AI assistant
KINGFISHER MINING LTD — Capital/Financing Update 2022
Sep 5, 2022
65177_rns_2022-09-05_8f3f6337-e624-4552-a2bd-354aa606a163.pdf
Capital/Financing Update
Open in viewerOpens in your device viewer
0
ASX Announcement:
6 September 2022
CORPORATE PROFILE
Shares on issue: 42,250,001 Unlisted options: 10,500,000 Cash: $2.2M (30 June 2022) Market Capitalisation: $22.4M* Debt: Nil
PROJECTS
MICK WELL AND KINGFISHER
Breakthrough high grade rare earth elements discovery in the Gascoyne region of Western Australia
BOOLALOO
Exciting copper and gold potential in the Ashburton region of Western Australia
Significant Clay REE Mineralisation Confirmed at Mick Well
24m at 2345ppm TREO from surface
-
In addition to the recent exceptional high grade hard rock Rare Earth Elements (REE) results, follow-up RC drilling of the mineralised clays at Mick Well has confirmed significant high grade clay hosted REE, with new drill hole results including:
-
24m at 2345 ppm TREO from surface (MWRC030). The drill hole also included 8m at 3011 ppm TREO from surface.
-
48m at 1076 ppm TREO, including 16m at 1580 ppm TREO from surface (MWRC028). The drill hole also included 4m at 2379 ppm TREO from surface.
- 36m at 779 ppm TREO from 4m (MWRC027).
-
20m at 734 ppm TREO from 32m, including 4m at 1020 ppm TREO from 48m (MWRC029).
-
The new results build upon the previously reported clay REE results from Mick Well (see ASX:KFM 27 July 2022):
-
48m at 1265 ppm TREO, including 40m at 1367 ppm TREO from 8m (MWRC020).
CORPORATE DIRECTORY
WARREN HALLAM Non-Executive Chairman
JAMES FARRELL Executive Director and CEO
ADAM SCHOFIELD Non-Executive Director
SCOTT HUFFADINE Non-Executive Director
STEPHEN BROCKHURST Company Secretary
MEDIA & INVESTOR ENQUIRIES
Peter Taylor, NWR Communications P: +61 412 036 231
ABN: 96 629 675 216
P: +61 8 9481 0389 E: [email protected]
Unit 2, 106 Robinson Avenue Belmont WA 6104 AUSTRALIA
-
16m at 1156 ppm TREO, including 12m at 1301 ppm TREO from 8m (MWRC021).
-
The clay and high-grade hard rock mineralisation at Mick Well are now recognised to be part of the same large scale mineral system within the Company’s 54km REE target corridor.
-
The latest clay mineralisation intersections are thick, high grade and confirm the continuity of mineralisation downhole and along strike.
-
Early-stage interpretation of the clay mineralisation highlights a potential strike length of more than 6.5km, with demonstrated widths of 100m and vertical depths from surface to greater than 40m.
-
Metallurgical sighter testwork is underway to assess the extraction of the REE from the clay mineralisation.
-
Additional assay results from further surface sampling around the high grade hard rock mineralisation at MW2 (see ASX:KFM 30 August 2022) are expected in September ahead of drilling planned for October.
Kingfisher Mining Limited ( ASX:KFM ) (“ Kingfisher ” or the “ Company” ) is pleased to provide the results from the Mick Well drilling at its 100% owned projects in the Gascoyne Mineral Field in Western Australia.
Kingfisher’s Executive Director and CEO James Farrell commented: “We continue to be amazed by the underlying potential of our Gascoyne projects. In addition to the very high grade hard rock assays recently reported, these latest drill results have confirmed broad zones of clays containing a second style of REE mineralisation at Mick Well. We now recognise that the clay and hard rock mineralisation are part of the same large-scale system, with the clay mineralisation hosted in broad structures within our 54km target corridor indicating the potential for larger mineralised carbonatite intrusions at depth.
Our fieldwork which is targeting the exceptionally high-grade hard rock monazite mineralisation in the MW2 area is continuing. This work remains a priority as we seek to discover new areas of outcropping mineralisation and extend the recently discovered REE lodes that remain open in all directions.”
* Based on a share price of $0.53 as of 5 September 2022
www.kingfishermining.com.au
1
ASX KFM
ASX Announcement: 6 September 2022
Mick Well Drilling Results
Follow-up reverse circulation (RC) drilling at Mick Well has confirmed the broad zones of clay hosted REE mineralisation at Mick Well (Figure 1, Figure 2). The mineralisation is associated with kaolinite clays and weathered bedrock within the shear zones which are part of the Company’s 54km REE target corridor. Significant new results from the clay mineralisation include:
-
MWRC030: 24m at 2345 ppm TREO with 470 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from surface.
-
MWRC028: 48m at 1076 ppm TREO with 204 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11, including 16m at 1580 ppm TREO with 325 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from surface.
-
MWRC027: 36m at 779 ppm TREO with 164 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from 4m.
-
MWRC029: 20m at 734 ppm TREO with 146 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from 32m, including 4m at 1020 ppm TREO with 237 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from 48m.
==> picture [525 x 420] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
MWRC027: 36m at 779 ppm TREO
MWRC028: 48m at 1076 ppm TREO,
including 16m at 1580 ppm TREO
MWRC030: 24m at 2345 ppm TREO
MWRC029: 20m at 734 ppm TREO,
including 4m at 1020 ppm TREO
MWRC020: 48m at 1265 ppm TREO,
including 40m at 1367 ppm TREO
MWRC021: 32m at 783 ppm TREO,
Legend
including 12m at 1301 ppm TREO
Geology
Carbonatite complex
Clay mineralisation target
Drilling
KFM RC drill hole
Historical drill hole 100 m
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 1: Mick Well Prospect showing TREO results and the clay REE mineralisation target. A long section is shown in Figure 2. Results from drill holes MWRC020 and MWRC021 were previously reported (see ASX:KFM 27 July 2022).
