structured entities. In general, the disclosure requirements in IFRS 12 are more extensive than in the current standards.
- c) Revised to IAS 28 “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures”
Revised IAS 28 requires when a portion of an investment in associates meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, that portion is classified as held for sale. Any retained portion that has not been classified as held for sale is accounted for using the equity method. Previously, when a portion of an investment in associates meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, the entire investment is classified as held for sale and ceases to apply the equity method.
Revised IAS 28 also requires that when a portion of an investment in an associate is held by, or is held indirectly through, an entity that is a venture capital organization, the Group may elect to measure investments in those associates at fair value through profit or loss. Any remaining portion of its investment in those associates that is not held through a venture capital organization is accounted for using the equity method. Previously, the entire investments in those associates are accounted for using equity method regardless of whether the investments are held by, or are held indirectly through, an entity that is a venture capital organization.
3) IFRS 13 “Fair Value Measurement”
IFRS 13 establishes a single source of guidance for fair value measurements. It defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires disclosures about fair value measurements. The disclosure requirements in IFRS 13 are more extensive than those required in the current standards. For example, quantitative and qualitative disclosures based on the three-level fair value hierarchy currently required for financial instruments only will be extended by IFRS 13 to cover all assets and liabilities within its scope.
- 4) Amendment to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements”
The amendments to IAS 1 require items of other comprehensive income to be grouped into those that (1) will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss; and (2) will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss when specific conditions are met. Income taxes on related items of other comprehensive income are grouped on the same basis. Previously, there were no such requirements.
- 5) Revised to IAS 19 “Employee Benefits”
The amendments require the recognition of changes in defined benefit obligations and in the fair value of plan assets when they occur, and hence eliminate the “corridor approach” permitted under the previous version of IAS 19 and accelerate the recognition of past service costs. The revision requires all actuarial gains and losses to be recognized immediately through other comprehensive income in order for the net pension asset or liability to reflect the full value of the plan deficit or surplus. Furthermore, the interest cost and expected return on plan assets used in the previous version of IAS 19 are replaced with a “net interest” amount, which is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit liability or asset.
- 6) Amendment to IAS 36 “Impairment of Assets”
In issuing IFRS 13 “Fair Value Measurement”, the IASB made some consequential amendments to the disclosure requirements in IAS 36 “Impairment of Assets”, introducing a requirement to disclose in every reporting period the recoverable amount of an asset or each cash-generating unit. The amendment clarifies that the disclosure of such recoverable amount is required during the
- 11 -
period when an impairment loss has been recognized or reversed. Furthermore, the Group is required to disclose the discount rate used in current and previous measurements of the recoverable amount based on fair value less costs of disposal measured using a present value technique.
- 7) New issued IFRIC 21 “Levies”
IFRIC 21 provides guidance on when to recognize a liability for a levy imposed by a government. It addresses the accounting for a liability whose timing and amount is certain and the accounting for a provision whose timing or amount is not certain. The Group accrues related liability when the transaction or activity that triggers the payment of the levy occurs. Therefore, if the obligating event occurs over a period of time (such as generation of revenue over a period of time), the liability is recognized progressively. If an obligation to pay a levy is triggered upon reaching a minimum threshold (such as a minimum amount of revenue or sales generated), the liability is recognized when that minimum threshold is reached.
- c. Material impact on consolidated financial statements resulted from new and revised standards, amendments and interpretations in issue but not yet effective
The Group is in the process of estimating the impact of the initial application of the standards, amendments and interpretations on its financial position and results of operations. Disclosures will be provided until a detailed review of the impact has been completed and the consolidated financial statements have been approved and authorized for issuance.
4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
On May 14, 2009, the FSC announced the “Framework for the Adoption of IFRSs by the Companies in the ROC.” In this framework, starting 2013, companies with shares listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange or traded on the Taiwan GreTai Securities Market or Emerging Stock Market should prepare their consolidated financial statements in accordance with the Regulations Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers and the International Financial Reporting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Interpretations approved by the FSC. The date of transition to IFRSs was January 1, 2012. Refer to Note 37 for the impact of IFRS conversion on the consolidated financial statements.
a. Statement of compliance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Regulations Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers, IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” and IAS 34 “Interim Financial Reporting” as endorsed by the FSC. Disclosure information included in interim financial reports is less than disclosures required in a full set of annual financial reports.
b. Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013. Refer to the Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013 for details.
- 1) Subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements:
Please see Table 3 (attached) for the intercompany relationships and percentages of ownership.
The financial statements of these subsidiaries as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were audited by other auditors: Lite-On IT Corporation; Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation; High Yield Group Co., Ltd.; Lite-On IT International (HK) Ltd.; Lite-On
- 12 -
Opto Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.; LET (HK) Ltd.; Silitech Technology Corp.; Silitech (BVI) Holding Ltd.; Silitech (Bermuda) Holding Ltd.; Silitech Technology Corporation Limited; Silitech (Hong Kong) Holding Co., Ltd.; Silitech Technology (Su Zhou) Co., Ltd.; Xurong Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; Logah Technology Co., Ltd.; Logah Electronic (Su Zhou) Co., Ltd.; Lite-On Overseas Trading Co., Ltd.; Lite-On Capital Corporation; Lite-On (Finland) Oy; and Lite-On Mobile Oyj (formerly: Perlos Oyj).
The financial statements of these subsidiaries as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were audited by other auditors also: Lite-On technology (Europe) B.V.; Lite-On China Holding Co., Ltd.; Logah Technology (HK) Co. Ltd.; Logah Technology Co. Ltd.; Lippo Electronics (Su Zhou) Co. Ltd.; Lite-On IT Opto Tech (BH) Co., Ltd. and Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA Inc.
Except the financial statements audited by other auditors, other subsidiaries as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were unreviwed financial reporting.
-
2) Subsidiaries excluded from consolidated financial statements: None.
-
c. Other significant accounting policies
Except as stated in the following paragraph, the same accounting policies have been followed in these consolidated financial statements as were applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2013, except for those described below. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013 for the details of summary of significant accounting policy.
- 1) Non-current assets are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the non-current asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition. To meet the criteria for the sale being highly probable, the appropriate level of management must be committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification.
Non-current assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their previous carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. Recognition of depreciation of those assets would cease.
- 2) Government grants are not recognized until there is reasonable assurance that the Group will comply with the conditions attached to them and that the grants will be received.
Government grants that are receivable as compensation for expenses or losses already incurred or for the purpose of giving immediate financial support to the Group with no future related costs are recognized in profit or loss in the period in which they become receivable.
5. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGMENTS AND KEY SOURCES OF ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTY
Except as stated in the following paragraph, the same critical accounting judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty of consolidated financial statements have been followed in these consolidated financial statements as were applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2013, except for those described below. Refer to the Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013 for the details of critical accounting judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty.
-
13 -
-
a. Impairment of property, plant and equipment
The impairment of equipment in relation to the production of handsets was based on the recoverable amount of those assets, which is the higher of fair value less costs to sell or value-in-use of those assets. Any changes in the market price or future cash flows will affect the recoverable amount of those assets and may lead to recognition of additional or reversal of impairment losses.
- b. Write-down of inventory
Net realizable value of inventory is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. The estimation of net realizable value was based on current market conditions and the historical experience of selling products of a similar nature. Changes in market conditions may have a material impact on the estimation of net realizable value.
- c. Impairment of investment in the associate
The Group immediately recognizes impairment loss on the investor’s net investment in the associate when there is any indication that the investment may be impaired and the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Group’s management evaluates the impairment based on the estimated future cash flow expected to be generated by the associate, including growth rate of sale and capacity of production facilities estimated by the associate’s management. The Group also takes into consideration the market conditions and industry development to evaluate the appropriateness of assumptions.
- d. Recognition and measurement of defined benefit plans
Accrued pension liabilities and the resulting pension expense under defined benefit pension plans are calculated using the Projected Unit Credit Method. Actuarial assumptions comprise the discount rate, rate of employee turnover, and long-term average future salary increase. Changes in economic circumstances and market conditions will affect these assumptions and may have a material impact on the amount of the expense and the liability.
6. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2013 Cash on hand $ 9,028 Checking accounts 1,879,677 Demand deposits 15,142,592 Cash equivalent Time deposits with original maturities less than three months 42,082,148 $ 59,113,445 |
December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 $ 10,300 $ 9,012 1,783,160 1,296,038 21,017,052 16,990,053 28,414,358 28,398,525 $ 51,224,870 $ 46,693,628 |
January 1, 2012 $ 10,415 2,768,789 22,226,441 27,876,601 |
| $ 52,882,246 |
Cash equivalents include time deposits that have a maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition, are readily convertible to a known amount of cash, and are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value; these were held for the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments.
As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the carrying amounts of time deposits with original maturities of over three months were $1,081,972 thousand, $9,365,207 thousand, $8,574,753 thousand and $3,633,137 thousand, respectively, which were classified as bond investment for which no active market exists (Note 10).
- 14 -
7. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Financial assets held for trading Derivative financial assets (not under hedge accounting) Foreign exchange forward contracts $ 12,573 $ 12,360 $ 7,318 Currency swap contracts 7,854 663 52,297 Financial assets at FVTPL $ 20,427 $ 13,023 $ 59,615 Current $ 20,427 $ 13,023 $ 59,615 Non-current - - - $ 20,427 $ 13,023 $ 59,615 Financial liabilities held for trading Derivative financial liabilities (not under hedge accounting) Foreign exchange forward contracts $ 23,729 $ 13,857 $ 42,680 Currency swap contracts 19,647 21,333 4,349 Interest swap contracts - 49 106 Options-put - - - Financial liabilities at FVTPL $ 43,376 $ 35,239 $ 47,135 Current $ 43,376 $ 35,239 $ 47,135 Non-current - - - $ 43,376 $ 35,239 $ 47,135 |
January 1, 2012 $ 45,295 66,289 $ 111,584 $ 111,584 - $ 111,584 $ 8,573 23,922 362 9,417 $ 42,274 $ 42,274 - $ 42,274 |
|---|---|
- a. At the end of the reporting period, outstanding interest swap contracts not under hedge accounting were as follows:
September 30, 2013: None
December 31, 2012
Lite-On Japan Ltd.
Notional Amounts Range of Range of Interest (In Thousands) Maturity Date Interest Rates Paid Rates Received JPY25,000 2008.02.04-2013.01.31 1.48% Note
- 15 -
September 30, 2012
Lite-On Japan Ltd.
| Lite-On Japan Ltd. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Notional Amounts | Range of | Range of Interest | |
| (In Thousands) | Maturity Date | Interest Rates Paid | Rates Received |
| JPY50,000 | 2008.02.04-2013.01.31 | 1.48% | Note |
| January 1, 2012 | |||
| Lite-On Japan Ltd. | |||
| Notional Amounts | Range of | Range of Interest | |
| (In Thousands) | Maturity Date | Interest Rates Paid | Rates Received |
| JPY125,000 | 2008.02.04-2013.01.31 | 1.48% | Note |
Note: Based on the Taipei interbank offered rate (Tibor) for three month plus a margin of 0.35%.
The economic substance of the pay-fixed receive-floating interest swap contracts listed in the above table is to manage exposures due to the interest rate risk of long-term loans. However, those contracts did not meet the criteria for hedge effectiveness and therefore were not subject to hedge accounting.
- b. At the end of the reporting period, outstanding forward exchange contracts, cross-currency swap contracts and options not under hedge accounting were as follows:
| Notional Amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Maturity Date | (In Thousands) | |
| September 30, 2013 | |||
| Lite-On IT Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.10.23 | USD10,000/NTD297,460 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2013.10.25 | EUR2,000/USD2,697 |
| Philips & Lite-On Digital | |||
| Solutions Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.10.24 | USD17,000/NTD505,580 |
| Lite-On Automotive Corp. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2013.10.15 | EUR930/USD1,194 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2013.11.15 | USD5,000/RMB30,978 |
| Leotek Electronic Corp. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.10.25 | USD1,500/NTD44,388 |
| Forward exchange contracts | GBP/NTD | 2013.10.18 | GBP40/NTD1,854 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/NTD | 2013.10.18 | EUR80/NTD3,150 |
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.10.18 | USD1,050/NTD31,421 |
| Currency swap contracts | EUR/NTD | 2013.10.25 | EUR132/NTD5,254 |
| Currency swap contracts | GBP/NTD | 2013.10.25 | GBP35/NTD1,653 |
| (Continued) |
- 16 -
| Notional Amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Maturity Date | (In Thousands) | |
| Lite-On Mobile Oyj | |||
| (formerly Perlos Oyj) | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/EUR | 2013.10.11 | USD16,000/EUR12,127 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/BRL | 2013.10.11 | USD1,000/BRL2,312 |
| Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile | |||
| Electronic Components Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2013.10.18 | USD4,000/RMB24,568 |
| Beijing Lite-On Mobile Electronic | |||
| and Telecommunication | |||
| Components Co., Ltd | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2013.12.20 | USD3,000/RMB18,429 |
| Lite-On Mobile Pte. Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/INR | 2013.10.11 | USD5,000/INR323,618 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2013.10.09 | EUR7,500/USD9,893 |
| Forward exchange contracts | RMB/USD | 2013.10.09 | RMB30,000/USD4,899 |
| Currency swap contracts | EUR/USD | 2013.09.13 | EUR2,300/USD3,057 |
| Lite-On Mobile India | |||
| Private Limited | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/INR | 2014.02.10 | USD1,000/INR64,850 |
| Lite-On Singapore Pte. Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2013.10.04 | EUR2,400/USD3,167 |
| Silitech Technology Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.10.04 | USD18,000/NTD534,600 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/MYR | 2013.10.11-2013.10.28 | USD70/MYR305 |
| Lite-On Electronics (Thailand) | |||
| Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/THB | 2013.10.24 | USD1,500/THB46,680 |
| December 31, 2012 | |||
| Lite-On IT Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.01.07-2013.01.28 | USD127,000/NTD3,696,738 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2013.01.03-2013.01.17 | EUR9,000/USD11,800 |
| Lite-On Automotive Corp. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/JPY | 2013.02.20 | USD755/JPY60,000 |
| (Continued) |
- 17 -
| Notional Amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Maturity Date | (In Thousands) | |
| Leotek Electronic Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.01.25 | USD1,300/NTD37,805 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.01.25 | USD2,000/NTD58,600 |
| Lite-On Automotive International | |||
| (Cayman) Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2013.03.05 | USD4,000/RMB25,108 |
| Lite-On Mobile Oyj | |||
| (formerly Perlos Oyj) | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/EUR | 2013.01.07 | USD16,500/EUR12,577 |
| Currency swap contracts | JPY/USD | 2013.01.17 | JPY50,000/USD597 |
| Currency swap contracts | JPY/EUR | 2013.01.07 | JPY50,000/EUR464 |
| Currency swap contracts | RMB/USD | 2013.01.28 | RMB10,000/USD1,604 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/EUR | 2013.01.07 | USD1,700/EUR1,283 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/INR | 2013.01.17 | USD6,000/INR327,252 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2013.02.06 | USD9,000/RMB56,489 |
| Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile | |||
| Electronic Components Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2013.01.18 | USD3,000/RMB18,842 |
| Lite-On Mobile India | |||
| Private Limited | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/INR | 2013.01.25 | USD1,000/INR57,350 |
| Lite-On Singapore Pte. Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2013.01.04 | EUR2,400/USD3,133 |
| Silitech Technology Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2013.01.14 | USD24,000/NTD697,200 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/MYR | 2013.01.07-2013.03.19 | USD1,730/MYR5,299 |
| September 30, 2012 | |||
| Lite-On IT Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.10.15-2012.10.24 | USD127,000/NTD3,748,647 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2012.10.18 | EUR6,000/USD7,789 |
| Lite-On Automotive Electronics | |||
| (Guang Zhou) Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2013.03.11 | USD990/RMB6,300 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/RMB | 2012.10.18 | EUR600/RMB4,799 |
| (Continued) |
- 18 -
| Notional Amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Maturity Date | (In Thousands) | |
| Lite-On Automotive Corp. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2012.11.28 | EUR500/USD627 |
| Lite-On Mobile Oyj | |||
| (formerly Perlos Oyj) | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/EUR | 2012.11.16 | USD7,000/EUR5,428 |
| Currency swap contracts | JPY/USD | 2012.10.19 | JPY50,000/USD638 |
| Currency swap contracts | HUF/EUR | 2012.10.09 | HUF150,000/EUR524 |
| Forward exchange contracts | JPY/EUR | 2012.10.12 | JPY80,000/EUR790 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/INR | 2012.10.10 | USD7,000/INR394,195 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2012.10.09 | USD3,000/RMB19,078 |
| Forward exchange contracts | RMB/USD | 2012.10.09 | RMB9,078/USD1,435 |
| Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile | |||
| Electronic Components Co Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2012.10.19 | USD4,000/RMB25,370 |
| Leotek Electronic Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.12.04 | USD1,000/NTD29,824 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.11.26 | USD2,000/NTD59,840 |
| Lite-On Mobile India | |||
| Private Limited | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/INR | 2012.10.22 | USD2,000/INR112,700 |
| Lite-On Singapore Pte. Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2012.10.05 | EUR2,400/USD3,016 |
| Silitech Technology Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.10.11 | USD22,000/NTD656,680 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/MYR | 2012.11.05-2012.12.18 | USD500/MYR1,556 |
| January 1, 2012 | |||
| Lite-On IT Corp. | |||
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.01.05-2012.01.13 | USD79,000/NTD2,382,530 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2012.01.11-2012.02.08 | EUR15,200/USD19,844 |
| Leotek Electronic Corp. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.01.30 | USD2,000/NTD60,320 |
| Lite-On Automotive International | |||
| (Cayman) Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.01.17 | USD900/NTD27,241 |
| (Continued) |
- 19 -
| Notional Amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | Maturity Date | (In Thousands) | |
| Lite-On Automotive Electronics | |||
| (Guang Zhou) Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2012.01.09 | USD400/RMB2,542 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/RMB | 2012.01.09 | EUR696/RMB5,932 |
| Lite-On Mobile Oyj | |||
| (formerly Perlos Oyj) | |||
| Currency swap contracts | EUR/USD | 2012.01.11 | EUR2,000/USD2,678 |
| Currency swap contracts | JPY/EUR | 2012.01.11 | JPY140,000/EUR1,374 |
| Currency swap contracts | USD/EUR | 2012.01.11 | USD12,650/EUR9,449 |
| Currency swap contracts | JPY/USD | 2012.01.06 | JPY495,660/USD6,378 |
| Currency swap contracts | SEK/EUR | 2012.01.18 | SEK5,000/EUR540 |
| Currency swap contracts | HUF/EUR | 2012.01.18 | HUF250,000/EUR809 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/BRL | 2012.01.23 | USD1,500/BRL2,710 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/INR | 2012.01.17 | USD17,000/INR898,855 |
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/RMB | 2012.02.21 | EUR3,000/RMB25,696 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2012.02.07 | USD20,000/RMB127,104 |
| Forward exchange contracts | JPY/USD | 2012.01.06 | JPY200,000/USD2,566 |
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/EUR | 2012.01.09 | USD700/EUR511 |
| Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile | |||
| Electronic Components Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/RMB | 2012.01.17 | USD2,000/RMB12,688 |
| Lite-On Japan Ltd. | |||
| Call option | JPY/USD | 2012.03.05 | JPY33,900/USD300 |
| Put option | JPY/USD | 2012.03.05 | JPY94,050/USD900 |
| Currency swap contracts | JPY/USD | 2012.03.05 | JPY33,990/USD300 |
| Lite-On Singapore Pte. Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | EUR/USD | 2012.01.05 | EUR2,400/USD3,221 |
| Forward exchange contracts | HUF/USD | 2012.01.05 | HUF384,000/USD1,691 |
| Forward exchange contracts | JPY/USD | 2012.01.05 | JPY55,000/USD707 |
| Silitech Technology Corp. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/MYR | 2012.01.09-2012.02.24 | USD700/MYR2,220 |
| Currency swap contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.01.09 | USD28,000/NTD844,960 |
| Logah Technology Co., Ltd. | |||
| Forward exchange contracts | USD/NTD | 2012.02.06-2012.02.24 | USD4,200/NTD126,834 |
| (Concluded) |
The subsidiaries entered into derivative contracts during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 to manage exposures due to fluctuations of foreign exchange rates. The derivative contracts entered into by the subsidiaries did not meet the criteria for hedge accounting. Thus, the derivative contracts classified as financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. The financial risk management objectives of the subsidiaries were to minimize risks due to changes in fair value or cash flows.
