AI assistant
LEGEND MINING LIMITED — Annual Report 2007
Mar 30, 2008
65223_rns_2008-03-30_96385b21-2d29-4212-9c56-95803a7e9114.pdf
Annual Report
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
==> picture [285 x 244] intentionally omitted <==
A.C.N. 060 966 145
ANNUAL REPORT
31st DECEMBER 2007
COMPANY DIRECTORY
CONTENTS
Directors
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Company Directory | 1 |
| Chairman’s Report | 2 |
| Directors’ Review of Activities | 3 |
| Corporate Governance Statement | 17 |
| Directors’ Report | 23 |
| Income Statement | 37 |
| Balance Sheet | 38 |
| Cash Flow Statement | 39 |
| Statement of Changes in Equity | 40 |
| Notes to the Financial Statements | 42 |
| Directors’ Declaration | 78 |
| Declaration of Auditor’s Independence | 79 |
| Independent Auditor’s Report | 80 |
| Shareholder Information | 82 |
| Tenement Listing | 84 |
Michael William Atkins (Chairman) Mark William Wilson (Managing Director) Dermot Michael Ryan (Non-executive Director) Robert John Perring –resigned 30 June 2007
Secretary
Tony Walsh
Registered Office
Level 2 640 Murray Street WEST PERTH, WA 6005
Telephone: (08) 9212 0600 Facsimile: (08) 9212 0611
Bankers
National Australia Bank 1232 Hay Street WEST PERTH, WA 6005
Auditors
Stantons International Level 1 / 1 Havelock Street WEST PERTH WA 6005
Home Exchange
Australian Securities Exchange 2 The Esplanade PERTH WA 6000
Share Registry
Web
www.legendmining.com.au
ASX Codes
LEG – ordinary shares LEGO – options
Advanced Share Registry Services 110 Stirling Highway NEDLANDS, WA 6009
Telephone: (08) 9389 8033 Facsimile: (08) 9389 7871
Lawyers
Pullinger Readhead Lucas Level 1, Fortescue House 50 Kings Park Road WEST PERTH, WA 6005
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
1
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
Dear Shareholder,
During the course of 2007 your Directors continued to progress the Company’s projects and strengthen its balance sheet.
In May Legend announced the sale its Gidgee Gold Project to Apex Minerals NL (“Apex”) for a consideration of $11,000,000 payable by the issue of 34 million Apex shares. At the same time the Company announced that it would distribute the 34 million Apex shares to its shareholders. The sale of the Gidgee Gold Project was completed in August and the distribution in-specie of the 34 million Apex shares to Legend shareholders by way of a return of capital was completed in November.
During the lead up to the return of capital the majority of the listed and unlisted options were exercised thereby raising over $9 million. This was the principal factor in the Company having over $13 million in cash at the end of the year.
Legend also entered into a joint venture with Oxiana Limited in May whereby Oxiana can acquire a 75% interest in the Mt Gibson Project following expenditure of $10 million. Legend retains ownership of the Mt Gibson plant and camp site.
Legend now faces a solid, well funded future, with over $13 million in cash at year end, a well credentialed management team, and significant tenement holdings at each of its three major projects. In addition, there are production facilities and infrastructure under care and maintenance at Mt Gibson.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Legend Board and staff for their hard work during 2007 and look forward to their continued support in 2008.
==> picture [122 x 37] intentionally omitted <==
Chairman 31[st] March 2008
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
2
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
PROJECT LOCATIONS
Legend Mining Limited (Legend) owns three major projects, all located within Western Australia.
-
Gum Creek Project
-
Pilbara Project
-
Mt Gibson Project
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 22] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [409 x 20] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 1: Location of Projects
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
3
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
GUM CREEK PROJECT – (Nickel-Copper-Platinum Group Elements)
The Gum Creek Project is located 640km northeast of Perth, Western Australia (Figure 1) and comprises a land holding of 688km[2] in the Gum Creek Greenstone Belt.
This Project represents the retained portion of the Gidgee Project, following the sale of the Gidgee Gold Project to Apex Minerals NL in August 2007. This area was retained following a regional commodity review, which highlighted the nickel-copper-platinum group elements (Ni-Cu-PGE) potential of the Gum Creek Greenstone Belt. The Project has had no systematic nickel exploration since the early 1970’s.
The Project is divided into three areas, Bungarra, Thangoo and Woodley, and considered prospective for both intrusion-related (Ni-Cu-PGE) and komatiite flow-related (Ni) sulphide mineralisation, see Figure 2. Exploration activities completed during 2007 included; geochemical sampling, aircore, reverse circulation (RC) and diamond drilling, a high resolution aeromagnetic/radiometric survey and ground electromagnetic surveys.
Drilling statistics for the Project are summarised in Table 1 below:-
Table 1: Drilling Statistics - 2007
| Area | Aircore Drilling | Aircore Drilling | RC Drilling | RC Drilling | Diamond Drilling | Diamond Drilling | Total | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. Holes |
No. Metres |
No. Holes |
No. Metres |
No. Holes |
No. Metres |
No. Holes | No. Metres | |
| Bungarra | 0 | 0 | 7 | 904 | 1 | 200.8 | 8 | 1,104.8 |
| Thangoo | 89 | 5,694 | 8 | 1,209 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 6,903 |
| Woodley | 48 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 1,764 |
| Total | 137 | 7,458 | 15 | 2,113 | 1 | 200.8 | 153 | 9,771.8 |
Bungarra
Legend discovered an outcropping magmatic sulphide gossan at Bungarra in April 2007, returning rock grab sample results up to 1.0% Ni, 5.7% Cu and 0.7g/t PGE. The gossan was hosted by gabbroic rocks at/near the basal margin of the layered mafic-ultramafic Bungarra Intrusive Complex (BIC). This position is considered a prospective geological setting for segregations of Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide mineralisation.
Follow-up ground electromagnetic surveying, utilising the Moving Loop Time-Domain Electromagnetic (MLTEM) technique, was completed over three prospects, namely Python, Dugite and Adder. The surveys identified a number of conductors coincident with the original outcropping gossan and subsequent field reconnaissance identified additional gossanous float, see Figure 3. Best rock grab sample results are provided below in Table 2.
Table 2: Gossan Rock Grab Sample Assay Results
| Easting | Northing | Cu % | Ni % | Pt ppb | Pd ppb | Rh ppb | Ru ppb | Os ppb | Ir ppb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 750160 | 6980210 | 0.10 | 0.41 | 137 | 1,530 | 548 | 66 | 12 | 56 |
| 750166 | 6980214 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 213 | 242 | 403 | 53 | 8 | 40 |
| 750030 | 6980350 | 0.33 | 0.22 | 113 | 415 | 85 | 10 | 2 | 6 |
| 750031 | 6980351 | 5.70 | 0.99 | 146 | 500 | 43 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 750031 | 6980350 | 2.10 | 0.51 | 91 | 404 | 65 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| 750032 | 6980359 | 0.15 | 0.55 | 108 | 41 | 316 | 34 | <1 | 26 |
| 750036 | 6980365 | 0.14 | 0.55 | 95 | 87 | 200 | 20 | 2 | 18 |
| 750015 | 6980385 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 387 | 305 | 324 | 13 | 2 | 19 |
| 749976 | 6980422 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 197 | 77 | 31 | 2 | <1 | 4 |
| Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni) assayed by XRF. Platinum (Pt), Palladium (Pd), Rhodium (Rh), Ruthenium (Ru), Osmium (Os) and Iridium (Ir) assayed by 25g fire assay (nickel sulphide collection) ICP-MS at Ultra Trace Pty Ltd, Perth. Grab sample of float: a composite sample of gossanous rubble lying on the surface and interpreted to be within metres of source. 1000partsper billion(ppb)= 1partper million(ppm)= 1gramper tonne(g/t) |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
4
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
==> picture [492 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [492 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [492 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [492 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [492 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [492 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [492 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [492 x 89] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 2: Gum Creek Project
5
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
==> picture [499 x 91] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [499 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [499 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [499 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [499 x 91] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [499 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [499 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [499 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 3: Bungarra – Drillhole Location, Prospects, EM Conductors and Gossan Samples
6
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
A high-resolution aeromagnetic/radiometric survey was also completed over the entire BIC to assist with target definition and the structural/geological interpretation of the complex.
Based on the above, diamond drillhole LGCD001 was drilled to a depth of 200.8m at the Python Prospect designed to target beneath the Ni-Cu-PGE gossan and to intersect a strong coincident electromagnetic conductor. The drillhole intersected two zones with elevated Ni-Cu-PGE values associated with gabbro adjacent to the contact with felsic volcanic.
Seven RC drillholes (LPYC001-007) for a total of 904m were completed at the Python Prospect during December 2007. The drilling was located along strike of diamond drillhole LGCD001, targeting beneath gossanous float with coincident ground EM conductors, interpreted to be associated with the basal margin of the BIC.
Drillhole details for the RC/diamond drillholes are provided in Table 3, while a summary of drill results are provided in Table 4.
Table 3: Python RC and Diamond Drillhole Details
| Hole | Easting | Northing | Drill Type | Dip | Azi(Mag) | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPYC001 | 749920 | 6980350 | RC | -600 | 900 | 165 |
| LPYC002 | 750000 | 6980300 | RC | -600 | 900 | 120 |
| LPYC003 | 749950 | 6980300 | RC | -600 | 900 | 175 |
| LPYC004 | 749950 | 6980400 | RC | -600 | 900 | 80 |
| LPYC005 | 749900 | 6980400 | RC | -600 | 900 | 133 |
| LPYC006 | 750140 | 6980200 | RC | -600 | 900 | 81 |
| LPYC007 | 749900 | 6980075 | RC | -550 | 600 | 150 |
| LGCD001 | 750040 | 6980350 | Diamond | -700 | 2700 | 200.8 |
| Total | 1,104.8 |
Table 4: Python RC and Diamond Drillhole Assay Results
| Hole ID | From | To | Int | Pt ppb | Pd ppb | Pt+Pd ppb | Ni % | Cu % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGCD001 | 7 | 15 | 8 | 35 | 256 | 291 | 0.10 | 0.21 |
| LGCD001 | 40.7 | 41.2 | 0.5 | 150 | 511 | 661 | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| LGCD001 | 51.4 | 57 | 5.6 | 49 | 268 | 317 | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| LGCD001 | 69 | 70 | 1 | 159 | 212 | 371 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
| LGCD001 | 138 | 140 | 2 | 108 | 62 | 170 | 0.07 | 0.14 |
| LPYC001 | 56 | 84 | 28 | - | - | - | - | 0.17 |
| LPYC001 | 76 | 80 | 4 | 175 | 225 | 400 | 0.16 | 0.41 |
| LPYC001 | 140 | 165 EOH | 25 | 138 | 59 | 197 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| LPYC003 | 80 | 104 | 24 | - | - | - | - | 0.11 |
| LPYC004 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 20 | 45 | 65 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
| LPYC004 | 64 | 80 EOH | 16 | 165 | 55 | 220 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| LPYC005 | 76 | 80 | 4 | 40 | 255 | 295 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| LPYC006 | 28 | 44 | 16 | 29 | 130 | 159 | 0.08 | 0.12 |
| Nickel (Ni) and Copper (Cu) assayed by XRF. Platinum (Pt), Palladium (Pd) assayed by 40g fire assay (lead collection) ICP-MS at Ultra Trace Pty Ltd, Perth. Diamond drillhole sampling based on nominal 1m intervals of half-NQ2 drill core. RC drillhole samples collected by spear and composited over 4m intervals. 1 percent (%)=10,000 parts per million (ppm). 1 part per million (ppm)=1,000 parts per billion (ppb) |
Legend signed the West Bungarra JV with Gateway Mining Limited (GML) on 16 July 2007, securing tenure over the entire BIC, see Figure 2. The JV, Legend 70%/GML 30%, covers the pending exploration licence E57/709 (P57/976 was originally included but subsequently expired) with Legend to sole fund and manage to Decision to Mine.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
7
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
An airborne Versatile Time Domain Electro-Magnetic survey (VTEM) over the entire BIC and RC drill testing of electromagnetic conductors at the Dugite and Adder Prospects on the eastern margin of the BIC is planned for the first Quarter of 2008.
Thangoo
A total of 89 aircore holes for 5,694m were completed at Thangoo targeting ultramafic units identified previously by ground reconnaissance and/or interpreted from aeromagnetic data. Seven traverses with holes spaced at 50m were drilled across six strike kilometres of the interpreted ultramafic units to confirm their komatiitic nature and assess the nickel potential of these units.
Ultramafic rocks with classic spinifex and olivine cumulate textures (and interbedded black shales) were intersected on a number of traverses. This together with high MgO values (>18%) confirm the ultramafics as komatiites. Minor disseminated sulphide hosted by komatiite was also observed in several holes at Thangoo.
The drilling intersected broad zones of elevated nickel closely associated with high chromium values, summarised in Table 5. These results provide encouragement for the possible presence of nickel mineralisation at depth or along strike.
Table 5: Thangoo Aircore Drill Results >0.5% Ni
| Hole | Easting | Northing | From | To | Int | Ni % | Cr % | Cu % | Co % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGCA072 | 739700 | 6969900 | 16 | 60 | 44 | 0.51 | 1.11 | 0.001 | 0.022 |
| Incl. | 24 | 36 | 12 | 0.68 | 1.31 | 0.001 | 0.040 | ||
| LGCA073 | 739750 | 6969900 | 24 | 28 | 4 | 0.53 | 0.05 | 0.020 | 0.059 |
| LGCA079 | 739400 | 6970600 | 8 | 41 Eoh | 33 | 0.52 | 1.25 | 0.006 | 0.035 |
| LGCA114 | 740950 | 6965600 | 12 | 67 Eoh | 55 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 0.006 | 0.055 |
| LGCA117 | 741100 | 6965600 | 12 | 32 | 20 | 0.53 | 1.09 | 0.005 | 0.042 |
| LGCA121 | 741300 | 6965600 | 24 | 56 | 32 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.007 | 0.067 |
| All aircore holes inclined -600 deg to 2700, co-ordinates GDA_94 Zone 50. Samples collected by scoop and composited over 4m intervals. Nickel(Ni),Chromium(Cr),Copper(Cu)& Cobalt(Co)assayed byXRF at Ultra Trace PtyLtd,Perth. |
Eight RC drillholes (LTHC001-008) for a total of 1,209m were completed at Thangoo during December 2007. The drilling was targeting anomalous Ni-Cu geochemistry and favourable geological units (komatiiteblack shale contacts) identified in the recent aircore drilling programme. Results from this drilling were of a similar tenor as the aircore drilling.
Drillhole details for the RC programme are provided in Table 6, while a summary of drill results is provided in Table 7.
Table 6: Thangoo RC Drillhole Details
| Hole | Easting | Northing | Dip | Azi (Mag) | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTHC001 | 740880 | 6965600 | -600 | 2700 | 159 |
| LTHC002 | 740975 | 6965600 | -600 | 2700 | 165 |
| LTHC003 | 741175 | 6965600 | -600 | 2700 | 121 |
| LTHC004 | 741375 | 6965600 | -600 | 2700 | 177 |
| LTHC005 | 741185 | 6965600 | -600 | 900 | 153 |
| LTHC006 | 739775 | 6969900 | -600 | 2700 | 159 |
| LTHC007 | 739425 | 6970600 | -600 | 2700 | 155 |
| LTHC008 | 740430 | 6971450 | -600 | 2700 | 120 |
| Total | 1,209 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
8
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
Table 7: Thangoo RC Drill Results
| Hole | From | To | Int | Ni % | Cr % | Cu % | Co % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTHC001 | 36 | 60 | 24 | 0.29 | 0.56 | 0.008 | 0.029 |
| LTHC001 | 88 | 128 | 40 | 0.26 | 0.82 | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| LTHC002 | 12 | 92 | 80 | 0.35 | 0.63 | 0.010 | 0.034 |
| Incl | 60 | 68 | 8 | 0.51 | 0.67 | 0.007 | 0.038 |
| LTHC003 | 72 | 84 | 12 | 0.31 | 0.67 | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| LTHC004 | 16 | 32 | 16 | 0.36 | 0.65 | 0.035 | 0.061 |
| LTHC005 | 24 | 60 | 36 | 0.31 | 0.87 | 0.007 | 0.029 |
| LTHC006 | 28 | 48 | 20 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 0.009 | 0.042 |
| LTHC007 | 28 | 52 | 24 | 0.30 | 0.68 | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| LTHC007 | 136 | 140 | 4 | 0.40 | 0.01 | 0.027 | 0.025 |
| LTHC008 | 32 | 76 | 44 | 0.24 | 0.99 | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Nickel (Ni), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu) & Cobalt (Co) assayed by XRF at Ultra Trace Pty Ltd, Perth Samples collected by spear and composited over 4m intervals. |
Two ground Moving Loop Time-Domain Electromagnetic surveys (MLTEM) were completed at Thangoo to further evaluate the ultramafic (komatiite) units with anomalous nickel drill results and associated elevated aeromagnetic response. The survey identified three strong conductors on the eastern flank of the survey area, however did not identify conductors over the targeted ultramafic units, see Figure 4.
These conductors have not been covered by geochemical sampling and only limited shallow aircore drilling. The limited drilling indicates the conductors are related to black shale, which is in direct contact with ultramafic units of komatiitic affinity and represent priority drill targets.
An airborne Versatile Time Domain Electro-Magnetic survey (VTEM) over the eastern half of Thangoo and an aircore drill programme to follow-up the EM conductors is planned for late in the first Quarter of 2008.
Woodley
A total of 48 aircore holes for 1,764m were completed at Woodley targeting ultramafic units identified previously by ground reconnaissance and/or interpreted from aeromagnetic data. The drilling was conducted along nine broad spaced traverses with holes spaced at 50m. No significant results were returned.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
9
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
==> picture [496 x 91] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [496 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [496 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [496 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [496 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [496 x 91] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [496 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [496 x 90] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Thangoo – Simplified Geology with Ground EM Image and Drillhole Locations
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
10
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
PILBARA PROJECT – (Nickel-Copper, Zinc-Copper, Copper-Gold)
Legend’s Pilbara Project area lies between 7km and 50km south of Karratha in the northwest of Western Australia (Figure 1). The company holds exploration rights through granted tenements, tenement applications and joint venture agreements over 686km[2] of land in the emerging West Pilbara base metal district. A breakdown of land equity interests is tabulated below:-
| PILBARA PROJECT EQUITY INTERESTS | AREA (km2) |
|---|---|
| Legend (100%) | 565 |
| Mt Marie Joint Venture: Legend earning 70% from Fox Radio Hill Pty Ltd | 103 |
| Munni Munni Joint Venture: East Coast Minerals NL 69.88% - Legend 30.12% | 18 |
| TOTAL | 686 |
Legend continued to advance exploration in the Pilbara during 2007 culminating in the identification of 11 priority drill targets, see Figure 5. Activities included; a second airborne Versatile Time Domain ElectroMagnetic survey (VTEM-2), ground electromagnetic surveys, geochemical sampling and ground reconnaissance.
