AI assistant
LEFROY EXPLORATION LIMITED — Governance Information 2017
Sep 21, 2017
65225_rns_2017-09-21_0a0ce72a-4f80-40d4-9b58-d530740cc6c9.pdf
Governance Information
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3[1]
Appendix 4G
Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Name of entity:
Lefroy Exploration Limited
ABN / ARBN: 052 123 930
Financial year ended:
30 June 2017
Our corporate governance statement[2] for the above period above can be found at:[3]
These pages of our annual report:
This URL on our website: http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
The Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 21 September 2017 and has been approved by the board.
The annexure includes a key to where our corporate governance disclosures can be located.
Date: 21 September 2017
Signed:
==> picture [91 x 45] intentionally omitted <==
Print name: Susan Patricia Hunter (Company Secretary)
1 Under Listing Rule 4.7.3, an entity must lodge with ASX a completed Appendix 4G at the same time as it lodges its annual report with ASX. Listing Rule 4.10.3 requires an entity that is included in the official list as an ASX Listing to include in its annual report either a corporate governance statement that meets the requirements of that rule or the URL of the page on its website where such a statement is located. The corporate governance statement must disclose the extent to which the entity has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council during the reporting period. If the entity has not followed a recommendation for any part of the reporting period, its corporate governance statement must separately identify that recommendation and the period during which it was not followed and state its reasons for not following the recommendation and what (if any) alternative governance practices it adopted in lieu of the recommendation during that period. Under Listing Rule 4.7.4, if an entity chooses to include its corporate governance statement on its website rather than in its annual report, it must lodge a copy of the corporate governance statement with ASX at the same time as it lodges its annual report with ASX. The corporate governance statement must be current as at the effective date specified in that statement for the purposes of rule 4.10.3.
2 “Corporate governance statement” is defined in Listing Rule 19.12 to mean the statement referred to in Listing Rule 4.10.3 which discloses the extent to which an entity has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council during a particular reporting period.
3 Mark whichever option is correct and then complete the page number(s) of the annual report, or the URL of the web page, where the entity’s corporate governance statement can be found. You can, if you wish, delete the option which is not applicable.
Throughout this form, where you are given two or more options to select, you can, if you wish, delete any option which is not applicable and just retain the option that is applicable. If you select an option that includes “OR” at the end of the selection and you delete the other options, you can also, if you wish, delete the “OR” at the end of the selection.
Page 1
ANNEXURE – KEY TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DISCLOSURES
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRINCIPLE 1 – LAY SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT | |||
| 1.1 | A listed entity should disclose: (a) the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and management; and (b) those matters expressly reserved to the board and those delegated to management. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and information about the respective roles and responsibilities of our board and management (including those matters expressly reserved to the board and those delegated to management): at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 1.2 | A listed entity should: (a) undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person, or putting forward to security holders a candidate for election, as a director; and (b) provide security holders with all material information in its possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a director. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 1.3 | A listed entity should have a written agreement with each director and senior executive setting out the terms of their appointment. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 1.4 | The company secretary of a listed entity should be accountable directly to the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with the proper functioning of the board. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
4 If you have followed all of the Council’s recommendations in full for the whole of the period above, you can, if you wish, delete this column from the form and re-format it.