- 20 -
On financial instruments with fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL), the Group had (a) net gains of $10,580 thousand and $97,800 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and (b) net losses of $49,173 thousand and net gains of $70,139 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
8. AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE FINANCIAL ASSETS
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Domestic investments Quoted shares $ 1,285,950 $ 903,046 $ 1,040,199 Unquoted shares and emerging market shares 660,501 792,442 775,677 Foreign investments Unquoted shares 321,475 316,720 227,045 Mutual funds 127,684 106,310 108,048 Quoted shares 46,298 35,957 70,568 $ 2,441,908 $ 2,154,475 $ 2,221,537 Current $ 11 $ 10 $ 11 Non-current 2,441,897 2,154,465 2,221,526 $ 2,441,908 $ 2,154,475 $ 2,221,537 |
January 1, 2012 $ 1,898,101 1,289,925 188,967 749,051 145,291 |
|---|---|
| $ 4,271,335 | |
$ 9 4,271,326 |
|
| $ 4,271,335 |
Refer to Note 30 for information relating to the fair values of on available-for-sale financial assets determined.
There was objective evidence that the fair values of some financial assets were below their carrying costs and will permanently decline. As a result, the Group recognized impairment losses of $0 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $273,000 thousand and $537,619 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS FOR HEDGING
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Derivative financial liabilities under hedge accounting Cash flow hedges - interest rate swaps $ 54,773 $ 101,563 $ 119,667 Current $ - $ - $ - Non-current 54,773 101,563 119,667 $ 54,773 $ 101,563 $ 119,667 |
January 1, 2012 $ 165,225 $ - 165,225 $ 165,225 |
|---|---|
- 21 -
The Parent Company’s liabilities with floating interest rate might be affected by changes in the market rate. Thus, future cash flows on those liabilities might fluctuate, exposing the Parent Company to cash flow risk. To hedge against this risk, the Parent Company entered into an interest rate swap contract with a bank to change the rate on its liabilities from floating to fixed. The cash flow hedge transactions are deemed sufficient.
The outstanding interest rate swap contracts of the Parent Company at the end of the reporting period were as follows:
as follows: |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2013 | |||
| Notional Amounts | Range of | Range of Interest | |
| (In Thousands) | Maturity Date | Interest Rates Paid | Rates Received |
| NT$4,800,000 | 2015.09.23 | 1.895% | 0.896% |
| December 31, 2012 | |||
| Notional Amounts | Range of | Range of Interest | |
| (In Thousands) | Maturity Date | Interest Rates Paid | Rates Received |
| NT$6,000,000 | 2015.09.23 | 1.895% | 0.900% |
| September 30, 2012 | |||
| Notional Amounts | Range of | Range of Interest | |
| (In Thousands) | Maturity Date | Interest Rates Paid | Rates Received |
| NT$6,000,000 | 2015.09.23 | 1.895% | 0.886% |
| January 1, 2012 | |||
| Notional Amounts | Range of | Range of Interest | |
| (In Thousands) | Maturity Date | Interest Rates Paid | Rates Received |
| NT$6,000,000 | 2015.09.23 | 1.895% | 0.861% |
10. DEBT INVESTMENTS WITH NO ACTIVE MARKET
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Time deposits with original maturity of more than 3 months $ 1,081,972 $ 9,365,207 $ 8,574,753 Pledged deposits 106,196 102,560 101,218 $ 1,188,168 $ 9,467,767 $ 8,675,971 Current $ 1,081,972 $ 9,365,207 $ 8,574,753 Noncurrent 106,196 102,560 101,218 $ 1,188,168 $ 9,467,767 $ 8,675,971 |
January 1, 2012 $ 3,633,137 108,107 |
|---|---|
| $ 3,741,244 | |
$ 3,633,137 108,107 |
|
| $ 3,741,244 |
Refer to Note 32 for information on bond investments with no active market pledged as security.
- 22 -
11. TRADE RECEIVABLES
| TRADE RECEIVABLES | ||
|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2013 Trade receivables $ 49,068,123 Less: Allowance for impairment loss 307,009 $ 48,761,114 |
December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 $ 45,123,260 $ 45,890,635 323,320 292,745 $ 44,799,940 $ 45,597,890 |
January 1, 2012 $ 46,111,657 270,049 |
| $ 45,841,608 |
As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the Group did not have the age of the trade receivables that were past due but not impaired.
Movements in the allowance for impairment loss recognized on notes receivable and trade receivables were as follow:
| Balance at January 1 Allowance (reversal of allowance) for impairment loss Amounts written off during the period as uncollectible Foreign exchange translation Reclassification Balance at September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 323,320 (6,816) (9,239) (256) - $ 307,009 |
2012 $ 270,049 16,890 (7,837) (4,472) 18,115 $ 292,745 |
The unexpired factored accounts receivable of the subsidiaries as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
- Philips & Lite On Digital Solutions Corp.
| Interest | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rates on | ||||||
| Advances | Advances | |||||
| Receivables | Amounts | Received | at | Received | ||
| Counter-parties | Sold | Collected | Year-end | (%) | Credit Line | |
| September 30, 2013 | ||||||
| Taishin International Bank | US$ 3,691 | US$ 3,900 | US$ | - | 0.17-0.18 | US$ 8,000 |
| September 30, 2012 | ||||||
| Taishin International Bank | US$ 5,671 | US$ 5,347 | US$ | - | 0.17-0.188 | US$ 8,500 |
- 23 -
Silitech Technology Corp.
September 30, 2013: None
| Interest | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rates on | ||||||
| Advances | Advances | |||||
| Receivables | Amounts | Received | at | Received | ||
| Counter-parties | Sold | Collected | Year-end | (%) | Credit Line | |
| September 30, 2012 | ||||||
| Citibank | EUR 976 |
EUR 4,774 | EUR | - | 1.47-1.81 | US$ 30,000 |
| US$ 13,166 | US$ 17,368 | US$ | - | 1.78-1.85 |
The above credit lines may be used on a revolving basis.
The subsidiaries (Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corp. and Silitech Technology Corp.) signed accounts receivable factoring contracts with banks. Pursuant to the factoring agreements, losses from commercial disputes were borne by the subsidiaries, while losses from credit risk were borne by the banks.
12. INVENTORIES
| September 30, 2013 Raw materials $ 6,936,531 Work in progress 2,832,316 Finished goods 12,923,972 Merchandise 349,812 Goods in transit 1,460,033 Power generation facility held for sale - $ 24,502,664 |
December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 $ 4,458,816 $ 4,701,318 2,616,363 3,017,730 11,436,105 11,667,634 219,155 230,256 1,835,678 1,067,653 - - $ 20,566,117 $ 20,684,591 |
January 1, 2012 $ 6,295,461 3,174,499 14,714,682 161,887 1,651,845 1,661,010 |
|---|---|---|
| $ 27,659,384 |
The cost of inventories recognized as cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $48,711,394 thousand and $47,462,596 thousand, respectively; for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $131,079,354 thousand and $140,112,233 thousand, respectively.
The cost of inventories recognized as cost of goods sold in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013 included inventory write-downs of $12,555 thousand and $183,043 thousand, respectively, which resulted from write-downs of inventory to net realizable value. The cost of inventories recognized as cost of goods sold in the three months and the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included reversal of inventory write-downs of $88,178 thousand and $287,478 thousand, respectively. Inventory write-down made through allowance account was reversed after the inventory had been disposed of by direct write off.
- 24 -
13. CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS IN EXCESS OF PROGRESSIVE BILLINGS
| Item C September 30, 2013 Solar power project December 31, 2012 Solar power project September 30, 2012 Solar power project January 1, 2012 Solar power project |
ontract Cost C $ 534,080 $ 593,697 $ 591,034 $ 609,049 |
ost Incurred to Date $ 454,457 $ 514,691 $ 471,918 $ 479,217 |
Estimated Costs to Complete Construction $ 43,573 $ 42,033 $ 71,623 $ 80,835 |
Construction in Progress $ 484,741 $ 547,916 $ 517,134 $ 525,796 |
Progressive Billings Percentage of Completion (%) Estimated Completion Year $ 409,718 80-100 2013 $ 475,389 80-100 2013 $ 473,053 80-100 2012 $ 487,502 80-100 2012 |
Gross Profit to Be Recognized $ 30,284 $ 33,225 $ 45,216 $ 46,579 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14. NON-CURRENT ASSETS CLASSIFIED AS HELD FOR SALE
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Production line for electronic goods $ 23,452 $ - $ - |
January 1, 2012 $ - |
|---|---|
On September 25, 2013, Logah Technology Co., Ltd. (“Logah”), a subsidiary of the Parent Company, signed a contract to dispose of partial of the company’s production line for electronic goods and expects to complete the sale by 12 months. The assets and liabilities attributable to the production line had been reclassified to non-current assets as held for sale, and presented separately in the consolidated balance sheets. The net proceeds of sale are expected not exceed the net carrying amount of the relevant assets and liabilities, and, accordingly, impairment loss was recognized of $50,053 thousand in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
The major classes of assets and liabilities of the production line classified as held for sale were as follows:
| Property, plant and equipment | September 30, 2013 $ 23,452 |
|---|---|
15. INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE EQUITY METHOD
| INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE EQUITY METHOD | |
|---|---|
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Investments in associates $ 3,434,737 $ 3,494,479 $ 3,403,423 Investments in jointly controlled entities 741 14,303 20,507 $ 3,435,478 $ 3,508,782 $ 3,423,930 |
January 1, 2012 $ 3,500,398 14,274 |
| $ 3,514,672 |
- 25 -
a. Investments in associates
| Name of Associate September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Listed companies Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. $ 1,546,891 $ 1,460,323 $ 1,437,594 Jhen Vei Electronics Co., Ltd. - 88,055 101,021 Unlisted companies Dragonjet Corporation 968,987 999,445 995,740 LiteStar JV Holding (BVI) Co., Ltd. 718,980 697,387 718,610 Epricrystal (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. 141,896 137,021 133,252 Lite-Space Technology Company Limited 40,731 108,355 13,393 Yamada-Lom Fabricacao De Artefatos De Material Plastico Ltda 12,455 - - Canfield Ltd. 4,797 3,893 3,813 $ 3,434,737 $ 3,494,479 $ 3,403,423 |
January 1, 2012 $ 1,496,027 117,285 965,445 765,534 125,756 26,208 - 4,143 |
|---|---|
| $ 3,500,398 |
As the end of the reporting period, the proportion of ownership and voting rights in associates held by the Group were as follows:
the Group were as follows: |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 30, | December 31, | September 30, | January 1, | |
| Name of Associate | 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | 2012 |
| Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. | 20.45% | 20.45% | 20.45% | 20.45% |
| Jhen Vei Electronics Co., Ltd. | - | 17.12% | 17.12% | 17.12% |
| Dragonjet Corporation | 29.66% | 29.74% | 29.74% | 29.74% |
| LiteStar JV Holding (BVI) Co., | ||||
| Ltd. | 24.18% | 26.72% | 30.00% | 30.00% |
| Epricrystal (Changzhou) Co., | ||||
| Ltd. | 4.33% | 4.71% | 5.00% | 5.00% |
| Lite-Space Technology | ||||
| Company Limited | 39.23% | 39.23% | 27.00% | 27.00% |
| Yamada-Lom Fabricacao De | ||||
| Artefatos De Material | ||||
| Plastico Ltda | 25.00% | - | - | - |
| Canfield Ltd. | 33.33% | 33.33% | 33.33% | 33.33% |
Although Li Shin International Enterprise Corp. (“Li Shin”), as of December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, held less than 20% of the total voting shares of Jhen Vei Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Jhen Vei”), Li Shin’s holding was still significantly higher than that of any other shareholder and was thus deemed to have significant influence over Jhen Vei’s. As a result, Li Shin used the equity method to account for its investment in Jhen Vei.
Lite-On Electronic (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of the Parent Company, held less than 20% of the equity interest in Epricrystal (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. (“Epricrystal”), but a joint arrangements, LiteStar JV Holding (BVI) Co., Ltd. owned more than 20% interest of Epricrystal, enabling the Group to exercise significant influence. Thus, the Group accounted for this investment by the equity method.
- 26 -
Publicly traded investments accounted for using the equity method were priced based on the closing price of those investments at the balance sheet date and were summarized as follows:
| Publicly traded investments accounted for using the equity method were priced based price of those investments at the balance sheet date and were summarized as follows: |
on the closin |
|---|---|
| Name of Associate September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. $ 1,635,894 $ 1,399,598 $ 1,395,053 Jhen Vei Electronics Co., Ltd. $ - $ 106,178 $ 101,349 |
January 1, 2012 $ 1,095,140 |
$ 96,523 |
In February 2013, Lite-On Mobile Pte. Ltd (“Lite-On Mobile”), a subsidiary of the Parent Company, subscribed for shares of Yamada-Lom Fabricacao De Artefatos De Material Plastico Ltda (“Yamada-Lom”) for US$540 thousand in cash. After the subscription, Lite-On Mobile acquired a 25% equity interest in Yamada-Lom and could thus exercise significant influence on this investee.
In January 2013, Li Shin International Enterprise Corp. (“Li Shin”), a subsidiary of the Parent Company, disposed of interests in Jhen Vei Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Jhen Vei”) and received proceeds of $111,476 thousand; thus Li Shin ceased to have significant influence on Jhen Vei. This transaction resulted in the recognition of a gain in profit or loss, calculated as follows:
| Proceeds of disposal Less: Carrying amount of investment on the date of loss of significant influence Gain recognized |
$ 111,476 75,526 $ 35,950 |
|---|---|
The equity-method investees’ financial statements, which had been used to determine the carrying amount of the Group’s investments share of profit and other comprehensive income of associates, had not been reviewed, except those of Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012; Jhen Vei Electronics Co., Ltd. for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
- b. Investments in jointly controlled entities
| September 30, | September 30, | December 31, | September 30, | January 1, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of Associate | 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | 2012 | |
| Unlisted companies | |||||
| Kompaktsolar GmbH | $ | 741 |
$ 14,303 | $ 20,507 |
$ 14,274 |
At the end of the reporting period, the proportion of ownership and voting rights in jointly controlled entities held by the Group were as follows:
| September 30, | December 31, | September 30, | January 1, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of Associate | 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | 2012 |
| Kompaktsolar GmbH | 51.00% | 51.00% | 51.00% | 51.00% |
In January 2011, Lite-On Green Technologies B.V. (LOGTBV), a subsidiary of the Parent Company, signed a joint venture contract with Kompakt Betriebs and Verwaltungs GmbH, and formed the company named Kompaktsolar GmbH (“Kompak”). Under the contract, LOGTBV had no controlling interest over the financial, operating and personnel hiring policy decisions but owned 51%. Thus, the Group accounted for this investment by the equity method. LOGTBV was not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements but the proportional consolidation method was applied to this investee.
- 27 -
There was objective evidence that the fair value of investment in jointly controlled entity was below tit carrying cost and will permanently decline. As a result, the Group recognized an impairment loss of $10,682 thousand in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Kompak’ financial statements, which had been used to determine the carrying amounts of the Group’s investments, shares of profits and other comprehensive income of associates, had not been reviewed.
16. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | ||
|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2013 Carrying amounts of each class of Freehold land $ 2,393,672 Buildings 14,409,913 Machinery equipment 16,496,410 Tooling equipment 559,826 Transportation equipment 29,210 Office equipment 643,671 Equipment held under finance lease 312,776 Other equipment 2,045,887 $ 36,891,365 |
December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 $ 2,693,720 $ 2,764,279 15,108,055 15,144,187 16,970,344 17,098,669 256,095 222,538 24,931 23,683 667,290 703,343 126,682 403,754 1,850,624 1,933,551 $ 37,697,741 $ 38,294,004 |
January 1, 2012 $ 2,747,664 14,408,900 18,965,895 325,390 30,868 771,694 129,918 1,506,248 |
| $ 38,886,577 |
| Cost Freehold land Buildings Machinery equipment Tooling equipment Transportation equipment Office equipment Equipment held under finance lease Other equipment Accumulated depreciation Buildings Machinery equipment Tooling equipment Transportation equipment Office equipment Equipment held under finance lease Other equipment |
For the | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2013 | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2013 $ 2,693,720 21,407,250 39,618,614 2,031,914 97,205 2,594,743 526,456 5,898,277 74,868,179 6,285,903 21,603,815 1,775,819 72,274 1,927,453 399,774 4,047,653 36,112,691 |
Additions $ - 17,684 3,473,056 345,340 2,693 135,238 19,116 574,355 $ 4,567,482 $ 675,807 2,654,474 766,972 5,989 156,868 32,215 581,082 $ 4,873,407 |
Disposals Reclassification $ 280,305 $ 36,063 552,063 127,325 1,991,692 (1,681,416 ) 313,015 1,923,636 19,298 2,777 96,222 188 25,089 2,361 98,489 60,625 $ 3,376,173 $ 471,559 $ 151,855 $ 29,611 1,196,949 (1,199,749 ) 297,270 1,119,709 17,249 73 84,170 (3,978 ) 16,307 (119 ) 101,681 (37,163) $ 1,865,481 $ (91,616) |
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Differences September 30, 2013 $ (55,806 ) $ 2,393,672 131,691 21,131,887 25,217 39,443,779 (185,504 ) 3,802,371 10,974 94,351 81,324 2,715,271 899,932 1,422,776 (168,963) 6,265,805 $ 738,865 77,269,912 $ (130,784 ) 6,708,682 175,020 22,036,611 (122,685 ) 3,242,545 4,054 65,141 73,577 2,069,750 687,258 1,102,821 (272,769) 4,217,122 $ 413,671 39,442,672 (Continued) |
- 28 -
| Accumulated impairment Freehold land Buildings Machinery equipment Tooling equipment Transportation equipment Office equipment Equipment held under finance lease Other equipment |
For the | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2013 | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2013 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2013 $ - 13,292 1,044,455 - - - - - 1,057,747 $ 37,697,741 |
Additions $ - - 181,212 - - 1,850 7,179 2,796 $ 193,037 |
Disposals Reclassification $ - $ - - - 11 (36,958 ) - - - - - - - - - - $ 11 $ (36,958) |
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Differences September 30, 2013 $ - $ - - 13,292 (277,940 ) 910,758 - - - - - 1,850 - 7,179 - 2,796 $ (277,940) 935,875 $ 36,891,365 (Concluded) |
| Cost Freehold land Buildings Machinery equipment Tooling equipment Transportation equipment Office equipment Equipment held under finance lease Other equipment Accumulated depreciation Buildings Machinery equipment Tooling equipment Transportation equipment Office equipment Equipment held under finance lease Other equipment Accumulated impairment Freehold land Buildings Machinery equipment Tooling equipment Transportation equipment Office equipment Equipment held under finance lease Other equipment |
For the | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2012 | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2012 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2012 $ 2,747,664 20,049,688 40,009,100 1,852,778 105,490 2,738,339 526,270 5,622,995 73,652,324 5,632,706 20,128,012 1,527,388 74,622 1,966,645 396,352 4,116,747 33,842,472 - 8,082 915,193 - - - - - 923,275 $ 38,886,577 |
Additions $ - 2,298,131 3,391,087 97,967 2,138 114,251 24,017 95,129 $ 6,022,720 $ 721,896 3,329,951 186,218 8,543 194,247 44,741 276,130 $ 4,761,726 $ - - - - - - - - $ - |
Disposals Reclassification $ - $ - 766,307 202,014 2,992,321 (313,569 ) 15,589 100,764 3,344 340 182,304 51,053 11,801 62,509 32,404 70,142 $ 4,004,070 $ 173,253 $ 56,886 $ (29,981 ) 1,976,410 (70,725 ) 15,376 (239 ) 5,118 56 171,017 26,355 6,787 2,623 29,401 23,440 $ 2,260,995 $ (48,471) $ - $ - - - 53,590 - - - - - - - - - - - $ 53,590 $ - |
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Differences September 30, 2012 $ 16,615 $ 2,764,279 (555,439 ) 21,228,087 (1,310,403 ) 38,783,894 (308,224 ) 1,727,696 (11,067 ) 93,557 (64,008 ) 2,657,331 815,960 1,416,955 (131,173) 5,624,689 $ (1,547,739) 74,296,488 $ 191,917 ) 6,075,818 (520,884 ) 20,889,944 (192,833 ) 1,505,158 (8,229 ) 69,874 (62,242 ) 1,953,988 576,272 1,013,201 (695,778) 3,691,138 $ (1,095,611) 35,199,121 $ - - - 8,082 (66,322 ) 795,281 - - - - - - - - - - $ (66,322 ) 803,363 $ 38,294,004 (Concluded) |
- 29 -
An analysis of deprecation by function:
| Operating costs Operating expenses |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 1,492,749 $ 1,308,795 201,269 199,074 $ 1,694,018 $ 1,507,869 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 1,492,749 201,269 $ 1,694,018 |
2013 $ 4,264,076 609,331 $ 4,873,407 |
2012 $ 4,117,254 644,472 $ 4,761,726 |
For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013 as the result of the declining sale of one of the products in the market, the estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the related equipment was decreased and recognized impairment loss $64,175 thousand and $193,026 thousand. The Group carried out a review of the recoverable amount of that related equipment and determined that the carrying amount exceeded the recoverable amount. The review led to recognize a reversal of impairment loss of $5,454 thousand and $53,590 thousand for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The impairment loss (reversal of impairment loss) was recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
The above items of property, plant and equipment were depreciated on a straight-line basis at the following rates per annum:
rates per annum: |
|
|---|---|
| Buildings | 5-60 years |
| Machinery equipment | 2-10 years |
| Tooling equipment | 2-10 years |
| Transportation equipment | 3-10 years |
| Office equipment | 2-10 years |
| Equipment held under finance lease | 3-40 years |
| Other equipment | 2-10 years |
17. OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
| OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS | ||
|---|---|---|
| September 30, 2013 Carrying amounts of each class Goodwill $ 14,288,275 Patents 7,447 Use rights 1,067,119 Client relationships - Software 76,368 Net other intangible assets 404,048 $ 15,843,257 |
December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 $ 14,267,414 $ 14,259,716 10,175 11,306 1,235,611 1,291,775 10,239 30,717 63,064 68,318 447,072 470,443 $ 16,033,575 $ 16,132,275 |
January 1, 2012 $ 14,261,731 14,698 1,460,267 51,193 68,105 447,418 |
| $ 16,303,412 |
- 30 -
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
| Cost Goodwill Patents Use right Client relationships Software Net other intangible assets Accumulated amortization Goodwill Patents Use right Client relationships Software Net other intangible assets Accumulated impairment Goodwill Patents Use right Client relationships Software Net other intangible assets |
January 1, 2013 $ 14,798,181 27,134 2,695,878 163,819 251,569 2,833,194 20,769,775 77,234 16,959 1,460,267 153,580 188,505 2,386,122 4,282,667 453,533 - - - - - 453,533 $ 16,033,575 |
Additions $ - - - - 4,841 87,514 $ 92,355 $ - 3,392 168,492 10,239 24,985 172,669 $ 379,777 $ - - - - - - $ - |
Disposals Reclassification $ - $ - - 664 - - - - - - 1,472 722,394 $ 1,472 $ 723,058 $ - $ - - - - - - - - - 714 575,353 $ 714 $ 575,353 $ - $ - - - - - - - - - - - $ - $ - |
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Differences $ 20,861 - - - 22,999 (105,688) $ (61,828) $ - - - - (10,449 ) (1,536) $ (11,985) $ - - - - - - $ - |
September 30, 2013 $ 14,819,042 27,798 2,695,878 163,819 279,409 3,535,942 21,521,888 77,234 20,351 1,628,759 163,819 203,041 3,131,894 5,225,098 453,533 - - - - - 453,533 $ 15,843,257 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Goodwill Patents Use right Client relationships Software Net other intangible assets Accumulated amortization Goodwill Patents Use right Client relationships Software Net other intangible assets |
For the | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2012 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2012 $ 14,792,498 27,134 2,695,878 163,819 242,189 2,601,730 20,523,248 77,234 12,436 1,235,611 112,626 174,084 2,154,312 3,766,303 |
Additions $ - - - - 19,978 44,487 $ 64,465 $ - 3,392 168,492 20,476 17,886 224,540 $ 434,786 |
Disposals Reclassification Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Differences September 30, 2012 $ - $ - ( $ 2,015 ) $ 14,790,483 - - - 27,134 - - - 2,695,878 - - - 163,819 - - (7,548 ) 254,619 4,259 (26,929) (4,723) 2,610,306 $ 4,259 $ (26,929) $ (14,286) 20,542,239 $ - $ - $ - 77,234 - - - 15,828 - - - 1,404,103 - - - 133,102 - - (5,669 ) 186,301 4,085 (13,190) (221,714) 2,139,863 $ 4,085 $ (13,190) $ (227,383) 3,956,431 (Continued) |
- 31 -
| Accumulated impairment Goodwill Patents Use right Client relationships Software Net other intangible assets |
For the | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2012 | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2012 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 1, 2012 $ 453,533 - - - - - 453,533 $ 16,303,412 |
Additions $ - - - - - - $ - |
Disposals Reclassification $ - $ - - - - - - - - - - - $ - $ - |
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Differences September 30, 2012 $ - $ 453,533 - - - - - - - - - - $ - 453,533 $ 16,132,275 (Concluded) |
An analysis of amortization by function:
| Operating costs Operating expenses |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 13,487 $ 18,882 112,674 117,365 $ 126,161 $ 136,247 |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 13,487 $ 18,882 112,674 117,365 $ 126,161 $ 136,247 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 13,487 112,674 $ 126,161 |
2013 $ 48,877 330,900 $ 379,777 |
2012 $ 59,490 375,296 $ 434,786 |
The above items of other intangible assets were depreciated on a straight-line basis at the following rates per annum:
| The above items of other intangible assets were depreciated per annum: |
on a straight-line basis at the following rates |
|---|---|
| Patents | 6 years |
| Use rights | 12 years |
| Client relationships | 4 years |
| Software | 2-14 years |
| Net other intangible assets | 1-10 years |
The Parent Company completed the purchase of some assets of the IrDA Department of Avago Technologies Limited. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 3- “Business Combinations” and SFAS No. 38 - “Intangible Assets” define recognized goodwill as the sum of the acquisition cost plus other direct transaction costs minus the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Thus, the calculation of goodwill generated as of December 31, 2009 was as follows:
| Acquisition costs Fair value of identifiable assets acquired Inventories Properties Patents Client relationships Goodwill |
$ 59,278 46,700 27,134 163,819 |
$ 708,863 296,931 $ 411,932 |
|---|---|---|
On April 10, 2006, Lite-On IT Corporation (LOITC) and Qisda Corp. (“Qisda”) signed a contract, under which LOITC will obtain Qisda’s subcontract and manufacturing business on optical storage devices, including related authorization on product manufacturing, technology, technology acquisition, patent rights, etc. for $1,226,855 thousand plus 13% equity in LOITC. This acquisition was in line with LOITC’s long-term strategic relationship with Qisda to expand production scale and promote market share.
- 32 -
In their special meeting on November 15, 2007, however, LOITC’s shareholders approved the board of directors’ proposal of August 27, 2007 to cancel the plan to use LOITC’s shares to make the payment and to negotiate instead with Qisda for a new payment mode (i.e., wholly pay in cash) and schedule. LOITC thus paid cash for its acquisition at these amounts: $2,695,878 thousand, recorded under intangible assets - patent rights; and $2,806,508 thousand, recorded under goodwill.
As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the accumulated amortization for patent rights amounted to $1,628,759 thousand, $1,460,267 thousand, $1,404,103 thousand and $1,235,611 thousand, respectively.
The goodwill arising from the Parent Company’s acquisition of Lite-On Enclosure Inc. in 2004 was $210,220 thousand was amortization approximately over a period of five years. However, under the Guidelines Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports, effective January 1, 2006, goodwill need no longer be amortized. As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the carrying value of goodwill was $132,986 thousand.
Except for the goodwill generated through the acquisition of Lite-On Enclosure Inc. by the Parent Company for $132,986 thousand, the Parent Company’s purchase of some assets of IrDA Department of Avago Technologies Limited for $411,932 thousand, and the goodwill carrying value of $2,806,508 thousand recognized by Lite-On IT Corp., resulted in differences between the acquisition costs of the Parent Company’s investments in the subsidiaries and the acquisition costs of the subsidiaries’ investments in other companies; the Parent Company’s proportionate shares in the investees’ equity are listed as follows:
| September 30, 2013 Lite-On Mobile Oyj (formerly Perlos Oyj) $ 8,622,710 Li Shin International Enterprise Corp. 1,708,258 Lite-On Automotive Corp. 303,073 Leotek Electronics Corp. 220,170 Others 82,638 $ 10,936,849 |
December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 $ 8,601,849 $ 8,592,868 1,708,258 1,708,258 303,073 303,073 220,170 221,453 82,638 82,638 $ 10,915,988 $ 10,908,290 |
January 1, 2012 $ 8,612,047 1,708,258 303,073 219,424 67,503 |
|---|---|---|
| $ 10,910,305 |
For this test, the recoverable amount should be evaluated by the value in use of the tangible and intangible assets of the Parent Company and the subsidiaries, and the projected cash flows during the period of the expected use of these devices should be considered. Some factors to consider in assessing value in use are past operating performance, future profit situation under normal operations, operating strategies, industrial development goals, and market prospects, etc. Net cash input and the number of residual assets should be estimated, and the value in use of these assets should be calculated net of their weighted average capital cost.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Group evaluated the recoverable amount of the cash-generating units and found that the recoverable amount was less than its carrying amount, thus there was no deification of impairment.
- 33 -
18. OTHER ASSETS
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Prepayments $ 3,625,931 $ 2,684,730 $ 3,239,805 Offset against business tax payable 1,766,277 1,269,470 1,160,088 Other financial assets 1,222,007 1,102,784 306,967 Prepayment for equipment 1,336,058 1,236,480 1,622,275 Land use rights 571,064 572,519 574,440 Others 280,268 345,941 221,481 $ 8,801,605 $ 7,211,924 $ 7,125,056 Current $ 6,614,215 $ 5,058,662 $ 4,708,535 Non-current 2,187,390 2,153,262 2,416,521 $ 8,801,605 $ 7,211,924 $ 7,125,056 |
January 1, 2012 $ 3,246,715 841,008 340,388 2,631,249 620,211 505,637 |
|---|---|
| $ 8,185,208 | |
$ 4,429,820 3,755,388 |
|
| $ 8,185,208 |
Land use rights with carrying amounts of $571,064 thousand, $572,519 thousand, $574,440 thousand and $620,211 thousand as of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively, referred to land located in Mainland China.
19. BORROWINGS
a. Short-term borrowings
| b. | September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 January 1, 2012 Unsecured borrowings Line of credit borrowings $ 11,287,855 $ 7,010,394 $ 8,160,766 $ 4,737,488 Market interest rates for short-term borrowings were as follows: September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 January 1, 2012 Short-term borrowings 0.72%-1.935% 0.76-1.86% 0.84%-1.962% 0.86%-8.24% Long-term borrowings September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 January 1, 2012 Unsecured borrowings Parent Company $ 27,987,500 $ 15,700,000 $ 15,700,000 $ 15,700,000 Lite-On Mobile Pte. Ltd. 5,908,749 5,808,000 5,591,832 6,053,601 (Continued) |
|---|---|
- 34 -
| September 30, 2013 Silitech Technology Corp. $ 1,440,000 Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile Electronic Components Co. Ltd. 1,181,750 Lite-On Japan Ltd. 321,236 Silitech Technology (SuZhou) Co., Ltd. - 36,839,235 Less: Current portion 11,988,711 Long-term borrowings: Non-current $ 24,850,524 |
December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 $ 1,005,000 $ 1,206,000 1,161,605 588,614 489,890 579,464 203,307 205,000 24,367,802 23,870,910 4,411,168 3,938,109 $ 19,956,634 $ 19,932,801 |
January 1, 2012 $ 1,809,000 - 602,923 302,913 24,468,437 1,173,473 $ 23,294,964 (Concluded) |
|---|---|---|
- 1) As of September 30, 2013, the Parent Company had six long-term bank loans with contract terms maturing between September 23, 2008 and September 23, 2018 and interest rates ranging from 1.53% to 1.697%, payable monthly or quarterly. These loans should be repaid in three, five, or eight installments or at lump sum on loan maturity.
As of December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the Parent Company had four long-term loans with contract terms maturing between September 23, 2008 and October 19, 2016 and interest rates ranging from 1.518% to 1.694%, 1.503% to 1.681%, and 1.48% to 1.661%, payable monthly or quarterly. These loans should be repaid in three, five or eight installments or at lump sum on loan maturity.
On September 23, 2008, the Parent Company signed the contract for a five-year syndicated loan with Citibank and 14 other financial institutions, and on May 16, 2011 changed the contract period to seven years from 2008. The repayment period is between September 23, 2008 and September 22, 2015. The credit line is NT$15 billion, consisting of:
-
a) NT$12 billion, which is a refinancing of existing credit lines to improve financial structure and which should be used as a medium-term loan but may not be used on a revolving basis; and
-
b) NT$3 billion, which is for supporting operations and may be used on a revolving basis.
As of September 30, 2013, the Parent Company used a) NT$9.6 billion of the credit line of the above syndicated loan.
As of December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the Parent Company used a) NT$12 billion and b) NT$0.5 billion of the credit line of the above syndicated loan.
The principal of this syndication loan should be repaid in five semiannual installments from September 23, 2013, and the interest rate is the 90-day Taiwan subprime commercial paper interest rate plus 55 points.
Under the syndicated loan agreement, the Parent Company should maintain certain financial ratios based on the most recent semiannual or annual consolidated financial statements.
- 35 -
On March 14, 2013, the Parent Company signed a contract for a five-year syndicated loan with Citibank and 10 other financial institutions. The credit line is NT$15 billion, consisting of (a) NT$6 billion and (b) NT$9 billion. This loan was obtained for the purposes of supporting operations and completing an acquisition and should be used as a medium-term loan but may not be used on a revolving basis.
At September 30, 2013, the Parent Company used a) NT$4 billion and b) NT$9 billion of the credit line of the above syndicated loan.
The minimum payment of principal should be repaid at NT$4 billion by March 19, 2014. The remaining principal of this syndication loan should be repaid in five semiannual installments from March 19, 2016, and the interest rate is the 90-day Taiwan subprime commercial paper interest rate plus 65 points.
Under the syndicated loan agreement, the Parent Company should maintain certain financial ratios based on the most recent semiannual or annual consolidated financial statements.
On September 12, 2013, the Parent Company signed a contract for a five-year syndicated loan with Citibank and 16 other financial institutions. The credit line is NT$15 billion, consisting of:
-
a) NT$12 billion, which was for Parent Company to repay the syndicated loan with Citibank signed on September 23, 2008. It should be used as a medium-term loan but may not be used on a revolving basis; and
-
b) NT$3 billion, which is for supporting operations and may be used on a revolving basis.
The remaining principal of this syndication loan should be repaid in five semiannual installments from September 23, 2016, and the interest rate is the 90-day Taiwan subprime commercial paper interest rate plus 61 points.
Under the syndicated loan agreement, the Parent Company should maintain certain financial ratios based on the most recent semiannual or annual consolidated financial statements.
As of September 30, 2013, the Parent Company had drawn down (a) NT$24 billion of the credit line of the above syndicated loan.
- 2) Lite-On Mobile Pte. Ltd., a subsidiary of the Parent Company, had a syndicated loan with Citibank. As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the floating interest rates were 1.04% to 1.35%, 0.908% to 1.09675%, 0.98525% to 1.375% and 1.625% to 2.2%. The principal is repayable from April 29, 2014 in five semiannual installments.
This contract is a five-year syndicated loan of US$200 million and was signed with Citibank and 13 other financial institutions (the endorsements and guarantees were provided by the Parent Company). As of September 30, 2013, Lite-On Mobile Pte. Ltd. had used the credit line US$190 million of the syndicated loan. As of December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, Lite-On Mobile Pte. Ltd. had used all of the credit line of the syndicated loan.
- 3) Silitech Technology Co., Ltd. (“Silitech”), a subsidiary of the Parent Company, entered into a NT$2.4 billion syndicated loan contract, with the Land Bank of Taiwan as lead bank and a contract term from February 18, 2013 to February 18, 2018. This loan was obtained for the purposes of supporting working capital and capital expenditure. As of September 30, 2013, Silitech had used NT$1.44 billion of the syndicated loan, with an interest rate of 1.6871%.
The first repayment of $480 million should be made on August 18, 2017. The remaining principal of NT$960 million is repayable by February 18, 2018.
- 36 -
Silitech entered into a contract for a NT$3 billion syndicated long-term bank loan, with the Land Bank of Taiwan as lead bank and a contract term from March 16, 2009 to March 16, 2014. Silitech had used NT$2.01 billion of the credit line of the syndicated loan. The floating interest rates were 1.7061%, 1.6977%-1.7030% and 1.6712% as of December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012, and January 1, 2012, respectively; The principal is repayable from December 16, 2011 in 10 trimestral installments. In February 2013, Silitech Technology Co., Ltd. settled this loan in advance.
- 4) Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile Electronic Components Co. Ltd., a subsidiary of the Parent Company, had a syndicated loan with Citibank. As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, the floating interest rates were 1.05% to 1.1%, 0.91% to 0.93425% and 1.125%. The principal repayable from December 28, 2014 in five semiannual installments.
This contract is a five-year syndicated loan of US$50 million and was signed with Citibank and 10 other financial institutions (the endorsements and guarantees were provided by the Parent Company). As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile Electronic Components Co. Ltd. had used US$40 million, US$40 million and US$20 million of the credit line of the syndicated loan.
- 5) As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Lite-On Japan Ltd., a subsidiary of the Parent Company, had 18 and 23 long-term bank loans, with contract terms from January 18, 2007 to May 31, 2018, with interest rate of 1.00% to 1.75% and principal repayable in trimestral installments.
As of September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, Lite-On Japan Ltd. had 18 long-term bank loans, with contract terms from January 18, 2007 to February 28, 2017, with interest rate of 1.06% to 1.75% and principal repayable in trimestral installments.
- 6) Silitech Technology (SuZhou) Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of the Parent Company, entered into a US$10 million long-term bank loan with Taipei Fubon Bank, with contract term from August 27, 2010 to August 27, 2013. As of September 30, 2013, Silitech Technology (SuZhou) Co., Ltd. had used full the credit line of the syndicated loan. The floating interest rates were 1.0615%, 1.17485% and 1.26806% as of December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively. The principal is amortized semiannually and repayable from August 27, 2012, at US$3,000 thousand for each of the first two installments and at US$4,000 thousand on the third repayment.
