Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

KING RIVER RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2021

Jul 25, 2021

65203_rns_2021-07-25_c83f1c50-8783-425c-9f30-894410d50ee9.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

KWINANA HPA PROJECT 5N PRECURSOR PURITY

Australian Securities Exchange Announcement

27 July 2021

Highlight

5N Precursor produced that is used to make 4N HPA by the ARC Process.

King River Resources Limited (ASX:KRR) provides this update on 5N (≥99.999%) purity Precursor compound produced by the ARC HPA process from an industrial aluminium chemical compound feedstock. The Precursor is the intermediate compound produced by the purification process which is then calcined to produce HPA at ≥4N (99.99%) purity (KRR ASX releases 25 March 2021 and 30 April 2021). KRR plans to become a producer of 4N HPA as documented in the Kwinana HPA Prefeasibility Study (PFS) (KRR ASX release 16 June 2021).

Source Certain International (SCI) has produced several batches of high purity 5N Precursor which have been assayed by SCI using the ICP-MS and ICP-AES[1] methods. SCI completed up to 5 duplicate analyses on each batch to improve confidence in the results.

Several batches of 5N Precursor are reported (Figure 1 and Table 1). Three (batches 8-10) were originally produced for the PFS testwork, and three more batches (11-13) have now been produced. The 5N purity result was calculated by the addition of all the assayed element impurities that reported above the detection limit then subtracting this result from 100%. Variability in the results is due to differences in the test sample and the analytical precision. The main contaminants in the Precursor are potassium (K), silicon (Si) and sodium (Na), with other elements <1ppm or below the detection limits.

==> picture [285 x 253] intentionally omitted <==

Batch 11 Precursor powder product (>99.999% purity) produced from an industrial aluminium chemical compound feedstock by the ARC Process.

1 ICP = Inductively Coupled Plasma; MS = Mass Spectrometry; AES = Atomic Emission Spectroscopy

==> picture [595 x 72] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [596 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [405 x 289] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Repeat assays for Precursor Batches 8-13

Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) Update

Other Metallurgical Developments

Metallurgical testwork is ongoing to further refine the ARC HPA process for the DFS with the current focus on further improving the Precursor product to simplify the final calcination stage.

Mini-Pilot Plant

Work has commenced on the development of a Mini-Pilot Plant to demonstrate the ARC HPA process works at a larger scale for the DFS and to produce market samples.

The process flowsheet and mass balances have been used to scale the mini-pilot plant and enquiries and purchase orders with vessel vendors are underway. The 1500°C rotary tube furnace, used for the calcination stage of the process, has been delivered and is being tested.

This announcement was authorised by the Chairman of the Company.

Anthony Barton

Chairman King River Resources Limited Email: [email protected] Phone: +61 8 92218055

==> picture [596 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1: Impurities in Precursor Batch 11

(One of the duplicate sample assays reporting elements above the detection limit)

Element Units Value
Na ppm 0.721
Si ppm 2.11
K ppm 3.12
Ca ppm 0.14
Cr ppm 0.055
Fe ppm 0.604
Ni ppm 0.077
Ga ppm 0.056

Note:

  1. Results shown are for elemental concentrations and not a molecular compound (oxide) of that element.

  2. Another thirty five elements were also assayed that are present at concentrations below detection limits for the Precursor batch sample and the sum of the concentrations for these other elements is <1 ppm.

  3. Precursor purity of 99.9993% was calculated by summing all the impurity elements > detection limit and subtracting from 100%.

  4. Assayed using ICP-MS and ICP-AES method.

Statement by Competent Person

The information in this report is based on information compiled by Mr Ken Rogers (BSc Hons) and fairly represents this information. Mr Rogers is the Chief Geologist and an employee of King River Resources Ltd, and a Member of both the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG number 2359) and The Institute of Materials Minerals and Mining (IMMM number 43552), and a Chartered Engineer of the IMMM. Mr Rogers has sufficient experience in the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Rogers consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

==> picture [842 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 1: King River Resources Limited HPA Project JORC 2012 Table 1

SECTION 1 : SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
Techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals
under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF
instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad
meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively
simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from
which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other
cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold
that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation
types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
This ASX Release dated 27 July 2021 provides an update on KRR HPA Project, including the production of
5N Precursor used to make high purity alumina (HPA) from an Aluminium chemical compound feedstock
produced from other industrial chemical processes.
Chemical precipitation and recrystallisation purification methods have been used in the separation and
precipitation of the high purity Aluminium Precursor compound reported in this announcement. The
Precursor compound is then calcined at 1250°C to the high purity alumina product.
The process and reagents used and the composition of the Precursor are commercial-in-confidence.
The six Precursor products reported in this announcement were made from a crystalline powder sample of an
industrial Aluminium chemical feedstock.
Two samples of the Aluminium chemical feedstock were initially used to make two batches of the high purity
Precursor compound by the KRR process.
Precursor batch 8 was a process test from 716.75g sample of the industrial chemical feedstock.
Precursor batches 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 were process tests from 423.97g, 423.48g, 423.45g, 423.57g and
423.59g samples of the industrial chemical feedstock respectively.
All these Precursor batches were produced by the KRR ARC HPA process purification stages. The details of
the ARC HPA process are a trade secret and commercial in confidence.
Analytical duplicate subsamples were taken from the Precursor sample batches for analysis.
Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).
Not Applicable. The samples were generated from a feedstock of an industrial chemical.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and
results assessed.
Not Applicable.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
Not Applicable.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Not Applicable.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically
logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Not Applicable.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc.) photography.
Not Applicable.
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Not Applicable.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. Not Applicable.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether
sampled wet or dry.
Not Applicable.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
Not Applicable.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
_representivity of samples. _
Not Applicable.

