AI assistant
LOTUS RESOURCES LIMITED — Capital/Financing Update 2021
Oct 13, 2021
65254_rns_2021-10-13_7cd1a563-5b9d-4aff-90ad-4937d9544323.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
14 October 2021
ASX Announcement
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
LOTUS ACQUIRES 6 MILLION POUND U3O8 LIVINGSTONIA URANIUM PROJECT IN MALAWI[1]
Lotus Resources Limited ( LOT, Lotus or the Company ) is pleased to announce the acquisition of the 6Mlb U3O8 (JORC code 2004 - refer Table 2) Livingstonia Uranium Project ( Livingstonia ) located 90km from the Company’s Kayelekera Uranium Project in Malawi. This acquisition increases the Company’s mineral resource base as well as having the potential to become a future satellite operation for the Company.
HIGHLIGHTS
-
Lotus has acquired the 6Mlb U3O8 Livingstonia Uranium Project in Malawi. Consideration for the acquisition was US$25,000 or US$0.004 / lb U3O8 of contained resource
-
There are multiple exploration targets across the landholding as shown by historical drilling at the Livingstonia boundary which ended in mineralisation. The airborne radiometrics (Figure 2) demonstrate the anomaly extends into the existing Lotus tenement at Livingstonia North.
-
Broader zones of mineralisation are also evident in Livingstonia, however these areas have been sparsely drilled, raising the prospect of higher-grade offshoots from the existing resource:
-
8.0m @ 1,180ppm eU3O8 (CBRC034 from 77.4m)
-
3.6m @ 1,800pm eU3O8 (CBPE007 from 72.5m)
-
The Company will shortly commence an inaugural exploration program at Livingstonia. This will include RC drilling to test a number of high priority targets including the strike extensions into the Company’s adjoining tenement.
Keith Bowes, Managing Director, commented:
“This is an extremely accretive acquisition for Lotus with the potential to increase our global mineral resource by 16% for less than $0.004 / lb U3O8 . More importantly, we have increased our landholding at the highly prospective, yet poorly explored Livingstonia region, to 187km[2] .
There are multiple walk up, drill ready targets across our Livingstonia tenements, including at the boundary of the Livingstonia resource where an airborne radiometric survey indicates mineralisation continues into our existing tenements (Figure 2). This area, as well as the highgrade intercepts previously reported, will be the basis of the first phase of exploration which will commence towards the end of this year. Other prospective targets, including Livingstonia North and Chilumba, will be tested in future exploration programs.
Assuming exploration success, the Company will undertake ore sorting test work on the Livingstonia material in 2022 as part of the process for determining whether Livingstonia could become a future satellite operation for the Company.”
1 Historical mineral resource estimate reported in accordance with the 2004 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ( JORC Code 2004 ). See Table 2 and Appendix
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
LIVINGSTONIA URANIUM PROJECT
The Livingstonia Uranium Project is located in Northern Malawi, approximately 90km southeast of the Company’s Kayelekera Uranium Mine (Figure 1). The Livingstonia Project is hosted in the prospective Karoo-equivalent sedimentary sequence which is also host to the main deposit associated with Lotus’ Kayelekera Uranium Mine. Details of the Livingstonia licences are contained in Table 1.
==> picture [430 x 257] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [430 x 257] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Project Location
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
Livingstonia hosts a historical Inferred Mineral Resource of 8.3Mt at 325ppm eU3O8 for 6.0Mlb of contained U3O8 at a cut-off grade of 150 ppm eU3O8 (JORC Code 2004 - see Table 2). The Mineral Resource Estimate ( MRE ) was prepared by independent consultants CSA Global in 2011 and reported in accordance with the JORC Code (2004) to the ASX by Resource Star Limited (ASX stock code RSL) (refer announcement 22 June 2011 on the ASX website), a former uranium and speciality metals exploration company.
Table 1: Livingstonia License Summary
| Tenement Name | License No. | Area(km2) | Holder |
|---|---|---|---|
| Livingstonia(new) | EL0595 | 5.6 | Lotus Africa Limited |
| Livingstonia West(new) | EL0583 | 17.4 | Lotus Africa Limited |
| Livingstonia North(existing) | EL0418 | 164.0 | Lotus Africa Limited |
| Total | 3 | 187.0 |
Table 2: Livingstonia Historical Mineral Resource Estimate (note: JORC 2004)[1] (Reported above a 150ppm U3O8 cut-off (note: figures have been rounded)
| Mt | Grade **(ppm U3O8) ** |
Mlb U3O8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inferred | 8.3 | 325 | 6.0 |
| Total | 8.3 | 325 | 6.0 |
1The estimates of Mineral Resources shown in Table 2 are historical and are not reported in accordance with the 2012 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves ( JORC Code 2012 ); a Competent Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimates as Mineral Resources in accordance with the JORC Code 2012; and it is uncertain that following evaluation and/or further exploration work that the currently reported historical estimates will be able to be reported as Mineral Resources under the JORC Code 2012. It is possible that following evaluation and/or further exploration work that the currently reported historical estimates may materially change and hence will need to be reported afresh under and in accordance with the JORC Code 2012. The Company’s personnel have reviewed the methodology and available reporting documents used to estimate the Mineral Resources and notes that the personnel involved in the historical estimate had a high level of experience in the estimation of uranium resources. In addition, nothing has come to the attention of Lotus that causes it to question the technical reliability of the historical Livingstonia MRE. Lotus has not independently validated the historical Livingstonia MRE and should not be regarded as reporting, adopting or endorsing those estimates.
