Skip to main content

AI assistant

Sign in to chat with this filing

The assistant answers questions, extracts KPIs, and summarises risk factors directly from the filing text.

KING RIVER RESOURCES LIMITED Capital/Financing Update 2020

Nov 18, 2020

65203_rns_2020-11-18_1fe2be18-9337-4ab1-a651-e47433224a2b.pdf

Capital/Financing Update

Open in viewer

Opens in your device viewer

==> picture [595 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

----- Start of picture text -----

A LTERNATIVE R OUTE T O HPA
P RODUCTION
----- End of picture text -----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Australian Securities Exchange Announcement 19 November 2020

Highlights

  • ❖ The Speewah Prefeasibility Study (PFS) testwork and studies have now identified a more direct route to complete a process design that outlines a lower risk and faster path towards High Purity Alumina (HPA) production.

  • ❖ The new KRR leaching and refining route can be used directly on a readily available industrial Aluminium chemical feedstock

  • ❖ Laboratory test results have already confirmed the production of a high purity precursor compound suitable for calcining into HPA.

  • ❖ This alternative production circuit is a simpler process than our original process flow sheets and not require the development of associated mining, processing and logistical infrastructure up at Speewah.

  • ❖ The simpler flowsheet also offers possible advantages and economic benefits in capex and opex savings and fewer process and development risks.

  • ❖ Some additional metallurgical testwork and engineering will be required to finalise the PFS, which is now expected in Q1 2021.

  • ❖ A recent HPA market report by CRU International supports strong future demand and pricing of HPA.

  • ❖ The Speewah mine development testwork and studies will continue, but focus will shift towards a broader range of battery metals and master alloy compounds.

HPA Production

King River Resources Limited (ASX: KRR) is pleased to provide this High Purity Alumina (HPA) Prefeasibility Study (PFS) update. A decision has been made to deliver the PFS using our HPA process using aluminium chemical feedstocks derived from other industrial processes. This HPA operation would be based at an industrial estate rather than at Speewah in the Kimberley of Western Australia. The change in direction has been identified as a consequence of HPA testwork underway as part of the PFS on the Speewah Project. KRR believes this will assist in completing the PFS, fast track the production of HPA, and improve the business case.

Recently, KRR announced the successful production of a high purity precursor compound from the industrial feedstock (KRR ASX release 11 November 2020). Testwork is underway to further reduce the impurity levels in the precursor compound and improve the HPA purity.

The alternative production circuit is a simpler process than the original process flow sheet involving fewer purification steps, and it does not require the development of a mining operation, beneficiation plant, acid plant, leach tanks, filtration, neutralisation or tailings facilities, or associated infrastructure for a remote mining operation (haul road, accommodation camp, airstrip, borefield), and would involve less transport of reagents and products.

==> picture [595 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

Earlier this week Como Engineers delivered the preliminary CAPEX and OPEX costings for the Speewah processing plant and associated infrastructure, which are in line with expectations. This engineering study has highlighted the potential benefits of utilising the simpler process flowsheet based on an industrial chemical feedstock, namely:

  • fewer process circuits and less plant and equipment;

  • CAPEX savings;

  • lower OPEX;

  • fewer process and logistical components to implement that may de-risk and fast track through Definitive Feasibility Studies (DFS), permitting, financing, construction and HPA production.

The KRR HPA refining process and the industrial Aluminium chemical feedstock and reagents used in the process are commercial-in-confidence.

Prefeasibility Study

KRR’s decision to modify the PFS to deliver HPA from an alternative chemical feedstock will require additional engineering, testwork and permitting studies now underway.

Allowing for the additional engineering and testwork requirement, the modified PFS is now expected to be delivered in Q1 2021.

Speewah HPA-V-Ti Project

The new HPA development plan does not preclude the future integration of the KRR’s HPA process with a flowsheet to produce vanadium and titanium products. The strong forecast demand for grid battery storage and lithium ion batteries especially in electric vehicles makes for a compelling business case to produce high purity products used in these green technologies.