2
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
ASX Announcement: 6 September 2022
The new drill hole results add significantly to the previously reported Mick Well results which included (see ASX:KFM 27 July 2022):
-
MWRC020: 48m at 1265 ppm TREO with 257 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from 4m, including 40m at 1367 ppm TREO with 278 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from 8m.
-
MWRC021: 16m at 1156 ppm TREO with 228 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from 8m, including 12m at 1301 ppm TREO with 259 ppm Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 from 8m.
==> picture [521 x 271] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
400 mRL 400 mRL
20m at 734 ppm TREO, including
4m at 1020 ppm TREO
36m at 779 ppm TREO
Open
Open
24m at 2345 ppm TREO
200 mRL 200 mRL
48m at 1076 ppm TREO, including 32m at 783 ppm TREO, including
16m at 1580 ppm TREO 48m at 1265 ppm TREO, including 12m at 1301 ppm TREO
40m at 1367 ppm TREO
Geology
Bedrock
0 mRL Clay mineralisation 0 mRL
Drill hole log
100 m
Kaolinite clays
7,247,600 mE 402,100 mE 403,000 mE 7,247,400 mE 403,200 mE 403,400 mE
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 2: Mick Well Prospect schematic long section showing TREO results and the clay REE mineralisation. The location of the long section is shown on Figure 1. Results from drill holes MWRC020 and MWRC021 were previously reported (see ASX:KFM 27 July 2022).
The interpretation of the shear zone and associated clay mineralisation has highlighted a potential strike length of 6.5km at Mick Well (Figure 3) and drilling has delineated widths of 100m with vertical extents to 40m depth from surface. The 100m width of the clay zone was highlighted by drill hole MWRC029, which was collared in rock and passed into the clays at 30m downhole.
The current program has also highlighted the association between the high grade REE mineralisation at MW2 and the clay mineralisation at Mick Well. Both styles of mineralisation are now recognised to be part of the same mineral system, occurring in related geological structures, with potential for both styles of mineralisation within structures that make up the 54km target corridor. The clay mineralisation has developed in areas of deep weathering of the carbonatites and associated intense alteration which filled the belt-scale shears.
3
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
ASX Announcement: 6 September 2022
==> picture [525 x 372] intentionally omitted <==
----- Start of picture text -----
MWGS0705: 11.76% TREO and 1.98% NdPr
MWGS0708: 40.02% TREO and 6.40% NdPr
MWGS0709: 5.29% TREO and 0.82% NdPr
MWGS0710: 3.14% TREO and 0.49% NdPr
MWGS0769: 21.55% TREO and 3.74% NdPr
MWGS0465: 14.29% TREO and 2.23% NdPr MWGS0770: 15.19% TREO and 2.56% NdPr
MWGS0474: 4.92% TREO and 0.87% NdPr
MWGS0475: 5.01% TREO and 0.85% NdPr MWGS0476: 4.43% TREO and 0.72% NdPr
MWGS0500: 8.30% TREO and 1.32% NdPr MWGS0477: 4.33% TREO and 0.73% NdPr
MW2 MWGS0478: 4.85% TREO and 0.80% NdPr
MWGS0484: 21.13% TREO and 3.59% NdPr
MWGS0488: 17.95% TREO and 3.01% NdPr
MWGS0490: 19.60% TREO and 3.09% NdPr
Drill Holes:
MWRC004: 12m at 1.12% TREO
MWRC011: 4m at 1.03% TREO
MW3 MWRC011: MWRC013: 8m at 1.05% TREO5m at 3.45% TREO
MWRC028: 48m at 1076 ppm TREO,
including 16m at 1580 ppm TREO
Mick Well
MWRC027: 36m at 779 ppm TREO
MWRC029: 20m at 734 ppm TREO,
MWRC030: 24m at 2345 ppm TREO
including 4m at 1020 ppm TREO
Legend
Geology
Mineralised carbonatite dyke
Carbonatite complex
Clay mineralisation target
Drilling
KFM RC drill hole
Historical drill hole 1 km
----- End of picture text -----
Figure 3: Mick Well Project area showing the clay target corridor and its relationship with the mineralised carbonatite dykes at MW2. Previously reported drill holes at MW2 which included 5m at 3.45% TREO, with 3m at 5.21% TREO (see ASX:KFM 5 July 2022) and 12m at 1.12% TREO, with 4m at 1.84% TREO (see ASX:KFM 24 March 2022) as well are previously reported rock chips (see ASX:KFM 30 August 2022 and 20 June 2022). Rock chip results are stated as Total Rare Earth Oxides (TREO%) and total Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 (%) content.
The RC drilling at MW2 intersected areas of alteration and anomalous REE mineralisation in the positions of the interpreted strike extents of the mineralisation intersected in MWRC011 (see ASX:KFM 5 July 2022), with 4m at 0.1% TREO returned from MWRC026 and 1m at 0.1% TREO returned from MWRC025 (see Annexure 1). The upcoming Q4 drilling at MW2 will now focus on the 2.2km of strike of outcropping high grade hard rock mineralisation (see ASX:KFM 30 August 2022) which is located 500m northwest of the previous MW2 drilling, along with the targeting of anticipated additional outcrop discoveries from our ongoing fieldwork.
