KALAMAZOO RESOURCES LIMITED — Regulatory Filings 2019

Apr 23, 2019

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

ASX Announcement and Media Release

24 April 2019

KALAMAZOO COMPLETES INITIAL DRILLING IN WA’S DOOLGUNNA REGION

Highlights

• Kalamazoo has completed a reconnaissance drilling program at its Cork Tree Copper Project in WA’s highly prospective Doolgunna region.

• Five anomalous copper zones were intersected (>500ppm Cu), all located within E52/2057 at the Cork Tree Copper Prospect.

• In one of the zones there was an intersection of anomalous copper across a significant 32m width at shallow depth.

• Maximum copper values of 2,140ppm (0.21% Cu) recorded.

• Kalamazoo will now follow up the composite sampling with resampling of onemetre splits in the copper zones of interest and planning the next phase of exploration.

Copper-gold exploration company, Kalamazoo Resources Limited (ASX:KZR) (“ Kalamazoo ”), today announced it has completed a preliminary reverse circulation drill programme at its Cork Tree Copper Project, located in Western Australia’s highly prospective Doolgunna region (Figure 1).

Four holes (19CTWRC001 – CTWRC004) were drilled for 624 metres at the Elmo and Cork Tree Copper Prospects, within E52/2056 and E52/2057 respectively. Hole details are recorded in Table 1.

The Cork Tree Project consists of six granted exploration licences (E52/2056, E52/2057, E52/3042, E52/3514, E52/3515 and E52/3540), comprising 117 blocks and covering a contiguous area of approximately 370km[2] along the contact of the Yerrida Basin and the Earaheedy Basin (Figure 2).

The exploration area covers 40kms of strike and is located 30kms to the south-east of the DeGrussa and Monty mines owned by ASX-listed Sandfire Resources NL (ASX: SFR) (Figure 2).

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

The Cork Tree Copper Project is bordered on three sides by Sandfire controlled tenure, which has now expanded to 6,674km[2 ] with 60,000m of drilling underway.[1]

==> picture [361 x 271] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 1: Location of the Cork Tree Project

Historical exploration at Cork Tree[2] has indicated very encouraging copper potential with a regional soil sampling program having defined an anomaly some 1,950m x 600m in extent with results ranging from 2ppm to 25ppm Cu. In addition, eight rock samples of ‘gossans’ have previously returned copper assay above 0.1% with a maximum of 1.42% copper.

1 Refer to ASX: SFR March 2019 Quarterly Presentation dated 18 April 2019

2 Refer to Independent Geologists Report in Section 5 of the Company’s Prospectus dated 3 October 2016

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [492 x 349] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 2: Location of Cork Tree tenement package and significant deposits

Tenement	Prospect	Hole No	Depth (m)	Easting (m)*	Northing (m)*	RL (m)*	Dip	Azimuth (M)
E52/2056	Elmo	19CTWRC001	156	785014	7170915	540	-90	-
E52/2056	Elmo	19CTWRC002	156	784827	7170974	536	-90	-
E52/2057	Cork Tree	19CTWRC003	156	761605	7160290	561	-90	-
E52/2057	Cork Tree	19CTWRC004	156	760691	7160626	561	-60	180
*Hand-held GPS survey, MGA94 Zone 50 (+/- 5m); RL (AHD)

Table 1: Drill hole details

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [430 x 313] intentionally omitted <==

Figure 3: RC drill hole locations

Sampling

Samples were taken at one metre intervals but composited over four metre intervals with a duplicate every twentieth sample and a certified reference standard inserted every forty samples. A total of 156 composite and 12 QAQC samples were analysed by ALS in Perth for a 33 element suite by ICP Method ME-ICP61 after a four-acid digest: Ag, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, La, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Nb, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb, Sc, Sr, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, W and Zn. Further analytical details are provided in the JORC table appended.