Page 2
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | A listed entity should: (a) have a diversity policy which includes requirements for the board or a relevant committee of the board to set measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to assess annually both the objectives and the entity’s progress in achieving them; (b) disclose that policy or a summary of it; and (c) disclose as at the end of each reporting period the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance with the entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards achieving them and either: (1) the respective proportions of men and women on the board, in senior executive positions and across the whole organisation (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes); or (2) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender Equality Indicators”, as defined in and published under that Act. |
… the fact that we have a diversity policy that complies with paragraph (a): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and a copy of our diversity policy or a summary of it: at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ … and the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance with our diversity policy and our progress towards achieving them: in our Corporate Governance StatementOR at [insert location] … and the information referred to in paragraphs (c)(1) or (2): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 1.6 | A listed entity should: (a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of the board, its committees and individual directors; and (b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process. |
… the evaluation process referred to in paragraph (a): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and the information referred to in paragraph (b): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 1.7 | A listed entity should: (a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of its senior executives; and (b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process. |
… the evaluation process referred to in paragraph (a): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and the information referred to in paragraph (b): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
Page 3
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRINCIPLE 2 - STRUCTURE THE BOARD TO ADD VALUE | |||
| 2.1 | The board of a listed entity should: (a) have a nomination committee which: (1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent directors; and (2) is chaired by an independent director, and disclose: (3) the charter of the committee; (4) the members of the committee; and (5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs to address board succession issues and to ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively. |
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):] … the fact that we have a nomination committee that complies with paragraphs (1) and (2): in our Corporate Governance StatementOR at [insert location] … and a copy of the charter of the committee: at [insert location] … and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5): in our Corporate Governance Statement (members of the Committee) AND the 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Report includes the number of times the Committee met through the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings [If the entity complies with paragraph (b):] … the fact that we do not have a nomination committee and the processes we employ to address board succession issues and to ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively: N/A in our Corporate Governance StatementOR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 2.2 | A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership. |
… our board skills matrix: in our Corporate Governance StatementOR at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
Page 4
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 | A listed entity should disclose: (a) the names of the directors considered by the board to be independent directors; (b) if a director has an interest, position, association or relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 but the board is of the opinion that it does not compromise the independence of the director, the nature of the interest, position, association or relationship in question and an explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and (c) the length of service of each director. |
… the names of the directors considered by the board to be independent directors: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and, where applicable, the information referred to in paragraph (b): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and the length of service of each director: in our Corporate Governance StatementOR the 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Report includes the length of service of each Director. |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
| 2.4 | A majority of the board of a listed entity should be independent directors. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 2.5 | The chair of the board of a listed entity should be an independent director and, in particular, should not be the same person as the CEO of the entity. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 2.6 | A listed entity should have a program for inducting new directors and provide appropriate professional development opportunities for directors to develop and maintain the skills and knowledge needed to perform their role as directors effectively. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| PRINCIPLE 3 – ACT ETHICALLY AND RESPONSIBLY | |||
| 3.1 | A listed entity should: (a) have a code of conduct for its directors, senior executives and employees; and (b) disclose that code or a summary of it. |
… our code of conduct or a summary of it: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
Page 5
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRINCIPLE 4 – SAFEGUARD INTEGRITY IN CORPORATE REPORTING | |||
| 4.1 | The board of a listed entity should: (a) have an audit committee which: (1) has at least three members, all of whom are non- executive directors and a majority of whom are independent directors; and (2) is chaired by an independent director, who is not the chair of the board, and disclose: (3) the charter of the committee; (4) the relevant qualifications and experience of the members of the committee; and (5) in relation to each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting, including the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner. |
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):] … the fact that we have an audit committee that complies with paragraphs (1) and (2): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and a copy of the charter of the committee: at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ … and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR in the 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Report. [If the entity complies with paragraph (b):] … the fact that we do not have an audit committee and the processes we employ that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of our corporate reporting, including the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
| 4.2 | The board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial statements comply with the appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity and that the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
| 4.3 | A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its external auditor attends its AGM and is available to answer questions from security holders relevant to the audit. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity that does not hold an annual general meeting and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
Page 6
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRINCIPLE 5 – MAKE TIMELY AND BALANCED DISCLOSURE | |||
| 5.1 | A listed entity should: (a) have a written policy for complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and (b) disclose that policy or a summary of it. |
… our continuous disclosure compliance policy or a summary of it: in our Corporate Governance Statement AND policy is included in the Corporate Governance Plan at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