The VTEM-2 survey, and the survey completed in November 2006 (VTEM-1), brings the total VTEM coverage over the Project area to 390km[2] . VTEM has proven to be an extremely valuable and cost effective technique in identifying new targets and known sulphide ore systems in the Pilbara. The second survey identified six priority targets and five second order anomalies, (the first survey identified five priority targets).
The priority VTEM survey targets were followed-up with Fixed Loop Time-Domain Electromagnetic (FLTEM) surveys resulting in the definition of 11 direct drill targets. The location of these targets is shown on Figure 5 and a brief description of each target is provided in Table 8 below.
Table 8: Description of Priority Targets from VTEM and FLTEM Surveys
| TARGET | BRIEF DESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| Chapman | Located 1km southeast of the Carlow Castle copper-gold workings, this anomaly coincides with historic copper-gold workings hosted in gabbro of the Andover Intrusive Complex. The FLTEM survey identified two shallow, discrete bedrock conductors at a depth from surface of 40m and 60m respectively, with both conductors dipping shallowly 25-35o to the north. These bedrock conductors may represent sulphide bodies. |
| Milburn | Located 2km east-southeast of the Carlow Castle copper-gold workings, this discrete anomaly is associated with outcropping copper mineralisation in gabbro. The anomaly occurs near the contact between mafic and ultramafic intrusives of the Andover Intrusive Complex and mafic volcanics. The top of the modelled FLTEM conductor is at a depth of 35m from surface and dips 45o west. The discrete bedrock conductor is consistent with a sulphide body. |
| Thorp | Located 2km southeast of the Carlow Castle copper-gold workings, this anomaly coincides with historic copper-gold workings hosted in gabbro of the Andover Intrusive Complex. Two bedrock conductors have been delineated by the FLTEM survey, the first at a depth of 100m from surface and dipping 60o north-northwest, the second at a depth of 40m from surface with a dip of 40o to the north. |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
11
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
| DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES | |
|---|---|
| Osborne | Located 5km northeast of the Sholl B1 nickel-copper deposit, this discrete anomaly coincides with the contact between mafic and ultramafic intrusives of the Andover Intrusive Complex. Osborne is modelled as a 30-45o northwest dipping conductor at a depth from surface of 145m. The conductive source is consistent with the presence of a sulphide body. |
| Hickmott | Located 4km northeast of the Ruth Well nickel-copper deposit, this anomaly coincides with a contact between ultramafic and basaltic lithologies. This stratigraphic position hosts historic copper workings along strike, although no workings are recorded in the immediate vicinity of the anomaly. Hickmott models as a discrete bedrock conductor at a depth from surface of 50m and dipping 40-50o to the south and may represent a sulphide body. |
| Varcoe | Located 1km east of the Ruth Well nickel-copper deposit, this anomaly coincides with the contact between the ultramafic host unit at Ruth Well and a brecciated basalt. The FLTEM survey revealed a number of bedrock conductors, potentially representing a folded structure. The stronger modelled conductors are consistent with the presence of sulphide bodies. |
| Castlebar | Located 2km west of the Ruth Well nickel-copper deposit at the contact between a chert and overlying ultramafic unit, the conductor is modelled to dip at 35-45º to the north and comes to within approximately 100m to 125m of surface. The conductor is consistent with the presence of a sulphide body. |
| Wexford & Banagher |
Located 4km northwest of Radio Hill, these two discrete anomalies lie within the lower contact zone of the Dingo Complex. The four associated conductors are modelled as having varying dips and all are within approximately 75m of surface. The modelled conductors are consistent with the presence of localised disseminated or matrix sulphide. |
| Roundstone | Located 6km south-southeast of Radio Hill, the anomaly is in an area of thin alluvial cover. This discrete anomaly has a modelled conductor dipping 45-55o southeast and is at a depth of 40m from surface to the top of the conductor. The conductor is consistent with the presence of a sulphide body. |
| Bushmill | Located 5km south of Radio Hill, this discrete anomaly is located in an area of thin soil cover on the sheared western margin of the Maitland Complex. The conductor is modelled to dip at 20-30º ENE and comes to within approximately 75m of surface. The conductor is possibly consistent with the presence of localised matrix or massive sulphide. |
Legend is currently working to expedite the grant of its exploration and prospecting licences.
Drilling is scheduled to commence in the middle of 2008 once the grant of exploration title and heritage clearance has been achieved.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
12
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
==> picture [521 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [521 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [521 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [521 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [521 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [521 x 101] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [521 x 102] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5 Pilbara Project Area Showing VTEM Anomalies
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
13
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
MT GIBSON – (Zinc-Copper, Gold)
The Mt Gibson project is located 290km northeast of Perth in Western Australia (Figure 1), and was acquired from Oroya Mining Limited in November 2005, principally to pursue the untested volcanic-hosted massive sulphide deposit potential (VHMS, predominant metals include zinc-copper-gold) beneath the oxide gold pits.
The project is situated 100km south of the world-class Golden Grove VHMS deposit owned by Oxiana Limited, and in common with Golden Grove, falls within the Yalgoo-Singleton Greenstone Belt in the southern Murchison Province.
Mt Gibson operated for 12 years as a gold mine from 1986 following the discovery of gold in surface laterite. The operation produced 870,000 ounces of gold from 16.5Mt of ore at an average grade of 1.68g/t.
Legend, through a study conducted in 2006 by Dr S Carras of Carras Mining Pty Ltd, estimated the residual gold Mineral Resource (Indicated and Inferred) to be 8.7Mt at 1.98g/t gold for 559,000 ounces. This Mineral Resource does not convert into Ore Reserve using current mining costs and gold price. The gold operation remains on care and maintenance.
Legend’s 2006 diamond drillhole results support the premise that Mt Gibson represents a large, fertile VHMS mineral system with potential to host a base metal orebody. The predictive geological model developed from this drilling has led to the identification of important trends (vectors) to new opportunities within this large base metal system. All eight holes contain visible zinc sulphide, principally associated with sedimentary units layered within the volcanic sequence. Significant zinc intercepts and an overview of the interpreted geology is presented in Figure 6.
Oxiana Joint Venture
On 8 May 2007, Legend announced a Farm-In and Joint Venture Agreement with Oxiana Exploration Pty Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Oxiana Limited (Oxiana).
Under the terms of the agreement, Oxiana may earn a 75% interest in the project by funding $10 million of exploration within 7 years, with Legend 25% free-carried to completion of a bankable feasibility study and a decision to mine. Oxiana must spend $1.2 million within 18 months before having a right to withdraw.
During the second half of 2007, Oxiana developed an exploration strategy for the Project and commenced relogging historic drillholes and interrogating the extensive geochemical dataset. Drillhole targeting will be undertaken during the first quarter of 2008 with downhole geophysics and diamond drilling planned to commence in the second quarter of 2008. Technical input from Oxiana geologists at the Golden Grove mine site, whose experience in the region and with this style of mineralisation, will be extremely valuable in assisting exploration activities.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
14
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
==> picture [477 x 160] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [477 x 160] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6: Mt Gibson Schematic Longsection Showing Significant Zinc Intercepts
The information relating to Exploration in this report is based on data compiled by Mr Derek Waterfield, a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a full time employee of Legend Mining Limited. Mr Waterfield has sufficient relevant experience in the styles of mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration, and in the activity he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the “Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (the JORC Code), and consents to the inclusion of the information in the form and context in which it appears.
15
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
DIRECTORS’ REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES
CORPORATE ACIVITIES
Sale of Gidgee Gold Project and return of capital
On 3 May 2007, the Company announced it had agreed to sell its Gidgee Gold Project (tenements, plant and infrastructure) to Apex Minerals NL (Apex) for a consideration of $11 million, payable by the issue of 34 million Apex shares which the Company announced would be distributed in-specie to shareholders. Contingent consideration of $5 million will be paid by Apex to the Company once a production milestone of 250,000oz of gold from the Gidgee Gold Project tenements is reached.
Settlement of this Sale Agreement was effected on 13 August 2007 and Apex issued 34 million shares to Legend.
The Company sent out a notice of meeting to shareholders on 20 September 2007 seeking shareholder approval for the return of capital via a distribution in-specie of the Apex shares.
The return of capital was approved by shareholders at the General Meeting on 25 October 2007 and was completed on 12 November 2007. Shareholders received 1 Apex share for every 33.8285 Legend shares held on 12 November 2007 (“Record Date”). Based on the closing price of Apex shares of $1.27 at the Record Date, the return of capital equated to 3.75 cents per Legend share.
As a result of the return of capital the exercise price of all outstanding options was reduced by 3.75 cents per option. The Company’s quoted 31 July 2008 options exercise price is now 0.25 cents per option.
The Company has received a draft tax ruling from the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”) on what proportion of the return of capital the ATO deems to be an unfranked dividend and therefore what proportion is deemed a return of capital. The Company’s tax specialists are engaged in further dialogue with the ATO on this draft tax ruling and the Company will advise shareholders of the outcome as soon as possible.
Exercise of Options during the year
A total of 226,052,491 listed and unlisted 4 cent options were exercised prior to the return of capital, thereby raising $9,042,100. As at 31 December 2007, a further 9,710,109 listed 0.25 cent options have been exercised since the return of capital thereby raising an additional $24,275.
At 31 December 2007 Legend had cash reserves of $13.3 million. Legend has applied approximately $1.4 million of these funds as security for environmental performance bonds on its projects. This has had the effect of discharging all of Mr Mark Creasy’s security for the Company’s environmental performance bonds.
16
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
Legend is committed to implementing and maintaining the highest standards of corporate governance. In determining what those standards should involve, Legend has turned to the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations . Legend is pleased to advise that its practices are largely consistent with those of the ASX guidelines. Where Legend did not have certain policies or committees recommended by the ASX Corporate Governance Council in place for the entire reporting period, we have identified when such policies or committees were introduced. Where Legend has not adopted the relevant recommendation, the reasons are set out below.
1. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1.1 Role of Board
The Legend Board of Directors (the Board) is responsible for setting the strategic direction and establishing and overseeing the policies and financial position of Legend, and monitoring the business and affairs on behalf of its shareholders, by whom the Directors are elected and to whom they are accountable.
Further, the Board takes specific responsibility for:-
-
the appointment and removal of the Managing Director and the Company Secretary,
-
the final approval of management’s development of corporate strategies and performance objectives,
-
the review and modification of internal controls with respect to internal and legal compliance and its code of conduct,
-
monitoring and evaluating senior management’s performance and the implementation of Legend’s corporate strategies and objectives,
-
ensuring that appropriate resources are available to achieve strategic objectives,
-
the appointment of Directors to the Board and ensuring those Directors receive a letter of appointment identifying their duties and specific responsibilities, Legend’s expectations of them, their remuneration and their obligations with respect to advising Legend of any compliance matters.
The Board is responsible for the overall Corporate Governance of Legend including the strategic direction, establishing goals for management and monitoring the achievement of these goals.
Legend has a formal Board Charter as per Recommendation 1.1. In broad terms, the Board is accountable to the shareholders and must ensure that Legend is properly managed to protect and enhance shareholders’ wealth and other interests. The Board Charter sets out the role and responsibilities of the Board of Legend within the governance structure of Legend and its related bodies corporate (as defined in the Corporations Act ).
1.2 Terms of Office of Directors
The constitution of Legend Mining Limited specifies that 1/3 of the Directors, excluding the Managing Director, shall rotate on an annual basis.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
17
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
1.3 Composition of the Board
The Directors of Legend in office at the date of this statement are:-
| Name | Position | Expertise |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Atkins Mark Wilson Dermot Ryan |
Non Executive Chairman Managing Director Non Executive Director |
Commercial Commercial and Mining Exploration and Mining |
The composition of the Board is determined using the following principles:-
-
the Board comprises three (3) Directors and may be increased where it is felt that additional expertise is required in specific areas, or when an outstanding candidate is identified, and
-
the Board should comprise Directors with a broad range of expertise.
The Board reviews its composition on an annual basis to ensure that the Board has the appropriate mix of expertise and experience. When a vacancy exists, for whatever reason, or where it is considered that the Board would benefit from the services of a new Director with particular skills, the Board selects a panel of candidates with the appropriate expertise and experience. Potential candidates are identified by the Board with advice from an external consultant, if necessary. The Board then appoints the most suitable candidate who must stand for election at a General Meeting of Shareholders.
1.4 Responsibilities of the Board
In general, the Board is responsible for, and has authority to determine all matters relating to the policies, practices, management and operations of the Company. It is required to do all things that may be necessary to be done in order to carry out the objectives of Legend.
In general, the principal functions and responsibilities of the Board include the following:-
Leadership of the Organisation : Overseeing the Company and establishing codes that reflect the values of the Company and guide the conduct of the Board, management and employees,
Strategy Formulation : working with senior management to set and review the overall strategy and goals for the Company and ensure that there are policies in place to govern the operation of the Company,
Overseeing Planning Activities : overseeing the development of the Company’s strategic plan and approving that plan as well as the annual and long term budgets,
Shareholder Liaison : ensuring effective communication with shareholders through an appropriate communications policy and promoting participation at general meetings of the Company,
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
18
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
1.4 Responsibilities of the Board (contd)
Monitoring, Compliance and Risk Management : overseeing the Company’s risk management, compliance and accountability systems and monitoring and directing the financial and operational performance of the Company,
Company Finances : approving expenses in excess of those approved in the annual budget and approving and monitoring acquisitions, divestitures and financial and other reporting,
Human Resources : appointing, and where appropriate, removing the Managing Director (MD) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) as well as reviewing the performance of the MD and monitoring the performance of senior management in their implementation of the Company’s strategy,
Ensuring the Health, Safety and Well-Being of Employees : developing a policy, and in conjunction with the senior management team, developing, overseeing and reviewing the effectiveness of the Company’s occupational health and safety systems to ensure the well-being of all employees,
Delegation of Authority : delegating appropriate powers to the MD to ensure the effective day-to–day management of the Company,
Environmental Management : developing a policy, and in conjunction with the senior management team, developing, overseeing and reviewing the effectiveness of the Company’s environmental management systems.
1.5 Monitoring of Board Performance
The performance of all Directors is reviewed by the Chairman on an ongoing basis and any Director whose performance is considered unsatisfactory is asked to retire. The Chairman’s performance is reviewed by the other Board members.
Legend has established firm guidelines to identify the measurable and qualitative indicators of the Director’s performance during the course of the year. Those guidelines include:
-
attendance at all Board meetings. Missing more than three consecutive meetings without reasonable excuse will result in that Director’s position being reviewed,
-
attendance at Legend’s Shareholder Meetings. Non-attendance without reasonable excuse will result in that Director’s position being reviewed.
Legend does not comply with Recommendation 2.1 which states the majority of Directors should be independent directors. Mr Atkins is the only Director considered independent and acts as Chairman of the Company, as required under Recommendation 2.2.
1.6 Independent Professional Advice
Each Director has the right, in connection with his/her duties and responsibilities as a Director, to seek independent professional advice at Legend’s expense. However, prior approval of the Chairman is required, which will not be unreasonably withheld.
2. BOARD COMMITTEES
2.1 Nomination Committee
A separate nomination committee has not been formed as required under Recommendation 2.4 as the Board considers the selection and appointment of Directors should be the responsibility of the full Board and that no benefits or efficiencies are to be gained by delegating this function to a separate committee.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
19
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
2.2 Audit Committee
Due to its size and composition, the Board has not established a separate audit committee as requested by Recommendation 4.2. However, the external auditor has full access to the Board throughout the year.
The responsibilities of the Board ordinarily include:-
-
reviewing internal control and recommending enhancements,
-
monitoring compliance with Corporations Act 2001, Securities Exchange Listing Rules, matters outstanding with auditors, Australian Taxation Office, Australian Securities and Investment Commission and financial institutions,
-
improving the quality of the accounting function,
-
reviewing external audit reports to ensure that where major deficiencies or breakdowns in controls or procedures have been identified, appropriate and prompt remedial action is taken by management, and
-
liaising with the external auditors and ensuring that the annual audit and half-year review are conducted in an effective manner.
The Board reviews the performance of the external auditors on an annual basis and nomination of auditors is at the discretion of the Board.
2.3 Remuneration Committee
Due to the relatively small size of Legend, remuneration is considered by the full Board. This does not comply with Recommendation 9.2. The Board reviews remuneration packages and policies applicable to the Managing Director and Directors. Remuneration levels are competitively set to attract the most qualified and experienced Directors and Senior Executives. The Board obtains independent advice on the appropriateness of remuneration packages.
An approved Employee Share Option Plan (excludes Directors) is in place to enable the Board to grant share options as an incentive for superior performance to eligible employees.
A full disclosure of the Company’s remuneration philosophy and framework and the remuneration received by Directors and Executives in the current period are set out in the remuneration report, which is contained within the Directors’ Report.
Overall Director Remuneration : Shareholders must approve the framework for any equity schemes if a Director is recommended for being able to participate in such a scheme.
Non-Executive Remuneration : Shareholders approve the maximum aggregate remuneration for NonExecutive Directors. The maximum aggregate remuneration approved for Non-Executive Directors is currently $200,000 per annum.
3. BUSINESS RISKS
Significant areas of concern are discussed at Board level. When appropriate, experts are invited to address Board meetings on the major risks facing the consolidated entity and to develop strategies to mitigate those risks.
4. ETHICAL STANDARDS
Legend has a formal Code of Conduct as per Recommendation 3.1. This code outlines how Legend expects directors and employees of Legend and its related bodies corporate to behave and conduct business in the workplace on a range of issues. Legend is committed to the highest level of integrity and ethical standards in all business practices. Directors and employees must conduct themselves in a manner consistent with current community and corporate standards and in compliance with all legislation. In addition, the Board subscribes to the Statement of Ethical Standards as published by the Australian Institute of Company Directors.
