Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

LEFROY EXPLORATION LIMITED Governance Information 2017

Sep 21, 2017

65225_rns_2017-09-21_0a0ce72a-4f80-40d4-9b58-d530740cc6c9.pdf

Governance Information

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3[1]

Appendix 4G

Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations

Name of entity:

Lefroy Exploration Limited

ABN / ARBN: 052 123 930

Financial year ended:

30 June 2017

Our corporate governance statement[2] for the above period above can be found at:[3]

These pages of our annual report:

This URL on our website: http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/

The Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 21 September 2017 and has been approved by the board.

The annexure includes a key to where our corporate governance disclosures can be located.

Date: 21 September 2017

Signed:

==> picture [91 x 45] intentionally omitted <==

Print name: Susan Patricia Hunter (Company Secretary)

1 Under Listing Rule 4.7.3, an entity must lodge with ASX a completed Appendix 4G at the same time as it lodges its annual report with ASX. Listing Rule 4.10.3 requires an entity that is included in the official list as an ASX Listing to include in its annual report either a corporate governance statement that meets the requirements of that rule or the URL of the page on its website where such a statement is located. The corporate governance statement must disclose the extent to which the entity has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council during the reporting period. If the entity has not followed a recommendation for any part of the reporting period, its corporate governance statement must separately identify that recommendation and the period during which it was not followed and state its reasons for not following the recommendation and what (if any) alternative governance practices it adopted in lieu of the recommendation during that period. Under Listing Rule 4.7.4, if an entity chooses to include its corporate governance statement on its website rather than in its annual report, it must lodge a copy of the corporate governance statement with ASX at the same time as it lodges its annual report with ASX. The corporate governance statement must be current as at the effective date specified in that statement for the purposes of rule 4.10.3.

2 “Corporate governance statement” is defined in Listing Rule 19.12 to mean the statement referred to in Listing Rule 4.10.3 which discloses the extent to which an entity has followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council during a particular reporting period.

3 Mark whichever option is correct and then complete the page number(s) of the annual report, or the URL of the web page, where the entity’s corporate governance statement can be found. You can, if you wish, delete the option which is not applicable.

Throughout this form, where you are given two or more options to select, you can, if you wish, delete any option which is not applicable and just retain the option that is applicable. If you select an option that includes “OR” at the end of the selection and you delete the other options, you can also, if you wish, delete the “OR” at the end of the selection.

Page 1

ANNEXURE – KEY TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DISCLOSURES

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 1 – LAY SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT
1.1 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and
management; and
(b)
those matters expressly reserved to the board and those
delegated to management.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and information about the respective roles and responsibilities of
our board and management (including those matters expressly
reserved to the board and those delegated to management):
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.2 A listed entity should:
(a)
undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person, or
putting forward to security holders a candidate for election,
as a director; and
(b)
provide security holders with all material information in its
possession relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect
or re-elect a director.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.3 A listed entity should have a written agreement with each director
and senior executive setting out the terms of their appointment.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.4 The company secretary of a listed entity should be accountable
directly to the board, through the chair, on all matters to do with the
proper functioning of the board.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

4 If you have followed all of the Council’s recommendations in full for the whole of the period above, you can, if you wish, delete this column from the form and re-format it.

Page 2

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
1.5 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a diversity policy which includes requirements for the
board or a relevant committee of the board to set
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to
assess annually both the objectives and the entity’s progress
in achieving them;
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it; and
(c)
disclose as at the end of each reporting period the
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by
the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance
with the entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards
achieving them and either:
(1) the respective proportions of men and women on the
board, in senior executive positions and across the
whole organisation (including how the entity has defined
“senior executive” for these purposes); or
(2) if the entity is a “relevant employer” under the Workplace
Gender Equality Act, the entity’s most recent “Gender
Equality Indicators”, as defined in and published under
that Act.
… the fact that we have a diversity policy that complies with
paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of our diversity policy or a summary of it:
at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
… and the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by
the board or a relevant committee of the board in accordance with our
diversity policy and our progress towards achieving them:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (c)(1) or (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.6 A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the
performance of the board, its committees and individual
directors; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting
period in accordance with that process.
… the evaluation process referred to in paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
1.7 A listed entity should:
(a)
have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the
performance of its senior executives; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether a
performance evaluation was undertaken in the reporting
period in accordance with that process.
… the evaluation process referred to in paragraph (a):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 3