Geology

The lithologies intersected in the drilling were generally a monotonous sequence of laminated to brecciated dolomite, dolomitic siltstone, laminated arenaceous siltstone, black pyritic shale and/or siltstone, with variable depths of intensive weathering.

At the Elmo Prospect, up to 2m of colluvium overlies a variably leached clay zone with abundant silica after dolomite to depths ranging from 18-32m and then increasingly fresh dolomite with minor interbedded siltstone. Minor quartz veining occurs sporadically, and traces of very fine grained sulphide (pyrite).

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Near the Cork Tree Copper Prospect within E52/2057, hole 19CTWRC003 was positioned to test a weak moving loop EM conductor interpreted from a ground survey in 2016. One meter of soil and colluvium overlies intensively leached clays after argillaceous sediment, with very minor siliceous dolomite interbeds, to 58m vertical depth, underlain by strongly haematitic weathered argillaceous clays and minor dolomite to 148m before ending in grey weakly weathered dolomite. No fresh rock (such as carbonaceous shale) or sulphide source is evident for the EM anomaly.

Angled hole 19CTWRC004 at the western margin of the historic RAB drilling at the Cork Tree Copper Prospect was drilled to the south to undercut strongly anomalous copper in the first 20-30m of the weathered profile in the old holes. Strongly weathered clays and siliceous dolomite were intersected to 27m down hole, underlain by partially oxidised massive bedded dolomite to 47m and thereafter very weakly oxidised grey dolomite with occasional white quartz veining. A zone of oxidised limonite/haematite stained quartz veining occurs from 143-147m down hole.

Assay Results

There were five anomalous copper intersections of note (>500ppm Cu), all located within E52/2057 at the Cork Tree Copper Prospect, with three intervals reporting copper greater than 1,000ppm (0.1% Cu), with a maximum of 2,140ppm (0.21% Cu). There were no significant assays in the other base metals:

• 19CTWRC003 – 56m-88m: 32m @ 700ppm Cu with the highest individual assay being 1,300ppm Cu. Apart from Fe, with assays up to 20.6%, there are no other base metal or mineralisation indicator elements that are anomalous. This zone was logged as extremely haematitic and limonitic shale and chert (after dolomite), with up to 30% limonitic vein quartz in a probable shear zone.

• 19CTWRC003 – 144m–148m: 4m @ 660ppm Cu. Other than 1.01% Mn, there are no other anomalous elements. Logging indicates up to 30% vein quartz at the base of the haematite oxidation zone.

• 19CTWRC004 – 8m–28m: 20m @ 740ppm Cu with the highest individual assay being 1,240ppm Cu. Apart from Fe, with assays up to 27.5%, there are variably weakly anomalous Co, Ni, Pb and Mn assays. This copper anomalism is within intensely weathered surficial material, extremely limonitic and ironstone-rich.

• 19CTWRC004 – 128m–132m: 4m @ 630ppm Cu. The sample also assayed 3.6% Fe. From 126m to 132m the logging indicates quartz and feldsparrich (up to 80%) veins within grey-black shales/siltstone.

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

• 19CTWRC004 – 144m–148m: 4m @ 2,140ppm Cu. The sample also assayed 9.8% Fe and 0.15% S, the latter being slightly elevated relative to the other sulphur assays and this may indicate very low levels of copper sulphide – none was observed in logging. As noted above, the logging indicates an oxidised quartz vein zone (up to 80%) from 143m to 147m. No accompanying copper carbonates or oxides were observed.

A representative suite of multielement assays is shown in Table 2.

Discussion

Reconnaissance drilling at the southern end of the Elmo Prospect in E52/2056 has established that a substantial thickness of bedded dolomite bedrock underlies the extensive surface scree comprising siliceous boulders and breccias of secondary origin. No anomalous copper lead or zinc assays were recorded at the Elmo Prospect.

The source of the moving loop EM conductor located south east of the Cork Tree Copper Prospect in E52/2057 is not evident from the one hole completed. One possibility for the source is a structurally controlled ‘channel’ of deep weathering that has been shown to extend to at least 148m vertically.

