LEGEND MINING LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2021

Jan 11, 2021

ASX:LEG

12 January 2021

Assay Results from RKDD034 Confirm Best Hole to Date at the Mawson Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Discovery

• 31.1m @ 2.80% Ni, 2.04% Cu, 0.15% Co from 200.7m

• Nickel values up to 3.26%, Copper values up to 3.84%, Cobalt values up to 0.17%

• Metallurgical test work underway

Legend Mining Limited (Legend) is pleased to announce assay results from diamond drillhole RKDD034 at the Mawson prospect within the Rockford project, Fraser Range Western Australia.

Legend Managing Director Mr Mark Wilson said: “These assay results are further confirmation of our earlier assessment that hole 34 is the best hole drilled at Mawson to date. The combination of the widths and grades of the massive sulphides in this hole support our conviction that we are dealing with a mineralised system of substance at Mawson. The purpose of the hole was to conduct Phase 1 metallurgical tests and the results of this test work will be reported once received.

“Meanwhile further assay results from 2020 drilling programmes are rolling in for compilation and assessment. Once integrated with existing data, they will assist in future drill planning for the 2021 field season.”

==> picture [486 x 317] intentionally omitted <==

Photo 1 - Massive Ni-Cu Sulphide from RKDD034 from 228m, HQ

P a g e 1

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

TECHNICAL DISCUSSION

RKDD034 - Assay Results

Assay results have been received for diamond drillhole RKDD034 (see ASX announcement 1 December 2020). RKDD034 was designed as a twin of RKDD008 (see ASX announcement 21 April 2020) for Phase 1 metallurgical test work on a representative massive Ni-Cu sulphide domain of the mineralisation identified at Mawson (see Figure1, Figure 2, and Appendix 1, 2, and 3).

A total of 43.1m of massive Ni-Cu was intersected downhole. The assay results are listed below in Table 1.

==> picture [462 x 169] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Table 1: RKDD034 - Assay Results
Hole From To Int. Ni% Cu% Co% Sulphide Mode
RKDD034 114.0 138.7 24.7 1.06 0.72 0.06 [Heavy disseminated, net-]
textured, massive sulphide
Incl. 133.15 138.7 5.55 2.32 1.53 0.11 Massive sulphide
RKDD034 149.00 172.55 23.55 1.20 0.85 0.06 [Heavy disseminated, breccia, ]
semi-massive, massive sulphide
Incl. 167.00 172.55 5.55 2.51 1.71 0.12 Massive sulphide
RKDD034 200.7 231.8 31.1 2.80 2.04 0.15 Massive sulphide
Incl. 204.0 216.0 12.0 3.00 1.96 0.16 Massive sulphide
RKDD034 236.60 240.85 4.25 1.37 0.96 0.07 [Heavy disseminated, breccia, ]
semi-massive, massive sulphide
----- End of picture text -----

The zone of 31.1m of entirely massive Ni-Cu sulphide intersected (see Photo 1) was significantly thicker than that intersected in RKDD008 (three zones of 5.6m, 6.9m and 12.8m totalling 25.3m within a 48.3m interval). Assay results from the massive sulphide intersected in RKDD034 have resulted in the thickest and highest-grade massive Ni-Cu sulphide intercept at Mawson to date. This speaks to the potential for more mineralisation to be discovered at Mawson as the drilling footprint expands.

Phase 1 metallurgical test work on the massive sulphide domain is now underway.

P a g e 2

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

==> picture [479 x 277] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Diamond Drillhole RKDD034 Location

==> picture [479 x 349] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Section 6,598,560mN showing diamond drillhole RKDD034

P a g e 3

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

Mawson Future Programmes

• Phase 1 sighter metallurgical test work on massive sulphide from RKDD034 underway.

• Integration of DD, RC, aircore geochemical and geophysical datasets to evolve 3D emplacement model of Mawson, with new constrained gravity and magnetic inversions underway.