Exploration potential exists in a number of areas around the existing Livingstonia Resource, including:
-
East of the northern end of the Mineral Resource outline, where drilling defined excellent broad zones of mineralisation that have not been closed off;
-
Along strike from the interpreted NW trending zone of the broad, higher grade mineralisation defined in the 2010 drilling within the Mineral Resource outline;
-
Within the Mineral Resource outline where interpretation suggests that earlier drilling did not drill through the full thickness of the host sequence; and
-
In the lower grade zone to the south, where sparse drilling indicates potential for defining offshoots of higher grade mineralisation within the system and within the areas defined as resource potential by CSA Global.
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 207] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 207] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Livingstonia Significant Intercepts (2011) with Trend Extensions to the North
Livingstonia North, which is already held by the Company, is situated directly along-trend of the Livingstonia uranium resource, with drilling at the northern end of the Livingstonia deposit supporting a continuation of mineralisation into Livingstonia North. The airborne radiometric anomaly at Livingstonia is coincident with the resource and this anomaly continues into Livingstonia North (see Figure 2). A parallel radiometric anomaly also exists in Livingstonia North that may indicate additional mineralisation.
Limited drilling has been undertaken at Livingstonia North, but the region is considered highly prospective for additional mineralisation due to both the continuation of the Livingstonia radiometric anomaly and the parallel radiometric anomaly (Figure 3).
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [429 x 177] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [429 x 177] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [429 x 177] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Airborne Radiometrics at Livingstonia and Chilumba Regions
The next stages for the Company will include ground-based exploration and sampling along the Livingstonia North trend as well as an RC drill program to test the extensions of the Livingstonia mineral resource and investigate the potential higher grade zones within the resource boundary. The Company’s current intention is to complete the work required to update the historical Livingstonia MRE to JORC 2012.
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
ACQUISITION TERMS
The Company entered into a sale and purchase agreement with a local Malawian entity to acquire the Livingstonia Project for US$25,000.
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Company’s board of directors.
For further information, contact:
Keith Bowes Adam Kiley Managing Director Business Development T: +61 (08) 9200 3427 T: +61 (08) 9200 3427
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
ABOUT LOTUS
Lotus Resources Limited (ASX: LOT, OTCQB: LTSRF) owns an 85% interest in the Kayelekera Uranium Project in Malawi. The Project hosts a current resource of 37.5M lbs U3O8 (see table below), and historically produced ~11MIb of uranium between 2009 and 2014. The Company completed a positive Restart Study[1] which demonstrated that Kayelekera can support a viable long-term operation and has the potential to be one of the first uranium projects to recommence production in the future.
Table 3: Kayelekera Mineral Resource Estimate – March 2020[2]
| Category | Mt | Grade (U3O8 ppm) |
U3O8 (M kg) |
U3O8 (M lbs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | 0.7 | 1,010 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
| Measured – RoM Stockpile3 | 1.6 | 760 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| Indicated | 18.7 | 660 | 12.3 | 27.1 |
| Inferred | 3.7 | 590 | 2.2 | 4.8 |
| Total | 24.6 | 660 | 16.3 | 36.0 |
| Inferred – LG Stockpiles4 | 2.4 | 290 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
| Total All Materials | 27.1 | 630 | 17.0 | 37.5 |
For more information, visit www.lotusresources.com.au
2 See ASX announcement dated 26 March 2020. Lotus confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the announcement of 26 March 2020 and that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral Resource estimate in that announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
3 RoM stockpile has been mined and are located near mill facility.
4 Medium-grade stockpiles have been mined and placed on the medium-grade stockpile and are considered potentially feasible for blending or beneficiation, with studies planned to further assess this optionality.
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
APPENDIX 1. HISTORICAL LIVINGSTONIA MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
Resource Estimate
The Mineral Resource Estimate for the Livingstonia Project was previously reported by Resource Star Limited in 2011 and has not been fully vetted by Lotus. The original statement of Mineral Resources, which was reported under the JORC Code 2004 may not conform to the requirements of the JORC Code 2012, can be found in the announcement by Resource Star Limited dated 22 June 2011 titled ‘Livingstonia Uranium Project Inferred JORC Resource Estimate Increases 30%’. That announcement is available on the ASX website under ASX stock code RSL.