Drilling below the shallow copper anomalies intersected in historic drilling at the western edge of the Cork Tree Copper Prospect has confirmed the anomalous response and an apparent association with strong clay weathering. Copper levels are generally lower in the underlying fresh bedrock except for a zone of oxidised quartz veining (143m-147m) that is associated with a 4m assay at 0.21% Cu from 144m-148m.

Next steps

Resampling of the anomalous copper intervals will be undertaken on a one metre basis together with the development of the next stage exploration program on the identified Cork Tree anomaly and its encouraging copper potential.

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Hole No	From m	To m	Cu ppm	Pb ppm	Zn ppm	Ca %	Mg %	Mn ppm	Fe %
19CTWRC003	48	52	46	104	19	0.04	0.19	47	1.29
19CTWRC003	52	56	33	95	8	0.05	0.07	116	0.33
19CTWRC003	56	60	785	174	42	0.05	0.07	255	5.94
19CTWRC003	60	64	1300	36	108	0.05	0.08	434	20.6
19CTWRC003	64	68	781	35	151	0.06	0.09	1115	27.2
19CTWRC003	68	72	500	158	94	0.05	0.06	348	14
19CTWRC003	72	76	475	50	43	0.03	0.04	176	4.55
19CTWRC003	76	80	669	38	37	0.05	0.06	281	4.27
19CTWRC003	80	84	607	52	42	0.06	0.07	591	5.53
19CTWRC003	84	88	482	54	42	0.05	0.07	613	5.53
19CTWRC003	88	92	386	83	54	0.05	0.08	778	7.26
19CTWRC004	0	4	88	12	14	13	6.01	909	2.22
19CTWRC004	4	8	79	5	41	13.6	8.74	259	0.92
19CTWRC004	8	12	760	53	42	5.59	2.1	5640	15.5
19CTWRC004	12	16	1240	262	148	1.19	0.7	4690	27.5
19CTWRC004	16	20	268	77	38	0.97	2.49	1400	2.21
19CTWRC004	20	24	598	219	70	1.48	3.68	693	4.96
19CTWRC004	24	28	840	203	189	2.6	5.33	1830	10.75
19CTWRC004	28	32	153	9	28	17.6	11.85	726	1.13
19CTWRC004	136	140	159	<2	8	11.1	18.75	2970	1.31
19CTWRC004	140	144	484	39	49	15.65	10.35	2450	1.16
19CTWRC004	144	148	2140	12	111	3.53	2.32	2430	9.8
19CTWRC004	148	152	451	6	58	4.79	3	2870	4.75
19CTWRC004	152	156	102	<2	7	16.05	10.15	1410	0.64

Table 2: Anomalous copper zones – Cork Tree Copper Prospect (E52/2057)

For further information, please contact:

Luke Reinehr, Chairman luke.reinehr@kzr.com.au

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

About Cork Tree Project

Kalamazoo’s copper asset is the Cork Tree Project, located 830km north east of Perth, 120 kms north-north west of Wiluna and 160 kms north east of Meekatharra, in the Mid-West region. It is situated within the Peak Hill Mineral Field, the Peak Hill (SG50-08) 1:250,000 map sheet and the Thaduna (2846) 1:100,000 map sheet. The project can be accessed from Meekatharra via the Great Northern Highway, then the graded Neds Creek Station road. It consists of six granted exploration licences. Access within the tenements is straightforward through relatively flat terrain using mining and exploration tracks.

Although the project is an exploration project some infrastructure exists in the area and reasonable proximity to Meekatharra and Wiluna provides access for some exploration supplies and services. Sandfire’s DeGrussa ore processing facility lies some 30km west of the project area.