| PRINCIPLE 6 – RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS | |||
| 6.1 | A listed entity should provide information about itself and its governance to investors via its website. |
… information about us and our governance on our website: at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
| 6.2 | A listed entity should design and implement an investor relations program to facilitate effective two-way communication with investors. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
| 6.3 | A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes it has in place to facilitate and encourage participation at meetings of security holders. |
… our policies and processes for facilitating and encouraging participation at meetings of security holders: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity that does not hold periodic meetings of security holders and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 6.4 | A listed entity should give security holders the option to receive communications from, and send communications to, the entity and its security registry electronically. |
… the fact that we follow this recommendation: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
Page 7
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRINCIPLE 7 – RECOGNISE AND MANAGE RISK | |||
| 7.1 | The board of a listed entity should: (a) have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each of which: (1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent directors; and (2) is chaired by an independent director, and disclose: (3) the charter of the committee; (4) the members of the committee; and (5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have a risk committee or committees that satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the processes it employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management framework. |
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):] … the fact that we have a committee or committees to oversee risk that comply with paragraphs (1) and (2): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and a copy of the charter of the committee: at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ … and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR in the Company’s 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Report [If the entity complies with paragraph (b):] … the fact that we do not have a risk committee or committees that satisfy (a) and the processes we employ for overseeing our risk management framework: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
| 7.2 | The board or a committee of the board should: (a) review the entity’s risk management framework at least annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound; and (b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether such a review has taken place. |
… the fact that board or a committee of the board reviews the entity’s risk management framework at least annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and that such a review has taken place in the reporting period covered by this Appendix 4G: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
Page 8
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | A listed entity should disclose: (a) if it has an internal audit function, how the function is structured and what role it performs; or (b) if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact and the processes it employs for evaluating and continually improving the effectiveness of its risk management and internal control processes. |
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):] … how our internal audit function is structured and what role it performs: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] [If the entity complies with paragraph (b):] … the fact that we do not have an internal audit function and the processes we employ for evaluating and continually improving the effectiveness of our risk management and internal control processes: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
| 7.4 | A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainability risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those risks. |
… whether we have any material exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainability risks and, if we do, how we manage or intend to manage those risks: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement |
Page 9
| Corporate Governance Council recommendation | Corporate Governance Council recommendation | We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed … |
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the period above. We have disclosed …4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRINCIPLE 8 – REMUNERATE FAIRLY AND RESPONSIBLY | |||
| 8.1 | The board of a listed entity should: (a) have a remuneration committee which: (1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent directors; and (2) is chaired by an independent director, and disclose: (3) the charter of the committee; (4) the members of the committee; and (5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs for setting the level and composition of remuneration for directors and senior executives and ensuring that such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive. |
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):] … the fact that we have a remuneration committee that complies with paragraphs (1) and (2): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] … and a copy of the charter of the committee: at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ … and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5): in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Statements. [If the entity complies with paragraph (b):] … the fact that we do not have a remuneration committee and the processes we employ for setting the level and composition of remuneration for directors and senior executives and ensuring that such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive: N/A in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 8.2 | A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive directors and the remuneration of executive directors and other senior executives. |
… separately our remuneration policies and practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive directors and the remuneration of executive directors and other senior executives: in our Corporate Governance Statement OR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
| 8.3 | A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme should: (a) have a policy on whether participants are permitted to enter into transactions (whether through the use of derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of participating in the scheme; and (b) disclose that policy or a summary of it. |
… our policy on this issue or a summary of it: in our Corporate Governance StatementOR at [insert location] |
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance Statement OR w e do not have an equity-based remuneration scheme and this recommendation is therefore not applicableOR we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is therefore not applicable |
Page 10
LEFROY EXPLORATION LIMITED ARBN 125 167 133
(Company)
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDING 30 JUNE 2017
This Corporate Governance Statement is current as at 21 September 2017 and has been approved by the Board of the Company on that date.
This Corporate Governance Statement discloses the extent to which the Company has, during the financial year ending 30 June 2017, followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council in its publication Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations ( Recommendations ). The Recommendations are not mandatory, however the Recommendations that have not been followed for any part of the reporting period have been identified and reasons provided for not following them along with what (if any) alternative governance practices were adopted in lieu of the recommendation during that period.
The Company has adopted a Corporate Governance Plan which provides the written terms of reference for the Company’s corporate governance duties.
The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies are available on the Company’s website at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ .
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight | ||
| Recommendation 1.1 A listed entity should have and disclose a charter which sets out the respective roles and responsibilities of the Board, the Chair and management, and includes a description of those matters expressly reserved to the Board and those delegated to management. |
YES | The Company has adopted Corporate Governance Policies that set out the specific roles and responsibilities of the Board, the Chair and management and includes a description of those matters expressly reserved to the Board and those delegated to management. The Corporate Governance Policies set out the specific responsibilities of the Board, requirements as to the Board’s composition, the roles and responsibilities of the Chairman and Company Secretary, Directors’ access to Company records and information, details of the Board’s relationship with management, details of the Board’s performance review and details of the Board’s disclosure policy. A copy of the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies is available on the Company’s website. |
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| Recommendation 1.2 A listed entity should: (a) undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person, or putting forward to security holders a candidate for election, as a Director; and (b) provide security holders with all material information relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re- elect a Director. |
YES | (a) The Company has guidelines for the appointment and selection of the Board in its Corporate Governance Plan. The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan requires that prior to appointing a director or recommending a new candidate for election as a director that appropriate checks are undertaken as to the persons character, experience, education, criminal record and bankruptcy history. These checks were undertaken with the appointments during the year and will continue to be undertaken in future prior to appointing a director or recommending a new candidate for election as a director. (b) Under the Corporate Governance Plan, all material information relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a Director must be provided to security holders in the Notice of Meeting containing the resolution to elect or re-elect a Director. The Board will ensure this material information is included in the Company’s 2017 Notice of Annual General Meeting. |
| Recommendation 1.3 A listed entity should have a written agreement with each Director and senior executive setting out the terms of their appointment. |
YES | The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies require the Company to ensure that each Director and senior executive is a party to a written agreement with the Company which sets out the terms of that Director’s or senior executive’s appointment. The Company has had written agreements with each of its Directors and senior executives for the past financial year. |
| Recommendation 1.4 The company secretary of a listed entity should be accountable directly to the Board, through the Chair, on all matters to do with the proper functioning of the Board. |
YES | The Corporate Governance Policies outline the roles, responsibility and accountability of the Company Secretary. In accordance with this, the Company Secretary reports to the Board through the Chairman and is responsible for monitoring the extent that Board policy and procedures are followed, and coordinating the timely completion and dispatch of Board agenda and briefing material. All directors have access to the Company Secretary. |
| Recommendation 1.5 A listed entity should: |
PARTIALLY | (a) The Company has not adopted a Diversity Policy. Given the size of the Board and the Company, the Board believes no efficiencies or |
2
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY |
|---|---|
| (a) have a diversity policy which includes requirements for | |
| the Board or a relevant committee of the Board to set | |
| measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity | |
| and to assess annually both the objectives and the | |
| entity’s progress in achieving them; | |
| (b) disclose that policy or a summary or it; and | |
| (c) disclose as at the end of each reporting period: | |
| (i) the measurable objectives for achieving gender |
|
| diversity set by the Board in accordance with the | |
| entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards | |
| achieving them; and | |
| (ii) either: | |
| (A) the respective proportions of men and |
|
| women on the Board, in senior executive | |
| positions and across the whole organisation | |
| (including how the entity has defined | |
| “senior executive” for these purposes); or | |
| (B) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under |
|
| the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the | |
| entity’s most recent “Gender Equality Indicators”, as defined in the Workplace |
|
| Gender Equality Act. | |
| Recommendation 1.6 | |
| A listed entity should: | YES |
| (a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating | |
| the performance of the Board, its committees and |
-
EXPLANATION
-
other benefits could be gained by establishing a Diversity Policy. It is noted the establishment of a Diversity Policy will be assessed in future in line with changes in Board composition, Company operations and the level of activity. The Board will consider the ASX Recommendations in establishing a Diversity Policy.