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 2 - STRUCTURE THE BOARD TO ADD VALUE
2.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a nomination committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs to address board
succession issues and to ensure that the board has the
appropriate balance of skills, knowledge, experience,
independence and diversity to enable it to discharge its
duties and responsibilities effectively.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a nomination committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at [insert location]
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement (members of the
Committee) AND
the 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Report includes the number
of times the Committee met through the period and the
individual attendances of the members at those meetings
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a nomination committee and the
processes we employ to address board succession issues and to
ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of skills,
knowledge, experience, independence and diversity to enable it to
discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively: N/A
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.2 A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix
setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the board currently
has or is looking to achieve in its membership.
… our board skills matrix:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 4

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
2.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
the names of the directors considered by the board to be
independent directors;
(b)
if a director has an interest, position, association or
relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 but the board
is of the opinion that it does not compromise the
independence of the director, the nature of the interest,
position, association or relationship in question and an
explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and
(c)
the length of service of each director.
… the names of the directors considered by the board to be
independent directors:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and, where applicable, the information referred to in paragraph (b):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and the length of service of each director:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
the 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Report includes the length of
service of each Director.
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
2.4 A majority of the board of a listed entity should be independent
directors.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.5 The chair of the board of a listed entity should be an independent
director and, in particular, should not be the same person as the
CEO of the entity.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
2.6 A listed entity should have a program for inducting new directors
and provide appropriate professional development opportunities
for directors to develop and maintain the skills and knowledge
needed to perform their role as directors effectively.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
PRINCIPLE 3 – ACT ETHICALLY AND RESPONSIBLY
3.1 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a code of conduct for its directors, senior executives
and employees; and
(b)
disclose that code or a summary of it.
… our code of conduct or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 5

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 4 – SAFEGUARD INTEGRITY IN CORPORATE REPORTING
4.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have an audit committee which:
(1) has at least three members, all of whom are non-
executive directors and a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director, who is not the
chair of the board,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the relevant qualifications and experience of the
members of the committee; and
(5) in relation to each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact
and the processes it employs that independently verify and
safeguard the integrity of its corporate reporting, including
the processes for the appointment and removal of the
external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement
partner.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have an audit committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
in the 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Report.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have an audit committee and the processes
we employ that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of our
corporate reporting, including the processes for the appointment and
removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit
engagement partner:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
4.2 The board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s
financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO
and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial records
of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial
statements comply with the appropriate accounting standards
and give a true and fair view of the financial position and
performance of the entity and that the opinion has been formed
on the basis of a sound system of risk management and internal
control which is operating effectively.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
4.3 A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its external
auditor attends its AGM and is available to answer questions
from security holders relevant to the audit.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity that does not hold an
annual general meeting and this recommendation is therefore
not applicable

Page 6

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 5 – MAKE TIMELY AND BALANCED DISCLOSURE
5.1 A listed entity should:
(a)
have a written policy for complying with its continuous
disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
… our continuous disclosure compliance policy or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance Statement AND
policy is included in the Corporate Governance Plan at
http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
PRINCIPLE 6 – RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS
6.1 A listed entity should provide information about itself and its
governance to investors via its website.
… information about us and our governance on our website:
at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
6.2 A listed entity should design and implement an investor relations
program to facilitate effective two-way communication with
investors.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
6.3 A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes it has in
place to facilitate and encourage participation at meetings of
security holders.
… our policies and processes for facilitating and encouraging
participation at meetings of security holders:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity that does not hold
periodic meetings of security holders and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
6.4 A listed entity should give security holders the option to receive
communications from, and send communications to, the entity
and its security registry electronically.
… the fact that we follow this recommendation:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 7

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 7 – RECOGNISE AND MANAGE RISK
7.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each of
which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the processes it
employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management
framework.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a committee or committees to oversee risk
that comply with paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
in the Company’s 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Report
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) and the processes we employ for overseeing our risk
management framework:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
7.2 The board or a committee of the board should:
(a)
review the entity’s risk management framework at least
annually to satisfy itself that it continues to be sound; and
(b)
disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether such
a review has taken place.
… the fact that board or a committee of the board reviews the entity’s
risk management framework at least annually to satisfy itself that it
continues to be sound:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and that such a review has taken place in the reporting period
covered by this Appendix 4G:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 8

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
7.3 A listed entity should disclose:
(a)
if it has an internal audit function, how the function is
structured and what role it performs; or
(b)
if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact and
the processes it employs for evaluating and continually
improving the effectiveness of its risk management and
internal control processes.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… how our internal audit function is structured and what role it
performs:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have an internal audit function and the
processes we employ for evaluating and continually improving the
effectiveness of our risk management and internal control processes:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement
7.4 A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material
exposure to economic, environmental and social sustainability
risks and, if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those
risks.
… whether we have any material exposure to economic,
environmental and social sustainability risks and, if we do, how we
manage or intend to manage those risks:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement

Page 9

Corporate Governance Council recommendation Corporate Governance Council recommendation We have followed the recommendation in full for the whole of the
period above. We have disclosed …
We have NOT followed the recommendation in full for the whole
of the period above. We have disclosed …4
PRINCIPLE 8 – REMUNERATE FAIRLY AND RESPONSIBLY
8.1 The board of a listed entity should:
(a)
have a remuneration committee which:
(1) has at least three members, a majority of whom are
independent directors; and
(2) is chaired by an independent director,
and disclose:
(3) the charter of the committee;
(4) the members of the committee; and
(5) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of
times the committee met throughout the period and
the individual attendances of the members at those
meetings; or
(b)
if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose that
fact and the processes it employs for setting the level and
composition of remuneration for directors and senior
executives and ensuring that such remuneration is
appropriate and not excessive.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (a):]
… the fact that we have a remuneration committee that complies with
paragraphs (1) and (2):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
… and a copy of the charter of the committee:
at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/
… and the information referred to in paragraphs (4) and (5):
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at 30 June 2017 Annual Financial Statements.
[If the entity complies with paragraph (b):]
… the fact that we do not have a remuneration committee and the
processes we employ for setting the level and composition of
remuneration for directors and senior executives and ensuring that
such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive: N/A
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation is
therefore not applicable
8.2 A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive directors
and the remuneration of executive directors and other senior
executives.
… separately our remuneration policies and practices regarding the
remuneration of non-executive directors and the remuneration of
executive directors and other senior executives:
in our Corporate Governance Statement OR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable
8.3 A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme
should:
(a)
have a policy on whether participants are permitted to
enter into transactions (whether through the use of
derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk of
participating in the scheme; and
(b)
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
… our policy on this issue or a summary of it:
in our Corporate Governance StatementOR
at [insert location]
an explanation why that is so in our Corporate Governance
Statement OR
w e do not have an equity-based remuneration scheme and this
recommendation is therefore not applicableOR
we are an externally managed entity and this recommendation
is therefore not applicable

Page 10

LEFROY EXPLORATION LIMITED ARBN 125 167 133

(Company)

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDING 30 JUNE 2017

This Corporate Governance Statement is current as at 21 September 2017 and has been approved by the Board of the Company on that date.

This Corporate Governance Statement discloses the extent to which the Company has, during the financial year ending 30 June 2017, followed the recommendations set by the ASX Corporate Governance Council in its publication Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations ( Recommendations ). The Recommendations are not mandatory, however the Recommendations that have not been followed for any part of the reporting period have been identified and reasons provided for not following them along with what (if any) alternative governance practices were adopted in lieu of the recommendation during that period.

The Company has adopted a Corporate Governance Plan which provides the written terms of reference for the Company’s corporate governance duties.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies are available on the Company’s website at http://lefroyex.com/corporate-governance/ .

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
Recommendation 1.1
A listed entity should have and disclose a charter which
sets out the respective roles and responsibilities of the
Board, the Chair and management, and includes a
description of those matters expressly reserved to the
Board and those delegated to management.
YES The Company has adopted Corporate Governance Policies that set
out the specific roles and responsibilities of the Board, the Chair and
management and includes a description of those matters expressly
reserved to the Board and those delegated to management.
The Corporate Governance Policies set out the specific responsibilities
of the Board, requirements as to the Board’s composition, the roles and
responsibilities of the Chairman and Company Secretary, Directors’
access to Company records and information, details of the Board’s
relationship with management, details of the Board’s performance
review and details of the Board’s disclosure policy.
A copy of the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies is available
on the Company’s website.
RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 1.2
A listed entity should:
(a) undertake appropriate checks before appointing a
person, or putting forward to security holders a
candidate for election, as a Director; and
(b) provide security holders with all material information
relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-
elect a Director.
YES (a) The Company has guidelines for the appointment and selection of
the Board in its Corporate Governance Plan. The Company’s
Corporate Governance Plan requires that prior to appointing a
director or recommending a new candidate for election as a
director that appropriate checks are undertaken as to the persons
character, experience, education, criminal record and bankruptcy
history. These checks were undertaken with the appointments
during the year and will continue to be undertaken in future prior
to appointing a director or recommending a new candidate for
election as a director.
(b) Under the Corporate Governance Plan, all material information
relevant to a decision on whether or not to elect or re-elect a
Director must be provided to security holders in the Notice of
Meeting containing the resolution to elect or re-elect a Director.
The Board will ensure this material information is included in the
Company’s 2017 Notice of Annual General Meeting.
Recommendation 1.3
A listed entity should have a written agreement with each
Director and senior executive setting out the terms of their
appointment.
YES The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies require the Company
to ensure that each Director and senior executive is a party to a written
agreement with the Company which sets out the terms of that
Director’s or senior executive’s appointment.
The Company has had written agreements with each of its Directors
and senior executives for the past financial year.
Recommendation 1.4
The company secretary of a listed entity should be
accountable directly to the Board, through the Chair, on
all matters to do with the proper functioning of the Board.
YES The Corporate Governance Policies outline the roles, responsibility and
accountability of the Company Secretary. In accordance with this, the
Company Secretary reports to the Board through the Chairman and is
responsible for monitoring the extent that Board policy and procedures
are followed, and coordinating the timely completion and dispatch of
Board agenda and briefing material. All directors have access to the
Company Secretary.
Recommendation 1.5
A listed entity should:
PARTIALLY (a) The Company has not adopted a Diversity Policy. Given the size of
the Board and the Company, the Board believes no efficiencies or