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this release that relates to the exploration data is based on information compiled by Mr Lance Govey, a competent person who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Govey is an employee of BinEx Consulting who is engaged as the Exploration Manager for the Company. Mr Govey has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Govey consents to the inclusion in this document of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

For additional and detailed information, please refer the Independent Geologist’s Report prepared by Ravensgate in Section 5 of the Company’s Prospectus dated 3 October 2016 and Supplementary Prospectus, dated 14 November 2016.

Forward Looking Statements

Statements regarding Kalamazoo’s plans with respect to its mineral properties and programmes are forwardlooking statements. There can be no assurance that Kalamazoo’s plans for development of its mineral properties will proceed as currently expected. There can also be no assurance that Kalamazoo will be able to confirm the presence of additional mineral resources/reserves, that any mineralisation will prove to be economic or that a mine will successfully be developed on any of Kalamazoo’s mineral properties. The performance of Kalamazoo may be influenced by a number of factors which are outside the control of the Company and its Directors, staff and contractors.

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Table 1. JORC Code, 2012 Edition

Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Sampling techniques	• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised	The prospects were sampled by reverse circulation (RC) drilling - a total of 4 holes for 624 metres.
	industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments,	RC drilling was sampled on 1m intervals. The one metre samples were composited over 4m intervals by scoop sampling of bulk samples for initial assaying.
	etc.). These examples should	Routine QAQC samples were
	not be taken as limiting the	inserted in the RC sample strings
	broad meaning of sampling.	comprising a base metal standard
	• Include reference to measures	(CRM or Certified Reference
	taken to ensure sample	Material) every forty samples.
	representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are	Duplicate composite samples were taken at a rate of one every twenty samples. Sampling practice is appropriate to the geology and mineralisation
	Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry	of the deposit and complies with industry best practice.
	standard’ work has been done
	this would be relatively simple
	(e.g. ‘reverse circulation
	drilling was used to obtain 1 m
	samples from which 3 kg was
	pulverised to produce a 30 g
	charge for fire assay’). In other
	cases more explanation may
	be required, such as where
	there is coarse gold that has
	inherent sampling problems.
	Unusual commodities or
	mineralisation types (e.g.
	submarine nodules) may
	warrant disclosure of detailed
	information.
Drilling techniques	• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, _face-sampling bit or other _	RC drilling was conducted with a modern Schramm T64 drill rig (owned by NDRC Drilling)) utilising high pressure and high volume compressed air and a 115mm (4.5”) diameter face sampling percussion hammer.

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	type, whether core is oriented
	and if so, by what method,
	_etc.). _
Drill sample recovery	• Method of recording and	RC sample recovery and sample
	assessing core and chip	condition (dry, moist or wet) was
	sample recoveries and results	visually logged on the original drill
	assessed.	logs and transferred to the digital
	• Measures taken to maximise	drill hole database. Most
	sample recovery and ensure	samples were logged as dry with
	representative nature of the	good recovery.
	samples.
	• Whether a relationship exists
	between sample recovery and
	grade and whether sample
	bias may have occurred due
	to preferential loss/gain of
	fine/coarse material.
Logging	• Whether core and chip	All RC chips were geologically
	samples have been	logged. Lithology, veining,
	geologically and	sulphide occurrence, oxidation
	geotechnically logged to a	and weathering are recorded in
	level of detail to support	the geology table of the drill hole
	appropriate Mineral Resource	database.
	estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative	RC logging is qualitative and descriptive in nature.
	or quantitative in nature. Core	Representative chip samples for
	(or costean, channel, etc.)	every metre drilled are stored for
	photography.	reference in plastic chip trays and
	• The total length and	were photographed.
	percentage of the relevant
	_intersections logged. _
Sub-sampling techniques and	• If core, whether cut or sawn	RC bulk samples were sub-
sample preparation	and whether quarter, half or all	sampled using a rig mounted
	core taken.	cone splitter to produce original
	• If non-core, whether riffled,	split samples for every metre of
	tube sampled, rotary split, etc.	approximately 3kg weight, a
	and whether sampled wet or	standard industry practice.
	dry.	Duplicate splits of one metre
	• For all sample types, the	intervals were taken every 20m
	nature, quality and	and stored on site.
	appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that	The splitter was routinely cleaned at the end of each drill rod (6m) or as needed if damp material clung to the splitter. For initial analysis, four metre composite samples were
	the sampling is representative of the in situ material	collected by scoop from the bulk one metre material.
	collected, including for instance results for field	Duplicate samples were collected whensplittingRC onemetre