-
(a) The Board did not set measurable gender diversity objectives for the past financial year because the Board considered the application of a measurable gender diversity objective requiring a specified proportion of women on the Board and in senior executive roles would, given the small size of the Company and the Board, unduly limit the Company from applying the Diversity Policy as a whole and the Company’s policy of appointing based on skills and merit. The respective proportions of men and women on the Board, in senior executive positions and across the whole organisation (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes) for the past financial year is disclosed below –
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| (a) have a diversity policy which includes requirements for the Board or a relevant committee of the Board to set measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to assess annually both the objectives and the entity’s progress in achieving them; (b) disclose that policy or a summary or it; and (c) disclose as at the end of each reporting period: (i) the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the Board in accordance with the entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards achieving them; and (ii) either: (A) the respective proportions of men and women on the Board, in senior executive positions and across the whole organisation (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes); or (B) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender Equality Indicators”, as defined in the Workplace Gender Equality Act. |
other benefits could be gained by establishing a Diversity Policy. It is noted the establishment of a Diversity Policy will be assessed in future in line with changes in Board composition, Company operations and the level of activity. The Board will consider the ASX Recommendations in establishing a Diversity Policy. (a) The Board did not set measurable gender diversity objectives for the past financial year because the Board considered the application of a measurable gender diversity objective requiring a specified proportion of women on the Board and in senior executive roles would, given the small size of the Company and the Board, unduly limit the Company from applying the Diversity Policy as a whole and the Company’s policy of appointing based on skills and merit. The respective proportions of men and women on the Board, in senior executive positions and across the whole organisation (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes) for the past financial year is disclosed below – Female Male Board 0% 100% Senior Executive 50% 50% Whole organisation 25% 75% The Senior Executives are the individuals at the highest level of organisational management who have the day-to-day responsibilities of managing the Company below the Board. The Senior Executives include the Company’s Managing Director and the Company Secretary. |
|
| Recommendation 1.6 A listed entity should: (a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of the Board, its committees and |
YES | (a) The Company’s Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is responsible for arranging an annual performance evaluation of the Board, its Committees, individual Directors and senior executives as appropriate. The process for this is set out in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan, which is available on the Company’s website. |
3
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| individual Directors; and (b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process. |
(b) A formal performance evaluation in respect of the Board and its committees was not undertaken during the year given the changes to the Board by way of appointment of the Managing Director, Wade Johnson, which occurred the financial year. A Board performance evaluation will be undertaken during the next financial year. It is noted that the Chairman has open and honest communications with each of the Directors both throughout the financial year and currently whereby matters relating to Director Performance, if any, are raised promptly and dealt with accordingly. |
|
| Recommendation 1.7 A listed entity should: (a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of its senior executives; and (b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process. |
YES | (a) The Board is responsible for evaluating the performance of the Company’s Managing Director/CEO on an annual basis. The Company’s Remuneration Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is responsible for approving changes to remuneration or contract terms of the CEO. The applicable processes for these evaluations can be found in the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies, which are available on the Company’s website. (b) The Board has not completed a performance evaluation in respect of the Managing Director/CEO in the past financial year as he was only appointed on 19 October 2016. A performance evaluation is planned for Mr. Johnson at the end of the calendar 2017 year following completion of a full year of employment as Managing Director/CEO. |
| Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value | ||
| Recommendation 2.1 The Board of a listed entity should: (a) have a nomination committee which: (i) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent Directors; and |
YES | (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies provides for the creation of a Nomination Committee (if it is considered it will benefit the Company). The Nomination Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website. (b) The Company did not have a Nomination Committee for the past financial year. Given the size of the Board and the Company, the |
4
-
RECOMMENDATIONS (3[RD] EDITION) COMPLY (ii) is chaired by an independent Director, and disclose: (iii) the charter of the committee; (iv) the members of the committee; and
-
(v) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or
-
(b) if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs to address Board succession issues and to ensure that the Board has the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the entity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively.
Recommendation 2.2
A listed entity should have and disclose a Board skill matrix YES setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership.
EXPLANATION
Board believes no efficiencies or other benefits could be gained by establishing a separate Nomination Committee. It is noted the establishment of a Nomination Committee will be assessed in future in line with changes in Board composition, Company operations and level of activity. The Board will consider the ASX Recommendations in establishing a Nomination Committee.
As the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from establishment of a separate Nomination Committee, the Board carried out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Nomination Committee under the Nomination Committee Charter, including the following processes to address succession issues and to ensure the Board has the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the entity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively. During the financial year, the Board devoted time to discuss Board succession issues and to assessing the Company’s Board skills with all Board members being involved in the process, to the maximum extent permitted under the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules.
Under the Nomination Committee Charter (in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan), the Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is required to prepare a Board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board currently has (or is looking to achieve) and to review this at least annually against the Company’s Board skills matrix to ensure the appropriate mix of skills and expertise is present to facilitate successful strategic direction.
The Company has a Board skill matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership. A copy is available on the Company’s website.