2

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY
(a) have a diversity policy which includes requirements for
the Board or a relevant committee of the Board to set
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity
and to assess annually both the objectives and the
entity’s progress in achieving them;
(b) disclose that policy or a summary or it; and
(c) disclose as at the end of each reporting period:
(i)
the measurable objectives for achieving gender
diversity set by the Board in accordance with the
entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards
achieving them; and
(ii) either:
(A)
the respective proportions of men and
women on the Board, in senior executive
positions and across the whole organisation
(including how the entity has defined
“senior executive” for these purposes); or
(B)
if the entity is a “relevant employer” under
the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the
entity’s most recent “Gender Equality
Indicators”, as defined in the Workplace
Gender Equality Act.
Recommendation 1.6
A listed entity should: YES
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating
the performance of the Board, its committees and
  • EXPLANATION

  • other benefits could be gained by establishing a Diversity Policy. It is noted the establishment of a Diversity Policy will be assessed in future in line with changes in Board composition, Company operations and the level of activity. The Board will consider the ASX Recommendations in establishing a Diversity Policy.

  • (a) The Board did not set measurable gender diversity objectives for the past financial year because the Board considered the application of a measurable gender diversity objective requiring a specified proportion of women on the Board and in senior executive roles would, given the small size of the Company and the Board, unduly limit the Company from applying the Diversity Policy as a whole and the Company’s policy of appointing based on skills and merit. The respective proportions of men and women on the Board, in senior executive positions and across the whole organisation (including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these purposes) for the past financial year is disclosed below –

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
(a) have a diversity policy which includes requirements for
the Board or a relevant committee of the Board to set
measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity
and to assess annually both the objectives and the
entity’s progress in achieving them;
(b) disclose that policy or a summary or it; and
(c) disclose as at the end of each reporting period:
(i)
the measurable objectives for achieving gender
diversity set by the Board in accordance with the
entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards
achieving them; and
(ii) either:
(A)
the respective proportions of men and
women on the Board, in senior executive
positions and across the whole organisation
(including how the entity has defined
“senior executive” for these purposes); or
(B)
if the entity is a “relevant employer” under
the Workplace Gender Equality Act, the
entity’s most recent “Gender Equality
Indicators”, as defined in the Workplace
Gender Equality Act.
other benefits could be gained by establishing a Diversity Policy. It
is noted the establishment of a Diversity Policy will be assessed in
future in line with changes in Board composition, Company
operations and the level of activity. The Board will consider the ASX
Recommendations in establishing a Diversity Policy.
(a) The Board did not set measurable gender diversity objectives for
the past financial year because the Board considered the
application of a measurable gender diversity objective requiring a
specified proportion of women on the Board and in senior
executive roles would, given the small size of the Company and
the Board, unduly limit the Company from applying the Diversity
Policy as a whole and the Company’s policy of appointing based
on skills and merit.
The respective proportions of men and women on the Board, in
senior executive positions and across the whole organisation
(including how the entity has defined “senior executive” for these
purposes) for the past financial year is disclosed below –
Female Male
Board
0%
100%
Senior Executive 50%
50%
Whole organisation 25%
75%
The Senior Executives are the individuals at the highest level of
organisational
management
who
have
the
day-to-day
responsibilities of managing the Company below the Board.
The Senior Executives include the Company’s Managing
Director and the Company Secretary.
Recommendation 1.6
A listed entity should:
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating
the performance of the Board, its committees and
YES (a) The Company’s Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the
Board) is responsible for arranging an annual performance
evaluation of the Board, its Committees, individual Directors and
senior executives as appropriate. The process for this is set out in
the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan, which is available on
the Company’s website.