All Directors and employees are expected to act with the utmost integrity and objectivity, striving at all times to enhance the reputation and performance of the Company.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
20
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
5. DIRECTORS’ DEALINGS IN COMPANY SHARES
Legend has a formal trading policy as required by Recommendation 3.2 entitled: Guidelines for Dealing in Securities. This policy applies to directors, employees and contractors of Legend.
In addition, directors must notify the Australian Securities Exchange of any acquisition or disposal of shares by lodgement of a Notice of Director’s Interests. Board policy is to prohibit Directors and Employees from dealing in shares of the Company whilst in possession of price sensitive information.
6. CORPORATE REPORTING
On submission of a set of the Company financial reports for review by the Board, senior management confirms that to the best of their knowledge and ability the financial reports present a true and fair view in all material aspects of the Company’s financial condition and that operational results are in accordance with relevant accounting standards.
Further, the statement made by senior management regarding the integrity of the financial statements also includes a statement regarding risk management and internal compliance and control which influence the policies adopted by the Board.
7. CONTINUOUS DISCLOSURE AND SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATION
Legend has a formal Continuous Disclosure and Information Policy as required by Recommendation 6.1. This policy was introduced to ensure Legend achieves best practice in complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules and ensuring Legend and individual officers do not contravene the Corporations Act or ASX Listing Rules.
The Board of Legend aims to ensure that the shareholders, on behalf of whom they act, are informed of all information necessary to assess the performance of the Directors. Information is communicated to shareholders through:-
-
the Annual Report which is distributed to all shareholders,
-
Half-Yearly Reports, Quarterly Reports, and all Australian Securities Exchange announcements which are posted on Legend’s website,
-
the Annual General Meeting and other meetings so called to obtain approval for Board action as appropriate,
-
compliance with the continuous disclosure requirements of the Australian Securities Exchange Listing Rules.
Legend’s auditor is required to be present, and be available to shareholders, at the Annual General Meeting.
8. RECOGNISE AND MANAGE RISK
Risk oversight, management and internal control are dealt with on a continuous basis by management and the Board, with differing degrees of involvement from various Directors and management, depending upon the nature and materiality of the matter.
The Board has no formal policy in place to recognise and manage risk as required by Recommendation 7.1, as it considers, in the context of the size and nature of the Company, that it would not improve the present modus operandi.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
21
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
9. ENCOURAGE ENHANCED PERFORMANCE
Board and management effectiveness are dealt with on a continuous basis by management and the Board, with differing degrees of involvement from various Directors and management, depending upon the nature of the matter.
The Board has no formal policy in place to encourage enhanced performance as required by Recommendation 8.1, as it considers, in the context of the size and nature of the Company, that it would not improve the present modus operandi.
10. RECOGNISE THE LEGITIMATE INTERESTS OF STAKEHOLDERS
Legend has a formal Privacy Policy. Legend is committed to respecting the privacy of stakeholders’ personal information. This Privacy Policy sets out Legend’s personal information management practices and covers the application of privacy laws, personal information collection, the use and disclosure of personal information, accessing and updating stakeholders’ information and the Security of stakeholders’ information.
Other than the introduction of a formal Privacy Policy, the Board has not adopted any additional formal codes of conduct to guide compliance with legal and other obligations to legitimate stakeholders as required by Recommendation 10.1, as it considers, in the context of the size and nature of the Company, that it would not improve the present modus operandi.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
22
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Directors submit their report for the year ended 31 December 2007.
1. DIRECTORS
The names and details of the Company’s Directors in office during the financial year and until the date of this report are as below. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.
Michael Atkins (Chairman, Non Executive Director)
Mark Wilson (Managing Director)
Robert Perring (Executive Director - Technical) (resigned 30 June 2007)
Dermot Ryan (Non Executive Director)
2. INFORMATION ON DIRECTORS AND COMPANY SECRETARY
Michael Atkins is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and was a founding partner of a national Chartered Accounting practice from 1979 to 1987. Since 1987 he has been involved in the executive management of several publicly listed resource companies with operations in Australia, USA, South East Asia and Africa. He was Managing Director of Claremont Petroleum NL and Beach Petroleum NL during 1990 and 1991 during their reconstruction, and then remained as a Non Executive Director until 1995. He was also founding Executive Chairman of Gallery Gold NL in 1998, and remained a Non Executive Director until 2000.
He is currently Chairman of Montagu Capital Ltd, the holding company for Montagu Stockbrokers Pty Ltd, and Chairman of Kalgoorlie-Boulder Resources Ltd and Westgold Resources NL.
During the past three years, Mr Atkins has also served as a Director of the following publicly listed companies:-
-
Marion Energy Ltd (formerly Carpenter Pacific Resources Limited) (resigned 31 January 2006)
-
Guardian Funds Management Ltd (resigned 31 January 2006)
Mark Wilson is a Member of the Institution of Engineers, Australia and a Chartered Professional Engineer with an Associateship in Civil Engineering from Curtin University in Western Australia. He has an extensive business background, mainly in corporate management and project engineering. This has included site management of remote construction projects, ten years of commercial construction as a founding proprietor of a Perth based company and the past sixteen years in executive, non-executive, consulting and owner roles in resource focused companies. He served as a Director of Duketon Goldfields NL in 1995/1996 and of Cambrian Resources NL (Servicepoint Ltd) from 1999 to 2003.
During the past three years, Mr Wilson has not served as a Director of any other publicly listed companies.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
23
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
2. INFORMATION ON DIRECTORS AND COMPANY SECRETARY (CONTD)
Dermot Ryan is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, a Chartered Professional Geologist and a graduate from Curtin University in Western Australia (B.App.Sc.) He has over 30 years experience in the discovery and successful development of gold, base metals, iron ore and diamond deposits. He has spent 20 years with the CRA (Rio Tinto) group of companies, including ten years as Chief Geologist for CRA Exploration in various parts of Australia. He was General Manager Exploration for Great Central Mines / Normandy Yandal Operations in the 5 year period up to 2001. He has acted as a mineral exploration consultant to both private and public mining and exploration companies in Western Australia, with an emphasis on the gold industry.
During the past three years, Mr Ryan has not served as a Director of any other publicly listed companies.
Robert Perring (resigned 30 June 2007) is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a graduate of Imperial College, London (M.Sc., D.I.C.) and the University of Technology, Sydney (B.App.Sc.). He has more than 28 years experience in exploration and the resource definition of gold, platinum group element, nickel, copper-lead-zinc and uranium deposits. Mr Perring has worked in a broad range of geological terrains within Australia and overseas. He has recently held senior management positions with Newmont Australia and Normandy Mining Ltd.
During the past three years, Mr Perring has not served as a Director of any other publicly listed companies.
Tony Walsh (Company Secretary) is a chartered accountant with over 20 years work experience with ASX and publicly listed companies where he has held positions as listings manager and company secretary and has experience in the areas of corporate regulation and capital raisings. He works for a number of public companies in the resource sector.
Mr Walsh is an Associate Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and the Securities Institute of Australia.
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share after dividend: 2.61 cents Diluted earnings per share after dividend: 2.46 cents
4. DIVIDENDS
Following the announcement of the agreement to sell the Gidgee Gold Project to Apex Minerals NL, your directors sought and received legal, taxation and accounting advice on the proposed return of capital. The taxation and accounting advice on the return of capital was that any return of capital over and above the amount of funds invested by the Company into the Gidgee Gold Project ($30.3 million) was likely to be deemed as an unfranked dividend.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
24
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
4. DIVIDENDS (Continued)
The Company, through its taxation advisors, sought a tax ruling on this matter and received a draft tax ruling from the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”) on what proportion of the return of capital the ATO would deem an unfranked dividend for taxation purposes and therefore what proportion is deemed a return of capital. The draft tax ruling from ATO advised that any return of capital over and above $11 million, being the sale agreement value of the consideration received from Apex, would be deemed an unfranked dividend for taxation purposes. As a result of the draft tax ruling from the ATO, your Company received further advice that, for the return of capital, it should withhold tax from overseas shareholders and Australian shareholders who had not provided a tax file number on the basis that any return of capital over and above $11 million would be deemed an unfranked dividend for taxation purposes.
On 12 November 2007, as a result of the return of capital of 34,000,000 Apex shares and the value of $1.27 per Apex share, the Company received advice from its taxation and accounting advisors that an unfranked dividend of $12,845,614 or 1.12 cents per share was deemed to be paid to shareholders. This deemed dividend represents the difference between the amount invested by the company into the Gidgee Gold Project and the value of the Apex shares at the Record Date for the return of capital
The Company’s tax specialists are engaged in further dialogue with the ATO on its draft tax ruling and the Company will advise shareholders of the outcome as soon as possible.
5. CORPORATE INFORMATION
Corporate Structure
Legend Mining Limited is a company limited by shares that is incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Legend Mining Limited has prepared a consolidated financial report incorporating the entities that it controlled during the financial year, which are outlined in the following illustration of the group’s corporate structure.
==> picture [397 x 196] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
LEGEND MINING LIMITED
(100%) (100%)
Gibson Metals Pty Ltd Gidgee Resources Limited
(formerly Arbotech Pty Ltd)
(100%)
Armada Mining Limited
----- End of picture text -----
Nature of Operations and Principal Activities
The principal activities during the year of the entities within the consolidated entity were:-
- exploration for gold and base metal (zinc-copper-gold, nickel-copper, zinc-copper and coppergold) deposits.
Employees
The consolidated entity had a staff of 12 employees at 31 December 2007 (2006: 15 employees).
25
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
6. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
Results of Operations
The net profit after dividend and income tax of the consolidated entity for the year was $12,456,423 (2006: loss $7,736,579) (refer page 37).
Review of Operations
The Directors Review of Activities for the year ended 31 December 2007 is contained on pages 3 to 16 of the Annual Report.
Summarised Operating Results
Exploration Expenditure Write-Off: Deferred expenditure on tenements surrendered or withdrawn during the year amounting to $15,325,993 (2006: $3,732,296) with $5,421,686 expensed to the Income Statement and the balance written off in the sale of the Gidgee Gold Project to Apex Minerals NL.
Deferred Exploration Costs: Total deferred expenditure on tenements capitalised during the year amounted to $3,483,854 (2006: $5,333,428).
7. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS
During 2007 Legend has:-
-
raised approximately $9.1 million capital through the exercise of quoted and unquoted options;
-
sold the Gidgee Gold Project to Apex Minerals NL (Apex) for a consideration of $11 million, payable by the issue of 34 million Apex shares. These 34,000,000 Apex shares were distributed in-specie by way of a return of capital.
-
Entered into a farm-in and joint venture with Oxiana Limited (Oxiana) over its Mt Gibson Project where Oxiana may earn 75% interest in the project by funding $10 million of exploration within 7 years, with Legend 25% free-carried to completion of a bankable feasibility study.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE
The consolidated entity’s operations are subject to various environmental regulations under both Commonwealth and State legislation. The Directors have complied with these regulations and are not aware of any breaches of the legislation during the financial year which are material in nature.
9. LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS
Likely developments in the operations of the consolidated entity, and expected results of those operations in subsequent financial years have been discussed, where appropriate, in the Chairman’s Report and Review of Activities.
10. SHARE OPTIONS
Unissued shares
As at the date of this report, there were 58,122,285 unissued ordinary shares under options. Refer to note 18 for further details of the options outstanding.
Option holders do not have any right, by virtue of the option, to participate in any share issue of the company or any related body corporate.
26
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
10. SHARE OPTIONS (CONTD)
Shares issued as a result of the exercise of options
During the financial year, investors have exercised options to acquire 235,762,600 fully paid ordinary shares made up of 226,052,491 options exercised at 4 cents each and 9,710,109 options exercised at 0.25 cent. The weighted average exercise price of these options was $0.038. Refer to note 18 for further details of the options exercised.
11. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE DATE
As at the date of the report there are no subsequent significant events after the balance date.
12. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND AUDITORS
The Company has not, during or since the financial year, in respect of any person who is or has been an Officer or auditor of the Company or a related body corporate:
-
(a) indemnified or made any relevant agreement for indemnifying against a liability incurred as an officer, including costs and expenses in successfully defending legal proceedings; or
-
(b) paid or agreed to pay a premium in respect of a contract insuring against a liability incurred as an officer for the costs or expenses to defend legal proceedings.
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (AUDITED)
The compensation arrangements in place for key management personnel of Legend are set out below:
Details of key management personnel
(i) Directors M. Atkins Chairman (non-executive) M. Wilson Managing Director R. Perring Executive Director - Technical – Resigned 30 June 2007 D. Ryan Non-Executive Director (ii) Executives T. Walsh Company Secretary D. Waterfield Exploration Manager B. Phyland District Geologist P. Petrovic Systems Administrator L. Mitchell Care & Maintenance Manager – Resigned 9 May 2007
Compensation Philosophy
The performance of the Company depends upon the quality of its Directors and Executives. To prosper, the Company must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled Directors and Executives.
The Company embodies the following principle in its compensation framework:-
- Provide competitive rewards to attract high-calibre executives.
Remuneration Committee
Due to the size of Legend, remuneration is considered by the full Board. The Board reviews remuneration packages and policies applicable to the Directors and Senior Executives. Remuneration levels are competitively set to attract the most qualified and experienced Directors and Senior Executives. The Board obtains independent advice on the appropriateness of remuneration packages.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
27
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTD)
Compensation Structure
In accordance with best practice corporate governance, the structure of Non Executive Director and senior manager remuneration is separate and distinct.
Objective of Non Executive Director Compensation
The Board seeks to set aggregate compensation at a level that provides the company with the ability to attract and retain Directors of the highest calibre, whilst incurring a cost that is acceptable to shareholders.
Structure of Non Executive Director Compensation
The Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules specify that the aggregate compensation of non-executive directors shall be determined from time to time by a general meeting. An amount not exceeding the amount determined is then divided between the directors as agreed. The latest determination was at the Annual General Meeting held on 30 May 2006 when shareholders approved the aggregate remuneration of $200,000 per year.
The amount of aggregate compensation sought to be approved by shareholders and the manner in which it is apportioned amongst directors is reviewed annually. The Board considers advice from external consultants as well as the fees paid to non-executive directors of comparable companies when undertaking the annual review process.
Objective of Senior Management and Executive Director Compensation
The company aims to reward executives with a level and mix of compensation commensurate with their position and responsibilities within the company and so as to:-
-
reward executives for company and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks,
-
align the interests of executives with those of shareholders, and
-
ensure total compensation is competitive by market standards.
Structure of Senior Management and Executive Director Compensation
In determining the level and make-up of executive compensation, the Board engages external consultants to provide independent advice.
It is the Board’s policy that an employment contract is entered into with key executives.
Compensation consists of a fixed compensation element and the issue of options from time to time at the directors’ discretion under the Employee Share Option Plan. Any issue of options to directors under the Employee Share Option Plan requires prior shareholder approval.
Fixed Compensation
Fixed compensation is reviewed annually by the Board. The process consists of a review of company and individual performance, relevant comparative compensation in the market and internally and, where appropriate, external advice on policies and practices.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
28
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTD)
Structure
Senior managers are given the opportunity to receive their fixed (primary) compensation in a variety of forms including cash and fringe benefits. It is intended that the manner of payment chosen will be optimal for the recipient without creating undue cost for the Company.
Employment contracts
The Managing Director, Mr Mark Wilson, is employed under contract. The current employment contract commenced on the 1 July 2007 and terminates on the 30 June 2008, at which time the Company may choose to commence negotiations to enter into a new employment contract.
-
Mr Wilson receives remuneration of $250,000 per annum plus GST.
-
Mr Wilson may resign from his position and thus terminate his contract by giving 1 month written notice.
-
The company may terminate Mr Wilson’s employment contract by providing 1 month written notice or by providing payment in lieu of notice period (based on the fixed component of his remuneration)
-
The company may terminate Mr Wilson’s contract at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred. Where termination with cause occurs Mr Wilson is only entitled to that portion of remuneration that is fixed, and only up to the date of termination.
Employee Share Option Plan
The Board has in place an Employee Share Option Plan allowing share options to eligible employees in order to provide them with an incentive to provide growth and value to all shareholders. 3,450,000 options were issued to eligible employees during the year under the Employee Share Option Plan.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
29
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTD)
Compensation of Key Management Personnel for Year Ended 31 December 2007
| Name | Year | Short term Salary and Fees $ |
Post Employment Superannuation $ |
Share based payments options $ |
Total $ |
% of compensation granted as options |
% of performance related remuneration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director | |||||||
| M. Atkins (Windamurah P/L) |
2007 | 66,000 | - | - | 66,000 | - | - |
| 2006 | 61,500 | - | - | 61,500 | - | - | |
| M. Wilson (Hostyle P/L) |
2007 | 241,598 | - | - | 241,598 | - | - |
| 2006 | 211,600 | - | 100,000 | 311,600 | 32% | - | |
| D. Ryan | 2007 | 36,696 | 3,302 | - | 39,998 | - | - |
| 2006 | 40,710 | 3,664 | 300,000 | 344,374 | 87% | - | |
| R Perring (Quadramin) |
2007 | 109,500 | - | - | 109,500 | - | - |
| 2006 | 209,700 | - | 100,000 | 309,700 | 32% | - | |
| Executive | |||||||
| ~~T~~. Walsh | 2007 | 151,776 | - | 11,181 | 162,957 | 7% | - |
| 2006 | 54,084 | - | - | 54,084 | - | - | |
| ~~D~~. Waterfield | 2007 | 152,186 | 13,696 | 22,361 | 188,243 | 12% | - |
| 2006 | 138,359 | 12,452 | 10,625 | 161,436 | 7% | - | |
| ~~B~~. Phyland | 2007 | 123,671 | 11,130 | 16,771 | 151,572 | 11% | - |
| 2006 | 110,563 | 9,951 | 5,312 | 125,826 | 4% | - | |
| ~~P~~. Petrovic | 2007 | 84,020 | 7,561 | 6,708 | 98,289 | 7% | - |
| 2006 | 65,380 | 5,884 | 2,125 | 73,389 | 3% | - | |
| L. Mitchell | 2007 | 44,155 | 3,973 | - | 48,128 | - | - |
| 2006 | 99,450 | 8,951 | - | 108,401 | - | - | |
| ~~T~~otal | 2007 | 1,009,602 | 39,662 | 57,021 | 1,106,285 | 5% | - |
| 2006 | 991,346 | 40,902 | 518,062 | 1,550,310 | 33% | - |
Compensation Options of Key Management Personnel for Year Ended 31 December 2007
The following options were granted or vested as equity compensation benefits to specified executives as disclosed below. The options were issue free of charge. Each option entitles the holder to subscribe for one fully paid ordinary share in the entity at an exercise price of $0.0425. Please note that the options were issued at an exercise price of $0.08 but due to the capital reduction from the distribution of Apex shares the exercise price was reduced to $0.0425. Options issued under the Employee Share Option Plan are subject to the employee retaining employment with the Group for a period of 12 months. All other options are issued to employees for past performance and therefore have no performance conditions placed on them. For further information please refer to note 19.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
30
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTD)
Options and rights over equity instruments granted as compensation in 2007 to directors and executives
| Name | No. of Options |
Grant Date | Value per option at grant date ($) |
Exercise price per option ($) |
Expiry Date | Number of options vested in 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | ||||||
| T. Walsh | 500,000 | 22 May 2007 | 0.0366 | 0.0425 | 22 May 2010 | - |
| D. Waterfield | 1,000,000 | 22 May2007 |
0.0366 | 0.0425 | 22 May2010 |
- |
| B. Phyland | 750,000 | 22 May2007 | 0.0366 | 0.0425 | 22 May2010 | - |
| P. Petrovic | 300,000 | 22 May2007 | 0.0366 | 0.0425 | 22 May2010 | - |
No options have been granted since the end of the financial year. The options were granted at no cost to the recipients.