The Company is targeting REE mineralisation along a 54km corridor associated with the Chalba Shear Zone (Figure 4). The Chalba Shear is a broad WNW-trending crustal-scale structure that has played an important role in providing a conduit for the intrusion of the carbonatites, as well as the associated alteration and late-stage mineralised veins and carbonatite dykes. Fenites (carbonatite-associated alteration) and potassium fenites, are well-developed in the Mick Well area and are an important host of the REE mineralisation. The carbonatite intrusion-related REE exploration model is shown in Figure 5.
4
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
ASX Announcement:
6 September 2022
==> picture [525 x 435] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 4: Total Magnetic Intensity for the Kingfisher, Mick Well and Arthur River Projects. Kingfisher is targeting REE mineralisation associated carbonatite intrusions which intrude along faults and shear zones which extend for 54km within the Company’s tenure.
5
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
ASX Announcement:
6 September 2022
==> picture [299 x 339] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 5: Carbonatite associated rare earth element mineralisation model*. The model shows carbonatite intrusions and dykes, areas of potassic fenitisation as well as the late stage REE-bearing dykes and veins – which have been discovered by the Company at the Mick Well project.
2022 Gascoyne Exploration Program
Kingfisher is carrying out extensive and targeted exploration programs for its Gascoyne projects during 2022. The planned exploration is cost-effective and aims to develop and test drill targets from ground-based mapping and rock sampling. The Company also plans to simultaneously develop a pipeline of exploration opportunities through integrating current and scheduled tenement-scale airborne geophysical surveys with geological knowledge from the Company’s breakthrough REE discovery at Mick Well.
6
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
ASX Announcement:
6 September 2022
Planned and completed activities for 2022 for Kingfisher’s Gascoyne projects are shown below.
| Q1 2022 | Q2 2022 | Q3 2022 | Q4 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mick Well | |||
| RC Drilling | |||
| Magnetic and radiometric survey | |||
| Mappingand drill target definition | |||
| Ground-based radiometrics | |||
| Kingfisher | |||
| RC Drilling | |||
| Magnetic and radiometric survey | |||
| Arthur River | |||
| Magnetic and radiometric survey | |||
| Boolaloo | |||
| Magnetic and radiometric survey |
Upcoming News
-
September 2022: Results from ongoing surface mapping, rock chip sampling and drill target definition.
-
October 2022: Results from airborne geophysics surveys.
-
November 2022: Drilling and results from MW2.
About the Kingfisher and Mick Well Projects
The Kingfisher and Mick Well Projects are located approximately 230km east of Carnarvon, in the Gascoyne region of Western Australia. The Company holds exploration licences covering 969km[2] and has recently increased its interests in the Gascoyne Mineral Field by nearly 40% through the targeted pegging of additional tenure interpreted to be prospective for rare earth elements (Figure 6). The tenure includes rocks of the Proterozoic Durlacher Suite that hosts the world-class Yangibana Deposit which includes 27.42Mt @ 0.97% TREO[# ] as well as the Archaean Halfway Gneiss.
The recently discovered REE mineralisation at Mick Well is associated with carbonatite intrusions discovered by Kingfisher. Historic exploration in the area had focused on outcrops of quartz reef and gossanous ironstones which are up to 10m in width. Past exploration returned rock chip sample results of up to 10.6% Cu over a strike length of 1km within a laterally extensive geological horizon. Four historical drill holes were completed in the Mick Well area, with the best result being 11m @ 0.25% Cu from 118 m (MWDD001)[^] .
Historical exploration also identified copper at the Kingfisher Project, with mineralisation exposed in a series of shallow historical mining pits over a strike length of 2km. Previous exploration at the project has included geophysical surveys, surface geochemical sampling and limited reverse circulation drilling, with drilling intercepts including 3m @ 0.6% Cu (KFRC10) and rock chip results of 15.3% Cu, 6.3% Cu, 6.2% Cu, 5.9% Cu and 3.4% Cu[^] .
7
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
ASX Announcement: 6 September 2022
==> picture [503 x 608] intentionally omitted <==
Figure 6: Location of the Kingfisher and Mick Well Projects in the Gascoyne Mineral Field showing the extents of the Durlacher Suite and Halfway Gneiss. The location of the Yangibana Deposit and Yin and Lyons Projects 100km north of Kingfisher’s projects are also shown.
8
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
ASX Announcement: 6 September 2022
This announcement has been authorised by the Board of Directors of the Company.
Ends
For further information, please contact:
Kingfisher Mining Limited
James Farrell, Executive Director Ph: +61 (08) 9481 0389
Media & Investor Enquiries
Peter Taylor, NWR Communications Ph: +61 412 036 231 E: [email protected]
About Kingfisher Mining Limited
Kingfisher Mining Limited ( ASX:KFM ) is a mineral exploration company committed to increasing value for shareholders through the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral resource projects throughout Western Australia. The Company’s tenements and tenement applications cover 1,676km[2] in the underexplored Ashburton and Gascoyne Mineral Fields.
The Company has made a break through high grade rare earth elements discovery in the Gascoyne region where it holds a target strike length of more than 50km along the mineralised corridor and has secured significant landholdings across the interpreted extensions to its advanced copper-gold exploration targets giving it more than 30km of strike across the Boolaloo Project target geology.
To learn more please visit: www.kingfishermining.com.au
Previous ASX Announcements
ASX:KFM: 40% REE Returned from Mick Well 30 August 2022.
ASX:KFM: Broad Zones of Anomalous REEs Discovered in Mick Well Clays 27 July 2022.