Table 4: Livingstonia Historical Mineral Resource (note: JORC 2004)[1] Reported above a 150ppm U3O8 cut-off (note: figures have been rounded)
| Mt | Grade (ppm **U3O8) ** |
Mlb U3O8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inferred | 8.3 | 325 | 6.0 |
| Total | 8.3 | 325 | 6.0 |
The Livingstonia Resource Estimate was undertaken by a reputable Australian based consultancy firm; however, neither Lotus nor its consultants have reviewed the resource in sufficient detail to make a judgement on its veracity. Future estimates will likely need to incorporate additional assessment of QAQC of chemical data sets to radiometric sourced U3O8 grades and on-site verification of underlying drill hole data sets.
The Mineral Resource modelling was based on a total of 64 RC percussion and 43 open hole percussion drill holes, which were drilled primarily on 50 x 50 and 100 x 100 metre drilling patterns, grading to 200 x 100 to 300 x 200 metre patterns in peripheral areas.
Wireframe surfaces were generated for the hanging walls and footwalls for each mineralised lode based on the sectional interpretations provided by the then owner to delineate the lodes of uranium mineralisation, using geological interpretation and delineation of the mineralisation (predominantly by equivalent uranium grade). A lower cut-off of 130 ppm eU3O8 combined with the geological information was used to define the mineralised envelopes, and it was assumed that a minimum 3m mining width will be used in an open pit scenario, where possible.
It is noted that much of the down-hole eU3O8 grade data used on the project was acquired by the same probing equipment that was used at Kayelekera, and that similar QAQC protocols would have been utilised at the time.
A 0.5m composite data set for individual lodes was used for variography analysis and interpolation. A block model was created using 50mE × 50mN × 1mRL parent blocks. Ordinary Kriging (OK) was used to estimate 3D blocks. A minimum of three composite intervals and a maximum of 16 intervals were used to estimate the eU3O8 grades into each block for the first two search passes. A top cut of 1500 ppm eU3O8 was applied (based on experience from similar deposits), and the resource statement contains only the cut grade values. The resource reporting was truncated at 8,827,500mN, which is the northern tenement boundary.
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
Uranium Deposit
The mineralisation has been interpreted as being contained within a sub-horizontal sedimentary sandstone package bound by a mudstone above and a coal unit below and is modelled based on geological interpretation and delineation of the mineralisation by equivalent uranium grade derived from downhole gamma readings.
Relevance and materiality of the Livingstonia Mineral Resource Estimate
The Company considers that the Livingstonia Resource can add significant value to the Kayelekera Project. The Company is confident that there is an opportunity to improve tonnes, grade and total contained metal in certain areas of the existing Livingstonia Resource, including:
-
East of the northern end of the Resource outline, where drilling defined excellent thick zones of mineralisation that have not been closed off;
-
Along strike from the interpreted NW trending zone of the thickened, higher grade mineralisation defined in the 2010 drilling within the Resource outline;
-
Within the Resource outline where interpretation suggests that earlier drilling did not drill through the full thickness of the host sequence; and
-
In the lower grade zone to the south, where sparse drilling indicates potential for defining offshoots of higher grade mineralisation within the system and within the areas defined as resource potential by CSA Global Pty Ltd.
Categories of Mineralisation
The Livingstonia MRE uses only those categories of mineralisation that are defined in the 2012 JORC Code.
Reliability of the Livingstonia Mineral Resource Estimate
The Company understands that the Livingstonia MRE was undertaken by reputable and competent practitioners; however, neither Lotus nor its consultants have reviewed that resource estimate in sufficient detail to make a judgement on its accuracy or reliability. While nothing has come to the attention of the Company that causes it to question the accuracy or reliability of the estimate, the Company has not independently validated this estimate and therefore it is not to be regarded as reporting, adopting or endorsing that estimate.
Summary of Previous Work Programs
Uranium mineralisation was discovered at Livingstonia by Globe Metals & Mining Ltd (“Globe”, ASX: GBE) in 2007, and during 2007-08 Globe drilled 95 holes at Livingstonia for a total of 11,000 metres, using both reverse circulation (RC) and open hole percussion drilling methods along with a combination of laboratory assay and downhole gamma probing for U3O8 analysis.
In July 2010, based on the Globe drilling, CSA Global Pty Ltd completed a Mineral Resource Estimate and defined a JORC 2004 Inferred Resource of 7.7Mt @ 270 ppm eU3O8 using a 150ppm cut-off. A joint venture agreement between Globe and Resource Star Limited (ASX: RSL) to explore the Livingstonia Project was announced to the ASX on 16 March 2010.