==> picture [842 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Commentary
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half
sampling.
Not Applicable.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
Sample sizes are considered appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
Quality of assay
data and
laboratory tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.
Source Certain International (SCI), previously TSW Analytical, Testwork
Testwork on the Aluminium chemical feedstock includes chemical precipitation, solid liquid separations,
purification steps and calcination and washing processes, that produce purified intermediate Precursor
precipitates and final high purity alumina (HPA) calcine products. Assays are conducted on solutions and
solid precipitates and calcines.
SCI is an established analytical service provider that has developed a reputation for providing accurate
analyses of complex samples. The company’s expertise has assisted with the development of
hydrometallurgical flow-sheets for multi-element ore concentrates.
The Aluminium Precursor products have been assayed using ICP-AES and ICP-MS. Samples are digested in
nitric acid and then suitably diluted prior to analysis using ICP-AES and ICP-MS instrumentation.
The primary and mother liquors have been analysed using ICP-AES and ICP-MS. The samples were diluted
suitably for the appropriate ICP based analysis. Dilutions are used to bring the analyte concentration into the
optimum analytical range of the ICP instrument used and to reduce matrix interference complications during
quantification.
Precipitation efficiency has been determined using the mass of the total analyte in the Precursor product
divided by the mass of the total analyte in the initial liquor solution used. The resulting fraction is multiplied by
100 to give a percent precipitation efficiency.
SCI uses in-house standards and Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) to ensure data are“Fit-For-Purpose”.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the
parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
Not Applicable.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of
accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.
Source Certain International (SCI)
SCI reports concentrations as micrograms per gram (μg/g) in the solid (unless otherwise stated).
Instrumental response is measured against AccuTrace High Purity multi-element standards (Choice
Analytical) to achieve quantitation. Data are subjected to in-house QA and QC procedures where an
independent analyst recalculates instrumental output and compares the newly generated data set with the
original. Lack of equivalence between the two data sets triggers an internal review and if necessary re-
analysis of the entire data set. Under these circumstances a third independent analyst will assess all
generated data prior to sign off.
Initial equivalence between the two data sets, generated by the analyst and reviewer, will clear data for
remittance to the customer. In addition to these procedures, samples are regularly sent to selected
analytical laboratories in Western Australia for confirmation of the analytical data obtained. Once
completed, all reports are then reviewed by an independent analyst prior to submission to the customer
and where necessary, relevant changes such as wording that may give rise to possible ambiguity in
interpretation will be modified prior to the final report being sent to the customer.
In order to validate analytical data, SCI circulates duplicate samples to selected analytical laboratories in
Western Australia for confirmation of their results.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
Assay results have been verified by alternative SCI laboratory company personnel.
SCI has completed analytical duplicate analyses on all HPA batches produced.
The use of twinned holes. Not applicable - no drilling.
Multiple samples have been produced and assayed.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data Not applicable

==> picture [842 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Commentary
storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Not applicable.
Location of data
points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral
Resource estimation.
Not Applicable.
Specification of the grid system used. Not Applicable.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Not Applicable.
Data spacing and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Not Applicable.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree
of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and
Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
Not Applicable.
Whether sample compositing has been applied. Not Applicable.
Orientation of data
in relation to
geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.
Not Applicable.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if material.
Not Applicable.
Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. Chain of Custody is managed by the Company until feedstock samples pass to Source Certain
International, for subsampling, assaying, and hydrometallurgical test work. The Aluminium feedstock
sample was delivered to the metallurgical laboratory by the Company or a competent agent. The chain of
custody passes upon delivery of the samples to the metallurgical laboratory.
Products, Residues and Duplicates of all samples are retained at the Company’s Perth laboratory to insure
against any sample loss
Audits or Reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No external audits have been completed.

SECTION 2 : REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding
royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Not Applicable.
Exploration done
by other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Not Applicable.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Not Applicable.
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results
including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes:
o
easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o
elevation or RL (Reduced Level– elevation above sea level in metres) of the
Not Applicable.

==> picture [842 x 71] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
drill hole collar
o
dip and azimuth of the hole
o
down hole length and interception depth
o
hole length.
o
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information
is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report,
the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.
Not Applicable.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer
lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated
and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.
Not Applicable.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
Not Applicable.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept lengths
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If
the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are
reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true
width not known’).
Not Applicable.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be
included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be
limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Not Applicable.
Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced
to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
Reports on previous metallurgical and study results can be found in ASX Releases that are
available on our website, including announcements 1 April 2010, 15 July 2010, 9 November 2010,
8 February 2012, 21 April 2017, 21 August 2017, 9 October 2017, 4 December 2017, 30 January
2018, 27 February 2018, 21 March 2018, 25 June 2018, 23 July 2018, 15 October 2018,19
November 2018, 18 January 2019, 1 March 2019, 21 March 2019, 22 March 2019, 9 May 2019, 7
June 2019, 27 September 2019, 26 November 2019, 6 December 2019, 22 January 2020, 24
March 2020, 23 April 2020, 13 May 2020, 17 June 2020, 7 September 2020 and 13 October 2020,
11 November 2020, 19 November 2020, 26 November 2020, 15 December 2020, 25 March 21, 30
April 2021,21 May2021,16 June 2021 and 22 July2021.
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not
limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey
results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
Not Applicable.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth
extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling
_areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. _
Further metallurgical tests are planned to refine the ARC process and produce Precursor and HPA
products.