Annual Report • Mar 31, 2017
Annual Report
Open in ViewerOpens in native device viewer
Annual Report of KBC Group 2016
impact of goodwill impairment for a number of participating interests
Business Unit Business Unit Unit
Common equity ratio at group level (Basel III, Danish compromise, fully loaded)
We are an integrated bank-insurance group, catering mainly for retail, private banking, SME and mid-cap clients. Our core markets are Belgium, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria and Ireland. We are also present to a limited extent in several other countries to support corporate clients from our core markets.
| Clients (estimate) | over 10 million |
|---|---|
| Staff | 38 356 |
| Bank branches | 1 456 |
| Insurance network | 427 agencies in Belgium, various distribution |
| channels in Central and Eastern Europe |
| Fitch | Moody's | Standard & Poor's | |
|---|---|---|---|
| KBC Bank NV | A | A1 | A |
| KBC Insurance NV | – | – | A |
| KBC Group NV | A | Baa1 | BBB+ |
| KBC Ancora | 18.5% |
|---|---|
| Cera | 2.7% |
| MRBB | 11.4% |
| Other core shareholders | 7.6% |
Data relates to year-end 2016, unless otherwise indicated. For definitions, please see the detailed tables and analyses in this report. Outlook/watch/review data for our ratings is given elsewhere in this report.
| 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated balance sheet, end of period (in millions of EUR) | |||||
| Total assets | 275 200 | 252 356 | 245 174 | 238 686 | 256 928 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 133 231 | 128 223 | 124 551 | 120 371 | 128 492 |
| Securities | 73 262 | 72 623 | 70 359 | 64 904 | 67 295 |
| Deposits from customers and debt securities | 177 730 | 170 109 | 161 783 | 161 135 | 159 632 |
| Technical provisions and liabilities under investment contracts, insurance | 32 310 | 31 919 | 31 487 | 30 488 | 30 058 |
| Total equity | 17 357 | 15 811 | 16 521 | 14 514 | 15 879 |
| Risk-weighted assets (Basel II to 2012, Basel III from 2013, fully loaded) | 87 782 | 89 067 | 91 236 | 91 216 | 102 148 |
| Consolidated income statement (in millions of EUR) | |||||
| Total income | 7 211 | 7 148 | 6 720 | 7 448 | 7 733 |
| Operating expenses | -3 948 | -3 890 | -3 818 | -3 843 | -4 248 |
| Impairment | -201 | -747 | -506 | -1 927 | -2 511 |
| Net result, group share | 2 427 | 2 639 | 1 762 | 1 015 | 612 |
| Belgium | 1 432 | 1 564 | 1 516 | – | – |
| Czech Republic | 596 | 542 | 528 | – | – |
| International Markets (Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ireland) | 428 | 245 | -182 | – | – |
| Group Centre | -29 | 287 | -100 | – | – |
| Gender diversity | |||||
| Gender diversity in the workforce (percentage of women) | 56% | 56% | 57% | 57% | 58% |
| Gender diversity in the Board of Directors (percentage of women) | 31% | 25% | 22% | 15% | 10% |
| Environmental efficiency (per FTE) | |||||
| Electricity consumption (in GJ) | 17.6 | 18.5 | – | – | – |
| of which low-carbon electricity (as % of electricity consumption) | 66% | 48% | – | – | – |
| Gas and heating oil consumption (in GJ) | 9.8 | 9.9 | – | – | – |
| Other energy consumption (in GJ) | 2.6 | 2.8 | – | – | – |
| Commuter and business travel (in km) | 8 839 | 8 909 | – | – | – |
| Paper consumption (in tonnes) | 0.11 | 0.12 | – | – | – |
| Water consumption (in m³ of drinking water) | 10.5 | 12.4 | – | – | – |
| Greenhouse gas emissions (in tonnes of CO2e) | 2.6 | 2.9 | – | – | – |
| KBC share | |||||
| Number of shares outstanding, end of period (in millions) | 418.4 | 418.1 | 417.8 | 417.4 | 417.0 |
| Parent shareholders' equity per share, end of period (in EUR) | 38.1 | 34.5 | 31.4 | 28.3 | 29.0 |
| Average share price for the financial year (in EUR) | 51.0 | 56.8 | 43.1 | 32.8 | 17.3 |
| Share price at year-end (in EUR) | 58.8 | 57.7 | 46.5 | 41.3 | 26.2 |
| Gross dividend per share (in EUR) | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Basic earnings per share (in EUR) | 5.68 | 3.80 | 3.32 | 1.03 | -1.09 |
| Equity market capitalisation, end of period (in billions of EUR) | 24.6 | 24.1 | 19.4 | 17.2 | 10.9 |
| Financial ratios | |||||
| Return on equity | 18% | 22% | 14% | 9% | 1% |
| Cost/income ratio, banking | 55% | 55% | 58% | 52% | 64% |
| Combined ratio, non-life insurance | 93% | 91% | 94% | 94% | 95% |
| Credit cost ratio, banking | 0.09% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 0.71% |
| Common equity ratio (Basel III, Danish compromise method, fully loaded) | 15.8% | 14.9% | 14.3% | 12.8% | – |
| Total capital ratio (Basel III, Danish compromise method, fully loaded) | 20.0% | 19.0% | 18.3% | 17.8% | – |
| Net stable funding ratio (NSFR) | 125% | 121% | 123% | 111% | 105% |
| Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) | 139% | 127% | 120% | 131% | 107% |
For definitions and comments, please see the analyses and 'Glossary of ratios and terms' in this report. The proposed dividend for 2016 is subject to the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders.
| Our key performance indicators (KPIs) at group level* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth of total income Target: CAGR for 2013–17 ≥ 2.25% |
Growth of gross bank-insurance income Target: CAGR for 2013–17 ≥ 5% |
Cost/income ratio Target: in 2017 ≤ 53% |
Combined ratio Target: in 2017 ≤ 94% |
Dividend Target: dividend payout ratio ≥ 50% |
| Common equity ratio Target: fully loaded ≥ 10.4% in 2019 |
Total capital ratio Target: fully loaded ≥ 17% in 2017 |
Net stable funding ratio (NSFR) Target: ≥ 105% |
Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) Target: ≥ 105% |
Reputation Target: higher score and/or more progress than sector average |
| Client experience Target: higher score and/ or more progress than sector average |
Innovation Target: higher score and/or more progress than sector average |
Governance Target: higher score and/ or more progress than sector average |
Stakeholder interaction Target: have a formal stakeholder interaction process in place |
Position in SRI funds Target: market leadership in Belgium |
* Most of which were defined in 2014.
| 148 | Consolidated income statement |
|---|---|
| 149 | Consolidated statement of comprehensive income |
| 150 | Consolidated balance sheet |
| 151 | Consolidated statement of changes in equity |
| 152 | Consolidated cashflow statement |
| 154 | 1.0 Notes on the accounting policies |
| 154 | Note 1.1: Statement of compliance |
| 155 | Note 1.2: Summary of significant accounting policies |
| 162 | Note 1.3: Critical estimates and significant judgements |
| 163 | 2.0 Notes on segment reporting |
| 163 | Note 2.1: Segment reporting based on the management structure |
| 164 | Note 2.2: Results by segment |
| 166 | Note 2.3: Balance sheet information by segment |
| 166 | 3.0 Notes to the income statement |
| 166 | Note 3.1: Net interest income |
| 167 | Note 3.2: Dividend income |
| 167 | Note 3.3 Net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss |
| 168 | Note 3.4: Net realised result from available-for-sale assets |
| 168 | Note 3.5: Net fee and commission income |
| 168 | Note 3.6: Other net income |
| 168 | Note 3.7: Insurance results |
| 172 | Note 3.8: Operating expenses |
| 172 | Note 3.9: Personnel |
| 173 | Note 3.10: Impairment (income statement) |
| 174 | Note 3.11: Share in results of associated companies and |
| joint ventures | |
| 174 | Note 3.12: Income tax expense |
| 175 | Note 3.13: Earnings per share |
191 Note 5.1: Other assets
189 Note 4.10: Derivatives
value – focus on level 3 187 Note 4.8: Changes in own credit risk
186 Note 4.6: Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value – transfers between levels 1 and 2 187 Note 4.7: Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair
188 Note 4.9: Reclassification of financial assets and liabilities
Statutory annual report: we have incorporated the content of the annual report required by law into the 'Report of the Board of Directors', which also contains additional, non-compulsory information. We have also combined the reports for the company and consolidated financial statements. All other reports and the websites we refer to do not form part of our annual report.
Integrated reporting: we have chosen to present our annual report – more specifically the sections dealing with our business model and our strategy – in as integrated a manner as possible, taking the fullest possible account of IIRC guidelines. We view integrated reporting as our ultimate goal, one we get closer to achieving each year.
Company name: 'KBC', 'we', 'the group' or 'the KBC group' refer to the consolidated entity, i.e. KBC Group NV plus all the group companies included in the scope of consolidation. 'KBC Group NV' refers solely to the parent company.
Translation: this annual report is available in Dutch, French and English. The Dutch version is the original; the other language versions are unofficial translations. We have made every reasonable effort to avoid any discrepancies between the different language versions. However, should such discrepancies exist, the Dutch version will take precedence.
Regarding the acquisition of United Bulgarian Bank and Interlease in Bulgaria announced on 30 December 2016, we expect the deal to be finalised by no later than the second quarter of 2017. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, therefore, the consolidated data in this annual report refers to the situation without the impact of the announced acquisition.
Disclaimer: the expectations, forecasts and statements regarding future developments that are contained in the annual financial report are based on assumptions and assessments made when drawing up this report. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve uncertainty. Various factors could cause actual results and developments to differ from the initial statements.
| Who are we? | |
|---|---|
| Creation: formed in 1998 after the merger of two large Belgian banks (the Kredietbank and CERA Bank) and a large Belgian insurance company (ABB Insurance) |
|
| Principal activity: integrated bank-insurance (banking, insurance and asset management) |
|
| Over 10 million clients | |
| Over 38 000 employees | |
| Principal brands and estimated market share: • Belgium: KBC, KBC Brussels and CBC (21% in banking, 13% in life insurance, 9% in non-life insurance) • Czech Republic: Cˇ SOB (20% in banking, 7% in life insurance, 7% in non-life insurance) • Slovakia: Cˇ SOB (11% in banking, 4% in life insurance, 3% in non-life insurance) • Hungary: K&H (10% in banking, 4% in life insurance, 6% in non-life insurance) • Bulgaria*: CIBANK and DZI (3% in banking, 11% in life insurance, 10% in non-life insurance) • Ireland: KBC Bank Ireland (7% in retail banking) |
|
| 1 456 bank branches, insurance sales via own agents and other channels, various mobile and online channels |
|
| * Not including the effect of the acquisition of United Bulgarian |
Bank (8% share of the banking market) and Interlease in
Bulgaria announced at the end of 2016.
• encouraging responsible behaviour on the part of our employees.
We take our cue from relevant legislation and the International Financial Reporting Standards, for instance, and take as much account as possible of the guidelines of the International Integrated Reporting Council. Information regarding the application of GRI Standards is provided in our Sustainability Report.
These reporting frameworks emphasise the principle of importance/relevance (also called 'materiality') in reporting. We asked our stakeholders themselves for input on determining which subjects are important to them. The results obtained are discussed elsewhere in this report under 'Our stakeholder survey' (which also includes a reference list showing where we discuss the matters in question in the annual report).
Information on the scope of consolidation used for financial information is provided in Note 6.5 of the 'Consolidated financial statements' section. Our non-financial data is collected through a group-wide process that includes strict hierarchical validation. In 2016, we switched to a group-wide web tool for more efficient data collection and consolidation of non-financial data. As a minimum, all KBC entities with over 100 FTEs report on the various non-financial areas (and for some areas this applies to the entire scope of consolidation).
Johan Thijs: First of all, we view sustainability for a financial institution much more broadly than simply from the traditional angle, which is based mainly on environmental, philanthropic or corporate governance considerations. To us, sustainability means that we have to be able to live up to the expectations of all our stakeholders, not just today but also in the future, and to do so, of course, without assistance from outside sources. We have developed a group-wide sustainability framework to this end with clear guiding principles and views. This forms the sustainable backbone of our operations. In brief, our approach to sustainability is based on three cornerstones. Firstly, we want to enhance our positive impact on society. To achieve this, we have chosen a number of focus areas in which we – as a bank-insurer – can make a difference. The chosen areas are financial literacy, environmental responsibility, promoting entrepreneurship, and lastly demographic ageing and health. Secondly, we want to limit any negative impact we may have as much as possible. We do this primarily by reducing our own ecological footprint and by means of our updated policy guidelines in areas such as lending to the energy sector. We are also placing even greater emphasis on socially responsible investment funds. Thirdly, we want to encourage responsible behaviour on the part of all our employees.
We also view transparent reporting as an important part of sustainability that takes account of all our stakeholders. So, we're continuing to work towards the integrated reporting of financial and non-financial information, while paying considerable attention to the principle of materiality and brevity.
Thomas Leysen: An obvious one is the acquisition of United Bulgarian Bank and Interlease in Bulgaria, which was announced at the end of 2016. It is a logical and important step in our expansion in Central and Eastern Europe, a strategy we embarked on almost twenty years ago. Combining this latest development with our existing presence through CIBANK puts us into third place for banking, and bringing DZI Insurance into the equation means that we also become
the reference for bank-insurance in Bulgaria, which is an attractive growth market. We can share our know-how and extensive experience in the field of bank-insurance, leasing, asset management and factoring there, generating all sorts of synergies and so create value for our shareholders. We expect the acquisition to be finalised in the second quarter of 2017. Another event that springs to mind is the EBA stress test at the end of July, which showed that we remain sufficiently capitalised even in an adverse scenario. That's good news for all our stakeholders. We also introduced an interim dividend policy which basically means that in November each year we will now pay an interim dividend of 1 euro in cash as an advance on the final dividend. This will ensure a more evenly distributed cashflow to our shareholders.
Johan Thijs: Firstly, it's important to bear in mind when comparing our results with last year's that the numbers for 2015 were enhanced by the liquidation of a group company, which had a net positive impact of 765 million euros, and that we recorded substantial goodwill impairment charges in that year. Disregarding that effect, our net profit was 9% higher than its 2015 level, even though market conditions were challenging. Our net interest income, for instance, fell by just 1%, despite the negative impact of the climate of low interest rates. Our insurance business performed strongly. Premiums were up 14% and the combined ratio of our non-life activities ended the year at a very good 93%. Our net fee and commission income was down 14%, due mainly to the lower level of income generated by our asset management activities, reflecting investor caution that had arisen because of uncertainty on the markets. The quality of our loan portfolio improved further, resulting in exceptionally low loan loss provisioning, thanks in part to Ireland, where we were actually able to reverse impairment charges, on balance. We do not expect, however, to be able to maintain this exceptionally low level of provisioning in the years ahead. We kept our costs well under control too, with the result that our cost/income ratio come to an excellent 55%. This brought our net profit for 2016 to a total of 2.4 billion euros, an excellent performance to be proud of and one for which we're genuinely grateful to our clients and employees.
Thomas Leysen: Digitisation is a means rather than an end. Our credo is and will remain 'everything at KBC is based on what the client requires'. That means looking constantly at how we can adapt in order to respond to our clients' changing needs. Our focus is on an omnichannel approach that enables us to provide solutions in an accessible way, wherever and whenever the client requires them. We place particular importance on enabling flawless and seamless interaction between our bank branches, insurance agencies, advisory centres, websites and mobile apps, so that we can offer clients an optimum bank-insurance experience and save them as much of their valuable time as possible.
Johan Thijs: Our clients are obviously looking for a different way of banking and insurance than, say, ten years ago. This has led to a shift – on our part too – between the different distribution channels, with a particular increase in the importance of digital channels. We've firmly committed ourselves to those channels, as demonstrated by the success of our mobile apps. But we're not neglecting our other channels: we continue to work hard, for instance, on innovative branch concepts. Incidentally, we have been involved in the digital transformation process for a long time – it didn't just come out of the blue. We have pursued a gradual path for years now, working at our clients' pace and with respect for our staff, shareholders and other stakeholders. That too is an example of corporate social responsibility.
Thomas Leysen: The past year has been a turbulent one, to say the least. I'm obviously thinking of Brexit and the US elections, which will have an impact on economic and political developments in 2017. We expect the steady economic growth of 2016 to continue in 2017 and inflation to pick up further, although the increase in underlying core inflation will probably be limited. The ECB's flexible monetary policy is likely to keep European government bond yields low, though elections in a number of European countries could bring extra volatility.
Johan Thijs: We signed an important acquisition agreement in Bulgaria, which fits our strategy perfectly. We also included Ireland as one of our core countries at the beginning of 2017 and we revamped our sustainability strategy. We are working hard on our digital transformation to enable us to provide even better quality service to our clients. This puts us in an excellent position to look confidently to 2017 and to work together towards a sustainable future. As we do so, we will continue to put our clients at the heart of everything we do.
We hope you enjoy our annual report.
Johan Thijs Thomas Leysen Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board
of Directors
In this section, we describe how we create value, the characteristics of our model, the conditions in which we pursue our activities, and what types of capital we use for that purpose. In the section on our strategy, we discuss the principles we apply in order to achieve our goal of becoming the reference for bank-insurance in all our core markets.
In our capacity as a bank, we ensure that our clients can save and invest in a well-informed manner. In this way, every client can grow their assets in keeping with their personal risk profile, and call on the expertise of our staff to assist them. We also want to contribute to general financial education and have taken a variety of initiatives in that field, as discussed below.
We use the money from the deposits our clients entrust to us to provide loans to individuals, businesses and public authorities, thereby putting that money to productive use in society. As a lender, we enable people to build a house or buy a car, for instance, and businesses to be created or to grow.
We also hold a portfolio of investments, which means we invest in the economy indirectly too. Besides loans to individuals and businesses, we fund specific sectors and target groups, such as the social profit sector, infrastructure projects that have a major impact on the domestic economy, and green energy projects.
The role we play as a deposit-taker and a lender ultimately means that we assume our clients' risks for them. Our highly developed risk and capital management know-how allows us to manage those risks.
As an insurer, we enable our clients to operate free of worry and to limit their risks. We work hard every day to provide the best insurance cover at a fair price and we invest in a highquality claims-handling service, because that will always be the true litmus test of any non-life policy. What's more, we use our knowledge of the causes of accidents to develop accident prevention campaigns and we have a long-standing tradition of working with organisations involved in road safety, welfare and victim assistance.
We also offer our clients a variety of other services that are important to them in their everyday lives, including payments, cash management, trade finance, leasing, corporate finance, and money and capital market products. In this way too, we contribute to the economic system.
We make an important contribution to employment in all our core markets. We recognise that we have a significant direct impact on the lives of our people. Therefore, we offer them a fair reward for their work, thereby contributing to the welfare of the countries in which we operate. We also offer them development opportunities and the means to maintain the best possible work-life balance.
What's more, as a major local player in each of our core countries, we form part of the economic and social fabric in those countries. We take account of this in our activities, and we take a range of initiatives to support local communities.
We use various types of resource or 'capital' to enable us to operate.
worth of assets under management, 32 billion euros in insurance reserves • Aggregate 1.1 billion euros paid in income taxes and bank taxes
• …
We sum up our business culture and our values in the acronym 'PEARL', which stands for Performance, Empowerment, Accountability, Responsiveness and Local Embeddedness. We also encourage all our employees to behave in a way that is responsive, respectful and results-driven. An explanation of what we mean is given in the following diagram. It goes without saying that we monitor how embedded this culture is among our staff. We have even appointed a dedicated PEARL manager to make sure that all our employees are thoroughly imbued
with these values. The PEARL manager reports regularly to our CEO, ensuring that senior management is aware of the extent to which PEARL is known, practised and embedded within our group.
Besides our culture and our values, we distinguish ourselves from our competitors through several specific features, including our integrated bank-insurance model and our focus on a number of specific countries. The tables below go into this in greater depth.
We offer an integrated response to our clients' banking and insurance needs. Our organisation is similarly integrated, with most services operating at group level and the group also managed in an integrated style. Our integrated model offers our clients the benefit of a comprehensive, one-stop financial service that allows them to choose from a wider, complementary and optimised range of products and services. For ourselves, it offers benefits in terms of income and risk diversification, additional sales potential through intensive co-operation between the bank and insurance distribution channels, and significant cost-savings and synergies.
We focus on our core markets of Belgium, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria and Ireland. As a result, we now operate in a mix of mature and growth markets, taking advantage in the latter of the catch-up potential for financial services. We have a limited presence elsewhere in the world, primarily to support activities in our core markets.
We want to build sustainable local relationships with private individuals, SMEs and mid-caps in our core countries. Local responsiveness is very important to us in that regard. It means we know and understand our local clients better, that we pick up signals effectively and respond to them proactively, and that we offer products and services tailored to these local needs. It also means that we focus on the sustainable development of the different communities in which we operate.
A special feature of our shareholder structure is the core shareholder syndicate consisting of Cera, KBC Ancora, MRBB and the other core shareholders, which together held about 40% of our shares at the end of 2016. These shareholders act in concert, thereby ensuring shareholder stability and the further development of our group.
| Our strengths | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A well-developed bank-insurance strategy, which enables us to respond immediately to our clients' needs |
Strong and finely meshed commercial banking and insurance franchises in Belgium and the Czech Republic |
Turnaround achieved in the International Markets Business Unit |
Successful track record of underlying business results |
Solid capital position and strong liquidity |
Firmly embedded in the local economies of our core countries |
| Our challenges | |||||
| Macroeconomic environment characterised by low interest rates, demographic ageing, increased nervousness and uncertainty, and geopolitical challenges |
Stricter regulation in areas like client protection and solvency |
Competition, new players in the market, new technologies and changing client behaviour |
Cyber crime | Public image of the financial sector |
|
Like to know more? You will find information on each business unit and country in the 'Our business units' section. Information about our culture and values can be found at www.kbc.com > About us. * A proportion of our employees work in other countries or in group functions. We also allocate part of our capital and income to the Group Centre (see below). We have structured our group around three business units, which focus on local activities and contribute to sustainable earnings and growth. These units are Belgium, the Czech Republic and International Markets.
We have illustrated the importance of the different business units in the following diagram. A more detailed description is provided in the 'Our business units' section.
The Board of Directors is responsible for defining our group's strategy, general policy and risk appetite. It is supported by several specialised committees, namely the Audit Committee, the Risk & Compliance Committee, the Nomination Committee and the Remuneration Committee. These committees are dealt with in the 'Corporate governance statement' section.
Our Executive Committee provides the operational management of the group within the confines of the general strategy approved by the board. Besides the CEO, the Executive Committee also includes the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Chief Risk Officer (CRO) of the group, as well as the CEOs of the Belgium, Czech Republic and International Markets business units.
The most important matters discussed by the Board of Directors in 2016 are summarised in the 'Corporate governance statement' section.
We also deal with our remuneration policy for senior management in that section. The principle underpinning this policy – and indeed the remuneration of all our staff – is that good performance deserves to be rewarded. It is only fair that every employee who works hard is properly rewarded for their efforts, including by means of (limited) variable remuneration.
* A proportion of our employees work in other countries or in group functions. We also allocate part of our capital and income to the Group Centre (see below).
| Board of Directors | Members | 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Men/Women | 11/5 | |
| Principal qualifications2 | economics, law, actuarial sciences, management, mathematics, fiscal sciences, philosophy, etc. |
|
| Nationality | Belgian (14), Hungarian (1), Czech (1) | |
| Independent directors | 3 | |
| Attendance record | See the 'Corporate governance statement' | |
| Executive Committee |
Members | 6 |
| Men/Women | 5/1 | |
| Principal qualifications2 | law, economics, actuarial sciences, mathematics, international relations |
|
| Nationality | Belgian (5), British (1) | |
1 Changes after the General Meeting of May 2017: see the 'Corporate Governance statement' section.
2 Based on all qualifications (several individuals have more than one degree).
More detailed information on our governance is provided in the 'Corporate governance statement' section and in the group's Corporate Governance Charter at www.kbc.com.
Rough breakdown based on all qualifications (several individuals have more than one degree)
The world economy, the financial markets and demographic developments can strongly influence our results. This relates to matters like growth, the level and volatility of interest rates, inflation, employment, population structure, bankruptcies, household income, financial market liquidity, exchange rate movements, availability of funding, investor and consumer confidence and credit spreads.
The risk of persistently low interest rates has become more important in recent years, exerting significant pressure on the income of banks and insurers. Demographic ageing is also a challenge for our life insurance business, for instance, where it can lead to a changing product offering due to the shift in the structure of the insurance population, and because it drives up demand for rate products with longer maturities. Another specific element relates to the potential consequences of the Brexit vote in 2016 (see the 'How do we manage our risks?' section).
We carry out our activities in a highly competitive environment. Our competitors too are being affected by technological change and shifting client behaviour. Examples include the surge in growth of online services. Besides the traditional players, therefore, there is also intensifying competition from online banks and e-commerce in general. Intensifying competition is affecting client expectations, exerting potential pressure on cross-selling opportunities, increasing the importance of digitisation, and creating a need for an organisation that is responsive and resilient. We are both eager and obliged, therefore, to keep up and constantly to challenge our business model with technological developments and the new needs of a changing society.
We calculate the potential impact of changes in key parameters and estimate the impact of material events as effectively as possible.
The creative input of our employees is highly important when it comes to equipping ourselves to deal with competition and technological change. We do everything we can to attract and motivate talented staff.
Increasing regulation is an issue for the financial sector as a whole. It includes rules like the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation and the Insurance Distribution Directive to protect clients from unfair or inappropriate practices.
There is also the new European market abuse regime, which extends the scope of the regime, fine-tunes existing rules and introduces new rules on 'market soundings'. The Audit Regulation introduces special rules, including ones on the appointment and mandatory rotation of the auditor, restrictions on the non-audit services that the auditor may provide and the role of the audit committee in this respect. Various initiatives are currently underway in the area of solvency, mainly in relation to the banking business. The main initiatives relate to the method for calculating risk-weighted assets and the further streamlining of legislation to ensure that shareholders and creditors absorb losses at banks rather than the government. As regards the insurance business, the Solvency II Directive was transposed into Belgian law for application to the status and supervision of (re)insurance companies.
Another factor is the new IFRS that have yet to become effective, including IFRS 17 (applies specifically to the insurance business) and especially IFRS 9 (introduces a number of measures, including a new classification system for financial instruments and new impairment rules).
Hacking and cyber attacks are a constant threat in an increasingly digital world, with the potential to cause significant financial and reputational harm. Our focus here is on the optimum protection of both our clients and our group itself.
We produce memorandums and provide training courses for the business side.
We raise our employees' awareness of cyber risks by providing training in areas like phishing and vishing, and fraud in general.
1 Excluding self-service branches.
We can split the economic climate in 2016 into two periods. The first half of the year was characterised by a deterioration in sentiment indicators, primarily in manufacturing industry. Growing concerns about the emerging economies – and more specifically fear of a hard landing for China – also caused the financial markets to slide at the beginning of the year. A general improvement in the climate for economic growth followed during the second half of the year, with private consumption leading the way. The negative impact of political events ultimately turned out to be less than feared. Having initially responded with panic to the UK's vote to leave the EU, the financial markets staged a swift recovery and the UK economy continued to perform better than anticipated. The election of the new president of the United States proved not to be a threat to the prevailing economic optimism either. Nevertheless, both events constitute a risk to future economic growth.
Like to know more? More information on market conditions in each country is provided in the 'Our business units' section.
The real economy developed against a background of low inflation. Energy and commodity prices bottomed out at the beginning of 2016, before rising gradually and increasing upside pressure on inflation. All the same, underlying core inflation remained weak, especially in the euro area. As a consequence, the ECB took the decision in December to extend its asset purchase programme until the end of 2017, albeit at a slower pace. The US central bank marked time in 2016, only announcing a further rate hike at the end of the year, precisely 12 months since the previous one. Yields on government bonds remained low in this context. An upward trend nevertheless seems to have begun in the final quarter of the year, accelerated by higher inflation forecasts in anticipation of an expansive budgetary policy in the United States.
As a financial group, we draw on many different types of capital, including our employees and our capital base, but also our brands, reputation and capacity to innovate, our relationships with all our stakeholders, our networks – both electronic and bricks-and-mortar – and our ICT infrastructure.
Our HR policy is based on our PEARL business culture and it is our employees who give tangible shape to this policy. We closely monitor how this business culture is applied in all the core countries.
We create a stimulating working environment where employees are given the opportunity to develop their talents and skills, not only by learning, but also by communicating their ideas and taking responsibility. We view self-development as the key to career-long employability. With that in mind, we offer our staff a wide range of traditional training courses, e-learning, Skype sessions, workplace coaching, and other development opportunities.
Although employees are primarily responsible for developing their careers, KBC offers a great deal of support. There is also a range of interesting jobs, and plenty of opportunities are offered to change jobs internally and for employees to grow in their current position. At the same time, we pay particular attention to extending careers. For instance, Minerva – our HR plan for older employees in Belgium – has enabled us to move towards a more individualised approach geared to their particular needs. We are responding in this way to demographic developments and preparing people to work for longer.
We realise that good managers are key when it comes to enabling employees to bring out the best in themselves. That's why we have intensive leadership tracks in place at different levels. Managers develop their skills through our 'lead yourself', 'lead your business' and 'lead your people' courses. KBC University is now also up and running. This ambitious development programme is aimed at senior managers from the entire KBC group, with different speakers and modules focusing on bank-insurance, leadership and 'client-centricity'.
We do not make any distinction on the grounds of gender, religion, ethnic background or sexual orientation in our HR, recruitment and promotion policies or remuneration systems. Equal treatment of employees is also enshrined in the KBC Code of Conduct and in the various manifestos and charters we have endorsed. As an employer, we want to give a clear signal to society: we treat our employees in a socially responsible manner and that relationship is grounded in mutual trust and respect.
We closely monitor employee satisfaction and engagement, and consult our staff each year by means of the Group Employee Survey. The 85% response rate in 2016 was up five percentage points on the previous year, with over 30 000 employees taking the time to share their opinions. The survey revealed an engagement level for the group as a whole that is in line with the European financial sector average. The engagement index rose in Belgium, Ireland and Slovakia, but was down slightly on its year-earlier level in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Bulgaria. The index in Belgium and Slovakia also exceeded the respective national benchmarks.
| Number of staff, KBC group | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute number | 38 356 | 38 450 |
| FTEs | 36 315 | 36 411 |
| In % (based on FTEs) | ||
| Belgium | 44% | 44% |
| Central and Eastern Europe | 52% | 52% |
| Rest of the world | 4% | 4% |
| Belgium Business Unit | 34% | 34% |
| Czech Republic Business Unit | 23% | 23% |
| International Markets Business Unit | 29% | 30% |
| Group Functions and Group Centre | 14% | 13% |
| Men | 44% | 44% |
| Women | 56% | 56% |
| Full-time | 82% | 82% |
| Part-time | 18% | 18% |
| Average age | 42 | 42 |
| Average seniority (years) | 13 | 13 |
| Number of days absent through illness per FTE | 8 | 7 |
More information about our relationship with our employees can be found at www.kbc.com/Working at KBC and in our Sustainability Report.
Our activities are only possible if we have a solid capital base. At year-end 2016, our total equity came to 17.4 billion euros and chiefly comprised own share capital, share premiums, reserves and certain additional tier-1 instruments. Our capital was represented by 418 372 082 shares at year-end 2016, a small increase of 285 024 shares on the previous year, due to the customary capital increase reserved for staff in December.
Our shares are held by a large number of shareholders in a number of countries. A group of shareholders consisting of MRBB, Cera, KBC Ancora and the Other core shareholders, constitute KBC's core shareholders. A shareholder agreement was concluded between these core shareholders in order to ensure shareholder stability and guarantee continuity within the group, as well as to support and co-ordinate its general policy. To this end, the core shareholders act in concert at the General Meeting of KBC Group NV and are represented on its Board of Directors. The current agreement applies for a ten-year period with effect from 1 December 2014. According to the most recent notifications, the core shareholders own approximately 40% of our shares between them.
It is our intention (subject to the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders) to pay out at least 50% of the available consolidated profit as dividend (dividends on shares and coupon on the additional tier-1 instruments combined). Starting in 2016, and barring exceptional or unforeseen circumstances, we will pay an interim dividend of 1 euro per share annually in November of the current financial year as an advance on the total dividend, plus a final dividend after the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
| KBC share | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Number of shares outstanding at year-end (in millions) | 418.4 | 418.1 |
| Share price for the financial year* | ||
| Highest price (in EUR) | 61.3 | 65.3 |
| Lowest price (in EUR) | 39.8 | 44.3 |
| Average price (in EUR) | 51.0 | 56.8 |
| Closing price (in EUR) | 58.8 | 57.7 |
| Difference between closing price at financial year-end and previous financial year-end | +2% | +24% |
| Equity market capitalisation at year-end (in billions of EUR) | 24.6 | 24.1 |
| Average daily volume traded on NYSE Euronext Brussels (source: Bloomberg) | ||
| Number of shares (in millions) | 1.02 | 0.86 |
| In millions of EUR | 51.2 | 48.2 |
| Equity per share (in EUR) | 38.1 | 34.5 |
* Based on closing prices and rounded to one decimal place.
| Shareholder structure of KBC Group NV (31 December 2016)* | Number of shares at the time of disclosure |
% of the current number of shares |
|---|---|---|
| KBC Ancora | 77 516 380 | 18.5% |
| Cera | 11 127 166 | 2.7% |
| MRBB | 47 889 864 | 11.4% |
| Other core shareholders | 31 675 955 | 7.6% |
| Subtotal for core shareholders | 168 209 365 | 40.2% |
| Free float | 250 162 717 | 59.8% |
| Total | 418 372 082 | 100.0% |
* The shareholder structure is based on the most recent notifications made under the transparency rules or (if they are more recent) on disclosures made under the Act on public takeover bids or other available information. Details of notifications from shareholders can be found in the 'Company annual accounts and additional information' section.
(31 December 2015 = 100%, end-of-week prices)
A major part of our activities involves transforming deposits and other forms of funding into loans. For that reason, funding through deposits and debt securities is an important raw material for our group. We have therefore developed a strong retail/mid-cap deposit base in our core markets. We also regularly issue debt instruments, including via KBC IFIMA, KBC Bank and KBC Group NV itself.
| Credit ratings* on 20-03-2017 | Long-term rating Outlook/watch/review | Short-term rating | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fitch | |||
| KBC Bank NV | A | (Stable outlook) | F1 |
| KBC Group NV | A | (Stable outlook) | F1 |
| Moody's | |||
| KBC Bank NV | A1 | (Stable outlook) | P-1 |
| KBC Group NV | Baa1 | (Stable outlook) | P-2 |
| Standard & Poor's | |||
| KBC Bank NV | A | (Stable outlook) | A-1 |
| KBC Insurance NV | A- | (Stable outlook) | – |
| KBC Group NV | BBB+ | (Stable outlook) | A-2 |
* Please refer to the respective credit rating agencies for definitions of the different ratings. In KBC Insurance's case, it is the financial strength rating, which indicates the likelihood of policyholders' claims being met, whereas the ratings given for KBC Bank and KBC Group indicate the likelihood of their financial obligations being met.
Alongside staff and capital, our network and relationships are especially important to our activities. An overview of our network can be found under 'Market conditions in our most important countries in 2016'.
Our social and relationship capital comprises all relationships with our clients, shareholders, government, regulators and other stakeholders who enable us to remain socially relevant and to operate as a socially responsible business. This theme is dealt with in depth under 'Our role in society' in the 'Our strategy' section.
More information about our shareholder structure is provided in the 'Corporate governance statement' section. Further details of our credit ratings are available at www.kbc.com > Investor Relations > Credit ratings.
Our strategy rests on four principles:
We implement our strategy within a strict risk, capital and liquidity management framework.
Sustainability is embedded in our strategy. To us, this primarily means the ability to live up to the expectations of all our stakeholders and to meet our obligations, not just today but also in the future. Our sustainability strategy has three cornerstones:
Within a stringent risk, capital and liquidity management framework
We prepare thoroughly for the future. Changes in client behaviour and technological developments are influencing the route we are taking. Our clients decide for themselves when and how they want to be served. That's why KBC has opted for an omnichannel strategy. We want to ensure that all channels and apps are connected with each other interactively and in real time. As a result, we are there for clients whenever and wherever they need their bank-insurer.
We have to earn our clients' trust every day. We work hard to offer them complete, accessible and relevant solutions at a fair price and to achieve an optimum client experience. That means taking their needs rather than our banking or insurance products as our starting point.
What our clients want today is actually the same as they wanted in the past: a bank or insurer they can trust, and who offers them the right solutions. The difference today is that they want it through a variety of channels and at the moment that suits them best: mobile payments in the restaurant, online banking from home, advice from an insurance agent or an investment expert in an office or remotely from a regional advisory centre.
Each client makes their own choices, while we ensure a pleasant client experience and optimum convenience by enabling our branches, agencies, advisory centres and digital channels to communicate with each other as seamlessly as possible. The aim is to ensure that we recognise clients regardless of the channel they use and don't have to keep asking them for the same details. What's more, as both a bank and an insurer with a wide range of distribution channels, we know our clients very well. It means we can improve our understanding of their needs and expectations and that we can surprise them with rapid and inventive proposals tailored to their personal requirements.
It goes without saying that clients only accept us analysing their data once they already trust us. We achieve that through an excellent privacy policy, for which the client sets the limits. Because privacy is not only an objective concept, defined by law, it is a highly subjective one too. For that reason, we want to let clients themselves choose what we can do with their data. In the process, we want to communicate in a transparent way and offer our clients a clear privacy overview, in which they can adjust their choices at any moment. We view smart data analysis allied with effective privacy protection as the ideal opportunity to enhance our clients' trust.
Since putting the interests of our clients at the heart of everything we do is the cornerstone of our strategy, we keep a close eye on their situation. We collect their experiences in the various markets in which we are active and use that information to improve our services and products. We also closely monitor our reputation, which can be influenced by a range of factors (see diagram above). Not only do we calculate our overall score for reputation, we do so for the underlying elements as well, and communicate this analysis to all the departments and individuals concerned, so they can take appropriate action.
By setting targets for client experience and reputation, we aim to increase the general level of client satisfaction. The targets and results for client experience and reputation are set out in the diagrams below.
* In Belgium, the financial benchmarks are: BNP Paribas Fortis, ING, Argenta, AXA, Ethias, AG Insurance, Belfius, Baloise; in the Czech Republic: Air Bank, GE Money Bank, Cˇeská sporˇitelna, Komercˇní banka, Kooperativa pojišt'ovna, Cˇeská pojišt'ovna, Fio banka, Cˇeská pošta, UniCredit Bank; in Hungary: OTP Bank, Erste Bank Hungary, Budapest Bank, CIB Bank, Raiffeisen Bank Hungary, UniCredit Bank Hungary; in Slovakia: Slovenská sporitel'nˇa, VUB Banka, Tatra banka, Prima banka, Sberbank Slovensko, Unicredit Bank, Allianz; in Ireland: Zurich Ireland, Permanent TSB, Bank of Ireland, Ulster Bank, AIB, EBS, Credit Union; in Bulgaria: UniCredit Bulbank, Société Générale Expressbank, Allianz Bank, Central Cooperative Bank, Bulstrad Vienna Insurance, Armeec, Piraeus Bank, Allianz Insurance.
The scores relate to the KBC brand in Belgium, the CˇSOB brand in the Czech Republic, the CˇSOB brand in Slovakia, the K&H brand in Hungary, the KBC brand in Ireland and the DZI and CIBANK brands in Bulgaria.
In the diagrams, we compare:
If, for example, the score of a KBC entity in a country is significantly higher than the sector average and the progress compared to the previous year is significantly lower than the average progress in the sector, we place the KBC entity in the upper-left segment. 'Significantly' means 'a difference of 5 percentage points or more'.
Within a stringent risk, capital and liquidity management framework
We respond in an integrated way to all of our clients' banking and insurance needs and we also position ourselves as an integrated bank-insurer within our organisation. This integrated model offers the client the benefit of a comprehensive, one-stop service that allows them to choose from a wider, complementary and optimised range of products and services. It offers the group benefits in terms of income and risk diversification, additional sales potential through intensive co-operation between the bank and insurance distribution channels, and significant cost-savings and synergies.
As an integrated bank-insurer, we can put our clients' interests at the heart of what we do by offering them an integrated product range and advising them based on needs that transcend pure banking or insurance, and include family, the home and mobility.
As stated earlier, we do everything we can to integrate our channels (bank branches and insurance agencies, contact centres, self-service terminals, the website, our home banking application and mobile apps). Because we are both a bank and an insurer, we can commit ourselves completely to this integrated approach and seamless service. The best mix of channels is determined locally based on the client's needs and also depends on the degree of maturity of our bank and insurer in each country.
We have developed a unique bank-insurance co-operation concept within our group, the roll-out of which varies from one market to another.
We are furthest advanced in this area in Belgium, where our bank-insurance business already operates as a single unit that is achieving both commercial and non-commercial synergies. An important feature of our model in Belgium is the unique co-operation between our bank branches and insurance agencies in micro markets. The branches sell bank and standard insurance products, and refer clients to the insurance agency in the same micro market for other insurance products. The insurance agencies sell the full range of insurance products and handle all claims, including those relating to policies taken out at a bank branch.
We have not yet gone so far as in Belgium in our other core countries, but we want to create an integrated distribution model as swiftly as possible, which will allow commercial synergies.
Our bank-insurance model also enables us to achieve various commercial synergies. In Belgium, for instance, some seven out of ten clients who agreed home loans with KBC Bank in 2016 also took out mortgage protection cover with KBC Insurance, while eight to nine out of ten purchased home insurance. At Cˇ SOB in the Czech Republic, between six and seven out of ten clients who took out home loans in 2016 also purchased home insurance from the group. To give another example, roughly half of households in Belgium that bank with Our clients don't dream about banking or insurance products, but about a house, a holiday, a car or a business of their own – things for which they need money. And when they have them, they want to be certain they won't lose their investment, so they look for insurance too. Our integrated bank-insurance model means we can proactively offer them a comprehensive range of banking and insurance products.
KBC Bank hold at least one KBC Insurance product. About one in five of these households actually held three banking and three insurance products from KBC.
We took initiatives in all our markets to further optimise our bank-insurance model (relevant examples and more details of our bank-insurance performance in each country can be found in the 'Our business units' section).
We use a number of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to track the success of our bank-insurance performance. The most important one is listed in the table.
| KPI | Description | Target and result1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of: | BEL | CZE | SLO | HUN | BUL | IRE | Group | |||
| CAGR of | [fee and commission income received by the bank from the linked insurer] + [insurance income for insurance products sold by bank branches] + [management fees generated by unit-linked insurance products sold by bank branches and recognised at the asset manager] |
Target CAGR for 2013–2017 |
≥ 5% | ≥ 15% | ≥ 10% | ≥ 20% | ≥ 5% | – | ≥ 5% | |
| bank-insurance gross income |
CAGR for 2013–2016 |
-0.7% 13.2%2 | 2.6% | 5.6%2 | 8.5% | – | 0.0% | |||
1 The CAGR of bank-insurance gross income for 2013–2016 was adversely affected by the climate of low interest rates, which impacted sales of life insurance (especially in Belgium). 2 Calculated in local currency for the Czech Republic and Hungary.
Within a stringent risk, capital and liquidity management framework
Our updated sustainability strategy is designed to integrate sustainability into strategic decision-making processes and core business activities throughout the group. The sustainable organisational structure is now anchored at the different levels within our group (Board of Directors, senior management, Group level and the different business units and countries), guaranteeing that sustainability receives attention from the highest decisionmaking bodies while also being broadly integrated into our operations.
To secure our long-term future, we build long-term relationships with our clients. We do not pursue high shortterm returns that come with excessive risks but rather focus on sustainable and profitable growth in the long run. We have opted, for instance, not to set a target for return on equity (ROE), because we want to avoid getting caught up in the kind of short-term thinking that means pursuing the highest possible ROE every quarter.
Stringent risk management in everything we do is an absolute precondition in terms of guaranteeing sustainability. For more information on this, see 'We aim to achieve our ambitions within a stringent risk management framework'.
Sustainable and long-term thinking also means concentrating on the local economies of the core markets in which we operate and that we invest only to a very limited extent in projects outside these markets.
We view our presence in our core countries as a long-term commitment. We want to consolidate our presence there by means of organic growth or attractive acquisitions, in line with clear and strict strategic and financial criteria. The acquisition of United Bulgarian Bank and Interlease in Bulgaria, which was announced at the end of 2016, is perfectly aligned with this strategy (see also the 'Our business units' section). Meanwhile, we decided at the start of 2017 to clarify our position on Ireland and include it as one of our core countries. We will implement a 'Digital First' strategy there to create an outstanding client experience. 'Core country' status also means that we aim to achieve a market share of at least 10% in the retail and micro-SME segments and to develop bankinsurance in the same way as we do in our other core markets. We will offer insurance products through partnerships and co-operation agreements.
Sustainable and long-term thinking means, moreover, that we take specific sustainability initiatives in the communities in which we operate. Fine examples in this regard include the 'Start it' project in Belgium and the 'Gap in the market' campaign in Hungary (further details are provided in the 'Our business units' section and in 'Our role in society' below).
We monitor our long-term performance and our focus on the real economy and sustainability via a number of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), the most important of which are listed in the table below.
| KPI | Description | Target and result1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of | BEL | CZE | SLO | HUN | BUL | IRE | Group | ||
| CAGR of total | total income. The calculation is based on the adjusted results for 2013, and excludes |
Target CAGR for 2013–2017 |
≥ 2% | ≥ 3% | ≥ 3% | ≥ 4% | ≥ 3% | ≥ 25% ≥ 2.25% | |
| income | fluctuations in value of the derivatives used for asset/liability management purposes. |
CAGR for 2013–2016 |
-0.3% | 2.5%2 | 3.1% | -0.5%2 | 4.3% | 25.3% | 1.3% |
| [operating expenses of the banking activities] / [total income of the banking |
BEL | CZE | SLO | HUN | BUL | IRE | Group | ||
| Target for 2017 | ≤ 50% | ≤ 45% | ≤ 58% | ≤ 62% | ≤ 67% | ≤ 50% | ≤ 53% | ||
| Cost/income ratio | activities] | 2016 result | 54% | 45% | 60% | 67% | 61% | 63% | 55% |
| [technical insurance charges, including the | BEL | CZE | SLO | HUN | BUL | IRE | Group | ||
| internal cost of settling claims / earned insurance premiums] + [operating expenses / written insurance premiums] (for non-life insurance, and data after reinsurance). |
Target for 2017 | ≤ 94% | ≤ 94% | ≤ 94% | ≤ 96% | ≤ 96% | – | ≤ 94% | |
| Combined ratio | 2016 result | 92% | 96% | 89% | 93% | 97% | – | 93% | |
| Innovation | Innovation relates to: 'launches innovative products/services faster than competitors', 'continuously innovates to improve client |
Target | To have a higher absolute score and/or make more progress than the sector average in each country. |
||||||
| experience', 'exceeds client expectations', | Innovation | Change | |||||||
| 'uses advanced technologies'. The survey is | relative to peer group (by country) | ||||||||
| performed by Ipsos. | Less progress |
Same progress |
More progress |
||||||
| perfor mance |
Better | KBCI (Ireland) K&H (Hungary) Cˇ SOB (Slovakia) |
KBC (Belgium) | ||||||
| relaive to peer group (by country) Performance 2016 result |
perfor mance |
Same | |||||||
| Poorer perfor mance |
DZI & CIBANK (Bulgaria) Cˇ SOB (Czech Republic) |
||||||||
| Market share in SRI funds | BEL |
| 1 The list of benchmarks and an explanation of the diagrams are provided under the table appearing in 'The client is at the centre of our business culture'. | ||
|---|---|---|
2 Calculated in local currency for the Czech Republic and Hungary.
More information on strategy by business unit and country can be found in the 'Our business units' section. More information on our financial performance can be found in the 'Our financial report' section.
Target Market leadership
(September) 32%
2016 result
Position in SRI
funds
Within a stringent risk, capital and liquidity management framework
We can only be truly sustainable if we also retain the trust of society and live up – as a company – to our responsibilities towards it. This is achieved by recognising the impact our operations have on society and by meeting society's needs and expectations in a balanced, meaningful and transparent way.
If we want to retain and grow our stakeholders' trust, it is extremely important that we behave responsibly in everything we do. It is therefore not enough for KBC employees simply to comply with regulations: our ambition in this area goes further than that. The basis of responsible behaviour is integrity, which requires honesty, fairness, transparency and confidentiality, as well as a healthy awareness of risk.
Responsible behaviour is especially relevant for a bank-insurer when it comes to appropriate advice and sales. We pay
particular attention, therefore, to training and awareness. We have developed an internal programme to explore issues such as professional integrity, advising clients appropriately and dealing with dilemmas.
We want our sustainability policy to go beyond philanthropy and sponsorship. Although these aspects will remain important, we want to focus on a number of social needs in fields where a bank-insurer can make a genuine difference. Bearing in mind the context in our different core markets, we have defined the following focus areas for sustainability: 'financial literacy', 'environmental responsibility', 'entrepreneurship', and 'demographic ageing and health' (examples are provided in the table below).
| Our focus areas |
What? | A few examples: |
|---|---|---|
| Financial literacy |
• Helping clients make the right choices through good and transparent advice, and clear communication. • Using analysis to understand and respond to clients' behaviour more effectively. • Improving general public knowledge of financial concepts and products. |
• Cˇ SOB Education Programme, Education Fund and Blue Life Academy in the Czech Republic. • Promotion of financial education through the national 'K&H Ready, Steady, Money' contest, which tests schoolchildren's financial knowledge in Hungary. • Financial education initiatives in all countries, including seminars, various master's programmes, a range of digital learning packs and internships. |
| Environmental responsibility |
• Reducing our ecological footprint through a diverse range of initiatives and objectives. • Developing products and services that can make a positive contribution to the environment. |
• KBC Renovation Loan for Owners' Associations to provide flexible financing solutions for energy saving investments in apartment blocks. • Placing the emphasis on digitisation to reduce paper consumption. • KBC Insurance and KBC Autolease join a sustainable repair network. • Creating KBC Mobility for sustainable and qualitative mobility solutions in Belgium. • CIBANK and DZI in Bulgaria set up a CSR committee, which organises staff workshops on Products and Responsible Behaviour and is preparing for ISO 14001 environmental certification. |
| Our focus areas |
What? | A few examples: |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulating entrepreneur ship |
• Contributing to economic growth by supporting innovative ideas and projects. |
• The 'Gap in the Market' campaign in Hungary. • Start it @KBC, a major incubator for start-ups in Belgium, and KBC Match'it, a digital platform for transferring businesses. • Providing capital for start-ups via the KBC Start it Fund. • Supporting local initiatives through the Bolero Crowdfunding platform. • Encouraging clients to take the step to e-commerce via Storesquare, FarmCafe and similar initiatives. • Realising various European programmes to support small and micro businesses and SMEs. • Strengthening our partnership with the Belgian Raiffeisen Foundation to promote microfinance and microinsurance in developing countries. |
| Demographic ageing and health |
• We have opted for 'demographic ageing' as our fourth pillar in Belgium and the Czech Republic. This requires us to adapt our policy and our range of products and services to the fact that people are living longer and to make a positive contribution to the issues surrounding an ageing population by offering specific solutions through our core activities. • We chose 'health' as the fourth pillar in Bulgaria, Slovakia, Hungary and Ireland. These core countries will develop products, services and projects geared towards improving general health, healthcare and quality of life. |
• Cˇ SOB is collaborating with the Centre of Health Economics and Management at the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Charles University in Prague. • Launching Happy@Home, a joint venture between KBC, the service provider ONS and the software firm CUBIGO to make domestic assistance readily available (home help, odd-job work and other services). • Providing financial and material assistance to sick children through the 'K&H MediMagic Programme' in Hungary. • Launching awareness campaigns in various countries in areas such as sports, health and well-being, road safety and child protection, and developing insurance products related to health and personal risks. |
We also want to limit as much as possible any unfavourable impact our operations might have on society.