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
Resource Star Limited completed a program of 13 percussion holes for a total of 1,502m in late 2010. Mineralised zones were intersected in all but one of the holes, with some significant thick intersections along the eastern edge of the July 2010 Mineral Resource boundary.
An updated Livingstonia Mineral Resource Estimate (prepared under the JORC Code 2004) was prepared by CSA Global Pty Ltd for Resource Star Limited in 2011 and was announced 31 July 2011.
Work Required to Verify Mineral Resource Estimate
Work required to report the estimates under JORC 2012 includes an assessment of the current Resource data and estimation techniques and updating reporting requirements to JORC 2012. Due to the quality of the work undertaken by the previous workers, it is envisaged that much of this work could be undertaken on a desk-top basis if no material items are identified. This work, which is envisaged to commence immediately after acquisition will be funded out of existing cash reserves, and is expected to be completed within 6 months.
Cautionary Statement
The Livingstonia Mineral Resource Estimate is not reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012; a Competent Person has not done sufficient work to classify the mineral resource in accordance with the JORC Code 2012; and it is possible that following evaluation and / or further exploration work, the current Livingstonia Mineral Resource may not be able to be reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012.
Competent Person’s Statement
The information in this announcement that relates Livingstonia Mineral Resource Estimate is an accurate representation of the available data for the Project. Information that relates to the JORC 2004 Livingstonia Resource Estimate is based on information compiled by Resource Star Limited (ASX: RSL) and their consultants and was reviewed by Mr Alfred Gillman. Mr. Gillman is a Fellow and Chartered Professional of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AUSIMM) and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 JORC Code. Mr. Gillman consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based upon the information in the form and context in which it appears.
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [452 x 62] intentionally omitted <==
Table 5: Significant Intercepts from Historical Drilling at Livingstonia
| Hole East North WGS84 Zone 36s RL EOH m Dip Azi |
m From Interval m eU3O8 ppm |
| CBPE007 624801 8827200 1173.48 111 -90 0 |
65.7 2.5 470 |
| 72.58 3.6 1797 |
|
| CBPE012 623949 8827500 1140.996 111 -90 0 |
93.1 1.48 1312 |
| CBPE014 624646 8826704 1143 117 -90 0 |
84.04 1.14 243 |
| CBPE021 625703 8826002 1143 141 -90 0 |
60.62 1.06 209 |
| CBRC001 625967 8826194 1161.004 150 -90 0 |
73.69 1.08 221 |
| 82.21 2.08 223 |
|
| CBRC003 625699 8826400 1163.279 160 -90 0 |
89.54 1.24 335 |
| CBRC017 624620 8825796 1097.28 144 -90 0 |
109.58 1.08 574 |
| CBRC021 624214 8827236 1150.686 126 -90 0 |
88.23 8.54 1073 |
| 101.49 1.34 371 |
|
| CBRC024 624100 8827342 1140.939 122 -90 0 |
85.44 3.72 927 |
| CBRC034 624399 8827300 1159.654 111 -90 0 |
77.44 7.96 1181 |
| CBRC037 624201 8827254 1150.027 131 -90 0 |
102.26 2.04 1175 |
| CBRC039 624247 8827198 1150.971 126 -90 0 |
88.17 1.26 1927 |
| CBRC044 624405 8827000 1141.325 106 -90 0 |
84.44 2.26 552 |
| CBRC047 624500 8827300 1162.998 116 -90 0 |
75.37 1 1705 |
| CBRC048 624504 8827196 1154.319 126 -90 0 |
92.03 2.54 503 |
| CBRC048 624504 8827196 1154.319 126 -90 0 |
97.17 3.2 997 |
| CBRC052 624003 8827400 1134.012 116 -90 0 |
90.08 3.12 1116 |
| CBRC053 623803 8827504 1127.76 121 -90 0 |
88.87 1.12 364 |
| LPBE 101 624625.7 8827476 1178.856 117 -90 0 |
79.84 1.4 644 |
| 83.89 2 431 |
|
| 86.09 3.45 1093 |
|
| LPBE 103 624724.7 8827330 1170.243 105 -90 0 |
66.05 3.55 674 |
| 69.65 3.05 1054 |
|
| 73.55 1 245 |
|
| 76.05 2.1 397 |
|
| 91.5 3.7 681 |
|
| LPBE 105 624671.7 8826879 1145.632 114 -90 0 |
89.17 1.15 1030 |
| LPBE 107 625020.7 8826976 1167.831 129 -90 0 |
100.78 1.35 921 |
| LPBE 113 624968.7 8827125 1171.114 113 -90 0 |
80.08 2.35 1055 |
| 83.63 1.95 887 |
|
| 88.38 1.2 320 |
- Minimum 200ppb eU3O8, 0.5m and maximum 0.5m internal waste.
==> picture [452 x 70] intentionally omitted <==