3

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
individual Directors; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether
a performance evaluation was undertaken in the
reporting period in accordance with that process.
(b) A formal performance evaluation in respect of the Board and its
committees was not undertaken during the year given the
changes to the Board by way of appointment of the Managing
Director, Wade Johnson, which occurred the financial year. A
Board performance evaluation will be undertaken during the next
financial year. It is noted that the Chairman has open and honest
communications with each of the Directors both throughout the
financial year and currently whereby matters relating to Director
Performance, if any, are raised promptly and dealt with
accordingly.
Recommendation 1.7
A listed entity should:
(a) have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating
the performance of its senior executives; and
(b) disclose, in relation to each reporting period, whether
a performance evaluation was undertaken in the
reporting period in accordance with that process.
YES (a) The Board is responsible for evaluating the performance of the
Company’s Managing Director/CEO on an annual basis. The
Company’s Remuneration Committee (or, in its absence, the
Board) is responsible for approving changes to remuneration or
contract terms of the CEO.
The applicable processes for these evaluations can be found in the
Company’s Corporate Governance Policies, which are available
on the Company’s website.
(b) The Board has not completed a performance evaluation in
respect of the Managing Director/CEO in the past financial year as
he was only appointed on 19 October 2016. A performance
evaluation is planned for Mr. Johnson at the end of the calendar
2017 year following completion of a full year of employment as
Managing Director/CEO.
Principle 2: Structure the Board to add value
Recommendation 2.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a nomination committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent Directors; and
YES (a)
The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies provides for the
creation of a Nomination Committee (if it is considered it will
benefit the Company). The Nomination Committee Charter is
available on the Company’s website.
(b) The Company did not have a Nomination Committee for the past
financial year. Given the size of the Board and the Company, the

4

  • RECOMMENDATIONS (3[RD] EDITION) COMPLY (ii) is chaired by an independent Director, and disclose: (iii) the charter of the committee; (iv) the members of the committee; and

  • (v) as at the end of each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or

  • (b) if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs to address Board succession issues and to ensure that the Board has the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the entity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively.

Recommendation 2.2

A listed entity should have and disclose a Board skill matrix YES setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership.

EXPLANATION

Board believes no efficiencies or other benefits could be gained by establishing a separate Nomination Committee. It is noted the establishment of a Nomination Committee will be assessed in future in line with changes in Board composition, Company operations and level of activity. The Board will consider the ASX Recommendations in establishing a Nomination Committee.

As the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from establishment of a separate Nomination Committee, the Board carried out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Nomination Committee under the Nomination Committee Charter, including the following processes to address succession issues and to ensure the Board has the appropriate balance of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the entity to enable it to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively. During the financial year, the Board devoted time to discuss Board succession issues and to assessing the Company’s Board skills with all Board members being involved in the process, to the maximum extent permitted under the Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules.

Under the Nomination Committee Charter (in the Company’s Corporate Governance Plan), the Nomination Committee (or, in its absence, the Board) is required to prepare a Board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board currently has (or is looking to achieve) and to review this at least annually against the Company’s Board skills matrix to ensure the appropriate mix of skills and expertise is present to facilitate successful strategic direction.

The Company has a Board skill matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity that the Board currently has or is looking to achieve in its membership. A copy is available on the Company’s website.

The Board Charter requires the disclosure of each Board member’s qualifications and expertise. Full details as to each Director and senior executives’ relevant skills and experience are available in the Company’s Annual Report.