We want to contribute, for instance, to the transition to a low-carbon economy and have launched a group-wide programme to reduce our own ecological footprint. We are committed to reducing our own greenhouse gas emissions by at least 20% (from 2015 levels) by 2020. We have tightened up our policy on lending to the energy sector, and have taken initiatives to promote energy efficiency, renewable energy, sustainable mobility and the circular economy. More information about our ecological footprint can be found on our website under 'Corporate Sustainability'.
We apply strict sustainability rules to our business activities in respect of human rights, the environment, business ethics and sensitive or controversial social themes. New and recently updated KBC sustainability policies are summarised in the table. A complete list of policies and additional guidelines is available at www.kbc.com, under 'Corporate Sustainability'.
We offer a comprehensive range of socially responsible investments. As we place client-centricity at the centre of our corporate strategy, it is ultimately up to clients to choose between SRI and non-SRI investments. However, we also consider it our task to increase the focus on SRI investments, for instance, by means of enhanced SRI training for the relevant relationship managers in the various sales networks.
| Blacklist of companies and activities |
We place businesses on this list that are involved with controversial weapons systems or which commit serious breaches of UN Global Compact Principles. No entity belonging to our group is permitted to do business with such enterprises. |
|---|---|
| Human rights | We have updated our human rights policy to bring us in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and UN Global Compact Principles. |
| Controversial regimes | We do not wish to be involved in financial activities with controversial regimes that fundamentally violate human rights and lack any form of good governance, rule of law or economic freedom. We do, however, make an exception for humanitarian goods. Based on reputable external sources, we decide each year what countries are to be included on our list of controversial regimes. |
| Energy | We want to contribute to a low-carbon society in a number of ways, including by increasing the share of renewable energy sources in our total lending to the energy sector to at least 50% by 2030 at the latest, ceasing to fund new coal-fired power generation and coal mining (except for local coal-fired power generation and coal mining in the Czech Republic, though under strict conditions), and imposing extremely stringent conditions on the funding of nuclear power generation. |
| Arms-related activities | We are very reluctant to fund any kind of arms-related activities. Even though the arms industry plays a role in security, funding is only provided to companies that meet strict conditions. |
| Project finance | We do not provide financing or advisory services to projects where the client does not comply with the Equator Principles*. |
| Other socially sensitive sectors |
We have imposed restrictions on other socially sensitive sectors such as narcotic crops, gambling, fur, the palm oil production, mining, deforestation, land acquisition and involuntarily resettlement of indigenous populations, and prostitution. |
* More information is available at www.kbc.com, under 'Corporate Sustainability'.
We also use a number of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to see whether we are focusing sufficiently on socially relevant themes and whether we are meeting stakeholder expectations. The most important of these KPIs are listed in the table.
| KPI | Description | Target and result* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Does the entity have a formal process to | BEL | CZE SLO |
HUN | BUL IRE |
||||
| interact with its stakeholders? | Target | To have a formal stakeholder interaction process in place | ||||||
| Formal stakeholder process |
2016 result | OK | OK OK |
OK | OK OK |
|||
| Governance | 'Governance' refers to the statements: 'behaves ethically', 'is open and transparent', 'acts as an accountable |
To have a higher absolute score and/or make more progress Target than the sector average in each country. |
||||||
| company', 'is a responsive company', 'complies with laws, regulations and industry policies'. The survey is performed by Ipsos. |
Governance | Change relative to peer group (by country) |
||||||
| Less progress |
Same progress |
More progress |
||||||
| Performance | Better perfor mance |
K&H (Hungary) | ||||||
| relaive to peer group (by country) 2016 result |
Same perfor mance |
Cˇ SOB (Slovakia) KBCI (Ireland) |
Cˇ SOB (Czech Republic) |
KBC (Belgium) | ||||
| Poorer perfor mance |
DZI & CIBANK (Bulgaria) |
|||||||
| [(gross dividend x number of shares entitled | ≥ 50% from financial year 2016 Target |
|||||||
| Dividend payout ratio |
to dividend) + (coupon on outstanding AT1 securities)] / [consolidated net result] |
2016 result | 50% for 2016 |
* The list of benchmarks and an explanation of the diagrams are provided under the table appearing in 'The client is at the centre of our business culture'.
Risk management is an integral part of our strategy and our decision-making process.
Although the activities of a large financial group are exposed to risks that only become apparent in retrospect, we can currently identify a number of major challenges for our group. These are set out under 'In what environment do we operate?' in the 'Our business model' section.
As a bank-insurer, we are also exposed to the typical risks for the sector associated with these general risks, such as credit risk, country risk, interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, insurance underwriting risk and operational risk. A list of these risks can be found in the table.
| 1 | The business operations side is responsible for managing its risks. |
|---|---|
| 2 | As independent control functions, the Group risk function, Compliance and – for certain matters – Finance, Legal, Tax and Information Risk Security constitute the second line of defence. |
| 3 | As independent third line of defence, Internal Audit provides support to the Executive Committee, the Audit Committee and the Risk & Compliance Committee in monitoring the effectiveness and efficiency of the internal control and risk management system. |
* More detailed information on the Three Lines of Defence model can be found in the 'Corporate governance statement' section.
| Sector-specific risks | How are we addressing them? |
|---|---|
| Credit risk The potential negative deviation from the expected value of a financial instrument caused by default on the part of a party to a contract, due to the inability or unwillingness of that party to pay or perform, or due to particular situations or measures on the part of political or monetary authorities in a particular country. |
• Existence of a robust management framework • Recording impairment charges, taking risk-mitigating measures, optimising the overall credit risk profile, etc. |
| Market risk in trading activities The potential negative deviation from the expected value of a financial instrument caused by fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates, and share or commodity prices. |
• Existence of a robust management framework • Historical VaR method, duration, 'greeks' for products with options, stress tests, etc. |
| Operational and other non-financial risks Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes and (ICT) systems, human error or sudden external events, whether man-made or natural. Other non-financial risks include reputational risk, business risk and strategic risks. |
• Existence of a robust management framework • Group key controls, risk scans, Key Risk Indicators (KRIs), etc. |
| Market risk in non-trading activities Structural market risks, such as interest risk, equity risk, real estate risk, currency risk and inflation risk. Structural risks are risks inherent to the commercial activity or long-term positions. |
• Existence of a robust management framework • Basis Point Value (BPV), nominal amounts, limit tracking for crucial indicators, etc. |
| Liquidity risk The risk that KBC will be unable to meet its payment obligations as they come due, without incurring unacceptable losses. |
• Existence of a robust management framework • Liquidity stress tests, management of funding structure, etc. |
| Technical insurance risks Risks stemming from uncertainty as to how often insured events will occur and how extensive they will be. |
• Existence of a robust management framework • Underwriting, pricing, claims reserving, reinsurance and claims handling policies, etc. |
| Solvency risk Risk that the capital base will fall below an acceptable level. |
• Existence of a robust management framework • Minimum solvency ratios, active capital management, etc. |
In addition to the comprehensive monitoring of risk indicators (see the 'How do we manage our risks?' section), we monitor our solvency and liquidity performance using a number of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), the most important of which are listed in the table.
| KPI | What? | Target and result | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [common equity tier-1 capital] / [total | Target | ≥ 10.4% (fully loaded) from 2019 at group level* | ||||
| Common equity ratio |
weighted risks]. The calculation shown here is on a fully loaded basis and according to the Danish compromise method. For further details of the adjusted target, please refer to the 'How do we manage our capital?' section. |
2016 result | 15.8% | |||
| * With additional guidance of 1% (see the 'How do we manage our capital?' section in this report). |
||||||
| [total regulatory capital] / [total risk | Target | ≥ 17% (fully loaded) from 2017 at group level | ||||
| Total capital ratio | weighted assets]. The calculation shown here is on a fully loaded basis and according to the Danish compromise method. |
2016 result | 20.0% | |||
| [available amount of stable funding] / | Target | ≥ 105% from 2014 at group level | ||||
| Net stable funding ratio (NSFR) |
[required amount of stable funding] | 2016 result | 125% | |||
| [stock of high-quality liquid assets] / [total | Target | ≥ 105% from 2014 at group level | ||||
| Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) |
net cash outflows over the next 30 calendar days] |
2016 result | 139% |
Detailed information can be found in the 'How do we manage our risks?' and 'How do we manage our capital?' sections.
To help build a sustainable future, we have to be able to align our operations with our stakeholders' interests and needs. That means we need to find out what is important to those stakeholders. In 2016, we carried out an external survey of the general public in all our core countries and an internal survey at KBC itself (Board of Directors, Executive Committee and senior management).
We drew up a list of 27 important topics, based on various dialogues with both internal and external stakeholders and using input from market specialists and sustainability experts, and also taking account of global trends. We asked the external and internal target groups to rate these topics by importance. The survey results are set out in the matrix, the vertical axis of which shows the importance of a topic to the external stakeholders and the horizontal axis the importance according to KBC.
and services
20 Offering sustainable products and services
21 Responsible selling and
Generally speaking, the scores given by the external stakeholders were broadly in line with KBC's. This was reassuring, as it means we are focusing on areas that are important both to society and to the future of our company. It is important to us that we use this annual report to communicate on the topics considered most important both internally and externally (in other words, the top row and the right-hand column in the matrix). The table indicates where we discuss these topics in this report.
| Important topics | Information in this report and/or relationship with KPIs |
|---|---|
| Integrity | • See 'Main features of the internal control and risk management systems' in 'Corporate governance statement'. • See 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. • 'Governance' KPI: see 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Compliance with laws and regulations |
• See 'In what environment do we operate?' in 'Our business model'. • See 'How do we manage our capital?'. • See 'Main features of the internal control and risk management systems' in 'Corporate governance statement'. • 'Governance' KPI: see 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. • KPIs on capital and liquidity: see 'Our strategy'. |
| Privacy and data protection | • See 'Main features of the internal control and risk management systems' in 'Corporate governance statement'. • Cyber risk: see 'In what environment do we operate?' in 'Our business model'. • See 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Financial performance | • See 'Our financial report'. • See 'How do the business units contribute to the group result?' in 'Our business units'. • See 'Consolidated financial statements'. • Financial KPIs: see 'Our strategy'. |
| Pricing of products and services | • 'Client experience' KPI: see 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. • See 'How do we create value?' in 'Our business model'. |
| Quality of products and services | • See 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' and 'We offer our clients a unique bank-insurance experience' in 'Our strategy'. • New products and services: see 'Our business units'. • 'Client experience' KPI: see 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. |
| User-friendliness of products and services |
• See 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' and 'We offer our clients a unique bank-insurance experience' in 'Our strategy'. • New products and services: see 'Our business units'. • 'Client experience' KPI: see 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Enable people to make smart financial decisions |
• See 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Important topics | Information in this report and/or relationship with KPIs |
|---|---|
| Customer protection | • See 'Main features of the internal control and risk management systems' in 'Corporate governance statement'. • See 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. • See 'In what environment do we operate?' in 'Our business model'. |
| Responsible selling and advice | • See 'Main features of the internal control and risk management systems' in 'Corporate governance statement'. • See 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. • 'Client experience' KPI: see 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Risk management | • See 'We aim to achieve our ambitions within a stringent risk management framework' in 'Our strategy'. • See 'Main features of the internal control and risk management systems' in 'Corporate governance statement'. • See 'How do we manage our risks?'. |
| Business ethics | • PEARL business culture: see 'What makes us who we are?' in 'Our business model'. • See 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. • 'Reputation index' KPI: see 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Long-term strategy | • See 'Our strategy'. |
| Innovative products and services | • See 'In what environment do we operate?' in 'Our business model'. • New products and services: see 'Our business units'. • 'Innovation' KPI: see 'We focus on sustainable and profitable growth' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Transparent communication | • See 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. • 'Client experience' KPI: see 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. • 'Governance' KPI: see 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Funding and insuring the local economy and stimulating entrepreneurship |
• See 'Our business model'. • See 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Accessibility of products and services |
• See 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. • 'Client experience' KPI: see 'The client is at the centre of our business culture' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Equal opportunities for all employees |
• See 'Our employees, capital, network and relationships' in 'Our business model'. |
| Remuneration policy | • See 'Remuneration report for financial year 2016' in 'Corporate governance statement'. |
| Limiting our adverse impact on society via sustainable policies |
• See 'Our role in society' in 'Our strategy'. |
| Consolidated income statement, KBC group (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | 4 258 | 4 311 |
| Interest income | 6 642 | 7 150 |
| Interest expense | -2 384 | -2 839 |
| Non-life insurance (before reinsurance) | 628 | 611 |
| Earned premiums | 1 410 | 1 319 |
| Technical charges | -782 | -708 |
| Life insurance (before reinsurance)* | -152 | -201 |
| Earned premiums | 1 577 | 1 301 |
| Technical charges | -1 728 | -1 502 |
| Ceded reinsurance result | -38 | -29 |
| Dividend income | 77 | 75 |
| Net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss | 540 | 214 |
| Net realised result from available-for-sale assets | 189 | 190 |
| Net fee and commission income | 1 450 | 1 678 |
| Fee and commission income | 2 101 | 2 348 |
| Fee and commission expense | -651 | -670 |
| Other net income | 258 | 297 |
| Total income | 7 211 | 7 148 |
| Operating expenses | -3 948 | -3 890 |
| Impairment | -201 | -747 |
| on loans and receivables | -126 | -323 |
| on available-for-sale assets | -55 | -45 |
| on goodwill | 0 | -344 |
| other | -20 | -34 |
| Share in results of associated companies | 27 | 24 |
| Result before tax | 3 090 | 2 535 |
| Income tax expense | -662 | 104 |
| Net post-tax result from discontinued operations | 0 | 0 |
| Result after tax | 2 428 | 2 639 |
| Result after tax, attributable to minority interests | 0 | 0 |
| Result after tax, attributable to equity holders of the parent (net result) | 2 427 | 2 639 |
| Return on equity | 18% | 22% |
| Cost/income ratio, banking | 55% | 55% |
| Combined ratio, non-life insurance | 93% | 91% |
* Does not include investment contracts without DPF, which roughly correspond to unit-linked life insurance contracts (0.8 billion euros in premiums in 2016, 0.7 billion euros in 2015).
| Key consolidated balance sheet, solvency and liquidity figures*, KBC group (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 275 200 | 252 356 |
| Loans and advances to customers | 133 231 | 128 223 |
| Securities (equity and debt instruments) | 73 262 | 72 623 |
| Deposits from customers and debt securities | 177 730 | 170 109 |
| Technical provisions (before reinsurance) and liabilities under investment contracts, insurance | 32 310 | 31 919 |
| Risk-weighted assets (Basel III, fully loaded) | 87 782 | 89 067 |
| Total equity | 17 357 | 15 811 |
| Common equity ratio (Basel III, Danish compromise method, fully loaded) | 15.8% | 14.9% |
| Total capital ratio (Basel III, Danish compromise method, fully loaded) | 20.0% | 19.0% |
| Leverage ratio (Basel III, Danish compromise method, fully loaded) | 6.1% | 6.3% |
| Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL, see 'How do we manage our risks?') | 21.0% | 18.3% |
| Liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) | 139% | 127% |
| Net stable funding ratio (NSFR) | 125% | 121% |
* For a definition of the ratios, see 'Glossary of ratios and terms'.
Our net interest income amounted to 4 258 million euros in 2016, down just 1% on its year-earlier level, despite the climate of low interest rates and associated low level of reinvestment income, the reduction in interest income generated by the dealing rooms and a lower amount of early-repayment penalties (due to a lower level of home loan refinancing in Belgium). These negative items were largely offset by factors including the positive effect of lower rates of interest being paid on savings accounts in certain countries, generally lower funding costs and higher interest income on loans generated by increased volumes.
At 133 billion euros, loans and advances to customers (excluding reverse repos) rose on a comparable basis by 4% in 2016, increasing by 4% at the Belgium Business Unit, by 9% at the Czech Republic Business Unit and by 2% at the International Markets Business Unit (growth in all countries apart from Ireland), and contracting at the Group Centre. Our total volume of deposits (177 billion euros in deposits from customers and debt securities (excluding repos)) rose by 10%
in 2016, with the Belgium Business Unit recording an increase of 13%, the Czech Republic Business Unit 9%, the International Markets Business Unit 7% (with growth in all countries apart from Ireland) and the Group Centre recording a decline.
Consequently, the net interest margin for our banking activities came to 1.92%, 10 basis points lower than in 2015. The interest margin for 2016 came to 1.80% in Belgium, 2.94% in the Czech Republic and 2.55% at the International Markets Business Unit.
Our net fee and commission income came to 1 450 million euros in 2016, down 14% on the year-earlier figure. Most of the decline was accounted for by Belgium and was chiefly attributable to reduced entry and management fees relating to our asset management activities (sale of funds, etc., obviously reflecting the uncertain investment climate) and, to a lesser extent, to lower securities-related fees.
At the end of 2016, our total assets under management came to approximately 213 billion euros, still up 2% on the yearearlier figure, due to a combination of a slightly negative volume effect (-1%) and a positive price performance (+3%). Most of these assets were managed at the Belgium Business Unit (199 billion euros) and the Czech Republic Business Unit (9 billion euros).
Our technical insurance result (earned premiums less technical charges plus the ceded reinsurance result) amounted to 438 million euros, up 15% on its year-earlier level.
Earned premiums in non-life insurance came to 1 410 million euros, 7% more than the figure for 2015. They grew by 2% in Belgium (or 5% excluding a technical item), 8% in the Czech Republic, and 17% in the three other Central and Eastern European markets combined (due primarily to growth in Hungary). However, technical insurance charges also rose by 10% in 2016. They were adversely affected in Belgium by provisioning of 16 million euros in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Brussels and increased claims due to severe weather (storms). The combined ratio at group level deteriorated slightly from 91% to 93%.
Earned premiums in life insurance amounted to 1 577 million euros in 2016. However, in compliance with IFRS, certain types of life insurance (i.e. unit-linked products) have been excluded from this figure. If the premium income from such products is included, premium income from the life insurance business totalled around 2.1 billion euros, 18% more than in 2015. There was an increase of as much as 21% in the main market of Belgium for both rate-guaranteed (+24%) and unit-linked products (+14%). For the group as a whole, products offering guaranteed rates accounted for just over 60% of premium income from the life insurance business in 2016, and unitlinked products for almost 40%. On 31 December 2016, the group's accumulated life reserves came to 26.9 billion euros for the Belgium Business Unit, 1 billion euros for the Czech Republic and 0.6 billion euros for the three other Central and Eastern European core markets combined.
Our net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss (trading and fair value income) came to 540 million euros, 326 million euros more than in 2015, due in part to the liquidation of KBC Financial Holding Inc., which had an impact of -156 million euros in that year. Disregarding
this item, trading and fair value income would increase by 170 million euros, due primarily to higher dealing room results and the positive impact of various value adjustments (MVA, CVA, FVA).
Other income (dividends, gains realised on the sale of securities, and other net income) came to an aggregate 524 million euros in 2016, as opposed to 562 million euros in 2015. The figure for 2016 includes the gain on the sale of Visa Europe shares in the second quarter of that year (99 million euros, before tax).
Our expenses amounted to 3 948 million euros in 2016, a limited increase of 1% on the year-earlier figure. This reflected the impact of various factors, including somewhat higher special bank taxes (437 million euros in total, compared to 417 million euros in 2015), higher ICT expenses and, to a lesser extent, higher marketing costs, and higher staff expenses (including a one-off cost of 33 million euros to cover a voluntary early retirement scheme), offset somewhat by lower facility services charges and depreciation.
As a result, the cost/income ratio of our banking activities came to 55%, the same level as in 2015. The ratio was affected by a number of non-operating and exceptional items (including the mark-to-market valuations for ALM derivatives and the impact of liquidating KBC Financial Holding Inc. in 2015 – for more details, see the 'Glossary of ratios and terms' at the end of this report). Adjusted for these specific items, the cost/income ratio was 57%, compared with 55% in 2015. The ratio was 54% for the Belgium Business Unit (55% excluding specific items), 45% for the Czech Republic Business Unit (46% excluding specific items) and 64% for the International Markets Business Unit (66% excluding specific items).
Total impairment came to 201 million euros in 2016. Impairment on loans and receivables accounted for 126 million euros of this figure, compared with 323 million euros in 2015. Much of this improvement is attributable to the improved situation in Ireland, where there was actually a 45-million-euro net reversal of impairment charges in 2016 (as opposed to net provisioning of 48 million euros in 2015) and to Belgium (from 177 million euros to 113 million euros). Overall, our credit cost ratio improved further from what was an already low 23 basis points in 2015 to an unsustainably low 9 basis points in 2016. The figures per business unit were 12 basis points for Belgium, 11 basis points for the Czech Republic and -16 basis points for International Markets (Ireland: -33 basis points; Slovakia: 24
basis points; Hungary: -33 basis points; and Bulgaria: 32 basis points). A negative figure signifies a net reversal of impairments and hence a positive impact on the results.
The proportion of impaired loans (see 'Glossary of ratios and terms' for a definition) in our loan portfolio was 7.2% at year-end 2016, an improvement on the 8.6% for 2015. This breaks down into 3.3% at the Belgium Business Unit, 2.8% at the Czech Republic Business Unit and 25.4% at the International Markets Business Unit (this relatively high figure was chiefly attributable to Ireland, which had a ratio of 43% due to the real estate crisis of recent years). The proportion of impaired loans more than 90 days past due came to 3.9% in 2015, compared to the year-earlier figure of 4.8%. At year-end 2016, 46% of the impaired loans were covered by accumulated impairment charges. More information on the composition of the loan portfolio is provided in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section.
Other impairment charges totalled 75 million euros in 2016 and related primarily to available-for-sale securities (55 million euros). This item had amounted to 423 million euros in 2015, when it comprised mainly impairment charges on goodwill in respect of a number of group companies (344 million euros).
Our income tax expense came to 662 million euros in 2016. This item had made a positive contribution of 104 million euros in 2015, due to the impact (921 million euros) of a deferred tax asset relating to the liquidation of a group company (KBC Financial Holding Inc.). Besides paying income tax, we also pay special bank taxes (437 million euros in 2016, included under 'Operating expenses').
Our net result in 2016 breaks down as follows: Belgium Business Unit 1 432 million euros (down 132 million euros on the year-earlier figure, as lower net interest income and net fee and commission income, lower realised gains on securities and higher bank taxes were only partially offset by lower loan losses, higher technical insurance income and higher trading and fair value income); the Czech Republic Business Unit 596 million euros (an increase of 54 million euros, due in part to higher trading and fair value income and realised gains on securities, and slightly lower costs and impairment); the International Markets Business Unit 428 million euros (an improvement of 183 million euros, owing primarily to lower loan loss provisioning and higher net interest income in Ireland); and the Group Centre -29 million euros (a 316-million-euro deterioration that can be attributed to two significant items in 2015 (the recognition of the deferred tax asset related to KBC Financial Holding Inc. and impairment on goodwill for a number of group companies).
A more detailed analysis of the results for each business unit can be found in the relevant section of this annual report.
At the end of 2016, our consolidated total assets came to 275 billion euros, up 9% year-on-year. However, risk-weighted assets (Basel III, fully loaded) declined by 1% to 88 billion euros, with the increased volumes being comfortably offset by the impact of model-related changes, an improvement in average loan quality, lower risk-weighted assets for deferred tax assets and lower market exposure, and several other items. More information in this regard can be found in the 'How do we manage our capital?' section.
Our core banking business is to attract deposits and use them to provide loans. Indeed, this is reflected in the importance of the figure for loans and advances to customers on the assets side of our balance sheet (133 billion euros (excluding reverse repos) at year-end 2016). On a comparable basis, loans and advances to customers rose by 4% for the group as a whole, with growth of 4% being recorded at the Belgium Business Unit, 9% at the Czech Republic Business Unit, and 2% at the International Markets Business Unit (with growth in all countries apart from Ireland, where the reduction in corporate lending and impaired mortgage loans – on balance – continue to surpass new production). The main lending products at group level were again term loans (59 billion euros) and mortgage loans (57 billion euros). The latter expanded by 4% in 2016, due primarily to the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Belgium.
On the liabilities side, our customer deposits (deposits from customers and debt securities, excluding repos) grew by 10% to 177 billion euros. Deposits increased by 13% at the Belgium Business Unit, by 9% at the Czech Republic Business Unit and by 7% at the International Markets Business Unit (with growth in all countries apart from Ireland, where there was increased intra-group use of the TLTRO facility). The main deposit products at group level (including repos) were again time deposits (22 billion euros), demand deposits (63 billion euros) and savings accounts (53 billion euros, up 6% on their level at the end of 2015), due in part to the parking of funds from matured time deposits, given the volatile investment climate).
Balance sheet components (year-end 2016)
We also hold a portfolio of securities at the bank and at the insurer (where it serves primarily as an investment in the insurance context, especially life insurance), which totalled roughly 73 billion euros at year-end 2016. Approximately 30% of the portfolio relates to the insurance activities and some 70% to the banking activities. The total securities portfolio comprised 3% shares and 97% bonds (with bonds increasing by almost 1 billion euros in 2016). Just over three-quarters of these bonds at year-end 2016 consisted of government paper, the most important being Belgian, Czech, French, Spanish, Slovak, Hungarian and Italian. A detailed list of these bonds is provided in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section.
Other important items on the assets side of the balance sheet were loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firms (17 billion euros, up 28% year-on-year, due in part to higher reverse repos), derivatives (positive mark-to-market valuation of 9 billion euros mainly for interest rate contracts, virtually unchanged year-on-year), investment-linked life insurance contracts (14 billion euros, up 3% year-on-year) and cash and cash balances with central banks (20 billion euros, 13 billion euros more than at year-end 2015, owing to the placement of excess liquidity with the central bank).
Other significant items on the liabilities side of the balance sheet were the technical provisions and liabilities under the insurer's investment contracts (an aggregate 32 billion euros, roughly the same year-on-year), derivatives (negative mark-tomarket valuation of 9 billion euros mainly for interest rate contracts, down 7% year-on-year) and deposits from credit institutions and investment firms (32 billion euros, up 13 billion euros year-on-year and relating primarily to repos and the TLTRO II facility).
Equity 5
On 31 December 2016, our total equity came to 17.4 billion euros. This figure included 16 billion euros in parent shareholders' equity and 1.4 billion euros in additional tier-1 instruments. Total equity rose by 1.5 billion euros in 2016, with the most important components in this respect being the inclusion of the annual profit (+2.4 billion euros), the payment of an interim dividend in November 2016 (-0.4 billion euros, as an advance on the total dividend for 2016), changes in the cashflow hedge reserve (-0.2 billion euros), changes in defined benefit plans (-0.2 billion euros) and several smaller items.
Our solvency position remained strong as a result, with a common equity ratio of 15.8% (fully loaded) according to the Danish compromise method and 14.5% (fully loaded) according to the FICOD method. Our leverage ratio came to an excellent 6.1%. Detailed calculations of our solvency indicators are given in the 'How do we manage our capital?' section. The group's liquidity position also remained excellent, as reflected in an LCR ratio of 139% and an NSFR ratio of 125% at year-end 2016.
We have structured our group around three business units: 'Belgium', 'Czech Republic' and 'International Markets'. The latter is responsible for our operations in the other countries in Central and Eastern Europe (Slovakia, Hungary and Bulgaria) and in Ireland.
Belgium Business Unit KBC Bank NV and KBC Insurance NV, and their Belgian subsidiaries, which include CBC Banque, KBC Asset Management, KBC Lease Group (Belgium) and KBC Securities.
Czech Republic Business Unit The CˇSOB group (under the CˇSOB Bank, Era, Postal Savings Bank, Hypotecˇní banka, CˇMSS and Patria brands), the insurer CˇSOB Pojišt'ovna and CˇSOB Asset Management.
The modest economic recovery that began in the early months of 2013 continued in 2016. Real GDP growth remained volatile throughout the year, as it did in 2015. A weak first quarter was followed by a strong second. The third quarter was again disappointing, but the economic situation took a turn for the better towards the end of the year. This volatility illustrates the ongoing difficulty that the recovery is having in gaining momentum. Overall, real GDP grew by 1.2% in 2016. This was the second year running that Belgian economic growth fell short of the euro area average. As in 2015, this reflected the fact that, among other things, several former 'problem countries' in the euro area – Spain and Ireland in particular – were experiencing a surge in growth.
The continuing revival of the Belgian economy in 2016 was driven by domestic demand and net exports. However, changes in stockpiling weighed heavily on growth. Exports continued to reap the benefits of the improved competitiveness of Belgian businesses. Household consumption was supported on the domestic front by the sustained improvement of the labour market, which saw some 50 000 new jobs being created in the course of the year. Although further recovery in investment remained sluggish, it did not prevent bank lending to businesses from increasing vigorously. Mortgage lending likewise grew robustly, thanks in part to low interest rates and the improving labour market.
Inflation peaked at 2.3% in July, before falling back to 2% in December. The downturn in inflation after the summer was accounted for primarily by the fact that the increases in VAT on electricity and in registration fees for higher education (both pushed through in autumn 2015) had played out. The spread between Belgian ten-year government bonds and their German counterparts widened briefly to above 50 basis points towards the end of the year. This reflected heightened uncertainty in the euro area in the run-up to the Italian referendum on political reforms. Uncertainties and risks enticed savings mainly in the form of bank deposits, despite extremely low interest rates. Interest in investment funds waned somewhat in 2016, having picked up the year before.
We expect real GDP growth to end up at 1.3% in 2017. However, account needs to be taken of a number of uncertainties that could jeopardise economic activity in Belgium in the coming years. They include Brexit, the anticipated policy changes following the US presidential elections, and the further restructuring of Belgian public-sector finances. On the other hand, growth will be supported by socio-economic reforms that have already gone through.
Real GDP growth of 2.4% in the Czech Republic remained well above the figure for the EU-28 as a whole (1.9%), even though it barely exceeded half the year-earlier figure. The downturn in economic growth was largely attributable to the positive impact of the European Cohesion Fund petering out, having provided a considerable boost to government investment in 2015. Weaker investment in 2016 reduced imports, enabling net exports to contribute substantially to growth. Growth in household consumption slowed to a limited extent and was again underpinned by real wage increases and job creation. This slowdown was not reflected in lending. Business lending fluctuated at a solid level, while growth in home loans actually picked up a little. Deposits also continued to expand.
Persistently favourable economic growth was accompanied by a further decline in unemployment. The jobless rate was just 3.5% of the labour force at year-end 2016, having fallen from a peak of 7.7% at the beginning of 2010. Inflation remained low, but nevertheless rose at the end of the year towards 1%. Monetary policy remained expansive with a view to bringing inflation back to the 2% target.
We expect real GDP growth to weaken a little more in 2017 to around 2.3%. Underlying domestic demand remains strong. Household consumption will, however, contribute slightly less to growth, because of the somewhat slower increase in employment.
As was the case in the Czech Republic, investment growth in most other Central European countries suffered in 2016 from the temporary cessation of funding under the EU's cohesion policy. The decline this caused in real GDP growth was limited in Slovakia and Bulgaria. The economies of both countries expanded by 3.3% in 2016, still well above the average for the EU-28 as a whole. At 2%, Hungarian growth was only just above that average due to quite severe negative investment growth. Nevertheless, domestic demand remains buoyant, thanks to robust household consumption, supported in turn by a strong increase in wages and employment.
Consumer demand remained very dynamic in Slovakia and Bulgaria too, something that can also be attributed to wage growth and job creation. Although GDP growth in 2016 was
accounted for primarily by domestic demand, net exports also made a contribution in the three Central European countries. At year-end 2016, unemployment there was 6.1 (Slovakia), 7.0 (Hungary) and 6.2 (Bulgaria) percentage points, respectively, below the peak recorded during the recent financial and economic crisis. The figure for the EU-28 as a whole was just 2.8 percentage points below the peak level.
Inflation in the three countries remained largely negative (Slovakia and Bulgaria) or around 0% (Hungary) in 2016. However, it rose everywhere towards the end of the year, due to a smaller year-on-year decline in fuel prices. In Hungary, it actually rose to around 1% at year-end. With inflation remaining far below the 3% target, Hungary was able to continue with its expansive monetary policy in 2016. The policy rate was cut further and other measures taken.
Lending increased robustly only in Slovakia, particularly for home loans. A new legal restriction on the reinvestment fee charged for home loan refinancing gave a powerful boost to such refinancing operations and caused commercial margins to narrow. Although outstanding corporate loan volumes plateaued in Bulgaria, there were signs of a slight recovery in lending to households. Lending continued to be scaled down in Hungary. Deposits grew at a satisfactory rate of 6–7% in the three countries.
We expect real GDP growth in Slovakia and Bulgaria to slow a little more in 2017, slipping to 3% and 3.2%, respectively. Hungary will benefit most from the gradual return of the EU Cohesion Fund. As a result, its economic growth is expected to gain momentum again in 2017 and hit an estimated 3.4%.
Although GDP increased at a slower rate, Ireland's 4% figure meant that it was again one of the countries with the strongest economic growth among the EU-28 in 2016. Domestic demand picked up vigorously once more. The substantial rise in imports meant that net exports continued to contribute negatively to growth. Economic growth underpinned a modest expansion in deposits, but the domestic banks' outstanding loans to households and businesses continued to decline, albeit at a slower rate than in recent years. Irish inflation remained below zero for virtually the whole of 2016. Robust economic growth ensured that Irish public debt declined further to 75% of GDP, or roughly 45 percentage points below the peak during the financial crisis. Although the Irish economy is likely to slow further in 2017, estimated growth of 3% will still be twice that of the euro area as a whole.
The outlook for all countries is based on forecasts made at the start of 2017, and so the actual situation could differ (considerably).
| Market position in 20161 | Belgium | Czech Republic | Slovakia | Hungary | Bulgaria2 | Ireland |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main brands | KBC CBC KBC Brussels |
CˇSOB | CˇSOB | K&H | CIBANK DZI |
KBC Bank Ireland |
| Network | 716 bank branches |
287 bank branches3 |
125 bank branches |
207 bank branches |
96 bank branches |
15 bank branches |
| 427 insurance agencies |
Insurance sold through various channels |
Insurance sold through various channels |
Insurance sold through various channels |
Insurance sold through various channels |
Insurance sold through partnerships |
|
| Various online channels |
Various online channels |
Various online channels |
Various online channels |
Various online channels |
Various online channels |
|
| Clients (millions, estimate) | 3.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Loan portfolio (in billions of EUR) |
95.6 | 21.9 | 6.8 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 13.1 |
| Deposits and debt securities (in billions of EUR) |
125.1 | 26.2 | 5.7 | 6.8 | 0.8 | 5.0 |
| Market shares - bank products - investment funds - life insurance - non-life insurance |
21% 33% 13% 9% |
20% 23% 7% 7% |
11% 7% 4% 3% |
10% 15% 4% 6% |
3% – 11% 10% |
7%4 – – – |
| Main activities and target groups | We offer a wide range of loan, deposit, asset management, insurance and other financial products in virtually all our countries, where our focus is on private individuals, SMEs and high-net-worth clients. Services for corporate clients additionally include cash management, payments, trade finance, lease, money market activities, capital market products, stockbroking and corporate finance. |
We have yet to offer any asset management products in Bulgaria. | ||||
| Macroeconomic indicators for 20165 - GDP growth (real) - Inflation (average annual |
1.2% | 2.4% | 3.3% | 2.0% | 3.3% | 4.0% |
| increase in consumer prices) - Unemployment (% of the labour force at year-end; |
2.0% | 0.6% | -0.5% | 0.5% | -1.3% | -0.1% |
| Eurostat definition) - Government budget balance |
7.6% | 3.5% | 8.8% | 4.5% | 7.1% | 7.1% |
| (% of GDP) - Public debt (% of GDP) |
-2.9% 106.8% |
0.3% 37.8% |
-2.2% 52.1% |
-1.8% 73.5% |
-0.4% 29.0% |
-0.9% 75.1% |
1 Market shares and client numbers: based on own estimates (when calculating the figure for client numbers, we took account of the overlap (roughly estimated) between the various companies in the group). For traditional bank products: average estimated market share for loans and deposits. In Belgium, the life insurance market share is based on reserves; for the other countries, it is based on premiums. Loan portfolio: see 'How do we manage our risks?'. Deposits and debt securities: deposits from customers and debt securities (excluding repos). The number of bank branches does not include self-service branches. The Belgium Business Unit also includes the small network of KBC Bank branches established in the rest of Europe, the US and Southeast Asia, which focus on activities and clients with links to KBC's core markets (10 branches with a total loan portfolio of approximately 6 billion euros). The group operates under various brands in the Czech Republic, including CˇSOB, Era, PSB, CˇMSS and Hypotecˇní Banka. Market shares are based in most instances on data from the end of September 2016.
2 At year-end 2016, we announced the acquisition of United Bulgarian Bank (UBB) and Interlease in Bulgaria (deal expected to be finalised in the second quarter of 2017). UBB's estimated share of the market is 8% (based on assets). It has roughly 0.9 million clients and 190 branches. Neither UBB nor Interlease have been included in the data presented in the table.
3 CˇSOB Bank and Era. 4 Retail segment.
5 Data based on estimates made at the start of 2017.
A NETWORK OF PEOPLE LIVING THE STARTUP DREAM Through Start it @kbc, we aim – together with a number of partners – to help start-ups in Flanders with various aspects of
doing business. At present, Start it @kbc boasts centres in Antwerp, Brussels, Ghent, Hasselt, Leuven and Kortrijk. With almost 450 start-ups, Start it @kbc is the largest community of its kind in Belgium. Our large number of partners means that the start-ups in that community can count on extensive expertise and a widespread network, international contacts, office space, mentorship and the most complete Start-up Business Academy in Belgium.
We look constantly for ways of applying new technologies to enable us to serve our clients even better. Examples include the new features we have added to KBC Touch, such as the ability to display a list and details of insurance policies, take out certain types of client centricity bank-insurance
loan online, complete a medical questionnaire for mortgage protection cover and make appointments directly with an adviser. We also launched KBC Touch for businesses, KBC Touch for blind and partially-sighted clients and KBC Sign, and continued to develop KBC Mobile and KBC Invest. The latter is an app for tracking investment portfolios and savings schemes. The KBC Assist app enables clients to digitally report an accident or claim relating to their car or home. In total, around 1.3 million clients already use our digital systems. Working closely with IT specialist Cegeka and a number of other partners, we were the first in the market to successfully test Digital Trade Chain, a blockchain solution that facilitates secure international trade between SMEs. We are investing jointly with ING and Belfius in the payment solution Payconiq – linked with an integrated customer loyalty programme called 'joyn' – for cashless and cardless payments. Specially for young people, we launched KBC K'Ching, a free smartphone app they can use to carry out financial transactions, combining a high fun factor and attractive new look.
We developed the separate KBC Brussels brand, which has a metropolitan, innovative image and a modified network. KBC Brussels has its own management team operating out of the European Quarter. We are continuing to build our name recognition
through promotional campaigns and various local events in Brussels.
We further implemented our growth strategy in Wallonia, opening three new bank branches, with another three scheduled to open in 2017. We decided to move eleven existing branches to better locations, and began work on the new head office in Namur.
Our bank-insurance concept enjoyed continued success. At year-end 2016, half of households that are clients of KBC Bank held at least one KBC insurance product, while roughly a fifth of households held at least three KBC banking products and three KBC
insurance products. To give another example, eight to nine of every ten KBC Bank clients with a home loan also took out a KBC Home Insurance policy.
Our omnichannel approach enables us to provide our clients with solutions when they want them, and to offer them a unique bank-insurance experience. Clients can not only speak face-to-face with the staff at our bank branches and insurance agencies – we will continue to invest in new branch concepts that make maximum use of an omnichannel experience – they can also call and text or video chat with our advisers at the regional advisory centres. We offer a whole range of digital apps too.
We give concrete shape to our wider role in the community via initiatives relating to entrepreneurship, the environment, financial literacy and demographic ageing. Solid initiatives concerning entrepreneurship include the further expansion of
Start it @kbc (see boxed text) and FarmCafe, the platform that inspires agricultural and horticultural businesses to grow further. On the environmental side, we brought out our renovation loan for owners' associations, which is designed to make it easier to carry out sustainable and energy-efficient improvements to apartment buildings. The Happy@Home pilot project is another fine initiative. It is a joint venture between KBC, the service provider ONS and the software firm CUBIGO to make domestic assistance readily available (home help, odd-job work and other services). KBC Securities launched KBC Match'it in the autumn, a digital platform where buyers and companies that are looking to be taken over can meet each other. We are the first financial institution in Europe to offer a platform of this kind.
We also pay attention to the other challenges facing today's society. We participate actively in the mobility debate and have created the KBC Mobility programme, in which KBC Insurance, KBC Autolease and the breakdown assistance organisation VAB have joined forces to become the reference for sustainable and high-quality mobility solutions in Belgium. In this regard, we have already launched the DriveSafe app to raise road safety awareness among novice drivers.
As in previous years, we launched a variety of new products and services that respond to our clients' changing needs. In June 2016, for instance, we announced that clients of Cˇ SOB and Era Poštovní sporˇitelna (Postal Savings Bank) would be able to pay for their client centricity bank-insurance
shopping by mobile phone, courtesy of a new app called Cˇ SOB NaNákupy. We also launched a new and innovative investor portal (investice.csob.cz) and – in the area of nonfinancial services – unveiled a loyalty programme (Sveˇt odmeˇ n). We significantly expanded our cashless payment facilities at ATMs and enhanced convenience for our clients by offering them the possibility to digitally sign most documents in our branches. Our insurer, Cˇ SOB Pojišt'ovna, meanwhile launched a unique online risk policy. We worked to simplify our business model, with initiatives being taken in the areas of governance, network organisation and process and product simplification, including a much simplified website. To obtain an even better understanding of the client experience and to enhance it further, we now use 'Customer Journey Mapping' alongside traditional client satisfaction surveys. This approach (with direct input from clients) examines each step, starting from thinking about a financial service, through purchase and use, to even ending a contract.
We achieved decent growth in the areas we targeted for growth, such as consumer finance (+19% in 2016, due in part to successful marketing campaigns and new product launches). However, we also made progress in areas where we already have a
sound track record, with for instance the volume of home loans expanding by no less than 12% in 2016. Overall, our lending activities increased by 9% in 2016 and clients also placed 9% more deposits with our group.
We took new bank-insurance initiatives, including further increasing the number of insurance specialists in the bank branch network (a threefold increase since 2014) and launching new products, such as travel
insurance linked to a payment card. After going up by 18% in 2015, our bank-insurance gross income grew again in 2016, rising by 12%. About two-thirds of Cˇ SOB clients who took out home loans with the bank in 2016 also purchased home insurance from the group, while approximately half of them also took out life insurance.
We took a number of initiatives in terms of our social engagement, focusing on environmental awareness, financial literacy, entrepreneurship and demographic ageing. For instance, our ongoing attention to the environment was demonstrated by initiatives
to reduce our own ecological footprint. We intend, moreover, to develop new products and services that have a positive impact on the environment. We received the Cˇ SN EN ISO 50001:2012 certificate for 'Power Management' and we presented new guidelines for lending to the energy sector. We view stimulating entrepreneurship as an important part of our sustainability strategy and a means of differentiating ourselves from our competitors. For example, we offer financial support, professional counselling and workshops to businesses which we believe are specifically committed to sustainability. We want to support our clients throughout their lives. In this regard, we pay particular attention to senior citizens, as illustrated by the fact that we work with retired people's associations, provide online check lists (what to remember, for instance, when admitted to hospital) and collaborate with the Centre of Health Economics and Management (in the Faculty of Social Sciences) at the Charles University in Prague. Lastly, we also aim to raise financial literacy through local initiatives in the regions where we operate. Examples in this regard include the 'Cˇ SOB Education Programme', the 'Education Fund' and 'Blue Life Academy'.
At the end of 2016, KBC reached agreement with the National Bank of Greece to acquire 99.9% of United Bulgarian Bank (UBB) and 100% of Interlease. UBB is Bulgaria's fourth largest bank in terms of assets, while Interlease is the third largest provider of leasing services. KBC was already present in Bulgaria via CIBANK and DZI Insurance. The acquisition will make us the largest bank-insurance group in Bulgaria, a country with strong macroeconomic fundamentals and considerable potential in terms of financial services compared with the mature markets of Western Europe. The total cost of the acquisition was 610 million euros and the impact on our capital position is limited.
The deal, which is subject to the approval of the relevant central banks, regulators and anti-trust authorities, is expected to be finalised during the second quarter of 2017 at the latest.
As in Belgium and the Czech Republic, we look constantly at how we can apply new technologies in order to further align the service we offer to meet the needs of our clients in Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria and Ireland. An example is the digital partnership client centricity bank-insurance
we have entered into in Ireland with MyHome.ie to allow house hunters to take virtual tours of properties that are up for sale. This is the first time a bank has given prospective buyers in the Irish property market the chance to 'view' a house up close from their personal device. Clients in Slovakia can now log in to their Cˇ SOB SmartBanking app with their fingerprint thanks to the Touch ID function, a modern, very convenient and safe way for users to identify themselves. What's more, Cˇ SOB Bank is a pioneer in Slovakia in the online arrangement of mortgage loans. Clients can submit their applications online and receive a loan proposal in the same way. We are committed to simplification, as illustrated by the fact that the entire retail lending process is managed by a single department in each of the business unit's countries.
With the exception of Ireland, our deposits continued to grow in all countries in the business unit. The same goes for lending, which also saw a further improvement in quality. This was reflected, for instance, by a reduction in the proportion of impaired
loans in the portfolio. Our non-life insurance business also expanded nicely, thanks to a variety of initiatives. We took steps, moreover, to concentrate much more in the future on insurance for SMEs. The bank remains the most important channel for life insurance products. We took a major step forward in Bulgaria with the announced acquisition of United Bulgarian Bank (see boxed text).
Bank-insurance gross income for our business unit's three Central European countries in 2016 was up 15% in Slovakia, 6% in Hungary and 4% in Bulgaria, demonstrating the growing success of our bank-insurance model among our clients.
We recorded robust growth in the volume of premiums sold via the bank in each of the three Central European countries for both non-life insurance and life products with regular premium payments. Overall, there was also a sharp increase in the number of clients holding at least two banking and two insurance products. Numerous commercial synergies were likewise achieved. For instance, group fire insurance was sold in conjunction with around 90% of new home loans taken out in Bulgaria and Slovakia, and with 70% of such loans taken out in Hungary.
We put our social engagement into practice through various initiatives. For instance, K&H in Hungary provides financial and material assistance to sick children through the 'K&H MediMagic Programme' and sponsors the Paralympic Committee. It also promotes
financial education through its national 'K&H Ready, Steady, Money' contest, which tests schoolchildren's financial knowledge. K&H launched a 'Gap in the Market' campaign, too, to identify professions, services or shops that were lacking in a particular village or town, with the aim of stimulating entrepreneurship. CIBANK and DZI in Bulgaria set up a CSR committee, the activities of which included organising staff workshops on products and responsible behaviour and making preparations to obtain ISO 14001 environmental certification. CIBANK also promoted youth employment through its 'Jobs for Youth' initiative.
In 2016, our Belgium Business Unit recorded a net result of 1 432 million euros, compared with 1 564 million euros a year earlier.
At 2 701 million euros, net interest income – the most important income item – declined by just 4%, despite low interest rates (and therefore low level of income generated by reinvestments), less interest income being earned by the dealing rooms, a reduction in early-repayment penalties due to a smaller number of home loans being paid off early, and lower interest income on the insurer's bond portfolio. These negative factors were partially offset by the positive impact of lower funding costs and higher interest income from lending (due in part to volume growth – see below). As a result, our net interest margin in Belgium narrowed further from 1.91% in 2015 to 1.80% in 2016. Our volume of loans and advances to customers (92 billion euros, excluding reverse repos) rose by 4% and deposits from customers and debt securities (125 billion euros, excluding repos) went up by 13%.
Our net fee and commission income (1 070 million euros) declined by 16%, due primarily to the lower level of fee income from our asset management activities (including entry and management fees on funds, which were adversely affected by the volatile stock market climate) and, to a lesser
extent, to lower securities-related fees. Our total assets under management in Belgium grew by almost 3% to 199 billion euros, due almost entirely to the rise in value of the assets themselves (+3%).
Our insurance activities in Belgium generated 2 229 million euros in earned premiums, 1 217 million euros of which came from the life segment and 1 012 million euros from the non-life segment. Non-life premium income grew by 2% (or 5% excluding a technical item; growth primarily in the 'Fire and other damage to property' and 'Motor' classes), but claims incurred also rose by 8%, due to factors including weather conditions (storms) and the impact of the Brussels terrorist attacks in March (16 million euros). As a result, the technical profitability of our non-life insurance business – expressed as the combined ratio – came to 92%, a solid figure though slightly less so than a year earlier (90%). Our life insurance sales – including investment contracts without a discretionary participation feature (roughly equivalent to unit-linked life insurance policies), which are excluded from the IFRS figures – amounted to 1.7 billion euros, up 21% primarily on account of increased sales of guaranteed-rate products (+24%) in 2016 and, to a lesser extent, unit-linked products (+14%). At year-end, our outstanding life reserves totalled 26.9 billion euros, up 1% on the year-earlier figure.
The other income items chiefly comprised gains realised on the sale of shares and bonds (90 million euros, positively influenced by a gain of 20 million euros on the sale of our Visa Europe shares), the dividends we received on the securities held in our portfolios (61 million euros), our trading and fair value income (329 million euros, significantly better than in 2015 due primarily to a higher result generated by the dealing room and the positive impact of various market value adjustments) and other income (208 million euros). Besides mainly the usual items (results from KBC Autolease, VAB, etc.), 'other income' also included a number of smaller one-off items.
Our costs in Belgium rose by 3% to 2 432 million euros in 2016, with various factors playing their part, the most important of which being the special bank taxes (increasing from 222 million euros to 273 million euros). Excluding such taxes, costs hardly went up at all (increase in ICT costs, facility services costs, early retirement expenses and professional fees, but a reduction in staff, marketing and other costs). Our cost/ income ratio for the banking activities came to 54%, compared with 50% in 2015.
As in 2015, loan loss provisioning was limited (113 million euros, which was actually 64 million euros less than the year-earlier level, due primarily to the retail portfolio). In terms of our overall loan portfolio, therefore, loan loss provisions amounted to just 12 basis points, compared with 19 basis points in 2015. Approximately 3.3% of the business unit's loan portfolio was impaired (see 'Glossary of ratios and terms' for definition) at year-end 2016, compared with 3.8% a year earlier. Impaired loans that were more than 90 days past due accounted for 1.7% of the portfolio (2.2% in 2015).
In 2016, our Czech Republic Business Unit recorded a net profit of 596 million euros, compared with 542 million euros a year earlier.
Net interest income – our most important income item – suffered in the Czech Republic (as it did everywhere else) from the climate of low interest rates and associated lower level of income generated by reinvestments, and a lower contribution made by the dealing room. At 849 million euros, it nevertheless remained at its year-earlier level, thanks mainly to the positive impact of lower interest rates on savings accounts and strong volume growth of loans. As regards the latter, our loans and advances to customers (20 billion euros, excluding
reverse repos) rose by 9% in 2016 (due in part to robust growth in home loans). Deposits from customers and debt securities (26 billion euros, excluding repos) also grew by 9% year-on-year. The net interest margin in the Czech Republic narrowed from 3.03% in 2015 to 2.94% in 2016.
Our net fee and commission income (191 million euros) declined by 5%, owing primarily to lower fund entry fees and a net reduction in fees for a variety of banking services. Total assets under management in the Czech Republic fell by 3% to just under 8.5 billion euros.
Our insurance activities generated a total of 461 million euros in earned premiums, 271 million euros of which came from the life segment and 190 million euros from the non-life segment. Non-life premium income grew by 8%, but there was also a 16% increase in non-life claims due to several larger cases. As a result, the combined ratio for our Czech non-life insurance business amounted to 96%, compared to 94% a year earlier. Sales of life insurance ended the year at 0.3 billion euros, 12% higher than the figure for 2015 owing to stronger sales of unit-linked products. At year-end, the outstanding life reserves in this business unit totalled 1 billion euros, up approximately 4% on the year-earlier figure.
The other income items chiefly comprised gains realised on the sale of shares and bonds (48 million euros relating to the Visa Europe shares), trading and fair value income (117 million euros in 2016, as opposed to 98 million euros in 2015, due in part to higher dealing room income and a number of market value adjustments) and other income (18 million euros).