Details of vesting profiles of options granted as remuneration to each director and executives of the company are detailed below.
| Name | No. of Options |
Grant Date | % Vested in the year |
% forfeited in year |
Financial years in which grant vests |
Value yet to vest $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | ||||||
| T. Walsh | 500,000 | 22 May 2007 | 61.1% | - | 1 Jan 2008 | 7,119 |
| D. Waterfield | 1,000,000 | 22 May2007 | 61.1% | - | 1 Jan 2008 | 14,239 |
| B. Phyland | 750,000 | 22 May2007 | 61.1% | - | 1 Jan 2008 | 10,679 |
| P. Petrovic | 300,000 | 22 May2007 | 61.1% | - | 1 Jan 2008 | 4,272 |
Exercise of options granted as compensation
| 31-Dec-07 Name |
Balance at beg of period 1 Jan 2007 |
Granted as Remuneration |
Exercised during the year |
Balance at end of period 31 Dec 2007 |
Not Vested & Not Exercisable |
Vested & Exercisable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director | ||||||
| M. Wilson | 5,000,000 | - | (5,000,000) | - | - | - |
| R. Perring | 5,000,000 | - | (5,000,000) | - | - | - |
| D. Ryan | 15,000,000 | - | (15,000,000) | - | - | - |
| Executive | ||||||
| T. Walsh | - | 500,000 | - | 500,000 | 500,000 | |
| D. Waterfield | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | (1,000,000) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | - |
| B. Phyland | 500,000 | 750,000 | - | 1,250,000 | 750,000 | 500,000 |
| P. Petrovic | 200,000 | 300,000 | (200,000) | 300,000 | 300,000 | - |
| Total | 26,700,000 | 2,550,000 | (26,200,000) | 3,050,000 | 2,550,000 | 500,000 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
31
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTD)
During the year, the following shares were issued on exercise of options previously granted as compensation.
| 31-Dec-07 Name |
Number of shares |
Amount paid per share $ |
Total value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Director | |||
| M. Wilson | 5,000,000 | 0.04 | 200,000 |
| R. Perring | 5,000,000 | 0.04 | 200,000 |
D. Ryan |
15,000,000 | 0.04 | 600,000 |
| Executive | |||
| T. Walsh | - | - | - |
| D. Waterfield | 1,000,000 | 0.04 | 40,000 |
| B. Phyland | - | - | - |
| P. Petrovic | 200,000 | 0.04 | 8,000 |
| Total | 26,200,000 | 1,048,000 |
There were no amounts unpaid on shares issued as a result of the options in 2007.
Analysis of movements in value of options
| 31-Dec-07 Name |
Value of options granted during the year $ |
Value of options exercised during the year $ |
Value of options lapsed during the year $ |
Total value of options granted, exercised and lapsed during the year $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director | ||||
| M. Wilson | - | 100,000 | - | 100,000 |
| R. Perring | - | 100,000 | - | 100,000 |
| D. Ryan | - | 300,000 | - | 300,000 |
| Executive | ||||
| T. Walsh | 18,300 | - | - | 18,300 |
| D. Waterfield | 36,600 | 10,625 | - | 47,225 |
| B. Phyland | 27,450 | - | - | 27,450 |
| P. Petrovic | 10,980 | 2,125 | - | 13,105 |
| Total | 93,330 | 512,750 | - | 587,780 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
32
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTD)
Option holdings of Key Management Personnel
(i) Options (listed) over Ordinary Shares in Legend Mining Limited (number)
| 31-Dec-07 | Balance 1-Jan-07 |
Granted as compensation |
On exercise of options |
Net change other |
Balance 31-Dec-07 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directors | |||||
| M. Atkins | 51,667 | - | (51,667) | - | - |
| M. Wilson | - | - | - | - | - |
| R. Perring | - | - | - | - | - |
| D.Ryan | 5,000 | (5,000) | - | - | |
| Executives | |||||
| T. Walsh | - | - | - | - | - |
| D. Waterfield | - | - | - | - | - |
| B. Phyland | 50,000 | - | (50,000) | - | - |
| P. Petrovic | 50,000 | - | (50,000) | - | - |
| L. Mitchell | - | - | - | - | - |
| 156,667 | - | (156,667) | - | - | |
| 31-Dec-06 | Balance 1-Jan-06 |
Granted as compensation |
On exercise of options |
Net change other |
Balance 31-Dec-06 |
| Directors | |||||
| M. Atkins | - | - | - | 51,667 | 51,667 |
| M. Wilson | - | - | - | - | - |
| R. Perring | - | - | - | - | - |
| D. Ryan | - | - | - | 5,000 | 5,000 |
| Executives | |||||
| T. Walsh | - | - | - | - | - |
| D. Waterfield | - | - | - | - | - |
| B. Phyland | - | - | - | 50,000 | 50,000 |
| P. Petrovic | - | - | - | 50,000 | 50,000 |
| L. Mitchell | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | 156,667 | 156,667 |
(ii) Options (unlisted) over Ordinary Shares in Legend Mining Limited (number)
| 31-Dec-07 | Balance | Granted as | On exercise | Balance 31-Dec-07 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Jan-07 | compensation | of options | ||
| Directors | ||||
| M. Atkins | 500,000 | - | - | 500,000 |
| M. Wilson | 5,000,000 | - | (5,000,000) | - |
| R. Perring | 5,000,000 | - | (5,000,000) | - |
| D. Ryan | 15,000,000 | - | (15,000,000) | - |
Executives |
||||
| T. Walsh | - | 500,000 | - | 500,000 |
| D. Waterfield | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | (1,000,000) | 1,000,000 |
| B. Phyland | 500,000 | 750,000 | - | 1,250,000 |
| P. Petrovic | 200,000 | 300,000 | (200,000) | 300,000 |
| L. Mitchell | - | - | - | - |
| 27,200,000 2,550,000 |
(26,200,000) 3,550,000 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
33
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTD)
| 31-Dec-06 | Balance | Granted as | On exercise | Balance 31-Dec-06 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Jan-06 | compensation | of options | ||
| Directors | ||||
| M. Atkins | 500,000 | - | - | 500,000 |
| M. Wilson | - | 5,000,000 | - | 5,000,000 |
| R. Perring | - | 5,000,000 | - | 5,000,000 |
| D.Ryan | - | 15,000,000 | - | 15,000,000 |
| Executives | ||||
| T. Walsh | - | - | - | - |
| D. Waterfield | - | 1,000,000 | - | 1,000,000 |
| B. Phyland | - | 500,000 | - | 500,000 |
| P. Petrovic | - | 200,000 | - | 200,000 |
| L. Mitchell | - | - | - | - |
| 500,000 | 26,700,000 | - | 27,200,000 |
Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel
| 31-Dec-07 Directors |
Balance 1-Jan-07 |
Granted as compensation |
On exercise of options |
Net change additions |
Balance 31-Dec-07 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Atkins (Windamurah P/L) (Alkali Exploration P/L) |
1,206,667 | - | 51,667 |
300,000 | 1,558,334 |
M. Wilson (Chester Nominees WA P/L) |
16,900,000 | - | 5,000,000 | 4,200,000 | 26,100,000 |
| R. Perring (Quality ServicesEnterprisesP/L) |
3,000,000 | - | 5,000,000 | - | 8,000,000 |
| D. Ryan (Enterprise Family Trust) |
1,020,000 | - | 15,005,000 | - | 16,025,000 |
| Executives | |||||
| T. Walsh | 100,000 | - | - | 100,000 | 200,000 |
| D. Waterfield | - | - | 1,000,000 | - | 1,000,000 |
| B. Phyland | 50,000 | - | 50,000 | - | 100,000 |
| P. Petrovic | 50,000 | - | 250,000 | (100,000) | 200,000 |
| L. Mitchell | - | - | - | - | - |
| 22,326,667 | - | 26,356,667 | 4,500,000 | 53,183,334 |
Mr D. Ryan was a shareholder of Gidgee Resources Ltd, at the time of its acquisition by Legend Mining Limited on the 7 April 2005.
| 31-Dec-06 Directors |
Balance 1-Jan-06 |
Granted as compensation |
On exercise of options |
Net change additions |
Balance 31-Dec-06 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Atkins (Windamurah P/L) (Alkali Exploration P/L) |
155,000 | - | - | 1,051,667 | 1,206,667 |
M. Wilson (Chester Nominees WA P/L) |
- | - | - | 16,900,000 | 16,900,000 |
| R. Perring (Quality Services Enterprises P/L) |
- | - | - | 3,000,000 | 3,000,000 |
| D. Ryan (Enterprise Family Trust) |
15,000 | - | - | 1,005,000 | 1,020,000 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
34
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
13. REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTD)
| Executives | Balance 1-Jan-06 |
Granted as compensation |
On exercise of options |
Net change additions |
Balance 31-Dec-06 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. Walsh | - | - | - | 100,000 | 100,000 |
| D. Waterfield | - | - | - | - | - |
| B. Phyland | - | - | - | 50,000 | 50,000 |
P. Petrovic |
- | - | - | 50,000 | 50,000 |
| L. Mitchell | - | - | - | - | - |
| 170,000 | - | - | 22,156,667 | 22,326,667 |
Other transactions and balances with Key Management Personnel Services
During the year Windamurah Pty Ltd (a company associated with Mr M. Atkins) received fees for the provision of consulting services to the Company. The aggregate amount charged for such services was $66,000 (2006: $61,500).
During the year Hostyle Pty Ltd (a company associated with Mr M. Wilson) received fees for the provision of consulting services to the Company. The aggregate amount charged for such services was $241,598 (2006:$211,600 ).
During the year Quadramin (an entity associated with Mr R. Perring) received fees for the provision of consulting services to the Company. The aggregate amount charged for such services and expenses was $109,500 (2006: 209,700).
During the year Tony Walsh Corporate Services (an entity associated with Mr T. Walsh) received fees for the provision of consulting services to the Company. The aggregate amount charged for such services and expenses was $151,776 (2006: 54,084).
14. DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS
The number of Meetings of Directors held during the year and the number of Meetings attended by each Director was as follows:-
| Name | No. of Meetings Attended |
No. of Meetings Held Whilst A Director |
|---|---|---|
| Attended by: | ||
| Michael Atkins | 10 | 11 |
| MarkWilson | 11 | 11 |
| Robert Perring–resigned 30 June 2007 | 5 | 5 |
Dermot Ryan |
11 | 11 |
15. DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS
The relevant interest of each director in the shares and options issued by the company in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, at the date of this report is as follows:
| Name | Ordinary shares |
Options over ordinary shares |
|---|---|---|
| M. Atkins (Windamurah P/L), (Alkali Exploration P/L) |
1,558,334 | 500,000 |
| M. Wilson (Chester Nominees WA P/L) |
26,100,000 | - |
| R. Perring (Quality Services Enterprises P/L) |
8,000,000 | - |
| D. Ryan (Enterprise Family Trust) |
16,025,000 | 5,000 |
35
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
16. AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
Non-audit services
Non-audit services were provided by the Company’s auditor, Stantons International during the 2007 financial year. The directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services is compatible with the general stardard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. The nature and and scope of the non-audit service provided means that auditor independence was not compromised.
Stantons International received or are due to receive the following amounts for the provision of nonaudit services:
$ Consulting fees corporate advice 6,000
We have received the Declaration of Auditor Independence from Stantons International, the Company’s Auditor, this is available for review on page 79 and form part of this report.
SIGNED in accordance with a Resolution of the Directors on behalf of the Board
==> picture [177 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
________ M Wilson Managing Director
Dated this 31[st] day of March 2008
36
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
| Note Continuing Operations Sales revenues 4(a) Cost of sales Gross profit/(loss) Rental revenue 4(b) Finance revenue 4(c) Net income from Sale of Gidgee Project 27 Other income 4(d) Transfer from Equity Revaluation Reserve on in-specie distribution 4(e) Employee benefits expense 4(f) Deferred exploration expenditure written off 4(g) Other expenses 4(h) Investment and receivables in subsidiary companies written off 4(i) Corporate head office expenses 4(j) Finance costs 4(k) Net profit/(loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense Income tax benefit/ (expense) 6 Net profit/(loss) attributable to members of the entity Dividend arising from in-specie distribution 30 Net profit/(loss) after dividend PROFIT/(LOSS) PER SHARE (cents per share) 5 Basic profit/(loss) after dividend for the year Diluted profit/(loss) after dividend for the year |
CONSOLIDATED COMPANY 2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ - 451,352 - 451,352 - (145,668) - (145,668) |
|---|---|
| - 305,684 - 305,684 18,800 30,990 18,800 24,242 551,257 213,952 551,257 213,952 1,725,808 - 1,725,808 - 94,259 279,728 94,259 79,728 32,180,000 - 32,180,000 - (650,540) (1,092,413) (650,540) (1,092,413) (5,421,686) (3,732,296) (5,421,686) (3,494,770) (185,799) (250,570) (124,637) (189,408) - - (4,297,314) (550,047) (699,979) (500,988) (699,979) (497,796) (284,556) (2,990,666) (284,556) (2,990,666) |
|
| 27,327,564 (7,736,579) 23,091,412 (8,191,494) (2,025,527) - (1,235,866) - |
|
| 25,302,037 (7,736,579) 21,855,546 (8,191,494) (12,845,614) - (12,845,614) - |
|
| 12,456,423 (7,736,579) 9,009,932 (8,191,494) |
|
| 2.61 cents (1.21 cents) 2.46 cents (1.21 cents) |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
37
BALANCE SHEET AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2007
| Notes ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents 8 Trade & other receivables 9 Prepayments Other financial assets 11 Inventories 10 Total Current Assets Non-current Assets Deferred tax asset 6 Other financial assets 11 Property, plant & equipment 12 Deferred exploration costs 13 Total Non-current Assets TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES Current Liabilities Trade & other payables 14 Income tax payable 6 Provisions 15 Total Current Liabilities Non-current Liabilities Provisions 15 Deferred tax liability 6 Total Non-current Liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES NET ASSETS EQUITY Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent Contributed Equity 16 Share Option Premium Reserve 17 Equity Revaluation Reserve Accumulated profits/(losses) TOTAL EQUITY |
CONSOLIDATED COMPANY 2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ 11,913,555 8,924,983 11,913,555 8,924,983 98,137 233,766 100,831 4,047,781 339,594 18,130 339,594 18,130 321,025 - 321,025 - - 145,318 - 145,318 |
|---|---|
| 12,672,311 9,322,197 12,675,005 13,136,212 |
|
| 902,732 - 496,420 1,158,162 1,544,931 148,730 1,835,581 1,791,502 535,257 1,785,851 288,868 1,478,300 9,303,553 21,145,692 3,467,179 15,788,645 |
|
| 12,286,473 23,080,273 6,088,048 20,216,609 |
|
| 24,958,784 32,402,470 18,763,053 33,352,821 |
|
| 224,016 447,842 514,664 2,941,108 376,597 - 429,785 - 104,592 89,135 104,592 89,135 |
|
| 705,205 536,977 1,049,041 3,030,243 |
|
| 1,472,840 3,224,336 83,840 2,136,336 2,311,121 - 1,061,960 - |
|
| 3,783,961 3,224,336 1,145,800 2,136,336 |
|
| 4,489,166 3,761,313 2,194,841 5,166,579 |
|
| 20,469,618 28,641,157 16,568,212 28,186,242 |
|
| 36,385,772 57,328,816 36,385,772 57,328,816 3,192,481 3,115,335 3,192,481 3,115,335 237,936 - 237,936 - (19,346,571) (31,802,994) (23,247,977) (32,257,909) |
|
| 20,469,618 28,641,157 16,568,212 28,186,242 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
38
CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Note Receipts from customers Payments to suppliers and employees Payment for exploration and evaluation 13 Interest received Interest paid Net cash flows used in operating activities 21(ii) CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from sale of property, plant & equipment & scrap Purchase of property, plant & equipment 12 Payment for Mt Gibson Project assets Proceeds from the sale of investments Repayment of Performance Bond Term Deposit Payment for Performance Bonds Net cash flows from/ (used in) investing activities CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares Transaction costs of issue of shares Repayment of borrowings Net cash flows from financing activities Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 21 |
CONSOLIDATED COMPANY 2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ 258,377 873,708 258,377 873,708 (1,335,114) (1,328,979) (1,335,114) (1,107,673) (3,483,854) (5,841,783) (3,483,854) (5,841,783) 478,569 230,313 478,569 230,313 (401,958) (987,886) (401,958) (987,886) |
|---|---|
| (4,483,980) (7,054,627) (4,483,980) (6,833,321) |
|
| - 232,399 - 12,399 (202,737) (202,685) (202,737) (202,685) - (125,069) - (125,069) - 11,000 - 11,000 - 3,145,000 - 3,145,000 (1,396,201) - (1,396,201) - |
|
| (1,598,938) 3,060,645 (1,598,938) 2,840,645 |
|
| 9,071,490 15,848,855 9,071,490 15,848,855 - (337,867) - (337,867) - (3,000,000) - (3,000,000) |
|
| 9,071,490 12,510,988 9,071,490 12,510,988 |
|
| 2,988,572 8,517,006 2,988,572 8,518,312 8,924,983 407,977 8,924,983 406,671 |
|
| 11,913,555 8,924,983 11,913,555 8,924,983 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
39
STATEMENT OF CHANGE IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
| Consolidated At 1 January 2007 Profit for the year Total income/ (expense) for the year Issue of Share Capital Exercise of Share Options Cost of Issue of Share Capital Revaluation of Apex shares to fair value Transfer to income statement in respect of in- specie distribution Return of Capital At 31 December 2007 At 1 January 2006 Loss for the year Total income/ (expense) for the year Issue of Share Capital Exercise of Share Options Cost of issue of Share Capital At 31 December 2006 |
Issued Capital Share Option Premium Reserve $ $ 57,328,816 3,115,335 - - |
Equity Revaluation Reserve Accumulated Losses Total Equity $ $ - (31,802,994) 28,641,157 - 12,456,423 12,456,423 |
|---|---|---|
| - - |
- 12,456,423 12,456,423 |
|
| - 77,146 9,067,711 - 240,541 - - - - - (30,251,296) - |
- - 77,146 - - 9,067,711 - - 240,541 32,417,936 - 32,417,936 (32,180,000) - (32,180,000) 237,936 - (30,013,360) |
|
| 36,385,772 3,192,481 |
237,936 (19,346,571) 20,469,618 |
|
| 37,035,960 447,272 - - |
- (24,066,415) 13,416,817 - (7,736,579) (7,736,579) |
|
| - - |
- (7,736,579) (7,736,579) |
|
| 21,115,444 2,668,063 6,049 - (828,637) - |
- - 23,783,507 - - 6,049 - - (828,637) |
|
| 57,328,816 3,115,335 |
- (31,802,994) 28,641,157 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
40
STATEMENT OF CHANGE IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
| Company At 1 January 2007 Profit for the year Total income/ (expense) for the year Issue of Share Capital Exercise of Share Option Cost of Issue of Share Capital Revaluation of Apex shares to fair value Transfer to income statement in respect of in- specie distribution Return of Capital At 31 December 2007 At 1 January 2006 Loss for the year Total income/ (expense) for the year Issue of Share Capital Exercise of Share Option Cost of issue of Share Capital At 31 December 2006 |
Issued Capital Share Option Premium Reserve Equity Revaluation Reserve Accumulated Losses Total Equity $ $ $ $ 57,328,816 3,115,335 - (32,257,909) 28,186,242 - 9,009,932 9,009,932 |
|---|---|
| - - - 9,009,932 9,009,932 |
|
| - 77,146 - - 77,146 9,067,711 - - - 9,067,711 240,541 - - - 240,541 - - 32,417,936 - 32,417,936 - - (32,180,000) - (32,180,000) (30,251,296) - 237,936 - (30,013,360) |
|
| 36,385,772 3,192,481 237,936 (23,247,977) 16,568,212 |
|
| 37,035,960 447,272 - (24,066,415) 13,416,817 - - (8,191,494) (8,191,494) |
|
| - - - (8,191,494) (8,191,494) |
|
| 21,115,444 2,668,063 - - 23,783,507 6,049 - - - 6,049 (828,637) - - - (828,637) |
|
| 57,328,816 3,115,335 - (32,257,909) 28,186,242 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
41
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 1: CORPORATE INFORMATION
The financial report of Legend Mining Limited (the Company) for the year ended 31 December 2007 was authorised for issue in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 28 March 2008.