5

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
Recommendation 2.3
A listed entity should disclose:
(a) the names of the Directors considered by the Board to
be independent Directors;
(b) if a Director has an interest, position, association or
relationship of the type described in Box 2.3 of the ASX
Corporate
Governance
Principles
and
Recommendation (3rd Edition), but the Board is of the
opinion
that
it
does
not
compromise
the
independence of the Director, the nature of the
interest, position, association or relationship in question
and an explanation of why the Board is of that opinion;
and
(c) the length of service of each Director
YES (a) The Managing Director, Wade Johnson, is not considered to be
independent as he is an Executive of the Company. In addition,
the
remaining
Non-executive
Directors
including
the
Non-
executive Chairman, Gordon Galt and Non-executive Directors
James Beecher, Geoff Piggott and Michael Davies were
considered
Executive
Directors
of
the
Company
prior
to
appointment of Mr Johnson in October 2016. As such, they are not
considered to be independent.
(b) There are no independent Directors who fall into this category.
(c) The Company’s Annual Report discloses the length of service of
each Director.
Recommendation 2.4
A majority of the Board of a listed entity should be
independent Directors.
NO The Company’s Board Charter requires that, where practical, the
majority of the Board should be independent. The Board does not have
an independent majority as whilst there is a majority of Non-executive
Directors, these Directors are not considered to be independent as they
were executives within the last three years.
The Board considers the composition of the Board is appropriate in the
context of the size of the Board and the Company and the scope and
scale of the Company’s operations. Further, the Board considers that
each of the non-independent Directors in office during the financial
year possesses skills and experience suitable for building the Company.
It is noted the membership of the Board will be assessed in future in line
with changes in the Company’s operations and level of activity and
may be adjusted as deemed appropriate. The Board will consider the
ASX Recommendations in assessing any future changes to the Board.
Recommendation 2.5
The Chair of the Board of a listed entity should be an
PARTIALLY The Corporate Governance Policies provides that, where practical, the
Chair of the Board should be an independent Director and should not

6

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
independent Director and, in particular, should not be the
same person as the CEO of the entity.
be the CEO.
The Chairman, Gordon Galt, in not considered to be independent as
he was an executive Director prior to the appointment of Wade
Johnson as Managing Director in October 2016. Mr. Galt is not the CEO
of the Company.
It is noted the membership of the Board will be assessed in line with
changes in the Company’s operations and level of activity and may be
adjusted as deemed appropriate. The Board will consider the ASX
Recommendations in assessing any future changes to the Board.
Recommendation 2.6
A listed entity should have a program for inducting new
Directors
and
providing
appropriate
professional
development opportunities for continuing Directors to
develop and maintain the skills and knowledge needed to
perform their role as a Director effectively.
YES In accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies
the Board is responsible for implementing an induction program for new
Directors to ensure that they gain an understanding of the Company
and that they can effectively discharge their responsibilities. The
Company Secretary assists in the facilitation of inductions and
professional development. The Company Secretary regularly provides
information to the Directors which may assist in their ongoing
professional development.
Principle 3: Act ethically and responsibly
Recommendation 3.1
A listed entity should:
(a) have a code of conduct for its Directors, senior
executives and employees; and
(b) disclose that code or a summary of it.
YES (a) The Company’s Corporate Code of Conduct applies to the
Company’s Directors, senior executives and employees.
(b) The Company’s Corporate Code of Conduct (which forms part of
the Company’s Corporate Governance Policies) is available on
the Company’s website.
Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in financial reporting
Recommendation 4.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a) have an audit committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, all of whom are
YES (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan contains an Audit and
Risk Committee Charter that provides for the creation of an Audit
and Risk Committee (if it is considered it will benefit the Company.
The Charter is available on the Company’s website.
The Companydid not have an Audit and Risk Committee for the

7

RECOMMENDATIONS (3[RD] EDITION)

  - non-executive Directors and a majority of whom are independent Directors; and
  • (ii) is chaired by an independent Director, who is not the Chair of the Board,

  • and disclose:

  • (iii) the charter of the committee;

  • (iv) the relevant qualifications and experience of the members of the committee; and

  • (v) in relation to each reporting period, the number of times the committee met throughout the period and the individual attendances of the members at those meetings; or

  • (b) if it does not have an audit committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs that independently verify and safeguard the integrity of its financial reporting, including the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner.

Recommendation 4.2

The Board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s financial statements for a financial period, receive from its CEO and CFO a declaration that the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained and that the financial statements comply with the appropriate accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the entity and that

COMPLY

==> picture [71 x 368] intentionally omitted <==

YES

  • EXPLANATION

  • past financial year as the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. In accordance with the Company’s Board Charter, the Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee under the Audit and Risk Committee Charter including the processes to independently verify and safeguard the integrity of its financial reporting, including the processes for the appointment and removal of the external auditor and the rotation of the audit engagement partner.

  • (b) As noted above, the Company did not have a separate Audit and Risk Committee for the past financial year as the Board did not consider the Company would benefit from its establishment. The Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee including the following processes to oversee the entity’s risk management framework:

  • 'Risk' is a standing agenda item at each Board meeting whereby any changes to the risk profile of the Company from prior period are noted by the Managing Director and a Risk Register is presented to the Board. The Board are encouraged to update and challenge the matters disclosed in the area of risk at each Board meeting; and

  • prior to approval of the Company's statutory financial statements, the Board had the opportunity to meet with the Company's auditors as appropriate. The auditors attended the Board meeting prior to sign off of the Annual Report.