Costs fell by 1% to 608 million euros in 2016, owing to a number of factors, including slightly lower bank taxes and various smaller items. Consequently, the cost/income ratio for our banking activities amounted to a very good 45%, compared with 48% in 2015.
As was the case in 2015, loan loss provisioning was limited in 2016 (23 million euros, which was actually 13 million euros less than the year-earlier level, due primarily to the retail portfolio). In terms of our overall loan portfolio, therefore, loan loss provisions amounted to just 11 basis points in 2016, compared with 18 basis points in 2015. Approximately 2.8% of the business unit's loan portfolio was impaired at year-end 2016, compared with 3.4% a year earlier. Impaired loans that were more than 90 days past due accounted for 1.9% of the portfolio (2.5% in 2015).
In 2016, the net result at our International Markets Business Unit amounted to 428 million euros, as opposed to 245 million euros a year earlier. Hungary accounted for 130 million euros of this figure, Slovakia for 92 million euros, Bulgaria for 22 million euros and Ireland for 184 million euros.
Net interest income for the business unit as a whole came to 740 million euros in 2016, up 4% year-on-year, due primarily to lower funding and liquidity costs in Ireland. As regards volumes, loans and advances to customers for the business unit as a whole (21 billion euros, excluding reverse repos) rose by 2% in 2016, with the decline in Ireland (-5%, where the further scaling back of corporate lending and matured mortgage loans was not fully offset by new production) being more than compensated for by increases in Slovakia (+12%, due primarily to home loans), Hungary (+5%) and Bulgaria (+15%). Deposits from customers and debt securities (18 billion euros, excluding repos) went up by almost 7%. There was a decline in Ireland (-5%, due to increased intra-group use of TLTRO II funding), but deposits grew in all the other countries (Slovakia +9%, Bulgaria +15% and Hungary +14%). The business unit's average net interest margin was more or less unchanged at 2.55%.
Net fee and commission income fell only slightly, slipping by 3% to 201 million euros. The business unit's insurance activities, which are confined to Hungary, Slovakia and Bulgaria, generated a total of 287 million euros in earned premiums, 89 million euros of which came from the life segment and 198 million euros from the non-life segment. Non-life premium income grew robustly by 17% (growth in all countries, but strongest in Hungary), although claims incurred also rose by a substantial 21% (similar pattern to premium income). As a result, the combined ratio for the non-life insurance business amounted to a fine 94%, a slight improvement on its year-earlier level (95%). Sales of life insurance – including investment contracts without a discretionary participation feature (roughly equivalent to unit-linked life insurance policies), which are excluded from the IFRS figures – came to 132 million euros, comparable with the figure for 2015, with sales of unit-linked products growing slightly and guaranteed-rate products falling slightly. At year-end, the outstanding life reserves in this business unit totalled 0.6 billion euros, up 8% on the year-earlier figure.
The other income items chiefly comprised gains realised on the sale of shares and bonds (38 million euros, up sharply due to the 31-million-euro gain on the sale of Visa Europe shares), trading and fair value income (89 million euros) and other income (-1 million euros).
Costs in 2016 remained roughly at their year-earlier level (750 million euros), owing to various factors, including lower bank taxes (particularly in Hungary) and slightly higher general expenses in Slovakia and Hungary. Consequently, the cost/ income ratio for the banking activities came to 64%, compared with 66% in 2015.
There was a 42-million-euro net reversal of loan loss provisions in 2016 (with a positive impact on the results), compared to net provisioning of 82 million euros in 2015. This improvement was largely attributable to Ireland (from a net increase of 48 million euros in 2015 to a net reversal of 45 million euros in 2016, due in part to rising house prices, an improvement in the problem loan portfolio and the generally better macroeconomic situation in the country). In terms of our overall loan portfolio, loan loss provisions for the business unit as a whole amounted to -16 basis points (a negative figure signifies a net reversal of impairment and hence a positive impact on the results) compared with 32 basis points in 2015. The figures per country were -33 basis points for Ireland, -33 basis points for Hungary, 24 basis points for Slovakia and 32 basis points for Bulgaria. Approximately 25% of the business unit's loan portfolio was impaired at year-end 2016, compared with 30% a year earlier. This still relatively high figure related chiefly to the high (but falling) figure in Ireland (where impaired loans stood at 43%, compared with 47% a year earlier). Impaired loans that were more than 90 days past due accounted for 13% of the portfolio (16% in 2015).
Besides financial reporting for three business units, we also report on a separate Group Centre. In 2016, it generated a net result of -29 million euros, compared with 287 million euros a year earlier. This consisted of:
Ireland, etc.: 33 million euros, as opposed to 753 million euros in 2015). The amount for 2015 also included 765 million euros in respect of the liquidation of KBC Financial Holding Inc. More information in this regard can be found in Notes 3.3 and 3.12 of the 'Consolidated financial statements';
• 74 million euros in other items, compared with -306 million euros in 2015. The figure for 2015 was heavily impacted by provisioning for impairment on goodwill relating to CIBANK (117 million euros), to DZI Insurance (34 million euros) and to Cˇ SOB in Slovakia (191 million euros, relating to the earlier acquisition of Istrobanka). For more information, see Note 3.10 of the 'Consolidated financial statements' section.
| Results by business unit (in millions of EUR) | Belgium | Czech Republic | International Markets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |
| Net interest income | 2 701 | 2 819 | 849 | 845 | 740 | 711 |
| Non-life insurance (before reinsurance) | 440 | 460 | 78 | 80 | 91 | 81 |
| Earned premiums | 1 012 | 989 | 190 | 177 | 198 | 169 |
| Technical charges | -572 | -530 | -112 | -96 | -107 | -88 |
| Life insurance (before reinsurance) | -208 | -243 | 36 | 26 | 20 | 16 |
| Earned premiums | 1 217 | 969 | 271 | 243 | 89 | 90 |
| Technical charges | -1 425 | -1 212 | -234 | -216 | -69 | -73 |
| Ceded reinsurance result | -12 | -20 | -4 | -8 | -6 | -6 |
| Dividend income | 61 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss |
329 | 162 | 117 | 98 | 89 | 76 |
| Net realised result from available-for-sale assets | 90 | 149 | 48 | 12 | 38 | 6 |
| Net fee and commission income | 1 070 | 1 280 | 191 | 201 | 201 | 206 |
| Other net income | 208 | 207 | 18 | 23 | -1 | 50 |
| Total income | 4 680 | 4 878 | 1 333 | 1 277 | 1 173 | 1 141 |
| Operating expenses | -2 432 | -2 373 | -608 | -617 | -750 | -752 |
| Impairment | -179 | -222 | -24 | -42 | 34 | -84 |
| on loans and receivables | -113 | -177 | -23 | -36 | 42 | -82 |
| on available-for-sale assets | -58 | -38 | 3 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| on goodwill | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| other | -8 | -7 | -4 | 0 | -7 | -2 |
| Share in results of associated companies | 0 | -1 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| Result before tax | 2 070 | 2 282 | 724 | 640 | 457 | 305 |
| Income tax expense | -637 | -717 | -128 | -98 | -29 | -60 |
| Net post-tax result from discontinued operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Result after tax | 1 433 | 1 565 | 596 | 542 | 428 | 245 |
| attributable to minority interests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| attributable to equity holders of the parent (net result) | 1 432 | 1 564 | 596 | 542 | 428 | 245 |
| Banking | 1 180 | 1 230 | 564 | 516 | 406 | 225 |
| Insurance | 252 | 334 | 32 | 26 | 22 | 20 |
| Holding-company activities | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Risk-weighted assets, banking (Basel III; period-end) | 42 566 | 42 157 | 13 664 | 12 919 | 17 163 | 19 424 |
| Solvency, insurance (Solvency I in 2015, Solvency II in 2016; period-end) | 1 611 | 891 | 103 | 72 | 95 | 48 |
| Allocated capital (period-end) | 5 974 | 5 985 | 1 504 | 1 482 | 1 854 | 2 123 |
| Return on allocated capital | 24% | 26% | 41% | 37% | 22% | 12% |
| Cost/income ratio, banking | 54% | 50% | 45% | 48% | 64% | 66% |
| Combined ratio, non-life insurance | 92% | 90% | 96% | 94% | 94% | 95% |
| Total group | Group Centre | Of which: | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ireland | Bulgaria | Slovakia | Hungary | |||||||
| 2016 2015 |
2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 |
| 4 258 4 311 |
-63 | -32 | 202 | 244 | 47 | 48 | 214 | 216 | 248 | 231 |
| 628 611 |
-10 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 | 20 | 21 | 27 | 33 |
| 1 410 1 319 |
-16 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 83 | 29 | 32 | 65 | 82 |
| -782 -708 |
6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | -41 | -46 | -9 | -12 | -38 | -49 |
| -152 -201 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 12 | 2 | 4 |
| 1 577 1 301 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 22 | 52 | 51 | 15 | 16 |
| -1 728 -1 502 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -20 | -18 | -41 | -39 | -13 | -12 |
| -38 | 6 | -17 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -3 | -1 | -1 | -3 | -2 |
| 77 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 540 | -121 | 6 | -2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 60 | 66 |
| 189 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 3 | 19 |
| 1 450 1 678 |
-9 | -11 | -3 | -1 | -2 | -4 | 47 | 45 | 160 | 157 |
| 258 | 17 | 33 | 0 | -4 | 0 | -5 | 9 | 6 | 42 | 2 |
| 7 211 | -148 | 25 | 198 | 246 | 83 | 84 | 317 | 330 | 539 | 509 |
| -3 948 | -149 | -158 | -149 | -154 | -56 | -56 | -190 | -199 | -353 | -338 |
| -201 | -399 | -32 | -48 | 44 | -10 | -6 | -18 | -16 | -8 | 12 |
| -126 | -28 | -32 | -48 | 45 | -10 | -3 | -18 | -15 | -6 | 15 |
| -55 | -3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | -342 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| -20 | -25 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -3 |
| 27 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 090 | -693 | -161 | 1 | 136 | 17 | 22 | 108 | 115 | 179 | 183 |
| -662 | 980 | 132 | 12 | 49 | 2 | 0 | -26 | -23 | -47 | -54 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 428 | 287 | -29 | 13 | 184 | 18 | 22 | 82 | 92 | 131 | 130 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 427 | 287 | -29 | 13 | 184 | 18 | 22 | 82 | 92 | 131 | 130 |
| 2 167 | 432 | 17 | 13 | 184 | 12 | 18 | 74 | 83 | 125 | 120 |
| 314 | -26 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 9 |
| -53 | -119 | -53 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| – | 5 433 | 4 352 | 7 449 | 6 477 | 750 | 839 | 4 350 | 4 635 | 6 858 | 5 199 |
| – | 0 | -18 | 0 | – | 16 | 39 | 15 | 23 | 16 | 33 |
| – | 571 | 428 | 782 | 664 | 108 | 125 | 483 | 499 | 749 | 566 |
| – | – | – | 2% | 25% | 18% | 16% | 18% | 19% | 17% | 22% |
| 55% | – | – | 75% | 63% | 65% | 61% | 60% | 60% | 65% | 67% |
| 93% | – | – | – | – | 97% | 97% | 88% | 89% | 97% | 93% |
Mainly active in banking, insurance and asset management, we are exposed to a number of typical industry-specific risks such as credit risk, movements in interest rates and exchange rates, liquidity risk, insurance underwriting risk, operational risks, etc.
In this section, we focus on our risk governance model and the most material sector-specific risks we face. The general risks (relating to the macroeconomic situation, competition, regulations, etc.) are described in the 'Our business model' section.
Our statutory auditors have audited the information in this section that forms part of the IFRS financial statements, viz.:
Main elements in our risk governance model:
Relevant risk management bodies and control functions:
is a business committee that assists the Executive Committee in the domain of (integrated) balance sheet management at group level. It handles matters related to ALM and liquidity risk.
Risk committees:
process and, if necessary, can exercise a veto. Independence of the CROs is achieved through a direct reporting line to the Group CRO.
• Group Risk and Group Credit Risk (known collectively as 'the Group risk function') have a number of responsibilities, including monitoring risks at an overarching group-wide level, developing risk and capital models (while business models are developed by business), performing independent validations of all risk and capital models, developing risk frameworks and advising/reporting on issues handled by the Executive Committee and the risk committees. When appropriate, dedicated working groups comprising risk and business-side representatives are set up to deal with emerging risks or unexpected developments in an integrated way (covering all risk types). An example in 2016 was the outcome of the Brexit referendum (see elsewhere in this section).
Performance is assessed on a yearly basis as part of the Internal Control Statement.
A simplified schematic of our risk governance model is shown above.
More information on risk management can be found in our Risk Report at www.kbc.com, under 'investor relations', 'reports', 'risk reports'.
The overall management responsibility of a financial institution can be defined as managing capital, liquidity, return (income versus costs) and risks, which in particular arise from the special situation of banks and insurers as risk transformers. Taking risks and transforming risks is an integral part – and hence an inevitable consequence of – the business of a financial institution. Therefore, KBC does not aim to eliminate all the risks involved (risk avoidance) but instead looks to identify, control and manage them in order to make optimal use of its available capital (i.e. risk-taking as a means of creating value).
How much risk KBC is prepared to assume and its tolerance for risk is captured in the notion of 'risk appetite'. It is a key instrument in the overall (risk) management function of the KBC group, as it helps us to better understand and manage risks by explicitly expressing – both qualitatively and quantitatively – how much and what kind of risk we want to take.
KBC defines risk appetite as the amount and type of risk that it is able and willing to accept in pursuit of its strategic objectives.
The ability to accept risk (also referred to as risk-taking capacity) is limited both by financial constraints (available capital, liquidity profile, etc.) and non-financial constraints (regulations, laws, etc.), whereas the willingness to accept risk depends on the interests of the various stakeholders (shareholders, creditors, employees, management, regulators, clients, etc.). A key component in defining risk appetite is therefore an understanding of the organisation's key stakeholders and their expectations. The objective of risk appetite is to find the right balance of satisfaction among all stakeholders.
The institution's risk appetite sets the 'tone from the top' and reflects the view of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee on risk-taking in general, and the acceptable level and composition of risks in particular, while ensuring coherence with the desired return.
Risk appetite within KBC is set out in a 'risk appetite statement', which is produced at both group and local level. In this statement, risk appetite is expressed in a layered way
across several dimensions. Risk appetite dimensions are 'Capital adequacy', 'Performance' and 'Material risk types' (as defined in the KBC Risk Map document).
The layered nature of the risk appetite statement is illustrated as follows.
The statement is based on risk appetite objectives that are directly linked to corporate strategy and provide a qualitative description of the KBC group's playing field. These high-level risk appetite objectives are then specified for the different types of risk. For each type, the risk appetite for 2017-2019 is categorised as High (H), Medium (M) or Low (L) based on key metrics and also based on pre-defined thresholds per metric.
The risk appetite specification and related thresholds per metric for 2017-2019 define KBC's long-term upper boundary for the full planning cycle. The specific 2017 limits per risk type correspond to the long-term upper limit, but can be set lower. The limits are further cascaded down via (primary) limits imposed on the entities by KBC Group NV. More information in this regard is available in KBC's Risk Report, which can be obtained from www.kbc.com.
Credit risk is the potential negative deviation from the expected value of a financial instrument arising from the non-payment or non-performance by a contracting party (for instance a borrower), due to that party's insolvency, inability or lack of willingness to pay or perform, or to events or measures taken by the political or monetary authorities of a particular country (country risk). Credit risk thus encompasses default risk and country risk, but also includes migration risk, which is the risk for adverse changes in credit ratings.
We manage our credit risk at both transactional and portfolio level. Managing credit risk at the transactional level means that we have sound practices, processes and tools in place to identify and measure the risks before and after accepting individual credit exposures. Limits and delegations are set to determine the maximum credit exposure allowed and the level at which acceptance decisions are taken. Managing the risk at portfolio level encompasses, inter alia, periodic measuring and analysing of risk embedded in the consolidated loan and investment portfolios and reporting on it, monitoring limit discipline, conducting stress tests under different scenarios and taking risk mitigating measures.
We have sound acceptance policies and procedures in place for all kinds of credit risk exposure. We are limiting our description below to exposures related to traditional loans to businesses and to lending to individuals, as these account for the largest part of the group's credit risk exposure.
Lending to individuals (e.g., mortgages) is subject to a standardised process, during which the output of scoring models plays an important role in the acceptance procedure. Lending to businesses is subject to an acceptance process in which relationship management, credit acceptance committees and model-generated output are taken into account.
We review loans to large corporations at least once a year, with the internal rating being updated as a minimum. If ratings are not updated in time, a capital add-on is imposed. Loans to small and medium-sized enterprises and to private individuals are reviewed periodically, with account being taken of any new information that is available (such as arrears, financial data, a significant change in the risk class). This monthly exercise can trigger a more in-depth review or may result in measures being taken for the client.
We also monitor credit risk on a portfolio basis, inter alia by means of monthly and/or quarterly reports on the consolidated credit portfolio in order to ensure that lending policy and limits are being respected. In addition, we monitor the largest risk concentrations via periodic and ad hoc reports. Limits are in place at borrower/guarantor, issuer or counterparty level, at sector level and for specific activities or geographic areas. Moreover, we perform stress tests on certain types of credit, as well as on the full scope of credit risk.
Whereas some limits are in notional terms, we also use concepts such as 'expected loss' and 'loss given default'. Together with 'probability of default' and 'exposure at default', these concepts form the building blocks for calculating the regulatory capital requirements for credit risk, as KBC has opted to use the Internal Ratings Based (IRB) approach. By the end of 2016, the main group entities (apart from CIBANK in Bulgaria and Cˇ SOB in Slovakia) and some smaller entities had adopted the IRB Advanced approach. The other 'non-material' entities will continue to adopt the Standardised approach.
For most types of credit risk exposure, monitoring is determined primarily by the risk class, with a distinction being made based on the Probability of Default (PD) and the Loss Given Default (LGD). The latter reflects the estimated loss that would be incurred if an obligor defaults.
In order to determine the risk class, we have developed various rating models for measuring how creditworthy borrowers are and for estimating the expected loss of various types of transactions. A number of uniform models throughout the group (models for governments, banks, large companies, etc.) are in place, while others have been designed for specific geographic markets (SMEs, private individuals, etc.) or types of transaction. We use the same internal rating scale throughout the group.
We use the output generated by these models to split the non-defaulted loan portfolio into internal rating classes ranging from 1 (lowest risk) to 9 (highest risk) for the PD. We assign an internal rating ranging from PD 10 to PD 12 to a defaulted obligor. PD class 12 is assigned when either one of 2016
the obligor's credit facilities is terminated by the bank, or when a court order is passed instructing repossession of the collateral. PD class 11 groups obligors that are more than 90 days past due (in arrears or overdrawn), but that do not meet PD 12 criteria. PD class 10 is assigned to obligors for which there is reason to believe that they are unlikely to pay (on time), but that do not meet the criteria for classification as PD 11 or PD 12. 'Defaulted' status is fully aligned with the 'non-performing' and 'impaired' statuses. Obligors in PD classes 10, 11 and 12 are therefore referred to as 'defaulted' and 'impaired'. Likewise, 'performing' status is fully aligned with the 'non-defaulted' and 'non-impaired' statuses.
For credit linked to defaulted borrowers in PD classes 10, 11 and 12, we record impairment losses based on an estimate of the net present value of the recoverable amount. This is done on a case-by-case basis, and on a statistical basis for smaller credit facilities. In addition, for non-defaulted credit in PD classes 1 to 9, we record impairment losses on a 'portfolio basis', using a formula based on the Internal Ratings Based (IRB) Advanced models used internally, or an alternative method if a suitable IRB Advanced model is not yet available.
In the following sections, we take a closer look at the credit risk exposure of the entities of the KBC group.
Credit risk arises in both the banking and insurance activities of the group. Looking at the banking activities first, the main source of credit risk is the loan and investment portfolio. This portfolio has been built up mainly through what can be considered as pure, traditional lending activities. It includes all retail lending such as mortgage loans and consumer loans, all corporate lending such as (committed and uncommitted) working capital credit lines, investment credit, guarantee credit and credit derivatives (protection sold) and all non-government debt securities in the investment books of the group's bank entities. The table below excludes other credit risks, such as trading exposure (issuer risk), counterparty risk associated with interprofessional transactions, international trade finance (documentary credit, etc.) and government bonds. We describe these items separately below.
The loan and investment portfolio as defined in this section differs significantly from 'Loans and advances to customers' in Note 4.1 of the 'Consolidated financial statements' section. For more information, please refer to the 'Glossary of ratios and terms'.
| Loan and investment portfolio, banking | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio (in billions of EUR) | ||
| Amount granted | 181 | 174 |
| Amount outstanding | 148 | 143 |
| Loan portfolio breakdown by business unit (as a % of the portfolio of credit outstanding)1 | ||
| Belgium | 65% | 65% |
| Czech Republic | 15% | 14% |
| International Markets | 17% | 18% |
| Group Centre | 3% | 3% |
| Total | 100% | 100% |
| Loan portfolio breakdown by counterparty sector (as a % of the portfolio of credit outstanding)1 | ||
| Private individuals | 42% | 42% |
| Finance and insurance | 6% | 6% |
| Governments | 3% | 3% |
| Corporates | 49% | 49% |
| Services | 12% | 11% |
| Distribution | 8% | 8% |
| Real estate | 7% | 7% |
| Building and construction | 4% | 4% |
| Agriculture, farming, fishing | 3% | 3% |
| Automotive | 2% | 2% |
| Other2 | 14% | 14% |
| Total | 100% | 100% |
| Loan portfolio breakdown by region (as a % of the portfolio of credit outstanding)1, 6 | ||
| Western Europe | 73% | 74% |
| Central and Eastern Europe | 23% | 22% |
| North America | 2% | 1% |
| Other | 2% | 3% |
| Total | 100% | 100% |
| Loan portfolio breakdown by risk class (part of the portfolio, as a % of the portfolio of credit outstanding)1, 3 | ||
| PD 1 (lowest risk, default probability ranging from 0.00% up to, but not including, 0.10%) | 30% | 31% |
| PD 2 (0.10% – 0.20%) | 9% | 11% |
| PD 3 (0.20% – 0.40%) | 17% | 14% |
| PD 4 (0.40% – 0.80%) | 14% | 15% |
| PD 5 (0.80% – 1.60%) | 12% | 11% |
| PD 6 (1.60% – 3.20%) | 9% | 9% |
| PD 7 (3.20% – 6.40%) | 5% | 4% |
| PD 8 (6.40% – 12.80%) | 2% | 2% |
| PD 9 (highest risk, ≥ 12.80%) | 2% | 2% |
| Total | 100% | 100% |
| Loan and investment portfolio, banking | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Impaired loans (PD 10 + 11 + 12; in millions of EUR or %)4 | ||
| Impaired loans5 | 10 583 | 12 305 |
| Specific impairment | 4 874 | 5 517 |
| Portfolio-based impairment (i.e. based on PD 1 to 9) | 288 | 229 |
| Credit cost ratio1 | ||
| Belgium Business Unit | 0.12% | 0.19% |
| Czech Republic Business Unit | 0.11% | 0.18% |
| International Markets Business Unit | -0.16% | 0.32% |
| Ireland | -0.33% | 0.34% |
| Slovakia | 0.24% | 0.32% |
| Hungary | -0.33% | 0.12% |
| Bulgaria | 0.32% | 1.21% |
| Group Centre | 0.67% | 0.54% |
| Total | 0.09% | 0.23% |
| Impaired loans ratio1 | ||
| Belgium Business Unit | 3.3% | 3.8% |
| Czech Republic Business Unit | 2.8% | 3.4% |
| International Markets Business Unit | 25.4% | 29.8% |
| Group Centre | 8.8% | 10.0% |
| Total | 7.2% | 8.6% |
| Impaired loans that are more than 90 days past due (PD 11 + 12; in millions of EUR or %) | ||
| Impaired loans that are more than 90 days past due | 5 711 | 6 936 |
| Specific impairment for impaired loans that are more than 90 days past due | 3 603 | 4 183 |
| Ratio of impaired loans that are more than 90 days past due1 | ||
| Belgium Business Unit | 1.7% | 2.2% |
| Czech Republic Business Unit | 1.9% | 2.5% |
| International Markets Business Unit | 13.4% | 16.0% |
| Group Centre | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Total | 3.9% | 4.8% |
| Cover ratio [Specific loan loss impairment]/[impaired loans] | ||
| Total | 46% | 45% |
| Total (excluding mortgage loans) | 54% | 53% |
The Belgium Business Unit also includes the small network of 10 KBC Bank branches established in the rest of Europe, the US and Southeast Asia. These branches, which focus on activities and clients with links to KBC's core markets, have a total loan portfolio of approximately 6 billion euros.
1 Unaudited figures.
2 Individual sector shares not exceeding 3%.
3 Internal rating scale.
4 Figures differ from those appearing in Note 4.2 of the 'Consolidated financial statements' section, due to differences in scope.
5 Reconciliation of year-end figures: the difference of 1 722 million euros between the figures for 2016 and 2015 was due to this category of loan decreasing by 438 million euros at the Belgium Business Unit, by 85 million euros at the Czech Republic Business Unit, by 81 million euros at the Group Centre, and by 1 118 million euros at the International Markets Business Unit (899 million euros of which in Ireland).
6 A more detailed breakdown by country is available in KBC's Extended Quarterly Report – 4Q2016 at www.kbc.com.
We have provided the following additional information for the loan and investment portfolio in Ireland, due to the specific situation on this market.
| Details for the loan and investment portfolio of KBC Bank Ireland* | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total portfolio (outstanding, in billions of EUR) | 13 | 14 |
| Breakdown by loan type | ||
| Home loans | 86% | 84% |
| SME & corporate loans | 7% | 8% |
| Real estate investment and real estate development | 7% | 8% |
| Breakdown by risk class | ||
| Normal (PD 1-9) | 57% | 53% |
| Impaired (PD 10) | 22% | 24% |
| Impaired (PD 11+12) | 21% | 24% |
| Credit cost ratio | -0.33% | 0.34% |
| Cover ratio | 43% | 41% |
* For a definition, see 'Credit risk exposure in the banking activities' (i.e. excluding inter alia government bonds).
In order to avoid a situation where an obligor facing financial difficulties ends up defaulting, we can decide to renegotiate its loans and grant forbearance measures in accordance with internal policy guidelines.
Forbearance measures consist of concessions towards a borrower facing, or about to face, financial difficulties. They may involve:
After a forbearance measure has been decided upon, a forbearance tag is attached to the file in the credit systems for identification, monitoring and reporting purposes.
A client with a forborne loan will in principle be assigned a PD class that is higher than the one it had before the forbearance measure was granted, given the higher risk of the client.
If a client/facility has been assigned 'defaulted' status (before or at the time forbearance measures are granted), the client/
forborne facility (depending on whether defaulted status is assigned at client or facility level) must remain defaulted for at least one year. Only upon strict conditions can the client/ facility be reclassified as 'non-defaulted'. A forborne facility with a 'non-defaulted' status will be tagged as 'forborne' for at least two years after the forbearance measure has been granted, or after the client/facility becomes non-defaulted, and can only be removed when strict extra criteria have been met (non-defaulted, regular payments, etc.).
As forbearance measures constitute an objective indicator (i.e. impairment trigger) that requires assessing whether impairment is needed, all forbearance measures are subject to an impairment test.
At the end of 2016, forborne loans accounted for some 5% of our total loan portfolio. The tables below provide details on the movement in forborne loan exposure, the relevant impairment recorded between year-end 2015 and year-end 2016, and the breakdown of forborne loans by PD class. Compared to the end of 2015, the forborne loan exposure decreased by 9%, due mainly to repayments and cures, and to a lesser extent to write-offs. In Ireland, the exposure fell by 6%.
| Gross carrying value | Opening balance |
Closing balance |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans which have become forborne |
Loans which are no longer considered to be forborne |
Repayments | Write-offs | Other1 | |||
| 2016 | |||||||
| Total | 7 794 | 1 379 | -1 054 | -861 | -192 | 17 | 7 083 |
| Of which: KBC Bank Ireland | 5 383 | 320 | -201 | -296 | -123 | 0 | 5 083 |
| 2015 | |||||||
| Total | 7 897 | 2 099 | -1 443 | -671 | -105 | 16 | 7 794 |
| Of which: KBC Bank Ireland | 5 703 | 541 | -377 | -426 | -75 | 17 | 5 383 |
| Impairment | Opening balance |
Movements | Closing balance |
||||
| Existing im pairment on loans which have become forborne |
Decrease in impairment because loans are no longer forborne |
Increase in impairment on forborne loans |
Decrease in impairment on forborne loans |
Other2 | |||
| 2016 | |||||||
| Total | 2 203 | 213 | -427 | 292 | -276 | -38 | 1 967 |
| Of which: KBC Bank Ireland | 1 607 | 0 | -134 | 228 | -190 | 0 | 1 511 |
| 2015 | |||||||
| Total | 2 108 | 586 | -304 | 209 | -378 | -19 | 2 203 |
| Of which KBC Bank Ireland | 1 664 | 228 | -160 | 176 | -300 | 0 | 1 607 |
1 Includes foreign-exchange effects for loans granted in currencies other than the local currency, changes in the drawn/undrawn portion of facilities, and increases in the gross carrying value of existing forborne loans.
2 Includes the use of impairment in respect of write-offs.
| Forborne loans | As a % of the out standing portfolio |
Breakdown by PD class (as a % of the entity's portfolio of forborne loans) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD 1-8 | PD 9 | PD 10 | PD 11-12 | ||||||
| (impaired, less than 90 days past due) |
(impaired, 90 days and more past due) |
||||||||
| 31-12-2016 | |||||||||
| Total | 5% | 9% | 13% | 52% | 26% | ||||
| Of which: KBC Bank Ireland | 39% | 1% | 16% | 56% | 27% | ||||
| By client segment1 | |||||||||
| Private individuals2 | 8% | 9% | 18% | 54% | 19% | ||||
| SMEs | 1% | 32% | 10% | 36% | 21% | ||||
| Corporations3 | 4% | 4% | 5% | 50% | 41% | ||||
| 31-12-2015 | |||||||||
| Total | 5% | 8% | 11% | 53% | 28% | ||||
| Of which: KBC Bank Ireland | 38% | 1% | 11% | 59% | 29% | ||||
| By client segment1 | |||||||||
| Private individuals2 | 8% | 9% | 13% | 59% | 19% | ||||
| SMEs | 1% | 28% | 12% | 35% | 25% | ||||
| Corporations3 | 5% | 3% | 6% | 46% | 45% |
1 Unaudited
2 99% of the forborne loans total relates to mortgage loans in 2016 (99% in 2015).
3 47% of the forborne loans relates to commercial real estate loans in 2016 (53% in 2015).
The main sources of other credit risk in the banking activities are:
Short-term commercial transactions. This involves export or import finance (documentary credit, pre-export and postimport finance, etc.) and mainly entails exposure to financial institutions. We manage risks associated with this activity by setting limits per financial institution and per country or group of countries.
Trading book securities. These securities carry an issuer risk (potential loss on default by the issuer). We measure exposure to this type of risk on the basis of the market value of the securities. Issuer risk is curtailed through the use of limits both per issuer and per rating category.
Interprofessional transactions (deposits with professional counterparties and derivatives trading). These transactions result in counterparty risk. The amounts shown in the table below are the group's pre-settlement risks, measured as the sum of the (positive) current replacement value ('mark-tomarket' value) of a transaction and the applicable add-on. Risks are curtailed by setting limits per counterparty. We also use close-out netting and collateral techniques. Financial collateral is only taken into account if the assets concerned are considered eligible risk-mitigants for regulatory capital calculations.
| (in billions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term commercial transactions | 3.3 | 2.9 |
| Issuer risk1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Counterparty risk in interprofessional transactions2 | 9.6 | 9.6 |
1 Excluding a nominative list of central governments, and all exposure to EU institutions and multilateral development banks.
2 After deduction of collateral received and netting benefits.
Government securities in the investment portfolio of banking entities. We measure exposure to governments in terms of nominal value and book value. Such exposure relates mainly to EU states (particularly Belgium). We have put in place limiting caps for both non-core and core country sovereign bond exposure. Details on the exposure of the combined banking and insurance activities to government bonds are provided in a separate section below.
For the insurance activities, credit exposure exists primarily in the investment portfolio (towards issuers of debt instruments) and towards reinsurance companies. We have guidelines in place for the purpose of controlling credit risk within the investment portfolio with regard to, for instance, portfolio composition and ratings.
| (in millions of EUR, market value)1 | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Per balance sheet item | ||
| Securities | 22 211 | 22 048 |
| Bonds and other fixed-income securities | 20 890 | 20 490 |
| Held to maturity | 6 550 | 6 629 |
| Available for sale | 14 286 | 13 813 |
| At fair value through profit or loss and held for trading | 5 | 1 |
| As loans and receivables | 48 | 46 |
| Shares and other variable-yield securities | 1 321 | 1 555 |
| Available for sale | 1 317 | 1 551 |
| At fair value through profit or loss and held for trading | 3 | 3 |
| Other | 0 | 3 |
| Property and equipment and investment property | 332 | 341 |
| Investment contracts, unit-linked2 | 13 693 | 13 330 |
| Other | 1 831 | 1 485 |
| Total | 38 066 | 37 204 |
| Details for bonds and other fixed-income securities | ||
| By external rating3 | ||
| Investment grade | 96% | 95% |
| Non-investment grade | 4% | 3% |
| Unrated | 0% | 2% |
| By sector3 | ||
| Governments | 61% | 59% |
| Financial4 | 25% | 26% |
| Other | 14% | 15% |
| By remaining term to maturity3 | ||
| Not more than 1 year | 12% | 12% |
| Between 1 and 3 years | 19% | 21% |
| Between 3 and 5 years | 15% | 18% |
| Between 5 and 10 years | 31% | 26% |
| More than 10 years | 23% | 22% |
Investment portfolio of KBC group insurance entities
1 The total carrying value amounted to 36 619 million euros at year-end 2016 and to 35 847 million euros at year-end 2015.
2 Representing the assets side of unit-linked (class 23) products and completely balanced on the liabilities side. No credit risk involved for KBC Insurance.
3 Excluding investments for unit-linked life insurance. In certain cases, based on extrapolations and estimates.
4 Including covered bonds and non-bank financial companies.
In 2016, KBC Insurance bought a 333-million-euro portfolio of newly originated mortgages from KBC Bank, further diversifying its investments. KBC Bank selected these loans according to a predefined list of eligibility criteria defined by KBC Insurance. While this is a full sale, servicing remains with KBC Bank.
We are also exposed to a credit risk in respect of (re)insurance companies, since they could default on their commitments under (re)insurance contracts concluded with us. We measure this particular type of credit risk by means of a nominal approach (the maximum loss) and expected loss, among other techniques. Name concentration limits apply. PD – and by extension – expected loss is calculated using internal or external ratings. We determine the exposure at default by adding up the net loss reserves and the premiums, and the loss given default percentage is fixed at 50%.
| Credit exposure to (re)insurance companies by risk class1 : |
EAD | EL | EAD | EL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure at Default (EAD) and Expected Loss (EL)2 (in millions of EUR) |
2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| AAA up to and including A- | 186 | 0.08 | 236 | 0.10 |
| BBB+ up to and including BB- | 12 | 0.02 | 27 | 0.03 |
| Below BB- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unrated | 2 | 0.04 | 4 | 0.09 |
| Total | 200 | 0.13 | 267 | 0.22 |
1 Based on internal ratings.
2 EAD figures are audited, whereas EL figures are unaudited.
We hold a significant portfolio of government bonds, primarily as a result of our considerable excess liquidity position and for the reinvestment of insurance reserves into fixed instruments. A breakdown per country, together with the economic impact of a 100-basis-point upward shift in the spread (by year-end 2016), is provided under 'Credit spread risk' in the 'Market risk in non-trading activities' section.
At 1.4 billion euros, the total net portfolio (i.e. excluding de-risked positions) of structured credit products (consisting primarily of European residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS)) was down 0.2 billion euros on its level at year-end 2015, as redemptions were higher than new investments. In 2013, KBC decided to lift the strict moratorium on investments in ABS and to allow treasury investments in liquid, highquality, non-synthetic European ABS, which are also accepted as eligible collateral by the European Central Bank (ECB). This allows for further diversification in the investment portfolios. The moratorium on investments in synthetic securitisations or re-securitisations is still in place.
Under the phased-in approach, the regulatory capital requirements for credit risk increased from 5 917 million euros at the end of 2015 to 5 944 million euros at the end of 2016. Under the fully loaded approach, these requirements decreased from 6 055 million euros at the end of 2015 to 6 017 million euros at the end of 2016. This reduction in weighted credit risks during 2016 was driven by volume increases, but more than offset by the impact of model-related changes and the improved quality of the loan portfolio. For more details, please see the 'Credit risk' section in KBC's Risk Report, which is available at www.kbc.com.
We define market risk as the potential negative deviation from the expected value of a financial instrument (or portfolio of such instruments) due to changes in the level or in the volatility of market prices, e.g., interest rates, exchange rates and equity or commodity prices. The interest rate, foreign exchange and equity risks of the non-trading positions in the banking book and of the insurer's positions are all included in ALM exposure.
The objective of our market risk management is to measure, report and advise on the market risk of the aggregate trading position at group level, taking into account the main risk factors and specific risk.
We are exposed to market risk via the trading books of our dealing rooms in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, as well as via a minor presence in the UK and Asia. The traditional dealing rooms, with the dealing room in Belgium accounting for the lion's share of the limits and risks, focus on trading in interest rate instruments, while activity on the FX markets has traditionally been limited. All dealing rooms focus on providing customer service in money and capital market products and on funding the bank activities.
The market risk and regulatory capital in the four legacy business lines of KBC Investments Limited, namely the CDO, fund derivatives, reverse mortgages and insurance derivatives businesses, have been reduced in recent years and are now almost equal to zero. This is especially the case for the fund derivatives, reverse mortgages and insurance derivatives businesses where the market risk regulatory capital charges represent only about 1% of the total. These legacy business lines continue to be monitored and wound down by dedicated teams.
Regarding the other legacy business (i.e. the CDO business), the remaining small positions will expire before August 2017. However, these positions (pertaining to the 0.15 billion euros of CDO notes held by investors) are located in the trading books of KBC Investments Limited. Consequently, the market risk regulatory capital charges for this position are recorded
under the re-securitisation column in the 'Trading regulatory capital requirements' table (on page 93). Please note that the market risk regulatory capital charges for this legacy position (less than 1 million euros) correspond to the maximum loss that can be incurred.
The principal tool we use for measuring and monitoring market risk exposures in the trading book is the Historical Value-at-Risk (HVaR) method. VaR is defined as an estimate of the amount of economic value that might be lost on a given portfolio due to market risk over a defined holding period, with a given confidence level. The measurement takes account of the market risk of the current portfolio. We use the historical simulation method, observing the relevant CRD IV standards (99% one-sided confidence interval, ten-day holding period, historical data going back at least 250 working days, for which – after analysis – we choose to use 500 working days of historical data). This means that the HVaR used for managing market exposure uses the same holding period and confidence level as the HVaR used for the three approved internal models referred to in the 'Regulatory capital' sub-section below. The HVaR method does not rely on assumptions regarding the distribution of price fluctuations or correlations, but is based on patterns of experience over the previous two years. The HVaR is calculated and monitored at desk and entity level, as well as at KBC group level.
As with any model, there are a certain number of uncertainties/deficiencies. However, the model is subject to regular review and improvements. Apart from implementing a few minor improvements during 2016, attention was also
devoted to preparing for the future regulatory demands and quality standards that will be necessary once the requirements stipulated in the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book come into effect.
Certain composite and/or illiquid instruments that cannot be modelled in an HVaR context are subject to nominal and/or scenario limits.
We monitor risk concentrations via a series of secondary limits, including equity concentration limits, FX concentration limits and basis-point-value limits for interest rate risk and basis risk. The specific risk associated with a particular issuer or country is also subject to concentration limits. There are also scenario analysis limits, and – where deemed appropriate – stress scenario limits involving multiple shifts of underlying risk factors. In addition, secondary limits are in place to monitor the risks inherent in options (the so-called 'greeks').
In addition to the daily HVaR calculations, we conduct extensive stress tests. Whereas the HVaR model captures potential losses under normal market conditions, stress tests show the impact of exceptional circumstances and events with a low degree of probability. The historical and hypothetical stress-test scenarios incorporate both market risk and the liquidity aspects of disruptions in the market. During 2016, a complete and thorough review of all the scenarios and calculation methodologies for historical and hypothetical stress tests was carried out. The focus of this review was on producing intuitive and usable reports (rather than generating a 'black box' stress test result). When newly calibrated stress
tests fully replace old ones and are put into place, they are explained in detail to the Group Markets Committee to allow members to fully understand and interpret the reports, enabling them to appreciate any potential weaknesses in the positions held by the KBC group. For more details about stress testing, please refer to the relevant sub-section of the 'Market risk' section in KBC's Risk Report, which is available at www.kbc.com.
One of the building blocks of sound risk management is prudent valuation. We perform a daily independent middleoffice valuation of front-office positions. Whenever the independent nature or the reliability of the valuation process is not guaranteed, we perform a monthly parameter review. Where applicable, we make adjustments to the fair value to reflect close-out costs, mark-to-model-related valuation adjustments, counterparty risk, liquidity risk and operationsrelated costs.
In addition to the parameter review, we perform periodic risk controls, including all checks that do not entail parameter or P&L testing as carried out in the parameter review, but that are necessary for sound risk management. Moreover, we set up a business case for every new product or activity in order to analyse the risks and the way in which they will be managed.
The table below shows KBC's Historical Value-at-Risk model (HVaR; 99% confidence interval, ten-day holding period, historical simulation) used for the linear and non-linear exposure of all the dealing rooms of the KBC group.
| Holding period: 10 days | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Average for 1Q | 16 | 14 |
| Average for 2Q | 15 | 15 |
| Average for 3Q | 15 | 15 |
| Average for 4Q | 14 | 16 |
| As at 31 December | 20 | 18 |
| Maximum in year | 20 | 21 |
| Minimum in year | 11 | 12 |
A breakdown of the risk factors (averaged) in KBC's HVaR model is shown in the table below. Please note that the equity risk stems from the European equity derivatives business, and also from KBC Securities.
| Breakdown by risk factor of trading HVaR for the KBC group (in millions of EUR) | Average for 2016 | Average for 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Interest rate risk | 15.2 | 14.7 |
| FX risk | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| FX option risk | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Equity risk | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Diversification effect | -4.8 | -6.1 |
| Total HVaR | 15.3 | 15.1 |
We test the reliability of the VaR model daily via a back-test, which compares the one-day VaR figure to daily P&L figures. This is done both at the top level and at the level of the different entities and desks. For more details about backtesting, please refer to the relevant sub-section of the 'Market risk' section in KBC's Risk Report, which is available at www.kbc.com.
We have provided an overview of the derivative products under Note 4.10 in the 'Consolidated financial statements' section.
Both KBC Bank NV and KBC Investments Limited have been authorised by the Belgian regulator to use their respective VaR models to calculate regulatory capital requirements for most of their trading activities. Similarly, Cˇ SOB (Czech Republic) has received approval from the local regulator to use its VaR model for capital requirement purposes. These models (approved internal models) are also used for the calculation of Stressed VaR (SVaR), which is one of the CRD III Regulatory Capital charges that entered into effect at year-end 2011. The calculation of an SVaR measure is based on the normal VaR calculations and follows the same methodological assumptions, but is constructed as if the relevant market factors were experiencing a period of stress. The period of stress is calibrated at least once a year by determining which
250-day period between 2006 and the (then) present day produces the severest losses for the relevant positions.
The resulting capital requirements for trading risk at year-ends 2015 and 2016 are shown in the table below. The regulatory capital requirements for the trading risk of local KBC entities that did not receive approval from their respective regulator to use an internal model for capital calculations, as well as the business lines not included in the HVaR calculations, are measured according to the Standardised approach. This approach sets out general and specific risk weightings per type of market risk (interest risk, equity risk, foreign exchange risk and commodity risk). It should be noted that the trading regulatory capital requirements assessed by the internal model (shown in the table below) are derived from the regulatory capital requirements calculated using the three approved internal models referred to in the previous paragraph. However, as European equity derivatives is KBC Investments Limited's only non-legacy business line (and the only business line in its approved internal model) – and is managed as part of the Brussels dealing room – KBC has been working towards incorporating this business into the KBC Bank NV approved internal model to more closely align management scope with regulatory scope. Given that this would result in two approved internal models instead of three, it would also cut costs and reduce complexity.
| Trading regulatory capital requirements | Interest | Commodity | Resecur | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| by risk type (in millions of EUR) | rate risk | Equity risk | FX risk | risk | itisation | Total | |
| 31-12-2016 | |||||||
| Market risks assessed by internal model | HVaR SVaR |
57 74 |
2 2 |
7 14 |
– – |
– | 156 |
| Market risks assessed by the Standardised approach | 18 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 37 | |
| Total | 150 | 8 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 193 | |
| 31-12-2015 | |||||||
| Market risks assessed by internal model | HVaR SVaR |
68 84 |
3 2 |
9 26 |
– – |
– | 192 |
| Market risks assessed by the Standardised approach | 18 | 5 | 16 | 2 | 15 | 56 | |
| Total | 171 | 10 | 50 | 2 | 15 | 248 |
As can be seen from the table above, the total capital requirement at year-end 2016 was 55 million euros lower than a year earlier, 36 million euros of which was due to a decrease in internal model-based capital requirements and 19 million euros to a decrease in capital requirements assessed by the Standardised approach. Almost all of the reduction in the internal model-based capital requirements came about because of a decrease in the regulatory multipliers used for HVaR and SVaR in calculating capital requirements in both the KBC Bank NV and Cˇ SOB (Czech Republic) internal models (from 3.65 and 3.85, respectively, to the floor level, i.e.
3.00 for both models). The reduction in the multipliers was due to the fact that there were fewer overshootings in the regulatory back-tests in 2016 (the plus factor for a multiplier is determined by the number of overshootings). For more details, please see the 'Market risk' section in KBC's Risk Report, which is available at www.kbc.com. The reduction in capital requirements assessed by the Standardised approach was due mainly to the re-securitisation charge falling by 14 million euros, because the small positions remaining in the legacy CDO business have reached maturity or been wound down.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes and systems, human error or sudden external events, whether man-made or natural. Operational risks include non-financial risks such as information and compliance risks, but exclude business, strategic and reputational risks.
We have a single, global framework for managing operational risk across the entire group.
The Group risk function is primarily responsible for defining the operational risk management framework. The development and implementation of this framework is supported by an extensive operational risk governance model covering all entities of the group.
In early 2016, a new Competence Centre for Operational Risk was set up following a review of the 'Three Lines of Defence' model. It sets the standards for managing and monitoring operational risks within the group and also includes the Competence Centre for Information Risk Management, which deals with cyber risk, among other things.
The main tasks of the Competence Centre for Operational Risk are to:
uniform reporting, etc.). It is assisted by the local risk management units, which are likewise independent of the business.
Since 2011, specific attention has been given to the structured set-up of process-based Group Key Controls. These controls are policies containing top-down basic control objectives and are used to mitigate key and killer risks inherent in the processes of KBC entities. As such, they are an essential building block of both the operational risk management framework and the internal control system. Our Group Key Controls now cover the complete process universe of the group (68 KBC Group Processes). Structural risk-based review cycles are installed to manage the process universe, close gaps, eliminate overlap and optimise group-wide risks and controls.
The business and (local) control functions assess these Group Key Controls. The risk self-assessments are consolidated at the Group Risk function and ensure that there is a consistent relationship between (i) processes, (ii) risks, (iii) control activities and (iv) assessment scores. In 2016, KBC implemented a management tool to evaluate its internal control environment and to benchmark the approach across its entities. In this regard, it consolidates operational risk information flows across the business, risk, audit and compliance functions.
In line with the other risk types, we use a number of building blocks for managing operational risks, which cover all aspects of operational risk management:
We use the Standardised approach for operational risk under Basel III. Operational risk capital at KBC group level totalled 822 million euros at the end of 2015 and 812 million euros at the end of 2016.
The Group Competence Centre For Information Risk Management (IRM) focuses on information security and IT-related risks, especially risks caused by cybercrime.
At the end of 2015, the decision was taken to make a number of changes relating to information risk management. Firstly, the Group CRO became the CRO responsible for the entities belonging to CFO Services and Corporate Staff Services, including IT (the first line). All major decisions at these entities are now presented to the Group Executive Committee, on which the Group CRO sits. Secondly, the former Information Risk Management Practice function was re-positioned as the Group Competence Centre for Information Risk Management in the new Group Operational Risk unit, under the Senior General Manager of Group Risk (the second line). This unit is an independent assurance provider and risk ambassador, headed up by the Group Information Security Officer. It focuses on information risks, such as information security, cybercrime, operational risks for IT, vendors and third parties, the cloud, etc. It shapes the information risk framework, provides oversight, enables risk governance and helps the group's entities to strengthen their risk capabilities by:
Reputational risk is the risk arising from the negative perception on the part of clients, counterparties, shareholders, investors, debt-holders, market analysts, other relevant parties or regulators that can adversely affect a financial institution's ability to maintain existing, or establish new business relationships and to have continued access to sources of funding (for instance, through the interbank or securitisation markets).
Reputational risk is mostly a secondary or derivative risk since it is usually connected to and will materialise together with another risk.
We refined the Reputational Risk Management Framework in 2016, in line with the KBC Risk Management Framework. The pro-active and re-active management of reputational risk is the responsibility of the business, supported by many specialist units (including Group Communication and Group Compliance).
Under the pillar 2 approach to capital, the impact of reputational risk on the current business is covered in the first place by the capital charge for primary risks (including credit or operational risk).
Business risk is the risk arising from changes in external factors (the macroeconomic environment, regulations, client behaviour, competitive landscape, socio-demographic environment, etc.) that impact the demand for and/or profitability of our products and services. Strategic risk is the risk caused by not taking a strategic decision, by taking a strategic decision that does not have the intended effect or by not adequately implementing strategic decisions.
Business and strategic risks are assessed as part of the strategic planning process, starting with a structured risk scan that identifies the top financial and non-financial risks. Exposure to the identified business and strategic risks is monitored on an ongoing basis. Besides the risk scan, business and strategic risks are continually monitored by means of risk signals being reported to top management. In addition, these
risks are discussed during the planning process and are quantified under different stress test scenarios and long-term earnings assessments.
Under the pillar 2 approach to capital, business risk is incorporated by performing a one-year stress test on profit or loss.
Like to know more? Information on legal disputes is provided in Note 5.7 of the 'Consolidated financial statements' section.
The process of managing our structural exposure to market risks (including interest rate risk, equity risk, real estate risk, foreign exchange risk and inflation risk) is also known as Asset/Liability Management (ALM).
'Structural exposure' encompasses all exposure inherent in our commercial activity or in our long-term positions (banking and insurance). Trading activities are consequently not included. Structural exposure can also be described as a combination of:
Managing market risk in non-trading activities Management of the ALM risk strategy at KBC is the
responsibility of the Group Executive Committee, assisted by the Group ALCO, which has representatives from both the business side and the risk function.
Managing the ALM risk on a daily basis starts with risk awareness at Group Treasury and the local treasury functions. The treasury departments measure and manage interest rate risk on a playing field defined by the risk appetite. They take into account measurement of prepayment and other option risks in KBC's banking book, and manage a balanced investment portfolio. KBC's ALM limits are approved at two levels. Primary limits for interest rate risk, equity risk, and real estate risk for the consolidated entities are approved by the Board of Directors. Secondary limits for interest rate risk, equity risk, real estate risk and foreign exchange risk are approved for each entity by the Executive Committee. Together this forms the playing field for KBC's solid first line of defence for ALM risk.
KBC's second line of defence is the responsibility of Group Risk and the local risk departments. Their main task is to measure ALM risks and flag up current and future risk positions. A common rulebook and shared group measurement infrastructure ensures that these risks are measured consistently throughout the group. The ALM Risk Rulebook has been drawn up by Group Risk.