The Board Charter requires the disclosure of each Board member’s qualifications and expertise. Full details as to each Director and senior executives’ relevant skills and experience are available in the Company’s Annual Report.
5
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| Recommendation 2.3 A listed entity should disclose: (a) the names of the Directors considered by the Board to be independent Directors; (b) if a Director has an interest, position, association or relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendation (3rd Edition), but the Board is of the opinion that it does not compromise the independence of the Director, the nature of the interest, position, association or relationship in question and an explanation of why the Board is of that opinion; and (c) the length of service of each Director |
YES | (a) The Managing Director, Wade Johnson, is not considered to be independent as he is an Executive of the Company. In addition, the remaining Non-executive Directors including the Non- executive Chairman, Gordon Galt and Non-executive Directors James Beecher, Geoff Piggott and Michael Davies were considered Executive Directors of the Company prior to appointment of Mr Johnson in October 2016. As such, they are not considered to be independent. (b) There are no independent Directors who fall into this category. (c) The Company’s Annual Report discloses the length of service of each Director. |
| Recommendation 2.4 A majority of the Board of a listed entity should be independent Directors. |
NO | The Company’s Board Charter requires that, where practical, the majority of the Board should be independent. The Board does not have an independent majority as whilst there is a majority of Non-executive Directors, these Directors are not considered to be independent as they were executives within the last three years. The Board considers the composition of the Board is appropriate in the context of the size of the Board and the Company and the scope and scale of the Company’s operations. Further, the Board considers that each of the non-independent Directors in office during the financial year possesses skills and experience suitable for building the Company. It is noted the membership of the Board will be assessed in future in line with changes in the Company’s operations and level of activity and may be adjusted as deemed appropriate. The Board will consider the ASX Recommendations in assessing any future changes to the Board. |
| Recommendation 2.5 The Chair of the Board of a listed entity should be an |
PARTIALLY | The Corporate Governance Policies provides that, where practical, the Chair of the Board should be an independent Director and should not |
6
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| independent Director and, in particular, should not be the same person as the CEO of the entity. |
be the CEO. The Chairman, Gordon Galt, in not considered to be independent as he was an executive Director prior to the appointment of Wade Johnson as Managing Director in October 2016. Mr. Galt is not the CEO of the Company. It is noted the membership of the Board will be assessed in line with changes in the Company’s operations and level of activity and may be adjusted as deemed appropriate. The Board will consider the ASX Recommendations in assessing any future changes to the Board. |
|
| Recommendation 2.6 A listed entity should have a program for inducting new Directors and providing appropriate professional development opportunities for continuing Directors to develop and maintain the skills and knowledge needed to perform their role as a Director effectively. |
YES | In accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies the Board is responsible for implementing an induction program for new Directors to ensure that they gain an understanding of the Company and that they can effectively discharge their responsibilities. The Company Secretary assists in the facilitation of inductions and professional development. The Company Secretary regularly provides information to the Directors which may assist in their ongoing professional development. |
| Principle 3: Act ethically and responsibly | ||
| Recommendation 3.1 A listed entity should: (a) have a code of conduct for its Directors, senior executives and employees; and (b) disclose that code or a summary of it. |
YES | (a) The Company’s Corporate Code of Conduct applies to the Company’s Directors, senior executives and employees. (b) The Company’s Corporate Code of Conduct (which forms part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies) is available on the Company’s website. |
| Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in financial reporting | ||
| Recommendation 4.1 The Board of a listed entity should: (a) have an audit committee which: (i) has at least three members, all of whom are |
YES | (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan contains an Audit and Risk Committee Charter that provides for the creation of an Audit and Risk Committee (if it is considered it will benefit the Company. The Charter is available on the Company’s website. The Companydid not have an Audit and Risk Committee for the |
7
RECOMMENDATIONS (3[RD] EDITION)
- non-executive Directors and a majority of whom are independent Directors; and
-
(ii) is chaired by an independent Director, who is not the Chair of the Board,
-
and disclose:
-
(iii) the charter of the committee;
-
(iv) the relevant qualifications and experience of the members of the committee; and
-
(v) in relation to each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or
-
(b) if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of its financial reporting, including the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner.