20. FINANCE LEASE PAYABLES
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Minimum lease payments Not later than one year $ 82,302 $ 62,483 $ 71,749 Later than one year and not later than five years 200,120 234,213 278,836 Later than five years - - - 282,422 296,696 350,585 Less: Future finance charges 25,553 1,599 41,080 Present value of minimum lease payments $ 256,869 $ 295,097 $ 309,505 |
January 1, 2012 $ 85,046 322,215 - 407,261 1,994 $ 405,267 (Continued) |
|---|---|
- 37 -
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Present value of minimum lease payments Not later than one year $ 69,307 $ 62,381 $ 55,372 Later than one year and not later than five years 187,562 232,716 254,133 Later than five years - - - $ 256,869 $ 295,097 $ 309,505 Current $ 69,307 $ 62,381 $ 55,372 Non-current 187,562 232,716 254,133 $ 256,869 $ 295,097 $ 309,505 Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile Electronic Components Co., Ltd. $ 254,807 $ 291,839 $ 305,241 Lite-On Mobile Sweden AB 1,084 918 1,135 Lite-On Mobile Oyj (formerly Perlos Oyj) 788 1,470 1,512 Lite-On Japan Ltd. 190 417 1,189 Parent Company - 453 428 Beijing Lite-On Mobile Electronic and Telecommunication Components Co., Ltd. - - - Lite-On Mobile India Private Limited - - - 256,869 295,097 309,505 Less: Current portion of long-term capital lease liabilities 69,307 62,381 55,372 $ 187,562 $ 232,716 $ 254,133 |
January 1, 2012 $ 84,360 320,907 - $ 405,267 $ 84,360 320,907 $ 405,267 $ 355,986 1,612 2,048 4,441 826 40,064 290 405,267 84,360 $ 320,907 (Concluded) |
|---|---|
-
a. Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile Electronic Components Co., Ltd. leased buildings, machinery and equipment under capital leases valid from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2016. The terms of these leases were 10 years, with 7.11% interest rate. The building, machinery and equipment can be bought at a bargain purchase price at the end of the lease term.
-
b. Lite-On Mobile Sweden AB leased machinery and equipment under capital leases valid from January 1, 2009 to January 31, 2016. The terms of these leases were three years, with 2.36% to 3.63% interest rate.
-
c. Lite-On Mobile Oyj (formerly Perlos Oyj) leased machinery and equipment under capital leases valid from July 1, 2009 to September 30, 2015. The terms of these leases were between three and four years, with 5.00% interest rate.
-
d. Lite-On Japan Ltd. leased machinery and equipment under capital leases valid from May 2009 to July 2014. The terms of these leases were between three and five years, with 1.3% to 2.7% interest rate.
-
38 -
-
e. The Parent Company leased machinery and equipment under capital leases valid from September 1, 2009 to June 1, 2013. The terms of these leases were between 3 and 5 years, with 15.6% interest rate. The payments of these leases were between $42 thousand and $120 thousand. The ownership of the leased assets will be transferred to the Parent Company at the end of the lease term.
-
f. Beijing Lite-On Mobile Electronic and Telecommunication Components Co., Ltd. leased buildings under capital leases valid from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2012. These leases were for 10 years, with 4.24% interest rate. In the third quarter of 2012, Beijing Lite-On Mobile Electronic and Telecommunication Components Co., Ltd. fully rapid this loan in advance.
-
g. Lite-On Mobile India Private Limited leased machinery and equipment under capital leases valid from September 15, 2009 to April 18, 2013. The terms of these leases were between three and five years, with 10.24% interest rate. In the second quarter of 2012, Lite-On Mobile India Private Limited fully rapid this loan in advance.
21. PROVISIONS
| September 30, 2013 Warranties $ 925,185 Customer returns and rebates 679,561 $ 1,604,746 Current $ 1,604,746 Non-current - $ 1,604,746 Balance at January 1, 2013 Additional provisions recognized Usage Reversing un-usage balances Effect of foreign currency exchange differences Balance at September 30, 2013 Balance at January 1, 2012 Additional provisions recognized Usage Reversing un-usage balances Effect of foreign currency exchange differences Balance at September 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2012 $ 917,217 774,156 $ 1,691,373 $ 1,691,373 - $ 1,691,373 Warranties $ 917,217 276,327 (91,590) (172,136) (4,633) $ 925,185 $ 1,121,504 207,375 (159,637) (116,892) (1,848) $ 1,050,502 |
September 30, 2012 $ 1,050,502 745,250 $ 1,795,752 $ 1,795,752 - $ 1,795,752 Customer Returns and Rebates $ 774,156 566,671 (664,188) - 2,922 $ 679,561 $ 371,835 764,566 (388,558) - (2,593) $ 745,250 |
January 1, 2012 $ 1,121,504 371,835 $ 1,493,339 $ 1,493,339 - $ 1,493,339 Total $ 1,691,373 842,998 (755,778) (172,136) (1,711) $ 1,604,746 $ 1,493,339 971,941 (548,195) (116,892) (4,441) $ 1,795,752 |
|---|---|---|---|
-
a. The provision for warranty claims represents the present value of management’s best estimate of the future outflow of economic benefits that will be required under the Group’s obligations for warranties under local sale of goods legislation. The estimate had been made on the basis of historical warranty trends and may vary as a result of new materials, altered manufacturing processes or other events affecting product quality.
-
39 -
-
b. The provision of customer returns and rebates was based on historical experience, management’s judgments and other known reasons estimated product returns and rebates may occur in the year. The provision was recognized as a reduction of operating income in the periods of the related goods sold.
22. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Group’s retirement benefit plans include defined contribution and defined benefit plans. For defined benefit plans, employee benefit expenses were calculated using the actuarially determined pension cost discount rate as of December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2012, and recognized in their respective periods. Refer to Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013 for information on the Group’s retirement benefit plans.
Employee benefit expenses were included in the following line items by nature and function:
| By nature Post-employment benefits Defined contribution plans Defined benefit plans Termination benefits Other benefits By function Operating costs Operating expenses |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 138,143 $ 137,816 12,637 23,187 150,780 161,003 12,180 609 6,965,684 6,257,772 $ 7,128,644 $ 6,419,384 $ 4,517,359 $ 4,633,397 2,611,285 1,785,987 $ 7,128,644 $ 6,419,384 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 138,143 12,637 150,780 12,180 6,965,684 $ 7,128,644 $ 4,517,359 2,611,285 $ 7,128,644 |
2012 $ 415,762 36,802 452,564 16,434 18,601,186 $ 19,070,184 $ 11,942,236 7,127,948 $ 19,070,184 |
2012 $ 443,383 35,583 478,966 9,388 16,943,759 $ 17,432,113 $ 11,070,629 6,361,484 $ 17,432,113 |
23. EQUITY
- a. Share capital
1) Ordinary shares
| September 30, 2013 Numbers of shares authorized (in thousands) 3,500,000 Shares authorized $ 35,000,000 Number of shares issued and fully paid (in thousands) 2,320,688 Shares issued $ 23,206,877 |
December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 3,500,000 3,500,000 $ 35,000,000 $ 35,000,000 2,295,315 2,295,261 $ 22,953,154 $ 22,952,613 |
January 1, 2012 3,500,000 |
|---|---|---|
| $ 35,000,000 | ||
2,309,980 |
||
| $ 23,099,801 |
- 40 -
Fully paid ordinary shares, which have a par value of NT$10, carry one vote per share and carry a right to dividends.
Of the Parent Company’s authorized shares, 120,000 thousand shares and 100,000 thousand shares had been reserved for the issuance of convertible bonds and employee share options, respectively.
In their meeting on August 27, 2008, the Parent Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase up to 30,000 thousand shares listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSE) between September 28, 2008 and October 27, 2008, with the buyback price ranging from NT$20.48 to NT$43.60. On October 28, 2008, the Parent Company’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 40,000 thousand shares listed on the TSE between October 29, 2008 and December 28, 2008, with the buyback price ranging from NT$13.00 to NT$37.10. The Parent Company bought back a total of 30,565 thousand shares during the repurchase periods and retired all these shares in January 2012.
2) Issued global depositary receipts
On September 25, 1996, the Parent Company issued 4,900 thousand units of global depositary receipts (GDRs) on the London Stock Exchange. These GDRs represented 49,000 thousand common shares of the Parent Company.
On April 3, 1995, GVC Corp. issued 5,000 units of GDRs on the London Stock Exchange. These GDRs represented 25,000 thousand common shares of GVC Corp., which were assumed by the Corporation as a result of a merger, with the Parent Company as the survivor entity. As of November 4, 2002, the outstanding GDRs were 7,627 thousand units, or 38,136 thousand common shares of GVC Corp. For merger purposes, these GDRs were exchanged for the Parent Company’s 1,478 thousand marketable equity securities, which represented the Parent Company’s 14,781 thousand common shares.
As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the outstanding marketable equity securities were 5,206 thousand units, 5,201 thousand units, 5,201 thousand units and 5,196 thousand units, representing 52,064 thousand common share, 52,006 thousand common share, 52,006 thousand common share and 51,957 thousand common shares of the Parent Company, respectively. The rights and obligation of security holders are the same as those of common shareholders, except for voting rights. As of September 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, the unredeemed GDRs amounted to 1,205 thousand units, 984 thousand units, 984 thousand units, and 1,141 thousand units.
b. Capital surplus
The premium from shares issued in excess of par (including share premium from issuance of common shares, conversion of bonds, treasury share transactions, and excess of the consideration received over the carrying amount of the subsidiaries’ net assets during disposal or acquisition) and donations may be used to offset a deficit; in addition, when the Parent Company has no deficit, such capital surplus may be distributed as cash dividends or transferred to capital (limited to a certain percentage of the Parent Company’s capital surplus and once a year).
The capital surplus from long-term investments, employee share options and share warrants may not be used for any purpose.
c. Retained earnings and dividend policy
To ensure the availability of cash for the Parent Company’s present and future expansion plans and to meet shareholders’ cash flow requirements, the Parent Company prefers to distribute more stock dividends. In principle, cash dividends are limited to 10% of total dividends distributed.
- 41 -
The Parent Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the annual net income, less any deficit, and 10% legal reserve as well as special reserve equal to the debit balances of the shareholders’ equity accounts, together with the distributable unappropriated earnings of prior years, can be retained partially on the basis of operating requirements. The remainder should be distributed as follows:
-
1) Bonus to employees: At least 1%.
-
2) Bonus to directors: 1.5% or less.
-
3) Others, as dividends.
If the bonus to employees is in the form of shares, it may be distributed to the employees’ subsidiaries. The requirements and the method of distribution of these share bonuses are based on resolutions passed by the board of directors.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the bonus to employees were estimated on the basis of net income after considering the effect of partial profit on share of associates at 15%; the remuneration to directors were estimated on the basis of net income at 0.85%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the bonus to employees and remuneration to directors and supervisors represented 13.50% and 0.85%, respectively of net income. Material differences between these estimates and the amounts proposed by the Board of Directors in the following year are adjusted in the year of the proposal. If the actual amounts subsequently resolved by shareholders differ from the proposed amounts, the differences are recorded in the year of the shareholders’ resolution as a change in accounting estimate. If stock bonuses are resolved to be distributed to employees, the number of shares is determined by dividing the amount of bonuses by the closing price (after considering the effect of cash and stock dividends) of the shares on the day preceding the shareholders’ meeting.
Under Rule No. 100116 and Rule No. 0950000507 issued by the FSC, certain amounts shall be transferred from unappropriated earnings to a special reserve before any appropriation of earnings generated before January 1, 2012 shall be made. Any special reserve appropriated may be reversed to the extent of the decrease in the net debit balance.
Under Rule No. 1010012865 issued by the FSC on April 6, 2012 and the directive titled “Questions and Answers for Special Reserves Appropriated Following Adoption of IFRSs”, on the first-time adoption of IFRSs, a Parent Company should appropriate and reverse a special reserve.
Appropriation of earnings to legal reserve shall be made until the legal reserve equals the Parent Company’s paid-in capital. Legal reserve may be used to offset deficit. If the Parent Company has no deficit and the legal reserve has exceeded 25% of the Parent Company’s paid-in capital, the excess may be transferred to capital or distributed in cash.
Except for non-ROC resident shareholders, all shareholders receiving the dividends are allowed a tax credit equal to their proportionate share of the income tax paid by the Parent Company.
The appropriations of earnings for 2012 and 2011 had been approved in the shareholders’ meetings on June 19, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The appropriations and dividends per share were as follows:
| Legal reserve Special reserve Share dividends Cash dividends |
Appropriation of Earnings 2012 2011 $ 753,486 $ 722,592 689,913 - 114,899 113,972 5,400,265 5,174,335 |
Dividends Per Share (NT$) |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 2011 $ - $ - - - 0.05 0.05 2.35 2.27 |
- 42 -
The bonus to employees and the remuneration to directors and supervisors for 2012 and 2011 approved in the shareholders’ meetings on June 19, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were as follows:
| Bonus to employees Remuneration of directors and supervisors |
For the Years Ended December 31 | For the Years Ended December 31 |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2011 Cash Dividends Stock Dividends $ 819,420 $ 156,080 61,420 - |
|
| Cash Dividends Stock Dividends $ 897,799 $ 171,010 61,420 - |
The 4,422 thousand shares for 2011 was determined by dividing the amount of share bonus resolved in 2012 by the closing price of NT$35.3 (after considering the effect of cash and stock dividends) on the day immediately preceding the shareholders’ meeting.
The 3,669 thousand shares for 2012 was determined by dividing the amount of share bonus resolved in 2013 by the closing price of NT$46.61 (after considering the effect of cash and stock dividends) on the day immediately preceding the shareholders’ meeting.
The appropriation of the earnings for 2012 was approved by the Financial Supervisory Commission, Executive Yuan, ROC. The Parent Company’s board of directors approved August 13, 2013 as the date of distributing stock dividends and cash dividends.
The appropriations of earnings for 2012 were proposed according to the Parent Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2012, which were prepared in accordance with the Guidelines Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers and International Financial Reporting Standards, and by reference to the balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2012, which was prepared in accordance with the Guidelines Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers (revised) and International Financial Reporting Standards.
There was no significant difference between the approved amounts of the bonus to employees and the remuneration to directors and supervisors and the accrual amounts recognized in the financial statements.
Information on the bonus to employees, directors and supervisors proposed by the Parent Company’s board of directors is available on the Market Observation Post System website of the Taiwan Stock Exchange.
d. Non-controlling interests
| Balance at January 1 Attributable to non-controlling interests: Share of profit for the year Other comprehensive income Additional non-controlling interests arising on partial disposal (acquisition) of subsidiaries (Note 28) Attributable to non-controlling cash dividends Balance at September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 19,961,011 197,452 278,840 (13,554,088) (450,532) $ 6,432,683 |
2012 $ 20,088,166 1,531,197 (302,913) 144,435 (1,842,840) $ 19,618,045 |
- 43 -
e. Treasury shares
| Purpose of Buy-Back (Please Specify Reasons) For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 Shares held by its subsidiaries For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 Shares held by its subsidiaries Shares transferred to employees |
Number of Shares at January 1 27,979 27,840 30,565 58,405 |
Unit: In Thousands of Shares Increase During the Period Decrease During the Period Number of Shares at September 30 100 - 28,079 100 - 27,940 - 30,565 - 100 30,565 27,940 |
|---|---|---|
The Parent Company’s shares held by its subsidiaries at the end of the reporting periods were as follows:
| Name of Subsidiary Number of Shares Held (In Thousands) September 30, 2013 Lite-On Capital Corporation 14,891 LTC International Ltd. 6,885 Yet Foundate Ltd. 2,226 Lite-On Electronics Co., Ltd. 2,402 Lite-On IT Corp. 1,675 December 31, 2012 Lite-On Capital Corporation 14,818 LTC International Ltd. 6,866 Yet Foundate Ltd. 2,226 Lite-On Electronics Co., Ltd. 2,402 Lite-On IT Corp. 1,667 September 30, 2012 Lite-On Capital Corporation 14,818 LTC International Ltd. 6,850 Yet Foundate Ltd. 2,215 Lite-On Electronics Co., Ltd. 2,390 |
Carrying Amount Market Price $ 718,857 $ 750,530 297,469 319,295 126,881 92,163 105,515 99,440 85,938 84,421 $ 1,334,660 $ 1,345,849 $ 718,857 $ 571,221 297,469 271,316 126,881 90,511 105,515 97,658 85,938 64,252 $ 1,334,660 $ 1,094,958 $ 718,857 $ 560,849 297,469 269,152 126,881 90,821 105,515 97,992 (Continued) |
|---|---|
- 44 -
| Name of Subsidiary Number of Shares Held (In Thousands) Lite-On IT Corp. 1,667 January 1, 2012 Lite-On Capital Corporation 14,744 LTC International Ltd. 6,832 Yet Foundate Ltd. 2,215 Lite-On Electronics Co., Ltd. 2,390 Lite-On IT Corp. 1,659 |
Carrying Amount Market Price $ 85,938 $ 63,085 $ 1,334,660 $ 1,081,899 $ 718,857 $ 502,769 297,469 258,888 126,881 93,869 105,515 101,281 85,938 56,552 $ 1,334,660 $ 1,013,359 (Concluded) |
|---|---|
Under the Securities and Exchange Act, the Parent Company shall neither pledge treasury shares nor exercise shareholders’ rights on these shares, such as rights to dividends and to vote. The subsidiaries holding treasury shares, however, retain shareholders’ rights, except the rights to participate in any share issuance for cash and to vote.
24. REVENUE
| Revenue from the sale of goods Power Rental income from property |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 57,037,365 $ 55,317,084 11,945 121,145 28,202 31,163 $ 57,077,512 $ 55,469,392 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 57,037,365 11,945 28,202 $ 57,077,512 |
2013 $ 153,633,285 136,449 85,457 $ 153,855,191 |
2012 $ 162,776,196 279,990 93,598 $ 163,149,784 |
For segment revenue information, refer to Note 36.
25. INCOME TAX
- a. Income tax recognized in profit or loss
The major components of tax expense (income) were as follows:
| Income tax expense - current Deferred income tax Income tax expense recognized in profit or loss |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 356,333 $ 698,363 363,352 (24,459) $ 719,685 $ 673,904 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 356,333 363,352 $ 719,685 |
2013 $ 1,588,524 207,979 $ 1,796,503 |
2012 $ 1,768,423 124,699 $ 1,893,122 |
- 45 -
Income tax expense was recognized in each interim period based on the best estimate of the weighted average annual income tax rate expected for the full financial year. Significant differences may arise between the estimated amount of nontaxable income and nondeductible expenses for the full financial year and the actual amount in each interim period. Income tax expenses recognized in each interim period and income tax expenses recognized from current tax multiplied by the applicable tax rate after considering the change in deferred tax may be different. A numerical reconciliation between accounting profit and taxable income is not disclosed.
b. Income tax recognized in other comprehensive income
| c. | Deferred tax Recognized in other comprehensive income Translation of foreign operations Integrated income tax Unappropriated earnings Unappropriated earnings generated before January 1, 1998 Unappropriated earnings generated on and after January 1, 1998 Imputation credits accounts |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $(57,609) $ 268,657 September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 $ 2,215 $ 2,215 9,522,912 13,652,397 $ 9,525,127 $ 13,654,612 $ 552,995 $ 494,075 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $(57,609) September 30, 2013 $ 2,215 9,522,912 $ 9,525,127 $ 552,995 |
2013 $ 318,426 September 30, 2012 $ 2,215 11,457,598 $ 11,459,813 $ 474,637 |
2012 $(429,462) January 1, 2012 $ 2,215 12,390,715 $ 12,392,930 $ 514,845 |
The estimated and actual creditable ratio for distribution of earnings of 2012 and 2011 were 3.35% and 5.43%, respectively.