The main building blocks of KBC's ALM Risk Management Framework are:
The main technique used to measure interest rate risks is the 10 BPV method, which measures the extent to which the value of the portfolio would change if interest rates were to go up by ten basis points across the entire swap curve (negative figures indicate a decrease in the value of the portfolio). We
also use other techniques such as gap analysis, the duration approach, scenario analysis and stress testing (both from a regulatory capital perspective and from a net income perspective).
| Impact of a parallel 10-basis-point increase in the swap2 curve for the KBC group |
Impact on value1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 | |||
| Banking | -83 | -30 | |||
| Insurance | 5 | 10 | |||
| Total | -79 | -20 |
1 Full market value, regardless of accounting classification or impairment rules.
2 From 2016 – and in accordance with changing market standards – sensitivity figures are based on a risk-free curve (swap curve).
We manage the ALM interest rate positions of the banking entities via a system of market-oriented internal pricing for products with a fixed maturity date, and via a replicating portfolio technique for products without a fixed maturity date (e.g., current and savings accounts).
The bank takes interest rate positions mainly through government bonds, with a view to acquiring interest income, both in a bond portfolio used for reinvesting equity and in a bond portfolio financed with short-term funds. The following table shows the bank's exposure to interest rate risk in terms of 10 BPV.
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Average for 1Q | -24 | -63 |
| Average for 2Q | -35 | -46 |
| Average for 3Q | -50 | -33 |
| Average for 4Q | -83 | -30 |
| As at 31 December | -83 | -30 |
| Maximum in year | -83 | -63 |
| Minimum in year | -24 | -30 |
* Unaudited figures, except for those 'As at 31 December'.
(in millions of EUR)
In line with the Basel guidelines, we conduct a 200-basis-point stress test at regular intervals. It sets off the total interest rate risk in the banking book (given a 2% parallel shift in interest rates) against total capital and reserves. For the banking book at KBC group level, this risk came to 5.95% of total capital and reserves at year-end 2016. This is well below the 20% threshold, which is monitored by the National Bank of Belgium.
The following table shows the interest sensitivity gap of the ALM banking book. In order to determine the sensitivity gap, we break down the carrying value of assets (positive amount) and liabilities (negative amount) according to either the contractual repricing date or the maturity date, whichever is earlier, in order to obtain the length of time for which interest rates are fixed. We include derivative financial instruments, mainly to reduce exposure to interest rate movements, on the basis of their notional amount and repricing date.
| Non-interest | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 1 month | 1–3 months | 3–12 months | 1–5 years | 5–10 years | > 10 years | bearing | Total | |
| 31-12-2016 | -3 218 | -2 698 | 7 941 | 6 631 | 7 421 | 2 780 | -18 856 | 0 |
| 31-12-2015 | -20 413 | 300 | 13 132 | 15 847 | 8 163 | -4 006 | -13 024 | 0 |
The interest sensitivity gap shows our overall long position in interest rate risk. Generally, assets reprice over a longer term than liabilities, which means that KBC's net interest income benefits from a normal yield curve. The economic value of the KBC group is sensitive primarily to movements at the longterm end of the yield curve.
An analysis of net interest income is performed by measuring the impact of a one percent upward shock to interest rates over a one-year period, assuming a constant balance sheet. For the banking activities, the analysis shows that net interest income would remain under pressure over the next year due to the low rate environment. If rates increased by 1%, we could expect net interest income to improve by between 1% and 1.5%.
Where the group's insurance activities are concerned, the fixed-income investments for the non-life reserves are invested with the aim of matching the projected payout patterns for claims, based on extensive actuarial analysis.
The non-unit-linked life activities (class 21) combine a guaranteed interest rate with a discretionary participation feature (DPF) fixed by the insurer. The main risks to which the insurer is exposed as a result of such activities are a lowinterest-rate risk (the risk that return on investments will drop below the guaranteed level) and a risk that the investment return will not be sufficient to give customers a competitive profit-sharing rate. The risk of low interest rates is managed via a cashflow-matching policy, which is applied to that portion of the life insurance portfolios covered by fixed-income securities. Unit-linked life insurance investments (class 23) are not dealt with here, since this activity does not entail any market risk for KBC.
In the table below, we have summarised the exposure to interest rate risk in our life insurance activities. The life insurance assets and liabilities relating to business offering guaranteed rates are grouped according to the expected timing of cashflows.
| Expected cashflows (not discounted), life insurance activities | 10–15 | 15–20 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 0–5 years | 5–10 years | years | years | > 20 years | Total |
| 31-12-2016 | ||||||
| Fixed-income assets backing liabilities, guaranteed component | 9 248 | 5 097 | 2 340 | 1 560 | 1 147 | 19 391 |
| Liabilities, guaranteed component | 8 832 | 3 836 | 2 316 | 1 767 | 2 818 | 19 570 |
| Difference in expected cashflows | 416 | 1 260 | 24 | -207 | -1 672 | -179 |
| Mean duration of assets | 6.50 years | |||||
| Mean duration of liabilities | 7.90 years | |||||
| 31-12-2015 | ||||||
| Fixed-income assets backing liabilities, guaranteed component | 10 309 | 4 368 | 2 469 | 1 259 | 1 264 | 19 671 |
| Liabilities, guaranteed component | 9 860 | 3 371 | 2 292 | 1 769 | 2 802 | 20 094 |
| Difference in expected cashflows | 449 | 997 | 177 | -509 | -1 538 | -423 |
| Mean duration of assets | 5.94 years | |||||
| Mean duration of liabilities | 7.29 years |
As mentioned above, the main interest rate risk for the insurer is a downside one. We adopt a liability driven ALM approach focused on mitigating the interest rate risk in accordance with KBC's risk appetite. For the remaining interest rate risk, we
adhere to a policy that takes into account the possible negative consequences of a sustained decline in interest rates, and have built up adequate supplementary reserves.
| cuvn | . . | |
|---|---|---|
| activities | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| 5.00% and higher1 | 2% | 3% |
| More than 4.25% up to and including 4.99% | 9% | 10% |
| More than 3.50% up to and including 4.25% | 5% | 5% |
| More than 3.00% up to and including 3.50% | 9% | 21% |
| More than 2.50% up to and including 3.00% | 19% | 20% |
| 2.50% and lower2 | 52% | 40% |
| 0.00% | 2% | 2% |
| Total | 100% | 100% |
1 Contracts in Central and Eastern Europe.
2 Starting from 2016, future returns on specific insurance contracts under Belgian law have been indexed to the market (with a threshold at 1.75%).
We manage the credit spread risk for, inter alia, the sovereign portfolio by monitoring the extent to which the value of the sovereign bonds would change if credit spreads were to go up by 100 basis points across the entire curve. This economic sensitivity is illustrated in the table below, together with a breakdown per country.
| For compa | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rison purpo | Economic | |||||||
| ses: total | impact of | |||||||
| Available for | Held to | Designated | Loans and | Held for | at year-end | +100 basis | ||
| sale | maturity | at fair value | receivables | trading | Total | 2015 | points3 | |
| KBC core countries | ||||||||
| Belgium | 5 496 | 15 231 | 28 | 0 | 130 | 20 886 | 22 276 | -1 110 |
| Czech Republic | 2 341 | 5 022 | 0 | 12 | 168 | 7 543 | 7 496 | -414 |
| Hungary | 721 | 1 458 | 0 | 4 | 176 | 2 358 | 2 161 | -96 |
| Slovakia | 1 362 | 1 590 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 953 | 2 915 | -182 |
| Bulgaria | 471 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 487 | 390 | -31 |
| Ireland | 433 | 774 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 207 | 1 038 | -65 |
| Southern Europe | ||||||||
| Greece | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Portugal | 323 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 359 | 385 | -22 |
| Spain | 2 760 | 256 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 017 | 2 951 | -182 |
| Italy | 2 132 | 115 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 250 | 2 739 | -141 |
| Other countries | ||||||||
| France | 2 944 | 3 843 | 0 | 0 | 137 | 6 924 | 5 512 | -558 |
| Poland | 1 229 | 270 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 1 515 | 1 068 | -86 |
| Germany | 326 | 523 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 850 | 803 | -41 |
| Austria | 308 | 489 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 796 | 817 | -53 |
| Netherlands | 102 | 399 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 502 | 516 | -31 |
| Rest2 | 2 035 | 2 112 | 7 | 0 | 88 | 4 243 | 3 727 | -186 |
| Total carrying value | 22 982 | 32 131 | 47 | 16 | 713 | 55 889 | 54 796 | – |
| Total nominal value | 20 005 | 30 413 | 43 | 16 | 572 | 51 048 | 49 956 | – |
1 The carrying amount refers to the amount at which an asset or a liability is recognised in the company's books, i.e. the fair value amount for instruments categorised as available for sale, designated at fair value through profit or loss and held for trading and the amortised cost amount for instruments categorised as held to maturity. The table excludes exposure to supranational entities of selected countries. No material impairment on the government bonds in portfolio.
2 Sum of countries whose individual exposure is less than 0.5 billion euros at year-end 2016.
3 Theoretical economic impact in fair value terms of a parallel 100-basis-point upward shift in the spread over the entire maturity structure (in millions of euros). Only a portion of this impact is reflected in profit or loss and/or equity. Figures relate to banking book exposure only (impact on trading book exposure was very limited and amounted to -8 million euros at year-end 2016).
• The carrying value of the total sovereign bond exposure increased by 1.1 billion euros. There was a significant increase in exposure to bonds issued by France (+1.4 billion euros), Poland (+0.4 billion euros) and Hungary (+0.2 billion euros), but a decrease in exposure to Belgium (-1.4 billion euros) and Italy (-0.5 billion euros).
Revaluation reserve for available-for-sale assets at year-end 2016:
Portfolio of Belgian government bonds:
• Belgian sovereign bonds accounted for 37% of our total government bond portfolio at the end of 2016, reflecting the importance to KBC of Belgium, the group's primary core market. The importance of Belgium, in general, is also reflected in the 'Loan and investment portfolio' table at the start of the 'Credit risk' section, in the contribution that Belgium makes to group profit and in the various
components of the result (see 'Notes on segment reporting' under 'Consolidated financial statements').
The main exposure to equity is within our insurance business, where the ALM strategies are based on a risk-return evaluation, account taken of the market risk attached to open equity positions. Please note that a large part of the equity portfolio is held for the DPF of insurance liabilities (especially
profit-sharing in the Belgian market). Apart from the insurance entities, smaller equity portfolios are also held by other group entities, e.g., KBC Bank and KBC Asset Management. We have provided more information on total non-trading equity exposures at KBC in the tables below.
| Equity portfolio of the KBC group | Banking activities | Insurance activities | Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (breakdown by sector, in %) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | |
| Financials | 60% | 71% | 21% | 19% | 28% | 24% | |
| Consumer non-cyclical | 0% | 0% | 13% | 14% | 11% | 12% | |
| Communication | 0% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 1% | 3% | |
| Energy | 0% | 0% | 7% | 5% | 6% | 5% | |
| Industrials | 26% | 25% | 34% | 36% | 33% | 35% | |
| Utilities | 0% | 0% | 2% | 4% | 2% | 3% | |
| Consumer cyclical | 5% | 1% | 15% | 13% | 13% | 12% | |
| Materials | 0% | 0% | 6% | 5% | 5% | 5% | |
| Other and not specified | 9% | 2% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 2% | |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| In billions of EUR | 0.26 | 0.25 | 1.35 | 1.6 | 1.6* | 1.8 | |
| of which unlisted | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
* The main differences between the 1.6 billion euros in this table and the 2.2 billion euros for 'Equity instruments' in the table appearing in Note 4.1 of the 'Consolidated financial statements' section – besides a number of minor differences in the scope of consolidation – are that:
(a) Shares in the trading book (0.4 billion euros) are excluded above, but are included in the table in Note 4.1.
(b) Real estate participations that are not consolidated are classified as 'investments in building' in this table, but classified as 'shares' in the table in Note 4.1 (as they are not consolidated). (c) Most 'investments in funds' are treated on a 'look-through' basis (according to the underlying asset mix of the fund and therefore also partially classified as 'fixed-income instruments'), whereas they are classified as 'shares' in the table in Note 4.1.
| Impact of a 25% drop in equity prices | Impact on value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 | |||
| Banking activities | -64 | -61 | |||
| Insurance activities | -329 | -397 | |||
| Total | -393 | -458 |
| Non-trading equity exposure (in millions of EUR) |
Net realised gains (in income statement) |
Net unrealised gains on year-end exposure (in equity) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | ||
| Banking activities | 113 | 31 | 123 | 238 | |
| Insurance activities | 53 | 105 | 375 | 320 | |
| Total* | 165 | 136 | 503 | 573 |
* The total figure includes gains from some equity positions directly attributable to the KBC group. Gains from joint participations involving the banking and insurance entities of the KBC group have been eliminated, since these participations are consolidated at group level.
The groups' real estate businesses hold a limited real estate investment portfolio. KBC Insurance also holds a diversified real estate portfolio, which is held as an investment for non-life reserves and long-term life activities. The real estate exposure is viewed as a long-term hedge against inflation risks and as a way of optimising the risk/return profile of these portfolios. The table provides an overview of the sensitivity of economic value to fluctuations in the property markets.
| Impact of a 25% drop in real estate prices | Impact on value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 | ||
| Bank portfolios | -92 | -95 | ||
| Insurance portfolios | -55 | -60 | ||
| Total | -146 | -155 |
We pursue a prudent policy as regards our structural currency exposure, essentially seeking to avoid currency risk. Foreign exchange exposures in the ALM books of banking entities with a trading book are transferred to the trading book where they are managed within the allocated trading limits. The foreign exchange exposure of banking entities without a trading book, of the insurance entities and of other entities has to be hedged, if material. Equity holdings in non-euro currencies that are part of the investment portfolio do not need to be hedged. Participating interests in foreign currency are in principle funded by borrowing an amount in the relevant currency equal to the value of the net assets excluding goodwill.
The available capital is impacted when the market is stressed. Stress can be triggered by a number of market parameters, including by swap rates or bond spreads that increase or by equity prices that fall. At KBC, we use this capital sensitivity as a common denominator to measure the vulnerability of the banking book to different market risk shocks. Common equity tier-1 (CET1) capital is most sensitive to a parallel increase in bond spreads. This sensitivity is caused by investments in sovereign and corporate bonds whose spread component has not been hedged. The loss in available capital in the event of a fall in equity prices is caused primarily by positions in pension funds that would be hit by such a shock.
| (as % of CET1) | ||
|---|---|---|
| IFRS impact caused by | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
| +100-basis-point parallel shift in interest rates | -0.2% | -0.04% |
| +100-basis-point parallel shift in spread | -0.9% | -0.8% |
| -25% in equity prices | -0.3% | -0.2% |
| Joint scenario | -1.3% | -1.1% |
Liquidity risk is the risk that an organisation will be unable to meet its payment obligations as they come due, without incurring unacceptable losses.
The principal objective of our liquidity management is to be able to fund the group and to enable the core business activities of the group to continue to generate revenue, even under adverse circumstances. Since the financial crisis, there has been a greater focus on liquidity risk management throughout the industry, and this has been intensified by the minimum liquidity standards defined by the Basel Committee, which have been transposed into European law through CRR/ CRD IV.
A group-wide 'liquidity risk management framework' is in place to define the risk playing field.
Liquidity management itself is organised within the Group Treasury function, which acts as a first line of defence and is responsible for the overall liquidity and funding management of the KBC group. The Group Treasury function monitors and steers the liquidity profile on a daily basis and sets the policies and steering mechanisms for funding management (intragroup funding, funds transfer pricing). These policies ensure that local management has an incentive to work towards a sound funding profile. It also actively monitors its collateral on a group-wide basis and is responsible for drafting the liquidity contingency plan that sets out the strategies for addressing liquidity shortfalls in emergency situations.
Our liquidity risk management framework is based on the following pillars:
• Contingency liquidity risk. This risk is assessed on the basis of liquidity stress tests, which measure how the liquidity buffer of the group's bank entities changes under extreme stressed scenarios. This buffer is based on assumptions regarding liquidity outflows (retail customer behaviour, professional client behaviour, drawing of committed credit lines, etc.) and liquidity inflows resulting from actions to
increase liquidity ('repoing' the bond portfolio, reducing unsecured interbank lending, etc.). The liquidity buffer has to be sufficient to cover liquidity needs (net cash and collateral outflows) over (i) a period that is required to restore market confidence in the group following a KBC-specific event, (ii) a period that is required for markets to stabilise after a general market event and (iii) a combined scenario, which takes a KBC-specific event and a general market event into account. The overall aim of the liquidity framework is to remain sufficiently liquid in stress situations, without resorting to liquidity-enhancing actions which would entail significant costs or which would interfere with the core banking business of the group.
• Structural liquidity risk. We manage our funding structure so as to maintain substantial diversification, to minimise funding concentrations in time buckets, and to limit the level of reliance on short-term wholesale funding. We manage the structural funding position as part of the integrated strategic planning process, where funding – in addition to capital, profits and risks – is one of the key elements. At present, our strategic aim for the next few years is to build up a sufficient buffer in terms of LCR and NSFR via a funding management framework, which sets clear funding targets for the subsidiaries (own funding, reliance on intra-group funding) and provides further incentives via a system of intra-group pricing to the extent subsidiaries run a funding mismatch.
In the table below, we have illustrated the structural liquidity risk by grouping the assets and liabilities according to the remaining term to maturity (contractual maturity date). The difference between the cash inflows and outflows is referred to as the 'net funding gap'. At year-end 2016, KBC had attracted 32 billion euros' worth of funding on a gross basis from the professional interbank and repo markets.
• Operational liquidity risk. Operational liquidity management is conducted in the treasury departments, based on
estimated funding requirements. Group-wide trends in funding liquidity and funding needs are monitored on a daily basis by the Group Treasury function, ensuring that a sufficient buffer is available at all times to deal with extreme liquidity events in which no wholesale funding can be rolled over.
| Liquidity risk | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (excluding intercompany deals)* (in billions of EUR) |
<= 1 month |
1–3 months |
3–12 months |
1–5 years | 5–10 years |
> 10 years |
On demand |
Not defined |
Total |
| 31-12-2016 | |||||||||
| Total inflows | 22 | 8 | 19 | 56 | 50 | 33 | 19 | 32 | 239 |
| Total outflows | 39 | 12 | 14 | 31 | 14 | 1 | 103 | 26 | 239 |
| Professional funding | 17 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
| Customer funding | 19 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 102 | 0 | 143 |
| Debt certificates | 1 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 36 |
| Other | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 26 | 29 |
| Liquidity gap (excl. undrawn commitments) |
-18 | -4 | 5 | 26 | 37 | 32 | -84 | 7 | 0 |
| Undrawn commitments | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | -34 | – |
| Financial guarantees | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | -10 | – |
| Net funding gap (incl. undrawn commitments) |
-18 | -4 | 5 | 26 | 37 | 32 | -84 | -38 | -44 |
| 31-12-2015 | |||||||||
| Total inflows | 17 | 11 | 15 | 56 | 48 | 34 | 4 | 34 | 218 |
| Total outflows | 34 | 14 | 10 | 28 | 12 | 1 | 93 | 26 | 218 |
| Professional funding | 15 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 |
| Customer funding | 17 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 138 |
| Debt certificates | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| Other | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 26 | 28 |
| Liquidity gap (excl. undrawn commitments) |
-17 | -3 | 6 | 28 | 36 | 33 | -90 | 8 | 0 |
| Undrawn commitments | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | -37 | – |
| Financial guarantees | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | -9 | – |
| Net funding gap (incl. undrawn commitments) |
-17 | -3 | 6 | 28 | 36 | 33 | -90 | -38 | -46 |
* Cashflows exclude interest rate flows consistent with internal and regulatory liquidity reporting. Inflows/outflows that arise from margin calls posted/received for MtM positions in derivatives are reported in the 'not defined' bucket. Professional funding' includes all deposits from credit institutions and investment firms, as well as all repos. Instruments are classified on the basis of their first callable date. Some instruments are reported at fair value (on a discounted basis), whereas others are reported on an undiscounted basis (in order to reconcile them with Note 4.1 of the 'Consolidated financial statements' section). Due to the uncertain nature of the maturity profile of undrawn commitments and financial guarantees, these instruments are reported in the 'Not defined' bucket. The 'Other' category under 'Total outflows' contains own equity, short positions, provisions for risks and charges, tax liabilities and other liabilities.
Typical for a banking group, funding sources generally have a shorter maturity than the assets that are funded, leading to a negative net liquidity gap in the shorter time buckets and positive net liquidity gap in the longer term buckets. This
creates liquidity risk if we would be unable to renew maturing short-term funding. Our liquidity framework imposes a funding strategy to ensure that the liquidity risk remains within the group's risk appetite.
We have a solid liquidity position. At year-end 2016, the KBC group had 60 billion euros' worth of unencumbered central bank eligible assets, 45 billion euros of which in the form of liquid government bonds (75%). The remaining available liquid assets were mainly other ECB/FED eligible bonds (10%) and pledgeable credit claims (4%). Most of the liquid assets are expressed in euros, Czech koruna and Hungarian forint (all home market currencies). Unencumbered liquid assets were three times the net recourse to short-term wholesale funding, while funding from non-wholesale markets was accounted for by stable funding from core customer segments in our core markets.
We have a strong retail/mid-cap deposit base in our core markets, resulting in a stable funding mix. A significant portion of the funding is attracted from core customer segments and markets.
The KBC group's funding mix (at 31 December 2016) can be broken down as follows:
Both the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) are defined in the 'Glossary of ratios and terms'. At year-end 2016, our NSFR stood at 125% and our LCR at 139%. Our NSFR and LCR are both well above the minimum regulatory requirements and KBC's internal floors of 105%.
Technical insurance risks stem from uncertainty regarding the frequency of insured losses and how extensive they will be. All these risks are kept under control through appropriate underwriting, pricing, claims reserving, reinsurance and claims handling policies of line management and through independent insurance risk management.
The Group risk function develops and rolls out a group-wide framework for managing insurance risks. It is responsible for providing support for local implementation and for the functional direction of the insurance risk management process of the insurance subsidiaries.
The insurance risk management framework is designed primarily around the following building blocks:
We develop models from the bottom up for all material group-wide insurance liabilities, i.e. (i) future claims that will occur over a predefined time horizon, as well as the claims settlement pattern, (ii) the future settlement of claims (whether already reported to the insurer or not) that have occurred in the past but have not yet been fully settled, and (iii) the impact of the reinsurance programme on these claims. We use these models to steer the group's insurance entities towards creating more shareholder value, by means of applications to calculate the internal capital (ICM model), support decisions on reinsurance, calculate the ex post profitability of specific sub-portfolios and set off internal capital requirements against the relevant return in pricing insurance policies.
The insurance portfolios are protected against the impact of large claims or the accumulation of losses (due, for instance, to a concentration of insured risks) by means of reinsurance. We divide these reinsurance programmes into three main groups, i.e. property insurance, liability insurance and personal insurance, and we re-evaluate and renegotiate them every year.
Most of our reinsurance contracts are concluded on a non-proportional basis, which provides cover against the impact of large claims or loss events. The independent insurance risk management function is also responsible for advising on the restructuring of the reinsurance programmes. This approach has resulted in optimising the retention of the KBC group particularly in respect of its exposure to natural catastrophe risk, but also in respect of other lines of business.
As part of its mission to independently monitor insurance risks, the Group risk function regularly carries out in-depth studies. These confirm that there is a high degree of probability that the non-life technical provisions at subsidiary level are adequate. In addition, various group companies conduct
Liability Adequacy Tests (LAT) that meet local and IFRS requirements for the life technical provisions. We make calculations using prospective methods (cashflow projections that take account of lapse rates and a discount rate that is set for each insurance entity based on local macroeconomic conditions and regulations), and build in extra market-value margins to deal with the factor of uncertainty in a number of parameters. Since no deficiencies were identified by year-end 2016, there was no need for a deficiency reserve to be set aside within the KBC group.
The table below shows claims settlement figures in the non-life business over the past few years and includes KBC Insurance NV, Cˇ SOB Pojišt'ovna (Czech Republic), Cˇ SOB Poist'ovnˇ a (Slovakia), DZI Insurance (from financial year 2008), K&H Insurance, and KBC Group Re. All provisions for claims to be paid at the close of 2016 have been included. The claimssettlement figures incorporate all amounts that can be allocated to individual claims, including the Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) and Incurred But Not Enough Reserved (IBNER) provisions, and the external claims handling expenses, but do not include internal claims settlement expenses and provisions for amounts expected to be recovered. The provision figures included are before reinsurance and have not been adjusted to eliminate intercompany amounts. The first row in the table shows the total claims burden (claims paid plus provisions) for the claims that occurred during a particular year, as estimated at the end of the year of occurrence. The following rows indicate the situation at the end of the subsequent calendar years. We restated the amounts to reflect exchange rates at year-end 2016.
| Loss triangles, KBC Insurance |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
Year of occur rence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 2007 | 2008* | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
| Estimate at the end of the year of |
||||||||||
| occurrence | 687 | 792 | 824 | 871 | 810 | 849 | 916 | 994 | 948 | 1 049 |
| 1 year later | 621 | 755 | 720 | 774 | 711 | 742 | 770 | 883 | 802 | – |
| 2 years later | 587 | 726 | 668 | 723 | 655 | 706 | 700 | 828 | – | – |
| 3 years later | 565 | 713 | 650 | 719 | 636 | 682 | 677 | – | – | – |
| 4 years later | 561 | 708 | 633 | 714 | 624 | 668 | – | – | – | – |
| 5 years later | 556 | 701 | 626 | 705 | 617 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 6 years later | 549 | 675 | 619 | 699 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 7 years later | 549 | 671 | 616 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 8 years later | 548 | 664 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 9 years later | 548 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Current estimate | 548 | 664 | 616 | 699 | 617 | 668 | 677 | 828 | 802 | 1049 |
| Cumulative payments |
480 | 604 | 535 | 612 | 526 | 535 | 552 | 631 | 512 | 381 |
| Current provisions | 66 | 60 | 81 | 87 | 91 | 132 | 125 | 197 | 291 | 668 |
* Figures for DZI Insurance (Bulgaria) have been included from financial year 2008. If these figures had not been taken into account, the following amount would have been arrived at for financial year 2008 (amount and year of occurrence): 586 for 2007.
The Actuarial function is one of the key control functions that is defined in the Solvency II regulatory framework. Solvency II requires an Actuarial function to be installed in each insurance entity and at insurance group level. Basically, the task of such a function is to ensure that the company's Board of Directors or
Supervisory Board is fully informed in an independent manner. It does this, for example, by:
• advising on the calculation of the technical provisions (including appropriateness of methodologies, appropriateness and quality of data used, and experience analysis);
Solvency II results and more detailed information on how all the ratios developed in 2016 are provided under 'Solvency of KBC Bank and KBC Insurance separately' in the 'How do we manage our capital?' section.
For unexpected events like Brexit, we had a dedicated working group in place comprising both risk and business-side people who dealt with the matter in an integrated way and covered all the potential risks involved. Actions taken prior to and following the Brexit vote revealed that the impact on the KBC group would be minimal in 2016.
Specific information on the insurance activities of the group can be found in Notes 3.7 and 5.6 in the 'Consolidated financial statements' section. We have provided a breakdown by business unit of earned premiums and technical charges in the notes dealing with segment reporting.
Capital adequacy (or solvency) risk is the risk that the capital base of the group, the bank or the insurer might fall below an acceptable level.
Our statutory auditors have audited the information in this section that forms part of the IFRS financial statements, namely the 'Solvency at group level' table (the audited parts are indicated in a footnote to the table), 'ICAAP and ORSA' and 'Stress testing'.
We report the solvency of the group, the bank and the insurance company based on IFRS data and according to the rules imposed by the regulator. For the KBC group, this implies that we calculate our solvency ratios based on CRR/CRD IV. This regulation entered gradually into force on 1 January 2014, and will be fully implemented by 1 January 2022.
The minimum solvency ratios required under CRR/CRD IV are 4.5% for the common equity tier-1 (CET1) ratio, 6.0% for the tier-1 capital ratio and 8.0% for the total capital ratio (i.e. pillar 1 minimum ratios).
As a result of its supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP), the competent supervisory authority (in KBC's case, the ECB) can require that higher minimum ratios be maintained (= pillar 2 requirements) because, for instance, not all risks are properly reflected in the regulatory pillar 1 calculations.
Following the SREP for 2016, the ECB formally notified KBC of its decision (applicable from 1 January 2017) to set:
The ECB decision of 2.75% CET1 equals the previous capital requirement, but no split was made at that time between the P2R (which mandatorily restricts profit distribution and, therefore, is relevant for Additional Tier-1 investors) and the P2G (which might affect dividend policy and hence is relevant for shareholders). The fact that the requirement remains unchanged reflects KBC's low risk profile and its resilience to adverse economic conditions, as demonstrated in the stress tests, whose results were published on 29 July 2016.
The capital requirement for KBC is determined not only by the ECB, but also by the decisions of the local competent authorities in its core markets. Indeed, the decision taken by the relevant Czech and Slovak authorities to introduce a countercyclical buffer requirement of 0.5% in the first and third quarters, respectively, of 2017 corresponds with an additional CET1 requirement of 0.15% at KBC group level. The objective of a countercyclical buffer is to counteract the effects of the economic cycle on banks' lending activity. As far as Belgium is concerned, the national bank (NBB) kept this buffer at 0%. For Belgian systemic banks, the NBB had already announced its capital buffers back in 2015. For KBC, it means that an additional capital buffer of 1.0% of CET1 is required for 2017, which is to be built up to 1.5% in 2018.
Lastly, the conservation buffer currently stands at 1.25% for 2017, and is to increase to 2.50% in 2019.
Altogether, this brings the fully loaded CET1 requirement (under the Danish compromise) to 10.40% (4.5% (pillar 1) + 1.75% (P2R) + 2.5% (conservation buffer) + 1.5% (systemic buffer) + 0.15% (countercyclical buffer)), with an additional P2G of 1%. KBC clearly exceeds this requirement: at year-end 2016, the fully loaded CET1 ratio came to 15.8%, which represented a capital buffer of 4 757 million euros relative to the minimum requirement of 10.40%. Furthermore, since part of the capital requirements is to be gradually built up by 2019, the relevant requirement (under the Danish compromise) for 2017 on a phased-in basis has been reduced, i.e. 8.65% of CET1 (4.5% (pillar 1) + 1.75% (P2R) + 1.25% (conservation buffer) + 1% (systemic buffer) + 0.15% (countercyclical buffer)).
The regulatory minimum solvency targets were also amply exceeded throughout the entire financial year.
The general rule under CRR/CRD IV for insurance participations is that an insurance participation is deducted from common equity at group level, unless the competent authority grants permission to apply a risk weighting instead (Danish compromise). KBC received such permission from the supervisory authority and hence reports its solvency on the basis of a 370% risk weighting being applied to the holdings of own fund instruments of the insurance company, after having deconsolidated KBC Insurance from the group figures.
In addition to the solvency ratios under CRD IV, KBC – as a financial conglomerate – also has to disclose its solvency position as calculated in accordance with the Financial Conglomerate Directive (FICOD; 2002/87/EC). This implies that available capital will be calculated on the basis of the consolidated position of the group and the eligible items recognised as such under the prevailing sectoral rules, which are CRD IV for the banking business and Solvency II for the insurance business (Solvency I until the end 2015). The resulting available capital is to be compared with a capital requirement expressed as a risk weighted asset amount. For this latter figure, the capital requirements for the insurance business (based on Solvency I until the end of 2015 and on Solvency II as of 2016) are multiplied by 12.5 to obtain a risk weighted asset equivalent (instead of the 370% risk weighting applied to the participation in the insurance company under the Danish compromise). At year-end 2016, the phased common equity ratio (under FICOD) was 14.8%.
A detailed calculation of the KBC group's solvency ratios under the Danish compromise method is given below, with summary calculations provided for the FICOD and deduction methods.
Additional information concerning the calculation of solvency according to CRR/CRD IV (Danish compromise method, fully loaded):
At year-end 2016, our fully loaded leverage ratio at group level stood at 6.1% (see table below). Year-on-year, the ratio fell 0.2 percentage points, due mainly to the higher total exposure being only partly offset by a higher level of tier-1 capital. More details, including a description of the processes used to manage the risk of excessive leverage, can be found in KBC's Risk Report, which is available at www.kbc.com (the risk report has not been audited by the statutory auditor).
| Solvency at group level (consolidated; under CRR/CRD IV, Danish compromise method) (in millions of EUR) |
31-12-2016 Phased-in |
31-12-2016 Fully loaded |
31-12-2015 Phased-in |
31-12-2015 Fully loaded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total regulatory capital, after profit appropriation | 17 887 | 17 571 | 17 305 | 16 936 |
| Tier-1 capital | 15 473 | 15 286 | 14 691 | 14 647 |
| Common equity1 | 14 033 | 13 886 | 13 242 | 13 247 |
| Parent shareholders' equity (after deconsolidating KBC Insurance) | 15 500 | 15 500 | 14 075 | 14 075 |
| Intangible fixed assets, incl. deferred tax impact (-) | -400 | -400 | -366 | -366 |
| Goodwill on consolidation, incl. deferred tax impact (-) | -483 | -483 | -482 | -482 |
| Minority interests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Available-for-sale revaluation reserves (-)3 | -206 | – | -466 | – |
| Hedging reserve, cashflow hedges (-) | 1 356 | 1 356 | 1 163 | 1 163 |
| Valuation differences in financial liabilities at fair value – own credit risk (-) | -18 | -18 | -20 | -20 |
| Value adjustment due to requirements for prudent valuation (-)2 | -109 | -140 | -53 | -94 |
| Dividend payout (-) | -753 | -753 | 0 | 0 |
| Coupon on AT1 instruments (-) | -2 | -2 | -2 | -2 |
| Deduction with regard to financing provided to shareholders (-) | -91 | -91 | -91 | -91 |
| IRB provision shortfall (-) | -203 | -203 | -171 | -171 |
| Deferred tax assets on losses carried forward (-) | -557 | -879 | -345 | -765 |
| Additional going concern capital | 1 440 | 1 400 | 1 450 | 1 400 |
| Grandfathered innovative hybrid tier-1 instruments | 40 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
| Grandfathered non-innovative hybrid tier-1 instruments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CRR-compliant AT1 instruments | 1 400 | 1 400 | 1 400 | 1400 |
| Minority interests to be included in additional going concern capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tier-2 capital | 2 414 | 2 285 | 2 614 | 2 289 |
| IRB provision excess (+) | 362 | 367 | 359 | 369 |
| Subordinated liabilities | 2 053 | 1 918 | 2 255 | 1 920 |
| Subordinated loans non-consolidated financial sector entities (-) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority interests to be included in tier-2 capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total weighted risk volume | 86 878 | 87 782 | 87 343 | 89 067 |
| Banking | 77 579 | 78 482 | 78 034 | 79 758 |
| Insurance | 9 133 | 9 133 | 9 133 | 9 133 |
| Holding-company activities | 198 | 198 | 208 | 208 |
| Elimination of intercompany transactions | -32 | -32 | -33 | -33 |
| Solvency ratios | ||||
| Common equity ratio | 16.2% | 15.8% | 15.2% | 14.9% |
| Tier-1 ratio | 17.8% | 17.4% | 16.8% | 16.4% |
| Total capital ratio | 20.6% | 20.0% | 19.8% | 19.0% |
1 Audited figures (excluding 'IRB provision shortfall' and 'Value adjustment due to requirements for prudent valuation').
2 CRR ensures that prudent valuation is reflected in the calculation of available capital. This means that the fair value of all assets measured at fair value and impacting the available capital (by means of fair value changes in P&L or equity) need to be brought back to their prudent value. The difference between the fair value and the prudent value (also called the 'additional value adjustment' or AVA) must be deducted from the CET1 ratio.
3 Relates to the prudential filter for positive revaluation reserves from equity.
| Solvency at group level (consolidated; FICOD method)* (in millions of EUR) |
31-12-2016 Phased-in |
31-12-2016 Fully loaded |
31-12-2015 Phased-in |
31-12-2015 Fully loaded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Common equity | 14 794 | 14 647 | 14 014 | 14 019 |
| Total weighted risk volume | 100 136 | 101 039 | 98 107 | 99 831 |
| Common equity ratio | 14.8% | 14.5% | 14.3% | 14.0% |
* For more details, please refer to KBC's Extended Quarterly Reports (available at www.kbc.com). The 31-12-2015 figures under FICOD have been adjusted to reflect the switch from Solvency I to Solvency II for KBC Insurance.
| Solvency at group level (consolidated; CRR/CRD IV, deduction method) (in millions of EUR) |
31-12-2016 Fully loaded |
31-12-2015 Fully loaded |
|---|---|---|
| Common equity | 12 806 | 12 103 |
| Total weighted risk volume | 82 120 | 83 245 |
| Common equity ratio | 15.6% | 14.5% |
| Leverage ratio at group level (consolidated; under CRR/CRD IV, Danish compromise method) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | Fully loaded | Fully loaded |
| Tier-1 capital | 15 286 | 14 647 |
| Total exposure | 251 891 | 233 675 |
| Total assets | 275 200 | 252 355 |
| Deconsolidation of KBC Insurance | -32 678 | -31 545 |
| Adjustment for derivatives | -5 784 | -3 282 |
| Adjustment for regulatory corrections in determining tier-1 capital | -2 197 | -806 |
| Adjustment for securities financing transaction exposures | 1 094 | 1 057 |
| Off-balance sheet exposures | 16 256 | 15 897 |
| Leverage ratio | 6.1% | 6.3% |
Besides the ECB and NBB, which supervise KBC on a going concern basis, KBC is also subject to requirements set by the Single Resolution Board (SRB). The SRB is developing resolution plans for the major banks in the euro area. Such a plan describes how the resolution authorities will approach the resolution of a bank that is failing (or likely to fail) in a way that protects its critical functions, government funds and financial stability. It takes account of the specific features of the bank and is tailor-made. A key feature of the resolution plan is deciding at which level the competent resolution authorities will intervene. A choice has to be made between a single resolution authority that resolves the group as a whole (Single Point of Entry or 'SPE') or different authorities that separately resolve those parts of the group that fall within their jurisdiction (Multiple Point of Entry or 'MPE'). In January 2016, KBC indicated its preference for a SPE approach at group level, because our business model relies heavily on integration, both commercially (e.g., banking and insurance) and organisationally (e.g., risk, finance, treasury, etc.).
A major resolution tool is 'bail-in', which implies a recapitalisation and stabilisation of the bank by writing down certain unsecured liabilities and issuing new shares to former creditors as compensation. Depending on the size of the losses, bail-in could be sufficient to bring the capital back to a level that is high enough to restore market confidence and to create a stable point from which additional actions could be implemented. When bail-in is proposed as the primary resolution tool, it is crucial that there are adequate liabilities eligible for bail-in. This is measured by the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), a formal target for which is expected to be set by the SRB in the course of 2017.
In view of our preference for an SPE approach at group level, debt instruments that are positioned for bail-in will be issued by KBC Group NV. This approach keeps the group intact and also safeguards the bank-insurance model in resolution. At year-end 2016, the MREL ratio of KBC Group NV calculated in this way stood at 21.0% (as a percentage of risk weighted assets). This approach is more restrictive than the MREL definition in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive
(BRRD), which also includes instruments issued at lower levels in the group.
| MREL: based on instruments issued by KBC Group NV | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | Fully loaded | Fully loaded |
| Own funds and eligible liabilities | 18 467 | 16 327 |
| CET1 capital (consolidated, CRR/CRD IV, Danish compromise method) | 13 886 | 13 247 |
| AT1 instruments | 1 400 | 1 400 |
| T2 instruments (nominal amount, remaining maturity > 1 year) | 1 681 | 1 680 |
| Senior debt (nominal amount, remaining maturity > 1 year) | 1 500 | 0 |
| Risk weighted assets (consolidated, CRR/CRD IV, Danish compromise method) | 87 782 | 89 067 |
| MREL ratio | 21.0% | 18.3% |
In the table below, we have provided certain solvency information for KBC Bank and KBC Insurance, separately. More detailed information can be found in their consolidated financial statements and in KBC's Risk Report, which is available at www.kbc.com (the risk report has not been audited by the statutory auditor).
As is the case for the KBC group, the solvency of KBC Bank is calculated based on CRR/CRD IV.
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total regulatory capital, after profit appropriation | 16 229 | 16 045 |
| Tier-1 capital | 12 625 | 12 346 |
| Of which common equity | 11 219 | 10 941 |
| Tier-2 capital | 3 604 | 3 699 |
| Total weighted risks | 78 482 | 79 758 |
| Common equity ratio | 14.3% | 13.7% |
| Tier-1 ratio | 16.1% | 15.5% |
| Total capital ratio | 20.7% | 20.1% |
The solvency of KBC Insurance is calculated on the basis of Solvency II, the new regulatory framework for insurers in Europe that was introduced on 1 January 2016. Whereas Solvency I requirements were volume-based, Solvency II pursues a risk-based approach. It aims to implement solvency requirements that better reflect the risks that companies face and to deliver a supervisory system that is consistent across all EU Member States. KBC is subject to the Solvency II regime as regards all its insurance subsidiaries.
| (Solvency II, in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Own funds | 3 637 | 3 683 |
| Tier-1 | 3 137 | 3 180 |
| IFRS parent shareholders' equity | 2 936 | 2 815 |
| Dividend payout | -103 | -71 |
| Deduction of intangible assets and goodwill (after tax) | -123 | -123 |
| Valuation differences (after tax) | 349 | 416 |
| Volatility adjustment | 120 | 195 |
| Other | -42 | -53 |
| Tier-2 | 500 | 503 |
| Subordinated liabilities | 500 | 503 |
| Solvency capital requirement (SCR) | 1 791 | 1 592 |
| Solvency II ratio | 203% | 231% |
| Solvency surplus above SCR | 1 846 | 2 091 |
| * Unaudited figures. |
The decrease in the Solvency II ratio (including volatility adjustment) compared to year-end 2015 is due mainly to:
KBC's ICAAP (Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process) consists of numerous business and risk processes that together contribute to the objective of assessing and ensuring at all times that we are adequately capitalised in view of our risk profile and the quality of our risk management and control environment. For this purpose, we also have an internal capital model in place to complement the existing regulatory capital models. This model is used, for example, to measure risk adjusted performance, to underpin and set risk limits and to assess capital adequacy. It is complemented by a framework for assessing earnings that aims to reveal vulnerabilities in terms of the longer term sustainability of our business model.
A backbone process in our ICAAP is the Alignment of Planning Cycles (APC). This yearly process aims to create an integrated three-year plan in which the strategy, finance, treasury and risk perspectives are collectively taken into account. In this process, the risk appetite of the group is set and cascaded by setting risk limits at entity level.
The APC is not only about planning, it is also about closely monitoring the execution of the plan in all its aspects (P&L, risk weighted assets, liquidity). Such monitoring is reflected in dedicated reports drawn up by the various Group functions.
In addition to the integrated approach at group level, KBC Insurance and its insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have conducted an Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) on a regular basis, in accordance with Solvency II requirements. Similar to ICAAP, the aim of the ORSA is to monitor and ensure that business is managed in a sound and prudent way and that the KBC Insurance group is adequately capitalised in view of its risk profile and the quality of its risk management and control environment. The ORSA process draws to a large extent on the same 'core processes' as the ICAAP and includes APC, risk appetite setting and ongoing business, risk and capital management processes. Where necessary, these processes are enhanced to take account of the specific nature of the (re)insurance activities and to comply with Solvency II requirements.
Stress testing is an important risk management tool that adds value both to strategic processes and to day-to-day risk management (risk identification, risk appetite and limit setting, etc.). As such, stress testing is an integral part of our risk management framework, and an important building block of our ICAAP and ORSA.
We define stress testing as a management decision supporting process that encompasses various techniques which are used to evaluate the potential negative impact on KBC's (financial) condition, caused by specific event(s) and/or movement(s) in risk factors ranging from plausible to extreme, exceptional or implausible.
As such, it is an important tool in identifying sources of vulnerability and hence in assessing whether our capital is adequate enough to cover the risks we face. That is why the APC also includes sensitivities to critical assumptions used in the base case plan. In addition, APC is complemented by a
dedicated integrated stress test that is run in parallel. These sensitivities and stress tests are designed to provide assurance that:
The resulting capital ratios are compared to internal and regulatory capital targets.
Even more severe scenarios and sensitivities are calculated in the context of the recovery plan. These scenarios focus on events that lead to a breach of the regulatory capital requirements. As such, the recovery plan provides another insight into key vulnerabilities of the group and the mitigating actions that management could implement should the defined stress materialise.
Numerous other stress tests are run within KBC that provide valuable information for assessing the capital adequacy of the
We remained adequately capitalised under the 2016 EU-wide EBA stress test, as announced by the European Banking Authority (EBA) at the end of July 2016. The impact of the stress test on our fully loaded common equity ratio (which was 14.9% at year-end 2015) increased this ratio by 1.3 percentage points to 16.2% under the baseline scenario (+1.0 percentage point on a transitional basis). Under the adverse scenario, our
group. They include regulatory stress tests, ad hoc integrated and risk-type or portfolio-specific stress tests at group and local level. Relevant stress test impacts are valuable inputs for defining sensitivities in APC planning.
fully loaded common equity ratio would fall by 3.6 percentage points to 11.3% (-3.9 percentage points on a transitional basis, likewise falling to 11.3%). Therefore, we remain adequately capitalised even in an adverse scenario. Our leverage ratio, which stood at 6.3% at the end of 2015, would increase to 7.4% under the baseline scenario and decrease to 5.7% under the adverse scenario.
The main aspects of our corporate governance policy are set out in the Corporate Governance Charter of KBC Group NV (the 'Charter', which is published at www.kbc.com). We have adopted the 2009 version of the Belgian Corporate Governance Code (the 'Code') as our benchmark. This Code can be downloaded at www.corporategovernancecommittee.be.
More factual information regarding corporate governance and on the application of certain statutory provisions is contained in this corporate governance statement.
Unless otherwise indicated, the period dealt with runs from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016.
A number of terms have been abbreviated as follows in this section of the annual report: Board of Directors: Board; Executive Committee: EC; Audit Committee: AC; Risk & Compliance Committee: RCC.
The following table shows the members of the Board and its committees on 31 December 2016. A list of the external offices held by all members of the Board is provided at www.kbc.com, as is a brief CV for each director. The number of meetings attended is shown in the columns relating to the committees.
| ee on Committ Remunerati |
5 | 5 (c) | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Committee Nomination |
5 | 5 (c) | 5 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||
| RCC | 10 | 10 (c) | 9 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||
| AC | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 (c) | ||||||||||||
| EC | n (c) | n | n | ||||||||||||||
| Independen t directors |
n | n | n | ||||||||||||||
| olders' repr esentatives Core shareh |
n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | |||||||
| ve directors Non-executi |
n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||||
| ngs attende d Board meeti |
11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Expiry date e erm of offic of current t |
2019 | 2017 | 2020 | 2019 | 2017 | 2020 | 2019 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2020 | 2019 | 2020 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | |
| ard in 2016 d on the Bo Period serve |
Full year | Full year | Full year | Full year | From 16 December 2016 |
From 4 May 2016 | Full year | Full year | Full year | From 16 December 2016 |
Full year | Full year | Full year | Full year | From 16 December 2016 |
Full year | |
| ponsibility Primary res |
Chairman of the Board | Deputy Chairman of the Board CEO, Vlerick Group |
President of the EC and Executive Director | CEO, Christeyns Group | Managing Director, Cera and KBC Ancora | Chairperson, Boerenbond | Managing Director, Cera and KBC Ancora | Managing Director, 3D | Professor, International Business School of Budapest | Professor Emeritus in Economics at the University of Antwerp Director, Cera |
Senior Partner, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Executive Director | CEO, Ravago Group | Executive Director | Director and Senior Manager, Cera | Statutory auditor: PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC), represented by Roland Jeanquart and Tom Meuleman. Managing Director, MRBB |
|
| Name* | Number of meetings in 2016 | Thomas Leysen | Philippe Vlerick | Johan Thijs | Alain Bostoen | Katelijn Callewaert | Sonja De Becker | Franky Depickere | Frank Donck | Júlia Király | Walter Nonneman | Vladimira Papirnik | Luc Popelier | Theodoros Roussis | Christine Van Rijsseghem | Matthieu Vanhove | Marc Wittemans |
Secretary to the Board of Directors: Johan Tyteca.
(c) Chairman of this committee.
* Luc Discry, Lode Morlion and Ghislaine Van Kerckhove, who were non-executive directors up to and including 15 December 2016, attended 10, 11 and 11 Board meetings, respectively. Piet Vanthemsche, who was a non-executive director up to and including 4 May 2016, attended 4 Board meetings and 1 Nomination Committee meeting.
• Sonja De Becker replaced Piet Vanthemsche on the Nomination Committee with effect on 4 May 2016.
Like to know more?
The corporate governance charter can be found under 'Corporate Governance' at www.kbc.com. The agenda for the General Meeting of 4 May 2017 is available at www.kbc.com.
Christine Van Rijsseghem °1962 Belgian Master's Degree in Law (UGent) Joined company in 1987* CRO (Chief Risk Officer)
°1964 Belgian Master's Degree in Applied Economics, (UFSIA Antwerp) Joined company in 1988* CFO (Chief Financial Officer)
Master's Degree in Science (Applied Mathematics) and Actuarial Sciences (KU Leuven) Joined company in 1988* Group CEO (Chief Executive Officer)
at the end of 2016 Composition of the EC
John Hollows
°1956 British Master's Degree in Law and Economics (Cambridge University) Joined company in 1996* CEO of the Czech Republic Business Unit
* 'Joined company in ...' refers to KBC Group NV, group companies or pre-merger entities (Kredietbank, Cera, ABB, etc.).
Daniel Falque °1963 Belgian Master's Degree in International Relations (Université catholique de Louvain) Joined company in 2009* CEO of the Belgium Business Unit
Luc Gijsens °1953 Belgian Master's Degree in Law (KU Leuven) Joined company in 1977* CEO of the International Markets Business Unit
As of 5 May 2017, the EC will comprise seven members, with the following changes being made to its composition:
Following these appointments and changes, the composition of the EC will be as follows:
Besides carrying out the activities required under the Companies Code, reviewing the quarterly results and the activities of the AC, RCC, Nomination Committee and Remuneration Committee, and handling and taking decisions on the dossiers submitted by these committees, the Board also dealt with the following matters:
The EC also reported monthly on the trend in the results and the general course of business at the group's various business units. It also paid regular attention to the strategy and specific challenges for the different areas of activity.
The AC is tasked with a number of responsibilities, including advising the Board on the integrity of financial reporting and the effectiveness of the internal control process and risk management. It provides guidance to the internal audit function and oversees the external auditor.
The AC met in the presence of the President of the EC, the Group CRO, the Group CFO, the internal auditor, the compliance officer and the statutory auditors. Besides reviewing the company and consolidated financial statements, the annual report, the half-year and quarterly figures, approving the relevant press releases and discussing the auditor's findings, it also discussed the quarterly reports drawn up by the internal auditor.
The AC also examined:
The RCC advises the Board on current and future risk tolerance and on risk strategy, and assists it in supervising how the EC implements this strategy. It ensures that the prices of assets and liabilities and of categories of off-balance-sheet products that are offered to clients, factor in the risks run by the institution, with due account taken of its business model and risk strategy, viz. risks – especially reputational risks – that might arise from the types of product offered to clients. The RCC monitors the risk and compliance functions.
The RCC met in the presence of the President of the EC, the Group CRO, the Group CFO, the internal auditor, the compliance officer and the statutory auditors. Besides discussing the periodic reports from the risk function and the compliance officer (including the annual reports), it also examined the reports drawn up by the legal, tax and branch inspection departments.
In addition, the following special reports were dealt with:
Please note that the Nomination Committee of KBC Group NV acts in the same capacity for KBC Insurance and KBC Bank.
The main matters dealt with were:
The Remuneration Committee met each time in the presence of the Chairman of the RCC, with the President of the EC often in attendance too. Please note that the Remuneration Committee of KBC Group NV acts in the same capacity for KBC Insurance and KBC Bank.
The main matters dealt with were:
For a general description of how the Board and its committees function, see sections 5 and 6 of the Charter of KBC Group NV (at www.kbc.com).