ASX:KFM: Latest Drilling Returns High Grade REEs with 5m at 3.45% TREO, including 3m at 5.21% TREO 5 July 2022.
ASX:KFM: Surface Assays up to 21% TREO Define a Further 800m of Outcropping Mineralisation 20 June 2022.
ASX:KFM: High Grade Rare Earths Returned from Discovery Drill Hole: 4m at 1.84% TREO, including 1m at 3.87% TREO 24 March 2022.
ASX:KFM: Significant Rare Earths Discovery: 12m at 1.12% TREO 10 January 2022.
-
Elliott, H.A.L., Wall, F., Chakhmouradian, A.R., P.R.Siegfried, Dahlgrend, S., Weatherley, S., Finch, A.A., Marks, M.A.W., Dowman, E. and Deady, F. 2018. Fenites associated with carbonatite complexes: A review. Ore Geology Reviews , Volume 93, February 2018, Pages 38-59.
-
ASX Announcement ‘Yangibana Project updated Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources tonnes up by 54%, TREO oxides up by 32% Australia’. Hastings Technology Metals Limited (ASX:HAS), 5 May 2021.
-
^ Kingfisher Mining Limited Prospectus, 9 November 2020.
9
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
6 September 2022
ASX Announcement:
Total Rare Earth Oxide Calculation
Total Rare Earths Oxides (TREO) is the sum of the oxides of the light rare earth elements lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce), praseodymium (Pr), neodymium (Nd), and samarium (Sm) and the heavy rare earth elements europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), terbium (Tb), dysprosium (Dy), holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb), lutetium (Lu), and yttrium (Y).
Forward-Looking Statements
This announcement may contain forward-looking statements which involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. These statements reflect current expectations, intentions or strategies regarding the future and assumptions based on currently available information. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties materialise, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary from the expectations, intentions and strategies described in this announcement. No obligation is assumed to update forward looking statements if these beliefs, opinions, and estimates should change or to reflect other future developments.
Competent Persons Statements
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr James Farrell, a geologist and Executive Director / CEO employed by Kingfisher Mining Limited. Mr Farrell is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and has sufficient experience that is relevant to this style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that is being reported on to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Farrell consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters in the form and context in which it appears.
10
www.kingfishermining.com.au
ASX KFM
Annexure 1: Drill Hole Information
Collar and Survey
| Target | Hole ID | Easting | Northing | Elevation | Depth | Azimuth | Dip |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mick Well | MWRC027 MWRC028 MWRC029 MWRC030 |
402769 | 7247619 | 305 | 77 | 225 | -60 |
| 402951 | 7247525 | 305 | 77 | 35 | -60 | ||
| 402981 | 7247398 | 305 | 75 | 35 | -60 | ||
| 403344 | 7247339 | 305 | 64 | 0 | -60 | ||
| MW2 | MWRC025 MWRC026 MWRC031 |
402066 | 7249542 | 305 | 154 | 225 | -60 |
| 402137 | 7249529 | 305 | 221 | 220 | -60 | ||
| 402154 | 7249430 | 305 | 205 | 230 | -60 |
- Drill hole lengthened by 50m during current program.
Analytical Data (all values are ppm)
| DHID | From | To | CeO2 | Dy2O3 | Er2O3 | Eu2O3 | Gd2O3 | Ho2O3 | La2O3 | Lu2O3 | Nd2O3 | Pr6O11 | Sm2O3 | Tb2O3 | Tm2O3 | Y2O3 | Yb2O3 | TREO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWRC025 | 140 | 144 | 266 | 6.5 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 12.3 | 1.0 | 126 | 0.23 | 114 | 31 | 19.7 | 1.5 | 0.23 | 28.6 | 1.5 | 614 |
| 144 | 148 | 252 | 7.6 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 13.0 | 1.3 | 118 | 0.34 | 109 | 30 | 20.1 | 1.6 | 0.34 | 37.3 | 2.3 | 599 | |
| 148 | 149 | 367 | 9.1 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 17.9 | 1.3 | 177 | 0.23 | 152 | 43 | 27.0 | 2.1 | 0.23 | 36.8 | 1.3 | 840 | |
| 149 | 150 | 297 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 13.1 | 0.9 | 143 | 0.11 | 120 | 34 | 19.5 | 1.4 | 0.23 | 27.7 | 1.0 | 669 | |
| 150 | 151 | 310 | 9.2 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 18.2 | 1.4 | 146 | 0.23 | 132 | 37 | 24.5 | 2.1 | 0.34 | 40.1 | 1.8 | 729 | |
| 151 | 152 | 519 | 7.1 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 15.8 | 1.0 | 262 | 0.23 | 181 | 56 | 26.4 | 1.7 | 0.23 | 32.5 | 1.7 | 1110 | |