This announcement was authorised by the Chairman of the Company.

Anthony Barton

Chairman King River Resources Limited Email: [email protected] Phone: +61 8 92218055

==> picture [595 x 87] intentionally omitted <==

Statement by Competent Person

The information in this report is based on information compiled by Ken Rogers (BSc Hons) and fairly represents this information. Mr. Rogers is the Chief Geologist and an employee of King River Resources Ltd, and a Member of both the Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and The Institute of Materials Minerals and Mining (IMMM), and a Chartered Engineer of the IMMM. Mr. Rogers has sufficient experience of relevance to the styles of mineralisation and the types of deposits under consideration, and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr. Rogers consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on information in the form and context in which it appears.

==> picture [843 x 92] intentionally omitted <==

Appendix 1: King River Resources Limited HPA Project JORC 2012 Table 1

SECTION 1 : SAMPLING TECHNIQUES AND DATA

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
Techniques
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or
specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to
the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken
as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity
and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be
relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m
samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for
fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as
where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules)
may warrant disclosure of detailed information.
This ASX Release dated 19 November 2020 provides an update on KRR HPA Project.
KRR plans to use samples in its hydrometallurgical testwork to produce high purity alumina
(HPA) sourced from alternative Aluminium feedstocks from other industrial chemical processes.
Chemical precipitation methods will be used in the separation and precipitation of a high purity
Aluminium precursor compound prior to calcination to high purity alumina product.
The process, and feedstock and reagents used are commercial-in-confidence..
Drilling
techniques
Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air
blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).
Not Applicable. The samples will be generated from a feedstock of industrial chemicals.
Drill sample
recovery
Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries
and results assessed.
Not Applicable.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples.
Not Applicable.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and
whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
Not Applicable.
Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
Not Applicable.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc.) photography.
Not Applicable.
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Not Applicable.
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. Not Applicable.

==> picture [843 x 92] intentionally omitted <==

Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether
_sampled wet or dry. _
Not Applicable.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
Not Applicable.
Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representivity of samples.
Not Applicable.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in
situ material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
Not Applicable.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material
_being sampled. _
Sample sizes are considered appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.
Quality of
assay data and
laboratory
tests
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
TSW Analytical Testwork
Testwork includes chemical precipitation of intermediate aluminium compounds from solutions
made from industrial aluminium chemicals, solid liquid separations, purification steps involving
recrystallisation methods, and calcination to produce HPA.
Assays are conducted on leach solutions and solid residues, mother liquors and residue liquors.
TSW Analytical is a well-established analytical service provider that has developed a reputation
for producing accurate analyses for complex samples. The company’s expertise has assisted
with the development of the hydrometallurgical flow-sheets.
Samples have been assayed using
ICP-AES and ICP-MS. Solid samples were fused in a lithium borate flux, the resultant glass bead
was dissolved in hydrochloric acid and suitably diluted for either ICP-MS or ICP-AES analysis.
Loss on Ignition (LOI) at 1000 degrees C was performed for completeness of the analytical data
and to give a better indication of the total analytical percentage approximation to 100%.
Soluble solid samples (such as intermediate aluminium compounds and recrystallised solids)
were digested in nitric acid and the digestate was suitably diluted for ICP-AES or ICP-MS
analysis.
The liquor samples (such as leach solutions, wash liquors, mother liquors) have been
analysed using ICP-AES and ICP-MS. The samples were diluted suitably for the appropriate ICP
based analysis. Dilutions are used to bring the analyte concentration into the optimum analytical
range of the ICP instrument used and to reduce matrix interference complications during
quantification.
Precipitation efficiency has been determined using the mass of the total analyte in the leach
residue divided by the mass of the total analyte in the initial leach solution used. The resulting
fraction is multiplied by 100 to give percent precipitation efficiency.
Similarly the recovery of soluble solid precipitates has been determined using the mass of
analyte in the precipitate divided by the mass of the total analyte in the pregnant liquor from
which it was derived. The resultant fraction is multiplied by 100 to give the percent recovery.
TSW Analytical uses in-house standards and Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) to ensure
data are“Fit-For-Purpose”.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc.,
the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
Not Applicable.