On 31 December 2016, the AC had two independent directors within the meaning of and in line with the criteria set out in Article 526ter of the Companies Code and in the Code.
of Department at the International Business School of Budapest and Research Associate at the Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
The other members of the AC are:
It can be concluded on the basis of the profiles and competences of the members of the AC that the committee is constructed and has the requisite skills and experience in
accordance with the requirements of the Charter and of Article 526bis, § 2 of the Companies Code.
On 31 December 2016, the RCC of KBC Group NV had one independent director within the meaning of and in line with the criteria set out in Article 526ter of the Companies Code and in the Code:
• Vladimira Papirnik (see CV above).
• Franky Depickere (non-executive director), who holds Master's Degrees in Trade & Finance (UFSIA Antwerp) and in Financial Management (VLEKHO Business School). He was internal auditor at CERA Bank and has held positions and
offices in various financial institutions. He is currently Managing Director at Cera and KBC Ancora. Mr Depickere is the Chairman of the RCC.
It can be concluded on the basis of the profiles and competences of the members of the RCC that each individual member and the committee as a whole possess the requisite skills and experience.
The Board worked out an arrangement regarding transactions and other contractual ties between the company (including its affiliated companies) and its directors, not covered by the conflict of interest rule set out in Articles 523 or 524ter of the
Companies Code. It has been incorporated into the Charter. There were no transactions that required this arrangement to be applied during the 2016 financial year.
The Board has updated the Dealing Code to take account of new applicable regulations. The Code requires a list of key employees to be drawn up, annual blocking periods to be set, and transactions by persons with managerial responsibility and with persons connected with them to be reported to the Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA).
With a view to constantly improving its own effectiveness, the Board – led by its Chairman – evaluates a number of elements each year, including the composition of the Board, the selection, appointment and training of its members, practical operations (relating to the agenda, meetings, chairmanship, secretariat), reporting to the Board, the type of culture within the Board, the performance of its duties, remuneration, the working relationship with the EC, the shareholders and other
stakeholders, the Board's committees, proposed agenda items and training proposals.
On the initiative of the Chairman of the Board, directors who are nominated for re-appointment are subject to an individual evaluation that focuses on their efforts and effectiveness within the Board and – where appropriate – their performance as chairman or member of a committee of the Board. This
evaluation is performed by the Chairman. The Board evaluates the Chairman who must not be present when the evaluation is being performed.
Once a year, non-executive directors assess how they interact with the executive management. To that end, they meet at least once a year without the executive directors.
Each Board committee regularly carries out an evaluation of its own composition and workings, before reporting its findings and, where necessary, making proposals to the Board.
On the initiative of the President of the EC, the full EC discusses its objectives and assesses its performance once a year. Each year, the President of the EC evaluates each member of the EC individually. The individual evaluation of the President is performed by the Chairman of the Board.
Procedures for developing the remuneration policy and for determining the remuneration granted to individual directors and members of the EC
General: The remuneration policy for the Board and EC takes account of prevailing legislation, the Code and market data. It is monitored and regularly checked by the Remuneration Committee – with the assistance of specialist members of staff – to see whether it complies with changes in the law, the Code, and prevailing market practices and trends. The Chairman of the Remuneration Committee informs the Board of the committee's activities and advises it of any changes to the remuneration policy and its practical implementation. The full minutes of the meetings of the Remuneration Committee are provided to the Board for information purposes. The Board may also act on its own initiative, or on a proposal from the EC, and instruct the Remuneration Committee to examine potential changes to the remuneration policy and to advise it accordingly. If required by law, the Board will submit any policy changes to the General Meeting for approval.
Board: On the basis of advice obtained from the Remuneration Committee, the Board decides on the remuneration package for its members. If required, it may also submit proposals in this regard to the General Meeting for decision.
EC: On the basis of advice obtained from the Remuneration Committee and taking account of the established remuneration policy, the Board determines the remuneration to be granted to members of the EC, and assesses this amount at regular intervals. The amount in question is split into a fixed component and a profit-related/performance-related component.
The policy for remunerating members of senior management is published in the Remuneration Policy. It contains a number of group-wide principles relating primarily to the variable remuneration component. The main principles stipulate that:
With effect on 1 January 2017, the Remuneration Policy was adjusted to take account of the new 'EBA guidelines on sound remuneration policies' and their specific interpretation by the National Bank of Belgium. The main adjustments concern the following:
Besides the risk gateway, a risk-adjusted measure of company profitability ('Risk-Adjusted Profit or RAP) has been in place to set results-based variable remuneration for performances as from financial year 2012. For certain categories of key identified staff for whom the competent control function has assessed that the RAP is an inadequate risk-adjustment mechanism, this framework will be supplemented by additional performance indicators that are better designed to measure risk.
As already explained above, payment of the total annual variable remuneration is not only spread over time, half of it is also awarded in the form of phantom stocks that are subject to a retention period of one year (i.e. they are only converted into cash one year after being awarded).
The variable remuneration component, including the deferred part, is only acquired when this can be reconciled with the financial situation of the entire institution and justified by the performances of the KBC group and the EC.
Action can be taken regarding payment of deferred amounts that have still to be acquired (malus arrangement), when:
underlying KBC entity in the year preceding the one in which the amounts are to be acquired, has fallen by at least 50% since the year in which the variable remuneration was awarded. In such a situation, the malus arrangement will be applied to the deferred amounts that have still to be acquired (and that relate to the year they were awarded), unless the Remuneration Committee of KBC Group NV provides well-reasoned advice to the Board not to apply this arrangement. The Remuneration Committee will also provide advice on the percentage that should be applied to the malus arrangement. The Board is responsible for the final decision in this regard.
• Either the net result excluding non-recurrent profit, or the risk-adjusted profit of the KBC group, is negative in the year preceding the one in which the amounts are to be acquired. In that case, all the deferred amounts that have still to be acquired (usually in the year following the one in which the negative result was posted) will not be acquired and will therefore be relinquished.
In this regard, the Board takes a decision on the advice of the Remuneration Committee.
Variable remuneration already acquired will exceptionally be clawed back when there is:
that, if meetings coincide with AC or RCC meetings of KBC Bank and/or KBC Insurance, the emolument will be paid just once to directors sitting on different committees. The chairmen of the AC and RCC receive an additional fixed emolument. Directors sitting on either the Nomination Committee or the Remuneration Committee do not receive additional remuneration for the work they perform in that regard.
granted by KBC Group NV banking subsidiaries pursuant to Article 72 of the Banking Act of 25 April 2014, meaning that loans may be granted at terms applying to clients and approved by the Board.
In accordance with the remuneration system described above, the non-executive directors of KBC Group NV – and, where relevant, of other companies of the KBC group in Belgium or abroad – received the amounts set out in the following table. The members of the EC who also sit on the Board as executive directors did not receive either a fixed remuneration or any attendance fees.
| Remuneration (for FY 2016) |
Remuneration for AC and RCC members (for FY 2016) |
Attendance fees (for FY 2016) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Leysen | 500 000 | 0 | 0 |
| Alain Bostoen | 30 000 | 0 | 50 000 |
| Sonja De Becker | 26 667 | 0 | 30 000 |
| Franky Depickere | 65 000 | 130 000 | 61 250 |
| Luc Discry | 40 000 | 0 | 50 000 |
| Frank Donck | 30 000 | 30 000 | 50 000 |
| Júlia Király | 20 000 | 30 000 | 75 000 |
| Lode Morlion | 40 000 | 0 | 55 000 |
| Vladimira Papirnik | 20 000 | 30 000 | 82 500 |
| Theodoros Roussis | 30 000 | 0 | 45 000 |
| Ghislaine Van Kerckhove | 40 000 | 0 | 55 000 |
| Philippe Vlerick | 60 000 | 0 | 55 000 |
| Piet Vanthemsche | 13 333 | 0 | 20 000 |
| Marc Wittemans | 40 000 | 60 000 | 55 000 |
It is not the intention to make any changes to the remuneration awarded to non-executive directors. Following the decision to replace the attendance fees paid to members of the AC and RCC with a fixed emolument, a comparison was again made with BEL 20 companies and an extensive sample of continental European financial institutions. The results that emerged indicated that there was no need to adjust the size of this emolument.
For members of the EC who have worked six years or less in the KBC group, such payments have been set at 12 months' remuneration, for those who have worked between six and nine years, they are equal to 15 months' remuneration, and for those who have worked more than nine years, they are equal to 18 months' remuneration. In this context, remuneration is taken to be the fixed remuneration component for the current year and the variable component for the last full year preceding termination of office.
The variable component is split into a performance-related variable emolument and an individual variable emolument. The performance-related variable component for the President of the EC is set between 0 and 300 000 euros and the individual variable component between 0 and 100 000 euros. The limits for these components are 200 000 euros and 70 000 euros, respectively, for the other members of the EC. The final amount is set by the Board on the advice of the Remuneration Committee, based on an assessment of the individual and collective achievements during the previous financial year.
With effect from 1 January 2017, the total amount of annual variable remuneration (i.e. both the performance-related and individual components) for members of the EC will be paid over six years, with 40% being paid in the first year and the rest spread equally over the next five years. Payment of these deferred amounts is subject to the clawback provisions outlined above.
Furthermore, 50% of the total annual variable remuneration is awarded in the form of equity-related instruments called phantom stocks (though not in the Czech Republic where virtual investment certificates are used), whose value is linked to the price of the KBC Group NV share. These stocks must be retained for one year after being allocated. Like the cash component of variable remuneration, they are also allocated over a six-year period. The average price of the KBC share during the first three months of the year is used to calculate the number of phantom stocks to which each member of the EC is entitled. These stocks are then converted into cash a year later on the basis of the average price of the KBC share during the first three months of that year. They are subject to the allocation and acquisition conditions described under 'Clawback provisions'.
Up until the start of 2016, a supplementary defined benefit pension plan (as well as a very limited defined contribution plan) had been in place for members of the EC. In that plan, no distinction was made between the CEO and the other members of the EC, and the formula for calculating the pension benefit did not take any account of the remuneration actually paid. What's more, a study carried out in partnership with an external research agency found that the size of both the supplementary retirement pension and death cover was not in line with the market. The same study also revealed that the trend of switching from defined benefits plans to defined contributions plans had continued in relation to pension arrangements for top management.
Based on these findings – and as announced last year – a new pension plan for members of the EC was launched on 1 January 2016. It is a defined contribution plan that – as before – is funded entirely by KBC. When drawing up this plan, account was taken of the fact that the career of a member (and especially the President) of the EC is shorter than that of an average employee. In the pension formula, therefore, the first ten years that an individual sits on the EC are the ones in which a significant part of the supplementary pension is built up. The contribution that KBC makes to the pension plan amounts to 32% of the fixed emolument (40% for the CEO) during those first ten years, 7% for the next five years (3% for the CEO) and 3% starting from the sixteenth year of plan membership. A minimum return of 0% (capped at 8.25%) is guaranteed on the contributions.
Given the specific structure of this new pension plan, funding of the plan is not spread equally over the entire career. During the first ten years, the size of the payment made into the pension fund is rather large, but declines to a fraction of what it had been previously starting from the eleventh year and even more markedly from the sixteenth year.
The plan applies to all new members who join the EC on or after 1 January 2016 (provided they are resident in Belgium). Members already on the EC on 31 December 2015 were offered the choice of continuing with their current pension plan or joining the new one. Apart from Luc Gijsens, all of the members decided to switch to the new plan. In their case, the vested reserves built up by 31 December 2015 were transferred to that plan.
In accordance with the pension regulations, 511 121 euros was paid into the fund for Johan Thijs in 2016, and 1 174 937 euros for the other members of the EC (apart from Luc Gijsens). The service cost of funding the old plan for Luc Gijsens was 147 380 euros. Given that the new type of pension plan differs from the previous one and that the funding curve also has a totally different structure, the contributions referred to above are of an entirely different order than the amounts for the old plan published previously in the annual report and, therefore, are in no way comparable. The study also revealed that the death cover was relatively lower than the benchmark level and, therefore, the death benefit was increased under the new plan to four times the amount of the fixed emolument (or, if higher, to the reserves that have been built at the time of death). The orphan's pension, where applicable, has been kept at roughly its existing level (a benefit of 185 000 euros and interest of 6 000 euros per year).
The disability benefit has been kept at its old level for all members of the EC (i.e. circa 700 000 euros).
For 2016, the fixed component awarded to the CEO (Johan Thijs) came to 1 125 000 euros. For the other members of the EC, it came to an aggregate 3 962 500 euros.
For members of the EC, the individual component is set on the basis of an assessment of the performance of the member in question, using the five aspects of our (PEARL) corporate culture and the core value of being 'respectful', while the performance-related component is set on the basis of an assessment of a number of criteria agreed at the start of 2016 that relate to the performances of the EC and the company. These criteria are centred on implementing strategy (including the sustainability policy), realising financial plans, strengthening the risk control environment and increasing the satisfaction of all stakeholders (staff, clients and society). Sustainability is also an important factor in this last aspect. Less than 7% of the total remuneration package, therefore, is related to achieving financial results. When setting the variable remuneration of the CRO, financial planning achievements are not taken into account, but the relative weighting of riskrelated criteria is doubled. These assessments generate a percentage between 0% and 100% that is applied to the maximum variable remuneration. Based on the advice of the Remuneration Committee, the Board decided that the members of the EC should be awarded performance-related
variable remuneration for 2016 that equalled 98%. The same percentage also applies to the CRO.
Variable remuneration awarded to Johan Thijs: In accordance with the remuneration system described above, a performance-related variable emolument of 294 000 euros and an individual variable emolument of 95 000 euros was awarded to Johan Thijs for 2016. Half of the variable remuneration component is paid in cash and the other half is awarded in the form of phantom stocks. As regards the cash component, 40% (77 800 euros) will be paid in 2017 and the remaining 60% spread equally over the next five years (23 340 euros per year from 2018 to 2022, inclusive).
Variable remuneration awarded to the other members of the EC: In accordance with the remuneration system described above, performance-related variable emoluments totalling 980 000 euros and individual variable emoluments totalling
303 333 euros were awarded to the five members of the EC for 2016. Half of the variable remuneration component is paid in cash and the other half is awarded in the form of phantom stocks. As regards the cash component, 40% (256 667 euros) will be paid in 2017 and the remaining 60% spread equally over the next five years (77 000 euros per year from 2018 to 2022, inclusive).
Phantom stocks for 2016: The number of phantom stocks is calculated on the basis of the average price of the KBC share during the first quarter of 2017. Like the other variable components, 40% will be awarded in 2017 and the remaining 60% spread equally over the next five years. Given that phantom stocks are to be retained for one year, they are paid out in cash one year after being awarded, which means that payment is spread over 2018 to 2023, inclusive. The amounts for which phantom stocks were awarded in this way for 2016 are given in the table below:
| Amounts awarded in the form of | Vesting in | Vesting in | Vesting in | Vesting in | Vesting in | Vesting in | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom stocks (in EUR) | Total | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
| Johan Thijs | 194 500 | 77 800 | 23 340 | 23 340 | 23 340 | 23 340 | 23 340 |
| Luc Popelier | 128 333 | 51 333 | 15 400 | 15 400 | 15 400 | 15 400 | 15 400 |
| John Hollows* | 128 917 | 51 567 | 15 470 | 15 470 | 15 470 | 15 470 | 15 470 |
| Luc Gijsens | 127 750 | 51 100 | 15 330 | 15 330 | 15 330 | 15 330 | 15 330 |
| Daniel Falque | 127 750 | 51 100 | 15 330 | 15 330 | 15 330 | 15 330 | 15 330 |
| Christine Van Rijsseghem | 128 917 | 51 567 | 15 470 | 15 470 | 15 470 | 15 470 | 15 470 |
* Virtual Investment Certificates (VICs) instead of phantom stocks.
Of the variable remuneration component awarded to Johan Thijs for 2013, 2014 and 2015, 68 406 euros was paid as a results-based variable emolument and 21 666 euros as an individual variable emolument in 2017. For the other members of the EC, these components came to an aggregate 208 979 euros and 62 611 euros, respectively.
A portion of the phantom stocks awarded in 2013, 2014 and 2015 was converted into cash at 49.68 euros per share in April 2016. The following amounts were paid (in euros):
| • Johan Thijs | 225 696 | |
|---|---|---|
| • Luc Popelier | 157 038 | |
| • John Hollows | 161 121 (partly VICs) | |
| • Luc Gijsens | 148 096 | |
| • Daniel Falque | 134 136 | |
| • Christine Van Rijsseghem | 56 635 | |
Each member of the EC has a company car, the personal use of which is charged in accordance with the prevailing regulations. Other benefits which members of the EC receive include hospitalisation insurance, assistance insurance and
accident insurance. The value of these benefits are estimated at 15 881 euros for Johan Thijs and at an aggregate 62 393 euros for the other members of the EC. These figures do not include the flat-rate expenses allowance of 400 euros which each member of the EC receives each month.
| Remuneration paid to the EC of KBC Group NV (2016) | CEO: Johan Thijs | Other members of the EC (combined) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awarded | Paid | Awarded | Paid | |
| Employment status | Self-employed | Self-employed | ||
| Base remuneration (fixed) | 1 125 000 | 1 125 000 | 3 962 500 | 3 962 500 |
| Individual variable remuneration for the financial year (cash) | 47 500 | 19 000 | 151 667 | 60 667 |
| Individual variable remuneration for the financial year (phantom stocks) |
47 500 | 0 | 151 667 | 0 |
| Performance-related variable remuneration for the financial year (cash) |
147 000 | 58 800 | 490 000 | 196 000 |
| Performance-related variable remuneration for the financial year (phantom stocks) |
147 000 | 0 | 490 000 | 0 |
| Individual variable remuneration for previous financial years | – | 21 666 | – | 62 611 |
| Performance-related variable remuneration for previous financial years |
– | 68 406 | – | 208 979 |
| Phantom stocks for previous financial years | – | 225 696 | – | 657 026 |
| Total | 1 514 000 | 1 518 568 | 5 245 834 | 5 147 783 |
| Defined contribution pension plan (contribution) | 511 121 | 1 174 937 | ||
| Defined benefit pension plan (service cost) | 0 | 147 380 | ||
| Other benefits | 15 881 | 62 393 |
In 2016, a comparison of the remuneration paid to members of the EC was made with the remuneration awarded to the top management of BEL 20 companies and an extensive selection of continental European financial institutions. It again emerged that the total level of remuneration at KBC was at the lower end of the spectrum in terms of its peers (below the median level) and, therefore, not commensurate with the size and complexity of the KBC group. Based on the advice of the Remuneration Committee, the Board duly decided to raise the
fixed component paid to the CEO and the members of the EC by approximately 6% with effect on 1 July 2016 and to increase the maximum variable component by roughly 20% with effect from financial year 2017, which – when aggregated – is an increase in maximum total remuneration of about 10%. Given that the comparative position of the remuneration awarded to the CEO was still much less favourable than that for members of the EC, his maximum variable remuneration was increased by 40%.
Part 1: Description of the main features of the internal control and risk management systems at KBC
We examine the strategy and organisational structure of the KBC group in the 'Our business model' and 'Our strategy' sections of this annual report.
The KBC group has a dual governance structure based on the Belgian model:
The Charter describes the mutual responsibilities of both management bodies, their composition and activities, as well as the qualification requirements for their members. Their composition and activities are dealt with in more detail elsewhere in this section.
Ethical behaviour and integrity are essential components of corporate social responsibility. Honesty, correctness, transparency and confidentiality, together with sound risk management, are part of the high ethical standards that KBC stands for – both in the spirit and the letter of the applicable regulations. Therefore, KBC treats its clients in a fair, reasonable, honest and professional manner.
These principles are set out in the integrity policy, as well as in specific codes, instructions and codes of conduct. They are also incorporated into specific training courses and campaigns for staff. The main guidelines and policy memos on socially responsible business practices can be found under 'Corporate Sustainability' at www.kbc.com.
One of the topics covered by the integrity policy is 'conduct risk', a relatively recent concept that identifies the risk arising from the inappropriate provision of financial services. To address this matter, KBC has drawn up a comprehensive policy that includes prevention, monitoring and reporting. Extensive, group-wide communication campaigns and dilemma training ensure that the necessary awareness of this risk is in place.
KBC's Integrity Policy focuses primarily on the following areas, for which – where appropriate – specific group-wide compliance rules have been issued, i.e. for:
The integrity policy also maintains a strong and comprehensive focus on ethics and combating fraud:
that have been or will be taken to achieve this. One element of this is the 'policy on gifts, donations and sponsorship' through which KBC endeavours to protect its employees and the other parties involved by means of criteria that have been drawn up to foster transparent and reasonable behaviour.
The Code of Conduct for KBC Group Employees is a generalised document based on a set of group values that outlines how all members of staff should conduct themselves. It forms the basis for developing specialised codes of conduct for specific target groups and for drawing up policy guidelines at group level. It is also the source of inspiration for awareness-raising campaigns and training courses.
To arm itself against the risks that it is exposed to in achieving its mission, the EC – under its responsibility and the supervision of the Board – has implemented a multi-layered internal control system. This system is commonly known as the 'Three Lines of Defence' model.
The business operations side is fully responsible for all the risks in its area of activity and has to ensure that effective controls are in place. In so doing, it ensures that the right controls are performed in the right way, that self-assessment of the business side is of a sufficiently high standard, that there is adequate awareness of risk and that sufficient priority/capacity is allocated to risk themes.
Independent of the business side, the second-line risk and control functions formulate their own opinion regarding the risks confronting KBC. In this way, they provide an adequate degree of certainty that the first-line control function is keeping these risks under control, without taking over primary responsibility from the first line. In this regard, the second-line functions are tasked to identify, measure and report risks. The risk function has a veto right to ensure that it is respected. The second-line risk and control functions also support the consistent implementation of the risk policy, the risk framework, etc., throughout the group, and supervise how they are applied.
Compliance is an independent function within the KBC group, protected by its modified status (as described in the Compliance Charter), its place in the organisation chart (hierarchically under the CRO with a functional reporting line to the President of the EC) and its reporting lines (reporting to the RCC as the highest body and even to the Board in certain cases). Its prime objective is to prevent KBC from running a compliance risk or from incurring loss/damage – regardless of its nature – due to non-compliance with applicable laws, regulations or internal rules that fall either within the scope of the compliance function or within the areas assigned to it by the EC. Hence, the compliance function devotes particular attention to adherence to the integrity policy.
Internal Audit is responsible for the quality control of the existing business processes. It performs risk-based and general audits to ensure that the internal control and risk management system, including Risk Policy, are effective and efficient, and to ensure that policy measures and processes are in place and consistently applied within the group to guarantee the continuity of operations.
Responsibilities, features, organisational structure and reporting lines, scope, audit methodology, co-operation between internal audit departments of the KBC group, and outsourcing of internal audit activities are set out in the Audit Charter of KBC Group NV. This charter complies with the stipulations of the National Bank of Belgium regulation of 19 May 2015 – approved by the Royal Decree of 5 July 2015 – on the internal control system and the internal audit function, with the Implementation Circular 2015_21 of 13 July 2015, with the Act of 25 April 2014 on the status and supervision of credit institutions and with the Act of 13 March 2016 on the status and supervision of insurance and reinsurance undertakings.
In accordance with international professional audit standards, an external entity screens the audit function on a regular basis (the last time this happened was in 2014). The results of that exercise were reported to the EC and the AC.
Each year, the EC evaluates whether the internal control and risk management system is still compliant and reports its findings to the AC and RCC.
These committees supervise, on behalf of the Board, the integrity and effectiveness of the internal control measures and the risk management system set up under the EC, paying special attention to correct financial reporting. They also examine the procedures set up by the company to see whether they comply with the law and other regulations.
Their role, composition and activities, along with the qualifications of their members, are laid down in their respective charters, which are included under the Charter of KBC Group NV. More information on these committees is provided elsewhere in this section.
It is vitally important that timely, accurate and understandable financial reports are provided to both internal and external stakeholders. To ensure this is the case, the underlying process needs to be sufficiently robust.
Periodic reporting at company level is based on a documented accounting process. A manual on the accounting procedures and financial reporting process is available. Periodic financial statements are prepared directly from the general ledger. Bookkeeping accounts are examined to see whether they correspond to underlying inventories. The result of these controls can be demonstrated. Periodic financial statements are prepared in accordance with local accounting policies and periodic reports on own funds in accordance with the most recent National Bank of Belgium (NBB) resolutions.
The main affiliated companies have their own accounting and administrative organisation, as well as a set of procedures for internal financial controls. The consolidation process is explained in a descriptive document. The consolidation system and the consolidation process have been operational for some time and have numerous built-in consistency controls.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS accounting policies that apply to all the companies included in the scope of consolidation. The relevant senior financial managers (CFOs) of the subsidiaries certify to the accuracy and completeness of the financial figures reported in accordance with group accounting policies. The Approval Committee, which is chaired by the general managers of Financial Insight & Communication and of Group Finance, monitors compliance with IFRS accounting policies.
Pursuant to the Act of 25 April 2014 on the status and supervision of credit institutions, the EC of KBC Group NV evaluated the internal control system for the financial reporting process and prepared a report on its findings.
The group-wide roll-out of 'fast close' procedures, the monitoring of intercompany transactions within the group, and permanent follow-up of a number of indicators relating to risk, performance and quality (Key Risk Indicators and Key Performance Indicators) continually help raise the quality of both the accounting process and the financial reporting process.
The internal control of the accounting process has been based on Group Key Control Accounting and External Financial Reporting standards since 2006. These rules for managing the main risks attached to the accounting process involve the establishment and maintenance of accounting process architecture, the establishment and maintenance of accounting policies and accounting presentations, compliance with authorisation rules and the separation of responsibilities when transactions are registered in the accounts, and the establishment of appropriate first- and second-line account management.
The Reporting Framework (2011) and Challenger Framework (2012) define a solid governance structure and clearly describe the roles and responsibilities of the various players in the financial reporting process. The aim here is to radically reduce reporting risks by challenging input data and improving the analysis of – and therefore insight into – the reported figures.
Each year, when preparing the Internal Control Statement for the supervisory authorities, the legal entities have to assess themselves as to whether they comply with the Group Key Control Accounting and External Financial Reporting standards. The findings of this self-assessment are registered in the risk function's Group Risk Assessment Tool. Besides a questionnaire to be completed by the CFOs, it also includes drawing up a list of all the responsibilities (Entity Accountability Excel sheets) for accounting and external financial reporting, along with the underlying Departmental Reference Documents that substantiate how these responsibilities are being shouldered.
In this way, the CFOs formally confirm by substantiated means that all the defined roles and responsibilities relating to the end-to-end process for external financial reporting have been properly assumed within their entity. The veracity of this confirmation can be checked at any time by all the internal and external stakeholders involved.
KBC Group NV's Internal Audit function conducts an end-toend audit of the accounting process and external financial reporting process at both company and consolidated level.
For details of the AC's supervisory work, see the second paragraph of point 4 in the first part of this text.
The corporate governance statement included in the annual report must indicate whether any provisions of the Corporate Governance Code have not been complied with and state the reasons for non-compliance (the 'comply-or-explain' principle). This information is provided below.
Provision 5.2./1 of Appendix C to the Corporate Governance Code stipulates that the Board should set up an audit committee composed exclusively of non-executive directors. Provision 5.2./4 of the same appendix additionally specifies that at least a majority of its members should be independent. Provision 5.3./1 of Appendix D to the Corporate Governance Code stipulates that the Board should set up a nomination committee composed of a majority of independent nonexecutive directors.
At year-end 2016, the AC was composed of four nonexecutive directors, two of whom were independent and two who represented the core shareholders. Independent directors were, therefore, in the minority on this committee. On 31 December 2016, the Nomination Committee was composed of four directors, one of whom was the Chairman of the Board (who is also an independent director) and three who represented the core shareholders. Independent directors were, therefore, in the minority on this committee. Vladimira Papirnik (independent director) was appointed as an additional member of the Nomination Committee with effect on 1 January 2017, as a result of which two independent directors now sit on that committee.
When selecting the members of the AC and Nomination Committee – as is also the case with the Board – the group takes account of the specific shareholder structure and, in particular, of the presence of the core shareholders. Given their engagement, the Board considered it appropriate to involve them in a suitable and balanced manner in the activities of the committees via their representatives on the Board.
At least one-third of the Board's members had to be of a different gender than the other members by no later than 1 January 2017.
On 1 January 2017, the Board comprised five women and eleven men, and thus complied with the Code.
There were no conflicts of interest during the 2016 financial year that required the application of Article 523, 524 or 524ter of the Companies Code.
At the General Meeting of 4 May 2016, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) was appointed as statutory auditor for a period of three years. It will be represented by Messrs Roland Jeanquart and Tom Meuleman. Until that meeting, Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BCVBA – represented
by Christel Weymeersch and/or Jean-François Hubin – had acted as the company's statutory auditor.
Details of the statutory auditor's remuneration are provided in Note 6.4 of the 'Consolidated financial statements' section.
The share capital was fully paid up and was represented by 418 372 082 shares of no nominal value. More information on the group's capital can be found in the 'Company annual accounts and additional information' section.
Each year, KBC Group NV carries out a capital increase reserved for its employees and the employees of certain of its Belgian subsidiaries. If the issue price of the new shares is less than the closing price, these new shares may not be transferred by the employee for two years, starting from the payment date, unless he or she dies. The shares subscribed to by employees under the capital increase decided upon by the
Board on 16 November 2016 are blocked until 19 December 2018. The shares issued under the capital increase in 2015 also remain blocked (until 17 December 2017).
The options on KBC Group NV shares held by employees of the various KBC group companies and allocated to them under stock option plans set up at different points in time, may not be transferred inter vivos. For information on stock options for staff, see Note 3.8 in the 'Consolidated financial statements' section.
None.
4 Systems of control of any employee share scheme where the control rights are not exercised directly by the employees None.
5 Restrictions on exercising voting rights as laid down by law or the Articles of Association
The voting rights attached to the shares held by KBC Group NV and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are suspended. At 31 December 2016, these rights were suspended for two shares (0.00% of the shares in circulation at that time).
The core shareholders of KBC Group NV comprise KBC Ancora Comm.VA, its parent company Cera CVBA, MRBB CVBA, and a group of legal entities and individuals referred to as 'Other core shareholders'.
Based on the most recent notifications provided to KBC, their shareholdings are:
That is a total of 168 209 365 KBC Group NV shares, which represents the same number of voting rights, or 40.21% of the total number of such voting rights on 31 December 2016 (418 372 082).
A shareholder agreement was concluded between these core shareholders in order to ensure shareholder stability and guarantee continuity within KBC Group NV, as well as to support and co-ordinate its general policy. To this end, the core shareholders act in concert at the General Meeting of KBC Group NV and are represented on its Board.
The core shareholder agreement provides for a contractual shareholder syndicate. It sets out the rules for the syndicated shares, management of the syndicate, syndicate meetings, voting rights within the syndicate, preferential subscription rights in the event of the transfer of syndicated shares, withdrawal from the agreement, and duration of the
agreement. Apart from a limited number of decisions, the syndicate meeting may – in the absence of a consensus – take decisions by a two-thirds majority vote, on the understanding that none of the shareholder groups can block a decision. The agreement was extended for a new ten-year period, with effect from 1 December 2014.
Appointment and replacement of members of the Board:
Following the approval of or notification to the supervisory authority, proposals to appoint nominated directors or to re-appoint directors are submitted by the Board to the General Meeting for approval. Each proposal is accompanied by a documented recommendation from the Board, based on the advice of the Nomination Committee.
Without prejudice to the applicable legal provisions, nominations are communicated as a separate agenda item for the General Meeting at least thirty days before it is held. When nominating an independent director, the Board will state whether the individual meets the independence criteria of the Companies Code.
The General Meeting appoints directors by a simple majority of votes cast.
From among its non-executive members, the Board elects a chairman and one or more deputy chairmen, if necessary. Outgoing directors are always eligible for re-appointment. If, during the course of a financial year, a directorship falls vacant as a result of decease, resignation, dismissal or for any other reason, the remaining directors may provisionally arrange for a replacement and appoint a new director. In that case, the next General Meeting will proceed to a definitive appointment. A director appointed to replace a director whose term of office had not yet come to an end will complete this term of office, unless the General Meeting decides on a different term of office when making the definitive appointment.
Amendment of the Articles of Association:
Unless stipulated otherwise, the General Meeting is entitled to amend the Articles of Association. Accordingly, the General
Meeting may only validly deliberate and take decisions about such amendments if they have been expressly proposed in the convening notice and if those attending the meeting represent at least half the share capital. If the latter condition is not satisfied, a new convening notice is required and the new meeting can validly deliberate and take decisions, regardless of the share of capital represented by the shareholders attending the meeting. An amendment is only adopted if it receives three-quarters of the votes cast (Article 558 of the Companies Code).
If an amendment to the Articles of Association pertains to the object of the company, the Board must justify the proposed amendment in a detailed report that is referred to in the agenda. A statement of assets and liabilities drawn up no longer than three months previously must be included in this report and be reported on separately by the statutory auditors. Copies of the reports in question can be obtained in accordance with Article 535 of the Companies Code. If these reports do not appear, decisions taken at the General Meeting will be null and void. The General Meeting may only deliberate and take decisions validly on changes in the object of the company if those present not only represent half of the share capital (…). If this condition is not satisfied, a second convening notice is required. To ensure that the second meeting can deliberate and take decisions validly, it is sufficient that some of the capital is represented. An amendment will then only be adopted if it receives at least four-fifths of the votes cast. (…) (excerpt from Article 559 of the Companies Code).
The General Meeting authorised the Board until 20 May 2018 to increase, in one or more steps, the share capital by a total amount of 700 million euros, in cash or in kind, by issuing shares. The Board is also authorised until the same date to decide on one or more occasions to issue convertible bonds (whether subordinated or otherwise) or warrants that may or
may not be linked to bonds (whether subordinated or otherwise) that could result in capital being increased within the 700 million euros referred to above. Under this authorisation, the Board can suspend or restrict preferential subscription rights, subject to the limits laid down by law and the Articles of Association.
On 16 November 2016, the Board decided to use its authorisation to increase capital by issuing shares without preferential subscription rights to employees at a price of 48.65 euros per share and with a limit of 71 shares per employee. On 23 December 2016, the issued share capital was increased by 991 883.52 euros (represented by 285 024 new shares). For the impact of excluding preferential subscription rights, see 'Notes to the company annual accounts'.
As a result, the authorised capital amounted to 695 111 550.04 euros at year-end 2016. Consequently, when account is taken of the accounting par value of the share on 31 December 2016, a maximum of 199 744 698 new shares can still be issued, i.e. 47.74% of the number of shares in circulation at that time.
The General Meeting of 2 May 2013 authorised the Board (and also granted it a power of sub-delegation) to acquire maximum 250 000 shares over a five-year period. The shares may be acquired at a price that may not be higher than the last closing price on Euronext Brussels prior to the date of acquisition, plus 10%, and not lower than 1 euro. Within the confines of the law, this authorisation is valid for all acquisitions for a consideration, in the broadest sense of the term, on or off the exchange.
The boards of KBC Group NV and its direct subsidiaries received authorisation to sell their KBC Group NV shares on or off the exchange. In the latter case, the price may not be lower than that prevailing on the exchange at the time of sale, less 10%. On 31 December 2016, KBC Group NV and its direct subsidiaries did not hold any KBC Group NV shares.
9 Significant agreements to which KBC Group NV is a party and which take effect, alter or terminate upon a change of control of KBC Group NV following a public takeover bid None.
10 Agreements between KBC and its directors or employees providing for compensation if the directors resign or are made redundant, or if employees are made redundant, without valid reason following a public takeover bid None.
Notifications of shareholdings are provided:
A summary containing the most recent disclosures is provided under 'Our business model' in the 'Report of the Board of Directors' section.
It should be noted that the figures provided under A) and B) below may differ from the current number of shares in possession, as a change in the number held does not always give rise to a new notification.
Article 10bis of the Articles of Association of KBC Group NV stipulates the threshold at which individuals must disclose their shareholdings. KBC publishes these notifications on www.kbc. com. The table provides an overview of the shareholder structure at year-end 2016, based on all the notifications
received by 31 December 2016. The 'Company annual accounts and additional information' section also contains an overview of notifications received in 2016 (and the first two months of 2017).
| Shareholder structure on 31-12-2016 (based on the most recent notifications received pur suant to the Act of 2 May 2007) |
Address | Number of KBC shares/voting rights (as a % of the current number of shares/voting rights) |
Notification relating to |
|---|---|---|---|
| KBC Ancora Comm.VA | Mgr. Ladeuzeplein 15, 3000 Leuven, Belgium | 77 516 380 (18.53%) | 1 December 2014 |
| Cera CVBA | Mgr. Ladeuzeplein 15, 3000 Leuven, Belgium | 11 127 166 (2.66%) | 1 December 2014 |
| MRBB CVBA | Diestsevest 40, 3000 Leuven, Belgium | 47 889 864 (11.45%) | 1 December 2014 |
| Other core shareholders | C/o Ph. Vlerick, Ronsevaalstraat 2, 8510 Bellegem, Belgium |
32 020 498 (7.65%) | 1 December 2014 |
| KBC group companies | Havenlaan 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium | 300 (0.00%) | 16 October 2012 |
| FMR LLC (Fidelity) | The Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801, United States |
12 628 843 (3.02%) | 18 November 2016 |
| BlackRock Inc. | 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055, United States |
20 650 780 (4.94%) | 9 February 2016 |
| Parvus Asset Management Europe Ltd. |
7 Clifford Street, London W1S 2FT, United Kingdom |
12 341 146 (2.95%) | 13 February 2015 |
Within the framework of this law, KBC Group NV received a number of updated disclosures on 30 August 2016. The entities and individuals referred to below act in concert.
| Shareholding | Shareholding | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shareholder | (quantity) | %2 Shareholder | (quantity) | %2 | ||||
| KBC Ancora Comm. VA | 77 516 380 | 18.53 Bareldam SA | 387 544 | 0.09 | ||||
| MRBB CVBA | 47 889 864 | 11.45 Robor NV | 359 606 | 0.09 | ||||
| Cera CVBA | 11 127 166 | 2.66 Dufinco BVBA | 357 002 | 0.09 | ||||
| SAK AGEV | 6 461 885 | 1.54 Sereno SA | 321 408 | 0.08 | ||||
| Ravago Finance NV | 3 855 915 | 0.92 Rodep Comm. VA | 304 181 | 0.07 | ||||
| VIM CVBA | 3 834 500 | 0.92 Efiga Invest SPRL | 230 806 | 0.06 | ||||
| 3D NV | 2 491 893 | 0.60 Gavel Comm. VA | 220 024 | 0.05 | ||||
| Almafin SA | 1 285 997 | 0.31 Ibervest | 190 000 | 0.05 | ||||
| De Berk BVBA | 1 138 208 | 0.27 Promark International NV | 189 008 | 0.05 | ||||
| Algimo NV | 1 040 901 | 0.25 Niramore International SA | 150 700 | 0.04 | ||||
| SAK PULA | 981 450 | 0.23 SAK Iberanfra | 120 107 | 0.03 | ||||
| Rainyve SA | 941 958 | 0.23 Isarick NV | 45 056 | 0.01 | ||||
| Alia SA | 937 705 | 0.22 Agrobos | 45 000 | 0.01 | ||||
| Stichting Amici Almae Matris | 912 731 | 0.22 Filax Stichting | 38 529 | 0.01 | ||||
| Ceco CVA | 568 849 | 0.14 I.B.P Ravago Pensioenfonds | 34 833 | 0.01 | ||||
| Van Holsbeeck NV | 502 822 | 0.12 Hendrik Van Houtte CVA | 25 920 | 0.01 | ||||
| Nascar Finance SA | 485 620 | 0.12 Asphalia NV | 14 241 | 0.00 | ||||
| Cecan NV | 466 002 | 0.11 Vobis Finance NV | 685 | 0.00 | ||||
| Cecan Invest NV | 397 563 | 0.10 |
| Shareholding | Shareholding | Shareholding | Shareholding | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (quantity) | %2 | (quantity) | %2 | (quantity) | %2 | (quantity) | %2 |
| 861 395 | 0.21 | 182 826 | 0.04 | 80 500 | 0.02 | 19 522 | 0.00 |
| 285 000 | 0.07 | 159 100 | 0.04 | 41 500 | 0.01 | 3 431 | 0.00 |
| 239 400 | 0.06 | 107 744 | 0.03 | 32 554 | 0.01 | 2 800 | 0.00 |
| 193 200 | 0.05 | 107 498 | 0.03 | 20 836 | 0.00 |
1 No such disclosures were received.
2 The calculation (%) of the total outstanding number of shares is based on the total number of shares on 31 December 2016.
Consolidated financial statements
| (in millions of EUR) | Note | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income | 3.1 | 4 258 | 4 311 |
| Interest income | 3.1 | 6 642 | 7 150 |
| Interest expense | 3.1 | -2 384 | -2 839 |
| Non-life insurance (before reinsurance) | 3.7 | 628 | 611 |
| Earned premiums | 3.7 | 1 410 | 1 319 |
| Technical charges | 3.7 | -782 | -708 |
| Life insurance (before reinsurance) | 3.7 | -152 | -201 |
| Earned premiums | 3.7 | 1 577 | 1 301 |
| Technical charges | 3.7 | -1 728 | -1 502 |
| Ceded reinsurance result | 3.7 | -38 | -29 |
| Dividend income | 3.2 | 77 | 75 |
| Net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss | 3.3 | 540 | 214 |
| Net realised result from available-for-sale assets | 3.4 | 189 | 190 |
| Net fee and commission income | 3.5 | 1 450 | 1 678 |
| Fee and commission income | 3.5 | 2 101 | 2 348 |
| Fee and commission expense | 3.5 | -651 | -670 |
| Other net income | 3.6 | 258 | 297 |
| TOTAL INCOME | 7 211 | 7 148 | |
| Operating expenses | 3.8 | -3 948 | -3 890 |
| Staff expenses | 3.8 | -2 252 | -2 245 |
| General administrative expenses | 3.8 | -1 449 | -1 392 |
| Depreciation and amortisation of fixed assets | 3.8 | -246 | -253 |
| Impairment | 3.10 | -201 | -747 |
| on loans and receivables | 3.10 | -126 | -323 |
| on available-for-sale assets | 3.10 | -55 | -45 |
| on goodwill | 3.10 | 0 | -344 |
| other | 3.10 | -20 | -34 |
| Share in results of associated companies and joint ventures | 3.11 | 27 | 24 |
| RESULT BEFORE TAX | 3 090 | 2 535 | |
| Income tax expense | 3.12 | -662 | 104 |
| Net post-tax result from discontinued operations | – | 0 | 0 |
| RESULT AFTER TAX | 2 428 | 2 639 | |
| attributable to minority interests | – | 0 | 0 |
| of which relating to discontinued operations | – | 0 | 0 |
| attributable to equity holders of the parent | – | 2 427 | 2 639 |
| of which relating to discontinued operations | – | 0 | 0 |
| Earnings per share (in EUR) | |||
| Ordinary | 3.13 | 5.68 | 3.80 |
| Diluted | 3.13 | 5.68 | 3.80 |
• We have dealt with the main items in the income statement in the 'Report of the Board of Directors' under the 'Our financial report'
and 'Our business units' sections. The statutory auditor has not audited these sections.
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| RESULT AFTER TAX | 2 428 | 2 639 |
| attributable to minority interests | 0 | 0 |
| attributable to equity holders of the parent | 2 427 | 2 639 |
| OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | ||
| Recycled to profit or loss | ||
| Net change in revaluation reserve for shares | -57 | 176 |
| Fair value adjustments before tax | 83 | 260 |
| Deferred tax on fair value changes | 1 | -11 |
| Transfer from reserve to net result | -141 | -72 |
| Impairment | 31 | 7 |
| Net gains/losses on disposal | -185 | -79 |
| Deferred taxes on income | 14 | 0 |
| Net change in revaluation reserve for bonds | 26 | -209 |
| Fair value adjustments before tax | 102 | -256 |
| Deferred tax on fair value changes | -30 | 91 |
| Transfer from reserve to net result | -46 | -44 |
| Impairment | 0 | 0 |
| Net gains/losses on disposal | -30 | -57 |
| Amortisation and impairment of revaluation reserve for available-for-sale financial assets following reclassification to 'loans and receivables' and 'held-to-maturity assets' |
-40 | -3 |
| Deferred taxes on income | 24 | 16 |
| Net change in revaluation reserve for other assets | 0 | 0 |
| Fair value adjustments before tax | 0 | 0 |
| Deferred tax on fair value changes | 0 | 0 |
| Transfer from reserve to net result | 0 | 0 |
| Impairment | 0 | 0 |
| Net gains/losses on disposal | 0 | 0 |
| Deferred taxes on income | 0 | 0 |
| Net change in hedging reserve (cashflow hedges) | -201 | 222 |
| Fair value adjustments before tax | -379 | 302 |
| Deferred tax on fair value changes | 122 | -110 |
| Transfer from reserve to net result | 56 | 29 |
| Gross amount | 80 | 39 |
| Deferred taxes on income | -24 | -9 |
| Net change in translation differences | 20 | 264 |
| Gross amount | -16 | 162 |
| Deferred taxes on income | 36 | 103 |
| Net change in respect of associated companies and joint ventures | 4 | 6 |
| Gross amount | 5 | 5 |
| Deferred taxes on income | -1 | 0 |
| Other movements | 11 | 2 |
| Not recycled to profit or loss | ||
| Net change in defined benefit plans | -231 | 226 |
| Remeasurements | -336 | 323 |
| Deferred tax on remeasurements | 104 | -97 |
| Net change in respect of associated companies and joint ventures | 0 | 0 |
| Remeasurements | 0 | 0 |
| Deferred tax on remeasurements | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | 2 000 | 3 327 |
| attributable to minority interests | 0 | 0 |
| attributable to equity holders of the parent | 2 000 | 3 326 |
• See Note 1.1 for changes in the above presentation.
| ASSETS (in millions of EUR) | Note | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and cash balances with central banks | – | 20 148 | 7 038 |
| Financial assets | 4.0 | 246 836 | 237 346 |
| Held for trading | 4.0 | 9 683 | 10 385 |
| Designated at fair value through profit or loss | 4.0 | 14 185 | 16 514 |
| Available for sale | 4.0 | 36 708 | 35 670 |
| Loans and receivables | 4.0 | 152 152 | 141 305 |
| Held to maturity | 4.0 | 33 697 | 32 958 |
| Hedging derivatives | 4.0 | 410 | 514 |
| Reinsurers' share in technical provisions, insurance | 5.6 | 110 | 127 |
| Fair value adjustments of the hedged items in portfolio hedge of interest rate risk | – | 202 | 105 |
| Tax assets | 5.2 | 2 312 | 2 336 |
| Current tax assets | 5.2 | 66 | 107 |
| Deferred tax assets | 5.2 | 2 246 | 2 228 |
| Non-current assets held for sale and disposal groups | 5.11 | 8 | 15 |
| Investments in associated companies and joint ventures | 5.3 | 212 | 207 |
| Investment property | 5.4 | 426 | 438 |
| Property and equipment | 5.4 | 2 451 | 2 299 |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets | 5.5 | 999 | 959 |
| Other assets | 5.1 | 1 496 | 1 487 |
| TOTAL ASSETS | 275 200 | 252 356 | |
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (in millions of EUR) | Note | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
| Financial liabilities | 4.0 | 234 300 | 213 333 |
| Held for trading | 4.0 | 8 559 | 8 334 |
| Designated at fair value through profit or loss | 4.0 | 16 553 | 24 426 |
| Measured at amortised cost | 4.0 | 207 485 | 178 383 |
| Hedging derivatives | 4.0 | 1 704 | 2 191 |
| Technical provisions (before reinsurance) | 5.6 | 19 657 | 19 532 |
| Fair value adjustments of the hedged items in portfolio hedge of interest rate risk | – | 204 | 171 |
| Tax liabilities | 5.2 | 681 | 658 |
| Current tax liabilities | 5.2 | 188 | 109 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 5.2 | 493 | 549 |
| Liabilities associated with disposal groups | 5.11 | 0 | 0 |
| Provisions for risks and charges | 5.7 | 238 | 310 |
| Other liabilities | 5.8 | 2 763 | 2 541 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | 257 843 | 236 545 | |
| Total equity | 5.10 | 17 357 | 15 811 |
| Parent shareholders' equity | 5.10 | 15 957 | 14 411 |
| Additional tier-1 instruments included in equity | 5.10 | 1 400 | 1 400 |
| Minority interests | – | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | 275 200 | 252 356 |
| Remeasu | Additional | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Issued | Hedging | rement of | Parent | tier-1 in | |||||||||
| and paid | Revaluation | reserve | defined | Transla | share | Non-voting | struments | ||||||
| (in millions of EUR) | up share capital |
Share premium |
Treasury shares |
reserve (AFS assets) |
(cashflow hedges) |
benefit plans |
Reserves | tion dif ferences |
holders' equity |
core-capital securities |
included in equity |
Minority interests |
Total equity |
| 2016 | |||||||||||||
| Balance at the beginning of the period | 1 454 | 5 437 | 0 | 1 782 | -1 146 | 94 | 6 779 | 11 | 14 411 | 0 | 1 400 | 0 | 15 811 |
| Net result for the period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 427 | 0 | 2 427 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 428 |
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | -26 | -201 | -231 | 11 | 20 | -427 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -427 |
| Subtotal, comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | -26 | -201 | -231 | 2 439 | 20 | 2 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 000 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -418 | 0 | -418 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -418 |
| Coupon on additional tier-1 instruments included in equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -52 | 0 | -52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -52 |
| Capital increase | 1 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| Effect of business combinations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Change in minority interests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Change in scope | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total change | 1 | 15 | 0 | -26 | -201 | -231 | 1 969 | 20 | 1 546 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 546 |
| Balance at the end of the period | 1 455 | 5 453 | 0 | 1 756 | -1 347 | -138 | 8 747 | 31 | 15 957 | 0 | 1 400 | 0 | 17 357 |
| of which revaluation reserve for equity instruments | – | – | – | 490 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| of which revaluation reserve for bonds | – | – | – | 1 266 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| of which relating to non-current assets held for sale and | |||||||||||||
| disposal groups | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| of which relating to application of the equity method | – | – | – | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 32 | – | – | – | 32 |
| 2015 | |||||||||||||
| Balance at the beginning of the period | 1 453 | 5 421 | 0 | 1 815 | -1 368 | -133 | 6 197 | -261 | 13 125 | 2 000 | 1 400 | -3 | 16 521 |
| Net result for the period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 639 | 0 | 2 639 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 639 |
| Other comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | -34 | 222 | 226 | 2 | 272 | 688 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 688 |
| Subtotal, comprehensive income | 0 | 0 | 0 | -34 | 222 | 226 | 2 640 | 272 | 3 326 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 327 |
| Dividends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -836 | 0 | -836 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -836 |
| Coupon on non-voting core-capital securities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -171 | 0 | -171 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -171 |
| Coupon on additional tier-1 instruments included in equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -52 | 0 | -52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -52 |
| Capital increase | 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| Redemption of non-voting core-capital securities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 000 | 0 | -1 000 | -2 000 | 0 | 0 | -3 000 |
| Effect of business combinations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Change in minority interests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Change in scope | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Total change | 1 | 16 | 0 | -33 | 222 | 226 | 582 | 272 | 1 286 | -2 000 | 0 | 3 | -710 |
| Balance at the end of the period | 1 454 | 5 437 | 0 | 1 782 | -1 146 | 94 | 6 779 | 11 | 14 411 | 0 | 1 400 | 0 | 15 811 |
| of which revaluation reserve for equity instruments | – | – | – | 547 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| of which revaluation reserve for bonds | – | – | – | 1 235 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| of which relating to non-current assets held for sale and | |||||||||||||
| disposal groups | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | -3 | -3 | – | – | – | -3 |
| of which relating to application of the equity method | – | – | – | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 28 | – | – | – | 28 |
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
because of the Visa Europe shares that were sold following the public offering of Visa Inc.). The hedging reserve (cashflow hedges) declined by 201 million euros (due primarily to the fall in long-term rates). In 2016, 'Remeasurement of defined benefit plans' fell by 231 million euros (mainly on account of the decrease in the discount rate). The revaluation reserve for available-for-sale financial assets fell by 33 million euros in 2015, due chiefly to bonds (a decrease of 210 million euros) and to shares (an increase of 177 million euros; the figure included 69 million euros for Visa Europe Limited shares following the public offering of Visa Inc.). The hedging reserve (cashflow hedges) went up by 222 million euros in 2015.