Legend Mining Limited is a company incorporated in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian Securities Exchange.
The nature of the operations and principal activities of the Group are described in note 3.
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Basis of preparation
The financial report is a general-purpose financial report, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, Australian Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. The financial report has also been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for certain financial assets carried at fair value.
The financial report is presented in Australian dollars and all values are expressed as whole dollars.
(b) Statement of compliance
The consolidated financial report of the group and the financial report of the company complies with Australian Accounting Standards, which include Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (‘AIFRS’). Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the financial report, comprising the financial statements and notes thereto, complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
42
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
(b) Statement of compliance (contd)
Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations that have recently been issued or amended but are not yet effective have not been adopted for the annual reporting period ending 31 December 2007 are outlined in the table below:
| AASB | Affected Standard(s) | Nature of change | Application | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment | to accounting | date for | date for | |
| policy | standard* | group | ||
| 2007-4 | AASB 1:First-time Adoption of Australian | No change to | 1 July 2007 | 1 January |
| Equivalents to International Financial Reporting | accounting policy | 2008 | ||
| Standards,_AASB 2:_Share-based Payment, | required. | |||
| AASB 3:Business Combinations, AASB 4: | Therefore no | |||
| Insurance Contracts,_AASB 5:_Non-current Assets | impact. | |||
| Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, | ||||
| AASB 6:Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral | ||||
| Resources,_AASB 7:_Financial Instruments: | ||||
| _Disclosures,_AASB 102:_Inventories,_AASB 107: | ||||
| Cash Flow Statements,_AASB 108:_Accounting | ||||
| Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and | ||||
| Errors,_AASB 110:_Events after the Balance Sheet | ||||
| Date,_AASB 112:_Income Taxes, AASB 114: | ||||
| Segment Reporting,_AASB 116:_Property, Plant and | ||||
| _Equipment,_AASB 117:_Leases,_AASB 118: | ||||
| Revenue,_AASB 119: _Employee Benefits, | ||||
| AASB 120:Accounting for Government Grants and | ||||
| _Disclosure of Government Assistance,_AASB 121: | ||||
| The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, | ||||
| AASB 127:Consolidated and Separate Financial | ||||
| Statements,_AASB 128:_Investments in Associates, | ||||
| AASB 129:Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary | ||||
| Economies,_AASB 130:_Disclosures in the Financial | ||||
| Statements of Banks and Similar Financial | ||||
| Institutions,_AASB 131:_Interests in Joint Ventures, | ||||
| AASB 132:Financial Instruments: Disclosure and | ||||
| Presentation,_AASB 132:_Financial Instruments: | ||||
| Presentation,_AASB 133:_Earnings per Share, | ||||
| AASB 134:Interim Financial Reporting, AASB 136: | ||||
| Impairment of Assets,_AASB 137:_Provisions, | ||||
| Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, | ||||
| AASB 138:Intangible Assets, AASB 139: Financial | ||||
| Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, | ||||
| AASB 141:Agriculture,_AASB 1023:_General | ||||
| Insurance Contracts,_AASB 1038:_Life Insurance | ||||
| Contracts | ||||
| 2007-5 | AASB 102: Inventories | No change to | 1 July 2007 | 1 January |
| accounting policy | 2008 | |||
| required. | ||||
| Therefore no | ||||
| impact. | ||||
| 2007-7 | AASB 1:First-time Adoption of Australian | 1 July 2007 | 1 January | |
| Equivalents to International Financial Reporting | 2008 | |||
| Standards,_AASB 2:_Share-based Payment, | ||||
| AASB 4:Insurance Contracts, AASB 5:Non-current | ||||
| Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, | ||||
| AASB 107:Cash Flow Statements, AASB 128 | ||||
| Investments in Associates |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
43
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
| New Standard | New Standard | AASB 8:Operating Segments | No change to | 1 January | 1 January |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| accounting policy | 2009 | 2009 | |||
| required. | |||||
| Therefore no | |||||
| impact. | |||||
| Interpretation | Group and Treasury Share Transactions | No change to | 1 March | 1 January | |
| 11 | accounting policy | 2007 | 2008 | ||
| required. | |||||
| Therefore no | |||||
| impact | |||||
| Interpretation | Service Concession Arrangement | No change to | 1 January | 1 January | |
| 12 | accounting policy | 2009 | 2009 | ||
| required. | |||||
| Therefore no | |||||
| impact |
- Application date is for the annual reporting periods beginning on or after the date shown in the above table.
(c) Summary of significant accounting policies
(i) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Legend Mining Limited and its subsidiaries (‘the Group’).
Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies so as to obtain benefits from their activities. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether a group controls another entity.
The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been eliminated in full.
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred out of the Group.
In the company’s financial statements, investments in subsidiaries are carried at cost.
(ii) Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
The carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities are often determined based on estimates and assumptions of future events. The key estimate and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities within the next annual reporting period are:
Share-based payment transactions
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled share-based payments at fair value at the grant date using a black-scholes formula taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the instruments were granted.
Impairment of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure
The future recoverability of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is dependent on a number of factors, including whether the Group decides to exploit the related lease itself or, if not, whether it successfully recovers the related exploration and evaluation asset through sale.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
44
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
Factors which could impact the future recoverability include the level of proved, probable and inferred mineral resources, future technological changes which could impact the cost of mining, future legal changes (including changes to environmental restoration obligations) and changes to commodity prices.
To the extent that capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is determined not to be recoverable in the future, this will reduce profits and net assets in the period in which the determination is made.
In addition, exploration and evaluation expenditure is capitalised if activities in the area of interest have not yet reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves. To the extent that it is determined in the future that this capitalised expenditure should be written off, this will reduce profits and net assets in the period in which this determination is made.
Provision for Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation costs are a normal consequence of mining, and the majority of this expenditure is incurred at the end of a mine’s life. In determining an appropriate level of provision consideration is given to the expected future costs to be incurred, the timing of these expected future costs (largely dependent on the life of the mine), and the estimated level of inflation.
The ultimate costs of rehabilitation is uncertain and cost can vary in response to many factors including changes to the relevant legal requirement, the emergence of new restoration techniques or experience at other mine sites. The expected timing of expenditure can also change, for example in response to changes in reserves.
Changes to any of the estimates could result in significant changes to the level of provisioning required, which would in turn impact future financial results.
(iii) Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment in value.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight line basis over the useful life of the asset from the time the asset is held ready for use.
Production assets are not depreciated during periods where mining activity is placed on a care and maintenance basis.
The depreciation rates used for each class are:
Buildings 10% Plant and equipment 7.5% - 50% Leased plant and equipment 22.5%
Impairment
The carrying values of property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment at each reporting date, with recoverable amount being estimated when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
45
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
If any indication of impairment exists and where the carrying values exceed the estimated recoverable amount, the assets or cash-generating units are written down to their recoverable amounts.
The recoverable amount of property, plant and equipment is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
Derecognition and disposal
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset.
Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the income statement in the period the item is derecognised.
(iv) Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred.
(v) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet comprise cash at bank and in hand, short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.
(vi) Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables, which generally have 30-90 day terms, are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less an allowance for any uncollectible amounts.
Collectibility of trade receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts that are known to be uncollectible are written off when identified. An allowance for doubtful debts is raised when there is objective evidence that the group will not be able to collect the debt.
(vii) Other Financial Assets
Financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are classified as either financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-tomaturity investments, or available-for-sale investments, as appropriate. When financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transactions costs. The Group determines the classification of its financial assets after initial recognition and, when allowed and appropriate, reevaluates this designation at each financial year-end.
All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade date i.e. the date that the Group commits to purchase the asset. Regular way purchases or sales are purchases or sales of financial assets under contracts that require delivery of the assets within the period established generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace.
46
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets classified as held for trading are included in the category ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’. Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. Derivatives are also classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments. Gains or losses on investments held for trading are recognised in profit or loss.
Held-to-maturity investments
Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity are classified as held-to-maturity when the Group has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Investments intended to be held for an undefined period are not included in this classification. Investments that are intended to be held-to-maturity, such as bonds, are subsequently measured at amortised cost. This cost is computed as the amount initially recognised minus principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using the effective interest method of any difference between the initially recognised amount and the maturity amount. This calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums and discounts. For investments carried at amortised cost, gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the investments are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Such assets are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired, as well as through the amortisation process.
Available-for-sale investments
Available-for-sale investments are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not classified as any of the three preceding categories. After initial recognition available-for sale investments are measured at fair value with gains or losses being recognised as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognised or until the investment is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is recognised in profit or loss.
The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets is determined by reference to quoted market bid prices at the close of business on the balance sheet date. For investments with no active market, fair value is determined using valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm’s length market transactions; reference to the current market value of another instrument that is substantially the same; discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models.
(viii) Inventories
Stores
Inventories of consumable supplies and spare parts are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost is assigned on a weighted average basis.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
47
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
(ix) Deferred exploration costs
Deferred exploration and evaluation costs
Exploration and evaluation expenditure is stated at cost and is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest.
Mining information is stated at cost.
Such costs are only carried forward to the extent that they are expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area of interest (or alternatively by its sale), or where activities in the area have not yet reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves, and active operations are continuing.
Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area are written off to the income statement in the period in which the decision to abandon the area is made.
A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest.
Impairment
The carrying values of exploration and evaluation costs are reviewed for impairment when facts and circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
The recoverable amount of exploration and evaluation costs is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the fair value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area are written off in full against the income statement in the year in which the decision to abandon the area is made. A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest. Each area of interest is limited to the size related to known or probable mineral resources capable of supporting a mining operation.
(x) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
48
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
Rehabilitation provision
Long-term environmental obligations are based on the Group’s environmental management plans, in compliance with current environmental and regulatory requirements.
Full provision is made, based on the net present value of the estimated cost of restoring the environmental disturbance that has occurred up to the balance sheet date. Increases due to additional environmental disturbances are capitalised and amortised over the remaining lives of the mines. These increases are accounted for on a net present value basis.
Annual increases in the provision relating to the change in the net present value of the provision are accounted for in earnings.
The estimated costs of rehabilitation are reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate for changes in legislation, technology and other circumstances. Cost estimates are not reduced by the potential proceeds from the sale of assets or from plant clean-up at closure.
(xi) Revenue
Revenue is recognised and measured at the fair value of consideration received or receivable to the extent that it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the Group and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:
Sale of goods
Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. Risks and rewards of ownership are considered passed to the buyer at the time of delivery of the goods to the customer.
Interest income
Interest revenue is recognised as it accrues, using the effective interest method. This is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset and allocating the interest income over the relevant period using the effective interest rate, which is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to the net carrying amount of the financial asset.
Rental Income
Rental income is accounted for on a straight line basis over the lease term.
All revenue is stated net of the amount of goods and services tax (GST) .
(xii) Income tax
Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax law used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
49
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
-
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences:
-
Except where the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
-
In respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses can be utilised:
-
Except where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary differences arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
-
In respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
The carrying amounts of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax assets to be utilised.
Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance sheet date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date.
Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in the income statement.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
(xiii) Other taxes
Revenue, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except;
-
where the amount of the GST incurred is not recoverable from the Australian Taxation Office. In these circumstances the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense.
-
Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to the ATO is included as a current asset or liability in the Balance Sheet.
50
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
Cashflows are included in the Cash Flow Statement on a gross basis. The GST components of cashflows arising from investing or financing activities which are recoverable from, or payable to the ATO are classed as operating cashflows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.
(xiv) Recoverable amounts of assets
At each reporting date, the Group assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired. Where an indicator of impairment exists, the Group makes a formal estimate of recoverable amount. Where the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. It is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset’s value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value less costs to sell and it does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, in which case, the recoverable amount is determined for the cashgenerating unit to which the asset belongs.
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
Impairment losses relating to continuing operations are recognised in those expense categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset.
An assessment is also made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised in the income statement. After such a reversal the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the asset’s revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.
(xv) Trade and or other payables
Liabilities for trade creditors and other amounts are carried at amortised cost and represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments in respect of these goods and services. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days.
(xvi) Interest bearing loans and borrowings
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration received less directly attributable transaction costs.
After initial recognition, interest bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any issue costs, and any discount or premium on settlement.
51
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
(xvii) Share based payment transactions
The Group provides benefits to employees (including directors) of the Group and to the providers of services to the Group in the form of share based payment transactions, whereby employees or service providers render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (‘equity-settled transactions’).
There are currently three scenarios in place to provide these services:
-
(a) ‘Employees Share Option Plan’, which provides benefits to eligible persons;
-
(b) Capital raising costs, which provide payment to stockbrokers and finance institutions for capital raising services and commissions; and
-
(c) Other grants of options to directors on an ad hoc basis.
The cost of the equity-settled transactions with stockbrokers and finance institutions is measured by reference to the fair value of the service received at the date they are granted.
For transactions with employees (including directors), the cost of these equity-settled transactions is measured by reference to the fair value of the options provided. The fair value is determined by an external valuer using a Black-Scholes model.
The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employee becomes fully entitled to the award (‘vesting date’).
In valuing these equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any performance conditions, other than conditions linked to the price of the shares of Legend Mining Limited (market conditions) if applicable.
The cumulative expense recognised for these equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the Group’s best estimate of the number of equity instruments that will ultimately vest. No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date. The income statement charge or credit for a period represents the movement in cumulative expenses recognised as at the beginning and end of the period.
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is only conditional upon a market condition.
If the terms of an equity-settled award are modified, as a minimum an expense is recognised as if the terms had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any modification that increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is otherwise beneficial to the employee, as measured at the date of modification.
If an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However , if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a modification of the original award, as described in the previous paragraph.
For transactions with other service providers, the cost of these equity-settled transactions is measured by reference to the value of the services provided. The cost of these equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, at the time the services are provided unless they are transaction costs arising on the issue of ordinary shares, in which case the transaction costs are recognised directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds received on the issue of shares.
52
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
(xviii) Contributed Equity
Issued and paid up capital is recognised at the fair value of the consideration received by the Company. Any transaction costs net of tax arising on the issue of ordinary shares are recognised directly in equity as a reduction of the proceeds received.
(xix) Employee Benefits
Provision is made for employee benefits accumulated as a result of employee services up to the reporting date. These employee benefits include wages, salaries, annual leave and include related oncosts such as superannuation and payroll tax.
Provision for annual leave together with the associated employment on-costs are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liability is settled.
No provision is made for non-vesting sick leave, as the anticipated pattern of future sick leave taken indicates that accumulated non vesting sick leave will never be paid.
The liability for long service leave is recognised and measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures, and period of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currencies that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflow.
No long service leave has been provided for in these financial statements.
Contributions to employee superannuation funds of choice are expensed as incurred.
(xx) Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated as net loss attributable to members, adjusted to exclude costs of servicing equity (other than dividends), divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
Diluted EPS is calculated as net loss attributable to members, adjusted for:
-
(i) Costs of servicing equity (other than dividends).