Under the Income Tax Law, for distribution of earnings generated after January 1, 1998, the imputation credits allocated to ROC resident shareholders of the Parent Company was calculated based on the creditable ratio as of the date of dividend distribution.
According to legal interpretation No. 10204562810 announced by the Taxation Administration of the Ministry of Finance, when calculating imputation credits in the year of first-time adoption of IFRSs, the cumulative retained earnings include the net increase or net decrease in retained earnings arising from first-time adoption of IFRSs.
- d. Income tax assessments
Income tax returns through 2011 have been examined by the tax authorities. The Parent Company disagreed with the tax authorities’ assessment of its 2009 to 2011 tax returns and had applied for a reexamination. Nevertheless, the Parent Company made a provision for the income tax assessed.
- 46 -
26. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Unit: NT$ Per Share
| Unit: NT$ Per Share | Unit: NT$ Per Share | Unit: NT$ Per Share | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic earnings per share Diluted earnings per share |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 1.06 $ 0.87 $ 1.05 $ 0.87 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|||
| 2013 $ 1.06 $ 1.05 |
2013 $ 2.73 $ 2.71 |
2012 $ 2.24 $ 2.21 |
The earnings and weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding in the computation of earnings per share from continuing operations were as follows:
Net Profit for the Period
| Net Profit for the Period | ||
|---|---|---|
| For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 Earnings used in the computation of diluted earnings per share from continuing operations $ 2,419,608 $ 1,980,698 Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding: |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|
| 2013 2012 $ 6,235,935 $ 5,085,144 Unit: In Thousands of Shares |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares in computation of basic earnings per share Effect of dilutive potential ordinary shares: Employee share option Bonus issue to employee Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the computation of diluted earnings per share |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 2,289,504 2,276,600 381 - 6,610 8,553 2,296,495 2,285,153 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 2,289,504 381 6,610 2,296,495 |
2013 2,284,100 609 20,064 2,304,773 |
2012 2,275,114 - 24,958 2,300,072 |
If the Parent Company was able to settle the bonuses paid to employees by cash or shares, the Parent Company presumed that the entire amount of the bonus would be settled in shares and the resulting potential shares were included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in the computation of diluted earnings per share, if the effect is dilutive. Such dilutive effect of the potential shares was included in the computation of diluted earnings per share until the shareholders resolve the number of shares to be distributed to employees at their meeting in the following year.
Since the exercise price of the options or warrants issued by the Parent Company exceeded the average market price of the shares during the period of three months and nine months ended September 30, 2012, they were anti-dilutive and excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
- 47 -
27. SHARE-BASED PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS
Employee Share Option Plan
Qualified employees of the Parent Company and its subsidiaries were granted 30,000 options in December 2007. Each option entitles the holder to subscribe for one thousand common shares of the Parent Company. The options granted are valid for 6 years and exercisable at certain percentages after the second, third and fourth anniversary from the grant date. The options were granted at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Parent Company’s common shares listed on the grant date. For any subsequent changes in the Parent Company’s capital surplus, the exercise price is adjusted accordingly.
Information on employee share options was as follows:
| Employee Share Option Plan Balance at January 1 Options exercised Options expired Balance at September 30 Options exercisable, end of period Weighted-average fair value of options granted (NT$) |
**For the Nine Months ** | Ended September 30 |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 Number of Options (In Thousands) Weighted- average Exercise Price (NT$) $ 17,724 $35.5 (13,497) 33.7-35.5 (126) 33.7-35.5 $ 4,101 33.7 $ 4,101 $ 16.964 |
2012 | |
| Number of Options (In Thousands) Weighted- average Exercise Price (NT$) 19,819 $38.0 (1,286) 35.5-38.0 (82) 35.5-38.0 $ 18,451 35.5 $ 18,451 $ 16.964 |
Information about outstanding options at the end of the reporting period was as follows:
| September 30, 2013 Range of Exercise Price (NT$) Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) $33.7 0.25 September 30, 2012 Range of Exercise Price (NT$) Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) $35.5 1.25 |
December 31, 2012 |
|---|---|
| Range of Exercise Price (NT$) Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) $35.5 1 January 1, 2012 |
|
| Range of Exercise Price (NT$) Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) $38.0 2 |
- 48 -
Options granted in December 2007 were priced using the (Binomial option pricing model) and the inputs to the model were as follows:
| September 30, | September 30, | |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | |
| Expected volatility | 40.07% | 40.07% |
| Expected life (years) | 0.25 years | 1.25 years |
| Expected dividend yield | 7.07% | 7.07% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 2.5101% | 2.5101% |
28. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS WITH NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS
In March 2012, the Parent Company disposed of 2.21% of its interest in Silitech Technology Corp., reducing its continuing interest from 34.90% to 32.69%.
Between July to September 2013, the Parent Company acquired an additional 3.95% of its interest in Lite-On IT Corp., increasing its continuing interest from 94.91% to 98.86%.
The above transactions were accounted for as equity transactions, since the Parent Company did not cease to have control over these subsidiaries.
| Cash consideration received (paid) The proportionate share of the carrying amount of the net assets of the subsidiary transferred to (from) non-controlling interests Reattribution of other comprehensive income to non-controlling interests Exchange differences arising on the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations Differences arising from equity transaction Silitech Technology Corp. Line items adjusted for equity transaction Capital surplus - difference between consideration and carrying amounts adjusted arising from changes in percentage of ownership in subsidiaries $ 146,193 Retained earnings - $ 146,193 |
Silitech Technology Corp. $ 288,198 (144,435) 2,430 $ 146,193 Lite-On IT Corp. $ (146,193) (3,406,857) $ (3,553,050) |
Lite-On IT Corp. $ (17,107,138) 13,554,088 - $ (3,553,050) Total $ - (3,406,857) $ (3,406,857) |
|---|---|---|
29. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to continue as going concerns while maximizing the return to shareholders through the optimization of the debt and equity balance.
- 49 -
The Group’s capital management system aims to ensure that the necessary financial resources and operating plan are enough to meet the next 12 months’ requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, research and development expenses, debt repayment, dividend expenses and other need.
30. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
-
a. Fair value of financial instruments
-
1) Fair value of financial instruments not carried at fair value
The Group’s management consider that the carrying amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities recognized in the consolidated financial statements approximate their fair values.
- 2) Fair value measurements recognized in the balance sheets
The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:
-
a) Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
-
b) Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and
-
c) Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
September 30, 2013
| Financial assets at FVTPL Derivative financial assets Financial liabilities at FVTPL Derivative financial liabilities Available-for-sale financial assets Securities listed in ROC - equity securities Securities listed in other countries - equity securities Unlisted securities - ROC - equity securities Unlisted securities - other countries - equity securities Mutual funds Emerging market stocks |
Level 1 $ - $ - $ 1,285,950 46,298 - - - - $ 1,332,248 |
Level 2 $ 20,427 $ 43,376 $ - - - - 127,684 178,716 $ 306,400 |
Level 3 $ - $ - $ - - 481,785 321,475 - - $ 803,260 |
Total $ 20,427 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ 43,376 | ||||
| $ 1,285,950 46,298 481,785 321,475 127,684 178,716 |
||||
| $ 2,441,908 |
- 50 -
December 31, 2012
| Financial assets at FVTPL Derivative financial assets Financial liabilities at FVTPL Derivative financial liabilities Available-for-sale financial assets Securities listed in ROC - equity securities Securities listed in other countries - equity securities Unlisted securities - ROC - equity securities Unlisted securities - other countries - equity securities Mutual funds Emerging market stocks September 30, 2012 Financial assets at FVTPL Derivative financial assets Financial liabilities at FVTPL Derivative financial liabilities Available-for-sale financial assets Securities listed in ROC - equity securities Securities listed in other countries - equity securities Unlisted securities - ROC - equity securities Unlisted securities - other countries - equity securities Mutual funds Emerging market stocks January 1, 2012 Financial assets at FVTPL Derivative financial assets Financial liabilities at FVTPL Derivative financial liabilities |
Level 1 $ - $ - $ 903,046 35,957 - - - - $ 939,003 Level 1 $ - $ - $ 1,040,199 70,568 - - - - $ 1,110,767 Level 1 $ - $ - |
Level 2 $ 13,023 $ 35,239 $ - - - - 106,310 310,657 $ 416,967 Level 2 $ 59,615 $ 47,135 $ - - - - 108,048 293,892 $ 401,940 Level 2 $ 111,584 $ 42,274 |
Level 3 $ - $ - $ - - 481,785 316,720 - - $ 798,505 Level 3 $ - $ - $ - - 481,785 227,045 - - $ 708,830 Level 3 $ - $ - |
Total $ 13,023 $ 35,239 $ 903,046 35,957 481,785 316,720 106,310 310,657 $ 2,154,475 Total $ 59,615 $ 47,135 $ 1,040,199 70,568 481,785 227,045 108,048 293,892 $ 2,221,537 Total $ 111,584 $ 42,274 (Continued) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
- 51 -
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Available-for-sale financial | ||||||||||
| assets | ||||||||||
| Securities listed in ROC - | ||||||||||
| equity securities |
$ 1,898,101 | $ | - |
$ | - |
$ 1,898,101 | ||||
| Securities listed in other | ||||||||||
| countries - equity securities | 145,291 | - | - | 145,291 | ||||||
| Unlisted securities - ROC - | ||||||||||
| equity securities | - | - | 851,972 | 851,972 | ||||||
| Unlisted securities - other | ||||||||||
| countries - equity securities | - | - | 188,967 | 188,967 | ||||||
| Mutual funds | - | 749,051 | - | 749,051 | ||||||
| Emerging market stocks | - | 437,953 | - | 437,953 | ||||||
| $ 2,043,392 | $ | 1,187,004 | $ | 1,040,939 | $ 4,271,335 | |||||
| (Concluded) | ||||||||||
| There were no transfers between Level 1 and 2 | in the current and | prior | periods. | |||||||
| Reconciliation of Level 3 fair value | measurements of financial assets | |||||||||
| For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 | ||||||||||
| Available-for-sa | ||||||||||
| le Financial | ||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||
| Unlisted Shares | ||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2013 | $ 798,505 | |||||||||
| Total gains or losses | ||||||||||
| In other comprehensive income | 5,576 | |||||||||
| Purchases | 129 | |||||||||
| Disposal | (950) | |||||||||
| Balance at September 30, 2013 | $ 803,260 | |||||||||
| For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||
| Available-for-sa | ||||||||||
| le Financial | ||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||
| Unlisted Shares | ||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2012 | $ | 1,040,939 | ||||||||
| Total gains or losses | ||||||||||
| In profit or loss | (470,187) | |||||||||
| In other comprehensive income | (6,942) | |||||||||
| Purchases | 145,134 | |||||||||
| Disposal | (114) | |||||||||
| Balance at September 30, 2013 | $ | 708,830 |
(Concluded)
- 3) Reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements of financial assets
The total gains or losses for the period included a loss of $0 thousand and $470,187 thousand relating to assets held for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. Such fair value gains or losses were included in impairment losses.
-
52 -
-
4) Valuation techniques and assumptions applied for the purpose of measuring fair value
The fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities were determined as follows:
-
a) The fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities with standard terms and conditions and traded in active liquid markets are determined with reference to quoted market prices.
-
b) The fair values of derivative instruments were calculated using quoted prices. Where such prices were not available, a discounted cash flow analysis was performed using the applicable yield curve for the duration of the instruments for non-optional derivatives, and option pricing models for optional derivatives. The estimates and assumptions used by the Group were consistent with those that market participants would use in setting a price for the financial instrument;
-
c) The fair values of other financial assets and financial liabilities (excluding those described above) were determined in accordance with generally accepted pricing models based on discounted cash flow analysis.
-
b. Categories of financial instruments
| September 30, | September 30, | December 31, | December 31, | September 30, | September 30, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | January 1, 2012 | |||||
| Financial assets | ||||||||
| Fair value through profit or loss | ||||||||
| (FVTPL) | ||||||||
| Derivative financial assets | $ | 20,427 |
$ | 13,023 |
$ | 59,615 |
$ | 111,584 |
| Loans and receivables (i) | 110,898,217 | 107,257,401 | 102,754,583 | 104,139,455 | ||||
| Available-for-sale financial assets | 2,441,908 | 2,154,475 | 2,221,537 | 4,271,335 | ||||
| Financial liabilities | ||||||||
| Fair value through profit or loss | ||||||||
| (FVTPL) | ||||||||
| Derivative financial liabilities | 43,376 | 35,239 | 47,135 | 42,274 | ||||
| Derivative instruments in | ||||||||
| designated hedge accounting | ||||||||
| relationships | 54,773 | 101,563 | 119,667 | 165,225 | ||||
| Measured at amortized cost | ||||||||
| Short-term borrowings | 11,287,855 | 7,010,394 | 8,160,766 | 4,737,488 | ||||
| Long-term loans (included | ||||||||
| current portion of long-term | ||||||||
| debts) | 36,839,235 | 24,367,802 | 23,870,910 | 24,468,437 | ||||
| Payables (ii) | 75,539,946 | 68,692,057 | 67,317,019 | 79,830,312 |
-
i: The balances included loans and receivables measured at amortized cost, which comprise cash and cash equivalents, debt investments with no active market, trade and other receivables.
-
ii: The balances included financial liabilities measured at amortized cost, which comprise short-term bills payable, trade and other payables.
-
c. Financial risk management objectives and policies
The Group’s major financial instruments included equity investments, trade receivable, trade payables and borrowings. The Group’s Corporate Treasury function provides services to the business, coordinates access to domestic and international financial markets, monitors and manages the financial risks relating to the operations of the Group through internal risk reports which analyze exposures by
- 53 -
degree and magnitude of risks. These risks include market risk (including currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.
The Group sought to minimize the effects of these risks by using derivative financial instruments to hedge risk exposures. The use of financial derivatives was governed by the Group’s policies approved by the board of directors, which provided written principles on foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, the use of financial derivatives and non-derivative financial instruments, and the investment of excess liquidity. Compliance with policies and exposure limits was reviewed by the internal auditors on a continuous basis. The Group did not enter into or trade financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for speculative purposes.
1) Market risk
The Group’s activities exposed it primarily to the financial risks of changes in foreign currency exchange rates (see a) below) and interest rates (see b) below). The Group entered into a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to foreign currency risk and interest rate risk, including:
-
a) Forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the exchange rate risk arising on exportation; and
-
b) Interest rate swaps to mitigate the risk of rising interest rates.
There had been no change to the Group’s exposure to market risks or the manner in which these risks were managed and measured.
a) Foreign currency risk
Several subsidiaries of the Parent Company had foreign currency sales and purchases, which exposed the Group to foreign currency risk. Exchange rate exposures were managed within approved policy parameters utilizing forward foreign exchange contracts.
The carrying amounts of the Group’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at the end of the reporting period (see Note 34).
The Group required all its group entities to use foreign exchange forward contracts, cross-currency swap contract and options to eliminate currency exposure. It is the Group’s policy to negotiate the terms of the hedge derivatives to match the terms of the hedged item to maximize hedge effectiveness.
The carrying amounts of the Group’s derivatives exposed to foreign currency risk at the end of the reporting period were as follows.
| September 30, | December | 31, | September 30, | January 1, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | 2012 | ||
| Assets | |||||
| USD | $ 16,722 | $ 13,023 | $ 58,839 | $ 88,771 | |
| EUR | 3,705 | - | 776 | 13,383 | |
| JPY | - | - | - | 9,430 | |
| Liabilities | |||||
| USD | 35,372 | 29,140 | 39,295 | 32,495 | |
| EUR | 6,910 | 6,050 | 7,734 | - | |
| RMB | 1,094 | - | - | - | |
| JPY | - | 49 | 106 | 9,779 |
- 54 -
Sensitivity analysis
The Group was mainly exposed to the Currency USD.
The following table details the Group’s sensitivity to a 5% increase and decrease in New Taiwan dollars (the functional currency) against the US dollars. The sensitivity analysis included only outstanding foreign currency denominated monetary items. A positive number below indicates an increase in pre-tax profit and other equity associated with New Taiwan dollars strengthen 5% against the US dollars. For a 5% weakening of New Taiwan dollars against the US dollars, there would be an equal and opposite impact on pre-tax profit and other equity and the balances below would be negative.
| Profit or loss | Currency USD Impact | Currency USD Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|||
| 2013 $ 334,932 |
2012 $ 61,466 |
b) Interest rate risk
The Group was exposed to interest rate risk because entities in the Group borrowed funds at both fixed and floating interest rates. The risk is managed by the Group by maintaining an appropriate mix of fixed and floating rate borrowings, and using interest rate swap contracts. Hedging activities are evaluated regularly to align with interest rate views and defined risk appetite, ensuring the most cost-effective hedging strategies are applied.
The carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets and financial liabilities with exposure to interest rates at the end of the reporting period were as follows.
| September 30, | December 31, | December 31, | September 30, | January 1, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2012 | 2012 | 2012 | ||
| Fair value interest rate | |||||
| risk | |||||
| Financial assets (i) | $ 43,270,316 | $ | 37,882,125 | $ 37,074,496 | $ 31,617,845 |
| Financial liabilities | |||||
| (ii) | 11,866,689 | 10,931,598 | 11,495,558 | 8,055,575 | |
| Cash flow interest rate | |||||
| risk | |||||
| Financial assets (iii) | 15,142,592 | 21,017,052 | 16,990,053 | 22,226,441 | |
| Financial liabilities | |||||
| (iv) | 36,260,401 | 20,446,598 | 20,536,118 | 21,150,350 |
-
i: The balances included cash and cash equivalents and debt investments with no active market.
-
ii: The balances included financial liabilities exposed to fair value risk from interest rate fluctuation.
-
iii: The balances included demand deposits.
-
iv: The balances included financial liabilities exposed to cash flow risk from interest rate fluctuation.
-
55 -
The Group aims to keep borrowings at variable rates. In order to achieve this result, the Group entered into interest rate swaps to hedge its exposures to changes in fair values of the borrowings. The critical terms of these interest rate swaps are similar to those of hedged borrowings. These interest rate swaps were designated as effective hedging instruments and hedge accounting is used.
The Group was also exposed to cash flow interest rate risk in relation to variable-rate bank borrowings and pay-fixed/receive-floating interest rate swaps. It is the Group’s policy to keep its borrowings at floating rate of interests so as to minimize the fair value interest rate risk. The Group’s cash flow interest rate risk was mainly concentrated in the fluctuation of the average rate for 90-day notes in Taiwan’s secondary market arising from the Group’s New Taiwan dollars denominated borrowings.
Sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity analyses below were determined based on the Group’s exposure to interest rates for both derivatives and non-derivative instruments at the end of the reporting period. For floating rate liabilities, the analysis was prepared assuming the amount of the liability outstanding at the end of the reporting period was outstanding for the whole year.
If interest rates had been 25 basis points higher and all other variables were held constant, the Group’s pre-tax profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 would decrease by $39,596 thousand and $6,649 thousand.
- c) Other price risk
The Group was exposed to equity price risk through its investments in listed equity securities. Equity investments are held for strategic rather than trading purposes. The Group does not actively trade these investments.
Sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity analyses below were determined based on the exposure to equity price risks at the end of the reporting period.
If equity prices had been 7% higher, the pre-tax other comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 would increase by $93,257 thousand and $77,754 thousand as a result of the changes in fair value of available-for-sale shares.
- 2) Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group.
The Group is exposed to credit risk from trade receivables, deposits and other financial instruments. Credit risk for business-related exposures are managed separately from that for financial-related exposures.