• Translation differences increased by 20 million euros in 2016. They had changed by 272 million euros in 2015, partly on account of the liquidation of KBC Financial Holding Inc. (the foreign exchange loss on the capital of KBC Financial Holding Inc. was transferred from equity to profit or loss; net impact of 145 million euros (after tax), including hedging effects).
| (in millions of EUR) | Reference1 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating activities | |||
| Result before tax | See consolidated income statement |
3 090 | 2 535 |
| Adjustments for: | |||
| Result before tax from discontinued operations | See consolidated income statement |
0 | 0 |
| Depreciation, impairment and amortisation of property and equipment, intangible fixed assets, investment property and securities |
3.10, 4.2, 5.4, 5.5 | 341 | 698 |
| Profit/Loss on the disposal of investments | – | -11 | -24 |
| Change in impairment on loans and advances | 3.10 | 126 | 323 |
| Change in technical provisions (before reinsurance) | 5.6 | 391 | 429 |
| Change in the reinsurers' share in the technical provisions | 5.6 | 17 | 69 |
| Change in other provisions | 5.7 | -7 | -224 |
| Other unrealised gains or losses | – | -371 | 147 |
| Income from associated companies and joint ventures | 3.11 | -27 | -24 |
| Cashflows from operating profit before tax and before changes in operating assets and liabilities |
– | 3 548 | 3 927 |
| Changes in operating assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents) | – | -3 676 | -2 897 |
| Financial assets held for trading | 4.1 | 707 | 1 656 |
| Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 4.1 | 657 | 2 066 |
| Available-for-sale assets | 4.1 | -909 | -3 324 |
| Loans and receivables | 4.1 | -4 226 | -3 866 |
| Hedging derivatives | 4.1 | 104 | 590 |
| Operating assets associated with disposal groups, and other assets | – | -9 | -20 |
| Changes in operating liabilities (excluding cash and cash equivalents) | – | 18 611 | 10 032 |
| Deposits measured at amortised cost | 4.1 | 15 044 | 9 464 |
| Debts represented by securities measured at amortised cost | 4.1 | 11 728 | 255 |
| Financial liabilities held for trading | 4.1 | 175 | 172 |
| Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | 4.1 | -7 355 | 1 226 |
| Hedging derivatives | 4.1 | -867 | -998 |
| Operating liabilities associated with disposal groups, and other liabilities | – | -114 | -88 |
| Income taxes paid | 3.12 | -470 | -457 |
| Net cash from or used in operating activities | 18 014 | 10 604 |
| (in millions of EUR) | Reference1 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investing activities | |||
| Purchase of held-to-maturity securities | 4.1 | -2 365 | -3 202 |
| Proceeds from the repayment of held-to-maturity securities at maturity | 4.1 | 1 683 | 2 029 |
| Acquisition of a subsidiary or a business unit, net of cash acquired (including increases in percentage interest held) |
– | 0 | 200 |
| Proceeds from the disposal of a subsidiary or business unit, net of cash disposed of (including decreases in percentage interest held) |
– | 0 | 0 |
| Purchase of shares in associated companies and joint ventures | – | 0 | 0 |
| Proceeds from the disposal of shares in associated companies and joint ventures | – | 0 | 0 |
| Dividends received from associated companies and joint ventures | – | 26 | 23 |
| Purchase of investment property | 5.4 | -35 | -5 |
| Proceeds from the sale of investment property | 5.4 | 32 | 15 |
| Purchase of intangible fixed assets (excluding goodwill) | 5.5 | -158 | -158 |
| Proceeds from the sale of intangible fixed assets (excluding goodwill) | 5.5 | 9 | 39 |
| Purchase of property and equipment | 5.4 | -713 | -558 |
| Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment | 5.4 | 269 | 233 |
| Net cash from or used in investing activities | -1 252 | -1 385 |
| Financing activities | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| See consolidated statement of | |||
| Purchase or sale of treasury shares | changes in equity | 0 | 0 |
| Issue or repayment of promissory notes and other debt securities | 4.1 | -140 | -537 |
| Proceeds from or repayment of subordinated liabilities | 4.1 | -428 | -277 |
| Principal payments under finance lease obligations | – | 0 | 0 |
| Proceeds from the issuance of share capital | See consolidated statement of changes in equity |
16 | 17 |
| Redemption of non-voting core-capital securities | See consolidated statement of changes in equity |
0 | -3 000 |
| Proceeds from the issuance of preference shares | See consolidated statement of changes in equity |
0 | 0 |
| Dividends paid | See consolidated statement of changes in equity |
-470 | -1 058 |
| Net cash from or used in financing activities | -1 022 | -4 855 | |
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | |||
| Net increase or decrease in cash and cash equivalents | – | 15 741 | 4 364 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | – | 10 987 | 6 518 |
| Effects of exchange rate changes on opening cash and cash equivalents | – | 19 | 104 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | – | 26 747 | 10 987 |
| Additional information | |||
| Interest paid2 | 3.1 | -2 384 | -2 839 |
| Interest received2 | 3.1 | 6 642 | 7 150 |
| Dividends received (including equity method) | 3.2, 5.3 | 103 | 98 |
| Components of cash and cash equivalents | |||
| Cash and cash balances with central banks | See consolidated balance sheet | 20 148 | 7 038 |
| Loans and advances to banks repayable on demand and term loans to banks at not more than three months |
4.1 | 11 622 | 6 541 |
| Deposits from banks repayable on demand | 4.1 | -5 023 | -2 593 |
| Cash and cash equivalents belonging to disposal groups | – | 0 | 0 |
| Total | – | 26 747 | 10 987 |
| of which not available | – | 0 | 0 |
1 The notes referred to do not always contain the exact same amounts as those included in the cashflow statement, as – among other things – adjustments have been made to take account of acquisitions or disposals of subsidiaries, as set out in IAS 7.
2 'Interest paid' and 'Interest received' in this overview are the equivalent of the 'Interest expense' and 'Interest income' items in the consolidated income statement. Given the large number of underlying contracts that generate interest expense and interest income, it would take an exceptional administrative effort to establish actual cashflows. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that actual cashflows for a bankinsurance company do not differ much from the accrued interest expense and accrued interest income, as most rate products pay interest regularly within the year.
create the third-largest banking group by assets in the country. The inclusion of our subsidiary DZI with these banking entities will make us the largest bank-insurance group there. The deal is not expected to be finalised until the second quarter of 2017. With the acquisition being paid for entirely in cash, its impact on cashflows from investing activities is estimated at -0.6 billion euros.
The consolidated financial statements of KBC Group NV, including all the notes, were authorised for issue on 16 March 2017 by the Board of Directors. They have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted for use in the European Union ('endorsed IFRS') and present one year of comparative information. All amounts are shown in millions of euros and rounded to the million.
The following IFRS (which have an impact on KBC) became effective on 1 January 2016 and have been applied in this report.
• 'Disclosure Initiative' amendments to IAS 1 (Presentation of Financial Statement) provide more details on how financial statements are to be prepared, with a view to identifying what is relevant or material – and, therefore, leaving out redundant information – in order to improve the understandability of these statements (this topic is returned to later in this note). It is required moreover that the aggregate share in 'other comprehensive income' of associated companies and joint ventures be recognised separately. This share also has to be grouped according to whether or not it is recycled to profit or loss. As a consequence, the amounts presented in the other items of 'other comprehensive income' exclude the share in results of associated companies and joint ventures. The reference figures for 2015 have also been restated.
The following IFRS were issued but not yet effective at year-end 2016. KBC will apply these standards when they become mandatory.
model in place and the assets' contractual cashflow characteristics. The project is at the stage where all the business models have been identified, analysed and documented, as to a large extent have the characteristics of the contractual cashflows. Based on current market conditions, regulations, interpretation, assumptions and policies, the impact of first-time application is currently expected to be limited (subject to an audit review) and would be reflected primarily in a potential rebalancing of the treasury portfolio (reclassification from 'Available-for-sale' to 'Amortised cost'), the recognition of unrealised gains and losses on a limited number of investments that have failed the contractual cashflow characteristics test, and the reversal of frozen available-for-sale reserves. These frozen reserves existed under IAS 39 due to historical reclassifications out of the 'Available-for-sale' category to the 'Held-to-maturity' or 'Loans and receivables' categories, but need to be reversed on transition to IFRS 9.
For equity instruments not held for trading, which are situated mainly in our insurance activities, KBC intends to apply the overlay approach (subject to EU endorsement) to the majority of eligible equity instruments and so continue treating them under IAS 39 in a transparent way. This approach has been provided by the IASB to cover the transition period between the implementation of IFRS 9 and IFRS 17, thus ensuring there is a level playing field with other insurers and bank-insurers.
For financial liabilities, IFRS 9 changes the presentation of gains and losses on own credit risk for financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or loss. KBC will early adopt this aspect of IFRS 9 with effect from 1 January 2017 and the gains and losses on own credit risk will then go through other comprehensive income. The impact of early adoption is expected to be minimal given the current limited effect of own credit risk (see Note 4.8).
Financial assets that are subject to impairment will be classified into three stages:
KBC has established policies and processes to assess whether credit risk has increased significantly at the end of each reporting period and, therefore, whether 'staging' is required (i.e. moving from one stage to another). For the loan portfolio, a multi-tier approach has been adopted to staging, based on internal credit ratings, forbearance measures, collective assessment and days past due as a backstop. A similar multi-tier approach will be used for the investment portfolio, except that KBC intends to use the lowcredit-risk exemption, meaning that all bonds in scope with a probability of default (PD) of 1 to 3 are considered to be in 'Stage 1', unless any of the other triggers indicate otherwise. For 'Stage 1' and 'Stage 2' – under IAS 39 – KBC records incurred-but-notreported (IBNR) impairment losses, which are influenced by
emergence periods. Under IFRS 9, impairment of financial assets is calculated on a 12-month expected credit loss (ECL) basis for 'Stage 1' and on a lifetime ECL basis for 'Stage 2'. As a consequence, impairment levels are generally expected to increase. We do not expect any major impact on 'Stage 3'. Forward looking information is incorporated into the staging criteria and measurement of ECL. Different macroeconomic factors are taken into consideration and KBC is currently considering three scenarios to evaluate a range of possible outcomes.
KBC expects to announce impact assessments when the half-year results for 2017 are released. The impact of first time application depends on the regulatory framework and economic conditions at that time, as well as the composition of the portfolios. Impairment levels under IFRS 9 will differ from current prudential requirements because of:
We have also slightly modified the presentation of our financial statements by:
• presenting – for the first time in this annual report – the most recent year in tables first, followed by the reference year (previous reports did the opposite), which is the approach taken by most of our competitors;
• changing the numbering of the notes to make them easier to adjust (1.0, 1.1, 1.2 … 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, etc.) rather than (1, 2, 3, 4, etc.). This will make it easier to insert new notes.
What's more, the 'Disclosure Initiative' amendments to IAS 1 allow information that the company deems to be non-material (insignificant) to be left out of the annual accounts. Based on a number of factors, including the experience of our Investor Relations service (regarding matters that are regularly raised by analysts and investors), we have classified several note tables (or parts of them) as non-material and have either omitted or summarised the relevant information.
The main changes to enhance simplification involve:
All (material) entities (including structured entities) over which the consolidating entity exercises, directly or indirectly, exclusive control – as defined in IFRS 10 – are consolidated according to the method of full consolidation.
(Material) companies over which joint control is exercised, directly or indirectly, are consolidated according to the equity method (IFRS 11). (Material) investments in associates, i.e. companies over which KBC has significant influence, are also accounted for using the equity method. As allowed under IAS 28, investments held by venture capital organisations are classified as 'held for trading' (measured at fair value through profit or loss).
Changes in ownership interests (that do not result in a loss of control) are accounted for as equity transactions. They do not affect goodwill or profit or loss.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the spot rate at balance sheet date.
Negative and positive valuation differences, except for those relating to the funding of shares and investments of consolidated companies in a foreign currency, are recognised in profit or loss.
Non-monetary items measured at historical cost are translated into the functional currency at the historical exchange rate that existed on the transaction date.
Non-monetary items carried at fair value are translated at the spot rate of the date the fair value was determined.
Translation differences are reported together with changes in fair value. Income and expense items in foreign currency are taken to profit or loss at the exchange rate prevailing when they were recognised.
The balance sheets of foreign subsidiaries are translated into the reporting currency (euros) at the spot rate at balance sheet date (with the exception of the capital and reserves, which are translated at the historical rate). The income statement is translated at the average rate for the financial year as best estimate of the exchange rate at transaction date.
Differences arising from the use of one exchange rate for assets and liabilities, and another for net assets (together with the exchange rate differences – net of deferred taxes – on loans concluded to finance participating interests in foreign currency) are recognised in equity, commensurate with KBC's share.
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised in the balance sheet when KBC becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instruments. Regular-way purchases or sales of financial assets are recognised using settlement date accounting.
All financial assets and liabilities – including derivatives – must be recognised in the balance sheet according to the IAS 39 classification system. Each classification is subject to specific measurement rules.
The IAS 39 classifications are as follows:
instruments. Other financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss are measured in the same way as held-for-trading assets. KBC may use the fair value option when doing so results in more relevant information, because it eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency (sometimes referred to as 'an accounting mismatch') that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognising the gains and losses on them on different bases. The fair value option may also be used for financial assets with embedded derivatives.
Financial instruments are reported according to the dirty price convention, i.e. accrued interest is presented under the same heading as the financial instruments for which the interest has accrued.
KBC applies the following general rules:
• Amounts receivable. These are classified under 'Loans and receivables' and are measured on acquisition at fair value, including transaction costs. Loans with a fixed maturity are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, i.e. an interest rate is applied that exactly discounts all estimated future cashflows from the loans to the net carrying value. This interest rate takes account of all related fees and transaction costs. Loans with no fixed maturity date are measured at amortised cost. Impairment losses are recognised for loans and advances for which there is evidence – either on an individual or portfolio basis – of impairment at balance sheet date. Whether or not evidence exists is determined on the basis of the probability of default (PD). The PD
depends on a number of loan-specific characteristics, such as the type of loan, the borrower's line of business, the geographical location of the borrower and other elements key to a borrower's risk profile. Loans with the same PD therefore have a similar credit risk profile.
For off-balance-sheet commitments (commitment credit) classified as uncertain or irrecoverable and doubtful, provisions are recognised if the general IAS 37 criteria are satisfied and the more-likely-than-not criterion met. These provisions are recognised at their net present value.
Interest on loans written down as a result of impairment is recognised using the contractual rate of interest used to measure the impairment loss.
• Derivatives. All derivatives are classified as held-for-trading assets or held-for-trading liabilities unless they are designated and effective hedging instruments. Held-for-trading derivatives are measured at fair value, with fair value changes being recognised in profit or loss for the financial year. Held-for-trading derivatives with a positive replacement value are recorded on the asset side of the balance sheet; those with a negative replacement value on the liabilities side.
• Amounts owed. Liabilities arising from advances or cash deposits received are recorded in the balance sheet at amortised cost. The difference between the amount made available and the nominal value is reflected on an accruals basis in the income statement. It is recorded on a discounted basis, based on the effective rate of interest.
For fair value hedges, both the derivatives hedging the risks and the hedged positions are measured at fair value, with all fair value changes being taken to the income statement. Accrued interest income from rate swaps is included in net interest income. Hedge accounting is discontinued once the hedge accounting requirements are no longer met or if the hedging instrument expires or is sold. In this case, the gain or loss recorded in equity on the hedged position (for fixed-income financial instruments) will be taken to profit or loss on an accruals basis until maturity.
KBC uses fair value hedges for a portfolio of interest rate risk to hedge the interest rate risk for a portfolio of loans and savings deposits using interest rate swaps. The interest rate swaps are measured at fair value, with fair value changes reported in profit or loss. Accrued interest income from these swaps is included in net interest income. The hedged amount of loans is measured at fair value as well, with fair value changes reported in profit or loss. The fair value of the hedged amount is presented as a separate line item of the assets on the balance sheet. KBC makes use of the 'carvedout' version of IAS 39, so that no ineffectiveness results from anticipated repayments, as long as underhedging exists. In case of hedge ineffectiveness, the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedged amount will be amortised through profit or loss over the remaining lifetime of the hedged assets or immediately removed from the balance sheet if the ineffectiveness is due to the fact that the corresponding loans have been derecognised.
For cashflow hedges, derivatives hedging the risks are measured at fair value, with those fair value gains or losses determined to be an effective hedge being recognised separately in equity. Accrued interest income from rate swaps is included in net interest income. The ineffective portion of the hedge is recognised in income for the financial year. Hedge accounting will be discontinued if the hedge accounting criteria are no longer met. In this case, the derivatives will be treated as held-for-trading derivatives and measured accordingly.
Foreign currency funding of a net investment in a foreign entity is accounted for as a hedge of that net investment. This form of hedge accounting is used for investments not denominated in euros. Translation differences (account taken of deferred taxes) on the funding are recorded in equity, along with translation differences on the net investment.
Goodwill is defined as any excess of the cost of the acquisition over the acquirer's interest in the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. It is recognised as an intangible asset and is carried at cost less impairment losses. Goodwill is not amortised, but is tested for impairment at least once a year or if there is either internal or external evidence for doing so. An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying value of the cash-generating unit to which the goodwill belongs exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses on goodwill cannot be reversed. For each new business combination, KBC has to choose whether to measure minority interests at fair value or as their proportionate share of the acquiree's net identifiable assets. This choice determines the amount of goodwill recognised.
Software is recognised as an intangible asset if the capitalisation criteria are met. System software is capitalised and amortised at the same rate
as hardware, i.e. over three years, from the moment the software is available for use. Standard software and customised software developed by a third party are capitalised and amortised over five years according to the straight-line method from the moment the software is available for use. Internal and external development expenses for internally-generated software for investment projects are capitalised and written off according to the straight-line method over five years, while for core systems with a longer useful life, the period is eight years. Investment projects are large-scale projects that introduce or replace an important business objective or model. Internal and external research expenses for these projects and all expenses for other ICT projects concerning internally-generated software (other than investment projects) are taken to the income statement directly.
All property and equipment is recognised at cost (including directly allocable acquisition costs), less accumulated depreciation and impairment. The rates of depreciation are determined on the basis of the anticipated useful life of the assets and are applied according to the straight-line method from the moment the assets are available for use. Impairment is recognised when there is evidence of impairment and if the carrying value of the asset exceeds its recoverable value (i.e. the higher of the asset's value in use and net selling price). Amounts written down can be reversed through the income statement. When property or equipment is sold, the realised gains or losses are taken directly to the income statement. If property or equipment is destroyed, the remaining amount to be written off is taken directly to the income statement. The accounting policy outlined for property and equipment also applies to investment property.
External borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of an asset are capitalised as part of the cost of that asset. All other borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. Capitalisation commences when expenses are incurred for the asset, when the borrowing costs are incurred and when activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are in progress. When development is interrupted, the capitalisation of borrowing costs is suspended. The capitalisation of borrowing costs ceases when all the activities necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are complete.
For primary business, the provision for unearned premiums is in principle calculated on a daily basis, based on the gross premiums. For inward treaties, i.e. reinsurance business received, the provision for unearned premiums is calculated for each contract separately on the basis of the information communicated by the ceding undertaking and, where necessary, supplemented on the basis of the company's own view of how the risk will change over time.
The provision for unearned premiums for the life insurance business is recorded under the provision for the life insurance group of activities.
Except for unit-linked life insurance products, this provision is calculated according to current actuarial principles, with account being taken of
the provision for unearned premiums, the ageing reserve, provision for annuities payable but not yet due, etc. In principle, this provision is calculated separately for every insurance contract. For accepted business, a provision is constituted for each individual contract, based on the information supplied by the ceding undertaking and supplemented, where necessary, by the company's own past experience. Besides the rules set out below, an additional provision is set aside as required by law.
For claims reported, the provision is in principle measured separately in each case, taking into account the known facts in the claims file, on the basis of the amounts still due to the injured parties or beneficiaries, plus external costs of settling claims. Where benefits have to be paid in the form of an annuity, the amounts to be set aside for that purpose are calculated using recognised actuarial methods.
For 'claims incurred but not reported' at balance sheet date, an IBNR (Incurred But Not Reported) provision is set aside. In the primary business, this IBNR provision is based on a lump sum per class of insurance depending upon past experience and the trend in the insured portfolio. For extraordinary events, additional amounts are added to the IBNR provision.
For 'claims incurred but not enough reserved' at balance sheet date, an IBNER (Incurred But Not Enough Reserved) provision is set aside if the adequacy procedures demonstrate that the other claims provisions are insufficient to meet future liabilities. This provision contains amounts for claims which have already been reported but which, for technical reasons, could not yet be recorded in the claims file. Where appropriate, a provision is set aside on a prudent basis for possible liabilities arising for claims files already closed.
A provision for the internal cost of settling claims is calculated at a percentage that is based on past experience.
Additional provisions are also constituted as required by law, such as supplementary workmen's compensation provisions.
This heading includes the provision for the profit share that has been allocated but not yet awarded at the end of the financial year for both the group of life insurance activities and the group of non-life insurance activities.
A liability adequacy test is performed to evaluate current liabilities, detect possible deficiencies and recognise them in profit or loss.
The effect of reinsurance business ceded and retrocession is entered as an asset and calculated for each contract separately, supplemented where necessary by the company's own past experience regarding the evolution of the risk over time.
Deposit accounting rules apply to financial instruments that do not include a discretionary participation feature (DPF), and to the deposit component of unit-linked insurance contracts. This means that the deposit component and insurance component are measured separately. In deposit accounting, the portion of the premiums relating to the deposit component is not taken to the income statement, nor is the resulting increase in the carrying value of the liability. Management fees and commissions are recognised immediately in the income statement. When the value of unit-linked investments fluctuates subsequently, both the change on the asset side and the resulting change on the liabilities side are taken to the income statement immediately. Therefore, after initial recognition, the deposit component is measured at fair value through profit or loss. This fair value is determined by multiplying the number of units by the value of the unit, which is based upon the fair value of the underlying financial instruments. Settlements relating to the deposit component are not recorded in the income statement, but will result in a decrease in the carrying value of the liability.
Financial instruments with a discretionary participation feature and the insurance component of unit-linked contracts are treated as non-unitlinked insurance contracts (see f Technical provisions), and are not unbundled into a deposit component and an insurance component. On the balance sheet date, the liabilities resulting from these financial instruments or insurance contracts are tested to see if they are adequate, according to the liability adequacy test. If the carrying value of these liabilities is lower than their estimated future discounted cashflows, the deficiency will be recognised in the income statement against an increase in the liability.
Retirement benefit obligations are included under the 'Other liabilities' item and relate to obligations for retirement and survivor's pensions, early retirement benefits and similar pensions or annuities. Defined benefit plans are those under which KBC has a legal or constructive obligation to pay extra contributions to the pension fund if this last has insufficient assets to settle all the obligations to employees resulting from employee service in current and prior periods. The retirement benefit obligations under these plans for employees are calculated according to IAS 19, based on the projected-unit-credit
method, with each period of service granting additional entitlement to pension benefits.
Changes in the net defined benefit liability/asset are recognised in operating expenses (current service costs), in interest expense (net interest costs) and in other comprehensive income (remeasurements).
This heading includes current and deferred tax liabilities.
Provisions are recognised in the balance sheet:
Equity is the residual interest in the net assets after all liabilities have been deducted.
Equity instruments have been differentiated from financial instruments in accordance with the IAS 32 rules.
Put options on minority interests (and, where applicable, combinations of put and call options resulting in forward contracts) are recognised as financial liabilities at the present value of the exercise prices. The corresponding minority interests are deducted from equity. When the share in equity held by minority interests changes, KBC adjusts the carrying value of the majority and minority interests in order to reflect
the changes in their relative interests in the consolidated companies. KBC recognises any difference between the amount by which the minority interests are adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received, directly in equity and attributes it to the majority interest holder.
| Exchange rate at 31-12-2016 | Exchange rate average in 2016 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 EUR = … … currency |
Change from 31-12-2015 (positive: appreciation relative to EUR) (negative: depreciation relative to EUR) |
1 EUR = … … currency |
Change relative to average in 2015 (positive: appreciation relative to EUR) (negative: depreciation relative to EUR) |
|
| CZK | 27.021 | 0% | 27.042 | 1% |
| GBP | 0.85618 | -14% | 0.81760 | -11% |
| HUF | 309.83 | 2% | 312.17 | -1% |
| USD | 1.0541 | 3% | 1.1046 | 0% |
* Rounded figures.
No material changes were made to the accounting policies in 2016.
When preparing the consolidated financial statements and applying KBC's accounting policies, management is required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Some degree of uncertainty is inherent in almost all amounts reported. The estimates are based on the experience and assumptions that KBC's management believes are reasonable at the time the financial statements are being prepared.
Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. Significant areas of estimation uncertainty, and critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated financial statements are found in, but not limited to, the following notes: 3.3, 3.7, 3.10, 4.2, 4.4–4.7, 5.4–5.7 and 5.9.
Detailed information on the group's management structure can be found in the 'Our business units' section (which has not been audited by the statutory auditor). In line with IFRS 8, KBC has identified the Executive Committee and Board of Directors as 'chief operating decision-makers', responsible for allocating the resources and assessing the performance of the different parts of the company. The operating segments are based on the internal financial reporting to these policy bodies and on the location of the company's activities, resulting in geographical segmentation.
The three operating segments are (essentially):
For reporting purposes, there is also a Group Centre (comprising the results of the holding company, items that have not been allocated to the other business units, and the results of companies to be divested).
• The policy bodies analyse the performance of the segments based on a number of criteria, with the 'Result after tax' being the most important results indicator. The segment data is based entirely on IFRS data (with no adjustments).
We have commented on the results for each business unit in the 'Report of the Board of Directors' section. The statutory auditor has not audited these sections.
| (in millions of EUR) | Belgium Business Unit |
Czech Republic Business Unit |
Interna tional Markets Business Unit |
Of which: | Group | Centre KBC group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungary | Slovakia | Bulgaria | Ireland | ||||||
| INCOME STATEMENT FOR 2016 | |||||||||
| Net interest income | 2 701 | 849 | 740 | 231 | 216 | 48 | 244 | -32 | 4 258 |
| Non-life insurance (before reinsurance) | 440 | 78 | 91 | 33 | 21 | 37 | 0 | 18 | 628 |
| Earned premiums | 1 012 | 190 | 198 | 82 | 32 | 83 | 0 | 10 | 1 410 |
| Technical charges | -572 | -112 | -107 | -49 | -12 | -46 | 0 | 8 | -782 |
| Life insurance (before reinsurance) | -208 | 36 | 20 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -152 |
| Earned premiums | 1 217 | 271 | 89 | 16 | 51 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 577 |
| Technical charges | -1 425 | -234 | -69 | -12 | -39 | -18 | 0 | 0 | -1 728 |
| Ceded reinsurance result | -12 | -4 | -6 | -2 | -1 | -3 | 0 | -17 | -38 |
| Dividend income | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 77 |
| Net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss |
329 | 117 | 89 | 66 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 540 |
| Net realised result from available-for-sale assets | 90 | 48 | 38 | 19 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 189 |
| Net fee and commission income | 1 070 | 191 | 201 | 157 | 45 | -4 | -1 | -11 | 1 450 |
| Other net income | 208 | 18 | -1 | 2 | 6 | -5 | -4 | 33 | 258 |
| TOTAL INCOME | 4 680 | 1 333 | 1 173 | 509 | 330 | 84 | 246 | 25 | 7 211 |
| Operating expensesa | -2 432 | -608 | -750 | -338 | -199 | -56 | -154 | -158 | -3 948 |
| Impairment | -179 | -24 | 34 | 12 | -16 | -6 | 44 | -32 | -201 |
| on loans and receivables | -113 | -23 | 42 | 15 | -15 | -3 | 45 | -32 | -126 |
| on available-for-sale assets | -58 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -55 |
| on goodwill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| other | -8 | -4 | -7 | -3 | 0 | -3 | -1 | 0 | -20 |
| Share in results of associated companies and joint ventures |
0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 27 |
| RESULT BEFORE TAX | 2 070 | 724 | 457 | 183 | 115 | 22 | 136 | -161 | 3 090 |
| Income tax expense | -637 | -128 | -29 | -54 | -23 | 0 | 49 | 132 | -662 |
| Net post-tax result from discontinued operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RESULT AFTER TAX | 1 433 | 596 | 428 | 130 | 92 | 22 | 184 | -29 | 2 428 |
| attributable to minority interests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| attributable to equity holders of the parent | 1 432 | 596 | 428 | 130 | 92 | 22 | 184 | -29 | 2 427 |
| a Of which non-cash expenses | -62 | -48 | -55 | -27 | -12 | -3 | -12 | -81 | -246 |
| Depreciation and amortisation of fixed assets | -57 | -49 | -56 | -27 | -13 | -3 | -12 | -85 | -246 |
| Other | -5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Acquisitions of non-current assets* | 448 | 260 | 132 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 21 | 102 | 942 |
* Non-current assets held for sale and disposal groups, investment property, property and equipment, investments in associated companies, and goodwill and other intangible assets.
| (in millions of EUR) | Belgium Business Unit |
Czech Republic Business Unit |
Interna tional Markets Business |
Unit Of which: | Group Centre |
KBC group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungary | Slovakia | Bulgaria | Ireland | ||||||
| INCOME STATEMENT FOR 2015 | |||||||||
| Net interest income | 2 819 | 845 | 711 | 248 | 214 | 47 | 202 | -63 | 4 311 |
| Non-life insurance (before reinsurance) | 460 | 80 | 81 | 27 | 20 | 35 | 0 | -10 | 611 |
| Earned premiums | 989 | 177 | 169 | 65 | 29 | 76 | 0 | -16 | 1 319 |
| Technical charges | -530 | -96 | -88 | -38 | -9 | -41 | 0 | 6 | -708 |
| Life insurance (before reinsurance) | -243 | 26 | 16 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | -201 |
| Earned premiums | 969 | 243 | 90 | 15 | 52 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 301 |
| Technical charges | -1 212 | -216 | -73 | -13 | -41 | -20 | 0 | 0 | -1 502 |
| Ceded reinsurance result | -20 | -8 | -6 | -3 | -1 | -2 | 0 | 6 | -29 |
| Dividend income | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 75 |
| Net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss |
162 | 98 | 76 | 60 | 16 | 2 | -2 | -121 | 214 |
| Net realised result from available-for-sale assets | 149 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 190 |
| Net fee and commission income | 1 280 | 201 | 206 | 160 | 47 | -2 | -3 | -9 | 1 678 |
| Other net income | 207 | 23 | 50 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 297 |
| TOTAL INCOME | 4 878 | 1 277 | 1 141 | 539 | 317 | 83 | 198 | -148 | 7 148 |
| Operating expensesa | -2 373 | -617 | -752 | -353 | -190 | -56 | -149 | -149 | -3 890 |
| Impairment | -222 | -42 | -84 | -8 | -18 | -10 | -48 | -399 | -747 |
| on loans and receivables | -177 | -36 | -82 | -6 | -18 | -10 | -48 | -28 | -323 |
| on available-for-sale assets | -38 | -4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -45 |
| on goodwill | 0 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -342 | -344 |
| other | -7 | 0 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -25 | -34 |
| Share in results of associated companies and joint ventures |
-1 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 |
| RESULT BEFORE TAX | 2 282 | 640 | 305 | 179 | 108 | 17 | 1 | -693 | 2 535 |
| Income tax expense | -717 | -98 | -60 | -47 | -26 | 2 | 12 | 980 | 104 |
| Net post-tax result from discontinued operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RESULT AFTER TAX | 1 565 | 542 | 245 | 131 | 82 | 18 | 13 | 287 | 2 639 |
| attributable to minority interests | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| attributable to equity holders of the parent | 1 564 | 542 | 245 | 131 | 82 | 18 | 13 | 287 | 2 639 |
| a Of which non-cash expenses | -55 | -18 | -56 | -24 | -13 | -3 | -16 | -102 | -231 |
| Depreciation and amortisation of fixed assets | -57 | -24 | -61 | -25 | -12 | -3 | -21 | -111 | -253 |
| Other | 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 22 |
| Acquisitions of non-current assets* | 406 | 82 | 93 | 27 | 29 | 9 | 28 | 142 | 722 |
* Non-current assets held for sale and disposal groups, investment property, property and equipment, investments in associated companies, and goodwill and other intangible assets.
The table below presents some of the main on-balance-sheet products by segment.
| Belgium Business |
Czech Republic Business |
Interna tional Markets Business |
Group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | Unit | Unit | Unit Of which: | Centre | KBC group | ||||
| Hungary | Slovakia | Bulgaria | Ireland | ||||||
| BALANCE SHEET AT 31-12-2016 | |||||||||
| Deposits from customers and debt certificates (excluding repos) |
125 074 | 26 183 | 18 344 | 6 814 | 5 739 | 792 | 4 999 | 7 820 | 177 421 |
| Loans and advances to customers (excluding reverse repos) |
91 804 | 19 552 | 21 496 | 3 802 | 6 094 | 835 | 10 765 | 4 | 132 856 |
| Term loans (excluding reverse repos) | 46 130 | 7 375 | 5 203 | 1 762 | 2 124 | 273 | 1 043 | 0 | 58 707 |
| Mortgage loans | 34 265 | 9 077 | 13 993 | 1 451 | 2 608 | 234 | 9 700 | 0 | 57 335 |
| Current accountadvances | 2 751 | 995 | 894 | 299 | 411 | 176 | 9 | 0 | 4 640 |
| Finance leases | 3 615 | 570 | 731 | 142 | 589 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 916 |
| Consumer credit | 1 314 | 1 260 | 606 | 80 | 362 | 152 | 13 | 0 | 3 180 |
| Other loans and advances | 3 728 | 275 | 69 | 67 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 076 |
| BALANCE SHEET AT 31-12-2015 | |||||||||
| Deposits from customers and debt certificates (excluding repos) |
111 136 | 24 075 | 17 089 | 5 862 | 5 263 | 692 | 5 272 | 9 241 | 161 542 |
| Loans and advances to customers (excluding reverse repos) |
88 017 | 18 005 | 21 035 | 3 552 | 5 462 | 725 | 11 295 | 664 | 127 721 |
| Term loans (excluding reverse repos) | 43 969 | 7 137 | 5 106 | 1 647 | 1 944 | 204 | 1 311 | 649 | 56 860 |
| Mortgage loans | 33 341 | 8 079 | 13 657 | 1 369 | 2 072 | 242 | 9 975 | 0 | 55 078 |
| Current account advances | 2 271 | 954 | 800 | 284 | 374 | 139 | 4 | 0 | 4 026 |
| Finance leases | 3 303 | 527 | 683 | 117 | 566 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 512 |
| Consumer credit | 1 174 | 1 067 | 687 | 67 | 474 | 140 | 5 | 0 | 2 928 |
| Other loans and advances | 3 958 | 241 | 102 | 69 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 4 316 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 4 258 | 4 311 |
| Interest income | 6 642 | 7 150 |
| Available-for-sale assets | 703 | 717 |
| Loans and receivables | 3 805 | 4 085 |
| Held-to-maturity investments | 981 | 1 013 |
| Other assets not at fair value | 79 | 41 |
| Subtotal, interest income from financial assets not measured at fair value through profit or loss |
5 568 | 5 857 |
| of which impaired financial assets | 64 | 94 |
| Financial assets held for trading | 661 | 807 |
| Hedging derivatives | 288 | 360 |
| Other financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | 124 | 127 |
| Interest expense | -2 384 | -2 839 |
| Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost | -870 | -1 202 |
| Other liabilities not at fair value | -33 | -8 |
| Subtotal, interest expense for financial liabilities not measured at fair value through profit or loss |
-903 | -1 210 |
| Financial liabilities held for trading | -771 | -926 |
| Hedging derivatives | -564 | -590 |
| Other financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss |
-139 | -103 |
| Net interest expense relating to defined benefit plans | -6 | -10 |
| (in millions of EUR) | |
|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 77 | 75 |
| Shares held for trading | 12 | 9 |
| Shares initially recognised at fair value through profit or loss | 1 | 2 |
| Available-for-sale shares | 63 | 65 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 540 | 214 |
| Trading instruments (including interest and fair value changes in trading derivatives) | 687 | 211 |
| Other financial instruments initially recognised at fair value through profit or loss | -6 | 71 |
| of which gains/losses on own credit risk | 8 | 17 |
| Foreign exchange trading | -94 | -31 |
| Fair value adjustments in hedge accounting | -47 | -37 |
| Fair value micro hedges | -5 | -1 |
| Changes in the fair value of the hedged items | 295 | -30 |
| Changes in the fair value of the hedging derivatives, including discontinuation | -300 | 29 |
| Cashflow hedges | -2 | 2 |
| Changes in the fair value of the hedging derivatives, ineffective portion | -2 | 2 |
| Hedges of net investments in foreign operations, ineffective portion | 0 | 0 |
| Portfolio hedge of interest rate risk | -2 | 1 |
| Changes in the fair value of the hedged items | 101 | -54 |
| Changes in the fair value of the hedging derivatives, including discontinuation | -104 | 55 |
| Discontinuation of hedge accounting for fair value hedges | 0 | 0 |
| Discontinuation of hedge accounting for cashflow hedges | -37 | -38 |
• Foreign exchange trading results comprise total exchange differences, excluding those recognised on financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss. In 2015, this item also included the foreign exchange loss on the capital of KBC Financial Holding Inc., following that business's liquidation. The loss was transferred from equity to profit or loss (-156 million euros (before tax), including hedging effects).
portfolio of interest rate risk. IFRS does not permit net positions to be reported as hedged items, but does allow hedging instruments to be designated as a hedge of a gross asset position (or a gross liabilities position, as the case may be). Specifically, we make sure that the volume of assets (or liabilities) in each maturity bucket is greater than the volume of hedging instruments allocated to the same bucket.
| (in millions of EUR) | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 189 | 190 |
| Fixed-income securities | 24 | 54 |
| Shares | 165 | 136 |
• In 2016, the net realised result on shares included the capital gain of 99 million euros (84 million euros (after tax)) generated by the sale of Visa Europe shares (following the public offering for Visa Europe).
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 1 450 | 1 678 |
| Fee and commission income | 2 101 | 2 348 |
| Securities and asset management | 1 107 | 1 289 |
| Margin on life insurance investment contracts without DPF (deposit accounting) | 48 | 81 |
| Commitment credit | 254 | 266 |
| Payments | 566 | 535 |
| Other | 127 | 178 |
| Fee and commission expense | -651 | -670 |
| Commission paid to intermediaries | -335 | -309 |
| Other | -316 | -362 |
• The lion's share of the fees and commissions related to lending is recognised under 'Net interest income' (effective interest rate calculations).
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 258 | 297 |
| of which gains or losses on | ||
| Sale of loans and receivables | 2 | 3 |
| Sale of held-to-maturity investments | 4 | 6 |
| Repurchase of financial liabilities measured at amortised cost | -7 | -9 |
| Other, including: | 259 | 297 |
| Income from (mainly operational) leasing activities, KBC Lease Group | 78 | 81 |
| Income from VAB Group | 69 | 59 |
| Gains and losses on divestments | 3 | 11 |
| Impact of surrender of a reinsured contract | 25 | 0 |
| Provisions for the Hungarian act on consumer loans | 0 | 34 |
| Deconsolidation of real estate companies | 0 | 18 |
• The impact of surrendering a reinsured contract in 2016 concerns the investment gains that were realised (and recognised under 'Other net income') when a large reinsured savings contract was surrendered.
The gains were transferred in their entirety to the client through technical charges (life insurance) and, therefore, did not have any impact on KBC's net result.
commissions that insurance entities pay to bank branches for sales of insurance, etc.) in order to give a more accurate view of the profitability of the insurance business.
• Additional information on the insurance business is provided separately in Note 3.7.2, Note 3.7.3, Note 5.6 and Note 6.5 (KBC Insurance section), in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section ('Credit risk exposure in the insurance activities', 'Interest rate risk', 'Equity risk' and 'Real estate risk', 'Technical insurance risk') and in the 'How do we manage our capital?' section ('Solvency of KBC Bank and KBC Insurance separately').
| Non-technical | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | Life | Non-life | account | Total |
| 2016 | ||||
| Earned premiums, insurance (before reinsurance) | 1 579 | 1 428 | – | 3 007 |
| Technical charges, insurance (before reinsurance) | -1 728 | -784 | – | -2 512 |
| Net fee and commission income | -29 | -272 | – | -301 |
| Ceded reinsurance result | -1 | -37 | – | -38 |
| General administrative expenses | -135 | -242 | -3 | -380 |
| Internal claims settlement expenses | -8 | -54 | – | -62 |
| Indirect acquisition costs | -32 | -80 | – | -112 |
| Administrative expenses | -95 | -108 | – | -203 |
| Investment management fees | 0 | 0 | -3 | 3 |
| Technical result | -315 | 94 | -3 | -224 |
| Net interest income | – | – | 614 | 614 |
| Net dividend income | – | – | 45 | 45 |
| Net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss | – | – | -10 | -10 |
| Net realised result from available-for-sale assets | – | – | 56 | 56 |
| Other net income | – | – | 18 | 18 |
| Impairment | – | – | -55 | -55 |
| Allocation to the technical accounts | 558 | 73 | -631 | 0 |
| Technical-financial result | 242 | 167 | 35 | 445 |
| Share in results of associated companies and joint ventures | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| RESULT BEFORE TAX | 242 | 167 | 39 | 449 |
| Income tax expense | – | – | – | -135 |
| RESULT AFTER TAX | – | – | – | 314 |
| attributable to minority interests | – | – | – | 0 |
| attributable to equity holders of the parent | – | – | – | 314 |
| 2015 | ||||
| Earned premiums, insurance (before reinsurance) | 1 303 | 1 338 | – | 2 642 |
| Technical charges, insurance (before reinsurance) | -1 502 | -708 | – | -2 210 |
| Net fee and commission income | -15 | -247 | – | -262 |
| Ceded reinsurance result | -2 | -27 | – | -29 |
| General administrative expenses | -119 | -231 | -3 | -353 |
| Internal claims settlement expenses | -7 | -53 | – | -60 |
| Indirect acquisition costs | -29 | -77 | – | -107 |
| Administrative expenses | -82 | -101 | – | -183 |
| Investment management fees | 0 | 0 | -3 | -3 |
| Technical result | -334 | 125 | -3 | -212 |
| Net interest income | – | – | 636 | 636 |
| Net dividend income | – | – | 53 | 53 |
| Net result from financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss | – | – | -9 | -9 |
| Net realised result from available-for-sale assets | – | – | 108 | 108 |
| Other net income | – | – | -6 | -6 |
| Impairment | – | – | -69 | -69 |
| Allocation to the technical accounts | 574 | 104 | -678 | 0 |
| Technical-financial result | 240 | 228 | 31 | 499 |
| Share in results of associated companies and joint ventures | – | – | 3 | 3 |
| RESULT BEFORE TAX | 240 | 228 | 34 | 502 |
| Income tax expense | – | – | – | -148 |
| RESULT AFTER TAX | – | – | – | 355 |
| attributable to minority interests | – | – | – | 0 |
| attributable to equity holders of the parent | – | – | – | 354 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Non-life insurance (before reinsurance) – Earned premiums | ||
| In the consolidated income statement | 1 410 | 1 319 |
| Addition of premiums from intragroup transactions between bank and insurer | 19 | 20 |
| In Note 3.7.1 | 1 428 | 1 338 |
| Life insurance (before reinsurance) – Earned premiums | ||
| In the consolidated income statement | 1 577 | 1 301 |
| Addition of premiums from intragroup transactions between bank and insurer | 2 | 2 |
| In Note 3.7.1 | 1 579 | 1 303 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 1 579 | 1 303 |
| Breakdown by IFRS category | ||
| Insurance contracts | 920 | 897 |
| Investment contracts with DPF | 659 | 406 |
| Breakdown by type | ||
| Accepted reinsurance | 5 | 0 |
| Primary business | 1 574 | 1 303 |
| Breakdown of primary business | ||
| Individual premiums | 1 265 | 1 024 |
| Single premiums | 624 | 393 |
| Periodic premiums | 642 | 631 |
| Premiums under group contracts | 309 | 279 |
| Single premiums | 48 | 49 |
| Periodic premiums | 261 | 230 |
| Total sales of life insurance (including investment contracts without DPF) | ||
| Unit-linked | 820 | 722 |
| Guaranteed-rate | 1 295 | 1 071 |
| Total | 2 114 | 1 793 |
• As required under IFRS, we use deposit accounting for a number of investment contracts without DPF. This means that the premium income and technical charges from these contracts are not recognised under 'Earned premiums' and 'Technical charges', but that the margins on them are reported under 'Net fee and commission
income'. Investment contracts without DPF are more or less the same as unit-linked contracts, which in 2016 accounted for premium income of 0.8 billion euros and in 2015 for premium income of 0.7 billion euros.
| (in millions of EUR) | Earned premiums (before reinsurance) |
Claims incurred (before reinsurance) |
Operating expenses (before reinsurance) |
Ceded reinsurance |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | |||||
| Total | 1 428 | -784 | -514 | -37 | 94 |
| Accepted reinsurance | 36 | -2 | -14 | -15 | 6 |
| Primary business | 1 392 | -782 | -500 | -22 | 89 |
| Accident & health (classes 1 & 2, excl. industrial accidents) | 110 | -53 | -38 | -1 | 19 |
| Industrial accidents (class 1) | 72 | -79 | -18 | -1 | -26 |
| Motor, third-party liability (class 10) | 382 | -243 | -124 | -1 | 15 |
| Motor, other classes (classes 3 & 7) | 211 | -121 | -75 | 0 | 14 |
| Shipping, aviation, transport (classes 4, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 12) | 3 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Fire and other damage to property (classes 8 & 9) | 425 | -185 | -165 | -20 | 55 |
| General third-party liability (class 13) | 97 | -64 | -39 | 1 | -6 |
| Credit and suretyship (classes 14 & 15) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Miscellaneous pecuniary losses (class 16) | 14 | -9 | -6 | 0 | -1 |
| Legal assistance (class 17) | 51 | -18 | -19 | 0 | 14 |
| Assistance (class 18) | 25 | -8 | -13 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | |||||
| Total | 1 338 | -708 | -479 | -27 | 125 |
| Accepted reinsurance | 32 | -2 | -8 | 0 | 22 |
| Primary business | 1 306 | -707 | -470 | -27 | 102 |
| Accident & health (classes 1 & 2, excl. industrial accidents) | 110 | -50 | -36 | 0 | 24 |
| Industrial accidents (class 1) | 72 | -42 | -18 | -1 | 10 |
| Motor, third-party liability (class 10) | 359 | -240 | -122 | -1 | -5 |
| Motor, other classes (classes 3 & 7) | 193 | -110 | -70 | 1 | 15 |
| Shipping, aviation, transport (classes 4, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 12) | 3 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 |
| Fire and other damage to property (classes 8 & 9) | 403 | -152 | -153 | -21 | 77 |
| General third-party liability (class 13) | 87 | -67 | -38 | -3 | -20 |
| Credit and suretyship (classes 14 & 15) | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| Miscellaneous pecuniary losses (class 16) | 10 | -5 | -4 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal assistance (class 17) | 48 | -32 | -19 | 0 | -3 |
| Assistance (class 18) | 20 | -7 | -9 | 0 | 4 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | -3 948 | -3 890 |
| Staff expenses | -2 252 | -2 245 |
| General administrative expenses | -1 449 | -1 392 |
| of which bank taxes | -437 | -417 |
| Depreciation and amortisation of fixed assets | -246 | -253 |
December. Not all the options need to be exercised at once. When exercising options, members of staff can either deposit the resulting shares on their custody accounts or sell them immediately on NYSE Euronext Brussels. The remaining number of outstanding options at year-end 2016 was very limited (145 380 options, average exercise price 75.73 euros). Changes in 2016 related to expired options (-6 700 options).
| (number) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total average number of persons employed (in full-time equivalents) | 36 030 | 36 199 |
| Breakdown by legal entity | ||
| KBC Bank NV | 27 910 | 27 033 |
| KBC Insurance NV | 4 100 | 4 074 |
| KBC Group NV (holding company) | 4 020 | 5 092 |
| Breakdown by employee classification | ||
| Blue-collar staff | 367 | 366 |
| White-collar staff | 35 393 | 35 560 |
| Senior management | 270 | 273 |
• The figures in the table are annual averages, which – in terms of scope – may differ from year-end figures that are provided elsewhere.
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | -201 | -747 |
| Impairment on loans and receivables | -126 | -323 |
| Breakdown by type | ||
| Specific impairment, on-balance-sheet lending | -75 | -322 |
| Provisions for off-balance-sheet credit commitments | 8 | 9 |
| Portfolio-based impairment | -58 | -10 |
| Breakdown by business unit | ||
| Belgium | -113 | -177 |
| Czech Republic | -23 | -36 |
| International Markets | 42 | -82 |
| Group Centre | -32 | -28 |
| Impairment on available-for-sale assets | -55 | -45 |
| Shares | -58 | -43 |
| Other | 3 | -3 |
| Impairment on goodwill | 0 | -344 |
| Impairment on other | -20 | -34 |
| Intangible fixed assets (other than goodwill) | -11 | -7 |
| Property and equipment (including investment property) | -7 | -27 |
| Held-to-maturity assets | -1 | 0 |
| Associated companies and joint ventures | 0 | 0 |
| Other | -1 | 0 |
At KBC Bank Ireland, the loan portfolio which contains a relatively large proportion of home loans and mortgages – has suffered as a consequence of the property crisis. The Irish loan portfolio stood at about 13 billion euros at the end of the year, 86% of which relates to mortgage loans. The rest is more or less equally divided across SME and corporate loans, and loans related to real estate investment and development. The group was able to recognise a net impairment reversal of 45 million euros for its Irish portfolio in 2016. In 2015, it had set aside 48 million euros.
'Impairment on available-for-sale assets' in 2016 and 2015 comprised primarily impairment on shares.
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 27 | 24 |
| of which CˇMSS | 23 | 23 |
• The share in results of associated companies and joint ventures is accounted for primarily by CˇMSS, a joint venture of Cˇ SOB in the Czech Republic. More details are provided in Note 5.3.
• Impairment on (goodwill on) associated companies and joint ventures is included in 'Impairment' (see Note 3.10). The share in results of associated companies and joint ventures does not therefore take this impairment into account.
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | -662 | 104 |
| Breakdown by type | ||
| Current taxes on income | -470 | -457 |
| Deferred taxes on income | -192 | 562 |
| Tax components | ||
| Result before tax | 3 090 | 2 535 |
| Income tax at the Belgian statutory rate | 33.99% | 33.99% |
| Income tax calculated | -1 050 | -861 |
| Plus/minus tax effects attributable to | ||
| differences in tax rates, Belgium – abroad | 251 | 220 |
| tax-free income | 125 | 143 |
| adjustments related to prior years | 11 | -10 |
| adjustments, opening balance of deferred taxes due to change in tax rate | -8 | 0 |
| unused tax losses and unused tax credits to reduce current tax expense | 31 | 10 |
| unused tax losses and unused tax credits to reduce deferred tax expense | 110 | 1 |
| reversal of previously recognised deferred tax assets due to tax losses | -20 | 0 |
| liquidation of KBC Financial Holding Inc. | 0 | 910 |
| other (mainly non-deductible expenses) | -112 | -310 |
| Aggregate amount of temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, branches and associated companies and interests in joint ventures, for which deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised* |
358 | 314 |
* Reserves of joint or other subsidiaries, associated companies and branches that, at certain entities, will be taxed in full on distribution (recorded in full). For a significant number of entities, the foreign tax credit applies (5% is recorded, since 95% is definitively taxed).
• For information on tax assets and tax liabilities, see Note 5.2.