The Company’s Audit and Risk Committee Charter requires the CEO and CFO (or, if none, the person(s) fulfilling those functions) to provide a sign off on these terms.

The Company has obtained a sign off on these terms for each of its financial statements during the financial year.

8

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound
system of risk management and internal control which is
operating effectively.
Recommendation 4.3
A listed entity that has an AGM should ensure that its
external auditor attends its AGM and is available to
answer questions from security holders relevant to the
audit.
YES The Company’s Corporate Governance Plan provides that the Board
must ensure the Company’s external auditor attends its AGM and is
available to answer questions from security holders relevant to the
audit.
The Company’s external auditor will attend the Company’s 2017 AGM.
Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure
Recommendation 5.1
A listed entity should:
(a) have a written policy for complying with its continuous
disclosure obligations under the Listing Rules; and
disclose that policy or a summary of it.
YES (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies detail the
Company’s Continuous Disclosure policy.
(b) The Corporate Governance Policies, which incorporates the
Continuous Disclosure policy, is available on the Company’s
website.
Principle 6:Respect the rights of security holders
Recommendation 6.1
A listed entity should provide information about itself and
its governance to investors via its website.
YES Information about the Company and its governance including the
Corporate Governance Policies, Board Skills Matrix and the 2017
Corporate Governance Statement is available in the Corporate
Governance page on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 6.2
A listed entity should design and implement an investor
relations
program
to
facilitate
effective
two-way
communication with investors.
YES The Company has adopted a Shareholder Communications Policy
which
aims
to
promote
and
facilitate
effective
two-way
communication with investors. The Policy outlines a range of ways in
which information is communicated to shareholders and is available on
the Company’s website as part of the Company’s Corporate
Governance Policies.
Recommendation 6.3
A listed entity should disclose the policies and processes it
YES Shareholders are encouraged to participate at all general meetings
and AGMs of the Company. Upon the dispatch of any notice of
meetingto Shareholders,the Company Secretary shallsend out

9

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
has in place to facilitate and encourage participation at
meetings of security holders.
material stating that all Shareholders are encouraged to participate at
the meeting.
Recommendation 6.4
A listed entity should give security holders the option to
receive communications from, and send communications
to, the entity and its security registry electronically.
YES The Shareholder Communications Policy provides security holders with
the option to receive communication from, and send communications
to, the Board and its security registry electronically. All information
provided to the ASX is immediately posted to the Company’s website.
Shareholder queries are referred to the Company Secretary in the first
instance.
Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk
Recommendation 7.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a committee or committees to oversee risk, each
of which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent Directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent Director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number
of
times
the
committee
met
throughout the period and the individual
attendances
of
the
members
at
those
meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a risk committee or committees that
satisfy (a) above, disclose that fact and the process it
employs for overseeing the entity’s risk management
framework.
YES (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies provides, where
practical, for the creation of an Audit and Risk Management
Committee.
The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies contains an Audit
and Risk Committee Charter which is available on the Company’s
website.
The Company does not have a separate Audit and Risk Committee
given the size of the Board and the fact the Board does not consider
the Company would benefit from its establishment.
(b) As noted above, the Company does not have a separate Audit
and Risk Committee given the size of the Board and the fact the
Board does not consider the Company would benefit from its
establishment. The Board carries out the duties that would ordinarily
be carried out by the Audit and Risk Committee including the
following processes to oversee the entity’s risk management
framework. 'Risk' is a standing agenda item at each Board meeting
whereby any changes to the risk profile of the Company from prior
period is noted by the Managing Director. The Managing Director
also tables the Risk Register at each Board meeting and noted any
updates to the Register from the prior Board meeting. The Board
are encouraged to update and challenge the matters disclosed
with respect tothe Company'sriskatand betweeneach Board