- a) Business related credit risk
To maintain the quality of receivables, the Group has established operating procedures to manage credit risk.
For individual customers, risk factors considered include the customer’s financial position, credit rating agency rating, the Group’s internal credit rating, and transaction history as well as current economic conditions that may affect the customer’s ability to pay. The Group also has
- 56 -
the right to use some credit protection enhancement tools, such as requiring advance payments, to reduce the credit risks involving certain customers.
- b) Financial credit risk
Bank deposits and other financial instruments are credit risk sources required by the Parent Company’s Department of Finance Department to be measured and monitored. However, since the Group’s counter-parties are all reputable financial institutions and government agencies, there is no significant financial credit risk.
3) Liquidity risk
The Group manages liquidity risk by monitoring and maintaining a level of cash and cash equivalents deemed adequate to finance the Group’s operations.
The objective of liquidity risk management, the Department is required to maintain operating cash and cash equivalents, in order to ensure that the combined company has sufficient financial flexibility.
- a) Liquidity and interest risk rate tables
The table below summarizes the maturity profile of the Group’s non-derivative financial liabilities based on contractual undiscounted payments.
September 30, 2013
| Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate (%) Non-derivative financial liabilities Non-interest bearing - Finance lease liabilities 1.30-10.24 Variable interest rate liabilities 0.72-1.6934 Fixed interest rate liabilities 1.10-1.53 December 31, 2012 Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate (%) Non-derivative financial liabilities Non-interest bearing - Finance lease liabilities 1.3-15.6 Variable interest rate liabilities 0.01-1.610 Fixed interest rate liabilities 1.10-1.75 |
On Demand or Less than 1 Year $ 76,855,063 69,307 16,366,594 6,909,972 $ 100,200,936 On Demand or Less than 1 Year $ 72,425,874 62,381 6,700,998 4,720,564 $ 83,909,817 |
1-3 Years $ 2,839,598 187,562 645,058 4,926,067 $ 8,598,285 1-3 Years $ 2,258,300 232,716 6,276,000 6,207,670 $ 14,974,686 |
3 Years to 5 Years $ - - 19,248,749 30,650 $ 19,279,399 3 Years to 5 Years $ - - 7,469,600 3,364 $ 7,472,964 |
5+ Years $ 852 - - - |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ 852 | ||||
| 5+ Years $ 821 - - - $ 821 |
- 57 -
September 30, 2012
| Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate (%) On Demand or Less than 1 Year Non-derivative financial liabilities Non-interest bearing - $ 70,689,665 Finance lease liabilities 1.30-15.6 55,372 Variable interest rate liabilities 0.01-1.75 6,844,154 Fixed interest rate liabilities 1.15-1.75 5,254,721 $ 82,843,912 January 1, 2012 Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate (%) On Demand or Less than 1 Year Non-derivative financial liabilities Non-interest bearing - $ 83,489,232 Finance lease liabilities 1.3-15.6 84,360 Variable interest rate liabilities 0.01-1.74 4,169,955 Fixed interest rate liabilities 1.10-8.235 1,741,006 $ 89,484,553 |
1-3 Years $ 2,177,845 254,133 7,011,521 6,210,637 $ 15,654,136 1-3 Years $ 2,222,227 320,907 2,726,794 295,054 $ 5,564,982 |
3 Years to 5 Years $ - - 6,680,443 30,200 $ 6,710,643 3 Years to 5 Years $ - - 14,253,601 6,019,515 $ 20,273,116 |
5+ Years $ 821 - - - |
|---|---|---|---|
| $ 821 | |||
| 5+ Years $ 935 - - - |
|||
| $ 935 |
The table below summarizes the maturity profile of the Group’s financial instruments on undiscounted contract payments.
September 30, 2013
| On Demand or Less than 1 Year Forward exchange contracts Inflows $ 1,929,588 Outflows (1,937,344) (7,756) Currency swap contracts Inflows 1,169,757 Outflows (1,194,320) (24,563) $ (32,319) |
1-3 Years $ - - - - - - $ - |
3 Years to 5 Years $ - - - - - - $ - |
5+ Years $ - - |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | |||
| - - |
|||
| - | |||
| $ - |
- 58 -
December 31, 2012
| On Demand or Less than 1 Year Forward exchange contracts Inflows $ 768,527 Outflows (764,314) 4,213 Currency swap contracts Inflows 1,840,192 Outflows (1,850,325) (10,133) $ (5,920) September 30, 2012 On Demand or Less than 1 Year Forward exchange contracts Inflows $ 1,183,638 Outflows (1,224,701) (41,063) Currency swap contracts Inflows 1,345,542 Outflows (1,325,952) 19,590 $ (21,473) January 1, 2012 On Demand or Less than 1 Years Forward exchange contracts Inflows $ 784,113 Outflows (628,849) 155,264 Currency swap contracts Inflows 2,563,951 Outflows (2,494,563) 69,388 $ 224,652 |
1-3 Years $ - - - - - - $ - 1-3 Years $ - - - - - - $ - 1-3 Years $ - - - - - - $ - |
3 Years to 5 Years $ - - - - - - $ - 3 Years to 5 Years $ - - - - - - $ - 3 Years to 5 Years $ - - - - - - $ - |
5+ Years $ - - |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | |||
| - - |
|||
| - | |||
| $ - | |||
| 5+ Years $ - - |
|||
| - | |||
| - - |
|||
| - | |||
| $ - | |||
| 5+ Years $ - - |
|||
| - | |||
| - - |
|||
| - | |||
| $ - |
- 59 -
31. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
Balances and transactions between the Parent Company and its subsidiaries, which were related parties of the Parent Company, had been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Significant transactions with related parties are summarized below and in the accompanying Tables 1 and 2:
-
a. The price of the Group’s sales to Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. For the nine months ended September 30 in 2013 and 2012 was calculated at cost plus specific profit. Except for these sales, the sales terms between the Parent Company and its related parties were normal.
-
b. The cost of the Group’s purchases from Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. for the nine months ended September 30 in 2013 and 2012 was based on cost plus specific profit. Except for these purchases, the purchase terms between the Parent Company and its related parties were normal.
-
c. Operating lease contracts with related parties were based on market prices and made under normal terms.
-
d. Compensation of directors, supervisors and management personnel:
| Short-term employee benefits Post-employment benefits Other long-term employee benefits Share-based payments Termination benefits |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 363,715 $ 363,325 6,594 2,294 - - 169 1,092 248 414 $ 370,726 $ 367,125 |
For the Three Months Ended September 30 2013 2012 $ 363,715 $ 363,325 6,594 2,294 - - 169 1,092 248 414 $ 370,726 $ 367,125 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 $ 363,715 6,594 - 169 248 $ 370,726 |
2013 $ 552,740 48,312 - 964 713 $ 602,729 |
2012 $ 556,292 11,969 - 2,664 8,855 $ 579,780 |
The remuneration of directors and key executives was determined by the remuneration committee having regard to the performance of individuals and market trends.
32. ASSETS PLEDGED AS COLLATERAL OR FOR SECURITY
| September 30, 2013 December 31, 2012 September 30, 2012 Pledge-time deposits $ 106,196 $ 102,560 $ 101,218 |
January 1, 2012 $ 108,107 |
|---|---|
Mortgaged or pledged assets - noncurrent included the guarantee deposits of Lite-On IT Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, Logah Electronics (Su Zhou) Co., Ltd. and Lippo Electronics (Su Zhou) Co., Ltd. provided to a supplier and the export customs agency for shipment clearance in advance of customs duty payments.
- 60 -
33. SIGNIFICANT CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND UNRECOGNIZED COMMITMENTS
-
a. In May, 2010, INPRO II Licensing Sarl (INPRO) filed a lawsuit with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and charged the Parent Company with breach of contract. INPRO alleged that the Parent Company incurred a debt on patent rights obtained from Hitachi Limited. INPRO also claimed it had assumed Hitachi’s rights to payments for patent use. But because of the court’s lack of jurisdiction, INPRO dismissed the case later. On September 3, 2010, the Parent Company filed a lawsuit with the Intellectual Property Court (“IP Court”) in Taiwan against INPRO, alleging that the Parent Company had no patent obligations. On September 8, 2010, INPRO filed a lawsuit with the Superior Court of California (SCC) in the County of San Francisco. In December 2010, the SCC ruled that the U.S. proceedings in the U.S. should be stopped because the same facts had been filed with the IP Court in Taiwan. In July 2012, INPRO file a counterclaim with the IP Court in Taiwan and demanded a royalty payment of U.S$5.4 million. In June 2013, on the basis of its presentence investigation, the IP Court made a final judgment in favor of INPRO and ruled that the Parent Company should pay royalties of U.S$5.4 million plus interest. In July 2013, the Parent Company filed an appeal, claiming that the Parent Company had no patent obligations under the former patent licensing contract. Parent Company accrued a reasonable amount in case of a loss on this lawsuit. Parent Company will continue to recognize the losses based upon reasonable estimation of the lawsuit quarterly until the settlement of this lawsuit.
-
b. In October 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it would make antitrust investigations of CD-ROM factories. Lite-On IT Corp. (“Lite-On IT”) received an investigation notice from the DOJ. Lite-ON IT stated it would cooperate with the DOJ in the investigation. This case was still in the preliminary stage, but Lite-On IT believes that the case will not have a significant impact on the financial operations.
-
c. CMP Consulting Service, Inc., KI, Inc., Aaron Wagner, The Stereo Shop, David Carney, Jr. Tina Corse, Cynthia R. Rall, Richard R. Rall, Aaron Deshaw and Don Cheung filed an antitrust group lawsuit against Lite-On IT and its subsidiaries - Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc. and other companies with related businesses - with a court in California, from October 2009 to September 2010. Although the outcome of the proceedings had not been determined, Lite-On IT accrued a reasonable amount in case of a loss on this lawsuit. Lite-On IT will continue to recognize the losses based upon reasonable estimation of the lawsuit quarterly until the settlement of this lawsuit.
-
d. In April 2010, petitioner Carlos Fogelman filed a motion for authorization to institute class action antitrust proceedings with the Superior Court of Quebec in the district of Montreal. In June 2010, the Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology filed a statement of claim in Ontario court. In September 2010, Neil Godfrey filed a statement of claim with the Superior Court of British Columbia. In September 2011, Donald Woligroski filed a statement of claim in Manitoba court. All plaintiffs filed the antitrust group lawsuit against Lite-On IT Corporation and its subsidiaries - Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc. and other companies with related businesses. Lite-On IT assigned lawyers as its representative in these lawsuits. These proceedings were still in preliminary stage, but Lite-On IT believes that the case will not have a significant impact on the financial operations in Canada. The outcome cannot be determined and Lite-On IT cannot make a reliable estimate of the contingent liability at this time.
-
e. In April 2011, Orinda Intellectual Properties USA Holding Group, Inc. instituted class action proceedings against Lite-On IT Corp., Lite-On Americans, Inc. and other companies with related businesses, with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging infringement of a single patent on Blue-ray discs. Lite-On IT has assigned lawyers to deal with the lawsuits. In December 2009, The United States Patent and Trademark office reopened this case and examined the right of this patent. In preliminary judgement, this patent right was still in debate and the patent owner appeal against the validity of the patent. The outcome cannot be determined, but Lite-On IT believes that the case will not have a significant impact on the financial operations.
-
61 -
-
f. The European Commission issued a Statement of Objection to some CD-ROM factories to make antitrust investigations in the third quarter of 2012. When Lite-On IT Corp. (“Lite-On IT”) received in July 2012 the investigation notice from the European Commission, it stated that it would cooperate with the European Commission in the investigation. Lite-On IT has assigned lawyers to deal with the lawsuits. These cases were still in proceeding, but Lite-On IT believes that the case will not have a significant impact on the financial operations.
-
g. On July 23, 2013, Lake Cherokee Hard Drive Technologies, instituted class action proceedings against Lite-On Sales & Distribution Inc. and other companies with related businesses, with the United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of patent. These cases were still in the preliminary stage, and Lite-On IT could not estimate the outcome of the case or amount of possible loss.
-
h. On May 13, 2013, Dell Inc. and Dell Products L.P. filed a complaint with the United States District Court for Western District of Texas; on October 24, 2013, Hewlett Packard Company filed a complaint with the United States District Court for Southern District of Texas; on October 25, 2013, Acer Inc, Acer America Corporation, Gateway Inc and Gateway U.S. Retail, Inc. filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; on October 31,2013, Ingram Micro Inc., and Synnex Corporation filed a complaint with the United States District Court for the Central District of California. All these complaints constituted an antitrust group lawsuit against Lite-On IT and other companies with related businesses. Lite-On IT assigned lawyers as its representative in these lawsuits. These cases were still in the preliminary stage, but Lite-On IT could not estimate the outcome of the case or amount of possible loss and will continue to recognize the losses based upon reasonable estimation of the lawsuit quarterly until the settlement of this lawsuit.
34. EXCHANGE RATE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES DENOMINATED IN FOREIGN CURRENCIES
The significant financial assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies were as follows:
| Financial assets Monetary items USD JPY INR THB HKD Non-monetary items JPY USD HKD EUR Financial liabilities Monetary items JPY USD INR THB HKD |
September 30, 2013 Foreign Currencies Exchange Rate $ 2,960,568 29.57 2,489,417 0.3023 1,944,289 0.4713 715,106 0.9465 167,265 3.8137 5,888 0.3023 5,720 29.57 5,861 3.8137 - 39.887 2,761,488 0.3023 2,734,033 29.57 953,098 0.4713 305,406 0.9465 18,201 3.8137 |
December 31, 2012 Foreign Currencies Exchange Rate $ 1,726,192 29.0400 2,007,618 0.3364 2,170,846 0.5299 370,358 0.9506 190,306 3.7464 4,554 0.3364 40,332 29.0400 5,900 3.7464 960 38.4780 1,075,705 0.3364 2,107,333 29.0400 2,491,401 0.5299 193,477 0.9506 20,200 3.7464 |
September 30, 2012 Foreign Currencies Exchange Rate $ 2,211,766 29.285 2,602,242 0.3775 2,546,324 0.5418 426,382 0.9545 335,288 3.7773 4,565 0.3775 177,460 29.285 5,973 3.7773 6,312 37.8714 2,445,839 0.3775 2,169,788 29.285 1,822,620 0.5418 282,666 0.9545 17,037 3.7773 |
December 1, 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign Currencies Exchange Rate $ 2,406,629 30.2680 3,201,028 0.3903 2,586,306 0.5678 509,548 0.9609 214,211 3.8956 55,944 0.3903 141,784 30.2680 54,050 3.8956 17,490 39.1668 1,948,319 0.3903 2,024,131 30.2680 1,309,431 0.5678 143,239 0.9609 130,549 3.8956 |
35. SEPARATELY DISCLOSED ITEMS
-
a. Information on significant transactions and information on investees:
-
1) Lending funds to others: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
2) Providing endorsements or guarantees for others: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
3) Holding of securities at the end of the period: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
62 -
-
4) Aggregate purchases or sales of the same securities reaching NT$100 million or 20 percent of paid-in capital or more: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
5) Acquisition of real estate reaching NT$100 million or 20 percent of paid-in capital or more: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
6) Disposal of real estate reaching NT$100 million or 20 percent of paid-in capital or more: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
7) Purchases or sales of goods from or to related parties reaching NT$100 million or 20 percent of paid-in capital or more: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
8) Trade receivables from related parties reaching NT$100 million or 20 percent of paid-in capital or more: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
9) Information on investees: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
10) Trading in derivative instruments: Notes 7, 9 and 30 to the financial statements
-
b. Information on investments in mainland China: Note 4 to the financial statements
-
c. Significant direct or indirect transactions with the investee, prices, payment terms and unrealized gain or loss: Note 4 to the financial statements
36. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Group's reportable segments were Optoelectronics and Communications, IT Products and Optical Storage segments. These segments mainly performance were as follows:
-
a. Optoelectronics and communications: Produce LEDs, designs and mass-manufactures of phone camera modules;
-
b. IT Products: Provides a full range products for Computing, Server and Networking; manufactures and sells multifunction and all-in-one printers.
-
c. Optical Storage: Manufactures and sells CD-ROM, CD-RW, and DVD-ROM as well as more advanced products.
The Group also had other operating segments that did not exceed the quantitative threshold. These segments mainly engage in the LED Transit Modules, Automotive Electronics, and renewable energy and efficiency related technologies and products.
The Group uses net profit as the measurement for segment profit and the basis of performance assessment. There was no material inconsistency between the accounting policies of the operating segment and the accounting policies described in Note 4.
- 63 -
The Group’s operating segment information is as follows:
Industry financial information:
| Sales from external customers Sales among segments Operating profit (loss) Segment assets Sales from external customers Sales among segments Operating profit (loss) Segment assets |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
|---|---|
| Optoelectronics and Communications IT Products Optical Storage Others Elimination Total $ 48,268,632 $ 63,979,935 $ 32,570,161 $ 9,036,463 $ - $ 153,855,191 1,115,575 1,587,916 8,380 174,311 (2,886,182 ) - 2,652,610 4,583,900 1,333,715 (2,136,838 ) - 6,433,387 60,881,901 53,409,981 43,680,112 50,169,334 (2,481,136 ) 205,660,192 For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
|
| Optoelectronics and Communications IT Products Optical Storage Others Elimination Total $ 51,110,675 $ 62,702,219 $ 39,533,442 $ 9,803,448 $ - $ 163,149,784 1,135,733 1,693,110 8,272 224,030 (3,061,145 ) - 1,932,900 4,541,067 1,959,240 (1,816,866 ) - 6,616,341 57,854,004 47,423,648 40,657,652 49,361,675 (2,215,679 ) 193,081,300 |
37. FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF IFRSS
- a. Basis of the preparation for financial information under IFRSs
The Group’s consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 not only follows the significant accounting policies stated in Note 4 but also applies the requirements under IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of IFRS” as the basis for the preparation.
b. Impact on the transition to IFRSs
Except for the following additional information on the impact on the transition to IFRSs, refer to Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013 for the impact on the Group’s consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of comprehensive income after transition to IFRSs.