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	duplicate/second-half	samples to assess the sampling
	sampling.	precision. Duplicate composite
	• Whether sample sizes are	samples were also collected.
	appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.	Sample size assessment was not conducted but used sampling
		size typical for WA
		reconnaissance exploration.
Quality of assay data and	• The nature, quality and	RC composite samples were
laboratory tests	appropriateness of the	prepared and assayed at NATA
	assaying and laboratory	accredited ALS Geochemistry in
	procedures used and whether	Perth.
	the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control	RC composite samples were weighed, dried, and pulverized in total to nominal 85% passing 75 microns and a 0.25g pulp sub sample assayed for 33 elements after a four acid digest by method ME-ICP61. Elements were: Ag, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, La, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Nb, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb, Sc, Sr, Th, Ti, Tl, U, V, W and Zn.
	procedures adopted (e.g.	In addition to the Company
	standards, blanks, duplicates,	QAQC samples included within
	external laboratory checks)	the batch the laboratory included
	and whether acceptable levels	its own CRM’s, blanks and
	of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias)	duplicates.
	and precision have been
	_established. _
Verification of sampling and	• The verification of significant	Intersection assays were
assaying	intersections by either	documented by a professional
	independent or alternative	contractor to Kalamazoo
	company personnel.	Resources Ltd and independently
	• The use of twinned holes.	verified by an experienced
	• Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,	professional Exploration Manager at Kalamazoo Resources.
	data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to	All assay data were received in electronic format from ALS, checked and verified by Kalamazoo Resources Ltd.
	assay data.	No twinned drilling was
		conducted.
		Data files are exported to
		independent data management
		consultants, RockSolid Data
		Consultancy, in Perth for final
		verification and secure digital
		storage.

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
		No assay adjustment was
		applied.
Location of data points	• Accuracy and quality of	All drill hole collars were
	surveys used to locate drill	surveyed post drilling using hand
	holes (collar and down-hole	held GPS to x-y accuracy of 5m
	surveys), trenches, mine	and height (z) relative to AHD.
	workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of	All collar location data is in UTM grid (MGA94 Zone 50). Three holes were drilled vertical, and one to magnetic south at -60 degrees.
	topographic control.	No downhole surveys were
		taken.
Data spacing and distribution	• Data spacing for reporting of	Holes are widely spaced at
	Exploration Results.	irregular intervals peripheral to
	• Whether the data spacing and	historic RAB drilling for three of
	distribution is sufficient to	the four holes completed.
	establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation	Current reporting is for progressive exploration results and not for Mineral Resource estimation.
	procedure(s) and	Sample compositing and assay
	classifications applied.	over 4m intervals has been
	• Whether sample compositing	applied for initial appraisal of
	has been applied.	geochemical results.
Orientation of data in relation	• Whether the orientation of	Drill holes are reconnaissance in
to geological structure	sampling achieves unbiased	nature and not targeted at
	sampling of possible	specific structures or known
	structures and the extent to	trends of mineralisation.
	which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the	No bias is considered to have been introduced by the existing sampling orientation.
	orientation of key mineralised
	structures is considered to
	have introduced a sampling
	bias, this should be assessed
	and reported if material.
Sample security	• The measures taken to ensure	Samples were secured in closed
	sample security.	polyweave sacks and hand
		delivered to the laboratory.
Audits or reviews	• The results of any audits or	No external audits or reviews
	reviews of sampling	have been completed on behalf
	techniques and data.	of Kalamazoo Resources Limited.