10

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
meeting and raise any material risks that they believe are not
adequately dealt with.
Recommendation 7.2
The Board or a committee of the Board should:
(a) review the entity’s risk management framework with
management at least annually to satisfy itself that it
continues to be sound; and
(b) disclose in relation to each reporting period, whether
such a review has taken place.
YES (a) The Board, at least annually, satisfies itself that the Company’s risk
management framework continues to be sound.
(b) The Company’s Board and Audit and Risk Committee, if
established, is focused on the management of risk. The
Company’s Board reviews the Company’s risks at each Board
meeting. The Managing Director is required to report on the
management of risk as a standing agenda item at each Board
meeting.
The
Board
has
reviewed
the
Company’s
risk
management framework during the period.
Recommendation 7.3
A listed entity should disclose:
(a) if it has an internal audit function, how the function is
structured and what role it performs; or
(b) if it does not have an internal audit function, that fact
and the processes it employs for evaluating and
continually improving the effectiveness of its risk
management and internal control processes.
YES (a) The Board believes the Company is not of a size to justify having an
internal audit function for efficiency purposes but will monitor the
need for an internal audit function as the size of the Company and
its operations grow having regard to the size, location and
complexity of the Company’s operations.
(b) The Company did not have an internal audit function for the past
financial year. The Board as a whole is ultimately responsible for
establishing and reviewing the Company’s policies on risk profile,
oversight and management and satisfying itself that management
has developed and implemented a sound system of risk
management and internal control. In addition, the Board or the
Company’s Audit and Risk Committee, if established, reviews the
Company’s risk management framework including in relation to
internal controls, economic, environmental and social sustainability
risk at least annually and monitors the quality of the accounting
function. This review was undertaken by the Board during the
financial year.
Recommendation 7.4
A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material
exposure
to
economic,
environmental
and
social
sustainabilityrisks and,if itdoes,how it manages or intends
YES The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies requires the Company
to disclose whether it has any material exposure to economic,
environmental and social sustainability risks and, if it does, how it
manages or intends to manage those risks. The Company discloses this

11

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
to manage those risks. information in its Annual Report and on its ASX website as part of its
continuous disclosure obligations.
Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly
Recommendation 8.1
The Board of a listed entity should:
(a) have a remuneration committee which:
(i)
has at least three members, a majority of whom
are independent Directors; and
(ii)
is chaired by an independent Director,
and disclose:
(iii)
the charter of the committee;
(iv)
the members of the committee; and
(v)
as at the end of each reporting period, the
number of times the committee met throughout
the period and the individual attendances of
the members at those meetings; or
(b) if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose
that fact and the processes it employs for setting the
level and composition of remuneration for Directors
and senior executives and ensuring that such
remuneration is appropriate and not excessive.
YES (a) The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies provides for the
creation of a Remuneration Committee if it is considered it will
benefit the Company and if practical.
The Remuneration Committee Charter is available in the
Corporate Governance Policies on the Company’s website.
The
Company
does
not
have
a
separate
Remuneration
Committee given the size of the Board and the fact the Board
does not consider the Company would benefit from its
establishment.
(b) As noted above, the Company did not have a separate
Remuneration Committee for all of the past financial year given
the size of the Board and as the Board did not consider the
Company would benefit from its establishment. The Board
currently carries out the duties that would ordinarily be carried out
by the Remuneration Committee. The Board undertakes this role
with the assistance of any external advice which may be required
from time to time. Remuneration levels are competitively set to
attract suitably qualified and experienced Directors and senior
Executives, having regard for Company performance.
It is noted the establishment of a Remuneration Committee will be
assessed in future in line with changes in Board composition,
Company operations and level of activity. The Board will consider
the ASX Recommendations in assessing any future changes in the
Committee's membership.
Recommendation 8.2
A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and
practices regarding the remuneration of non-executive
Directors and the remuneration of executive Directors and
YES The Company’s Corporate Governance Policies require the Board to
disclose its policies and practices regarding the remuneration of
Directors and senior executives, which is disclosed in the remuneration
report contained in the Company’s Annual Report as well as being

12

RECOMMENDATIONS (3RD EDITION) COMPLY EXPLANATION
other senior executives and ensure that the different roles
and responsibilities of non-executive Directors compared
to executive Directors and other senior executives are
reflected
in
the
level
and
composition
of
their
remuneration.
disclosed on the Company’s website.
Recommendation 8.3
A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration
scheme should:
(a) have a policy on whether participants are permitted to
enter into transactions (whether through the use of
derivatives or otherwise) which limit the economic risk
of participating in the scheme; and
(b) disclose that policy or a summary of it.
YES (a) The Company had an equity based remuneration scheme during
the
past
financial
year.
Under
the
Company’s
Corporate
Governance Policies, participants are not permitted to enter into
transactions (whether through the use of derivatives or otherwise)
which limit the economic risk of participating in the scheme unless
specifically approved by the Board.
(b) A summary of the policy is provided in the Company’s Corporate
Governance Policies which is on the Company’s website.

13