- 1) Reconciliation of the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2012
| Item Cash and cash equivalents Bond Investments with no active market Accounts receivable Other current assets Deferred income tax assets - current Available-for-sale financial assets - noncurrent Financial assets carried at cost - noncurrent Investments accounted for by the equity method Properties Intangible assets Assets leased to others, net Idle assets, net Deferred expense, net Deferred income tax assets Other noncurrent assets Other Total |
ROC GAAP Amount $ 55,268,381 - 44,852,640 4,651,094 855,782 1,205,626 1,015,900 3,584,738 38,323,670 16,157,714 112,007 268,857 2,010,500 - - 23,044,777 $ 191,351,686 |
Effect of Transition to IFRSs $ (8,574,753 ) 8,574,753 745,250 57,441 (855,782 ) 1,015,900 (1,015,900 ) (160,808 ) (26,666 ) (25,439 ) (112,007 ) (268,857 ) (2,010,500 ) 1,973,461 2,416,521 - $ 1,729,614 |
IFRSs Amount Note $ 46,693,628 a) 8,574,753 a) 45,597,890 b) 4,708,535 h), i) and j) - c) 2,221,526 f) - f) 3,423,930 o) 38,294,004 e), h), j) and l) 16,132,275 h) and i) - e) - e) - h) 1,973,461 c), d) and n) 2,416,521 h), i), j) and m) 23,044,777 $ 193,081,300 (Continued) |
|---|---|---|---|
- 64 -
| Item Other payables Provision Obligations under capital leases - noncurrent Reserve for land value increment tax Accrued pension liabilities Deferred income tax liabilities Other Total liabilities Capital surplus Unappropriated earnings Net loss not recognized as pension cost Unrealized loss on financial instruments Foreign currency translation reserve Treasury stock Other Noncontrolling interests Total shareholders’ equity Total |
ROC GAAP Amount $ 16,174,979 1,050,502 252,944 239,693 161,119 741,401 85,764,912 104,385,550 27,482,557 10,945,639 (20,881 ) (527,391 ) (176,822 ) (1,104,073 ) 30,681,391 19,685,716 86,966,136 $ 191,351,686 |
Effect of Transition to IFRSs $ 154,806 745,250 1,189 (239,693 ) 12,311 1,344,203 - 2,018,066 (757,655 ) 514,174 20,881 230,587 1,819 (230,587 ) - (67,671) (288,452) $ 1,729,614 |
IFRSs Amount Note $ 16,329,785 n) 1,795,752 b) 254,133 - g) 173,430 m) 2,085,604 d) and g) 85,764,912 106,403,616 26,724,902 o), p) and r) 11,459,813 l), m), n), o), p), q) and r) - q) (296,804 ) k) (175,003 ) (1,334,660 ) k) 30,681,391 19,618,045 m) and n) 86,677,684 $ 193,081,300 |
|---|---|---|---|
(Concluded)
- 2) Reconciliation of the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
| Item Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating gains and loss Gain on disposal of investments, net Investment income recognized under the equity method, net Other Total nonoperating expenses and losses Income before income tax Income tax Consolidated net income Exchange differences on translating foreign operations Unrealized loss on available-for-sale financial assets Cash flow hedges Income tax relating to components of other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income for the period |
ROC GAAP Amount $ 163,149,597 (140,190,300) 22,959,297 (14,949,812) 8,009,485 546,635 12,256 83,249 642,140 8,651,625 (1,892,172) $ 6,759,453 |
Effect of Transition to IFRSs $ 187 (138,652) (138,465) 137,229 (1,236) (146,193 ) 5,267 - (140,926) (142,162 ) (950) $ (143,112) |
IFRSs Amount Note $ 163,149,784 (140,328,952) m), n), and s) 22,820,832 (14,812,583) l), m), n) and s) 8,008,249 400,442 r) 17,523 o) 83,249 501,214 8,509,463 (1,893,122) m), n) and o) 6,616,341 (2,526,249 ) (159,059 ) 45,558 429,462 $ 4,406,053 |
|---|---|---|---|
-
65 -
-
3) Reconciliation of the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2012.
| Item Net sales Cost of sales Gross profit Operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating gains and loss Investment income recognized under the equity method, net Other Total nonoperating expenses and losses Income before income tax Income tax Consolidated net income Exchange differences on translating foreign operations Unrealized loss on available-for-sale financial assets Cash flow hedges Income tax relating to components of other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income for the period |
ROC GAAP Amount $ 55,469,328 (47,432,726) 8,036,602 (4,905,687) 3,130,915 4,041 114,580 118,621 3,249,536 (673,926) $ 2,575,610 |
Effect of Transition to IFRSs IFRSs Amount Note $ 64 $ 55,469,392 (106,559) (47,539,285) m), n) and s) (106,495) 7,930,107 100,975 (4,804,712) l), m), n) and s) (5,520) 3,125,395 1,988 6,029 o) - 114,580 1,988 120,609 (3,532 ) 3,246,004 22 (673,904) m), n) and o) $ (3,510) 2,572,100 1,580,335 (58,406 ) 15,218 (268,657 ) $ 3,840,590 |
|---|---|---|
4) Exemptions from IFRS 1
The exemptions adopted by the Group on January 1, 2012 were the same as those indicated in the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013. Refer to the Note 36 to the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2013 for detail information.
- 5) Explanations of significant reconciling items in the transition to IFRSs
Material differences between the accounting policies under R.O.C. GAAP and the accounting policies adopted under IFRSs were as follows:
- a) Bank deposits with original maturity more than three months
Under ROC GAAP, the term “cash and cash equivalents” used in the financial statements includes cash on hand, demand deposits, check deposits, time deposits that are cancelable but without any loss of principal and negotiable certificates of deposit that are readily salable without any loss of principal. However, under IFRSs, cash equivalents are held for the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments rather than for investment or other purposes. An investment normally qualifies as a cash equivalent only when it has a short maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition. Thus, some certificates of deposit the Group held that had maturities of more than three months from the date of investment have been reclassified to bond investments with no active market.
As of September 30, 2012, the amount reclassified to bond investments with no active market was $8,574,753 thousand.
- b) Allowance for sales returns and discounts
Under ROC GAAP, provisions for estimated sales returns and discounts are recognized as a reduction of revenue in the period the related revenue is recognized on the basis of historical experience. Allowance for sales returns and discounts is recorded as a deduction from accounts receivable. Under IFRSs, the allowance for sales returns and discounts is a present obligation arising from past events and with uncertain timing of settlement and is thus reclassified to provisions.
- 66 -
As of September 30, 2012, the amount reclassified from allowance for sales returns and discounts to provisions was $745,250 thousand.
- c) Classifications of deferred income tax asset/liability and valuation allowance
Under ROC GAAP, valuation allowances are provided to the extent, if any, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Under IFRSs, deferred tax assets are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that there will be sufficient taxable profits against which the deductible temporary differences can be used; thus, a valuation allowance account is not needed.
In addition, under ROC GAAP, a deferred tax asset and liability is classified as current or noncurrent in accordance with the related asset or liability for financial reporting. However, if a deferred income tax asset or liability does not relate to an asset or liability in the financial statements, it is classified as current or noncurrent on the basis of the expected length of time before it is realized or settled. Under IFRSs, a deferred tax asset and liability is classified as noncurrent asset or liability.
As of September 30, 2012, the amounts reclassified from deferred income tax assets - current to deferred income tax assets - noncurrent was $855,782 thousand.
- d) Offsetting between deferred tax assets/liabilities
Under ROC GAAP, deferred current tax assets - current should be offset against deferred tax liability - current under the same taxable entity. The same rule applies to deferred tax asset/liability - noncurrent. Under IFRSs, an entity is eligible to offset tax assets against tax liabilities generated from the same taxable entity only (a) if the entity has a legally enforceable right to make this offset and (b) the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authorities on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities that intend either to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
As of September 30, 2012, the offset amounts of the Group’s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities was $1,104,510 thousand.
- e) Classification of leased assets and idle asset
Under ROC GAAP, leased assets and idle assets are classified under other assets and idle assets. Under IFRSs, the aforementioned items are classified as properties in accordance with their nature. Leased assets are mainly dormitories leased to employees and factories leased to suppliers. Based on IAS 40 - “Investment Property,” the dormitories leased to employees and factories leased to suppliers are not considered investment properties since they cannot be sold separately and comprise only an insignificant portion of the plant.
As of September 30, 2012, the amount reclassified from leased assets and idle assets to properties was $380,864 thousand.
- f) Financial assets carried at cost
Under Regulations Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers, the non-publicly traded stocks or stocks that are not traded in the Emerging Stock Market and pertaining to an investment in which the investor has no significant influence on the investee should be measured as financial assets carried at cost.
- 67 -
Under IFRSs, the financial instruments designated as at fair value through other comprehensive income and financial assets carried at cost should be classified as at fair value through profit or loss.
As of September 30, 2012, the Group’s financial assets carried at cost reclassified to available for sale financial assets amounted to $1,015,900 thousand.
- g) Reserve for land value increment tax
Based on the Guidelines Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers, land revaluation surplus is classified as reserve for land value increment tax and recorded under other liabilities. Under IFRSs, the Group reclassified land value increment tax to deferred income tax liabilities. As of September 30, 2012, the amount reclassified from land value increment tax to deferred income tax liabilities was $239,693 thousand.
h) Classification of deferred expenses
Under ROC GAAP, deferred expenses are recorded under other assets. Under IFRSs, the Group reclassified deferred expenses to other current assets, properties, intangible assets, and other noncurrent assets in accordance with their nature.
As of September 30, 2012, the Group had reclassified deferred expenses of $10,686 thousand, $1,176,209 thousand, $555,413 thousand and $268,192 thousand to other current assets, properties, intangible assets and other noncurrent assets, respectively.
- i) Land use rights
Under ROC GAAP, land use rights are classified as intangible asset. Under IFRSs, based on their nature, a land use right is classified as prepayment in accordance with International Accounting Standard (IAS) No. 17 - “Leases.”
As of September 30, 2012, the Group’s land use rights reclassified to other current assets and other noncurrent assets amounted to $1,675 thousand and $579,177 thousand, respectively.
- j) Classification of the prepayments for equipment
Under ROC GAAP, the prepayments for equipment are usually recorded under fixed assets. Under IFRSs, prepayments for equipment are usually recorded under other current assets or other noncurrent assets.
As of September 30, 2012, on the basis of the nature of the prepayments for equipment, the Group reclassified prepayments for equipment to other current assets and other noncurrent assets of $45,080 thousand and $1,564,013 thousand, respectively.
- k) Treasury stock
Under ROC GAAP on the accounting for treasury stocks, effective January 1, 2002, the Group accounted for its shares held by its subsidiary as treasury stock when it recognized the investment income at the market price. The difference in carrying value and market value of this treasury stock was recorded as unrealized loss on available-for-sale financial assets. Under IFRSs, treasury shares are recognized immediately at the time when treasury shares are acquired by subsidiaries.
As of September 30, 2012, the Group’s unrealized loss of $230,587 thousand on available-for-sale financial assets was reclassified to treasury stock.
- 68 -
l) Capitalization of lease payments
Under ROC GAAP, lease payments are recorded as rental expense in the period the lessee actually uses the item leased. Under IFRSs, they should be capitalized as part of asset acquisition cost.
As of September 30, 2012, the IFRS-based adjustment resulted in increases in properties by $25,354 thousand and unappropriated earnings by $14,024 thousand, respectively.
The depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and for the three months ended September 30, 2012, were adjusted for an increase of $2,288 thousand and for a decrease of $504 thousand (recorded as operating expenses).
m) Employee benefits
The Group had previously applied actuarial valuation to its defined benefit obligations and recognized the related pension cost and retirement benefit obligation in conformity with ROC GAAP. Under IFRSs, the group should carry out actuarial valuation on defined benefit obligations in accordance with IAS No. 19 - “Employee Benefits.” The Group has opted to recognize actuarial gains and losses as other comprehensive income immediately in full in the period in which they occur. The subsequent reclassification to earnings is not permitted.
At the transition date, the Group performed the actuarial valuation under IAS No. 19 - “Employee Benefits” and recognized the valuation difference directly as retained earnings under IFRS 1. As of September 30, 2012, the IFRS-based adjustments resulted in (a) increases in other noncurrent assets by $5,139 thousand; accrued pension liabilities by $12,311 thousand; and unappropriated earnings by $23,569 thousand and (b) decreases in noncontrolling interests by $34,201 thousand.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, IFRS adoption resulted in a decrease of $4,353 thousand ($1,359 thousand recorded as cost of sales and $2,994 thousand recorded as operating expenses) in salary expenses and an increase of $290 thousand in income tax.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, IFRS adoption resulted in a decrease of $1,220 thousand ($442 thousand recorded as cost of sales and $778 thousand recorded as operating expenses) in salary expenses and an increase of $97 thousand in income tax.
n) Employee benefits - short-term accumulated compensated absences
Under ROC GAAP, there are no specific requirements for recognizing accumulated compensated absences at the end of reporting periods. Companies usually recognize the related costs when the employees actually go on leave. Under IFRSs, the expected cost of short-term accumulated compensated absences should be recognized as the employees render services that increase their entitlement to these compensated absences.
As of September 30, 2012, the IFRS-based evaluation adjustment resulted in increases of the other payables by $154,806 thousand and deferred tax assets by $13,169 thousand. This adjustment also resulted in decreases in unappropriated earnings by $190,006 thousand and noncontrolling interests by $33,470 thousand.
- 69 -
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the salary expenses were adjusted for an increase of $3,488 thousand (resulting in a decrease of $71,544 thousand in cost of sales and an increase of $75,032 thousand in operating expenses). The income tax was also adjusted for an increase of $689 thousand. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the salary expenses were adjusted for an increase of $7,308 thousand (resulting in a decrease of $2,696 thousand in cost of sales and an increase of $10,004 thousand in operating expenses). The income tax was also adjusted for a decrease of $120 thousand.
- o) Investments accounted for using the equity method
The Group has evaluated significant differences between current accounting policies and IFRSs for the Group’s associates and joint ventures accounted for by the equity method. The significant difference is mainly due to the adjustment to employee benefits and leases.
As of September 30, 2012, the differences mentioned above resulted in an increase in unappropriated earnings by $179,153 thousand. In addition, the adjustment resulted in decreases in investments accounted for by the equity method by $160,808 thousand and capital surplus by $249,346 thousand.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the IFRS-based adjustments resulted in increases in investment income recognized under the equity method by $5,267 thousand and unrealized gain for jointly controlled entities by $34 thousand, and a decrease of $29 thousand in income tax.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the IFRS-based adjustments resulted in increases in investment income recognized under the equity method by $1,988 thousand and income tax by $1 thousand.
- p) Accounting treatment of the Parent Company for increases in carrying values of equity-method investments due to not subscribing proportionally to the additional shares issued by the investees and relevant adjustment of capital surplus - long-term equity investment.
Under ROC GAAP, if an investee issues new shares and an investor does not buy new shares proportionately, the investor’s ownership percentage and its interest in net assets of the investment will change. The resulting difference should be used to adjust the capital surplus and long-term equity investment accounts.
Under IFRSs, any equity changes in the invested associates without the loss of significant influence on the associates will be recognized as a deemed acquisition or a deemed disposal of the shares in the invested associates. Any equity changes in the invested subsidiaries without losing significant control over the subsidiaries will be deemed equity transactions. In addition, in accordance with the “Q&A on the Adoption of IFRSs” issued by the Taiwan Stock Exchange, capital surplus not covered by the IFRSs, the ROC Company Law and the relevant legal interpretations of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, ROC should be adjusted accordingly at the date of transition to IFRSs.
As of September 30, 2012, the foregoing adjustments resulted in a decrease of $654,502 thousand in the Parent Company’s capital surplus - long term investments and an increase of $654,502 thousand in unappropriated earnings.
q) Employee benefits - minimum pension liability to be recognized
Under ROC GAAP, the minimum pension liability should be should be recognized as such in the balance sheet; if the accrued pension liability is lower than this minimum, any shortfall should be recorded.
- 70 -
Under the IFRSs, there is no requirement for recognizing minimum pension liability.
As of September 30, 2012, net loss not recognized as pension cost was adjusted for an increase of $20,881 thousand and a decrease of $20,881 thousand in unappropriated earnings.
- r) Disposal of partial shares without losing significant influence on the investee
Under ROC GAAP, if the stock ownership percentage changes during the year, the investor company should recognize investment gains or losses in proportion to the actual stock ownership percentage on the disposition date.
Under IFRSs, disposal of the shares of subsidiaries without losing significant control over the subsidiaries is deemed an equity transaction.
As of September 30, 2012, the IFRS-based adjustments resulted in an increase of $146,193 thousand in the Parent Company’s capital surplus - long term investments under the equity method and a decrease of $146,193 thousand in the gain on disposal of investments.
- s) The reclassification of line items in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Under IFRSs, based on the nature of operating transactions, the Group reclassified a repair and warranty expense of $211,555 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and $109,697 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2012 to cost of sales.
- 71 -
TABLE 1
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012 (In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars)
| Nature of Relationship Related Party (Notes 1) September 30, 2013 Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. a Silpert Travel Service Co., Ltd. c Chi Mei Mold Co., Ltd. b Diodes Taiwan Co., Ltd. d Dragonjet Corporation a Other related parties (Note 3) December 31, 2012 Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. a Silpert Travel Service Co., Ltd. c Chi Mei Mold Co., Ltd. b Lite-Space Technology Company Limited a Other related parties (Note 4) September 30, 2012 Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. a Silpert Travel Service Co., Ltd. c Chi Mei Mold Co., Ltd. b Jhen Vei Electronic (Wujian) Co., Ltd. a Other related parties (Note 5) January 1, 2012 Co Tech Copper Foil Corp. e Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. a Chi Mei Mold Co., Ltd. b Silpert Travel Service Co., Ltd. c Other related parties (Note 6) |
Receivable from Related Parties | Receivable from Related Parties | Receivable from Related Parties | Payable to Related Parties | Payable to Related Parties | Payable to Related Parties | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts Receivable | Other Receivable % Amount (Note 2) $ 859 1 12 - - - 2,935 3 13,651 12 - - $ 17,457 16 $ 1,945 2 236 - - - - - 50 - $ 2,231 2 $ 1,241 2 201 - - - - - - - $ 1,442 2 $ - - 955 47 - - - - - - $ 955 47 |
Total $ 91,915 12 - 2,935 13,651 529 $ 109,042 $ 84,837 236 - - 579 $ 85,652 $ 94,826 201 - - 746 $ 95,773 $ 746 1,308 - - - $ 2,054 |
Accounts Payable | Other Payable % Amount (Note 2) $ 1,364 - 9,628 3 4,175 1 6 - - - 56 - $ 15,229 4 $ 38 - 7,006 5 13,129 8 - - - - $ 20,173 13 $ 82 - 5,147 2 12,633 4 - - - - $ 17,862 6 $ - - - - 37,654 10 5,404 2 - - $ 43,058 12 |
Total $ 275,141 9,628 13,269 105,344 - (3,407) $ 399,975 $ 98,099 7,006 33,305 14,516 5,170 $ 158,096 $ 201,415 5,147 30,148 44,118 4,089 $ 284,917 $ - 266,987 82,002 5,404 6,173 $ 360,566 (Continued) |
|||||
| % Amount (Note 2) $ 91,056 84 - - - - - - - - 529 - $ 91,585 84 $ 82,892 97 - - - - - - 529 1 $ 83,421 98 $ 93,585 98 - - - - - - 746 - $ 94,331 98 $ 746 36 353 17 - - - - - - $ 1,099 53 |
% Amount (Note 2) $ 273,777 68 - - 9,094 2 105,338 26 - - (3,463) - $ 384,746 96 $ 98,061 62 - - 20,176 13 14,516 9 5,170 3 $ 137,923 87 $ 201,333 71 - - 17,515 6 44,118 16 4,089 1 $ 267,055 94 $ - - 266,987 74 44,348 12 - - 6,173 2 $ 317,508 88 |
- 72 -
Note 1: a. Associates.
-
b. A subsidiary is its chairman.
-
c. Its chairman is a relative of the Parent Company’s chairman.
d. The Parent Company’s chairman is same person
- e. The Parent Company’s chairman is its director.
Note 2: Percentage of specific account balance.
Note 3: Other Related Parties including:
-
a. Associates: Lite-Space Technology Company Limited.
-
b. The Parent Company’s chairman is its director: Co Tech Copper Foil Corp.
-
c. The Parent Company is its main contributor: Lite-On Cultural Foundation
Note 4: Other Related Parties including:
a. Associates: Jhen Vei Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Jhen Vei Electronic (Wujian) Co., Ltd.
b. The Parent Company’s chairman is its director: Co Tech Copper Foil Corp.
Note 5: Other Related Parties including:
- a. Associates: Jhen Vei Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
b. The Parent Company’s chairman is its director: Co Tech Copper Foil Corp.
Note 6: Associates: Jhen Vei Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Note 7: Significant intercompany transactions have already been eliminated.