• Diamond and RC drillhole planning/design for 2021 field season at Mawson underway.

==> picture [438 x 381] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: Rockford Project – Mawson Location

Authorised by Mark Wilson, Managing Director.

P a g e 4

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

Appendix 1 – Mawson Diamond Drillhole Details

Hole	MGA94-East	MGA94-North	RL	Azimuth	Dip	Total Depth
RKDD008	638,460	6,598,560	200	090	-70	383.3m
RKDD034	638,460	6,598,560	200	88	-70	283.2m

Co-ordinates GDA94 Zone 51

Appendix 2 – RKDD034 Assay Results for Metallurgical Domain

==> picture [391 x 541] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Hole From To Interval Ni % Cu % Co %
RKDD034 200.7 201 0.3 3.13 2.09 0.17
RKDD034 201 202 1 2.99 1.55 0.16
RKDD034 202 203 1 2.75 3.77 0.14
RKDD034 203 204 1 2.72 1.64 0.14
RKDD034 204 205 1 3.26 2.39 0.17
RKDD034 205 206 1 2.92 2.79 0.16
RKDD034 206 207 1 3.01 1.83 0.16
RKDD034 207 208 1 2.92 1.33 0.15
RKDD034 208 209 1 2.96 2.85 0.15
RKDD034 209 210 1 2.87 2.68 0.15
RKDD034 210 211 1 2.84 1.00 0.15
RKDD034 211 212 1 2.82 2.56 0.15
RKDD034 212 213 1 3.05 1.61 0.16
RKDD034 213 214 1 3.20 1.96 0.17
RKDD034 214 215 1 3.09 1.56 0.16
RKDD034 215 216 1 3.10 0.96 0.16
RKDD034 216 216.9 0.9 2.80 2.39 0.15
RKDD034 216.9 217.55 0.65 2.13 1.83 0.11
RKDD034 217.55 218 0.45 2.42 1.33 0.13
RKDD034 218 219 1 2.50 2.14 0.13
RKDD034 219 220.15 1.15 2.56 1.24 0.13
RKDD034 220.15 221 0.85 2.69 2.05 0.14
RKDD034 221 222 1 2.47 1.48 0.13
RKDD034 222 223 1 2.58 3.76 0.14
RKDD034 223 224 1 2.59 3.84 0.14
RKDD034 224 225 1 2.17 1.62 0.11
RKDD034 225 226 1 2.83 2.00 0.15
RKDD034 226 227 1 2.79 1.50 0.14
RKDD034 227 228 1 2.92 1.70 0.15
RKDD034 228 229 1 2.90 0.81 0.15
RKDD034 229 229.55 0.55 2.83 3.73 0.15
RKDD034 229.55 230 0.45 2.73 1.05 0.14
RKDD034 230 231 1 2.66 1.60 0.14
RKDD034 231 231.8 0.8 2.75 2.97 0.14
----- End of picture text -----

P a g e 5

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

Appendix 3 - Legend Field Logging Guidelines

Legend Field Logging Guidelines

==> picture [228 x 99] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Sulphide Mode Percentage Range
Disseminated & blebby 1-5%
Heavy Disseminated 5-20%
Matrix 20-40%
Net-Textured 20-40%
Semi-Massive >40% to <80%
Massive >80%
----- End of picture text -----

P a g e 6

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

Competent Person Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Oliver Kiddie, a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a full-time employee of Legend Mining Limited. Mr Kiddie has sufficient experience that is relevant to the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration, and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (JORC Code). Mr Kiddie consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

The information in this report that relates to Legend’s Exploration Results is a compilation of previously released to ASX by Legend Mining (21 April 2020 and 1 December 2020) and Mr Derek Waterfield and Mr Oliver Kiddie consents to the inclusion of these Results in this report. Mr Waterfield and Mr Kiddie has advised that this consent remains in place for subsequent releases by Legend of the same information in the same form and context, until the consent is withdrawn or replaced by a subsequent report and accompanying consent. Legend confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcements and that all material assumptions and technical parameters in the market announcements continue to apply and have not materially changed. Legend confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person’s findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcements.