-
(ii) The after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with the dilutive potential ordinary shares that have been recognised as expenses; and
-
(iii) Other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of potential ordinary shares;
divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.
53
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
(xxi) Financial risk management objectives and policies
The Group’s principal financial instruments, comprise loans and borrowings, and cash and shortterm deposits.
The main purpose of these financial instruments is to raise finance for the Group’s operations. The Group has various other financial assets and liabilities such as trade receivables and trade payables, which arise directly from its operations. It is, and has been throughout the period under review, the Group’s policy that no trading in financial instruments shall be undertaken. The main risks arise from the Group’s financial instruments are fair value interest rate risks, liquidity risk, and credit risk. The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and they are summarised below.
Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed elsewhere in note 2 to the financial statements.
Fair value interest risk
The Group’s exposure to the risk of change in the fair value of its loans and borrowings relates primarily to the Group’s debt obligations with a fixed interest rate. The Group’s policy is to manage this risk using a mixture of long and short term debt, and equity.
Foreign currency risk
The Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk is minimal.
Commodity price risk
The Group’s exposure to price risk is minimal.
Credit risk
The Group trades only with recognised, creditworthy third parties.
It is the Group’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on credit terms are subject to credit verification procedures.
In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Group’s exposure to bad debts is not significant.
There are no significant concentrations of credit risk within the Group.
With respect to credit risk arising from the other financial assets of the Group, which comprise cash and cash equivalents, the Group’s exposure to credit risk arises from default of the counter party, with a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of these instruments.
Since the Group only trades with recognised third parties, there is no requirement for collateral.
Liquidity risk
The Group’s objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility through the use of a mixture of long and short term debt.
54
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD)
(xxii) Interest in a jointly controlled operation
The Group has four interests in joint ventures that are jointly controlled operations. A joint venture is a contractual arrangement whereby two or more parties undertake an economic activity that is subject to joint control. A jointly controlled operation involves the use of assets and other resources of the venturers rather than establishment of a separate entity. The Group recognises its interest in the jointly controlled operations by recognising its interest in the assets and the liabilities of the joint ventures. The Group also recognises the expenses that it incurs and its share of the income that it earns from the sale of goods or services by the jointly controlled operations. For details of joint ventures please refer note 25.
NOTE 3: NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
The principal activity of the Group is:
- Exploration for gold and base metal (nickel-copper-zinc) deposits at Gum Creek, Mt Gibson and the Pilbara.
55
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
| NOTE 4: REVENUE AND EXPENSES Note Revenues and expenses from continuing operations a) Operating activities Sales revenue b) Rental Revenue Rental revenue c) Finance Revenue Bank interest received and receivable d) Other Income Net gains on disposal of property, plant & equipment Net gain on sale of investments Field work completed by Legend Geologists Payment for Aeromagnetic Data Refunds from DOIR Reimbursement of premises expenses e) Transfer from Equity Revaluation Reserve on in- specie distribution Transfer from Equity Revaluation Reserve on in- specie distribution from the sale of the Gidgee Gold Project to Apex Minerals NL f) Employee Benefits Expense Salaries & Oncosts Share Based Payments Other Employee Benefits g) Deferred Exploration Expenditure written off Write down of deferred exploration expenditure 13 h) Other Expenses Depreciation Exploration administration Inventory written off i) Investment and receivables in subsidiary companies written off Investment in subsidiary companies written down Intercompany receivables provided for |
CONSOLIDATED COMPANY 2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ - 451,352 - 451,352 |
|---|---|
| 18,800 30,990 18,800 24,242 |
|
| 551,257 213,952 551,257 213,952 |
|
| 7,273 204,269 7,273 4,269 - 10,737 - 10,737 14,800 - 14,800 - 5,000 - 5,000 - 14,222 31,611 14,222 31,611 52,964 33,111 52,964 33,111 |
|
| 94,259 279,728 94,259 79,728 |
|
| 32,180,000 - 32,180,000 - |
|
| 600,419 560,192 600,419 560,192 40,838 500,000 40,838 500,000 9,283 32,221 9,283 32,221 |
|
| 650,540 1,092,413 650,540 1,092,413 |
|
| 5,421,686 3,732,296 5,421,686 3,494,770 |
|
| 185,799 233,336 124,637 172,173 - 17,234 - 17,235 |
|
| 185,799 250,570 124,637 189,408 |
|
| 159,353 - 159,353 - |
|
| - - - 550,047 4,297,314 - |
|
| - - 4,297,314 550,047 |
56
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
| NOTE 4: REVENUE AND EXPENSES (CONTD) |
CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | CONSOLIDATED | COMPANY | COMPANY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||
| j) Corporate head office expenses | |||||||
| Fees – Audit/Tax | 72,712 | 57,931 | 72,712 | 57,931 | |||
| Fees – ASX | 51,952 | 41,375 | 51,952 | 41,375 | |||
| Fees – Share Registry | 80,813 | 16,213 | 80,813 | 16,213 | |||
| Office Rent | 104,905 | 113,042 | 104,905 | 113,042 | |||
| Legal Expenses | 78,627 | 33,841 | 78,627 | 33,841 | |||
| Travel Expenses | 27,444 | 34,229 | 27,444 | 34,229 | |||
| Other expenses | 283,526 | 204,357 | 283,526 | 201,165 | |||
| 699,979 | 500,988 | 699,979 | 497,796 | ||||
| k) Finance costs | |||||||
| Debt Consolidation Expense | - | 2,000,000 | - | 2,000,000 | |||
| Interest Expense | 284,556 | 990,666 | 284,556 | 990,666 | |||
| 284,556 | 2,990,666 | 284,556 | 2,990,666 | ||||
| 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
| NOTE 5: PROFIT/(LOSS) PER SHARE |
$ | $ | |||||
| (a) Reconciliation of earnings to net profit/(loss): | |||||||
| Net Profit/(Loss) | 25,302,037 | (7,736,579) | |||||
| Profit/(loss) used in the calculation of basic earnings | 25,032,037 | (7,736,579) | |||||
| per share | |||||||
| (b) Weighted average number of shares on issue | |||||||
| during the financial year used in the | |||||||
| calculation of basic loss per share | 968,997,475 | 640,917,387 | |||||
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares on issue | |||||||
| used in the calculation of diluted loss per share | 1,027,119,760 | 640,917,387 | |||||
| NOTE 6: INCOME TAX |
|||||||
| Consolidated | Company | ||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||
| The major components of income tax | |||||||
| expense are: | |||||||
| Income Statement | |||||||
| Current income tax | |||||||
| Current income tax charge/(benefit) | 376,597 | (2,303,726) | 429,785 | (2,275,186) | |||
| Deferred income tax | |||||||
| Relating to origination and reversal of | |||||||
| temporary difference | 1,648,930 | 471,649 | 806,081 | 98,656 | |||
| Deferred tax assets not brought to | |||||||
| account as realisation is not considered | |||||||
| probable | - | 1,832,077 | - | 2,176,530 | |||
| Income tax expense reported in the | |||||||
| income statement | 2,025,527 | - | 1,235,866 | - |
57
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 6: INCOME TAX (CONTD)
| A reconciliation between tax expense and the product of accounting profit before income tax multiplied by the Group’s applicable income tax rate is as follows: Accounting profit/(loss) before tax from ordinary activities Accounting profit/(loss) before income tax At the Group’s statutory income tax rate of 30% Expenditure not allowed for income tax purposes Capital Gain on sale of assets Recoupment of prior year tax losses not previously brought to account Other Deferred tax assets not brought to account as realisation is not considered probable Income tax expense reported in the consolidated income statement Current Income Tax Deferred Income Tax Deferred income tax at 31 December related to the following: Consolidated Deferred tax liabilities Capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure Accrued interest income Gross deferred income tax liabilities Deferred tax assets Losses available to offset against future taxable income Provision for rehabilitation Other provisions Revaluation of land and buildings to fair value Revaluation of plant and equipment to fair values Impairment of property, plant & equipment Share based costs on equity Other Deferred tax assets not brought to account as realisation is not regarded as probable Gross deferred tax assets |
Consolidated Company 2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ 27,327,564 (7,736,579) 23,091,412 (8,191,494) |
|---|---|
| 27,327,564 (7,736,579) 23,091,412 (8,191,494) |
|
| 8,198,269 (2,320,974) 6,927,424 (2,457,448) 169 17,248 169 182,262 2,497,781 - 2,497,781 - (8,436,604) - (8,436,604) - (234,088) - 247,096 - - 2,303,726 - 2,275,186 |
|
| 2,025,527 - 1,235,866 - |
|
| 376,597 - 429,785 - (2,289,315) (5,841,957) (1,040,154) (4,736,594) (21,806) - (21,806) - |
|
| (2,311,121) (5,841,957) (1,061,960) (4,736,594) |
|
| 9,540,898 10,820,770 441,852 967,301 25,152 640,901 51,491 - 51,491 - - 28,376 - 13,440 - 160,375 - 161,926 123,879 - 134,267 - 240,541 - 240,541 - 44,969 - 44,969 - - (4,854,993) - (6,900,443) |
|
| 902,732 5,841,957 496,420 4,736,594 |
58
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 6: INCOME TAX (CONTD)
Tax Consolidation
Legend Mining Limited and its 100% owner Australian resident subsidiaries have formed a tax consolidated group with effect from 1 July 2004. Legend Mining Limited is the head entity of the tax consolidated group. Members of the group have entered into a tax sharing agreement in order to allocate income tax expense to the wholly owned subsidiaries on a pro-rata basis. In addition, the agreement provides for the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities should the head entity default on its tax payment obligations. At the balance date, the possibility of default is remote.
Tax effect accounting by member of the tax consolidated group
Tax expense / income, deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences are recognised in the separate financial statements of the members of the tax consolidated group using the group allocation method. Current tax liabilities and assets and deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and tax credits of the members of the tax consolidated group are recognised by the Company (as head entity in the tax consolidated group).
Members of the tax consolidated group have not entered into a tax funding agreement. As a result, the aggregate of the current tax liability or asset and any deferred tax asset arising from unused tax losses and tax credits in respect of that period, assumed by the Company, are recognised as a contribution from (or distribution to) equity participants.
NOTE 7: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates in one business and geographical segment, being the mining and exploration for gold and base metals (nickel-copper-zinc) in Australia.
NOTE 8: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
| NOTE 8: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|---|---|
| Cash at bank and in hand Deposits-at call |
Consolidated Company 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 442,865 540,727 442,865 540,727 11,470,690 8,384,256 11,470,690 8,384,256 |
| 11,913,555 8,924,983 11,913,555 8,924,983 |
Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. Deposits at call earn interest on a 30 day term basis at bank deposit rates.
59
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 9: TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
| Current Trade Receivables (a) Other Receivables (a) Related party receivables (b) Less: Provision for impairment (c) |
Consolidated Company 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ - 14,775 - 14,775 98,137 218,991 98,137 218,991 - - 4,625,191 4,139,198 - - (4,622,497) (325,183) |
|---|---|
| 98,137 233,766 100,831 4,047,781 |
(a) Terms and conditions relating to the above financial instruments
-
Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and generally on 30 day terms.
-
Other receivables are non-interest bearing and have repayment terms of between 30 and 60 days.
(b) For terms and conditions of related party receivables refer note 20.
(c) The amount of the impairment has been measured as the difference between the net assets and liabilities of the controlled entity and the loans from the parent entity.
NOTE 10: INVENTORIES
| Current Stores and spares at net realisable value |
Consolidated Company 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ - 145,318 - 145,318 |
|---|---|
NOTE 11: OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS
| Note Current Shares in Apex Minerals NL – at market value Non-current Performance and other bonds (a) Shares in controlled entities - at (lower of cost and net realisable value) 23 |
Consolidated Company 2007 2006 2007 2006 $ $ $ $ 321,025 - 321,025 - |
|---|---|
| 1,544,931 148,730 1,544,931 148,730 - - 290,650 1,642,772 |
|
| 1,544,931 148,730 1,835,581 1,791,502 |
(a) Terms and conditions relating to the above financial instruments
-
Non-Current Rehabilitation/Performance bonds– bank deposits were held as security for rehabilitation and credit cards, as a security deposit for the premises rented and as security for joint venture assets. These bonds were held on 30 day term deposits at 7.14%, or at call.
-
Shares in Apex Minerals NL – 256,820 Apex shares were on hand at 31 December 2007 from the in-specie distribution to shareholders. These shares were withheld to pay for the withholding tax due to the Australian Taxation Office on behalf of shareholders that didn’t provide their tax file numbers before the in-specie distribution. The shares had a market value of $1.25 each at 31 December 2007 and were subsequently sold at an average price of $1.27 each during January 2008.
60
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 12: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
| Consolidated At 1 January 2007 net of accumulated depreciation Additions Disposals Depreciation expense At 31 December 2007 Net of accumulated depreciation At 1 January 2007 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net carrying amount At 31 December 2007 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net carrying amount Company At 1 January 2007 net of accumulated depreciation Additions Disposals Depreciation expense At 31 December 2007 net of accumulated depreciation At 1 January 2007 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net carrying amount At 31 December 2007 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net carrying amount |
Buildings Plant and equipment Total $ $ $ 321,921 1,463,930 1,785,851 - 202,737 202,737 (84,620) (1,182,912) (1,267,532) (73,978) (111,821) (185,799) |
|---|---|
| 163,323 371,934 535,257 |
|
| 468,725 2,625,996 3,094,721 (146,804) (1,162,066) (1,308,870) |
|
| 321,921 1,463,930 1,785,851 |
|
| 284,040 1,110,537 1,394,577 (120,717) (738,603) (859,320) |
|
| 163,323 371,934 535,257 |
|
| 101,790 1,376,510 1,478,300 - 202,737 202,737 (84,620) (1,182,912) (1,267,532) (17,170) (107,467) (124,637) |
|
| - 288,868 288,868 |
|
| 184,685 2,531,836 2,716,521 (82,895) (1,155,326) (1,238,221) |
|
| 101,790 1,376,510 1,478,300 |
|
| - 1,016,377 1,016,377 - (727,509) (727,509) |
|
| - 288,868 288,868 |
61
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 12: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (CONTD)
| Consolidated At 1 January 2006 net of accumulated depreciation Additions Disposals Depreciation expense At 31 December 2006 Net of accumulated depreciation At 1 January 2006 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net carrying amount At 31 December 2006 Cost Accumulated Net carrying amount Company At 1 January 2006 net of accumulated depreciation Additions Disposals Depreciation expense At 31 December 2006 net of accumulated depreciation At 1 January 2006 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net carrying amount At 31 December 2006 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net carrying amount |
Buildings Plant and equipment Total $ $ $ 393,867 1,437,334 1,831,201 13,000 181,989 194,989 - (7,003) (7,003) (84,946) (148,390) (233,336) |
|---|---|
| 321,921 1,463,930 1,785,851 |
|
| 455,725 2,459,634 2,915,359 (61,858) (1,022,300) (1,084,158) |
|
| 393,867 1,437,334 1,831,201 |
|
| 468,725 2,625,996 3,094,721 (146,804) (1,162,066) (1,308,870) |
|
| 321,921 1,463,930 1,785,851 |
|
| 116,928 1,345,559 1,462,487 13,000 181,989 194,989 - (7,003) (7,003) (28,138) (144,035) (172,173) |
|
| 101,790 1,376,510 1,478,300 |
|
| 171,685 2,365,474 2,537,159 (54,757) (1,019,915) (1,074,672) |
|
| 116,928 1,345,559 1,462,487 |
|
| 184,685 2,531,836 2,716,521 (82,895) (1,155,326) (1,238,221) |
|
| 101,790 1,376,510 1,478,300 |
62
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 13: DEFERRED EXPLORATION COSTS
| Note Deferred exploration and evaluation Deferred mining information (a) Deferred exploration and evaluation costs At 1 January, at cost Expenditure incurred during the year Expenditure reassigned 13(i) Expenditure written off during the year 13(ii) Expenditure written off during the year via sale to Apex Minerals NL 27 At 31 December, at cost 13(iii) (b) Deferred Mining Information At 1 January, at cost At 31 December, at cost 13(iii) |
Consolidated Company 2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ 7,631,050 19,473,189 3,467,179 15,788,645 1,672,503 1,672,503 - - |
|---|---|
| 9,303,553 21,145,692 3,467,179 15,788,645 |
|
| 19,473,189 17,872,057 15,788,645 15,475,600 3,483,854 5,333,428 3,003,986 3,807,815 - - 541 - (5,421,686) (3,732,296) (5,421,686) (3,494,770) (9,904,307) - (9,904,307) - |
|
| 7,631,050 19,473,189 3,467,179 15,788,645 |
|
| 1,672,503 1,672,503 - - |
|
| 1,672,503 1,672,503 - - |
Note :
-
(i) As part of the continuing tenement rationalisation, Legend Mining Limited lodged new tenement applications over areas covered by Gidgee Resources Limited tenement application. Expenditure allocated to these Gidgee Resources Limited tenements was reassigned to the new tenement applications.
-
(ii) Carrying values for certain tenements were reviewed and subject to the following conditions being met;
-
(1) no substantive expenditure for further exploration in the specific areas has been budgeted for; (2) exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area has not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources;
-
(3) it was decided to discontinue such activities in the specific areas; it was decided to write off the carrying values ($5,412,686) of the affected tenements, which included the impairment of the Gidgee tenements to the recoverable amounts.
-
(iii) The future recoverability of capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure is dependent on a number of factors, including whether the Group decides to exploit the related lease itself or, if not, whether it successfully recovers the related exploration and evaluation asset through sale.
63
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
| NOTE 14: TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES Current – unsecured Trade payables Other payables & accruals Related party payables |
Consolidated Company 2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ 192,447 421,719 192,447 401,719 31,569 26,123 31,569 26,123 - - 290,648 2,513,266 |
|---|---|
| 224,016 447,842 514,664 2,941,108 |
Terms and conditions relating to the above financial instruments
(i) Trade payables are non-interest bearing and normally settled on 30 day terms.
- (ii) Other payables are non-interest bearing and normally settled as they fall due.