Recommendation 4.2
The Board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO and CFO a declaration that the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial statements comply with the appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity and that
COMPLY
==> picture [71 x 368] intentionally omitted <==
YES
-
EXPLANATION
-
past financial year as the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee under the Audit and Risk Committee Charter including the processes to independently verify and safeguard the integrity of its financial reporting, including the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner.
-
(b) As noted above, the Company did not have a separate Audit and Risk Committee for the past financial year as the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. The Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee including the following processes to oversee the entity’s risk management framework:
-
'Risk' is a standing agenda item at each Board meeting whereby any changes to the risk profile of the Company from prior period are noted by the Managing Director and a Risk Register is presented to the Board. The Board are encouraged to update and challenge the matters disclosed in the area of risk at each Board meeting; and
-
prior to approval of the Company's statutory financial statements, the Board had the opportunity to meet with the Company's auditors as appropriate. The auditors attended the Board meeting prior to sign off of the Annual Report.
The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the CEO and CFO (or, if none, the person(s) fulfilling those functions) to provide a sign off on these terms.
The Company has obtained a sign off on these terms for each of its financial statements during the financial year.
8
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal control which is operating effectively. |
||
| Recommendation 4.3 A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its external auditor attends its AGM and is available to answer questions from security holders relevant to the audit. |
YES | The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan provides that the Board must ensure the Company’s external auditor attends its AGM and is available to answer questions from security holders relevant to the audit. The Company’s external auditor will attend the Company’s 2017 AGM. |
| Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure | ||
| Recommendation 5.1 A listed entity should: (a) have a written policy for complying with its continuous disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and disclose that policy or a summary of it. |
YES | (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies detail the Company’s Continuous Disclosure policy. (b) The Corporate Governance Policies, which incorporates the Continuous Disclosure policy, is available on the Company’s website. |
| Principle 6:Respect the rights of security holders | ||
| Recommendation 6.1 A listed entity should provide information about itself and its governance to investors via its website. |
YES | Information about the Company and its governance including the Corporate Governance Policies, Board Skills Matrix and the 2017 Corporate Governance Statement is available in the Corporate Governance page on the Company’s website. |
| Recommendation 6.2 A listed entity should design and implement an investor relations program to facilitate effective two-way communication with investors. |
YES | The Company has adopted a Shareholder Communications Policy which aims to promote and facilitate effective two-way communication with investors. The Policy outlines a range of ways in which information is communicated to shareholders and is available on the Company’s website as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies. |
| Recommendation 6.3 A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes it |
YES | Shareholders are encouraged to participate at all general meetings and AGMs of the Company. Upon the dispatch of any notice of meetingto Shareholders,the Company Secretary shallsend out |
9
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| has in place to facilitate and encourage participation at meetings of security holders. |
material stating that all Shareholders are encouraged to participate at the meeting. |
|
| Recommendation 6.4 A listed entity should give security holders the option to receive communications from, and send communications to, the entity and its security registry electronically. |
YES | The Shareholder Communications Policy provides security holders with the option to receive communication from, and send communications to, the Board and its security registry electronically. All information provided to the ASX is immediately posted to the Company’s website. Shareholder queries are referred to the Company Secretary in the first instance. |
| Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk | ||
| Recommendation 7.1 The Board of a listed entity should: (a) have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each of which: (i) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent Directors; and (ii) is chaired by an independent Director, and disclose: (iii) the charter of the committee; (iv) the members of the committee; and (v) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have a risk committee or committees that satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the process it employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management framework. |
YES | (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies provides, where practical, for the creation of an Audit and Risk Management Committee. The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies contains an Audit and Risk Committee Charter which is available on the Company’s website. The Company does not have a separate Audit and Risk Committee given the size of the Board and the fact the Board does not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. (b) As noted above, the Company does not have a separate Audit and Risk Committee given the size of the Board and the fact the Board does not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. The Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee including the following processes to oversee the entity’s risk management framework. 'Risk' is a standing agenda item at each Board meeting whereby any changes to the risk profile of the Company from prior period is noted by the Managing Director. The Managing Director also tables the Risk Register at each Board meeting and noted any updates to the Register from the prior Board meeting. The Board are encouraged to update and challenge the matters disclosed with respect tothe Company'sriskatand betweeneach Board |