Forward Looking Statements

This announcement contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of securities laws of applicable jurisdictions. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “guidance” or other similar words, and include statements regarding certain plans, strategies and objectives of management and expected financial performance. Forward-looking statements are provided as a general guide only and should not be relied upon as an indication or guarantee of future performance. These forwardlooking statements are based upon a number of estimates, assumptions and expectations that, while considered to be reasonable by Legend Mining Limited, are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Legend Mining Limited and any of its officers, employees, agents or associates.

Actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from any projections and forward-looking statements and the assumptions on which those statements are based. Exploration potential is conceptual in nature, to date there has been insufficient exploration to define a Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the determination of a Mineral Resource. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and Legend Mining Limited assumes no obligation to update such information made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of this announcement.

Visit www.legendmining.com.au for further information and announcements.

For more information contact: Mr Mark Wilson Mr Oliver Kiddie Managing Director Executive Director Ph: +61 8 9212 0600 Ph: +61 8 9212 0600

Ph: +61 8 9212 0600

P a g e 7

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

Appendix 4:

Legend Mining Ltd – Diamond Drilling Programme Mawson Prospect - Rockford Project JORC Code Edition 2012: Table 1

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data

==> picture [475 x 619] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling  Diamond drilling was used to produce
(e.g., cut channels, random quarter and half HQ core samples
chips, or specific specialised (between 0.2m-1.2m) which were
industry standard measurement submitted to Intertek Genalysis
tools appropriate to the minerals Laboratory Services Perth for
under investigation, such as geochemical analysis.
down hole gamma sondes, or  Sample intervals were based on
handheld XRF instruments, geology and style of sulphide
etc.). These examples should occurrence.
not be taken as limiting the  QAQC standard samples were
broad meaning of sampling. included.
• Include reference to measures  Samples were analysed for:
taken to ensure sample  Ag, Al, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Ce,
representivity and the Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Dy, Er, Eu, Fe,
appropriate calibration of any Ga, Gd, Ge, Hf, Ho, In, K, La, Li,
measurement tools or systems Lu, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Nb, Nd, Ni, P,
used. Pb, Pr, Rb, Re, S, Sb, Sc, Se, Sm,
Sn, Sr, Ta, Tb, Te, Th, Ti, Tl, Tm,
• Aspects of the determination of
U, V, W, Y, Yb, Zn, Zr by methods
mineralisation that are Material
4A/MS48R and 4AH/OE (four acid
to the Public Report. In cases
digest with ICP-MS finish).
where ‘industry standard’ work  Au, Pt, Pd by method FA50/MS (fire
has been done this would be
assay with an ICP-MS finish).
relatively simple (e.g., ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which
3 kg was pulverised to produce
a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In
other cases, more explanation
may be required, such as where
there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g.,
submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
Drilling techniques • Drill type (e.g., core, reverse  Diamond drillholes RKDD034 was
circulation, open-hole hammer, pre-collared using the mud rotary
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, technique.
sonic, etc.) and details (e.g.,  No samples were recovered from the
core diameter, triple or standard mud rotary pre-collar.
tube, depth of diamond tails,  The remainder of the holes were
face-sampling bit or other type, diamond drilled with HQ coring to end
whether core is oriented and if of hole for RKDD034.
so, by what method, etc.).  Orlando Drilling completed the drilling.
Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and  Drill core sample recoveries for the
assessing core and chip sample HQ core were measured and
recorded in drill log sheets.
 Drill core orientation was recorded
----- End of picture text -----