==> picture [843 x 92] intentionally omitted <==

derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels
of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.
TSW Analytical
TSW reports concentrations as micrograms per gram (μg/g) in the solid (unless otherwise
stated). Instrumental response is measured against AccuTrace High Purity multi-element
standards (Choice Analytical) to achieve quantitation. Data are subjected to in-house QA and
QC procedures where an independent analyst recalculates instrumental output and compares
the newly generated data set with the original. Lack of equivalence between the two data sets
triggers an internal review and if necessary re-analysis of the entire data set. Under these
circumstances a third independent analyst will assess all generated data prior to sign off. Initial
equivalence between the two data sets, generated by the analyst and reviewer, will clear data for
remittance to the customer. All reports are reviewed by an independent analyst prior to
submission to the customer and where necessary relevant changes, such as wording that may
give rise to possible ambiguity of interpretation, will be modified prior to the final report being
sent to the customer.
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
The verification of significant intersections by either independent or
alternative company personnel.
Solid sample assays done in triplicate. Different assays methods used by TSW. Verification
assays onprecursor and HPAproducts now routinelysent to umpire laboratory
The use of twinned holes. Not applicable
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification,
_data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. _
Not applicable
Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Not Applicable
Location of
data points
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used
in Mineral Resource estimation.
Not Applicable.
_Specification of the grid system used. _ NotApplicable.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Not Applicable.
Data spacing
and
distribution
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Not Applicable.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the
degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
Not Applicable.
Whether sample compositing has been applied. Not Applicable.
Orientation of
data in relation
to geological
structure
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of
possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering
the deposit type.
Not Applicable.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of
key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling
bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.
Not Applicable.
Sample
security
The measures taken to ensure sample security. Chain of Custody is managed by the Company until testwork samples pass to TSW Analytical
PtyLtd, a duly certifiedmetallurgical laboratory,forsubsampling, assaying, and

==> picture [843 x 92] intentionally omitted <==

hydrometallurgical test work. The Aluminium feedstock sample was delivered to the metallurgical
laboratory by the Company or a competent agent. The chain of custody passes upon delivery of
the samples to the metallurgical laboratory.
Products, Residues and Duplicates of all samples are retained at the Company’s Perth
laboratory to insure against any sample loss
Audits or
Reviews
The results of ay audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. No external audits have been completed.

SECTION 2 : REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement
and land tenure
status
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements
or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Not Applicable.
Exploration done
by other parties
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Not Applicable.
Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Not Applicable.
Drill hole
Information
A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill
holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
o If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the
information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain
why this is the case.
Not Applicable.
Data aggregation
methods
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum
and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off
grades are usually Material and should be stated.
Not Applicable.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results
and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown indetail.
Not Applicable.

==> picture [843 x 92] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be
clearly stated.
Not Applicable.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept lengths
These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration
Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole
angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the
down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this
_effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). _
Not Applicable.
Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and
_appropriate sectional views. _
Not Applicable.
Balanced
reporting
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
Reports on previous metallurgical results can be found in ASX Releases that are
available on our website, including announcements 1 April 2010, 15 July 2010, 9
November 2010, 8 February 2012, 21 April 2017, 21 August 2017, 9 October 2017, 4
December 2017, 30 January 2018, 27 February 2018, 21 March 2018, 25 June 2018, 23
July 2018, 15 October 2018,19 November 2018, 18 January 2019, 1 March 2019, 21
March 2019, 22 March 2019, 9 May 2019, 7 June 2019, 27 September 2019, 26
November 2019, 6 December 2019, 22 January 2020, 24 March 2020, 23 April 2020, 13
May2020,17 June 2020,7 September 2020,13 October 2020 and 11 November 2020.
Other substantive
exploration data
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported
including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
Not Applicable.
Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions
or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly
highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.
Further metallurgical tests are planned to produce HPA by the Company’s process.