| MWRC026 | 148 | 152 | 258 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 10.4 | 0.6 | 127 | 0.23 | 97 | 29 | 16.9 | 1.0 | 0.11 | 16.9 | 1.1 | 566 |
| 152 | 156 | 224 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 8.6 | 0.5 | 111 | 0.00 | 86 | 25 | 13.6 | 0.8 | 0.11 | 13.0 | 0.7 | 489 | |
| 156 | 160 | 254 | 8.4 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 122 | 0.45 | 106 | 30 | 18.2 | 1.7 | 0.57 | 47.9 | 3.5 | 613 | |
| 160 | 164 | 464 | 8.4 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 17.9 | 1.4 | 219 | 0.34 | 189 | 54 | 29.9 | 2.0 | 0.46 | 40.6 | 2.4 | 1037 | |
| 164 | 168 | 270 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 13.7 | 1.0 | 131 | 0.23 | 115 | 32 | 20.1 | 1.6 | 0.23 | 30.1 | 1.3 | 629 | |
| MWRC027 | 4 | 8 | 399 | 8.4 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 13.8 | 1.3 | 217 | 0.34 | 138 | 43 | 21.6 | 1.7 | 0.46 | 37.2 | 2.2 | 890 |
| 8 | 12 | 423 | 11.2 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 16.9 | 1.9 | 231 | 0.45 | 145 | 46 | 23.3 | 2.3 | 0.57 | 61.8 | 3.6 | 975 | |
| 12 | 16 | 284 | 9.0 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 12.3 | 1.5 | 146 | 0.45 | 110 | 32 | 18.2 | 1.8 | 0.46 | 48.1 | 2.7 | 673 | |
| 16 | 20 | 301 | 8.3 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 12.1 | 1.4 | 159 | 0.34 | 117 | 35 | 18.7 | 1.6 | 0.46 | 42.7 | 2.5 | 706 | |
| 20 | 24 | 351 | 7.9 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 13.1 | 1.4 | 180 | 0.34 | 132 | 39 | 20.8 | 1.6 | 0.46 | 41.5 | 2.5 | 798 | |
| 24 | 28 | 394 | 7.9 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 13.8 | 1.4 | 203 | 0.34 | 153 | 44 | 22.6 | 1.7 | 0.46 | 44.1 | 2.5 | 895 | |
| 28 | 32 | 376 | 11.1 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 17.6 | 1.9 | 192 | 0.45 | 155 | 43 | 24.7 | 2.2 | 0.69 | 66.0 | 4.1 | 904 | |
| 32 | 36 | 213 | 8.4 | 5.0 | 2.2 | 11.5 | 1.7 | 114 | 0.57 | 89 | 25 | 15.3 | 1.5 | 0.69 | 62.9 | 3.9 | 554 | |
| 36 | 40 | 254 | 7.8 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 133 | 0.34 | 102 | 29 | 16.6 | 1.6 | 0.46 | 51.2 | 2.8 | 619 | |
| MWRC028 | 0 | 4 | 1072 | 16.2 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 29.9 | 3.0 | 602 | 0.80 | 370 | 113 | 49.9 | 3.5 | 1.03 | 95.1 | 6.1 | 2379 |
| 4 | 8 | 662 | 10.6 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 17.5 | 1.8 | 326 | 0.57 | 216 | 68 | 29.8 | 2.2 | 0.69 | 60.2 | 4.0 | 1409 | |
| 8 | 12 | 674 | 8.8 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 15.4 | 1.5 | 319 | 0.34 | 222 | 71 | 29.7 | 2.0 | 0.46 | 45.0 | 2.6 | 1399 | |
| 12 | 16 | 542 | 7.0 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 13.8 | 1.3 | 257 | 0.34 | 182 | 58 | 25.0 | 1.6 | 0.34 | 35.2 | 2.4 | 1133 | |
| 16 | 20 | 458 | 6.4 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 12.0 | 0.9 | 221 | 0.23 | 158 | 49 | 22.4 | 1.3 | 0.34 | 28.1 | 1.8 | 965 | |
| 20 | 24 | 438 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 11.5 | 0.9 | 215 | 0.23 | 151 | 48 | 21.1 | 1.4 | 0.34 | 26.9 | 1.9 | 928 | |
| 24 | 28 | 240 | 5.9 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 124 | 0.45 | 84 | 26 | 14.1 | 1.2 | 0.46 | 29.6 | 3.2 | 545 |
11
ASX KFM
www.kingfishermining.com.au
| DHID | From | To | CeO2 | Dy2O3 | Er2O3 | Eu2O3 | Gd2O3 | Ho2O3 | La2O3 | Lu2O3 | Nd2O3 | Pr6O11 | Sm2O3 | Tb2O3 | Tm2O3 | Y2O3 | Yb2O3 | TREO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWRC028 | 28 | 32 | 392 | 7.5 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 14.1 | 1.3 | 202 | 0.45 | 141 | 43 | 21.6 | 1.7 | 0.46 | 34.9 | 3.0 | 868 |
| 32 | 36 | 238 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 9.3 | 1.1 | 125 | 0.45 | 85 | 26 | 13.3 | 1.2 | 0.46 | 29.3 | 3.1 | 543 | |
| 36 | 40 | 309 | 8.1 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 12.0 | 1.7 | 156 | 0.91 | 110 | 33 | 16.2 | 1.4 | 0.80 | 54.4 | 5.7 | 717 | |
| 40 | 44 | 286 | 8.6 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 11.9 | 1.6 | 145 | 0.57 | 102 | 32 | 16.8 | 1.6 | 0.57 | 55.2 | 4.1 | 673 | |
| 44 | 48 | 623 | 10.6 | 5.3 | 4.2 | 16.8 | 1.9 | 324 | 0.57 | 206 | 65 | 28.1 | 2.1 | 0.69 | 62.9 | 4.3 | 1355 | |
| 48 | 52 | 178 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 95 | 0.11 | 56 | 18 | 7.4 | 0.5 | 0.11 | 15.0 | 0.9 | 381 | |
| 52 | 56 | 296 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 0.8 | 156 | 0.23 | 98 | 31 | 13.0 | 0.9 | 0.34 | 24.8 | 1.7 | 640 | |
| MWRC029 | 0 | 4 | 384 | 6.4 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 12.1 | 1.1 | 184 | 0.23 | 141 | 43 | 21.2 | 1.5 | 0.34 | 31.0 | 1.8 | 833 |
| 4 | 8 | 318 | 7.8 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 12.8 | 1.4 | 144 | 0.45 | 131 | 37 | 20.2 | 1.6 | 0.46 | 41.8 | 3.1 | 726 | |