• 'Liquidation of KBC Financial Holding Inc.' (KBCFH) in 2015 reflects the strategic refocus that KBC agreed with the European Commission in 2009, when KBC undertook to run down or divest the activities of its subsidiary KBCFH (in the US) in order to reduce its own risk profile. That process has since been completed, with KBC collapsing the last two CDOs it held in portfolio in September 2014. As a final step, KBC also liquidated KBCFH. According to Belgian tax law, the loss in paid-up capital that KBC Bank sustained as a result of the liquidation of KBCFH is tax deductible for the parent company on the date of liquidation, rather than at the time the losses were incurred
(specifically 2008 and 2009). On balance, the full impact on the results came to 765 million euros in 2015 (910 million euros in the form of a deferred tax asset relating to tax losses carried forward, partially offset by the transfer from equity to profit or loss of -156 million euros (-145 million euros (after tax)) in exchange differences relating to the capital of KBCFH.
• On balance, 'Income tax expense' in 2016 was positively impacted (103 million euros) by deferred tax assets at KBC Credit Investments (+65 million euros), KBC Securities (-20 million euros), KBC Bank Ireland (+66 million euros) and K&H Bank (-8 million euros).
| (in millions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Result after tax, attributable to equity holders of the parent | 2 427 | 2 639 |
| Coupon/penalty on core-capital securities sold to the Belgian Federal and Flemish Regional governments | 0 | -1 000 |
| Coupon on AT1 instruments | -52 | -52 |
| Net result used to determine basic earnings per share | 2 375 | 1 587 |
| Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (millions of units) | 418 | 418 |
| Basic earnings per share (in EUR) | 5.68 | 3.80 |
• Diluted earnings per share are currently equal to basic earnings per share.
Note 4.1: Financial assets and liabilities, breakdown by portfolio and product
| Held for | Desig nated at fair |
Available | Loans and recei |
Held to | Hedging deriva |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | trading | value1 | for sale | vables | maturity | tives | Total |
| FINANCIAL ASSETS, 31-12-2016 | |||||||
| Loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firmsa | 6 | 1 | 0 | 17 459 | – | – | 17 466c |
| Loans and advances to customersb | 1 | 77 | 0 | 133 154 | – | – | 133 231 |
| Trade receivables | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 549 | – | – | 3 549 |
| Consumer credit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 180 | – | – | 3 180 |
| Mortgage loans | 0 | 29 | 0 | 57 307 | – | – | 57 335 |
| Term loans | 0 | 49 | 0 | 59 035 | – | – | 59 083 |
| Finance leases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 916 | – | – | 4 916 |
| Current account advances | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 640 | – | – | 4 640 |
| Other | 1 | 0 | 0 | 527 | – | – | 528 |
| Equity instruments | 427 | 2 | 1 723 | – | – | – | 2 153 |
| Investment contracts (insurance) | – | 13 693 | – | – | – | – | 13 693 |
| Debt instruments issued by | 1 001 | 411 | 34 985 | 1 015 | 33 697 | – | 71 109 |
| Public bodies | 713 | 47 | 22 982 | 16 | 32 131 | – | 55 889 |
| Credit institutions and investment firms | 127 | 174 | 5 032 | 140 | 948 | – | 6 421 |
| Corporates | 161 | 190 | 6 970 | 859 | 618 | – | 8 799 |
| Derivatives | 8 249 | – | – | – | – | 410 | 8 659 |
| Other3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 524 | 0 | 0 | 525 |
| Total | 9 683 | 14 185 | 36 708 | 152 152 | 33 697 | 410 | 246 836 |
| a of which reverse repos2 | 11 776 | ||||||
| b of which reverse repos2 | 376 | ||||||
| c of which loans and advances to banks repayable on demand and term loans to banks at not more than three months |
11 622 | ||||||
| FINANCIAL ASSETS, 31-12-2015 | |||||||
| Loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firmsa | 0 | 2 107 | 0 | 11 524 | – | – | 13 631c |
| Loans and advances to customersb | 0 | 394 | 0 | 127 829 | – | – | 128 223 |
| Trade receivables | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 729 | – | – | 3 729 |
| Consumer credit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 928 | – | – | 2 928 |
| Mortgage loans | 0 | 28 | 0 | 55 050 | – | – | 55 078 |
| Term loans | 0 | 366 | 0 | 56 997 | – | – | 57 363 |
| Finance leases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 512 | – | – | 4 512 |
| Current account advances | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 026 | – | – | 4 026 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 587 | – | – | 587 |
| Equity instruments | 411 | 2 | 2 071 | – | – | – | 2 485 |
| Investment contracts (insurance) | – | 13 330 | – | – | – | – | 13 330 |
| Debt instruments issued by | 1 785 | 681 | 33 598 | 1 117 | 32 958 | – | 70 138 |
| Public bodies | 1 408 | 120 | 21 892 | 22 | 31 353 | – | 54 796 |
| Credit institutions and investment firms | 192 | 104 | 4 893 | 158 | 984 | – | 6 330 |
| Corporates | 184 | 456 | 6 813 | 937 | 622 | – | 9 013 |
| Derivatives | 8 188 | – | – | – | – | 514 | 8 702 |
| Other3 | 1 | – | – | 835 | 0 | 0 | 836 |
| Total | 10 385 | 16 514 | 35 670 | 141 305 | 32 958 | 514 | 237 346 |
| a of which reverse repos2 | 5 012 | ||||||
| b of which reverse repos2 | 502 | ||||||
| c of which loans and advances to banks repayable on demand and term loans |
to banks at not more than three months 6 541
1 Loans and advances in the 'Designated at fair value' column relate primarily to reverse repo transactions and a small portfolio of home loans. In each case, the carrying value comes close to the maximum credit exposure.
2 The amount of the reverse repos is virtually identical to the amount of the underlying assets (that have been lent out).
3 Financial assets not included under 'Loans and advances to customers' as they are not directly related to commercial lending.
| Held for | Desig nated at |
Hedging deriva |
Measured at amor |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | trading | fair value | tives | tised cost | Total |
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES, 31-12-2016 | |||||
| Deposits from credit institutions and investment firmsa | 5 | 1 766 | – | 30 248 | 32 020c |
| Deposits from customers and debt securitiesb | 541 | 2 134 | – | 175 055 | 177 730 |
| Demand deposits | 0 | 0 | – | 63 427 | 63 427 |
| Time deposits | 117 | 1 100 | – | 21 027 | 22 245 |
| Savings accounts | 0 | 0 | – | 53 328 | 53 328 |
| Special deposits | 0 | 0 | – | 2 056 | 2 056 |
| Other deposits | 0 | 0 | – | 630 | 630 |
| Certificates of deposit | 0 | 14 | – | 16 629 | 16 643 |
| Savings certificates | 0 | 0 | – | 1 959 | 1 959 |
| Convertible bonds | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 |
| Non-convertible bonds | 424 | 744 | – | 12 889 | 14 057 |
| Convertible subordinated liabilities | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 |
| Non-convertible subordinated liabilities | 0 | 276 | – | 3 109 | 3 385 |
| Liabilities under investment contracts | – | 12 653 | – | 0 | 12 653 |
| Derivatives | 7 334 | 0 | 1 704 | – | 9 037 |
| Short positions | 665 | 0 | – | – | 665 |
| In equity instruments | 36 | 0 | – | – | 36 |
| In debt instruments | 629 | 0 | – | – | 629 |
| Other2 | 13 | 0 | – | 2 182 | 2 195 |
| Total | 8 559 | 16 553 | 1 704 | 207 485 | 234 300 |
| a of which repos1 | 9 420 | ||||
| b of which repos1 | 309 | ||||
| c of which deposits from banks repayable on demand | 5 023 | ||||
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES, 31-12-2015 | |||||
| Deposits from credit institutions and investment firmsa | 1 | 1 123 | – | 17 828 | 18 953c |
| Deposits from customers and debt securitiesb | 431 | 10 916 | – | 158 762 | 170 109 |
| Demand deposits | 0 | 0 | – | 55 148 | 55 148 |
| Time deposits | 57 | 9 360 | – | 27 724 | 37 141 |
| Savings accounts | 0 | 0 | – | 50 075 | 50 075 |
| Special deposits | 0 | 0 | – | 1 983 | 1 983 |
| Other deposits | 0 | 0 | – | 484 | 484 |
| Certificates of deposit | 0 | 10 | – | 6 159 | 6 168 |
| Savings certificates Convertible bonds |
0 0 |
0 0 |
– – |
1 092 0 |
1 092 0 |
| Non-convertible bonds | 374 | 1 253 | – | 12 576 | 14 203 |
| Convertible subordinated liabilities | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 |
| Non-convertible subordinated liabilities | 0 | 293 | – | 3 522 | 3 815 |
| Liabilities under investment contracts | – | 12 387 | – | 0 | 12 387 |
| Derivatives | 7 487 | 0 | 2 191 | – | 9 677 |
| Short positions | 415 | 0 | – | – | 415 |
| In equity instruments | 58 | 0 | – | – | 58 |
| In debt instruments | 357 | 0 | – | – | 357 |
| Other2 | 0 | 0 | – | 1 792 | 1 792 |
| Total | 8 334 | 24 426 | 2 191 | 178 383 | 213 333 |
| a of which repos1 | 1 128 | ||||
| b of which repos1 | 8 567 | ||||
| c of which deposits from banks repayable on demand | 2 593 |
1 The amount of the repos is virtually identical to the amount of the underlying assets (that have been lent out).
2 Financial liabilities not included under deposits from customers as they are not directly related to commercial deposit acquisition.
repo transactions and securities lent out with a carrying value of 9 871 million euros (debt instruments classified as 'held for trading' (113 million euros), 'available for sale' (1 662 million euros), and 'held to maturity' (8 096 million euros)); and an associated financial liability with a carrying value of 10 638 million euros (94 million euros classified as 'held for trading', 1 634 million euros as 'available for sale', and 8 910 million euros as 'held to maturity'). At year-end 2015, KBC had transferred the following types of financial asset, which continued to be recognised in their entirety: repo transactions and securities lent out with a carrying value of 8 457 million euros (debt instruments classified as 'held for trading' (176 million euros), 'designated at fair value' (17 million euros), 'available for sale' (1 928 million euros), and 'held to maturity' (6 336 million euros)); and an associated financial liability with a carrying value of 8 978 million euros (178 million euros classified as 'held for trading', 17 million euros as 'designated at fair value', 1 883 million euros as 'available for sale', and 6 900 million euros as 'held to maturity'). It should be noted that, at year-ends 2015 and 2016, KBC had fewer transferred securities on its balance sheet than outstanding repo transactions, since securities obtained in reverse repo transactions are often used for repo transactions. These securities are not presented on the balance sheet and, therefore, do not qualify for disclosure as stated in this paragraph.
| (in millions of EUR) | Held for trading |
Designated at fair value |
Available for sale |
Loans and receivables |
Held to maturity |
Hedging derivatives |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FINANCIAL ASSETS, 31-12-2016 | |||||||
| Unimpaired assets | 9 683 | 14 185 | 36 400 | 146 995 | 33 696 | 410 | 241 370 |
| Impaired assets | – | – | 463 | 10 251 | 7 | – | 10 720 |
| Impairment | – | – | -155 | -5 094 | -6 | – | -5 255 |
| Total | 9 683 | 14 185 | 36 708 | 152 152 | 33 697 | 410 | 246 836 |
| FINANCIAL ASSETS, 31-12-2015 | |||||||
| Unimpaired assets | 10 385 | 16 514 | 35 454 | 134 905 | 32 957 | 514 | 230 728 |
| Impaired assets | – | – | 356 | 12 023 | 6 | – | 12 386 |
| Impairment | – | – | -140 | -5 623 | -5 | – | -5 768 |
| Total | 10 385 | 16 514 | 35 670 | 141 305 | 32 958 | 514 | 237 346 |
• Impairment: the concept of 'impairment' is relevant for all financial assets that are not designated at fair value through profit or loss. Fixed-income financial assets are impaired when impairment is identified on an individual basis. In the case of loans, they are impaired when they have a probability of default (or PD, see explanation below) rating of 10, 11 or 12. Impairment is recognised based on an estimate of the net present value of the recoverable amount. In addition, for credit in PD classes 1 to 9, impairment losses are recorded on a portfolio basis (IBNR), using a formula that takes account of the expected loss (EL) calculated using the internal rating
based (IRB) advanced models and emergence period (or an alternative method if an IRB advanced model is not yet available).
• PD class: KBC has developed various rating models to determine the PD class. The output generated by these models is used to split the normal loan portfolio into internal rating classes ranging from PD 1 (lowest risk) to PD 9 (highest risk). More information on PD is provided under 'Credit risk' in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section.
| (in millions of EUR) | Available for sale | Held to maturity |
Loans and receivables | Provisions for commitments and financial guarantees* |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-income assets |
Shares | Fixed-income assets |
Individual impairment |
Portfolio based impair ment |
||
| IMPAIRMENT, 31-12-2016 | ||||||
| Opening balance | 3 | 137 | 5 | 5 410 | 213 | 125 |
| Movements with an impact on results | ||||||
| Impairment recognised | 0 | 58 | 1 | 582 | 106 | 41 |
| Impairment reversed | -3 | 0 | 0 | -507 | -55 | -42 |
| Movements without an impact on results | ||||||
| Write-offs | 0 | -2 | 0 | -635 | 0 | -11 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Transfers to/from non-current assets held for sale and disposal groups |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | -40 | 0 | -22 | 1 | -38 |
| Closing balance | 0 | 155 | 6 | 4 829 | 265 | 76 |
| IMPAIRMENT, 31-12-2015 | ||||||
| Opening balance | 0 | 124 | 5 | 5 600 | 201 | 158 |
| Movements with an impact on results | ||||||
| Impairment recognised | 3 | 43 | 0 | 826 | 86 | 44 |
| Impairment reversed | 0 | 0 | -1 | -504 | -78 | -52 |
| Movements without an impact on results | ||||||
| Write-offs | 0 | -10 | 0 | -494 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Transfers to/from non-current assets held for sale and disposal groups |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | -20 | 1 | -18 | 3 | -25 |
| Closing balance | 3 | 137 | 5 | 5 410 | 213 | 125 |
* These impairment losses are recognised on the liabilities side of the balance sheet. Changes in impairment losses of this kind are recorded under 'Impairment on loans and receivables' in the income statement.
• For information regarding the impact of changes in impairment on the income statement, see Note 3.10.
• Additional information on impairment relating to the loan portfolio is provided under 'Credit risk' in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section.
| Less than 30 days past due |
30 days or more, but less than 90 days past due |
|---|---|
| 419 | |
| 0 | |
| 0 | 0 |
| 2 208 | 419 |
| 2 076 | 417 |
| 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 |
| 2 076 | 417 |
| 2 208 0 |
• Financial assets are past due if a counterparty fails to make a payment at the time agreed in the contract. The concept of 'past due' applies to a contract, not to a counterparty. For example, if a counterparty fails to make a monthly repayment, the entire loan is considered past
due, but that does not mean that other loans to this counterparty are considered past due. Financial assets that are 90 days or more past due are always considered impaired.
• See Notes 4.3 and 6.1.
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collateral | Collateral | |||||
| Gross | received | Net | Gross | received | Net | |
| Maximum credit exposure | ||||||
| Equity instruments | 2 153 | 0 | 2 153 | 2 485 | 0 | 2 485 |
| Debt instruments | 71 109 | 68 | 71 041 | 70 138 | 61 | 70 078 |
| Loans and advances | 150 698 | 78 038 | 72 660 | 141 854 | 70 285 | 71 570 |
| of which designated at fair value | 79 | 39 | 40 | 2 501 | 1 028 | 1 473 |
| Derivatives | 8 659 | 3 875 | 4 784 | 8 702 | 3 605 | 5 097 |
| Other | 32 586 | 3 816 | 28 769 | 29 686 | 4 205 | 25 481 |
| Total | 265 204 | 85 797 | 179 407 | 252 866 | 78 156 | 174 710 |
quality of the loan portfolio is set out in detail (under 'Credit risk') in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section. All parts of that particular section which have been audited by the statutory auditor are listed at the start of the section.
• Collateral received: recognised at market value and limited to the outstanding amount of the relevant loans.
| Financial instruments subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting agreements and similar |
Gross amounts of recognised financial |
Gross amounts of recognised financial instruments |
Net amounts of financial instruments presented in the balance |
Amounts not set off in the balance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| arrangements | instruments | set off | sheet | sheet | Net amount | ||
| (in millions of EUR) | Financial instruments |
Cash col lateral |
Securities collateral |
||||
| FINANCIAL ASSETS, 31-12-2016 | |||||||
| Derivatives | 12 543 | 3 884 | 8 659 | 4 931 | 2 160 | 0 | 1 568 |
| Derivatives (excluding central clearing houses) | 8 650 | 0 | 8 650 | 4 931 | 2 160 | 0 | 1 559 |
| Derivatives with central clearing houses* | 3 893 | 3 884 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Reverse repos, securities borrowing and similar arrangements |
18 407 | 6 255 | 12 152 | 31 | 0 | 12 109 | 12 |
| Reverse repos | 18 407 | 6 255 | 12 152 | 31 | 0 | 12 109 | 12 |
| Securities borrowing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial instruments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 950 | 10 139 | 20 811 | 4 962 | 2 160 | 12 109 | 1 580 |
| FINANCIAL ASSETS, 31-12-2015 | |||||||
| Derivatives | 11 238 | 2 536 | 8 702 | 4 659 | 2 213 | 0 | 1 831 |
| Derivatives (excluding central clearing houses) | 8 695 | 0 | 8 695 | 4 659 | 2 213 | 0 | 1 824 |
| Derivatives with central clearing houses* | 2 543 | 2 536 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Reverse repos, securities borrowing and similar arrangements |
8 035 | 2 521 | 5 514 | 340 | 0 | 5 141 | 33 |
| Reverse repos | 8 035 | 2 521 | 5 514 | 340 | 0 | 5 141 | 33 |
| Securities borrowing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial instruments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 273 | 5 057 | 14 216 | 4 999 | 2 213 | 5 141 | 1 863 |
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES, 31-12-2016 | |||||||
| Derivatives | 12 922 | 3 884 | 9 037 | 4 931 | 2 543 | 0 | 1 563 |
| Derivatives (excluding central clearing houses) | 9 017 | 0 | 9 017 | 4 931 | 2 543 | 0 | 1 543 |
| Derivatives with central clearing houses* | 3 905 | 3 884 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| Repos, securities lending and similar arrangements | 15 984 | 6 255 | 9 729 | 31 | 0 | 9 692 | 6 |
| Repos | 15 984 | 6 255 | 9 729 | 31 | 0 | 9 692 | 6 |
| Securities lending | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial instruments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 905 | 10 139 | 18 766 | 4 962 | 2 543 | 9 692 | 1 569 |
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES, 31-12-2015 | |||||||
| Derivatives | 12 213 | 2 536 | 9 677 | 4 659 | 3 630 | 0 | 1 389 |
| Derivatives (excluding central clearing houses) | 9 666 | 0 | 9 666 | 4 659 | 3 630 | 0 | 1 378 |
| Derivatives with central clearing houses* | 2 547 | 2 536 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Repos, securities lending and similar arrangements | 12 216 | 2 521 | 9 694 | 340 | 0 | 9 332 | 22 |
| Repos | 12 216 | 2 521 | 9 694 | 340 | 0 | 9 332 | 22 |
| Securities lending | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial instruments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 429 | 5 057 | 19 372 | 4 999 | 3 630 | 9 332 | 1 411 |
* Cash collateral account at central clearing houses included in the gross amount.
defaults, becomes insolvent or goes bankrupt. The same principle applies for financial instruments given or received as collateral. The value given in the table for non-cash collateral received (the 'Securities collateral' column under the 'Amounts not set off in the balance sheet' heading) corresponds with the market value. This is the value that is used if one of the counterparties defaults, becomes insolvent or goes bankrupt.
adjustments (CVAs) are used when measuring derivatives to ensure that the market value of the derivatives is adjusted to reflect the credit risk of the counterparty. In making this adjustment, both the mark-to-market value of the contract and its expected future fair value are taken into account. These valuations are weighted based on the counterparty credit risk that is determined using a quoted credit default swap (CDS) spread, or, if there is no such spread, on the counterparty credit risk that is derived from bonds whose issuers are similar to the derivative counterparty in terms of rating, sector and geographical location. A debt value adjustment (DVA) is made for contracts where the counterparty is exposed to KBC (as opposed to the other way around). It is similar to a CVA, but the expected future negative fair value of the contracts is taken into consideration. A funding value adjustment (FVA) is a correction made to the market value of uncollateralised derivatives in order to ensure that the (future) funding costs or income attached to entering into and hedging such instruments are factored in when measuring the value of the instruments.
| Fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value in the balance sheet |
Loans and receivables | Financial assets held to maturity |
Financial liabilities measured | at amortised cost | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | Carrying value | Fair value | Carrying value | Fair value | Carrying value | Fair value |
| FINANCIAL ASSETS, 31-12-2016 | ||||||
| Loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firms | 17 459 | 17 447 | – | – | – | – |
| Loans and advances to customers | 133 154 | 134 292 | – | – | – | – |
| Debt instruments | 1 015 | 1 033 | 33 697 | 37 502 | – | – |
| Other | 524 | 529 | – | – | – | – |
| Total | 152 152 | 153 301 | 33 697 | 37 502 | – | – |
| Level 1 | – | 110 | – | 36 032 | – | – |
| Level 2 | – | 27 403 | – | 986 | – | – |
| Level 3 | – | 125 789 | – | 484 | – | – |
| FINANCIAL ASSETS, 31-12-2015 | ||||||
| Loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firms | 11 524 | 11 438 | – | – | – | – |
| Loans and advances to customers | 127 829 | 128 859 | – | – | – | – |
| Debt instruments | 1 117 | 1 136 | 32 958 | 36 693 | – | – |
| Other | 835 | 836 | – | – | – | – |
| Total | 141 305 | 142 268 | 32 958 | 36 693 | – | – |
| Level 1 | – | 231 | – | 35 468 | – | – |
| Level 2 | – | 21 350 | – | 794 | – | – |
| Level 3 | – | 120 687 | – | 431 | – | – |
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES, 31-12-2016 | ||||||
| Deposits from credit institutions and investment firms | – | – | – | – | 30 248 | 30 309 |
| Deposits from customers and debt securities | – | – | – | – | 175 055 | 175 284 |
| Liabilities under investment contracts | – | – | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Other | – | – | – | – | 2 182 | 2 181 |
| Total | – | – | – | – | 207 485 | 207 774 |
| Level 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 70 |
| Level 2 | – | – | – | – | – | 102 028 |
| Level 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 105 676 |
| FINANCIAL LIABILITIES, 31-12-2015 | ||||||
| Deposits from credit institutions and investment firms | – | – | – | – | 17 828 | 17 842 |
| Deposits from customers and debt securities | – | – | – | – | 158 762 | 159 367 |
| Liabilities under investment contracts | – | – | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Other | – | – | – | – | 1 792 | 1 743 |
| Total | – | – | – | – | 178 383 | 178 952 |
| Level 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 75 |
| Level 2 | – | – | – | – | – | 83 804 |
| Level 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 95 073 |
| Fair value hierarchy Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Financial assets at fair value Held for trading Loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firms 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 Loans and advances to customers 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Equity instruments 302 125 0 427 256 155 0 411 Debt instruments 731 62 208 1 001 1 254 244 287 1 785 of which sovereign bonds 653 29 31 713 1 157 209 42 1 408 Derivatives 0 6 392 1 856 8 249 0 6 133 2 055 8 188 Other 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Designated at fair value Loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firms 0 1 0 1 0 2 107 0 2 107 Loans and advances to customers 0 77 0 77 0 366 28 394 Equity instruments 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 Investment contracts (insurance) 13 331 362 0 13 693 13 046 284 0 13 330 Debt instruments 44 177 190 411 257 41 383 681 of which sovereign bonds 42 5 0 47 80 40 0 120 Available for sale Equity instruments 1 368 18 338 1 723 1 641 19 411 2 071 Debt instruments 30 059 3 699 1 227 34 985 28 814 3 486 1 298 33 598 of which sovereign bonds 21 248 1 417 317 22 982 20 761 687 444 21 892 Hedging derivatives Derivatives 0 410 0 410 0 514 0 514 Total 45 838 11 329 3 820 60 987 45 271 13 348 4 462 63 082 Financial liabilities at fair value Held for trading Deposits from credit institutions and investment firms 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 1 Deposits from customers and debt securities 0 541 0 541 0 429 2 431 Derivatives 0 5 100 2 234 7 334 0 5 428 2 058 7 487 Short positions 665 0 0 665 415 0 0 415 Other 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 Designated at fair value Deposits from credit institutions and investment firms 0 1 766 0 1 766 0 1 123 0 1 123 Deposits from customers and debt securities 0 1 577 557 2 134 0 10 321 594 10 916 Liabilities under investment contracts 12 652 0 0 12 653 12 386 0 0 12 387 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hedging derivatives Derivatives 0 1 704 0 1 704 0 2 191 0 2 191 Total 13 318 10 707 2 791 26 815 12 801 19 495 2 654 34 950 |
(in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observable inputs are also referred to as 'level 2 inputs' and reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the reporting entity. Examples of observable inputs are the risk-free rate, exchange rates, stock prices and implied volatility. Valuation techniques based on observable inputs include discounted cashflow analysis, or reference to the current or recent fair value of a similar instrument.
| Instrument type | Products | Valuation technique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Liquid financial instruments for which quoted prices are regularly available |
FX spots, exchange traded financial futures, exchange traded options, exchange traded stocks, exchange traded funds, liquid government bonds, other liquid bonds, liquid asset backed securities (ABS) in active markets |
Mark-to-market (quoted prices in active markets) |
| (Cross-currency) interest rate swaps (IRS), FX swaps, FX forwards, forward rate agreements (FRA), inflation swaps, dividend swaps, commodity swaps, reverse floaters, bond future options, interest rate future options, overnight index swaps (OIS), FX resets |
Discounted cashflow analysis based on discount and estimation curves (derived from quoted deposit rates, FX swaps and (CC)IRS) |
||
| Plain vanilla/liquid derivatives | Caps & floors, interest rate options, European & American stock options, European & American FX options, forward starting options, digital FX options, FX strips of simple options, European swaptions, constant maturity swaps (CMS), European cancellable IRS, compound options |
Option pricing model based on observable inputs (e.g., volatilities) |
|
| Credit default swaps (CDS) | CDS model based on credit spreads | ||
| Level 2 | Linear financial assets (without optional features) – cash instruments |
Deposits, simple cashflows, repo transactions | Discounted cashflow analysis based on discount and estimation curves (derived from quoted deposit rates, FX swaps and (CC)IRS) |
| Asset backed securities | Medium liquid asset backed securities | Third-party pricing (e.g., lead manager); prices corroborated by alternative observable market data, or using comparable spread method |
|
| Debt instruments | KBC IFIMA own issues (liabilities), mortgage bonds held by Cˇ SOB |
Discounted cashflow analysis and valuation of related derivatives based on observable inputs |
|
| Linear financial liabilities (cash instruments) | Loans, commercial paper | Discounted cashflow analysis based on discount and estimation curves (derived from quoted deposit rates, FX swaps and (CC)IRS) |
|
| Level 3 | Exotic derivatives | Target profit forwards, target strike forwards, Bermudan swaptions, digital interest rate options, quanto interest rate options, digital stock options, Asian stock options, barrier stock options, quanto digital FX options, FX Asian options, FX European barrier options, FX simple digital barrier options, FX touch rebates, double average rate options, inflation options, cancellable reverse floaters, American and Bermudan cancellable IRS, CMS spread options, CMS interest rate caps/floors, (callable) range accruals, outperformance options, auto-callable options |
Option pricing model based on unobservable inputs (e.g., correlation) |
| Illiquid credit-linked instruments | Collateralised debt obligations (notes) | Valuation model based on correlation of probability of default of underlying assets |
|
| Private equity investments | Private equity and non-quoted participations | Based on the valuation guidelines of the European Private Equity & Venture Capital Association (EVCA) |
|
| Illiquid bonds/asset backed securities | Illiquid (mortgage) bonds/asset backed securities that are indicatively priced by a single pricing provider in an inactive market |
Third-party pricing (e.g., lead manager), where prices cannot be corroborated due to a lack of available/reliable alternative market data |
|
| Debt instruments | KBC own issues (KBC IFIMA) | Discounted cashflow analysis and valuation of related derivatives based on unobservable inputs (indicative pricing by third parties for derivatives) |
In 2015, KBC transferred 273 million euros' worth of instruments (mainly classified as 'available for sale') out of level 1 and into level 2 due to the decline in market activity. KBC also reclassified around 317 million euros' worth of debt instruments from level 2 to level 1 because the market for those instruments became more active in 2015.
In 2016, significant movements in financial assets and liabilities classified in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy included the following:
trading' category went up by 164 million euros, due mainly to new issues (+160 million euros) and positive changes in fair value (+497 million euros, +485 million euros of which from liabilities that were still recognised in the balance sheet at the end of the year), offset in part by deals reaching maturity (-481 million euros).
| Own debt issues designated at fair value ((+) profit (-) loss; amounts before tax) | ||
|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
| Impact of change in own credit spreads on the income statement | 8 | 17 |
| Total cumulative impact at balance sheet date | -6 | -14 |
• The fair value of financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss takes account of own credit risk. A significant portion of the financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss relates to KBC IFIMA issues. The own credit risk of KBC IFIMA issues designated at fair value through profit or loss is measured using KBC's own funding spread. Taking into account this own credit risk, the total fair value of KBC IFIMA issues designated at fair value
through profit or loss amounted to some 0.7 billion euros on 31 December 2016.
• If no account is taken of the effect of changes in credit risk, the difference between the carrying value and redemption price of the financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss is limited (less than 0.1 billion euros).
| (in millions of EUR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying value | 570 | ||
| Fair value | 588 | ||
| If not reclassified (available for sale) |
After reclassification (loans and receivables) |
Impact | |
| Impact on the revaluation reserve (available-for-sale assets), before tax | -49 | -67 | -18 |
| Impact on the income statement, before tax | 0 | 1 | 1 |
• Reclassifications: in October 2008, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 7 under 'Reclassification of financial assets'. Following the implementation of these amendments, the KBC group reclassified a number of assets out of the 'available for sale' category to the 'loans and receivables' category because they had become less liquid. On the date of reclassification, the assets in question met the definition of loans and receivables, and the group has the intention and ability to hold these assets for the foreseeable future or until maturity. KBC reclassified these assets on 31 December 2008. On the reclassification date (31 December 2008), the estimated recoverable amount of these assets came to 5 billion euros and the effective interest rate varied between 5.88% and 16.77%. The above reclassifications had a negative impact of 18 million euros on equity and a limited impact on the income statement.
• Other reclassifications (not included in the table):
| Held for trading | Fair value hedge | Cashflow hedge2 | Portfolio hedge of interest rate risk | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying value | Notional amount | Carrying value | Notional amount | Carrying value | Notional amount | Carrying value | Notional amount | |||||||||
| (in millions of EUR)1 | Assets | Liabilities Purchased | Sold | Assets | Liabilities Purchased | Sold | Assets | Liabilities Purchased | Sold | Assets | Liabilities Purchased | Sold | ||||
| 31-12-2016 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | 8 249 | 7 334 | 390 342 | 393 830 | 99 | 528 | 34 636 | 34 636 | 265 | 1 147 | 26 046 | 26 042 | 46 | 29 | 9 143 | 8 945 |
| Breakdown by type | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate contracts | 4 135 | 3 682 | 202 117 | 204 823 | 99 | 528 | 34 636 | 34 636 | 256 | 1 142 | 25 940 | 25 940 | 46 | 29 | 9 143 | 8 945 |
| of which interest rate swaps |
3 285 | 3 294 | 160 501 | 160 741 | 99 | 528 | 34 636 | 34 636 | 256 | 1 142 | 25 940 | 25 940 | 38 | 29 | 7 397 | 7 157 |
| of which options | 849 | 388 | 39 563 | 36 802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 746 | 1 788 |
| Foreign exchange contracts |
2 486 | 2 012 | 154 899 | 156 160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 106 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| foreign exchange opera tions/currency forwards of which forward |
317 | 326 | 24 024 | 24 006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which currency and interest rate swaps |
2 007 | 1 578 | 121 996 | 121 596 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 106 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which options | 162 | 108 | 8 784 | 10 464 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Equity contracts | 1 563 | 1 613 | 32 627 | 32 421 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which equity swaps | 1 278 | 1 295 | 29 731 | 29 731 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which options | 285 | 318 | 2 869 | 2 690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Credit contracts | 38 | 0 | 311 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which credit default swaps |
38 | 0 | 311 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Commodity and other contracts |
28 | 27 | 389 | 390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31-12-2015 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | 8 188 | 7 487 | 374 627 | 376 167 | 127 | 469 | 31 073 | 31 065 | 356 | 1 708 | 26 724 | 26 718 | 31 | 13 | 7 809 | 7 569 |
| Breakdown by type | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate contracts | 4 458 | 4 283 | 207 334 | 206 585 | 127 | 469 | 31 065 | 31 065 | 346 | 1 703 | 26 607 | 26 607 | 31 | 13 | 7 809 | 7 569 |
| of which interest rate swaps |
3 546 | 3 854 | 155 102 | 155 321 | 127 | 469 | 31 065 | 31 065 | 346 | 1 703 | 26 607 | 26 607 | 31 | 13 | 6 765 | 6 524 |
| of which options | 912 | 425 | 44 637 | 41 063 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 045 | 1 045 |
| Foreign exchange contracts |
1 814 | 1 340 | 133 090 | 136 179 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 117 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| foreign exchange opera tions/currency forwards of which forward |
149 | 192 | 18 381 | 18 409 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which currency and interest rate swaps |
1 434 | 1 032 | 104 376 | 104 146 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 117 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which options | 231 | 117 | 10 266 | 13 557 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Equity contracts | 1 717 | 1 721 | 32 141 | 31 842 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which equity swaps | 1 409 | 1 422 | 28 961 | 28 962 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which options | 308 | 299 | 3 154 | 2 880 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Credit contracts | 66 | 8 | 916 | 413 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| of which credit default swaps |
66 | 8 | 916 | 413 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Commodity and other contracts |
133 | 134 | 1 147 | 1 148 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 In this table, both legs of the derivatives are reported in the notional amounts. |
2 Including hedges of net investments in foreign operations.
the derivative to be recognised in equity (in a cashflow hedge reserve).
| (in millions of EUR) | Inflow | Outflow |
|---|---|---|
| Not more than three months | 21 | -16 |
| More than three but not more than six months | 23 | -47 |
| More than six months but not more than one year | 77 | -99 |
| More than one but not more than two years | 115 | -293 |
| More than two but not more than five years | 273 | -826 |
| More than five years | 895 | -1 838 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 1 496 | 1 487 |
| Debtors arising out of direct insurance operations | 403 | 376 |
| Debtors arising out of reinsurance operations | 16 | 17 |
| Deposits with ceding companies | 158 | 216 |
| Income receivable (other than interest income from financial assets) | 43 | 26 |
| Other | 877 | 852 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| CURRENT TAXES | ||
| Current tax assets | 66 | 107 |
| Current tax liabilities | 188 | 109 |
| DEFERRED TAXES | 1 753 | 1 680 |
| Deferred tax assets by type of temporary difference | 2 743 | 2 829 |
| Employee benefits | 219 | 191 |
| Losses carried forward | 1 069 | 1 146 |
| Tangible and intangible fixed assets | 28 | 32 |
| Provisions for risks and charges | 21 | 38 |
| Impairment for losses on loans and advances | 248 | 218 |
| Financial instruments at fair value through profitor loss and fair value hedges | 140 | 244 |
| Fair value changes, available-for-sale assets, cashflow hedges and hedges of net investments in foreign operations | 944 | 828 |
| Technical provisions | 24 | 29 |
| Other | 49 | 103 |
| Deferred tax liabilities by type of temporary difference | 990 | 1 150 |
| Employee benefits | 15 | 91 |
| Losses carried forward | 0 | 0 |
| Tangible and intangible fixed assets | 102 | 103 |
| Provisions for risks and charges | 0 | 1 |
| Impairment for losses on loans and advances | 6 | 8 |
| Financial instruments at fair value through profitor loss and fair value hedges | 60 | 45 |
| Fair value changes, available-for-sale assets, cashflow hedges and hedges of net investments in foreign operations | 644 | 665 |
| Technical provisions | 97 | 134 |
| Other | 65 | 102 |
| Recognised as a net amount in the balance sheet as follows: | ||
| Deferred tax assets | 2 246 | 2 228 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 493 | 549 |
| Unused tax losses and unused tax credits | 450 | 492 |
euros) and impairment for losses on loans and advances (+30 million euros));
the decrease in deferred tax liabilities via the income statement: -78 million euros (owing primarily to technical and other provisions (-37 million euros), the decline in financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss (-33 million euros), and the decrease related to fixed assets (-8 million euros));
the decrease in deferred tax liabilities relating to changes in defined benefit plans recognised in other comprehensive income: -67 million euros;
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 212 | 207 |
| Overview of investments, including goodwill | ||
| CˇMSS | 178 | 179 |
| Other | 34 | 28 |
| Goodwill on associated companies and joint ventures | ||
| Gross amount | 0 | 0 |
| Accumulated impairment | 0 | 0 |
| Breakdown by type | ||
| Unlisted | 212 | 207 |
| Listed | 0 | 0 |
| Fair value of investments in listed associated companies and joint ventures | 0 | 0 |
• Goodwill paid on associated companies and joint ventures is included in the nominal value of 'Investments in associated companies and joint ventures' shown on the balance sheet. An impairment test is performed and, if required, the necessary impairment losses on goodwill recognised (see table).
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property and equipment | 2 451 | 2 299 | |||
| Investment property | 426 | 438 | |||
| Rental income | 43 | 54 | |||
| Direct operating expenses from investments generating rental income | 12 | 15 | |||
| Direct operating expenses from investments not generating rental income | 1 | 0 | |||
| MOVEMENTS TABLE | Land and buildings |
IT equipment | Other equipment |
Total property and equipment |
Investment property |
| 2016 | |||||
| Opening balance | 1 161 | 96 | 1 041 | 2 299 | 438 |
| Acquisitions | 81 | 55 | 578 | 713 | 35 |
| Disposals | -18 | -25 | -224 | -267 | -25 |
| Depreciation | -71 | -46 | -29 | -145 | -20 |
| Other movements | -4 | 21 | -166 | -150 | -2 |
| Closing balance | 1 149 | 101 | 1 200 | 2 451 | 426 |
| of which accumulated depreciation and impairment | 1 206 | 385 | 655 | 2 247 | 240 |
| Fair value 31-12-2016 | – | – | – | – | 610 |
| 2015 | |||||
| Opening balance | 1 202 | 111 | 965 | 2 278 | 568 |
| Acquisitions | 108 | 53 | 397 | 558 | 5 |
| Disposals | -68 | -2 | -150 | -221 | -5 |
| Depreciation | -70 | -54 | -29 | -153 | -21 |
| Other movements | -10 | -12 | -142 | -165 | -110 |
| Closing balance | 1 161 | 96 | 1 041 | 2 299 | 438 |
| of which accumulated depreciation and impairment | 1 159 | 373 | 653 | 2 186 | 229 |
| Fair value 31-12-2015 | – | – | – | – | 609 |
primarily on the capitalisation of the estimated rental value and on unit prices of similar real property. Account is taken of all the market inputs available on the date of the assessment (including location and market situation, type of building and construction, state of repair, use, etc.).
• Certain other investment property is valued annually by in-house specialists based on the current annual rental per building and expected rental movements and on an individual capitalisation rate per building.
| (in millions of EUR) | Goodwill | Software developed in-house |
Software developed externally |
Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | |||||
| Opening balance | 594 | 176 | 181 | 9 | 959 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 94 | 56 | 8 | 158 |
| Disposals | 0 | -2 | -3 | -5 | -9 |
| Amortisation | 0 | -58 | -42 | -1 | -102 |
| Other movements | 2 | -6 | -2 | 0 | -6 |
| Closing balance | 597 | 203 | 189 | 10 | 999 |
| of which accumulated amortisation and impairment | 287 | 555 | 643 | 45 | 1 531 |
| 2015 | |||||
| Opening balance | 933 | 165 | 153 | 7 | 1 258 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 71 | 78 | 9 | 158 |
| Disposals | 0 | -28 | -5 | -6 | -39 |
| Amortisation | 0 | -53 | -48 | -1 | -103 |
| Other movements | -338 | 21 | 3 | 0 | -315 |
| Closing balance | 594 | 176 | 181 | 9 | 959 |
| of which accumulated amortisation and impairment | 829 | 495 | 594 | 54 | 1 971 |
discounted cashflow method. This method calculates the recoverable amount of an investment as the present value of all future free cashflows of the business. This method is based on long-term projections about the company's business and the resulting cashflows (i.e. projections for a number of years ahead (usually 16), and the residual value of the business at the end of the specific projection period). These long-term projections are the result of an assessment of past and present performances combined with external sources of information on future performances in the respective markets and the global macroeconomic environment. The terminal growth rate is determined using a long-term average market growth rate. The present value of these future cashflows is calculated using a compound discount rate which is based on the capital asset pricing model (CAPM). A risk-free rate, a market-risk premium (multiplied by an activity beta), and a country risk premium (to reflect the impact of the economic situation of the country where KBC is active) are also used in the calculation. KBC has developed two distinct discounted cashflow models, viz. a bank model and an insurance model. Free cashflows in both cases are the dividends that can be paid out to the company's shareholders, account taken of the minimum capital requirements.
| Discount rates throughout the specific period of cashflow projections |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwill outstanding (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
| K&H Bank | 223 | 220 | 12.8%–10.5% | 13.6%–10.7% |
| Cˇ SOB (Czech Republic) | 233 | 233 | 10.1%–9.5% | 9.9%–9.7% |
| DZI Insurance | 74 | 74 | 9.6%–7.7% | 9.2%–7.6% |
| Rest | 68 | 68 | – | – |
| Total | 597 | 594 | – | – |
• No sensitivity analysis was carried out for entities where the recoverable amount exceeded the carrying value to such a large extent that no reasonably possible change in the key assumptions would result in the recoverable amount being less than or equal to the carrying value. A sensitivity analysis was not carried out for DZI Insurance either because the recoverable amount was only just higher than the carrying value and, therefore, any adverse change in the key assumptions would lead to impairment. The following table gives an indication for K&H Bank of the change in key assumptions that would lead to their recoverable amount equalling their carrying value.
| Decrease | Increase in | Decrease in | Increase in annual |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase in | in terminal | targeted sol | annual net | impairment | |
| Change in key assumptions1 | discount rate2 | growth rate3 | vency ratio4 | profit | charges |
| K&H Bank | 2.83% | – | 3.91% | 19.5% | 113.3% |
1 Needless to say account should be taken of the fact that a change in these assumptions could affect other assumptions used to calculate the recoverable amount.
2 Based on a parallel shift and absolute increase in the discount rate curve. Discount rates are in the 15.6%–13.4% bracket.
3 Not relevant for K&H Bank as it would mean that the terminal growth rate will be negative.
4 Absolute increase in the tier-1 capital ratio.
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical provisions (before reinsurance) (i.e. gross figures) | 19 657 | 19 532 | ||
| Insurance contracts | 10 715 | 10 297 | ||
| Provision for unearned premiums and unexpired risk | 687 | 647 | ||
| Life insurance provision | 6 961 | 6 677 | ||
| Provision for claims outstanding | 2 524 | 2 436 | ||
| Provision for profit sharing and rebates | 19 | 18 | ||
| Other technical provisions | 524 | 519 | ||
| Investment contracts with DPF | 8 942 | 9 235 | ||
| Life insurance provision | 8 856 | 9 143 | ||
| Provision for claims outstanding | 0 | 0 | ||
| Provision for profit sharing and rebates | 87 | 92 | ||
| Reinsurers' share | 110 | 127 | ||
| Insurance contracts | 110 | 127 | ||
| Provision for unearned premiums and unexpired risk | 2 | 1 | ||
| Life insurance provision | 3 | 2 | ||
| Provision for claims outstanding | 105 | 123 | ||
| Provision for profit sharing and rebates | 0 | 0 | ||
| Other technical provisions | 0 | 0 | ||
| Investment contracts with DPF | 0 | 0 | ||
| Life insurance provision | 0 | 0 | ||
| Provision for claims outstanding | 0 | 0 | ||
| Provision for profit sharing and rebates | 0 | 0 | ||
| Gross | Reinsurance | Gross | Reinsurance | |
| MOVEMENTS TABLE | 2016 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 |
| INSURANCE CONTRACTS, LIFE | ||||
| Opening balance | 7 170 | 3 | 6 754 | 2 |
| Deposits excluding fees | 774 | 0 | 788 | 0 |
| Provisions paid | -550 | 0 | -599 | 0 |
| Accretion of interest | 185 | 0 | 234 | 0 |
| Cost of profit sharing | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Exchange differences | 6 | 0 | 27 | 0 |
| Transfers out of/into liabilities associated with disposal groups | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other movements1 | -128 | 0 | -36 | 1 |
| Closing balance | 7 460 | 3 | 7 170 | 3 |
| INSURANCE CONTRACTS, NON-LIFE | ||||
| Opening balance | 3 127 | 123 | 3 004 | 192 |
| Changes in the provision for unearned premiums | 24 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
| Payments regarding claims of previous years | -223 | -5 | -204 | -7 |
| Surplus/shortfall of claims | ||||
| provision in previous financial years | -135 | -8 | -129 | 8 |
| Provision for new claims | 406 | 32 | 332 | 13 |
| Exchange differences | 2 | 0 | -5 | 0 |
| Transfers out of/into liabilities associated with disposal groups | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other movements | 56 | -36 | 93 | -83 |
| Closing balance | 3 255 | 107 | 3 127 | 123 |
| INVESTMENT CONTRACTS WITH DPF, LIFE | ||||
| Opening balance | 9 235 | 0 | 9 176 | 0 |
| Deposits excluding fees | 632 | 0 | 378 | 0 |
| Provisions paid | -800 | 0 | -606 | 0 |
| Accretion of interest | 214 | 0 | 259 | 0 |
| Cost of profit sharing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exchange differences | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Transfers out of/into liabilities associated with disposal groups | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other movements2 | -339 | 0 | 27 | 0 |
| Closing balance | 8 942 | 0 | 9 235 | 0 |
1 Includes the acquisition of a life insurance portfolio from another insurance company in 2015 and the surrender of a large, reinsured savings policy in 2016.
2 Includes transfers to unit-linked contracts.
and expense loadings;
| (in millions of EUR) | Provisions for restructuring |
Provisions for taxes and pending legal disputes |
Other | Subtotal | Provisions for commitments and financial guarantees |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | ||||||
| Opening balance | 9 | 118 | 58 | 184 | 125 | 310 |
| Movements with an impact on results | ||||||
| Amounts allocated | 0 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 41 | 71 |
| Amounts used | -2 | -21 | -13 | -36 | -11 | -46 |
| Unused amounts reversed | 0 | -11 | -2 | -14 | -42 | -56 |
| Transfers out of/into liabilities associated with disposal groups |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| Other movements | -3 | -1 | 1 | -3 | -38 | -41 |
| Closing balance | 3 | 105 | 53 | 162 | 76 | 238 |
| 2015 | ||||||
| Opening balance | 32 | 225 | 144 | 402 | 158 | 560 |
| Movements with an impact on results | ||||||
| Amounts allocated | 7 | 22 | 11 | 40 | 44 | 84 |
| Amounts used | -31 | -82 | -80 | -194 | 0 | -194 |
| Unused amounts reversed | 0 | -47 | -19 | -66 | -52 | -118 |
| Transfers out of/into liabilities associated with disposal groups |
2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| Other movements | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -25 | -23 |
| Closing balance | 9 | 118 | 58 | 184 | 125 | 310 |
• For most of the provisions recorded, no reasonable estimate can be made of when they will be used.
in order not to prejudice the position of the group in ongoing litigation.
together with KBC Bank and KBC Group NV, was summoned to appear in the proceedings before a judge in chambers in Bruges. On 9 November 2011, the judge referred KB Consult and KBC Bank to Bruges Criminal Court on charges of uttering, but dismissed the charges against KBC Group NV. The Belgian state appealed the decision of no case to answer against KBC Group NV. On 27 October 2015, the indictments division ruled that proceedings were time-barred and upheld the original decision of no case to answer. The case as referred will now be heard before Bruges Criminal Court in the course of 2017. A suitable provision has been constituted to deal with the potential impact of claims for damages in this respect. The transfer of a cash company is in principle completely legitimate. However, it later transpired that certain purchasers were acting in bad faith since they did not make any investments at all and did not file tax returns for the cash companies they had purchased. KBC Bank and KB Consult immediately took the necessary measures to preclude any further involvement with these parties. Referral to the criminal court does not in any way imply that any KBC entity has been convicted of an offence. KBC is fully defending its position in these cases, based, among other things, on the fact that, during the period in which the events took place, the legal entity was not liable to prosecution and, in particular, KBC was utterly lacking in criminal intent.
Possible outflow:
On 6 October 2011, Irving H. Picard, trustee for the substantively consolidated SIPA (Securities Investor Protection Corporation Act) liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investments Securities LLC and Bernard L. Madoff, sued KBC Investments before the bankruptcy court in New York to recover approximately 110 million US dollars' worth of transfers made to KBC entities. The basis for this claim was the subsequent transfers that KBC received from Harley International, a Madoff feeder fund established under the laws of the Cayman Islands. This claim is one of a whole set made by the trustee against several banks, hedge funds, feeder funds and investors. In addition to the issues addressed by the district court, briefings were held on the applicability of the Bankruptcy Code's 'safe harbor' and 'good defenses' rules to subsequent transferees
(as is the case for KBC). KBC, together with numerous other defendants, filed motions for dismissal. District court Judge Jed Rakoff has made several intermediate rulings in this matter, the most important of which are the rulings on extraterritoriality and good faith defences. On 27 April 2014, Judge Rakoff issued an opinion and order regarding the 'good faith' standard and pleading burden to be applied in the Picard/SIPA proceeding based on sections 548(b) and 559(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. As such, the burden of proof that KBC should have been aware of the fraud perpetrated by Madoff in this matter is for Picard/SIPA. On 7 July 2014, Judge Rakoff ruled that Picard/SIPA's reliance on section 550(a) did not allow for the recovery of subsequent transfers received abroad by a foreign transferee from a foreign transferor (as is the case for KBC Investments Ltd). Therefore, the trustee's recovery claims were dismissed to the extent that they seek to recover purely foreign transfers. In June 2015, the trustee filed a petition against KBC to overturn the ruling that the claim fails on extraterritoriality grounds. In this petition, the trustee also amended the original claim including the sum sought, which was increased to 196 million US dollars. On 22 November 2016, Judge Bernstein handed down an intermediate ruling dismissing the claims of the trustee in respect of those foreign transfers under the rules of international comity. The final judgment on this matter is expected in the first quarter of 2017. The trustee can then still appeal.
| 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|
| 2 763 | 2 541 |
| 705 | 371 |
| 73 | 77 |
| 289 | 244 |
| 1 696 | 1 849 |
• For more information on retirement benefit obligations, see Note 5.9 (note that the amount recognised under 'Retirement benefit
obligations or other employee benefits' in Note 5.8 relates to a broader scope than the amounts presented in Note 5.9).