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
Mineral	• Type, reference name/number, location	Results reported are from E52/2056 and
tenement and	and ownership including agreements or	E52/2057, granted exploration licences
land tenure	material issues with third parties such as	within the Cork Tree Project area, owned
status	joint ventures, partnerships, overriding	100% by Kalamazoo Resources Limited.
	royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time	Both licences are in good standing and no impediment is foreseen to obtaining a licence to operate.
	of reporting along with any known
	impediments to obtaining a licence to
	_operate inthe area. _
Exploration	• Acknowledgment and appraisal of	Historical exploration was undertaken by
done by other	exploration by other parties.	Western Mining Corporation, CRA
parties		Exploration and Kalamazoo Resources.
Geology	• Deposit type, geological setting and style	Sediment hosted base metal
	of mineralisation.	mineralization is the target, located in the
		western Earaheedy Basin, Doolgunna
		district.
Drill hole	• A summary of all information material to	All requisite drill hole information is
Information	the understanding of the exploration	tabulated elsewhere in this release.
	results including a tabulation of the
	following information for all Material drill
	holes:
	o easting and northing of the drill hole
	collar
	o elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
	elevation above sea level in metres) of
	the drill hole collar
	o dip and azimuth of the hole
	o down hole length and interception
	depth
	o hole length.
	• If the exclusion of this information is
	justified on the basis that the information
	is not Material and this exclusion does not
	detract from the understanding of the
	report, the Competent Person should
	_clearly explain why this is the case. _
Data	• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting	Drill hole intersections are reported
aggregation	averaging techniques, maximum and/or	above a nominal lower cut-off grade of
methods	minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of	500ppm Cu and no upper cut-off grade
	high grades) and cut-off grades are	has been applied. Internal dilution has
	usually Material and should be stated.	been included.
	• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the	No metal equivalent reporting has been applied.
	procedure used for such aggregation
	should be stated and some typical
	examples of such aggregations should be

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==

==> picture [177 x 62] intentionally omitted <==

Criteria	JORC Code explanation	Commentary
	shown in detail.
	• The assumptions used for any reporting of
	metal equivalent values should be clearly
	_stated. _
Relationship	• These relationships are particularly	Only down hole lengths are reported, no
between	important in the reporting of Exploration	true widths are known
mineralisatio	Results.
n widths and	• If the geometry of the mineralisation with
intercept	respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
lengths	nature should be reported.
	• If it is not known and only the down hole
	lengths are reported, there should be a
	clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down
	_hole length, true width not known’). _
Diagrams	• Appropriate maps and sections (with	Included elsewhere in this release.
	scales) and tabulations of intercepts
	should be included for any significant
	discovery being reported These should
	include, but not be limited to a plan view
	of drill hole collar locations and
	_appropriate sectional views. _
Balanced	• Where comprehensive reporting of all	All results above 1m at 500m Cu and
reporting	Exploration Results is not practicable,	selected base metals from the 33
	representative reporting of both low and	elements analysed have been reported.
	high grades and/or widths should be
	practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
	_Exploration Results. _
Other	• Other exploration data, if meaningful and	None to report with this release.
substantive	material, should be reported including (but
exploration	not limited to): geological observations;
data	geophysical survey results; geochemical
	survey results; bulk samples – size and
	method of treatment; metallurgical test
	results; bulk density, groundwater,
	geotechnical and rock characteristics;
	potential deleterious or contaminating
	_substances. _
Further work	• The nature and scale of planned further	Further drilling may be planned to for
	work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or	parts of the area not the subject of this
	depth extensions or large-scale step-out	program.
	drilling).
	• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
	possible extensions, including the main
	geological interpretations and future
	drilling areas, provided this information is
	not commercially sensitive.

==> picture [596 x 98] intentionally omitted <==