| 8 | 12 | 247 | 6.4 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 8.5 | 1.4 | 122 | 0.57 | 86 | 26 | 13.7 | 1.2 | 0.57 | 35.2 | 3.8 | 558 | |
| 12 | 16 | 288 | 5.9 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 9.8 | 0.9 | 148 | 0.34 | 97 | 31 | 14.4 | 1.2 | 0.34 | 28.1 | 2.2 | 631 | |
| 16 | 20 | 468 | 12.7 | 6.4 | 4.3 | 19.4 | 2.3 | 238 | 0.91 | 186 | 53 | 29.9 | 2.4 | 0.91 | 60.1 | 6.5 | 1091 | |
| 20 | 24 | 496 | 11.2 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 17.6 | 1.8 | 260 | 0.68 | 181 | 55 | 27.6 | 2.3 | 0.69 | 51.2 | 4.8 | 1117 | |
| 24 | 28 | 285 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 11.1 | 1.1 | 142 | 0.45 | 106 | 32 | 17.5 | 1.4 | 0.34 | 30.1 | 2.8 | 642 | |
| 28 | 32 | 182 | 5.4 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 93 | 0.45 | 67 | 20 | 11.8 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 24.3 | 2.7 | 422 | |
| 32 | 36 | 322 | 6.1 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 11.9 | 1.0 | 168 | 0.34 | 117 | 34 | 19.1 | 1.4 | 0.34 | 23.4 | 2.0 | 713 | |
| 36 | 40 | 311 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 8.9 | 0.8 | 163 | 0.34 | 102 | 32 | 15.1 | 1.0 | 0.34 | 23.6 | 1.9 | 670 | |
| 40 | 44 | 314 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 11.1 | 1.0 | 163 | 0.34 | 108 | 32 | 16.6 | 1.4 | 0.46 | 31.2 | 2.6 | 694 | |
| 44 | 48 | 237 | 8.6 | 4.7 | 2.0 | 11.1 | 1.6 | 125 | 0.68 | 85 | 25 | 13.6 | 1.5 | 0.69 | 50.8 | 4.6 | 573 | |
| 48 | 52 | 450 | 10.6 | 5.8 | 2.9 | 15.1 | 1.9 | 233 | 0.80 | 149 | 47 | 21.9 | 2.0 | 0.80 | 73.8 | 5.2 | 1020 | |
| MWRC030 | 0 | 4 | 1310 | 23.0 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 39.2 | 4.0 | 679 | 1.02 | 456 | 140 | 63.8 | 4.8 | 1.26 | 102.7 | 8.5 | 2854 |
| 4 | 8 | 1427 | 26.9 | 12.3 | 11.5 | 43.0 | 4.7 | 780 | 1.36 | 492 | 152 | 68.6 | 5.3 | 1.48 | 132.5 | 9.7 | 3168 | |
| 8 | 12 | 1211 | 26.3 | 12.6 | 9.1 | 38.3 | 4.7 | 655 | 1.48 | 411 | 128 | 55.9 | 4.9 | 1.71 | 128.1 | 10.7 | 2698 | |
| 12 | 16 | 1089 | 25.7 | 13.8 | 9.6 | 36.8 | 5.0 | 567 | 1.71 | 384 | 115 | 53.2 | 4.7 | 1.83 | 146.6 | 11.4 | 2466 | |
| 16 | 20 | 667 | 20.7 | 14.2 | 4.4 | 25.5 | 4.8 | 334 | 2.16 | 217 | 69 | 32.9 | 3.5 | 2.06 | 165.3 | 14.6 | 1577 | |
| 20 | 24 | 589 | 10.8 | 6.5 | 3.4 | 16.0 | 2.3 | 302 | 0.91 | 193 | 61 | 27.4 | 2.1 | 0.91 | 84.6 | 5.5 | 1305 | |
| 24 | 28 | 337 | 5.7 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 9.6 | 1.0 | 178 | 0.34 | 110 | 35 | 15.4 | 1.2 | 0.34 | 32.4 | 2.0 | 733 | |
| 28 | 32 | 406 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 9.8 | 0.9 | 208 | 0.23 | 133 | 43 | 18.6 | 1.2 | 0.34 | 27.3 | 1.6 | 860 | |
| 32 | 36 | 344 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 9.9 | 0.9 | 176 | 0.23 | 117 | 37 | 16.8 | 1.2 | 0.23 | 27.6 | 1.8 | 743 | |
| MWRC031 | 144 | 148 | 333 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 11.2 | 0.9 | 167 | 0.34 | 117 | 36 | 18.7 | 1.3 | 0.34 | 27.7 | 1.9 | 726 |
| 148 | 152 | 117 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 5.4 | 0.3 | 57 | 0.00 | 42 | 13 | 7.1 | 0.6 | 0.00 | 9.3 | 0.6 | 255 | |
| 152 | 156 | 322 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 9.5 | 0.9 | 163 | 0.23 | 114 | 34 | 16.2 | 1.2 | 0.34 | 26.4 | 2.0 | 700 | |
| 176 | 180 | 293 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 11.2 | 0.8 | 139 | 0.23 | 119 | 34 | 18.8 | 1.3 | 0.23 | 24.0 | 1.4 | 654 | |
| 180 | 184 | 438 | 7.7 | 2.9 | 4.9 | 15.2 | 1.3 | 211 | 0.34 | 180 | 51 | 27.7 | 1.8 | 0.34 | 36.2 | 2.2 | 980 | |
| 184 | 188 | 174 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 0.5 | 85 | 0.11 | 66 | 19 | 11.0 | 0.8 | 0.11 | 15.9 | 1.0 | 387 | |
| 188 | 192 | 110 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 5.6 | 0.6 | 53 | 0.23 | 44 | 12 | 8.0 | 0.6 | 0.23 | 16.4 | 1.4 | 258 | |
| 192 | 196 | 69 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 34 | 0.34 | 27 | 8 | 5.2 | 0.6 | 0.23 | 19.2 | 1.8 | 177 | |
| 196 | 200 | 300 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 10.1 | 0.9 | 152 | 0.23 | 106 | 32 | 16.4 | 1.2 | 0.23 | 26.8 | 1.9 | 658 | |
| MWRC031 | 200 | 204 | 175 | 4.6 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 7.3 | 0.9 | 88 | 0.34 | 62 | 19 | 10.8 | 0.9 | 0.34 | 24.5 | 1.9 | 399 |
| 204 | 205 | 272 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 9.6 | 0.9 | 138 | 0.23 | 94 | 29 | 15.0 | 1.2 | 0.23 | 25.1 | 1.9 | 595 |
All reported drill intervals are included in the table above. The intervals were reported using a cut-off grade of 500 ppm TREO, with included higher grade results reported using a cut-off grade of 1000 ppm TREO. All sample information is parts per million (ppm).