(Concluded)
- 73 -
TABLE 2
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012 (In Thousands of New Taiwan Dollars)
| Nature of Relationship Related Party (Notes 1) Nine months ended September 30, 2013 Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. a Lite-On Cultural Foundation e Silpert Travel Service Co., Ltd. c Chi Mei Machinery Corp. b Diodes Taiwan Co., Ltd. d Actron Technology Corp. f Lite-Space Technology Company Limited b Other related parties (Note 5) Three months ended September 30, 2013 Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. a Lite-On Cultural Foundation e Silpert Travel Service Co., Ltd. c Chi Mei Machinery Corp. b Diodes Taiwan Co., Ltd. d Actron Technology Corp. f Lite-Space Technology Company Limited b Other related parties (Note 5) Nine months ended September 30, 2012 Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. a Lite-On Cultural Foundation e Silpert Travel Service Co., Ltd. c Chi Mei Machinery Corp. b Actron Technology Corp. f Other related parties (Note 6) |
Sales (Note 2) | Purchases (Note 2) % Amount (Note 3) $ 807,089 38 - - - - 11,636 1 277,278 13 - - 986,393 47 11,980 1 $ 2,094,376 100 $ 263,437 31 - - - - 2,847 1 105,246 12 - - 477,789 56 - - $ 849,319 100 $ 486,947 93 - - - - 28,121 6 - - 4,569 1 $ 519,637 100 |
Rental Revenue $ - 258 43 - - - - - $ 301 $ - 86 14 - - - - - $ 100 $ - 258 43 - - - $ 301 |
Other Revenue $ 2,730 36 - 686 2,970 423 - - $ 6,845 $ 892 17 - 229 2,970 141 - - $ 4,249 $ 2,735 34 - 686 405 - $ 3,860 |
Rental Expense $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - $ - |
Other Expense (Note 4) $ - 915 80,912 12,464 - - - - $ 94,291 $ - - 33,109 2,320 - - - - $ 35,429 $ - - 77,922 7,054 - - $ 84,976 |
**Property Transaction ** | **Property Transaction ** | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Amount (Note 3) $ 190,141 99 71 - - - - - - - - - - - 2,268 1 $ 192,480 100 $ 65,437 99 20 - - - - - - - - - - - 756 1 $ 66,213 100 $ 218,853 99 67 - - - - - - - 2,268 1 $ 221,188 100 |
Book Value $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - $ - |
Proceeds $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - $ - |
Disposal Gain (Loss) $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - $ - |
Cost $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - - - $ - $ - - - - - - $ - (Continued) |
- 74 -
| Nature of Relationship Related Party (Notes 1) Three months ended September 30, 2012 Lite-On Semiconductor Corp. a Lite-On Cultural Foundation e Silpert Travel Service Co., Ltd. c Chi Mei Machinery Corp. b Actron Technology Corp. f Other related parties (Note 6) |
Sales (Note 2) | Purchases (Note 2) % Amount (Note 3) $ 226,031 96 - - - - 10,148 4 - - - - $ 236,179 100 |
Rental Revenue $ - 86 14 - - - $ 100 |
Other Revenue $ 846 16 (383) 229 135 - $ 843 |
Rental Expense $ - - - - - - $ - |
Other Expense (Note 4) $ - - 28,943 2,841 - - $ 31,784 |
**Property Transaction ** | **Property Transaction ** | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Amount (Note 3) $ 81,546 99 24 - - - - - - - 756 1 $ 82,326 100 |
Book Value $ - - - - - - $ - |
Proceeds $ - - - - - - $ - |
Disposal Gain (Loss) $ - - - - - - $ - |
Cost $ - - - - - - $ - |
Note 1: a. Associates.
-
b. A subsidiary is its chairman.
-
c. Its chairman is a relative of the Parent Company’s chairman.
-
d. The Parent Company is same person.
-
e. The Parent Company is its main contributor.
-
f. The Parent Company’s chairman is its director.
Note 2: Except for transactions disclosed in Note 31, the sales prices and payment terms to related parties were not significantly different from those of sales to third parties.
Note 3: Percentage of specific account balance.
Note 4: Mainly included travel fees and repair expenses.
Note 5: Other related parties including:
-
a. Associates: Jhen Vei Electronic (Wujian) Co., Ltd. and Jhen Vei Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
-
b. The Parent Company’s chairman is its director: Co Tech Copper Foil Corp.
Note 6: Other related parties including:
-
a. Associates: Jhen Vei Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
-
b. The Parent Company’s chairman is its director: Co Tech Copper Foil Corp.
Note 7: Significant intercompany transactions between the entities of consolidation have already been eliminated.
(Concluded)
- 75 -
TABLE 3
LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INTERCOMPANY RELATIONSHIPS AND PERCENTAGES OF OWNERSHIP FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012
September 30, 2013
==> picture [723 x 388] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
100% 100% 100%
Leotek Electronics USA
Lite-On Technology Corporation Lite-On Capital Corportaion Leotek Electronics Corp. Corportaion
100% 100%
Leotek Electronics Holding Changzhou Leotek New Energy
Limited Trade Limited
100% 100%
Lite-On Clean Energy Technology Lite-on Green Energy
Corp. Kaiserslautern GmbH
100% 100% 100%
Lite-on Green Energy (Singapore)Pte. Ltd. Lite-on Green Energy B.V. Romeo Tetti PV1 S.R.L.
100%
Lite-on Green Energy S.R.L.
100% 100% 100%
Lite-On Green Technologies Inc. Lite-On Green Technologies B.V Lite-on Green Technologies S.R.L.
100% 100% 100%
Lite-on Green Energy (HK) Lite-on Green Technologies (HK) Lite-On Green Technologies
Limited Limited (Nanjing) Corporation
100% 100%
LTC Group Ltd. LTC International Ltd.
100%
Titanic Capital Services Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Integrated Service Inc.
98.86% 100%
Lite-On IT Corporation LET (HK) Ltd.
100% 100% 100%
High Yield Group Co., Ltd. Lite-On IT International (HK)Ltd. Lite-On Opto Technology(Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-on IT Singapore Pte. Ltd. Lite-On IT Trading (Guangzhou)Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Sales & Distribution Inc. Lite-On IT Opto Tech (BH) Co.,Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Information Technology Lite-On Information Technology
B.V. GmbH
49% 100%
Philip & Lite-On Digital Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions
Solutions Corp. USA Inc.
100%
Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions
Netherlands B.V.
100%
Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions
Germany GmbH
100% 100%
Lite-On Electronics (Thailand) Co., Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions
Ltd. Korea Ltd.
100%
Philips & Lite-On Digital
Solution (Shanghai) Co.,Ltd.
----- End of picture text -----
- 76 -
==> picture [697 x 442] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
100% 100% 50% 100%
Lite-On Technology Corporation Lite-On International Holding Co.,Ltd Lite-On China Holding Co., Ltd. G&W Technology (BVI) Limited G&W Technology Limited
100% 100%
Lite-On Electronics Co., Ltd. Lite-On Communications(Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Elec and Wire
(Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
I-Solutions Limited Lite-On (GuangZhou) InfortechCo., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Electroncis (Guangzhou)
Co., Ltd.
67.03%
Lite-On (Guangzhou) Precision
Tooling Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Tech. (Guangzhou) Co.,
Ltd. 32.97%
100% 100%
Lite-On Electronics (Jiangsu) Lite-On Technology (Changzhou) Co.,
Co. Ltd. Ltd.
100% 87.41%
Lite-On Technology (Guangzhou) Lite-On Opto Technology (Changzhou)
Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.
100% 12.59%
Lite-On Power Technology
(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Yet Foundate Ltd. Dongguan Lite-On Computer Co.,Ltd.
100% 100%
Fordgood Electronic Ltd. Lite-On Li Shin Technology(Ganzhou) Co., Ltd.
48.13% 100%
Ze Poly Pte. Ltd. Ze Poly Tomsk Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Electronics H.K. Ltd. Silitek Elec. (Dongguan) Co.,Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Digital Electronics
(Donguan) Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Computer Tech
(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
100%
Dong Guan G-Com Computers Co.,
Ltd.
100%
Dong Guan G-Tech Computers Co.,
Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Electronics (Dongguan) 20.71%
Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Electronics (Tianjin)
Co., Ltd.
79.29%
DongGuan G-pro Computer Co.,
Ltd.
100% 100%
China Bridge (China) Co., Ltd. China Bridge Express (Wuxi)Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Power Technology (Chang Zhou)
Co., Ltd. (original name: Li Shin
Enterprise (Su Zhou) Co., Ltd.)
100% 100%
Lite-On Singapore Pte. Ltd. Lite-On Technology (Ying Tan)Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Technology (Xianing)
Co., Ltd.
----- End of picture text -----
- 77 -
==> picture [715 x 420] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
100% 100%
Lite-On Technology Corporation Lite-On Technology USA Inc. Lite-On Trading USA, Inc.
100%
Lite-On Service USA, Inc.
100%
Lite-On, Inc.
100%
Maxi Switch S.A. de C.V
100%
Lite-On Electronics (Europe) Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Overseas Trading Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Automotive Electronics
(Europe) BV
100%
Lite-On Automotive North
America Inc.
82.26% 100% 100% 100%
Lite-On Automotive International Lite-On Automotive Holdings Litie-On Automotive Electronics
Lite-On Automotive Corp. (Cayman) Co., Ltd (Hong Kong) Ltd. (Gungzhou) Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Automotive Service Lite-On Automotive (Wuxi) Co.,
USA,Inc Ltd.
100% 100%
Silitech Technology (SuZhou) Co.,
Silitech (Hong Kong) Holding Ltd. Ltd.
32.14% 100% 100% 100%
Silitech Technology Corporation
Silitech Technology Corp. Silitech (BVI) Holding Ltd. Silitech (Bermuda) Holding Ltd. Sdn. Bhd.
100%
0.61% Silitech Technology (Europe)
Limited
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Silitech Technology Corporation Xurong Electronic (Shenzhen) Co.,
Lite-On Capital Inc. Lite-On Japan(s) Pte. Ltd. Lite-On Japan (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Limited Ltd.
100% 100%
7.87% L&K Industries Philippines, Inc. Silitech International (India)Private Ltd.
100% 100% 60%
Lite-On Japan (H.K.) Ltd. NL (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. SuZhou Xulong Mold Producing Co.,Ltd.
49.49% 100% 100%
Lite-On Japan Ltd. LOJ Korea Co., Ltd. Major Suit (HK) Co. Ltd.
----- End of picture text -----
- 78 -
==> picture [745 x 421] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
100% 20.66% 100% 100% 100%
Li Shin International Logah Electronics (Su Zhou) Co.,
Lite-On Technology Corporation Enterprise Corp. Logah Technology Corp. Logah Technology Co., Ltd. Logah Technology (HK) Co., Ltd. Ltd.
18.97% 100%
Lippo Electronics (Su Zhou) Co.,
Ltd.
100% 100%
Li Shin International Enterprise Huizhou Li Shin Electronic Co.,
Corp. Ltd.
100% 100%
Huizhou Fu Tai Electronic Co.,
Eagle Rock Investment Ltd. Ltd.
100%
Li Shin Technology (Huizhou)
Ltd.
100%
54% 100% 100%
Lite-On Mobile Oyj 4%
Lite-On Technology (Europe) B.V. Lite-On (Finland) Oy Lite-On Mobile Sweden AB
(Formerly: Perlos Oyi)
100% 100% 96%
Lite-On Mobile Indústria e Comércio
Lite-On Capital Inc. Lite-On Mobile Pte. Ltd.
de Plásticos Ltda.
46%
100%
Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile
Engineering Plastics Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Guangzhou Lite-on Mobile Electronic Yantai Lite-On Mobile Electronic
Components Co. Ltd. Components Co., Ltd.
100% 11% 89%
Beijing Lite-On Mobile Electronic and Zhuhai Lite-On Mobile Technology
Telecommunications Components Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.
100%
Shenzhen Lite-On Mobile Precision
Molds Co., Ltd.
100%
Perlos Precision Plastics Moulding
Limited Liability Company
100%
Lite-On Mobile India Private Limited.
65% 100%
Lite-On Young Fast (Huizhou) Co.,
Lite-on Young Fast Pte. Ltd. Ltd.
----- End of picture text -----
- 79 -
September 30, 2012
==> picture [676 x 435] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
100% 91.79% 100%
Leotek Electronics USA
Lite-On Technology Corporation Lite-On Capital Inc. Leotek Electronics Corp.
Corportaion
100% 100%
Leotek Electronics Holding Changzhou Leotek New Energy
Limited Trade Limited
100% 100%
Lite-On Clean Energy Technology Lite-on Green Energy
Corp. Kaiserslautern GmbH
100% 100% 100%
Lite-on Green Energy (Singapore)Pte. Ltd. Lite-on Green Energy B.V. Romeo Tetti PV1 S.R.L
100%
Lite-on Green Energy S.R.L
100% 100% 100%
Lite-On Green Technologies Inc. Lite-On Green Technologies B.V Lite-on Green Technologies S.R.L
100% 100%
Lite-on Green Energy (HK) Lite-on Green Technologies
Limited Australia Pty Ltd
100% 100% 100% 100%
LTC Group Ltd. LTC International Ltd. Lite-on Green Technologies (HK)Limited Lite-On Green Technologies(Nanjing) Corporation
100%
100% Titanic Capital Services Ltd.
Lite-On Integrated Service Inc.
42.33% 0.32% 100%
Lite-On IT Corporation LET (HK) Ltd.
100% 100% 100%
High Yield Group Co., Ltd. Lite-On IT International (HK)Ltd. Lite-On Opto Technology(Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-on IT Singapore Pte. Ltd. Lite-On IT Trading (Guangzhou)Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Sales & Distribution Inc. Lite-On IT Opto Tech (BH) Co.,
Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Information Technology Lite-On Information Technology
B.V. GmbH
100% 100%
Automotive Playback Modules Hungary Electronical
Lite-On Americas Inc. Mechanical Manufacturing and Trading Limited
Liability Company
49% 100%
Philip & Lite-On Digital Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions
Solutions Corp. USA Inc.
100%
Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions
Netherlands B.V.
100%
Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions
Germany GmbH
100% 100%
Lite-On Electronics (Thailand) Co., Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions
Ltd. Korea Ltd.
100%
Philips & Lite-On Digital
Solution (Shanghai) Co. , Ltd.
----- End of picture text -----
- 80 -
==> picture [711 x 428] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
100% 100% 50% 100%
Lite-On Technology Corporation Lite-On International Holding Co.,Ltd Lite-On China Holding Co., Ltd. G&W Technology (BVI) Limited G&W Technology Limited
100% 100%
Lite-On Electronics Co., Ltd. Lite-On Communications(Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Elec and Wire
(Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
I-Solutions Limited Lite-On (Guang Zhou) InfortechCo., Ltd.
100% 100%
Silitek Elec. (Guangzhou) Co.Ltd. Visonpak (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
67.03%
Lite-On (Guang Zhou) Precision
Tooling Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Tech. (Guangzhou) Co.,
Ltd. 32.97%
100% 100%
Lite-On Electronics (Jiangsu) Lite-On Technology (Guangzhou) Co.,
Co. Ltd. Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Technology (Guangzhou) Lite-On Opto Technology (Changzhou)
Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Power Technology
(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Yet Foundate Ltd. Dongguan Lite-On Computer Co.,Ltd.
100% 100%
Fordgood Electronic Ltd. Lite-On Li Shin Technology(Ganzhou) Co., Ltd.
48.13% 100%
Ze Poly Pte. Ltd. Ze Poly Tomsk Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Electronics H.K. Ltd. Silitek Elec. (Dongguan) Co.,Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Digital Electronics
(Donguan) Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Computer Tech
(Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
100%
Dong Guan G-Com Computers Co.,
Ltd.
100%
Dong Guan G-Tech Computers Co.,
Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Electronics (Dongguan) 20.71%
Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Electronics (Tianjin)
Co., Ltd.
79.29%
DongGuan G-pro Computer Co.,
Ltd.
100% 100%
China Bridge (China) Co., Ltd. China Brdige Express (Wuxi)Co., Ltd.
100% 100%
Lite-On Power Technology (Chang Zhou) Lite-On Electronics (Chang Zhou) Co.,
Co., Ltd. (original name: Li Shin Ltd. (Formerly: Wuxi Lite-On Tech.
Enterprise (Su Zhou) Co., Ltd.) Co., Ltd.)
100% 100%
Lite-On Singapore Pte. Ltd. Lite-On Technology (Ying Tan)Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Technology (Xianing)
Co., Ltd.
----- End of picture text -----
- 81 -
==> picture [758 x 401] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
100% 100%
Lite-On Technology Corporation Lite-On Technology USA Inc. Lite-On Trading USA, Inc.
100%
Lite-On Service USA, Inc.
100%
Lite-On, Inc.
100%
Maxi Switch S.A. de C.V
100%
Lite-On Electronics (Europe) Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Overseas Trading Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Automotive Electronics
(Europe) BV
100%
Lite-On Automotive North
America Inc.
84.89% 100% 100% 100%
Lite-On Automotive International Lite-On Automotive Holdings Litie-On Automotive Electronics
Lite-On Automotive Corp. (Cayman) Co., Ltd (Hong Kong) Ltd. (Gungzhou) Co., Ltd.
100%
Lite-On Automotive (Wuxi) Co.,
Ltd.
100% 100%
Silitech Technology (SuZhou) Co.,
Silitech (Hong Kong) Holding Ltd. Ltd.
32.37% 100% 100% 100%
Silitech Technology Corporation
Silitech Technology Corp. Silitech (BVI) Holding Ltd. Silitech (Bermuda) Holding Ltd. Sdn. Bhd.
100%
Silitech Technology (Europe)
0.61% Limited
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Silitech Technology Corporation Xurong Electronic (Shenzhen) Co.,
Lite-On Capital Inc. Lite-On Japan(s) Pte. Ltd. Lite-On Japan (Thailand) Co., Ltd. Limited Ltd.
100% 100%
7.87% L&K Industries Philippines, Inc. Silitech International (India)Private Ltd.
100% 100% 60%
Lite-On Japan (H.K.) Ltd. NL (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. SuZhou Xulong Mold Producing Co.,Ltd.
49.49% 100% 100% 100%
Lite-On Japan Ltd. LOJ Korea Co., Ltd. Major Suit (HK) Co. Ltd. Silitech Surface Treatment(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
----- End of picture text -----
- 82 -
==> picture [690 x 445] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
100% 20.66% 100% 100% 100%
Li Shin International Logah Electronics (Su Zhou) Co.,
Lite-On Technology Corporation Logah Technology Corp. Logah Technology Co., Ltd. Logah Technology (HK) Co., Ltd.
Enterprise Corp. Ltd.
18.97% 100%
Lippo Electronics (Su Zhou) Co.,
Ltd.
100% 100%
Li Shin International Enterprise Huizhou Li Shin Electronic Co.,
Corp. Ltd.
100% 100%
Huizhou Fu Tai Electronic Co.,
Eagle Rock Investment Ltd.
Ltd.
100%
Li Shin Technology (Huizhou)
Ltd.
54% 100% 100% 100%
Lite-On Technology (Europe) B.V. Lite-On (Finland) Oy Lite-On Mobile Oyj Lite-On Mobile Sweden AB
(Formerly-Perlos Oyj)
100% 100% 100%
Lite-On Mobile Indústria e Comércio
Lite-On Capital Inc. Lite-On Mobile Pte. Ltd.
de Plásticos Ltda.
46%
100%
Guangzhou Lite-On Mobile
Engineering Plastics Co. Ltd.
100% 100%
Guangzhou Lite-on Mobile Electronic Yantai Lite-On Mobile Electronic
Components Co. Ltd. Components Co., Ltd.
100% 11% 89%
Beijing Lite-On Mobile Electronic and Zhuhai Lite-On Mobile Technology
Telecommunications Components Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.
100%
Shenzhen Lite-On Mobile Precision
Molds Co., Ltd.
100%
Perlos Precision Plastics Moulding
Limited Liability Company
100%
Lite-On Mobile India Private Limited.
65% 100%
Lite-On Young Fast (Huizhou) Co.,
Lite-on Young Fast Pte. Ltd.
Ltd.
----- End of picture text -----
- 83 -