P a g e 8

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

==> picture [475 x 690] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
recoveries and results when possible at the end of each drill
assessed. run (line on bottom of core).
 No relationship has been determined
• Measures taken to maximise
between sample recoveries and
sample recovery and ensure
grade and there is insufficient data to
representative nature of the
determine if there is a sample bias.
samples.
• Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Logging • Whether core and chip samples  Geological logging of drillhole
have been geologically and RKDD034 included; lithology,
geotechnically logged to a level grainsize, texture, structure,
of detail to support appropriate deformation, mineralisation, alteration,
Mineral Resource estimation, veining, colour, weathering.
mining studies and metallurgical  Drill core logging is qualitative and
studies. based on drill core retained in core
trays.
• Whether logging is qualitative or
 The drillhole was logged in its entirety.
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc.)
photography.
• The total length and percentage
of the relevant intersections
logged.
Sub-sampling • If core, whether cut or sawn and  Selected sawn quarter and half HQ
techniques and sample whether quarter, half or all core core samples based on geology and
preparation taken. sulphide occurrence were submitted
for geochemical analysis.
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube  The size of the sample from the
sampled, rotary split, etc. and
diamond drilling method is
whether sampled wet or dry. considered appropriate for the
• For all sample types, the nature, mineralisation style sought and for
quality and appropriateness of the analytical technique used.
the sample preparation  Sample preparation includes;
technique. drying, crushing and pulverising
before analysis.
• Quality control procedures
 QAQC standard samples were
adopted for all sub-sampling
included.
stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that
the sampling is representative of
the in-situ material collected,
including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are
appropriate to the grain size of
the material being sampled.
Quality of assay data • The nature, quality and  Core samples were analysed for:
and laboratory tests appropriateness of the assaying  Ag, Al, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Ce,
and laboratory procedures used Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Dy, Er, Eu, Fe,
Ga, Gd, Ge, Hf, Ho, In, K, La, Li,
----- End of picture text -----

P a g e 9

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

Criteria	JORC Code Explanation	Commentary
	and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g., standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e., lack of bias) and precision have been established.	Lu, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Nb, Nd, Ni, P, Pb, Pr, Rb, Re, S, Sb, Sc, Se, Sm, Sn, Sr, Ta, Tb, Te, Th, Ti, Tl, Tm, U, V, W, Y, Yb, Zn, Zr by methods 4A/MS48R and 4AH/OE (four acid digest with ICP-MS finish). Au, Pt, Pd by method FA50/MS (fire assay with an ICP-MS finish). These assay methods are considered appropriate. QAQC standard samples were included. In addition, reliance is placed on laboratory procedures and internal laboratory batch standards and blanks. All samples were analysed by Intertek Genalysis Laboratory Services Perth.
Verification of sampling and assaying	• The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data.	Significant intersections were verified by senior exploration personnel. Primary data was collected in the field using a set of standard logging templates and entered into a laptop computer. The data was forwarded to Legend’s database manager for validation and loading into the company’s drilling database. No adjustments of assay results have been undertaken.
Location of data points	• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control.	The drillhole collars were surveyed with a handheld GPS unit with an accuracy of ±5m which is considered sufficiently accurate for the purpose of the drillhole. All co-ordinates are expressed in GDA94 datum, Zone 51. Regional topographic control has an accuracy of ±2m based on detailed DTM data.
Data spacing and distribution	• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied.	No regular drill hole spacing has been set with individual holes design to intersect specific targets. Diamond drillhole RKDD034 was designed as a twin of RKDD008 for metallurgical test work.

P a g e 10

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

==> picture [475 x 306] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Orientation of data in • Whether the orientation of  The relationship between drill
relation to geological sampling achieves unbiased orientation and mineralisation is
structure sampling of possible structures unknown.
and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit
type.
• If the relationship between the
drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and
reported if material.
Sample security • The measures taken to ensure  Individual calico sample bags from the
sample security. diamond drilling were placed in
polyweave bags and hand delivered
directly to the assay laboratory in
Kalgoorlie by company personnel.
 All diamond drill core will be removed
from site and stored at an appropriate
facility.
Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or  Internal audits/reviews of procedures
reviews of sampling techniques are ongoing, however no external
and data. reviews have been undertaken.
----- End of picture text -----

Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results

==> picture [475 x 352] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and • Type, reference name/number,  The Rockford Project comprises nine
land tenure status location and ownership granted exploration licences, covering
including agreements or 2,430km [2] , (Legend manager).
material issues with third  Rockford JV tenements:
parties such as joint ventures,  E28/2188, 2189, 2192 (70%
partnerships, overriding Legend, 30% Rockford Minerals Pty
royalties, native title interests, Ltd)
historical sites, wilderness or  E28/1716, 1717, 1718, 1727 (70%
national park and Legend, 30% Ponton Minerals Pty
environmental settings. Ltd).
• The security of the tenure held  Legend 100%: E28/2404, 2405.
at the time of reporting along  The Project is located 280km east of
with any known impediments to Kalgoorlie mostly on vacant crown
obtaining a licence to operate land with the eastern portion on
in the area. Kanandah Pastoral Station.
 There are no Native Title Claims over
tenements E28/1716, 1717, 2192,
2405. Tenements E28/2188, and
E28/2189 are covered 20% and 85%
respectively by the Untiri Pulka Native
Title Claim. Tenements E28/1718,
E28/1727 & E28/2404 are covered
90%, 20% and 100% respectively by
the Ngadju Native Title Claim.
 The tenements are in good standing
and there are no known impediments.
Exploration done by • Acknowledgment and appraisal  Not applicable, not referred to.
other parties of exploration by other parties.
----- End of picture text -----

P a g e 11

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

Criteria	JORC Code Explanation	Commentary
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation.	The primary target is Nova style nickel-copper mineralisation hosted in mafic/ultramafic intrusives within the Fraser Zone of the larger Albany- Fraser Orogen. Secondary targets include VMS style zinc-copper-lead-silver mineralisation and structurally controlled Tropicana style gold.
Drill hole Information	• A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: • easting and northing of the drill hole collar • elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar • dip and azimuth of the hole • down hole length and interception depth • hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.	See Appendix 1.
Data aggregation methods	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g., cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.	Individual sample assays and weighted averages are presented.

P a g e 12

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

==> picture [475 x 679] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary
Relationship between • These relationships are  The drill core has been oriented to
mineralisation widths particularly important in the enable structural logging and
and intercept lengths reporting of Exploration evaluation of true thicknesses of the
mineralised intervals.
Results.
 Drillhole intercepts/intervals are
• If the geometry of the measured downhole in metres.
mineralisation with respect to
the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.
• If it is not known and only the
down hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear
statement to this effect (e.g.,
‘down hole length, true width
not known’).
Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections  Project and drillhole location maps
(with scales) and tabulations of have been included in the body of the
intercepts should be included report.
for any significant discovery
being reported. These should
include, but not be limited to a
plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate
sectional views.
Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive  Assay results presented are
reporting of all Exploration balanced.
Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both
low and high grades and/or
widths should be practiced to
avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
Other substantive • Other exploration data, if  Detailed high quality aeromagnetic
exploration data meaningful and material, and gravity datasets, aircore drilling
should be reported including ground EM surveys and DHTEM
(but not limited to): geological surveys have been used to target
observations; geophysical drilling.
survey results; geochemical
survey results; bulk samples –
size and method of treatment;
metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential
deleterious or contaminating
substances.
Further work • The nature and scale of  Submit selection of RKDD034 for
planned further work (e.g., tests metallurgical test work.
for lateral extensions or depth  Assessment of geochemical results.
extensions or large-scale step-  Full integration of geological,
out drilling). geophysical and geochemical data.
• Diagrams clearly highlighting  Plan further diamond and RC
the areas of possible drillholes.
extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and
future drilling areas, provided
----- End of picture text -----

P a g e 13

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia

ASX:LEG

Commentary

Criteria

JORC Code Explanation this information is not commercially sensitive.

P a g e 14

Registered Office: Level 1 / 8 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005, Australia