(iii) For terms and conditions relating to related party payables refer to note 20.
| NOTE 15: PROVISIONS Current Employee benefits Number of employees at year end |
2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ 104,592 89,135 104,592 89,135 12 15 12 15 |
|---|---|
At the May 2004 Annual General Meeting of the Company shareholders approved a resolution to implement an employee share option plan allowing Legend to issue options to eligible employees in order to provide them with an incentive to provide growth and value to all shareholders.
For details of options issued, converted or expired refer note 19.
| Non Current Provision for restoration – Gum Creek Provision for restoration – Pilbara Provision for restoration – Mt Gibson Movement in provision for restoration: Carrying amount at beginning of the year Additional provision Amount utilised during the year Amounts transferred to Apex Minerals on sale of tenements Carrying amount at year end |
2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ - 2,057,000 - 2,057,000 83,840 79,336 83,840 79,336 1,389,000 1,088,000 - - 1,472,840 3,224,336 83,840 2,136,336 3,224,336 3,208,000 2,136,336 2,120,000 305,504 16,336 4,504 16,336 - - (2,057,000) - (2,057,000) - |
|---|---|
| 1,472,840 3,224,336 83,840 2,136,336 |
A provision for restoration is recognised in relation to the mining and exploration activities for costs such as reclamation, waste site closure, plant closure and other costs associated with restoration. No provisions were used or released during the year
64
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 16: CONTRIBUTED EQUITY
| Ordinary shares Issued and fully paid Issue costs Return of capital Movement in ordinary shares on issue 2007 At 1 January 2007 16-Mar-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 28-May-07 Issued for cash & option premium on exercise of share options 27-Jul-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 30-Aug-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 17-Sep-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 21-Sep-07 Issued for cash & option premium on exercise of share options 2-Oct-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 5-Oct-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 15-Oct-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 18-Oct-07 Issued for cash & option premium on exercise of share options 24-Oct-07 Issued for cash & option premium on exercise of share options 26-Oct-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 5-Nov-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 1-Dec-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 4-Dec-07 Issued for cash on exercise of share options Total prior to return of capital Return of capital Movement in ordinary shares on issue 2006 At 1 January 2006 20-Jul-06 Conversion of convertible note 20-Jul-06 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 20-Jul-06 Issued for cash on rights issue 01-Aug-06 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 10-Aug-06 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 31-Dec-06 Issued for cash on exercise of share options 31-Dec-06 Issued for cash on capital raising |
Consolidated and Company Dec-07 $ Dec-06 $ 68,176,255 59,108,544 (1,539,186) (1,779,728) (30,251,297) - |
|---|---|
| 36,385,772 57,328,816 |
|
| No $ 924,115,651 59,108,544 172,000 6,880 260,111 10,404 192,324 7,693 859,112 34,364 3,718,572 148,743 5,587,333 223,493 6,164,667 246,587 3,618,333 144,733 4,800,332 192,013 37,230,153 1,489,206 121,056,667 4,842,267 8,068,966 322,759 34,323,954 1,372,958 33,400 1,336 |
|
| 9,710,109 24,275 |
|
| 1,159,911,684 68,176,255 - (30,251,297) |
|
| 1,159,911,684 37,924,958 |
|
| No $ 458,578,322 37,987,051 125,000,000 5,000,000 125,000,000 5,000,000 152,886,107 6,115,444 66,667 2,667 33,333 1,333 51,222 2,049 62,500,000 5,000,000 |
|
| 924,115,651 59,108,544 |
Effective 1 July 1998, the Corporations’ legislation in place abolished the concept of authorised share capital and par value shares. Accordingly the Company does not have authorised capital nor par value in respect of its issued shares.
Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry the right to dividends.
65
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 17: SHARE OPTION PREMIUM RESERVE
| Share option premium reserve Movement in share option premium reserve in 2007 At 1 January 2007 20-Apr-07 Options lapsed 22-May-07 Issue of options to employees 28-May-07 Exercise of options 21-Sep-07 Exercise of options 18-Oct-07 Exercise of options 24-Oct-07 Exercise of options This reserve relates to : the fair value of the premium received by the Group on the issue of unlisted options the identified fair value of $0.02 on the issue of 132,500,000 unlisted options the identified fair value of $0.011 on the issue of 1,700,000 unlisted options the vesting portion of the identified fair value of $0.037 on the issue of 3,450,000 unlisted options Movement in share option premium reserve At 1 January 2006 20-July-06 Issue of options for convertible note early exercise fee 20-July-06 Issue of options for capital raising costs 20-July-06 Issue of options to employees At 31 December 2006 This reserve relates to : the fair value of the premium received by the Group on the issue of unlisted options the identified fair value of $0.02 on the issue of 132,500,000 unlisted options |
Dec-07 $ Dec-06 $ |
|---|---|
| 3,192,481 3,115,335 |
|
| No $ 152,700,000 3,115,335 (15,000,000) - 3,450,000 77,146 (200,000) - (5,000,000) - (3,250,000) - (121,000,000) - |
|
| 11,700,000 3,192,481 |
|
| Dec-06 No Dec-06 $ 18,500,000 447,272 125,000,000 2,500,000 7,500,000 150,000 1,700,000 18,063 |
|
| 152,700,000 3,115,335 |
|
- the identified fair value of $0.011 on the issue of 1,700,000 unlisted options
Details of share options issued, vested or expired is available in note 19.
66
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 18: SHARE OPTIONS
| (i) Listed options – Expiry date 31 July 08 At 1 January 2007 Options issued Options exercised Options expired At 31 December 2007 (ii) Unlisted options – Expiry date 30 July 2007 At 1 January 2007 Options issued Options exercised Options expired At 31 December 2007 Unlisted options – Expiry date 7 February 2008 At 1 January 2007 Options issued Options exercised Options expired At 31 December 2007 Unlisted options – Expiry date 30 July 2009 At 1 January 2007 Options issued Options exercised Options expired At 31 December 2007 Unlisted options – Expiry date 31 July 2008 At 1 January 2007 Options issued Options exercised Options expired At 31 December 2007 Unlisted options – Expiry date 22 May 2010 At 1 January 2007 Options issued Options exercised Options expired At 31 December 2007 |
Number Exercise price cents per share 152,734,885 0.25cents 1 - (106,312,600) - 46,422,285 0.25cents 15,000,000 20cents - - (15,000,000) - 20cents 2,000,000 6.25cents2 - - - 2,000,000 6.25cents 1,500,000 26.25cents3 - - - 1,500,000 26.25cents 134,200,000 0.25cents4 - (129,450,000) - 4,750,000 0.25cents - 3,450,000 4.25cents5 - - 3,450,000 4.25cents |
|---|---|
1 Reduced from 4 cents per option to 0.25 cents following the return of capital
2 Reduced from 10 cents per option to 6.25 cents following the return of capital
3 Reduced from 30 cents per option to 26.25 cents following the return of capital
4 Reduced from 4 cents per option to 0.25 cents following the return of capital
5 Reduced from 8 cents per option to 4.25 cents following the return of capital
67
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 19: SHARE-BASED PAYMENT PLANS
(a) Recognised share-based payment expenses
The expense recognised for services received during the year is shown in the table below:
| Consolidated | Consolidated | Company | Company | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Expense arising from Employee Share Option Plan | 77,146 | 18,062 | 77,146 | 18,062 |
| Expense arising from Expense Share Option Plan | - | 2,650,000 | - | 2,650,000 |
(b) Types of share-based payment plans
Employee Share Option Plan, ‘ESOP’
Share options are granted to Eligible Persons with more than 6 months’ service. Eligible Persons are determined by the Board after taking into account the following considerations:
-
(i) the seniority of the Eligible Person and the position the Eligible Person occupies within the Group;
-
(ii) the length of service of the Eligible Person with the Group;
-
(iii) the record of employment of the Eligible Person with the Group;
-
(iv) the contractual history of the Eligible Person with the Group;
-
(v) the potential contribution of the Eligible Person to the growth of the Group;
-
(vi) the extent (if any) of the existing participation of the Eligible Person in the Plan; and (vii) any other matters which the Board considers relevant.
The ESOP is designed to align participants’ interests with those of shareholders by increasing the value of the Company’s shares. Under the ESOP, the exercise price of the options is set “at least 80% of the average closing sale price of the Shares on ASX over the five trading days immediately preceding the day of issue of Options by the Board” as per the terms stated in the ESOP.
Options may be exercised at any time during the period commencing 12 months after the Issue Date and ending on the Expiry.
When an Eligible Person ceases employment prior to the first anniversary of the Issue Date otherwise than to take up employment with an Associate Company, or ceases to be an Eligible Person on account of Retirement, Permanent Disability, Redundancy or death, the share options automatically lapse and are forfeited.
When an Eligible Person ceases employment after the first anniversary of the Issue Date and prior to the Expiry Date otherwise than to take up employment with an Associate Company, or ceases to be an Eligible Person on account of Retirement, Permanent Disability, Redundancy or death, the share options automatically lapse and are forfeited if the Eligible Person fails to exercise any or all of the options within a period of three months from the date of cessation of employment.
Expense Share Option Plan, ‘ExSOP’
No options were issued under the “Expense Share Option Plan, ExSOP”
68
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 19:SHARE-BASED PAYMENT PLANS (CONTD)
(c) Summaries of options granted
ESOP: The following table illustrates the number (No.) and weighted average exercise prices (WAEP) of, and movements in, share options issued during the year:
| Outstanding balance at the beginning of the year Granted during the year Exercised during the year Outstanding at the end of the year Exercisable at the end of the year |
2007 No. 2007 WAEP 2006 No. 2006 WAEP 1,700,000 0.04 - - 3,450,000 0.08 1,700,000 0.04 (1,200,000) 0.04 - - |
|---|---|
| 3,950,000 0.037 1,700,000 0.04 |
|
| 500,000 0.0025 - - |
The outstanding balance as at 31 December 2007 is represented by:
(i) 500,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of $0.0025 each, exercisable from 15 August 2007 to 31 July 2008.
(ii) 3,450,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of $0.0425 each, exercisable from 22 May 2008 to 22 May 2010.
Due to the capital reduction from the distribution of Apex shares the exercise price of all options was reduced by $0.0375.
ExSOP:
The following table illustrates the number (No.) and weighted average exercise prices (WAEP) of, and movements in, share options issued during the year:
| Outstanding balance at the beginning of the year Granted during the year Exercised during the year Outstanding at the end of the year Exercisable at the end of the year |
2007 No. 2007 WAEP 2006 No. 2006 WAEP 132,500,000 0.04 - - - - 132,500,000 0.04 (128,250,000) 0.04 - - |
|---|---|
| 4,250,000 0.0025 132,500,000 0.04 |
|
| 4,250,000 0.0025 132,500,000 0.04 |
The outstanding balance as at 31 December 2007 is represented by:
(i) 4,250,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of $0.0025 each, exercisable until 31 July 2008.
Due to the capital reduction from the distribution of Apex shares the exercise price of all options was reduced by $0.0375.
(d) Option pricing model
ESOP
The fair value of the share options granted under the ESOP is measured at the reporting date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the instruments were granted.
| Expected volatility (%) | 75.00 |
|---|---|
| Risk-free interest rate (%) | 6.00 |
| Expected life of option (days) | 1095 |
| Option exercise price ($) | 0.08 |
| Weighted average share price at | 0.088 |
| measurement date ($) |
A discount of 25% was applied as the options are unlisted and are not negotiable.
69
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 20: RELATED PARTIES
(i) Wholly-owned group transactions
Loans made by Legend Mining Limited to wholly-owned subsidiaries are repayable on demand and are not interest bearing.
(ii) Other related party transactions
Transactions between related parties are on normal commercial terms and conditions no more favourable than those available to other parties unless otherwise stated.
Allowance for impairment loss on trade receivables
For the year ended 31 December 2007, the Group made an allowance for impairment loss relating to amounts owed by related parties of $4,297,314 (2006: Nil). An impairment assessment is undertaken each financial year by examining the financial position of the related party and the market in which the related party operates to determine whether there is objective evidence that a related party receivable is impaired. When such objective evidence exists, the Group recognises an allowance for the impairment loss.
(iii) Ultimate parent
Legend Mining Limited is the ultimate parent company.
(iv) Loans to related parties
Legend Mining Limited advanced/ (received) the following loans to/(from) its subsidiary companies during 2007
Gibson Metals Pty Ltd $ 496,089 - Armada Mining Limited $ Gidgee Resources Limited $ (287,666)
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
70
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 21: CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(i) Reconciliation of Cash
For the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand and at bank and short term deposits at call, net of outstanding bank overdrafts. Cash as at the end of the financial year as shown in the Cash Flow Statement is reconciled to the related items in the Balance Sheet as follows:
| Consolidated | Consolidated | Company | Company | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Note | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 |
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Cash on hand | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Cash at bank | 442,565 | 540,427 | 442,565 | 540,427 |
| Deposits at call | 11,470,690 | 8,384,256 | 11,470,690 | 8,384,256 |
| 8 | 11,913,555 | 8,924,983 | 11,913,555 | 8,924,983 |
| (ii) Reconciliation of net loss after income tax to net cash used | in operating activities | |||
| Net Profit/(Loss) | 25,302,037 | (7,736,579) | 21,855,546 | (8,191,494) |
| Adjusted for: | ||||
| (Gain)/Loss on disposal of property, plant & | (1,725,808) | (2,997) | (1,725,808) | (2,997) |
| equipment | ||||
| Depreciation | 185,799 | 233,336 | 124,637 | 172,173 |
| Inventory written off | (159,353) | - | (159,353) | - |
| Deferred exploration expenditure written off | 5,421,686 | 3,732,296 | 5,421,686 | 3,494,770 |
| Income tax expense | 2,025,527 | - | 1,235,866 | - |
| Expenses paid in the form of options | 2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | ||
| Investments and receivables in subsidiary | ||||
| companies written down | - | - | 4,297,314 | 550,047 |
| Share options expensed | 77,146 | - | 77,146 | - |
| Transfer from equity revaluation | (32,180,000) | - | (32,180,000) | - |
| reserve | ||||
| (1,052,966) | (1,273,944) | (1,052,966) | (1,477,501) | |
| Change in assets and liabilities: | ||||
| (Increase)/ decrease in prepayments | (321,464) | 11,487 | (321,464) | 11,487 |
| (Increase)/ decrease in receivables | 135,629 | (181,478) | 135,629 | (184,172) |
| Decrease / (Increase) in inventory | 145,318 | 11,544 | 145,318 | 11,544 |
| Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure | (3,483,854) | (5,841,783) | (3,202,854) | (5,841,783) |
| (Decrease)/Increase in provision for | ||||
| annual leave | 15,457 | 27,001 | 15,457 | 27,001 |
| (Decrease)/ Increase in payables in | ||||
| operating activities | (227,604) | 192,470 | (207,604) | 620,103 |
| (Decrease)/ Increase in Rehabilitation | ||||
| provision | 305,504 | - | 4,504 | - |
| Net Cash (Used)/ provided in operating | ||||
| activities | (4,483,980) | (7,054,703) | (4,483,980) | (6,833,321) |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
71
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 21: CASH FLOW INFORMATION (CONTD)
Non cash financing and investment activities
During the financial year, the consolidated entity transacted the following non cash activities:
- (a) Gidgee Gold Project was sold to Apex Minerals NL for a consideration of $11,000,000 payable by the issue of 34,000,000 Apex shares.
NOTE 22: COMMITMENTS
- (a) Exploration expenditure commitments.
In order to maintain current rights of tenure to exploration tenements, the Company will be required to outlay in 2008 amounts of approximately $1,373,980 (2006: $3,367,880) in respect of tenement lease rentals and to meet minimum expenditure requirements of the Department of Industry & Resources. These obligations are expected to be fulfilled in the normal course of operations and have not been provided for in the financial report.
Note: This is the maximum commitment to exploration, to fully meet DOIR requirements. In practice, Legend has routinely applied for and been granted exemptions from meeting these requirements on a tenement by tenement basis. As a result the actual amount required to be expended on exploration is expected to be less than $1.35 million, while still holding all the tenements in good standing.
NOTE 23: INVESTMENTS IN CONTROLLED ENTITIES
| Name | Class of Share | Interest Held 2007 |
Interest Held 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson Metals Pty Ltd (formerlyArbotech PtyLtd) |
Ordinary | 100% | 100% |
| Armada Mining Ltd | Ordinary | 100% | 100% |
Gidgee Resources Ltd |
Ordinary | 100% | 100% |
The parent company and all the controlled entities are Australian registered entities.
NOTE 24: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE
(a) Interest Rate Risk
The consolidated entity’s exposure to interest rate risk, which is the risk that a financial instrument’s value will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates and the effective weighted average interest rates on classes of financial assets and financial liabilities, is as follows:
| Consolidated 2007 Weighted Average Interest Rate Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents 7.17% Other financial assets 5.30% Other financial assets – Apex shares Trade & other receivables Financial liabilities Trade & other payables |
Floating Interest $ Fixed Interest $ Non-Interest Bearing $ Total $ 442,865 11,470,690 - 11,913,555 - 1,528,797 16,134 1,544,931 - - 321,025 321,025 - - 98,137 98,137 |
|---|---|
| 442,865 12,999,487 435,296 13,877,648 |
|
| - - 224,016 224,016 |
|
| 224,016 224,016 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
72
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 24: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE (CONTD)
| Company 2007 Weighted Average Interest Rate Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents 7.17% Other financial assets 5.30% Other financial assets – Apex shares Related party receivables Trade & other receivables Financial liabilities Trade & other payables Related party payables Consolidated 2006 Weighted Average Interest Rate Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents 6.22% Other financial assets 5.10% Trade & other receivables Financial liabilities Trade & other payables Company 2006 Weighted Average Interest Rate Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents 6.22% Other financial assets 5.10% Related party receivables Trade & other receivables Financial liabilities Trade & other payables |
Floating Interest $ Fixed Interest $ Non-Interest Bearing $ Total $ 442,865 11,470,690 - 11,913,555 - 1,528,797 16,134 1,544,931 - - 321,025 321,025 - - 2,694 2,694 - - 98,137 98,137 |
|---|---|
| 442,865 12,999,487 437,990 13,880,342 |
|
| 224,016 224,016 - - 290,648 290,648 |
|
| 514,664 514,664 |
|
| Floating Interest $ Fixed Interest $ Non-Interest Bearing $ Total $ 540,727 8,384,256 - 8,924,983 - 132,596 16,134 148,730 - - 233,766 233,766 |
|
| 540,727 8,516,852 249,900 9,307,479 |
|
| - - 447,842 447,842 |
|
| 447,842 447,842 |
|
| Floating Interest $ Fixed Interest $ Non-Interest Bearing $ Total $ 540,727 8,384,256 - 8,924,983 - 132,596 16,134 148,730 - - 3,814,015 3,814,015 - - 233,766 233,766 |
|
| 540,727 8,516,852 4,063,915 13,121,494 |
|
| - - 427,842 427,842 |
|
| 427,842 427,842 |
The maturity date for all financial instruments included in the above tables is 1 year or less from balance date.