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS | ||
| Reconciliation of defined benefit obligations | ||
| Defined benefit obligations at the beginning of the period | 2 380 | 2 610 |
| Current service cost | 111 | 120 |
| Interest cost | 54 | 45 |
| Plan amendments | 0 | 0 |
| Actuarial gain or loss resulting from changes in demographic assumptions | 5 | -9 |
| Actuarial gain or loss resulting from changes in financial assumptions | 357 | -220 |
| Experience adjustments | 1 | -50 |
| Past-service cost | -1 | 0 |
| Benefits paid | -93 | -116 |
| Exchange differences | -9 | 8 |
| Curtailments | 1 | -9 |
| Transfers under IFRS 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 45 | 0 |
| Defined benefit obligations at the end of the period | 2 851 | 2 380 |
| Reconciliation of the fair value of plan assets | ||
| Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the period | 2 165 | 2 103 |
| Actual return on plan assets | 160 | 82 |
| Expected return on plan assets | 48 | 36 |
| Employer contributions | 90 | 65 |
| Plan participant contributions | 21 | 21 |
| Benefits paid | -93 | -116 |
| Exchange differences | -8 | 7 |
| Settlements | 0 | 0 |
| Transfers under IFRS 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 1 | 2 |
| Fair value of plan assets at the end of the period | 2 336 | 2 165 |
| of which financial instruments issued by the group | 32 | 50 |
| of which property occupied by KBC | 9 | 9 |
| Funded status | ||
| Plan assets in excess of defined benefit obligations | -515 | -215 |
| Reimbursement rights | 0 | 0 |
| Asset ceiling limit | -28 | -4 |
| Unfunded accrued/prepaid pension cost | -543 | -220 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Movement in net liabilities or net assets | ||
| Unfunded accrued/prepaid pension cost at the beginning of the period | -221 | -507 |
| Amounts recognised in the income statement | -95 | -103 |
| Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income | -336 | 323 |
| Employer contributions | 90 | 65 |
| Exchange differences | 1 | -1 |
| Transfers under IFRS 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 17 | 2 |
| Unfunded accrued/prepaid pension cost at the end of the period | -543 | -221 |
| Amounts recognised in the income statement | 95 | 103 |
| Current service cost | 111 | 120 |
| Past-service cost | -1 | 0 |
| Interest cost | 5 | 9 |
| Plan participant contributions | -21 | -21 |
| Curtailments | 0 | -5 |
| Settlements | 0 | 0 |
| Changes in the scope of consolidation | 0 | 0 |
| Changes to the amounts recognised in other comprehensive income | 336 | -323 |
| Actuarial gain or loss resulting from changes in demographic assumptions | 5 | -9 |
| Actuarial gain or loss resulting from changes in financial assumptions | 357 | -220 |
| Actuarial result on plan assets | -112 | -46 |
| Experience adjustments | 1 | -50 |
| Adjustments to asset ceiling limits | 24 | 0 |
| Other | 60 | 0 |
| DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS | ||
| Expenses for defined contribution plans | 14 | 8 |
• The pension claims of the Belgian-based staff of the various KBC group companies are covered by pension funds and group insurance schemes. Retirement benefits that are actively accrued for the current workforce of KBC Bank, KBC Insurance and most of their Belgian subsidiaries are accrued exclusively through the KBC pension funds. Retirement benefits accrued through employer contributions are currently accrued primarily through a defined benefit plan, where the benefit is calculated based on the final salary of employees before they retire, the number of years they had been in the plan and a formula that applies a progressive rate scale. A defined contribution plan was introduced on 1 January 2014 for all new employees. In this plan, a contribution is deposited based on the current monthly salary and the amounts deposited are paid out together with the (guaranteed) return on retirement. Both types of pension plan are managed by the OFP Pensioenfonds KBC and the OFP Pensioenfonds
Senior Management KBC, which uses the services of KBC Asset Management for the investment strategy. In addition, there are a number of smaller, closed group insurance schemes from the past that will continue to be funded, such as the one for employees of KBC Insurance.
• KBC Bank Ireland participated in a defined benefit plan until 31 August 2012. As of that date, no additional pension rights will be accumulated under that plan for future years of service. Benefits accrued in the plan continue to be linked to future salary increases of the participants (i.e. it will be managed dynamically). The assets of the pension plan have been separated from the assets of the bank. The employees of KBC Finance Ireland and the Dublin branch of KBC Bank are also signed up to this pension plan. The retirement benefits are calculated using a mathematical formula that takes account of age, salary and the length of time the participant was signed up.
| Additional information regarding retirement benefit obligations (in millions of EUR) |
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in main headings in the main table | |||||
| Defined benefit obligations | 2 851 | 2 380 | 2 610 | 2 034 | 2 191 |
| Fair value of plan assets | 2 336 | 2 165 | 2 103 | 1 818 | 1 765 |
| Unfunded accrued/prepaid pension cost | -543 | -220 | -507 | -216 | -425 |
| Impact of changes in the assumptions used in the actuarial calculation of plan assets and retirement benefit obligations |
|||||
| Impact on plan assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Impact on retirement benefit obligations | 147 | 24 | -135 | -85 | 213 |
| KBC pension fund | KBC Bank Ireland pension plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Composition (31-12-2016) | ||
| Shares | 34% | 41% |
| Bonds | 49% | 35% |
| Real estate | 13% | 3% |
| Cash | 4% | 0% |
| Investment funds | 0% | 21% |
| of which illiquid assets | 8% | 0% |
| Composition (31-12-2015) | ||
| Shares | 38% | 41% |
| Bonds | 49% | 16% |
| Real estate | 10% | 3% |
| Cash | 3% | 2% |
| Investment funds | 0% | 37% |
| of which illiquid assets | 4% | 0% |
| Contributions expected in 2017 (in millions of EUR) | 49 | 4 |
| Regulatory framework | Pension plans are registered in collective labour agreements and incorporated into a set of regulations. Annual reporting of funding levels to supervisory authorities (FSMA/NBB). Any underfunding must be reported immediately to the supervisory authorities. |
Regulated by the Irish Pensions Authority. Funding level calculated every year and certified every three years. Any underfunding must be reported immediately to the Irish Pensions Authority. |
| Risks for KBC | Investment risk and inflation risk. | Investment risk. |
| ALM policy | The hedging portfolio hedges against interest rate risk and inflation risk using interest rate swaps. The return portfolio aims to generate an extra return. |
Investments in leveraged LDI pooled funds. |
| Plan amendments | An employer-funded defined contribution plan was introduced on 1 January 2014. All employees joining the company from that date are signed up to this new plan, while all those who were already employed on 31 December 2013 remain signed up to the defined benefit plan unless they chose to switch to the new one. |
For a number of participants (employees of KBC Finance Ireland), the benefits are linked to inflation instead of to future increases in salary. |
| Curtailments and settlements | Not applicable. | For a number of participants (employees of KBC Finance Ireland), the benefits are linked to inflation instead of to future increases in salary. |
| Discounting method | Based on iBoxx quotes for various time buckets of AA-rated corporate bonds. The resulting yield curve is converted into a zero coupon curve. As of year 14, extrapolation is applied to flatten the curve for maturities of 18 years and longer. |
The Mercer method starts from a proprietary basket of corporate bonds with AAA, AA and A ratings. A spread is deducted from the bonds with an A rating in order to obtain the equivalent of an AA-rated corporate bond. After conversion to the zero coupon format using extrapolation for long maturities, the equivalent discount rate is determined. |
| KBC pension fund | KBC Bank Ireland pension plan | |
|---|---|---|
| Key actuarial assumptions | ||
| Average discount rate | 1.32% | 2.10% |
| Expected rate of salary increase | 2.80% | 2.60% |
| Expected inflation rate | 1.85% | 1.60% |
| Expected rate of increase in pensions | – | 1.60% |
| Weighted average duration of the obligations | 13.23 years | 28 years |
| Impact of changes in the assumptions used in the actuarial calculation of the retirement benefit obligations |
||
| Increase in the retirement benefit obligations on 31-12-2016 consequent on: |
||
| a decrease of 1% in the discount rate | 14.76% | 32.81% |
| an increase of 1% in the expected inflation rate | 12.33% | 32.51% |
| an increase that is 1% higher than the expected real increase in salary | 15.96% | 6.76% |
| the age of retirement being 65 for all active employees | 1.56% | – |
| an increase of one year in life expectancy | – | 2.95% |
| The impact of the following assumptions has not been calculated: | Decreasing mortality rates. Pension benefits are paid out in capital, so longevity risk is immaterial. Staff turnover rates, since the expected rate is very low. |
Not applicable. |
| Additional information on retirement benefit obligations – DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS | ||
| KBC pension fund | ||
| Contributions expected in 2017 (in millions of EUR) | 18 | |
| Regulatory framework | Pursuant to the Belgian Supplementary Pensions Act, the employer must guarantee a minimum return of 1.75% on employee and employer contributions. |
|
| Risks for KBC | Investment risk. | |
| Valuation | Retirement benefit obligations are measured on the basis of the accrued benefits on the reporting date, making a projection of these benefits (at the rate of interest guaranteed by law) until the expected age of retirement, and discounting the resulting benefits. KBC offers two types of defined contribution plan: one that is financed through employee contributions and one through employer contributions. The value of the employee-funded defined contribution plan takes account of the accrued interest (at the fund return rate), but not of future contributions since the plan is not deemed to be backloaded. The value of the employer-funded defined contribution plan takes account of future contributions in the projection, due to the fact that the plan is deemed to be backloaded. |
|
| Discounting method | Based on iBoxx quotes for various time buckets of AA-rated corporate bonds. The resulting yield curve is converted into a zero coupon curve. |
|
| As of year 14, extrapolation is applied to flatten the curve for maturities of 18 years and longer. | ||
| Key actuarial assumptions | ||
| Average discount rate | 1.07% | |
| Weighted average duration of the obligations | 11.20 years | |
| Impact of changes in the assumptions used in the actuarial calculation of the retirement benefit obligations |
||
| Increase in the retirement benefit obligations on 31-12-2016 consequent on: a decrease of 1% in the discount rate |
9.93% | |
| the age of retirement being 65 for all active employees | 0.55% | |
| Quantities | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares | 418 372 082 | 418 087 058 |
| of which ordinary shares that entitle the holder to a dividend payment | 418 372 082 | 418 087 058 |
| of which treasury shares | 2 | 2 |
| Mandatorily convertible bonds | 0 | 0 |
| Non-voting core-capital securities | 0 | 0 |
| Additional information | ||
| Par value per share (in EUR) | 3.48 | 3.48 |
| Number of shares issued but not fully paid up | 0 | 0 |
• Ordinary shares: ordinary shares of no nominal value. All ordinary shares carry voting rights and each share represents one vote. No participation certificates or non-voting shares have been issued. The shares are listed solely on NYSE Euronext Brussels.
euros (plus a 15% penalty) on 17 December 2012. It repaid the Flemish Regional Government 1.17 billion euros (plus a 50% penalty) on 3 July 2013, 0.33 billion euros (plus a 50% penalty) on 8 January 2014 and the remaining 2 billion euros (plus a 50% penalty) on 28 December 2015.
• Additional tier-1 instruments: in March 2014, KBC issued 1.4 billion euros in CRD IV-compliant additional tier-1 securities. These securities qualify as additional tier-1 capital under Basel III (as adopted in the CRR) and, therefore, have had a positive impact on KBC's tier-1 capital. They are perpetual and may be called for redemption after five years or on each subsequent coupon date. They also have a loss absorption mechanism (i.e. a temporary write-down trigger should the common equity tier-1 ratio fall below 5.125%). Since they are classified as shares under IAS 32 (because they have fully discretionary non-cumulative coupons and are perpetual), the annualised coupon of 5.625% – which is paid every quarter – is treated as a dividend. This transaction had no impact on the number of ordinary shares.
No principal group companies fell under the scope of IFRS 5 in 2015 and 2016.
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Loan commitments – undrawn amount | ||
| Given | 34 027 | 36 575 |
| Irrevocable | 21 869 | 19 266 |
| Revocable | 12 157 | 17 309 |
| Received | 31 | 134 |
| Financial guarantees | ||
| Given | 9 908 | 9 364 |
| Guarantees/collateral received | 42 494 | 34 477 |
| For impaired and past due assets | 3 795 | 1 699 |
| For assets that are not impaired or past due | 38 699 | 32 778 |
| Other commitments | ||
| Given | 284 | 220 |
| Irrevocable | 284 | 220 |
| Revocable | 0 | 0 |
| Received | 6 | 0 |
| Carrying value of financial assets pledged by KBC as collateral | ||
| For liabilities* | 36 517 | 31 723 |
| For contingent liabilities | 2 339 | 3 311 |
* At year-end 2016, some 11.2 billion euros' worth of residential mortgage loans and cash collections were entered in the cover asset register for the special estate of the covered bond programme (12 billion euros at year-end 2015).
• Fair value of financial guarantees: based on the available market value.
• KBC Group NV irrevocably and unconditionally guarantees all amounts shown as liabilities in the statutory financial statements of the following Irish companies in respect of the financial year ending on 31 December 2016, allowing these companies to be eligible for exemption from certain disclosure requirements, pursuant to Section 357 of the Irish Companies Act 2014:KBC Fund Management Limited.
• Since this company is included in the scope of consolidation, this is an intragroup transaction and the guarantee is not included in the above table.
• There is an obligation to return collateral received (which may be sold or repledged in the absence of default by the owner; see table below) in its original form, or possibly in cash. Collateral can be called in if loans are terminated for various reasons such as default or bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy, the collateral will be sold by the receiver. In other cases, the bank will organise the foreclosure itself or take possession of the collateral. Collateral received that relates to OTC derivatives is primarily cash, which is recognised by KBC on the balance sheet (and is not included in the table). More details are provided in Note 4.3.
| Collateral received (which may be sold or repledged in the absence of default by the owner) (in millions of EUR) |
Fair value of collateral received | Fair value of collateral sold or | repledged | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | |
| Financial assets | 13 529 | 12 666 | 7 859 | 6 881 |
| Equity instruments | 13 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Debt instruments | 13 309 | 12 499 | 7 854 | 6 881 |
| Loans and advances | 206 | 166 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Property and equipment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Investment property | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
• Collateral acquired through foreclosure came to 0.3 billion euros in 2016 (0.2 billion euros in 2015).
| in millions of EUR) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Finance lease receivables | ||
| Gross investment in finance leases, receivable | 5 453 | 5 114 |
| At not more than one year | 1 323 | 1 229 |
| At more than one but not more than five years | 2 836 | 2 615 |
| At more than five years | 1 294 | 1 270 |
| Unearned future finance income on finance leases | 530 | 593 |
| Net investment in finance leases | 4 916 | 4 512 |
| At not more than one year | 1 212 | 1 100 |
| At more than one but not more than five years | 2 601 | 2 358 |
| At more than five years | 1 103 | 1 054 |
| of which unguaranteed residual values accruing to the benefit of the lessor | 21 | 38 |
| Accumulated impairment for uncollectable lease payments receivable | 67 | 83 |
| Contingent rents recognised in the income statement | 93 | 95 |
| Operating lease receivables | ||
| Future aggregate minimum rentals receivable under non-cancellable operating leases | 554 | 434 |
| Contingent rents recognised in the income statement | 0 | 0 |
real estate leasing. In Belgium, finance leases are typically sold through KBC group's branch network, and that channel is becoming increasingly important in Central Europe, too.
• Operating leases: involve primarily full service car leases, which are sold through the KBC Bank and CBC Banque branch network and through an internal sales team. Full service car leasing activities are being further developed in Central Europe, too.
| Transactions with related parties, excluding key management (in millions of EUR) |
Subsidiaries | companies Associated |
es Joint ventur |
Other | Total | Subsidiaries | companies Associated |
es Joint ventur |
Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | 333 | 187 | 11 | 40 | 572 | 304 | 146 | 13 | 77 | 540 |
| Loans and advances | 104 | 46 | 2 | 31 | 182 | 133 | 55 | 2 | 34 | 223 |
| Equity instruments | 228 | 140 | 10 | 4 | 382 | 154 | 81 | 11 | 4 | 251 |
| Other | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 38 | 66 |
| Liabilities | 365 | 109 | 289 | 221 | 983 | 720 | 121 | 315 | 173 | 1 329 |
| Deposits | 364 | 8 | 289 | 220 | 881 | 581 | 17 | 259 | 171 | 1 027 |
| Other financial liabilities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101 |
| Other | 1 | 101 | 0 | 1 | 102 | 38 | 104 | 56 | 3 | 201 |
| Income statement | 7 | -1 | -7 | 6 | 4 | 2 | -3 | -7 | 3 | -5 |
| Net interest income | -2 | -1 | -4 | 0 | -6 | -1 | -1 | -5 | 1 | -7 |
| Interest income | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Interest expense | -2 | -2 | -5 | 0 | -8 | -4 | -2 | -8 | 0 | -14 |
| Earned premiums, insurance (before reinsurance) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Technical insurance charges (before reinsurance) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend income | 2 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 9 |
| Net fee and commission income | 14 | -1 | -3 | 2 | 12 | 14 | -1 | -3 | 2 | 11 |
| Fee and commission income | 14 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 |
| Fee and commission expense | 0 | -1 | -4 | 0 | -5 | 0 | -1 | -3 | 0 | -5 |
| Other net income | 1 | -5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| General administrative expenses | -9 | -3 | 0 | -5 | -17 | -17 | -5 | 0 | -6 | -28 |
| Undrawn portion of loan commitments, financial guarantees and other commitments |
||||||||||
| Given by the group | 10 | 6 | 0 | 151 | 167 | 138 | 6 | 1 | 185 | 329 |
| Received by the group | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| (in millions of EUR)* | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Total* | 10 | 9 |
| Breakdown by type of remuneration | ||
| Short-term employee benefits | 9 | 8 |
| Post-employment benefits | 2 | 1 |
| Defined benefit plans | 0 | 1 |
| Defined contribution plans | 2 | 0 |
| Other long-term employee benefits | 0 | 0 |
| Termination benefits | 0 | 0 |
| Share-based payments | 0 | 0 |
| Stock options (units) | ||
| At the beginning of the period | 0 | 0 |
| Granted | 0 | 0 |
| Exercised | 0 | 0 |
| Composition-related changes | 0 | 0 |
| At the end of the period | 0 | 0 |
| Advances and loans granted to key management and partners | 2 | 2 |
* Remuneration to key management or partners of the consolidating company on the basis of their activity in that company, its subsidiaries and associated companies, including the amount of retirement pensions granted to former key management staff on that basis.
• The 'Subsidiaries' heading in the first table includes transactions with unconsolidated subsidiaries (transactions with consolidated subsidiaries have already been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements).
• The 'Other' heading in the first table includes KBC Ancora, Cera and
• At the General Meeting of 4 May 2016, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) was appointed as statutory auditor for a period of three years.
MRBB.
| KBC Group NV and its subsidiaries | |
|---|---|
| Standard audit services | 7 020 249 |
| Other services | 1 153 589 |
| Other certifications | 293 746 |
| Tax advice | 42 379 |
| Other non-audit assignments | 817 463 |
| KBC Group NV (alone) | |
| Standard audit services | 145 000 |
| Other services | 420 944 |
The KBC group's legal structure has one single entity – KBC Group NV – in control of two underlying companies, viz. KBC Bank NV and KBC Insurance NV, each of which has several subsidiaries and subsubsidiaries.
The main group companies are shown in the following table. A complete list of group companies (included in or excluded from the scope of consolidation) is provided at www.kbc.com > About us > Our structure.
Until that meeting, Ernst & Young Bedrijfsrevisoren BCVBA had acted as the company's statutory auditor.
various subsidiaries, joint ventures and associated companies
various subsidiaries, joint ventures and associated companies
| Share of capital | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | held at group | Business | |||
| Company | Registered office | number | level (in %) | unit* | Activity |
| KBC Bank (group) | |||||
| KBC Bank NV | Brussels – BE | 0462.920.226 | 100.00 | BEL/GRP | credit institution |
| CBC BANQUE SA | Brussels – BE | 0403.211.380 | 100.00 | BEL | credit institution |
| Cˇeskoslovenská Obchodná Banka a.s. | Bratislava – SK | -- | 100.00 | IMA | credit institution |
| Cˇeskoslovenská Obchodní Banka a.s. | Prague – CZ | -- | 100.00 | CZR | credit institution |
| CIBANK EAD | Sofia – BG | -- | 100.00 | IMA | credit institution |
| KBC Asset Management NV | Brussels – BE | 0469.444.267 | 100.00 | BEL | asset management |
| KBC Autolease NV | Leuven – BE | 0422.562.385 | 100.00 | BEL | leasing |
| KBC Bank Ireland Plc. | Dublin – IE | -- | 100.00 | IMA | credit institution |
| KBC Commercial Finance NV | Brussels – BE | 0403.278.488 | 100.00 | BEL | factoring |
| KBC Credit Investments NV | Brussels – BE | 0887.849.512 | 100.00 | BEL/GRP | investment firm |
| KBC Financial Products (group) | various locations | -- | 100.00 | GRP | (derivative) financial products |
| KBC IFIMA SA | Luxembourg – LU | -- | 100.00 | GRP | financing |
| KBC Securities NV | Brussels – BE | 0437.060.521 | 100.00 | BEL | stockbroker |
| K&H Bank Zrt. | Budapest – HU | -- | 100.00 | IMA | credit institution |
| Loan Invest NV | Brussels – BE | 0889.054.884 | 100.00 | IMA | securitisation |
| KBC Insurance (group) | |||||
| KBC Insurance NV | Leuven – BE | 0403.552.563 | 100.00 | BEL/GRP | insurance company |
| ADD NV | Heverlee – BE | 0406.080.305 | 100.00 | BEL | insurance broker |
| KBC Group Re SA | Luxembourg – LU | -- | 100.00 | GRP | reinsurance company |
| CˇSOB Pojišt'ovna a.s. | Pardubice – CZ | -- | 100.00 | CZR | insurance company |
| CˇSOB Poist'ovnˇ a a.s. | Bratislava – SK | -- | 100.00 | IMA | insurance company |
| DZI (group) | Sofia – BG | -- | 100.00 | IMA | insurance company |
| Groep VAB NV | Zwijndrecht – BE | 0456.920.676 | 95.00 | BEL driving school/roadside assistance | |
| K&H Biztosító Zrt. | Budapest – HU | -- | 100.00 | IMA | insurance company |
| NLB Vita d.d. (equity method) | Ljubljana – SI | -- | 50.00 | GRP | life insurance |
| KBC Group | |||||
| KBC Group NV | Brussels – BE | 0403.227.515 | 100.00 | GRP bank-insurance holding company | |
| KBC Bank (group) | various locations | -- | 100.00 | various | credit institution |
| KBC Insurance (group) | various locations | -- | 100.00 | various | insurance company |
* BEL = Belgium Business Unit, CZR = Czech Republic Business Unit, IMA = International Markets Business Unit, GRP = Group Centre.
– as long as the combined balance sheet total of the companies excluded from consolidation is not more than 1% of the consolidated balance sheet total – these entities are not consolidated. This relates chiefly to the structured entities set up for the remaining CDO activities. Please note that these entities only exceed one threshold (balance sheet total) since their equity and net results are always very limited. However, the remaining CDO-related results are recorded under the KBC Financial Products group, which is, of course, consolidated. Consequently, excluding these structured entities from the consolidated accounts only impacts presentation of the consolidated balance sheet, and not equity, the results or solvency. • Disclosures of interests in other entities (IFRS 12)
(power, exposure to a variable return and ability to use such power to affect those returns).
solidated structured entities established for that purpose. Between 2006 and 2010, these entities were established as Irish public limited companies or Irish private limited companies under the Irish Companies Act 1963 to 2012. Their primary business is to raise money by issuing notes in order to buy financial assets (such as securities, bonds and deposits) and to enter into related derivative and other contracts (like equity-linked swaps, interest-linked swaps, total return swaps and repo transactions). They provide investment opportunities for clients by providing economies of scale, a diversification of credit risk and a high level of granularity. Each structured entity has a prospectus that was approved by the Central Bank of Ireland (available at www.kbc. be/prospectus/spv). However, the structured entities are not consolidated because they fail to meet the three criteria for consolidation (power, exposure to a variable return and ability to use such power to affect those returns). At year-end 2016, the assets under management at these entities amounted to 16.6 billion euros.
| Company | Consolidation method |
Ownership percentage at group level | Remarks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 | |||
| Additions | ||||
| VB Leasing SK, spol. s.r.o. | Full | 100% | 100% | Acquisition by CˇSOB Leasing as of 1 July 2015 |
| VB Leasing Sprostredkovatel'ská s.r.o. | Full | 100% | 100% | Acquisition by CˇSOB Leasing as of 1 July 2015 |
| Exclusions | ||||
| KBC Financial Holding Inc. | Full | – | – | Liquidated in 4Q 2015 |
| IIB Finance Ireland | Full | – | 100% | Deconsolidated in 2Q 2016 |
| Name changes | ||||
| None | – | – | – | – |
| Changes in ownership percentage and internal mergers | ||||
| KBC Financial Products International SA | Full | – | 100% | Merged with KBC IFIMA SA in 3Q 2016 |
• Expected change in the scope of consolidation in 2017: on 30 December 2016, KBC reached agreement with the National Bank of Greece to acquire 99.9% of United Bulgarian Bank (UBB) and
The information required in relation to risks (in accordance with IFRS 4 and IFRS 7) and capital (pursuant to IAS 1) is provided in those parts of
Significant non-adjusting events between balance sheet date and the date on which the financial statements were approved for publication by the Board of Directors (16 March 2017):
100% of Interlease. The deal is expected to be finalised in the second quarter of 2017.
the 'How do we manage our risks?' and 'How do we manage our capital?' sections that have been audited by the statutory auditor.
• None.
rights of use in respect of these rights to the beneficiaries referred to in the second sentence above. The company may also perform all commercial, financial and industrial transactions that may be useful or expedient for achieving the object of the company and that are directly or indirectly related to this object. The company may also by means of subscription, contribution, participation or in any other form whatsoever participate in all companies, businesses or institutions that have a similar, related or complementary activity. In general, the company may, both in Belgium and abroad, perform all acts which may contribute to the achievement of its object (Article 2 of the Articles of Association, which are available at www.kbc.com).
The company annual accounts of KBC Group NV are presented here in abridged form. A full set of these accounts will be submitted for approval to the General Meeting of Shareholders of 4 May 2017.
The company annual accounts, the report of the Board of Directors and the statutory auditor's report are filed with the National Bank of Belgium. These documents are available free of charge from KBC Group NV, Investor Relations Office – IRO, Havenlaan 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium. They can also be viewed at www.kbc.com.
The statutory auditor has delivered an unqualified audit opinion on the company annual accounts of KBC Group NV.
The company annual accounts have been prepared according to Belgian accounting standards (B-GAAP) and are, therefore, not comparable with the figures prepared in accordance with IFRS in the other sections of this report.
Company annual accounts and additional information
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed assets | 19 645 | 18 140 |
| Intangible fixed assets | 176 | 160 |
| Property and equipment | 97 | 105 |
| Land and buildings | 29 | 31 |
| Plant, machinery and equipment | 54 | 60 |
| Furniture and vehicles | 12 | 13 |
| Other tangible fixed assets | 1 | 0 |
| Assets under construction and advance payments | 1 | 1 |
| Financial fixed assets | 19 372 | 17 875 |
| Affiliated companies | 19 370 | 17 874 |
| Participating interests | 14 044 | 14 044 |
| Amounts receivable | 5 327 | 3 830 |
| Other companies linked by participating interests | 1 | 1 |
| Participating interests | 1 | 1 |
| Amounts receivable | 0 | 0 |
| Current assets | 135 | 261 |
| Amounts receivable at more than one year | 0 | 0 |
| Trade debtors | 0 | 0 |
| Other amounts receivable | 0 | 0 |
| Stocks and contracts in progress | 1 | 1 |
| Stocks | 1 | 1 |
| Goods purchased for resale | 1 | 1 |
| Amounts receivable within one year | 36 | 10 |
| Trade debtors | 22 | 6 |
| Other amounts receivable | 14 | 5 |
| Current investments | 0 | 0 |
| Own shares | 0 | 0 |
| Other investments | 0 | 0 |
| Cash at bank and in hand | 31 | 163 |
| Deferred charges and accrued income | 67 | 87 |
| Total Assets | 19 780 | 18 401 |
| Equity | 13 683 | 13 670 |
| Capital | 1 455 | 1 454 |
| Issued capital | 1 455 | 1 454 |
| Share premium account | 5 436 | 5 423 |
| Reserves | 1 466 | 1 466 |
| Legal reserves | 146 | 145 |
| Reserves not available for distribution | 1 | 1 |
| Untaxed reserves | 190 | 190 |
| Reserves available for distribution | 1 129 | 1 129 |
| Profit (Loss (-)) carried forward | 5 326 | 5 327 |
| Provisions and deferred taxes | 16 | 13 |
| Provisions for liabilities and charges | 16 | 13 |
| Pensions and similar obligations | 16 | 12 |
| Other liabilities and charges | 0 | 1 |
| Amounts payable | 6 081 | 4 718 |
| Amounts payable at more than one year | 4 576 | 3 080 |
| Financial debt | 4 576 | 3 080 |
| Subordinated loans | 3 081 | 3 080 |
| Non-subordinated bonds | 1 496 | 0 |
| Credit institutions | 0 | 0 |
| Amounts payable within one year | 1 450 | 1 583 |
| Amounts payable at more than one year falling due within the year | 0 | 480 |
| Financial debt | 558 | 937 |
| Credit institutions | 0 | 0 |
| Other loans | 558 | 937 |
| Trade debt | 31 | 33 |
| Advance payments received on orders | 1 | 0 |
| Taxes, remuneration and social security charges | 79 | 78 |
| Income tax expense | 10 | 7 |
| Remuneration and social security charges | 69 | 71 |
| Other amounts payable | 780 | 55 |
| Accrued charges and deferred income | 55 | 55 |
| Total liabilities | 19 780 | 18 401 |
| (in millions of EUR) | ||
|---|---|---|
| -- | ---------------------- | -- |
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating income | 928 | 1 088 |
| Turnover | 859 | 971 |
| Increase (decrease (-)) in stocks of finished goods, work and contracts in progress | 0 | 0 |
| Own construction capitalised | 53 | 61 |
| Other operating income | 16 | 28 |
| Non-recurring operating income | 0 | 28 |
| Operating charges | 957 | 1 142 |
| Services and other goods | 487 | 577 |
| Remuneration, social security charges and pensions | 374 | 430 |
| Depreciation of and amounts written off formation expenses and intangible and tangible fixed assets | 84 | 110 |
| Provisions for liabilities and charges: amounts set aside (amounts reversed (-)) | 4 | -7 |
| Other operating charges | 1 | 5 |
| Non-recurring operating charges | 8 | 27 |
| Operating profit (loss (-)) | -29 | -55 |
| Financial income | 1 345 | 3 389 |
| Recurring financial income | 1 345 | 3 366 |
| Income from financial fixed assets | 1 204 | 3 224 |
| Income from current assets | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial income | 141 | 142 |
| Non-recurring financial income | 0 | 23 |
| Financial charges | 133 | 1 144 |
| Recurring financial charges | 133 | 1 144 |
| Debt charges | 129 | 1 128 |
| Amounts written down on current assets: increase (decrease (-)) | 0 | 0 |
| Other financial charges | 4 | 16 |
| Non-recurring financial charges | 0 | 0 |
| Profit (Loss (-)) for the period, before tax | 1 184 | 2 191 |
| Transfers from deferred taxes | 2 | 0 |
| Transfers to deferred taxes | 0 | 4 |
| Income tax | 4 | 6 |
| Profit (Loss (-)) for the period | 1 182 | 2 181 |
| Profit (Loss (-)) for the period available for appropriation | 1 182 | 2 181 |
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2016 | 31-12-2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit (Loss (-)) to be appropriated | 6 508 | 5 338 |
| Profit (Loss (-)) for the period available for appropriation | 1 182 | 2 181 |
| Profit (Loss (-)) carried forward from the previous period | 5 327 | 3 158 |
| Transfers to equity | 0 | 0 |
| To the legal reserves | 0 | 0 |
| To other reserves | 0 | 0 |
| Profit (Loss (-)) to be carried forward | 5 326 | 5 327 |
| Profit to be distributed | 1 182 | 11 |
| Dividends | 1 171 | 0 |
| Directors' entitlements | 0 | 0 |
| Other beneficiaries, employee profit-sharing | 11 | 11 |
We will propose to the General Meeting of Shareholders that the profit for appropriation for the 2016 financial year be distributed as shown in the table. If this proposal is approved, the total gross dividend per share entitled to dividend will amount to 2.80 euros, 1 euro of which was
already paid as an interim dividend in November 2016, leaving a final dividend of 1.80 euros.
| (in millions of EUR) | Participating interests in affiliated companies |
Amounts receivable from affiliated companies |
Participating interests in companies linked by participating interests |
Amounts receivable from companies linked by participating interests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying value at 31-12-2015 | 14 044 | 3 830 | 1 | 0 |
| Acquisitions in 2016 | 0 | 1 496 | 0 | 0 |
| Disposals in 2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other changes in 2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carrying value at 31-12-2016 | 14 044 | 5 327 | 1 | 0 |
Participating interests in affiliated companies comprise mainly the shareholdings in KBC Bank NV, KBC Insurance NV en KBC Asset Management NV. The amounts receivable from affiliated companies related to loans to KBC Bank NV in the form of additional tier-capital (1.4 billion euros), tier-2 capital (1.7 billion euros), tier-3 capital (1.5 billion euros), a subordinated perpetual loan of 0.25 billion euros to KBC Bank NV and a subordinated loan of 0.5 billion euros to KBC Insurance NV.
| Capital increase | Appropriation of | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions of EUR) | 31-12-2015 | for staff | results | 31-12-2016 |
| Capital | 1 454 | 1 | 0 | 1 455 |
| Share premium account | 5 423 | 13 | 0 | 5 436 |
| Reserves | 1 466 | 0 | 0 | 1 466 |
| Profit (Loss) carried forward | 5 327 | 0 | -1 | 5 326 |
| Equity | 13 670 | 14 | -1 | 13 683 |
At year-end 2016, the company's issued share capital amounted to 1 455 289 897.87 euros, represented by 418 372 082 shares of no nominal value, and the share premium account came to 5 435 514 655.77 euros. The share capital is fully paid up.
• A capital increase under the authorisation to increase capital carried out on 23 December 2016 and reserved exclusively for employees of KBC Group NV and its Belgian subsidiaries resulted in 285 024 shares being issued at a price of 48.65 euros per share. These shares are blocked for two years, since the issue price was less than the closing price of the KBC share on 14 November 2016. As a result of this operation, capital was increased by 991 883.52 euros and the share
The table below gives an overview of the notifications received in 2016 and in the first two months of 2017 pursuant to the Belgian Act of 2 May 2007 concerning the disclosure of significant participations. We publish all such notifications on www.kbc.com. Please note that the number of shares stated in the notifications may differ from the current number in possession, as a change in the number of shares held does not always give rise to a new notification.
premium account went up by 12 874 534.08 euros. By carrying out this capital increase, the group aims to strengthen ties with its staff and the staff of its Belgian subsidiaries. Given the limited extent of the capital increase, the financial ramifications for existing shareholders are minor. All of the shares issued in 2016 will also be entitled to dividend from the 2016 financial year (but not the interim dividend of 1 euro per share already paid by the company on 18 November 2016).
The authorisation to increase capital may be exercised up to and including 20 May 2018 for an amount of 695 111 550.04 euros. Based on a par value of 3.48 euros a share, a maximum of 199 744 698 new KBC Group NV shares can therefore be issued under this authorisation.
The 'Corporate governance statement' section contains an overview of the shareholder structure at year-end 2016, based on all the notifications received pursuant to the Belgian Act of 2 May 2007.
| Number of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KBC shares (= voting | % of total voting | |||
| rights) on date | rights on date | |||
| Notifications* | Notification relating to | Note | concerned | concerned* |
| BlackRock Inc. | 9 February 2016 | Size of holding moves below the 5% notification threshold | 20 650 780 | 4.94% |
| FMR LLC | 18 November 2016 | Size of holding moves above the 3% notification threshold | 12 628 843 | 3.02% |
| * More detailed information is available at www.kbc.com. |
The following table gives an overview of KBC shares held by KBC group companies. The average par value of the KBC share came to 3.48 euros
in 2016.
| 31 December | 31 December | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| KBC shares held by KBC group companies | Address | 2016 | 2015 |
| KBC Securities NV | Havenlaan 12, 1080 Brussels, Belgium | 2 | 2 |
| As a percentage of the total number of shares | 0.0% | 0.0% |
See Note 6.4 in the 'Consolidated financial statements' section.
KBC Group NV had three branch offices (in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary) at year-end 2016.
The information required in accordance with Article 96 of the Belgian Companies Code that has not been provided above appears in the 'Report of the Board of Directors' section.
Gives an insight into the income generated by insurance products sold through the bank channel and, therefore, into the success of the bankinsurance model.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fee and commission income received by the bank from the linked insurer (A) |
'Consolidated income statement': component of 'Net fee and com mission income' |
134 | 146 |
| + | |||
| Insurance income for insurance products sold by bank branches (B) |
'Consolidated income statement': component of 'Total income' (various headings) |
306 | 298 |
| + Management fees generated by unit-linked insurance products sold by bank branches and recognised at the asset manager (C) |
'Consolidated income statement': component of 'Net fee and commission income' |
64 | 63 |
| = (A)+(B)+(C) | 504 | 507 |
Gives an idea of the amount of profit over a certain period that is attributable to one share (and, where applicable, including dilutive instruments).
| Calculation (in millions of EUR) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result after tax, attributable to equity holders of the parent (A) - |
'Consolidated income statement' | 2 427 | 2 639 |
| Coupon (and/or penalty) on the core-capital securities sold to the government (B) - |
'Consolidated statement of changes in equity' | – | -1 000 |
| Coupon on the additional tier-1 instruments included in equity (C) / |
'Consolidated statement of changes in equity' | -52 | -52 |
| Average number of ordinary shares less treasury shares (in millions) in the period (D) |
Note 5.10 | 418 | 418 |
| or Average number of ordinary shares plus dilutive options less treasury shares in the period (E) |
(idem) | (idem) | |
| Basic = (A-B-C) / (D) (in EUR) | 5.68 | 3.80 | |
| Diluted = (A-B-C) / (E) (in EUR) | 5.68 | 3.80 |
Gives an insight into the technical profitability (i.e. after eliminating investment returns, among other items) of the non-life insurance business, more particularly the extent to which insurance premiums adequately cover claim payments and expenses. The combined ratio takes ceded reinsurance into account.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical insurance charges, including the internal cost of settling claims (A) |
Note 3.7 | 839 | 757 |
| / | |||
| Earned insurance premiums (B) | Note 3.7 | 1 387 | 1 301 |
| + | |||
| Operating expenses (C) | Note 3.7 | 460 | 435 |
| / | |||
| Written insurance premiums (D) | Note 3.7 | 1 406 | 1 325 |
| = (A/B)+(C/D) | 93% | 91% |
A risk-weighted measure of the group's solvency, based on common equity tier-1 capital (the ratios given here are based on the Danish compromise).
| Calculation | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Detailed calculation under 'Solvency at group level' in the 'How do we manage our capital?' section | ||
| Phased-in* | 16.2% | 15.2% |
| Fully loaded* | 15.8% | 14.9% |
* The CRD IV rules are gradually being implemented to allow banks to build up the necessary capital buffers. The capital position of a bank, when account is taken of the transition period, is referred to as the 'phased-in' view. The capital position based on full application of all the rules – as would be the case after this transition period – is referred to as 'fully loaded'.
Gives an impression of the relative cost efficiency (costs relative to income) of the banking activities.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating expenses of the banking activities (A) | 'Consolidated income statement': component of 'Operating expenses' |
3 437 | 3 391 |
| / | |||
| Total income of the banking activities (B) | 'Consolidated income statement': component of 'Total income' | 6 238 | 6 144 |
| = (A) / (B) | 55% | 55% |
Where relevant, we also eliminate exceptional and/or non-operating items when calculating the cost/income ratio, viz. the mark-to-market valuation of ALM derivatives (income equalling 87 and 107 million euros in 2016 and 2015, respectively), the mark-to-market valuation of own credit risk (income equalling 8 and 17 million euros in 2016 and 2015, respectively), the impact of liquidating or deconsolidating group companies (income totalling 16 and -135 million euros in 2016 and 2015, respectively) plus a number of smaller items (income totalling 100 and 38 million euros in 2016 and 2015, respectively, and costs totalling 18 and 17 million euros in 2016 and 2015, respectively). This calculation aims to give a better idea of the relative cost efficiency of the pure business activities.
Indicates the proportion of impaired loans (see 'Impaired loans ratio' for definition) that are covered by impairment charges.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific impairment on loans (A) | 'Loan and investment portfolio, banking' table in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section |
4 874 | 5 517 |
| / | |||
| Outstanding impaired loans (B) | 'Loan and investment portfolio, banking' table in the 'How do we | ||
| manage our risks?' section | 10 583 | 12 305 | |
| = (A) / (B) | 46% | 45% |
The numerator and denominator in the formula may be limited to impaired loans that are more than 90 days past due. Relevant data is also given in the 'Loan and investment portfolio, banking' table in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section.
Gives an idea of loan impairment charges recognised in the income statement for a specific period, relative to the total loan portfolio (see 'Loan portfolio' for definition). In the longer term, this ratio can provide an indication of the credit quality of the portfolio.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net changes in impairment for credit risks (A) | 'Consolidated income statement': component of 'Impairment' | 126 | 323 |
| / | |||
| Average outstanding loan portfolio (B) | 'Loan and investment portfolio, banking' table in the 'How do we | ||
| manage our risks?' section | 146 257 | 141 951 | |
| = (A) / (B) | 0.09% | 0.23% |
Gives an idea of the extent to which KBC Group NV distributes its annual profit (and, therefore, also indirectly the extent to which profits are used to strengthen the capital reserves).
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amount of dividend to be distributed* (including any interim dividend) (A) |
'Consolidated statement of changes in equity' | 1 171 | – |
| + | |||
| Coupon to be paid/already paid on the additional tier-1 instruments included in equity (B) / |
'Consolidated statement of changes in equity' | 52 | |
| Net result, group share (C) | 'Consolidated income statement' | 2 427 | |
| = (A+B) / (C) | 50% | – |
* Subject to the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders. Please note that no dividend was paid for 2015.
Indicates the proportion of impaired loans in the loan portfolio (see 'Loan portfolio' for definition) and, therefore, gives an idea of the creditworthiness of the portfolio. Impaired loans are loans where it is unlikely that the full contractual principal and interest will be repaid/paid. These loans have a KBC default status of PD 10, PD 11 or PD 12 and correspond to the new definition of 'non-performing' used by the European Banking Authority.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amount outstanding of impaired loans (A) | 'Loan and investment portfolio, banking' table in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section |
10 583 | 12 305 |
| / | |||
| Total outstanding loan portfolio (B) | 'Loan and investment portfolio, banking' table in the 'How do we | ||
| manage our risks?' section | 147 526 | 143 400 | |
| = (A) / (B) | 7.2% | 8.6% | |
Where appropriate, the numerator may be limited to impaired loans that are more than 90 days past due (PD 11 + PD 12). Relevant data is also given in the 'Loan and investment portfolio, banking' table in the 'How do we manage our risks?' section.
Gives an idea of the group's solvency, based on a simple non-risk-weighted ratio.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory available tier-1 capital (A) | 'Solvency at group level' table in the 'How do we manage our capital?' section |
15 286 | 14 647 |
| / | |||
| Total exposure measures (total of non-risk-weighted on and off-balance sheet items, with a number of |
'Solvency at group level' table in the 'How do we manage our | ||
| adjustments) (B) | capital?' section | 251 891 | 233 675 |
| = (A) / (B) | 6.1% | 6.3% |
Gives an idea of the bank's liquidity position in the short term, more specifically the extent to which the group is able to overcome liquidity difficulties over a one-month period.
| Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Based on the European Commission's Delegated Act on LCR | 65 400 | 47 300 |
| 47 100 | 37 150 | |
| 139% | 127% | |
| Total net cash outflows over the next 30 calendar days (B) |
Gives an idea of the magnitude of (what are mainly pure, traditional) lending activities.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loans and advances to customers (related to the group's banking activities) (A) |
Note 4.1, component of 'Loans and advances to customers' | 131 415 | 126 812 |
| - | |||
| Reverse repos with customers (B) | Note 4.1 | -376 | -502 |
| + | |||
| Debt instruments issued by corporates and by credit institutions and investment firms (related to the group's banking activities) (C) |
Note 4.1, component of 'Debt instruments issued by corporates and by credit institutions and investment firms' |
7 114 | 7 118 |
| + | |||
| Loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firms (related to the group's banking activities, excluding dealing room activities) (D) |
Note 4.1, component of 'Loans and advances to credit institutions and investment firms' |
952 | 1 060 |
| + | |||
| Financial guarantees granted to clients (E) | Note 6.1, component of 'Financial guarantees given' | 8 279 | 7 823 |
| + | |||
| Impairment on loans (F) | Note 4.2, component of 'Impairment' | 5 094 | 5 623 |
| + | |||
| Other (including accrued interest) (G) | Component of Note 4.1 | -4 952 | -4 534 |
| = (A)-(B)+(C)+(D)+(E)+(F)+(G) | 147 526 | 143 400 |
Provides an indication of the stock market value of the KBC group.
| Calculation (in EUR or quantity) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closing price of KBC share (in EUR) (A) | – | 58.8 | 57.7 |
| X | |||
| Number of ordinary shares (in millions) (B) | Note 5.10 | 418.4 | 418.1 |
| = (A) X (B) (in billions of EUR) | 24.6 | 24.1 |
Indicates the extent to which a bank has sufficient own funds and eligible liabilities available for bail-in. MREL and bail-in are based on the principle that shareholders and debt-holders should bear losses first if a bank fails.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Detailed calculation under 'Solvency at group level' in the | ||
| 'How do we manage our capital?' section | 21.0% 18.3% |
Gives an idea of the net interest income of the banking activities (one of the most important sources of revenue for the group) relative to the average total interest-bearing assets of the banking activities.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net interest income of the banking activities* (A) | 'Consolidated income statement': component of 'Net interest income' |
3 602 | 3 644 |
| / | |||
| Average interest-bearing assets of the banking activities* | |||
| (B) | 'Consolidated balance sheet': component of 'Total assets' | 184 117 | 177 629 |
| = (A) / (B) X 360/number of calendar days | 1.92% | 2.02% |
* After elimination of all divestments and volatile short-term assets used for liquidity management purposes.
Gives an idea of the bank's structural liquidity position in the long term, more specifically the extent to which the group is able to overcome liquidity difficulties over a one-year period.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Available amount of stable funding (A) | 'Basel III: the net stable funding ratio' (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision publication, October 2014) |
144 150 | 135 400 |
| / | |||
| Required amount of stable funding (B) | 114 950 | 111 800 | |
| = (A) / (B) | 125% | 121% |
Gives the carrying value of a KBC share, i.e. the value in euros represented by each share in the parent shareholders' equity of KBC.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or quantity) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent shareholders' equity (A) | 'Consolidated balance sheet' | 15 957 | 14 411 |
| / | |||
| Number of ordinary shares less treasury shares | |||
| (in millions, at period-end) (B) | Note 5.10 | 418.4 | 418.1 |
| = (A) / (B) (in EUR) | 38.1 | 34.5 |
Gives an idea of the relative profitability of a business unit, more specifically the ratio of the net result to the capital allocated to the business unit.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BELGIUM BUSINESS UNIT | |||
| Result after tax (including minority interests) of the business unit (A) |
Note 2.2: Results by segment | 1 433 | 1 565 |
| / | |||
| The average amount of capital allocated to the business unit is based on the risk-weighted assets for the banking activities |
|||
| (under Basel III) and risk-weighted asset equivalents for the | |||
| insurance activities (under Solvency I or II*) (B) | 'Our business units' section | 6 092 | 5 955 |
| = (A) / (B) | 24% | 26% | |
| CZECH REPUBLIC BUSINESS UNIT | |||
| Result after tax (including minority interests) of the business unit (A) |
Note 2.2: Results by segment | 596 | 542 |
| / | |||
| The average amount of capital allocated to the business unit is based on the risk-weighted assets for the banking activities (under Basel III) and risk-weighted asset equiva |
|||
| lents for the insurance activities (under Solvency I or II*) (B) 'Our business units' section | 1 455 | 1 474 | |
| = (A) / (B) | 41% | 37% | |
| INTERNATIONAL MARKETS BUSINESS UNIT | |||
| Result after tax (including minority interests) of the business unit (A) |
Note 2.2: Results by segment | 428 | 245 |
| / | |||
| The average amount of capital allocated to the business unit is based on the risk-weighted assets for the banking |
|||
| activities (under Basel III) and risk-weighted asset equiva lents for the insurance activities (under Solvency I or II*) (B) 'Our business units' section |
1 959 | 2 028 | |
| = (A) / (B) | 22% | 12% | |
| * Solvency I for 2015 and Solvency II for 2016. |
Gives an idea of the relative profitability of the group, more specifically the ratio of the net result to equity.
| Calculation (in millions of EUR or %) | Reference | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result after tax, attributable to equity holders of the parent (A) - |
'Consolidated income statement' | 2 427 | 2 639 |
| Coupon on the core-capital securities sold to the government (B) |
'Consolidated statement of changes in equity' | – | -0 |
| - Coupon on the additional tier-1 instruments included in equity (C) / |
'Consolidated statement of changes in equity' | -52 | -52 |
| Average parent shareholders' equity, excluding the revaluation reserve for available-for-sale assets (D) |
'Consolidated statement of changes in equity' | 13 415 | 11 969 |
| = (A-B-C) / (D) | 18% | 22% |
Measures the solvency of the insurance business, calculated under Solvency II (as of 2016).
| Calculation | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Detailed calculation under 'Solvency of KBC Bank and KBC Insurance separately' in the | ||
| 'How do we manage our capital?' section | 203% | 231% |
Total assets under management (AuM) comprise third-party assets and KBC group assets managed by the group's various asset management companies (KBC Asset Management, Cˇ SOB Asset Management, etc.), as well as assets under advisory management at KBC Bank. The assets, therefore, consist mainly of KBC investment funds and unit-linked insurance products, assets under discretionary and advisory management mandates of (mainly retail, private banking and institutional) clients, and certain group assets. The size and development of total AuM are major factors behind net fee and commission income (generating entry and management fees) and hence account for a large part of any change in this income line. In that respect, the AuM of a fund that is not sold directly to clients but is instead invested in by another fund or via a discretionary/ advisory management portfolio, are also included in the total AuM figure, in view of the related work and any fee income linked to them.
| Calculation (in billions of EUR) | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium Business Unit (A) | 198.9 | 193.8 |
| + | ||
| Czech Republic Business Unit (B) | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| + | ||
| International Markets Business Unit (C) | 5.7 | 6.2 |
| = (A)+(B)+(C) | 213.1 | 208.8 |
A risk-weighted measure of the group's solvency, based on total regulatory capital (the ratio given here is based on the Danish compromise).
| Calculation | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| Detailed calculation under 'Solvency at group level' in the 'How do we manage our capital?' section | ||
| Phased-in | 20.6% | 19.8% |
| Fully loaded | 20.0% | 19.0% |
'I, Luc Popelier, Chief Financial Officer of the KBC group, certify on behalf of the Executive Committee of KBC Group NV that, to the best of my knowledge, the financial statements, which are based on the relevant standards for annual accounts, fairly present in all material respects the assets, the financial condition and results of KBC Group NV, including its consolidated subsidiaries, and that the annual report provides a fair overview of the development, the results and the situation of KBC Group NV, including its consolidated subsidiaries, as well as an overview of the main risks and uncertainties to which they are exposed.'
| Investor Relations Office |
|---|
| Wim Allegaert (General Manager, Financial Insight & Communication) |
| [email protected] |
| KBC Group NV, Investor Relations Office, Havenlaan 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium |
| Press |
| Viviane Huybrecht (General Manager, Corporate Communication/Company Spokesperson) |
| [email protected] |
| KBC Group NV, Corporate Communication, Havenlaan 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium |
| Corporate Sustainability |
| Vic Van de Moortel (General Manager, Corporate Sustainability) |
| [email protected] |
| KBC Group NV, Corporate Sustainability, Havenlaan 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium |
The most up-to-date version of the financial calendar is available at www.kbc.com.
| Publication of the Annual Report and the Risk Report for 2016 | 31 March 2017 |
|---|---|
| General Meeting of Shareholders (agenda available at www.kbc.com) | 4 May 2017 |
| Earnings release for 1Q 2017 | 11 May 2017 |
| Earnings release for 2Q 2017 | 10 August 2017 |
| Earnings release for 3Q 2017 | 16 November 2017 |
Editor-in-chief: KBC Investor Relations Office, Havenlaan 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium Sub-editing, translation, concept and design: KBC Communication Division, Brusselsesteenweg 100, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Printer: Van der Poorten, Diestsesteenweg 624, 3010 Leuven, Belgium Publisher: KBC Group NV, Havenlaan 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium This annual report has been printed on paper that is not harmful to the environment.
Building tools?
Free accounts include 100 API calls/year for testing.
Have a question? We'll get back to you promptly.