12
ASX KFM
www.kingfishermining.com.au
Attachment 1: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling | • | Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific | • | RC drill samples were collected at 1m intervals and composited to 4m |
| techniques | specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals | lengths for analysis. | ||
| under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF | • | The 4m composites, or in some cases 1m samples (where submitted), | ||
| instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad | were crushed and a sub-fraction obtained for pulverisation. | |||
| meaning of sampling. | ||||
| • | Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the | |||
| appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. | ||||
| • | Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public | |||
| Report. | ||||
| • | In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively | |||
| simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from | ||||
| which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other | ||||
| cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold | ||||
| that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation | ||||
| types(eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. | ||||
| Drilling | • | Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, | • | Drilling was completed using a Schramm T450 reverse circulation drill rig. |
| techniques | auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard | • | The reverse circulation drilling used a face-sampling hammer. | |
| tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is | ||||
| _oriented and if so, by what method, etc). _ | ||||
| Drill sample | • | Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and | • | Drill sample recovery was monitored by Kingfisher’s exploration team |
| recovery | results assessed. | during drilling. | ||
| • | Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative | • | Sample recoveries were consistently satisfactory and of a high standard | |
| nature of the samples. | throughout the 2022 RC drill programs. | |||
| • | Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and | |||
| whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of | ||||
| fine/coarse material. | ||||
| Logging | • | Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically | • | Chip samples were logged for geology, alteration and mineralisation by |
| logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, | the Company’s geologists. | |||
| mining studies and metallurgical studies. | • | Drill logs were verified by the Company’s geologists on submission of the | ||
| • | Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, | samples for laboratory analysis. | ||
| channel, etc) photography. | ||||
| • | The total length andpercentage of the relevant intersections logged. | |||
| Sub-sampling | • | If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. | • | RC samples were collected from the drill rig splitter in calico bags. The RC |
| techniques | • | If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether | samples were generally dry. | |
| and sample | sampled wet or dry. | • | The 1m samples were composited to 4m intervals on site by the | |
| preparation | • | For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. |
• | Company’s geologists. The original 1m samples were submitted for analysis for downhole |
13
ASX KFM
www.kingfishermining.com.au
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| • | Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise | intervals with anomalous analytical results. | ||
| representivity of samples. | • | A sub-fraction was obtained for pulverisation from the crushed RC | ||
| • | Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ | samples using a riffle splitter. | ||
| material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half | ||||
| sampling. | ||||
| • | Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being | |||
| sampled. | ||||
| Quality of | • | The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory | • | Samples were analysed by Intertek Genalysis in Perth. The sample analysis |
| assay data | procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. | uses a sodium peroxide fusion with an Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass | ||
| and laboratory tests |
• |
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and |
Spectrometry and Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Mass Spectrometry (MS) and Optical Emission Spectrometry (OES) finish. |
|
| model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. | ||||
| • | Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, | |||
| duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of | ||||
| accuracy (ie lack of bias) andprecision have been established. | ||||
| Verification of | • | The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative | • | Analytical QC is monitored by the laboratory using standards and repeat |
| sampling and | company personnel. | assays. | ||
| assaying | • | The use of twinned holes. | • | Independent checks or field duplicates were not conducted for and were |
| • | Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data | not considered necessary for this early stage of exploration. | ||
| storage (physical and electronic) protocols. | ||||
| • | Discuss any adjustment to assay data. | |||
| Location of | • | Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down- | • | Drill hole locations were surveyed using a handheld GPS using the UTM |
| data points | hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral | coordinate system, with an accuracy of +/-5m. | ||
| Resource estimation. | • | Downhole surveys were completed using a north-seeking gyroscopic | ||
| • | Specification of the grid system used. | survey tool and were reported in 30 m intervals. | ||
| • | Quality and adequacy of topographic control. | |||
| Data spacing | • | Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. | • | The first-pass exploration drilling reported in this announcement has not |
| and | • | Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree | been completed on grids. | |
| distribution | of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and | |||
| Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. | ||||
| • | Whether sample compositing has been applied. | |||
| Orientation of | • | Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible | • | The drilling has been designed to be perpendicular to the target structure |
| data in | structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. | and drill hole inclination is likely to result in true widths that are | ||
| relation to | • | If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key | approximately 65% of the reported intercepts. | |
| geological structure |
mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. |
• | Mick Well drill holes MWRC027 to MWRC030 were collared in mineralisation and the true width of the mineralisation is likely to be greater than the drill intervals. |
|
| Sample | • | The measures taken to ensure sample security. | • | Samples were given individual samples numbers for tracking. |