(b) Credit Risk
The Group trades only with recognised, creditworthy third parties.
It is the Group’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on credit terms are subject to credit verification procedures.
In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the result that the Group’s exposure to bad debt is not significant.
There are no significant concentrations of credit risk within the Group.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
73
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 24: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE (CONTD)
The carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:
| Note Available-for-sale financial assets 11 Cash and cash equivalents 8 |
Carrying Amount 2007 $ 2006 $ 321,025 - 11,913,555 8,384,256 |
|---|---|
| 12,234,580 8,384,256 |
The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was $321,025 (2006: Nil) for available-for-sale financial assets and $11,913,555 (2006: $8,384,256) for cash and cash equivalents, totalling $12,234,580 (2006: $8,384,256).
(c) Liquidity Risk
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments and excluding the impact of netting agreements:
Consolidated
| 31 December 2007 Non-derivative financial liabilities Trade and other payables 31 December 2006 Non-derivative financial liabilities Trade and other payables |
Carrying Amount Contratual cash flows 6 mths or less 224,016 (224,016) (224,016) |
|---|---|
| Carrying Amount Contratual cash flows 6 mths or less 447,842 (447,842) (447,842) |
(d) Net Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities, together with the carrying amounts shown in the balance sheet, are as follows:
| Consolidated Available-for-sale financial assets Cash and cash equivalents Performance and other bonds Trade and other payables |
31 December 2007 31 December 2006 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value 321,025 321,025 - - 11,913,555 11,913,555 8,384,256 8,384,256 1,544,931 1,544,931 148,730 148,730 (224,016) (224,016) (447,842) (447,842) |
|---|---|
| 13,555,495 13,555,495 8,085,144 8,085,144 |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
74
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 25: INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURE ASSETS
Legend Mining Limited has an interest in the following joint venture assets.
| Joint Venture | Project | Activity | 2007 Interest |
2006 Interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Munni Munni Joint Venture | Elizabeth Hill |
Silver Exploration | 30.12% | 30.12% |
| West Bungara Joint Venture | Gum Creek | Nickel, Copper & Zinc Exploration |
70% | - |
| Oxiana Joint Venture | Mt Gibson | Gold, Zinc & Copper Exploration |
100% | - |
| Mount Marie Joint Venture | Pilbara | Nickel, Copper & Zinc Exploration |
- | - |
Net assets employed in the joint ventures totalling $4,676,864 (2006: $277,010) are included as deferred exploration expenditure carried forward in the financial statements.
NOTE 26: AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION
| Remuneration of the auditor of the parent entity by Ernest & Young for - auditing or reviewing the financial report - consulting fees corporate advice Remuneration of the auditor of the parent entity by Stantons International for - auditing or reviewing the financial report - consulting fees corporate advice |
Consolidated Company 2007 $ 2006 $ 2007 $ 2006 $ - 49,512 - 49,512 - - - - 33,282 - 33,282 - 6,000 - 6,000 - |
|---|---|
NOTE 27: GIDGEE GOLD PROJECT SALE
On 3 May 2007, the Company announced it had agreed to sell its Gidgee Gold Project (tenements, plant and infrastructure) to Apex Minerals NL (Apex) for a consideration of $11 million, payable by the issue of 34 million Apex shares which the Company announced would be distributed in-specie to shareholders. Contingent consideration of $5 million will be paid by Apex to the Company once a production milestone of 250,000oz of gold from the Gidgee Gold Project tenements is reached.
This contingent consideration has not been accounted for at 31 December 2007 as it is still uncertain whether the production milestone will be achieved.
75
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 27: GIDGEE GOLD PROJECT SALE (CONTD)
Settlement of this Sale Agreement was effected on 13 August 2007 and Apex issued 34 million shares to Legend. The details of the sale are as follows:
| Proceeds from sale of Gidgee Gold Project (34 million shares in Apex Minerals NL) Written down value of tenements sold (note 13) Written down value of plant & equipment sold Written down value of inventory sold Total value of Gidgee Gold Project at time of sale Loss on sale of Gidgee Gold Project Add provision for rehabilitation written back as a result of the sale Final profit on the sale of the Gidgee Gold Project |
(9,904,307) (1,267,532) (159,353) |
11,000,000 (11,331,192) |
|---|---|---|
| (331,192) 2,057,000 |
||
| 1,725,808 |
The written down value of the Gidgee tenements sold of $9,904,307 is after the write off of $5,409,595 at 30 June 2007.
NOTE 28: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
There has been no material change of any contingent liabilities during the year.
No matter or circumstance has arisen since the end of the year to the date of this report which has significantly effected, or may significantly effect, the operations of the consolidated entity the results of those operations or the state of affairs of the consolidated entity.
The consolidated entity’s activities in Australia are subject to the Native Titles Act and the Department of Environment. Uncertainty associated with Native Title issues may impact on the Company’s future plans.
There are no unresolved Native Title issues and the consolidated entity is not aware of any other matters that may impact upon its access to the land that comprises its project areas.
NOTE 29: EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
As at the date of the report there are no subsequent significant events after the balance date.
NOTE 30: DIVIDENDS PAID AND PROPOSED
Following the announcement of the agreement to sell the Gidgee Gold Project to Apex Minerals NL, your directors sought and received legal, taxation and accounting advice on the proposed return of capital. The taxation and accounting advice on the return of capital was that any return of capital over and above the amount of funds invested by the Company into the Gidgee Gold Project ($30.3 million) was likely to be deemed as an unfranked dividend.
The Company, through its taxation advisors, sought a tax ruling on this matter and received a draft tax ruling from the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”) on what proportion of the return of capital the ATO would deem an unfranked dividend for taxation purposes and therefore what proportion is deemed a return of capital. The draft tax ruling from ATO advised that any return of capital over and above $11 million, being the sale agreement value of the consideration received from Apex, would be deemed an unfranked dividend for taxation purposes. As a result of the draft tax ruling from the ATO, your Company received further advice that, for the return of capital, it should withhold tax from overseas shareholders and Australian shareholders who had not provided a tax file number on the basis that any return of capital over and above $11 million would be deemed an unfranked dividend for taxation purposes.
76
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2007
NOTE 30: DIVIDENDS PAID AND PROPOSED (CONTD)
On 12 November 2007, as a result of the return of capital of 34,000,000 Apex shares and the value of $1.27 per Apex share, the Company received advice from its taxation and accounting advisors that an unfranked dividend of $12,845,614 or 1.12 cents per share was deemed to be paid to shareholders. This deemed dividend represents the difference between the amount invested by the company into the Gidgee Gold Project and the value of the Apex shares at the Record Date for the return of capital
The Company’s tax specialists are engaged in further dialogue with the ATO on its draft tax ruling and the Company will advise shareholders of the outcome as soon as possible.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
77
DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION
In accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Legend Mining Limited, I state that:
In the opinion of the Directors:
-
a) the financial statements and notes, of the consolidated entity, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including;
-
i. Giving a true and fair view of the Company’s and consolidated entity’s financial position as at 31 December 2007 and their performance for the year ended on that date; and
-
ii. Complying with Accounting Standards’ and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
-
b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.
This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ending 31 December 2007.
On behalf of the Board.
==> picture [177 x 33] intentionally omitted <==
_____
M. Wilson Managing Director
Dated this 31[st] day of March 2008
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
78
==> picture [41 x 792] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [263 x 92] intentionally omitted <==
31 March 2008
Board of Directors Legend Mining Limited Level 2, 640 Murray Street WEST PERTH, WA 6005
Dear Sirs,
RE: LEGEND MINING LIMITED
In accordance with section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, I am pleased to provide the following declaration of independence to the directors of Legend Mining Limited.
As Audit Director for the audit of the financial statements of Legend Mining Limited for the year ended 31 December 2007, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of:
-
(i) the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and
-
(ii) any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
Yours faithfully STANTONS INTERNATIONAL (Authorised Audit Company)
==> picture [91 x 29] intentionally omitted <==
John P Van Dieren Director
==> picture [174 x 31] intentionally omitted <==
Au:LEG5551A/Independence Declaration 31 Dec-07(s)
79
==> picture [40 x 792] intentionally omitted <==
==> picture [263 x 92] intentionally omitted <==
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF LEGEND MINING LIMITED
Report on the Financial Report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Legend Mining Limited, which comprises the balance sheet as at 31 December 2007, and the income statement, statement of changes in equity and cash flow statement for the year ended on that date, a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes and the directors’ declaration of the consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.
As permitted by the Corporations Regulations 2001, the Company has disclosed the information about the remuneration of directors and executives (“remuneration disclosures”), required by Australian Accounting Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures, under the heading “Remuneration Report” in section 13, of the Directors’ report and not the financial report. We have audited these remuneration disclosures.
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report and the AASB 124 remuneration disclosures contained in the Directors’ Report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Act 2001 . This responsibility includes designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances. In note 2(b), the directors also state, in accordance with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, that the financial report of the Group and those of the company, comprising the financial statements and notes, comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
The directors of the Company are also responsible for the remuneration disclosures contained in the Directors’ report.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement. Our responsibility is also to express an opinion that the remuneration disclosures contained in the Directors’ report comply with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 124.
==> picture [173 x 32] intentionally omitted <==
[80]
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report and the remuneration disclosures contained in the Directors’ report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report and the remuneration disclosures contained in the Directors’ report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial report and the remuneration disclosures contained in the Directors’ report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report and the remuneration disclosures contained in the Directors’ report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 .
Auditor’s Opinion
In our opinion:
-
(a) the financial report of Legend Mining Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 , including:
-
(i) giving a true and fair view of the company’s and consolidated entity’s financial position as at 31 December 2007 and of their performance for the year ended on that date; and
-
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
-
(b) the financial report of the Group and those of the company also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in note 2(b).
-
(c) the remuneration disclosures required by paragraphs Aus 25.4 to Aus 25.7.2 of Australian Accounting Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures that are contained in the Remuneration report in the Directors’ report comply with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures.
STANTONS INTERNATIONAL (An Authorised Audit Company)
==> picture [118 x 46] intentionally omitted <==
J P Van Dieren
Director
West Perth, Western Australia 31 March 2008
81
Au:LEG5551A /2007 Auditors Report(s)
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
The issued capital of the company as at 31 December 2007 is 1,159,911,684 ordinary fully paid shares.
Distribution of Share Holders as at 7 March 2008
| Fully Paid Shares | Number | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 - 1,000 |
37 | |
| 1,001 - 5,000 |
137 | |
| 5,001 - 10,000 |
385 | |
| 10,001 - 100,000 |
1,666 | |
| 100,001 and over |
760 | |
| 2,985 | ||
| er holding less that a marketable parcel | 775 | |
| antial Shareholder as at 7 March 2008 | ||
| lian Gold Resources Pty Ltd | 509,735,000 | |
| 0 Shareholders as at 7 March 2008 | ||
| Name | Total Holdings | % Issued Capital |
| Yandal Investments Pty Ltd | 344,750,000 | 29.34 |
| Australian Gold Resources Pty Ltd | 149,985,000 | 12.76 |
| HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited | 33,443,310 | 2.85 |
| Ron Medich Properties Pty Ltd | 28,808,886 | 2.45 |
| Citigroup Nominees Pty Limited | 26,700,700 | 2.27 |
| Chester Nominees WA Pty Ltd | 26,100,000 | 2.22 |
| Merrill Lynch (Australia) Nominees Pty Limited | 20,873,581 | 1.78 |
| Oroya Mining Limited | 20,000,000 | 1.70 |
| Karari Australia Pty Ltd | 19,000,000 | 1.62 |
| VE & DM Ryan | 16,000,000 | 1.36 |
| ANZ Nominees Limited | 13.539,056 | 1.15 |
| G Santalucia Investment Pty Ltd | 11,642,328 | 0.99 |
| Rigi Investments Pty Ltd | 11,194,144 | 0.95 |
| National Nominees Limited | 9,807,999 | 0.84 |
| ANZ Nominees Limited | 8,635,396 | 0.74 |
| Palazzo Nominees Pty Ltd | 8,000,000 | 0.68 |
| Mr Brian McCubbing | 7,100,000 | 0.60 |
| Ankaa Springs Pty Ltd | 5,100,000 | 1.20 |
| Yarandi Investments Pty Ltd | 5,057,064 | 0.43 |
| Tetramin Pty Ltd | 5,000,000 | 0.43 |
| 757,198,408 | 66.36 |
Number holding less that a marketable parcel
Substantial Shareholder as at 7 March 2008
Australian Gold Resources Pty Ltd 509,735,000
Top 20 Shareholders as at 7 March 2008
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
82
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION (CONTD)
The number of listed options on issue as at 31 December 2007 is 46,422,255 options.
Distribution of Listed Option Holders as at 7 March 2008
| Fully Paid | Shares | Number | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 1,000 | 9 |
| 1,001 | - | 5,000 | 24 |
| 5,001 | - | 10,000 | 16 |
| 10,001 | - | 100,000 | 71 |
| 100,001 | and over | 41 | |
| 161 |
Number holding less that a marketable parcel 58
Top 20 Listed Option Holders as at 7 March 2008
| Name H Wallace-Smith and Co Pty Ltd Second Naremi Pty Ltd Agricultural Solutions Consultancy Pty Ltd Rigi Investments Pty Ltd Mr Kevin Charles Looby Bird Tyndall Pty Ltd W G Bird Ucan Nominees Pty Ltd First Farley Pty Ltd Anderby Qld Pty Ltd Bond Street Custodians Limited Florin Mining Investment Company Limited Oro Investments Pty Ltd GA & JL Downey Arinya Investments Pty Ltd AJ Vetter BC Steele GP Pagliara Captain Starlight Nominees Pty Ltd Agricultural Solutions Consultancy Pty Ltd |
Total Holdings % Issued Capital 3,342,833 10.71 2,797,575 8.96 2,625,692 8.41 2,482,045 7.95 1,300,000 4.16 1,200,000 3.84 1,000,000 3.20 1,000,000 3.20 1,000,000 3.20 950,000 3.04 700,000 2.24 666,666 2.14 626,667 2.01 600,000 1.92 557,333 1.79 500,000 1.60 500,000 1.60 500,000 1.60 499,998 1.60 441,629 1.41 |
|---|---|
| 23,290,438 74.59 |
Unlisted Option holders as at 7 March 2008
| Class of options | Number | Number of Holders |
|---|---|---|
| 20 May 2012 exercisable at 4.25 cents per share | 3,450,000 | 7 |
| 30 July 2009 exercisable at 26.25 cents per share | 1,500,000 | 3 |
| 31 July 2008 exercisable at 0.25 cents per share | 4,750,000 | 3 |
Each option holder holds more than 100,000 unlisted options each.
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
83
TENEMENT LISTING
GUM CREEK PROJECT
| GUM CREEK PROJECT | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tenement | Status | Percentage Interest |
| E57/632 | Granted | 100% |
| E57/634 | Granted | 100% |
| E57/674 | Granted | 100% |
| E57/706 | Granted | 100% |
| P57/1126 | Granted | 100% |
| P57/1127 | Granted | 100% |
| E57/709 | Pending | 100% |
| P57/1056 | Pending | 100% |
| P57/1057 | Pending | 100% |
| P57/1058 | Pending | 100% |
| P57/1068 | Pending | 100% |
| P57/1069 | Pending | 100% |
| P57/1070 | Pending | 100% |
| PILBARA PROJECT | ||
| Tenement | Status | Percentage Interest |
| E47/562 | Granted | 100% |
| E47/587 | Granted | 30.12% |
| M47/340 | Granted | 30.12% |
| M47/341 | Granted | 30.12% |
| M47/342 | Granted | 30.12% |
| M47/343 | Granted | 30.12% |
| P47/944 | Granted | 100% |
| P47/945 | Granted | 100% |
| P47/1135 | Granted | 100% |
| P47/1136 | Granted | 100% |
| E47/1806 | Pending | Earning70% from Fox Radio Hill PL |
| E47/1807 | Pending | Earning 70% from Fox Radio Hill PL |
| E47/1877 | Pending | 100% |
| E47/1878 | Pending | Earning 70% from Fox Radio Hill PL |
| E47/1178 | Pending | 100% |
| E47/1745 | Pending | 100% |
| E47/1746 | Pending | 100% |
| E47/1747 | Pending | 100% |
| E47/1797 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/409 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/414 | Pending | 30.12% |
| M47/415 | Pending | 30.12% |
| M47/417 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/457 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/462 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/463 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/466 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/490 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/491 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/493 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/494 | Pending | 100% |
| M47/518 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1112 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1124 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1126 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1127 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1128 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1129 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1130 | Pending | 100% |
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007
84
| P47/1131 | Pending | 100% |
|---|---|---|
| P47/1134 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1272 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1360 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1361 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1362 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1363 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1364 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1365 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1366 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1367 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1368 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1369 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1370 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1371 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1372 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1373 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1374 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1375 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1380 | Pending | 100% |
| P47/1386 | Pending | 100% |
| Mt GIBSON PROJECT | ||
| Tenement | Status | Percentage Interest |
| E59/1041 | Granted | 100% |
| G59/11 | Granted | 100% |
| G59/12 | Granted | 100% |
| G59/13 | Granted | 100% |
| G59/14 | Granted | 100% |
| G59/15 | Granted | 100% |
| G59/16 | Granted | 100% |
| G59/17 | Granted | 100% |
| G59/18 | Granted | 100% |
| L59/12 | Granted | 100% |
| L59/13 | Granted | 100% |
| L59/14 | Granted | 100% |
| L59/16 | Granted | 100% |
| L59/21 | Granted | 100% |
| L59/45 | Granted | 100% |
| L59/46 | Granted | 100% |
| L59/53 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/11 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/13 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/14 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/15 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/16 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/17 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/166 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/217 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/304 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/305 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/308 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/309 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/328 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/402 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/403 | Granted | 100% |
| M59/404 | Granted | 100% |
85
Legend Mining Limited Annual Report 2007