10
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| meeting and raise any material risks that they believe are not adequately dealt with. |
||
| Recommendation 7.2 The Board or a committee of the Board should: (a) review the entity’s risk management framework with management at least annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound; and (b) disclose in relation to each reporting period, whether such a review has taken place. |
YES | (a) The Board, at least annually, satisfies itself that the Company’s risk management framework continues to be sound. (b) The Company’s Board and Audit and Risk Committee, if established, is focused on the management of risk. The Company’s Board reviews the Company’s risks at each Board meeting. The Managing Director is required to report on the management of risk as a standing agenda item at each Board meeting. The Board has reviewed the Company’s risk management framework during the period. |
| Recommendation 7.3 A listed entity should disclose: (a) if it has an internal audit function, how the function is structured and what role it performs; or (b) if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact and the processes it employs for evaluating and continually improving the effectiveness of its risk management and internal control processes. |
YES | (a) The Board believes the Company is not of a size to justify having an internal audit function for efficiency purposes but will monitor the need for an internal audit function as the size of the Company and its operations grow having regard to the size, location and complexity of the Company’s operations. (b) The Company did not have an internal audit function for the past financial year. The Board as a whole is ultimately responsible for establishing and reviewing the Company’s policies on risk profile, oversight and management and satisfying itself that management has developed and implemented a sound system of risk management and internal control. In addition, the Board or the Company’s Audit and Risk Committee, if established, reviews the Company’s risk management framework including in relation to internal controls, economic, environmental and social sustainability risk at least annually and monitors the quality of the accounting function. This review was undertaken by the Board during the financial year. |
| Recommendation 7.4 A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainabilityrisks and,if itdoes,how it manages or intends |
YES | The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies requires the Company to disclose whether it has any material exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainability risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those risks. The Company discloses this |
11
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| to manage those risks. | information in its Annual Report and on its ASX website as part of its continuous disclosure obligations. |
|
| Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly | ||
| Recommendation 8.1 The Board of a listed entity should: (a) have a remuneration committee which: (i) has at least three members, a majority of whom are independent Directors; and (ii) is chaired by an independent Director, and disclose: (iii) the charter of the committee; (iv) the members of the committee; and (v) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or (b) if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs for setting the level and composition of remuneration for Directors and senior executives and ensuring that such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive. |
YES | (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies provides for the creation of a Remuneration Committee if it is considered it will benefit the Company and if practical. The Remuneration Committee Charter is available in the Corporate Governance Policies on the Company’s website. The Company does not have a separate Remuneration Committee given the size of the Board and the fact the Board does not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. (b) As noted above, the Company did not have a separate Remuneration Committee for all of the past financial year given the size of the Board and as the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. The Board currently carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Remuneration Committee. The Board undertakes this role with the assistance of any external advice which may be required from time to time. Remuneration levels are competitively set to attract suitably qualified and experienced Directors and senior Executives, having regard for Company performance. It is noted the establishment of a Remuneration Committee will be assessed in future in line with changes in Board composition, Company operations and level of activity. The Board will consider the ASX Recommendations in assessing any future changes in the Committee's membership. |
| Recommendation 8.2 A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive Directors and the remuneration of executive Directors and |
YES | The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies require the Board to disclose its policies and practices regarding the remuneration of Directors and senior executives, which is disclosed in the remuneration report contained in the Company’s Annual Report as well as being |
12
| RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) | COMPLY | EXPLANATION |
|---|---|---|
| other senior executives and ensure that the different roles and responsibilities of non-executive Directors compared to executive Directors and other senior executives are reflected in the level and composition of their remuneration. |
disclosed on the Company’s website. | |
| Recommendation 8.3 A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme should: (a) have a policy on whether participants are permitted to enter into transactions (whether through the use of derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of participating in the scheme; and (b) disclose that policy or a summary of it. |
YES | (a) The Company had an equity based remuneration scheme during the past financial year. Under the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies, participants are not permitted to enter into transactions (whether through the use of derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of participating in the scheme unless specifically approved by the Board. (b) A summary of the policy is provided in the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies which is on the Company’s website. |
13