| security | • | The sample chain of custody was overseen by the Company’s geologists. |
14
ASX KFM
www.kingfishermining.com.au
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples were transported to the laboratory in Perth sealed bulka bags. | ||||
| Audits or | • | The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. | • | The sampling techniques and analytical data are monitored by the |
| reviews | Company’s geologists. | |||
| • | External audits of the data have not been completed. |
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral tenement | • |
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including | • | The project area is located 80km northeast of the Gascoyne Junction and |
| and land tenure | agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, | 230km east of Carnarvon. | ||
| status | partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, | • | The project includes ten granted Exploration Licences, E09/2242, E09/2349, | |
| wilderness or national park and environmental settings. | E09/2319, E09/2320, E09/2481, E09/2494, E09/2495, E09/2653, E09/2654 and | |||
| • | The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any | E09/2655 as well as two EL applications, E09/2660 and E09/2661. | ||
| known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. | • | The tenements are held by Kingfisher Mining Ltd. | ||
| • | The tenements lie within Native Title Determined Areas of the Wajarri | |||
| Yamatji People and Gnulli People. | ||||
| • | All the tenements are in good standing with no known impediments. | |||
| Exploration done | • | Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. | • | No previous systematic exploration for carbonatite-associated |
| by other parties | mineralisation had been previously completed. | |||
| • | Exploration for base metals at Kingfisher undertaken was by Pasminco Ltd | |||
| in 1994, Mt Phillips Exploration Pty Ltd in 2006 and WCP Resources in 2007. | ||||
| • | Exploration for base metals at Mick Well was completed by Helix | |||
| Resources Ltd in 1994, WA Exploration Services Pty Ltd in 1996, Mt Phillips | ||||
| Exploration Pty Ltd in 2006 and WCP Resources in 2007. | ||||
| Geology | • | Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. | • | The Company’s tenements in the Gascoyne Mineral Field are prospective |
| for rare earth mineralisation associated with carbonatite intrusions and | ||||
| associated fenitic alteration. | ||||
| Drill hole | • | A summary of all information material to the understanding of the | • | Location, orientation and depth data as well as summary geological logs |
| Information | exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all | were tabulated and were included in this announcement for all new drill | ||
| Material drill holes: | hole information received at the date of the report. | |||
oeasting and northing of the drill hole collar |
• | No information has been excluded. | ||
oelevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of |
||||
| the drill hole collar | ||||
odip and azimuth of the hole |
||||
odown hole length and interception depth |
||||
ohole length. |
||||
| • | If the exclusion of this information isjustified on the basis that the |
15
ASX KFM
www.kingfishermining.com.au
| Criteria | JORC Code explanation | JORC Code explanation | Commentary | Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the | ||||
| understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain | ||||
| why this is the case. | ||||
| Data aggregation | • |
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum | • | Values for intervals that comprise samples of different lengths have been |
| methods | and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off | reported using length-weighted averages. | ||
| grades are usually Material and should be stated. | • | A cut-off grade of 500 ppm TREO has been used for the reported intervals. | ||
| • | Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results | • | Higher grade intervals with mineralisation above the reporting cut-off | |
| and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such | were reported using a cut-off grade of 1000 ppm TREO. | |||
| aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such | • | Metal equivalents have not been used in this report. | ||
| aggregations should be shown in detail. | ||||
| • | The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should | |||
| be clearly stated. | ||||
| Relationship | • | These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration | • | The drilling has been designed to be perpendicular to the target structure |
| between | Results. | and drill hole inclination is likely to result in true widths that are | ||
| mineralisation | • | If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is | approximately 65% of the reported intercepts. | |
| widths and | known, its nature should be reported. | • | Mick Well drill holes MWRC027 to MWRC030 were collared in mineralisation | |
| intercept lengths | • | If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not |
and the true width of the mineralisation is likely to be greater than the drill intervals. |
|
| _known’). _ | ||||
| Diagrams | • | Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts | • | Maps showing relevant data has been included in the report along with |
| should be included for any significant discovery being reported These | documentation. | |||
| should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations | ||||
| and appropriate sectional views. | ||||
| Balanced | • | Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, | • | All of drilling information with TREO results is included in Annexure 1 and |
| reporting | representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should | anomalous results are included in the diagrams in this report. | ||
| bepracticed to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. | ||||
| Other | • | Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported | • | All of the relevant historical exploration data has been included in this |
| substantive | including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey | report. | ||
| exploration data | results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of | • | All historical exploration information is available via WAMEX. | |
| treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, | ||||
| geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or | ||||
| contaminating substances. | ||||
| Further work | • | The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions | • | On-going exploration in the area is a high priority for the Company. |
| or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). | • | Exploration to include tenement-scale acquisition of geophysics data to | ||
| • | Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the | define the extents of carbonatites, mapping and rock chip sampling as | ||
| main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this | well as additional RC drilling. | |||
| information is not commercially sensitive. |
16
ASX KFM
www.kingfishermining.com.au